U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty Orders on Polyvinyl Alcohol from Japan and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently released its final results on the expedited fourth sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) from Japan and China. These reviews were conducted by the International Trade Administration (ITA) under the Commerce Department. The main conclusion of these reviews is that revoking the antidumping duty orders on PVA from these countries would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping is when products are sold at less than fair value, making it hard for domestic producers to compete. Commerce first published the antidumping duty order on PVA from Japan on July 2, 2003, and from China on October 1, 2003. The most recent reviews started on March 2, 2026, in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. By March 17, 2026, domestic interested parties, meaning U.S. producers, expressed their intent to participate in the reviews. They provided the needed information within the necessary timeframe. However, no respondent, meaning no company or country that would be affected by the removal of the duties, provided comments or rebuttals. On April 1, 2026, domestic interested parties filed their substantive response, which is their detailed explanation and evidence on why these duties should stay. Since no companies from Japan or China responded, the Commerce Department proceeded with an expedited review. The final result says that removing the duties would likely lead to as much as 144.16% dumping from Japan and 97.86% from China. Therefore, the duties will remain to protect U.S. producers from unfair competition. For those handling confidential information related to this case, the Department reminds parties to follow rules about returning or destroying information appropriately. This decision underscores the ongoing vigilance by the U.S. Department of Commerce to maintain fair trading practices and protect domestic industries from unfair pricing by foreign competitors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Order on Twist Ties from China Remains in Effect Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its first sunset review of the antidumping duty (AD) order concerning twist ties from the People’s Republic of China. Commerce announced that revoking this order would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping is when foreign producers sell goods in the U.S. at prices lower than the fair value. The determination was made on June 30, 2026. Commerce stated that the dumping margins could be as high as 72.96 percent if the order were revoked. Background of the Order Commerce first issued the antidumping order on April 14, 2021. The order was put in place to protect U.S. producers from unfair pricing by foreign companies. The review process ensures that the order is still needed. Review Process The review began with a notice of initiation on March 2, 2026. This was part of a routine five-year sunset review to check if the order should continue. Bedford Industries, Inc., a U.S. company, participated in the review. They argued that removing the order would harm U.S. producers. No foreign producers from China responded to the review. Conclusion of the Review Based on the review, Commerce decided that lifting the order would hurt U.S. businesses. The anticipated consequence would be the return of dumping practices by Chinese producers. Commerce is responsible for enforcing trade laws to ensure fair competition. This decision reflects their commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair competition practices. What Happens Next? The order remains in place, continuing to impose duties on twist ties imported from China. These duties counteract the negative effects of dumping by ensuring that imported goods are priced fairly compared to domestic products. For more information, materials related to this decision can be accessed through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. This move signifies a broader effort by the United States to maintain fair trade practices and protect local industries against unfair competition from foreign markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Upholds Subsidy Duties on Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding phosphate fertilizers from Russia. They have chosen to keep the countervailing duty (CVD) order in place. This action is based on findings that removing the order could lead to unfair subsidy practices continuing or restarting. Background Information In 2021, a CVD order was placed on phosphate fertilizers from Russia. This order was made to prevent unfair trading advantages due to subsidies. The government reviews such orders every five years to decide if they should continue. This review process is called a “sunset review.” Review and Responses The sunset review for this order began on March 2, 2026. The Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, two U.S. fertilizer producers, showed interest in this review. They argued that the CVD order should not be revoked. Their timely responses were part of the review procedure. However, neither the Russian government nor any Russian fertilizer producers responded adequately. Because of this, the review was fast-tracked, lasting only 120 days. Outcome of the Review The review concluded that canceling the CVD order could lead to the continuation of subsidies by Russian producers. Therefore, the Commerce Department decided to keep the order active. This decision aims to ensure fair competition. Subsidy Rates The review outlined specific subsidy rates for Russian producers if the order was to be revoked. EuroChem would have a rate of 24.11%, JSC Apatit at 14.64%, and all other producers at 16.64%. Next Steps This notice serves as a reminder for anyone involved in this case under the Administrative Protective Order (APO) to properly handle confidential information. The Department of Commerce emphasizes the importance of this regulation. In summary, the Department of Commerce has decided to maintain the CVD order on Russian phosphate fertilizers. This decision aims to protect the U.S. market from unfair trading and ensure a level playing field for all producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Determines Silicon Metal from Australia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that silicon metal from Australia is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This decision comes after a detailed investigation by the department’s International Trade Administration. The investigation looked at the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The final finding from the investigation was made on June 30, 2026, and says that the silicon metal imported from Australia is being sold for less than what it’s worth. Commerce’s thorough checks included examining the sales and cost information of Simcoa Operations Pty Ltd., the main producer involved. The information was verified following strict procedures. This included looking at the company’s sales records and original documents to ensure accuracy. The investigation also confirmed that no parties raised concerns about the scope, which describes that only non-semiconductor grade silicon metal is covered. The silicon must contain between 85.00 and 99.99 percent silicon. Silicon considered “semiconductor grade” is not part of this investigation. The final results of this investigation set a dumping margin of 6.16 percent. This means that the specific producer, Simcoa, as well as other producers not individually investigated, fall under this margin. All other producers and exporters will have this same margin applied. As a result of this finding, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold off on finalizing the customs charges on these imports, keeping them in a temporary status. This applies to goods arriving after February 9, 2026, and will continue until new directions are issued. The U.S. International Trade Commission is also involved in this process. They will decide if the underpriced imports have harmed the domestic industry within 45 days of this determination. If they find no harm was done, the process will end, and any held funds will be returned. If they find the opposite, measures to counteract the unfair pricing will be reinforced. This decision and all related processes follow the guidelines and regulations in place for international trade. The detailed process aims to ensure fairness and protect domestic industry from unfair pricing practices. For detailed information on the scope of the investigation, one can refer to the scope appendices provided. These clearly define the measures and specific silicon types covered under this investigation. The enforcement of existing rules aims to maintain a fair market environment. It’s a vital part of ensuring that imported products are priced appropriately when entering the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Subsidies on Silicon Metal from Australia Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about silicon metal from Australia. They found that producers and exporters of silicon metal there receive subsidies. A subsidy is when the government helps by providing financial support or other aid. This investigation is an important step in understanding trade relations. Time Period of Investigation The investigation looked at how things were between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. This time frame is called the period of investigation. Commerce wants to make sure that trade is fair and that no one is getting an unfair advantage. What is Silicon Metal? The investigation focuses on silicon metal from Australia. Silicon metal is used in many products, from electronics to solar panels. It contains at least 85.00 percent silicon but less than 99.99 percent. The investigation did not cover semiconductor grade silicon, which is even purer and used mainly in electronics and technology. Details of the Investigation Commerce began by issuing a preliminary decision in September 2025. They invited input and comments from interested parties. Then, they examined the situation further with responses and evidence taken from Simcoa Operations Pty, Ltd. This is the main company involved in the case. They verified all information provided by Simcoa and the Australian Government. Verification involves checking documents and making sure the information given is correct and trustworthy. Final Findings The investigation resulted in a finding that Simcoa receives a subsidy rate of 32.57 percent. This is the amount of financial aid or benefit measured compared to typical market conditions. Because Simcoa was the only company closely looked at, all other related companies will receive the same subsidy rate. Next Steps Commerce has informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of its determination. The ITC will now decide if these subsidies harm or threaten to harm U.S. industries. Their decision will determine whether or not further actions, like tariffs, will be applied. Importance of Fair Trade This investigation is part of efforts to ensure that trade is fair between countries. Unfair subsidies can make it difficult for U.S. companies to compete. By finding these subsidies, Commerce can help protect industries and jobs in the United States. This ruling will have significant effects on trade relations and the companies involved. The investigation sheds light on how important and complex international trade can be. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Silicon Metal from Norway Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-30 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a decision about silicon metal from Norway. They have found that producers in Norway are receiving countervailable subsidies. This means the U.S. believes that the Norwegian government is giving unfair financial support to these producers. The Department looked at the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They reviewed the situation thoroughly and decided that these subsidies are affecting the U.S. market. Elkem ASA, a major producer from Norway, was specifically investigated. They were found to have received subsidies at a rate of 17.27%. This rate will apply to all other producers/exporters from Norway as well. The Commerce Department follows a specific process to determine these subsidies. They check if there is a financial contribution by an authority that offers a benefit to the company receiving it. If this action is specific, it can be labeled as a countervailable subsidy. The investigation included several programs. The department also conducted verification visits to Norway. They looked at sales and accounting records to ensure accuracy. If no major changes occur, the U.S. will continue to impose duties on silicon metal from Norway. This is to make sure that the U.S. industry is protected from unfair competition. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now make its own decision. They will decide if U.S. industry is being harmed by these subsidized imports. If they agree, there will be a formal order to impose duties. For now, cash deposits are being collected on products imported since September 26, 2025. These are held until the final decision is confirmed. If the ITC finds no harm, the process will be stopped, and duties will be refunded. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce is taking steps to address subsidies on silicon metal from Norway. They aim to ensure fair competition and protect U.S. producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Silicon Metal from Norway Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes June 30, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a significant announcement regarding silicon metal imported from Norway. They have determined that this product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means that the prices at which it is being sold are lower than the regular market value, potentially hurting U.S. businesses. Background of the Investigation Back in February 2026, the Commerce Department started looking into the pricing of silicon metal from Norway. This investigation focused on sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. They had initially found that Norwegian silicon metal was being sold at unfair prices, and now they have finalized this decision on June 24, 2026. Details of the Final Decision The investigation specifically looked at a company called Elkem ASA. They found that this company was selling silicon metal at a dumping margin of 2.47%. A dumping margin shows how much lower the selling price is compared to the normal market value. This same margin of 2.47% will apply to all other producers and exporters from Norway, as Elkem was the only company looked into in this process. What Happens Next Now, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold off on finalizing sales (or suspend liquidation) of these products that were brought into the U.S. from February 2026 onwards. Importers will need to put down cash deposits to cover estimated antidumping duties, which are protections against unfairly low-priced imports. Role of the International Trade Commission The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now look at whether the U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. They have 45 days from this final determination to make their decision. If they find no harm, then the duties won’t go into effect, and any deposits made will be refunded. However, if they do find harm, the Department of Commerce will ask Customs and Border Protection to officially apply the duties. This final step in the process helps ensure fair competition between imported products and those made domestically in the U.S., protecting local industries from being undercut by low-priced foreign goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Made to Antidumping Review by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to its recent notice about antidumping duties. These duties concern chlorinated isocyanurates from China. On March 11, 2026, the Department published the final results of an antidumping duty review. The review looked at products from China between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2024. But there was a mistake in the dates. The notice originally said that the review period ended on May 3, 2024. This was wrong. The correct end date is May 31, 2024. Antidumping duties are charges placed on goods sold below cost. They protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing by foreign countries. The correction was published in the Federal Register. It serves as an official update to the record. For more information, contact Dan Alexander at (202) 482-4313. He works in the AD/CVD Operations Office at the International Trade Administration. This update is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notification is part of regular government procedures. It ensures that all interested parties have the correct information. The U.S. Department of Commerce is responsible for these notices. Christopher Abbott is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He performed these duties related to the correction. For further official information, visit www.gpo.gov. This correction is now part of the permanent public record. It ensures the transparency and accuracy of trade actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue the antidumping duty order on frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. This decision is based on findings that removing the duty would likely result in dumping and harm U.S. industries. The antidumping duty order was first published on August 12, 2003. On December 1, 2025, a fourth review began. The review aimed to decide if the duty should stay. Commerce and the ITC found that getting rid of the order could cause problems like dumping and material injury to U.S. industries. The frozen fish fillets covered by the order are from the species Pangasius, known as “basa” and “tra” in Vietnam. The products involved include regular and shank fillets, whether breaded or marinated. However, the order does not include whole fish, steaks, or belly-flap nuggets. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting cash deposits at current rates for these products. The order’s continuation is effective from June 24, 2026. Commerce plans to start another review of this order before its five-year anniversary. This order helps protect U.S. industries by making sure imported products are sold at fair prices. The process of reviewing these orders follows strict legal guidelines to ensure U.S. industries remain competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Tariffs on Matchbooks from India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced it will continue to impose duties on commodity matchbooks from India. This decision follows findings from both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They both believe that removing the current duties would probably lead to more dumping, or unfairly low prices, and subsidies, which are unfair financial benefits from foreign governments. Keeping these duties in place will help protect the U.S. matchbook industry from injury. The duties in question have been in effect since December 11, 2009. The ITC and the Commerce Department recently completed a third review of these orders. This review is known as a “sunset review,” and it takes place every five years. The latest review began on October 1, 2025, and finished with a decision that the duties should remain in place to prevent any harm. The matchbooks affected by this order are the simple kind, often called “commodity matchbooks.” These are the book matches you can find in ordinary stores, like supermarkets and convenience stores. They are made from materials such as paperboard. They sometimes have printing on them, like a simple “Thank You” message, but they don’t include promotional matchbooks from places like hotels or restaurants. Those promotional items are not covered by this order. The decision to maintain the duties took effect on June 15, 2026. It means the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue collecting the existing duties when these matchbooks are imported. The Department of Commerce will begin another review of this decision five years from now to decide if the duties should still continue. This decision shows the U.S. is committed to protecting local industries from unfair trade practices by continuing to monitor and enforce trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Made to Raw Honey Antidumping Review from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important correction regarding the antidumping duty on raw honey from Brazil. In a notice published on June 3, 2026, the Department listed a company under the wrong name. The company was listed as Breyer & Via Ltda. This was a mistake. The correct name of the company is Breyer & Cia Ltda. This correction was published on June 29, 2026. The information was published to ensure accuracy in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 123. The correction appears in the Federal Register on page 39071. The correction relates to the final results of the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order. The review is important for ensuring fair trade practices. The name correction ensures that all involved parties have the right information. The Department of Commerce is committed to accuracy. They encourage interested parties to note this correction. For more details, contact Braeden Lowe at the U.S. Department of Commerce. His phone number is (202) 482-9124. This correction is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). The notice was prepared by Scot Fullerton. He is the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The correction is part of official records. It will help maintain the integrity of the trade review process. This announcement aims to keep all documents accurate and up to date. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Dumped Steel Propane Cylinders from Thailand Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its review of steel propane cylinders imported from Thailand. An administrative review for the period of August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024, was conducted. Florida-based company, Sahamitr Pressure Container Public Company Limited (SMPC), was involved in this case. Commerce discovered that SMPC sold steel propane cylinders to the United States at unfairly low prices. The review process began with preliminary results announced on February 10, 2026. Further comments were invited, and the final results were released on June 17, 2026. The conclusion showed that Sahamitr Pressure Container Public Company Limited had a dumping margin of 1.01 percent. A dumping margin is the difference between the price in the U.S. and the normal value. Commerce plans to tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) how much antidumping duty to charge. These charges will apply to all covered entries during the specified period. Importers who have entries during this period should be aware. There is a responsibility to file a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Not complying could lead to double duties. The new cash deposit requirements will be enforced. Importers will pay based on these requirements. The rate for all producers and exporters, not specifically covered, will remain at 10.77 percent. These measures will stay in place to ensure fair pricing in the market. The review was overseen by Christopher Abbott, who is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This action helps keep a fair trade environment in the U.S. Thank you for reading this report on Commerce’s actions concerning steel propane cylinders from Thailand. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Antidumping Review on Indian Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Date: 2026-06-22 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (CVP-23) imported from India. This review covers the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. The review focused on Western Chemical Industries P Limited (Western Chemical), a producer and exporter of CVP-23 in India. The Department found that Western Chemical did not sell CVP-23 at prices below the normal value in the United States during the specified period. Therefore, the company’s dumping margin was determined to be 0.00 percent. Because the results did not change from the preliminary findings announced on February 13, 2026, there is no accompanying decision memorandum. No parties contested the preliminary findings. The Department’s review was conducted under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The scope of the order includes CVP-23 in any form. The Department conducts these reviews to ensure fair trade practices are followed. Since no changes were made, there are no new calculations to disclose. The Department has confirmed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that duties will be assessed according to these final results. Entries will be liquidated without additional antidumping duties due to the zero margin for Western Chemical. Those involved in importing merchandise during the period should note that if they were unaware their products would enter the U.S., CBP may assess duties at the “all-others” rate from the original investigation, set at 27.48 percent. Cash deposit requirements for future imports will reflect these results. If a company-specific rate is 0.00 percent, no cash deposit will be required. If a company was not reviewed but was included in an earlier segment with a specific rate, that rate will apply. Otherwise, the “all-others” rate of 27.48 percent will be used. Importers must remember to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties as required by U.S. laws. Failure to do so may lead to the presumption of reimbursement and result in double duties or increased antidumping duties. All parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must manage their responsibilities regarding APO materials, including their return or destruction. Failure to comply with APO rules could lead to sanctions. This notice is published in accordance with U.S. law and the Department’s regulations. The Department ensures fair and equitable trade practices by conducting thorough reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction in Antidumping Duty Review on Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Published: 2026-06-22 The U.S. Department of Commerce has published a correction in the Federal Register. The correction is related to the antidumping duty review on activated carbon from China for the years 2023-2024. This review determines if companies from China sold activated carbon in the U.S. at prices below fair value. Originally, the notice published on June 2, 2026, listed companies that should not have been included. It also missed one company that should have been on the list. Now, the correct list of companies receiving a separate rate is as follows: Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. Bengbu Modern Environmental Co. Ltd. Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. Ningxia Mineral & Chemical Limited Shanxi Industry Technology Trading Co., Ltd. Shanxi Sincere Industrial Co., Ltd. Tancarb Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. Companies listed here are given special attention in the review. This is important for fair trade practices. The Public Notice was updated with this correction on June 16, 2026. This correction follows rules in sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. For more information, contact Andrew Hart at the U.S. Department of Commerce. This update helps provide accurate information about trade rules and regulations. It is essential for fair trade between the U.S. and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Steel Wire from Spain Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary results in an important trade review. The department is looking at prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. They are concerned that this wire is being sold in the U.S. at less than its normal value. This could be unfair to U.S. companies. What Did They Find? From June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025, a Spanish company called Global Special Steel Products S.A.U., also known as Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. (TYCSA), was investigated. The Department of Commerce found that TYCSA sold their products in the U.S. at prices lower than in Spain. This is called “dumping,” and it can hurt American businesses. The dumping margin for TYCSA was found to be 13.57%. Why Is This Important? Dumping can harm U.S. companies because it allows foreign companies to sell their products at a much lower price. This makes it hard for U.S. companies to compete. The Department of Commerce is tracking these sales to ensure fair competition. Next Steps for TYCSA TYCSA must comment on these findings. They can send briefs or written comments to the Department of Commerce. They have 21 days from the date of the announcement to do so. Other companies can also send comments, but they must do so five days after TYCSA. Assessment and Cash Deposit Changes Once the review is finalized, the Department will calculate the duties TYCSA must pay. If the final review shows a dumping margin not less than 0.50%, the company will have to pay antidumping duties. This could mean paying extra fees on their products to make up for the low prices at which they were sold. For now, the Department of Commerce plans to adjust cash deposit requirements. This will affect how much TYCSA and others must deposit when they sell these products in the U.S. What If There’s No Dumping? If in the final review, the margin is found to be zero or very small, TYCSA may not need to pay extra duties. Their products can be imported without additional costs. Final Thoughts The Department of Commerce takes these issues seriously. Ensuring fair trade helps protect American jobs and companies. This review is part of ongoing efforts to keep the playing field level between U.S. and foreign businesses. Stay tuned for updates on this case as the Department of Commerce reviews comments and issues its final decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Review on R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On June 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review concerning 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) imported from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Background The Department of Commerce had previously released preliminary results on March 12, 2026. They invited interested parties to comment on those results, but no comments were received. Therefore, the findings remain unchanged from the preliminary stage. Key Findings The Commerce Department determined that Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Sanmei Chemicals Co., Ltd., and Fujian Qingliu Dongying Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (combined as “Sanmei”) did not qualify for separate rates. Alongside Sanmei, 23 other companies also failed to qualify for separate rates. This determination means they are all part of the China-wide entity. China-Wide Entity All companies under review that could not demonstrate eligibility for separate rates are treated as part of the China-wide entity. The assigned weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide entity remains at 167.02%. Assessment Rates The Commerce Department will soon instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on the appropriate antidumping duties for this review period. Companies that did not receive a separate rate will be subject to the China-wide entity rate. Assessment instructions are expected no earlier than 35 days after this announcement. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit requirements will be applied to shipments of R-134a entering the U.S. from China. The cash deposit rate for exporters that couldn’t secure separate rates will match the China-wide rate of 167.02%. These rates will remain effective until further notice. Reminder to Importers Importers are reminded of their duty to submit certifications regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties, in compliance with federal regulations. These decisions were made in line with U.S. trade laws, aiming to ensure fair competition between domestic and foreign products. The results of this review reflect the efforts to address any unfair pricing practices from foreign manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

ITA Implements New User Fees for Export and Investment Promotion Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The International Trade Administration (ITA) is making big changes to its fees for export and investment promotion services. Starting July 22, 2026, ITA will have a new User Fee Schedule to help recover the costs of these special services. The ITA offers services to U.S. companies to help them grow their business overseas. This includes small and medium-sized businesses, which are encouraged to export more goods and services. ITA is also focused on attracting foreign investment into the U.S. New Fee Structure The ITA recently did a cost study and found out it was not recovering the full costs of its services. To fix this, ITA will now follow guidelines from the Office of Management and Budget. These guidelines are in Circular A-25, which says that federal agencies should recover their costs when offering special services. The ITA will no longer offer fee discounts for small and medium businesses. This means that fees for standardized services will be adjusted to fully recover costs. The new fees will charge for ITA staff time and any extra costs like travel or venue rental. New Services The ITA is also adding new services to its offerings: Trade Missions: These will have a non-standard fee. Rural Export Center (REC) Services: There will be new services like Matrix, One Country Report, Potential Partner List, and REC Check. Services for Trade Show Organizers: This includes the Trade Event Partnership Program (TEPP) and the Trade Event Menu of Services (TEMS). The ITA aims to provide better services at trade shows and events, including matchmaking and market counseling. Fee Changes Explained There are two main reasons for these fee changes: Full Cost Recovery: The ITA wants to make sure it covers all its costs. Adjustments: The ITA took into account the actual level of effort needed for their services, which was higher than before. The ITA held an independent study to check their costs and is now applying these findings to the new fee structure. Request for Comments ITA is asking for public comments about how the new fees will affect their clients. They want to understand how businesses will adapt to these changes. Comments can be sent by email or through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. The ITA wants these fees to help promote U.S. exports and investments efficiently. They will reassess the fee schedule one year after implementation and then every two years. This change aims to provide fair and sustainable financial support for the services that help U.S. businesses succeed globally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Confirms Dumping of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the antidumping duty review for finished carbon steel flanges imported from India. The review covered the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. According to the Department, these products were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value. The Commerce Department conducted an administrative review of the antidumping duty order first published on August 24, 2017. The review was part of its ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition and compliance with international trade laws. Norma Group, comprised of companies including Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal, was a primary subject of this review. The Department determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.82% for this group. R. N. Gupta & Company Limited, another significant exporter, was determined to have a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.65%. For companies not individually examined, a rate of 1.94% was assigned based on the performance of the reviewed companies. An important development in this review was the successor-in-interest determination for Munish Forge Limited. The company underwent a name change from Munish Forge Private Limited. The Department found that the structure, operations, and management remained largely unchanged. Therefore, Munish Forge Limited is considered the same entity as its predecessor for the purposes of the antidumping duty order. The Commerce Department has outlined assessment rates for importers of the subject merchandise. These rates will be used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on entries during the review period. New cash deposit requirements, effective upon publication of these results, will apply to future shipments. The establishment of these antidumping duties underscores the Department’s commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices while fostering a level playing field for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets New Import Duties on Raw Honey from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new findings regarding the import of raw honey from India. After a thorough investigation, it was determined that India sold raw honey in the United States at prices lower than usual during the period from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The decision was made official on June 18, 2026. The review looked into companies like Indocan Honey Private Limited and Shakti Apifoods Pvt., Ltd. These companies were found to have sold their honey at a dumping margin. This means they sold honey at unfairly low prices. The margins, or differences in price, were calculated and released. Indocan Honey Private Limited had a dumping margin of 6.98%. Shakti Apifoods Pvt., Ltd. had a margin of 1.11%. Other companies were assigned a margin of 3.99%. The U.S. government will now apply duties, or taxes, on these honey imports. This is to ensure fair competition within the U.S. market. Duties help to level the playing field for local producers. Importers must now pay cash deposits when bringing in honey from India. These deposits are based on the calculated dumping margins. The goal is to prevent unfairly cheap products from hurting U.S. industries. The cash deposit rate for companies not reviewed individually will be 3.99%. For companies previously investigated, the rate will reflect past findings. If a company has not been investigated and the producer has been, the producer’s rate will apply. For others, a standard rate of 5.87% will remain in effect. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been instructed to assess and collect these duties. If an importer does not fulfill its duty to report reimbursements, double duties may be enforced. This decision reflects the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices. It ensures that American honey producers can compete justly in the market. The American public benefits from fair competition and quality products. This notice serves to inform importers about their responsibility to adhere to these new regulations. It is important for importers to remain in compliance to avoid additional penalties. Duties and regulations like these are set to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices by foreign companies. It ensures that the trade remains fair for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues New Import Duties on Chassis from Mexico and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new countervailing duties on certain chassis and parts from Mexico and Thailand. This decision follows a confirmation by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that American industries have been hurt by the subsidized imports of these products. What Are Chassis and Subassemblies? The products affected by these new duties are chassis and their parts. Chassis are frames that can carry containers or other loads. They are used for road, marine, and rail transport. They usually include wheels, brakes, and lighting systems, among other components. Important Dates and Contact Information The new duties come into effect starting June 18, 2026. Any unprocessed entries of these products that have been brought in for consumption will be subject to these duties. For further details, interested parties can contact Jose Rivera for issues related to Mexico at (202) 482-0842, and Caroline Carroll for issues related to Thailand at (202) 482-4948. They are both from the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration. How Will This Affect Import Procedures? Due to the new duties, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess a cash deposit equal to the calculated subsidy rates when these products are imported. The purpose is to help offset the unfair benefit given to these products by their home countries through subsidies, which harm U.S. industries. Subsidy Rates The countervailing duty rates for each company affected are noted in the Federal Register. For Mexico, companies like Hyundai de Mexico S.A. and Fruehauf de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. have a subsidy rate of 76.91%. For Thailand, the rate varies little between companies. Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd., for instance, has a rate of 10.72%, and Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. is at 9.65%. Leveraging Legal Frameworks These actions are in accordance with sections 705 and 706 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The U.S. Department of Commerce is using these legal measures to protect U.S. industries from the damage caused by unfair import practices. Next Steps for Interested Parties The Department of Commerce allows interested parties to be added to an annual inquiry list to receive updates. This service list will be updated every year. Any party wishing to be added to this list must submit their details within 30 days of the order’s publication. Exclusions in the Order Certain products are excluded from these duties. These include dry van trailers, refrigerated van trailers, and flatbed trailers. Individual chassis parts sold by themselves are not included in this probe, but when these parts come with a chassis, they fall under the order. Conclusion With these new countervailing duties, the Department of Commerce aims to even the playing field for U.S. manufacturers and protect them from the effects of these subsidized imports. Detailed information can be accessed via the Federal Register publication, under document number 2026-12329. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Puts Antidumping Duties on Chassis from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On June 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce put antidumping duties on chassis from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam. This decision comes after finding that these countries sold chassis in the United States at less-than-fair-value prices. This means they were sold for less than it costs to make them. Commerce’s Determinations The Department of Commerce found that many companies were selling chassis for prices that hurt U.S. businesses. They published these findings on April 23, 2026. This was a part of a bigger investigation on whether trading practices were fair. International Trade Commission Involvement On June 8, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) agreed with the Commerce Department. They said the U.S. industry was being hurt by cheap chassis coming from these countries. This allowed the Commerce Department to set up duties or extra taxes on these products. Details of the Chassis Orders Chassis are frames or trailers used to carry containers. They can be used on roads, ships, or trains. This decision covers all chassis coming from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam, whether finished or not. Implementation Dates Antidumping duties affect chassis entries that were brought into the U.S. after September 29, 2025. The duties can now be assessed on any chassis that is still in customs or has not been settled yet. Rates of Duties Different companies in Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam will have different duty rates. For example, in Thailand, Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. will face duties of 72.85%. Companies from Mexico have a general rate of 32.37%. For Vietnam, all concerned exporters must pay a 186.84% duty. Custom Procedures The Department of Commerce will direct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect these extra taxes. They need to keep a watch on the entries until further notice. For some time, starting from March 28, 2026, some imports were not charged duties, but that has now changed after this release. Annual Inquiry Service Lists The Department of Commerce will maintain a list each year of all parties interested in these orders. People who want to be on this list must sign up within 30 days of the order being published. This helps ensure everyone follows the new rules effectively. Final Details This step is a significant move to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. By applying these duties, the U.S. aims to ensure fair trading and to support its industries. The rules will affect how companies bring chassis into the country from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam. The order and all its details can be found published in the Federal Register under Volume 91, Number 117. This measure shows a strong commitment to maintaining a level playing field for U.S. companies and ensuring fair prices in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Steel and Aluminum Tariff Adjustments Process Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public opinions on a new information collection about steel and aluminum tariffs. They want people to share their thoughts before they send the collection plan to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. This is important to make sure the process is useful and not too hard for people to do. Deadline for Comments The deadline for sending in comments is August 17, 2026. People can write to Emily Davis at the International Trade Administration with their feedback. They should use the OMB Control Number 0625-0285 when they send their comments. Background on Tariffs Last year, on October 17, 2025, the President made a decision to change how medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and parts from other countries are brought into the United States. This change was to protect U.S. national security. The President decided that new tariffs were needed for these imports. How Tariffs are Adjusted Proclamation 10984 was made to allow changes in how much tariff companies pay when they bring in steel and aluminum from other countries. If certain companies in Canada or Mexico make commitments to produce more steel or aluminum in the U.S., they could pay less in tariffs. The tariffs cannot go below 25 percent. The aim is to boost U.S. steel and aluminum production, which in turn supports the making of important items like vehicles in the U.S. For example, automobile parts and vehicle parts are key products. Public Participation and Collection Process The plan under discussion is meant to help the Department of Commerce figure out the best way to implement these tariffs. Information such as location, production details, and investment plans from companies can help in this process. Companies in Canada and Mexico that want reduced tariffs will provide this information. Call for Comments and Participation The Department of Commerce is encouraging public comments to improve their process. They want to know if the proposed collection makes sense and is useful. This feedback will help them evaluate if the process can be simpler and better for businesses. Comments from the public will become a part of the official record. All personal details shared in comments, like names and addresses, might become public too. Sheleen Dumas, the Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, shared this important notice from the Commerce Department. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.