U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Countervailing Duty Review on Turkish Welded Pipe Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its review of countervailing duties on large diameter welded pipe from Türkiye. The review focused on the producer and exporter HDM Çelik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. This company received subsidies from the Turkish government that give it an unfair advantage in the U.S. market. Timeframe of the Review The review covers the period between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The final results of the review maintain that HDM Çelik received countervailable subsidies. The decision was finalized on October 6, 2026. Subsidy Rate The final results show that HDM Çelik received a total net subsidy rate of 3.34 percent. This rate includes an export subsidy rate of 0.61 percent. Instructions to U.S. Customs The Department of Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle countervailing duties. These instructions will be issued no less than 35 days after the publication of the final results. Cash Deposit Rates The cash deposit rate for HDM Çelik will be 3.34 percent. If the rate is less than 0.50 percent, known as de minimis, the cash deposit rate will be zero. If the producer and exporter have different rates, Customs will apply the higher rate. For all other producers and exporters from Türkiye, the cash deposit rate remains 3.72 percent. Next Steps All parties are reminded of their responsibilities concerning confidential information. Failure to comply with information protection rules can lead to penalties. This announcement marks the end of a detailed review aimed at ensuring fair trade between the United States and Türkiye. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Uncoated Paper from Portugal Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has recently completed a review investigating whether Portuguese company, The Navigator Company, S.A., sold uncoated paper in the U.S. for less than fair value. This review covered the period from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. The results are in, and they show that Navigator has indeed engaged in dumping. Dumping means selling products in a foreign market at prices lower than in the home market or below the cost to produce the goods. This can harm domestic industries, and thus, it is closely monitored and regulated. The Department of Commerce established that Navigator’s weighted-average dumping margin is 2.70 percent. This percentage indicates how much lower Navigator’s prices were compared to the normal value. These findings are important because they assure fair competition in the market. With this decision, the U.S. government will assess additional duties on Navigator’s paper to counterbalance the dumping effect. This means that Navigator or its customers in the U.S. will have to pay extra fees when importing these products. The Commerce Department will send instructions to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to ensure these duties are collected. These instructions will take effect 35 days after this announcement unless there is a court appeal. Furthermore, new cash deposit requirements will be set. Cash deposits are additional sums paid upfront to cover possible duties. For Navigator, the new deposit rate aligns with the dumping margin of 2.70 percent. These arrangements make sure that if more similar findings come up, the appropriate duties are covered. The Department has also reminded importers about maintaining compliance. If Navigator did not know its goods were bound for the U.S., they may avoid penalties. However, non-compliance could lead to assumptions of duty reimbursement and even higher charges. Lastly, the document outlines that the policy regarding proprietary information must be adhered to. Any confidential data used in this review must be handled according to rules to ensure it remains protected. This decision helps ensure a level playing field in the paper market and protects U.S. businesses from unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Thai Shrimp Sales Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has recently concluded its review of the sales of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand. This review was conducted to determine if these shrimp were sold in the United States at prices below their normal value during the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. The review found that some producers and exporters did indeed sell the shrimp at prices lower than they should have. This is called dumping. When a country sells goods abroad for cheaper than they would sell them locally, it can hurt businesses in the buying country. Because of the findings, actions will be taken to address these sales practices. The main companies in Thailand that were reviewed are Thai Union Group Public Co., Ltd. and Thai Royal Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. Thai Union was found to have a dumping margin of 1.76 percent. This means they were selling shrimp at 1.76 percent less than normal value. Thai Royal, however, was found to have no dumping margin, meaning their sales were fair. For the companies that were not reviewed in detail, like B.S.A. Food Products Co., Ltd. and Kongphop Frozen Foods Co., Ltd., the Department of Commerce decided to use the 1.76 percent rate from Thai Union. This is because it was the only rate found not to be zero or based on guessing. The review also determined that some companies, like Marine Gold Products Ltd. and Thai Union Manufacturing Company Limited, did not ship any shrimp to the U.S. during this timeline. Thus, no action will need to be taken against them. The Department of Commerce uses this review to make sure fair trade practices are followed. The results of this review will affect how much these companies need to pay to sell shrimp in the U.S. in the future. The Department has issued instructions to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on the shrimp. These duties are extra charges that the companies have to pay because of their unfair pricing. If companies do not follow these rules, they might have to pay double in the future. Companies that were not reviewed individually but are still affected by this review will need to wait 35 days from the publication date of these results to see what their duties will be. This action by the Department of Commerce is meant to ensure that trade is fair and that U.S. businesses are not put at a disadvantage by unfair pricing practices from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Steel Pipe Sales Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-06 In a recent development, the U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its review concerning certain steel pipes from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The review determined that some producers and exporters made sales of these steel pipes at prices lower than usual during the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. This is according to the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 192. The products in question are called circular welded carbon-quality steel pipes. These pipes are used in a variety of industries for their strength and durability. Commerce found that two main companies, Conares Metal Supply Limited and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE, sold these pipes at dumping margins of 3.15 percent and 5.11 percent, respectively. Other companies involved will have a dumping margin of 4.68 percent applied to their products. Dumping margins help measure how much a product is sold below normal value. The Department published these findings to ensure that all companies follow the rules of fair trade. When companies sell products below their normal value, it can hurt U.S. businesses. The review process included careful examination and comments from different interested parties. Changes were made based on these comments to ensure fair calculations. The ruling means that these companies must now pay certain duties to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This will help balance the market and protect the U.S. industry from unfair pricing. Commerce uses a special method to decide the duty rates for companies not directly investigated. They look at rates of similar companies to make fair assessments. The results of this review will help ensure fair trade practices and safeguard U.S. businesses. All parties involved are reminded to follow these guidelines and regulations to ensure a level playing field in international trade. For more detailed information about the review and the decisions made, you can visit the official website of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Review on Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of countervailing duties placed on corrosion inhibitors from China. The review covered the year 2024. These duties are extra charges placed on imports from another country if those imports are helped by the foreign government. The Department found that certain Chinese companies received help from the Chinese government, which makes their products cheaper to produce. Key Companies Reviewed: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. got a subsidy rate of 18.64%. Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. got a higher rate of 48.45%. Some other companies, such as Connect Chemicals GMBH and Gold Chemical Limited, will follow an average rate of 36.40%. Background Information: Commerce started this review on May 26, 2026. They wanted to see if any changes were needed to the duties. They focused on subsidies from the Chinese government to these companies. Subsidies Detected: A subsidy means the Chinese government gave money to these companies. This can include helping them buy things cheaper or giving them direct money support. Because of these subsidies, the U.S. places extra duties on products to make sure it is fair for American companies. The review found these subsidies are specific, meaning only certain companies got them. These subsidies give those companies an unfair advantage because their production costs are lower than without the subsidies. Next Steps: Customs will start collecting these duties 35 days after this notice is published. These duties will apply to any shipments from January 1 to December 31, 2024. The Department has told Customs to use the rates they found. Companies that were not reviewed will stick to their current duties. The duties will remain until further notice. This ensures that companies importing these inhibitors pay a fair price without undercutting U.S. businesses unfairly. This act tries to keep U.S. trade fair, ensuring every company plays on the same field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Preliminary Review on Steel Rebar from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Background of the Review The review began following requests submitted on August 22, 2025. This involves looking into sales made during the time from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The United States aims to discover if Turkish companies are selling rebar at lower prices in the U.S. than in Türkiye, which might affect U.S. businesses unfairly. Companies Under Review The review includes several Turkish companies. Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. and Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. are selected as key respondents in this investigation. The review mainly targets these companies to assess their sales practices related to rebar. Rescission of Some Reviews The Commerce Department decided to rescind, or cancel, reviews for three companies. These are Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S., Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim A.S., and Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S., for which no notable entries were found during the review period. Method of Review The review process involves various calculations and adjustments. Commerce follows specific rules and methods under the U.S. Tariff Act and regulations. They compare U.S. sale prices against normal values like domestic prices in Türkiye, to decide on dumping activities. Preliminary Findings Colakoglu, the main company under the spotlight, was found to have a dumping margin of 13.11%. This means their exported rebar to the U.S. was sold significantly cheaper than in their home market. Ekinciler Demir ve Celik Sanayi A.S., another company reviewed but not individually assessed, also received a preliminary dumping margin of 13.11%. Future Steps The Commerce Department allows interested parties to comment on these findings before final results are issued. The parties can submit their comments by specified deadlines and request a hearing if needed. Cash Deposit Requirements The outcome of this preliminary review affects the future cash deposits required for imported rebar. If the determined rate is above zero, affected companies might need to deposit additional funds to continue selling in the U.S. without duty offsetting advantages. Conclusion These actions and decisions aim to maintain fair competition in the U.S. steel market. The Commerce Department’s ongoing efforts scrutinize foreign trade practices, ensuring domestic producers face fair competition according to established trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duty Review for Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Agency Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings of an antidumping duty review concerning oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine. This review pertains to sales made between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The goods in question are typically used in oil and gas well operations. This study was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a section within the Department of Commerce that enforces trade laws and agreements. Key Findings The Department of Commerce believes that a Ukrainian company, Interpipe, has sold products in the United States at prices below normal value. A preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 18.43% has been calculated for Interpipe. About Interpipe Interpipe comprises several entities: Interpipe Ukraine LLC, Interpipe Europe S.A., LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, and PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant, collectively named Interpipe. Background on the Review Process The antidumping review began on September 11, 2025, following requests from U.S. stakeholders. Although Interpipe withdrew their request for a review on November 19, 2025, the process continued because the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association also sought the review. The review faced delays due to a 47-day government shutdown and additional tolling of deadlines by 21 days, extending the time for preliminary results. Public Involvement Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. The Department of Commerce has sought case briefs to be submitted within 21 days after the public notice and rebuttal briefs within five days following that. Parties can request a hearing to discuss the issues further. Next Steps The Commerce Department plans to release the final results following these preliminary findings. They will then inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection of any adjustments to assessment rates on these goods imported from Ukraine. Information Access The Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which details the methodologies used, is publicly accessible online. Conclusion This review highlights the U.S. government’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor and adjust procedures to uphold these standards. The final determination will set future cash deposit requirements for Ukrainian OCTG exported to the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Breaking News: U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Tire Duty Order Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This review focused on countervailing duties, which are taxes placed on foreign imports thought to benefit from government subsidies. The department concluded that lifting these duties on Vietnamese tires could lead to more government support for companies there. This could hurt American tire makers by creating unfair competition in prices. The decision affects companies like Kumho Tire (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., and Sailun (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., among others. These companies might continue to receive government help, making their products cheaper in the U.S. market. The U.S. union, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, participated in this review. They represent workers in the tire industry in the United States and believe that maintaining these duties is important for their livelihood. The Department of Commerce has provided specific percentages indicating how much support Vietnamese tire companies could still receive. Kumho Tire (Vietnam) might receive a 7.89% subsidy, and Sailun (Vietnam) could receive a 6.23% subsidy. Other companies may get a 6.46% subsidy rate. These numbers are crucial as they reflect the level of financial advantage these companies would have if the duties were removed. This finding by the Department of Commerce is based on a process known as a “sunset review.” This type of evaluation is standard procedure to decide if duties should remain in place after five years. The department also informed the U.S. International Trade Commission about its findings. This communication ensures that the right discussions and policies are maintained to protect U.S. industries from unfair international competition. The decision highlights the importance of balancing international trade while protecting domestic jobs and industries. Stay tuned for more updates on international trade and commerce affairs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty on Potassium Phosphate Salts from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a significant decision regarding potassium phosphate salts imported from China. The decision comes as part of an “expedited third sunset review” related to the antidumping duty order on these salts. The Department has determined that removing the antidumping duty on this product could result in continued dumping of the product in the U.S. market. Dumping occurs when a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. at a price lower than fair value. This decision means that the current antidumping duties will remain in place. The decision was officially recorded in the Federal Register on October 5, 2026. The document notes that there is a risk of Chinese manufacturers continuing to undercut U.S. prices if the duties are removed. The dumping margins, which indicate the extent of underpricing, could reach up to 95.40%. This figure suggests that without duties, potassium phosphate salts from China could be sold for significantly less than their fair value, harming U.S. producers. The International Trade Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, conducted the review. ICL Specialty Products Inc. and Prayon, Inc., both U.S.-based companies that produce similar products, participated in the review. They claimed that removing the antidumping duties would harm the U.S. industry. The process began earlier in June 2026, with a notice of intent to review the existing order. Following a substantive response from domestic producers and a lack of response from foreign respondents, the department conducted an expedited review process. This quick review helped determine the final outcome, ensuring that the current duties remain to protect the U.S. market. In conclusion, this decision underscores the Department of Commerce’s commitment to counter unfair trade practices and support domestic industries. The continued enforcement of antidumping duties will help maintain fair competition in the U.S. market for potassium phosphate salts. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Continuation of Potassium Phosphate Salt Subsidies Order Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Key Findings The Department of Commerce has found that ending the countervailing duty order would lead to a continuation or recurrence of subsidies. This order has been in place for some time to address unfair trade practices from China. Background The original order was published on July 22, 2010. On June 1, 2026, the third review of this order began. This review is commonly known as a “sunset review.” It is required by law and ensures that duties are still needed. The review was expedited since there wasn’t an adequate response from the interested parties in China. Hence, the U.S. conducted a quick (120-day) review. Companies Involved Several companies in China are listed in the findings. These include: Lianyungang Mupro Import Export Co., Ltd. Mianyang Aostar Phosphate Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Shifang Anda Chemicals Co., Ltd. All these companies have a countervailable subsidy rate set at 109.11 percent. What Happens Next The notice serves to remind parties about handling confidential information. Those with access to certain information must either return or destroy it promptly, as per regulations. This Federal Register notice also informs interested parties about these final results. The continuation of the order follows sections of U.S. trade law, which include specifics about subsidies and rates. The Department of Commerce, along with the International Trade Administration, will continue to monitor and enforce these duties to ensure fair trade practices. Contact Information For further details, Sarah Keith can be contacted at the U.S. Department of Commerce, using the phone number provided in the notice. This notification concludes the review process for now, but may be revisited if circumstances change. It’s a step to ensure that the U.S. market is not harmed by subsidized imports from China, thereby maintaining fair competition and protecting domestic producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice Issued for Final Results of Large Diameter Welded Pipe Review from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has issued a correction notice regarding the final results of an administrative review. This review concerns the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe from the Republic of Türkiye for the years 2024-2025. The original notice, published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2026, contained an error in the company name of Cimtas Boru Imalatlari ve Ticaret Ltd. It was mistakenly listed as Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd. This correction is also applicable to previous notices. The incorrect company name appeared in the Initiation Notice dated June 25, 2025, and in the Preliminary Results notice dated May 27, 2026. Both of these documents incorrectly referred to the company as Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd. The correction notice ensures the correct company name, Cimtas Boru Imalatlari ve Ticaret Ltd., is used consistently. Interested parties are informed that this correction adheres to the provisions of sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice also follows the regulatory guidelines outlined in 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). The correction notice was signed on September 30, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This official update aims to maintain accuracy in the records of the Department of Commerce and ensure clear communication with stakeholders involved in international trade matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Results of Antidumping Duty Reviews on Steel Plate from China and Russia Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the expedited fifth sunset reviews regarding the antidumping duty orders on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and Russia. The reviews were conducted by the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. The findings concluded that revoking these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping occurs when foreign producers sell goods in the United States at a price lower than the fair value, which can harm domestic industries. The orders were first put in place to address this issue and protect American businesses. These reviews are in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930. They ensure that the antidumping duty orders remain effective and appropriate for managing unfair trade practices. In this case, the Department of Commerce determined that the levels of dumping likely to occur if the orders were revoked would be up to 128.59 percent for China and 185.00 percent for Russia. Domestic companies Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Nucor Corporation, and SSAB Enterprises LLC participated in the review process by expressing their intent and providing substantive responses. The Department of Commerce published a notice of these reviews on June 1, 2026. It informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of the responses received from domestic parties but noted that there were no substantive responses from any foreign respondents. As no foreign parties responded, the Department conducted expedited reviews and confirmed the necessity of continuing the antidumping duty orders to prevent unfair competition from foreign producers dumping their products in the U.S. market. The decision has been made in accordance with the legal requirements and frameworks set out to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. This announcement serves as a reminder to parties subject to Administrative Protective Orders (APO) about their responsibilities concerning the handling of proprietary information. Failure to comply with APO regulations can lead to sanctions. The detailed findings and supporting documents can be accessed through the Department of Commerce’s official channels to assist interested parties in understanding the decision and its implications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Prepares to Rescind Antidumping Duty Review on Mattresses from Poland Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes October 5, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary decision to rescind an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on mattresses from Poland. This decision comes after a detailed inquiry over the sale activities during the period of July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Background of the Review The original antidumping duty order for mattresses from Poland was published on July 11, 2024. An opportunity for review was announced on June 30, 2025, with requests for administrative review made by entities including EBI, LLC, CORRECT—K. Błaszczyk i Wspólnicy Sp. K. (CORRECT), and COM40 Sp. z o.o. Sp. K. (COM 40). Investigation and Findings The Department of Commerce initiated the review on August 22, 2025. However, upon examination, it was found that the companies CORRECT and COM 40 did not have any reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Moreover, CORRECT informed Commerce that it had no sales of the subject merchandise during this period. Delays in Process Due to a lapse in government appropriations, there were significant delays in the review process. The Department of Commerce issued several memos extending deadlines by a total of 181 days. The final deadline for the preliminary results was set for October 7, 2026. Preliminary Decision to Rescind Based on findings that there were no bona fide sales or entries subject to review during the period of interest, the Department of Commerce has preliminarily decided to rescind the review. The preliminary decision indicates that, without reviewable entries, there is no basis for reassessment of duties for the companies involved. Next Steps Interested parties may submit comments on this preliminary decision within 21 days. The Department of Commerce will consider these comments before issuing its final decision, expected within 120 days after the preliminary announcement. This decision is in line with Commerce’s practice of rescinding reviews where no reviewable entries exist, maintaining compliance with regulatory standards. The process ensures that antidumping duties continue to serve their purpose of providing fair competition and avoiding the harm caused by unfair pricing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty on Melamine from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duty on melamine coming from China. This is because removing the duty could lead to more unfair pricing practices. Melamine is a type of chemical used in making many products, such as laminates, adhesives, and dinnerware. The U.S. has been checking the pricing practices related to melamine from China to make sure they are fair. The decision from the Department of Commerce happened after a review that started on June 1, 2026. This review is called a sunset review. In this review, the Department looks into whether taking away the duty would cause dumping to start again. Dumping is when a country sells a product cheaper in another country than in its own. The Department found that if the antidumping duty were removed, it could lead to dumping again. This means the U.S. believes that without the duty, China might sell melamine at unfairly low prices. A company called Cornerstone Chemical Company was involved in the review. They make melamine in the U.S. and showed interest in keeping the duty. In the review, the U.S. International Trade Commission was also informed about the decision. This is another way of making sure that everyone is aware of the pricing practices. The final decision shows that the U.S. plans to keep a check on melamine coming from China. The goal is to stop unfair trade practices and make sure U.S. companies can compete fairly. Because of the review, a dumping margin of up to 363.31 percent might apply. A dumping margin is a kind of tax rate on imported goods that are being dumped. This decision is important to U.S. companies that make melamine. It helps them to make and sell their products without facing unfair competition from imports. This careful approach supports fair trade practices and ensures the U.S. market remains competitive and fair for all producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce to Maintain Antidumping Duties on Methionine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, has announced the final results of the expedited first sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on methionine from France, Japan, and Spain. This determination follows a review process carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930 and its later amendments. The Commerce Department concluded that ending the antidumping duty orders would likely result in continued or new instances of dumping. Dumping is when a product is sold in the U.S. at less than its fair value. The antidumping orders were put in place to protect U.S. industries by imposing duties on the imported methionine that is sold at unfairly low prices. The antidumping duty orders for methionine, which is an important animal feed supplement, were originally published on July 13, 2021, for France, and on September 14, 2021, for Japan and Spain. These orders were set to expire but were reviewed as part of the sunset review process. This process helps determine whether there is a likelihood of dumping continuing or recurring if the orders were revoked. The review began on June 1, 2026, after the publication of the initiation notice. Novus International, a U.S. company involved in the production of methionine, participated actively in the review. They submitted substantive responses supporting the continuation of the orders. By July 27, 2026, no responses were received from other interested parties, prompting an expedited review by Commerce. The review process led Commerce to determine likely dumping margins if the orders were revoked, with rates of up to 43.82% for France, 76.50% for Japan, and 37.53% for Spain. Commerce’s findings ensure that the antidumping duties will remain in place, thereby continuing to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to dumping. These findings were detailed in a memorandum and a public notice, both accessible through official channels. Overall, this decision reflects the U.S. government’s commitment to defending its markets and industries from unfair trade practices while ensuring that local manufacturers remain competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on Aluminum from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an official inquiry. This inquiry is about aluminum products from China. The inquiry is called a “circumvention inquiry.” It will check if some aluminum products are avoiding certain U.S. rules. These rules are called antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These orders have been in place since 2019. They are for common alloy aluminum sheets from China. Why is This Inquiry Happening? The inquiry was started because of some information found during a previous investigation. This investigation is about aluminum composite panels (ACPs) made by a company in China named Alumetal. These panels are used to build things. They have a special core made from low-density polyethylene (LDPE). They also have aluminum sheets on the outside. The inquiry will determine if these panels are the same as the sheets covered by the AD and CVD orders. What Happens Next? The inquiry officially began on October 2, 2026. During the inquiry, the Commerce Department will look at all the information very carefully. The inquiry has several steps. First, the Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The CBP will make sure any questionable products stay on hold. This way, they will pay extra fees if needed as the inquiry finds more information. The Inquiry Process The inquiry has rules it must follow. It must follow the Tariff Act of 1930 and the rules in 19 CFR 351.226(b). These rules help decide if a product is changed only a little bit to avoid paying fees. The inquiry will look at details like the product’s shape, how people use it, and how it is sold. The Commerce Department aims to make a decision on the inquiry in about 300 days. During this time, the public can access more information about the inquiry on the government’s electronic systems. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is working to ensure fair trade. This inquiry is important as it will determine if certain aluminum products from China are avoiding U.S. trade rules. The detailed and fair inquiry process helps maintain a balanced market for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Changes Rules on Steel Fittings from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3 minutes IntroductionThe U.S. Department of Commerce has made important changes regarding certain steel fittings from China and Vietnam. This change came after a court decision. BackgroundThe U.S. imports many products. Sometimes, they place special rules to make sure imports are fair. One such rule is on steel pipe fittings from China. These are special parts used to join pipes. Court DecisionRecently, the U.S. Court of International Trade said that the previous rule was not right. They decided that unfinished pipe fittings from China, which are then finished in Vietnam, still belong under the same rules as if they were from China. Commerce’s CorrectionDue to the court’s decision, the Department of Commerce changed its rule about these pipe fittings. Previously, there was confusion about whether these parts from Vietnam should follow the same rule. Now, they confirmed that these parts are still under the rule. Suspension of LiquidationCommerce also announced a few steps: The government will continue to hold these unfinished pipe fittings to the rule by keeping their import records. There is a new rule for parts not yet checked by the government since September 26, 2022. Parts that entered between November 4, 2021, and September 26, 2022, will also be held and checked. Future ExpectationsThis means anyone importing these parts must follow the new rules. The U.S. will now ensure these imports are handled correctly. The changes are meant to make sure trade is fair and correct. ConclusionThe Department of Commerce wants everyone to follow the rules correctly. By working with the Court’s decision, they aim to keep trade fair and balanced. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Duties on Chinese Melamine Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue duties on melamine from China. This is to prevent harmful economic effects. Revoking these duties could lead to unfair subsidies. The order adds extra costs to melamine from China entering the U.S. It aims to protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing. Background and Review The initial order was made in 2015. After reviewing in 2021, the order was kept. A second review began in June 2026. Cornerstone Chemical Company, a U.S. maker of melamine, supported keeping the order. They believe the duties help them compete fairly. China gave no input or response during this review. This led the Commerce Department to conduct a fast-track review. Results of the Review The Commerce Department decided that removing the order would likely lead to subsidies from China resuming. These subsidies make it unfair for U.S. companies to compete. The order will remain, with specific rates applied to Chinese companies: Far-Reaching Chemical Co., Ltd.: 154.00% M and A Chemicals Corp China: 154.00% Qingdao Unichem International Trade Co., Ltd.: 154.00% Shandong Liaherd Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.: 156.90% Zhongyuan Dahua Group Co., Ltd.: 154.00% All Others: 154.58% Importance of the Order Melamine is used in various products like laminates and plastics. These duties help U.S. companies like Cornerstone Chemical. They aim to create a level playing field for American products. The decision demonstrates the U.S. commitment to fair trade practices. It hopes to prevent negative impacts on U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. Next Steps The order will continue, and details will be monitored. Companies must comply with regulations to avoid penalties. This decision by the Commerce Department is part of broader trade strategies. It aims to support domestic industries and fair international competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Foil from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final results on the countervailing duty review of certain aluminum foil from the Republic of Türkiye. This review was conducted during the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. According to the findings, producers and exporters of aluminum foil in Türkiye received subsidies. The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance wing of the International Trade Administration, which is a part of the Department of Commerce. It was noted that countervailable subsidies, which are financial aids given to local companies, were provided by the Turkish government to certain aluminum foil producers and exporters. The review began with preliminary results published earlier this year, on May 6, 2026. Following comments and further analysis, the final results were released on October 2, 2026. The companies under review include Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Panda Aluminyum A.S. They received countervailable subsidy rates of 2.65% and 3.82% respectively. The merchandise in question falls under the countervailing duty order issued on November 12, 2021. This order aims to regulate how much financial benefit companies can get from their government. For the companies reviewed, the Department of Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle future cash deposits for duties on affected imports. The rates applicable are based on the results of this review. For those not reviewed, they will follow previously established rates. Everyone involved in these reviews had a chance to comment. These comments were addressed in the final document. It is important for those bound by an administrative protective order to handle the information carefully and follow specific guidelines. This decision helps maintain fair trading practices by ensuring that U.S. industries aren’t harmed by unfair subsidies elsewhere. For more information, you can access the full document and results online via platforms provided by the government. This announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on September 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds PET Film Sales from Taiwan Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings concerning the sale of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film from Taiwan. This review was carried out by the International Trade Administration, a division of the Department of Commerce. It examined sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Key Findings: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation: The Department of Commerce determined that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation was selling PET film at less than normal value. Therefore, a weighted-average dumping margin of 3.95 percent has been preliminarily imposed on Nan Ya. Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC) / Shinkong Synthetic Fiber Corporation (SSFC): This entity did not have any reviewable entries of PET film during the period of review. Consequently, the agency plans to rescind this part of the review. The initial data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection supported this finding. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce is inviting comments from interested parties on these preliminary results. Any comments must be submitted seven calendar days after the notice’s publication. Rebuttal comments are also welcome and should be filed within seven days after the comments’ submission. Disclosure: The Department plans to disclose its calculation methods to interested parties. This will occur within five days following the public announcement or the notice’s publication. Assessment Rates: If the preliminary results are finalized without changes, Nan Ya will face an antidumping duty rate of 3.95 percent. For other producers/exporters not previously reviewed or investigated, the cash deposit rate will remain at 2.40 percent unless otherwise specified. These rates will apply to entries made on or after the publication date of the final results. Public Comment and Hearing: Interested parties may submit written comments or request a hearing. Any hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days of this notice’s publication. The hearing will focus on issues raised in written comments. This careful examination and the prospect of duties aim to ensure fair trade practices between countries, maintaining the integrity of U.S. markets. All interested parties are advised to comply with the established timelines and procedures for comments and hearings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Preliminary Determination on Truck Bed Covers from China Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision regarding truck bed covers imported from the People’s Republic of China. The decision found that these items are being sold in the United States for less than what it costs to make them, also known as “less than fair value.” Background and Timeline The investigation started on March 20, 2026. On July 14, 2026, the Department of Commerce decided to extend the time it would take to make their preliminary decision. As of September 23, 2026, this preliminary determination has now been made. Investigation Details The investigation looks at truck bed covers from China sold between July 1, 2025, and December 31, 2025. Truck bed covers are used to protect and cover the cargo area of a pickup truck. The covers can be made of various materials like aluminum, steel, fiberglass, and even water-resistant fabric. Affected Parties There are a few companies in China that are being examined. These companies have been found to sell their truck bed covers in the U.S. at lower prices than it costs to make them. Hangzhou Golden Sun Autoparts Co., Ltd. Wenzhou Tianmao Automobile Parts Co., LTD More companies also listed in the official investigation document. Key Findings The investigation finds the dumping margins, which is how much less they are selling the products for compared to their normal value. For instance, Hangzhou Golden Sun Autoparts Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 51.35%. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will now send these findings to another U.S. agency, the International Trade Commission. This agency will decide if these imports harm U.S. businesses. If they agree, more rules might be placed on these imports, like extra taxes. Hearing Requests People or companies interested in having a say about this can ask for a hearing. They need to make a request within 30 days of the announcement. Postponement and Provisional Measures The companies involved have asked to postpone the final decision, which means it will take up to 135 days for a final determination to be made. In the meantime, the companies may have to adjust their prices or face more duties. This situation is being closely watched by U.S. businesses and importers who might be affected by these preliminary determinations and any final decisions that will follow. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Air Compressors from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On October 1, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary determination that air compressors from Vietnam have received unfair subsidies from the Vietnamese government. This decision is part of an investigation into countervailing duties (CVD) on imports from Vietnam. Background The investigation started on May 27, 2026. The examined period is between January 1 and December 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce suspects that air compressors from Vietnam are benefiting from subsidies that harm U.S. manufacturers. This investigation comes under the Tariff Act of 1930. Details of Investigation The products investigated are stationary and portable air compressors. These include various models powered by electricity, gasoline, or batteries, with tanks ranging from 1 to 80 gallons. The Department focused on certain reciprocating air compressors. Findings So far, the Department of Commerce sees evidence that some Vietnamese companies are receiving subsidies. These include financial assistance from government authorities, which creates an unfair advantage. Commerce has made two significant findings: Hybest-Vietnam, Limited Liability Company has a de minimis subsidy rate, meaning it is too insignificant to countervail. Other companies, like Hongkong Sun Rise Trading Limited, face preliminary CVD rates due to uncooperative behavior in providing requested information. Preliminary Duty Rates The Commerce Department has assigned preliminary subsidy rates to different companies. Most have a rate of 74.39 percent, but Hybest-Vietnam’s rate is only 0.35 percent. The “all others” rate is set at 37.20 percent. Actions and Next Steps As a result, most Vietnamese air compressors will need to pay a cash deposit equal to the subsidy rates when entering the U.S. This is to ensure U.S. companies have a fair competition field. The Department will investigate further to confirm these findings. The final determination of the investigation is aligned with the related antidumping investigation. Commerce expects to finalize the results by February 10, 2027. Invitation for Comments The Department invites comments from interested parties. These comments must be submitted before the final determination to be considered. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also review these findings. They must decide if these subsidies harm U.S. companies. If affirmed, the duties will continue to be imposed on Vietnamese air compressors. Conclusion This investigation highlights the effort to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from foreign government assistance that unfairly skews competition. The Commerce Department, by examining subsidy practices, aims to maintain a level playing field for domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Chinese Companies Receive Illegal Help Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On October 1, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce made a big announcement. They think that Chinese companies that make air compressors are getting unfair help from their government. Air compressors are machines that push out air, and they can be used for different things. The Department of Commerce has been checking this since May 27, 2026. They found that two Chinese companies took money or special deals that break U.S. trade rules. They believe that these companies did not follow the rules on purpose. There is still time for more people to talk about this. The Department of Commerce will listen to what others have to say. They plan to make a final decision on February 10, 2027. Right now, the U.S. government will start charging these Chinese companies when they bring their air compressors into the United States. They will also tell the U.S. International Trade Commission what they found. This group will decide if what China did can hurt businesses in the United States. Until then, the Department of Commerce will keep looking into this very carefully. They want to be sure about their final decision. People and companies can still send their thoughts and comments to help the investigation. This is a big deal because it means the U.S. is taking action. They want to make sure everything is fair for companies that make air compressors in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Malaysian Air Compressors Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about air compressors coming from Malaysia. It has found that some Malaysian companies are receiving government help, known as subsidies, for making and selling these products. What’s Happening? The government support is for products called stationary and portable air compressors. These compressors are machines that create and move air for different purposes. The investigation looked into the time period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. Key Players Some companies named in the report include Alton Intelligent Technology Sdn. Bhd, Panasonic Industrial Device Sales, and Puma Air Compressors. They are found to be receiving these subsidies. Why Is This Important? The Department of Commerce checks to make sure that companies do not sell products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Subsidies can make products cheaper when they enter the U.S., which can hurt American companies. What Will Happen Next? As a result of their findings, the Department has made a move to stop the products from being sold without special checks. They will require that a cash deposit equal to the estimated subsidy rate must be paid. This is like a financial guarantee that ensures everything is fair. Checking the Details The Commerce Department said that they found out the Malaysian companies did not completely cooperate with their investigation. This led them to use specific methods to decide on the subsidy rates. What’s the Subsidy Rate? They set the subsidy rate at 92.86% for the involved companies and all others. This means almost the entire price of the product might be covered by subsidies from the Malaysian government. Next Steps for U.S. Government The U.S. International Trade Commission will look at this matter further. Its job is to decide if these imports harm American industries. This decision is scheduled to happen by February 2027. What about the Future? After this preliminary decision, there might be comments and discussions from different groups. Interested parties are allowed to provide input, which the Commerce Department will consider before making a final decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.