Continuation of Antidumping Duties on Chinese Ironing Tables Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On November 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update regarding ironing tables imported from China. The announcement was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 212. The Department of Commerce’s decision affects floor-standing, metal-top ironing tables and parts that are imported from the People’s Republic of China. They concluded that revoking the antidumping duty on these goods would likely result in continued or recurring dumping. This means that without the duty, these products might be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The antidumping duty order on these products was first published on August 6, 2004. Most recently, the order was continued on August 31, 2021. The fourth sunset review, which reviews and updates trade regulations every five years, began on July 2, 2025. Seymour Home Products, a company that manufactures these types of products in the United States, expressed interest in keeping the duty in place. This company is considered an interested party because they make ironing tables in the U.S. The review process did not get any responses from interested parties in China. This led the Department of Commerce to conduct an expedited review, which aims to make a decision in 120 days. The order maintains that the duty is necessary to prevent unfair pricing practices. The anticipated dumping margin, if the duty were removed, could be as high as 157.68 percent. This margin means that products could be sold significantly below their fair value in the U.S. market. The report also reminds parties of their responsibilities. If a party received proprietary information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO), they need to return or destroy this information as per regulations. This announcement by the Department of Commerce ensures that U.S. businesses like Seymour Home Products are protected from unfair competition due to low-priced imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Review of Magnesia Carbon Bricks from Mexico and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made important findings about magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico and China. These findings concern the continuation or recurrence of dumping, which means selling products at unfairly low prices. On November 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce published their final results regarding antidumping duty orders. These orders have been in place to stop unfair pricing. The review began on July 2, 2026. It looked at the possibility of removing these duties. Commerce found that ending the orders would likely lead to more dumping of magnesia carbon bricks at high levels. Background In 2010, antidumping duty orders were first put in place. These orders helped protect U.S. producers. Without them, businesses from Mexico and China might sell bricks at unfair prices, hurting U.S. companies. The review process allows both domestic and foreign parties to share their opinions. In July 2026, U.S. producers showed their interest in keeping the duties. They were worried about possible harm to their business if the duties were lifted. Main Findings The Department discovered that removing these duties could see dumping levels as high as 57.90% for Mexico and 236.00% for China. This means bricks from these countries could be sold in the United States for much less than fair value. Legal and Administrative Information This review also involves legal rules about protective orders. These rules help keep sensitive business information safe. Parties involved must follow these rules carefully. This notice serves to remind them about their responsibilities under these protection rules. Conclusion The Department’s findings mean that the duties on magnesia carbon bricks will stay in place. This decision helps to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. The official document with all details is available digitally for interested parties. This completes the official and thorough review by the U.S. Department of Commerce on magnesia carbon bricks from Mexico and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Confirms Metal Locker Dumping by China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has reviewed the dumping of metal lockers from … Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Duty Review on Ripe Olives From Spain Released Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings in the countervailing duty review concerning ripe olives from Spain. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The preliminary results indicate that certain producers and exporters received countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are a type of financial aid provided by governments that give an unfair advantage to businesses. The department focused on Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop And. (Agro Sevilla) during their review. The review began on January 21, 2026, as part of an examination of the countervailing duty order. Due to lapses in federal appropriations, several deadlines were delayed. Initially, all deadlines were postponed by 47 days. Later, an additional delay of 21 days was added. These delays were accounted for in the review process, affecting timelines but ensuring thoroughness. The review has found that Agro Sevilla received subsidies at a rate of 4.57% ad valorem. The term “ad valorem” means that a percentage is applied to the value of the goods. Another company, Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with its affiliates, also received subsidies at the same rate. There were changes in the status of certain companies involved in the review. Four companies were partially rescinded from the review. Rescission means that those companies are no longer being examined for subsidy receipts during the review period. These companies are Alimentary Group DCoop, S.Coop. And., Aceitunera del Norte de Caceres, Soc. Coop. LTDA 2° Grado, Aceitunera del Norte de Cáceres, S.C.L., and Plasoliva, S.L. Commerce has invited interested parties to submit comments on the preliminary findings. There is a specified period for comments, and hearings may be scheduled if requested. Upon completion of the review, the results could impact duty rates applied to imports of ripe olives from Spain. New rates will be published following the conclusion of the review process, currently scheduled to conclude within 120 days of the preliminary results’ release. The preliminary findings are now available for public view through the Commerce Department’s system. The findings and potential changes in duty rates may affect both importers and consumers in the United States. Please stay tuned for continued updates as the review proceeds toward its final results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Steel Nails from China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results concerning an ongoing administrative review of antidumping duties on certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. The review identifies that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yueda Nails (Chuzhou) Ltd., collectively known as Yueda Nails, have sold nails from China at less than their normal value during this period. As a result, Yueda Nails is assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 9.27 percent. The document further explains that the review initially included several companies. However, the Commerce Department is rescinding the review concerning nine other companies because there were no entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the review period. These companies are: JISCO Corporation Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. Nanjing Yuechang Hardwares Co., Ltd. Qingdao Jisco Co., Ltd. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Co., Ltd. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd. Xi’an Metals and Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. The review and its results are part of the Commerce Department’s efforts to enforce fair trade practices by ensuring that the imported steel nails are not being sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. For public involvement, the department welcomes interested parties to submit written comments or case briefs. These comments are to be submitted no later than 21 days after the announcement of the preliminary results. Additionally, the department will hold a hearing if requested, providing a platform for interested parties to discuss the issues raised in the review. Finally, the review also clarified that for future shipments, the cash deposit rates for the companies reviewed will change based on the final findings of this review. For the companies not participating in the review, current cash deposit rates will remain the same. These preliminary results underscore the U.S. government’s ongoing commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices and ensuring a level playing field for all businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Renewal of Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from India Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the final results of its review on the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from India. This decision was taken to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. producers from unfair subsidies given by the Indian government to its manufacturers. Background The original countervailing duty order was put in place on December 6, 2021. The purpose of this order was to protect U.S. producers from subsidized imports that harm domestic businesses. On July 2, 2026, the Department began reviewing whether these duties should continue. Findings The Commerce Department believes that revoking the duty could lead to more subsidized imports from India. This would disadvantage U.S. producers. Therefore, they have decided to maintain the duty. Duties The specific duty rates announced are as follows: Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited will have a duty rate of 2.25%. Companies like Naiks Brass & Iron Works and Suzlon Energy face a much higher rate of 397.70%. Other producers who are not individually listed will face a duty rate of 2.25%. Procedures Followed The Wind Tower Trade Coalition, representing U.S. producers, expressed their interest and participation in the review. They showed their concern over possible continuation of unfair subsidies by the Indian government. The Indian government or any Indian producers did not actively participate in this review process. Hence, the review was conducted fairly quickly. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is committed to protecting American industries. By maintaining these duties, they aim to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. All parties who provided confidential information during the review are reminded to handle such information following the rules laid down by the Department. The full list of topics and further details are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For more information, interested parties can visit the official website for access to the complete documents. This step highlights the ongoing efforts to uphold fair trade practices and support the domestic wind tower industry in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Chinese Metal Pipes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-11-04 The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining trade practices related to light-walled rectangular pipe and tube imports from China. This review aims to ensure fair trading and prevent unfair pricing. Background and Review Period The Department of Commerce started an administrative review of antidumping duties on these metal products from China. This review period is from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. is part of this review. They did not show they could get a separate rate. So, they are part of the larger group of companies from China. Review Rescission The Department is ending its review for 39 companies. These companies did not have subject merchandise entries during the review period. Administrative Proceedings There were delays in the review process because of a government shutdown. The deadlines were extended to accommodate these delays. Scope of the Order The products in question are welded steel pipes and tubes. They are rectangular and have a thin wall. These products are used in construction and other industries. Impact and Future Steps The review determines if companies still meet trade rules. Hangzhou Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. is being reviewed under the China-wide rate, which is 255.07 percent. Public Comments Interested parties can comment on these preliminary results. Comments should be submitted by the given deadline. Refund and Reimbursement Importers must file a certificate about the reimbursement of duties. If they don’t, it could mean they may incur extra charges. Conclusion The investigation helps maintain fair trade and protect U.S. industries. The final results will set new assessment rates and cash deposit requirements to ensure compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On November 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited third sunset review. The focus was on certain magnesia carbon bricks imported from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department determined that revoking the countervailing duty order on these bricks would likely cause the continuation or recurrence of subsidized exports. The decision impacts several companies. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd., and its related companies, were found to have a net countervailable subsidy rate of 3.00 percent. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories and its partner Dalian Mayerton Refractories Co. Ltd., collectively known as Mayerton, were found to have a much higher subsidy rate of 232.63 percent. All other companies have a rate of 3.00 percent. The original countervailing duty order was published in September 2010. It was designed to protect U.S. industry from unfair trade practices. The current review began in July 2026. The Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee showed interest in keeping these protections. The Commerce Department did not receive a response from the Chinese government. The Commerce Department notified the U.S. International Trade Commission about the lack of response. Because of this, an expedited review took place. The product affected is magnesia bricks from China. These bricks are important in many U.S. industries. They are used for their durability and resistance to heat and are favored in steel making. All information on this decision is available publicly. The final results were published under Federal Register Volume 91. The decision is addressed under the act’s relevant sections, including sections 751(c) and 752(b). Companies that are part of this process must return or destroy all proprietary information. This is in line with specific regulations. This action preserves existing protections against unfair trade. It helps maintain a fair market for U.S. producers of magnesia carbon bricks. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Continued Risk of Dumping from Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its sunset reviews on the antidumping duty orders for utility-scale wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain. According to the findings, removing these orders would likely lead to continued or increased selling of wind towers in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Background on the Investigation The antidumping duty orders for wind towers from Spain, India, and Malaysia were initially published in August and December of 2021. These orders aim to prevent foreign manufacturers from selling wind towers at less than fair value, which can harm U.S. industries. In July 2026, the Department of Commerce began its first sunset review of these orders. This is a routine procedure required by the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether dumping would continue if the orders were revoked. Participation and Responses Domestic manufacturers showed strong interest in maintaining the antidumping duties. They submitted timely notices of intent to participate in the review, which were received by the Commerce Department by mid-July 2026. However, no substantive responses were received from any foreign producers or exporters in the implicated countries. Due to the lack of opposition from foreign entities, the Department of Commerce proceeded with expedited reviews. These expedited reviews lasted 120 days. Final Results of the Review The Department has now finalized its findings. It concluded that removing the antidumping duties would likely lead to continued dumping of wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain into the U.S. market. The dumping margins, which indicate how much lower the export prices are compared to fair value, could be as high as: 54.03 percent for India 3.20 percent for Malaysia 73.00 percent for Spain These significant margins underscore the risk of harm to U.S. manufacturers if the orders are revoked. Conclusion This notice serves as an important reminder for all parties subject to these orders. The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to enforcing fair trade practices and will continue to monitor foreign manufacturers closely. This decision reaffirms the Department’s role in protecting domestic industries from unfair competition. The orders will remain in place, continuing to prevent the risk of dumped wind towers affecting the U.S. market. The announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Pricing Issues with Austrian Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement on November 4, 2026. It said that some types of oil country tubular goods from Austria are being sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This announcement is about a study that covered the period from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. The investigation looked at how these goods were sold between Austria and the U.S. These goods are used in the oil and gas industry. Details of the Investigation The specific goods investigated are hollow steel products used in the oil and gas industry. These products include oil well casing and tubing. The investigation is focused on whether these goods are being sold at less-than-fair value, which means at a price lower than in Austria or at a cost to make them. Comments and Changes There were comments from other interested groups about the scope of this investigation. Some parties asked if certain kinds of pipes should not be included in the investigation. These types include mechanical pipes used for oilfield tools and perforating guns. Commerce has clarified that these types of pipes are not included in the investigation. This decision follows an earlier ruling about similar goods from other countries. Methodology Used The Commerce Department used specific methods to determine the price differences. The department calculated prices that are normal for such goods and compared them to prices in the U.S. If there is a difference, it means the goods are being sold for less than their fair value. Effects on Other Companies Apart from voestalpine Tubulars GmbH & Co. KG, which is a specific company in Austria, any other companies will have to follow this same rule. The cash deposit rate for these goods sold in the U.S. from this company will be 47.21%. Next Steps The department will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission about this preliminary finding. If the final decision is also affirmative, meaning the goods are still found to be sold for less than they should, the commission will make a ruling about whether this practice harms U.S. businesses. A final decision is expected no later than 135 days after this initial announcement. There will be more discussions and possibilities for other interested parties to comment before this final decision is made. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken these steps to ensure fair trading practices. This helps to protect U.S. manufacturers and ensure fair competition in the market. The investigation remains ongoing, and the final decision is awaited in the coming months. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Finds Oil Country Tubular Goods From Taiwan Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination regarding the sale of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Taiwan. The department has found that these products are being sold in the United States at prices lower than their fair value. This determination is in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The investigation looked at sales from April 1, 2025, through March 31, 2026. The purpose of the investigation was to determine if these goods were sold at less than fair value, also known as dumping. If dumping is found, it can cause harm to industries in the United States by undercutting prices of domestically produced goods. Based on its findings, the Department of Commerce has determined that producers from Taiwan, specifically Shin Yang Steel Co. Ltd. and Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd., have sold OCTGs in the U.S. at price differences of 51.19% and 54.74%, respectively. Other exporters and producers from Taiwan face an average dumping margin of 52.43%. Because of the preliminary positive finding, the Department of Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of certain OCTG entries from Taiwan. This means that these goods cannot be sold or withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption until further notice. The Department of Commerce will require a cash deposit equal to these margins on entries made on or after November 4, 2026. This cash deposit ensures that if the final investigation confirms dumping, sufficient funds will have been set aside to cover any duties that may be imposed. Companies involved in the trade of OCTGs, industry stakeholders, and other interested parties have been invited to comment on the preliminary determination. Comments concerning the scope of the investigation are due 30 days after the preliminary determination, with rebuttal briefs submitted five days after case briefs. The Department of Commerce intends to release its final determination after additional analysis and a verification process. Interested parties can also request a hearing regarding this investigation, should they desire to present their views in more detail. The department’s actions aim to protect the U.S. industries from unfair trade practices and ensure a level playing field for domestic producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Tubular Goods from UAE Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain oil country tubular goods, also known as OCTG, from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Officials from the department have found that these goods are being sold at prices lower than fair market value in the United States. The investigation considered sales during the period from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. According to the Department of Commerce, products like oil well casing and tubing from the UAE are being sold at prices that hurt U.S. businesses. These are hollow steel products used mainly in drilling and are made from both carbon and alloy steel. Two companies named in the investigation, Universal Tube Industries FZE and Ajmal Steel Tubes and Pipes Industries, LLC, have not been selling at fair prices. Ajmal Steel Tubes and Pipes Industries, LLC are reported to have a dumping margin of 68.88%, and the combined entity of Universal Tube and THL Pipe and Tube Industries LLC has a dumping margin of 61.45%. As per the law, the government can ask for cash deposits to balance this unfair price advantage. The companies mentioned will now need to pay a deposit equal to these margins on new imports to the U.S. All other companies from the UAE exporting similar products to the U.S. will face an average deposit rate of 68.23%. This measure is in place to prevent harm to the U.S. industry and ensure fair competition in the market. There will be a time for public comments and further investigation. A final decision is expected in about 75 days. The outcome will guide whether these measures become permanent. This ruling shows how the U.S. is making efforts to protect its industries from unfair international trade practices. Interested individuals or parties wanting to participate in the process can submit their views on the investigation. Decisions like this aim to sustain fair market conditions for manufacturers and companies in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

NAFTA Panel Decision Leads to Changes in US-Canada Softwood Lumber Duties Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat announced a major decision. The decision came from the NAFTA Binational Panel concerning the U.S. Department of Commerce’s countervailing duty (CVD) on certain softwood lumber products from Canada. This panel’s final judgment was not in harmony with the Department of Commerce’s original decision. In November 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce had set certain duty rates on lumber from Canada. This decision was challenged, and the case was reviewed multiple times by the NAFTA Binational Panel. As of October 5, 2026, the panel affirmed Commerce’s Second Remand Determination. This led to a Notice of Final Panel Action issued on October 19, 2026. As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce has amended its final determination. The countervailing subsidy rates for Canadian companies Canfor Corporation, J.D. Irving, Resolute FP Canada Inc., Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd., West Fraser Mills Ltd., and all other companies have been adjusted. The new subsidy rates for these companies are: Canfor Corporation: reduced from 13.24% to 12.49% J.D. Irving Limited: reduced from 3.34% to 2.96% Resolute FP Canada Inc.: reduced from 14.70% to 13.90% Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd.: reduced from 14.85% to 11.01% West Fraser Mills Ltd.: reduced from 17.99% to 16.73% All other producers and exporters: reduced from 14.19% to 12.80% For companies with updated cash deposit rates from previous reviews, these changes won’t alter the current deposit rates. However, for other companies without updated rates, new instructions will be issued to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice was officially released and published on October 28, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The decision is important for trade between the U.S. and Canada, especially in the lumber industry. This adjustment of rates could impact the market and trade relations moving forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Phosphate Fertilizer Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the countervailing duty order on phosphate fertilizers from Morocco. The findings were published on November 3, 2026, in the Federal Register. Background: In 2021, the Commerce Department issued a countervailing duty (CVD) order on phosphate fertilizers from Morocco. This was to counter subsidies provided by the Moroccan government to their producers. On March 2, 2026, the Commerce Department began the first sunset review of this order. Sunset reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether duties should continue or be revoked. Review Process: Domestic U.S. companies, like the Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, participated in this review. They argued that subsidies from Morocco should continue to be offset by duties. The Moroccan government and its company, OCP S.A., also took part. They stated that changes in the subsidy programs meant the duties should end. Findings: The Commerce Department’s final decision was that revoking the duties would likely lead to the continuation of unfair benefits for Moroccan producers. Both OCP S.A. and other Moroccan exporters were found to receive countervailable subsidies at a rate of 20.04%. This rate means that subsidies worth 20.04% of the value of the fertilizers would be offset by duties. Conclusion: The Commerce Department’s ruling indicates the continuation of duties on Moroccan phosphate fertilizers. These duties help ensure fair competition for U.S. producers. The ruling highlights the ongoing balance between international trade and domestic industry protection. Businesses involved, including OCP S.A. and U.S. companies like Mosaic and Simplot, will continue to monitor and respond to these regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a five-year review. This is called a “Sunset Review.” It happens automatically for certain trade rules. The rules relate to antidumping and countervailing duties. Antidumping and countervailing duties are special taxes. They are used to protect U.S. businesses. These taxes are on goods from other countries that are sold at unfairly low prices or that get government help. The review is important. It helps decide if these special taxes should continue. The review started on November 2, 2026. Trade Rules Under Review The review covers specific products. They include goods from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. From China: Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies face both antidumping and countervailing duties. Potassium Permanganate has antidumping duties. From Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Polyester Textured Yarn faces antidumping duties. These reviews are the first review for Mobile Access Equipment and Polyester Textured Yarn. Potassium Permanganate is in its sixth review. Participation in the Review Businesses and people who want to be part of the review need to act fast. They must say they want to join within 15 days. They need to file a notice to show their intention. For those who file, a full response is required in 30 days. It is very important to follow all rules when submitting information. All information must be complete and correct. Electronic Submissions Required All documents must be submitted electronically. This is done using a special system. It’s called ACCESS. All documents need to be in by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Executive Summaries Needed The Department wants a summary at the start of documents. Each summary should be no longer than 450 words. These summaries help in creating an official decision document. What’s Next? This initiation notice keeps the process open and transparent. The review follows specific laws, such as Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed off on these details. This check is to see if the trade rules are still needed. It ensures fair competition for U.S. companies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Korean Power Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its official review on large power transformers imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covered the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Two key companies were evaluated: HD Hyundai Electric Co., Ltd. and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd. These companies were chosen as the main focus of this review due to requests from interested parties. The investigation aimed to determine if these companies sold transformers to the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value, which is known as dumping. Upon review, the Department of Commerce found that both Hyundai and Iljin did not engage in dumping during the reviewed period. Their sales were not below the normal value, resulting in an estimated dumping margin of zero percent. Other companies involved in the transformer market, such as LS Electric Co., Ltd. and Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation, were also reviewed indirectly. Since Hyundai and Iljin had zero percent margins, the Department applied a previously determined margin of 4.32 percent to these non-selected companies. This whole process is part of the Department’s actions to ensure fair trade practices and to protect the U.S. industry from unfair competition due to dumping. It is based on the U.S. Tariff Act which allows regular assessments and adjustments to duties imposed on imported goods. The findings and preliminary results are open for comments from interested parties. These parties have the right to submit their feedback for further consideration before the final decision. The decision and further details about this review are publicly accessible. Such transparency helps maintain fairness and accountability in international trade dealings. The final results, which will take into account any comments or additional insights, will determine the duties that need to be adjusted or maintained. This includes what importers will need to pay when bringing in power transformers from Korea. As the review process continues, there may be a public hearing if requested. The Department is committed to following all legal procedures and ensures that all findings are carefully analyzed and verified. Finally, these actions underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and enforcement in trade practices to safeguard domestic industries while facilitating fair global trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Requests Reviews on Trade Duties Estimated reading time: 5–9 minutes November 2, 2026 Today, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced an opportunity for interested parties to request an administrative review of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders, findings, or suspended investigations. This would occur during the anniversary month of the publication of an order. The notice was published in Volume 91, Number 210 of the Federal Register. The Department of Commerce manages these trade orders through the International Trade Administration. They focus on enforcement and compliance, ensuring fair trade practices. What Are Antidumping and Countervailing Duties? Antidumping duties are extra tariffs on foreign imports believed to be priced below fair market value. Countervailing duties are tariffs imposed on subsidized imports, which harm domestic industries. Who Can Request a Review? An interested party is someone affected by these duties or investigations. Examples include domestic producers, exporters, or government agencies. They can request a review following specific guidelines. How Are Companies Reviewed? If multiple companies are involved, Commerce may limit the number examined. They use data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection to select respondents. Decisions are usually made within 35 days after announcing a review. Respondent Selection Details Generally, determinations about collapsing (treating multiple companies as a single entity) require detailed information. Companies previously collapsed in other segments might remain so. Detailed collapse history must be submitted if relevant. Key Deadlines Requests to review must be submitted by the end of November. Withdrawal of review requests is allowed within 90 days of the publication notice. Market Situation Allegations Under the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, a “particular market situation” (PMS) can affect constructed value. Allegations can be submitted if market conditions do not reflect ordinary trade. Parties must submit PMS allegations within 20 days of initial Section D responses. Annual Inquiry Service List Commerce keeps an annual service list for each order. New entries of appearance are required to be added to the updated list for the next year. Petitioners and foreign governments will remain on the list automatically after their first entry. Special Instructions for Petitioners and Foreign Governments Petitioners and foreign governments are automatically placed on the inquiry list each year after their initial request. They must update their details as necessary. This notice shows the Commerce Department’s efforts to ensure fair trade and involves many complex legal processes. Interested parties are encouraged to understand these procedures fully and meet all necessary deadlines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Changes Steel Duty Case Involving Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a big decision about steel from Mexico. The court’s decision has changed how the U.S. Department of Commerce looked at steel products from Mexico. This case is about certain steel products that are resistant to rust, known as corrosion-resistant steel. The court’s judgment is about an earlier decision that the Commerce Department made. The period they looked at was from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The company involved is Galvasid S.A. De C.V., a steel producer from Mexico. The court said the Department of Commerce needs to change the earlier decision it made about Galvasid’s steel. The court told Commerce that it made mistakes in how it calculated fees, called dumping margins, for Galvasid and other steel producers. The Commerce Department had earlier applied some rules wrongly to Galvasid. They used the wrong methods to determine how much extra charge should be put on Galvasid’s steel. The court has now told them to make corrections. On September 22, 2026, Commerce fixed these mistakes after the court asked them to take another look. They changed how they worked out Galvasid’s selling price. They found out they shouldn’t have added extra charges for things like transporting steel. Now, the new finalized rates for how much extra charge will be applied are set. For Galvasid, this extra charge is now 14.54%. For all other producers, it is set at 14.29%. The Commerce Department will now tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use these new charges. The changes will start on October 29, 2026. This case shows the steps taken when deciding on duties for importing goods, like steel, by respecting court decisions. The decision from the court helps ensure that fees are applied fairly. Decisions like this help keep trade fair between countries. They also help make sure companies follow the rules. The Commerce Department’s announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, who is the acting deputy assistant secretary for antidumping operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Error in Truck Bed Covers Trade Case with China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On November 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a change in an important trade investigation. This investigation is about truck bed covers imported from China. Officials found mistakes that needed to be fixed. Background Earlier, on October 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared their initial findings. They found that truck bed covers from China were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. But a company named Ningbo Scarman said there were errors in these findings. What Changed Ningbo Scarman pointed out that there was an error in how the trade officials calculated their costs. The mistake was about which company made and sold the covers. Because of this, the Department of Commerce changed their earlier decision. Details of the Correction The officials noticed that they listed the wrong company when figuring out the costs. They meant to talk about Ningbo Scarman and its related company, Ningbo Auto Parts. This correction means lower penalties for this group than before. Impact of the Change Now, if Ningbo Scarman or Ningbo Auto Parts bring truck bed covers to the U.S., they will pay fewer tariffs. The new tariff rate is 49.38%. This change took effect back on October 1, 2026, so any extra money they paid since then will be returned. Conclusion The correction shows how important it is for trade investigations to have the right details. The Department of Commerce has fixed the mistake and has told everyone about the correct charges. This ensures fair treatment in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from Malaysia. This decision means that Malaysia will continue to face certain subsidies when exporting these wind towers to the U.S. The countervailing duty was first put in place on August 4, 2021. The Department of Commerce started a review of this duty on July 2, 2026. The law requires them to do these reviews every five years to check if the duty is still needed. The decision to keep the duty came after a review process. The Domestic Interested Party, which is a group of U.S. producers, participated in this review. They argued that ending the duty could lead to continued or increased subsidies from Malaysia. The government of Malaysia and other interested parties did not take part in this review. Because of this, the review process was faster and only took 120 days. The review found that ending the duties could allow Malaysian wind towers to continue getting subsidies. This could hurt U.S. producers. The wind towers from Malaysia affected are large structures used for harnessing wind power. They must meet specific size and production criteria to be covered by the duty. The Department of Commerce found that ending the order would likely let subsidies continue at a rate of 6.43 percent for CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd and others. This announcement serves as a reminder to those under an administrative protective order to handle documents properly. They must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. These final results are published in accordance with U.S. trade laws and regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Duties on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On October 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update. They have decided to continue with the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain non-refillable steel cylinders from China. This decision was made because removing these orders might hurt the U.S. industry. In May 2021, the U.S. started imposing duties on non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The reason was to prevent unfair competition due to lower prices and subsidies given by the Chinese government. Earlier this year, in April 2026, a review of these orders began. Both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission looked into the matter. They studied if lifting these duties would lead to unfair practices again. Their answer was yes. Without the orders, there might be more dumping, subsidies, and harm to U.S. businesses. The orders cover specific types of steel cylinders. These cylinders are used in many places. They range in size and might be imported with or without valves. It’s important to note that seamless cylinders are not included in these orders. For those importing these cylinders, there are rules. Importers will still need to pay duties when bringing them into the U.S. The orders officially continue from October 14, 2026. Periodic reviews will keep checking if these duties should remain. Businesses that deal with these cylinders need to remain aware. It’s crucial to follow all the rules and ensure they are on top of any changes. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission are focused on protecting local businesses from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Rescinds Review of Antidumping Duty on Frozen Shrimp from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to rescind the review of the antidumping duty order on frozen shrimp from China. This decision was announced on October 29, 2026. The review covered the period from February 1, 2025, to January 31, 2026. Important Details The antidumping duty (AD) order was first published on February 1, 2005. This order means that shrimp from China was being sold at a price lower than its regular value. The order aimed to make sure the prices were fair. In March 2026, the Department of Commerce started a review as usual. This review would check to see if the Chinese shrimp was being sold at low prices again. However, in April 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shared data showing there were no new entries of shrimp from China during the review period. All companies involved also did not show any activity. Review Process The review is a process where officials check if any shrimp came in at unfair prices. If no shrimp came in, there is no need for a review. Since no entries were recorded from Chinese companies, the Department of Commerce decided to stop the review. Impact Because the review found no wrongdoing, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to assess duties at the rate previously set. This means nothing changes from before the review started. The main goal is to ensure prices remain fair. Next Steps If there were any duties unpaid, Customs will take care of it according to the rules. They will assess duties based on the original rates. Legal Duties The document reminds the people involved about their legal duties to handle any sensitive information properly. They must destroy or return any information shared under protection according to the law. Conclusion This announcement was made by Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton. The government has a list of all companies involved in the review, which includes many exporters from China. The decision shows the U.S. is closely monitoring trade practices to ensure fairness in the market. The elimination of unfair pricing helps maintain a level field for all countries and companies trading with the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Softwood Lumber Subsidies Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public comments about subsidies. These subsidies are given by some countries that send softwood lumber to the United States. The time for these subsidies is from January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. The Softwood Lumber Act of 2008 says that the Secretary of Commerce must report to Congress every 180 days. This report is about any subsidies for softwood lumber that other countries send to the U.S. The last report was sent on June 30, 2026. The countries that sent the most softwood lumber to the U.S. from January to June 2026 are Brazil, Canada, Germany, and Sweden. These countries sent enough lumber to make up at least one percent of all imports to the U.S. The Commerce Department will use these same time periods to choose countries for future reports. For example, the next report will be about lumber imports from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. According to U.S. trade law, a subsidy is when a government helps with money or gives support that affects prices. The subsidy can also happen if a government asks someone else to give money or support. If you want to comment, you must include four pieces of information. First, the name of the country that gave the subsidy. Second, the name of the subsidy program. Third, a short description of the program in 3-4 sentences. Fourth, the name of the government body that gave the subsidy. All comments must be sent by November 30, 2026. Comments should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. This ensures your comments are considered for the report. For more details, you can contact Brendan Santschi at the U.S. Department of Commerce. You can call him at (202) 482-4141. Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed the notice on October 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Countervailing Duties on Aluminum Sheets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the cancellation of a review. This review was about countervailing duties on aluminum sheets from China. Commerce started the review because some people asked for it. They wanted to look at certain companies: Alcha International, Jiangsu Alcha, Yantai Jintai, and Yinbang. These reviews help check if higher taxes, called duties, are paid on goods from other countries. The government does this to protect U.S. companies from unfair prices. Commerce found that Alcha International and Jiangsu Alcha didn’t have any shipments during the time they were looking at. Without shipments, there is nothing to review. Yantai Jintai asked to stop its review. The petitioner, who wanted the review for Yinbang, also decided to cancel their request. Because there are no more reviews needed, the government is stopping the entire review. No changes will be made to current duty rates. The department will tell Customs to keep duties as they are, and no changes will be made. Everyone who asked for a review will need to follow rules for sending back or destroying private information. This notice was signed on October 19, 2026, by Scot Fullerton from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Steel Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on standard steel welded wire mesh imported from Mexico. This decision comes after careful investigation and a series of reviews. On September 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made its final determination about these orders. Both the Department of Commerce and the ITC agreed that canceling them would likely lead to the continuation of unfair pricing practices and subsidies. It could also result in harm to U.S. industries focused on making similar products. The orders first came into effect on April 12 and August 9, 2021. They were set up to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling products at unfairly low prices or receiving unfair support from foreign governments. The wire mesh in question is made of smooth or deformed wire. It is used in making concrete and is made by welding wires together in square or rectangular grids. These grids have specific sizes for their wires and spacings. The ITC found that if these orders were canceled, Mexico might continue its past unfair practices. This could hurt American companies by putting them at an unfair disadvantage in the marketplace. Therefore, wire mesh from Mexico will keep having duties added to it. This means that companies will need to pay extra fees when they bring the product into the United States. The aim of these fees is to make market conditions fair. The Department of Commerce plans to check on these orders again in five years. They will make sure the extra fees are still needed to keep the market fair for U.S. producers. The ongoing duties will be in effect starting September 23, 2026. This decision ensures that U.S. companies can compete on a more level playing field with foreign manufacturers. Commerce has reminded all parties involved about the rules to protect private information during these proceedings. This rules-making process is essential to maintaining professional and lawful oversight of trade practices. In summary, the continuation of these orders is part of the U.S. government’s effort to support fair trade and protect local industries from unfair competition due to dumping and improper subsidies by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review on Carbon Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an important review of heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Mexico. This is officially known as a “Changed Circumstances Review” or CCR. The review involves Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (PLM), which was earlier known as Perfiles y Herrajes LM, S.A. de C.V. (PyH). On October 26, 2026, the Department of Commerce began this review to decide if PLM is the same as PyH. This is important for setting the right taxes that need to be paid when these steel products are sold in the U.S. This needs to be done according to certain rules in trade laws. PLM told the Department that it changed its name back in July 2017. This change in name did not come with major shifts in how the company is run or how it does business. In the beginning, the Department of Commerce wanted more information before starting the review. PLM answered all their questions in time. Now, after looking at this, the Department thinks that PLM is pretty much the same company as PyH in terms of how it operates. The Department will use several factors to decide this, like checking if there has been any major change in management, who owns the company, where products are made, who supplies materials, and who buys these products. After a preliminary check, none of these factors seem to have changed much. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They have to send responses by a set time after the notice publication. The Department will review all comments before making the final decision. Overall, the Department of Commerce wants to make sure that the right rules and taxes are followed when these steel products are brought into the U.S. From what has been seen so far, it looks like PLM works similarly to how PyH did before the name change, so it will likely be treated the same. This case shows how carefully the U.S. checks and manages trade, making sure that companies follow the rules. The result of this review will be finalized soon. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Spanish Steel Wire Strand Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. The focus was specifically on sales made by Global Special Steel Products S.A.U., also known as Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. The time period for the review of these sales was from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce concluded that the wire strand from Spain was sold at less than its normal value. This means the price at which it was sold was lower than expected. These findings were made as part of an administrative review. The review process included looking at sales numbers and comparing them to standard prices. The results of the review showed that the dumping margin is 13.57 percent. This is the amount by which the prices were lower than normal. TYCSA, the company responsible for these sales, was found to have this specific margin. There were discussions and decisions made about the case. TYCSA and some other companies discussed these results through case briefs and rebuttals. However, the Department of Commerce found no reason to change the previously calculated rates. As a result of these findings, duties will be assessed on the subject merchandise. This means there will be additional costs for importing these products into the U.S. based on the final review results, with new rates applied starting from October 26, 2026. All parties involved have responsibilities to ensure their practices align with these findings. They have to file certificates to confirm that no unlawful reimbursement of duties took place. The release of this information marks the completion of the Department’s review process, and instructions for applying these duties have been issued accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Review on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of duties on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 from India. This review focused on Navpad Pigments Private Limited for the year 2023. The review was part of a larger order that examines countervailing duties, which are charges placed on imports to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments. During the review period, Navpad Pigments Private Limited received a subsidy rate of 2.81%. This means that the U.S. charges this percentage as a duty on imports of the pigment from this company. The Department follows strict legal guidelines to ensure fair trade practices. The Department also decided to stop the review for another company, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited. This decision was made because there were no recorded shipments from this company during the review period. Without any shipments, there is no need to review or change the duties. After the review, the Department plans to release more detailed instructions to U.S. Customs. These instructions will help set the exact duties for products coming into the country. They also plan to issue new rules for cash deposits on future imports. The Department ensures transparency by disclosing the calculations and methodologies. This process includes a public memorandum available to interested parties. The Department reminds importers of their duty to file certificates. These certificates help track reimbursement of duties to maintain fair trading practices. Overall, this review helps ensure that trade remains fair for U.S. businesses by adjusting duties on subsidized imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Continued Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain small vertical shaft engines from China. This decision comes after findings that removing these orders could lead to further dumping, subsidies, and harm to industries in the United States. Background Information The orders originally began on May 4, 2021. Commerce started reviewing these orders again on April 1, 2026. They found that stopping the orders would likely allow unfair pricing and financial aid problems to continue. Because of this, the Commerce Department decided to keep the orders active. Details on the Engines The engines involved are small vertical shaft engines. These engines have a power capacity between 99cc and 225cc. They are usually used in machines like lawn mowers and pressure washers. These engines work with a particular kind of spark ignition and are non-road, meaning they are used outside. The engines usually have to follow certain environmental rules by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If engines do not meet the EPA standards, they are not always left out of these orders. The covered engines might come with or without being mounted on machines. If an engine from China is attached to a machine, only the engine is part of the order. Unfinished engines with key parts are also included. Certain bigger, heavy-duty engines are not part of these orders. These heavier engines have specific parts that lighter engines do not have. Conclusion The antidumping and countervailing duties will remain in place, starting again on October 20, 2026. This notice means U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports. These duties aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this last determination. Scot Fullerton, the acting deputy assistant secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed this continuation notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Maintains Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2-4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that certain duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from five countries will continue. These countries are India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Türkiye, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Ukraine. This decision follows findings from both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). According to a recent notice, revoking the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders could lead to more dumping and harmful subsidies. These actions would likely hurt an industry in the United States. So, the Commerce Department has decided to keep these AD and CVD orders in place. The notice is effective starting on September 29, 2026. The orders show a commitment by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. Yang Jin Chun from the International Trade Administration is the contact person for any questions. You can reach Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760. OCTG are hollow steel products used in the oil industry. The orders cover different types of OCTG products from these countries. These include both welded and seamless products. The scope details specific steel products by categorizing them with codes from the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). These codes help in identifying the products for customs purposes. Products high in chromium, drill pipes, and certain other items are not covered by these orders. U.S. Customs will keep collecting duties at existing rates on subject imports to ensure compliance. The decision to continue these duties is part of a five-year review process. The Commerce Department assesses whether ending these orders would harm U.S. industries. The effective date ties back to the ITC’s final determination. Commerce acts on reminding parties about their responsibilities under an administrative protective order (APO). Compliance with APO rules is mandatory, and failure to do so may result in sanctions. This announcement is a part of ongoing efforts by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from what they consider unfair trade practices. The decision ensures protection provided by the AD and CVD orders will stay in effect going forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Pipes from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has completed its review of welded stainless pressure pipes from India. The review examined the sales between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce, tasked with enforcing fair trade practices, found that Suncity Metals and Tubes Private Limited, a key exporter from India, sold these pipes at less than normal value. This means they were sold cheaper than expected, which can be harmful to U.S. businesses. The Department set a new dumping margin of 0.74 percent. This is an important number. If a product has a high dumping margin, it might be subject to more tariffs or duties to even out the competitive landscape between countries. The Department extended the deadline for this review by 43 days. This allowed them to make sure their review was thorough and fair. Changes were made based on comments from Suncity, ensuring that the final results are accurate. The Department will disclose its calculations to the public within five days. This helps maintain transparency. New assessment rates will be applied. These are rules on how much duty should be levied on these pipes from India. Importers will get new instructions soon. The Department emphasizes the importance of certificates that prevent the reimbursement of duties. Importers who don’t comply may face penalties. This conclusion from the Department of Commerce aims to balance trade practices. The ultimate goal is to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair pricing tactics. The decision will affect deposits and duties as per the new rates. These new rates start from the publication of the review results. Overall, it’s a reminder of the importance of complying with international trade rules. The department’s decision is a win for those advocating for fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Antidumping Duty Orders for Dioctyl Terephthalate from Multiple Countries Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to a previous notice about antidumping duties on dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP). This chemical material comes from Malaysia, Poland, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye. These antidumping duties are part of an effort to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition due to lower-priced foreign goods. On May 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce issued an error in their notice. This error was related to the dates mentioned for terminating certain temporary measures. There was a mistake in stating the end dates for temporary measures and when the suspension of liquidation ended. The document said that the period started on May 4, 2025. However, the correct end date for these temporary measures was actually May 3, 2025. Furthermore, the suspension of liquidation, which means not finalizing entries, should have ended on May 4, 2025. This is one day earlier than what was initially stated. Stakeholders and interested parties should take note of these corrections. The change has legal importance for businesses involved in the import and export of DOTP. Companies should make sure to use these corrected dates in their records and calculations. This information was released officially in the Federal Register under the notice number FR Doc 2026-21457. The correction is a reminder of how important small details can be in legal and trade matters. The person responsible at the Department of Commerce for questions is Dennis McClure. He can be reached at (202) 482-5973. The government remains open to communication and adjustments in trade compliance to ensure accuracy. This correction notice ensures that all processes are aligned and fair, maintaining clear trade rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Chinese Diamond Sawblades Over Evasion Claims Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation about diamond sawblades coming from China. This investigation is to check if some companies are trying to avoid paying extra taxes when importing these sawblades into the United States. Background The investigation began after U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) received a complaint. The complaint said a company, Dymatec USA, LLC, might be pretending that their sawblades are made in the United Kingdom. This would allow them to dodge taxes put on Chinese goods. What Commerce Will Do The Department of Commerce wants to find out if diamond sawblades made from parts that come from China are being snuck into the U.S. to avoid taxes. They are especially looking at sawblades made in three different ways: Both the core and segments come from China and are put together in the UK. The core comes from China, but the segments do not. They are put together in the UK. The segments come from China, but the core does not. They are put together in the UK. How It Will Work The Commerce Department will allow people and companies to send in their comments and give extra information over the next few weeks. They will check these comments and might even send out questions to gather more facts. After going through all the information, the Department will decide if these sawblades are breaking the rules. They plan to finish this by February 2027. Next Steps If the Department finds out that companies are avoiding taxes, they will tell the Customs office. They will also decide how to handle the taxes on these imports moving forward. Conclusion This investigation is important to make sure everyone follows the rules about importing goods. It helps keep trade fair and makes sure taxes are paid correctly on goods coming into the U.S. For now, people interested in this topic can send in their thoughts and follow the updates from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results on Countervailing Duties for Canadian Softwood Lumber Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the countervailing duty administrative review on softwood lumber products from Canada. This review covered the period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Targeted Products: The review focused on certain softwood lumber products that are imported from Canada. These products are said to have received government subsidies, which may affect fair trade practices. Key Findings: Subsidies Identified: It was determined that Canadian producers and exporters of softwood lumber received countervailable subsidies during the review period. These subsidies are financial contributions from the government that provide a benefit to companies. Specific Company Rates: Resolute FP Canada Inc. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 12.42 percent. West Fraser Mills Ltd. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 15.31 percent. Other non-selected companies were assigned a weighted average subsidy rate of 14.11 percent. Methodology Used: The research followed the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. Each subsidy program was checked to determine if it was specific and beneficial. Changes and Calculations: Changes were made to certain companies’ calculations after analyzing comments received from interested parties. These changes were reflected in the final subsidy rates. Impact on Companies: For companies not individually reviewed, a rate was based on the average of the evaluated companies. 215 non-selected companies are listed to receive the average rate. Cash Deposit Requirements: Upon publication of these final results, the Department of Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits based on the final subsidy rates. These deposits will be required for future shipments of the identified softwood lumber products from Canada. Conclusion: The final results aim to ensure a fair competitive environment by offsetting the subsidized benefits received by Canadian companies. The U.S. remains committed to enforcing trade rules and maintaining a level playing field for American businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Colombian Citric Acid Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes About the Review The review is about citric acid and some citric salts from Colombia. It covers sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department found that Sucroal S.A. sold their products at lower prices than expected. Important Dates The results were shared on October 19, 2026. People interested can comment on these results. Contact Information For questions, contact Charles Doss at the U.S. Department of Commerce. His phone number is (202) 482-4474. What is Being Reviewed? The review looks at citric acid products from Colombia. Citric acid is used in food, drinks, and cleaning products. How is the Review Done? The review checks the prices and values using certain U.S. laws. This includes the Tariff Act of 1930. Preliminary Findings The review found Sucroal S.A. sold its products at prices 3.25% lower than expected. More Information The detailed review is available online. It is called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. It can be found at the website https://access.trade.gov/frnotices. Sharing of Information The results are explained in detail to the interested parties. This will happen within five days of the announcement. Fact Checking A group of companies asked to check if the review information is correct. They looked into it in July 2026. Public Comments The public can send in their thoughts about the review. They have 21 days from the announcement to do so. There is also a chance for people to speak at a hearing if they request it. Tax Rules The review will affect how much tax is paid when these products enter the United States. The exact amount will be decided after the final review. Next Steps Cash deposit rules will change based on the final review findings. These rules will affect how Sucroal S.A and other companies handle money when importing goods. Final Reminder Importers are reminded to follow the rules about paying duties. They must file a certificate showing they paid the right amount of duties. This reminder is important to avoid paying twice. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce continues its efforts to ensure fair business practices in international trade. This detailed review will be finalized soon. Interested parties should keep an eye on further updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Italian Steel Blocks Priced Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the results of its 2024 review on the sale of forged steel fluid end blocks imported from Italy. The review found that certain Italian producers and exporters sold these steel blocks at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold the blocks for much lower prices in the U.S. compared to their usual costs. The review, conducted by the International Trade Administration within the Department, covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department confirmed that companies like Lucchini Mamé Forge S.p.A., Lucchini Industries S.r.l., and Lucchini RS S.p.A. were involved. These companies have been assigned a dumping margin of 58.48 percent, which is based on adverse facts available. This means the Department used special methods to determine prices because they did not provide necessary information. As a result, these companies will have to pay duties at these rates on their steel blocks imported to the U.S. from Italy. These duties will be collected by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The cash deposit rate for future imports of these steel blocks will also be adjusted according to these final results. The Commerce Department will issue assessment instructions to the Customs and Border Protection to enforce these duties. They anticipate sharing these instructions 35 days after this review’s publication. For imports during the review period, where the producers were unaware the blocks were destined for the U.S., the Department will apply a 7.33 percent duty rate. This rate is used when neither the producer nor an exporter involved had a specific rate decided in this review. These actions are part of the U.S. government’s ongoing efforts to protect domestic industries and ensure fair trade practices. The final results of the administrative review have been published and are available through the Department of Commerce’s designated platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Results in Review of Indian PET Film Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced important preliminary findings regarding the trade of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covered the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Key Findings: The U.S. Department of Commerce found that certain producers from India sold PET film at prices below the normal value. This means they sold it for less than what it costs to make and sell in their home market. However, the review will not continue for some companies because the request for their review was withdrawn. Companies Involved: Commerce started a review of several companies, but later many were removed from the review because requests to review them were canceled. Here are the details: Companies removed from the review: Cosmo First Ltd. India, Chiripal Poly Films Limited, Ester Industries Ltd., Garware Hi-Tech Films, JPFL Films Private Limited, Polyplex Corporation Ltd., Vacmet India Limited. The review will continue only for SRF Limited. What Happens Next: Commerce examines trade practices to ensure fair competition. If companies sell goods too cheaply, they might hurt U.S. industries. Commerce checks to see if any company breaks these rules. For SRF Limited, they found a dumping margin of 0.61 percent. This number shows how much the prices were below normal value. Procedures and Deadlines: Interested parties have until 21 days after October 19, 2026, to submit written comments or case briefs. They can also submit rebuttal briefs five days after that. If anyone wants a hearing, they must request it within 30 days after the notice. Final Results: Commerce plans to make a final decision within 120 days after the notice was published. Based on the findings, companies might have to pay extra duties on their goods to make up for selling at lower prices. These results are essential as they help keep trade fair and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing overseas. Let’s wait for the final results, which will give a clear picture of what actions will be taken to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Postpones Final Decision on Chinese Graphite Electrodes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to delay its final decision concerning large diameter graphite electrodes from China. Initially, this decision was supposed to be concluded earlier, but now it will be postponed to February 12, 2027. The delay involves an ongoing investigation about selling these electrodes at less-than-fair-value, often called a LTFV situation. This means that the products might be sold for less in the United States than in the home market of China, which can be unfair to local businesses. The investigation started on March 20, 2026. It covers the period from July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A preliminary report was already published on September 30, 2026, which showed that the sales were indeed happening at less-than-fair-value. Jiangsu Jianglong New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a key player in this investigation. They are the main company involved from China. On October 6, 2026, they asked for more time for the final decision. They wanted the deadline pushed back, and also requested to extend provisional measures, which are temporary rules applied during investigations. The Department agreed to this request after checking three things. First, they looked at whether the preliminary findings were positive, meaning they found enough evidence to continue. Second, they ensured that Jiangsu Jianglong accounted for a significant part of the exports involved. Third, there was no strong reason to reject the request. Because of this, provisional measures in place will now last up to six months instead of four. This means temporary rules applied to stabilize the market will continue until the final decision. The Department of Commerce made this announcement on October 9, 2026. It was done by Scot Fullerton, who is the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The information can be found in the Federal Register, a daily record of government activities. This decision is crucial as it affects trade relations between the United States and China. Businesses that use these electrodes in America are watching closely, as the final decision will influence prices and availability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Chinese Truck Bed Covers Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination on countervailing duties for truck bed covers from China. This decision was reported in the Federal Register on October 19, 2026, Volume 91, Issue 200. Investigation and Findings The investigation looked into whether producers and exporters of truck bed covers from China received unfair subsidies. The period of investigation covered January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. The Department found that countervailable subsidies were indeed being provided. This determination is crucial for ensuring fair trade practices are followed. Companies Involved The investigation targeted several companies. Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd., were specifically examined. The investigation also looked into other companies that didn’t respond to questionnaires. Methodology The Department followed sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, applying facts where necessary. They used adverse inference in certain cases where companies did not cooperate. For the two main companies, specific financial contributions by authorities were found to provide benefits, which were deemed countervailable. Rates Determined The Department determined subsidy rates. Changzhou Sunwood International received a rate of 77.17%, and Hangzhou Golden Son Auto Parts received a rate of 11.60%. An adverse facts available rate of 142.11% was applied to various other companies. An all-others rate of 43.43% was also established. Next Steps and Actions The U.S. Customs and Border Protection was instructed to collect cash deposits from importers of the subject merchandise from October 19, 2026. If the U.S. International Trade Commission confirms injury to U.S. industry, a countervailing duty order will be issued. This order will direct further assessments of duties. Scope of the Investigation The focus was on truck bed covers made of materials like aluminum, steel, and fiberglass. These are used to protect the cargo area of pickup trucks. The scope included various configurations like folding, roll-up, one-piece, and retractable covers. Exclusions were truck caps and products already covered by other orders, like certain aluminum extrusions. Conclusion This determination is a step in the enforcement of fair trade laws. The Commerce Department ensures that foreign subsidies do not unfairly harm U.S. industries. This commitment protects fair competition and supports the principles of international trade agreements. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results for Canadian Softwood Lumber Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of its review on antidumping duties for certain softwood lumber products imported from Canada. This review covered sales made between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The review determined that some Canadian producers sold softwood lumber in the U.S. at prices lower than normal. As a result, certain companies will face penalties. These companies must pay duties, which are extra charges by the government when goods are sold for less than normal prices. In this review, three major Canadian lumber companies were examined closely: Canfor, Resolute, and West Fraser. The investigation found that these companies did sell at unfairly low prices and will face specific duty rates. Canfor has a duty rate of 17.00%, West Fraser’s rate is 4.71%, and Resolute’s rate stands at 13.13%. Other companies that were not individually reviewed will have a combined average rate of 10.64%. Commerce also announced a partial rescission of the review for some companies. This means that for 105 companies, the review will not continue. This decision comes because either no sales were made, or all review requests were withdrawn by the parties. For companies no longer under review, Commerce will keep the current duty rate that was applied before the review started, ensuring duties are fairly assessed on past entries. The department will inform the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which is in charge of collecting these duties, about the assessment instructions within 41 days after the results are published. This step is crucial to ensure that duties are correctly applied to goods that entered the U.S. during the review period. Commerce’s actions help protect U.S. businesses by ensuring that imported products are not sold at unfairly low prices. The final decision also affects future shipments, as companies will now know the duty rates to apply to their goods. These results are based on data and comments gathered throughout the review process. All findings will guide future shipments and related duty collections to continue fostering fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Dumping in Korean Thermal Paper Sales Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Commerce Department Finds Dumping in Korean Thermal Paper Sales The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding sales of thermal paper from Korea. The department found that Hansol Paper Company sold thermal paper in the U.S. at prices below the normal value during a review period from November 1, 2024, to October 31, 2025. This practice is known as dumping and can harm U.S. businesses by undercutting fair competition. The dumping margin for Hansol has been preliminarily calculated at 1.69 percent. Review and Rescission Details The Commerce Department began reviewing the antidumping order on thermal paper from Korea following requests from interested parties. Although the review initially included multiple companies, the focus narrowed to Hansol Paper Company after a partial withdrawal of review requests for 16 other companies. The companies for which the review was rescinded include Akon Rulo Kagit Plastik Imalat, Amtress (M) Sdn. Bhd., Besto Sdn. Bhd., and others listed in the official document. The withdrawal was timely, and no other party requested a review of these companies, leading to the decision to rescind their review status. Public Participation and Comment Period The Department has opened a period for public comment on these preliminary results. Interested parties can submit written comments, known as case briefs, within 21 days of the notice publication. Rebuttals to these comments are allowed within five days after the case brief deadline. Assessment and Cash Deposit Instructions Commerce will work with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to determine appropriate duties based on the final results. If the final review confirms dumping margins, importers will pay duties at these rates for relevant entries. Through specific importer rates or a general calculation, duties reflect the amount of dumping identified. If the margin is de minimis, below 0.50 percent, duties may not be collected for some entries. New cash deposit rates will replace previous ones for shipments entering the country after the final results publication. Summary The Department’s findings on thermal paper from Korea highlight ongoing efforts to enforce fair trade practices. By identifying and calculating dumping margins, Commerce seeks to protect domestic industries while adhering to international trade laws. The process ensures that U.S. companies can compete on equal footing and that foreign producers do not unfairly impact the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Taiwanese Steel Nails Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-19 The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain steel nails from Taiwan. The nails were found to have been sold in the United States at a price lower than the normal value during the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Background: This comes after the preliminary results were published on June 16, 2026. No comments were received on these preliminary findings. Scope of Review: The review covered nails with a shaft length of up to 12 inches. These nails can be made from various steels, finishes, and head types. The nails can be packaged in bulk or collated in any material. Exclusions: Some nails are excluded from the order. These include nails in packages with fewer than 25 nails, nails used in certain furniture, and nails used in specific hand tools. Other specific types of nails like corrugated nails and thumb tacks are also excluded. Use of Adverse Facts Available: The review involved two producers/exporters: Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. and Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd. These companies did not supply required information. So, the Department of Commerce used the highest dumping rate from past reviews, which is 78.17%, as their dumping margin. Because there were no new calculations, no disclosure was made to interested parties. Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Requirements: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on the entries of subject merchandise as per the final results. New cash deposit rates based on these results will apply starting from the date of this announcement. Exporter/Producer Rates: Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.: 78.17% Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd.: 78.17% Concluding Remarks: Importers must file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failing this may result in double duties. This notice serves as a reminder for returning or destroying proprietary information disclosed under administrative protective orders in accordance with regulations. Violations may lead to sanctions. The Department of Commerce’s review is in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and relevant regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.