U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Orders in Crafting Machines Investigation
Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes
On July 10, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a significant decision regarding certain crafting machines and their components. This decision results from an investigation into violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation focused on imported crafting machines that infringe on specific U.S. patents.
The ITC has issued several orders:
- General Exclusion Order (GEO): This order bans the importation of crafting machines that violate U.S. Patent No. D893,563.
- Limited Exclusion Orders (LEOs):
- One LEO was directed at the respondent, LiPing Zhan, known as Konduone, for infringing U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646.
- Another LEO was aimed at Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co., Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co. Ltd. (collectively called Vevor Respondents) for infringing U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090.
- Cease and Desist Orders (CDOs): These were issued against Konduone and the Vevor Respondents to prevent further violations.
The investigation commenced on December 11, 2024, based on a complaint by Cricut, Inc. from South Jordan, Utah. The complaint alleged violations due to the importation and sale of certain crafting machines that infringe various patents held by Cricut.
During the investigation, several developments occurred:
- SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. was initially part of the investigation but was terminated based on a consent order.
- Respondents like HSET were terminated, while other companies like HK Sijiu International Share Co., Ltd. were added.
- Claims were dropped or resolved through consent orders as the investigation progressed.
The final determination found violations regarding certain patents, while others were found non-infringing or moot. The ITC ordered remedies, including a bond requirement during a Presidential review period.
The Commission finalized its decision on July 7, 2026, and delivered its conclusion along with orders to the relevant authorities. This decision is based on legal statutes in the Tariff Act of 1930 and ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Legal Disclaimer
This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.


