U.S. Department of Commerce Preliminary Review on Nickel-Plated Steel Products from Japan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding the sale of diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. The focus of this review is the sales period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. Key Information: Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd., a Japanese company, has been assessed in this review. The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that Toyo Kohan did not sell its steel products at less than normal value during this period. Additional Details: A review was initially conducted on multiple companies. However, for 14 of these companies, the review has been rescinded due to the lack of suspended entries of merchandise during the review period. These companies include Higuchi Manufacturing Co., Ltd., IHI Corporation, JFE Shoji Corporation, and several others. Methodology and Next Steps: The review is conducted under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and in line with sections 772 and 773 of the Act. Calculations and analysis methods are detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, available to registered users online. Public Participation: Interested parties can comment on the preliminary results. Case briefs may be filed within seven days after the verification report issue date. Rebuttal briefs can follow within five days after the case briefs. Comments and briefs should be filed electronically using the Commerce department’s system. Assessment and Future Actions: If the finding is not zero or de minimis, customs will calculate specific duty rates for importers based on the weighted-average dumping margin. The current estimated dumping margin for Toyo Kohan is 0.00 percent. Cash Deposit Requirements: Effective from the final results publication, new cash deposit rules will be applied for Toyo Kohan and other relevant companies. Existing cash deposit rates will continue until further notifications. The review underscores the efforts to ensure fair trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. The complete details are available for public review through official government publications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Critical Circumstances in Indonesian Fatty Acids Import Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made an important decision. They have found that critical circumstances exist for some imports of fatty acids from Indonesia. This is part of an investigation into potential unfair trade practices. Background Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. filed a complaint. They believe that imports of fatty acids from Indonesia are harming the U.S. industry. This led Commerce to start a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation on March 9, 2026. Critical Circumstances Claim On June 29, 2026, the petitioner claimed that imports of fatty acids from Indonesia showed critical circumstances. They said the subsidies Indonesia gives are against international rules. They also noted a big increase in imports during early 2026 compared to late 2025. Investigation Details For Commerce to decide if critical circumstances exist, they look for two things: They check if the subsidies are against international agreements. They see if there has been a large increase in imports in a short time. Findings Commerce found some subsidies from Indonesia violate international rules. These are linked to tax exemptions for bonded zones and import duty exemptions. When checking for import increases, they compared shipping data for two periods: September 2025 to January 2026 against February to June 2026. They found massive imports from PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia and others but not from PT Musim Mas. Immediate Impact Because of these findings, shipments from PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia and others will face increased duties. This applies to goods entered into the U.S. since April 24, 2026. For PT Musim Mas, there are no extra duties yet. Further Steps Commerce will continue its investigation and give a final decision later. People can submit their thoughts or request a hearing on this matter. Conclusion This determination impacts how U.S. companies compete with foreign imports. It shows Commerce’s role in ensuring fair trade practices according to international laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews by the Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically the International Trade Administration, began the five-year Sunset Reviews. Sunset Reviews look at certain products to see if they can continue to have extra trade duties. The reviews started for some products from China. These products include seamless carbon and alloy steel. The purpose of the review is to check if duties are still needed to stop unfair pricing. The process for these reviews follows rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. There are detailed procedures in place to ensure fairness and accuracy. Several rules from 1998 and 2005 guide how the reviews are conducted. The reviews are detailed and require careful checking of information. The department uses a method to calculate costs and decide if dumping is happening. The following cases are being reviewed: Antidumping Duty on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel from China. Countervailing Duty on the same products from China. Currently, there are no suspended investigations needing review in August 2026. Anyone wanting to send information for these reviews must follow strict rules. These include how to format, translate, and serve documents. Submissions must be filed electronically. Those who want to take part in these reviews need to submit their interest quickly. A notice of intent to participate is due 15 days after this notice. If no interest is shown, the review for that case stops. Participants must follow Commerce’s rules to ensure all information is complete and truthful. There are special rules in place for sharing information securely. For those wanting to participate, filing a complete response is necessary within 30 days of the announcement. This applies to domestic and foreign parties. Information must meet specific requirements based on the participant’s role. Commerce asks for clear summaries of comments made during the process. Summaries must be brief and supported by footnotes where needed. This notice ensures transparency and fairness as the department reviews these important trade duty cases. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Thermal Paper from Germany Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has finalized its administrative review concerning the sale of thermal paper from Germany. This review was conducted to determine if the paper was sold in the United States at less than its normal value during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The Department has confirmed that thermal paper from Germany was not sold in the United States at less than normal value during this period. This means that there were no unfair sales practices involved in the selling of this paper in the U.S. market. The main company examined during this review was Koehler Paper SE along with its affiliate, Koehler Kehl GmbH. The review results showed that these companies had a zero percent dumping margin, meaning they sold the paper at fair prices, not undercutting U.S. market prices. Other companies, Convertidoras PCM, S.A. de C.V., and Papeles y Conversiones de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which were not individually reviewed, were given a dumping margin rate of 0.76 percent. This rate was determined based on the most recent previous calculations in this proceeding. Normally, a detailed decision memo accompanies such announcements, but since there were no changes from the preliminary findings earlier this year, no such memo was issued. The Department emphasized that because no unfair prices were found, the Koehler companies will see their entries liquidated without additional duties. Meanwhile, the other reviewed companies will have duties assessed based on the rates provided. Instructions have been prepared for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to carry out these assessments. These instructions will be implemented 35 days after this announcement, unless legal actions delay the process. Cash deposit requirements for future entries of thermal paper from these producers will adjust to these final results. Specifically, Koehler faces a zero percent rate, while Convertidoras and Papeles have a 0.76 percent rate. If a company was not part of this review, existing rates from prior reviews will still apply. The Department of Commerce reminded importers about their duty to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Ensuring compliance is critical to proving that no reimbursements occurred, which could otherwise lead to doubling of duties. This review and related actions help ensure fair trade practices and were conducted following specific sections of the Tariff Act of 1930. These efforts are part of ongoing work to maintain a level playing field in U.S. markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Chinese Boltless Steel Shelving Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its second expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty on boltless steel shelving units from China. Following the review, the Department has decided to keep the duty in place. This decision stems from findings that removing the duty could lead to a return or continuation of dumping practices by Chinese manufacturers. The antidumping duty on these shelving units was first imposed on October 21, 2015. The Department of Commerce evaluated the situation, examining past and current data, to decide if the duty should remain. The review process started on April 1, 2026, under the Tariff Act of 1930. Edsal Manufacturing Company Inc., an American business that makes similar products, actively participated in the review. As the petitioner in the original investigation, Edsal sought to maintain these duties. They provided a detailed response supporting the need for continued protection against unfair trading. No other interested parties joined Edsal in submitting responses. Consequently, the Department conducted the review quickly, wrapping it up in 120 days. The duty covers boltless steel shelving units that are prepackaged and ready for sale. These products may include decks or be sold without them. The Department’s final decision hinges on the belief that Chinese manufacturers would continue dumping these products at a rate of up to 112.68% without the duty. Maintaining this duty aims to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair trade practices and ensure a level playing field. Such protective measures are vital in safeguarding domestic jobs and supporting U.S. industries. All parties who handled proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) are reminded to responsibly manage or destroy these materials, aligning with the Department’s regulations. Violating APO terms can lead to serious penalties. The Department has publicly shared the full review results, accessible through the Federal Register and the Department’s electronic systems. This transparency allows interested parties to understand the review’s rationale and conclusions. For more detailed information on the review and its implications, the documentation is available through government channels. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty Orders on Mattresses Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed the expedited first sunset reviews of antidumping duty (AD) orders on mattresses from several countries. These countries are Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, the Republic of Türkiye, and Vietnam. The reviews aim to determine if revoking these orders would lead to dumping and harming the domestic industry. The reviews started when Commerce published a notice on April 1, 2026. This notice initiated the reviews of the orders placed on May 14, 2020. Domestic parties, like producers of mattresses in the United States and a certified union, showed their intent to participate in these reviews. They are the ones who requested Commerce to continue with the reviews. Commerce found that removing the orders would likely lead to dumping again. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. As a result, Commerce decided to keep the antidumping duty orders in place. The intention is to protect U.S. mattress producers from unfair competition from these countries. Commerce’s analysis shows that the dumping margins—meaning the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price—are significant. For example, Cambodia has a margin of 103.79 percent and Serbia has a margin of 112.11 percent. Thailand recorded a much higher margin of 763.28 percent, while Vietnam’s margin is 668.38 percent. Malaysia and Türkiye have margins of 42.92 percent and 20.03 percent, respectively. Commerce’s final decision highlights the possibility of continued dumping if the orders are revoked. This would hurt U.S. mattress producers. Therefore, these orders remain crucial for maintaining fair competition in the market. This decision is not just about numbers and countries. It affects many people who work in mattress production in the United States. Continued support through these orders ensures that domestic industries remain competitive and can keep providing jobs and products. The U.S. Department of Commerce took this decision on July 28, 2026, and it is effective from July 31, 2026. Those with administrative protective orders must handle proprietary information carefully, following set regulations. This outcome illustrates the role of the Department of Commerce in promoting fair trade and protecting U.S. industries. It ensures mattresses sold in the U.S. from these countries do not harm local businesses through unfair pricing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Orders Continue on Certain Preserved Mushrooms Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia. This decision follows findings by the Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that stopping the orders would likely lead to more dumping and harm to U.S. industries. On December 2, 1998, and February 19, 1999, the Commerce Department first put these AD orders in place. They were meant to protect U.S. businesses from unfair foreign pricing on preserved mushrooms imported from the mentioned countries. In February 2026, the ITC started its fifth review to consider if the AD orders should continue. The Commerce Department, as part of this review, found that removing the orders might cause dumping to continue. It informed the ITC about these findings. On July 16, 2026, the ITC agreed. It stated that ending the orders would likely result in harm to the U.S. mushroom industry. Therefore, the AD orders will stay in effect. The orders cover preserved mushrooms from the species Agaricus Bisporus and Agaricus Bitorquis. These can be whole, sliced, diced, or in pieces. They are preserved by cleaning, blanching, and are often in liquid such as water or brine. Notably, other types of mushrooms, fresh, frozen, dried, pickled, or marinated mushrooms are not included in the order. Customs will keep collecting AD cash deposits for these mushrooms at current rates. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this decision. The continued enforcement of these orders emphasizes the Commerce Department’s efforts to support fair trade practices and safeguard U.S. industries against foreign market disruptions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Findings on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced important findings regarding certain engines from China. The engines are called “small vertical shaft engines.” They range between 99cc and 225cc capacity. The Department of Commerce found that getting rid of extra charges on these engines could cause problems. This would likely lead to more dumping. Dumping is when goods are sold at very low prices that hurt local businesses. On July 31, 2026, the Commerce Department finalized its review. They said that revoking the current antidumping rules could allow this unfair practice to continue. The decision to keep the rules is based on a law from 1930. This law helps protect U.S. businesses from dumping practices. The review began on April 1, 2026. Domestic interested parties, like Briggs & Stratton, LLC, took part. They expressed concerns about dumping practices. The Commerce Department did not get much feedback from foreign parties. Because of this, they finished their review in 120 days. The small vertical shaft engines from China will still have antidumping duties. These duties can be as high as 541.75 percent. This decision is important for American engine makers. It aims to prevent unfair pricing from foreign companies. Commerce’s findings are now part of the Federal Register. This ensures that everyone knows about the results. The details of this review are public. They are stored in a centralized electronic system. People can read more about the decision if they want. In conclusion, the Commerce Department is working to keep fair prices in the U.S. engine market. The aim is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice for Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Sheets from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction notice regarding the final results of an administrative review of antidumping duties on aluminum sheets from the Sultanate of Oman. This correction notice was published on July 31, 2026, in the Federal Register. The original notice was published on May 29, 2026. It covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The review aimed to determine the appropriate antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. In the original notice, an error was made in listing the company “Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC.” The company was incorrectly listed under an “exporter” header. It should have been listed under an “exporter/producer” header instead. This correction is important for clarity in trade documentation. Proper categorization ensures accurate tracking and application of duties. For questions, Javeria Ali is the contact person. She is part of the AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, within the International Trade Administration. You can reach her at (202) 482-0462. This correction notice is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s ongoing efforts to maintain clear and precise trade practices. The Department ensures transparency and accuracy in documenting trade activities. The notice was issued by Christopher Abbott. He is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This action aligns with the rules in the Tariff Act of 1930. This correction is now part of the legal documentation for trade with Oman concerning aluminum sheets. The Department stays committed to accurate enforcement and compliance actions. This correction applies to interested parties involved in international trade and commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Subsidies on Truck Bed Covers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It says companies in China are getting subsidies to make and sell truck bed covers. This decision was announced on July 31, 2026. The period of investigation took place from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce wants to hear what people think about this decision. The investigation found that several Chinese companies received financial help that makes their products cheaper. These companies include Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd., and several others. The Department of Commerce has set different subsidy rates for these companies. Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd. has a rate of 30.38 percent. Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. has a rate of 8.72 percent. Other companies have a much higher rate based on available information. Because of this finding, U.S. Customs will hold back the truck bed covers. This means that while the investigation continues, these goods won’t be sold in the U.S. without paying a deposit. The Department will share its calculations with interested parties. This ensures that the process remains transparent. If the investigation finds more information, the Department of Commerce might change its decision. A hearing could take place, giving interested parties a chance to discuss the decision. The International Trade Commission will also hear about this decision. They need to decide if these imports are hurting businesses in the U.S. The investigation looked at specific products. These include truck bed covers that protect the open area of a pickup truck. Various types of truck bed covers were considered. These are made from materials like aluminum, steel, plastic, and fabric. Truck caps, which make the truck bed bigger, are not included in this investigation. The Department is using online systems to share documents related to this investigation. They want to keep the process open and clear for everyone involved. The U.S. Department of Commerce wants to make sure trade is fair for all. This investigation is a step towards ensuring that U.S. companies can compete fairly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Changes in Trade Duty for Steel Pipes from Thailand Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Court of International Trade (CIT) recently made a decision affecting trade with Thailand. On July 17, 2026, the court ruled in a case involving steel pipes from Thailand. This case is known as Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Company Limited v. United States, Court No. 21-00627. The U.S. Department of Commerce had reviewed the case, and the court decided that their review’s results were not correct. This case is about the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The Department of Commerce originally calculated a high dumping margin, which is the amount a product is sold for less than fair value. Before, they set this at 36.97% for two companies: Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Co., Ltd. and Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd. During the case, the CIT asked the Department of Commerce to look at some information again. They wanted to check whether certain sales should be included and whether some companies were related in a way that affects prices. The court stayed involved to make sure everything was correct, asking for more reviews in 2022, 2023, and 2024. After several reviews, the Department of Commerce adjusted the results. They changed their mind about how some companies are related and recalculated the dumping margin to 14.74% for Saha Thai and Thai Premium. The CIT agreed with these new results on July 17, 2026. The law needs the Department of Commerce to inform the public when a court decision changes one of its own. This is important because the decision supports fair pricing in trade. As a result of these changes, the cash deposit rates for Saha Thai and Thai Premium will not change, as they apply due to newer results from another review. The CIT’s decision also affects how suspended entries, or items brought into the country without full clearance, are handled. The CIT has stopped these items from being finalized (or liquidated) by Customs until all legal processes and appeals are finished. This ruling is a part of how trade laws help keep prices fair and protect industries from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Duties on Chinese Vertical Engines Amid Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a key decision in its ongoing efforts to enforce fair trade practices. On July 31, 2026, it announced the final results of the first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on certain vertical shaft engines from China. The decision means that duties on these engines will continue. A countervailing duty (CVD) order was first put in place to address unfair subsidies given by foreign governments to manufacturers. This order targets vertical shaft engines between 99cc and up to 225cc, originating from the People’s Republic of China. The decision highlights the essential role of the Commerce Department in ensuring U.S. manufacturers face a level playing field. According to the department, removing the existing order could see unfair subsidies resume, harming U.S. companies. The review started on April 1, 2026. It was part of a regular process, known as a sunset review, which assesses if the countervailing duties should continue. Briggs & Stratton, LLC, a U.S. producer of vertical engines, actively took part in the review. They provided the necessary information to support the continuation of the duties. The department carried out an expedited review because they did not receive enough responses from other interested parties. As a result, they finished the review in just 120 days. The final duty rates are set as follows: Chongqing Kohler Engines Ltd: 2.84% Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co: 18.13% All Others: 10.46% These rates show the extra costs that these companies would face if they export engines to the U.S. This decision aims to ensure that U.S. producers can compete fairly and continue to thrive in the market. The document containing this information is publicly available. It can be viewed online on the Government Publishing Office’s portal. The department reminds parties involved to comply with regulations regarding confidential information. This decision marks an important step in the U.S. government’s duty to protect domestic industries from unfair international competition. The duties will remain effective, helping to maintain fair pricing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Are Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes? Large diameter graphite electrodes are used in furnaces. They help generate very high temperatures needed for melting metals. These electrodes are larger than 425 millimeters across and are important in steel production. What Has Commerce Found? Commerce has looked into whether these electrodes from India are being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices because of subsidies. It found that Indian producers are indeed getting unfair help from their government. The period examined was from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. What Happens Next? Because Commerce is concerned about these subsidies, they have decided that until a final decision is made, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will hold off on finalizing transactions, or “liquidating,” when these electrodes are imported into the U.S. This step will start from July 30, 2026. Who is Affected? The companies directly involved and studied in this investigation are Graphite India Limited and HEG Limited. Others that ship these kinds of electrodes from India to the U.S. will also be impacted. Estimated Subsidy Rates Graphite India Limited has a subsidy rate of 3.68%. HEG Limited has a subsidy rate of 6.99%. Other companies not individually assessed have an average rate of 5.87%. Public Involvement The Department of Commerce is open to hearing thoughts from interested groups or people about this decision. They have until seven days after the next report is available to share their comments. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will continue its investigation and plans to verify the information before making a final decision. If a hearing is requested, Commerce will schedule it accordingly. All parties must follow specific guidelines to submit their comments and concerns. In conclusion, this preliminary decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce indicates concerns over unfair pricing because of subsidies on large diameter graphite electrodes imported from India. This investigation continues as the Department seeks further clarity on the issue to ensure fair trade practices are upheld. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Preliminary Decision on Graphite Electrodes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Investigation Details The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a preliminary affirmative determination on countervailable subsidies for large diameter graphite electrodes from the People’s Republic of China (China). This came after finding evidence that such subsidies were provided to Chinese producers and exporters. The investigation covers a period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A decision was postponed earlier but was issued on July 24, 2026. The Department of Commerce encourages interested parties to submit comments on this determination. Scope of the Investigation The scope includes large graphite electrodes used in furnaces from China. These have a diameter over 425 millimeters and might be attached to specific joining systems. The investigation also covers large graphite pins. Any graphite electrode identified under HTSUS statistical reporting number 8545.11.0020 is included. Certain thermal energy storage (TES) graphite blocks, defined by specific dimensions and properties, are excluded from this investigation’s scope. Methodology and Findings The U.S. Department of Commerce followed procedures set by the Tariff Act of 1930. This involved identifying financial contributions that might give subsidies. Commerce used facts and drew adverse conclusions since the respondents did not provide all required information. Preliminary Determination The preliminary determination found a subsidy rate of 103.49% for certain Chinese companies in the graphite electrode sector. These include Dantan New Materials Co., Ltd. and Shanxi Juxian Graphite New Material Co., Ltd. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend the liquidation of entries related to these imports, enforcing cash deposits at the subsidy rates found. Public Comment and ITC Notification The Department invites public comments on non-scope related issues by a specified date and acknowledges the importance of hearing parties on the matter. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will determine the injury status to U.S. industries related to these imports following Commerce’s findings. This decision is part of a larger enforcement and compliance strategy by the Department to address potential unfair trade practices concerning large diameter graphite electrodes from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of HFC Blends from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-07-30 No Shipments for Zhejiang Yonghe During the review, it was determined that Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. made no shipments to the United States during the review period. Details of Review The Department of Commerce began this review on February 10, 2026. They extended deadlines and gathered comments from various interested parties. The review was carried out in accordance with U.S. trade laws. Scope of Review The review covered HFC blends exported from China. These chemicals are used in air conditioning and refrigeration. Findings The review confirmed that Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. sold HFC blends at dumping margins of 182.61%. This means they were sold below fair value in the U.S. China-Wide Entity Companies that did not qualify for separate rates, listed in Appendix II, are considered part of the China-wide entity. They face a 216.37% duty rate. Assessment and Cash Deposits The Commerce Department will instruct how duties should be assessed on imports. Certain cash deposit rates will be maintained or adjusted based on the review. These rates ensure that trading is fair and within rules. Conclusion The Department of Commerce remains committed to fair trade and will continue monitoring imports to ensure compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping in Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of its review concerning large diameter welded pipe imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. This review was administered by the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce focusing on enforcing trade laws and agreements. In its findings, the Department of Commerce established that the major producers and exporters of the pipe from Korea did not sell the merchandise at prices less than the normal value in the United States during the period under review. The reviewed companies, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (HSP), and SeAH Steel Corporation, were examined separately, and both received results showing a zero percent dumping margin. The Department’s methodology in such reviews involves examining whether products were sold at less than their fair value, which can be detrimental to local manufacturers. If dumping is discovered, additional duties could be imposed. However, since the dumping margin for the two companies was calculated to be zero, no duties for improper pricing will be collected against them. The review process is detailed and includes many steps to ensure accuracy and fairness. Initially initiated on June 25, 2025, the review process experienced some delays due to the Federal Government’s shutdown around that time, but it eventually concluded with preliminary results. Moreover, the Department of Commerce also mentioned rescinding the review concerning 15 companies because there were no suspended entries during the review period. When there are no shipments recorded, specific reviews can be terminated following the regulations of the Department of Commerce. The current review also addresses the duty rates for non-individually examined companies. Since HSP and SeAH both received a zero percent margin, other companies not individually reviewed are assigned an earlier established duty rate of 0.80 percent from a previous period. Public comments on the preliminary results of this review are welcomed until the completion of the process, with specific instructions provided to ensure they follow the review’s procedural regulations. Additionally, a verification process of the information used is intended before the final results are published. Lastly, following the preliminary outcome, adjustments to cash deposits required by U.S. importers have been set to mirror the findings of this review, stipulating zero duties when no dumping margin is detected while maintaining existing duty levels where necessary. These results highlight compliance with U.S. antidumping policies by Korean manufacturers during the period reviewed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Ripe Olives from Spain Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its review concerning the import of ripe olives from Spain. The review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. During this period, certain exporters and producers in Spain received countervailable subsidies. Background Information The examination began with a preliminary report released on February 10, 2026. From March 9 to March 13, 2026, officials from Commerce verified the data provided by the Spanish companies Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop.And. and Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with their olive growers. Final Results The Commerce Department determined that there were countervailable subsidies—these are government financial aids that benefit specific companies. These help certain exporters and producers of ripe olives from Spain. The subsidies arose from financial contributions by the government, which provided benefits to certain growers and exporters. Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop.And. had a subsidy rate of 4.80%. Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with its cross-owned companies like Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., showed a much higher subsidy rate of 25.21%. Methodology and Changes Throughout the process, Commerce used a detailed methodology to assess the subsidies. This included using facts available, sometimes with an adverse inference. This means that if a company did not provide enough information, Commerce relied on the information available to determine the subsidy amount. In the final assessment, adjustments were made to certain calculations. These involved changes in programs deemed countervailable and determinations were made for applying adverse facts, such as when incorrect information was found. Implications With the final results, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can collect countervailing duties on all affected entries from this review period. These duties are essentially extra taxes on imported goods that received subsidies. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to issue instructions to CBP within 35 days after this notice. This may result in holding off on liquidating relevant entries for up to 90 days if a legal challenge, called a summons, is filed in time. Cash Deposits Required The announcement also means new cash deposit requirements for estimated countervailing duties on shipments of ripe olives entering the U.S. These deposits are based on the established subsidy rates and will remain in place until further notice. For companies not reviewed, the cash deposit rate is set at 11.08%. These procedures are important to ensure fair trade and to counteract subsidies that might otherwise lead to unfair competition in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Makes Changes to Honey Imports from Argentina Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced changes to the rules about importing raw honey from Argentina. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. These changes are about antidumping duties, which are extra taxes put on goods that are priced lower than what they usually cost in the U.S. This helps to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. Background On June 12, 2026, the Department of Commerce published the results of the review of raw honey imports from Argentina. Right after that, a group called “Asociación de Cooperativas Argentinas” (ACA) pointed out some mistakes in how their duty (a kind of tax) was calculated. Ministerial Errors Found The Department of Commerce found that they accidentally counted some honey sales twice. This was a mistake in math. Removing the mistake changed ACA’s tax rate to 17.76%. Correction The Department also found problems with converting costs from kilograms to metric tons. They fixed this too. This means for ACA and other companies not selected for individual evaluation, the dumping margin is now 17.76%. Companies that were not listed before, but were mistakenly not exempted, have been corrected too. Assessment Rates Once a shipment comes into the U.S., Customs will charge a fee based on the corrected rates. Customs will use these new corrected tax levels when checking shipments entered between June 2023 and May 2024. Cash Deposit Requirements For honey imports after the review period, new cash deposits will be needed. If a specific company has a rate from before, they will use that rate. If not, they will use the rate for the honey’s producer. For everyone else not covered before, the tax rate will be 16.92%. This information is important for importers to note because failing to file certain paperwork might mean extra charges and doubled duties. What’s Next The Department has informed importers about their responsibilities to file documents showing they haven’t been reimbursed for duties. They are also reminding parties about handling sensitive data properly. Anyone who doesn’t follow these rules might face penalties. Conclusion The Department is committed to correcting mistakes and ensuring fair trade practices with these amended final results for honey from Argentina. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Confirms Subsidies on Rebar from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a decision about steel concrete reinforcing bars, commonly known as rebar, coming from Vietnam. They have found that Vietnamese producers and exporters of rebar have been getting unfair financial help from their government. This decision covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Investigation Overview The Commerce Department started looking into this matter on January 13, 2026. They published their preliminary decision soon after, inviting public comments. They based their investigation on U.S. laws that relate to countervailing duties, which aim to offset unfair government subsidies. Scope and Methodology The investigation focused solely on rebar from Vietnam, which was the product at the center of this case. Commerce followed strict rules to ensure their findings were accurate. They even went to Vietnam to check details about the rebar production and see if the subsidies were truly unfair. Findings Commerce found that the Hoa Phat Group, a major steel producer in Vietnam, received a subsidy rate of 6.80%. This means that the financial help they got from their government made their products cheaper to produce. This subsidy gave them an unfair advantage over competitors in the U.S. Implications The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if these imports from Vietnam harm the U.S. rebar industry. If the ITC agrees with Commerce’s findings, a special tax, called a countervailing duty, will apply to rebar imports from Vietnam. If they disagree, the case will end, and any fees collected will be refunded. Next Steps The Commerce Department has shared their findings with the ITC. In the meantime, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep an eye on imports from Vietnam. If the final decision stands, it will impact how much tax companies have to pay to bring Vietnamese rebar into the U.S. This development marks a significant step for both the U.S. and Vietnamese steel industries and will have lasting effects depending on the ITC’s final determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Rebar from Vietnam Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Vietnam is being sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This decision is aimed at protecting American industry from unfair competition. Investigation Overview The investigation period was from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department began looking into the claims in March 2026 and postponed the final decision until July 27, 2026. Scope of Investigation The investigation covered rebar from Vietnam. It included rebar that underwent processing in Vietnam or other countries but did not remove it from the scope if the rebar was originally manufactured in Vietnam. Plain rounds and smooth rebar are not part of this investigation. Vietnam-Wide Entity and Results Commerce maintains that certain producers in Vietnam did not cooperate effectively. Therefore, they used adverse facts to assign a dumping margin of 136.57% to the entire Vietnam-wide entity. Separate Rates Hoa Phat Dung Quat Steel Joint Stock Company, Hoa Phat Hai Duong Steel Joint Stock Company, Hoa Phat Hung Yen Steel Limited Liability Company, and Hoa Phat Prestressed Concrete Company Limited, collectively known as Hoa Phat Steel, were granted a separate rate. Their weighted-average dumping margin was set at 128.53%. Cash Deposits and Duties As of March 13, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to require cash deposits. The cash deposit for Hoa Phat Steel is adjusted for certain subsidy offsets. For others that did not qualify for separate rates, the Vietnam-wide rate applies. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the imports are harming U.S. industry. If the ITC finds significant injury or threat, an antidumping duty order will be issued, finalizing the application of antidumping duties on Vietnamese rebar. This process is crucial for ensuring fair competition and supporting domestic production. Issue List Commerce addressed many issues during this investigation. Some were about whether Hoa Phat Steel failed to report all U.S. sales or water consumption accurately. Other concerns included which financial data to use for calculating costs and other technical factors impacting the margins. This determination by the Commerce Department is essential in supporting fair trade practices and ensuring fair treatment of U.S. industries against unfair foreign practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Unfair Financial Help by Egypt for Rebar Producers Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision confirming that Egypt is providing unfair financial help to its producers of steel concrete reinforcing bar, commonly known as rebar. This decision means that Egypt gives special benefits to companies, making it unfair to U.S. producers. During an investigation that examined events from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, the Department found that these benefits, also known as subsidies, were being provided. The main company involved is the Ezz Group, which includes Al-Ezz Dekheila Steel Alexandria Company and others. These companies will face a countervailable subsidy rate of 23.27 percent, which means they will have to pay extra charges when their products enter the U.S. market. The investigation shows how Egypt is giving these companies cheaper access to resources like natural gas and electricity. By doing this, they have advantages over companies in the U.S., which goes against fair trade rules. The Department is continuing to hold off on certain entries of rebar into the U.S. After January 13, 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection began collecting deposits for these products and stopped liquidation, ensuring no further financial action until decisions were taken. This was halted on May 13, 2026, but the Department says that if the International Trade Commission (ITC) confirms injury to U.S. companies, it will resume imposing fees. The ITC plays a vital role in this process and will decide if U.S. companies have been hurt because of these practices by September 2026. Depending on their findings, the U.S. may continue further actions or drop the case. If the ITC supports the Commerce Department’s findings, U.S. customs will oversee extra fees on similar shipments coming in from Egypt. If ITC does not find harm, all deposits made will be refunded to those companies. This case highlights how global trade rules are overseen and ensures fairness for all parties involved. The focus remains on fair competition and ensuring that no country gives undue advantages to their domestic industries at the expense of international trade norms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Steel Rebar from Egypt Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently declared that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Egypt is being sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This means Egyptian companies are selling their steel for less in the U.S. than they do in their own country or other countries. This practice is called dumping. The investigation looked at sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department’s announcement, made on July 30, 2026, is the final decision in this case. Companies Involved The main company involved in the investigation is the Ezz Group. This group consists of Al-Ezz Dekheila Steel Alexandria Company S.A.E., Ezz Steel Company S.A.E., Ezz Rolling Mills Company S.A.E., and Al-Ezz Flat Steel Company S.A.E. Other companies like El Marakby Steel and Suez Steel Company also faced accusations, but their dumping margins were based on adverse facts available because they did not fully cooperate with the investigation. What Are Dumping Margins? A dumping margin is the amount by which the normal value of a product exceeds the export price. Here are the margins found: Ezz Group: 34.20% El Marakby Steel: 52.73% Suez Steel Company: 52.73% All Others: 34.20% These percentages show how much cheaper these companies were selling their products in the United States compared to their home market. Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold up these imports until a final decision is made. Importers will need to leave a deposit that matches these margins. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these low prices harm the U.S. industry. If the ITC finds that U.S. steel producers are being hurt, the Commerce Department will make an antidumping duty order. This order will impose extra duties on these imports to level the playing field for U.S. producers. The ITC’s decision is expected within 45 days. If they conclude no harm is done to the U.S. industry, the case will close, deposits will be refunded, and the suspension of imports will end. This ruling stresses the U.S. commitment to fair trade practices and protecting local industries from unfair foreign competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Steel Rebar from Bulgaria Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final decision on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from Bulgaria. The findings indicate that these steel imports were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value. The period of investigation spans from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department’s analysis has led to the conclusion that there is evidence of unfair pricing for rebar from Bulgaria during this period. The main company under investigation was Promet Steel JSC. It was found that the company sold rebar at a dumping margin of 53.27%. This same rate is also applied to all other Bulgarian producers and exporters not individually examined in this investigation. The Commerce Department followed standard procedures, which included verification of sales and cost data provided by Promet. They looked at accounting records and other relevant documents to ensure accurate determinations. Going forward, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep holding deposits on rebar imports at the newly established dumping rates from March 13, 2026. This suspension will remain until further notice. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) concludes that these imports cause material injury to the U.S. industry, antidumping duties will be enforced. This decision is expected within 45 days following the Commerce Department’s final determination. The ITC’s decision will directly affect if cash deposits transform into finalized duties. If the ITC finds no injury, the deposits will be refunded, and the suspension of liquidation will be lifted. The Commerce Department has ensured that all involved parties are informed of their responsibilities concerning the handling of business proprietary information. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signs off on this determination, which was entered and published as official in accordance with pertinent sections of the Trade Act. The scope of this investigation includes steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form but excludes smooth, non-deformed rebar. It primarily involves harmonized tariff numbers including 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, among others. This decision impacts the pricing and importation practices of steel rebar from Bulgaria, ensuring fair competition and protection of U.S. market participants. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Inquiry on Import Rules for Spray-Foam Systems Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun an investigation to check if certain imports are breaking trade laws. This inquiry is focused on spray-foam systems from Canada that use special esters made in China. The inquiry was requested by ICL-IP America, Inc. They believe that some imports are avoiding rules that were put in place on products from China. The antidumping and countervailing duty rules are meant to stop unfair trade practices. These rules make sure that products are not sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S. The rules also stop countries from giving extra help to their industries unfairly. The review will decide if spray-foam systems from Canada are being made with parts from China in a way that breaks these rules. If the products are found to be breaking the rules, new charges could be placed on them. This process started after ICL-IP America, Inc. filed requests. They asked for an inquiry back in March 2026. They said the imports might not be following existing orders that started in June 2025. The Department of Commerce sent questions to get more information from ICL-IP America in March and May 2026. They answered these questions in April and May 2026. The Department of Commerce has set up rules to guide this inquiry. They include checking if the making of the spray-foam systems is a minor part that helps avoid the rules. Once the inquiry is finished, the Department of Commerce will decide if changes are needed. If products are found to be breaking the rules, suspension of trade and extra charges might happen. The inquiry will keep going throughout the year. The aim is to protect fair trading practices between countries. The findings might lead to changes for businesses that import these goods. They will need to watch for updates from the Department of Commerce. This will help them comply with any new rules that are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Initiates Inquiry on Alkyl Phosphate Esters from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Washington D.C., July 23, 2026 – The Department of Commerce has begun a scope inquiry related to certain alkyl phosphate esters from the People’s Republic of China. This inquiry aims to determine if spray-foam systems imported from China are covered by existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Commerce received a request from ICL-IP America, Inc. They allege that these spray-foam systems might be bypassing the orders. The request was filed on March 3, 2026. This request leads the Department of Commerce to start a scope inquiry. The scope inquiry will check if the esters-containing side of spray-foam systems, imported separately or as part of a system, falls under the orders. The orders target merchandise with specific chemical compositions. The inquiry will establish if these imports meet the criteria. Commerce has decided to defer the circumvention inquiry pending the outcomes of the scope inquiry. The department will gather information to make informed conclusions. All interested parties have been notified about this development. The scope inquiry is an important step in maintaining fair trade practices. The inquiry will also inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection about its initiation. They will continue the suspension of liquidation on entries connected to the inquiry. This applies to those already under suspension of liquidation. A final scope ruling by Commerce is expected within 120 days from today’s notice. Commerce may extend this period to 180 days if needed. This notice is a part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade in the U.S. market. It reflects the commitment of the Department of Commerce to enforce trade laws strictly and compliantly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Corrects Notice on Trade Reviews Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In a recent update from the U.S. Department of Commerce, there has been a correction in the notice regarding the initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. This update was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2026. The correction addresses omissions from an earlier notice published on July 9, 2026. The original notice failed to include Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan and Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea. These products, along with specific companies, were not listed in the initial publication. The correction is important for businesses and stakeholders involved in these trade sectors. For Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan, the companies under review include: Karaganda Complex Alloys Plant LLP KSP Steel TELF AG TNC Kazchrome JSC Eurasian Energy Corporation JSC Shubarkol Komir JSC YDD Corporation LLP ASIA Ferroalloys LLP KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP The period of review for Kazakhstan’s Ferrosilicon is from September 10, 2024, to December 31, 2025. For Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea, the companies under review include: Kudo Chemical Co., Ltd. Kukdo Finechem Co., Ltd. Kumho P&B Chemicals Inc. The period of review for Korea’s Epoxy Resins is from April 3, 2025, to December 31, 2025. This correction ensures that all relevant products and companies are included in the review process. This update is critical for ensuring the fairness and transparency of trade practices. The notice was issued by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. It adheres to the legal requirements under the Tariff Act of 1930 and its amendments. For further information, interested parties can contact Brenda E. Brown at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Her contact details are provided in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Decision on Malaysian Fatty Acids by the U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has delivered a preliminary affirmative determination concerning countervailable subsidies on imports of certain fatty acids from Malaysia. This decision follows an investigation that spanned the entire calendar year of 2025. In this determination, Commerce found that producers and exporters from Malaysia received countervailable subsidies. The investigation initially commenced back on March 13, 2026. However, Commerce announced a postponement on April 29, 2026, moving the preliminary determination to July 17, 2026. Brandon James and Rachel Accorsi, from the International Trade Administration, are responsible for overseeing this case. They can be reached for further inquiries at (202) 482-7472 and (202) 482-3149, respectively. This investigation and determination process are executed under section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce released the notices and findings via the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and public access to the information. A detailed Description and a list of topics discussed can be accessed through the Preliminary Decision Memorandum available at the provided links: access.trade.gov and access.trade.gov/frnotices. The specific products under scrutiny are certain fatty acids from Malaysia, as defined in Appendix I of the investigation document. The determination found countervailable subsidies under 701 of the Act, with noted financial contributions that offered specific benefits to participants. As documented, facts available and adverse inferences were applied due to non-cooperative responses from certain respondents. Alignment to ensure consistent final determinations across sectors, Commerce has aligned the final Consequential Value Determination (CVD) with its less-than-fair-value (LTFV) findings. Malaysia-based companies must now contend with the outcome that sets forth an ‘all-others’ rate—derived based on non-zero or non-de minimis subsidy rates—to ensure uniform application of determinations. The determined preliminary assessments are as follows: Evyap Sabun Malaysia Sdn Bhd received a subsidy rate of 4.40 percent. Palm-Oleo Sdn Bhd, and its affiliates, were marked at 4.19 percent. Other enterprises were assigned an average rate of 4.32 percent. Commerce has instructed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of related imports and cash deposits are now mandated at specified rates for involved companies. This suspension is applicable from the document’s publication date. Detailed calculations of these determinations are expected to be disclosed soon, providing additional insights into Commerce’s decision-making process. Moreover, verification processes will be employed to affirm the accuracy of the provided details. The issue remains under review, with public comment and hearing opportunities open for stakeholders to express concerns or additional observations. Comments, case briefs, or requests for hearings should be submitted within designated timelines post-verification. This matter is now awaiting evaluation by the U.S. International Trade Commission, which will determine the broader market impact of this preliminary decision and its implications on domestic industries. Interested parties, stakeholders, and relevant agencies are informed of these proceedings and encouraged to monitor developments as Commerce advances toward final determinations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Decision on Fatty Acids from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision on the investigation of certain fatty acids imported from Indonesia. These fatty acids are organic acids made from hydrocarbons. They are often used in the production of various goods. The preliminary findings show that these fatty acids from Indonesia received unfair financial help, or subsidies, from the Indonesian government. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. It started on March 13, 2026, and was supposed to end earlier, but the preliminary decision was delayed to July 17, 2026. In this investigation, the Department looked at whether the fatty acids were sold at unfair prices due to government help. They found evidence of subsidies for Indonesian producers. The companies examined in this case are PT Musim Mas and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. They are two of the largest producers exporting fatty acids from Indonesia. The preliminary subsidy rates found for these companies are 16.47% for PT Musim Mas and 16.48% for PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. These rates mean these companies received financial benefits allowing them to sell their products at lower prices than they should. The decision also affects all other Indonesian producers of fatty acids not specifically examined in this investigation. These producers have been given an estimated subsidy rate of 16.48%. The Department of Commerce will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to start collecting deposits on these imports. These deposits will be based on the subsidy rates mentioned above. This means importers must pay extra when bringing fatty acids from Indonesia into the U.S. This extra is held as a precaution while the investigation is finalized. The investigation is not over yet. The Department plans to verify the information provided by Indonesian companies. They will double-check the findings to ensure accuracy before making a final decision. Public comments on this case are invited. Interested parties may submit written feedback on the matter. There will be a hearing where these comments are discussed. The final decision will then be made after reviewing all input. This important preliminary decision is a step towards fair trade practices. It ensures that U.S. markets are not hurt by unfair imports. The International Trade Commission will also look into the effects of these imports on U.S. industries. The final decision is set to be released by November 30, 2026, unless further delays occur. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announces Antidumping Duty Order on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 4 minutes On July 23, 2026, the Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This action follows an affirmative final determination by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Earlier, on June 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce found that lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan were being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This decision was based on sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsequently, on July 16, 2026, the ITC confirmed that the U.S. industry was being harmed by these dumped imports. Scope of the Order The order covers lattice boom crawler cranes and their parts from Japan. These cranes have specific components: Lattice boom assemblies. Lower carriage assembly. Crawler assembly. Upper carriage assembly. Hoisting assembly. Jib assemblies. The order includes all cranes, whether they have additional features or not. Antidumping Duties Unliquidated entries of these cranes from Japan are now subject to antidumping duties. These duties apply to entries made on or after January 16, 2026, the date of the preliminary determination. The dumping margins for the major exporters are as follows: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.: 12.36% Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd.: 20.00% All other producers: 16.18% Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of these cranes and require cash deposits. This will continue until further notice. Provisional Measures Provisional measures started on January 16, 2026, and ended on July 15, 2026. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are not subject to antidumping duties. However, from July 20, 2026, suspension of liquidation resumes. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for each order. Interested parties can be added to this list for future notifications. Notification This notice establishes the antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. For a comprehensive list of antidumping and countervailing duty orders, visit the Commerce website. Commerce’s goal is to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. This order reflects their continued commitment to these principles. For further details, access the full Federal Register document online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Low-Value Sales of L-Lysine from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final findings on the importation of L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China. They have found that this important animal feed ingredient is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. Investigation Details The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation and reporting were completed by the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. Key Players and Companies Several key companies from China were involved in the investigation. These include Changchun Dahe Bio Technology Development Co., Eppen Asia Pte. Ltd., and Shouguang Golden Corn Biotechnological Co. Ltd. The Eppen Group and Zhengzhou Longgu Trading Co. Ltd. were particularly notable. Findings and Results The Department of Commerce used a method called “adverse facts available” to decide the outcomes, especially for companies that did not co-operate fully, like Longgu and Heshu. The investigation revealed dumping margins, which are differences between the prices in China and the U.S., suggesting that L-lysine was sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Implications and Actions As a result of these findings, the Department of Commerce will continue to suspend the entry of this product into the U.S. The cash deposit rates have been set for these imports. Companies will have to pay duties when they bring in L-lysine from China, ensuring fair pricing. What Happens Next The International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these imports have hurt U.S. businesses. If they conclude that they have caused harm, the duties will remain. If not, the investigation’s outcomes will change. For those involved in the importation and use of lysine, this decision is crucial. It aims to protect the U.S. market from unfairly priced imports and ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Decision on L-Lysine Import from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision. It will place a countervailing duty on L-lysine from China. This means extra charges will be added to the cost of L-lysine coming from China. What is L-Lysine? L-lysine is a type of amino acid. Animals need it to help them grow. It helps in making proteins. Farmers add L-lysine to animal feed for pigs, chickens, and cows. It’s important for animal health. Period of Investigation The Department of Commerce checked how L-lysine was sent from China. They looked at data from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They wanted to see if producers in China had unfair help from their government. The investigation started on January 22, 2026. The Findings The investigation found that Chinese producers received unfair help, called subsidies, from their government. This helps them sell products cheaper in the United States. This hurts American producers. Companies Involved Researchers examined several companies, like Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd, and found some were given unfair advantages. Three Chinese companies have to face these duties. They are Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd, and Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. Rates Announced Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd will have a countervailing duty of 48.21%. Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd will both face a duty rate of 82.11%. This rate is harsher because they didn’t provide the necessary information. All other producers will have the same rate as Inner Mongolia Eppen, which is 48.21%. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission will look at this decision. They will decide if U.S. businesses are being hurt. They have 45 days to make this decision. If they agree, the duties will stay. If they disagree, the duties will be removed. Final Steps All companies involved must respect the new rules. They should also make sure any private information shared with the U.S. Department of Commerce is kept safe. This decision is important for trade between the United States and China. It ensures a fair marketplace for goods like L-lysine. The U.S. continues to watch out for its businesses and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Department of Commerce: Review of Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is Happening? On July 24, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared that the removal of the CVD on fertilizers from Morocco is likely to lead to the continuance of unfair subsidies. The subsidies are benefits given by the Moroccan government to their local fertilizer producers, making their products cheaper in the U.S. Background Information Initially, the CVD order was put in place on April 7, 2021, to level the playing field for U.S. producers by counteracting the Moroccan government’s support. This review began on March 2, 2026, to decide whether this order should continue. Two U.S. companies, Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, are involved in this review. They provided timely notices showing their interest in continuing the examination of this issue. Findings So Far The Department of Commerce thinks that if the CVD were removed, Morocco’s producers, like OCP S.A., would keep receiving a subsidy rate of 20.04% from their government. This could mean they maintain an unfair advantage over U.S. producers. What’s Next? Interested people or companies can give their opinions or share their views. They have 30 days from the date of this announcement to submit their case briefs. If necessary, they may request a hearing to discuss these issues further. The Department of Commerce plans to publish its final decision within the next 240 days. They will consider all the comments and information submitted before making their final decision. This process is significant because it impacts both the Moroccan producers and U.S. companies selling fertilizers. Balancing fair trade practices is essential to ensure competitiveness within the global market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement about crepe paper from China. The department has decided to keep a special rule, called an antidumping duty order, on certain crepe paper products from the People’s Republic of China. This decision comes after careful examination and agreement with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). What is Crepe Paper? Crepe paper is a type of paper with a wrinkled texture, often used for decoration. It can come in various forms such as streamers and is sometimes treated to resist flames. Crepe paper can be colored or have different designs on it. It is usually packaged in rolls or different types of packaging for consumers. Why the Special Rule? The U.S. wants to make sure the local industry is not harmed by unfair pricing practices. When a country sells a product at a lower price in another country, it can hurt the industries in the importing country. This is called dumping. The U.S. government believes that ending the antidumping duty on crepe paper from China could lead to more dumping, which might hurt American companies that make similar products. What Happens Next? The rule to keep the antidumping duty will still apply from July 14, 2026. This means that for now, extra fees from the antidumping duty will be added to crepe paper from China entering the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting these fees. The U.S. Department of Commerce will review the situation again in five years. They will start this new review not later than 30 days before the five-year anniversary of the current decision. This decision is a reminder for all companies involved in the case to handle private information correctly and return or destroy it as required. By continuing this rule, both Commerce and ITC aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition and ensure they remain strong and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Reviews Subsidies for Pasta from Italy Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding countervailable subsidies for certain pasta from Italy. These subsidies were given to producers and exporters during 2023. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The department is responsible for checking if subsidies from foreign governments hurt U.S. businesses. They found that some Italian companies received help from the Italian government. This help, called subsidies, can make it unfair for U.S. pasta makers to compete. Two main companies in Italy, De Matteis Agroalimentare and Pastificio Attilo Mastromauro-Granoro, were part of this review. These companies were investigated to see if they received extra help that U.S. companies did not get. The review showed they did receive such help. This means they benefited from Italian government programs that influenced their production costs. The U.S. Department of Commerce has set new rates at which these companies must pay duties, which are like taxes, when they send pasta to the U.S. De Matteis Agroalimentare now has a rate of 3.32%, and Granoro’s rate is 3.21%. Other Italian companies, like Antiche Tradizioni di Gragnano and Pastificio Sgambaro, are also part of this review, and they have a rate of 3.32%. These new rates mean these companies need to pay extra when they bring their pasta into the U.S. This is to make sure they are not unfairly beating U.S. companies by using government help. Moreover, the report explains that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, will collect these duties. This will happen when the pasta enters the U.S. The aim is to level the playing field for American pasta producers and ensure fair competition. In addition, it is also crucial for the companies involved to handle sensitive information properly. They have received a reminder to protect any business secrets they learned during the investigation. The new decisions on subsidies and rates are important. They help ensure that U.S. pasta companies do not suffer because some Italian companies received unfair government help. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.