U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duty on Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review concerning the antidumping duty on wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review is crucial to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by international competitors. On February 16, 2021, the antidumping duty order was first placed on Chinese wood mouldings and millwork products. The order was meant to prevent products sold below their fair value, a practice known as dumping. Dumping can hurt domestic businesses by making it hard for them to compete with cheaper imports. In this case, the products made in China could harm American producers if not priced fairly. In January 2026, the Department of Commerce began a routine five-year review of this order. This is known as a sunset review, as it determines whether the order should continue or “sunset.” The Department evaluates if removing the order would result in continued dumping. A group called the Coalition of American Millwork Producers supported continuing the antidumping duty. This group includes several U.S. companies, like Best Moulding Corporation and Sierra Pacific Industries, which produce similar products domestically. The Department of Commerce looked at all the information and decided to continue the order. They believe that dumping would likely continue or recur if the order were canceled. The review found that the dumping margins, or the difference in selling price, could be as high as 231.60 percent. This means products from China could potentially be sold at prices much lower than what is considered fair. The agency’s findings are meant to help preserve the health of U.S. industries and ensure competitive pricing. By maintaining these duties, the U.S. aims to protect its producers from unfair market practices. The final results and decisions are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. For further information, interested parties can reach out to David De Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Overall, these actions safeguard U.S. industries against unfair pricing and ensure a level playing field for domestic and international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Countervailing Duty Order on Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized a review of countervailing duties on wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. These duties are important charges placed on imported goods, like wood products, to counteract any unfair advantages from government subsidies in the exporting country. The original order on these wood products was published on February 16, 2021. On January 2, 2026, the Department started a special review called a “sunset review.” This type of review helps decide if duties should continue or end after five years. On January 20, 2026, the Coalition of American Millwork Producers, a group representing U.S. manufacturers, expressed their interest in the review. They wanted to participate because they make similar products in the U.S. The Coalition believes that the duties should continue. By February 2, 2026, the Coalition submitted a detailed response. However, the Government of China and other interested parties did not respond with sufficient reasons or information to oppose the duties. So, the Department of Commerce carried out a quick evaluation, finishing the review in 120 days. The Department determined that stopping the duties might lead to subsidies returning, which could harm U.S. producers. As a result, the duties will stay in place. Specifically, the subsidy rates are 28.17% for Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd., 252.29% for Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and 40.33% for all other producers. This decision helps safeguard U.S. manufacturers from unfair competition due to subsidies provided to some Chinese exporters by their government. It continues to ensure that the playing field is even for American businesses making similar products. The public can access detailed documents and further information about the review through the Department of Commerce’s electronic service system, ACCESS. This system allows people to view decisions and understand the actions taken to protect U.S. industries. The Department has reminded all parties involved to handle the proprietary information responsibly and follow the rules when dealing with confidential data. The decision to keep the duties aims to support U.S. jobs and ensure that American companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-05-05 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of an antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) from China. This decision follows determinations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Their findings suggest that doing away with the order could lead to continued unfair trading practices and harm to U.S. industries. Background The antidumping duty order for THFA from China was first introduced in August 2004. This order was put in place to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by Chinese exporters. Over the years, multiple reviews have been conducted to evaluate whether the order should stay. The recent review process involved both Commerce and the ITC. Findings Commerce determined that removing this order might lead to a recurrence of dumping, which refers to exporting goods at unfairly low prices. This action can harm U.S. market competition. The ITC supported this view, stating that removing the order could lead to injuries for U.S. industries in the foreseeable future. Product Details Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) is the product in question. It is a clear, water-like liquid but can appear pale yellow. THFA is part of a group of chemicals called furans. It can mix with water and dissolve in many other liquids. THFA is classified under a specific code in the U.S. Tariff Schedule, known as HTSUS subheading 2932.13.00.00. Impact Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will still collect cash deposits linked to these duties on incoming THFA. This continuation seeks to ensure fair market conditions for U.S. manufacturers. Future Actions Commerce plans to start another round of reviews within five years. These reviews aim to check if the order should continue or if conditions have improved, allowing for its removal. Conclusion This decision is seen as an essential step in safeguarding U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair pricing practices from Chinese exporters. By continuing the antidumping order, the U.S. seeks to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results on Frozen Shrimp from India Antidumping Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the import of frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review covers the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The preliminary findings indicate that some producers or exporters from India sold shrimp in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. The Department of Commerce has an important role in enforcing trade laws. It is checking to see if foreign companies are “dumping” products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The review specifically looked at several companies in India, including Devi Fisheries Limited and Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited. The Department calculated a dumping margin for these companies. This margin shows how much lower the prices were than they should have been. For Devi Fisheries Limited and related entities, the margin was found to be 2.36 percent, and for Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited, it was 4.30 percent. Other Indian companies not individually examined in the review have been assigned an average dumping margin of 3.33 percent. This average is calculated based on the margins of the companies that were individually examined. The report explains that when the dumping margin is de minimis, or less than 0.5 percent, Customs and Border Protection may not assess duties on those imports. The document also states how duties will be used by Customs for all relevant entries during this reviewed period. The Commerce Department plans to make the results final within 120 days after publishing these preliminary findings. Until then, interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. It is important for companies involved in the seafood industry to be aware of these developments as they can impact import practices and duty liabilities. This preliminary review is part of ongoing efforts by the Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to protect local businesses in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically its International Trade Administration, has recently announced the results of its review concerning certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. In the summary published on May 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce confirmed that if the countervailing duty (CVD) order on these tires is revoked, it would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies from China. The countervailing duty order was first established on August 10, 2015. The idea behind the CVD order is to offset subsidies provided by foreign governments, which can make products from those countries cheaper and harm domestic industries in the United States. This order is specifically against tires from the People’s Republic of China. The review process started on January 2, 2026, as part of the second sunset review. Sunset reviews happen every five years to determine if the duties should continue. On January 14, 2026, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, a domestic interested party, filed a notice to participate in this review. This group claims to represent industries involved in the production of similar products in the United States. The department received adequate information from the domestic interested party. However, there was no substantial response from the Government of China or any related parties. This led the Department of Commerce to undertake an expedited review process for 120 days. The review’s findings showed that if the order is lifted, countervailable subsidies likely to continue would have significant rates. For GITI Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd., the rate is 38.15%. For Cooper Kunshan Tire Co., Ltd., it’s 21.68%. Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd. faces even a higher rate of 116.73%. Other producers and exporters would have an all-encompassing rate of 31.56%. These findings underline the necessity to keep the duty in place, ensuring no unfair advantage to foreign producers that might harm the U.S. tire industry. This announcement also serves as a reminder regarding the return or destruction of any proprietary information shared under Administrative Protective Orders. Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to penalties. The decision is documented in the Federal Register and was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on April 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Continues Antidumping Duties on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. The aim of the review was to decide if the antidumping duties should continue. The review began on January 2, 2026. It involved checking if dumping would likely continue or happen again if the duties were removed. The duties were first put in place in August 2015. They were added because Chinese tires were being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The domestic interested party, representing U.S. workers, was the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union. They filed a notice to participate on January 14, 2026. The Department of Commerce did not receive responses from any party representing the Chinese industry. This is called a “non-response” situation. As a result, an expedited review took place. This means a quicker decision was made without further investigation. The final decision stated that removing the duties would likely cause dumping to continue or happen again. The dumping margins, or the price differences, could be as high as 87.99 percent if the duties were removed. This decision means the duties will stay in place to protect U.S. industries and jobs from unfair pricing practices by Chinese manufacturers. The conclusion was reached in a document called the “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” The U.S. Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for transparency and fairness in global trade. The decision is intended to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. The review process is important for maintaining fair trade conditions. The Department of Commerce helps decide when duties are necessary to protect domestic industries. This notice serves as a reminder for all parties involved in the trading of tires to comply with the rules set forth to ensure fair competition. Any proprietary information involved should be handled according to the regulations. Overall, the decision highlights the ongoing importance of trade regulations and their enforcement in protecting domestic markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited first sunset reviews. These reviews focus on the existing antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, also known as PC strand. PC strand is a type of steel wire used in making strong concrete structures. It is designed for use in prestressed concrete applications, both pretensioned and post-tensioned. These reviews involved several countries, including Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates. The Department of Commerce found that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of the PC strand in the U.S. This means foreign companies might sell PC strand at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. manufacturers. As a result, the U.S. plans to keep the antidumping duties in place. These duties are intended to stop or lessen the effects of dumping. The rates of these duties are different for each country. For instance, Argentina faces a duty rate of 60.40 percent, while Saudi Arabia has a much higher rate of 194.40 percent. These rates help ensure fair competition and protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. The original orders for these antidumping duties began on February 1, 2021. The sunset review process started in January 2026. Domestic U.S. producers showed strong support for keeping the duties. These producers sent their intent to participate in the review process and later provided detailed responses about why the duties should remain. There were no detailed responses from companies in the countries affected by the duties. Because there was no opposition, the Department of Commerce was able to complete the review quickly. This led to an expedited decision to extend the duties. The Department of Commerce’s decision is important. It helps control foreign pricing that could damage the U.S. PC strand industry. These duties have provided stability for U.S. producers, ensuring they can compete fairly. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of fair trade and the measures in place to protect domestic industries. The continuation of these duties maintains the balance in trade, allowing U.S. companies to thrive without unfair competition from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Potential Continuation of Trade Measures on Steel Wire from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings regarding the countervailing duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, known as PC strand, from the Republic of Türkiye. The decision could lead to ongoing trade measures. Background On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce introduced a countervailing duty order on PC strand from Türkiye. This was to address unfair subsidies given to producers in Türkiye. This year, they reviewed the order to see if it should continue. Recent Developments On May 4, 2026, the Commerce Department determined that removing the countervailing duty might result in continued unfair subsidies from Türkiye. By law, such reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether these orders should be ended or remain in place. Review Process In January 2026, a sunset review started. This process helps decide if trade measures like tariffs and duties should keep going. Three U.S. companies, Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp., showed interest as they make similar products in the U.S. The government of Türkiye and other interested parties were expected to give comments, but they did not. Because of this, the review was faster than usual. Findings The review found that ending the order might lead to more subsidies from Türkiye. Specific companies in Türkiye are likely to receive help from their government that could affect U.S. businesses. The report lists expected subsidy rates for these companies. Results The U.S. Commerce Department suggests keeping the duties. They believe removing them could harm U.S. companies by allowing cheaper, subsidized products from Türkiye back into the market. Conclusion This decision highlights the careful checks the Commerce Department conducts to ensure fair trade. By maintaining the duties, the intention is to support local U.S. producers and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of administrative reviews for multiple antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews are related to various products with March anniversary dates. The reviews are set to begin on May 4, 2026. Purpose of Reviews The reviews are being conducted to assess whether antidumping duties and countervailing duties on various products are being correctly applied. The reviews help ensure that foreign manufacturers are not selling goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also check if foreign governments are subsidizing their producers unfairly. Respondent Selection Process The Department will choose which companies, known as respondents, will be individually reviewed. The choices depend on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and questionnaires submitted by the companies. If the Department limits the number of respondents, it will use specific data to make selections. Notice of No Sales Sometimes, companies may not sell or export goods during the review period. If this is the case, companies should notify the Department within 30 days of the review’s start. The Department will then decide how to handle these cases. Deadline for Withdrawal and Market Situations Companies that request reviews can withdraw their request within 90 days from the start of the review. If there are special market situations affecting the cost of production, companies can inform the Department within 20 days after submitting their initial questionnaire responses. Establishing Separate Rates in NME Countries For companies in non-market economy (NME) countries, they need to prove they are not controlled by their government. If they provide sufficient proof, they can receive separate antidumping duty rates. Companies must submit appropriate applications or certifications to qualify. Certification for Combined Goods Some companies sell both subject and non-subject goods to the U.S. The Department may allow these companies to certify their eligibility based on their tracking systems. Companies wishing to establish eligibility must submit an application within 30 days. Timeframe The final results of these reviews are expected by March 31, 2027. This ensures timely assessment and adjusts any unfair practices. Regulations for Factual Information All factual submission in these reviews must comply with specific categories and timelines. Submissions also require accurate certification. Late submissions may not be accepted, keeping the process clear and organized. This structured review process by the Department of Commerce is crucial in maintaining fair trade practices and ensuring U.S. markets are not negatively impacted by unfair pricing or government subsidies from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to a previous notice about the common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. On April 9, 2026, the Commerce Department announced the final results of a review related to duties on these aluminum sheets for the year 2023 in the Federal Register. However, there was a mistake in the notice regarding the names of companies involved. The notice incorrectly stated that the subsidy rate applies to “Kibar Americas, Inc.” It should have said “Kibar Holding A.S.” This error has now been corrected. Additionally, a footnote was missing. The footnote is important because it tells us which companies are linked together. Specifically, it should have mentioned that the rate also applies to “TAC Metal Ticaret A.S.,” which is linked to “Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.” These corrections were officially published on May 4, 2026, in another Federal Register notice. This is crucial for ensuring that all interested parties have the correct information. The corrections are important for companies involved in international trade, as they affect how duties are applied. Proper reporting ensures fair practices in international commerce. For those needing more information, they can contact Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude at the U.S. Department of Commerce using the provided contact details. This correction notice is made in line with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific regulations that guide how reviews like these are to be published and corrected. The notice was signed and dated on April 29, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, a senior official in the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Releases Final Results on Canadian Welded Pipe Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the results of its review on the import of large diameter welded pipes from Canada from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration. In this review, the Department found that Pipe & Piling Supplies Ltd., a Canadian company, sold these pipes at prices lower than the normal value. This is known as ‘dumping.’ As a consequence, the company faces a penalty tariff, also known as a ‘dumping margin,’ of 50.89 percent. For Evraz Inc. NA, another Canadian company, the Department of Commerce found that they did not sell or ship these pipes to the United States during the review period. The Department used a method called ‘adverse facts available’ to decide on the penalty for Pipe & Piling. This means that if a company does not provide enough information during the investigation, the Department can use the best information available to make its decision. These penalties affect how much American importers pay when they bring these pipes into the U.S. The fees are set to make sure fair pricing is maintained and U.S. companies are not harmed by cheaper imports. Companies in the United States affected by these imports must follow certain rules. For example, they need to declare if they are getting a refund on these penalties before they sell the pipes. If they do not follow the rules, they could have to pay twice the penalty amount. The results of this review and the penalties will stay in place unless there is another review or change announced. The Department will give more instructions on how to handle these penalties to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The results of this review were made public on May 1, 2026, and anyone interested, like importers and consumers, can look up more detailed information about these decisions online or contact the Department directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unwrought Palladium from Russia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision regarding the sale of unwrought palladium from Russia. They have determined that this metal is being sold in the United States for less than its fair value. This investigation, conducted by the International Trade Administration, covered sales of unwrought palladium during the first half of 2025, from January 1 to June 30. The initial findings, shared on February 19, 2026, indicated that palladium from Russia was sold for less than it should be. No one challenged this preliminary decision. As a result, the final decision did not change from the initial one. The investigation focused on unwrought palladium, which is a form of palladium that includes items like ingots, blocks, lumps, and pellets. All these forms are covered, regardless of how they were produced. The U.S. Department of Commerce did not receive any comments about what products should be included in this investigation. This means the scope of their study remained unchanged. No Russian companies took part in the investigation. This led the Department to assume that all Russian producers of palladium were part of a group known as the “Russia-wide entity.” The Department applied a rule called “adverse facts available” to this group because they did not cooperate. As a result, the Russian producers of palladium face a dumping margin of 132.83 percent. This means that the palladium is considered to be sold for 132.83 percent less than its fair value. The Department of Commerce will keep requiring U.S. Customs and Border Protection to hold any imports of Russian palladium that arrive starting February 19, 2026. Importers must deposit an amount equal to the dumping margin before the goods are released. The U.S. Department of Commerce is also waiting to see if the International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these sales have harmed the U.S. market. This decision will come within 45 days. If the ITC agrees there is harm, steps will be taken to apply duties on these imports permanently. If not, the investigation and any measures will end. It is important for any parties involved to follow protective orders related to this investigation. These orders protect sensitive business information. Failure to do so can result in penalties. The announcement and the measures outlined reflect the Department’s commitment to fair trade practices. The case emphasizes the importance of regulations in maintaining market balance and protecting domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Korean Pipe Imports for Fair Trade Practices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of large diameter welded pipes imported from the Republic of Korea. This review focused on whether these pipes were sold at unfairly low prices in the United States during the period from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The results are now final. Final Determination The Department confirmed that one company, SeAH Steel Corporation, sold pipes at prices below what is normal. This means they sold their products in the U.S. more cheaply than they would in Korea. However, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., another company under review, did not sell its pipes below the normal value. Background Information Initially, the process for this review started with preliminary results published on August 29, 2025. The review looked at the activities of 23 producers and exporters from Korea. SeAH Steel Corporation and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. were chosen for close examination. Unexpected delays, including a government shutdown, interrupted this review. As a result, the deadline for final results was extended several times. The current findings were ultimately concluded by April 27, 2026. Review Outcomes For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., the review found no dumping, giving them a zero percent margin. SeAH Steel Corporation was found to have a dumping margin of 0.80 percent, indicating some underpricing. Companies that weren’t individually examined will use SeAH’s margin of 0.80 percent. Next Steps The Commerce Department will share detailed calculations and findings within five days of this announcement. Instructions will be given to U.S. Customs for collecting duties on relevant imports. For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., there will be no additional duties. For SeAH and other non-examined companies, duties might be assessed according to the specified margins. Cash Deposit Arrangements The cash deposit rate for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. remains at zero. For SeAH, and other non-examined businesses, a rate of 0.80 percent will be in effect. Any other companies will follow past determined rates unless exempt or otherwise specified. Important Notices U.S. importers must file necessary reimbursement certificates to avoid penalties. This is part of ensuring compliance with trade rules and is mandatory for those involved in importing these products. The results and actions from this review underscore ongoing efforts to ensure fair trading practices. The Commerce Department remains committed to regulating and ensuring compliance with trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year “Sunset Reviews” on Duties Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun its five-year reviews. These reviews are also known as “Sunset Reviews.” They involve antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These orders are laws to ensure fair trade. They prevent cheap products from other countries from harming U.S. businesses. The reviews will look at whether these duties are still necessary. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is also looking at the same orders at the same time. The reviews started on May 1, 2026. The Department of Commerce will decide if the duties are still needed. The duties help protect American businesses from unfair competition. The reviews involve many countries and products. From China, there are reviews on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 and Steel Grating. From India, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 is under review. From Korea, Steel Nails and Welded Line Pipe are included. Malaysia is being reviewed for Steel Nails. Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam are also reviewed for Steel Nails. Türkiye is reviewed for Welded Line Pipe. There are strict rules on how to give information for the reviews. Parties have to follow the rules set by the Department of Commerce. These rules include how to send documents electronically. Special computer systems are used for this. Those who want to be involved in the review should show interest quickly. There is a 10-day window to submit a letter to participate. The Commerce Department has rules about sharing secret business information. These rules are strict to protect businesses’ secrets. Parties involved need to send a notice within 15 days to show they want to participate. If no one shows interest, the review ends without changes. If interest is shown, parties need to give detailed responses within 30 days. These responses help the Department decide if trade duties should stay or be removed. The aim is to keep U.S. businesses strong and protect them from unfair international practices. These activities are important for fair and strong U.S. trade practices. The process ensures fair competition and helps American industries thrive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Cheap Solar Cell Imports from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a preliminary decision. They believe solar cells from Laos are being sold in the U.S. at very low prices. This could hurt American businesses and workers. The solar cells in question are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. The inquiry began due to claims these solar cells are priced lower than what’s fair. The investigation covers sales from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. Businesses and individuals interested in this topic can provide their comments to the Department of Commerce. Some important actions have been taken. The Department of Commerce has said that those bringing in solar cells need to put a cash deposit. This is to make sure they pay a fair price. Customs officers will be keeping an eye on these imports. The investigation also looks at possible critical situations. It suggests some companies are shipping many solar cells into the U.S. quickly. This could be to avoid any future fees or charges. Several companies have been named in this investigation. This includes Solarspace Technology from Laos. Laos is considered to have a non-market economy, which means they might price goods differently. The investigation studies the reasons behind such low pricing. Following this preliminary inquest, the next steps will determine the final decision. The department plans to conduct thorough checks to verify information. Eventually, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will evaluate the situation. The ITC will decide if these imports significantly hurt or could hurt U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce is careful in examining these issues. The investigation reflects their commitment to ensuring fair trade and protection for U.S. industries. This process will continue, with final results taking several months. The decision can impact international trade relations and solar cell prices. Stakeholders are encouraged to stay engaged and follow updates. The findings from this investigation will guide future trade policies with Laos and possibly other countries, shaping how the U.S. deals with imports that may be sold at unfairly low prices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Indonesia Solar Cells Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes April 28, 2026 – The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination that crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Indonesia are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This determination follows an investigation that began on August 12, 2025. The period of investigation spans from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The products under scrutiny are solar cells, whether assembled into modules or not. Due to a federal government shutdown, deadlines related to this investigation were extended. The preliminary finding was postponed and then finalized on April 21, 2026. The Department of Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 35.17% for exporters such as PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. This rate also applies to all other producers from Indonesia. Additionally, the Department found critical circumstances in part. It determined that some producers may face increased duties on entries made in the months preceding this investigation. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend liquidation of the affected solar cell entries. This means the goods will be held at their ports of entry, and a cash deposit will be required at the current dumping margin rates. This investigation follows complaints that Indonesian solar cells were harming U.S. industries. The Department of Commerce aims to protect domestic producers by ensuring fair competition in the solar market. The findings and the methods used are explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Interested parties can access this document online via the Department’s electronic service system. Affected parties may comment on this preliminary determination. The Department of Commerce will hold a hearing if requested, allowing for further discourse on the decision. The final decision regarding these goods and their impact on the U.S. market is expected within 75 days of the preliminary determination. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will also assess whether these imports are injuring U.S. industry. The ITC’s decision will be made after the Department of Commerce’s final determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Indian Solar Cells Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes Date: 2026-04-28 The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) made an important announcement. Commerce has found that certain solar cells from India are sold in the United States below their fair value. This means they are sold at prices less than their normal worth. These solar cells are called “crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells.” Sometimes, they are assembled into larger pieces like modules. What Is Happening? The period checked or investigated was from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. During this time, these solar cells were sold in a way that might harm U.S. businesses because they are cheaper than they should be. Commerce calls this situation “sales at less than fair value” or LTFV. Critical Circumstances Commerce also looked at something called “critical circumstances.” Critical circumstances happen when products are dumped or subsidized, and this could quickly harm U.S. industries. They found such circumstances exist for some companies involved, like Mundra Solar PV Limited and others. But they did not find these circumstances for everyone selling these solar panels. What Happens Next? The companies selling these products must stop certain business actions temporarily. This is to make sure no more under-priced products like these enter the U.S. while the investigation continues. The decision is to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. Further Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also look into this issue. They will check more to decide if these imports harm U.S. companies. If they agree with Commerce’s findings, further actions may follow to continue safeguarding U.S. businesses. Importance of Compliance Companies involved must follow rules outlined for such investigations. They need to provide the right information when asked. Some companies did not cooperate as expected and may face additional challenges due to their non-compliance. This situation underscores the importance of fair trade practices and maintaining a level playing field for businesses in the global market. The U.S. Department of Commerce continues to work diligently to ensure that all trade activities comply with the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chassis from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided that Mexico is giving unfair financial support, called subsidies, to companies that make and sell certain chassis and parts to the United States. This decision is important because these subsidies can make products cheaper in the U.S., making it hard for American companies to compete. The investigation looked at chassis from Mexico. These chassis are frames used to carry containers or other loads on roads, ships, and trains. The investigation covered a period between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce first announced the findings on August 1, 2025. They invited people who were interested to share their thoughts and comments. The Department of Commerce had to pause its work twice in 2025 because of a government shutdown. This pause made the process take longer than planned. After finishing the investigation, the Department found that certain companies in Mexico, including Hyundai de Mexico and others, were getting unfair subsidies. As a result, these companies will have to pay additional taxes, called countervailing duties, when selling their products in the U.S. The duty rate is set at 76.91 percent for these companies. These duties are necessary so that American companies can compete fairly. If the International Trade Commission agrees that American companies have been hurt by these imports, the duties will continue. The Department also learned that some Mexican companies did not provide the needed information during the investigation. Because they were not cooperative, the Department decided to apply these duties to them as well. The companies include BRD Trailers, Carrocerias Gallegos, and several others. A decision will be made by the International Trade Commission to see if these chassis imports have hurt the U.S. industry. If they find that they have, the duties will be enforced permanently. If not, the duties will be removed, and any deposits returned. This decision is part of an effort to ensure fair trade practices and protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor the situation and make sure trade rules are followed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Some Chassis from Thailand Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced that certain chassis and subassemblies from Thailand are being sold in the United States at prices lower than what it considers fair. This practice is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. The investigation looked at chassis sales from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background The investigation started with a preliminary decision in September 2025. The investigation was temporarily delayed due to a government shutdown. The investigation’s final decision was issued on April 20, 2026. The issues raised during the investigation were addressed in a public document. You can find this document on the official government website for more details. Scope of the Investigation The products involved are chassis from Thailand, which are parts of vehicles used to carry containers or other loads. These chassis can be finished or unfinished. The investigation received comments from interested parties, and some changes were made to the scope. Verification and Analysis Commerce verified the information submitted by companies involved in making the chassis. They checked financial records and other important documents. Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Commerce found that one company, Panus Assembly Co., Ltd., obstructed this process. Therefore, Commerce applied an adverse facts available rate of 129.63% to this company. This means they used the worst possible inference against Panus. Final Determination The final decision lists the rates of dumping for different companies. Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 72.85%. Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 129.63%. All other companies have a dumping margin of 72.85%. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce has asked U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop the liquidation process of the involved merchandise. This happened once before and will restart if the International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that this has caused injury to the U.S. industry. ITC Notification The ITC will make its determination of injury within a set period. If they find injury to have occurred, antidumping duties will be applied to imports from Thailand. If not, the duties will be canceled. Conclusion This announcement highlights how Commerce is handling unfair trade practices. The decision can impact U.S. companies and consumers, depending on whether these chassis will face duties or not. The document marks the final decision in the investigation process. This final ruling aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Thai Chassis Producers Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a decision regarding chassis producers in Thailand. They found that the producers received unfair financial help, called subsidies. This decision comes after a thorough investigation. It affects those who make and export chassis, which are frames used under large trucks and trailers. The investigation looked at chassis produced between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. It showed that the Thai government helped companies through financial contributions in ways that are not allowed. This financial help makes it hard for U.S. manufacturers to compete fairly. The Department of Commerce announced that the final subsidy rates are 10.72% for Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and 9.65% for Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. All other producers will have a rate of 10.50%. The investigation process included checking the books and records of the companies involved. The U.S. government checked the details seriously to figure out how much help these companies got from their government. They even took special measures when the data was not clear. When this decision was first announced last August, the U.S. ordered that duties be collected on these products coming into the country. But these collections were stopped in November. Now, if another U.S. body called the International Trade Commission agrees with this decision, the duties will start again. This could mean extra charges for those importing Thai chassis into the U.S. This detailed review and final determination help ensure that competition is fair. It aims to support U.S. industries and jobs by stopping unfair practices from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chassis from Vietnam Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Published: 2026-04-24 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision. It found that certain chassis from Vietnam are being sold in the U.S. for less than they are worth. This decision is part of an investigation that started in 2025. These chassis are parts that can be assembled into a vehicle to carry containers. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The findings were published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2026. This investigation is run by the International Trade Administration. Their job is to make sure trade rules are followed. Background of the Investigation On September 29, 2025, the Commerce Department published an early decision. It found sales of Vietnam-made chassis at less than fair value. Public comments were invited at that time. Due to government shutdowns, deadlines were extended by 68 days. For more details on these events, the Department published an Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available online via ACCESS, the electronic service system. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers chassis and their subassemblies from Vietnam. These products are used for moving containers or payloads. The scope of the investigation, including changes based on public comments, is detailed in Appendix I of the investigation notice. Verification and Analysis In December 2025, Commerce verified information from Thaco, a Vietnamese manufacturer. They examined sales and accounting records. Interested parties could submit their views on the findings until the deadline in 2026. The Commerce Department analyzed comments from interested groups. This led to some changes in how Thaco’s sales were calculated. These changes are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination The Commerce Department determined that the estimated average dumping margin is 186.84%. This applies to Thaco and the Vietnam-wide entity. Suspension of Liquidation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of all entries related to this case. They are holding on to these products until further notice. If the U.S. International Trade Commission finds the U.S. industry harmed, anti-dumping duties will apply. The amount will match the dumping margin found in the investigation. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission needs to decide if U.S. industry is harmed by these sales. If the decision is yes, the Department of Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. If not, the proceeding will be terminated. In conclusion, this investigation is important to keep fair trade in place. It makes sure that the U.S. market isn’t hurt by unfair pricing from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.