U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from Malaysia. This decision means that Malaysia will continue to face certain subsidies when exporting these wind towers to the U.S. The countervailing duty was first put in place on August 4, 2021. The Department of Commerce started a review of this duty on July 2, 2026. The law requires them to do these reviews every five years to check if the duty is still needed. The decision to keep the duty came after a review process. The Domestic Interested Party, which is a group of U.S. producers, participated in this review. They argued that ending the duty could lead to continued or increased subsidies from Malaysia. The government of Malaysia and other interested parties did not take part in this review. Because of this, the review process was faster and only took 120 days. The review found that ending the duties could allow Malaysian wind towers to continue getting subsidies. This could hurt U.S. producers. The wind towers from Malaysia affected are large structures used for harnessing wind power. They must meet specific size and production criteria to be covered by the duty. The Department of Commerce found that ending the order would likely let subsidies continue at a rate of 6.43 percent for CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd and others. This announcement serves as a reminder to those under an administrative protective order to handle documents properly. They must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. These final results are published in accordance with U.S. trade laws and regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Duties on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On October 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update. They have decided to continue with the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain non-refillable steel cylinders from China. This decision was made because removing these orders might hurt the U.S. industry. In May 2021, the U.S. started imposing duties on non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The reason was to prevent unfair competition due to lower prices and subsidies given by the Chinese government. Earlier this year, in April 2026, a review of these orders began. Both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission looked into the matter. They studied if lifting these duties would lead to unfair practices again. Their answer was yes. Without the orders, there might be more dumping, subsidies, and harm to U.S. businesses. The orders cover specific types of steel cylinders. These cylinders are used in many places. They range in size and might be imported with or without valves. It’s important to note that seamless cylinders are not included in these orders. For those importing these cylinders, there are rules. Importers will still need to pay duties when bringing them into the U.S. The orders officially continue from October 14, 2026. Periodic reviews will keep checking if these duties should remain. Businesses that deal with these cylinders need to remain aware. It’s crucial to follow all the rules and ensure they are on top of any changes. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission are focused on protecting local businesses from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Rescinds Review of Antidumping Duty on Frozen Shrimp from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to rescind the review of the antidumping duty order on frozen shrimp from China. This decision was announced on October 29, 2026. The review covered the period from February 1, 2025, to January 31, 2026. Important Details The antidumping duty (AD) order was first published on February 1, 2005. This order means that shrimp from China was being sold at a price lower than its regular value. The order aimed to make sure the prices were fair. In March 2026, the Department of Commerce started a review as usual. This review would check to see if the Chinese shrimp was being sold at low prices again. However, in April 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shared data showing there were no new entries of shrimp from China during the review period. All companies involved also did not show any activity. Review Process The review is a process where officials check if any shrimp came in at unfair prices. If no shrimp came in, there is no need for a review. Since no entries were recorded from Chinese companies, the Department of Commerce decided to stop the review. Impact Because the review found no wrongdoing, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to assess duties at the rate previously set. This means nothing changes from before the review started. The main goal is to ensure prices remain fair. Next Steps If there were any duties unpaid, Customs will take care of it according to the rules. They will assess duties based on the original rates. Legal Duties The document reminds the people involved about their legal duties to handle any sensitive information properly. They must destroy or return any information shared under protection according to the law. Conclusion This announcement was made by Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton. The government has a list of all companies involved in the review, which includes many exporters from China. The decision shows the U.S. is closely monitoring trade practices to ensure fairness in the market. The elimination of unfair pricing helps maintain a level field for all countries and companies trading with the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Softwood Lumber Subsidies Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public comments about subsidies. These subsidies are given by some countries that send softwood lumber to the United States. The time for these subsidies is from January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. The Softwood Lumber Act of 2008 says that the Secretary of Commerce must report to Congress every 180 days. This report is about any subsidies for softwood lumber that other countries send to the U.S. The last report was sent on June 30, 2026. The countries that sent the most softwood lumber to the U.S. from January to June 2026 are Brazil, Canada, Germany, and Sweden. These countries sent enough lumber to make up at least one percent of all imports to the U.S. The Commerce Department will use these same time periods to choose countries for future reports. For example, the next report will be about lumber imports from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. According to U.S. trade law, a subsidy is when a government helps with money or gives support that affects prices. The subsidy can also happen if a government asks someone else to give money or support. If you want to comment, you must include four pieces of information. First, the name of the country that gave the subsidy. Second, the name of the subsidy program. Third, a short description of the program in 3-4 sentences. Fourth, the name of the government body that gave the subsidy. All comments must be sent by November 30, 2026. Comments should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. This ensures your comments are considered for the report. For more details, you can contact Brendan Santschi at the U.S. Department of Commerce. You can call him at (202) 482-4141. Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed the notice on October 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Countervailing Duties on Aluminum Sheets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the cancellation of a review. This review was about countervailing duties on aluminum sheets from China. Commerce started the review because some people asked for it. They wanted to look at certain companies: Alcha International, Jiangsu Alcha, Yantai Jintai, and Yinbang. These reviews help check if higher taxes, called duties, are paid on goods from other countries. The government does this to protect U.S. companies from unfair prices. Commerce found that Alcha International and Jiangsu Alcha didn’t have any shipments during the time they were looking at. Without shipments, there is nothing to review. Yantai Jintai asked to stop its review. The petitioner, who wanted the review for Yinbang, also decided to cancel their request. Because there are no more reviews needed, the government is stopping the entire review. No changes will be made to current duty rates. The department will tell Customs to keep duties as they are, and no changes will be made. Everyone who asked for a review will need to follow rules for sending back or destroying private information. This notice was signed on October 19, 2026, by Scot Fullerton from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Steel Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on standard steel welded wire mesh imported from Mexico. This decision comes after careful investigation and a series of reviews. On September 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made its final determination about these orders. Both the Department of Commerce and the ITC agreed that canceling them would likely lead to the continuation of unfair pricing practices and subsidies. It could also result in harm to U.S. industries focused on making similar products. The orders first came into effect on April 12 and August 9, 2021. They were set up to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling products at unfairly low prices or receiving unfair support from foreign governments. The wire mesh in question is made of smooth or deformed wire. It is used in making concrete and is made by welding wires together in square or rectangular grids. These grids have specific sizes for their wires and spacings. The ITC found that if these orders were canceled, Mexico might continue its past unfair practices. This could hurt American companies by putting them at an unfair disadvantage in the marketplace. Therefore, wire mesh from Mexico will keep having duties added to it. This means that companies will need to pay extra fees when they bring the product into the United States. The aim of these fees is to make market conditions fair. The Department of Commerce plans to check on these orders again in five years. They will make sure the extra fees are still needed to keep the market fair for U.S. producers. The ongoing duties will be in effect starting September 23, 2026. This decision ensures that U.S. companies can compete on a more level playing field with foreign manufacturers. Commerce has reminded all parties involved about the rules to protect private information during these proceedings. This rules-making process is essential to maintaining professional and lawful oversight of trade practices. In summary, the continuation of these orders is part of the U.S. government’s effort to support fair trade and protect local industries from unfair competition due to dumping and improper subsidies by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review on Carbon Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an important review of heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Mexico. This is officially known as a “Changed Circumstances Review” or CCR. The review involves Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (PLM), which was earlier known as Perfiles y Herrajes LM, S.A. de C.V. (PyH). On October 26, 2026, the Department of Commerce began this review to decide if PLM is the same as PyH. This is important for setting the right taxes that need to be paid when these steel products are sold in the U.S. This needs to be done according to certain rules in trade laws. PLM told the Department that it changed its name back in July 2017. This change in name did not come with major shifts in how the company is run or how it does business. In the beginning, the Department of Commerce wanted more information before starting the review. PLM answered all their questions in time. Now, after looking at this, the Department thinks that PLM is pretty much the same company as PyH in terms of how it operates. The Department will use several factors to decide this, like checking if there has been any major change in management, who owns the company, where products are made, who supplies materials, and who buys these products. After a preliminary check, none of these factors seem to have changed much. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They have to send responses by a set time after the notice publication. The Department will review all comments before making the final decision. Overall, the Department of Commerce wants to make sure that the right rules and taxes are followed when these steel products are brought into the U.S. From what has been seen so far, it looks like PLM works similarly to how PyH did before the name change, so it will likely be treated the same. This case shows how carefully the U.S. checks and manages trade, making sure that companies follow the rules. The result of this review will be finalized soon. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Spanish Steel Wire Strand Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. The focus was specifically on sales made by Global Special Steel Products S.A.U., also known as Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. The time period for the review of these sales was from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce concluded that the wire strand from Spain was sold at less than its normal value. This means the price at which it was sold was lower than expected. These findings were made as part of an administrative review. The review process included looking at sales numbers and comparing them to standard prices. The results of the review showed that the dumping margin is 13.57 percent. This is the amount by which the prices were lower than normal. TYCSA, the company responsible for these sales, was found to have this specific margin. There were discussions and decisions made about the case. TYCSA and some other companies discussed these results through case briefs and rebuttals. However, the Department of Commerce found no reason to change the previously calculated rates. As a result of these findings, duties will be assessed on the subject merchandise. This means there will be additional costs for importing these products into the U.S. based on the final review results, with new rates applied starting from October 26, 2026. All parties involved have responsibilities to ensure their practices align with these findings. They have to file certificates to confirm that no unlawful reimbursement of duties took place. The release of this information marks the completion of the Department’s review process, and instructions for applying these duties have been issued accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Review on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of duties on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 from India. This review focused on Navpad Pigments Private Limited for the year 2023. The review was part of a larger order that examines countervailing duties, which are charges placed on imports to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments. During the review period, Navpad Pigments Private Limited received a subsidy rate of 2.81%. This means that the U.S. charges this percentage as a duty on imports of the pigment from this company. The Department follows strict legal guidelines to ensure fair trade practices. The Department also decided to stop the review for another company, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited. This decision was made because there were no recorded shipments from this company during the review period. Without any shipments, there is no need to review or change the duties. After the review, the Department plans to release more detailed instructions to U.S. Customs. These instructions will help set the exact duties for products coming into the country. They also plan to issue new rules for cash deposits on future imports. The Department ensures transparency by disclosing the calculations and methodologies. This process includes a public memorandum available to interested parties. The Department reminds importers of their duty to file certificates. These certificates help track reimbursement of duties to maintain fair trading practices. Overall, this review helps ensure that trade remains fair for U.S. businesses by adjusting duties on subsidized imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Continued Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain small vertical shaft engines from China. This decision comes after findings that removing these orders could lead to further dumping, subsidies, and harm to industries in the United States. Background Information The orders originally began on May 4, 2021. Commerce started reviewing these orders again on April 1, 2026. They found that stopping the orders would likely allow unfair pricing and financial aid problems to continue. Because of this, the Commerce Department decided to keep the orders active. Details on the Engines The engines involved are small vertical shaft engines. These engines have a power capacity between 99cc and 225cc. They are usually used in machines like lawn mowers and pressure washers. These engines work with a particular kind of spark ignition and are non-road, meaning they are used outside. The engines usually have to follow certain environmental rules by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If engines do not meet the EPA standards, they are not always left out of these orders. The covered engines might come with or without being mounted on machines. If an engine from China is attached to a machine, only the engine is part of the order. Unfinished engines with key parts are also included. Certain bigger, heavy-duty engines are not part of these orders. These heavier engines have specific parts that lighter engines do not have. Conclusion The antidumping and countervailing duties will remain in place, starting again on October 20, 2026. This notice means U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports. These duties aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this last determination. Scot Fullerton, the acting deputy assistant secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed this continuation notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Maintains Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2-4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that certain duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from five countries will continue. These countries are India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Türkiye, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Ukraine. This decision follows findings from both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). According to a recent notice, revoking the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders could lead to more dumping and harmful subsidies. These actions would likely hurt an industry in the United States. So, the Commerce Department has decided to keep these AD and CVD orders in place. The notice is effective starting on September 29, 2026. The orders show a commitment by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. Yang Jin Chun from the International Trade Administration is the contact person for any questions. You can reach Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760. OCTG are hollow steel products used in the oil industry. The orders cover different types of OCTG products from these countries. These include both welded and seamless products. The scope details specific steel products by categorizing them with codes from the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). These codes help in identifying the products for customs purposes. Products high in chromium, drill pipes, and certain other items are not covered by these orders. U.S. Customs will keep collecting duties at existing rates on subject imports to ensure compliance. The decision to continue these duties is part of a five-year review process. The Commerce Department assesses whether ending these orders would harm U.S. industries. The effective date ties back to the ITC’s final determination. Commerce acts on reminding parties about their responsibilities under an administrative protective order (APO). Compliance with APO rules is mandatory, and failure to do so may result in sanctions. This announcement is a part of ongoing efforts by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from what they consider unfair trade practices. The decision ensures protection provided by the AD and CVD orders will stay in effect going forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Pipes from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has completed its review of welded stainless pressure pipes from India. The review examined the sales between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce, tasked with enforcing fair trade practices, found that Suncity Metals and Tubes Private Limited, a key exporter from India, sold these pipes at less than normal value. This means they were sold cheaper than expected, which can be harmful to U.S. businesses. The Department set a new dumping margin of 0.74 percent. This is an important number. If a product has a high dumping margin, it might be subject to more tariffs or duties to even out the competitive landscape between countries. The Department extended the deadline for this review by 43 days. This allowed them to make sure their review was thorough and fair. Changes were made based on comments from Suncity, ensuring that the final results are accurate. The Department will disclose its calculations to the public within five days. This helps maintain transparency. New assessment rates will be applied. These are rules on how much duty should be levied on these pipes from India. Importers will get new instructions soon. The Department emphasizes the importance of certificates that prevent the reimbursement of duties. Importers who don’t comply may face penalties. This conclusion from the Department of Commerce aims to balance trade practices. The ultimate goal is to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair pricing tactics. The decision will affect deposits and duties as per the new rates. These new rates start from the publication of the review results. Overall, it’s a reminder of the importance of complying with international trade rules. The department’s decision is a win for those advocating for fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Antidumping Duty Orders for Dioctyl Terephthalate from Multiple Countries Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to a previous notice about antidumping duties on dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP). This chemical material comes from Malaysia, Poland, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye. These antidumping duties are part of an effort to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition due to lower-priced foreign goods. On May 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce issued an error in their notice. This error was related to the dates mentioned for terminating certain temporary measures. There was a mistake in stating the end dates for temporary measures and when the suspension of liquidation ended. The document said that the period started on May 4, 2025. However, the correct end date for these temporary measures was actually May 3, 2025. Furthermore, the suspension of liquidation, which means not finalizing entries, should have ended on May 4, 2025. This is one day earlier than what was initially stated. Stakeholders and interested parties should take note of these corrections. The change has legal importance for businesses involved in the import and export of DOTP. Companies should make sure to use these corrected dates in their records and calculations. This information was released officially in the Federal Register under the notice number FR Doc 2026-21457. The correction is a reminder of how important small details can be in legal and trade matters. The person responsible at the Department of Commerce for questions is Dennis McClure. He can be reached at (202) 482-5973. The government remains open to communication and adjustments in trade compliance to ensure accuracy. This correction notice ensures that all processes are aligned and fair, maintaining clear trade rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Chinese Diamond Sawblades Over Evasion Claims Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation about diamond sawblades coming from China. This investigation is to check if some companies are trying to avoid paying extra taxes when importing these sawblades into the United States. Background The investigation began after U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) received a complaint. The complaint said a company, Dymatec USA, LLC, might be pretending that their sawblades are made in the United Kingdom. This would allow them to dodge taxes put on Chinese goods. What Commerce Will Do The Department of Commerce wants to find out if diamond sawblades made from parts that come from China are being snuck into the U.S. to avoid taxes. They are especially looking at sawblades made in three different ways: Both the core and segments come from China and are put together in the UK. The core comes from China, but the segments do not. They are put together in the UK. The segments come from China, but the core does not. They are put together in the UK. How It Will Work The Commerce Department will allow people and companies to send in their comments and give extra information over the next few weeks. They will check these comments and might even send out questions to gather more facts. After going through all the information, the Department will decide if these sawblades are breaking the rules. They plan to finish this by February 2027. Next Steps If the Department finds out that companies are avoiding taxes, they will tell the Customs office. They will also decide how to handle the taxes on these imports moving forward. Conclusion This investigation is important to make sure everyone follows the rules about importing goods. It helps keep trade fair and makes sure taxes are paid correctly on goods coming into the U.S. For now, people interested in this topic can send in their thoughts and follow the updates from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results on Countervailing Duties for Canadian Softwood Lumber Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the countervailing duty administrative review on softwood lumber products from Canada. This review covered the period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Targeted Products: The review focused on certain softwood lumber products that are imported from Canada. These products are said to have received government subsidies, which may affect fair trade practices. Key Findings: Subsidies Identified: It was determined that Canadian producers and exporters of softwood lumber received countervailable subsidies during the review period. These subsidies are financial contributions from the government that provide a benefit to companies. Specific Company Rates: Resolute FP Canada Inc. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 12.42 percent. West Fraser Mills Ltd. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 15.31 percent. Other non-selected companies were assigned a weighted average subsidy rate of 14.11 percent. Methodology Used: The research followed the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. Each subsidy program was checked to determine if it was specific and beneficial. Changes and Calculations: Changes were made to certain companies’ calculations after analyzing comments received from interested parties. These changes were reflected in the final subsidy rates. Impact on Companies: For companies not individually reviewed, a rate was based on the average of the evaluated companies. 215 non-selected companies are listed to receive the average rate. Cash Deposit Requirements: Upon publication of these final results, the Department of Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits based on the final subsidy rates. These deposits will be required for future shipments of the identified softwood lumber products from Canada. Conclusion: The final results aim to ensure a fair competitive environment by offsetting the subsidized benefits received by Canadian companies. The U.S. remains committed to enforcing trade rules and maintaining a level playing field for American businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Colombian Citric Acid Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes About the Review The review is about citric acid and some citric salts from Colombia. It covers sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department found that Sucroal S.A. sold their products at lower prices than expected. Important Dates The results were shared on October 19, 2026. People interested can comment on these results. Contact Information For questions, contact Charles Doss at the U.S. Department of Commerce. His phone number is (202) 482-4474. What is Being Reviewed? The review looks at citric acid products from Colombia. Citric acid is used in food, drinks, and cleaning products. How is the Review Done? The review checks the prices and values using certain U.S. laws. This includes the Tariff Act of 1930. Preliminary Findings The review found Sucroal S.A. sold its products at prices 3.25% lower than expected. More Information The detailed review is available online. It is called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. It can be found at the website https://access.trade.gov/frnotices. Sharing of Information The results are explained in detail to the interested parties. This will happen within five days of the announcement. Fact Checking A group of companies asked to check if the review information is correct. They looked into it in July 2026. Public Comments The public can send in their thoughts about the review. They have 21 days from the announcement to do so. There is also a chance for people to speak at a hearing if they request it. Tax Rules The review will affect how much tax is paid when these products enter the United States. The exact amount will be decided after the final review. Next Steps Cash deposit rules will change based on the final review findings. These rules will affect how Sucroal S.A and other companies handle money when importing goods. Final Reminder Importers are reminded to follow the rules about paying duties. They must file a certificate showing they paid the right amount of duties. This reminder is important to avoid paying twice. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce continues its efforts to ensure fair business practices in international trade. This detailed review will be finalized soon. Interested parties should keep an eye on further updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Italian Steel Blocks Priced Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the results of its 2024 review on the sale of forged steel fluid end blocks imported from Italy. The review found that certain Italian producers and exporters sold these steel blocks at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold the blocks for much lower prices in the U.S. compared to their usual costs. The review, conducted by the International Trade Administration within the Department, covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department confirmed that companies like Lucchini Mamé Forge S.p.A., Lucchini Industries S.r.l., and Lucchini RS S.p.A. were involved. These companies have been assigned a dumping margin of 58.48 percent, which is based on adverse facts available. This means the Department used special methods to determine prices because they did not provide necessary information. As a result, these companies will have to pay duties at these rates on their steel blocks imported to the U.S. from Italy. These duties will be collected by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The cash deposit rate for future imports of these steel blocks will also be adjusted according to these final results. The Commerce Department will issue assessment instructions to the Customs and Border Protection to enforce these duties. They anticipate sharing these instructions 35 days after this review’s publication. For imports during the review period, where the producers were unaware the blocks were destined for the U.S., the Department will apply a 7.33 percent duty rate. This rate is used when neither the producer nor an exporter involved had a specific rate decided in this review. These actions are part of the U.S. government’s ongoing efforts to protect domestic industries and ensure fair trade practices. The final results of the administrative review have been published and are available through the Department of Commerce’s designated platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Results in Review of Indian PET Film Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced important preliminary findings regarding the trade of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covered the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Key Findings: The U.S. Department of Commerce found that certain producers from India sold PET film at prices below the normal value. This means they sold it for less than what it costs to make and sell in their home market. However, the review will not continue for some companies because the request for their review was withdrawn. Companies Involved: Commerce started a review of several companies, but later many were removed from the review because requests to review them were canceled. Here are the details: Companies removed from the review: Cosmo First Ltd. India, Chiripal Poly Films Limited, Ester Industries Ltd., Garware Hi-Tech Films, JPFL Films Private Limited, Polyplex Corporation Ltd., Vacmet India Limited. The review will continue only for SRF Limited. What Happens Next: Commerce examines trade practices to ensure fair competition. If companies sell goods too cheaply, they might hurt U.S. industries. Commerce checks to see if any company breaks these rules. For SRF Limited, they found a dumping margin of 0.61 percent. This number shows how much the prices were below normal value. Procedures and Deadlines: Interested parties have until 21 days after October 19, 2026, to submit written comments or case briefs. They can also submit rebuttal briefs five days after that. If anyone wants a hearing, they must request it within 30 days after the notice. Final Results: Commerce plans to make a final decision within 120 days after the notice was published. Based on the findings, companies might have to pay extra duties on their goods to make up for selling at lower prices. These results are essential as they help keep trade fair and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing overseas. Let’s wait for the final results, which will give a clear picture of what actions will be taken to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Postpones Final Decision on Chinese Graphite Electrodes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to delay its final decision concerning large diameter graphite electrodes from China. Initially, this decision was supposed to be concluded earlier, but now it will be postponed to February 12, 2027. The delay involves an ongoing investigation about selling these electrodes at less-than-fair-value, often called a LTFV situation. This means that the products might be sold for less in the United States than in the home market of China, which can be unfair to local businesses. The investigation started on March 20, 2026. It covers the period from July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A preliminary report was already published on September 30, 2026, which showed that the sales were indeed happening at less-than-fair-value. Jiangsu Jianglong New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a key player in this investigation. They are the main company involved from China. On October 6, 2026, they asked for more time for the final decision. They wanted the deadline pushed back, and also requested to extend provisional measures, which are temporary rules applied during investigations. The Department agreed to this request after checking three things. First, they looked at whether the preliminary findings were positive, meaning they found enough evidence to continue. Second, they ensured that Jiangsu Jianglong accounted for a significant part of the exports involved. Third, there was no strong reason to reject the request. Because of this, provisional measures in place will now last up to six months instead of four. This means temporary rules applied to stabilize the market will continue until the final decision. The Department of Commerce made this announcement on October 9, 2026. It was done by Scot Fullerton, who is the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The information can be found in the Federal Register, a daily record of government activities. This decision is crucial as it affects trade relations between the United States and China. Businesses that use these electrodes in America are watching closely, as the final decision will influence prices and availability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Chinese Truck Bed Covers Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination on countervailing duties for truck bed covers from China. This decision was reported in the Federal Register on October 19, 2026, Volume 91, Issue 200. Investigation and Findings The investigation looked into whether producers and exporters of truck bed covers from China received unfair subsidies. The period of investigation covered January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. The Department found that countervailable subsidies were indeed being provided. This determination is crucial for ensuring fair trade practices are followed. Companies Involved The investigation targeted several companies. Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd., were specifically examined. The investigation also looked into other companies that didn’t respond to questionnaires. Methodology The Department followed sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, applying facts where necessary. They used adverse inference in certain cases where companies did not cooperate. For the two main companies, specific financial contributions by authorities were found to provide benefits, which were deemed countervailable. Rates Determined The Department determined subsidy rates. Changzhou Sunwood International received a rate of 77.17%, and Hangzhou Golden Son Auto Parts received a rate of 11.60%. An adverse facts available rate of 142.11% was applied to various other companies. An all-others rate of 43.43% was also established. Next Steps and Actions The U.S. Customs and Border Protection was instructed to collect cash deposits from importers of the subject merchandise from October 19, 2026. If the U.S. International Trade Commission confirms injury to U.S. industry, a countervailing duty order will be issued. This order will direct further assessments of duties. Scope of the Investigation The focus was on truck bed covers made of materials like aluminum, steel, and fiberglass. These are used to protect the cargo area of pickup trucks. The scope included various configurations like folding, roll-up, one-piece, and retractable covers. Exclusions were truck caps and products already covered by other orders, like certain aluminum extrusions. Conclusion This determination is a step in the enforcement of fair trade laws. The Commerce Department ensures that foreign subsidies do not unfairly harm U.S. industries. This commitment protects fair competition and supports the principles of international trade agreements. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results for Canadian Softwood Lumber Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of its review on antidumping duties for certain softwood lumber products imported from Canada. This review covered sales made between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The review determined that some Canadian producers sold softwood lumber in the U.S. at prices lower than normal. As a result, certain companies will face penalties. These companies must pay duties, which are extra charges by the government when goods are sold for less than normal prices. In this review, three major Canadian lumber companies were examined closely: Canfor, Resolute, and West Fraser. The investigation found that these companies did sell at unfairly low prices and will face specific duty rates. Canfor has a duty rate of 17.00%, West Fraser’s rate is 4.71%, and Resolute’s rate stands at 13.13%. Other companies that were not individually reviewed will have a combined average rate of 10.64%. Commerce also announced a partial rescission of the review for some companies. This means that for 105 companies, the review will not continue. This decision comes because either no sales were made, or all review requests were withdrawn by the parties. For companies no longer under review, Commerce will keep the current duty rate that was applied before the review started, ensuring duties are fairly assessed on past entries. The department will inform the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which is in charge of collecting these duties, about the assessment instructions within 41 days after the results are published. This step is crucial to ensure that duties are correctly applied to goods that entered the U.S. during the review period. Commerce’s actions help protect U.S. businesses by ensuring that imported products are not sold at unfairly low prices. The final decision also affects future shipments, as companies will now know the duty rates to apply to their goods. These results are based on data and comments gathered throughout the review process. All findings will guide future shipments and related duty collections to continue fostering fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Dumping in Korean Thermal Paper Sales Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Commerce Department Finds Dumping in Korean Thermal Paper Sales The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding sales of thermal paper from Korea. The department found that Hansol Paper Company sold thermal paper in the U.S. at prices below the normal value during a review period from November 1, 2024, to October 31, 2025. This practice is known as dumping and can harm U.S. businesses by undercutting fair competition. The dumping margin for Hansol has been preliminarily calculated at 1.69 percent. Review and Rescission Details The Commerce Department began reviewing the antidumping order on thermal paper from Korea following requests from interested parties. Although the review initially included multiple companies, the focus narrowed to Hansol Paper Company after a partial withdrawal of review requests for 16 other companies. The companies for which the review was rescinded include Akon Rulo Kagit Plastik Imalat, Amtress (M) Sdn. Bhd., Besto Sdn. Bhd., and others listed in the official document. The withdrawal was timely, and no other party requested a review of these companies, leading to the decision to rescind their review status. Public Participation and Comment Period The Department has opened a period for public comment on these preliminary results. Interested parties can submit written comments, known as case briefs, within 21 days of the notice publication. Rebuttals to these comments are allowed within five days after the case brief deadline. Assessment and Cash Deposit Instructions Commerce will work with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to determine appropriate duties based on the final results. If the final review confirms dumping margins, importers will pay duties at these rates for relevant entries. Through specific importer rates or a general calculation, duties reflect the amount of dumping identified. If the margin is de minimis, below 0.50 percent, duties may not be collected for some entries. New cash deposit rates will replace previous ones for shipments entering the country after the final results publication. Summary The Department’s findings on thermal paper from Korea highlight ongoing efforts to enforce fair trade practices. By identifying and calculating dumping margins, Commerce seeks to protect domestic industries while adhering to international trade laws. The process ensures that U.S. companies can compete on equal footing and that foreign producers do not unfairly impact the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Taiwanese Steel Nails Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-19 The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain steel nails from Taiwan. The nails were found to have been sold in the United States at a price lower than the normal value during the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Background: This comes after the preliminary results were published on June 16, 2026. No comments were received on these preliminary findings. Scope of Review: The review covered nails with a shaft length of up to 12 inches. These nails can be made from various steels, finishes, and head types. The nails can be packaged in bulk or collated in any material. Exclusions: Some nails are excluded from the order. These include nails in packages with fewer than 25 nails, nails used in certain furniture, and nails used in specific hand tools. Other specific types of nails like corrugated nails and thumb tacks are also excluded. Use of Adverse Facts Available: The review involved two producers/exporters: Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. and Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd. These companies did not supply required information. So, the Department of Commerce used the highest dumping rate from past reviews, which is 78.17%, as their dumping margin. Because there were no new calculations, no disclosure was made to interested parties. Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Requirements: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on the entries of subject merchandise as per the final results. New cash deposit rates based on these results will apply starting from the date of this announcement. Exporter/Producer Rates: Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.: 78.17% Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd.: 78.17% Concluding Remarks: Importers must file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failing this may result in double duties. This notice serves as a reminder for returning or destroying proprietary information disclosed under administrative protective orders in accordance with regulations. Violations may lead to sanctions. The Department of Commerce’s review is in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and relevant regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Subsidies for Brazilian Pulp Producers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes U.S. Finds Subsidies for Brazilian Pulp Producers The United States Department of Commerce has made a final decision about producers and exporters of high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This important decision is that these companies received help from their government, called countervailable subsidies, during 2024. What This Means When a country gives companies special help, like government money or special loans, it can make their products unfairly cheaper. This is called a subsidy. The U.S. government says the Brazilian companies got this kind of help and it is against trade rules. Detailed Investigation The investigation looked at how these companies got help from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce used many rules and calculations to figure this out. They checked companies’ records and spoke with officials in May and June of 2026. Who Is Affected The main company named in the report is Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A., along with other connected companies. This group of companies received a subsidy rate of 9.37 percent. This means a charge can be added to their product price when sold to the U.S. Next Steps If the U.S. International Trade Commission agrees that these subsidies hurt U.S. companies, more actions will be taken. The U.S. can add extra fees to the Brazilian pulp to make trade fairer again. Waiting for More Decisions The International Trade Commission will decide soon if these subsidies caused injury to U.S. industries. If they do, Commerce will put in place these new rules to level the playing field. This decision is part of efforts to make sure trade is fair and that no country has an unfair advantage. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Brazilian Dissolving Pulp Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-16 By: [Your Name] The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding the sale of high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. The department determined that these products are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This conclusion comes after thorough investigations. Investigation Background The investigation period stretched from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce had published a preliminary affirmative determination on May 27, 2026. Following this, the period for reaching the final determination was extended by 135 days, concluding on October 9, 2026. During this time, interested parties were invited to comment on the preliminary findings. Product in Focus The investigation focused on high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This product has an alpha cellulose percentage of 90 percent or higher, and a brightness level of 90 percent or higher. The product can be derived from any virgin or recycled cellulose fiber source. Key Findings and Decisions The Department verified sales and cost data submitted by Bracell Bahia Specialty Celulose S.A. and Bracell SP Celulose Ltda. The findings revealed that Bracell’s goods were sold below fair value. Commerce calculated a dumping margin of 6.50 percent for Bracell’s products. This same rate applies to all other producers not individually investigated. Impact of the Decision As a result of this decision, the Department will continue to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all related entries of the subject merchandise. This applies to goods entered or withdrawn for consumption starting May 27, 2026. Deposit requirements for antidumping duties will now reflect these final findings. Next Steps The case will now proceed to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC will determine whether the import of Brazilian high purity dissolving pulp injures or threatens the U.S. industry. They are expected to conclude their investigation within 45 days. If the ITC finds no injury, actions will terminate, existing deposits will be refunded, and suspensions lifted. Conversely, if injury is confirmed, an antidumping duty order will be issued to guide further actions. The ITC is tasked with safeguarding U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. Results from their decision will be pivotal moving forward. Stay tuned for further developments as the case unfolds in subsequent weeks. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Norwegian Company Selling Pulp Unfairly Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a final report. It says that high purity dissolving pulp from Norway is being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. These prices are below what is considered fair value. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The U.S. found that Borregaard AS, a Norwegian company, and other producers, sold the pulp for less than it costs to make. Because of this, the U.S. will continue to hold and check any imported high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. This started from May 27, 2026. Importers will have to pay extra money, called a cash deposit, when they bring this pulp into the U.S. The rate for this deposit is 6.51%. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) now has 45 days to decide if these unfair sales have hurt pulp producers in the U.S. If the ITC finds there is no harm, the investigation will stop, and all extra charges will be canceled. But if there is harm, more steps will be taken to stop these sales. The pulp involved here is special. It must be at least 90% pure and very bright. It is usually made from wood or plants that are treated with chemicals. This pulp can come in many forms, like liquids or sheets. There are some types of pulp not included in this decision. This includes pulp with low thickness or made mostly from cotton fibers. These rules and extra charges will stay in place until further notice. If you are a company or person affected, you have a responsibility to follow them. This situation is part of how the U.S. makes sure that trade is fair, and all companies compete equally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Duty Review Results for Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a decision about some products from China. The products are known as wood mouldings and millwork products. These items come from companies in China named China Cornici Co., Ltd. and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. The CIT’s judgment on September 23, 2026, was different from what the Department of Commerce (Commerce) had decided earlier. The issue has to do with taxes known as countervailing duties (CVDs) from June 12, 2020, to December 31, 2021. In September 2023, the Commerce Department thought these two companies should not be reviewed because there was no record of some details at that time. Specifically, information about whether these companies paid certain taxes was missing when it was time to make a decision. However, when the companies gave more information later and the CIT reviewed it, the CIT found new evidence. This new evidence showed that China Cornici and RaoPing had paid what they were supposed to. So, the CIT told the Commerce Department to change its decision. Now, these companies have a cash deposit rate of 8.89%. This rate will be used for future imports to ensure they pay the right amount. The CIT reminded that the Commerce Department cannot change any taxes that were already paid and cleared. The decision is final unless there are more appeals, which could change things in the future. This decision was noted by Commerce Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton, on October 9, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Certain Pasta from Italy Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary findings from its review of antidumping duties on certain pasta imported from Italy. The review covers the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. During this time, it was found that some producers and exporters from Italy sold pasta in the United States for less than the normal value, which is known as dumping. The review started on August 22, 2025, after timely requests according to U.S. regulations. The companies selected as key respondents for this review are La Molisana and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo. These companies were chosen because they are major exporters. Several companies had initially requested to be part of the review but later withdrew their requests. This includes companies like La Doria, Di Martino, Frescobaldi, and Barilla. As these companies withdrew their requests within the specified time, the review was rescinded with respect to 15 companies. The Department of Commerce has used specific methods to calculate the dumping margins. For La Molisana, the margin is 3.62%. For Garofalo, it is 6.47%. Other companies not individually reviewed are given an average rate of 5.05%. These rates are calculated to ensure fair pricing and to protect U.S. manufacturers. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. They can also provide feedback through public comments and request a hearing if necessary. The final results will be used to assess duties on future imports and to adjust deposit requirements for customs. Overall, these actions help maintain fair competition and protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. This review is part of regular checks by the Department of Commerce to ensure compliance with international trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results of Steel Nails Dumping Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results regarding the review of antidumping duties on steel nails from the Sultanate of Oman. This examination covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The main focus of this review was Oman Fasteners LLC, the only company from Oman selected for individual examination. The Department has preliminarily found that Oman Fasteners did not sell steel nails in the United States at less than normal value during this period. This means Oman Fasteners has not engaged in dumping practices for the year reviewed. Additionally, the Commerce Department expressed its intent to rescind the review for 15 other companies. This rescission is due to these companies having no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise during the period of review. These companies include Al Ansari Teqmark LLC, Al Sarah Building Materials LLC, and Gulf Nails Manufacturing, LLC, among others. The Department is also responsible for setting a dumping margin, which indicates the amount by which the export price is lower than the normal value. For Oman Fasteners, this margin is preliminarily set at zero percent. For another company, Gulf Nails LLC, which was not individually reviewed, the margin is set at 9.10 percent. This rate is based on previous investigations. Interested parties have the opportunity to comment on these preliminary results. Both case briefs and rebuttal briefs can be submitted within set deadlines following the publication of this notice. If necessary, these parties may also request a hearing to discuss their concerns. The next steps involve the Department of Commerce disclosing its calculations to interested parties. The final results of the review will determine the assessment of duties and future deposit requirements for imports of the merchandise in question. This review is significant as it influences the trade and pricing mechanisms for steel nails imported from Oman to the United States. It also affects the duties imposed and serves as a guide for future entries of steel nails merchandise. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Changes Antidumping Duty Rates for Italian Company Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 2, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final decision. This decision affects how the U.S. government handles certain imports from Italy. The case was about forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy. The U.S. Department of Commerce had reviewed the prices of these blocks from July 23, 2020, to December 31, 2021. They found that Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A., an Italian company, was dumping the blocks into the U.S. market at a lower price than normal. Initially, they set a dumping margin of 2.97 percent. Ellwood City Forge Company did not agree with this result. They took the case to court. The CIT told the Department of Commerce to look at the data again. This included looking at how they calculated costs and profits for Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. After re-examining the data in July 2026, the Department of Commerce made two changes. They removed two companies, Cogne and Ciscato, from their profit calculations. They also changed the way they calculated market-price benchmarks. This led to a higher dumping margin of 7.55 percent for Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. The CIT agreed with these changes on October 2, 2026. The court’s ruling means that the previous decision was not correct. This decision becomes final on October 12, 2026. Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. won’t change its current cash deposit rates. These rates were set in a later review that happened after the period from 2020 to 2021. The CIT has stopped the liquidation of certain entries by Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. These entries are from the 2020 to 2021 period. They will remain on hold until any appeals are finished. If no one appeals, or if appeals support the CIT, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to apply the new dumping margins. This means that when the new rate is not zero or almost zero, they will collect antidumping duties. This decision by the CIT and the changes by the Department of Commerce show how the U.S. government ensures fair competition in trade. Such actions aim to stop companies from selling goods at unfairly low prices, which can harm U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Changes in Duties for Wood Mouldings from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade made a final decision. This decision was for a case about wood mouldings and millwork products from China. Two companies, China Cornici Co., Ltd. and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd., took their case to court. The court’s decision was different from what the Department of Commerce had decided. Now, China Cornici is included in the review for the period from August 12, 2020, to January 31, 2022. A new cash deposit rate of 220.87% is given to China Cornici. This is because they were not given a separate rate in the review. The Department of Commerce will change the instructions for cash deposits. These instructions go to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The other company, Chen Chiu Global Corp., is not given a separate rate. So, the cash deposit instructions for them remain the same. The Department of Commerce says it cannot reliquidate entries. This means they cannot reassess duties on goods already processed. Only the court can order changes or reliquidation of these entries. This decision affects products from China for a certain period. This news is important for all businesses involved in trading these products. It helps people understand the changes in trade and duties between the United States and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.