Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a five-year review. This is called a “Sunset Review.” It happens automatically for certain trade rules. The rules relate to antidumping and countervailing duties. Antidumping and countervailing duties are special taxes. They are used to protect U.S. businesses. These taxes are on goods from other countries that are sold at unfairly low prices or that get government help. The review is important. It helps decide if these special taxes should continue. The review started on November 2, 2026. Trade Rules Under Review The review covers specific products. They include goods from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. From China: Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies face both antidumping and countervailing duties. Potassium Permanganate has antidumping duties. From Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Polyester Textured Yarn faces antidumping duties. These reviews are the first review for Mobile Access Equipment and Polyester Textured Yarn. Potassium Permanganate is in its sixth review. Participation in the Review Businesses and people who want to be part of the review need to act fast. They must say they want to join within 15 days. They need to file a notice to show their intention. For those who file, a full response is required in 30 days. It is very important to follow all rules when submitting information. All information must be complete and correct. Electronic Submissions Required All documents must be submitted electronically. This is done using a special system. It’s called ACCESS. All documents need to be in by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Executive Summaries Needed The Department wants a summary at the start of documents. Each summary should be no longer than 450 words. These summaries help in creating an official decision document. What’s Next? This initiation notice keeps the process open and transparent. The review follows specific laws, such as Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed off on these details. This check is to see if the trade rules are still needed. It ensures fair competition for U.S. companies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Korean Power Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its official review on large power transformers imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covered the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Two key companies were evaluated: HD Hyundai Electric Co., Ltd. and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd. These companies were chosen as the main focus of this review due to requests from interested parties. The investigation aimed to determine if these companies sold transformers to the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value, which is known as dumping. Upon review, the Department of Commerce found that both Hyundai and Iljin did not engage in dumping during the reviewed period. Their sales were not below the normal value, resulting in an estimated dumping margin of zero percent. Other companies involved in the transformer market, such as LS Electric Co., Ltd. and Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation, were also reviewed indirectly. Since Hyundai and Iljin had zero percent margins, the Department applied a previously determined margin of 4.32 percent to these non-selected companies. This whole process is part of the Department’s actions to ensure fair trade practices and to protect the U.S. industry from unfair competition due to dumping. It is based on the U.S. Tariff Act which allows regular assessments and adjustments to duties imposed on imported goods. The findings and preliminary results are open for comments from interested parties. These parties have the right to submit their feedback for further consideration before the final decision. The decision and further details about this review are publicly accessible. Such transparency helps maintain fairness and accountability in international trade dealings. The final results, which will take into account any comments or additional insights, will determine the duties that need to be adjusted or maintained. This includes what importers will need to pay when bringing in power transformers from Korea. As the review process continues, there may be a public hearing if requested. The Department is committed to following all legal procedures and ensures that all findings are carefully analyzed and verified. Finally, these actions underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and enforcement in trade practices to safeguard domestic industries while facilitating fair global trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Requests Reviews on Trade Duties Estimated reading time: 5–9 minutes November 2, 2026 Today, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced an opportunity for interested parties to request an administrative review of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders, findings, or suspended investigations. This would occur during the anniversary month of the publication of an order. The notice was published in Volume 91, Number 210 of the Federal Register. The Department of Commerce manages these trade orders through the International Trade Administration. They focus on enforcement and compliance, ensuring fair trade practices. What Are Antidumping and Countervailing Duties? Antidumping duties are extra tariffs on foreign imports believed to be priced below fair market value. Countervailing duties are tariffs imposed on subsidized imports, which harm domestic industries. Who Can Request a Review? An interested party is someone affected by these duties or investigations. Examples include domestic producers, exporters, or government agencies. They can request a review following specific guidelines. How Are Companies Reviewed? If multiple companies are involved, Commerce may limit the number examined. They use data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection to select respondents. Decisions are usually made within 35 days after announcing a review. Respondent Selection Details Generally, determinations about collapsing (treating multiple companies as a single entity) require detailed information. Companies previously collapsed in other segments might remain so. Detailed collapse history must be submitted if relevant. Key Deadlines Requests to review must be submitted by the end of November. Withdrawal of review requests is allowed within 90 days of the publication notice. Market Situation Allegations Under the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, a “particular market situation” (PMS) can affect constructed value. Allegations can be submitted if market conditions do not reflect ordinary trade. Parties must submit PMS allegations within 20 days of initial Section D responses. Annual Inquiry Service List Commerce keeps an annual service list for each order. New entries of appearance are required to be added to the updated list for the next year. Petitioners and foreign governments will remain on the list automatically after their first entry. Special Instructions for Petitioners and Foreign Governments Petitioners and foreign governments are automatically placed on the inquiry list each year after their initial request. They must update their details as necessary. This notice shows the Commerce Department’s efforts to ensure fair trade and involves many complex legal processes. Interested parties are encouraged to understand these procedures fully and meet all necessary deadlines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Changes Steel Duty Case Involving Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a big decision about steel from Mexico. The court’s decision has changed how the U.S. Department of Commerce looked at steel products from Mexico. This case is about certain steel products that are resistant to rust, known as corrosion-resistant steel. The court’s judgment is about an earlier decision that the Commerce Department made. The period they looked at was from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The company involved is Galvasid S.A. De C.V., a steel producer from Mexico. The court said the Department of Commerce needs to change the earlier decision it made about Galvasid’s steel. The court told Commerce that it made mistakes in how it calculated fees, called dumping margins, for Galvasid and other steel producers. The Commerce Department had earlier applied some rules wrongly to Galvasid. They used the wrong methods to determine how much extra charge should be put on Galvasid’s steel. The court has now told them to make corrections. On September 22, 2026, Commerce fixed these mistakes after the court asked them to take another look. They changed how they worked out Galvasid’s selling price. They found out they shouldn’t have added extra charges for things like transporting steel. Now, the new finalized rates for how much extra charge will be applied are set. For Galvasid, this extra charge is now 14.54%. For all other producers, it is set at 14.29%. The Commerce Department will now tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use these new charges. The changes will start on October 29, 2026. This case shows the steps taken when deciding on duties for importing goods, like steel, by respecting court decisions. The decision from the court helps ensure that fees are applied fairly. Decisions like this help keep trade fair between countries. They also help make sure companies follow the rules. The Commerce Department’s announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, who is the acting deputy assistant secretary for antidumping operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Error in Truck Bed Covers Trade Case with China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On November 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a change in an important trade investigation. This investigation is about truck bed covers imported from China. Officials found mistakes that needed to be fixed. Background Earlier, on October 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared their initial findings. They found that truck bed covers from China were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. But a company named Ningbo Scarman said there were errors in these findings. What Changed Ningbo Scarman pointed out that there was an error in how the trade officials calculated their costs. The mistake was about which company made and sold the covers. Because of this, the Department of Commerce changed their earlier decision. Details of the Correction The officials noticed that they listed the wrong company when figuring out the costs. They meant to talk about Ningbo Scarman and its related company, Ningbo Auto Parts. This correction means lower penalties for this group than before. Impact of the Change Now, if Ningbo Scarman or Ningbo Auto Parts bring truck bed covers to the U.S., they will pay fewer tariffs. The new tariff rate is 49.38%. This change took effect back on October 1, 2026, so any extra money they paid since then will be returned. Conclusion The correction shows how important it is for trade investigations to have the right details. The Department of Commerce has fixed the mistake and has told everyone about the correct charges. This ensures fair treatment in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from Malaysia. This decision means that Malaysia will continue to face certain subsidies when exporting these wind towers to the U.S. The countervailing duty was first put in place on August 4, 2021. The Department of Commerce started a review of this duty on July 2, 2026. The law requires them to do these reviews every five years to check if the duty is still needed. The decision to keep the duty came after a review process. The Domestic Interested Party, which is a group of U.S. producers, participated in this review. They argued that ending the duty could lead to continued or increased subsidies from Malaysia. The government of Malaysia and other interested parties did not take part in this review. Because of this, the review process was faster and only took 120 days. The review found that ending the duties could allow Malaysian wind towers to continue getting subsidies. This could hurt U.S. producers. The wind towers from Malaysia affected are large structures used for harnessing wind power. They must meet specific size and production criteria to be covered by the duty. The Department of Commerce found that ending the order would likely let subsidies continue at a rate of 6.43 percent for CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd and others. This announcement serves as a reminder to those under an administrative protective order to handle documents properly. They must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. These final results are published in accordance with U.S. trade laws and regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Duties on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On October 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update. They have decided to continue with the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain non-refillable steel cylinders from China. This decision was made because removing these orders might hurt the U.S. industry. In May 2021, the U.S. started imposing duties on non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The reason was to prevent unfair competition due to lower prices and subsidies given by the Chinese government. Earlier this year, in April 2026, a review of these orders began. Both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission looked into the matter. They studied if lifting these duties would lead to unfair practices again. Their answer was yes. Without the orders, there might be more dumping, subsidies, and harm to U.S. businesses. The orders cover specific types of steel cylinders. These cylinders are used in many places. They range in size and might be imported with or without valves. It’s important to note that seamless cylinders are not included in these orders. For those importing these cylinders, there are rules. Importers will still need to pay duties when bringing them into the U.S. The orders officially continue from October 14, 2026. Periodic reviews will keep checking if these duties should remain. Businesses that deal with these cylinders need to remain aware. It’s crucial to follow all the rules and ensure they are on top of any changes. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission are focused on protecting local businesses from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Rescinds Review of Antidumping Duty on Frozen Shrimp from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to rescind the review of the antidumping duty order on frozen shrimp from China. This decision was announced on October 29, 2026. The review covered the period from February 1, 2025, to January 31, 2026. Important Details The antidumping duty (AD) order was first published on February 1, 2005. This order means that shrimp from China was being sold at a price lower than its regular value. The order aimed to make sure the prices were fair. In March 2026, the Department of Commerce started a review as usual. This review would check to see if the Chinese shrimp was being sold at low prices again. However, in April 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shared data showing there were no new entries of shrimp from China during the review period. All companies involved also did not show any activity. Review Process The review is a process where officials check if any shrimp came in at unfair prices. If no shrimp came in, there is no need for a review. Since no entries were recorded from Chinese companies, the Department of Commerce decided to stop the review. Impact Because the review found no wrongdoing, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to assess duties at the rate previously set. This means nothing changes from before the review started. The main goal is to ensure prices remain fair. Next Steps If there were any duties unpaid, Customs will take care of it according to the rules. They will assess duties based on the original rates. Legal Duties The document reminds the people involved about their legal duties to handle any sensitive information properly. They must destroy or return any information shared under protection according to the law. Conclusion This announcement was made by Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton. The government has a list of all companies involved in the review, which includes many exporters from China. The decision shows the U.S. is closely monitoring trade practices to ensure fairness in the market. The elimination of unfair pricing helps maintain a level field for all countries and companies trading with the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Softwood Lumber Subsidies Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public comments about subsidies. These subsidies are given by some countries that send softwood lumber to the United States. The time for these subsidies is from January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. The Softwood Lumber Act of 2008 says that the Secretary of Commerce must report to Congress every 180 days. This report is about any subsidies for softwood lumber that other countries send to the U.S. The last report was sent on June 30, 2026. The countries that sent the most softwood lumber to the U.S. from January to June 2026 are Brazil, Canada, Germany, and Sweden. These countries sent enough lumber to make up at least one percent of all imports to the U.S. The Commerce Department will use these same time periods to choose countries for future reports. For example, the next report will be about lumber imports from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. According to U.S. trade law, a subsidy is when a government helps with money or gives support that affects prices. The subsidy can also happen if a government asks someone else to give money or support. If you want to comment, you must include four pieces of information. First, the name of the country that gave the subsidy. Second, the name of the subsidy program. Third, a short description of the program in 3-4 sentences. Fourth, the name of the government body that gave the subsidy. All comments must be sent by November 30, 2026. Comments should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. This ensures your comments are considered for the report. For more details, you can contact Brendan Santschi at the U.S. Department of Commerce. You can call him at (202) 482-4141. Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed the notice on October 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Countervailing Duties on Aluminum Sheets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the cancellation of a review. This review was about countervailing duties on aluminum sheets from China. Commerce started the review because some people asked for it. They wanted to look at certain companies: Alcha International, Jiangsu Alcha, Yantai Jintai, and Yinbang. These reviews help check if higher taxes, called duties, are paid on goods from other countries. The government does this to protect U.S. companies from unfair prices. Commerce found that Alcha International and Jiangsu Alcha didn’t have any shipments during the time they were looking at. Without shipments, there is nothing to review. Yantai Jintai asked to stop its review. The petitioner, who wanted the review for Yinbang, also decided to cancel their request. Because there are no more reviews needed, the government is stopping the entire review. No changes will be made to current duty rates. The department will tell Customs to keep duties as they are, and no changes will be made. Everyone who asked for a review will need to follow rules for sending back or destroying private information. This notice was signed on October 19, 2026, by Scot Fullerton from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Steel Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on standard steel welded wire mesh imported from Mexico. This decision comes after careful investigation and a series of reviews. On September 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made its final determination about these orders. Both the Department of Commerce and the ITC agreed that canceling them would likely lead to the continuation of unfair pricing practices and subsidies. It could also result in harm to U.S. industries focused on making similar products. The orders first came into effect on April 12 and August 9, 2021. They were set up to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling products at unfairly low prices or receiving unfair support from foreign governments. The wire mesh in question is made of smooth or deformed wire. It is used in making concrete and is made by welding wires together in square or rectangular grids. These grids have specific sizes for their wires and spacings. The ITC found that if these orders were canceled, Mexico might continue its past unfair practices. This could hurt American companies by putting them at an unfair disadvantage in the marketplace. Therefore, wire mesh from Mexico will keep having duties added to it. This means that companies will need to pay extra fees when they bring the product into the United States. The aim of these fees is to make market conditions fair. The Department of Commerce plans to check on these orders again in five years. They will make sure the extra fees are still needed to keep the market fair for U.S. producers. The ongoing duties will be in effect starting September 23, 2026. This decision ensures that U.S. companies can compete on a more level playing field with foreign manufacturers. Commerce has reminded all parties involved about the rules to protect private information during these proceedings. This rules-making process is essential to maintaining professional and lawful oversight of trade practices. In summary, the continuation of these orders is part of the U.S. government’s effort to support fair trade and protect local industries from unfair competition due to dumping and improper subsidies by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review on Carbon Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an important review of heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Mexico. This is officially known as a “Changed Circumstances Review” or CCR. The review involves Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (PLM), which was earlier known as Perfiles y Herrajes LM, S.A. de C.V. (PyH). On October 26, 2026, the Department of Commerce began this review to decide if PLM is the same as PyH. This is important for setting the right taxes that need to be paid when these steel products are sold in the U.S. This needs to be done according to certain rules in trade laws. PLM told the Department that it changed its name back in July 2017. This change in name did not come with major shifts in how the company is run or how it does business. In the beginning, the Department of Commerce wanted more information before starting the review. PLM answered all their questions in time. Now, after looking at this, the Department thinks that PLM is pretty much the same company as PyH in terms of how it operates. The Department will use several factors to decide this, like checking if there has been any major change in management, who owns the company, where products are made, who supplies materials, and who buys these products. After a preliminary check, none of these factors seem to have changed much. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They have to send responses by a set time after the notice publication. The Department will review all comments before making the final decision. Overall, the Department of Commerce wants to make sure that the right rules and taxes are followed when these steel products are brought into the U.S. From what has been seen so far, it looks like PLM works similarly to how PyH did before the name change, so it will likely be treated the same. This case shows how carefully the U.S. checks and manages trade, making sure that companies follow the rules. The result of this review will be finalized soon. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Spanish Steel Wire Strand Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. The focus was specifically on sales made by Global Special Steel Products S.A.U., also known as Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. The time period for the review of these sales was from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce concluded that the wire strand from Spain was sold at less than its normal value. This means the price at which it was sold was lower than expected. These findings were made as part of an administrative review. The review process included looking at sales numbers and comparing them to standard prices. The results of the review showed that the dumping margin is 13.57 percent. This is the amount by which the prices were lower than normal. TYCSA, the company responsible for these sales, was found to have this specific margin. There were discussions and decisions made about the case. TYCSA and some other companies discussed these results through case briefs and rebuttals. However, the Department of Commerce found no reason to change the previously calculated rates. As a result of these findings, duties will be assessed on the subject merchandise. This means there will be additional costs for importing these products into the U.S. based on the final review results, with new rates applied starting from October 26, 2026. All parties involved have responsibilities to ensure their practices align with these findings. They have to file certificates to confirm that no unlawful reimbursement of duties took place. The release of this information marks the completion of the Department’s review process, and instructions for applying these duties have been issued accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Review on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of duties on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 from India. This review focused on Navpad Pigments Private Limited for the year 2023. The review was part of a larger order that examines countervailing duties, which are charges placed on imports to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments. During the review period, Navpad Pigments Private Limited received a subsidy rate of 2.81%. This means that the U.S. charges this percentage as a duty on imports of the pigment from this company. The Department follows strict legal guidelines to ensure fair trade practices. The Department also decided to stop the review for another company, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited. This decision was made because there were no recorded shipments from this company during the review period. Without any shipments, there is no need to review or change the duties. After the review, the Department plans to release more detailed instructions to U.S. Customs. These instructions will help set the exact duties for products coming into the country. They also plan to issue new rules for cash deposits on future imports. The Department ensures transparency by disclosing the calculations and methodologies. This process includes a public memorandum available to interested parties. The Department reminds importers of their duty to file certificates. These certificates help track reimbursement of duties to maintain fair trading practices. Overall, this review helps ensure that trade remains fair for U.S. businesses by adjusting duties on subsidized imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Continued Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain small vertical shaft engines from China. This decision comes after findings that removing these orders could lead to further dumping, subsidies, and harm to industries in the United States. Background Information The orders originally began on May 4, 2021. Commerce started reviewing these orders again on April 1, 2026. They found that stopping the orders would likely allow unfair pricing and financial aid problems to continue. Because of this, the Commerce Department decided to keep the orders active. Details on the Engines The engines involved are small vertical shaft engines. These engines have a power capacity between 99cc and 225cc. They are usually used in machines like lawn mowers and pressure washers. These engines work with a particular kind of spark ignition and are non-road, meaning they are used outside. The engines usually have to follow certain environmental rules by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If engines do not meet the EPA standards, they are not always left out of these orders. The covered engines might come with or without being mounted on machines. If an engine from China is attached to a machine, only the engine is part of the order. Unfinished engines with key parts are also included. Certain bigger, heavy-duty engines are not part of these orders. These heavier engines have specific parts that lighter engines do not have. Conclusion The antidumping and countervailing duties will remain in place, starting again on October 20, 2026. This notice means U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports. These duties aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this last determination. Scot Fullerton, the acting deputy assistant secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed this continuation notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Maintains Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2-4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that certain duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from five countries will continue. These countries are India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Türkiye, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Ukraine. This decision follows findings from both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). According to a recent notice, revoking the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders could lead to more dumping and harmful subsidies. These actions would likely hurt an industry in the United States. So, the Commerce Department has decided to keep these AD and CVD orders in place. The notice is effective starting on September 29, 2026. The orders show a commitment by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. Yang Jin Chun from the International Trade Administration is the contact person for any questions. You can reach Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760. OCTG are hollow steel products used in the oil industry. The orders cover different types of OCTG products from these countries. These include both welded and seamless products. The scope details specific steel products by categorizing them with codes from the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). These codes help in identifying the products for customs purposes. Products high in chromium, drill pipes, and certain other items are not covered by these orders. U.S. Customs will keep collecting duties at existing rates on subject imports to ensure compliance. The decision to continue these duties is part of a five-year review process. The Commerce Department assesses whether ending these orders would harm U.S. industries. The effective date ties back to the ITC’s final determination. Commerce acts on reminding parties about their responsibilities under an administrative protective order (APO). Compliance with APO rules is mandatory, and failure to do so may result in sanctions. This announcement is a part of ongoing efforts by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from what they consider unfair trade practices. The decision ensures protection provided by the AD and CVD orders will stay in effect going forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Pipes from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has completed its review of welded stainless pressure pipes from India. The review examined the sales between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce, tasked with enforcing fair trade practices, found that Suncity Metals and Tubes Private Limited, a key exporter from India, sold these pipes at less than normal value. This means they were sold cheaper than expected, which can be harmful to U.S. businesses. The Department set a new dumping margin of 0.74 percent. This is an important number. If a product has a high dumping margin, it might be subject to more tariffs or duties to even out the competitive landscape between countries. The Department extended the deadline for this review by 43 days. This allowed them to make sure their review was thorough and fair. Changes were made based on comments from Suncity, ensuring that the final results are accurate. The Department will disclose its calculations to the public within five days. This helps maintain transparency. New assessment rates will be applied. These are rules on how much duty should be levied on these pipes from India. Importers will get new instructions soon. The Department emphasizes the importance of certificates that prevent the reimbursement of duties. Importers who don’t comply may face penalties. This conclusion from the Department of Commerce aims to balance trade practices. The ultimate goal is to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair pricing tactics. The decision will affect deposits and duties as per the new rates. These new rates start from the publication of the review results. Overall, it’s a reminder of the importance of complying with international trade rules. The department’s decision is a win for those advocating for fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.