US International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews for Chassis and Subassemblies from China
Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. These reviews are to determine if lifting the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on chassis and subassemblies from China would cause harm to the U.S. industry.
The reviews are under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC uses these reviews to decide if removing duties would lead to problems for U.S. companies making similar products.
The Commission decided on July 6, 2026, that the domestic group’s response was enough. However, the response from the Chinese side was not enough. They saw no reason to conduct full reviews and will proceed with expedited reviews.
The staff report with all relevant information is put in the nonpublic record. Those under the Administrative Protective Order can access this report from October 5, 2026. Later, a public version will be provided.
Interested parties that responded to the review notice or are part of the process can send written comments. The deadline for comments is October 13, 2026. These comments are important for the Commission’s final decision.
Commerce might extend its time to complete reviews. If that happens, comments on Commerce’s final results are due three business days post-results. Comments should not include new factual information.
These reviews are declared extraordinarily complicated. Thus, the Commission has decided to potentially extend the review period by 90 days.
Comments should follow all rules. This includes serving documents to all parties involved and filing a certificate of service.
This entire process is under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The notice about the reviews was published on September 29, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission.
Legal Disclaimer
This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
