U.S. Department of Commerce: Final Results on Aluminum Foil from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review concerning certain aluminum foil imported from the Sultanate of Oman. This review looked at sales made between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. During this time, the Oman Aluminum Rolling Company SPC (OARC) was found to have sold aluminum foil in the United States at prices lower than normal value. The final results were made public on November 5, 2026. It was determined that the weighted-average dumping margin for OARC was 0.76 percent. This means that OARC was selling its aluminum foil at 0.76 percent below the normal price. The review process started with preliminary results published on May 6, 2026. There was a series of extensions to review deadlines due to the complexity of the issues. During this period, various parties submitted briefs advocating their positions. The Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and its members, as well as OARC, participated actively by submitting their respective case and rebuttal briefs. After careful consideration of all comments, there were some changes made from the preliminary findings to the final results. Specific changes in the review were based on feedback and additional analysis that was conducted. The Department of Commerce has stated they will disclose the calculations made for these results within five days following any public announcement of the results, or five days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Regarding assessment rates, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on entries of merchandise in accordance with these final results. CBP instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after publication of the notice in the Federal Register. For future imports, new cash deposit rates are set. These include a 0.76 percent rate for OARC. Other exporters will follow a different set of rules depending on their previous reviews or investigations. This administrative review ensures that duties are correctly enforced, protecting fair competition in the U.S. market. Importers are also reminded to file necessary certificates regarding duties to avoid penalties. This review serves as a reminder of the responsibilities importers and exporters have to comply with trade regulations. It also highlights Commerce’s ongoing commitment to addressing unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Aluminum Sheet from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-11-05 The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining the antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet from China. The review period is from February 1, 2025, to January 31, 2026. Antidumping duties are extra charges on foreign products sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This review focuses on products from the People’s Republic of China. In their preliminary findings, the Department of Commerce has determined that the exporter under review, Yantai Jintai International Trade Co., Ltd., is part of a larger China-wide group. This means Yantai Jintai did not qualify for a separate duty rate and is included in the general duty rate for Chinese exporters. The China-wide group is not specifically reviewed in this process unless a person or group asks for it. If not asked, their current duty rate remains unchanged at 59.72 percent. Case and rebuttal briefs are to be submitted within certain timeframes. Interested parties must provide a table of contents and a table of authorities. They should summarize each issue in simple language at the beginning of their briefs. The Department will not calculate new rates for Yantai Jintai because it is classified under the China-wide entity. As such, no new information needs to be disclosed. Anyone who imports these products must continue to follow existing rules, including filing certificates regarding duties. Failure to provide these certificates could result in paying higher duties. The Department will announce final results after this review period. These results will determine future customs duty rates for the Chinese aluminum sheet exporters. The full scope of the order includes aluminum sheets of certain thickness and specifications, with some items excluded. The classification codes for these items are outlined, but the final determination is based on the written product descriptions. This review is part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reports on Steel Plate Subsidies from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain subsidies for cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plates from Korea. This review checked if Korean producers and exporters got support from their government. The results cover the year 2024. Background The review started with a preliminary finding in May 2026. The Commerce Department looked closely at the support received by Korean manufacturers from their government. These supports are known as “countervailable subsidies.” The analysis finished in November 2026. Results The Commerce Department discovered that two main Korean companies, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company, received subsidies. The subsidies raised concerns about unfair trade advantages. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd., received a subsidy rate of 1.89%. Hyundai Steel Company’s subsidy rate is 1.39%. These rates represent the levels of financial aid in excess of what is allowed under fair trade laws. Methodology Commerce followed laws from the Tariff Act of 1930. The Act guides the evaluation of subsidies that involve government financial support. These can include things like reduced taxes or lower prices on government goods. The analysis also considered whether the subsidies were meant for specific industries, which makes them “countervailable.” Next Steps Now, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will act. They will apply these findings to imports from the two companies. The assessed amounts have been set. These will be charged as duties on future imports to the U.S. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit rates are announced. These rates apply to goods imported on or after the final decision date. If a company-specific rate is less than 0.50%, the rate is zero. The default rate for other producers remains at 3.26%. Key Points Discussed Several topics were reviewed. They included special prices for electricity and emissions units. The review also looked into tax reduction programs and research grants. Some findings remained unchanged, while others included slight adjustments. What happens next is crucial for the American steel market. The rates will help make sure that American companies can compete fairly. New steps ensure no unfair advantages exist due to government help from other countries. This results guidance stays until further updates come from the Commerce Department. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Confirms Continued Duties on Metal Lockers from China Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On November 5, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its final results from an expedited sunset review concerning metal lockers and parts from the People’s Republic of China. The decision determined that canceling the countervailing duty (CVD) order on these products would likely lead to the continuation of subsidies that harm U.S. businesses. Background The countervailing duty order regarding certain metal lockers from China was initially published on August 20, 2021. The purpose of this order was to offset unfair subsidies that Chinese manufacturers receive, which can damage U.S. production and jobs. In July 2026, the Department of Commerce began a review to assess whether to keep these duties in place. U.S. companies List Industries, Inc. and Tennsco, LLC, both producers of metal lockers, participated in the review and supported maintaining the order. Review Outcomes The Commerce Department’s review showed a lack of sufficient response from Chinese exporters and the Chinese government regarding the subsidies. Given this, the Department of Commerce decided to expedite its decision-making process to confirm the continuation of the duties. Details of the Order The duties target several Chinese companies with high subsidy rates, including Changshu Taron Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and others, with rates as high as 131.51%. Two companies, Xingyi Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd., have lower rates at 24.66%, which also applies to all other exporters not specifically listed. Importance This decision underscores the U.S. government’s commitment to protecting domestic manufacturers from unfair trade practices. The continued duties are intended to create a level playing field by addressing the distorting effects of subsidies provided by foreign governments. Accessing the Details The complete memorandum outlining the decision and its rationale can be accessed through the Department’s Electronic Service System, allowing the public and interested parties to review the proceedings and findings in full detail. This decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce highlights its ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition and safeguard U.S. industries against unfair subsidies from foreign governments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of their review on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) imported from Mexico. These goods are used in the oil and gas industry. Background The review period was from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. During this time, some goods from Mexico were sold in the U.S. at prices below the normal value, which is known as “dumping.” The Department of Commerce looked at this closely. Key Findings The main company involved is Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A., also known as TAMSA. They received a dumping margin of 1.87 percent. This means TAMSA sold its goods in the U.S. at prices that were 1.87 percent below the usual rates. Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now assess antidumping duties. This means they will charge extra fees on these goods to make sure they’re sold at fair prices. The calculation of these duties will depend on the details of each sale and how much the goods were undervalued. Cash Deposit Requirements There are new rules for cash deposits on OCTG imports from Mexico: Companies covered by this review must make cash deposits equal to their specific dumping margins. For companies not reviewed but included in previous reviews, the deposit rate remains as before. If an exporter wasn’t part of any review, but their producer was, the producer’s rate applies. Companies that haven’t been reviewed have a deposit rate of 44.93 percent, the rate from the original case. Responsibility of Importers Importers must file a certificate to confirm they haven’t been reimbursed for antidumping duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay twice the fees. Conclusion These measures are part of the U.S. efforts to ensure fair trade. The aim is to balance competition and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. For more details, the complete findings and additional information are available through the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Reviews on Trade Duties Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Reviews and Dates The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has initiated reviews concerning antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These reviews are designed to assess various trade activities that have September anniversary dates. The new reviews officially started on November 5, 2026. The reviews will focus on a range of products imported into the United States from countries like India, Israel, Mexico, Oman, South Korea, Türkiye, Vietnam, Spain, Taiwan, China, and Ukraine. The products under review include lined paper products, mattresses, brass rod, carbon steel pipes, and certain types of steel racks, among others. Purpose of Reviews These reviews assess whether foreign companies are selling their goods in the U.S. at less than fair value, hurting U.S. industries. They also look into whether these companies are receiving unfair subsidies from their governments. Respondent Selection Process For each product and country involved, the Commerce Department selects certain foreign producers or exporters to review. They choose these companies based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection or through questionnaires asking about sales and shipments. Submission Deadlines Companies that wish to be considered for separate rate status must submit the relevant applications or certifications. They must also respond to any questionnaires. There are strict deadlines for these submissions, with extensions provided only in exceptional cases. Particular Market Situations The reviews will also determine if a particular market situation exists for certain products. This could mean that normal costs do not reflect true market conditions, which might require adjustments in how antidumping duties are calculated. Public Input The Commerce Department requires each company in the review to provide specific information about their operations. This includes details on how independent they are from government control, especially for companies in non-market economies. Outcomes The reviews aim to ensure fair competition by setting appropriate duty rates for imported goods. Final results are expected by September 30, 2027. This careful process is part of a broader effort to maintain a fair trading environment and protect U.S. industries from unfair international market practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Steel Pipe Review from Korea Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized a review regarding the sale of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from the Republic of Korea. The review period was from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Results of the Review The Department of Commerce determined that Hyundai Steel Company and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. made sales of the steel pipe at prices less than the normal value. This means they sold these products cheaper than what is usually expected. On the other hand, Husteel Co., Ltd. did not sell the steel pipe at prices less than the normal value. Important Dates The final results are effective from November 5, 2026. These results will determine duties and deposits required for any future entries of these products into the U.S. market. Background and Timeline On May 13, 2026, preliminary results were shared, inviting comments from interested parties. On August 25, 2026, the deadline for final results was extended to November 2, 2026. The Commerce Department received comments from Hyundai Steel and rebuttals from other companies in August and September 2026. A public hearing on the matter took place on October 15, 2026. Scope and Process The circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Korea was the focus of this review. During the process, verifications were held in May, June, and August 2026 to ensure the integrity of sales and cost data provided by Husteel and Hyundai Steel/HSP. Resulting Actions and Regulations For those involved in importing these products, there will be specific rates and duties to be paid. Companies that were not individually reviewed will have duties based on the results for Hyundai Steel/HSP. Liquidation instructions will be issued to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, directing them on duties for specific entries during the review period. For companies that did not have their sales specifically reviewed, a rate of 4.20% is established. The cash deposit rate for future shipments will either be the rate determined in this review or a previously established rate from earlier segments of this proceeding. Conclusion This detailed review ensures fair trading practices are upheld and applicable duties are imposed correctly on steel pipe imports from Korea. The reviewed companies and their importers must follow these guidelines and regulations to remain in compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Ends Review of Duties on Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 5-8 minutes On November 5, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it is stopping a review related to special taxes, called countervailing duties, on wood products from China. These wood products are mostly for building and decoration. Background Information In February 2021, the U.S. began charging extra taxes on Chinese wood products to help American producers. These taxes were meant to make it fair if Chinese companies got too much help from their government. Every year, companies can ask the government to review these taxes. In February 2026, the Commerce Department opened the window for people to request such a review for the year 2025. The Coalition of American Millwork Producers, an American group, asked for a review. Some Chinese companies asked for it, too. Initial Actions In March 2026, the Commerce Department started the review. They chose two main companies, Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd, and Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry and Trade Co., Ltd, to focus on. They also looked at 34 other companies. Withdrawal of Requests By June 29, 2026, the companies and groups who originally asked for a review started to change their minds. They began to take back their requests. At first, they took back requests for 14 companies. Then, Bel Trade said they really wanted out for all companies they had asked about. Reasons for Ending the Review The Commerce Department found that during 2025, none of the companies brought in any wood products from China that would need these extra taxes. If there are no entries, there is nothing to review. The review can only happen if products come in that are supposed to pay these duties. Conclusion Since there were no new wood products that needed these special taxes in 2025, the Commerce Department decided to stop the review altogether. This means nothing changes for now. The Commerce Department will let the U.S. Customs and Border Protection know that they don’t need to make any new tax decisions on these products for 2025. All previous rules will continue as they are. This decision follows the rules for how and when these kinds of tax reviews can be stopped. They will keep using the current deposit rules for companies involved. The Commerce Department reminds everyone to follow all rules about keeping information safe. If anyone used special, private info, they need to follow the guidelines given by the government to return or destroy this info properly. Published on November 2, 2026, this news shows how the government deals with import taxes on goods from other countries. It highlights how regulations can sometimes change when situations like no new entries arise. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duties on Chinese Ironing Tables Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On November 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update regarding ironing tables imported from China. The announcement was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 212. The Department of Commerce’s decision affects floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables and parts that are imported from the People’s Republic of China. They concluded that revoking the antidumping duty on these goods would likely result in continued or recurring dumping. This means that without the duty, these products might be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The antidumping duty order on these products was first published on August 6, 2004. Most recently, the order was continued on August 31, 2021. The fourth sunset review, which reviews and updates trade regulations every five years, began on July 2, 2025. Seymour Home Products, a company that manufactures these types of products in the United States, expressed interest in keeping the duty in place. This company is considered an interested party because they make ironing tables in the U.S. The review process did not get any responses from interested parties in China. This led the Department of Commerce to conduct an expedited review, which aims to make a decision in 120 days. The order maintains that the duty is necessary to prevent unfair pricing practices. The anticipated dumping margin, if the duty were removed, could be as high as 157.68 percent. This margin means that products could be sold significantly below their fair value in the U.S. market. The report also reminds parties of their responsibilities. If a party received proprietary information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO), they need to return or destroy this information as per regulations. This announcement by the Department of Commerce ensures that U.S. businesses like Seymour Home Products are protected from unfair competition due to low-priced imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Review of Magnesia Carbon Bricks from Mexico and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made important findings about magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico and China. These findings concern the continuation or recurrence of dumping, which means selling products at unfairly low prices. On November 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce published their final results regarding antidumping duty orders. These orders have been in place to stop unfair pricing. The review began on July 2, 2026. It looked at the possibility of removing these duties. Commerce found that ending the orders would likely lead to more dumping of magnesia carbon bricks at high levels. Background In 2010, antidumping duty orders were first put in place. These orders helped protect U.S. producers. Without them, businesses from Mexico and China might sell bricks at unfair prices, hurting U.S. companies. The review process allows both domestic and foreign parties to share their opinions. In July 2026, U.S. producers showed their interest in keeping the duties. They were worried about possible harm to their business if the duties were lifted. Main Findings The Department discovered that removing these duties could see dumping levels as high as 57.90% for Mexico and 236.00% for China. This means bricks from these countries could be sold in the United States for much less than fair value. Legal and Administrative Information This review also involves legal rules about protective orders. These rules help keep sensitive business information safe. Parties involved must follow these rules carefully. This notice serves to remind them about their responsibilities under these protection rules. Conclusion The Department’s findings mean that the duties on magnesia carbon bricks will stay in place. This decision helps to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. The official document with all details is available digitally for interested parties. This completes the official and thorough review by the U.S. Department of Commerce on magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Confirms Metal Locker Dumping by China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has reviewed the dumping of metal lockers from … Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Duty Review on Ripe Olives From Spain Released Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings in the countervailing duty review concerning ripe olives from Spain. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The preliminary results indicate that certain producers and exporters received countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are a type of financial aid provided by governments that give an unfair advantage to businesses. The department focused on Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop And. (Agro Sevilla) during their review. The review began on January 21, 2026, as part of an examination of the countervailing duty order. Due to lapses in federal appropriations, several deadlines were delayed. Initially, all deadlines were postponed by 47 days. Later, an additional delay of 21 days was added. These delays were accounted for in the review process, affecting timelines but ensuring thoroughness. The review has found that Agro Sevilla received subsidies at a rate of 4.57% ad valorem. The term “ad valorem” means that a percentage is applied to the value of the goods. Another company, Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with its affiliates, also received subsidies at the same rate. There were changes in the status of certain companies involved in the review. Four companies were partially rescinded from the review. Rescission means that those companies are no longer being examined for subsidy receipts during the review period. These companies are Alimentary Group DCoop, S.Coop. And., Aceitunera del Norte de Caceres, Soc. Coop. LTDA 2° Grado, Aceitunera del Norte de Cáceres, S.C.L., and Plasoliva, S.L. Commerce has invited interested parties to submit comments on the preliminary findings. There is a specified period for comments, and hearings may be scheduled if requested. Upon completion of the review, the results could impact duty rates applied to imports of ripe olives from Spain. New rates will be published following the conclusion of the review process, currently scheduled to conclude within 120 days of the preliminary results’ release. The preliminary findings are now available for public view through the Commerce Department’s system. The findings and potential changes in duty rates may affect both importers and consumers in the United States. Please stay tuned for continued updates as the review proceeds toward its final results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Steel Nails from China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results concerning an ongoing administrative review of antidumping duties on certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. The review identifies that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yueda Nails (Chuzhou) Ltd., collectively known as Yueda Nails, have sold nails from China at less than their normal value during this period. As a result, Yueda Nails is assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 9.27 percent. The document further explains that the review initially included several companies. However, the Commerce Department is rescinding the review concerning nine other companies because there were no entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the review period. These companies are: JISCO Corporation Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. Nanjing Yuechang Hardwares Co., Ltd. Qingdao Jisco Co., Ltd. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Co., Ltd. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd. Xi’an Metals and Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. The review and its results are part of the Commerce Department’s efforts to enforce fair trade practices by ensuring that the imported steel nails are not being sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. For public involvement, the department welcomes interested parties to submit written comments or case briefs. These comments are to be submitted no later than 21 days after the announcement of the preliminary results. Additionally, the department will hold a hearing if requested, providing a platform for interested parties to discuss the issues raised in the review. Finally, the review also clarified that for future shipments, the cash deposit rates for the companies reviewed will change based on the final findings of this review. For the companies not participating in the review, current cash deposit rates will remain the same. These preliminary results underscore the U.S. government’s ongoing commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices and ensuring a level playing field for all businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Renewal of Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from India Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the final results of its review on the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from India. This decision was taken to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. producers from unfair subsidies given by the Indian government to its manufacturers. Background The original countervailing duty order was put in place on December 6, 2021. The purpose of this order was to protect U.S. producers from subsidized imports that harm domestic businesses. On July 2, 2026, the Department began reviewing whether these duties should continue. Findings The Commerce Department believes that revoking the duty could lead to more subsidized imports from India. This would disadvantage U.S. producers. Therefore, they have decided to maintain the duty. Duties The specific duty rates announced are as follows: Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited will have a duty rate of 2.25%. Companies like Naiks Brass & Iron Works and Suzlon Energy face a much higher rate of 397.70%. Other producers who are not individually listed will face a duty rate of 2.25%. Procedures Followed The Wind Tower Trade Coalition, representing U.S. producers, expressed their interest and participation in the review. They showed their concern over possible continuation of unfair subsidies by the Indian government. The Indian government or any Indian producers did not actively participate in this review process. Hence, the review was conducted fairly quickly. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is committed to protecting American industries. By maintaining these duties, they aim to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. All parties who provided confidential information during the review are reminded to handle such information following the rules laid down by the Department. The full list of topics and further details are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For more information, interested parties can visit the official website for access to the complete documents. This step highlights the ongoing efforts to uphold fair trade practices and support the domestic wind tower industry in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Chinese Metal Pipes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-11-04 The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining trade practices related to light-walled rectangular pipe and tube imports from China. This review aims to ensure fair trading and prevent unfair pricing. Background and Review Period The Department of Commerce started an administrative review of antidumping duties on these metal products from China. This review period is from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. is part of this review. They did not show they could get a separate rate. So, they are part of the larger group of companies from China. Review Rescission The Department is ending its review for 39 companies. These companies did not have subject merchandise entries during the review period. Administrative Proceedings There were delays in the review process because of a government shutdown. The deadlines were extended to accommodate these delays. Scope of the Order The products in question are welded steel pipes and tubes. They are rectangular and have a thin wall. These products are used in construction and other industries. Impact and Future Steps The review determines if companies still meet trade rules. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. is being reviewed under the China-wide rate, which is 255.07 percent. Public Comments Interested parties can comment on these preliminary results. Comments should be submitted by the given deadline. Refund and Reimbursement Importers must file a certificate about the reimbursement of duties. If they don’t, it could mean they may incur extra charges. Conclusion The investigation helps maintain fair trade and protect U.S. industries. The final results will set new assessment rates and cash deposit requirements to ensure compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On November 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited third sunset review. The focus was on certain magnesia carbon bricks imported from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department determined that revoking the countervailing duty order on these bricks would likely cause the continuation or recurrence of subsidized exports. The decision impacts several companies. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd., and its related companies, were found to have a net countervailable subsidy rate of 3.00 percent. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories and its partner Dalian Mayerton Refractories Co. Ltd., collectively known as Mayerton, were found to have a much higher subsidy rate of 232.63 percent. All other companies have a rate of 3.00 percent. The original countervailing duty order was published in September 2010. It was designed to protect U.S. industry from unfair trade practices. The current review began in July 2026. The Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee showed interest in keeping these protections. The Commerce Department did not receive a response from the Chinese government. The Commerce Department notified the U.S. International Trade Commission about the lack of response. Because of this, an expedited review took place. The product affected is magnesia bricks from China. These bricks are important in many U.S. industries. They are used for their durability and resistance to heat and are favored in steel making. All information on this decision is available publicly. The final results were published under Federal Register Volume 91. The decision is addressed under the act’s relevant sections, including sections 751(c) and 752(b). Companies that are part of this process must return or destroy all proprietary information. This is in line with specific regulations. This action preserves existing protections against unfair trade. It helps maintain a fair market for U.S. producers of magnesia carbon bricks. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Continued Risk of Dumping from Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its sunset reviews on the antidumping duty orders for utility-scale wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain. According to the findings, removing these orders would likely lead to continued or increased selling of wind towers in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Background on the Investigation The antidumping duty orders for wind towers from Spain, India, and Malaysia were initially published in August and December of 2021. These orders aim to prevent foreign manufacturers from selling wind towers at less than fair value, which can harm U.S. industries. In July 2026, the Department of Commerce began its first sunset review of these orders. This is a routine procedure required by the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether dumping would continue if the orders were revoked. Participation and Responses Domestic manufacturers showed strong interest in maintaining the antidumping duties. They submitted timely notices of intent to participate in the review, which were received by the Commerce Department by mid-July 2026. However, no substantive responses were received from any foreign producers or exporters in the implicated countries. Due to the lack of opposition from foreign entities, the Department of Commerce proceeded with expedited reviews. These expedited reviews lasted 120 days. Final Results of the Review The Department has now finalized its findings. It concluded that removing the antidumping duties would likely lead to continued dumping of wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain into the U.S. market. The dumping margins, which indicate how much lower the export prices are compared to fair value, could be as high as: 54.03 percent for India 3.20 percent for Malaysia 73.00 percent for Spain These significant margins underscore the risk of harm to U.S. manufacturers if the orders are revoked. Conclusion This notice serves as an important reminder for all parties subject to these orders. The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to enforcing fair trade practices and will continue to monitor foreign manufacturers closely. This decision reaffirms the Department’s role in protecting domestic industries from unfair competition. The orders will remain in place, continuing to prevent the risk of dumped wind towers affecting the U.S. market. The announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Pricing Issues with Austrian Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement on November 4, 2026. It said that some types of oil country tubular goods from Austria are being sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This announcement is about a study that covered the period from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. The investigation looked at how these goods were sold between Austria and the U.S. These goods are used in the oil and gas industry. Details of the Investigation The specific goods investigated are hollow steel products used in the oil and gas industry. These products include oil well casing and tubing. The investigation is focused on whether these goods are being sold at less-than-fair value, which means at a price lower than in Austria or at a cost to make them. Comments and Changes There were comments from other interested groups about the scope of this investigation. Some parties asked if certain kinds of pipes should not be included in the investigation. These types include mechanical pipes used for oilfield tools and perforating guns. Commerce has clarified that these types of pipes are not included in the investigation. This decision follows an earlier ruling about similar goods from other countries. Methodology Used The Commerce Department used specific methods to determine the price differences. The department calculated prices that are normal for such goods and compared them to prices in the U.S. If there is a difference, it means the goods are being sold for less than their fair value. Effects on Other Companies Apart from voestalpine Tubulars GmbH & Co. KG, which is a specific company in Austria, any other companies will have to follow this same rule. The cash deposit rate for these goods sold in the U.S. from this company will be 47.21%. Next Steps The department will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission about this preliminary finding. If the final decision is also affirmative, meaning the goods are still found to be sold for less than they should, the commission will make a ruling about whether this practice harms U.S. businesses. A final decision is expected no later than 135 days after this initial announcement. There will be more discussions and possibilities for other interested parties to comment before this final decision is made. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken these steps to ensure fair trading practices. This helps to protect U.S. manufacturers and ensure fair competition in the market. The investigation remains ongoing, and the final decision is awaited in the coming months. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Finds Oil Country Tubular Goods From Taiwan Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination regarding the sale of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Taiwan. The department has found that these products are being sold in the United States at prices lower than their fair value. This determination is in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The investigation looked at sales from April 1, 2025, through March 31, 2026. The purpose of the investigation was to determine if these goods were sold at less than fair value, also known as dumping. If dumping is found, it can cause harm to industries in the United States by undercutting prices of domestically produced goods. Based on its findings, the Department of Commerce has determined that producers from Taiwan, specifically Shin Yang Steel Co. Ltd. and Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd., have sold OCTGs in the U.S. at price differences of 51.19% and 54.74%, respectively. Other exporters and producers from Taiwan face an average dumping margin of 52.43%. Because of the preliminary positive finding, the Department of Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of certain OCTG entries from Taiwan. This means that these goods cannot be sold or withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption until further notice. The Department of Commerce will require a cash deposit equal to these margins on entries made on or after November 4, 2026. This cash deposit ensures that if the final investigation confirms dumping, sufficient funds will have been set aside to cover any duties that may be imposed. Companies involved in the trade of OCTGs, industry stakeholders, and other interested parties have been invited to comment on the preliminary determination. Comments concerning the scope of the investigation are due 30 days after the preliminary determination, with rebuttal briefs submitted five days after case briefs. The Department of Commerce intends to release its final determination after additional analysis and a verification process. Interested parties can also request a hearing regarding this investigation, should they desire to present their views in more detail. The department’s actions aim to protect the U.S. industries from unfair trade practices and ensure a level playing field for domestic producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Tubular Goods from UAE Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain oil country tubular goods, also known as OCTG, from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Officials from the department have found that these goods are being sold at prices lower than fair market value in the United States. The investigation considered sales during the period from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. According to the Department of Commerce, products like oil well casing and tubing from the UAE are being sold at prices that hurt U.S. businesses. These are hollow steel products used mainly in drilling and are made from both carbon and alloy steel. Two companies named in the investigation, Universal Tube Industries FZE and Ajmal Steel Tubes and Pipes Industries, LLC, have not been selling at fair prices. Ajmal Steel Tubes and Pipes Industries, LLC are reported to have a dumping margin of 68.88%, and the combined entity of Universal Tube and THL Pipe and Tube Industries LLC has a dumping margin of 61.45%. As per the law, the government can ask for cash deposits to balance this unfair price advantage. The companies mentioned will now need to pay a deposit equal to these margins on new imports to the U.S. All other companies from the UAE exporting similar products to the U.S. will face an average deposit rate of 68.23%. This measure is in place to prevent harm to the U.S. industry and ensure fair competition in the market. There will be a time for public comments and further investigation. A final decision is expected in about 75 days. The outcome will guide whether these measures become permanent. This ruling shows how the U.S. is making efforts to protect its industries from unfair international trade practices. Interested individuals or parties wanting to participate in the process can submit their views on the investigation. Decisions like this aim to sustain fair market conditions for manufacturers and companies in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

NAFTA Panel Decision Leads to Changes in US-Canada Softwood Lumber Duties Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat announced a major decision. The decision came from the NAFTA Binational Panel concerning the U.S. Department of Commerce’s countervailing duty (CVD) on certain softwood lumber products from Canada. This panel’s final judgment was not in harmony with the Department of Commerce’s original decision. In November 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce had set certain duty rates on lumber from Canada. This decision was challenged, and the case was reviewed multiple times by the NAFTA Binational Panel. As of October 5, 2026, the panel affirmed Commerce’s Second Remand Determination. This led to a Notice of Final Panel Action issued on October 19, 2026. As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce has amended its final determination. The countervailing subsidy rates for Canadian companies Canfor Corporation, J.D. Irving, Resolute FP Canada Inc., Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd., West Fraser Mills Ltd., and all other companies have been adjusted. The new subsidy rates for these companies are: Canfor Corporation: reduced from 13.24% to 12.49% J.D. Irving Limited: reduced from 3.34% to 2.96% Resolute FP Canada Inc.: reduced from 14.70% to 13.90% Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd.: reduced from 14.85% to 11.01% West Fraser Mills Ltd.: reduced from 17.99% to 16.73% All other producers and exporters: reduced from 14.19% to 12.80% For companies with updated cash deposit rates from previous reviews, these changes won’t alter the current deposit rates. However, for other companies without updated rates, new instructions will be issued to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice was officially released and published on October 28, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The decision is important for trade between the U.S. and Canada, especially in the lumber industry. This adjustment of rates could impact the market and trade relations moving forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Phosphate Fertilizer Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the countervailing duty order on phosphate fertilizers from Morocco. The findings were published on November 3, 2026, in the Federal Register. Background: In 2021, the Commerce Department issued a countervailing duty (CVD) order on phosphate fertilizers from Morocco. This was to counter subsidies provided by the Moroccan government to their producers. On March 2, 2026, the Commerce Department began the first sunset review of this order. Sunset reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether duties should continue or be revoked. Review Process: Domestic U.S. companies, like the Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, participated in this review. They argued that subsidies from Morocco should continue to be offset by duties. The Moroccan government and its company, OCP S.A., also took part. They stated that changes in the subsidy programs meant the duties should end. Findings: The Commerce Department’s final decision was that revoking the duties would likely lead to the continuation of unfair benefits for Moroccan producers. Both OCP S.A. and other Moroccan exporters were found to receive countervailable subsidies at a rate of 20.04%. This rate means that subsidies worth 20.04% of the value of the fertilizers would be offset by duties. Conclusion: The Commerce Department’s ruling indicates the continuation of duties on Moroccan phosphate fertilizers. These duties help ensure fair competition for U.S. producers. The ruling highlights the ongoing balance between international trade and domestic industry protection. Businesses involved, including OCP S.A. and U.S. companies like Mosaic and Simplot, will continue to monitor and respond to these regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a five-year review. This is called a “Sunset Review.” It happens automatically for certain trade rules. The rules relate to antidumping and countervailing duties. Antidumping and countervailing duties are special taxes. They are used to protect U.S. businesses. These taxes are on goods from other countries that are sold at unfairly low prices or that get government help. The review is important. It helps decide if these special taxes should continue. The review started on November 2, 2026. Trade Rules Under Review The review covers specific products. They include goods from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. From China: Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies face both antidumping and countervailing duties. Potassium Permanganate has antidumping duties. From Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Polyester Textured Yarn faces antidumping duties. These reviews are the first review for Mobile Access Equipment and Polyester Textured Yarn. Potassium Permanganate is in its sixth review. Participation in the Review Businesses and people who want to be part of the review need to act fast. They must say they want to join within 15 days. They need to file a notice to show their intention. For those who file, a full response is required in 30 days. It is very important to follow all rules when submitting information. All information must be complete and correct. Electronic Submissions Required All documents must be submitted electronically. This is done using a special system. It’s called ACCESS. All documents need to be in by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Executive Summaries Needed The Department wants a summary at the start of documents. Each summary should be no longer than 450 words. These summaries help in creating an official decision document. What’s Next? This initiation notice keeps the process open and transparent. The review follows specific laws, such as Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed off on these details. This check is to see if the trade rules are still needed. It ensures fair competition for U.S. companies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Korean Power Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its official review on large power transformers imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covered the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Two key companies were evaluated: HD Hyundai Electric Co., Ltd. and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd. These companies were chosen as the main focus of this review due to requests from interested parties. The investigation aimed to determine if these companies sold transformers to the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value, which is known as dumping. Upon review, the Department of Commerce found that both Hyundai and Iljin did not engage in dumping during the reviewed period. Their sales were not below the normal value, resulting in an estimated dumping margin of zero percent. Other companies involved in the transformer market, such as LS Electric Co., Ltd. and Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation, were also reviewed indirectly. Since Hyundai and Iljin had zero percent margins, the Department applied a previously determined margin of 4.32 percent to these non-selected companies. This whole process is part of the Department’s actions to ensure fair trade practices and to protect the U.S. industry from unfair competition due to dumping. It is based on the U.S. Tariff Act which allows regular assessments and adjustments to duties imposed on imported goods. The findings and preliminary results are open for comments from interested parties. These parties have the right to submit their feedback for further consideration before the final decision. The decision and further details about this review are publicly accessible. Such transparency helps maintain fairness and accountability in international trade dealings. The final results, which will take into account any comments or additional insights, will determine the duties that need to be adjusted or maintained. This includes what importers will need to pay when bringing in power transformers from Korea. As the review process continues, there may be a public hearing if requested. The Department is committed to following all legal procedures and ensures that all findings are carefully analyzed and verified. Finally, these actions underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and enforcement in trade practices to safeguard domestic industries while facilitating fair global trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Requests Reviews on Trade Duties Estimated reading time: 5–9 minutes November 2, 2026 Today, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced an opportunity for interested parties to request an administrative review of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders, findings, or suspended investigations. This would occur during the anniversary month of the publication of an order. The notice was published in Volume 91, Number 210 of the Federal Register. The Department of Commerce manages these trade orders through the International Trade Administration. They focus on enforcement and compliance, ensuring fair trade practices. What Are Antidumping and Countervailing Duties? Antidumping duties are extra tariffs on foreign imports believed to be priced below fair market value. Countervailing duties are tariffs imposed on subsidized imports, which harm domestic industries. Who Can Request a Review? An interested party is someone affected by these duties or investigations. Examples include domestic producers, exporters, or government agencies. They can request a review following specific guidelines. How Are Companies Reviewed? If multiple companies are involved, Commerce may limit the number examined. They use data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection to select respondents. Decisions are usually made within 35 days after announcing a review. Respondent Selection Details Generally, determinations about collapsing (treating multiple companies as a single entity) require detailed information. Companies previously collapsed in other segments might remain so. Detailed collapse history must be submitted if relevant. Key Deadlines Requests to review must be submitted by the end of November. Withdrawal of review requests is allowed within 90 days of the publication notice. Market Situation Allegations Under the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, a “particular market situation” (PMS) can affect constructed value. Allegations can be submitted if market conditions do not reflect ordinary trade. Parties must submit PMS allegations within 20 days of initial Section D responses. Annual Inquiry Service List Commerce keeps an annual service list for each order. New entries of appearance are required to be added to the updated list for the next year. Petitioners and foreign governments will remain on the list automatically after their first entry. Special Instructions for Petitioners and Foreign Governments Petitioners and foreign governments are automatically placed on the inquiry list each year after their initial request. They must update their details as necessary. This notice shows the Commerce Department’s efforts to ensure fair trade and involves many complex legal processes. Interested parties are encouraged to understand these procedures fully and meet all necessary deadlines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Changes Steel Duty Case Involving Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a big decision about steel from Mexico. The court’s decision has changed how the U.S. Department of Commerce looked at steel products from Mexico. This case is about certain steel products that are resistant to rust, known as corrosion-resistant steel. The court’s judgment is about an earlier decision that the Commerce Department made. The period they looked at was from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The company involved is Galvasid S.A. De C.V., a steel producer from Mexico. The court said the Department of Commerce needs to change the earlier decision it made about Galvasid’s steel. The court told Commerce that it made mistakes in how it calculated fees, called dumping margins, for Galvasid and other steel producers. The Commerce Department had earlier applied some rules wrongly to Galvasid. They used the wrong methods to determine how much extra charge should be put on Galvasid’s steel. The court has now told them to make corrections. On September 22, 2026, Commerce fixed these mistakes after the court asked them to take another look. They changed how they worked out Galvasid’s selling price. They found out they shouldn’t have added extra charges for things like transporting steel. Now, the new finalized rates for how much extra charge will be applied are set. For Galvasid, this extra charge is now 14.54%. For all other producers, it is set at 14.29%. The Commerce Department will now tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use these new charges. The changes will start on October 29, 2026. This case shows the steps taken when deciding on duties for importing goods, like steel, by respecting court decisions. The decision from the court helps ensure that fees are applied fairly. Decisions like this help keep trade fair between countries. They also help make sure companies follow the rules. The Commerce Department’s announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, who is the acting deputy assistant secretary for antidumping operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Error in Truck Bed Covers Trade Case with China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On November 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a change in an important trade investigation. This investigation is about truck bed covers imported from China. Officials found mistakes that needed to be fixed. Background Earlier, on October 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared their initial findings. They found that truck bed covers from China were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. But a company named Ningbo Scarman said there were errors in these findings. What Changed Ningbo Scarman pointed out that there was an error in how the trade officials calculated their costs. The mistake was about which company made and sold the covers. Because of this, the Department of Commerce changed their earlier decision. Details of the Correction The officials noticed that they listed the wrong company when figuring out the costs. They meant to talk about Ningbo Scarman and its related company, Ningbo Auto Parts. This correction means lower penalties for this group than before. Impact of the Change Now, if Ningbo Scarman or Ningbo Auto Parts bring truck bed covers to the U.S., they will pay fewer tariffs. The new tariff rate is 49.38%. This change took effect back on October 1, 2026, so any extra money they paid since then will be returned. Conclusion The correction shows how important it is for trade investigations to have the right details. The Department of Commerce has fixed the mistake and has told everyone about the correct charges. This ensures fair treatment in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.