Court Decision Leads to Changes in Aluminum Foil Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 5, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made an important decision. This decision affects how the U.S. Department of Commerce handles aluminum foil from Turkey. The case is called Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States. The court decision relates to the investigation of aluminum foil. This investigation was about whether the foil was sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. Back in September 2021, Commerce published a final decision saying that aluminum foil from Turkey was sold at these low prices. In November 2021, Commerce published an order to add extra duties on this aluminum foil. The company involved, Assan Aluminyum, was not happy. They challenged Commerce’s decision in court. Two main issues were about how taxes were treated and how Assan’s costs were calculated. The court asked Commerce to reconsider these issues. Commerce adjusted some calculations and explained others. For example, they fixed how they handled duty drawbacks. But the court wanted more explanation on a final topic. This topic was about Assan’s hedging gains. Commerce gave its response, and the petitioner in the case later decided to drop the issue. The court agreed and dismissed the case. Commerce has now changed its final decision. The dumping margin for Assan was slightly increased. Though this change does not alter current cash deposits for Assan, it affects others who are involved in similar trades. Commerce will update rules for how customs duties are applied. But for now, no change in cash deposits is needed for Assan, as newer reviews have set different rates already. This case underscores the complexity of trade investigations. It shows how court decisions can lead to changes in how trade regulations are applied. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Sodium Nitrite Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Key Findings: Commerce determined that some subsidies given to Indian producers are countervailable. The review is part of an ongoing administrative process involving sodium nitrite imports. Companies Assessed: The review specifically focused on Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and Kutch Chemical Industries Limited. Three companies—Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd.—may be excluded from further review as no reviewable entries were found during the period for which liquidation is suspended. Rates Determined: Deepak Nitrite Limited has a preliminary subsidy rate of 2.26%. Kutch Chemical Industries Limited received a subsidy rate of 63.60%, calculated mainly using adverse facts available because of missing information. Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd., not individually examined, received a subsidy rate based on DNL, also at 2.26%. Future Steps: The Commerce Department invites comments from interested parties on these preliminary results. There is a plan to rescind reviews for companies without reviewable entries according to existing trade regulations. Methodology Used: The review process follows regulatory guidance to calculate subsidy rates based on contributions that give financial benefits and show specificity. Public Involvement: Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments or case briefs and request a hearing if needed. The Commerce Department is committed to transparency, offering access to documentation and data through its electronic portal, ACCESS. Next Moves: The preliminary results, subject to further comment and review, may lead to adjustments in cash deposit requirements for Indian sodium nitrite imports. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be instructed accordingly once the final results are published. These findings are part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices and compliance with international trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duties for Paper File Folders from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the preliminary results of its review on antidumping duties for paper file folders from India. This review covers a period from May 17, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to see if paper file folders from India were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value, which is called dumping. One key finding of this review is that Navneet Education Limited, a producer and exporter from India, made sales of paper file folders at less than normal value. This means that they were selling the folders cheaper in the U.S. than they would in India. The preliminary calculated dumping margin for Navneet is 5.65 percent. This rate tells us how much the prices were lower than expected. However, for another company, Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited, the Department of Commerce has decided to rescind, or cancel, the review. This decision was made because Kokuyo did not have any entries of these folders that could be looked at during the review period. This means there were no sales to review, so the process does not need to include them. The U.S. Department of Commerce uses an electronic system called ACCESS, where registered users can view documents related to these reviews. For anyone interested, detailed information about this review is available online. The paper file folders from India are under an order that watches for unfair pricing. This order was put in place to make sure companies do not sell products in the U.S. for less than the usual price. If they do, antidumping duties are applied. These duties are like extra taxes that make the price fair again. The next steps involve comments from interested parties. People or companies who want to comment on the preliminary results have 21 days from the notice date to submit their opinions. There is also an opportunity to request a hearing to discuss these results further. For now, the U.S. Department of Commerce will keep holding Navneet’s shipments of paper file folders to these new estimated duties until a final decision is made. For Kokuyo, any shipments that happened before will not have extra duties added after this decision. The U.S. Department of Commerce takes these steps to ensure that U.S. businesses can compete on a fair playing field. By investigating and reviewing the pricing of imports, they help protect local industries from unfair competition from overseas. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Delays Final Decision in Solar Cells Investigation from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a delay in its final decision in the investigation of solar cells from Indonesia. The case is about crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules. The investigation is about these products being sold for less than their value. The investigation started on August 12, 2025. It looked at imports from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. On April 28, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared its first findings. They believe the solar cells are indeed being sold for less. Now, the final decision is being delayed. The law allows this delay for up to 135 days after the first findings are published. Two Indonesian companies, REC Solar Energy Indonesia and PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia, asked for this delay. They also asked for more time before any provisional measures take effect. The Department of Commerce agreed with the companies’ requests. The new deadline for the final decision is September 10, 2026. This decision comes from Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This information is from the Federal Register and follows legal guidelines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Finds Subsidies for Korean Steel Producers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction: The United States Department of Commerce has released preliminary results from a review of subsidies provided to steel companies in South Korea. This review targets specific manufacturers who produce cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plates. Key Findings: The Commerce Department has discovered that countervailable subsidies were given to two South Korean steel companies. These companies are Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company. The period under review is from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Subsidy Rates: The preliminary subsidy rates determined by the Commerce Department are as follows: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 1.89 percent. Hyundai Steel Company has a subsidy rate of 1.39 percent. Partial Review Rescission: The review initially included other companies, but the Commerce Department has decided to rescind the review for Daeik Eng Co., Ltd. and MAIKO International. This decision came after domestic parties withdrew their requests for an administrative review of these companies. Process and Timeline: The review began in March 2025 after requests for evaluation were received. By May 2026, the preliminary results were announced. Interested parties are invited to comment on these results. The Commerce Department extended deadlines due to a federal government shutdown. This extension included a 47-day toll and an additional 21-day toll, with the preliminary results deadline set for May 7, 2026. Next Steps: The Commerce Department will disclose its calculations and analyses to parties of interest and invites comment submissions. There will also be opportunities for parties to submit briefs and request hearings. Conclusion: This preliminary finding by the U.S. Department of Commerce is an important step in managing fair trade practices. The final results are expected to be published following an analysis of comments and briefs submitted by interested parties. The steel industry and trade authorities are keenly observing these developments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Reviews Aluminum Foil Imports from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary results of its review of aluminum foil imports from the Sultanate of Oman. The review looked at whether subsidies were given to the Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC), which makes and exports aluminum foil to the U.S. What is the Review About? The review is focused on whether OARC received financial help from the government of Oman, which could give it an unfair advantage in selling aluminum foil. This kind of financial help is called a countervailable subsidy. When is the Review Period? The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce believes that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC received subsidies. The preliminary findings show a subsidy rate of 14.15 percent. The U.S. Commerce Department considers subsidies as financial support from a local authority that benefits the company specifically, which can affect competition. What Happens Next? Further comments on these preliminary results are invited. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to discuss these comments before making a final decision later. Those who wish to provide their thoughts must submit them within 21 days of the notice’s publication. Impact on U.S. Imports As a result of this review, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect cash deposits from importers of aluminum foil from Oman. This deposit is based on the subsidy rate of 14.15 percent. These rules will start after the final decision is published. How to Stay Informed The information from the review is available online through the International Trade Administration’s website at https://access.trade.gov/frnotices. Interested parties should keep an eye on this site for the latest updates. The final results of the review are expected within 120 days from May 13, 2026. Therefore, it is essential for involved parties to watch for these results and provide input accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results for Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared important news about oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea. They have been looking into whether any subsidies, which are financial help from the government, were given to companies in Korea during the year 2023. Key Findings The Department found that SeAH Steel Corporation, a company that produces and exports OCTG from Korea, did not receive any significant subsidies. Their subsidy rate was found to be only 0.13%, which is considered too small to count. Review and Rescission Details The Department of Commerce started this review after some companies requested it back in December 2024. Several companies, AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., ILJIN Steel Corporation, Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd., and NEXTEEL Co., Ltd., decided they no longer wanted a review and withdrew their requests. Because of this, the Department has stopped the review process for these companies. In addition, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (Hyundai Pipe) might also have its review stopped because there were no entries of their products during the time under review. Process and Timeline The review process has been ongoing with several delays due to various reasons, including a government shutdown. The preliminary results were finally issued on May 7, 2026. Next Steps Interested parties have the chance to provide comments on these preliminary results. They must submit any supporting documents through the Department’s electronic system. There is also a chance for them to request a hearing if they have more to discuss. The final results of this review are expected within 120 days from now, provided there are no further extensions. Assessment and Cash Deposits For those companies whose review was canceled, they will continue with the cash deposits as previously set. The results for other companies will be used to decide future cash deposit rates. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is acting thoroughly and systematically as they continue their review of Korean OCTG. They are committed to ensuring fair trade practices and will keep the public updated with any further decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Issues Orders on Steel Fencing from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new orders on steel fencing imported from China. The orders include “antidumping” and “countervailing duties.” This decision follows an investigation showing that steel fencing from China had been sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, hurting American industries. What Are These Orders? Antidumping Duty Order: This order stops steel fencing from being sold at very low prices in the U.S. These low prices, known as “less than fair value,” hurt American companies. Countervailing Duty Order: This order addresses unfair government subsidies in China. The Chinese government gave unfair support to companies that make steel fencing. This made it tough for U.S. companies to compete. Important Dates The orders start on May 13, 2026. Unfair pricing from China was first noticed on August 19, 2025. Details About Steel Fencing The orders affect temporary steel fencing. These are steel panels used to create fences for short-term use. The panels are usually between 10 and 12 feet long and 6 to 8 feet high. They are made of steel tubing and wire mesh. What Happens Next? The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect the duties. These duties will be charged on every panel that comes from China. The duties are meant to make the prices fair and help U.S. businesses. Critical Circumstances There was a concern about the import surge of steel fencing before the duty orders started. However, authorities decided there were no “critical circumstances” for this type from China. This means some steel that came in earlier will not be taxed. Looking to the Future The Department of Commerce will check on the yearly service list for these orders. This list helps keep track of who imports steel fencing. Adjustments can be made to this list to make sure everything is fair and organized. Continuing with these orders should help U.S. businesses by making it tougher to sell underpriced steel fencing from overseas. The same rules will apply every year to ensure fair competition. In summary, these orders are designed to make the market fair for U.S. industries and limit the unfair competition caused by cheap imports and government subsidies from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Chinese Chemical Company Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued preliminary findings regarding the provision of subsidies to Heze Huayi Chemical Co. Ltd. This company, located in the People’s Republic of China, is engaged in the production and export of chlorinated isocyanurates. These findings pertain to a period of review from January 1 to December 31, 2023. The investigation carried out by the International Trade Administration concluded that Heze Huayi is receiving countervailable subsidies. This means the government of China is providing financial benefits that give this company an advantage in international trade. The preliminary results indicate a subsidy rate of 18.71 percent. Additionally, the Department has decided to rescind the review for 41 other companies. This is in line with Commerce’s practice of terminating reviews when there are no suspended entries of merchandise for the period under review. The preliminary decision is now open for comments from interested parties. These parties are encouraged to provide their input on the findings. In line with standard procedures, the Department of Commerce plans to verify the information on which these preliminary results are based. As part of the ongoing administrative review, further details will be collected and analyzed. The public is invited to submit comments and rebuttal briefs regarding the results. These submissions will help shape the final determination of the review, expected to be completed within the next few months. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess any countervailing duties. The final subsidy rates will influence how these duties are calculated for subsequent entries of the affected merchandise. These developments are critical as they reflect ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices by addressing government subsidies that could distort market competition. The Department of Commerce is diligent in reviewing and implementing measures that foster equitable trading conditions for all parties involved. Interested parties may request a hearing to provide oral presentations on the issues raised. These presentations must relate to the content of previously submitted briefs. This process allows stakeholders to engage directly with the review, ensuring their perspectives are considered in the final decisions. The outcomes of this review will determine future import conditions for chlorinated isocyanurates from China. Companies involved in the import and export of these chemicals should closely monitor developments to align with regulatory requirements. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Breaking News: U.S. Review on Thermal Paper Imports from Spain Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce has taken a significant step. It has released the preliminary findings of a review on thermal paper imported from Spain. This review covers the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Background The department uses rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930 to monitor and control trade practices. The goal is to ensure fair competition. The focus of this review is a Spanish company named Torraspapel S.A. Findings The Department of Commerce discovered that Torraspapel had sold thermal paper in the United States at prices lower than its normal value. This practice is known as “dumping.” The review determines the dumping margin, or the difference between the U.S. price and the actual cost of the paper. Torraspapel has a dumping margin of 7.69 percent. Process The Department uses special methodologies. They calculate the export price and the price when sold in the United States. This process ensures fairness and equivalent competition. Next Steps Interested parties can comment on the review. They have a set period to submit briefs and arguments. There will be a final decision after evaluating all comments. Impact Companies importing thermal paper might pay extra duties. This ensures no unfair price advantages in the U.S. market. The review also affects how future imports will be taxed. Deadline The Department of Commerce aims to finish this review by September 2026. This includes analyzing all feedback from the public. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s review is an important process. It protects U.S. markets from unfair practices. The review encourages equal competition and ensures fair pricing in the U.S. Please stay tuned for updates on this important trade issue. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Stainless Steel Bar Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary results of its review on stainless steel bar imports from India. The review aims to determine if the products were sold in the United States at prices below the normal value. Entities Under Review The period of review was from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Eight producers and exporters from India, known collectively as the “Venus Group,” were examined. These include: Atlas Stainless Corporation Private Limited Astrabright LLP Bahubali Steel Industries Eurostahl Tech LLP Venus Metal Corporation Precision Metals Venus Wire Industries Private Limited Hindustan Inox Limited Sieves Manufactures (India) Private Limited The review also covered Laxcon Steels Private Limited. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce found that the Venus Group sold products at less than the normal value during the review period. However, it determined that Laxcon’s prices were not below this benchmark. Review Rescission The review for Ambica Steel Limited was rescinded because the request was withdrawn within the given period. Implications for Non-Examined Companies Five other companies were not directly reviewed but were included in the assessment: Aamor Inox Limited Bhansali Bright Bars Pvt. Ltd. Chandan Steel Limited Mangalam Alloys Limited Welspun Specialty Solutions, Ltd. These companies were assigned a rate based on the average findings for Laxcon and Venus Group. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has set specific cash deposit rates for future imports from these companies. These rates are effective upon finalization. Importers must ensure compliance and file certificates to avoid penalties. The final results of the review are expected within 120 days of this notice. Importers should be aware of the responsibilities that include filing certificates under the relevant regulations to avoid double assessment of duties. The Department’s findings help keep the market fair and maintain appropriate trade practices for stainless steel bar imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce released its preliminary findings on May 13, 2026, regarding the antidumping duty review of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Mexico for the period between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The review concluded that Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A. (TAMSA) engaged in sales of merchandise from Mexico at prices lower than normal value. Key Findings: TAMSA, the main producer/exporter under review, was found to have a dumping margin of 1.62 percent for the period specified. The review covered OCTG products originating from Mexico, as ordered under the scope of the administrative review. The Department of Commerce also announced the rescission of its review concerning two companies, Siderca S.A.I.C. and Vallourec Oil & Gas Mexico, S.A. de C.V. This decision was based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the review period. Next Steps: Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Submissions must abide by specified deadlines, with case briefs due no later than 21 days after the notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days following case brief submissions. Public comments must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Parties can submit comments electronically using the ACCESS system. If a hearing is requested, details will be provided to the parties involved. Impact on Importers: The Department of Commerce will determine and direct customs duties on subject merchandise entries covered by this review. Cash deposit requirements will change based on these findings, effective upon finalization of the review results. Conclusion: The preliminary results are a step in the process to ensure fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce’s decision will help maintain a level playing field for U.S. industries by assessing appropriate duties on Mexican imports found to be unfairly priced. Interested parties can continue to engage in the process through public comments and requests for hearings, ensuring a thorough review before the final decision is issued. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings concerning certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The review covers the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. This announcement relates to the antidumping duty administrative review concerning shrimp imports. In these preliminary results, the Department of Commerce determined that some sales of shrimp from Vietnam were made at prices below normal value. Two main companies, Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company (known collectively as Fimex Group) and Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company (STAPIMEX), were examined closely. Their sales were found to be below the normal value. Additionally, 29 other exporters are eligible for separate rates, meaning they will not be included under the Vietnam-wide entity rate, which is higher. However, the review will be rescinded for some exporters. This means that Commerce found no entries of subject merchandise from these exporters during the reviewed period. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Future actions include finalizing the review, with the results providing a basis for future deposits of estimated duties. The review process also revealed that 132 companies did not qualify for separate rate status. These companies are considered part of the Vietnam-wide entity and remain subject to the higher dumping margin. In detail, Fimex Group received a preliminary dumping margin of 10.76 percent, while STAPIMEX received a 6.30 percent margin. A weighted average of these margins will inform the separate rate assigned to the 27 companies that weren’t individually examined but met the standards for a separate rate. The Vietnam-wide entity remains subject to a margin of 25.76 percent. This rate is not under review as no specific request was made to review it. Commerce is conducting this review in line with U.S. laws, using export price calculations and understanding Vietnam as a non-market economy. These steps are consistent with the regulations aimed at ensuring fair trade practices. Businesses involved in importing shrimp from Vietnam should stay updated on the final results, which will impact duty assessments for entries made during the review period. The findings will be integral to future trade dealings and duty estimations. The Department of Commerce will issue instructions on assessing duties on entries made during the review period once the review is concluded. This includes handling companies part of the Vietnam-wide entity differently than those assigned separate rates. The preliminary results are a step in the ongoing process of ensuring trade compliance and fair pricing for shrimp imported from Vietnam. For those interested in the specifics of this review, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and notices are available for consultation, providing comprehensive details of the investigation and its preliminary conclusions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Antidumping Duty Review of Steel Pipes from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary announcement regarding steel pipes imported from Korea. It has found that Hyundai Steel Company and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. sold circular welded non-alloy steel pipes, commonly known as CWP, at prices less than their normal value. The review period for these findings covers November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The investigation has shown that Husteel Co., Ltd., another major exporter, did not sell at less than normal value during this period. The Department of Commerce has decided to end its review of 14 other companies because there were no reviewable entries from these companies during the review period. Readers can contact Benjamin Nathan or Mira Warrier at the Department of Commerce for further information. The contact numbers are (202) 482-3834 and (202) 482-8031. Background The review started after requests were made for a review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from Korea. Hyundai Steel and Husteel were picked as the main companies for the review. However, there were delays due to a government shutdown, which extended the review timeline. After these delays, the preliminary findings were ready by May 2026. The Department of Commerce had already notified companies that the review would be rescinded for those with no entries. None of the parties affected objected, so this plan stands. Scope and Method The review focused on steel pipes from Korea. When looking at companies not individually reviewed, the Department often applies the same method used to find a general rate in past investigations. For companies that were not reviewed individually, a rate was assigned based on findings for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results For the highlighted period, Hyundai Steel/HSP is subjected to a preliminary dumping margin of 4.19%. However, Husteel has a margin of 0.00%, meaning they did not sell below normal value. For six companies not selected for individual review, a rate of 4.19% also applies. Next Steps The public and interested parties can comment on these findings. The Department will share its calculations, and a verification of the information will be conducted. This is an important step to ensure that all details are correct. Anyone interested can submit their opinions or request a hearing. The deadline for these actions will be shortly after all information is finalized. Assessment and Future Steps After the review, duties will be assessed on entries during the period. The specific rates decided will guide how Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will handle duties on imports. For companies where the review has been stopped, the cash deposit rates effective at the time will continue to apply. In conclusion, the findings are significant in determining the duties and pricing policies moving forward. The final decisions will help guide the industry and ensure fairness in trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Strontium Chromate from Austria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released preliminary results regarding the sales of strontium chromate from Austria. This review focused on investigating whether the product was sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Background Commerce published an antidumping duty order on strontium chromate from Austria in November 2019. This order was put in place to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing by foreign producers. After a timely review request, Commerce began an administrative review specifically targeting an Austrian company named Habich GmbH. Preliminary Findings Preliminary results show that Habich GmbH sold strontium chromate in the U.S. at a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.01 percent. This means the company sold the product significantly below its normal value, impacting fair competition in the U.S. market. Scope of Review The review covers strontium chromate in all forms, including powder and paste. This product is classified under specific subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The written description in the original order takes precedence over these classifications. Next Steps for Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on these findings. Commerce will announce a schedule for submitting case and rebuttal briefs after the publication of these preliminary results. Public hearings may be requested by stakeholders to further discuss the issues at hand. Method of Review Commerce followed specific laws to determine the dumping margin, using export price and normal value comparisons. The review ensures proper enforcement of trade laws to maintain fair business practices. Impact on Future Shipments Once final results are published, new cash deposit requirements will be effective. Companies that have been found to dump their products at unfair prices will face additional duties to prevent future infractions. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to enforcing trade laws to protect U.S. industries. The preliminary findings against Habich GmbH are part of ongoing measures to ensure fair trade and competition. Final results of this review are expected within a few months, allowing time for interested parties to provide additional input. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes In recent developments, the U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings of an investigation into certain wood products imported from China. The investigation revealed that the products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. This is part of an ongoing review concerning the import of wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. The investigation covered a time period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Two major companies from China, Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. and Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd., were reviewed in detail. They were found to be selling products in the U.S. at prices substantially lower than they should be. This is also known as “dumping.” As a result of these findings, nine companies have been highlighted in this review. The review initially included 35 companies, but was reduced after requests for withdrawal and no findings of actionable entries for some. Of these, Fujian Hongjia Craft was given a dumping margin of 31.82 percent, while Nanping Huatai was assessed at 58.45 percent. Other companies not directly reviewed but thought to have engaged in similar activities were assigned a margin of 42.04 percent. The Commerce Department also decided to cease reviewing 26 companies after it was determined either no dumping had occurred or there were no entries to assess. The China-wide entity, a catch-all category for companies that have not been given their own rate, remains under scrutiny with a high duty rate of 220.87 percent – though it was not specifically reviewed in this process. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to assess how these products are evaluated and taxed to ensure fair trading practices. The companies involved in the review must now respond and provide any other necessary evidence to clarify their trading activities. The Department is seeking feedback on these preliminary findings, with final decisions expected later in the year. This decision impacts companies both in the U.S. and China, ensuring fair trading practices are upheld. These reviews are crucial in maintaining balanced economic relationships, preventing unfair undercutting, and protecting domestic industries. The ongoing reviews and adjustments in trading policies impact both American businesses and international trade partners. This news comes as part of wider efforts to regulate trade and parity between countries, ensuring American businesses can compete fairly while maintaining economic relationships with international partners. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping of Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is reviewing sodium nitrite imports from India to ensure fair trade practices. The review assesses whether Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and other companies from India are selling sodium nitrite at prices below normal value in the United States. The review period is from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. During this time, the Commerce Department found that DNL did not sell sodium nitrite at less than normal value, which means there was no dumping. The Commerce Department has also said they might stop the review for three companies: Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. This is because there were no recorded entries of sodium nitrite from these companies during the review period. For companies that were not individually reviewed, like Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd. and Kutch Chemical Industries Ltd., the Commerce Department plans to apply a dumping margin of 42.76%. This percentage is based on past findings and will be used as a rate for these companies. Even though the review shows that DNL did not dump products, Commerce will decide on the final results in a few months. Public comments on these findings are welcome, and the final results will be used to set future policies and cash deposit requirements. The next steps involve disclosing detailed calculations and methodology. Businesses and stakeholders can submit their written comments within the specified time frames. Antidumping duties will be assessed based on the final results. If any weighted-average dumping margin exceeds 0.50%, importer-specific duties will be calculated accordingly. Companies showing no dumping will not pay additional duties. These findings help maintain fair trade and ensure that products like sodium nitrite from India are priced properly in the U.S. market. The Commerce Department is committed to using careful analysis to make informed decisions. Stay informed to know about the final results, which will guide future actions and policies regarding sodium nitrite imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Trade Review Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has released the final results of an important review. This review looked at certain steel plate products from the Republic of Korea. The review focused on cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate products. These are special steel products used in different industries. The review covered sales made between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The Department found that the steel plates were sold in the United States at prices below what they should be. This is called “dumping.” Dumping can harm U.S. producers who cannot compete with such low prices. Two companies from Korea were named in the review: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. had a dumping margin of 1.18%. Hyundai Steel Company had a margin of 0.94%. This means they sold their products for less than the normal value. The products studied are made of hot-rolled carbon-quality steel. Some of these are known as universal mill plates and have special shapes and thicknesses. Certain types and grades of steel were not included in the review. After the review, the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how much extra duty or tax to collect when these products enter the United States. This is based on the dumping margins found during the review. Also, the Department set cash deposit rates. This is the money importers must pay upfront as a form of guarantee when such products enter the U.S. from Korea. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. will have a 1.18% rate, while Hyundai Steel Company will have a 0.94% rate. If these rates are less than 0.50%, the deposit will be zero as it is considered too small. These measures seek to ensure fair competition. They help protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by foreign companies. The detailed instructions from the Department of Commerce will be issued soon. These will guide how the duties and deposits are handled by customs officials. The cash deposit rates will stay effective until further notice. This action shows how the U.S. is actively reviewing and enforcing fair trade practices. Such measures aim to protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. This is an important step in maintaining healthy trade relationships, ensuring that American industries do not suffer from unfair pricing by foreign competitors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Review on Thermal Paper from Korea Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review regarding the sale of thermal paper from the Republic of Korea. This review was part of an ongoing examination into whether the sole producer/exporter of this paper sold it for less than its usual price during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The results are significant. The Department of Commerce found that the exporter, Hansol Paper Company, did not sell thermal paper at a lower price than the normal value during this time. This means Hansol is not required to pay any additional duties. The Commerce Department had initially included another company, Tele-Paper (M) Sdn. Bhd., in the review. However, they later decided to remove Tele-Paper from consideration. This decision was due to the withdrawal of review requests from interested parties concerning Tele-Paper. In terms of what this means going forward, Hansol Paper Company will have a cash deposit rate of zero. This rate is important because it determines future trade duties. Other companies not involved in this review will continue with their previous rates. For importers, it is critical to file certificates that confirm they have not been reimbursed for duties on these goods. This step is necessary to avoid paying double customs duties. Also, companies with access to sensitive information, under the administrative protective order, must ensure they handle this data responsibly to avoid legal problems. Overall, the Department of Commerce’s findings offer a clear path forward for all involved in the trade of thermal paper from Korea. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Review on Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China Announced by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings in its countervailing duty administrative review concerning wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, specifically by the Enforcement and Compliance arm. The review, which covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, has so far found that some producers and exporters of these materials did receive financial support from the Chinese government that might be countervailable. Background The review process began on March 28, 2025, following requests for an administrative examination of the existing countervailing duty order related to these products. In May 2025, the Department of Commerce picked two main companies, Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng) and Nanping Huatai Wood and Bamboo Co., Ltd. (Huatai), for further examination. However, Yinfeng later withdrew from participation. Key Findings The Department of Commerce has documented that the mandatory respondents, which include other companies like Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. (Hongjia), received subsidies, which allowed these companies to sell their products at lower prices than they might have otherwise. These subsidies were found to benefit these companies particularly and not equally available to others, falling under the category of “specific” subsidies. Furthermore, due to the withdrawal of requests for review by companies like Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd., the review for these specific firms has been halted. For other companies reviewed that didn’t actively participate during the review period, the Department of Commerce is concluding its review process. Next Steps The results and calculations made by the U.S. Department of Commerce are subject to a public comment period where interested parties can contribute feedback and perspectives. The deadline for public input will be shortly after the verification reports are issued. It is anticipated that these comments will play a significant role in the final determination of subsidy rates. Moreover, affected companies must prepare for the possibility of higher duties based on the preliminary subsidy rates. The Department is working diligently to finalize these rates and determine the impact on trade. Conclusion The results from this review and claims of countervailable subsidies raise concerns about competitive fairness and market integrity. Interested parties and related stakeholders should closely monitor updates from this ongoing review to understand better how it may affect the trade of wood mouldings and millwork products between China and the United States. The U.S. Department of Commerce remains committed to maintaining balanced and fair trade practices. For more information, contact the Department of Commerce or view the complete preliminary decision documentation directly through the U.S. government’s electronic service system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Receives Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-05-08 Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has received several applications related to scope rulings. These applications ask for scope inquiries to find out if certain products fall under antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Scope Ruling Applications Every month, the Commerce Department informs the public about these scope ruling applications. The notice for March 2026 is out, and it lists several applications. Here are some examples: Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from China Product: Stone-Coated Metal Roofing Tiles. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: La Viata Investment Firm LLC. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Certain Steel Racks and Parts from China Product: 4T Ergo Shelf Subassemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: K. Hartwall Oy Ab. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China Product: Salon Vanity Desks. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: Vanity Dreams LLC. Application Date: March 20, 2026. Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from China Product: MRCOOL® Pre-Charged Line Set Assemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: HVAC Distributing, LLC. Application Date: March 23, 2026. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from China Product: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules. Produced in and exported from Vietnam. Applicants: JA Solar Vietnam Company Limited, JA Solar USA Inc., and others. Application Date: March 27, 2026. Understanding the Process The process for handling scope ruling applications involves several steps. Once an application is filed, the Department has 30 days to either reject it or start an inquiry. If nothing happens in 30 days, the application is automatically accepted, and an inquiry begins on the next business day. In some cases, if more than one order covers the same product, the inquiry will be done on the AD record. The Department may decide to apply its ruling to all products from the same country that are similar in nature or limit it to specific companies. Public Participation and Notifications Interested parties can participate in these scope inquiries. They must file an entry to join the public service list for the inquiry segment they are interested in. If individuals want to receive updates, they can request inclusion in the annual inquiry service list. It’s important for parties to follow procedures to be officially involved. Conclusion These applications help determine if certain goods fall under trade regulations meant to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The public can view detailed information and participate in procedures regarding these applications through online platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping on Strontium Chromate from France Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the antidumping duties regarding strontium chromate from France. The review examined the sales made by Société Nouvelle des Couleurs Zinciques (SNCZ) in the United States within the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It was determined that SNCZ did not sell strontium chromate at less than the normal value during this period. This means SNCZ was not dumping the product at unfairly low prices in the U.S. market. The preliminary results show a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent for SNCZ. This indicates that the sales were made at fair prices. Interested parties can provide comments on these preliminary results. The agency responsible for this review is the Enforcement and Compliance Division of the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. The process began with an antidumping order on strontium chromate from France issued on November 27, 2019. An order provides measures to protect the domestic market from products sold below market value. Following a request from Lumimove Inc., who are doing business as WPC Technologies, an administrative review was initiated on December 18, 2025. The review examines whether dumping occurred during the specified period. Adjustments had to be made during the review process due to various delays. The deadlines for issuing the preliminary results were extended several times. These changes included a 90-day tolling of deadlines in December 2024, a further extension in September 2025, and additional delays owing to a federal government shutdown and related issues. A more detailed explanation of the review process can be found in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. This document is publicly available online, and interested parties can access it for deeper insights. The next steps in the review process involve public comments and a potential hearing. Interested parties are encouraged to submit written comments. These written submissions must follow a specific format and should be filed electronically. The deadline for submitting comments is seven days after the last verification report is issued. Following this, rebuttals to the initial comments may also be submitted. Any requests for a hearing must also be made electronically, and specific information such as a list of issues to be discussed must be provided. The final results of the administrative review are expected within 120 days of the notice publication. Depending on these results, the Department will determine if antidumping duties will need to be adjusted or maintained. Until the final determination is made, cash deposit requirements aligned with the preliminary results will stay in effect. If any adjustments are needed, updates will be announced in the Federal Register. This review ensures fair competition and protects U.S. companies from unfair pricing practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duty on Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review concerning the antidumping duty on wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review is crucial to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by international competitors. On February 16, 2021, the antidumping duty order was first placed on Chinese wood mouldings and millwork products. The order was meant to prevent products sold below their fair value, a practice known as dumping. Dumping can hurt domestic businesses by making it hard for them to compete with cheaper imports. In this case, the products made in China could harm American producers if not priced fairly. In January 2026, the Department of Commerce began a routine five-year review of this order. This is known as a sunset review, as it determines whether the order should continue or “sunset.” The Department evaluates if removing the order would result in continued dumping. A group called the Coalition of American Millwork Producers supported continuing the antidumping duty. This group includes several U.S. companies, like Best Moulding Corporation and Sierra Pacific Industries, which produce similar products domestically. The Department of Commerce looked at all the information and decided to continue the order. They believe that dumping would likely continue or recur if the order were canceled. The review found that the dumping margins, or the difference in selling price, could be as high as 231.60 percent. This means products from China could potentially be sold at prices much lower than what is considered fair. The agency’s findings are meant to help preserve the health of U.S. industries and ensure competitive pricing. By maintaining these duties, the U.S. aims to protect its producers from unfair market practices. The final results and decisions are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. For further information, interested parties can reach out to David De Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Overall, these actions safeguard U.S. industries against unfair pricing and ensure a level playing field for domestic and international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Countervailing Duty Order on Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized a review of countervailing duties on wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. These duties are important charges placed on imported goods, like wood products, to counteract any unfair advantages from government subsidies in the exporting country. The original order on these wood products was published on February 16, 2021. On January 2, 2026, the Department started a special review called a “sunset review.” This type of review helps decide if duties should continue or end after five years. On January 20, 2026, the Coalition of American Millwork Producers, a group representing U.S. manufacturers, expressed their interest in the review. They wanted to participate because they make similar products in the U.S. The Coalition believes that the duties should continue. By February 2, 2026, the Coalition submitted a detailed response. However, the Government of China and other interested parties did not respond with sufficient reasons or information to oppose the duties. So, the Department of Commerce carried out a quick evaluation, finishing the review in 120 days. The Department determined that stopping the duties might lead to subsidies returning, which could harm U.S. producers. As a result, the duties will stay in place. Specifically, the subsidy rates are 28.17% for Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd., 252.29% for Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and 40.33% for all other producers. This decision helps safeguard U.S. manufacturers from unfair competition due to subsidies provided to some Chinese exporters by their government. It continues to ensure that the playing field is even for American businesses making similar products. The public can access detailed documents and further information about the review through the Department of Commerce’s electronic service system, ACCESS. This system allows people to view decisions and understand the actions taken to protect U.S. industries. The Department has reminded all parties involved to handle the proprietary information responsibly and follow the rules when dealing with confidential data. The decision to keep the duties aims to support U.S. jobs and ensure that American companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-05-05 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of an antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) from China. This decision follows determinations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Their findings suggest that doing away with the order could lead to continued unfair trading practices and harm to U.S. industries. Background The antidumping duty order for THFA from China was first introduced in August 2004. This order was put in place to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by Chinese exporters. Over the years, multiple reviews have been conducted to evaluate whether the order should stay. The recent review process involved both Commerce and the ITC. Findings Commerce determined that removing this order might lead to a recurrence of dumping, which refers to exporting goods at unfairly low prices. This action can harm U.S. market competition. The ITC supported this view, stating that removing the order could lead to injuries for U.S. industries in the foreseeable future. Product Details Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) is the product in question. It is a clear, water-like liquid but can appear pale yellow. THFA is part of a group of chemicals called furans. It can mix with water and dissolve in many other liquids. THFA is classified under a specific code in the U.S. Tariff Schedule, known as HTSUS subheading 2932.13.00.00. Impact Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will still collect cash deposits linked to these duties on incoming THFA. This continuation seeks to ensure fair market conditions for U.S. manufacturers. Future Actions Commerce plans to start another round of reviews within five years. These reviews aim to check if the order should continue or if conditions have improved, allowing for its removal. Conclusion This decision is seen as an essential step in safeguarding U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair pricing practices from Chinese exporters. By continuing the antidumping order, the U.S. seeks to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results on Frozen Shrimp from India Antidumping Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the import of frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review covers the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The preliminary findings indicate that some producers or exporters from India sold shrimp in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. The Department of Commerce has an important role in enforcing trade laws. It is checking to see if foreign companies are “dumping” products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The review specifically looked at several companies in India, including Devi Fisheries Limited and Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited. The Department calculated a dumping margin for these companies. This margin shows how much lower the prices were than they should have been. For Devi Fisheries Limited and related entities, the margin was found to be 2.36 percent, and for Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited, it was 4.30 percent. Other Indian companies not individually examined in the review have been assigned an average dumping margin of 3.33 percent. This average is calculated based on the margins of the companies that were individually examined. The report explains that when the dumping margin is de minimis, or less than 0.5 percent, Customs and Border Protection may not assess duties on those imports. The document also states how duties will be used by Customs for all relevant entries during this reviewed period. The Commerce Department plans to make the results final within 120 days after publishing these preliminary findings. Until then, interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. It is important for companies involved in the seafood industry to be aware of these developments as they can impact import practices and duty liabilities. This preliminary review is part of ongoing efforts by the Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to protect local businesses in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically its International Trade Administration, has recently announced the results of its review concerning certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. In the summary published on May 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce confirmed that if the countervailing duty (CVD) order on these tires is revoked, it would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies from China. The countervailing duty order was first established on August 10, 2015. The idea behind the CVD order is to offset subsidies provided by foreign governments, which can make products from those countries cheaper and harm domestic industries in the United States. This order is specifically against tires from the People’s Republic of China. The review process started on January 2, 2026, as part of the second sunset review. Sunset reviews happen every five years to determine if the duties should continue. On January 14, 2026, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, a domestic interested party, filed a notice to participate in this review. This group claims to represent industries involved in the production of similar products in the United States. The department received adequate information from the domestic interested party. However, there was no substantial response from the Government of China or any related parties. This led the Department of Commerce to undertake an expedited review process for 120 days. The review’s findings showed that if the order is lifted, countervailable subsidies likely to continue would have significant rates. For GITI Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd., the rate is 38.15%. For Cooper Kunshan Tire Co., Ltd., it’s 21.68%. Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd. faces even a higher rate of 116.73%. Other producers and exporters would have an all-encompassing rate of 31.56%. These findings underline the necessity to keep the duty in place, ensuring no unfair advantage to foreign producers that might harm the U.S. tire industry. This announcement also serves as a reminder regarding the return or destruction of any proprietary information shared under Administrative Protective Orders. Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to penalties. The decision is documented in the Federal Register and was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on April 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Continues Antidumping Duties on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. The aim of the review was to decide if the antidumping duties should continue. The review began on January 2, 2026. It involved checking if dumping would likely continue or happen again if the duties were removed. The duties were first put in place in August 2015. They were added because Chinese tires were being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The domestic interested party, representing U.S. workers, was the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union. They filed a notice to participate on January 14, 2026. The Department of Commerce did not receive responses from any party representing the Chinese industry. This is called a “non-response” situation. As a result, an expedited review took place. This means a quicker decision was made without further investigation. The final decision stated that removing the duties would likely cause dumping to continue or happen again. The dumping margins, or the price differences, could be as high as 87.99 percent if the duties were removed. This decision means the duties will stay in place to protect U.S. industries and jobs from unfair pricing practices by Chinese manufacturers. The conclusion was reached in a document called the “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” The U.S. Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for transparency and fairness in global trade. The decision is intended to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. The review process is important for maintaining fair trade conditions. The Department of Commerce helps decide when duties are necessary to protect domestic industries. This notice serves as a reminder for all parties involved in the trading of tires to comply with the rules set forth to ensure fair competition. Any proprietary information involved should be handled according to the regulations. Overall, the decision highlights the ongoing importance of trade regulations and their enforcement in protecting domestic markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited first sunset reviews. These reviews focus on the existing antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, also known as PC strand. PC strand is a type of steel wire used in making strong concrete structures. It is designed for use in prestressed concrete applications, both pretensioned and post-tensioned. These reviews involved several countries, including Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates. The Department of Commerce found that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of the PC strand in the U.S. This means foreign companies might sell PC strand at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. manufacturers. As a result, the U.S. plans to keep the antidumping duties in place. These duties are intended to stop or lessen the effects of dumping. The rates of these duties are different for each country. For instance, Argentina faces a duty rate of 60.40 percent, while Saudi Arabia has a much higher rate of 194.40 percent. These rates help ensure fair competition and protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. The original orders for these antidumping duties began on February 1, 2021. The sunset review process started in January 2026. Domestic U.S. producers showed strong support for keeping the duties. These producers sent their intent to participate in the review process and later provided detailed responses about why the duties should remain. There were no detailed responses from companies in the countries affected by the duties. Because there was no opposition, the Department of Commerce was able to complete the review quickly. This led to an expedited decision to extend the duties. The Department of Commerce’s decision is important. It helps control foreign pricing that could damage the U.S. PC strand industry. These duties have provided stability for U.S. producers, ensuring they can compete fairly. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of fair trade and the measures in place to protect domestic industries. The continuation of these duties maintains the balance in trade, allowing U.S. companies to thrive without unfair competition from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Potential Continuation of Trade Measures on Steel Wire from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings regarding the countervailing duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, known as PC strand, from the Republic of Türkiye. The decision could lead to ongoing trade measures. Background On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce introduced a countervailing duty order on PC strand from Türkiye. This was to address unfair subsidies given to producers in Türkiye. This year, they reviewed the order to see if it should continue. Recent Developments On May 4, 2026, the Commerce Department determined that removing the countervailing duty might result in continued unfair subsidies from Türkiye. By law, such reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether these orders should be ended or remain in place. Review Process In January 2026, a sunset review started. This process helps decide if trade measures like tariffs and duties should keep going. Three U.S. companies, Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp., showed interest as they make similar products in the U.S. The government of Türkiye and other interested parties were expected to give comments, but they did not. Because of this, the review was faster than usual. Findings The review found that ending the order might lead to more subsidies from Türkiye. Specific companies in Türkiye are likely to receive help from their government that could affect U.S. businesses. The report lists expected subsidy rates for these companies. Results The U.S. Commerce Department suggests keeping the duties. They believe removing them could harm U.S. companies by allowing cheaper, subsidized products from Türkiye back into the market. Conclusion This decision highlights the careful checks the Commerce Department conducts to ensure fair trade. By maintaining the duties, the intention is to support local U.S. producers and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of administrative reviews for multiple antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews are related to various products with March anniversary dates. The reviews are set to begin on May 4, 2026. Purpose of Reviews The reviews are being conducted to assess whether antidumping duties and countervailing duties on various products are being correctly applied. The reviews help ensure that foreign manufacturers are not selling goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also check if foreign governments are subsidizing their producers unfairly. Respondent Selection Process The Department will choose which companies, known as respondents, will be individually reviewed. The choices depend on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and questionnaires submitted by the companies. If the Department limits the number of respondents, it will use specific data to make selections. Notice of No Sales Sometimes, companies may not sell or export goods during the review period. If this is the case, companies should notify the Department within 30 days of the review’s start. The Department will then decide how to handle these cases. Deadline for Withdrawal and Market Situations Companies that request reviews can withdraw their request within 90 days from the start of the review. If there are special market situations affecting the cost of production, companies can inform the Department within 20 days after submitting their initial questionnaire responses. Establishing Separate Rates in NME Countries For companies in non-market economy (NME) countries, they need to prove they are not controlled by their government. If they provide sufficient proof, they can receive separate antidumping duty rates. Companies must submit appropriate applications or certifications to qualify. Certification for Combined Goods Some companies sell both subject and non-subject goods to the U.S. The Department may allow these companies to certify their eligibility based on their tracking systems. Companies wishing to establish eligibility must submit an application within 30 days. Timeframe The final results of these reviews are expected by March 31, 2027. This ensures timely assessment and adjusts any unfair practices. Regulations for Factual Information All factual submission in these reviews must comply with specific categories and timelines. Submissions also require accurate certification. Late submissions may not be accepted, keeping the process clear and organized. This structured review process by the Department of Commerce is crucial in maintaining fair trade practices and ensuring U.S. markets are not negatively impacted by unfair pricing or government subsidies from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to a previous notice about the common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. On April 9, 2026, the Commerce Department announced the final results of a review related to duties on these aluminum sheets for the year 2023 in the Federal Register. However, there was a mistake in the notice regarding the names of companies involved. The notice incorrectly stated that the subsidy rate applies to “Kibar Americas, Inc.” It should have said “Kibar Holding A.S.” This error has now been corrected. Additionally, a footnote was missing. The footnote is important because it tells us which companies are linked together. Specifically, it should have mentioned that the rate also applies to “TAC Metal Ticaret A.S.,” which is linked to “Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.” These corrections were officially published on May 4, 2026, in another Federal Register notice. This is crucial for ensuring that all interested parties have the correct information. The corrections are important for companies involved in international trade, as they affect how duties are applied. Proper reporting ensures fair practices in international commerce. For those needing more information, they can contact Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude at the U.S. Department of Commerce using the provided contact details. This correction notice is made in line with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific regulations that guide how reviews like these are to be published and corrected. The notice was signed and dated on April 29, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, a senior official in the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.