U.S. Decides on Antidumping Duties for Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision about the duties on a chemical called Difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This chemical is used in air conditioners and refrigeration. The decision is part of a process called a sunset review. What is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a check to see if stopping a duty would cause the problem to start again. Duties are extra costs added to products from other countries. These are added to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. Background of the Order In 2021, the U.S. put an antidumping duty on Difluoromethane from China. The duty was due to reports that China was selling the chemical at a very low price, hurting U.S. businesses. Recent Developments In February 2026, Commerce started its first sunset review of this order. A group of U.S. producers showed that they wanted the duty to continue. They believe ending it would let China sell Difluoromethane cheaply again. Commerce did not get responses from other interested parties. Because of this, Commerce decided to do an expedited review, which is faster than the regular one. Conclusion of the Review Commerce decided that if the duty were removed, dumping would likely begin again. It decided the dumping margin, or amount by which the product is sold below market value, could be as high as 221.06%. Next Steps and Notifications The Commerce Department will notify relevant parties of this decision. This includes those involved with trade and duties. This reminder is important for parties who had access to special or private information during the review. They must follow rules on handling this information after the review ends. This decision shows how the U.S. tries to ensure fair play in trade and protect its industries from unfair practices by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Continuation of Dumping if Duties End Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duties on large vertical shaft engines from China. These engines have sizes ranging from 225cc to 999cc. The review concluded that removing these duties could lead to the return of dumping practices. The antidumping duties were first put in place in March 2021. They target specific engines and parts from the People’s Republic of China. The main goal of these duties is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. The sunset review had its start on February 2, 2026. A sunset review happens every five years. It decides if the duties should stay or be lifted. This process ensures that foreign products are not sold below fair value in the U.S. By February 17, 2026, U.S. domestic parties showed their interest in having the duties remain. Two companies, Discovery and Brigg & Stratton, submitted letters. They affirmed their status as domestic producers of the covered products. Commerce confirmed that there was no formal response from Chinese producers. Commerce decided to perform an expedited review. This means they made their decision faster than usual. The review confirmed the risk of dumping was high if duties end. The final decision shows the potential dumping margin could reach 468.33 percent. This is a very high percentage. It means that removing the duties may lead to very cheap imports that hurt U.S. businesses. Commerce’s findings make sure that U.S. companies can compete fairly. Duties like these help in keeping the market balanced and protect jobs in America. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton signed off on the conclusion. The findings were published in the Federal Register. These results underline the importance of maintaining the current duties against China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Impacts Antidumping Duties on Xanthan Gum From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-12 On May 12, 2026, a significant legal decision was made by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The case involved xanthan gum imported from the People’s Republic of China. This decision is important because it changes how some Chinese companies are charged for selling xanthan gum in the United States. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce had looked into the sale of xanthan gum from China. They wanted to ensure that the gum was not being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This process is called an “antidumping duty review.” The review covered the period from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. At first, the Commerce Department found that companies like Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group were selling xanthan gum at a dumping margin of 17.36 percent. Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group did not agree with this finding. They went to court, challenging the way the Commerce Department calculated their costs, especially related to energy and coal. Court Decisions: In December 2024, the CIT asked the Commerce Department to explain their calculations better. They wanted more details about how energy costs were valued and why a certain code was used for coal. The Commerce Department responded in May 2025, but the court was only partly satisfied. They agreed with some of the Commerce Department’s methods but not all. Finally, in April 2026, the Commerce Department changed their methods. They used a different code for coal, which significantly lowered the dumping margin for Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group. Instead of a 17.36 percent margin, the companies now have a 0.00 percent margin. Implications: This decision means that these companies are no longer considered to be dumping xanthan gum into the U.S. market at unfair prices. The CIT’s decision is final unless appealed. However, for now, the companies will not have to pay extra duties based on a 17.36 percent margin. Current Actions: The Commerce Department has said they will not change the cash deposit rates for these companies because there are newer reviews with different results. Also, due to a court order, certain entries of xanthan gum from these companies are not allowed to be finalized, or “liquidated,” until the appeals process is settled. This ongoing legal situation highlights how complex international trade can be. Companies and governments must carefully navigate rules and laws to ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Updates Investigation on Solar Cells from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to its investigation into solar cells imported from Indonesia. These cells are known as crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. The Commerce Department believes these solar cells were sold in the U.S. at less than their fair value. This process is often referred to as “dumping.” The investigation period covers July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Initially, on April 28, 2026, the Department had shared its first findings. However, it has now made some important updates. The Department found it needed more information about a company named PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia. Due to missing details, the Department has decided to use other facts to make their decisions. PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia did not cooperate with the Department’s request for more information. This meant the Department had to use something called “adverse facts available,” or AFA. This is a method used when a company does not provide the necessary information. Because of this, PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia now faces a higher dumping margin, set at 94.36 percent. This margin is like a penalty rate. The changes will affect cash deposits and the way the imports are handled at customs. The new cash deposit rate will be in effect from May 27, 2026. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also be informed of these changes. These steps by the Department aim to protect U.S. industries by ensuring fair competition and pricing. If you would like more information, you can contact Myrna Lobo or Thomas Cloyd at the numbers provided by the Department. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Monomers and Oligomers Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding the sale of certain chemicals from Korea. These chemicals are called monomers and oligomers. They are important materials used in making different products. The period that the Department looked at was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They found that these chemicals were being sold in the United States for less than what they should cost. This is known as “less than fair value” or LTFV. The investigation began on January 5, 2026, when the Department published its preliminary findings. They then extended these findings to be finalized by May 20, 2026. After reviewing further comments from interested parties, they finalized their determination that the chemicals were being sold at unfair prices. Companies Involved Several companies in Korea were part of this investigation. One of them is called Green Chemical Co., Ltd. This company and its affiliate were found to have sold products at unfair prices. Another company involved is Miwon Specialty Chemical Co., Ltd. The Department found that it was using unfair pricing. As a result, they gave this company a high penalty rate of 155.42%. Kukdo Chemicals Co., Ltd., another company, was also found to be selling at unfairly low prices. They received the same penalty rate as Miwon. Scope of Investigation The chemicals in question include various monomers and oligomers with different scientific names. These chemicals have uses in manufacturing other goods, but specific names were not changed during the investigation. No changes were made to the scope of the investigation since its preliminary findings. The Department didn’t receive any comments on this from interested parties. Final Decision on Critical Circumstances The Department found that there were critical circumstances involved. This means that the imports of these chemicals were causing harm more quickly than usual. This finding applied to all companies involved, including others not directly examined. Looking Ahead As a result of these findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold these chemicals at the border. They will collect extra duties on them to protect U.S. businesses from being harmed. The International Trade Commission will decide next if these low-priced imports are hurting U.S. industries. They have 45 days to make this decision. If the Commission agrees with the Department, the duties will become official, and the U.S. will continue to monitor these imports closely. This decision shows the government’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices that protect American businesses and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Review Results on Antidumping Duties for Welded Pipe from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has released preliminary results for the antidumping duty review on large diameter welded pipes from the Republic of Türkiye for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. This latest update indicates that certain Türkish producers and exporters have been selling these pipes at prices lower than normal value in the United States. Key Findings: The agency determined that HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. was the primary company of focus during this review. HDM Celik Boru and Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd received a preliminary dumping margin of 1.89 percent for this period. The review has been rescinded for 12 companies, as no other parties requested a review for these companies. Reason for Rescission: For some companies, the rescission was due to timely withdrawal requests from the American Line Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee. Others were rescinded as there were no reviewable entries or evidence of suspended merchandise subject to duties during the review period across these companies. The Commerce Department carefully monitors the import of welded pipes to ensure fair competition and address any cases of dumping, which occurs when a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges in its home market. Process Overview: The review was initiated following requests in 2025, and deadlines were modified due to government shutdowns and backlogs. The decision-making process included entries review, margin calculations, and open opportunities for comments and hearings. Next Steps: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments or case briefs. Parties may also request a hearing on these preliminary results. Commerce will issue instructions based on these preliminary findings and any updated results. These proceedings are part of the ongoing efforts to ensure that American producers are not unfairly disadvantaged by international trade practices. The results remain pivotal for future import regulations and duties related to Türkish welded pipes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Low-Price Sales of Dissolving Pulp from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has discovered that high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil may be sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This means Brazilian companies might be undercutting U.S. prices. The period reviewed for this finding was from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. This announcement invites interested parties to comment on the findings. High purity dissolving pulp is used for textiles and other products. The investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce looks at selling prices and compares them to the cost of production. This ensures that trade is fair and U.S. companies are not harmed by unfair pricing practices. Commerce began this investigation on September 8, 2025. Due to government shutdowns, their deadlines were delayed. The preliminary findings were planned for May 18, 2026. The result suggests that a Brazilian company, Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A., and its partner Bracell SP Celulose Ltda., might be selling pulp at unfairly low prices. Their estimated dumping margin is 7.20 percent. This means U.S. companies might lose out because of Brazil’s low prices. The investigation also affects cash deposits for Brazilian pulp imports. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend certain financial transactions. This step is to protect U.S. industries until there is a final decision. Commerce welcomes comments and feedback from parties by a set date. If any company disagrees with these results, they can provide their evidence during the comment period. The Department of Commerce will carefully check the evidence before making a final decision. A hearing might take place if requested. Depending on comments, a final decision might involve other details and evidence. This investigation aims to make trade fair. The findings will help U.S. businesses by ensuring they don’t suffer from unfair practices. The goal is to ensure that all competitors trade on an equal playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Updates Antidumping Duty on Chinese Aluminum Foil Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Summary The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced an update on antidumping duties for certain aluminum foil products from China. The change is due to a ministerial error corrected in the most recent review results. The updated rates cover the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The revised duties become effective from May 27, 2026. Background The Department of Commerce had earlier published results on April 16, 2026, regarding duties on aluminum foil from China. However, the Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group identified an error. This group consists of firms like JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC. Ministerial Error A ministerial error occurred in calculating costs for selling, general and administrative expenses, and interest. This oversight was identified by the petitioners. The Department of Commerce has agreed to this error and corrected it accordingly. Corrected Dumping Margins After correcting the error, the following companies have new dumping margins: Jiangsu Dingsheng and related companies: 26.60% Jiangsu Zhongji and its affiliates: 29.89% Companies receiving a separate rate like Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Eastern Valley Co., and others: 28.01% Disclosure and Assessment Rates The Department intends to disclose the detailed calculations within five days. Duties will be assessed according to the corrected review findings. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) will follow these amended results for merchandise entries. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit rates for these companies will apply for products entering the U.S. on or after the published date. Different rates apply based on whether the exporter has specific rates or falls under the China-wide entity. Important Reminders Importers must remember to file a certificate regarding antidumping duties. No compliance might lead to doubled duties. Those under administrative protective orders should return or destroy confidential information to avoid violations. Final Notes These updates were made to ensure fair pricing of imported goods into the U.S., protecting local industries from unfair competition. The changes reflect the commitment of the U.S. to maintain balanced trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Norwegian Dissolving Pulp Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding the import of high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. It was found that this product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This brings concerns about fair competition in the market. Key Details: Agency Involved: The determination was made by the International Trade Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce. This agency is responsible for enforcing laws related to international trade. Product in Focus: The investigation centers on high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. This pulp is often used in making textiles, cellophane, and certain chemicals. Investigation Period: The period under investigation spans from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Preliminary Findings: Commerce has found that dissolving pulp from Norway is sold in the U.S. at prices below fair value. The estimated dumping margin is set at 6.54 percent. This margin reflects the difference between the price in the U.S. and what is considered a fair market price. Borregaard AS, a company based in Norway, is the primary subject of this investigation. It is noted that this company is responsible for a significant portion of such exports to the U.S. All other producers and exporters of this type of pulp from Norway will also face the same rate of 6.54 percent. Next Steps and Procedures: The Commerce Department will now direct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of this merchandise. Importers will need to deposit cash for antidumping duties. Interested parties have been invited to comment on these preliminary findings. Final comments and briefs are expected following a verification process. A final determination is expected to be released later, after further examination and inputs from stakeholders. Public Participation: The public and interested parties are encouraged to submit comments. Comments will be considered before the final determination is made. A public hearing may be requested by interested parties. However, requests must clearly outline the topics to be discussed. Importance of Decision: This decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce is critical. It ensures that trade practices remain fair and competitive. It also protects U.S. industries from unfair pricing in the international market. This finding reflects a serious approach by U.S. authorities to uphold trade laws and ensure domestic industries are not harmed by unfair international practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Subsidies for Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has found that producers and exporters of corrosion inhibitors from China received subsidies. These preliminary results are part of an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on these products. The review covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Companies Reviewed Commerce reviewed submissions for two main Chinese companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. These companies were chosen for examination because of their involvement in exporting corrosion inhibitors. The review found that subsidies were given to these companies by Chinese authorities. Rate Calculation Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 19.31 percent. Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. got a higher rate of 48.45 percent. This means that these companies benefited from financial aid affecting their pricing. For other Chinese companies that were part of the review but not individually investigated, a rate of 36.67 percent was preliminarily assigned. Rescission and Methodology Commerce also decided to rescind the administrative review for five companies. These companies did not have any reviewable entries during the period. Without any entries, there was no basis for assessment. Commerce’s review is based on legal standards. These standards check for subsidies from authorities that provide a financial gain. The subsidy must be specific, meaning it targets only certain goods or companies. Public Participation Interested parties can comment on these findings. The public comment period is open and Commerce will establish a briefing schedule. Organizations and individuals can submit their opinions or requests for hearings. Next Steps Upon finalizing this review, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on the necessary duties. The cash deposit system will adjust based on the final results, affecting future imports. Overall, the Commerce Department’s work ensures fair trade practices and addresses unfair foreign subsidies. Exact calculations and procedures support U.S. industries affected by international competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Change in Antidumping Duties on Colombian Paper Bags Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On April 13, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a big decision. The court agreed with changes made by the U.S. Department of Commerce in a case about paper shopping bags from Colombia. This decision affects the antidumping duties. Antidumping duties are extra costs put on products sold below a fair price. The company involved is Ditar, S.A., which sells paper bags. They were investigated because it was thought they sold bags in the U.S. for less than they should have. The case looked at paper bag sales between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. At first, Commerce said Ditar’s dumping margin, or the amount sold below fair price, was 11.06%. Later, because of court findings, this changed to 11.16%. This new number affects both Ditar and other paper bag sellers, as Ditar was the only company studied closely in this case. The main reason for the change was how a test was used in the investigation. The court found the test was not used correctly in figuring out if a sale was for the U.S. or Colombia. After looking again, Commerce found Ditar knew the bags would go to the U.S. This led to changing their dumping margin. The court’s decision is final. It also means Commerce will change how they handle deposits. When companies bring goods into the U.S., they pay a deposit to cover possible duties. New instructions will be given about how much Ditar and other companies must deposit. This decision and the new rates are important for those who trade in paper shopping bags. It shows how carefully rules are checked to make sure trade is fair. The notice was officially published on May 20, 2026, and aims to keep the trading system fair for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Updates Solar Cell Investigation from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Background Information Earlier this year, on April 28, 2026, the Department of Commerce released a preliminary report suggesting there was less-than-fair-value (LTFV) sales involving solar cells from Laos. Following this, a petition by the Alliance for American Solar Manufacturing and Trade brought forward details of calculation mistakes made during the initial assessment. Details of the Errors Two main errors were flagged. Firstly, Commerce used surrogate value data for a year, rather than the relevant six-month period. Secondly, there was a mistake in converting truck freight values from a per-kilogram basis to a per-square meter basis. This conversion was necessary to match the values of solar glass. Due to these errors, the initial findings undervalued the weighted-average dumping margin for Solarspace Technology (Laos) Sole Co., Ltd. Revised Findings After correcting these errors, the dumping margin for Solarspace increased from 22.46% to 33.57%. This is a significant change, as it is more than five percentage points higher than the original figure and at least 25% greater overall. These changes not only affect Solarspace but also impact other associated firms and the Laos-wide entity involved in the investigation. Amended Rates and Future Steps The new cash deposit rates are effective immediately, according to the amended findings. These adjusted rates will remain until further notice. The Department of Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission of this updated determination. Conclusion This development is important as it gives further insight into fair trade practices and ensures that U.S. industries are protected from unfair international trade activities. The Department of Commerce has made it clear that they intend to follow these revised preliminary findings until more definitive results are found. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chromium Trioxide from India Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about chromium trioxide, a chemical product from India. They found that this product is likely being sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This finding is part of an investigation that took place from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is asking people who are interested in this case to share their thoughts about this preliminary finding. These comments need to follow certain rules and be sent by a deadline. Chromium trioxide is an inorganic compound used in many products. The investigation covers chromium trioxide in all forms and purities. No one has raised any issues regarding the range of products in this investigation. This investigation is happening under U.S. law. The Department of Commerce looks into claims that products from other countries are sold at very low prices in the U.S. This is sometimes called “dumping.” One company, Vishnu Chemicals Limited, is a main focus of this investigation. The Department of Commerce found that this company did not provide all the information needed to calculate if they were dumping the product. Because of this, the Department used evidence from other sources to make their decision. They found an average dumping margin of 14.44% for Vishnu Chemicals and all other companies that did not provide enough information. Because of these findings, the Department of Commerce will make sure that U.S. Customs collects a deposit when this product comes into the U.S. This is a common step in cases like this, to ensure fair trade practices. Next, there will be a few more steps. People can submit written comments on this finding, and there might be a hearing. If these steps happen, they would help the Department finalize its decision. Finally, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will receive information about this decision. The ITC will decide if the sale of this product is hurting U.S. companies that make similar products. This decision is important because it helps keep fair trade practices and supports U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chromium Trioxide from Türkiye Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding the sale of chromium trioxide from the Republic of Türkiye. The result shows that this chemical compound is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This preliminary decision covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is inviting interested parties to comment on this determination. The agency responsible for this investigation is the International Trade Administration, which is a part of the Department of Commerce. The contact person for more information is Monica Gillis from AD/CVD Operations, Office V. The product being investigated is chromium trioxide from Türkiye. This investigation follows section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. According to the findings, chromium trioxide from Türkiye has an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 40.88 percent. This margin applies to Türkiye Şi[ş]e ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş., the main respondent in the investigation, and all other producers not individually examined. The Department applies an adverse facts available (AFA) rate to the main respondent for not providing the necessary information for calculation. The Department instructs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of these entries of chromium trioxide. The CBP will now require a cash deposit equal to the estimated dumping margin. The public document detailing this decision is available on the Enforcement and Compliance website. The deadline for interested parties to submit comments is 14 days after the notice publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days later. To request a hearing, parties must submit a written request within 30 days after this notice. The final decision on this investigation is expected within 75 days of the preliminary determination. This determination means that chromium trioxide is sold more cheaply in the U.S. than in Türkiye, possibly harming U.S. industries. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will investigate further to determine if these imports are materially injuring U.S. industries. The Department’s decision is focused on ensuring fair trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Confirms Subsidies on Palladium from Russia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Introduction: On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a final decision about palladium coming from Russia. They found that Russian producers and exporters of unwrought palladium receive unfair financial help, also called subsidies, from their government. This decision comes after a detailed investigation. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce, also known as Commerce, started looking into these subsidies on January 1, 2024. The investigation covered palladium produced and sold before December 31, 2024. Palladium is a valuable metal used in many industries. Two main Russian companies were looked at: JSC Urals Innovative Technologies and Prioksky Plant of Non Ferrous Metals. Findings: Commerce found enough evidence to prove that the Russian government provided financial benefits or subsidies to these companies. These benefits give them an unfair advantage in the U.S. market. The Department used facts available, including some unfavorable assumptions, to conclude their decision. This approach is called using adverse facts available. Subsidy Rates: Both of the main companies looked at, along with other Russian producers and exporters, were assigned a subsidy rate of 109.10 percent. This means that these companies benefited from government help equal to 109.10 percent of the value of their palladium exports. Suspension of Liquidation: As a result of this decision, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits from these companies for their palladium exports. This action started on March 11, 2026, when the preliminary findings were first announced. Next Steps: The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now take 45 days to decide if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If the ITC agrees with the findings, further actions, like a countervailing duty order, might follow. This will ensure that U.S. industries compete fairly. Conclusion: The decision emphasizes the commitment of the U.S. to follow fair trade practices. It aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. The document also highlights a detailed investigation process to reach a fair and lawful conclusion. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review of Mushroom Imports from Poland Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its review of mushroom imports from Poland. This review looked at whether the Polish company Okechamp S.A. sold preserved mushrooms in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The review covered the period from November 3, 2022, to April 30, 2024. Commerce found that Okechamp did sell mushrooms at prices below the normal value, which is considered dumping. As a result, Commerce calculated a dumping margin of 2.55 percent for Okechamp S.A. The rules for how this decision affects the import of Polish mushrooms have also been set. Shipments from Okechamp will now have a cash deposit rate equal to the dumping margin of 2.55 percent. This means importers have to pay this percentage as a deposit for duties. For other companies, the rate will continue as previously set, depending on their specific case history or the general rate of 34.32 percent if they are new or have no specific rate. Commerce will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about how to assess duties for these shipments. Some shipments could be charged duties based on the found margin, while others might not be if they fall below a certain threshold. Commerce has also outlined what importers should do with any advance payments made on duties. If they paid too much or too little based on this new decision, adjustments will have to be made. In summary, Commerce is imposing new cash deposit rates and assessment procedures on companies dealing with preserved mushrooms from Poland. This action aims to ensure fair trade practices and uphold U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

No Dumping Found for Korean Superabsorbent Polymers: U.S. Commerce Department Report Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In a recent report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, it was announced that LG Chem, Ltd., a company from the Republic of Korea, did not engage in dumping superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in the United States market. This decision is based on the preliminary results of an antidumping duty administrative review. The review period examined was from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. During this time, LG Chem, Ltd. was found to have no sales of SAP in the U.S. market at less than the normal value. This means that LG Chem sold its products at fair market prices. The Department of Commerce is responsible for monitoring and enforcing trade laws in the U.S. to prevent dumping. Dumping is when a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it charges in its home market. This can harm local industries in the importing country. The results of the review are not final yet. Interested parties have been invited to comment on these preliminary findings. The Department of Commerce will finalize its decision after reviewing these comments. The findings will also have an impact on cash deposit requirements for future imports of SAP from Korea. If the final results remain the same, there will be no additional duties on SAP products from LG Chem, Ltd. Importers have responsibilities too. They need to submit a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. If they do not comply, the Department of Commerce might assume that duties have been reimbursed, leading to double charges. The Department plans to issue final results no later than 120 days after this announcement. It is a way to ensure fair trade practices continue and that the U.S. market isn’t negatively impacted by unfair pricing practices from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Steel Nails from UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review for the period of May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024, concerning certain steel nails imported from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Department found that some producers and exporters sold steel nails at prices lower than their normal value. This could impact how much U.S. buyers pay for these imports. Two companies were the focus of this review: Master Nails and Pins Manufacturing, LLC/Middle East Manufacturing Steel, LLC (together known as Master) and Rich Well Steel Industries LLC. The review determined that these companies engaged in unfair pricing practices, known as “dumping.” Final Findings: For Master, the Department calculated a dumping margin of 81.82%. For Rich Well, the margin was found to be 2.59%. These margins indicate how much the sales price of the nails in the U.S. was below their normal value. Higher percentages show more significant underpricing. Background and Process: The review process was lengthy and involved several extensions due to government shutdowns in late 2025. These delays affected the timeline but not the outcome. From comments and data, the Department adjusted the calculations for the final results. The process included evaluating comments from interested parties. The Department made changes to the calculations for both Rich Well and Master, based on the feedback received. Each step was done under the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. What’s Next? The Department will share its findings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They will assess duties based on these results. Duties are taxes on goods from abroad. They help ensure prices are fair and competitive. For Rich Well, duties will be calculated based on sales during the review period. Master will have duties assessed using their final review margin of 81.82%. If the margin is zero or very low (less than 0.5%), some companies may not have to pay these duties. The CBP will follow specific procedures to apply these duties effectively. Finally, there are set requirements for cash deposits on future imports. These deposits help cover potential duties. The rate for Master and Rich Well will match their review results, while others will follow previous guidelines. This decision remains effective until further notice, impacting any shipments entering the U.S. after the decision’s publication date. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Vietnamese Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipes Confirmed Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In May 2026, a notable decision was announced by the Department of Commerce in the United States. This decision is important for businesses involved in trade between the U.S. and Vietnam. It is about welded stainless steel pressure pipes from Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Commerce completed its review of these pipes from Vietnam. They found that they were being sold at lower prices than normal in America. This was during a time from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Key Points of the Decision The Department made a final decision that confirms earlier findings. They say that the Vietnam-wide entity has been selling these pipes at unfairly low prices. A “Vietnam-wide entity” means all companies from Vietnam selling these pipes. The Vietnam-wide entity now has a duty rate of 90.80 percent. This means they must pay extra money when they sell these pipes in the U.S. Important Dates and Information This decision is effective from May 20, 2026. The review checks whether any rules, like selling at low prices, were broken. No new comments or changes came after their first findings in January. Next Steps U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now collect these duties. They will wait 35 days after May 20 to start. If anyone disagrees with this decision, they can go to the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash Deposit Requirements Vietnam-wide entity must deposit 90.80 percent. Others with special rates keep their rates. No special rate? Then deposit 90.80 percent. These deposits last until further notice. Trade Compliance It’s essential for importers to meet these new rules. If they don’t, they might have to pay even more. The Department of Commerce reminded parties to handle any special information safely. They are responsible for its return or destruction after use. Conclusion This decision reinforces trade fairness rules between the U.S. and Vietnam for welded stainless steel pipes. The Department is clear about its findings and future expectations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Delays Solar Cell Investigation Decision Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is extending its investigation. This investigation is about the sales of solar cells from India. The investigation checks if these sales are at less-than-fair value. This means they might be sold at unfairly low prices. The final decision was supposed to come soon. Now, it will come by September 10, 2026. The provisional measures will also last longer. These are rules that were set for four months. Now, they will last up to six months. This change is due to a request from Mundra Solar Energy Limited and Mundra Solar PV Limited. These companies make and sell many of the solar cells in question. They asked for more time to prepare. The Department of Commerce agreed to this request. No other reasons were found to say no. The investigation started back in August 2025. It covers sales from July 2024 to June 2025. The decision impacts the trade of solar cells from India to the U.S. The aim is to ensure fair trading and competition. Commerce will use this extra time to gather all needed information. They want to make sure the decision is correct and fair. This decision comes under the laws that govern trade and tariffs. These rules make sure that trade is fair for everyone involved. Commerce’s final decision will be important for solar cell trade from India. It will help decide future trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Vietnam Sold Polypropylene Boxes at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding imports of polypropylene corrugated boxes from Vietnam. Here’s what this means: What Happened? The Department of Commerce looked into the sale of these boxes from Vietnam between July and December 2024. They found that the boxes were sold for less than what they should be, which is called “less than fair value.” This is sometimes known as dumping. They also noticed that these cheaper imports have been coming in very quickly, which could be harmful to U.S. companies. Important Dates: The investigation period covered July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This announcement took effect on May 20, 2026. Company Involvement: The investigation focused on a Vietnamese company, Jia Bao Rui, but this company stopped participating in the investigation. Because they didn’t cooperate, the U.S. has decided to treat Jia Bao Rui as part of a larger group, called the Vietnam-wide entity. This group is now being held responsible for selling the boxes at unfair prices. Outcome: The Department of Commerce determined that the wide Vietnam-wide group was guilty of these unfair trade practices. As a result, imports from this group face a high duty rate of 130.58% to make up for the underpricing. This rate is meant to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will look into whether the U.S. industry was indeed hurt by these underpriced imports. If they decide there was harm, then additional duties will be permanently applied to these imports. All these steps, like putting the extra fees on these boxes, will continue until further talks or changes happen. For now, U.S. Customs will keep an eye on imports from the Vietnam-wide group to ensure the new rules are followed. This decision shows how the U.S. takes steps to protect its markets from unfair foreign pricing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Ends Review on Chinese Freight Rail Couplers Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to stop its review of freight rail couplers from China. This review was about possible unfair pricing of these products in the U.S. This process is known as an antidumping duty review. The review period was between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The decision was published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2026. This review started after a group called the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers asked for it. They wanted the Department of Commerce to look at certain companies in China that might be selling freight rail couplers at unfair prices. On August 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce began this review. They checked records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to see if there were any entries of these products into the U.S. market. On December 8, 2025, the Department made it clear which companies they were looking into more closely. They also decided not to look into some other companies. In February 2026, the Department shared its plan to stop the review since it found no entries of the couplers during the review period. The department invited comments from interested parties, including the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers and a U.S. importer called Greenbrier Central LLC. The Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers wanted the review to continue because of an ongoing investigation by CBP. But Greenbrier argued against continuing the review, as there were no couplers from those companies recorded by CBP during the review period. The review process had been delayed twice due to government shutdowns, in November 2025. These pauses extended the review timeline by 68 days in total. The Department of Commerce will inform CBP about handling the duties related to any entries. Since the review was stopped, the current cash deposit rates for these products will stay the same. This notice also acts as a reminder for interested parties to handle all sensitive information properly. They must return or destroy any private data in line with U.S. regulations. This decision by the Department of Commerce is part of their efforts to manage and enforce fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Confirms Continued Dumping on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its fourth expedited sunset review regarding certain crepe paper products from China. The review focused on whether to revoke the antidumping duty order on these products. Importantly, it was determined that revoking this order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping practices. This conclusion stems from a detailed analysis undertaken by the Commerce team. On January 25, 2005, the initial antidumping duty order was published in the Federal Register. The recent review process began in earnest on February 2, 2026. Commerce issued a notice of its intent to review this order, as per the Tariff Act of 1930. By February 3, 2026, domestic manufacturers expressed their interest in participating in the review. Their involvement reflected significant concern over the potential impacts of revocation. No substantive response was received from respondents representing the Chinese exporters. This led to Commerce proceeding with an expedited review due to the lack of respondent input. The final review results confirm that continuation of the antidumping measures is necessary. The dumping margins could remain significant, at rates as high as 266.83 percent. This outcome reaffirms the ongoing concerns of domestic manufacturers about unfair pricing practices and reinforces the protection offered to U.S. industry. All parties handling proprietary information from this review must adhere to strict guidelines concerning its return or destruction. This is in line with the regulations overseeing administrative protective orders. The decision is now published and available for review, ensuring transparency in the enforcement of fair trade practices aimed at maintaining equitable market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Review Finds Chinese Steel Nails Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review on steel nails from China. This review covered the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The final results were published in the Federal Register on May 19, 2026. Commerce found that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. and its affiliate companies sold steel nails in the U.S. at prices below normal value. This action is called “dumping” and can harm U.S. industries by undercutting their prices. The rate for these dumped nails was set at 28.28 percent. This means that importers will have to pay this duty rate on future shipments from these companies. For the China-wide entity, which includes companies not reviewed separately, the duty rate remains at 118.04 percent. Commerce did not receive any comments on its preliminary findings from January 28, 2026. Because of this, the preliminary results stand as the final results. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will soon start collecting duties based on this review. The duties will apply to all entries of these steel nails made during the review period. These new duty rates apply to any shipments entering the U.S. after publication of the final results. Previous rates will apply to other companies that were not individually reviewed. This review is part of Commerce’s ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices. The duties aim to protect U.S. businesses by leveling the playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continuation of Subsidies Likely on Chinese Corrosion Inhibitors Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-05-19 The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final decision regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from China. The decision is the result of an expedited first sunset review of the countervailing duty order. This review is important in determining whether the removal of countervailing duties would result in continued subsidies. Background Information The Commerce Department had initially put an order on these inhibitors on March 19, 2021. This order came about to counter subsidies from China that affect U.S. businesses. On February 2, 2026, a review was started to reassess the situation. Participants in the Review The domestic company, Wincom Inc., expressed its interest in this review. This company is a manufacturer of similar products in the United States. They filed their notice of intent to participate on February 17, 2026. They have been recognized as an interested party because they manufacture the same type of products. Results of the Review The review found that taking away the duties would likely lead to more subsidies. These subsidies would continue to affect U.S. companies negatively. The Commerce Department used various legal frameworks, including sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, to reach this conclusion. Subsidy Rates The Commerce Department outlined specific subsidy rates for different Chinese companies. For example, Jiangyin Delian Chemical Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 96.29%, while Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. has a rate of 64.18%. Some companies, like CAC Shanghai Chemical Co., Ltd., have higher rates at 239.21%. Specifically, all other companies covered by the order have a rate of 80.58%. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce has made it clear that removing the duty order would lead to the continuation of subsidies. These subsidies are harmful to domestic producers like Wincom Inc. The countervailing duties will remain in place to support U.S. companies. The decision follows strict procedures and guidelines to ensure fairness. The announcement also serves as a reminder for parties to handle confidential information with care. The full details of this review are available electronically for those with access to the official systems. The Commerce Department stresses transparency in its decisions for public accountability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Decides on Antidumping Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On Tuesday, May 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from China. This decision came after a detailed review. The Department of Commerce looked at an antidumping duty order. An antidumping duty is a tax on foreign products sold below fair market value in the U.S. The order in question, first published on March 19, 2021, covers corrosion inhibitors from China. The sunset review began on February 2, 2026. A sunset review is when authorities check if canceling an antidumping duty would lead to unfair trade again. Notices were given, and parties were invited to participate. On February 17, 2026, a domestic interested party showed intent to take part. This means they make similar products in the U.S. and want to protect their business. By March 4, they submitted more information for the review. The Department did not hear back from any opposing parties. Without any responses, the review was expedited. An expedited review means it was done in 120 days instead of longer. The final findings showed that if the duty is revoked, unfair trade might return. The dumping margins, which are the amount by which normal value exceeds export price, could be as high as 277.90%. Parties with access to sensitive information have to handle it carefully. They must return or destroy protected data once the review ends. This ensures the protection of private information. The Department of Commerce has published these results following U.S. laws and regulations. These laws help maintain fair trade practices. In summary, the U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duty order on corrosion inhibitors from China. This decision aims to prevent unfair trade and protect U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Trade Duties on Electrical Steel Import Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it will continue to apply special trade duties on non-oriented electrical steel imported from six countries. These countries are Sweden, Germany, China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. This type of steel is important in making parts for machines like motors and transformers. It can be used in making electrical devices that need certain kinds of magnetic qualities. The trade duties are known as antidumping duty (AD) orders and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. They are in place to prevent unfair trade practices that hurt U.S. businesses. The duties were first put in place on December 3, 2014. They aim to protect U.S. industry from financial harm due to imports that are sold at less than fair value or get unfair government help from other countries. These duties prevent what is known as “dumping.” The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) reviewed the orders. They agreed with the Department of Commerce that removing the duties could lead to further harm. This harm would come if foreign companies continued to sell steel at unfairly low prices. Because of this decision, there will be no changes in the way duties are collected. The orders will stay in place. This means that the U.S. Customs will continue to collect duties on imports of this specific type of steel. In summary, the orders will continue to stop foreign companies from undercutting prices in the U.S. market. This protects companies in the United States. These actions by the Department of Commerce and the ITC ensure fair trading practices. They help keep the U.S. industry strong by making sure that all businesses play by the same rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Review on Antidumping of Resin from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review regarding the import of Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from the Sultanate of Oman. The outcome of this review shows that the sole manufacturer and exporter under examination, OCTAL SAOC FZC (OCTAL), sold the resin at prices lower than normal during the period of May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce first made preliminary findings on this matter in September 2025, which were discussed in detail in the Federal Register. Following this, in January 2026, the Department conducted a thorough verification process to inspect OCTAL’s sales and cost information. They examined detailed documents and accounting records. There were notable delays in the review process caused by a Federal Government shutdown and backlogs, but the final results have now been announced. According to these results, OCTAL SAOC FZC has a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.82 percent. Additionally, the Department of Commerce made updates based on findings during verification. They recalculated inventory carrying costs using the latest data from OCTAL. The Department will communicate with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to enforce the finalized antidumping duties. Importers of this resin need to be aware of their responsibilities to comply with these duties. For future imports, a new cash deposit rate will be applied. OCTAL will now have a rate of 2.82 percent. If the exporter was not reviewed but the producer was, the rate will follow the producer’s previous rate. If both the exporter and producer were not reviewed previously, the rate is set at 7.62 percent. Importers must also remember to file a certificate proving that antidumping duties have not been reimbursed. If this is not done, it may lead to higher duties being imposed. Parties who have benefited from access to confidential information under the Administrative Protective Order (APO) must follow proper procedures to return or destroy this information in accordance with regulatory guidance. This review by the Department of Commerce ensures fair trading practices and aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing strategies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Silicomanganese From India: U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duty Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Silicomanganese From India: U.S. Imposes Antidumping Duty The United States Department of Commerce has finalized results from its review of silicomanganese imports from India. The department has determined that Maithan Alloys Limited (MAL), the only producer/exporter under review, sold silicomanganese in the United States at prices lower than normal value. This review covered sales from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Review Summary The findings were published by the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration. The review was detailed in the Federal Register dated May 18, 2026. The final determination follows preliminary results announced on September 11, 2025. The review showed that MAL sold silicomanganese at a dumping margin of 0.53 percent. This means the company sold the product for less than its normal value in its home market, which can harm domestic producers in the U.S. Timeline and Procedures The review process experienced delays due to a government shutdown and other scheduling adjustments. The final results were completed by May 11, 2026, after extensions to address these disruptions. Only one other party, Eramet Marietta, Inc., commented on preliminary results. Discussions on these comments are documented in an Issues and Decision Memorandum. Additional changes were made to MAL’s margin calculations based on these comments. Next Steps The department plans to disclose detailed calculations from the review to involved parties. This disclosure will occur within five days after the results are publicly announced. For entries of silicomanganese, U.S. Customs will assess duties based on these findings. Import-specific rates will be calculated unless the rate is deemed too low to apply duties. If MAL did not know their product was destined for the U.S., rates for other companies will apply. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit requirements will take effect immediately. For MAL, a deposit rate of 0.53 percent will apply. Rates for other companies remain unchanged if they were not part of this review. These requirements are crucial to ensure future compliance. Conclusion Importers are reminded of their duties to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Failure to do so may lead to penalties. The Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for compliance with duty regulations and will keep monitoring imports to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The procedures set here aim to maintain fair competition and market stability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Anti-Dumping on Steel from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of their review on anti-dumping duties for certain corrosion-resistant steel products imported from Taiwan. The review determined that these steel products were being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The investigation involved multiple companies, including Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Prosperity) and Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. (SYSCO), which were found to have no dumping margin, indicating their practices were fair. However, Great Grandeul Steel Company Limited was found to have a dumping margin of 0.99 percent. The review process began with preliminary results announced on January 8, 2026. Interested parties, including Prosperity and Steel Dynamics, Inc., had submitted their comments during the review period. The final memorandum addresses all submitted issues and decides on the appropriate measures. Companies not selected for a detailed review received a rate derived from previously established methods. These methods ensure fair competition among U.S. domestic products and imported goods. The Department of Commerce will instruct Customs and Border Protection on the assessment of duties, ensuring fair competition. For entries made during the reviewed period where companies did not know the goods were destined for the U.S., duties will be assessed at a rate of 11.04 percent, which is the default rate for such situations. For more information and access to the complete decision memorandum, interested parties can visit specific government websites listed in the official notice, ensuring transparency and comprehensive understanding of the review findings and implications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Canadian Mushrooms Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision to impose countervailing duties on fresh mushrooms imported from Canada. This decision comes after an investigation revealed that Canadian producers and exporters are receiving countervailable subsidies from the Canadian government. Preliminary Findings The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. During this time, it was found that subsidies are being provided to Canadian mushroom producers, which might unfairly price them in the U.S. market. The U.S. Department of Commerce used specific criteria to identify these subsidies. The subsidies are recognized when a financial contribution by the government provides a benefit to the producers, and when the subsidies are specific to certain industries or companies. Two main companies involved in this investigation are Champ’s Fresh Farms Inc. and Farmers’ Fresh Mushrooms Inc. The preliminary subsidy rates for these companies are 1.62% and 4.97%, respectively. These rates are above zero and not negligible. Scope of the Investigation This investigation covers all fresh mushrooms from Canada of the Agaricus genus. These include common types such as button mushrooms and portobello mushrooms. The mushrooms might be whole, sliced, or diced. They may also come packaged for retail sale or in bulk. The current tariff code for these mushrooms is 0709.51.0100. Although this code helps identify the mushrooms for customs purposes, the investigation’s scope relies on the written description of the products. Impact on Importers In line with the preliminary decision, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now start suspending the liquidation of these mushrooms. This means they will not clear the goods for sale until the duties are paid. Importers will need to deposit cash equal to the calculated subsidy rates. The Department of Commerce will calculate these deposits based on whether the producer, exporter, or both have received company-specific subsidy rates. If neither has company-specific rates, a general “all others” rate of 2.84% will apply. Next Steps The U.S. Department of Commerce will further verify this information before making a final decision in September 2026. If the final decision also finds that these subsidies harm U.S. mushroom producers, the duties could become permanent. Public Comments and Hearings There is an opportunity for interested parties to submit comments or request a hearing. The Department encourages public engagement through written requests, and parties may discuss issues raised before and during the investigation. Final Thoughts This preliminary determination is crucial for U.S. mushroom producers as it seeks to balance competition against imports from Canada. The complete results of the investigation will be pivotal in establishing permanent measures to protect local industry and ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. International Trade Commission will further investigate whether these imports cause material injury to the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Circumvention of Duties on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain engines from China. They found that two models of engines made by Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., Ltd. are being used to avoid duties. These models are the 5C65M0 and the BC70M0. The engines were shipped from China to the U.S. This decision was reported in the Federal Register on May 18, 2026. The engines are known as small vertical shaft engines. They are between 99cc and 225cc in size. The Department of Commerce says these engines are “later-developed merchandise.” This means they were made to avoid antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are taxes put on goods sold below fair price to protect U.S. industries. The inquiry started because of a request from Briggs & Stratton, LLC, a U.S. company. They asked the Department of Commerce to investigate on June 18, 2025. The engines entered the U.S. market between January 1, 2018, and July 11, 2025. During a government shutdown, the investigation faced delays. On November 14, 2025, all deadlines were extended because of this. Another delay happened on November 24, 2025, due to document backlogs. Additional extensions were announced in January and May 2026. The Department of Commerce has started steps to handle this issue. They plan to request Customs and Border Protection to keep stopping entry of these engine models. They will also ask for cash deposits based on duties for these engines that were already in place for Zongshen. There is a chance for public comments on this decision. Written opinions can be submitted within two weeks of the notice being published. Others can respond to these comments within a week. Those who want a hearing can request it within 30 days of the notice. Finally, the Department will notify the International Trade Commission about the finding. This body might review if the decision affects U.S. industries badly. They will have 60 days to give their advice. The decision was made by Christopher Abbott from the International Trade Administration on May 12, 2026. For any questions, contact Zachary Shaykin at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Changes in Aluminum Foil Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 5, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made an important decision. This decision affects how the U.S. Department of Commerce handles aluminum foil from Turkey. The case is called Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States. The court decision relates to the investigation of aluminum foil. This investigation was about whether the foil was sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. Back in September 2021, Commerce published a final decision saying that aluminum foil from Turkey was sold at these low prices. In November 2021, Commerce published an order to add extra duties on this aluminum foil. The company involved, Assan Aluminyum, was not happy. They challenged Commerce’s decision in court. Two main issues were about how taxes were treated and how Assan’s costs were calculated. The court asked Commerce to reconsider these issues. Commerce adjusted some calculations and explained others. For example, they fixed how they handled duty drawbacks. But the court wanted more explanation on a final topic. This topic was about Assan’s hedging gains. Commerce gave its response, and the petitioner in the case later decided to drop the issue. The court agreed and dismissed the case. Commerce has now changed its final decision. The dumping margin for Assan was slightly increased. Though this change does not alter current cash deposits for Assan, it affects others who are involved in similar trades. Commerce will update rules for how customs duties are applied. But for now, no change in cash deposits is needed for Assan, as newer reviews have set different rates already. This case underscores the complexity of trade investigations. It shows how court decisions can lead to changes in how trade regulations are applied. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Sodium Nitrite Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Key Findings: Commerce determined that some subsidies given to Indian producers are countervailable. The review is part of an ongoing administrative process involving sodium nitrite imports. Companies Assessed: The review specifically focused on Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and Kutch Chemical Industries Limited. Three companies—Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd.—may be excluded from further review as no reviewable entries were found during the period for which liquidation is suspended. Rates Determined: Deepak Nitrite Limited has a preliminary subsidy rate of 2.26%. Kutch Chemical Industries Limited received a subsidy rate of 63.60%, calculated mainly using adverse facts available because of missing information. Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd., not individually examined, received a subsidy rate based on DNL, also at 2.26%. Future Steps: The Commerce Department invites comments from interested parties on these preliminary results. There is a plan to rescind reviews for companies without reviewable entries according to existing trade regulations. Methodology Used: The review process follows regulatory guidance to calculate subsidy rates based on contributions that give financial benefits and show specificity. Public Involvement: Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments or case briefs and request a hearing if needed. The Commerce Department is committed to transparency, offering access to documentation and data through its electronic portal, ACCESS. Next Moves: The preliminary results, subject to further comment and review, may lead to adjustments in cash deposit requirements for Indian sodium nitrite imports. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be instructed accordingly once the final results are published. These findings are part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices and compliance with international trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duties for Paper File Folders from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the preliminary results of its review on antidumping duties for paper file folders from India. This review covers a period from May 17, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to see if paper file folders from India were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value, which is called dumping. One key finding of this review is that Navneet Education Limited, a producer and exporter from India, made sales of paper file folders at less than normal value. This means that they were selling the folders cheaper in the U.S. than they would in India. The preliminary calculated dumping margin for Navneet is 5.65 percent. This rate tells us how much the prices were lower than expected. However, for another company, Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited, the Department of Commerce has decided to rescind, or cancel, the review. This decision was made because Kokuyo did not have any entries of these folders that could be looked at during the review period. This means there were no sales to review, so the process does not need to include them. The U.S. Department of Commerce uses an electronic system called ACCESS, where registered users can view documents related to these reviews. For anyone interested, detailed information about this review is available online. The paper file folders from India are under an order that watches for unfair pricing. This order was put in place to make sure companies do not sell products in the U.S. for less than the usual price. If they do, antidumping duties are applied. These duties are like extra taxes that make the price fair again. The next steps involve comments from interested parties. People or companies who want to comment on the preliminary results have 21 days from the notice date to submit their opinions. There is also an opportunity to request a hearing to discuss these results further. For now, the U.S. Department of Commerce will keep holding Navneet’s shipments of paper file folders to these new estimated duties until a final decision is made. For Kokuyo, any shipments that happened before will not have extra duties added after this decision. The U.S. Department of Commerce takes these steps to ensure that U.S. businesses can compete on a fair playing field. By investigating and reviewing the pricing of imports, they help protect local industries from unfair competition from overseas. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.