Commerce Delays Decision on Chromium Trioxide Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is delaying its final decision on the chromium trioxide investigation. This decision means that the final finding will be made on October 5, 2026. This is part of an investigation into whether chromium trioxide from Türkiye is being sold for less than it is worth. The decision to delay was made because the investigation is complicated. The investigation started on January 5, 2026, and looks at a period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. On May 22, 2026, a preliminary decision was made. This decision hinted that chromium trioxide from Türkiye might be sold at unfair prices. The company Türkiye Şişe ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş., also known as Şişecam, asked for the delay. The company is a major exporter involved in the investigation. By law, a request from such a significant exporter cannot be ignored without a good reason. The request also included extending provisional measures. This means certain rules will now last not four months but up to six months. If the investigation finds that chromium trioxide is priced unfairly, it may affect how this product is traded between countries. This means there could be new tariffs or rules to balance the pricing difference. This update comes from Christopher Abbott, who is responsible for policy and negotiations at the Department of Commerce. This investigation and decision follow specific rules. These rules are from the Tariff Act of 1930. The goal is to make sure trade between countries is fair. The public is alerted and informed through such notices. This information is published under regulation sections of federal law, which keeps processes transparent and open. For those interested, further details can be found on the official U.S. Government Publishing Office website. Following these processes helps ensure a fair trading environment for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Antidumping Review on Monosodium Glutamate from China Announced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-06-16 Location: Washington, DC The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The review found that Ajinoriki MSG (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Ajinoriki) has not qualified for a separate rate. As such, Ajinoriki will be considered part of the China-wide entity. During the review, it was corrected from the preliminary results that Ajinoriki is subject to a dumping margin rate for the China-wide entity, which is 56.54 percent. This rate was established based on findings from the prior 2017-2018 administrative review. The Department of Commerce published the preliminary results in February 2026 and allowed interested parties to submit comments. The petitioner, Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc, discovered an error in the preliminary report that listed the China-wide rate incorrectly as 40.41 percent. The correct rate is, and remains, 56.54 percent. Commerce has affirmed the petitioner’s comment, and no other comments were submitted. Therefore, no additional decision memoranda accompany this notice. The Department also explained that there are no calculations to disclose for these final results. This is because Ajinoriki, being part of the China-wide entity which was not under review, means there were no separate calculations needed. Merchants need to be aware of their responsibility for duties. The Department of Commerce will work with the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. CBP will follow Commerce’s instructions on assessing the antidumping duties on MSG imported from China. The cash deposit rate for shipments of subject merchandise from China will continue as currently set. For those not receiving a separate rate, the China-wide rate of 56.54 percent applies. Importers are reminded to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. This is crucial before CBP liquidates relevant entries. The notice reiterates the importance of compliance with duties and legal requirements for all merchants dealing with MSG imports from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Low Prices on Steel Nails from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement about steel nails from Taiwan. The department found that two companies from Taiwan sold nails in the United States at prices lower than normal. These companies are Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. and Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd. They sold the nails between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The review checked if companies followed fair trade rules. The results showed Faithful Engineering and Top Forever did not. They did not respond to important questions or provide needed information. As a result, the Department of Commerce decided to apply a high dumping rate of 78.17% to these companies. Twenty other companies were also reviewed. But, for these companies, the review has been stopped. This is because there were no sales that could be checked. The Commerce Department said it will give the final results soon. They also mentioned how people can send comments about these findings. All comments must be filed online. After the final check, the Commerce Department will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection about the results. The customs department will use the new rates to collect duties. Finally, everyone who imports nails should know about this change. This is important because it affects how much tax they need to pay. This development marks an important step in maintaining fair trade and making sure that products are sold at proper prices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Indian Glycine Producers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results on the countervailing duty investigation for producers and exporters of glycine from India. The review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Findings reveal that companies like Kumar Industries, India, received financial help, known as subsidies, from the Indian government. This help makes their products cheaper and helps them compete in the U.S. market. Such assistance is termed “countervailable” when a government gives financial aid to producers or exporters in a way that affects international trade. Between late 2025 and early 2026, the Department of Commerce faced many challenges, including a government shutdown. This delayed their investigation. They extended deadlines several times, leading to the final announcement on June 8, 2026. The investigation was about “Countervailable Subsidies,” which means checking if the help the Indian companies received was against U.S. trade rules. The Department followed the laws from the Tariff Act of 1930. Kumar Industries was the main company checked in this investigation. Bajaj Healthcare Limited, another company in review, did not get separate scrutiny but was assigned the same duty rate as Kumar Industries. The duty rate is 45.33 percent, the same for both Kumar and Bajaj. This means when these companies export glycine to the U.S., they have to pay this percentage as a duty to make things fair for U.S. competitors. The Commerce Department has also instructed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect these duties on shipments that arrived after the date of this announcement. This action ensures a level playing field for U.S. producers against imported goods that might be priced unfairly low due to subsidies. The Department has asked those who have access to any confidential data from the investigation to handle it responsibly, as per their duties under legal agreements. Failure to comply can result in penalties. The results ensure that U.S. domestic industries are protected from unfair foreign competition while maintaining fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Members for Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Committee’s Role and Importance The ETTAC gives important advice to the Environmental Trade Promotion Working Group. This group is part of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee. The committee helps in making programs that enhance U.S. exports of technologies and goods related to the environment. These goods and services help the U.S. meet environmental and safety requirements. Environmental technologies include solutions for water, waste treatment, and air quality monitoring. These technologies are crucial for building infrastructure and supporting U.S. manufacturing. They help the U.S. achieve economic and national security goals by promoting fair trade, manufacturing competitiveness, and strong supply chains. Every year, the U.S. exports about $60 billion worth of environmental technology goods and services. This sector employs nearly 1.9 million Americans. How to Nominate Someone Those who wish to nominate someone for ETTAC membership must do so by 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 2026. Applications can be submitted through the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee web page. After applying, nominees will receive an email asking for more documents. Any questions about the process can be sent to [email protected]. Nominations should be submitted through the ITA’s ETTAC web page. After submitting a nomination, nominees need to provide additional documents via an automated email. The Department of Commerce may reach out for more information. Eligibility and Selection ETTAC will have between 30 to 45 members. Members can come from different sectors, including environmental technology companies, trade associations, and civil society groups. They will represent various U.S. interests and contribute to the committee’s goals. To be eligible, nominees must be U.S. citizens. They must not be registered as foreign agents. They should represent U.S. entities in the environmental sector involved in international trade. Responsibilities and Criteria Committee members are expected to attend about eight meetings during the term, with at least four meetings in person. They will discuss topics openly in public settings. Members should also be able to handle additional tasks like conference calls and drafting recommendations. Applicants must submit several documents, including: A sponsor letter explaining why the nominee should be considered. A biography of the nominee. Details about the company, association, or organization’s business activities. Information on the organization’s ownership if applicable. Final Selection The Secretary of Commerce will consider applications based on their ability to represent different U.S. environmental technology sectors. Selection will consider viewpoints, industry subsectors, and geography. Nominees will be informed of their selection via email. The Department of Commerce aims to ensure that the ETTAC is diverse, balanced, and able to promote U.S. environmental technology exports effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Van-Type Trailers from China Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It says that van-type trailers from China are being sold in the U.S. at prices lower than what they are worth. This practice is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. These trailers are generally big and used to transport goods. They are different from smaller trailers you may see on the highway. The investigation looks at the timeframe from April 1, 2025, to September 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is inviting people to comment on its decision. This is a chance for interested parties to share their thoughts. Important Details What Are Van-Type Trailers?: These are trailers with a cover on top. They are usually rectangular in shape. Covered Parts: The investigation also includes trailer parts. These parts are included whether they are put together or not. Specific Features: These trailers weigh more than 26,000 pounds. They are big and can carry heavy loads. Impact and Actions The U.S. plans to charge more money, called a “cash deposit,” for these trailers. This will happen every time trailers from China enter the U.S. after June 15, 2026. The cash deposit rate is set at 130.86%. This means that the trailers from China could cost much more. Chinese trailers with Chinese parts that are brought through other countries are also affected. For example, trailers that come through Canada are still subject to U.S. rules. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will make a final decision later. If confirmed, these measures could change. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also look at the decision. They will see if U.S. trailer companies are harmed by the low prices. By doing this, the U.S. aims to protect its own companies. It wants to make sure they are not harmed by unfair pricing from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Fiberglass Door Panels from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding fiberglass door panels from China. This follows extensive investigation and analysis by the Commerce Department. Investigation Overview The investigation covered fiberglass door panels, including sidelites, from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that producers and exporters in China received government subsidies for these products. Key Details The final decision was made after gathering and analyzing information from various parties. The decision follows a preliminary finding reported on August 21, 2025. The final determination aligns with other related investigations on less-than-fair-value practices. Subsidy Rates Determined Various subsidy rates were determined for different Chinese companies. The rates were calculated based on the evidence collected: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd.: 66.22% Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd.: 58.50% Other named companies, which did not respond to requests for information, received a rate of 186.46%. All other companies received a rate of 60.64%. Scope of the Investigation The investigation focused on fiberglass door panels from China. These panels may include fiberglass sidelites and come in various forms, such as finished, unfinished, assembled, or unassembled. The investigation covers these panels whether or not they are part of a complete door system. Outcome and Next Steps Commerce’s findings will be forwarded to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC will decide if these imports harm U.S. industries. If the ITC agrees, duties will be applied on future imports to level the playing field for U.S. producers. If not, the investigation ends, and all deposits collected during the process will be refunded. Conclusion The United States is focused on fair trade practices. This investigation underlines the commitment of the Department of Commerce to ensure U.S. industries get a fair chance in the global market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Fiberglass Door Panels from China Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that fiberglass door panels from China are being sold in the United States at unfair prices. This is called selling at less than fair value (LTFV). The decision from the Department was published on June 15, 2026. The period during which this unfair pricing was investigated ran from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This means Commerce has been looking into the pricing practices for six months to understand the situation with these imports. The Department had initially made a preliminary determination about this issue in January 2026. They found signs of unfair pricing and decided to look deeper. This final decision confirms their earlier findings. The door panels being reviewed are made from fiberglass. Fiberglass is a durable material often used for doors because it can withstand tough weather. The Department worked with Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd., among other companies, to ensure correct sales records were examined. They checked sales and production records closely. This process is called “verification.” The final rates of unfair pricing, called “dumping margins,” have been published. These rates indicate how much lower these products were sold in the U.S. compared to their normal value. Besides the primary determination, the Department also looked at specific issues companies brought up during the review. These included adjustments to various freight expenses and financial calculations. The U.S. intends to keep a close watch on these imports and has announced plans to continue special rules. These rules require importers to pay extra fees when they bring such products into the U.S. This aims to prevent further harm to U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce will also inform the International Trade Commission. This body will check if the U.S. industries have been harmed by these unfair trade practices. If they find U.S. businesses hurt, further actions will be taken. This determination is a crucial step in maintaining fair trade practices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. The U.S. Commerce Department is committed to ensuring fair market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Preliminary Review on Welded Line Pipe from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding welded line pipe imported from the Republic of Korea. These findings relate to an administrative review conducted for the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. Commerce preliminarily determines that some producers and exporters from Korea sold welded line pipe at prices below what is known as the “normal value.” This means they may have been selling this pipe at a lower price than usual in the United States, a practice which can harm domestic manufacturers. Companies Involved The review focused on two main companies: Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. faced a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.86%. On the other hand, SeAH Steel Corporation did not have a significant margin, indicated by the 0.00% rate assigned to them. Additionally, five other companies involved in the case—AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., EEW Korea Co., Ltd., Husteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd., and NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.—were granted the same rate as Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., which is 1.86%. Review and Rescission During the review, the Commerce department also looked at entries from 26 companies which are now being rescinded from the review. The reason for this is that there were no suspended entries of welded line pipe from these companies during the period of review. Verification and Comments A verification of SeAH Steel Corporation’s information has been conducted as part of the review process. Interested parties in the case are invited to comment on the preliminary results of the review. These comments are part of the Department’s efforts to ensure a fair trade environment. Next Steps Commerce aims to release the final results of the review by October 2026. These final results will dictate the actions taken regarding the assessment of duties on specific import entries of welded line pipe. These findings emphasize the department’s continuous commitment to reviewing trade practices and enforcing antidumping laws to support fair competition within the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 3 minutes A recent error on the GovInfo website resulted in a “Page Not Found” message. Users trying to access certain information on the site were unable to do so. This has caused inconvenience for those seeking government documents and resources. Details of the Error The error message displayed reads: “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” This message indicates that the specific page the user tried to access does not exist or cannot be located on the server. The cause of this error could range from a mistyped URL to the page being moved or deleted. What to Do If You Encounter This Error Report the Error: If you come across this error, the GovInfo team requests that you report it to askGPO, which is their help service. Provide Information: When reporting, include the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you took when you encountered the error, any specific search terms used, and a screenshot if possible. Visit the Homepage: The error page provides a link to return to the GovInfo homepage. From there, you can try navigating to the desired information through different paths. View Search Tips: A link is also provided to search tips that might assist in locating the needed documents through more efficient search techniques. GovInfo’s Commitment GovInfo assures users that they are actively working to resolve the issue. They appreciate the users’ patience and cooperation in reporting these errors to enhance the website’s functionality. For any further assistance, users are encouraged to reach out to GovInfo’s contact support. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes A recent attempt to access certain pages on the government information website, GovInfo, resulted in a “Page Not Found” error. This can cause inconvenience for users seeking specific information. Error Occurrence The error message appears when users try to access content via specific URLs. The message indicates that the requested page could not be found on the server. What to Do The GovInfo website suggests steps to help resolve this error. Users are encouraged to report the error to askGPO. When reporting, users should provide the URL of the page they tried to access, and describe the steps they took that led to the error. They can also include specific search terms used or a screenshot showing the error. Assistance and Resources For those needing help, the website offers several resources: Users can visit the Help section for assistance. There is additional guidance on the homepage for those looking for more information or tips on searching the site. Importance of Reporting By reporting errors, users can aid in improving the website’s functionality. Prompt reporting contributes to quicker resolutions and the overall enhancement of user experience. If you experience this issue, following these steps may assist in resolving the problem effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Preliminary Antidumping Results for Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced preliminary findings of its latest review concerning antidumping duties on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) imported from Japan. The review specifically focuses on the sales conducted by Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC) during the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. Summary of Findings Commerce preliminarily determined that NSC did not sell NOES at less than its normal value during this period. This means that NSC did not sell the steel in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. As a result, NSC’s weighted-average dumping margin for this period is 0.00 percent. This outcome suggests that NSC has complied with the rules and is not subject to additional antidumping duties. Background and Process The review was initiated on January 27, 2025, following requests in accordance with applicable regulations. Initially, Commerce aimed to complete its work by the end of 2025. However, due to a U.S. Federal Government shutdown and a backlog in processing documents, deadlines were extended. The review process included sending a detailed questionnaire to NSC and evaluating their responses. Methodology and Calculation The review used sections 772 and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to calculate the constructed export price and normal value respectively. This ensures a fair comparison between the domestic price of steel in Japan and the price at which it was sold in the U.S. Next Steps Commerce will disclose its calculations to the parties involved and intends to verify the findings before the final results. Interested parties have the opportunity to comment on these preliminary results. They can submit case briefs within seven days after the last verification report and rebuttal briefs within five days after that. Potential Impact If the final results confirm the preliminary findings, NSC will not face extra tariffs on its steel exports to the United States for the reviewed period. Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess entries of steel during this time, based on the final outcome. Upcoming Hearing and Comments Interested parties may request a hearing to discuss the issues further. Written requests must be submitted within 30 days from the notice’s publication date. Conclusion The preliminary results highlight the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Department of Commerce to maintain fair trading practices and protect domestic industries from unfairly priced foreign imports. Stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the review process to ensure robust trade policies continue. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Review on Raw Honey from Argentina Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its administrative review concerning antidumping duties on raw honey from Argentina. This process took place for the period starting June 1, 2023, and ending May 31, 2024. In this review, the Commerce Department discovered that some exporters were selling raw honey to the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value. This practice is known as “dumping,” and it can hurt U.S. producers by driving down prices unfairly. The enforcement of these results is part of Commerce’s effort to ensure fair competition. The review named specific Argentine companies, like ACA (Asociación De Cooperativas Argentinas Cooperativa Limitada) and NEXCO S.A., which were individually examined. ACA was found to have a dumping margin of 21.35%, while NEXCO had a margin of 0.00%, meaning no dumping was detected for NEXCO. For other companies that were not individually examined but still fall under this order, a weighted-average dumping margin of 21.35% has been determined. This margin is based on ACA’s calculated rate, consistent with the approach outlined in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. This section advises using the average rate of the companies investigated unless results are zero or based entirely on facts available. The process also encountered delays due to a federal government shutdown. This interruption extended timelines for case briefs and final analysis, ensuring a comprehensive review despite the challenges. Assessment rates will be calculated and instructed for all entries covered by this review. Certain entries by ACA and NEXCO will have specific rates or be liquidated at previous “all others” rates if neither firm knew the merchandise was U.S.-bound. These duties will be collected to adjust past and future consistency in pricing. Importers should note that cash deposit requirements following this review now reflect the updated rates. These deposits are required to ensure that any future dumping detected is offset. This measure continues the Department of Commerce’s efforts to protect U.S. industries from the adverse effects of unfair trade practices, such as dumping. The final results and actions are parts of a continuous process to provide a level playing field for domestic producers of raw honey and other goods. This notice confirms the compliance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Trade Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo: A Guide to Resolving the Issue Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes An error has occurred. The page you requested on the GovInfo website cannot be found. This issue is commonly referred to as a “Page Not Found” error. It means the web address or URL you tried to visit does not exist on the server. Steps to Report This Error: Contact Support: Please report this error to the GovInfo Support Team. You can contact them through the provided askGPO link. Provide Necessary Information: To help resolve the problem, provide the following details: The URL or web address you attempted to access. The steps you followed before encountering this error. Any specific search or browsing terms you used. A screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Additional Guidance: Help and Support: If you need further assistance, please visit the Help page for search tips and other resources. Return to Homepage: You can return to the GovInfo Homepage to continue browsing. Feedback and Contact: Submit feedback or contact GovInfo through their Contact page for any other inquiries or support needs. Your patience is appreciated while they work to resolve this issue. Thank you for aiding in improving the efficiency and accessibility of the GovInfo platform. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Error: Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 1 minute On March 1, 2022, an error message was reported on the GovInfo website indicating that a page could not be found. This error affects users trying to access information on the site. Details of the Error The error message is clear: “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” Users are advised to report the error to askGPO. They are encouraged to provide the URL of the page they attempted to visit, describe the steps that led to the error, and include any specific search or browse terms. A screenshot of the error page is also suggested to assist in resolving the issue. Resolution Efforts Users are directed to visit the askGPO page to report the error. The GovInfo team requests that users provide as much detail as possible. This includes the steps taken when the error occurred and the page’s URL. Such details will help the team fix the problem quickly. Contact and Further Information For further assistance, users can visit the homepage of GovInfo. Additional resources for searching and finding information are available through links provided on the site. Conclusion This error highlights the importance of user feedback in maintaining the functionality of government information websites. By reporting errors, users help ensure that the site remains a reliable source of government information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Changes Made to Antidumping Duty Review on Thai Shrimp Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-08 The United States Department of Commerce has updated the results of its review on antidumping duties for certain frozen shrimp exported from Thailand. These changes come after errors were found and corrected. The review covers a time period from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The review looked at whether shrimp from Thailand was sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. Companies must pay extra fees if they are found to be selling products below a fair price. Thai Union Group, one of the companies involved, pointed out mistakes that were affecting their final duty rates. These mistakes included errors in calculating specific rates for importers and in assigning costs. The American Shrimp Producers Association responded by saying Commerce usually sets its own costs for control numbers or sales. After looking into these concerns, the Department of Commerce changed the calculations to fix the errors. As a result, Thai Union’s dumping margin, which is a measure of how much they sold below fair value, is now set at 1.24 percent. This is a reduction from the earlier number of 2.01 percent. Other companies not individually reviewed also receive this new rate. Charoen Pokphand Foods, another company involved, was given a higher duty rate due to adverse facts available (AFA). This means they did not cooperate fully in the review. The duty rate for them changed from 17.38 percent to 26.66 percent after the corrections. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for collecting these duties from applicable entries. Items will be assessed using the amended results starting from February 20, 2026. Companies like Phatthana Frozen Food and Thai Union Manufacturing were found not to have shipped any shrimp to the U.S. during this review period. If an importer’s margin is too low, meaning less than 0.5 percent, they do not have to pay extra duties. The rate for all companies not included in this specific review will remain at 5.34 percent, as given by a previous decision. This rate is for situations where there are no individual company rates. The new rules are applied to shipments entering the U.S. after February 20, 2026. These changes make sure that shrimp imported from Thailand are sold at fair prices and protect American shrimp producers from unfair competition. The stakeholders are reminded of their duty to follow the rules mentioned in the Administrative Protective Order. The Department of Commerce will also notify importers of these cash deposit requirements. These updates help ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. The full details of the corrections and how they affect duties are available through the Department of Commerce and related publications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register: Final Review of Subsidies on Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Background Information The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has announced the final results of its Countervailing Duty Administrative Review on finished carbon steel flanges from India. This review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review began with preliminary results, which were shared on February 3, 2026. These results invited comments from interested parties. The review period looked at subsidies provided to producers and exporters of steel flanges from India. A document detailing all related issues and decisions is available online. Scope of the Order The review focused on finished carbon steel flanges imported from India. This is part of a countervailing duty order that has been in place to address subsidies that Indian companies might receive, which can affect fair trade. Findings and Methodology The review adhered to procedures set out by the Tariff Act of 1930. Countervailable subsidies are those where government financial support leads to specific benefits for producers and exporters. The review confirmed that Norma (India) Ltd. and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd., along with other companies, received such subsidies. Final Results Norma (India) Ltd. and its associated entities retained a subsidy rate of 2.40%. R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 2.27%. Non-examined companies were assigned a rate of 2.32%, based on the weighted average of the examined companies. Assessment and Cash Deposits The U.S. Department of Commerce will direct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on relevant imports. New cash deposit rates will be applied to shipments entering the U.S. These rates will reflect the subsidy rates from the review, unless they are below a minimal threshold. Conclusion The review ensures that actions taken are consistent with trade laws, maintaining fair competition by countering the effects of foreign government subsidies. This is intended to protect U.S. industry and workers from unfair trade practices. For more information, parties are encouraged to consult the official documents available online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.