U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies Given to Aluminum Producers in Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that producers in Bahrain received subsidies for producing aluminum sheets. This was announced on July 13, 2026. The review focused on the time from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The review is part of a regular check under the countervailing duty order on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. Gulf Aluminum Rolling Mill, often called GARMCO, was the main company checked in this review. The Commerce Department used special rules to decide if subsidies were provided. If a government helps a company financially, and this help benefits the company, it might be a subsidy. The review found that GARMCO received a subsidy rate of 18.97%. These findings mean that the U.S. might charge extra fees, or duties, on aluminum sheets from Bahrain when they are sent to the U.S. This will be decided after the final review results. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They can submit their comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce within 21 days of this announcement. Once the review is complete, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will use the results to decide the duties on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to complete the final review in about 120 days. At that point, they will share their final decision, considering all the feedback and findings. These processes ensure that international trade rules are followed and that U.S. industries are not hurt by unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheet Imports from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has revealed preliminary findings in its recent administrative review concerning antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet imports from the Republic of Türkiye. The review, which focuses on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, has found that some producers/exporters sold aluminum sheets in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Background and Details: The antidumping duty order on aluminum sheets from Türkiye was first announced in April 2021. This current review began following an opportunity notice published on April 1, 2025, which allowed interested parties to request an administrative review of the order. Subsequently, the Department of Commerce initiated the review for five producers/exporters from Türkiye. Due to a lapse in government appropriations and subsequent backlog in document processing, there were several extensions to the review deadline. The current deadline for preliminary results was set to July 7, 2026. The review focused on two key companies: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. The Department preliminarily determined that Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. had a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.45 percent. Conversely, Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a margin of 0.00 percent, indicating no dumping within the reviewed period. Additionally, ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., a non-examined company, was preliminarily assigned Teknik’s calculated rate of 26.45 percent. Public Involvement: The Department invites public comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties have a specific time frame to submit their written comments and may file rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised in the initial briefs. Furthermore, parties can request a hearing to discuss their concerns in consideration of the final review results. Future Steps and Impact: The final results of this administrative review are anticipated to be published within 120 days after the notice, impacting future cash deposit requirements for aluminum sheet imports from Türkiye. The Department of Commerce’s findings will guide the assessment of antidumping duties on the subject merchandise entries and dictate the direction for future deposits of estimated duties. This step underscores the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Department of Commerce to enforce trade laws and ensure fair competition by addressing and mitigating the effects of unfair pricing practices in the U.S. trading system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of an administrative review regarding countervailing duties on common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. This review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests from interested parties. The Department of Commerce selected key companies for examination: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. These companies were chosen due to their significant participation in exporting aluminum sheets to the United States. Findings The Department of Commerce has initially found that producers and exporters from Türkiye benefited from countervailable subsidies. This means that these companies received financial assistance from their government, which is not allowed under U.S. trade law as it may harm American businesses. Methodology The review checks if there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial help from the government, that benefits companies in a way that is unfair to United States businesses. The review follows guidelines to ensure fairness as set in the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsidy Rates The preliminary results show specific subsidy rates for the reviewed companies. Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a subsidy rate of 2.64 percent. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. got a rate of 2.47 percent. Other companies not directly examined but involved in the review, namely ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and P.M.S. Metal Profil Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., each received a 2.56 percent rate. Upcoming Steps Interested parties are now invited to comment on these preliminary results. There is a process for submitting briefs and requesting a hearing, and the Department of Commerce will continue to verify the information before making the final ruling. Conclusion This review is significant as it affects the duties charged on aluminum sheets from Türkiye, impacting prices for industries using aluminum in the U.S. The final results will determine future trade practices. Further Information For those who want more details, the full preliminary decision memorandum can be accessed online. Interested parties can also follow updates on the review process as deadlines approach for further comments and final results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Duty Review on Steel Threaded Rod from India Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings from its review of subsidies provided to producers and exporters of carbon and alloy steel threaded rod from India. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some subsidies are countervailable, meaning they unjustly help manufacturers by providing government financial assistance. Review Details The preliminary review was initiated following requests from interested parties in 2025. The review aims to ensure fair trade practices by evaluating if producers in India received unfair subsidies. Companies Involved The review initially included several companies, such as Nishant Steel Industries and Kanika Fasteners Pvt Ltd. Later, companies like Bee Dee Cycle Industries, Maharaja International, and R K Fasteners withdrew their requests for review. Consequently, the Department of Commerce rescinded its review of these companies, meaning it will not continue examining them. Methodology The Commerce Department uses specific criteria to assess subsidies. They check for financial assistance from authorities, benefits to recipients, and specificity of the subsidy. Subsidies are considered unfair if they meet these criteria. Preliminary Findings The Department preliminarily found that producers, like Nishant Steel Industries, received subsidies totaling a 2.54 percent rate of advantage. This rate determines the countervailing duties (extra taxes) imposed on the products to offset the unfair subsidy. Next Steps Parties may submit comments on these preliminary results until the final review decision, expected within 120 days of the notice. Interested parties can submit written comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. Final decisions will guide future assessments of duties on these imports to the U.S. Instructions to Customs The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on assessing duties for companies under review. For companies withdrawn from review, customs duties remain at prior rates. Conclusion The preliminary review indicates that some subsidies provided to steel threaded rod producers in India are countervailable. The final review will include comments and further analysis before making a conclusive determination. This process ensures trade practices remain fair and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review regarding certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to determine if these products were sold in the U.S. at prices below their normal value, which would violate antidumping policies. According to the Department of Commerce, it found that the steel products from Korea were not sold below normal value during this review period. This outcome means that for the companies Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO, including POSCO International Corporation, the weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. This indicates that these companies were not selling their products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. For three other companies—Ameri-Source Korea, Hanawell Co Ltd, and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd—the review assigned a dumping margin of 2.28 percent. This percentage is based on the most recent above-de minimis rate from the last review period. The Department also set forth assessment rates. For Hyundai and POSCO, no antidumping duties will be assessed because their products were not found to be sold at dumping margins. The department has made clear instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, explaining how to handle entries of the merchandise in question. Cash deposit requirements for future shipments have also been detailed. These stipulations include a zero deposit rate for the companies reviewed. If a company was previously found to be dumping, the cash deposit will continue as per the last determined rate. For new companies entering the market, the deposit will match the existing rate for other similar producers, which is currently set at 20.33 percent. This notice from the Department of Commerce is a reminder for importers to comply with regulations, such as filing a certificate to confirm they haven’t received reimbursements for antidumping duties. Finally, this update serves as a reminder to parties involved of their responsibilities concerning the handling of proprietary information under established protective orders. Failure to adhere to these rules can lead to violations and sanctions. The Department published this notice on the Federal Register on July 13, 2026. This information is part of the ongoing enforcement of trade laws to ensure fair competition within the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Review Results for Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review concerning certain corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of Korea. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review found that producers and exporters of these steel products from Korea received countervailable subsidies. Countervailing duties are tariffs levied on imported goods to offset subsidies provided to producers or exporters in the exporting country. These measures ensure a level playing field for U.S. industries competing with foreign manufacturers. The Department of Commerce conducted this review in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies that were reviewed include Hyundai Steel Company and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. For Hyundai Steel Company, which includes its cross-owned companies like Hyundai Green Power and Hyundai ITC, the subsidy rate determined was 1.28 percent. For KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., also known as KG Steel Corporation, the subsidy rate was determined to be 5.34 percent. There are also several other companies that were part of the review but not selected as mandatory respondents. These include POSCO, POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd., POSCO International, POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd., SeAH Coated Metal, and SeAH Steel Corporation. Each of these companies received a subsidy rate of 2.88 percent. The Department intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits of these estimated countervailing duties on imports that are withdrawn from warehouses for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The findings are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is referenced in the Federal Register notice. Various aspects of the review, including methodology and assessment, are discussed thoroughly in the document. This review is part of ongoing monitoring by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to counteract any subsidies that may harm U.S. industries. These final results are part of a broader effort to uphold international trade laws and regulations. The new cash deposit requirements will apply until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Korean Tire Companies Sold Tires Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that two leading Korean tire manufacturers, Hankook Tire & Technology Co. Ltd. and Nexen Tire Corporation, sold passenger vehicle and light truck tires in the United States at prices less than their normal value. This finding is a result of their administrative review of antidumping duties for the period from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce is responsible for enforcing laws aimed at protecting U.S. businesses from unfair pricing practices. In this case, they found that the prices of the tires from Hankook and Nexen were lower than what would be considered fair. In their review, the Department calculated dumping margins for these companies. A dumping margin is the difference between the fair price of a product and the price it is being sold for in the U.S. Hankook was found to have a dumping margin of 13.03 percent. Nexen’s dumping margin was determined to be 8.02 percent. Another company, Kumho Tire Co., Inc., was assigned a rate of 10.53 percent. The final results of this review mean that these companies may have to pay additional duties to make up for the unfair pricing. Duties are extra fees that are applied to the products to raise their prices to a fair level. These results will also affect the future cash deposits required for these companies’ imports. Cash deposits are payments made upfront to ensure that the correct amount of duty will be collected when the product enters the U.S. The Department of Commerce ensures that their findings and actions are transparent. Interested parties can view all the documents and calculations used in this review on their public access system. In conclusion, this review is part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. government to maintain fair trade practices and protect domestic businesses from unfair competition through pricing below what is deemed normal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Review of Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings from an administrative review regarding antidumping duties on certain activated carbon imported from China. The period under review is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. This review evaluates whether certain Chinese companies sold activated carbon in the United States at less than the normal value, which could harm domestic producers. Key Companies Involved The review specifically examined two major companies: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (DJAC) and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. (Ningxia Huahui). The Department of Commerce has initially determined that both companies sold activated carbon in the United States at prices below the normal value. An important part of the review also concerned Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (BPACP). The review for BPACP has been rescinded because there were no entries of subject merchandise from this company during the period. Timeline and Procedures The review process started on May 20, 2025, due to timely requests as per the rules outlined in 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Originally, the review was set to be completed earlier, but delays were encountered due to a lapse in government operations, leading to multiple extensions. Scope of the Review The review considers all activated carbon exported from China that is covered by the antidumping duty order that originated on April 27, 2007. This ensures that any goods exported in violation of trade agreements are identified and duties are adjusted as necessary. Preliminary Results The preliminary findings have determined dumping margins, which are additional duties imposed on imported goods that are sold below fair market value, at 0.83 USD per KG for DJAC and 0.86 USD per KG for Ningxia Huahui. For other companies not individually examined but which qualify for a separate rate, a rate of 0.84 USD per KG applies. Review of the China-Wide Entity The review also involves the China-wide entity, which refers to any companies not specifically requested or self-initiated for review. In this case, the China-wide entity’s duty rate remains at 2.42 USD per KG, established in previous reviews and not subject to change in this cycle. Next Steps and Comment Period Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments and case briefs on these preliminary findings. These will be accepted until 21 days after the publication of this notice. A hearing may be requested within 30 days of the publication date, where parties can present their views on the issues raised. Final Note In conclusion, the preliminary findings highlight the importance of ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the domestic activated carbon industry. The review and its outcomes will help guide future assessments and duties imposed on imported activated carbon from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for PET Film from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of countervailing duties for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covers subsidies given to producers and exporters from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Findings The review found that subsidies were provided to manufacturers in India. These subsidies helped companies produce more PET film at a lower cost. Two companies were specifically mentioned in the review: Cosmo First Limited and JPFL Films Private Ltd. Cosmo First Limited received a subsidy rate of 10.07 percent, while JPFL Films Private Ltd. received a much higher rate of 135.38 percent. Review Process The review began with preliminary results published on January 8, 2026. Companies involved were allowed to submit comments. The final results were scheduled for release by July 7, 2026, after a 60-day extension. The document outlining the results used a method called adverse facts available. This method is used when companies do not provide enough information. What Happens Next The Department of Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how to collect duties on the imported PET film from these companies. These instructions should come within 35 days after the results are published in the Federal Register. If a legal action is filed within 90 days, Customs will wait to collect the duties until the case is resolved. Future Implications The findings affect how much importers will pay in customs duties when bringing PET film into the United States. The review will help ensure fair trade by making sure Indian exporters do not receive unfair government help. Contact Information For more details, Dusten Hom and Suresh Maniam from the U.S. Department of Commerce are available for contact. Interested parties can reach them by phone at (202) 482-5075 or (202) 482-0176. Final Note This decision demonstrates the steps the U.S. Department of Commerce takes to maintain fair business practices between countries. The duties ensure that the playing field remains level for companies competing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has conducted a review of wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. This review covered the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department found that Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. sold these products at prices less than normal value during this time. Review Background In May 2025, the Commerce Department started this review based on requests they received. They initially chose two companies to focus on: KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export Co., Ltd. However, both companies later withdrew. As a result, the department added Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd., and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. as the new focus companies. Ancientree also withdrew from this review shortly after. The Commerce Department extended deadlines for issuing their preliminary results on several occasions due to a government shutdown and other challenges. Results and Decisions The review found Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. to have sold wooden cabinets at a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.48 percent. Three other companies—Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd., Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd.—also got the same rate as they qualified for a separate rate in this review. The department has rescinded reviews for 42 different companies. Some of these companies had their review requests withdrawn, while others had no entries of subject merchandise. China-Wide Entity For some companies that did not participate or didn’t respond to requests, the Commerce Department considers them part of the China-wide entity. Those companies are subject to a higher rate of 251.64 percent, as they were not independently reviewed. Final Steps Interested parties have 21 days to submit written comments or concerns. These parties can also request a public hearing to discuss the issues further. The final results of this review will influence future imports and duties. This review by the Department of Commerce is a part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade and competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from China by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding countervailing duties on wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. These findings are part of an administrative review conducted by the International Trade Administration. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some producers and exporters from China received countervailable subsidies. Background The administrative review was initiated on May 20, 2025, following requests for a review of the countervailing duty order on these products. Companies reviewed include KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd, among others. The department faced delays due to a government shutdown and backlogs, extending the deadline for the preliminary results multiple times, leading up to the current report with a deadline of July 7, 2026. Scope of the Order This order focuses on wooden cabinets and vanities and includes any components thereof that are produced in China. The department evaluates whether subsidies were granted in ways that harm U.S. industry. Partial Rescission Some companies will no longer be part of this review. Commerce has decided to rescind its review for 28 companies. This is because some withdrew their requests, and for others, no reviewable entries were found during the period of review. Methodology The review process involves checking whether financial contributions providing benefits to these companies qualify as specific countervailable subsidies. This includes the use of adverse inferences where necessary, especially when companies fail to cooperate. For companies like KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd., adverse inferences were applied due to non-cooperation. Preliminary Results The preliminary subsidy rates for companies involved in this review have been released. These rates help us understand the level of subsidies that companies received, which might help in gaining unfair market advantage. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 5.48%. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. both received a subsidy rate of 113.08%. The review also determines that non-selected companies will, in general, have rates calculated as a weighted average or based on other reasonable methods. Public Comment and Final Results The Department of Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. There will be a period for public comment. Case briefs or written responses must be submitted by a specific deadline. A hearing may be requested for oral presentations. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is conducting a detailed review of subsidy practices related to wooden cabinet imports from China. This review aims to ensure fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair competition. The findings will remain open for comment until finalized, with further analysis determining final subsidy rates expected to be released after the comment period. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Aluminum Foil from China Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings on aluminum foil imports from China. The announcement came on July 13, 2026. The department found that some exporters from China sold aluminum foil at prices less than the normal value. The period of review was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The review was part of the antidumping duty measures to protect U.S. industries. Commerce selected Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co. and other related companies as key respondents. These companies are referred to as Dingsheng. There were delays in the review process due to a government shutdown. Because of this, the department postponed deadlines in November 2025. The preliminary results were eventually extended to July 7, 2026. The merchandise under review is aluminum foil from China. The department used special rules because China is considered a non-market economy. Commerce also found that another company, Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Co., is eligible for a separate rate. This means they will not follow the same rate as the general “China-wide” category. The China-wide rate, costing 105.80%, remains unchanged. This is because no one requested a review of this rate. According to the results, Dingsheng had a weighted-average dumping margin of 61.85%. This percentage shows how much less than the normal value the aluminum foil was sold for. Interested parties can comment on these results. They have 21 days from this notice’s date to submit comments. If they wish to have a hearing, they must request it within 30 days. When it comes to cash deposits, new rules will apply once final results are out. The deposits will help future entries comply with U.S. regulations. This finding is a preliminary step in ensuring fair trade practices. The final results will guide how duties are collected and may impact future imports from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Examines Steel Threaded Rod Imports from India Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce is looking into whether some steel threaded rods from India are being sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. These rods are important materials for construction and manufacturing. This study covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation helps ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. Background In May 2025, an official review began to check if companies from India are selling steel threaded rods at unfair prices. The review includes 20 companies, with a special focus on two companies: Nishant Steel Industries and Shree Luxmi Fasteners. This study follows rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. Current Findings Preliminary results suggest that some Indian companies might be selling products at prices that are lower than those in India. This can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department is also stopping a review for four companies. Three companies do not have any entries during the review time, and one company withdrew its request to be reviewed. Detailed Processes During the government’s shutdown in late 2025, many deadlines were affected. This caused delays in reviewing and processing documents. The Department used tolling, which is a method to extend deadlines to accommodate delays. Despite these challenges, the investigation is ongoing. Next Steps The Department plans to continue reviewing and finalizing results by July 7, 2026. The American legal rules say that companies must not sell below the normal value to protect fair trade. Request for Public Comment The Department invites anyone who is interested to share their thoughts about these preliminary findings. This can ensure that all views are considered before making any final decisions. What This Means If companies are found guilty of unfair pricing, they might have to pay extra duties. These duties help balance out the unfair prices and protect local businesses. The investigation looks into whether any U.S. business was unfairly affected by these priced imports. Conclusion This review helps maintain fair trade between the United States and India. The Department of Commerce will continue working closely with other government agencies to ensure that international trade rules are followed. This ensures that U.S. industries have a fair chance to compete with foreign imports. The final results will be published later this year. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Duties on Paper Plates from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On July 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary finding regarding paper plates imported into the United States. The department determined that certain paper plates made in Cambodia using paperboard from China are circumventing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders originally placed on Chinese products. This investigation began after antidumping and countervailing duty orders were applied to certain paper plates from China in March 2025. These orders were designed to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing and government subsidies that harm American businesses. On August 22, 2025, the Commerce Department started investigating whether paper plates completed in Cambodia with materials from China were avoiding these duties. The companies Cherish Industrial (Cambodia) Co., Ltd. and Namper Packaging (Cambodia) Co., Ltd. were first examined in this inquiry. Later, Hengrong International (Cambodia) was included as another respondent after initial challenges in contacting Namper Packaging. Due to a government shutdown in November 2025, there were delays in proceedings. However, by June 26, 2026, the department was able to issue its preliminary determination. The paper plates involved may have different shapes, colors, and materials. They may have printing, coatings, or finishes, and can be made from various plant or synthetic materials. This investigation specifically targets plates made using Chinese paperboard shipped through Cambodia. In response to the findings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now require certification processes for these imports. If companies do not comply with the requirements, duties will apply. For entries between August 22, 2025, and July 10, 2026, certifications need to be completed by August 7, 2026. The Department of Commerce is open to comments from interested parties, which must be submitted no later than 14 days from this notice. The final determination will be decided after reviewing submitted comments. This circumvention issue highlights the importance of enforcing fair trade practices to ensure that all goods entering the U.S. abide by trade rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Paper Plates from China Circumventing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain paper plates from China. This decision involves paper plates made in Malaysia using paperboard from China. Background In March 2025, the Department of Commerce issued antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on paper plates imported from China. In August 2025, the Department started an investigation to see if paper plates made in Malaysia, using Chinese paperboard, were avoiding these duties. Investigation Timeline The investigation faced delays due to a government shutdown in November 2025. Deadlines were extended several times, with the preliminary decision now issued in July 2026. Findings The Department of Commerce has initially found that the paper plates made in Malaysia with Chinese paperboard are indeed circumventing the duty orders. This means they will be subject to duties as they are considered part of the original orders on China. Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend these paper plates from Malaysia if they were entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after August 22, 2025. Importers need to file for post-summary corrections to ensure the entries comply with the antidumping and countervailing duties. Certifications Importers and exporters can use certifications to prove the paper plates were not made with Chinese paperboard. For certain companies, this certification regime might not be available if they have been found circumventing, like Huiming, unless they prove otherwise in future reviews. Public Involvement Interested parties can comment on these findings and certification requirements. This can be done by submitting case briefs to the Department of Commerce within a set time. If needed, a hearing will take place to discuss these issues further. Conclusion The Department of Commerce aims to ensure fair trading practices by confirming if Malaysian-made paper plates circumvent existing orders. The final decisions and verifications will determine the appropriate duties to be applied. This process helps protect U.S. industries by enforcing the rules on imported goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Changes Commerce Department’s Decision on Steel Racks from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final decision about steel racks and parts from China. This case involved Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. The court disagreed with a past decision made by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The court’s decision changes how the Commerce Department will handle this case going forward. The U.S. Department of Commerce finished reviewing an antidumping duty order on steel racks from China on April 10, 2024. Antidumping duties are tariffs set on foreign imports priced below fair market value. In this decision, the Commerce Department did not select Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent. It assigned Dongsheng the China-wide antidumping duty rate because Dongsheng did not submit a required form on time. Dongsheng was not happy with this decision and took it to the court. On June 16, 2025, the CIT told the Commerce Department to revisit its decision. The court said the Commerce Department was wrong not to select Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent just because the form was late. In February 2026, the Commerce Department took another look. This time, it treated Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent. It checked Dongsheng’s sales and production information and gave Dongsheng a dumping margin of 25.00 percent. Now, with the court’s June 23 judgment, the earlier decision by the Commerce Department is officially changed. This means the dumping margin for Dongsheng will be 25.00 percent. There have been new official instructions that will change how future cases are handled. The cash deposit requirements for Dongsheng will not change because there’s already a new rate in place from another review. The entries that haven’t been finished will stay on hold until a final decision is made. For now, the U.S. Court has stopped the Department of Commerce from collecting duties on certain steel rack entries made by Dongsheng. These entries are for products brought into the U.S. from September 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. The Commerce Department will wait to see if the Court’s decision is appealed or if it becomes final. This notice was officially published on July 3, 2026, by Christian L. Bush, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Corrects Company Name in Antidumping Duty Review Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction to a previous notice regarding the antidumping duty on glycine from India. This notice was originally published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2026. The initial notice contained a mistake in the name of a company. The company, Paras Intermediates Private Limited, was incorrectly listed as “Paras Intermediaries Private Limited.” The Department of Commerce has corrected this error. The correction is part of the final results for the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from India. This means that the official records now show the correct name for the export/producer as “Paras Intermediates Private Limited.” The Department of Commerce handles these administrative reviews to ensure companies comply with trade laws. Antidumping duties are put in place to protect local industries from unfair pricing practices by foreign companies. Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the correction notice. The correction was officially dated and published on July 1, 2026. For further information, you can contact Tyler Weinhold or Harrison Tanchuck at the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are located at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC. This correction helps maintain accuracy in official trade records and ensures compliance with U.S. trade laws. The Department of Commerce continues its efforts in monitoring and enforcing trade regulations. This correction ensures all interested parties have the correct information. This notice was published in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Code of Federal Regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Steel Wire Rod from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a notice about a new investigation. This investigation is about carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Algeria. The department found that subsidies were given to producers and exporters in Algeria. The period they looked at was from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The department wants people who are interested to comment on this. You can find more details about the investigation in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The product they are looking at is a type of steel called wire rod. No changes have been made to the scope of what is being investigated. This scope was announced on May 1, 2026, and was made clear at that time. The Department of Commerce has found that subsidies are being given by the Algerian government. These subsidies help Algerian companies by giving them financial support. This gives the Algerian companies an unfair advantage. The final rates for the subsidies are very high, at 73.33%. This applies to one company named SPA Algerian Qatar Steel. It also applies to all other companies involved. Until more is found out, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will hold back imports of these steel rods from Algeria. They will wait until the date of this report, published today, before making any decisions. If someone wants to comment or ask for a hearing, they have 30 days to do so. Officials will not verify anything more due to the lack of cooperation from Algeria. Importantly, there is no need for any injury determination. This is because Algeria doesn’t have a subsidies agreement with the U.S. Public comments are welcome. Interested people can write about their opinions on this within the next 30 days. If someone wants a hearing, they must ask for it by following the rules in the notice. This news affects steel producers and the economy of both Algeria and the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Indian PET Film Dumped Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review of imports related to Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) film from India. The review assessed sales during the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The assessment concluded that Cosmo First Limited, an Indian company, sold PET film in the United States at prices lower than those in India. The Department applied a measure known as “total adverse facts available” (AFA) and assigned Cosmo a dumping margin of 24.14 percent. These results were made official and are effective as of July 8, 2026. Earlier in January, preliminary findings were published. They indicated potential dumping, which led to further review. The Department extended the deadline for final results to ensure a thorough evaluation. The process followed the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. PET film covers a range of products, including film, sheet, and strip materials. These materials are used in packaging, insulating, and many other applications. The U.S. Government had previously established rules to address such dumping practices. Interested parties raised concerns during the review process, and these comments were addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Despite comments, there were no changes from the preliminary results. The public can access detailed information about this review and the memorandum online. It is hosted through the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Due to the determined dumping, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on these imported goods. Further instructions are to be issued 35 days after the final results are published. Importers should be aware of cash deposit requirements that will apply to future entries. For Cosmo, the deposit rate will now be 24.14 percent. Other companies may also have differing rates based on previous reviews or investigations. If neither the company nor the producer was reviewed, a general rate of 5.71 percent applies. Importers also have a responsibility to prove that they have not been reimbursed for dumping duties. This avoids the assessment of double duties. The review carried out by the Department of Commerce serves to enforce fair trade practices. These results are released in accordance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Temporary Duty-Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco Approved Estimated reading time: 3 minutes In an important move, the United States has temporarily allowed phosphate fertilizers from Morocco to enter the country without certain duties. This decision follows a declaration of emergency by the President on June 29, 2026. The goal is to ensure that farmers in the U.S. have enough fertilizers for their crops. This emergency measure was taken so that food production in the country can meet the needs of everyone living here. The U.S. Department of Commerce is involved in this process. They are responsible for letting exporters or importers bring in phosphate fertilizers from Morocco without countervailing duties. These duties are usually fees added to imported goods. The order to remove these duties is based on laws from the Tariff Act of 1930. The waiver is specifically for phosphate fertilizers in all forms – whether solid or liquid, with or without extra chemicals to prevent clumping. To make use of this opportunity, companies interested in importing fertilizers without these duties must submit a written request. This request needs to be sent to the Commerce Department and follow certain guidelines. Once a company’s request is approved, they have about 60 days to get their shipment into the United States. If they miss this window of time, regular duties will apply to their goods. For the request process, companies need to file paperwork electronically. This is done through a special system managed by the Trade Administration. If approved, both the company and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be notified. This means the CBP will allow the goods into the country without the usual duties. Lastly, businesses that want to follow this process should register and send in the necessary forms to be added to the service list. This ensures they receive all important information and updates about the importation rules and procedures. This action by the government provides crucial support to U.S. farmers, ensuring they have the resources needed to produce food effectively during an emergency situation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Open Meeting Announcement: Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) is having an important meeting soon. The meeting will take place on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. People who are interested can join the meeting. The meeting will be held from 11:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). The meeting will happen in the Commerce Research Library at the U.S. Department of Commerce. The address is 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. If you want to be part of the meeting, you need to register by Friday, July 10, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EDT. You can register online by visiting https://www.trade.gov/ettac. It’s important to register early because spaces are limited. This meeting is open to the public. During the meeting, members will show the recommendation letters they have submitted. They will also hear updates from key agencies about U.S. Government activities. You can send in comments or ask for special help, like sign language interpretation. To ask for these, you should contact Ms. Megan Hyndman by email at [email protected] or by phone at 202-482-1297. Make sure to do this at least one week before the meeting. Even if you send your request after that, they will try to help you. If you want to send written comments about ETTAC, you can do so anytime. But if you want them considered during the meeting, send them by July 7, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EDT. More details like the agenda and any materials will be available a week before the meeting. You can find this information on the website https://www.trade.gov/ettac. After the meeting, draft minutes and materials will also be posted on the website within 30 days. Edward O’Malley, the Director of the Office of Energy and Environmental Industries, announced this meeting on July 1, 2026. For more details, check Federal Register Volume 91, Number 129, published on July 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Issues Countervailing Duty Order on Steel Rebar from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imported from Algeria. This decision follows an affirmative final determination by Commerce. On March 27, 2026, Commerce published its final determination. It found that producers and exporters of rebar from Algeria are receiving countervailable subsidies. The International Trade Commission (ITC) closed its investigation on May 18, 2026. The ITC stated that Algeria is not considered a Subsidies Agreement country. Scope of the Order The order covers steel concrete reinforcing bars, which can be imported in straight length or coil form. They come in various metals, lengths, and diameters. Some processing of the rebar may occur, like cutting, grinding, or painting. But these processes do not affect the rebar’s inclusion in the order. The order does not cover plain, nondeformed rebar. Countervailing Duty Rates Commerce has established a subsidy rate of 72.94% for the company Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA and all others. Provisional Measures and Actions Commerce instructed the suspension of liquidation of rebar. Liquidation means clearing goods through customs, often with duties paid. This instruction applies to merchandise entered or withdrawn since May 13, 2026. Suspension resumed with the ITC’s closure of its investigation. Cash deposits are required at the established subsidy rates. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list. Interested parties must add themselves to this list within 30 days of order publication. Law firms representing parties should designate a lead attorney. This list will update annually. The petitioner and foreign governments will be included automatically after the initial request. They need to update their list details during the annual period. The CVD order is now active and published as required by regulations. For further details, parties can view current antidumping and countervailing duty orders online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Orders: Review Results for Steel Pipes Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Commerce’s Findings The United States Department of Commerce has released new findings. It carried out a review on antidumping duty orders about steel pipes. These steel pipes are from the Czech Republic, South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine. The review shows that removing these duties could lead to more dumping. Dumping is when foreign producers sell goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This can hurt U.S. producers. Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duties. These measures aim to prevent unfair price competition. What Is Covered The orders are about seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipes. These pipes come from four countries: the Czech Republic, South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine. Timeline and Process The antidumping duty order for the Czech Republic was first published in April 2021. The orders for South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine followed in August 2021. Commerce began this first sunset review in March 2026. A sunset review checks if duties should stay to prevent dumping. Participant and Responses Vallourec Star, LP, a U.S. producer, participated in the review. They argued to keep the duties. Other parties did not respond or participate. Conclusion Commerce predicts that without these duties, dumping could continue. The review found these specific dumping margins: Czech Republic: up to 51.70% South Korea: 4.48% Russia: 209.72% Ukraine: 23.75% These results mean duties will remain. They aim to protect U.S. businesses from unfairly low-priced imports. The decision was finalized and publicized on July 6, 2026. This ensures a fair trade environment and supports local industry sustainability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Sunset Review on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea and Russia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the expedited first sunset review of countervailing duty orders on seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe. These pipes come from the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation. Summary of Findings The review finds that canceling the countervailing duty orders would likely lead to more countervailable subsidies. This means that if the duties were removed, Korea and Russia might continue to unfairly subsidize their steel pipe exports to the U.S. This could harm U.S. producers. Background of Orders The countervailing duty orders were originally published on August 23, 2021. These orders aimed to protect U.S. industries from unfairly subsidized imports from Korea and Russia. On March 2, 2026, the Commerce Department began the first sunset review of these orders. A sunset review is a check to decide if the duties are still needed. Participation in the Review The domestic company, Vallourec Star, LP, took part in the review. Vallourec is a U.S. producer of similar steel products. They showed that they have a stake in ensuring fair competition and filed their intent to participate on March 16, 2026. Findings on Subsidy Rates For Korea: ILJIN Steel Corporation and All Others have a subsidy rate of 1.78%. For Russia: PAO TMK/Volzhsky Pipe Plant Joint Stock Company and All Others have a subsidy rate of 48.38%. Scope of the Orders The orders cover seamless pipes made from carbon and alloy steel. These are standard, line, and pressure pipes used for various industrial purposes. Conclusion The Department of Commerce concluded that removing the countervailing duties would lead to continued or repeated subsidies from Korea and Russia. Therefore, the duties will remain to protect U.S. industries. Notification to Parties Commerce reminds parties involved in administrative protective orders to handle proprietary information with care. They must return or destroy such information as required, helping to ensure fair trade practices. For further information, interested parties can refer to detailed documents available through the U.S. Department of Commerce. These results ensure that the U.S. market remains fair for all players involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Final Results on Aluminum Sheet Subsidy Review Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced the final results of its first expedited sunset reviews of countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheets from Bahrain, India, and the Republic of Türkiye. This decision reveals that getting rid of the CVD orders would likely lead to the continuation or repetition of subsidies that are not fair. The original CVD orders were issued on April 27, 2021. In March 2026, Commerce began the first sunset review process following the Tariff Act of 1930. Only domestic parties like the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and Aluminum Dynamics, LLC, showed interest in the review. The governments of Bahrain, India, and Türkiye did not participate. The review’s purpose was to decide if continued CVD orders protected U.S. industries from unfair subsidies. Commerce found that removing the orders could lead to more unfair subsidies. Here are the subsidy rates: Bahrain: Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C: 6.44% All Others: 6.44% India: Hindalco Industries Limited: 35.67% Manaksia Aluminium Company Limited: 5.70% All Others: 30.77% Türkiye: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S: 6.28% Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S: 4.94% All Others: 7.59% The document states this as the last reminder for parties involved to handle proprietary information carefully according to administrative protective orders. Violating these regulations can lead to penalties. The Commerce Department published these results according to legal directives under the Tariff Act of 1930. They are part of consistent efforts to maintain fair trade practices for U.S. industries. The final results are dated June 30, 2026, and the details were presented by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. These efforts are important to support U.S. industries and maintain a fair trade environment worldwide. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Measures on Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has decided to continue duties on steel welded wire mesh from Mexico. This comes after reviewing the order first put in place on August 9, 2021. Commerce looked closely at the situation and decided that if the duties were removed, there might be more dumping. Dumping is when goods are sold at a very low price in a foreign market. The decision taken is effective as of July 6, 2026. Commerce said there could be a return to unfair pricing, and if dumping happens again, these actions protect U.S. producers. The Department issued an order in 2021, which aimed to prevent unfair competition from foreign companies. They started this review on March 2, 2026, and got a lot of comments from U.S. businesses that make similar products. These businesses said they want the duties to remain, acting in line with U.S. trade laws and helping maintain fair prices. Commerce did not receive enough feedback from Mexican companies arguing against the duties. Now, U.S. companies making steel wire mesh continue to receive support. The duties help them compete fairly, keeping jobs and business within the U.S. The decision shows Commerce’s commitment to fair trade and supporting U.S. businesses. It aims to stop unfair pricing that could harm local industries and workers. The U.S. wants to ensure a level playing field in the international market and will keep these types of measures in place as needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continued Dumping of Aluminum Sheets Estimated reading time: 4 minutes Summary of Findings The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results that confirm the continuation of dumping in the common alloy aluminum sheet market. The decision follows the expedited first sunset reviews of antidumping duty orders on aluminum sheets imported from multiple countries. The Department has concluded that canceling the antidumping duty orders would likely result in ongoing dumping. Countries involved include Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye. Detailed Results Antidumping orders were first published on April 27, 2021. The latest review began on March 2, 2026, and findings were officially announced on July 6, 2026. Key stakeholders such as the Aluminum Association and Aluminum Dynamics expressed their participation in this review. Process Overview Between March 30 and April 1, 2026, several domestic parties submitted their responses. These parties are involved in manufacturing and trading aluminum sheets. No responses came from the interested parties representing the countries under review. Dumping Margins The Department of Commerce found dumping margins as follows: Bahrain: Up to 4.83% Brazil: 137.06% Croatia: 3.19% Egypt: 12.11% Germany: 242.80% India: 47.92% Indonesia: 32.12% Italy: 29.13% Oman: 5.29% Romania: 37.26% Serbia: 25.84% Slovenia: 13.43% South Africa: 8.85% Spain: 24.23% Taiwan: 17.50% Türkiye: 13.56% Legal Framework The inquiry was carried out under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930. These sections relate to the processes and responsibilities involved in trade agreements and commerce. Conclusion The Department’s decision serves as notification to interested parties of the finality of the results. It also highlights the importance of compliance with administrative protective orders concerning proprietary information. Failure to comply can result in sanctions. The findings imply that unless the orders remain in place, dumping behaviors are likely to continue, affecting the U.S. aluminum sheet market adversely. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Orders on Silicon Metal Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Findings of the Review The United States Department of Commerce has completed expedited reviews of antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia. These reviews were conducted to determine the potential for continued dumping if the orders were revoked. The Commerce Department found that ending the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continued or recurring dumping of silicon metal from these countries. The expected rates of dumping are up to 21.41% for Bosnia and Herzegovina, 47.54% for Iceland, and 12.27% for Malaysia. Background Information The antidumping orders were initially published in 2021. The order for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland was issued on April 19, 2021, while the order for Malaysia followed on August 19, 2021. The Commerce Department initiated the first sunset reviews of these orders on March 2, 2026. Participation and Response Domestic producers showed interest in maintaining the orders. They filed notices of intent to participate and provided substantive responses. No responses were received from the affected foreign respondents, which led the Commerce Department to expedite the review process. Scope of the Orders The orders cover silicon metal from the specified countries. Silicon metal is an important material used in various industrial applications, including the production of aluminum and electronics. Final Results and Next Steps Commerce’s final determination supports the continuation of antidumping duties. These duties help to prevent unfair pricing and protect domestic industries from foreign competition that could harm U.S. jobs and production. Interested parties are reminded of their responsibilities under administrative protective orders. Proper handling of proprietary information disclosed during the review is required, and mishandling could lead to sanctions. The Commerce Department’s comprehensive review and findings ensure ongoing fair trade practices and safeguard the domestic market against potentially harmful dumping practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Final Antidumping Duty on Aluminum Sheet from Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 17, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a judgment concerning the antidumping duty investigation of common alloy aluminum sheets from Turkey. This ruling affects the original decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, made in March 2021. The Department had calculated dumping margins for certain Turkish producers. The CIT’s decision now alters this. Background of Investigation In March 2021, Commerce published its final determination. The investigation covered January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Commerce assigned a 2.02 percent dumping margin for Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Assan). Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. was assigned 13.56 percent. Other producers got a 4.85 percent rate. Court Involvement and Remands Both Assan and the Aluminum Association filed appeals against the final determination. The CIT consolidated these appeals. On March 1, 2023, the CIT remanded Commerce’s determination, asking for reconsideration of certain elements. Specifically, it asked for a review of the duty drawback adjustment methodology. After several remands and redeterminations, including consideration of Assan’s submissions and recalculation of margins, Commerce completed its third remand in September 2025. This remand set Assan’s dumping margin to 2.14 percent, slightly higher than the original 2.02 percent. Timken Notice and Legal Obligations According to the Timken Court decision, Commerce is required to publish a notice when a court judgment is not in harmony with its prior determination. This ensures proper communication to all parties involved. Amended Determination As a result of the CIT’s final judgment, the dumping margin for Assan is now amended to 2.14 percent. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. remains at 13.56 percent, while the rate for all other producers stays 4.85 percent. Implications for Cash Deposit Requirements The decision affects cash deposit instructions with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Assan’s current cash deposit rate will remain unchanged due to a previously finalized administrative review. However, for other producers without a new deposit rate, Commerce will provide CBP with updated instructions. The decision marks an important conclusion to a lengthy legal process regarding aluminum sheets imported from Turkey. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Steel Wire Rod from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results for the antidumping duty review concerning carbon and certain alloy steel wire rods from Mexico. The review covers sales made from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The Department determined that the products were sold in the United States at less than normal value during this period. The specific companies involved in the review were Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V., jointly referred to as Deacero/Deacero Summit. The final weighted-average dumping margin for these companies is determined to be 14.67 percent. This means they sold the goods at a price 14.67 percent less than their usual value, according to the review. Nucor Corporation and Commercial Metal Company, along with Deacero/Deacero Summit, submitted their views on these findings in March 2026. These views were considered before finalizing the results. The Department followed strict rules and regulations laid out in the Tariff Act of 1930 to conduct this review. Detailed calculations and analyses are available through the Enforcement and Compliance’s centralized electronic system. Customs and Border Protection will assess duties based on these findings. This helps ensure that the companies comply with U.S. trade laws. The effective cash deposit rates will be applied to future imports at rates specified by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The Department is committed to monitoring international trade and safeguarding fair trade practices, ensuring a level playing field for domestic producers. These measures also serve as a careful reminder to importers about their duty to report accurately to avoid paying extra duties. Failure to adhere to these requirements could result in severe penalties under U.S. trade law. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s review shows a significant commitment to ensuring that trade regulations are met, protecting domestic interests, and maintaining fair market competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Diamond Sawblades Antidumping Duty Order Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Purpose The antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from China was originally published on November 4, 2009. The purpose of this order is to prevent unfair pricing and protect domestic industries from dumping, which is selling goods below market value. Current Review In March 2026, the Department of Commerce initiated its third sunset review of this order. A sunset review assesses whether ending the order would likely result in continued dumping. Domestic manufacturers expressed interest, showing support for continuing this order. They argue they could be harmed if the order is lifted. Analysis and Findings The Commerce Department has evaluated data and comments about possible continued dumping. They used a detailed process to see if ending the order would likely result in cheaper, unfairly priced imports from China. The review concluded that lifting the order could likely lead to more dumping. The duty margins could reach as high as 164.09 percent, according to the department’s findings. Final Decision The Department of Commerce decided that the antidumping duty order should remain in place. This will help ensure fair competition and support U.S. manufacturers. Next Steps Parties involved in this process must comply with rules about handling private information. Adherence to regulations is essential. Failure to follow these can result in penalties. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses by curbing unfair trading practices. The Department of Commerce will continue monitoring and may conduct future reviews. For more details, visit the Federal Register or the Department of Commerce’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on China’s Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has initiated an investigation regarding certain steel products from China. The inquiry began on July 6, 2026, following a request by Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. The investigation focuses on “corrosion-resistant steel products,” often called CORE. The concern is that these steel products are completed in Thailand using parts made in China and then exported to the United States. This inquiry aims to determine if these actions are attempts to avoid the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders that apply to steel products coming from China. Background of the Inquiry On February 26, 2026, the requesters filed a request, alleging circumvention. They claim that CORE completed with Chinese parts in Thailand should be included in the existing duty orders. The products involved fall under previous orders dating back to July 2016. These orders affect several countries but focus particularly on China. Details on the Circumventing Merchandise This inquiry reviews CORE made in Thailand using Chinese-origin components. These products are later exported from Thailand to the United States. Regulatory Steps and Criteria Commerce follows specific rules for starting such an investigation. According to section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, Commerce checks multiple criteria to see if circumvention is happening. To decide, they look at aspects such as: The process of production in another country. Value added through minor changes. If the process outside China is minor or insignificant. They also consider trade patterns and any increase in imports after starting the original investigation. Commerce’s Next Steps Commerce will collect data from U.S. Customs. They plan to choose respondents based on this data. Interested parties will be able to access this data through an online system. Commerce will send questionnaires to producers in Thailand for more information on their processes. Non-compliance might lead to adverse outcomes for those businesses. Impact on Product Suspensions While this inquiry is ongoing, Commerce has instructed border protection to continue the suspension of liquidation on affected products. If preliminary findings suggest circumvention, the suspension rules might change. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce aims to complete the preliminary determination within 150 days from the start date, with a final decision by 300 days. The outcome will affect how products meet existing U.S. trade laws. This announcement was officially made by Christopher Abbott on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.