Department of Commerce: Final Results of Review on Superabsorbent Polymers from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes Department of Commerce: Final Results of Review on Superabsorbent Polymers from Korea The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on Certain Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP) from the Republic of Korea. This review covered the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. The Commerce Department has determined that the SAP from Korea was not sold in the United States at less than the normal value. Specifically, the company reviewed, LG Chem, Ltd. (LGC), did not sell its SAP at unfair prices during this period. Therefore, there will be no antidumping duties applied to LGC’s SAP entries during this review period. Background and Process In May 2026, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the review. Stakeholders were invited to comment, but no feedback was received. The final decision remains unchanged from the preliminary findings. The administrative review ensured that imports from Korea complied fully with U.S. trade laws. The Department followed procedures outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930. Disclosure and Assessment Rates Since there were no changes from the preliminary results, the Department of Commerce will not release new calculation details. For entries made by LGC, customs will liquidate them without any duty because the final dumping margin is 0.00%. Cash Deposit Requirements The cash deposit rate for LG Chem, Ltd. will now be zero percent for future shipments. For companies not part of this review, the last determined rates will apply. If neither the exporter nor the producer was covered in past reviews, a rate of 26.05% would apply. Responsibilities and Reminders Importers must file certificates regarding antidumping duty reimbursements before the completion of the review process. The failure to file may result in penalties. Parties involved with confidential data in this review are reminded to return or destroy sensitive information according to the guidelines. These results are public and will be published in accordance with U.S. trade laws. This notice emphasizes the Department’s commitment to fair trade and its vigilance in monitoring compliance with trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Turkish Pipe Sold for Less Than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its review of large diameter welded pipe from Türkiye. It discovered that the pipe sold in the U.S. between May 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, was priced lower than normal. Elizabeth Beuley, from the Commerce Department, provided details. The review was part of the antidumping duty to check if products are sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The review showed that HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and another company, Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd, were selling the pipes at reduced prices. Both companies had a dumping margin of 1.89 percent. Usually, the Commerce Department shows how they calculate these results. But this time, no changes were made from a previous review, so there are no new calculations to show. Once the results are published, new cash deposit rates will start. These rates will apply to new shipments of the pipe from Türkiye. This decision is to make sure all companies play fair and help U.S. businesses compete equally. The Commerce Department will continue to review these cases to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Indian Freight Rail Couplers Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its investigation and has announced a final decision regarding subsidies for freight rail couplers and parts from India. The investigation covered the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Key Details from the Investigation The investigation found that producers and exporters of freight rail couplers from India received countervailable subsidies. This means that the government of India provided financial help to these companies, giving them an advantage in exporting these products. The U.S. Department of Commerce, also known as Commerce, worked on this case following a preliminary decision released on March 3, 2026. At that time, interested parties were given a chance to comment. The final decision was driven by detailed analysis and responses received during the verification process. Subsidy Rates Determined For the Indian company, Kharagpur Metal Reforming Industries Pvt Ltd, or KMRI, the determined subsidy rate is 9.71%. Another company, Texmaco Rail and Engineering Limited, received a much higher subsidy rate of 75%, based entirely on the information available because they did not fully cooperate with the investigation. Similarly, Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd and Jupiter Wagons Ltd were given a 75% rate. Other producers and exporters not specifically investigated received the same rate as KMRI, 9.71%. Next Steps and Potential Outcomes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is now involved. They will decide if the imported couplers from India are hurting the U.S. industry. If the ITC agrees that the U.S. industry is harmed, this means that companies importing such items will have to pay duties. On the other hand, if the ITC finds no harm, the investigation will end without such duties. Suspension of Liquidation Following the preliminary decision, Commerce had instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect deposits and stop liquidation of the items involved. This began on March 3, 2026. On July 1, 2026, provisional measures were no longer in effect, so they stopped the suspension but will resume if the ITC finds harm. This ensures that duties may be applied in the event of a final affirmative injury determination. Conclusion The Department of Commerce has taken a keen interest in ensuring fair trade practices are followed. The decision in this investigation emphasizes the importance of compliance and cooperation by international trade partners. This complex investigation reflects Commerce’s ongoing efforts to uphold fair trade and protect domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Decision on Korean Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Period of Review The review covered sales from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Findings The Department determined that OCTG from Korea were sold in the United States at less than their normal value during this period. This means that certain Korean sellers were selling these products at lower prices in the U.S. than in Korea. Key Companies Involved The review specifically examined two companies: NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. Their respective weighted-average dumping margins were calculated as follows: NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.: 29.94% SeAH Steel Corporation: 9.80% For other companies not individually examined, a simple average margin of 19.87% was applied. Process Details The U.S. Department of Commerce relied on several methodologies to determine these figures. They used U.S. benchmark prices for market adjustments and calculated constructed value (CV) profits and selling expenses for the companies involved. Impact on Duties As a result of these findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess antidumping duties accordingly. The CBP will follow specific instructions to apply these duties based on the determined margins. Cash Deposit Rates The Department set new cash deposit requirements for subject merchandise shipped on or after the publication date of these results. The cash deposit rate will be based on the dumping margin established in this review. Next Steps The Department will disclose the final calculations within five days of the publication of these results. There is a possibility for companies to challenge this decision in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which could delay the assessment procedures. This announcement serves as a reminder for importers to file necessary documents regarding any reimbursement of antidumping duties. Compliance is essential to avoid additional charges. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to monitor and enforce trade laws to ensure fair competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies from China on Tris Exporters Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding subsidies on a chemical product known as Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, or simply Tris, from the People’s Republic of China. This determination was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 184, on September 24, 2026. Tris is a chemical used in various applications, including pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. The investigation covers the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. According to the Department of Commerce, some producers and exporters from China are receiving government subsidies that affect the U.S. market. The case was initiated as part of an effort to determine whether Chinese producers of Tris are receiving unfair financial support from their government. Such subsidies can make it difficult for U.S. producers to compete. The Department of Commerce postponed the preliminary determination, which was initially scheduled earlier, and shifted the date to September 18, 2026. The purpose of the delay was to conduct a thorough analysis and gather more evidence. In its investigation, the Department found that subsidies were indeed provided by the Chinese government to certain producers and exporters. One such company, Changzhou Peicheng Imp. & Exp. Co., was found to be benefiting from these subsidies. As a result, this company was given a rate based on adverse facts available, which is the highest rate determined in the investigation. Conversely, another firm, Suzhou Yacoo Science Co., Ltd., received a much lower subsidy rate compared to Changzhou Peicheng. The rate for “all others,” meaning companies not individually reviewed, is the same as the rate for Suzhou Yacoo. The investigation also considered the aspect of critical circumstances. This refers to the possibility of a surge in imports causing harm to local industries. The Department determined that such critical circumstances exist for Changzhou Peicheng but do not apply to Suzhou Yacoo and other companies. The final results of this investigation will be aligned with another investigation on antidumping measures, which is scheduled for February 1, 2027. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also be involved to determine if these imports are causing material injury to U.S. industry. In the meantime, the U.S. government has instructed customs officials to suspend the liquidation of Tris entries and hold them until a final decision is made. This means that imports of Tris from China will have extra checks and will require deposits to be made based on the preliminary subsidy rates. The U.S. government maintains transparency in these investigations by offering opportunities for public comment and holding hearings. This ensures that all stakeholders, including affected businesses and the general public, can be heard. The case represents the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Tapered Roller Bearings from China Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its review of trade duties on tapered roller bearings from China. This review looked at imports from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The review covered only one company called Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai). In this review, the Department decided that Tainai did not qualify for a “separate rate.” This means Tainai is treated as part of the larger group of Chinese companies, known as the “China-wide entity.” The rate for this group is 92.84%. Commerce first shared their initial findings on this matter on May 15, 2026. No one commented on these results. As a result, the final decision is the same as the preliminary one. The Department of Commerce will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply duties based on the China-wide rate. The public can expect these instructions to be shared in about 35 days. If there is a legal challenge, this process might take longer. New cash deposit rules will start once these final results are made public. These rules will affect shipments of the subject merchandise from China. If a Chinese company has a separate rate, that rate will remain the same. If not, the cash deposit will follow the China-wide rate of 92.84%. Importers must file a certificate to show they haven’t been reimbursed for these duties. This is based on the law, to avoid any penalties of double duties. The Department reminds everyone about handling business information responsibly. If anyone has protection under administrative protective orders, they should handle and return items as needed. These actions follow the sections of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are a routine part of trade law enforcement. The news reflects Commerce’s ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade and compliance with trade regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Review on Antidumping Duties of Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has finalized their review of antidumping duties on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period of September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Commerce has determined that these products were not sold at prices below their normal value during this time. This review involved two main companies: HiSteel Co., Ltd. and Dong-A-Steel Co., Ltd. Additional information was provided by Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. Commerce found that both HiSteel and Dong-A-Steel had no dumping margins, meaning their margins were zero percent. As a result, Kukje Steel, which was not individually reviewed, also received a rate of zero percent. For those not individually reviewed, Commerce used the same method as in previous cases. This means the rates for companies not selected for detailed review were calculated based on the zero margins of the reviewed companies, resulting in no dumping duties for these companies as well. Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how to assess duties. Since HiSteel and Dong-A-Steel had zero dumping margins and reported the value of their U.S. sales, CBP will not charge any antidumping duties on these entries. The report also mentions that Commerce extended deadlines during their review process. They initially extended the deadline by 53 days to September 9, 2026, and then extended it again by 7 days to September 16, 2026. New cash deposit requirements will be in place following the review’s publication. The cash deposit rate for companies reviewed will be zero percent. For other companies, the rate will follow past review results or remain at the standard rate if there’s no current data. Commerce highlights the responsibility of importers to file certificates concerning antidumping duty reimbursements properly. This ensures no issues with duties on future entries. The details and analysis of the review are outlined in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available publicly through the Commerce’s electronic system. Overall, the review concluded with no evidence of dumping by the main companies reviewed, and as such, there will be no new antidumping duties applied to affected imports from Korea. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Findings on Copper Pipe Imports from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings regarding the import of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico. This review covers sales made during the period from November 1, 2024, to October 31, 2025. Findings on Nacional de Cobre The review finds that Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Cobre) sold copper pipe and tube in the U.S. at prices below their normal value. This practice is often referred to as “dumping,” as it can harm domestic manufacturers by undercutting prices. As a result, a preliminary antidumping duty margin of 56.43% has been determined for Cobre. Partial Rescission The review has been partially rescinded for two companies: GD Affiliates S. De R. L. de C.V. (Golden Dragon) and IUSA, S.A. de C.V. (IUSA). This means that these two companies are no longer subject to this particular review process. The decision to rescind the review for these companies comes after domestic interested parties withdrew their requests for review. Methodology Used The U.S. Department of Commerce relied on facts available to determine Cobre’s dumping margin since Cobre failed to provide necessary information. The Department also applied an adverse inference, which means they assumed less favorable facts due to Cobre’s lack of cooperation in providing information. Public Comment Invitation Interested parties are invited to submit comments on these preliminary results. The deadlines for these comments are strictly set: case briefs must be submitted within 14 days of the notice’s publication, and rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Any party wishing for a hearing must request it within 14 days. Future Implications For Cobre, the determined antidumping margin will affect all shipments made on or after the final results of this review are published. The calculated deposit rates will apply to future entries until there are further changes. Conclusion This announcement from the Department of Commerce indicates serious actions against certain imports of copper pipes and tubes from Mexico, notably impacting Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. The final results of this administrative review will provide clearer directions and any adjustments on duties applied. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chinese Tin Mill Products Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a preliminary report indicating that tin mill products from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the United States at prices below fair value. This decision is crucial as it affects the pricing and competition standards within the U.S. market. Timeframe and Investigation Details The period of investigation for this case includes transactions between October 1, 2025, and March 31, 2026. The Department of Commerce urges interested parties to provide comments on this preliminary determination, to help ensure a fair and thorough analysis. Products Under Investigation The inquiry centers around tin mill products, which are flat-rolled steel products coated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides. These products include tinplate and tin-free steel, essential materials in packaging and manufacturing industries. Scope Adjustments The investigation has undergone scope modifications based on feedback. Certain steel tapes used specifically in telecommunications are excluded from the inquiry due to their specialized nature. Determinations Made Dumping Margin: The estimated average dumping margin for the Chinese entities is set at 136.52%. Critical Circumstances: The investigation found that imports from China might have caused injury to the U.S. domestic industry. Because of this, imports of these products that entered the U.S. around three months before this notice may be subjected to backdated duties. Suspension and Cash Deposit Requirements From the date this notice is published, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend the liquidation of entries and require cash deposits equal to the identified dumping margin. These cash deposits could adjust based on future reviews or findings, especially related to subsidies. Next Steps and Public Participation Further assessments and comments are welcomed, which may influence the final determination due in approximately 75 days. Interested parties are encouraged to participate actively by reviewing detailed methodologies and submitting feedback. This preliminary ruling by the U.S. Department of Commerce is a significant move to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from potential injury due to unfair trade practices. It reflects the ongoing efforts to maintain a balanced international trade environment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Determines Dalmine Sold Tubing Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Findings of the Review The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review concerning certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel from Italy. The review focused on the activities of the company Dalmine S.p.A. during the period extending from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Commerce found that Dalmine sold the tubing in the United States at prices lower than the normal value. This determination was made under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The findings align with the preliminary results released earlier by Commerce on May 14, 2026. Antidumping Duty Determination Dalmine was assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 68.95 percent. This margin was calculated using adverse facts available, a measure applied due to lack of necessary information provided by the company. Assessment and Cash Deposits Commerce decided that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess antidumping duties according to these final results. A specific rate of 68.95 percent will be applied to all entries of Dalmine’s tubing during the review period. For future shipments, a cash deposit rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin is required for Dalmine’s merchandise. This rate will take effect upon publication and remain until further notice. Other Producers and Exporters In the absence of specific producer or exporter information for other companies during this review, Commerce will continue using rates from previously completed reviews. These include a default “all-others” rate set at 47.87 percent ad valorem. Compliance and Notices Importers must file a certificate concerning the reimbursement of duties prior to the liquidation of entries. Non-compliance could lead to the assumption of duty reimbursement and further assessments. This notice reaffirms the responsibilities of parties holding sensitive information under an Administrative Protective Order, ensuring proper handling and disposition. Commerce remains committed to thorough assessments to enforce fair trade laws, maintaining an equitable trading environment for U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping in Solar Products from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final results concerning the sale of crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, or solar products, from Taiwan. The findings come from an administrative review for the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The review checked if these products were sold in the United States at prices below what they cost normally. During this time, a company called EEPV Corp. was examined closely. The Department of Commerce found that EEPV Corp. did not sell their solar products at unfairly low prices. This means that EEPV did not dump products during the review period. As a result, their dumping margin, which shows unfair pricing, was found to be 0.00 percent. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection not to charge extra duties on these imports from EEPV. This is because their pricing did not break any rules. Instead, these entries will be processed like regular imports. For companies not covered under this review period, usual rules and duties still apply. If products were from a producer or exporter not previously examined, standard rates might be used. The Department of Commerce is quite clear about the next steps. They plan to issue instructions for processing imports. These directions will be given to Customs in around 35 days, provided no legal challenges arise. Cash deposit rules will also change. For EEPV, future shipments will not need extra deposits for now. But if a producer is not covered in the review, the previous rates will still apply. This decision is important for importers. They must be careful to follow rules about filing certificates. These documents say they haven’t been refunded antidumping duties. If they don’t, they could face double duties. In short, the Department of Commerce’s findings show EEPV’s fair pricing during the review year, which affects how their products will be treated when entering the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Amends Antidumping Duty on Korean Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a crucial decision about wind towers from Korea. This decision was not in agreement with the previous results from the U.S. Department of Commerce. The decision affects the antidumping duty review for the period from August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. The Department of Commerce is now changing the results of that review. Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd., a company from Korea, had to change how its dumping margin was calculated. The Court of International Trade agreed with the new calculations for Dongkuk’s costs. This means the final dumping margin for Dongkuk is now slightly lowered. From a former rate of 1.95%, the new dumping margin is now 1.90%. Even though the dumping margin has changed, Dongkuk won’t see a change in its current cash deposit rate. This is because there have been newer results since the 2021-2022 review. Currently, the liquidation of Dongkuk’s entries is on hold by order of the court. If this decision is not appealed, or the appeal favors the court’s decision, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs to assess antidumping duties accordingly. This decision is an important update in the ongoing monitoring and regulation of international trade duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Trade Regulations on L-Lysine from China: Import Duties Announced Estimated reading time: 4-5 minutes Background On July 23, 2026, Commerce announced its final decision that L-lysine from China was being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. Additionally, it was determined that Chinese producers received unfair subsidies for L-lysine production. The ITC later confirmed that these imports have harmed U.S. industries. Scope of the Orders The orders cover animal feed grade L-lysine. This includes various forms like lysine HCL, lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. The products may also be mixed with other substances but only the lysine component is covered by the orders. Antidumping Duty Order Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on relevant L-lysine entries from China. These duties apply to products entered on or after March 6, 2026, when initial determinations were published. A cash deposit reflecting the estimated dumping margins must be made for future imports. Key Details Different producers and exporters are assigned specific dumping margins, with some based on adverse facts available, which means higher penalty rates apply due to lack of cooperation from some organizations. Countervailing Duty Order Similarly, the CVD order results from findings that Chinese producers benefit from unfair subsidies. Duties are now assessed on products entered on or after January 22, 2026. Like the AD order, unliquidated entries before the ITC’s final determinations will escape these duties. Maintaining Compliance Importers should ensure compliance with these new measures to avoid penalties. The orders are part of efforts to level the playing field for U.S. producers by countering unfair trade practices. While these orders aim to help U.S. industries, they highlight ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Importers should stay informed about such regulations to navigate the complex international trade landscape effectively. For more specific details like estimated weighted-average dumping margins or subsidy rates, refer to the Federal Register notice on these orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China Under Review for Dumping in U.S. Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is checking if some chemicals from China were sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. These chemicals, called chlorinated isocyanurates, are used mainly for cleaning purposes like in swimming pools. The review period is from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Commerce is looking into the sales of these chemicals by three Chinese companies: Achlor Chemical Ltd., Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd., and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. The review is part of an ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from low-priced imports that could hurt local businesses. However, Commerce found that Achlor Chemical Ltd. did not have any sales entries of these chemicals during the review period and decided not to include them in the current review. This leaves Heze Huayi and Kangtai as the only companies being reviewed for selling these chemicals at less than normal value. In the past, the China-wide rate for these chemicals was set at 285.63 percent. Since no one requested a fresh review of this overall rate, it remains unchanged in this evaluation. Commerce will be checking if Heze Huayi and Kangtai deserve a different rate based on their current sales activities. Preliminary results show that Heze Huayi has a dumping margin of 90.65 percent, while Kangtai has a margin of 72.63 percent. Businesses and other interested parties can send their comments to the Commerce department. They can also ask for a hearing if needed. All comments must be submitted electronically. Commerce aims to finish the review by the end of the year and expects to make the final results available 120 days after the current review’s publication date. Until then, the cash deposit rates for these companies will stay as decided in the final results of this review. Conclusion This review matters because it helps maintain fair pricing of imported goods and supports local industries. It also ensures that companies pay the correct duties when bringing products into the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Final Results on Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final results regarding the antidumping duty review of sodium nitrite imports from India. This review covered the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance division. Their findings show certain Indian producers and exporters sold sodium nitrite in the United States at prices less than normal value during this time. Key Outcomes: Deepak Nitrite Limited, an Indian producer, has been assigned a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd and Kutch Chemical Industries Ltd face a dumping margin of 42.76 percent. The review also included a decision to rescind the administrative review for non-examined companies, Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. This decision was based on the absence of suspended entries during the review period. Cash Deposit Requirements: The cash deposit rate for goods from companies reviewed is based on these results. Companies not reviewed will continue under their last known rate. For exports where the producer is covered but the exporter is not, the producer’s rate will apply. The all-others rate remains at 42.76 percent. Upcoming Actions: The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on applicable entries. These instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the announcement date. The report also reminds importers about their duty to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties. This compliance is important to avoid penalties. The review has been completed without any changes or revisions to the preliminary findings. The Commerce Department follows a set process for reviewing antidumping actions, and this review was conducted in line with those guidelines. The findings are official and published according to the regulations of the Trade Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Solar Cells from Indonesia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has concluded that crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Indonesia are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The final determination includes the period of investigation from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Background and Investigation Process The process began earlier this year in April when Commerce invited comments on its preliminary findings. By May, revisions and extensions were made to ensure accurate results. This comprehensive investigation led to a final determination by September 10, 2026. For gathering information, Commerce conducted a thorough verification of the records from PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. They examined relevant sales and costs. However, PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia did not provide required information, which resulted in Commerce using adverse facts available against them. Critical Circumstances Commerce has also determined that there are critical circumstances associated with the import of these solar cells from Indonesia. This finding suggests that significant injury was caused or threatened to the domestic industry due to sudden large volumes of imports. Application of Adverse Facts Available Due to the lack of cooperation from companies like Blue Sky, as well as the deficiency in complete information from REC Solar, Commerce determined the use of facts available with adverse inferences (AFA). Both companies have been assigned a high dumping margin as a result. Dumping Margins and All-Others Rate The estimated dumping margins for both PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia are 94.36 percent each. This rate is based on adverse facts available. The same rate applies to all other producers and exporters. Implications and Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend liquidation of these products at specified rates pending further instructions. This ensures compliance until a final antidumping order is issued, provided the U.S. International Trade Commission confirms the material injury. Scope of Investigation The investigation covers specific solar cells and modules from Indonesia. It includes solar cells of particular thickness and characteristics. Products like thin film photovoltaic cells and small integrated cells in consumer products are excluded. Commerce’s detailed examination of this case aims to protect the domestic industry from unfair trading practices by ensuring solar cells are sold at fair value in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies in Indonesian Solar Products Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a key decision concerning solar products from Indonesia. On September 16, 2026, the department made a final affirmative determination related to countervailable subsidies. This decision is aimed at crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. These are solar cells made from crystals and might be assembled into modules or panels. The investigation covered products from Indonesia for the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department believes that producers in Indonesia received help from their government to manufacture these solar products. This is called a subsidy. Sometimes, subsidies can lead to unfair pricing when these products are sold in other countries, including the U.S. Scope and Products Covered The product in question includes solar cells and modules, whether assembled or not. They help generate electricity from sunlight. However, it does not cover thin film products made from certain materials like amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS). It also excludes small cells in consumer goods, some small panels, and modules made elsewhere. The Commerce Department assessed various subsidy programs in Indonesia. They looked at evidence from different parties. The department also visited Indonesian companies like PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. This helped verify the information collected. Findings and Rates The investigation led to different subsidy rates for Indonesian companies. PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia faced a rate of 173.70%, which was based on facts available since complete data was not provided. Meanwhile, PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia was given a lower rate of 73.20%. This latter rate also applies to other Indonesian producers. Commerce also examined if these subsidies began affecting the U.S. sooner. They found “critical circumstances,” meaning imports surged, causing harm to U.S. businesses before the official investigation. This conclusion applies to Blue Sky but not to REC Solar. Next Steps The Commerce Department has asked the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to see if these subsidized imports harm U.S. industries. If the ITC confirms this, the Department will order duties on these imports. This means extra charges on these solar products when they come into the U.S. This decision can lead to changes in how solar cells are imported and traded. It aims to ensure fair competition for U.S. companies. Keep watching as this investigation wraps up and further decisions are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Decides on Solar Cells from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision about solar cells from Laos. They say that these solar cells are being sold in the U.S. at prices that are too low. They also think some imports from Laos might hurt American businesses. The time they looked at for their investigation was from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. This decision was made final on September 16, 2026. Solar cells are devices that turn sunlight into electricity. The ones from Laos were investigated to see if they are priced less than they should be. Investigation Background The investigation began when Commerce published a preliminary decision in April 2026. They asked people to give comments about the decision. By September 10, 2026, they had to make a final decision. The decision includes how much lower the prices of these solar cells are compared to fair value. Commerce also looked at whether there were unusual price drops that needed attention. Companies Involved The main company in Laos that was looked at is Solarspace Technology (Laos). Another company, SolarSpace Technology (Hong Kong), is considered the same as Solarspace for this investigation. There are other companies involved too, like JA Solar and Trina Solar from Vietnam and Thailand. Critical Circumstances The decision also talks about “critical circumstances.” This means that certain imports from Laos could cause quick and severe harm to U.S. industries. For most companies, they found these circumstances to be true, but not for Solarspace. Separate Companies Not all companies are treated the same. Some companies got their own special rates because they showed they are separate from the larger group. Final Decision The U.S. Department of Commerce decided on the following points: The solar cells from Laos are priced too low in the U.S. Some companies have special rates for their exports. Solarspace and SolarSpace (Hong Kong) are treated as one company. The overall weighted average dumping margin is set at 65.43%. Next Steps The U.S. has taken steps to make sure these lower-priced solar cells from Laos don’t hurt U.S. businesses. They have asked the U.S. Customs to keep a close watch on these imports. If the U.S. International Trade Commission also finds that these imports harm U.S. businesses, there will be more taxes on these imports. This is called an “antidumping duty order.” If no harm is found, there will be no extra charges. This investigation is part of making sure trade is fair and does not harm businesses in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Solar Cells from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes What is Happening? The U.S. Department of Commerce found that some producers and exporters of these solar cells in Laos are receiving subsidies. A subsidy is when a government provides financial support to businesses, which can help make their products cheaper in other countries. The Investigation This investigation looked at activities from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Solar cells from Laos were checked to see if they were receiving benefits from their government that were unfair. Final Results The Department found out that companies like Solarspace Technology in Laos benefited from these subsidies. One company, Vietnam Sunergy, was found to be receiving significant help. Because of this, specific extra charges called countervailing duties will be put on these products when they come into the U.S. Critical Circumstances The announcement also mentioned “critical circumstances.” This term refers to situations where imports might have increased a lot quickly. The Department found that, for some companies, these circumstances applied, and extra duties will apply starting from a date 90 days earlier than when the first decision was made public. Verification and Methodology The decision included looking at documents and checking information during the summer of 2026. This is called verification. The process was thorough to make sure all details were correct. Impact The impact of this decision is that certain products from Laos will now cost more when they enter the United States. This pricing change aims to balance out the extra help Lao companies receive from their government. Further Steps The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if the U.S. industry suffers because of these imports. They will complete this decision within 45 days. Conclusion This significant ruling by the Department of Commerce shows its dedication to ensuring fair competition in the markets. As this process continues, there may be further developments based on the ITC verdict. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Indian Solar Cells Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about certain solar cells from India. These are called crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells. The Department says they were sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This happened during the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. What Was Decided? The decision, published on September 16, 2026, means that these solar cells were not priced fairly when sold in the U.S. This decision follows an earlier report from April 28, 2026, where Commerce said it found similar issues. Important Companies Several Indian companies were involved. These include Mundra Solar PV Limited, Mundra Solar Energy Limited, Kowa Company Ltd, and Premier Energies Photovoltaic Private Limited. They were all part of this decision. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce also found something called “critical circumstances.” This means urgent action was needed because of how the solar cells were being sold. This is true for the companies named above. What Happens Next? For these companies, duties will be applied to their products from January 28, 2026. This date is important because it’s before the first report from April 2026. Rates and Duties The companies will have to pay an estimated extra fee of 123.04% on their solar cell exports to the U.S. Other producers and exporters will also have to pay this fee. What About Others? If a company was not investigated but makes these solar cells, it must also pay the extra fee. This ensures that all similar products are treated the same way. Future Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will check if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If they agree, the decisions and fees will become permanent. Conclusion This move by the Department aims to protect U.S. businesses and ensure fair trade. By adjusting the fees, the Department seeks to level the playing field for American companies involved in solar cell production. The next step involves further review by the ITC to ensure U.S. industries are not adversely affected by these imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Reports Affirmative Determination on Solar Cells from India Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The Department of Commerce has concluded its investigation into subsidies for crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, also known as solar cells, from India. It has determined, with finality, that Indian producers and exporters of these solar cells receive unlawful subsidies that benefit and support their production. This investigation covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. In line with U.S. trade laws, the Department of Commerce found that some companies in India, such as Mundra Solar Energy Limited and Mundra Solar PV Limited, receive financial benefits from their government that give them an unfair advantage in the marketplace. These benefits are called countervailable subsidies. The Commerce Department’s findings also identify that critical circumstances exist for these companies. Critical circumstances refer to instances where massive imported quantities of subsidized products can potentially harm U.S. industries before trade measures can take effect. Importantly, the report covers solar cells that are not fully assembled into other products, such as modules and laminates, which were temporarily assembled or partially made. However, the report specifies which goods are not covered. For instance, certain small solar panels permanently integrated into consumer goods which are not primarily for power generation, and some panels used for special applications, are not included. The Commerce Department has ruled that the producers in India will face countervailing duties, which are financial charges on their imported goods. These duties aim to level the playing field by offsetting the unfair financial advantage provided through subsidies. While the investigation notes instances where particular Indian producers and exporters did not cooperate, the department based its findings on facts otherwise available, using adverse presumptions. This means if a company didn’t participate, the Commerce Department assumed the worst-case scenario regarding their subsidy benefits. For other Indian producers not reviewed individually, a general rate of 126.09 percent has been applied, which is calculated following regulatory guidelines. The International Trade Commission (ITC) must now make a decision within 45 days on whether these subsidized imports have harmed or could harm American industries. Should the ITC agree with the affirmative findings, a countervailing duty order will be issued by the Commerce Department. This ensures all imports of the subsidized product will face the same duties, helping protect U.S. jobs and industries. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce finds itself aligned with regulations to foster fair trade, ensuring a level playing field for American companies against unfair foreign advantages. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.