U.S. Confirms Subsidies on Palladium from Russia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Introduction: On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a final decision about palladium coming from Russia. They found that Russian producers and exporters of unwrought palladium receive unfair financial help, also called subsidies, from their government. This decision comes after a detailed investigation. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce, also known as Commerce, started looking into these subsidies on January 1, 2024. The investigation covered palladium produced and sold before December 31, 2024. Palladium is a valuable metal used in many industries. Two main Russian companies were looked at: JSC Urals Innovative Technologies and Prioksky Plant of Non Ferrous Metals. Findings: Commerce found enough evidence to prove that the Russian government provided financial benefits or subsidies to these companies. These benefits give them an unfair advantage in the U.S. market. The Department used facts available, including some unfavorable assumptions, to conclude their decision. This approach is called using adverse facts available. Subsidy Rates: Both of the main companies looked at, along with other Russian producers and exporters, were assigned a subsidy rate of 109.10 percent. This means that these companies benefited from government help equal to 109.10 percent of the value of their palladium exports. Suspension of Liquidation: As a result of this decision, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits from these companies for their palladium exports. This action started on March 11, 2026, when the preliminary findings were first announced. Next Steps: The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now take 45 days to decide if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If the ITC agrees with the findings, further actions, like a countervailing duty order, might follow. This will ensure that U.S. industries compete fairly. Conclusion: The decision emphasizes the commitment of the U.S. to follow fair trade practices. It aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. The document also highlights a detailed investigation process to reach a fair and lawful conclusion. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review of Mushroom Imports from Poland Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its review of mushroom imports from Poland. This review looked at whether the Polish company Okechamp S.A. sold preserved mushrooms in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The review covered the period from November 3, 2022, to April 30, 2024. Commerce found that Okechamp did sell mushrooms at prices below the normal value, which is considered dumping. As a result, Commerce calculated a dumping margin of 2.55 percent for Okechamp S.A. The rules for how this decision affects the import of Polish mushrooms have also been set. Shipments from Okechamp will now have a cash deposit rate equal to the dumping margin of 2.55 percent. This means importers have to pay this percentage as a deposit for duties. For other companies, the rate will continue as previously set, depending on their specific case history or the general rate of 34.32 percent if they are new or have no specific rate. Commerce will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about how to assess duties for these shipments. Some shipments could be charged duties based on the found margin, while others might not be if they fall below a certain threshold. Commerce has also outlined what importers should do with any advance payments made on duties. If they paid too much or too little based on this new decision, adjustments will have to be made. In summary, Commerce is imposing new cash deposit rates and assessment procedures on companies dealing with preserved mushrooms from Poland. This action aims to ensure fair trade practices and uphold U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

No Dumping Found for Korean Superabsorbent Polymers: U.S. Commerce Department Report Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In a recent report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, it was announced that LG Chem, Ltd., a company from the Republic of Korea, did not engage in dumping superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in the United States market. This decision is based on the preliminary results of an antidumping duty administrative review. The review period examined was from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. During this time, LG Chem, Ltd. was found to have no sales of SAP in the U.S. market at less than the normal value. This means that LG Chem sold its products at fair market prices. The Department of Commerce is responsible for monitoring and enforcing trade laws in the U.S. to prevent dumping. Dumping is when a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it charges in its home market. This can harm local industries in the importing country. The results of the review are not final yet. Interested parties have been invited to comment on these preliminary findings. The Department of Commerce will finalize its decision after reviewing these comments. The findings will also have an impact on cash deposit requirements for future imports of SAP from Korea. If the final results remain the same, there will be no additional duties on SAP products from LG Chem, Ltd. Importers have responsibilities too. They need to submit a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. If they do not comply, the Department of Commerce might assume that duties have been reimbursed, leading to double charges. The Department plans to issue final results no later than 120 days after this announcement. It is a way to ensure fair trade practices continue and that the U.S. market isn’t negatively impacted by unfair pricing practices from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Steel Nails from UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review for the period of May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024, concerning certain steel nails imported from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Department found that some producers and exporters sold steel nails at prices lower than their normal value. This could impact how much U.S. buyers pay for these imports. Two companies were the focus of this review: Master Nails and Pins Manufacturing, LLC/Middle East Manufacturing Steel, LLC (together known as Master) and Rich Well Steel Industries LLC. The review determined that these companies engaged in unfair pricing practices, known as “dumping.” Final Findings: For Master, the Department calculated a dumping margin of 81.82%. For Rich Well, the margin was found to be 2.59%. These margins indicate how much the sales price of the nails in the U.S. was below their normal value. Higher percentages show more significant underpricing. Background and Process: The review process was lengthy and involved several extensions due to government shutdowns in late 2025. These delays affected the timeline but not the outcome. From comments and data, the Department adjusted the calculations for the final results. The process included evaluating comments from interested parties. The Department made changes to the calculations for both Rich Well and Master, based on the feedback received. Each step was done under the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. What’s Next? The Department will share its findings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They will assess duties based on these results. Duties are taxes on goods from abroad. They help ensure prices are fair and competitive. For Rich Well, duties will be calculated based on sales during the review period. Master will have duties assessed using their final review margin of 81.82%. If the margin is zero or very low (less than 0.5%), some companies may not have to pay these duties. The CBP will follow specific procedures to apply these duties effectively. Finally, there are set requirements for cash deposits on future imports. These deposits help cover potential duties. The rate for Master and Rich Well will match their review results, while others will follow previous guidelines. This decision remains effective until further notice, impacting any shipments entering the U.S. after the decision’s publication date. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Vietnamese Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipes Confirmed Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In May 2026, a notable decision was announced by the Department of Commerce in the United States. This decision is important for businesses involved in trade between the U.S. and Vietnam. It is about welded stainless steel pressure pipes from Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Commerce completed its review of these pipes from Vietnam. They found that they were being sold at lower prices than normal in America. This was during a time from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Key Points of the Decision The Department made a final decision that confirms earlier findings. They say that the Vietnam-wide entity has been selling these pipes at unfairly low prices. A “Vietnam-wide entity” means all companies from Vietnam selling these pipes. The Vietnam-wide entity now has a duty rate of 90.80 percent. This means they must pay extra money when they sell these pipes in the U.S. Important Dates and Information This decision is effective from May 20, 2026. The review checks whether any rules, like selling at low prices, were broken. No new comments or changes came after their first findings in January. Next Steps U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now collect these duties. They will wait 35 days after May 20 to start. If anyone disagrees with this decision, they can go to the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash Deposit Requirements Vietnam-wide entity must deposit 90.80 percent. Others with special rates keep their rates. No special rate? Then deposit 90.80 percent. These deposits last until further notice. Trade Compliance It’s essential for importers to meet these new rules. If they don’t, they might have to pay even more. The Department of Commerce reminded parties to handle any special information safely. They are responsible for its return or destruction after use. Conclusion This decision reinforces trade fairness rules between the U.S. and Vietnam for welded stainless steel pipes. The Department is clear about its findings and future expectations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Delays Solar Cell Investigation Decision Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is extending its investigation. This investigation is about the sales of solar cells from India. The investigation checks if these sales are at less-than-fair value. This means they might be sold at unfairly low prices. The final decision was supposed to come soon. Now, it will come by September 10, 2026. The provisional measures will also last longer. These are rules that were set for four months. Now, they will last up to six months. This change is due to a request from Mundra Solar Energy Limited and Mundra Solar PV Limited. These companies make and sell many of the solar cells in question. They asked for more time to prepare. The Department of Commerce agreed to this request. No other reasons were found to say no. The investigation started back in August 2025. It covers sales from July 2024 to June 2025. The decision impacts the trade of solar cells from India to the U.S. The aim is to ensure fair trading and competition. Commerce will use this extra time to gather all needed information. They want to make sure the decision is correct and fair. This decision comes under the laws that govern trade and tariffs. These rules make sure that trade is fair for everyone involved. Commerce’s final decision will be important for solar cell trade from India. It will help decide future trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Vietnam Sold Polypropylene Boxes at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding imports of polypropylene corrugated boxes from Vietnam. Here’s what this means: What Happened? The Department of Commerce looked into the sale of these boxes from Vietnam between July and December 2024. They found that the boxes were sold for less than what they should be, which is called “less than fair value.” This is sometimes known as dumping. They also noticed that these cheaper imports have been coming in very quickly, which could be harmful to U.S. companies. Important Dates: The investigation period covered July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This announcement took effect on May 20, 2026. Company Involvement: The investigation focused on a Vietnamese company, Jia Bao Rui, but this company stopped participating in the investigation. Because they didn’t cooperate, the U.S. has decided to treat Jia Bao Rui as part of a larger group, called the Vietnam-wide entity. This group is now being held responsible for selling the boxes at unfair prices. Outcome: The Department of Commerce determined that the wide Vietnam-wide group was guilty of these unfair trade practices. As a result, imports from this group face a high duty rate of 130.58% to make up for the underpricing. This rate is meant to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will look into whether the U.S. industry was indeed hurt by these underpriced imports. If they decide there was harm, then additional duties will be permanently applied to these imports. All these steps, like putting the extra fees on these boxes, will continue until further talks or changes happen. For now, U.S. Customs will keep an eye on imports from the Vietnam-wide group to ensure the new rules are followed. This decision shows how the U.S. takes steps to protect its markets from unfair foreign pricing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Ends Review on Chinese Freight Rail Couplers Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to stop its review of freight rail couplers from China. This review was about possible unfair pricing of these products in the U.S. This process is known as an antidumping duty review. The review period was between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The decision was published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2026. This review started after a group called the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers asked for it. They wanted the Department of Commerce to look at certain companies in China that might be selling freight rail couplers at unfair prices. On August 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce began this review. They checked records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to see if there were any entries of these products into the U.S. market. On December 8, 2025, the Department made it clear which companies they were looking into more closely. They also decided not to look into some other companies. In February 2026, the Department shared its plan to stop the review since it found no entries of the couplers during the review period. The department invited comments from interested parties, including the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers and a U.S. importer called Greenbrier Central LLC. The Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers wanted the review to continue because of an ongoing investigation by CBP. But Greenbrier argued against continuing the review, as there were no couplers from those companies recorded by CBP during the review period. The review process had been delayed twice due to government shutdowns, in November 2025. These pauses extended the review timeline by 68 days in total. The Department of Commerce will inform CBP about handling the duties related to any entries. Since the review was stopped, the current cash deposit rates for these products will stay the same. This notice also acts as a reminder for interested parties to handle all sensitive information properly. They must return or destroy any private data in line with U.S. regulations. This decision by the Department of Commerce is part of their efforts to manage and enforce fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Confirms Continued Dumping on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its fourth expedited sunset review regarding certain crepe paper products from China. The review focused on whether to revoke the antidumping duty order on these products. Importantly, it was determined that revoking this order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping practices. This conclusion stems from a detailed analysis undertaken by the Commerce team. On January 25, 2005, the initial antidumping duty order was published in the Federal Register. The recent review process began in earnest on February 2, 2026. Commerce issued a notice of its intent to review this order, as per the Tariff Act of 1930. By February 3, 2026, domestic manufacturers expressed their interest in participating in the review. Their involvement reflected significant concern over the potential impacts of revocation. No substantive response was received from respondents representing the Chinese exporters. This led to Commerce proceeding with an expedited review due to the lack of respondent input. The final review results confirm that continuation of the antidumping measures is necessary. The dumping margins could remain significant, at rates as high as 266.83 percent. This outcome reaffirms the ongoing concerns of domestic manufacturers about unfair pricing practices and reinforces the protection offered to U.S. industry. All parties handling proprietary information from this review must adhere to strict guidelines concerning its return or destruction. This is in line with the regulations overseeing administrative protective orders. The decision is now published and available for review, ensuring transparency in the enforcement of fair trade practices aimed at maintaining equitable market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Review Finds Chinese Steel Nails Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review on steel nails from China. This review covered the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The final results were published in the Federal Register on May 19, 2026. Commerce found that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. and its affiliate companies sold steel nails in the U.S. at prices below normal value. This action is called “dumping” and can harm U.S. industries by undercutting their prices. The rate for these dumped nails was set at 28.28 percent. This means that importers will have to pay this duty rate on future shipments from these companies. For the China-wide entity, which includes companies not reviewed separately, the duty rate remains at 118.04 percent. Commerce did not receive any comments on its preliminary findings from January 28, 2026. Because of this, the preliminary results stand as the final results. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will soon start collecting duties based on this review. The duties will apply to all entries of these steel nails made during the review period. These new duty rates apply to any shipments entering the U.S. after publication of the final results. Previous rates will apply to other companies that were not individually reviewed. This review is part of Commerce’s ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices. The duties aim to protect U.S. businesses by leveling the playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continuation of Subsidies Likely on Chinese Corrosion Inhibitors Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-05-19 The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final decision regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from China. The decision is the result of an expedited first sunset review of the countervailing duty order. This review is important in determining whether the removal of countervailing duties would result in continued subsidies. Background Information The Commerce Department had initially put an order on these inhibitors on March 19, 2021. This order came about to counter subsidies from China that affect U.S. businesses. On February 2, 2026, a review was started to reassess the situation. Participants in the Review The domestic company, Wincom Inc., expressed its interest in this review. This company is a manufacturer of similar products in the United States. They filed their notice of intent to participate on February 17, 2026. They have been recognized as an interested party because they manufacture the same type of products. Results of the Review The review found that taking away the duties would likely lead to more subsidies. These subsidies would continue to affect U.S. companies negatively. The Commerce Department used various legal frameworks, including sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, to reach this conclusion. Subsidy Rates The Commerce Department outlined specific subsidy rates for different Chinese companies. For example, Jiangyin Delian Chemical Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 96.29%, while Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. has a rate of 64.18%. Some companies, like CAC Shanghai Chemical Co., Ltd., have higher rates at 239.21%. Specifically, all other companies covered by the order have a rate of 80.58%. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce has made it clear that removing the duty order would lead to the continuation of subsidies. These subsidies are harmful to domestic producers like Wincom Inc. The countervailing duties will remain in place to support U.S. companies. The decision follows strict procedures and guidelines to ensure fairness. The announcement also serves as a reminder for parties to handle confidential information with care. The full details of this review are available electronically for those with access to the official systems. The Commerce Department stresses transparency in its decisions for public accountability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Decides on Antidumping Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On Tuesday, May 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from China. This decision came after a detailed review. The Department of Commerce looked at an antidumping duty order. An antidumping duty is a tax on foreign products sold below fair market value in the U.S. The order in question, first published on March 19, 2021, covers corrosion inhibitors from China. The sunset review began on February 2, 2026. A sunset review is when authorities check if canceling an antidumping duty would lead to unfair trade again. Notices were given, and parties were invited to participate. On February 17, 2026, a domestic interested party showed intent to take part. This means they make similar products in the U.S. and want to protect their business. By March 4, they submitted more information for the review. The Department did not hear back from any opposing parties. Without any responses, the review was expedited. An expedited review means it was done in 120 days instead of longer. The final findings showed that if the duty is revoked, unfair trade might return. The dumping margins, which are the amount by which normal value exceeds export price, could be as high as 277.90%. Parties with access to sensitive information have to handle it carefully. They must return or destroy protected data once the review ends. This ensures the protection of private information. The Department of Commerce has published these results following U.S. laws and regulations. These laws help maintain fair trade practices. In summary, the U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duty order on corrosion inhibitors from China. This decision aims to prevent unfair trade and protect U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Trade Duties on Electrical Steel Import Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it will continue to apply special trade duties on non-oriented electrical steel imported from six countries. These countries are Sweden, Germany, China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. This type of steel is important in making parts for machines like motors and transformers. It can be used in making electrical devices that need certain kinds of magnetic qualities. The trade duties are known as antidumping duty (AD) orders and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. They are in place to prevent unfair trade practices that hurt U.S. businesses. The duties were first put in place on December 3, 2014. They aim to protect U.S. industry from financial harm due to imports that are sold at less than fair value or get unfair government help from other countries. These duties prevent what is known as “dumping.” The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) reviewed the orders. They agreed with the Department of Commerce that removing the duties could lead to further harm. This harm would come if foreign companies continued to sell steel at unfairly low prices. Because of this decision, there will be no changes in the way duties are collected. The orders will stay in place. This means that the U.S. Customs will continue to collect duties on imports of this specific type of steel. In summary, the orders will continue to stop foreign companies from undercutting prices in the U.S. market. This protects companies in the United States. These actions by the Department of Commerce and the ITC ensure fair trading practices. They help keep the U.S. industry strong by making sure that all businesses play by the same rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Review on Antidumping of Resin from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review regarding the import of Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from the Sultanate of Oman. The outcome of this review shows that the sole manufacturer and exporter under examination, OCTAL SAOC FZC (OCTAL), sold the resin at prices lower than normal during the period of May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce first made preliminary findings on this matter in September 2025, which were discussed in detail in the Federal Register. Following this, in January 2026, the Department conducted a thorough verification process to inspect OCTAL’s sales and cost information. They examined detailed documents and accounting records. There were notable delays in the review process caused by a Federal Government shutdown and backlogs, but the final results have now been announced. According to these results, OCTAL SAOC FZC has a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.82 percent. Additionally, the Department of Commerce made updates based on findings during verification. They recalculated inventory carrying costs using the latest data from OCTAL. The Department will communicate with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to enforce the finalized antidumping duties. Importers of this resin need to be aware of their responsibilities to comply with these duties. For future imports, a new cash deposit rate will be applied. OCTAL will now have a rate of 2.82 percent. If the exporter was not reviewed but the producer was, the rate will follow the producer’s previous rate. If both the exporter and producer were not reviewed previously, the rate is set at 7.62 percent. Importers must also remember to file a certificate proving that antidumping duties have not been reimbursed. If this is not done, it may lead to higher duties being imposed. Parties who have benefited from access to confidential information under the Administrative Protective Order (APO) must follow proper procedures to return or destroy this information in accordance with regulatory guidance. This review by the Department of Commerce ensures fair trading practices and aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing strategies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Silicomanganese From India: U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duty Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Silicomanganese From India: U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duty The United States Department of Commerce has finalized results from its review of silicomanganese imports from India. The department has determined that Maithan Alloys Limited (MAL), the only producer/exporter under review, sold silicomanganese in the United States at prices lower than normal value. This review covered sales from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Review Summary The findings were published by the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration. The review was detailed in the Federal Register dated May 18, 2026. The final determination follows preliminary results announced on September 11, 2025. The review showed that MAL sold silicomanganese at a dumping margin of 0.53 percent. This means the company sold the product for less than its normal value in its home market, which can harm domestic producers in the U.S. Timeline and Procedures The review process experienced delays due to a government shutdown and other scheduling adjustments. The final results were completed by May 11, 2026, after extensions to address these disruptions. Only one other party, Eramet Marietta, Inc., commented on preliminary results. Discussions on these comments are documented in an Issues and Decision Memorandum. Additional changes were made to MAL’s margin calculations based on these comments. Next Steps The department plans to disclose detailed calculations from the review to involved parties. This disclosure will occur within five days after the results are publicly announced. For entries of silicomanganese, U.S. Customs will assess duties based on these findings. Import-specific rates will be calculated unless the rate is deemed too low to apply duties. If MAL did not know their product was destined for the U.S., rates for other companies will apply. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit requirements will take effect immediately. For MAL, a deposit rate of 0.53 percent will apply. Rates for other companies remain unchanged if they were not part of this review. These requirements are crucial to ensure future compliance. Conclusion Importers are reminded of their duties to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Failure to do so may lead to penalties. The Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for compliance with duty regulations and will keep monitoring imports to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The procedures set here aim to maintain fair competition and market stability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Anti-Dumping on Steel from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of their review on anti-dumping duties for certain corrosion-resistant steel products imported from Taiwan. The review determined that these steel products were being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The investigation involved multiple companies, including Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Prosperity) and Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. (SYSCO), which were found to have no dumping margin, indicating their practices were fair. However, Great Grandeul Steel Company Limited was found to have a dumping margin of 0.99 percent. The review process began with preliminary results announced on January 8, 2026. Interested parties, including Prosperity and Steel Dynamics, Inc., had submitted their comments during the review period. The final memorandum addresses all submitted issues and decides on the appropriate measures. Companies not selected for a detailed review received a rate derived from previously established methods. These methods ensure fair competition among U.S. domestic products and imported goods. The Department of Commerce will instruct Customs and Border Protection on the assessment of duties, ensuring fair competition. For entries made during the reviewed period where companies did not know the goods were destined for the U.S., duties will be assessed at a rate of 11.04 percent, which is the default rate for such situations. For more information and access to the complete decision memorandum, interested parties can visit specific government websites listed in the official notice, ensuring transparency and comprehensive understanding of the review findings and implications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Canadian Mushrooms Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision to impose countervailing duties on fresh mushrooms imported from Canada. This decision comes after an investigation revealed that Canadian producers and exporters are receiving countervailable subsidies from the Canadian government. Preliminary Findings The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. During this time, it was found that subsidies are being provided to Canadian mushroom producers, which might unfairly price them in the U.S. market. The U.S. Department of Commerce used specific criteria to identify these subsidies. The subsidies are recognized when a financial contribution by the government provides a benefit to the producers, and when the subsidies are specific to certain industries or companies. Two main companies involved in this investigation are Champ’s Fresh Farms Inc. and Farmers’ Fresh Mushrooms Inc. The preliminary subsidy rates for these companies are 1.62% and 4.97%, respectively. These rates are above zero and not negligible. Scope of the Investigation This investigation covers all fresh mushrooms from Canada of the Agaricus genus. These include common types such as button mushrooms and portobello mushrooms. The mushrooms might be whole, sliced, or diced. They may also come packaged for retail sale or in bulk. The current tariff code for these mushrooms is 0709.51.0100. Although this code helps identify the mushrooms for customs purposes, the investigation’s scope relies on the written description of the products. Impact on Importers In line with the preliminary decision, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now start suspending the liquidation of these mushrooms. This means they will not clear the goods for sale until the duties are paid. Importers will need to deposit cash equal to the calculated subsidy rates. The Department of Commerce will calculate these deposits based on whether the producer, exporter, or both have received company-specific subsidy rates. If neither has company-specific rates, a general “all others” rate of 2.84% will apply. Next Steps The U.S. Department of Commerce will further verify this information before making a final decision in September 2026. If the final decision also finds that these subsidies harm U.S. mushroom producers, the duties could become permanent. Public Comments and Hearings There is an opportunity for interested parties to submit comments or request a hearing. The Department encourages public engagement through written requests, and parties may discuss issues raised before and during the investigation. Final Thoughts This preliminary determination is crucial for U.S. mushroom producers as it seeks to balance competition against imports from Canada. The complete results of the investigation will be pivotal in establishing permanent measures to protect local industry and ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. International Trade Commission will further investigate whether these imports cause material injury to the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Circumvention of Duties on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain engines from China. They found that two models of engines made by Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., Ltd. are being used to avoid duties. These models are the 5C65M0 and the BC70M0. The engines were shipped from China to the U.S. This decision was reported in the Federal Register on May 18, 2026. The engines are known as small vertical shaft engines. They are between 99cc and 225cc in size. The Department of Commerce says these engines are “later-developed merchandise.” This means they were made to avoid antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are taxes put on goods sold below fair price to protect U.S. industries. The inquiry started because of a request from Briggs & Stratton, LLC, a U.S. company. They asked the Department of Commerce to investigate on June 18, 2025. The engines entered the U.S. market between January 1, 2018, and July 11, 2025. During a government shutdown, the investigation faced delays. On November 14, 2025, all deadlines were extended because of this. Another delay happened on November 24, 2025, due to document backlogs. Additional extensions were announced in January and May 2026. The Department of Commerce has started steps to handle this issue. They plan to request Customs and Border Protection to keep stopping entry of these engine models. They will also ask for cash deposits based on duties for these engines that were already in place for Zongshen. There is a chance for public comments on this decision. Written opinions can be submitted within two weeks of the notice being published. Others can respond to these comments within a week. Those who want a hearing can request it within 30 days of the notice. Finally, the Department will notify the International Trade Commission about the finding. This body might review if the decision affects U.S. industries badly. They will have 60 days to give their advice. The decision was made by Christopher Abbott from the International Trade Administration on May 12, 2026. For any questions, contact Zachary Shaykin at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Changes in Aluminum Foil Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 5, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made an important decision. This decision affects how the U.S. Department of Commerce handles aluminum foil from Turkey. The case is called Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States. The court decision relates to the investigation of aluminum foil. This investigation was about whether the foil was sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. Back in September 2021, Commerce published a final decision saying that aluminum foil from Turkey was sold at these low prices. In November 2021, Commerce published an order to add extra duties on this aluminum foil. The company involved, Assan Aluminyum, was not happy. They challenged Commerce’s decision in court. Two main issues were about how taxes were treated and how Assan’s costs were calculated. The court asked Commerce to reconsider these issues. Commerce adjusted some calculations and explained others. For example, they fixed how they handled duty drawbacks. But the court wanted more explanation on a final topic. This topic was about Assan’s hedging gains. Commerce gave its response, and the petitioner in the case later decided to drop the issue. The court agreed and dismissed the case. Commerce has now changed its final decision. The dumping margin for Assan was slightly increased. Though this change does not alter current cash deposits for Assan, it affects others who are involved in similar trades. Commerce will update rules for how customs duties are applied. But for now, no change in cash deposits is needed for Assan, as newer reviews have set different rates already. This case underscores the complexity of trade investigations. It shows how court decisions can lead to changes in how trade regulations are applied. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Sodium Nitrite Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Key Findings: Commerce determined that some subsidies given to Indian producers are countervailable. The review is part of an ongoing administrative process involving sodium nitrite imports. Companies Assessed: The review specifically focused on Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and Kutch Chemical Industries Limited. Three companies—Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd.—may be excluded from further review as no reviewable entries were found during the period for which liquidation is suspended. Rates Determined: Deepak Nitrite Limited has a preliminary subsidy rate of 2.26%. Kutch Chemical Industries Limited received a subsidy rate of 63.60%, calculated mainly using adverse facts available because of missing information. Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd., not individually examined, received a subsidy rate based on DNL, also at 2.26%. Future Steps: The Commerce Department invites comments from interested parties on these preliminary results. There is a plan to rescind reviews for companies without reviewable entries according to existing trade regulations. Methodology Used: The review process follows regulatory guidance to calculate subsidy rates based on contributions that give financial benefits and show specificity. Public Involvement: Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments or case briefs and request a hearing if needed. The Commerce Department is committed to transparency, offering access to documentation and data through its electronic portal, ACCESS. Next Moves: The preliminary results, subject to further comment and review, may lead to adjustments in cash deposit requirements for Indian sodium nitrite imports. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be instructed accordingly once the final results are published. These findings are part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices and compliance with international trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duties for Paper File Folders from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the preliminary results of its review on antidumping duties for paper file folders from India. This review covers a period from May 17, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to see if paper file folders from India were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value, which is called dumping. One key finding of this review is that Navneet Education Limited, a producer and exporter from India, made sales of paper file folders at less than normal value. This means that they were selling the folders cheaper in the U.S. than they would in India. The preliminary calculated dumping margin for Navneet is 5.65 percent. This rate tells us how much the prices were lower than expected. However, for another company, Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited, the Department of Commerce has decided to rescind, or cancel, the review. This decision was made because Kokuyo did not have any entries of these folders that could be looked at during the review period. This means there were no sales to review, so the process does not need to include them. The U.S. Department of Commerce uses an electronic system called ACCESS, where registered users can view documents related to these reviews. For anyone interested, detailed information about this review is available online. The paper file folders from India are under an order that watches for unfair pricing. This order was put in place to make sure companies do not sell products in the U.S. for less than the usual price. If they do, antidumping duties are applied. These duties are like extra taxes that make the price fair again. The next steps involve comments from interested parties. People or companies who want to comment on the preliminary results have 21 days from the notice date to submit their opinions. There is also an opportunity to request a hearing to discuss these results further. For now, the U.S. Department of Commerce will keep holding Navneet’s shipments of paper file folders to these new estimated duties until a final decision is made. For Kokuyo, any shipments that happened before will not have extra duties added after this decision. The U.S. Department of Commerce takes these steps to ensure that U.S. businesses can compete on a fair playing field. By investigating and reviewing the pricing of imports, they help protect local industries from unfair competition from overseas. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Delays Final Decision in Solar Cells Investigation from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a delay in its final decision in the investigation of solar cells from Indonesia. The case is about crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules. The investigation is about these products being sold for less than their value. The investigation started on August 12, 2025. It looked at imports from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. On April 28, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared its first findings. They believe the solar cells are indeed being sold for less. Now, the final decision is being delayed. The law allows this delay for up to 135 days after the first findings are published. Two Indonesian companies, REC Solar Energy Indonesia and PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia, asked for this delay. They also asked for more time before any provisional measures take effect. The Department of Commerce agreed with the companies’ requests. The new deadline for the final decision is September 10, 2026. This decision comes from Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This information is from the Federal Register and follows legal guidelines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Finds Subsidies for Korean Steel Producers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction: The United States Department of Commerce has released preliminary results from a review of subsidies provided to steel companies in South Korea. This review targets specific manufacturers who produce cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plates. Key Findings: The Commerce Department has discovered that countervailable subsidies were given to two South Korean steel companies. These companies are Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company. The period under review is from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Subsidy Rates: The preliminary subsidy rates determined by the Commerce Department are as follows: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 1.89 percent. Hyundai Steel Company has a subsidy rate of 1.39 percent. Partial Review Rescission: The review initially included other companies, but the Commerce Department has decided to rescind the review for Daeik Eng Co., Ltd. and MAIKO International. This decision came after domestic parties withdrew their requests for an administrative review of these companies. Process and Timeline: The review began in March 2025 after requests for evaluation were received. By May 2026, the preliminary results were announced. Interested parties are invited to comment on these results. The Commerce Department extended deadlines due to a federal government shutdown. This extension included a 47-day toll and an additional 21-day toll, with the preliminary results deadline set for May 7, 2026. Next Steps: The Commerce Department will disclose its calculations and analyses to parties of interest and invites comment submissions. There will also be opportunities for parties to submit briefs and request hearings. Conclusion: This preliminary finding by the U.S. Department of Commerce is an important step in managing fair trade practices. The final results are expected to be published following an analysis of comments and briefs submitted by interested parties. The steel industry and trade authorities are keenly observing these developments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Reviews Aluminum Foil Imports from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary results of its review of aluminum foil imports from the Sultanate of Oman. The review looked at whether subsidies were given to the Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC), which makes and exports aluminum foil to the U.S. What is the Review About? The review is focused on whether OARC received financial help from the government of Oman, which could give it an unfair advantage in selling aluminum foil. This kind of financial help is called a countervailable subsidy. When is the Review Period? The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce believes that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC received subsidies. The preliminary findings show a subsidy rate of 14.15 percent. The U.S. Commerce Department considers subsidies as financial support from a local authority that benefits the company specifically, which can affect competition. What Happens Next? Further comments on these preliminary results are invited. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to discuss these comments before making a final decision later. Those who wish to provide their thoughts must submit them within 21 days of the notice’s publication. Impact on U.S. Imports As a result of this review, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect cash deposits from importers of aluminum foil from Oman. This deposit is based on the subsidy rate of 14.15 percent. These rules will start after the final decision is published. How to Stay Informed The information from the review is available online through the International Trade Administration’s website at https://access.trade.gov/frnotices. Interested parties should keep an eye on this site for the latest updates. The final results of the review are expected within 120 days from May 13, 2026. Therefore, it is essential for involved parties to watch for these results and provide input accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results for Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared important news about oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea. They have been looking into whether any subsidies, which are financial help from the government, were given to companies in Korea during the year 2023. Key Findings The Department found that SeAH Steel Corporation, a company that produces and exports OCTG from Korea, did not receive any significant subsidies. Their subsidy rate was found to be only 0.13%, which is considered too small to count. Review and Rescission Details The Department of Commerce started this review after some companies requested it back in December 2024. Several companies, AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., ILJIN Steel Corporation, Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd., and NEXTEEL Co., Ltd., decided they no longer wanted a review and withdrew their requests. Because of this, the Department has stopped the review process for these companies. In addition, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (Hyundai Pipe) might also have its review stopped because there were no entries of their products during the time under review. Process and Timeline The review process has been ongoing with several delays due to various reasons, including a government shutdown. The preliminary results were finally issued on May 7, 2026. Next Steps Interested parties have the chance to provide comments on these preliminary results. They must submit any supporting documents through the Department’s electronic system. There is also a chance for them to request a hearing if they have more to discuss. The final results of this review are expected within 120 days from now, provided there are no further extensions. Assessment and Cash Deposits For those companies whose review was canceled, they will continue with the cash deposits as previously set. The results for other companies will be used to decide future cash deposit rates. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is acting thoroughly and systematically as they continue their review of Korean OCTG. They are committed to ensuring fair trade practices and will keep the public updated with any further decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Issues Orders on Steel Fencing from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new orders on steel fencing imported from China. The orders include “antidumping” and “countervailing duties.” This decision follows an investigation showing that steel fencing from China had been sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, hurting American industries. What Are These Orders? Antidumping Duty Order: This order stops steel fencing from being sold at very low prices in the U.S. These low prices, known as “less than fair value,” hurt American companies. Countervailing Duty Order: This order addresses unfair government subsidies in China. The Chinese government gave unfair support to companies that make steel fencing. This made it tough for U.S. companies to compete. Important Dates The orders start on May 13, 2026. Unfair pricing from China was first noticed on August 19, 2025. Details About Steel Fencing The orders affect temporary steel fencing. These are steel panels used to create fences for short-term use. The panels are usually between 10 and 12 feet long and 6 to 8 feet high. They are made of steel tubing and wire mesh. What Happens Next? The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect the duties. These duties will be charged on every panel that comes from China. The duties are meant to make the prices fair and help U.S. businesses. Critical Circumstances There was a concern about the import surge of steel fencing before the duty orders started. However, authorities decided there were no “critical circumstances” for this type from China. This means some steel that came in earlier will not be taxed. Looking to the Future The Department of Commerce will check on the yearly service list for these orders. This list helps keep track of who imports steel fencing. Adjustments can be made to this list to make sure everything is fair and organized. Continuing with these orders should help U.S. businesses by making it tougher to sell underpriced steel fencing from overseas. The same rules will apply every year to ensure fair competition. In summary, these orders are designed to make the market fair for U.S. industries and limit the unfair competition caused by cheap imports and government subsidies from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Chinese Chemical Company Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued preliminary findings regarding the provision of subsidies to Heze Huayi Chemical Co. Ltd. This company, located in the People’s Republic of China, is engaged in the production and export of chlorinated isocyanurates. These findings pertain to a period of review from January 1 to December 31, 2023. The investigation carried out by the International Trade Administration concluded that Heze Huayi is receiving countervailable subsidies. This means the government of China is providing financial benefits that give this company an advantage in international trade. The preliminary results indicate a subsidy rate of 18.71 percent. Additionally, the Department has decided to rescind the review for 41 other companies. This is in line with Commerce’s practice of terminating reviews when there are no suspended entries of merchandise for the period under review. The preliminary decision is now open for comments from interested parties. These parties are encouraged to provide their input on the findings. In line with standard procedures, the Department of Commerce plans to verify the information on which these preliminary results are based. As part of the ongoing administrative review, further details will be collected and analyzed. The public is invited to submit comments and rebuttal briefs regarding the results. These submissions will help shape the final determination of the review, expected to be completed within the next few months. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess any countervailing duties. The final subsidy rates will influence how these duties are calculated for subsequent entries of the affected merchandise. These developments are critical as they reflect ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices by addressing government subsidies that could distort market competition. The Department of Commerce is diligent in reviewing and implementing measures that foster equitable trading conditions for all parties involved. Interested parties may request a hearing to provide oral presentations on the issues raised. These presentations must relate to the content of previously submitted briefs. This process allows stakeholders to engage directly with the review, ensuring their perspectives are considered in the final decisions. The outcomes of this review will determine future import conditions for chlorinated isocyanurates from China. Companies involved in the import and export of these chemicals should closely monitor developments to align with regulatory requirements. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Breaking News: U.S. Review on Thermal Paper Imports from Spain Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce has taken a significant step. It has released the preliminary findings of a review on thermal paper imported from Spain. This review covers the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Background The department uses rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930 to monitor and control trade practices. The goal is to ensure fair competition. The focus of this review is a Spanish company named Torraspapel S.A. Findings The Department of Commerce discovered that Torraspapel had sold thermal paper in the United States at prices lower than its normal value. This practice is known as “dumping.” The review determines the dumping margin, or the difference between the U.S. price and the actual cost of the paper. Torraspapel has a dumping margin of 7.69 percent. Process The Department uses special methodologies. They calculate the export price and the price when sold in the United States. This process ensures fairness and equivalent competition. Next Steps Interested parties can comment on the review. They have a set period to submit briefs and arguments. There will be a final decision after evaluating all comments. Impact Companies importing thermal paper might pay extra duties. This ensures no unfair price advantages in the U.S. market. The review also affects how future imports will be taxed. Deadline The Department of Commerce aims to finish this review by September 2026. This includes analyzing all feedback from the public. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s review is an important process. It protects U.S. markets from unfair practices. The review encourages equal competition and ensures fair pricing in the U.S. Please stay tuned for updates on this important trade issue. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Stainless Steel Bar Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary results of its review on stainless steel bar imports from India. The review aims to determine if the products were sold in the United States at prices below the normal value. Entities Under Review The period of review was from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Eight producers and exporters from India, known collectively as the “Venus Group,” were examined. These include: Atlas Stainless Corporation Private Limited Astrabright LLP Bahubali Steel Industries Eurostahl Tech LLP Venus Metal Corporation Precision Metals Venus Wire Industries Private Limited Hindustan Inox Limited Sieves Manufactures (India) Private Limited The review also covered Laxcon Steels Private Limited. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce found that the Venus Group sold products at less than the normal value during the review period. However, it determined that Laxcon’s prices were not below this benchmark. Review Rescission The review for Ambica Steel Limited was rescinded because the request was withdrawn within the given period. Implications for Non-Examined Companies Five other companies were not directly reviewed but were included in the assessment: Aamor Inox Limited Bhansali Bright Bars Pvt. Ltd. Chandan Steel Limited Mangalam Alloys Limited Welspun Specialty Solutions, Ltd. These companies were assigned a rate based on the average findings for Laxcon and Venus Group. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has set specific cash deposit rates for future imports from these companies. These rates are effective upon finalization. Importers must ensure compliance and file certificates to avoid penalties. The final results of the review are expected within 120 days of this notice. Importers should be aware of the responsibilities that include filing certificates under the relevant regulations to avoid double assessment of duties. The Department’s findings help keep the market fair and maintain appropriate trade practices for stainless steel bar imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce released its preliminary findings on May 13, 2026, regarding the antidumping duty review of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Mexico for the period between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The review concluded that Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A. (TAMSA) engaged in sales of merchandise from Mexico at prices lower than normal value. Key Findings: TAMSA, the main producer/exporter under review, was found to have a dumping margin of 1.62 percent for the period specified. The review covered OCTG products originating from Mexico, as ordered under the scope of the administrative review. The Department of Commerce also announced the rescission of its review concerning two companies, Siderca S.A.I.C. and Vallourec Oil & Gas Mexico, S.A. de C.V. This decision was based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the review period. Next Steps: Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Submissions must abide by specified deadlines, with case briefs due no later than 21 days after the notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days following case brief submissions. Public comments must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Parties can submit comments electronically using the ACCESS system. If a hearing is requested, details will be provided to the parties involved. Impact on Importers: The Department of Commerce will determine and direct customs duties on subject merchandise entries covered by this review. Cash deposit requirements will change based on these findings, effective upon finalization of the review results. Conclusion: The preliminary results are a step in the process to ensure fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce’s decision will help maintain a level playing field for U.S. industries by assessing appropriate duties on Mexican imports found to be unfairly priced. Interested parties can continue to engage in the process through public comments and requests for hearings, ensuring a thorough review before the final decision is issued. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings concerning certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The review covers the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. This announcement relates to the antidumping duty administrative review concerning shrimp imports. In these preliminary results, the Department of Commerce determined that some sales of shrimp from Vietnam were made at prices below normal value. Two main companies, Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company (known collectively as Fimex Group) and Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company (STAPIMEX), were examined closely. Their sales were found to be below the normal value. Additionally, 29 other exporters are eligible for separate rates, meaning they will not be included under the Vietnam-wide entity rate, which is higher. However, the review will be rescinded for some exporters. This means that Commerce found no entries of subject merchandise from these exporters during the reviewed period. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Future actions include finalizing the review, with the results providing a basis for future deposits of estimated duties. The review process also revealed that 132 companies did not qualify for separate rate status. These companies are considered part of the Vietnam-wide entity and remain subject to the higher dumping margin. In detail, Fimex Group received a preliminary dumping margin of 10.76 percent, while STAPIMEX received a 6.30 percent margin. A weighted average of these margins will inform the separate rate assigned to the 27 companies that weren’t individually examined but met the standards for a separate rate. The Vietnam-wide entity remains subject to a margin of 25.76 percent. This rate is not under review as no specific request was made to review it. Commerce is conducting this review in line with U.S. laws, using export price calculations and understanding Vietnam as a non-market economy. These steps are consistent with the regulations aimed at ensuring fair trade practices. Businesses involved in importing shrimp from Vietnam should stay updated on the final results, which will impact duty assessments for entries made during the review period. The findings will be integral to future trade dealings and duty estimations. The Department of Commerce will issue instructions on assessing duties on entries made during the review period once the review is concluded. This includes handling companies part of the Vietnam-wide entity differently than those assigned separate rates. The preliminary results are a step in the ongoing process of ensuring trade compliance and fair pricing for shrimp imported from Vietnam. For those interested in the specifics of this review, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and notices are available for consultation, providing comprehensive details of the investigation and its preliminary conclusions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Antidumping Duty Review of Steel Pipes from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary announcement regarding steel pipes imported from Korea. It has found that Hyundai Steel Company and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. sold circular welded non-alloy steel pipes, commonly known as CWP, at prices less than their normal value. The review period for these findings covers November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The investigation has shown that Husteel Co., Ltd., another major exporter, did not sell at less than normal value during this period. The Department of Commerce has decided to end its review of 14 other companies because there were no reviewable entries from these companies during the review period. Readers can contact Benjamin Nathan or Mira Warrier at the Department of Commerce for further information. The contact numbers are (202) 482-3834 and (202) 482-8031. Background The review started after requests were made for a review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from Korea. Hyundai Steel and Husteel were picked as the main companies for the review. However, there were delays due to a government shutdown, which extended the review timeline. After these delays, the preliminary findings were ready by May 2026. The Department of Commerce had already notified companies that the review would be rescinded for those with no entries. None of the parties affected objected, so this plan stands. Scope and Method The review focused on steel pipes from Korea. When looking at companies not individually reviewed, the Department often applies the same method used to find a general rate in past investigations. For companies that were not reviewed individually, a rate was assigned based on findings for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results For the highlighted period, Hyundai Steel/HSP is subjected to a preliminary dumping margin of 4.19%. However, Husteel has a margin of 0.00%, meaning they did not sell below normal value. For six companies not selected for individual review, a rate of 4.19% also applies. Next Steps The public and interested parties can comment on these findings. The Department will share its calculations, and a verification of the information will be conducted. This is an important step to ensure that all details are correct. Anyone interested can submit their opinions or request a hearing. The deadline for these actions will be shortly after all information is finalized. Assessment and Future Steps After the review, duties will be assessed on entries during the period. The specific rates decided will guide how Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will handle duties on imports. For companies where the review has been stopped, the cash deposit rates effective at the time will continue to apply. In conclusion, the findings are significant in determining the duties and pricing policies moving forward. The final decisions will help guide the industry and ensure fairness in trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Strontium Chromate from Austria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released preliminary results regarding the sales of strontium chromate from Austria. This review focused on investigating whether the product was sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Background Commerce published an antidumping duty order on strontium chromate from Austria in November 2019. This order was put in place to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing by foreign producers. After a timely review request, Commerce began an administrative review specifically targeting an Austrian company named Habich GmbH. Preliminary Findings Preliminary results show that Habich GmbH sold strontium chromate in the U.S. at a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.01 percent. This means the company sold the product significantly below its normal value, impacting fair competition in the U.S. market. Scope of Review The review covers strontium chromate in all forms, including powder and paste. This product is classified under specific subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The written description in the original order takes precedence over these classifications. Next Steps for Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on these findings. Commerce will announce a schedule for submitting case and rebuttal briefs after the publication of these preliminary results. Public hearings may be requested by stakeholders to further discuss the issues at hand. Method of Review Commerce followed specific laws to determine the dumping margin, using export price and normal value comparisons. The review ensures proper enforcement of trade laws to maintain fair business practices. Impact on Future Shipments Once final results are published, new cash deposit requirements will be effective. Companies that have been found to dump their products at unfair prices will face additional duties to prevent future infractions. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to enforcing trade laws to protect U.S. industries. The preliminary findings against Habich GmbH are part of ongoing measures to ensure fair trade and competition. Final results of this review are expected within a few months, allowing time for interested parties to provide additional input. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes In recent developments, the U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings of an investigation into certain wood products imported from China. The investigation revealed that the products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. This is part of an ongoing review concerning the import of wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. The investigation covered a time period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Two major companies from China, Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. and Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd., were reviewed in detail. They were found to be selling products in the U.S. at prices substantially lower than they should be. This is also known as “dumping.” As a result of these findings, nine companies have been highlighted in this review. The review initially included 35 companies, but was reduced after requests for withdrawal and no findings of actionable entries for some. Of these, Fujian Hongjia Craft was given a dumping margin of 31.82 percent, while Nanping Huatai was assessed at 58.45 percent. Other companies not directly reviewed but thought to have engaged in similar activities were assigned a margin of 42.04 percent. The Commerce Department also decided to cease reviewing 26 companies after it was determined either no dumping had occurred or there were no entries to assess. The China-wide entity, a catch-all category for companies that have not been given their own rate, remains under scrutiny with a high duty rate of 220.87 percent – though it was not specifically reviewed in this process. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to assess how these products are evaluated and taxed to ensure fair trading practices. The companies involved in the review must now respond and provide any other necessary evidence to clarify their trading activities. The Department is seeking feedback on these preliminary findings, with final decisions expected later in the year. This decision impacts companies both in the U.S. and China, ensuring fair trading practices are upheld. These reviews are crucial in maintaining balanced economic relationships, preventing unfair undercutting, and protecting domestic industries. The ongoing reviews and adjustments in trading policies impact both American businesses and international trade partners. This news comes as part of wider efforts to regulate trade and parity between countries, ensuring American businesses can compete fairly while maintaining economic relationships with international partners. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping of Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is reviewing sodium nitrite imports from India to ensure fair trade practices. The review assesses whether Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and other companies from India are selling sodium nitrite at prices below normal value in the United States. The review period is from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. During this time, the Commerce Department found that DNL did not sell sodium nitrite at less than normal value, which means there was no dumping. The Commerce Department has also said they might stop the review for three companies: Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. This is because there were no recorded entries of sodium nitrite from these companies during the review period. For companies that were not individually reviewed, like Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd. and Kutch Chemical Industries Ltd., the Commerce Department plans to apply a dumping margin of 42.76%. This percentage is based on past findings and will be used as a rate for these companies. Even though the review shows that DNL did not dump products, Commerce will decide on the final results in a few months. Public comments on these findings are welcome, and the final results will be used to set future policies and cash deposit requirements. The next steps involve disclosing detailed calculations and methodology. Businesses and stakeholders can submit their written comments within the specified time frames. Antidumping duties will be assessed based on the final results. If any weighted-average dumping margin exceeds 0.50%, importer-specific duties will be calculated accordingly. Companies showing no dumping will not pay additional duties. These findings help maintain fair trade and ensure that products like sodium nitrite from India are priced properly in the U.S. market. The Commerce Department is committed to using careful analysis to make informed decisions. Stay informed to know about the final results, which will guide future actions and policies regarding sodium nitrite imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.