U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Duties on Chinese Melamine

Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes

The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue duties on melamine from China. This is to prevent harmful economic effects. Revoking these duties could lead to unfair subsidies.

The order adds extra costs to melamine from China entering the U.S. It aims to protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing.

Background and Review

The initial order was made in 2015. After reviewing in 2021, the order was kept. A second review began in June 2026.

Cornerstone Chemical Company, a U.S. maker of melamine, supported keeping the order. They believe the duties help them compete fairly.

China gave no input or response during this review. This led the Commerce Department to conduct a fast-track review.

Results of the Review

The Commerce Department decided that removing the order would likely lead to subsidies from China resuming. These subsidies make it unfair for U.S. companies to compete. The order will remain, with specific rates applied to Chinese companies:

  • Far-Reaching Chemical Co., Ltd.: 154.00%
  • M and A Chemicals Corp China: 154.00%
  • Qingdao Unichem International Trade Co., Ltd.: 154.00%
  • Shandong Liaherd Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.: 156.90%
  • Zhongyuan Dahua Group Co., Ltd.: 154.00%
  • All Others: 154.58%

Importance of the Order

Melamine is used in various products like laminates and plastics. These duties help U.S. companies like Cornerstone Chemical. They aim to create a level playing field for American products.

The decision demonstrates the U.S. commitment to fair trade practices. It hopes to prevent negative impacts on U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition.

Next Steps

The order will continue, and details will be monitored. Companies must comply with regulations to avoid penalties.

This decision by the Commerce Department is part of broader trade strategies. It aims to support domestic industries and fair international competition.


Legal Disclaimer

This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.