U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Decision on Fatty Acids from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision on the investigation of certain fatty acids imported from Indonesia. These fatty acids are organic acids made from hydrocarbons. They are often used in the production of various goods. The preliminary findings show that these fatty acids from Indonesia received unfair financial help, or subsidies, from the Indonesian government. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. It started on March 13, 2026, and was supposed to end earlier, but the preliminary decision was delayed to July 17, 2026. In this investigation, the Department looked at whether the fatty acids were sold at unfair prices due to government help. They found evidence of subsidies for Indonesian producers. The companies examined in this case are PT Musim Mas and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. They are two of the largest producers exporting fatty acids from Indonesia. The preliminary subsidy rates found for these companies are 16.47% for PT Musim Mas and 16.48% for PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. These rates mean these companies received financial benefits allowing them to sell their products at lower prices than they should. The decision also affects all other Indonesian producers of fatty acids not specifically examined in this investigation. These producers have been given an estimated subsidy rate of 16.48%. The Department of Commerce will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to start collecting deposits on these imports. These deposits will be based on the subsidy rates mentioned above. This means importers must pay extra when bringing fatty acids from Indonesia into the U.S. This extra is held as a precaution while the investigation is finalized. The investigation is not over yet. The Department plans to verify the information provided by Indonesian companies. They will double-check the findings to ensure accuracy before making a final decision. Public comments on this case are invited. Interested parties may submit written feedback on the matter. There will be a hearing where these comments are discussed. The final decision will then be made after reviewing all input. This important preliminary decision is a step towards fair trade practices. It ensures that U.S. markets are not hurt by unfair imports. The International Trade Commission will also look into the effects of these imports on U.S. industries. The final decision is set to be released by November 30, 2026, unless further delays occur. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announces Antidumping Duty Order on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 4 minutes On July 23, 2026, the Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This action follows an affirmative final determination by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Earlier, on June 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce found that lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan were being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This decision was based on sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsequently, on July 16, 2026, the ITC confirmed that the U.S. industry was being harmed by these dumped imports. Scope of the Order The order covers lattice boom crawler cranes and their parts from Japan. These cranes have specific components: Lattice boom assemblies. Lower carriage assembly. Crawler assembly. Upper carriage assembly. Hoisting assembly. Jib assemblies. The order includes all cranes, whether they have additional features or not. Antidumping Duties Unliquidated entries of these cranes from Japan are now subject to antidumping duties. These duties apply to entries made on or after January 16, 2026, the date of the preliminary determination. The dumping margins for the major exporters are as follows: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.: 12.36% Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd.: 20.00% All other producers: 16.18% Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of these cranes and require cash deposits. This will continue until further notice. Provisional Measures Provisional measures started on January 16, 2026, and ended on July 15, 2026. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are not subject to antidumping duties. However, from July 20, 2026, suspension of liquidation resumes. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for each order. Interested parties can be added to this list for future notifications. Notification This notice establishes the antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. For a comprehensive list of antidumping and countervailing duty orders, visit the Commerce website. Commerce’s goal is to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. This order reflects their continued commitment to these principles. For further details, access the full Federal Register document online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Low-Value Sales of L-Lysine from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final findings on the importation of L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China. They have found that this important animal feed ingredient is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. Investigation Details The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation and reporting were completed by the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. Key Players and Companies Several key companies from China were involved in the investigation. These include Changchun Dahe Bio Technology Development Co., Eppen Asia Pte. Ltd., and Shouguang Golden Corn Biotechnological Co. Ltd. The Eppen Group and Zhengzhou Longgu Trading Co. Ltd. were particularly notable. Findings and Results The Department of Commerce used a method called “adverse facts available” to decide the outcomes, especially for companies that did not co-operate fully, like Longgu and Heshu. The investigation revealed dumping margins, which are differences between the prices in China and the U.S., suggesting that L-lysine was sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Implications and Actions As a result of these findings, the Department of Commerce will continue to suspend the entry of this product into the U.S. The cash deposit rates have been set for these imports. Companies will have to pay duties when they bring in L-lysine from China, ensuring fair pricing. What Happens Next The International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these imports have hurt U.S. businesses. If they conclude that they have caused harm, the duties will remain. If not, the investigation’s outcomes will change. For those involved in the importation and use of lysine, this decision is crucial. It aims to protect the U.S. market from unfairly priced imports and ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Decision on L-Lysine Import from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision. It will place a countervailing duty on L-lysine from China. This means extra charges will be added to the cost of L-lysine coming from China. What is L-Lysine? L-lysine is a type of amino acid. Animals need it to help them grow. It helps in making proteins. Farmers add L-lysine to animal feed for pigs, chickens, and cows. It’s important for animal health. Period of Investigation The Department of Commerce checked how L-lysine was sent from China. They looked at data from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They wanted to see if producers in China had unfair help from their government. The investigation started on January 22, 2026. The Findings The investigation found that Chinese producers received unfair help, called subsidies, from their government. This helps them sell products cheaper in the United States. This hurts American producers. Companies Involved Researchers examined several companies, like Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd, and found some were given unfair advantages. Three Chinese companies have to face these duties. They are Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd, and Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. Rates Announced Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd will have a countervailing duty of 48.21%. Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd will both face a duty rate of 82.11%. This rate is harsher because they didn’t provide the necessary information. All other producers will have the same rate as Inner Mongolia Eppen, which is 48.21%. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission will look at this decision. They will decide if U.S. businesses are being hurt. They have 45 days to make this decision. If they agree, the duties will stay. If they disagree, the duties will be removed. Final Steps All companies involved must respect the new rules. They should also make sure any private information shared with the U.S. Department of Commerce is kept safe. This decision is important for trade between the United States and China. It ensures a fair marketplace for goods like L-lysine. The U.S. continues to watch out for its businesses and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Department of Commerce: Review of Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is Happening? On July 24, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared that the removal of the CVD on fertilizers from Morocco is likely to lead to the continuance of unfair subsidies. The subsidies are benefits given by the Moroccan government to their local fertilizer producers, making their products cheaper in the U.S. Background Information Initially, the CVD order was put in place on April 7, 2021, to level the playing field for U.S. producers by counteracting the Moroccan government’s support. This review began on March 2, 2026, to decide whether this order should continue. Two U.S. companies, Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, are involved in this review. They provided timely notices showing their interest in continuing the examination of this issue. Findings So Far The Department of Commerce thinks that if the CVD were removed, Morocco’s producers, like OCP S.A., would keep receiving a subsidy rate of 20.04% from their government. This could mean they maintain an unfair advantage over U.S. producers. What’s Next? Interested people or companies can give their opinions or share their views. They have 30 days from the date of this announcement to submit their case briefs. If necessary, they may request a hearing to discuss these issues further. The Department of Commerce plans to publish its final decision within the next 240 days. They will consider all the comments and information submitted before making their final decision. This process is significant because it impacts both the Moroccan producers and U.S. companies selling fertilizers. Balancing fair trade practices is essential to ensure competitiveness within the global market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement about crepe paper from China. The department has decided to keep a special rule, called an antidumping duty order, on certain crepe paper products from the People’s Republic of China. This decision comes after careful examination and agreement with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). What is Crepe Paper? Crepe paper is a type of paper with a wrinkled texture, often used for decoration. It can come in various forms such as streamers and is sometimes treated to resist flames. Crepe paper can be colored or have different designs on it. It is usually packaged in rolls or different types of packaging for consumers. Why the Special Rule? The U.S. wants to make sure the local industry is not harmed by unfair pricing practices. When a country sells a product at a lower price in another country, it can hurt the industries in the importing country. This is called dumping. The U.S. government believes that ending the antidumping duty on crepe paper from China could lead to more dumping, which might hurt American companies that make similar products. What Happens Next? The rule to keep the antidumping duty will still apply from July 14, 2026. This means that for now, extra fees from the antidumping duty will be added to crepe paper from China entering the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting these fees. The U.S. Department of Commerce will review the situation again in five years. They will start this new review not later than 30 days before the five-year anniversary of the current decision. This decision is a reminder for all companies involved in the case to handle private information correctly and return or destroy it as required. By continuing this rule, both Commerce and ITC aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition and ensure they remain strong and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Reviews Subsidies for Pasta from Italy Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding countervailable subsidies for certain pasta from Italy. These subsidies were given to producers and exporters during 2023. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The department is responsible for checking if subsidies from foreign governments hurt U.S. businesses. They found that some Italian companies received help from the Italian government. This help, called subsidies, can make it unfair for U.S. pasta makers to compete. Two main companies in Italy, De Matteis Agroalimentare and Pastificio Attilo Mastromauro-Granoro, were part of this review. These companies were investigated to see if they received extra help that U.S. companies did not get. The review showed they did receive such help. This means they benefited from Italian government programs that influenced their production costs. The U.S. Department of Commerce has set new rates at which these companies must pay duties, which are like taxes, when they send pasta to the U.S. De Matteis Agroalimentare now has a rate of 3.32%, and Granoro’s rate is 3.21%. Other Italian companies, like Antiche Tradizioni di Gragnano and Pastificio Sgambaro, are also part of this review, and they have a rate of 3.32%. These new rates mean these companies need to pay extra when they bring their pasta into the U.S. This is to make sure they are not unfairly beating U.S. companies by using government help. Moreover, the report explains that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, will collect these duties. This will happen when the pasta enters the U.S. The aim is to level the playing field for American pasta producers and ensure fair competition. In addition, it is also crucial for the companies involved to handle sensitive information properly. They have received a reminder to protect any business secrets they learned during the investigation. The new decisions on subsidies and rates are important. They help ensure that U.S. pasta companies do not suffer because some Italian companies received unfair government help. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Keeps Tariffs on Chinese Mattresses Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided not to cancel the countervailing duty on mattresses from China. This decision is important for American companies that make mattresses because they believe it would be bad for their business if the duty was revoked. Background The duty, or tax, on Chinese mattresses started on May 24, 2021. This was called an “Order.” Its purpose was to stop unfair funding, or subsidies, that Chinese mattress makers were getting. These subsidies allowed them to sell mattresses at a lower price, which is unfair to U.S. companies. The Review Process On April 1, 2026, the Department began a review to decide if they should keep the duty in place. This was called a “sunset review.” During this review, U.S. mattress companies expressed their opinion that the duty should remain. They sent a letter to the Department on April 15, 2026. Submissions and Responses By May 1, 2026, the U.S. companies had provided detailed reasons why the duty should not be removed. But, the Chinese government and Chinese mattress companies did not send any arguments against the duty. Because there was no opposition from China, the Department moved quickly in their review. Results of the Review The Department of Commerce finished the review and decided to keep the duty in place. This decision means that the Chinese companies will continue to face charges of 97.78% on their mattress products when they sell them in the U.S. Conclusion and Responsibilities This decision is final for this review cycle. U.S. companies with access to special information must handle it properly according to the rules. This update should help those interested in trade and business between the U.S. and China understand what’s happening with the mattress market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Monomers and Oligomers from South Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized an antidumping duty order on certain monomers and oligomers from South Korea. This decision comes after the International Trade Commission confirmed that U.S. industries were harmed by imports sold at unfairly low prices. The order took effect on July 28, 2026. It affects imports from South Korea of specific monomers and oligomers, including those used in making inks, coatings, and varnishes. The purpose is to stop them from being sold at less than fair value in the United States. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on these products. These duties are the difference between their normal value and the price they were sold for here. Monomers and oligomers from South Korea will be taxed at rates between 65.72% and 155.42%, depending on the company. Some companies face higher rates due to a lack of cooperation in the investigation. The suspension of liquidation means businesses must put up cash deposits when importing these products. These deposits equal the estimated dumping margins. Suspension applies to entries made on or after January 5, 2026. For earlier entries, suspension lifted from October 7, 2025, to January 4, 2026, for which duties will be refunded. A new “annual inquiry service list” will allow interested parties to stay informed. Law firms and businesses must submit entries of appearance to be added. The Department of Commerce will update the list annually. The initial update occurs within 30 days after the order is published. This order aims to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition and secure a level playing field. The detailed list of materials affected is available through the official register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Continues Subsidy Protection for US Chassis Industry Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C., July 29, 2026 – The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its decision regarding certain chassis and their subassemblies from China. The decision is part of the expedited first sunset review of a countervailing duty order. Background: On April 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce started the first sunset review of the countervailing duty order issued on May 10, 2021. The order concerns the import of certain chassis and their subassemblies from the People’s Republic of China. Process: The review was prompted by the coalition of American Chassis Manufacturers. This group includes the Cheetah Chassis Corporation, Stoughton Trailer LLC, Pratt Intermodal Chassis, and Pratt Industries. These parties expressed their intent to continue the order because they believe it helps protect U.S. businesses. Lack of Response: Although the American manufacturers made their case, the Chinese government and other interested parties from China did not respond. Their lack of response was noted by the Department of Commerce. Expedited Review: Given the absence of response from China, the Department of Commerce proceeded with an expedited review, taking only 120 days to reach a decision. Results: The review results confirmed that revocation of the order could lead to continued or renewed subsidies on Chinese chassis. The Department of Commerce determined a subsidy rate of 44.32% for Chinese companies involved. Implications for U.S. Chassis Manufacturers: This decision means that countervailing duties will continue, ensuring that Chinese manufacturers do not have an unfair advantage due to subsidies. These duties serve as a protective measure for U.S. businesses. Administrative Measures: Parties to this review are reminded that they must return or destroy proprietary information shared under the administrative protective order. This is in accordance with U.S. regulations and compliance requirements. Conclusion: The continuation of the countervailing duty order shows the Department of Commerce’s commitment to maintaining fair competition for U.S. manufacturers. This ensures a level playing field for domestic producers of chassis and their subassemblies. The decision reflects the Department’s dedication to enforcing trade laws effectively. Contact Information: For further details, stakeholders can contact Mary Kolberg at the Department of Commerce, using the telephone number provided in the official release. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Begins Review of Solar Panel Duties Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has initiated a review process to consider making changes to certain trade duties on solar panels imported from China. This review was requested by RNG International, Inc., a company that makes and exports these solar panels. The solar panels in question are known as crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) panels. There are specific rules about which panels are covered by these duties. Certain small off-grid panels may now be excluded from the current duties. On December 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce set up rules to impose duties on certain solar cells from China. More rules were added in February 2015. These duties help prevent dumping, which is when products are sold at unfairly low prices. They also counter subsidies, which some governments give to help their industries unfairly. RNG International wants the Department to change these rules to exclude certain types of small, portable solar panels. These panels are usually used off-grid and are not fixed to buildings. On April 23, 2026, RNG submitted a formal request to review the rules. They want panels that are under 200 watts and with a maximum size of 16,000 square cm to be excluded. These panels must not have an inverter built-in. Other specifics include how the panels are packaged and connected with wires. Two groups in the U.S. that make solar panels, the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing and T1 Energy Inc., agree with this proposed change. They filed letters saying they do not oppose this idea. The Department of Commerce is asking for public input. This means people can share their thoughts on whether these specific solar panels should be excluded from the duties. The Department plans to make a preliminary decision soon, and they will allow more time for comments after their preliminary announcement. This review shows that trade rules can change. It is important to watch these developments if you are interested in solar energy or international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Procedures Announced to Help U.S. Engine Manufacturers Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Understanding Import Adjustment Offsets The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new procedures. These are for automobile engines and medium-and heavy-duty vehicle (MHDV) engines. The goal is to provide import adjustment offsets. This helps reduce the tax on some engine parts brought into the U.S. These offsets balance the extra charges set by past decisions. It started in 2025 when President talked about national safety concerns. Extra charges came onto vehicle parts to protect U.S. markets. The new rules will help U.S. engine makers by lowering their costs. Who Can Apply? Starting July 29, 2026, U.S. engine makers can apply. They must show details of their engine production. Applications have to be complete and sent electronically. Makers should provide engine production forecasts, value, and more. They should also detail component origins. Importance of U.S. Parts Engines made here need U.S. core components for approval. At first, two main parts need to be U.S. made. Later on, four parts must be from the U.S. This ensures U.S. industry growth, jobs, and strong supply connections. What Are The Recent Changes? The new rules outline ways for U.S. engine makers to gain advantages. Makers get 3.75% of their total U.S. assembled engine values as offsets. These help pay for certain import taxes. The offsets apply to engines made between 2025 and 2030. Government’s Role The U.S. Commerce office will check all applications. Accurate details are a must. False info can lead to penalties. Approved applications receive help through lowered import taxes. Program Goals The rules seek to make U.S. industries stronger. They help secure supply chains and create jobs. This keeps U.S. industry healthy and competitive. Information and reviews enhance market security. All the details about the offset program come from a notice on July 29, 2026. It aims to support U.S.-based engine manufacturers in reducing extra taxes. This is key to strengthening the U.S. manufacturing base. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Investigates Alkyl Phosphate Esters from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has opened an investigation. They are looking into certain chemicals called alkyl phosphate esters. These come from the People’s Republic of China. The Department wants to know if these chemicals are included in existing trade rules. The inquiry started because of a request by ICL-IP America, Inc. This company asked the Department to check if spray-foam systems from China are avoiding rules made to stop unfair trading. The rules are called antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The Department is not starting a full investigation yet. They will first look at what is included in the trade rules. This is called a scope inquiry. For now, the bigger investigation, called a circumvention inquiry, will wait. They will decide if the Chinese spray-foam systems fall under the current rules. If parts of these systems include the esters in question, then they might be covered by the orders. The purpose of the investigation is to find out if the esters meet certain rules. The rules say that the esters must make up a big part, at least 20 percent, of the spray-foam systems. While the investigation is happening, the Department will ask U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to keep holding on to any of these spray-foam systems coming into the U.S. This means that the companies involved will have to pay a deposit. This deposit is a protection in case the Department decides that the rules do apply. The Department will use specific sections of their rules to guide this investigation. They plan to finish the investigation within 120 days, but they can take up to 180 days if needed. They will understand more about these imports and decide if they need to pay the duties under existing orders. The products being investigated come from an order that covers various chemicals like TCPP, TDCP, and TEP. These are special esters used in many products as a fire retardant. The chemicals have specific names and numbers to identify them. The investigation is technical, but very important. It helps keep American businesses safe from unfair practices. This inquiry shows that the U.S. takes its trade rules seriously. For more details, please refer to the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 140 published on July 23, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice: U.S. Department of Commerce Adds Missing Items to Review List Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice. This notice was published in Volume 91, Number 140 of the Federal Register. It addresses a recent oversight by the department, specifically omitting certain items from a previous document. The action mentioned is a correction to the Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews. Originally, these reviews were published on July 9, 2026. The initial notice left out important entries related to Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan and Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea. These missing entries concerned specific companies. For Kazakhstan, the companies under review include: Karaganda Complex Alloys Plant LLP KSP Steel TELF AG TNC Kazchrome JSC; Eurasian Energy Corporation JSC; Shubarkol Komir JSC YDD Corporation LLP; ASIA Ferroalloys LLP; KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP For the Republic of Korea, the companies related to Certain Epoxy Resins are: Kudo Chemical Co., Ltd. Kukdo Finechem Co., Ltd. Kumho P&B Chemicals Inc. The period under review for Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan is from September 10, 2024, to December 31, 2025. For Epoxy Resins from Korea, the period is from April 3, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The notice is issued following sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. It also aligns with regulation 19 CFR 351.213. The correction aims to ensure that all interested parties have the correct and complete information. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed the document. The complete details of this notice are available in the Federal Register. This publication is accessible through the Government Publishing Office’s website. This correction is fundamentally important to stakeholders in the international trade community. It ensures all relevant entities are correctly accounted for in the trade review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. This decision is about fatty acids from Indonesia. It says that Indonesian producers and exporters are getting unfair help. This help is called a “countervailable subsidy.” What is a Countervailable Subsidy? This is when the government helps to make goods cheaper. This help could be money or other support. The U.S. law says this could hurt U.S. businesses. Investigation Period The investigation was for one year. It started on January 1, 2025, and ended on December 31, 2025. Background The U.S. started looking into these subsidies in March 2026. This was after companies in the U.S. complained. They said the subsidies were unfair. They claimed the subsidies caused problems for them. Company-Specific Rates Two companies in Indonesia were checked carefully. They are Wilmar and PT Musim Mas. Each got a countervailable subsidy rate of about 16.5%. All-Others Rate Other companies that did not get checked also received a rate. This rate is almost the same as the two main companies. Their rate is 16.48%. What Happens Next? The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop certain products from Indonesia. This will start after this notice goes public. Indonesia-exported fatty acids will need a cash deposit for the same percentage as their subsidy rate. Public Comments Interested people can give their opinion. They need to do this after the last check report is available. There is a set schedule for these comments. They can call for a hearing if they want. Critical Circumstances Check A critical look at these situations will happen by July 29, 2026. This is 30 days after the first issue was raised. What’s Next? The U.S. will keep checking. There will be a final decision by the end of November 2026. If they find the subsidies are unfair, they might take more actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan The U.S. Department of Commerce, along with the International Trade Commission (ITC), has issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This decision follows affirmative findings from both departments, which said that these cranes were being sold at less than fair value. What Does this Mean? Starting July 23, 2026, antidumping duties will be levied. This means that additional taxes will be applied to cranes coming from Japan to make the pricing fair. Background Details On June 4, the Department of Commerce announced their final affirmative determination regarding the sales of these cranes at less than fair value. Then, on July 16, the ITC confirmed their decision of material injury to the U.S. industry. Scope of the Order The order includes all lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. These cranes are often used for heavy lifting in construction and other industries. If you need more details, check the appendix on the original notice for a deeper description. Antidumping Duty Rates Several companies in Japan will face specific duty rates: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. will face a 12.36% duty. Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. will face a 20.00% duty. All other relevant companies will face a 16.18% duty rate. Provisional Measures The suspension of liquidation started on January 16, 2026, back when the preliminary determination was made. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are NOT subject to these duties. These entries should be liquidated without paying antidumping fees. Forward Steps It’s important that stakeholders keep up with the annual inquiry service list. This list will help ensure all parties are well-informed about the case proceedings and any updates to duties or regulations. Keep an eye on updates and notifications for any changes and to ensure compliance with this new order. This order aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing strategies by enforcing duties on products from Japan that do not adhere to fair pricing. Stay informed, and make sure you or your business fully understands the implications if you’re involved in importing these cranes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Provides Subsidies on L-Lysine Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision regarding an investigation into L-lysine (lysine) exports from China. This decision found that Chinese producers and exporters receive countervailable subsidies. This investigation focused on activities from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What is L-Lysine? Lysine is an essential amino acid. It is often added to animal feed to help in protein synthesis. The investigation covered lysine in all forms, including lysine monohydrochloride, lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. Investigation Findings The Commerce Department determined that Chinese lysine producers benefited from subsidies. These subsidies allow them to export lysine at lower costs. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd. was the main company investigated. Evidence showed financial contributions that helped these companies, making their exports unfairly cheap. The investigation also found that these subsidies were specific, meaning they were not available to all. Impact on Chinese Companies Different rates were calculated for the subsidies. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. was given a 48.21% subsidy rate. Two other companies, Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd., received a higher rate of 82.11%. This was based on adverse facts available. Future Actions The Commerce Department instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect deposits for these duties since January 22, 2026. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) confirms injury to U.S. industry, duties will continue to be applied. If not, the deposits will be refunded. The ITC will decide within 45 days if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If they find injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued. If not, the investigation will be closed, and no duties will be imposed. This decision marks a significant step in addressing trade imbalances. It aims to ensure fair competition for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Plywood from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce released important news on July 21, 2026. They finished an investigation on plywood from Indonesia. They found that Indonesian producers and exporters get subsidies. The International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce, ran the investigation. They looked at the time from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The announcement by the Department means that plywood from Indonesia was sold in the U.S. with the help of these subsidies. U.S. laws don’t allow this. This decision follows a long process. The Department first looked into the matter in January 2026. They called it the Preliminary Determination. They asked people to comment on it. Then, in April 2026, they looked into some programs more. The International Trade Administration, through ACCESS, a system for keeping records, logged all their findings. Anyone can check these details online. In this case, they found that certain Indonesian companies got unfair help from their government. These companies are PT. Mustika Buana Sejahtera, PT. Sengon Indah Mas, and PT. Wijaya Cahaya Timber Tbk. The report says these companies got different levels of help. The U.S. will apply duties on them to make things fair for U.S. producers. For everyone else making plywood in Indonesia, a separate rate applies. Before making this decision, the Department had several discussions. They talked about what products fit into the case. They wanted to make sure they only included the right kinds of plywood. The commission also looked at the rules. They verified information and looked at documents from the Indonesian companies. They wanted accurate data. The U.S. plans to keep track of any subsidies given to plywood makers. If the U.S. International Trade Commission finds that the subsidies hurt American businesses, they will take further action. In conclusion, the U.S. is being careful. They want fair trade. They will monitor how plywood from Indonesia affects American businesses. This step is important for protecting U.S. industries. The Department has given a copy of the investigation report to the International Trade Commission. If they find that these subsidies hurt U.S. industries, they will continue with stricter rules. Otherwise, they will return any cash deposits collected. The decision is now in the hands of the Commission to ensure fairness in trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chinese Plywood Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released a report. It states that hardwood and decorative plywood from China is being sold in the U.S. at prices below the actual value. This is known as “less than fair value” sales. The decision was announced on July 21, 2026. Investigation Timeframe The investigation covered sales from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The report did not change from a previous announcement made on March 2, 2026. Scope of Products The products under investigation include plywood from China. The investigation focused on whether these products were being sold at unfairly low prices. Findings and Decisions Two companies were primarily investigated: Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd. and Xuzhou Shelter Import and Export Co., Ltd. These companies did not cooperate by responding to questionnaires. As a result, they are part of a larger group known as the “China-wide entity.” This group includes several other companies that also did not cooperate. Because these companies did not cooperate, the Department of Commerce used “adverse facts available.” This means they assumed the companies were selling at unfair prices. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce also found “critical circumstances” exist. This means they believe that large shipments of plywood were sold at unfair prices in a short time. This could harm the U.S. market. Suspension of Liquidation Goods will continue to be held, not sold, until the issue is resolved. This applies to products that entered the U.S. starting from December 2, 2025. Final Margin Rates The dumping margins, or the amount by which selling prices are below the normal value, were set. Different rates apply to various Chinese companies. For example, the margin for many companies was 187.27 percent. It implies that these products were being sold at very low prices. Future Steps The final decision will involve the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They will check if the U.S. wood industry is hurt because of cheap plywood from China. If they agree with Commerce’s findings, an antidumping order will be issued. Conclusion The U.S. government’s actions show strong efforts to ensure fair trading practices. The decision aims to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. Further measures will depend on the ITC’s final decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Final Decision on Plywood from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has reached a decision about hardwood and decorative plywood from China. The department has found that certain Chinese plywood producers and exporters are receiving financial assistance, known as subsidies, from the Chinese government. This final decision means that the products are entering the U.S. market at unfair prices. The investigation focused on plywood from the People’s Republic of China. The time period examined was January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department has concluded that these products are being sold in the U.S. at a lower price than fair value due to the subsidies. The Department of Commerce’s decision was announced on July 21, 2026. This decision is important because it helps protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. The decision means that these imports will now face extra taxes, called countervailing duties, to level the playing field for U.S. companies. The duty rates connected to this case were largely based on the failure of two primary Chinese companies to cooperate with the investigation. The companies involved include Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd, and Xuzhou Shelter Import & Export Co., Ltd. These duties also apply to other Chinese companies not specifically investigated. Furthermore, the Commerce Department has established a point of critical circumstances. This refers to the surge in plywood imports from China that are viewed as unfair. Products being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices can harm American companies and workers. By applying countervailing duties, the U.S. government aims to support fair competition. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) now needs to confirm if the imports have indeed caused harm. If the ITC agrees with the Commerce Department, further measures will be imposed on these imports to protect U.S. businesses and workers. If not, the duties will not be applied. In conclusion, this decision emphasizes the importance of fair trade and protecting local industries from unfair international practices. The situation will be closely monitored as the ITC makes its determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Plywood from Indonesia Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination in its investigation of hardwood and decorative plywood from Indonesia. The Department found that this plywood is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The investigation period spans from April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Commerce’s determination means that plywood exporters from Indonesia are selling their products in the U.S. at prices lower than what is considered fair market value. This determination is part of the Department’s efforts to enforce trade laws and ensure fair competition. The Commerce Department investigated several Indonesian companies. It found that two of these companies, PT Sengon Indah Mas and PT Java Wood Industri, had significant dumping margins. PT Wijaya Cahaya Timber TBK and PT Wijaya Triutama Plywood Industri were found to have lower margins, but they were still selling below market value. Another company, PT. Mustika Buana Sejahtera, was found to have the highest dumping margin, which was based on adverse facts available. The Department also verified the sales and cost information provided by the investigated companies. This was done through standard verification procedures, such as examining accounting records and original documents. The outcomes led to some adjustments in the preliminary findings to reach the final figures. As a result of this determination, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend liquidation of entries of the subject merchandise. This means that importers must post a cash deposit equal to the estimated dumping margins. These cash deposit requirements are necessary to maintain fair market conditions. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now review the final determination to decide if U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. The ITC has 45 days to make its decision. If the ITC confirms injury, an antidumping duty order will be issued, which will enforce duties on imports of Indonesian plywood to prevent further harm to U.S. industries. The Commerce Department follows detailed procedures and relies on facts when making these determinations. This helps to uphold fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. Overall, the decision highlights the importance of enforcing trade laws to ensure that all participants in the market operate within set rules. The focus remains on maintaining a level playing field for all industries involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Vietnamese Plywood Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has officially determined that Vietnam has been providing illegal subsidies to producers and exporters of hardwood and decorative plywood. This results from a thorough investigation by the department. The investigation covered a period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Findings The Department of Commerce found that Vietnamese plywood producers received unfair benefits through subsidies. This action goes against fair trade rules and negatively affects U.S. producers. The period of investigation began after the publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register on January 22, 2026. Companies Affected Two Vietnamese companies, Junma Phu Tho Co., Ltd and Trieu Thai Son Co., Ltd, were primarily investigated. Junma received a countervailing duty rate of 165.39%. This rate was determined using adverse facts due to incomplete verification. Meanwhile, Trieu Thai was given a rate of 47.68%. All other Vietnamese producers or exporters of plywood received the same rate as Trieu Thai. Critical Circumstances Critical circumstances were found to exist for Junma’s products. This means the Department of Commerce believes that massive imports of subsidized products occurred, causing further harm to U.S. industries. The department has directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries from Junma, with measures retroactively applying from a defined date. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now review the case. They will determine if imported plywood harms or threatens the U.S. plywood industry. If the ITC finds evidence of harm, the Department of Commerce will issue a final order. This will require importing companies to pay duties according to the determined rates. Public Access and Notifications The Department of Commerce has ensured public access to all non-sensitive information. They have put in place standard procedures to disclose their calculations to interested parties. Additionally, parties involved must comply with legal requirements regarding sensitive information disclosed during this investigation. This investigation and its results are significant because they aim to create fair trade conditions and protect U.S. industries from harmful foreign practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Vietnam’s Plywood Exports to the U.S. Found at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Investigation Background The period of investigation covered was from October 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Commerce had initially made a preliminary determination on March 2, 2026. The final decision was announced on July 21, 2026. Key Findings The investigation found that certain Vietnamese companies were selling plywood at prices lower than fair market value. This is often referred to as “dumping.” As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 90.12% for these products. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covered hardwood and decorative plywood products from Vietnam. These products must include at least one layer of hardwood, softwood, or bamboo veneer. Various exclusions were noted, such as plywood used for structural purposes. Verification of Data The U.S. Department of Commerce conducted a verification of the sales and production information provided by the involved Vietnamese companies. It involved reviewing sales documents and accounting records. Separate Rates and Entity Findings A total of 52 Vietnamese companies were found eligible for a separate rate in this investigation. The Vietnam-wide entity also received a dumping margin rate similar to some individual companies. Final Rulings The International Trade Commission is tasked with determining if these imports harm U.S. producers. If found harmful, antidumping duties will be imposed, requiring importers to pay cash deposits equivalent to the determined dumping margin. If no harm is found, the matter will be closed. Conclusion The decision reflects ongoing scrutiny by U.S. authorities over international trade practices. The ruling aims to ensure fair competition and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Dillinger France S.A. Avoids Antidumping Duties in U.S. Review Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued preliminary results for its review of Dillinger France S.A., a producer of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plates from France. The review covers the period of May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. According to these preliminary findings, Dillinger France S.A. did not sell the steel plates in the U.S. at prices below normal value, meaning no antidumping duties will be imposed. The review was part of an ongoing process that assesses whether foreign companies sell products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This is known as “dumping.” The review process is essential to ensure fair competition in the U.S. market. Background and Process The review began on June 25, 2025, after entering a request for it, and it covers one main exporter, Dillinger France S.A. The Commerce Department uses several calculations to determine if dumping occurred, comparing the export price to the normal value of the product. During the review, the ongoing U.S. government shutdown caused deadlines to be postponed. This was because Commerce needed time to manage electronically filed documents and the backlog they created. Results and Next Steps The Commerce Department found that Dillinger France S.A. did not sell its steel plates at less than normal value. As a result, the preliminary margins were determined to be zero percent. This decision means Dillinger France S.A. will not face any additional duties on its steel plates imported into the United States during the review period. Interested parties can submit comments on this preliminary review. They have 21 days from the notice date to send case briefs, followed by five days for rebuttal briefs. If any party requests a hearing, it must be submitted within 30 days of the publication date. However, the oral presentations in the hearing will be limited to the issues already mentioned in the written briefs. Future Implications The findings will influence cash deposit requirements for future imports. A final review will determine cash deposit rates and could impact other companies if further investigations occur. The Commerce Department is expected to publish the final results of the review later this year, which will provide more insights and confirm whether any adjustments need to be made to cash deposit rates and assessment rates. This review represents an ongoing effort by the U.S. to ensure fair pricing and competitive practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Determines Antidumping on Tires from Thailand Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Commerce Determines Antidumping on Tires from Thailand The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared the final results of its review of anti-dumping duties on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from Thailand. This review covered the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Key Findings Sentury Tire (Thailand) Co., Ltd. sold tires in the United States at prices that were less than normal value. In contrast, Sumitomo Rubber (Thailand) Co., Ltd. did not sell at prices below the normal value. This means Sentury will face antidumping duties due to their pricing. Antidumping Duty Rates The duty rates set by the Commerce Department are 2.90% for Sentury Tire. Sumitomo Rubber will not face duties as their margin was zero. Other companies not selected for individual review will also have a rate of 2.90%. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements For the entries made during the review period, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be assessing antidumping duties. If a company didn’t know their products were destined for the U.S., these products will be charged at a rate of 17.06%, which is the all-others rate. For future shipments, the cash deposit rates are as follows: 2.90% for Sentury Tire. 0% for Sumitomo Rubber, given their zero-margin rate. 2.90% for companies not individually examined. 17.06% for those not covered before. The new cash deposit rates apply to any shipments made on or after July 20, 2026. These rates will remain in effect until further notice from the Commerce Department. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has also reminded importers about their duties. They must submit a certificate concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties for entries during the period of review. The failure to file could lead to presumption of reimbursement and additional duties. Companies have been advised to follow these new guidelines to avoid legal complications or excess duties as they continue to engage in international trade of tires. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Aluminum Sheets from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary findings in an important trade review. This involves the import of common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. The agency discovered that these aluminum sheets were sold at prices lower than usual market rates. This is often referred to as “dumping.” The time period reviewed was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Key Findings The sole company under review is Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC). The U.S. Department of Commerce found that OARC had a dumping margin of 2.23%. A dumping margin is the amount by which the normal market price exceeds the selling price. Background This review is part of an antidumping duty order issued by the U.S. against several countries, including Oman. Such orders are meant to protect domestic industries from foreign companies that sell goods at unfairly low prices. This can harm local businesses. The process started on May 20, 2025, when the Department began the review following requests from interested parties. Due to a government shutdown, deadlines were pushed back, with a final preliminary result date of July 7, 2026. Methodology The review was carried out following certain U.S. trade laws. An export price was calculated, which refers to the price at which the goods were sold to U.S. buyers. The normal value represents the typical market price if the goods were sold in Oman. Next Steps Stakeholders can comment on these preliminary results. They have until 21 days after the announcement to submit their views. They can also request a hearing within 30 days if they want to discuss their issues. Final Decisions The Commerce Department will use the findings to instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess duties for these imports. If the final results also show dumping, duties will be applied. These include detailed calculations to ensure fair assessments. The review aims to establish cash deposit rates based on the final dumping margins. Adjustments could mean duties for OARC and other involved parties. Public Engagement The Department invites public feedback to aid in concluding this review. This will help to ensure fair trading practices and address any potential issues raised by stakeholders. The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to promoting fair trade and protecting domestic industries through thorough and detailed reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheets from Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently shared preliminary findings regarding the review of antidumping duties on aluminum sheets imported from Bahrain. The review focused on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation zeroed in on a specific company, Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO), a major exporter of aluminum sheets to the United States. Commerce found that GARMCO has been selling its aluminum sheets at prices lower than the normal value, which means they are priced below what is expected or fair. This is known as “dumping.” The purpose of providing such dumping assessments is to protect U.S. industries from unfair and underpriced competition from foreign entities. Due to this determination, an antidumping margin, or extra duty, is set. For GARMCO, a weighted-average dumping margin of 6.25 percent is proposed. This percentage represents the level of unfair pricing detected by the Department of Commerce. The Commerce Department reached this finding through a series of extended reviews. Initially, there were delays because of government shutdowns and backlogs, which pushed the deadlines back multiple times. But by July 7, 2026, Commerce was ready to release its preliminary results. Now, the review will go through further processing. Interested parties can comment on these preliminary results. Commerce invites written comments often called case briefs, within 21 days of this announcement’s publication. They allow rebuttal briefs within five days after that, specifically to address concerns raised in the case briefs. Commerce plans to disclose its calculations and analysis supporting these preliminary results. To ensure transparency, they will provide the information within ten days to public stakeholders. The public has 30 days to request a hearing about these preliminary findings. If requested, hearings will be scheduled, allowing for oral presentations on issues raised in the written comments. Final results are expected within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Depending on the final outcome, the antidumping duties for imports from GARMCO may be adjusted accordingly. Meanwhile, cash deposit requirements based on these margins are set to be effective upon the final results’ publication. The proposed margin of 6.25 percent could increase import costs once enforced. The Department of Commerce enforces these duties to ensure fair competition. They protect U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair trade practices. For now, the preliminary results highlight necessary steps to correct such practices. This protection aims to create a level playing field for U.S. aluminum sheet producers to compete against imports priced lower than what is deemed fair. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.