U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Trade Review Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has released the final results of an important review. This review looked at certain steel plate products from the Republic of Korea. The review focused on cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate products. These are special steel products used in different industries. The review covered sales made between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The Department found that the steel plates were sold in the United States at prices below what they should be. This is called “dumping.” Dumping can harm U.S. producers who cannot compete with such low prices. Two companies from Korea were named in the review: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. had a dumping margin of 1.18%. Hyundai Steel Company had a margin of 0.94%. This means they sold their products for less than the normal value. The products studied are made of hot-rolled carbon-quality steel. Some of these are known as universal mill plates and have special shapes and thicknesses. Certain types and grades of steel were not included in the review. After the review, the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how much extra duty or tax to collect when these products enter the United States. This is based on the dumping margins found during the review. Also, the Department set cash deposit rates. This is the money importers must pay upfront as a form of guarantee when such products enter the U.S. from Korea. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. will have a 1.18% rate, while Hyundai Steel Company will have a 0.94% rate. If these rates are less than 0.50%, the deposit will be zero as it is considered too small. These measures seek to ensure fair competition. They help protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by foreign companies. The detailed instructions from the Department of Commerce will be issued soon. These will guide how the duties and deposits are handled by customs officials. The cash deposit rates will stay effective until further notice. This action shows how the U.S. is actively reviewing and enforcing fair trade practices. Such measures aim to protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. This is an important step in maintaining healthy trade relationships, ensuring that American industries do not suffer from unfair pricing by foreign competitors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Review on Thermal Paper from Korea Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review regarding the sale of thermal paper from the Republic of Korea. This review was part of an ongoing examination into whether the sole producer/exporter of this paper sold it for less than its usual price during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The results are significant. The Department of Commerce found that the exporter, Hansol Paper Company, did not sell thermal paper at a lower price than the normal value during this time. This means Hansol is not required to pay any additional duties. The Commerce Department had initially included another company, Tele-Paper (M) Sdn. Bhd., in the review. However, they later decided to remove Tele-Paper from consideration. This decision was due to the withdrawal of review requests from interested parties concerning Tele-Paper. In terms of what this means going forward, Hansol Paper Company will have a cash deposit rate of zero. This rate is important because it determines future trade duties. Other companies not involved in this review will continue with their previous rates. For importers, it is critical to file certificates that confirm they have not been reimbursed for duties on these goods. This step is necessary to avoid paying double customs duties. Also, companies with access to sensitive information, under the administrative protective order, must ensure they handle this data responsibly to avoid legal problems. Overall, the Department of Commerce’s findings offer a clear path forward for all involved in the trade of thermal paper from Korea. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Review on Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China Announced by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings in its countervailing duty administrative review concerning wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, specifically by the Enforcement and Compliance arm. The review, which covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, has so far found that some producers and exporters of these materials did receive financial support from the Chinese government that might be countervailable. Background The review process began on March 28, 2025, following requests for an administrative examination of the existing countervailing duty order related to these products. In May 2025, the Department of Commerce picked two main companies, Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng) and Nanping Huatai Wood and Bamboo Co., Ltd. (Huatai), for further examination. However, Yinfeng later withdrew from participation. Key Findings The Department of Commerce has documented that the mandatory respondents, which include other companies like Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. (Hongjia), received subsidies, which allowed these companies to sell their products at lower prices than they might have otherwise. These subsidies were found to benefit these companies particularly and not equally available to others, falling under the category of “specific” subsidies. Furthermore, due to the withdrawal of requests for review by companies like Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd., the review for these specific firms has been halted. For other companies reviewed that didn’t actively participate during the review period, the Department of Commerce is concluding its review process. Next Steps The results and calculations made by the U.S. Department of Commerce are subject to a public comment period where interested parties can contribute feedback and perspectives. The deadline for public input will be shortly after the verification reports are issued. It is anticipated that these comments will play a significant role in the final determination of subsidy rates. Moreover, affected companies must prepare for the possibility of higher duties based on the preliminary subsidy rates. The Department is working diligently to finalize these rates and determine the impact on trade. Conclusion The results from this review and claims of countervailable subsidies raise concerns about competitive fairness and market integrity. Interested parties and related stakeholders should closely monitor updates from this ongoing review to understand better how it may affect the trade of wood mouldings and millwork products between China and the United States. The U.S. Department of Commerce remains committed to maintaining balanced and fair trade practices. For more information, contact the Department of Commerce or view the complete preliminary decision documentation directly through the U.S. government’s electronic service system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Receives Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-05-08 Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has received several applications related to scope rulings. These applications ask for scope inquiries to find out if certain products fall under antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Scope Ruling Applications Every month, the Commerce Department informs the public about these scope ruling applications. The notice for March 2026 is out, and it lists several applications. Here are some examples: Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from China Product: Stone-Coated Metal Roofing Tiles. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: La Viata Investment Firm LLC. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Certain Steel Racks and Parts from China Product: 4T Ergo Shelf Subassemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: K. Hartwall Oy Ab. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China Product: Salon Vanity Desks. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: Vanity Dreams LLC. Application Date: March 20, 2026. Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from China Product: MRCOOL® Pre-Charged Line Set Assemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: HVAC Distributing, LLC. Application Date: March 23, 2026. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from China Product: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules. Produced in and exported from Vietnam. Applicants: JA Solar Vietnam Company Limited, JA Solar USA Inc., and others. Application Date: March 27, 2026. Understanding the Process The process for handling scope ruling applications involves several steps. Once an application is filed, the Department has 30 days to either reject it or start an inquiry. If nothing happens in 30 days, the application is automatically accepted, and an inquiry begins on the next business day. In some cases, if more than one order covers the same product, the inquiry will be done on the AD record. The Department may decide to apply its ruling to all products from the same country that are similar in nature or limit it to specific companies. Public Participation and Notifications Interested parties can participate in these scope inquiries. They must file an entry to join the public service list for the inquiry segment they are interested in. If individuals want to receive updates, they can request inclusion in the annual inquiry service list. It’s important for parties to follow procedures to be officially involved. Conclusion These applications help determine if certain goods fall under trade regulations meant to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The public can view detailed information and participate in procedures regarding these applications through online platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping on Strontium Chromate from France Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the antidumping duties regarding strontium chromate from France. The review examined the sales made by Société Nouvelle des Couleurs Zinciques (SNCZ) in the United States within the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It was determined that SNCZ did not sell strontium chromate at less than the normal value during this period. This means SNCZ was not dumping the product at unfairly low prices in the U.S. market. The preliminary results show a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent for SNCZ. This indicates that the sales were made at fair prices. Interested parties can provide comments on these preliminary results. The agency responsible for this review is the Enforcement and Compliance Division of the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. The process began with an antidumping order on strontium chromate from France issued on November 27, 2019. An order provides measures to protect the domestic market from products sold below market value. Following a request from Lumimove Inc., who are doing business as WPC Technologies, an administrative review was initiated on December 18, 2025. The review examines whether dumping occurred during the specified period. Adjustments had to be made during the review process due to various delays. The deadlines for issuing the preliminary results were extended several times. These changes included a 90-day tolling of deadlines in December 2024, a further extension in September 2025, and additional delays owing to a federal government shutdown and related issues. A more detailed explanation of the review process can be found in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. This document is publicly available online, and interested parties can access it for deeper insights. The next steps in the review process involve public comments and a potential hearing. Interested parties are encouraged to submit written comments. These written submissions must follow a specific format and should be filed electronically. The deadline for submitting comments is seven days after the last verification report is issued. Following this, rebuttals to the initial comments may also be submitted. Any requests for a hearing must also be made electronically, and specific information such as a list of issues to be discussed must be provided. The final results of the administrative review are expected within 120 days of the notice publication. Depending on these results, the Department will determine if antidumping duties will need to be adjusted or maintained. Until the final determination is made, cash deposit requirements aligned with the preliminary results will stay in effect. If any adjustments are needed, updates will be announced in the Federal Register. This review ensures fair competition and protects U.S. companies from unfair pricing practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duty on Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review concerning the antidumping duty on wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review is crucial to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by international competitors. On February 16, 2021, the antidumping duty order was first placed on Chinese wood mouldings and millwork products. The order was meant to prevent products sold below their fair value, a practice known as dumping. Dumping can hurt domestic businesses by making it hard for them to compete with cheaper imports. In this case, the products made in China could harm American producers if not priced fairly. In January 2026, the Department of Commerce began a routine five-year review of this order. This is known as a sunset review, as it determines whether the order should continue or “sunset.” The Department evaluates if removing the order would result in continued dumping. A group called the Coalition of American Millwork Producers supported continuing the antidumping duty. This group includes several U.S. companies, like Best Moulding Corporation and Sierra Pacific Industries, which produce similar products domestically. The Department of Commerce looked at all the information and decided to continue the order. They believe that dumping would likely continue or recur if the order were canceled. The review found that the dumping margins, or the difference in selling price, could be as high as 231.60 percent. This means products from China could potentially be sold at prices much lower than what is considered fair. The agency’s findings are meant to help preserve the health of U.S. industries and ensure competitive pricing. By maintaining these duties, the U.S. aims to protect its producers from unfair market practices. The final results and decisions are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. For further information, interested parties can reach out to David De Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Overall, these actions safeguard U.S. industries against unfair pricing and ensure a level playing field for domestic and international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Countervailing Duty Order on Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized a review of countervailing duties on wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. These duties are important charges placed on imported goods, like wood products, to counteract any unfair advantages from government subsidies in the exporting country. The original order on these wood products was published on February 16, 2021. On January 2, 2026, the Department started a special review called a “sunset review.” This type of review helps decide if duties should continue or end after five years. On January 20, 2026, the Coalition of American Millwork Producers, a group representing U.S. manufacturers, expressed their interest in the review. They wanted to participate because they make similar products in the U.S. The Coalition believes that the duties should continue. By February 2, 2026, the Coalition submitted a detailed response. However, the Government of China and other interested parties did not respond with sufficient reasons or information to oppose the duties. So, the Department of Commerce carried out a quick evaluation, finishing the review in 120 days. The Department determined that stopping the duties might lead to subsidies returning, which could harm U.S. producers. As a result, the duties will stay in place. Specifically, the subsidy rates are 28.17% for Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd., 252.29% for Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and 40.33% for all other producers. This decision helps safeguard U.S. manufacturers from unfair competition due to subsidies provided to some Chinese exporters by their government. It continues to ensure that the playing field is even for American businesses making similar products. The public can access detailed documents and further information about the review through the Department of Commerce’s electronic service system, ACCESS. This system allows people to view decisions and understand the actions taken to protect U.S. industries. The Department has reminded all parties involved to handle the proprietary information responsibly and follow the rules when dealing with confidential data. The decision to keep the duties aims to support U.S. jobs and ensure that American companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-05-05 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of an antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) from China. This decision follows determinations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Their findings suggest that doing away with the order could lead to continued unfair trading practices and harm to U.S. industries. Background The antidumping duty order for THFA from China was first introduced in August 2004. This order was put in place to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by Chinese exporters. Over the years, multiple reviews have been conducted to evaluate whether the order should stay. The recent review process involved both Commerce and the ITC. Findings Commerce determined that removing this order might lead to a recurrence of dumping, which refers to exporting goods at unfairly low prices. This action can harm U.S. market competition. The ITC supported this view, stating that removing the order could lead to injuries for U.S. industries in the foreseeable future. Product Details Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) is the product in question. It is a clear, water-like liquid but can appear pale yellow. THFA is part of a group of chemicals called furans. It can mix with water and dissolve in many other liquids. THFA is classified under a specific code in the U.S. Tariff Schedule, known as HTSUS subheading 2932.13.00.00. Impact Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will still collect cash deposits linked to these duties on incoming THFA. This continuation seeks to ensure fair market conditions for U.S. manufacturers. Future Actions Commerce plans to start another round of reviews within five years. These reviews aim to check if the order should continue or if conditions have improved, allowing for its removal. Conclusion This decision is seen as an essential step in safeguarding U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair pricing practices from Chinese exporters. By continuing the antidumping order, the U.S. seeks to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results on Frozen Shrimp from India Antidumping Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the import of frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review covers the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The preliminary findings indicate that some producers or exporters from India sold shrimp in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. The Department of Commerce has an important role in enforcing trade laws. It is checking to see if foreign companies are “dumping” products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The review specifically looked at several companies in India, including Devi Fisheries Limited and Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited. The Department calculated a dumping margin for these companies. This margin shows how much lower the prices were than they should have been. For Devi Fisheries Limited and related entities, the margin was found to be 2.36 percent, and for Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited, it was 4.30 percent. Other Indian companies not individually examined in the review have been assigned an average dumping margin of 3.33 percent. This average is calculated based on the margins of the companies that were individually examined. The report explains that when the dumping margin is de minimis, or less than 0.5 percent, Customs and Border Protection may not assess duties on those imports. The document also states how duties will be used by Customs for all relevant entries during this reviewed period. The Commerce Department plans to make the results final within 120 days after publishing these preliminary findings. Until then, interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. It is important for companies involved in the seafood industry to be aware of these developments as they can impact import practices and duty liabilities. This preliminary review is part of ongoing efforts by the Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to protect local businesses in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically its International Trade Administration, has recently announced the results of its review concerning certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. In the summary published on May 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce confirmed that if the countervailing duty (CVD) order on these tires is revoked, it would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies from China. The countervailing duty order was first established on August 10, 2015. The idea behind the CVD order is to offset subsidies provided by foreign governments, which can make products from those countries cheaper and harm domestic industries in the United States. This order is specifically against tires from the People’s Republic of China. The review process started on January 2, 2026, as part of the second sunset review. Sunset reviews happen every five years to determine if the duties should continue. On January 14, 2026, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, a domestic interested party, filed a notice to participate in this review. This group claims to represent industries involved in the production of similar products in the United States. The department received adequate information from the domestic interested party. However, there was no substantial response from the Government of China or any related parties. This led the Department of Commerce to undertake an expedited review process for 120 days. The review’s findings showed that if the order is lifted, countervailable subsidies likely to continue would have significant rates. For GITI Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd., the rate is 38.15%. For Cooper Kunshan Tire Co., Ltd., it’s 21.68%. Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd. faces even a higher rate of 116.73%. Other producers and exporters would have an all-encompassing rate of 31.56%. These findings underline the necessity to keep the duty in place, ensuring no unfair advantage to foreign producers that might harm the U.S. tire industry. This announcement also serves as a reminder regarding the return or destruction of any proprietary information shared under Administrative Protective Orders. Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to penalties. The decision is documented in the Federal Register and was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on April 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Continues Antidumping Duties on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. The aim of the review was to decide if the antidumping duties should continue. The review began on January 2, 2026. It involved checking if dumping would likely continue or happen again if the duties were removed. The duties were first put in place in August 2015. They were added because Chinese tires were being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The domestic interested party, representing U.S. workers, was the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union. They filed a notice to participate on January 14, 2026. The Department of Commerce did not receive responses from any party representing the Chinese industry. This is called a “non-response” situation. As a result, an expedited review took place. This means a quicker decision was made without further investigation. The final decision stated that removing the duties would likely cause dumping to continue or happen again. The dumping margins, or the price differences, could be as high as 87.99 percent if the duties were removed. This decision means the duties will stay in place to protect U.S. industries and jobs from unfair pricing practices by Chinese manufacturers. The conclusion was reached in a document called the “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” The U.S. Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for transparency and fairness in global trade. The decision is intended to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. The review process is important for maintaining fair trade conditions. The Department of Commerce helps decide when duties are necessary to protect domestic industries. This notice serves as a reminder for all parties involved in the trading of tires to comply with the rules set forth to ensure fair competition. Any proprietary information involved should be handled according to the regulations. Overall, the decision highlights the ongoing importance of trade regulations and their enforcement in protecting domestic markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited first sunset reviews. These reviews focus on the existing antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, also known as PC strand. PC strand is a type of steel wire used in making strong concrete structures. It is designed for use in prestressed concrete applications, both pretensioned and post-tensioned. These reviews involved several countries, including Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates. The Department of Commerce found that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of the PC strand in the U.S. This means foreign companies might sell PC strand at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. manufacturers. As a result, the U.S. plans to keep the antidumping duties in place. These duties are intended to stop or lessen the effects of dumping. The rates of these duties are different for each country. For instance, Argentina faces a duty rate of 60.40 percent, while Saudi Arabia has a much higher rate of 194.40 percent. These rates help ensure fair competition and protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. The original orders for these antidumping duties began on February 1, 2021. The sunset review process started in January 2026. Domestic U.S. producers showed strong support for keeping the duties. These producers sent their intent to participate in the review process and later provided detailed responses about why the duties should remain. There were no detailed responses from companies in the countries affected by the duties. Because there was no opposition, the Department of Commerce was able to complete the review quickly. This led to an expedited decision to extend the duties. The Department of Commerce’s decision is important. It helps control foreign pricing that could damage the U.S. PC strand industry. These duties have provided stability for U.S. producers, ensuring they can compete fairly. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of fair trade and the measures in place to protect domestic industries. The continuation of these duties maintains the balance in trade, allowing U.S. companies to thrive without unfair competition from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Potential Continuation of Trade Measures on Steel Wire from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings regarding the countervailing duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, known as PC strand, from the Republic of Türkiye. The decision could lead to ongoing trade measures. Background On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce introduced a countervailing duty order on PC strand from Türkiye. This was to address unfair subsidies given to producers in Türkiye. This year, they reviewed the order to see if it should continue. Recent Developments On May 4, 2026, the Commerce Department determined that removing the countervailing duty might result in continued unfair subsidies from Türkiye. By law, such reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether these orders should be ended or remain in place. Review Process In January 2026, a sunset review started. This process helps decide if trade measures like tariffs and duties should keep going. Three U.S. companies, Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp., showed interest as they make similar products in the U.S. The government of Türkiye and other interested parties were expected to give comments, but they did not. Because of this, the review was faster than usual. Findings The review found that ending the order might lead to more subsidies from Türkiye. Specific companies in Türkiye are likely to receive help from their government that could affect U.S. businesses. The report lists expected subsidy rates for these companies. Results The U.S. Commerce Department suggests keeping the duties. They believe removing them could harm U.S. companies by allowing cheaper, subsidized products from Türkiye back into the market. Conclusion This decision highlights the careful checks the Commerce Department conducts to ensure fair trade. By maintaining the duties, the intention is to support local U.S. producers and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of administrative reviews for multiple antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews are related to various products with March anniversary dates. The reviews are set to begin on May 4, 2026. Purpose of Reviews The reviews are being conducted to assess whether antidumping duties and countervailing duties on various products are being correctly applied. The reviews help ensure that foreign manufacturers are not selling goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also check if foreign governments are subsidizing their producers unfairly. Respondent Selection Process The Department will choose which companies, known as respondents, will be individually reviewed. The choices depend on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and questionnaires submitted by the companies. If the Department limits the number of respondents, it will use specific data to make selections. Notice of No Sales Sometimes, companies may not sell or export goods during the review period. If this is the case, companies should notify the Department within 30 days of the review’s start. The Department will then decide how to handle these cases. Deadline for Withdrawal and Market Situations Companies that request reviews can withdraw their request within 90 days from the start of the review. If there are special market situations affecting the cost of production, companies can inform the Department within 20 days after submitting their initial questionnaire responses. Establishing Separate Rates in NME Countries For companies in non-market economy (NME) countries, they need to prove they are not controlled by their government. If they provide sufficient proof, they can receive separate antidumping duty rates. Companies must submit appropriate applications or certifications to qualify. Certification for Combined Goods Some companies sell both subject and non-subject goods to the U.S. The Department may allow these companies to certify their eligibility based on their tracking systems. Companies wishing to establish eligibility must submit an application within 30 days. Timeframe The final results of these reviews are expected by March 31, 2027. This ensures timely assessment and adjusts any unfair practices. Regulations for Factual Information All factual submission in these reviews must comply with specific categories and timelines. Submissions also require accurate certification. Late submissions may not be accepted, keeping the process clear and organized. This structured review process by the Department of Commerce is crucial in maintaining fair trade practices and ensuring U.S. markets are not negatively impacted by unfair pricing or government subsidies from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to a previous notice about the common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. On April 9, 2026, the Commerce Department announced the final results of a review related to duties on these aluminum sheets for the year 2023 in the Federal Register. However, there was a mistake in the notice regarding the names of companies involved. The notice incorrectly stated that the subsidy rate applies to “Kibar Americas, Inc.” It should have said “Kibar Holding A.S.” This error has now been corrected. Additionally, a footnote was missing. The footnote is important because it tells us which companies are linked together. Specifically, it should have mentioned that the rate also applies to “TAC Metal Ticaret A.S.,” which is linked to “Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.” These corrections were officially published on May 4, 2026, in another Federal Register notice. This is crucial for ensuring that all interested parties have the correct information. The corrections are important for companies involved in international trade, as they affect how duties are applied. Proper reporting ensures fair practices in international commerce. For those needing more information, they can contact Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude at the U.S. Department of Commerce using the provided contact details. This correction notice is made in line with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific regulations that guide how reviews like these are to be published and corrected. The notice was signed and dated on April 29, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, a senior official in the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Releases Final Results on Canadian Welded Pipe Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the results of its review on the import of large diameter welded pipes from Canada from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration. In this review, the Department found that Pipe & Piling Supplies Ltd., a Canadian company, sold these pipes at prices lower than the normal value. This is known as ‘dumping.’ As a consequence, the company faces a penalty tariff, also known as a ‘dumping margin,’ of 50.89 percent. For Evraz Inc. NA, another Canadian company, the Department of Commerce found that they did not sell or ship these pipes to the United States during the review period. The Department used a method called ‘adverse facts available’ to decide on the penalty for Pipe & Piling. This means that if a company does not provide enough information during the investigation, the Department can use the best information available to make its decision. These penalties affect how much American importers pay when they bring these pipes into the U.S. The fees are set to make sure fair pricing is maintained and U.S. companies are not harmed by cheaper imports. Companies in the United States affected by these imports must follow certain rules. For example, they need to declare if they are getting a refund on these penalties before they sell the pipes. If they do not follow the rules, they could have to pay twice the penalty amount. The results of this review and the penalties will stay in place unless there is another review or change announced. The Department will give more instructions on how to handle these penalties to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The results of this review were made public on May 1, 2026, and anyone interested, like importers and consumers, can look up more detailed information about these decisions online or contact the Department directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unwrought Palladium from Russia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision regarding the sale of unwrought palladium from Russia. They have determined that this metal is being sold in the United States for less than its fair value. This investigation, conducted by the International Trade Administration, covered sales of unwrought palladium during the first half of 2025, from January 1 to June 30. The initial findings, shared on February 19, 2026, indicated that palladium from Russia was sold for less than it should be. No one challenged this preliminary decision. As a result, the final decision did not change from the initial one. The investigation focused on unwrought palladium, which is a form of palladium that includes items like ingots, blocks, lumps, and pellets. All these forms are covered, regardless of how they were produced. The U.S. Department of Commerce did not receive any comments about what products should be included in this investigation. This means the scope of their study remained unchanged. No Russian companies took part in the investigation. This led the Department to assume that all Russian producers of palladium were part of a group known as the “Russia-wide entity.” The Department applied a rule called “adverse facts available” to this group because they did not cooperate. As a result, the Russian producers of palladium face a dumping margin of 132.83 percent. This means that the palladium is considered to be sold for 132.83 percent less than its fair value. The Department of Commerce will keep requiring U.S. Customs and Border Protection to hold any imports of Russian palladium that arrive starting February 19, 2026. Importers must deposit an amount equal to the dumping margin before the goods are released. The U.S. Department of Commerce is also waiting to see if the International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these sales have harmed the U.S. market. This decision will come within 45 days. If the ITC agrees there is harm, steps will be taken to apply duties on these imports permanently. If not, the investigation and any measures will end. It is important for any parties involved to follow protective orders related to this investigation. These orders protect sensitive business information. Failure to do so can result in penalties. The announcement and the measures outlined reflect the Department’s commitment to fair trade practices. The case emphasizes the importance of regulations in maintaining market balance and protecting domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Korean Pipe Imports for Fair Trade Practices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of large diameter welded pipes imported from the Republic of Korea. This review focused on whether these pipes were sold at unfairly low prices in the United States during the period from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The results are now final. Final Determination The Department confirmed that one company, SeAH Steel Corporation, sold pipes at prices below what is normal. This means they sold their products in the U.S. more cheaply than they would in Korea. However, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., another company under review, did not sell its pipes below the normal value. Background Information Initially, the process for this review started with preliminary results published on August 29, 2025. The review looked at the activities of 23 producers and exporters from Korea. SeAH Steel Corporation and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. were chosen for close examination. Unexpected delays, including a government shutdown, interrupted this review. As a result, the deadline for final results was extended several times. The current findings were ultimately concluded by April 27, 2026. Review Outcomes For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., the review found no dumping, giving them a zero percent margin. SeAH Steel Corporation was found to have a dumping margin of 0.80 percent, indicating some underpricing. Companies that weren’t individually examined will use SeAH’s margin of 0.80 percent. Next Steps The Commerce Department will share detailed calculations and findings within five days of this announcement. Instructions will be given to U.S. Customs for collecting duties on relevant imports. For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., there will be no additional duties. For SeAH and other non-examined companies, duties might be assessed according to the specified margins. Cash Deposit Arrangements The cash deposit rate for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. remains at zero. For SeAH, and other non-examined businesses, a rate of 0.80 percent will be in effect. Any other companies will follow past determined rates unless exempt or otherwise specified. Important Notices U.S. importers must file necessary reimbursement certificates to avoid penalties. This is part of ensuring compliance with trade rules and is mandatory for those involved in importing these products. The results and actions from this review underscore ongoing efforts to ensure fair trading practices. The Commerce Department remains committed to regulating and ensuring compliance with trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year “Sunset Reviews” on Duties Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun its five-year reviews. These reviews are also known as “Sunset Reviews.” They involve antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These orders are laws to ensure fair trade. They prevent cheap products from other countries from harming U.S. businesses. The reviews will look at whether these duties are still necessary. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is also looking at the same orders at the same time. The reviews started on May 1, 2026. The Department of Commerce will decide if the duties are still needed. The duties help protect American businesses from unfair competition. The reviews involve many countries and products. From China, there are reviews on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 and Steel Grating. From India, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 is under review. From Korea, Steel Nails and Welded Line Pipe are included. Malaysia is being reviewed for Steel Nails. Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam are also reviewed for Steel Nails. Türkiye is reviewed for Welded Line Pipe. There are strict rules on how to give information for the reviews. Parties have to follow the rules set by the Department of Commerce. These rules include how to send documents electronically. Special computer systems are used for this. Those who want to be involved in the review should show interest quickly. There is a 10-day window to submit a letter to participate. The Commerce Department has rules about sharing secret business information. These rules are strict to protect businesses’ secrets. Parties involved need to send a notice within 15 days to show they want to participate. If no one shows interest, the review ends without changes. If interest is shown, parties need to give detailed responses within 30 days. These responses help the Department decide if trade duties should stay or be removed. The aim is to keep U.S. businesses strong and protect them from unfair international practices. These activities are important for fair and strong U.S. trade practices. The process ensures fair competition and helps American industries thrive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.