Commerce Department Confirms Dumping of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the antidumping duty review for finished carbon steel flanges imported from India. The review covered the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. According to the Department, these products were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value. The Commerce Department conducted an administrative review of the antidumping duty order first published on August 24, 2017. The review was part of its ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition and compliance with international trade laws. Norma Group, comprised of companies including Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal, was a primary subject of this review. The Department determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.82% for this group. R. N. Gupta & Company Limited, another significant exporter, was determined to have a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.65%. For companies not individually examined, a rate of 1.94% was assigned based on the performance of the reviewed companies. An important development in this review was the successor-in-interest determination for Munish Forge Limited. The company underwent a name change from Munish Forge Private Limited. The Department found that the structure, operations, and management remained largely unchanged. Therefore, Munish Forge Limited is considered the same entity as its predecessor for the purposes of the antidumping duty order. The Commerce Department has outlined assessment rates for importers of the subject merchandise. These rates will be used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on entries during the review period. New cash deposit requirements, effective upon publication of these results, will apply to future shipments. The establishment of these antidumping duties underscores the Department’s commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices while fostering a level playing field for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets New Import Duties on Raw Honey from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new findings regarding the import of raw honey from India. After a thorough investigation, it was determined that India sold raw honey in the United States at prices lower than usual during the period from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The decision was made official on June 18, 2026. The review looked into companies like Indocan Honey Private Limited and Shakti Apifoods Pvt., Ltd. These companies were found to have sold their honey at a dumping margin. This means they sold honey at unfairly low prices. The margins, or differences in price, were calculated and released. Indocan Honey Private Limited had a dumping margin of 6.98%. Shakti Apifoods Pvt., Ltd. had a margin of 1.11%. Other companies were assigned a margin of 3.99%. The U.S. government will now apply duties, or taxes, on these honey imports. This is to ensure fair competition within the U.S. market. Duties help to level the playing field for local producers. Importers must now pay cash deposits when bringing in honey from India. These deposits are based on the calculated dumping margins. The goal is to prevent unfairly cheap products from hurting U.S. industries. The cash deposit rate for companies not reviewed individually will be 3.99%. For companies previously investigated, the rate will reflect past findings. If a company has not been investigated and the producer has been, the producer’s rate will apply. For others, a standard rate of 5.87% will remain in effect. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been instructed to assess and collect these duties. If an importer does not fulfill its duty to report reimbursements, double duties may be enforced. This decision reflects the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices. It ensures that American honey producers can compete justly in the market. The American public benefits from fair competition and quality products. This notice serves to inform importers about their responsibility to adhere to these new regulations. It is important for importers to remain in compliance to avoid additional penalties. Duties and regulations like these are set to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices by foreign companies. It ensures that the trade remains fair for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues New Import Duties on Chassis from Mexico and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new countervailing duties on certain chassis and parts from Mexico and Thailand. This decision follows a confirmation by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that American industries have been hurt by the subsidized imports of these products. What Are Chassis and Subassemblies? The products affected by these new duties are chassis and their parts. Chassis are frames that can carry containers or other loads. They are used for road, marine, and rail transport. They usually include wheels, brakes, and lighting systems, among other components. Important Dates and Contact Information The new duties come into effect starting June 18, 2026. Any unprocessed entries of these products that have been brought in for consumption will be subject to these duties. For further details, interested parties can contact Jose Rivera for issues related to Mexico at (202) 482-0842, and Caroline Carroll for issues related to Thailand at (202) 482-4948. They are both from the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration. How Will This Affect Import Procedures? Due to the new duties, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess a cash deposit equal to the calculated subsidy rates when these products are imported. The purpose is to help offset the unfair benefit given to these products by their home countries through subsidies, which harm U.S. industries. Subsidy Rates The countervailing duty rates for each company affected are noted in the Federal Register. For Mexico, companies like Hyundai de Mexico S.A. and Fruehauf de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. have a subsidy rate of 76.91%. For Thailand, the rate varies little between companies. Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd., for instance, has a rate of 10.72%, and Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. is at 9.65%. Leveraging Legal Frameworks These actions are in accordance with sections 705 and 706 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The U.S. Department of Commerce is using these legal measures to protect U.S. industries from the damage caused by unfair import practices. Next Steps for Interested Parties The Department of Commerce allows interested parties to be added to an annual inquiry list to receive updates. This service list will be updated every year. Any party wishing to be added to this list must submit their details within 30 days of the order’s publication. Exclusions in the Order Certain products are excluded from these duties. These include dry van trailers, refrigerated van trailers, and flatbed trailers. Individual chassis parts sold by themselves are not included in this probe, but when these parts come with a chassis, they fall under the order. Conclusion With these new countervailing duties, the Department of Commerce aims to even the playing field for U.S. manufacturers and protect them from the effects of these subsidized imports. Detailed information can be accessed via the Federal Register publication, under document number 2026-12329. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Puts Antidumping Duties on Chassis from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On June 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce put antidumping duties on chassis from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam. This decision comes after finding that these countries sold chassis in the United States at less-than-fair-value prices. This means they were sold for less than it costs to make them. Commerce’s Determinations The Department of Commerce found that many companies were selling chassis for prices that hurt U.S. businesses. They published these findings on April 23, 2026. This was a part of a bigger investigation on whether trading practices were fair. International Trade Commission Involvement On June 8, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) agreed with the Commerce Department. They said the U.S. industry was being hurt by cheap chassis coming from these countries. This allowed the Commerce Department to set up duties or extra taxes on these products. Details of the Chassis Orders Chassis are frames or trailers used to carry containers. They can be used on roads, ships, or trains. This decision covers all chassis coming from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam, whether finished or not. Implementation Dates Antidumping duties affect chassis entries that were brought into the U.S. after September 29, 2025. The duties can now be assessed on any chassis that is still in customs or has not been settled yet. Rates of Duties Different companies in Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam will have different duty rates. For example, in Thailand, Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. will face duties of 72.85%. Companies from Mexico have a general rate of 32.37%. For Vietnam, all concerned exporters must pay a 186.84% duty. Custom Procedures The Department of Commerce will direct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect these extra taxes. They need to keep a watch on the entries until further notice. For some time, starting from March 28, 2026, some imports were not charged duties, but that has now changed after this release. Annual Inquiry Service Lists The Department of Commerce will maintain a list each year of all parties interested in these orders. People who want to be on this list must sign up within 30 days of the order being published. This helps ensure everyone follows the new rules effectively. Final Details This step is a significant move to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. By applying these duties, the U.S. aims to ensure fair trading and to support its industries. The rules will affect how companies bring chassis into the country from Mexico, Thailand, and Vietnam. The order and all its details can be found published in the Federal Register under Volume 91, Number 117. This measure shows a strong commitment to maintaining a level playing field for U.S. companies and ensuring fair prices in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Steel and Aluminum Tariff Adjustments Process Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public opinions on a new information collection about steel and aluminum tariffs. They want people to share their thoughts before they send the collection plan to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. This is important to make sure the process is useful and not too hard for people to do. Deadline for Comments The deadline for sending in comments is August 17, 2026. People can write to Emily Davis at the International Trade Administration with their feedback. They should use the OMB Control Number 0625-0285 when they send their comments. Background on Tariffs Last year, on October 17, 2025, the President made a decision to change how medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and parts from other countries are brought into the United States. This change was to protect U.S. national security. The President decided that new tariffs were needed for these imports. How Tariffs are Adjusted Proclamation 10984 was made to allow changes in how much tariff companies pay when they bring in steel and aluminum from other countries. If certain companies in Canada or Mexico make commitments to produce more steel or aluminum in the U.S., they could pay less in tariffs. The tariffs cannot go below 25 percent. The aim is to boost U.S. steel and aluminum production, which in turn supports the making of important items like vehicles in the U.S. For example, automobile parts and vehicle parts are key products. Public Participation and Collection Process The plan under discussion is meant to help the Department of Commerce figure out the best way to implement these tariffs. Information such as location, production details, and investment plans from companies can help in this process. Companies in Canada and Mexico that want reduced tariffs will provide this information. Call for Comments and Participation The Department of Commerce is encouraging public comments to improve their process. They want to know if the proposed collection makes sense and is useful. This feedback will help them evaluate if the process can be simpler and better for businesses. Comments from the public will become a part of the official record. All personal details shared in comments, like names and addresses, might become public too. Sheleen Dumas, the Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, shared this important notice from the Commerce Department. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Delays Decision on Chromium Trioxide Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is delaying its final decision on the chromium trioxide investigation. This decision means that the final finding will be made on October 5, 2026. This is part of an investigation into whether chromium trioxide from Türkiye is being sold for less than it is worth. The decision to delay was made because the investigation is complicated. The investigation started on January 5, 2026, and looks at a period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. On May 22, 2026, a preliminary decision was made. This decision hinted that chromium trioxide from Türkiye might be sold at unfair prices. The company Türkiye Şişe ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş., also known as Şişecam, asked for the delay. The company is a major exporter involved in the investigation. By law, a request from such a significant exporter cannot be ignored without a good reason. The request also included extending provisional measures. This means certain rules will now last not four months but up to six months. If the investigation finds that chromium trioxide is priced unfairly, it may affect how this product is traded between countries. This means there could be new tariffs or rules to balance the pricing difference. This update comes from Christopher Abbott, who is responsible for policy and negotiations at the Department of Commerce. This investigation and decision follow specific rules. These rules are from the Tariff Act of 1930. The goal is to make sure trade between countries is fair. The public is alerted and informed through such notices. This information is published under regulation sections of federal law, which keeps processes transparent and open. For those interested, further details can be found on the official U.S. Government Publishing Office website. Following these processes helps ensure a fair trading environment for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Antidumping Review on Monosodium Glutamate from China Announced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-06-16 Location: Washington, DC The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The review found that Ajinoriki MSG (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Ajinoriki) has not qualified for a separate rate. As such, Ajinoriki will be considered part of the China-wide entity. During the review, it was corrected from the preliminary results that Ajinoriki is subject to a dumping margin rate for the China-wide entity, which is 56.54 percent. This rate was established based on findings from the prior 2017-2018 administrative review. The Department of Commerce published the preliminary results in February 2026 and allowed interested parties to submit comments. The petitioner, Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc, discovered an error in the preliminary report that listed the China-wide rate incorrectly as 40.41 percent. The correct rate is, and remains, 56.54 percent. Commerce has affirmed the petitioner’s comment, and no other comments were submitted. Therefore, no additional decision memoranda accompany this notice. The Department also explained that there are no calculations to disclose for these final results. This is because Ajinoriki, being part of the China-wide entity which was not under review, means there were no separate calculations needed. Merchants need to be aware of their responsibility for duties. The Department of Commerce will work with the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. CBP will follow Commerce’s instructions on assessing the antidumping duties on MSG imported from China. The cash deposit rate for shipments of subject merchandise from China will continue as currently set. For those not receiving a separate rate, the China-wide rate of 56.54 percent applies. Importers are reminded to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. This is crucial before CBP liquidates relevant entries. The notice reiterates the importance of compliance with duties and legal requirements for all merchants dealing with MSG imports from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Low Prices on Steel Nails from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement about steel nails from Taiwan. The department found that two companies from Taiwan sold nails in the United States at prices lower than normal. These companies are Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. and Top Forever Screws Co., Ltd. They sold the nails between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The review checked if companies followed fair trade rules. The results showed Faithful Engineering and Top Forever did not. They did not respond to important questions or provide needed information. As a result, the Department of Commerce decided to apply a high dumping rate of 78.17% to these companies. Twenty other companies were also reviewed. But, for these companies, the review has been stopped. This is because there were no sales that could be checked. The Commerce Department said it will give the final results soon. They also mentioned how people can send comments about these findings. All comments must be filed online. After the final check, the Commerce Department will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection about the results. The customs department will use the new rates to collect duties. Finally, everyone who imports nails should know about this change. This is important because it affects how much tax they need to pay. This development marks an important step in maintaining fair trade and making sure that products are sold at proper prices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Indian Glycine Producers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results on the countervailing duty investigation for producers and exporters of glycine from India. The review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Findings reveal that companies like Kumar Industries, India, received financial help, known as subsidies, from the Indian government. This help makes their products cheaper and helps them compete in the U.S. market. Such assistance is termed “countervailable” when a government gives financial aid to producers or exporters in a way that affects international trade. Between late 2025 and early 2026, the Department of Commerce faced many challenges, including a government shutdown. This delayed their investigation. They extended deadlines several times, leading to the final announcement on June 8, 2026. The investigation was about “Countervailable Subsidies,” which means checking if the help the Indian companies received was against U.S. trade rules. The Department followed the laws from the Tariff Act of 1930. Kumar Industries was the main company checked in this investigation. Bajaj Healthcare Limited, another company in review, did not get separate scrutiny but was assigned the same duty rate as Kumar Industries. The duty rate is 45.33 percent, the same for both Kumar and Bajaj. This means when these companies export glycine to the U.S., they have to pay this percentage as a duty to make things fair for U.S. competitors. The Commerce Department has also instructed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect these duties on shipments that arrived after the date of this announcement. This action ensures a level playing field for U.S. producers against imported goods that might be priced unfairly low due to subsidies. The Department has asked those who have access to any confidential data from the investigation to handle it responsibly, as per their duties under legal agreements. Failure to comply can result in penalties. The results ensure that U.S. domestic industries are protected from unfair foreign competition while maintaining fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Members for Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Committee’s Role and Importance The ETTAC gives important advice to the Environmental Trade Promotion Working Group. This group is part of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee. The committee helps in making programs that enhance U.S. exports of technologies and goods related to the environment. These goods and services help the U.S. meet environmental and safety requirements. Environmental technologies include solutions for water, waste treatment, and air quality monitoring. These technologies are crucial for building infrastructure and supporting U.S. manufacturing. They help the U.S. achieve economic and national security goals by promoting fair trade, manufacturing competitiveness, and strong supply chains. Every year, the U.S. exports about $60 billion worth of environmental technology goods and services. This sector employs nearly 1.9 million Americans. How to Nominate Someone Those who wish to nominate someone for ETTAC membership must do so by 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 2026. Applications can be submitted through the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee web page. After applying, nominees will receive an email asking for more documents. Any questions about the process can be sent to [email protected]. Nominations should be submitted through the ITA’s ETTAC web page. After submitting a nomination, nominees need to provide additional documents via an automated email. The Department of Commerce may reach out for more information. Eligibility and Selection ETTAC will have between 30 to 45 members. Members can come from different sectors, including environmental technology companies, trade associations, and civil society groups. They will represent various U.S. interests and contribute to the committee’s goals. To be eligible, nominees must be U.S. citizens. They must not be registered as foreign agents. They should represent U.S. entities in the environmental sector involved in international trade. Responsibilities and Criteria Committee members are expected to attend about eight meetings during the term, with at least four meetings in person. They will discuss topics openly in public settings. Members should also be able to handle additional tasks like conference calls and drafting recommendations. Applicants must submit several documents, including: A sponsor letter explaining why the nominee should be considered. A biography of the nominee. Details about the company, association, or organization’s business activities. Information on the organization’s ownership if applicable. Final Selection The Secretary of Commerce will consider applications based on their ability to represent different U.S. environmental technology sectors. Selection will consider viewpoints, industry subsectors, and geography. Nominees will be informed of their selection via email. The Department of Commerce aims to ensure that the ETTAC is diverse, balanced, and able to promote U.S. environmental technology exports effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Van-Type Trailers from China Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It says that van-type trailers from China are being sold in the U.S. at prices lower than what they are worth. This practice is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. These trailers are generally big and used to transport goods. They are different from smaller trailers you may see on the highway. The investigation looks at the timeframe from April 1, 2025, to September 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is inviting people to comment on its decision. This is a chance for interested parties to share their thoughts. Important Details What Are Van-Type Trailers?: These are trailers with a cover on top. They are usually rectangular in shape. Covered Parts: The investigation also includes trailer parts. These parts are included whether they are put together or not. Specific Features: These trailers weigh more than 26,000 pounds. They are big and can carry heavy loads. Impact and Actions The U.S. plans to charge more money, called a “cash deposit,” for these trailers. This will happen every time trailers from China enter the U.S. after June 15, 2026. The cash deposit rate is set at 130.86%. This means that the trailers from China could cost much more. Chinese trailers with Chinese parts that are brought through other countries are also affected. For example, trailers that come through Canada are still subject to U.S. rules. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will make a final decision later. If confirmed, these measures could change. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also look at the decision. They will see if U.S. trailer companies are harmed by the low prices. By doing this, the U.S. aims to protect its own companies. It wants to make sure they are not harmed by unfair pricing from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Fiberglass Door Panels from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding fiberglass door panels from China. This follows extensive investigation and analysis by the Commerce Department. Investigation Overview The investigation covered fiberglass door panels, including sidelites, from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that producers and exporters in China received government subsidies for these products. Key Details The final decision was made after gathering and analyzing information from various parties. The decision follows a preliminary finding reported on August 21, 2025. The final determination aligns with other related investigations on less-than-fair-value practices. Subsidy Rates Determined Various subsidy rates were determined for different Chinese companies. The rates were calculated based on the evidence collected: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd.: 66.22% Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd.: 58.50% Other named companies, which did not respond to requests for information, received a rate of 186.46%. All other companies received a rate of 60.64%. Scope of the Investigation The investigation focused on fiberglass door panels from China. These panels may include fiberglass sidelites and come in various forms, such as finished, unfinished, assembled, or unassembled. The investigation covers these panels whether or not they are part of a complete door system. Outcome and Next Steps Commerce’s findings will be forwarded to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC will decide if these imports harm U.S. industries. If the ITC agrees, duties will be applied on future imports to level the playing field for U.S. producers. If not, the investigation ends, and all deposits collected during the process will be refunded. Conclusion The United States is focused on fair trade practices. This investigation underlines the commitment of the Department of Commerce to ensure U.S. industries get a fair chance in the global market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Fiberglass Door Panels from China Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that fiberglass door panels from China are being sold in the United States at unfair prices. This is called selling at less than fair value (LTFV). The decision from the Department was published on June 15, 2026. The period during which this unfair pricing was investigated ran from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This means Commerce has been looking into the pricing practices for six months to understand the situation with these imports. The Department had initially made a preliminary determination about this issue in January 2026. They found signs of unfair pricing and decided to look deeper. This final decision confirms their earlier findings. The door panels being reviewed are made from fiberglass. Fiberglass is a durable material often used for doors because it can withstand tough weather. The Department worked with Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd., among other companies, to ensure correct sales records were examined. They checked sales and production records closely. This process is called “verification.” The final rates of unfair pricing, called “dumping margins,” have been published. These rates indicate how much lower these products were sold in the U.S. compared to their normal value. Besides the primary determination, the Department also looked at specific issues companies brought up during the review. These included adjustments to various freight expenses and financial calculations. The U.S. intends to keep a close watch on these imports and has announced plans to continue special rules. These rules require importers to pay extra fees when they bring such products into the U.S. This aims to prevent further harm to U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce will also inform the International Trade Commission. This body will check if the U.S. industries have been harmed by these unfair trade practices. If they find U.S. businesses hurt, further actions will be taken. This determination is a crucial step in maintaining fair trade practices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. The U.S. Commerce Department is committed to ensuring fair market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Preliminary Review on Welded Line Pipe from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding welded line pipe imported from the Republic of Korea. These findings relate to an administrative review conducted for the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. Commerce preliminarily determines that some producers and exporters from Korea sold welded line pipe at prices below what is known as the “normal value.” This means they may have been selling this pipe at a lower price than usual in the United States, a practice which can harm domestic manufacturers. Companies Involved The review focused on two main companies: Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. faced a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.86%. On the other hand, SeAH Steel Corporation did not have a significant margin, indicated by the 0.00% rate assigned to them. Additionally, five other companies involved in the case—AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., EEW Korea Co., Ltd., Husteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd., and NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.—were granted the same rate as Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., which is 1.86%. Review and Rescission During the review, the Commerce department also looked at entries from 26 companies which are now being rescinded from the review. The reason for this is that there were no suspended entries of welded line pipe from these companies during the period of review. Verification and Comments A verification of SeAH Steel Corporation’s information has been conducted as part of the review process. Interested parties in the case are invited to comment on the preliminary results of the review. These comments are part of the Department’s efforts to ensure a fair trade environment. Next Steps Commerce aims to release the final results of the review by October 2026. These final results will dictate the actions taken regarding the assessment of duties on specific import entries of welded line pipe. These findings emphasize the department’s continuous commitment to reviewing trade practices and enforcing antidumping laws to support fair competition within the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 3 minutes A recent error on the GovInfo website resulted in a “Page Not Found” message. Users trying to access certain information on the site were unable to do so. This has caused inconvenience for those seeking government documents and resources. Details of the Error The error message displayed reads: “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” This message indicates that the specific page the user tried to access does not exist or cannot be located on the server. The cause of this error could range from a mistyped URL to the page being moved or deleted. What to Do If You Encounter This Error Report the Error: If you come across this error, the GovInfo team requests that you report it to askGPO, which is their help service. Provide Information: When reporting, include the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you took when you encountered the error, any specific search terms used, and a screenshot if possible. Visit the Homepage: The error page provides a link to return to the GovInfo homepage. From there, you can try navigating to the desired information through different paths. View Search Tips: A link is also provided to search tips that might assist in locating the needed documents through more efficient search techniques. GovInfo’s Commitment GovInfo assures users that they are actively working to resolve the issue. They appreciate the users’ patience and cooperation in reporting these errors to enhance the website’s functionality. For any further assistance, users are encouraged to reach out to GovInfo’s contact support. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes A recent attempt to access certain pages on the government information website, GovInfo, resulted in a “Page Not Found” error. This can cause inconvenience for users seeking specific information. Error Occurrence The error message appears when users try to access content via specific URLs. The message indicates that the requested page could not be found on the server. What to Do The GovInfo website suggests steps to help resolve this error. Users are encouraged to report the error to askGPO. When reporting, users should provide the URL of the page they tried to access, and describe the steps they took that led to the error. They can also include specific search terms used or a screenshot showing the error. Assistance and Resources For those needing help, the website offers several resources: Users can visit the Help section for assistance. There is additional guidance on the homepage for those looking for more information or tips on searching the site. Importance of Reporting By reporting errors, users can aid in improving the website’s functionality. Prompt reporting contributes to quicker resolutions and the overall enhancement of user experience. If you experience this issue, following these steps may assist in resolving the problem effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Preliminary Antidumping Results for Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced preliminary findings of its latest review concerning antidumping duties on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) imported from Japan. The review specifically focuses on the sales conducted by Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC) during the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. Summary of Findings Commerce preliminarily determined that NSC did not sell NOES at less than its normal value during this period. This means that NSC did not sell the steel in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. As a result, NSC’s weighted-average dumping margin for this period is 0.00 percent. This outcome suggests that NSC has complied with the rules and is not subject to additional antidumping duties. Background and Process The review was initiated on January 27, 2025, following requests in accordance with applicable regulations. Initially, Commerce aimed to complete its work by the end of 2025. However, due to a U.S. Federal Government shutdown and a backlog in processing documents, deadlines were extended. The review process included sending a detailed questionnaire to NSC and evaluating their responses. Methodology and Calculation The review used sections 772 and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to calculate the constructed export price and normal value respectively. This ensures a fair comparison between the domestic price of steel in Japan and the price at which it was sold in the U.S. Next Steps Commerce will disclose its calculations to the parties involved and intends to verify the findings before the final results. Interested parties have the opportunity to comment on these preliminary results. They can submit case briefs within seven days after the last verification report and rebuttal briefs within five days after that. Potential Impact If the final results confirm the preliminary findings, NSC will not face extra tariffs on its steel exports to the United States for the reviewed period. Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess entries of steel during this time, based on the final outcome. Upcoming Hearing and Comments Interested parties may request a hearing to discuss the issues further. Written requests must be submitted within 30 days from the notice’s publication date. Conclusion The preliminary results highlight the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Department of Commerce to maintain fair trading practices and protect domestic industries from unfairly priced foreign imports. Stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the review process to ensure robust trade policies continue. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Review on Raw Honey from Argentina Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its administrative review concerning antidumping duties on raw honey from Argentina. This process took place for the period starting June 1, 2023, and ending May 31, 2024. In this review, the Commerce Department discovered that some exporters were selling raw honey to the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value. This practice is known as “dumping,” and it can hurt U.S. producers by driving down prices unfairly. The enforcement of these results is part of Commerce’s effort to ensure fair competition. The review named specific Argentine companies, like ACA (Asociación De Cooperativas Argentinas Cooperativa Limitada) and NEXCO S.A., which were individually examined. ACA was found to have a dumping margin of 21.35%, while NEXCO had a margin of 0.00%, meaning no dumping was detected for NEXCO. For other companies that were not individually examined but still fall under this order, a weighted-average dumping margin of 21.35% has been determined. This margin is based on ACA’s calculated rate, consistent with the approach outlined in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. This section advises using the average rate of the companies investigated unless results are zero or based entirely on facts available. The process also encountered delays due to a federal government shutdown. This interruption extended timelines for case briefs and final analysis, ensuring a comprehensive review despite the challenges. Assessment rates will be calculated and instructed for all entries covered by this review. Certain entries by ACA and NEXCO will have specific rates or be liquidated at previous “all others” rates if neither firm knew the merchandise was U.S.-bound. These duties will be collected to adjust past and future consistency in pricing. Importers should note that cash deposit requirements following this review now reflect the updated rates. These deposits are required to ensure that any future dumping detected is offset. This measure continues the Department of Commerce’s efforts to protect U.S. industries from the adverse effects of unfair trade practices, such as dumping. The final results and actions are parts of a continuous process to provide a level playing field for domestic producers of raw honey and other goods. This notice confirms the compliance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Trade Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo: A Guide to Resolving the Issue Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes An error has occurred. The page you requested on the GovInfo website cannot be found. This issue is commonly referred to as a “Page Not Found” error. It means the web address or URL you tried to visit does not exist on the server. Steps to Report This Error: Contact Support: Please report this error to the GovInfo Support Team. You can contact them through the provided askGPO link. Provide Necessary Information: To help resolve the problem, provide the following details: The URL or web address you attempted to access. The steps you followed before encountering this error. Any specific search or browsing terms you used. A screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Additional Guidance: Help and Support: If you need further assistance, please visit the Help page for search tips and other resources. Return to Homepage: You can return to the GovInfo Homepage to continue browsing. Feedback and Contact: Submit feedback or contact GovInfo through their Contact page for any other inquiries or support needs. Your patience is appreciated while they work to resolve this issue. Thank you for aiding in improving the efficiency and accessibility of the GovInfo platform. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Error: Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 1 minute On March 1, 2022, an error message was reported on the GovInfo website indicating that a page could not be found. This error affects users trying to access information on the site. Details of the Error The error message is clear: “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” Users are advised to report the error to askGPO. They are encouraged to provide the URL of the page they attempted to visit, describe the steps that led to the error, and include any specific search or browse terms. A screenshot of the error page is also suggested to assist in resolving the issue. Resolution Efforts Users are directed to visit the askGPO page to report the error. The GovInfo team requests that users provide as much detail as possible. This includes the steps taken when the error occurred and the page’s URL. Such details will help the team fix the problem quickly. Contact and Further Information For further assistance, users can visit the homepage of GovInfo. Additional resources for searching and finding information are available through links provided on the site. Conclusion This error highlights the importance of user feedback in maintaining the functionality of government information websites. By reporting errors, users help ensure that the site remains a reliable source of government information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Changes Made to Antidumping Duty Review on Thai Shrimp Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-08 The United States Department of Commerce has updated the results of its review on antidumping duties for certain frozen shrimp exported from Thailand. These changes come after errors were found and corrected. The review covers a time period from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The review looked at whether shrimp from Thailand was sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. Companies must pay extra fees if they are found to be selling products below a fair price. Thai Union Group, one of the companies involved, pointed out mistakes that were affecting their final duty rates. These mistakes included errors in calculating specific rates for importers and in assigning costs. The American Shrimp Producers Association responded by saying Commerce usually sets its own costs for control numbers or sales. After looking into these concerns, the Department of Commerce changed the calculations to fix the errors. As a result, Thai Union’s dumping margin, which is a measure of how much they sold below fair value, is now set at 1.24 percent. This is a reduction from the earlier number of 2.01 percent. Other companies not individually reviewed also receive this new rate. Charoen Pokphand Foods, another company involved, was given a higher duty rate due to adverse facts available (AFA). This means they did not cooperate fully in the review. The duty rate for them changed from 17.38 percent to 26.66 percent after the corrections. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for collecting these duties from applicable entries. Items will be assessed using the amended results starting from February 20, 2026. Companies like Phatthana Frozen Food and Thai Union Manufacturing were found not to have shipped any shrimp to the U.S. during this review period. If an importer’s margin is too low, meaning less than 0.5 percent, they do not have to pay extra duties. The rate for all companies not included in this specific review will remain at 5.34 percent, as given by a previous decision. This rate is for situations where there are no individual company rates. The new rules are applied to shipments entering the U.S. after February 20, 2026. These changes make sure that shrimp imported from Thailand are sold at fair prices and protect American shrimp producers from unfair competition. The stakeholders are reminded of their duty to follow the rules mentioned in the Administrative Protective Order. The Department of Commerce will also notify importers of these cash deposit requirements. These updates help ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. The full details of the corrections and how they affect duties are available through the Department of Commerce and related publications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register: Final Review of Subsidies on Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Background Information The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has announced the final results of its Countervailing Duty Administrative Review on finished carbon steel flanges from India. This review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review began with preliminary results, which were shared on February 3, 2026. These results invited comments from interested parties. The review period looked at subsidies provided to producers and exporters of steel flanges from India. A document detailing all related issues and decisions is available online. Scope of the Order The review focused on finished carbon steel flanges imported from India. This is part of a countervailing duty order that has been in place to address subsidies that Indian companies might receive, which can affect fair trade. Findings and Methodology The review adhered to procedures set out by the Tariff Act of 1930. Countervailable subsidies are those where government financial support leads to specific benefits for producers and exporters. The review confirmed that Norma (India) Ltd. and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd., along with other companies, received such subsidies. Final Results Norma (India) Ltd. and its associated entities retained a subsidy rate of 2.40%. R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 2.27%. Non-examined companies were assigned a rate of 2.32%, based on the weighted average of the examined companies. Assessment and Cash Deposits The U.S. Department of Commerce will direct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on relevant imports. New cash deposit rates will be applied to shipments entering the U.S. These rates will reflect the subsidy rates from the review, unless they are below a minimal threshold. Conclusion The review ensures that actions taken are consistent with trade laws, maintaining fair competition by countering the effects of foreign government subsidies. This is intended to protect U.S. industry and workers from unfair trade practices. For more information, parties are encouraged to consult the official documents available online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced that it is stopping the review of the antidumping duty on aluminum wire and cable coming from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant for the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. What is an Antidumping Duty? An antidumping duty is a special tax the U.S. puts on products from other countries. It helps to make sure local companies can compete fairly. If a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. for less than it costs at home, it is called “dumping.” This can hurt U.S. businesses. Why Did Commerce Rescind the Review? The Department of Commerce began the review because Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (Tanghenam) asked for it. They are a company in China that makes aluminum wire and cable. The review found that there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam during the review period. Process and Timeline The review was initiated on January 27, 2025, based on a request from Tanghenam. On September 9, 2025, a memo was released to show that there were no entries of the product during the time of review. Commerce then planned to cancel the review on December 11, 2025, due to this lack of entries. There were some delays because of the government shutdown and other issues, which made deadlines longer. Deadlines were extended by 47 days due to a government shutdown and another 21 days because of technical issues. Commerce extended the deadline for preliminary results by another 110 days on February 9, 2026. The final decision was set for May 28, 2026. Rescission Decision Commerce uses a special rule that lets them stop a review if there are no entries of the product during the review time. Since there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam, Commerce decided to stop the review. Next Steps Since the review is canceled, the cash deposit rates for antidumping duties will stay the same as before. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be told not to change how they assess duties on these products. Important Notifications The notice also reminds everyone involved that they have to return or destroy any private or protected information they used for this review. They have to send a written note to confirm this. Not doing so could lead to penalties. This decision and the reasons for it are available publicly, and the Commerce Department welcomes interested parties to review the related materials for in-depth understanding. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its decision to rescind the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on aluminum wire and cable imported from the People’s Republic of China. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Department of Commerce, specifically the International Trade Administration, was responsible for this decision. They determined there were no reviewable entries of aluminum wire and cable from China during this time. Originally, a request for an administrative review was made for Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. This request led to the initiation of the review process in January 2025. However, the Department found that there were no shipments or entries to review. This conclusion came after analyzing data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision means that there will be no change in current cash deposit requirements. The cash deposit rate will remain as it is, based on previously set rates. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess duties on any entries deemed appropriate. This assessment will not occur until a minimum of 35 days after the rescission notice is published. This rescission is aligned with Commerce’s regulations, ensuring that only merchandise with suspended entries are reviewed. This decision will be followed by no changes to cash deposits for future entries. This announcement serves as a reminder to parties involved in the process about their ongoing obligations under Administrative Protective Orders. Parties must return or destroy any proprietary information obtained in this review process. The rescission aligns with section 751 of relevant U.S. law, ensuring compliance with legal and procedural guidelines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping in Review of Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final decision regarding the sale of chlorinated isocyanurates, also known as chlorinated isos, from Spain. The decision covers the period from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The finding is that these products were not sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value during this time. Chlorinated isos are chemicals that come from another substance called cyanuric acid. The company from Spain involved in this review was Ercros S.A. The Department of Commerce found that Ercros did not sell its products at unfairly low prices. As a result, the company was given a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent. This means there is no penalty or additional duty due to dumping. The Department of Commerce reviews cases like this one according to rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. This process ensures that products from other countries are not being sold at unfairly low prices that can harm U.S. companies. The decision to not change the preliminary results comes after asking for comments, but receiving none. Thus, there was no need for a separate decision document. For products entering the U.S. from Spain now, the cash deposit rate for Ercros will be 0 percent because of the zero dumping margin. The Department of Commerce has specific rules about handling these cases. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will handle all entries on or after the announcement date according to these rules. For any previous cases without an assigned rate, the all-others rate will be 24.83 percent. This rate will stay until further announcements. The Department reminds all parties involved about the correct procedure for returning or destroying any proprietary information. They emphasize the importance of following these guidelines to avoid penalties. This decision was issued by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He was also performing duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. This announcement was made on June 1, 2026, and published in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Corrosion Inhibitors from China by the U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. This announcement, made on June 4, 2026, indicates that Chinese producers/exporters sold these inhibitors in the U.S. at less than their normal value. Background Information The review, which spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025, follows a decision to investigate 10 Chinese companies. The main focus was on two key companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. These companies were picked as the mandatory respondents for this review. Methodology Used To determine the sale prices, the Department of Commerce used specific methods outlined in the U.S. trade laws. Because China is considered a non-market economy, the normal value of these products was evaluated differently, using section 773(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Findings of the Review The preliminary findings showed that Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. had dumping margins of 61.51% and 86.96%, respectively. Other companies involved in this review, Gold Chemical Limited and Kanghua Chemical Co., Ltd., were assigned a dumping margin of 73.75%. Separate Rates Determination The investigation also identified several companies eligible for a separate rate, distinct from those under the general Chinese entity rate. This includes the two main companies investigated and two other companies that were not individually examined but still eligible for a separate status. China-Wide Entity Six companies reviewed failed to claim separate status and are thus part of the China-wide entity. Consequently, these companies are subject to a 241.02% duty rate as determined by the department’s policy. Future Steps and Public Involvement The U.S. Department of Commerce will provide a chance for interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. They have set a timeline for public comments and planned a verification process for information used in the final results. Next Actions for Importers Importers of the affected products must comply with filing requirements concerning antidumping and/or countervailing duties. This will involve filing a certificate regarding the reimbursement of duties before entry liquidation. In summary, the preliminary results indicate significant dumping margins for corrosion inhibitors from China sold in the U.S. The Department intends to proceed with verification and review public comments before finalizing the results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Japanese Cranes Sold for Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently made a final decision on the sale of lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. They found these cranes are being sold in the United States for less than they should be. This is called selling at “less than fair value” or LTFV. The Department of Commerce looked at crane sales from Japan from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation results were first shared on January 16, 2026. Back then, Commerce said they believed Japanese cranes were indeed being sold below fair value. In their final decision, the Department confirmed that two Japanese companies were involved. These companies are Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. Kobelco was found to have a dumping margin of 12.36%, and Sumitomo had a margin of 20.00%. Other companies will have a margin of 16.18%. This means these companies were marking down prices too low in America, which can harm U.S. businesses selling cranes. So, to fix this, the Department will require extra fees, known as dumping duties, on these cranes when they are brought into the U.S. These extra fees will match the dumping margins found. Before this final decision, the Department checked documents and visited the company’s sites. They made sure all facts were correct. The changes made after the first findings were small. These changes were shared in a special document, the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Now, the Department will tell the International Trade Commission about their final decision. The Commission will then decide if these low-price sales are hurting U.S. businesses. If they agree there’s harm, U.S. Customs will start collecting these extra fees. If not, the case will be closed, and no extra fees will be added. All companies must follow rules about handling private information given during this investigation. This ensures that company secrets stay safe. This decision is important because it helps keep fair trade between countries. It makes sure that companies in the U.S. can compete fairly with those from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Freight Rail Couplers from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results on the antidumping duty review concerning freight rail couplers from Mexico. This review is for the period from May 3, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It found that these products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. Commerce started this review because they wanted to check if these products were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. The agency uses laws from the Tariff Act of 1930 to conduct these reviews. The products being reviewed are called “freight rail couplers,” which are parts used in trains. Commerce found that the products from the Amsted Rail Company and its subsidiary, ASF-K de Mexico, had a dumping margin of 6.50%. The Commerce report mentions that there were no changes from the preliminary findings published earlier. They will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply duties on an ad valorem basis. This means duties will be assessed based on the value of the products, rather than a per-unit fee. The business or company involved may need to pay additional duties. If a company has zero or very low sales margins, they might not pay any duties. Commerce will give detailed instructions to CBP on how to handle these duties within 41 days. Commerce will also update cash deposit rates for future shipments. The rates differ based on whether the company was involved in previous reviews or if they are new to this case. For other producers or exporters, the rate remains at 48.10%, which was set in a past investigation. Importers must also submit a certificate showing if they were reimbursed for any duties, before completed entries are processed for liquidation. Failure to submit this could lead to double duty assessments. Finally, companies under the administrative protective order (APO) must handle all sensitive business details according to Commerce’s rules. Any mishandling of such information will lead to legal consequences. This update ensures fair trading and market practices in the rail industry, while protecting U.S. manufacturers and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary results on a review concerning large diameter welded pipes (LDWP) imported from the Republic of Türkiye. The findings reveal that HDM Çelik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. (HDM Çelik), a notable producer and exporter from Türkiye, received countervailable subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background and Review Process The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests for an administrative review in line with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). HDM Çelik was selected as the mandatory respondent on July 14, 2025. However, due to a government shutdown starting November 14, 2025, the deadlines for administrative proceedings were delayed by 47 days. An additional delay of 21 days occurred due to a backlog from the shutdown. The timeline was also extended on March 13, 2026, resulting in a final due date for preliminary results on May 29, 2026. Scope of Review The review centers on LDWP from Türkiye, assessing whether these products received unfair government subsidies. These subsidies, defined by financial contributions that benefit the recipient in a specific manner, fall under scrutiny to ensure fair trade practices. Partial Rescission Decision In part of the review, it was decided to rescind the administrative review for 11 companies. This decision is based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the period of review (POR). The companies affected by this rescission will have their entries assessed at the rate established at the time of entry, as dictated by 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Subsidy Rates and Methodology For HDM Çelik, the preliminary subsidy rate is set at 3.37 percent ad valorem. This rate considers various subsidy programs in which financial contributions benefit and specify how they are allocated to companies. The methodology used adheres to the legal framework aimed at identifying specific financial assistance benefiting the recipient. Next Steps and Public Participation The Commerce Department plans to disclose its full calculations for these preliminary results soon after the announcement. There will be an opportunity for interested parties to comment on these findings, with case briefs due following the issuance of the last verification report. Parties are encouraged to submit their comments with structured tables of content and authorities. Additionally, requests for a hearing should be submitted at least 30 days after this notice’s publication, including details of participants and discussion issues. Finality and Future Instructions The final results of this review are expected within 120 days from the notice publication, pending any timeline extensions. The findings will impact the cash deposit instructions for future imports from Türkiye. Conclusion The preliminary results signal ongoing diligence by the U.S. Department of Commerce in assessing international trade practices and ensuring fair economic competition. The focus remains on transparent and lawful assessments that uphold trade agreements and standards. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Strand Continue Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue antidumping duties on prestressed concrete steel wire strand. Countries affected are Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and Thailand. The Commerce Department, along with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), decided these duties should stay. The reason is to stop companies in these countries from selling at very low prices in the U.S. The duties began on January 28, 2004, for most countries and February 4, 2004, for India. These duties are to balance out any unfair subsidies that companies might get from their governments. The decision to continue these duties came after reviews in 2025. The reviews showed that without the duties, dumping and subsidies would probably continue. Prestressed concrete steel wire strand is a special type of steel used in building. The duties make sure companies in America can compete fairly with those in the other countries. The rates of duties will stay the same as before. This decision was officially made on June 2, 2026. The duties help protect jobs and industries in the United States. The next review to decide if these duties should continue will happen before the fifth anniversary of this decision. All companies must follow rules about how to handle information about these duties. This is important to make sure everything stays fair and private. This ongoing action ensures that American businesses dealing with these products are not unfairly harmed by international trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results Published for Antidumping Review of Steel Pipe from the UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily determined that some steel pipe producers and exporters from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) sold their products in the United States at less than normal value. The preliminary results cover the period from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The review focuses on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe, a specific type of steel pipe used in various applications. The review was initiated in January 2025 due to requests for a closer look at trade practices. The companies specifically examined are Conares Metal Supply Limited and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE, along with its related entities THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC and KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC. Determination Process The U.S. Department of Commerce used several methods to calculate whether the companies sold their products at unfairly low prices. These methods include examining export prices and constructed export prices. The goal is to determine if such prices are less than the normal value, which would affect fair competition. Preliminary results show that the companies have different dumping margins. A dumping margin indicates how much the export price is less than the normal value. Major companies in the review like Conares and Universal have dumping margins that are not zero, meaning they were selling at less than normal value. Rates and Procedures Conares Metal Supply Limited: Preliminary dumping margin is 3.15%. Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE and Related Entities: Preliminary dumping margin is 6.16%. Other Companies Not Individually Examined: These companies have been assigned a weighted average dumping margin of 5.50%. For companies not individually examined, their rates are based on the overall results of the reviewed companies. After these preliminary findings, the Commerce Department will accept more comments, allowing interested parties to submit their opinions. The opportunity to submit written comments will last for 21 days from the notice’s publication date. Rebuttals or responses to these comments are allowed for five days after the initial comment period. If requested, the Department will hold a hearing allowing further discussion. Such requests must be submitted within 30 days of this announcement. Upon completion of all final reviews and issuance of results, cash deposit requirements will be updated, affecting future shipments and indicating future compliance requirements. These results provide important insights into how international trade laws are monitored and enforced. The findings and the comments received during this period will help inform the final decision, ensuring fair international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Extra Taxes on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision. They decided to keep extra taxes, called countervailing duties, on certain engines from China. These engines are large, vertical shaft engines. They range from 225cc to 999cc in size. The Department thinks that removing these duties would lead to Chinese companies continuing to receive unfair help from their government. This kind of help is known as a subsidy. Subsidies can make products cheaper, making it hard for other countries to compete. The decision is based on a review that started on February 2, 2026. The review checked if these subsidies would continue without the duties in place. The main companies in the U.S. that care about this decision are Briggs & Stratton, LLC and Discovery Energy, LLC. These companies gave their thoughts to the Department of Commerce by March 4, 2026. The Government of China and other Chinese companies did not respond with their thoughts. The review found rates for subsidies that would likely continue. For Loncin Motor Co., the rate is 18.96 percent. For Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., the rate is 20.38 percent. All other companies would have a rate of 19.85 percent. This decision means the U.S. will keep the extra taxes on these engines. This helps protect American companies from unfair competition. The decision was announced by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The Department of Commerce’s review shows how important it is to check on foreign subsidies. They want to make sure trade with other countries is fair for everyone. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Malaysia Steel Wire Strand Review Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of an important review involving prestressed concrete steel wire strand imported from Malaysia. This review focused on determining if Malaysian companies sold this wire strand in the United States at unfairly low prices. The companies reviewed were Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that these companies did not sell the wire strand below its normal value during this time. This means they sold it at fair prices in the U.S. market. The review’s findings are officially effective as of June 3, 2026. The agency involved is the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Contact persons for more details are Monica Gillis and Peter Shaw from the AD/CVD Operations office. They can be reached at (202) 482-6384 or (202) 482-0697 for inquiries. Earlier on October 3, 2025, a preliminary result was published. This preliminary finding was delayed due to a government shutdown that tolled deadlines by 47 days. Further delays resulted in an additional tolling of 21 days. However, Commerce verified responses from Kiswire and Wei Dat through verification sessions in March 2026. The review specifically assessed if goods from these companies were sold at prices lower than normal value. It was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. For the companies not individually examined, such as Southern PC Steel, the Act suggests a reasonable calculation method. The result is a zero percent margin for them as well. Based on these results, all reviewed companies – Kiswire, Wei Dat, and Southern PC Steel, have a dumping margin of 0.00 percent for the period. This means no extra antidumping duties are required on their products for this review period. The Commerce Department will disclose full calculation details following this review. Usually, this happens within five days of the announcement. The customs and border authority, CBP, will assess the covered entries of wire strand without imposing additional antidumping duties, following the finalized results. For future imports of the wire strand from Malaysia, the cash deposit rates will now align with these findings. The special zero rate applies to the named companies. For others not reviewed, the previous rates from earlier investigations still apply. This process involves significant documentation and the handling of proprietary information. Importers are reminded of their duty to submit respective certificates before liquidation to avoid double duties. This review helps ensure fair trade practices and confirms that the selling practices of Malaysian wire strand imports align with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Raw Honey from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Review Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review on raw honey imported from Brazil. This review, conducted by the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce, determined that raw honey from Brazil was sold in the U.S. at prices below normal value. The period of review was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The review involved 14 producers and exporters of raw honey from Brazil. Among them were Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindustrial Ltda. and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda., which acted as mandatory respondents in the investigation. The preliminary results were published on September 30, 2025, and public comments were invited. However, due to a federal government shutdown later that year, the Commerce extended deadlines for the review several times. The final results were scheduled and released by May 29, 2026. The review was conducted according to U.S. law, specifically Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce based this review on its findings, which involved public comments and extensive data analysis. The final decisions were detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum made available to registered users and directly accessible online. Scope and Examination of Imports The product under review included raw honey as defined in the original antidumping duty orders. The review continued to investigate other shipments from Brazil, especially those involving companies not individually examined in this review. Final Results and Antidumping Margins Based on the review, the weighted-average dumping margins for the examined companies were determined. Melbras Importadora faced a 4.48% dumping margin, while Minamel Agroindústria was subject to a 10.48% margin. For companies not individually reviewed, an average margin of 7.48% was applied. Disclosure and Compliance Instructions The Department of Commerce intends to disclose detailed findings and calculations from this review. Companies are required to comply with all instructions regarding antidumping assessments and cash deposits due after these final results. Notably, a reminder was issued to importers about filing certificates concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective immediately, all U.S. entries of raw honey from Brazil will have updated cash deposit requirements matching the review’s final results. These requirements will remain in place until further notifications are given by the Department of Commerce. Conclusion and Further Notifications This announcement echoes the compliance terms set by U.S. trade laws for imported raw honey. Importers and other stakeholders must remain aware of the updated duties and follow federal regulations to ensure proper execution of trade practices. The review and subsequent announcements are essential to maintain fair trade and protect domestic markets from unfair pricing methods used by some international exporters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unfair Paper Sales from Portugal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced preliminary findings about paper sales from Portugal. This decision involves uncoated paper. The period under review was from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. The review investigates if Portuguese companies sold paper in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The focus was on The Navigator Company, S.A., a major producer. The company faced scrutiny over its pricing practices. The Department found that Navigator had sold paper at prices lower than normal value. They calculated a dumping margin of 2.70%. A dumping margin shows how much a company’s sale price undershoots a fair market price. The findings came from a process involving many calculations and rules. The Department looked at export prices and the normal values in Portugal. They used specific methods outlined in U.S. law. This announcement opens a window for further comments. Each party in the review can share their thoughts on this preliminary result. They have 21 days from the announcement to file their case briefs. Rebuttal comments can be filed five days after that. There is also a chance for a hearing. Interested parties must request this within 30 days of the announcement. They must include the names of participants and the issues they want to discuss. The findings lead to certain actions by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. If the dumping margin is above de minimis (0.50%), they will assess duties. If Navigator’s margin is zero or very low, there will be no duties. The Commerce Department has made instructions for customs. They want to ensure all regulations are followed properly. The next steps depend on any final decisions after this review. These measures aim to ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. is protecting its market from unfair pricing practices. The process involves detailed reviews and public participation before any final decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Starts New Trade Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has begun new administrative reviews. These are for antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These are important because they help ensure that products imported to the U.S. are fairly priced. The reviews started on June 2, 2026. The Commerce Department received requests for reviews concerning various products. Many of these products have April anniversary dates. What Products Are Being Reviewed? Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet: This product is used in buildings and transportation. Companies in countries like Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, and several more are being reviewed. Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod: Used in construction, items from companies in India and China are under review. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a): This chemical is used in refrigeration. Companies in China are being checked. Activated Carbon: This product cleans air and water. Companies in China are under review. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities: Used in homes, these products from China are being looked at. And many more products and companies from countries like Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Türkiye, and Slovenia. Why Are These Reviews Important? These reviews help to check if foreign companies are selling their products too cheaply in the U.S. This is called “dumping”. Products sold this way can hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews make sure companies are charging fair prices. What Will Happen Next? Once the reviews are done, the Commerce Department will decide if any actions are needed. They may impose extra duties on some products if they find problems. This process helps keep trade fair and protects American companies. It is important for companies who want to keep their separate tax rates to fill out certain forms. They need to do this 14 days after the notice came out. Companies that are part of these reviews need to keep track of their sales carefully. The Commerce Department will finish these reviews by April 30, 2027. This gives them time to make sure everything is fair and accurate. What Should Interested Parties Do? If anyone is interested in these reviews, they should apply for access to information. They need to follow the rules given by the Commerce Department. There are specific ways to share information and facts. This ensures that the reviews are transparent. Commerce will not be able to share information unless a party asks for it in the right way. As the reviews continue, the Commerce Department remains focused on maintaining fair trade for all involved. These actions ensure a level-playing field in the market. Stay informed as this process progresses and further decisions are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced changes to the results of its review of antidumping duties on certain activated carbon from China. This review looked at imports from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. On April 23, 2026, the Commerce Department released the original results. However, errors were found by several companies involved. These companies included Calgon Carbon Corporation and Norit Americas, Inc., along with Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. The errors were seen as ‘ministerial,’ meaning they were mistakes like math errors or incorrect copying. The law says these kinds of mistakes can be fixed. Specific Errors Corrected: The errors affected how some costs were calculated. For Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., mistakes included how a by-product was excluded and the costs of electricity and packing were added up. For Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., errors included using incorrect export numbers and mislabeled units of measure. Correcting these errors changed the dumping margin for Ningxia Huahui from $0.56 per kilogram to $0.04 per kilogram. This change also affected other non-selected companies, setting their new rate at $0.04 per kilogram. Amended Results: After corrections, the estimated dumping margins are: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.: $0.00 per kilogram. Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.: $0.04 per kilogram. Cash Deposit Requirements: With these new results, new cash deposit requirements will take effect. Companies must deposit an amount equal to their dumping margin for any future shipments. For example, Datong Juqiang will deposit $0.00 per kilogram, and Ningxia Huahui will deposit $0.04 per kilogram. Conclusion: These changes ensure that the duties applied are based on accurate information. The Department of Commerce will give specific instructions on how to handle affected imports to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses by ensuring a fair trade environment with China in the activated carbon market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Panel Review Request Filed Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes A new development has taken place under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). A Request for Panel Review was filed on May 4, 2026. This involves Certain oil country tubular goods from the United States. The request was submitted to the Canadian Section of the USMCA Secretariat. The request was filed on behalf of Maverick Tube Corporation. The case has been given the number CDA-USA-2026-10.12-01. The panel review is about a final result from the Canadian Border Services Agency. This result was published in the Canada Gazette on April 4, 2026. USMCA Article 10.12 allows countries to settle disputes about trade remedy determinations. These determinations come from the United States, Canada, or Mexico. When a panel review is requested, a Binational Panel is formed. This panel reviews the determination and gives a binding decision. The USMCA has specific Rules for Article 10.12 reviews. These rules were agreed upon by the three countries. The filing of requests must follow Rule 40. Details about these rules can be found on the official USMCA Secretariat website. There are steps for parties interested in the panel review: A Complaint must be filed no later than 30 days after the first Request for Panel Review. This means the Complaint deadline is June 3, 2026. Anyone who wants to participate in the review must file a Notice of Appearance. This must be done no later than 45 days after the first Request for Panel Review. The deadline for this is June 18, 2026. The panel review will focus on errors of fact or law. It can also include challenges to the jurisdiction of the authority. The focus will be on errors and defenses raised in the panel review. Further information can be obtained by contacting Vidya Desai. She is the United States Secretary of the USMCA Secretariat. This development marks an important step in resolving trade disputes under USMCA rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Wind Towers Dumped Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its review concerning utility scale wind towers from the Republic of Korea. The review determined that these wind towers, produced by Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. from Korea, were sold in the United States at below their normal value during the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Dumping Margin Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. has been assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 4.99%. This means that the Department of Commerce found that the company sold its wind towers in the U.S. at prices that were 4.99% less than their fair value. Background The Department had made a preliminary determination earlier in January 2026, which it has now finalized. Interested parties were invited to comment on these preliminary results. Dongkuk S&C was the sole producer or exporter reviewed in this period. Scope of the Order The order covers utility scale wind towers from Korea, which are subject to U.S. antidumping laws. These laws are intended to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling goods at unfairly low prices. Assessment and Cash Deposits Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess additional duties on imports at the determined dumping margin. The Department also confirmed that there would be no changes to the preliminary margin calculation. It outlined that CBP would liquidate entries of Dongkuk’s wind towers at these rates unless they had no knowledge of the items’ destination being the U.S. The new cash deposit rate for future imports will be set at Dongkuk’s determined margin of 4.99%, effective from the date of publication of these findings. For others, different historical rates or a rate of 5.41% will apply. Legal and Administrative Details Commerce’s determination is part of its routine enforcement under the Tariff Act of 1930. Companies involved in importing must comply with these requirements or face penalties. The information used in this determination can be accessed on the Department’s electronic systems by registered users. For more details or further information, Anne Entz from AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, can be contacted at the Department of Commerce. The U.S. government continues to monitor and enforce trade laws to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from practices like dumping. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding the import of certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) from India. According to the Department, producers and exporters in India sold some of these tires in the United States at unfairly low prices, violating trading rules. The review period spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. Companies Under Review Commerce selected two companies for detailed examination: ATC Tires Private Ltd., which includes ATC Tires AP Private Limited, and Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited (MTPL). These companies are referred to as the mandatory respondents. Government Shutdown Impact and Timing Adjustments Due to a lapse in U.S. federal funding and a government shutdown, the review process faced delays. Commerce extended deadlines twice to account for these interruptions. Initially, deadlines were moved back 47 days, then an additional 21 days were added, delaying the preliminary results to May 26, 2026. Scope of Review The review focuses on OTR tires from India and seeks to determine if they were sold in U.S. markets at less than the normal value. Normal value is the price at which goods are sold in the exporter’s home market. If exported products are sold for less, it’s considered dumping. Methodology and Preliminary Findings Commerce is conducting the review under specific U.S. trade rules. Both export price and normal value are determined according to legal guidelines. Commerce calculates the margin of unfair pricing to decide on possible penalties. The Department found that the two scrutinized companies had dumping margins of 2.01% for ATC and 1.07% for MTPL during the review period. For other companies not individually reviewed, a margin of 1.87% was established. Next Steps for Public Participation The decision is open for public comment. Interested parties have the opportunity to file their views in writing. Comments should be filed within seven days after the last verification report related to this review. Rescission for Certain Companies The Department has also decided to rescind the review for 25 companies, concluding there were no entries of interest during the review period. These companies will have their antidumping duties assessed based on their previous rates. Cash Deposit Requirements After the review, new cash deposit rates are set for the companies based on their calculated margins. These rates will be applied to all future shipments from June 1, 2026, onward. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s preliminary determination and ongoing review process aim to ensure fair trading practices in the importation of OTR tires from India. This step reflects broader efforts to maintain competitive market conditions in the U.S. tire industry. The final decision is pending further investigations and will ultimately direct the trade measures applied to these imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Ruling Changes Antidumping Measures for Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a significant decision on May 22, 2026, concerning steel products from Japan. The case involves the company Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. The CIT ruled in favor of Toyo Kohan by upholding the Department of Commerce’s revised findings about antidumping duties on specific steel products. The products in question are diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. The review covers sales from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. The Department of Commerce originally calculated a dumping margin of 4.44 percent. Toyo Kohan did not agree with this result and appealed the decision. The CIT found issues with how Commerce evaluated the U.S. sales data. It asked Commerce to review how it determines the “date of sale” and to perform a different analysis for price differences, aligning with suggestions from the Federal Circuit’s Marmen decision. Following the CIT’s guidance, Commerce revised its evaluation. It slightly increased the dumping margin for Toyo Kohan from 4.44 percent to 4.58 percent. The CIT’s latest ruling is a definitive judgment, meaning it does not support the original Commerce’s results. This means Commerce had to amend its previous decision with this updated dumping rate. However, Toyo Kohan’s cash deposit rate will not change because newer results exist from subsequent reviews. Furthermore, the CIT has blocked the liquidation of Toyo Kohan’s entries during the review period. Whether the CIT’s decision stands or if it is challenged in higher courts will affect how duties are assessed. For now, antidumping duties will follow the amended margin if there are no further appeals. The decision brought by the CIT marks a crucial moment for international trade relations and duties on Japanese steel products. This ruling is essential for companies involved in the steel import business, as it influences how duties and prices are configured. The Department of Commerce’s updates in response to CIT’s decision reflect the ongoing regulatory adjustments and international trade’s legal framework’s complexity. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews The International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce, has begun the process of five-year reviews, also known as Sunset Reviews. These reviews look at antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. They also check on suspended investigations of certain products. This step is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. Purpose and Background The aim of these reviews is to see if the existing duties are still needed to stop unfair trading activities. Procedures for these Sunset Reviews are outlined in past notices from 1998 and 2005. In 2012, a final adjustment was made to guide how Commerce conducts these reviews. Products Under Review Many products from different countries are under review. Some of them include: Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from China and Russia. Melamine from China. Potassium Phosphate Salts from China. Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers from China and Vietnam. Methionine from France, Japan, and Spain. Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Each product has a specified case number for identification and is assigned a Commerce contact for inquiries. Important Dates and Contacts These reviews become applicable from May 29, 2026. If you need more information, you can contact officials from the AD/CVD Operations, based at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Filing Information The Commerce Department encourages interested parties to visit its website for more details about the process. They have set specific rules for submissions that include electronic filing. Participation Parties wanting to participate in the reviews must submit necessary documentation, including a letter of appearance. This helps in being listed as an interested party. Conclusion The initiation of these reviews is a critical process that ensures fair trading practices. It allows the Department of Commerce to evaluate whether trade duties are still needed. The department encourages participation to maintain a fair trade environment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.