U.S. Finds Eight Chinese Exporters Part of China-Wide Entity in Wooden Bedroom Furniture Case
Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes
On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its review of antidumping duties for wooden bedroom furniture from China.
The review looked at exports made between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023.
Commerce decided that eight exporters from China did not show that they qualify for a separate rate from the China-wide entity. These exporters are:
- Dorbest Ltd.
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd.
- Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd.
- Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd.
- Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
- Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
- Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd.
- Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd.
These companies either did not file the required forms, did not respond to requests for information, or failed to show that they meet the rules for a separate rate. Because of this, they are treated as part of the China-wide entity.
Commerce did not calculate any individual dumping margins for this review. There are no new calculations to share.
For all entries of wooden bedroom furniture from these companies, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect antidumping duties at the China-wide entity rate. The current China-wide rate is 216.01 percent.
The cash deposit requirements for shipments will be as follows:
- If an exporter already has a separate rate from a past review, that rate is still used.
- For exporters from China that do not have a separate rate, including those listed above, the cash deposit rate is 216.01 percent.
- For non-China exporters with no separate rate, the rate will match the Chinese supplier they used.
Importers must file a certificate showing they did not get reimbursed for antidumping duties before their entries are finalized. If they do not do this, they may have to pay double duties.
This notice also reminds anyone under an Administrative Protective Order to follow rules for handling confidential information.
These results were published under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and United States regulations.
For more information, interested parties can find the full decision and related documents on the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS website.
Legal Disclaimer
This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
