Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review of R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has finalized its review for the antidumping duty administrative review of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) imported from the People’s Republic of China. This is based on the sales between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. R-134a, a coolant used in air conditioning, was sold in the U.S. at less than normal value. This decision was announced on April 2, 2026. Commerce conducted this review under Section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. They used detailed information to determine if R-134a was dumped, meaning sold below market value. For the final review results, Commerce identified several Chinese companies involved with the product. These companies include Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Jiangsu Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., and Fujian Qingliu Dongying Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. These firms were treated as a single entity, referred to as Sanmei. This review concluded that the dumping margin for these companies is 173.90 percent. This margin indicates how much cheaper the imported product was sold than its regular market value. Changes were made from preliminary results, impacting margin calculations for Sanmei. Commerce analyzed case comments to ensure accuracy and make necessary adjustments. For companies not reviewed in this period, the rate remains 167.02 percent, unchanged from previous reviews. This rate covers companies not explicitly named but included under the China-wide entity. Importers of R-134a must follow specific procedures. If their sales lead to zero or de minimis (too small for legal concern) margins, they will not face antidumping duties. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about these rates, ensuring correct duty applications. The cash deposit requirements are effective immediately for all R-134a shipments. These requirements help enforce the dumping margin rates. Commerce urges importers to submit a certificate regarding any duty reimbursements. Failure to comply could mean paying double antidumping duties. This case continues to serve as a cautionary tale for international trade, emphasizing the importance of compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
Commerce Department Launches Inquiry on Steel Products from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation. This is about certain steel products. These are from the Republic of Korea. The investigation is to see if these steel products are avoiding taxes. These taxes are called antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These taxes are on steel from Korea. Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. asked for this investigation. They think the steel products from Korea are finished in Thailand. Then, these products come to the U.S. This may be avoiding the taxes on Korean steel. Details About the Investigation The investigation started on April 2, 2026. This is called a circumvention inquiry. The Department wants to know if the steel products finished in Thailand are really from Korea. It also wants to know if these products should count under the Korean steel orders. What the Inquiry Will Look For The inquiry will check if the products are finished in another country. They will see if the work done in Thailand is minor. They want to know if the main parts come from Korea. The Department will also look at things like: Investment in Thailand Research and development in Thailand How much of the steel is made in Thailand If the parts from Korea are a big part of the final product’s value They also want to prevent any evasion of the duties. How the Inquiry Will Work The Department will select producers in Thailand. They will use data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Comments on this data should be sent within seven days after the Department places the data on the record. Next Steps and Timing The Department aims to make a preliminary decision in 150 days. A final decision will follow in 300 days. They might stop the inquiry earlier if they find enough information. In conclusion, the Department of Commerce is thorough in its investigation. They want to make sure no one is unfairly avoiding taxes on Korean steel products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Oleoresin Paprika From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Oleoresin Paprika from India Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary decision regarding oleoresin paprika from India. The decision finds that this product has been sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation for this is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce has been studying the sales and pricing to make sure products are not being sold unfairly. Companies in India, such as Mane Kancor and Synthite, have been looked at closely. It was found that their oleoresin paprika is being sold at lower prices than it should be. The department has asked for comments from interested parties on this decision. They have invited anyone with an interest in this matter to give their feedback. A critical circumstances analysis was also done. This looks at whether the imports from India have caused harm to the U.S. market. The department found that there were no critical circumstances, meaning the imports have not caused sudden harm. A detail noted in the determination is that oleoresin paprika, a coloring additive from India, must meet certain criteria to be considered under investigation. This includes having an American Spice Trade Association value of at least 500 or a color unit value of at least 20,000. The estimated dumping margins for these companies are 3.33% for Mane Kancor and 5.66% for Synthite. An all-others rate, which is a weighted-average rate for producers not individually examined, is set at 4.60%. The cash deposit rates for these companies are adjusted based on possible export subsidies identified in a related investigation. For now, the cash deposit rate stands at 0.00% for both Mane Kancor and Synthite. The Department explained that this will remain until further notice. There is a postponement of the final determination. This means a more extended investigation period, and provisional measures have been extended. The final decision is expected to be made no later than 135 days after this preliminary announcement. The U.S. International Trade Commission has been notified and will determine if the imports from India are harmful to the U.S. industry. This decision will affect how the situation moves forward. For more details or to participate in comments or hearings, interested parties should follow the guidance from the Department of Commerce. The investigation shows the U.S. government’s role in ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Briefing 2026-04-02
Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Briefing 2026-04-02 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06419/board-of-overseers-of-the-malcolm-baldrige-national-quality-award Sub: Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Content: The Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award ("Board of Overseers" or "Board") will meet in open session on Thursday, June 11, 2026, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The purpose of this meeting is for the Board of Overseers to review and discuss the work of the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, to implement improvements to the Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award ("Award"), and to provide recommendations to the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as the Board deems necessary. The agenda will include the Baldrige Program Update, Baldrige Foundation Update, Ethics Review, Alliance for Performance Excellence Update, Communities of Excellence Update, and New Business/Public Comment. Details of the agenda are noted in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; ASKCHIPS Information Collection Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06391/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for Sub: Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-02
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-02 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Oleoresin Paprika From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06450/oleoresin-paprika-from-india-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair-value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that oleoresin paprika from India is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 2. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06449/certain-corrosion-resistant-steel-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-initiation-of-circumvention Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In response to requests from Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (collectively, the requesters), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), completed in Thailand using components produced in Korea, are circumventing the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CORE from Korea. 3. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06448/1112-tetrafluoroethane-r-134a-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People’s Republic of China (China) was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 4. Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From India: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06447/granular-polytetrafluoroethylene-resin-from-india-amended-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin (Granular PTFE) from India to correct a ministerial error. The period of review (POR) is March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. 5. Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Extension of Deadline To Certify Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06420/fresh-tomatoes-from-mexico-extension-of-deadline-to-certify Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the Federal Register of February 18, 2026, in which Commerce announced the final clarification of the scope of the antidumping duty order on fresh tomatoes from Mexico. This notice extends the deadline for importers that import fresh tomatoes for processing on or after February 18, 2026, and before April 15, 2026, to fulfill the certification requirements applicable to tomatoes entered for processing. 6. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/02/2026-06418/antidumping-or-countervailing-duty-order-finding-or-suspended-investigation-opportunity-to-request Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-01
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-01 1) Executive Summary Seven China-related trade remedy events were published today involving the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). The ITC instituted multiple five-year (sunset) reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 covering products from China such as non-refillable steel cylinders, small vertical shaft engines, prestressed concrete steel wire strand, boltless steel shelving, chassis and subassemblies, and mattresses. The DOC issued parallel notices initiating automatic sunset reviews and publishing applications for scope rulings in existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings. The main policy instruments were antidumping and countervailing duty orders. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (U.S. ITC) Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders — AD/CVD (Institution of Five-Year Reviews)The ITC instituted five-year reviews to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on non-refillable steel cylinders from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-644 and 731-TA-1494 (Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/non-refillable-steel-cylinders-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ Chassis and Subassemblies — AD/CVD (Institution of Five-Year Reviews)The ITC began reviews to assess whether removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on chassis and subassemblies from China would lead to material injury to the U.S. industry.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-657 and 731-TA-1537 (Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/chassis-and-subassemblies-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ Mattresses — AD/CVD (Institution of Five-Year Reviews)The Commission instituted reviews to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on mattresses from China and antidumping duty orders on mattresses from several other countries would result in material injury to the U.S. industry.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-645 and 731-TA-1495 and 1497-1501 (Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/mattresses-from-cambodia-china-malaysia-serbia-thailand-turkey-and-vietnam-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ Small Vertical Shaft Engines — AD/CVD (Institution of Five-Year Reviews)The ITC initiated five-year reviews concerning antidumping and countervailing duty orders on small vertical shaft engines from China to examine the likelihood of continued or recurring injury if revoked.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-643 and 731-TA-1493 (Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/small-vertical-shaft-engines-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand — AD/CVD (Third Five-Year Reviews)The ITC launched its third reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders covering prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China, assessing whether revocation would cause the continuation or recurrence of injury.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Third Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale — AD/CVD (Second Five-Year Reviews)The ITC instituted second reviews to determine whether removal of the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China would likely lead to material injury.– Authority: International Trade Commission– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-523 and 731-TA-1259 (Second Review)– Dates: Instituted April 1, 2026; responses due May 1, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026.– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews/ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION) Multiple Chinese Products — AD/CVD (Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews)The Department of Commerce initiated five-year sunset reviews for a series of antidumping and countervailing duty orders, including several against China, covering products such as boltless steel shelving units, chassis and subassemblies, mattresses, non-refillable steel cylinders, prestressed concrete steel wire strand, and small vertical shaft engines.– Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: Explicit– Date: Applicable April 1, 2026– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-five-year-sunset-reviews-4/ Raw Flexible Magnets and Hand Trucks — AD/CVD (Notice of Scope Ruling Applications)The Department of Commerce announced receipt of scope ruling applications requesting determinations on whether certain products, such as raw flexible magnets and hand trucks from China, fall within existing antidumping or countervailing duty orders.– Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD/CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY (Scope Ruling Applications)– China Indicator: Explicit– Date: Applicable April 1, 2026– Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-scope-ruling-applications-filed-in-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-proceedings-3/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC began five-year reviews for six Chinese-origin product categories under existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders. All ITC notices were published April 1, 2026, with response deadlines of May 1, 2026, and comment deadlines of June 9, 2026. The Department of Commerce initiated corresponding sunset reviews under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce also received scope ruling requests concerning flexible magnets and hand trucks from China, indicating ongoing order interpretation activity. These coordinated actions reflect the statutory cycle of review and enforcement within U.S. trade remedy practices related to Chinese imports. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders – ITC Five-Year Reviews Chassis and Subassemblies – ITC Five-Year Reviews Mattresses – ITC Five-Year Reviews Small Vertical Shaft Engines – ITC Five-Year Reviews Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand – ITC Five-Year Reviews Boltless Steel Shelving Units – ITC Five-Year Reviews Commerce – Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews Commerce – Scope Ruling Applications (China Products) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Algeria: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Government Finds Subsidies on Steel Rebar from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. They found that producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar, called rebar, from Algeria are receiving unfair subsidies. This is according to a notice published in the Federal Register. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce checked if companies in Algeria got unfair help from their government. They used the rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. If a government gives money or help that benefits a company unfairly, it is called a subsidy. A company named Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA did not participate in the investigation. The Government of Algeria did not give the requested information. So, the U.S. Department made a decision based on the information they had. The subsidies provided to rebar producers in Algeria mean U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect extra duties. The rate of this subsidy is 72.94 percent. This means Algerian rebar companies will pay more to export their goods to the U.S. The “all-others” rate, which applies to other companies not individually examined, will also be 72.94 percent. Before this decision becomes final, another U.S. organization needs to agree. This organization is called the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC checks if the U.S. industry is harmed by imports of rebar from Algeria. If the ITC finds U.S. industry is harmed, the Department of Commerce will issue a countervailing duty order. This will make sure any harmful impact on the U.S. industry is addressed. If the ITC does not find any harm, the investigation ends. The Department of Commerce and the ITC will continue to work together. They aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. If there are changes in this determination, the Department of Commerce will update the Federal Register with any new details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews
Federal Register Announces Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background Information The Department of Commerce conducts these reviews to examine the need for continued duties on certain imports. If not reviewed, the duties can be removed. The reviews are called “Sunset Reviews” and are essential for protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices. Initiation of Review Initiating the review process means the department will assess if duties should remain on different products. The products under review include items like mattresses from countries such as Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Türkiye, and Vietnam. It also includes various products from China. Commerce and ITC Collaboration The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) collaborates with the Department of Commerce. Both institutions publish notices about these reviews to keep the public informed and involved in the process. Contact Information For further inquiry about these reviews, the public can contact officials at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Their offices are located at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Participation in Reviews Parties interested in participating in these reviews must follow specific procedures. Domestic interested parties should file notices by specific deadlines mentioned in the Federal Register notice. Electronic Submissions For submissions, the department has set electronic filing requirements. Interested parties must follow guidelines on submitting relevant information, ensuring accuracy, and complying with certification formats. More details are available on the Department of Commerce’s website. Conclusion This announcement marks the beginning of an important review process impacting international trade. The sunset reviews will determine the future of duties on specific products, helping maintain fair competition in domestic markets. The public and interested parties are encouraged to participate actively in these reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings
U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has received scope ruling applications. These applications ask if certain products are covered by antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The Department will issue scope rulings if necessary. The applications were filed in February 2026. The public is being notified as part of the standard procedure. Two specific applications have been highlighted in this notice: Raw Flexible Magnets from China: The products are educational tools like letter magnets and place value disks. These are produced and exported from China. They were submitted by Adams Magnetic Products Co. on February 12, 2026. Hand Trucks from China: The product in question is a heavy-duty industrial cart. It is made from steel and exported from China. American Lubrication Equipment Corporation submitted the application on February 20, 2026. These applications are available for public access online. If the Department of Commerce has not rejected an application within 30 days, it is accepted for a scope inquiry. If the 30th day is a non-business day, the next business day is considered the deadline. If there are antidumping and countervailing duties for the same product from the same country, the inquiry will be on the antidumping record. The Department can apply a scope ruling generally or specifically to certain companies. For more information on filing and participation, interested parties can consult the Scope Ruling Application Guide available online. The public can comment on the completeness of the scope ruling applications. Comments should be sent to Scot Fullerton from the International Trade Administration. This announcement follows regulations set under CFR 19 351.225(d)(3). The Department of Commerce encourages all interested parties to participate in a transparent and fair review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a five-year review. This review is about imports of boltless steel shelving units from China. The purpose is to see whether revoking existing trade orders will harm the U.S. industry. Background On October 21, 2015, the Department of Commerce made orders about these imports. These were antidumping and countervailing duty orders. They were put in place because the imported shelving units were sold cheaper than they should have been. This caused concern for U.S. producers. In May 2021, another review continued these orders. Now, the USITC is reviewing them again. Details of Review The review started on April 1, 2026. The USITC wants information from people interested in this matter by May 1, 2026. Comments on the responses can be filed until June 9, 2026. Rachel Devenney at USITC is the contact person for more information. Definitions and Participation The review will look at several factors: Subject Merchandise: This is the product being reviewed, which is the shelving units from China. Domestic Like Product: This is the similar product made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: This is U.S. companies that produce the like product. Importer and Participation: Companies involved in importing, or looking to participate, must file for participation within 21 days of the notice. Former Commission employees can also take part, thanks to an ethics update. Business information will be protected under special orders, and such information must be filed within 21 days. Information Requested Interested parties need to provide specific information by May 1, 2026. They need to describe their operations in 2025, including production, sales, and financial details. The companies in the U.S. and China have to submit information about their production and exports. Public Reporting and Additional Information Public reporting details are available, and it’s estimated to take 15 hours to respond to this request. All submissions will be electronic, and no paper documents will be accepted. Conclusion The USITC is reviewing the impact of removing trade orders on Chinese steel shelving. They ask for detailed information from interested companies and parties. This information is important to ensure a fair decision is made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a review. This review looks at imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China. The review will check if revoking orders will hurt U.S. industries. These orders involve antidumping and countervailing duties. Duties are extra charges on products when they enter a country. The review can help decide if these duties should continue or end. The USITC is asking for information from interested parties. These parties must give their responses by May 1, 2026. Comments on these responses must be sent by June 9, 2026. Caitlyn Hendricks-Costello from the Office of Investigations can provide more information. She can be reached at (202) 205-2058. The antidumping duty was first made on June 29, 2010. The countervailing duty was added on July 7, 2010. These duties were reviewed in 2015 and again in 2021. Now, the USITC is looking to review them again. This review is very detailed. It will look at things like imports, prices, and how they affect U.S. industries. The USITC will assess this information to decide its next steps. People or groups who want to take part must file an entry of appearance. They have to do this no later than 21 days after this news was published in the Federal Register. The USITC will also handle business proprietary information (BPI) under special rules. Those who want to see this information must apply within 21 days. The process has rules to ensure all submissions are accurate. These rules include making certifications about the data submitted. The review is for anyone interested in steel wire strands. This can be producers, importers, or anyone affected by these duties. They must share specific information like their name, address, and the likely effects of removing duties. The investigation wants to see the impact on U.S. industries. It will gather data from 2025 as part of this process. The review also seeks to understand changes in supply and demand after 2019. There is an option for participants to agree or disagree with the definitions given in the review. This review is part of ongoing efforts under the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order for this review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Small Vertical Shaft Engines From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
USITC Reviews on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started reviews related to small vertical shaft engines from China. This is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The reviews will find out if removing the existing duties on these engines from China could hurt the U.S. industry again. These reviews started on April 1, 2026. Anyone interested in this issue should provide information by May 1, 2026. Comments about the adequacy of responses can be submitted by June 9, 2026. The background of this issue started on May 4, 2021, when the Department of Commerce put duties on small vertical shaft engines from China. These reviews will help decide if keeping the duties is necessary to protect U.S. producers. Definitions are important in these reviews. “Subject Merchandise” refers to engines from China. The “Domestic Industry” includes U.S. engine makers like Briggs & Stratton and Honda Power. The reviews also talk about “Subject Country,” which is China, and “Domestic Like Product,” which are U.S. similar engines. Interested parties can be involved by adding their names to a public service list. People who have worked for the Commission before may participate if there’s no conflict of interest. For this review, some business information may be shared with authorized people through an administrative protective order. Written submissions are required for formal replies. Submission details and specifications are outlined by the Commission’s rules. Responses should include detailed company information, business data, and judgments on the effect of duties on the Domestic Industry. This includes the volume of imports, their price impact, and effects on U.S. job markets. Producers and importers should provide specific data about production and sales both in the U.S. and with exports. All responses should be as detailed as possible. Finally, the USITC seeks to identify any significant changes in the market since the orders began, focusing on supply, demand, and competition both in the U.S. and abroad. The reviews are held under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, as noted in the official notice by the USITC Secretary, Lisa Barton. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Mattress Imports Estimated reading time: 8–10 minutes On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of reviews concerning imported mattresses. This review will look at mattresses from several countries, including Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The purpose is to determine if lifting current trade duties would harm U.S. mattress makers. In 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce placed special duties on these mattresses to protect local producers. The review will see if these duties are still needed or not. Key Dates and Participation The review started on April 1, 2026. Responses to the notice must be submitted by May 1, 2026. Comments about these responses are due by June 9, 2026. Information for Participants Alejandro Orozco, at 202-205-3177, is the point of contact. People with hearing or mobility problems can get assistance by contacting the USITC. Definitions and Procedures The review will look at “Subject Merchandise,” which refers to mattresses from the listed countries. The review aims to decide if ending duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. U.S. producers, importers, and other parties interested in this review can participate by filing paperwork correctly. Previous USITC workers can join if they meet specific rules. Information and Details Needed for Responses Participants must submit detailed information, including: Business name, contact details, and an official certifier. Statement showing if the participant is affected by the review. Willingness to participate and provide requested information. Impact statement on the U.S. mattress industry if duties are lifted. The review will also gather data about producers, changes since the duties started, and any economic impacts. Submission and Filing Process All responses are to be submitted online through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System. No paper submissions will be accepted. Additional Information If a participant cannot provide requested details, they must inform the USITC as soon as possible, explaining why. This information is crucial for the review process. The USITC will use this data to decide if the special duties should remain or end. The outcome of these reviews will impact U.S. mattress producers, importers, and exporters. For the document display, the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 26-5-683, ending on June 30, 2026. Participants can find more procedural information on the USITC’s website. Conclusion This review by the USITC is an important step in deciding the future of trade duties on mattresses from these countries. The involved parties have specific deadlines to meet to have their input considered. For more details, participants are encouraged to contact the USITC directly or visit its website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Chassis and Subassemblies From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
United States International Trade Commission Begins Review on Chassis and Subassemblies from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On Wednesday, April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of a review. This review is about chassis and subassemblies from China. The USITC wants to decide if removing certain trade orders will hurt U.S. industries. The USITC is looking at antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are special taxes on items from China. The review will see if taking away these duties might cause harm to U.S. companies. The USITC wants feedback from interested parties. They have until May 1, 2026, to reply. In May and July of 2021, antidumping and countervailing orders were placed. These orders aimed to protect U.S. industries. The current review will check if U.S. industries still need this protection. The USITC has set up rules for this review. The rules will help decide if they need a full or short review. The next step depends on how many people reply. The public can watch this process. Many details are online. People can visit websites like https://www.usitc.gov for info. There’s an electronic system to see details related to this review. People and companies in the U.S. that care about the outcome can join. They need to file their intent to participate soon. Those involved will be on a special list. This list helps the USITC know who is part of the review. Former USITC employees can be part of this review. This is allowed even if they worked on similar past issues. There are rules and ethics to follow. For ethics questions, they should contact Charles Smith at the General Counsel’s Office. The USITC will keep some information private. They will follow certain rules to do this. Some people can see this private info if they meet certain criteria. They will use a special order to control who can see what. Those who want to submit opinions and data must make sure their information is accurate. There are rules on how to send in documents. They can see these rules on the USITC website. The USITC wants information from manufacturers, importers, and other important groups. They will look at this info carefully. Whether these duties stay or go will affect many businesses. The review will cover many points. They will look at the amount of goods coming in. How these goods affect prices and their impact on U.S. businesses are key points. All views on possible changes in supply and demand are important. It’s not just about what is happening right now. The USITC wants to know what might happen later too. This review is important for the U.S. economy. It will guide decisions on trade with China. The USITC is working hard to ensure they make the right choice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
International Trade Commission Begins Review on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of a five-year review process. This review will determine if the removal of existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on non-refillable steel cylinders from China would continue to harm the U.S. industry. This decision is based on the Tariff Act of 1930, which is used to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. The review process began on April 1, 2026. Interested parties must submit their responses by May 1, 2026. The USITC will receive comments on whether these responses are adequate by June 9, 2026. For more information, details can be obtained by contacting Alexis Yim at 202-708-1446 in the Office of Investigations. Electronic access to documents is also available through the USITC’s website. The original antidumping and countervailing duty orders were issued by the Department of Commerce on May 11, 2021. These orders were designed to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices concerning non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The review will assess several factors. These include whether revoking the orders will lead to continued or repeat injury to U.S. producers. Details about the type of merchandise and the domestic industry involved are clearly defined by the USITC. USITC rules and processes will guide the review. These include evaluating how parties respond to the notice of institution. Former USITC employees can appear in this review process, provided they meet specific conditions. Certain information is considered business proprietary information (BPI). The Secretary of the Commission will disclose this under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). All parties must ensure their submitted information is accurate and complete. This applies to submissions throughout the entire review process. Responses must contain specific information. This includes details about their firm and the likely effects of revoking the duties. The USITC has laid out detailed instructions for participants wishing to submit information. U.S. producers, importers, and other interested parties must provide detailed figures about their operations from calendar year 2025 in their responses. The Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during the review process. All documents must be submitted using the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Parties unable to provide the requested information must notify the Commission promptly and explain why they cannot provide it. This review is crucial for determining the continuation of duties that protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices involving Chinese steel cylinders. For more comprehensive details, parties can visit the USITC website. The review ensures that the U.S. industry is not adversely affected by international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-04-01
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing — April 1, 2026 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Registering Emergency Medical Services Agencies Under the Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act of 2017 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/C1-2026-02288/registering-emergency-medical-services-agencies-under-the-protecting-patient-access-to-emergency Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Title-Voice of Customer Survey Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06312/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-title-voice-of Sub: Justice Department Content: The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Private Sector, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 3. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Research Triangle Institute Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06311/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-research-triangle-institute Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Research Triangle Institute has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 4. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Pharmaron Manufacturing Services (US) LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06261/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-pharmaron-manufacturing-services-us-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Pharmaron Manufacturing Services (US) LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 5. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Sterling Wisconsin, LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06260/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-sterling-wisconsin-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Sterling Wisconsin, LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 6. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Indivior Manufacturing LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06259/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-indivior-manufacturing-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Indivior Manufacturing LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 7. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Fisher Clinical Services, Inc. (Document 2026-06258) Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06258/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-fisher-clinical-services-inc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Fisher Clinical Services, Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 8. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Fisher Clinical Services, Inc. (Document 2026-06257) Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06257/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-fisher-clinical-services-inc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Fisher Clinical Services, Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 9. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Royal Emerald Pharmaceuticals Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06256/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-royal-emerald-pharmaceuticals Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Royal Emerald Pharmaceuticals has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-01
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-01 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06327/notice-of-scope-ruling-applications-filed-in-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-proceedings Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) received scope ruling applications, requesting that scope inquiries be conducted to determine whether identified products are covered by the scope of antidumping duty (AD) and/or countervailing duty (CVD) orders and that Commerce issue scope rulings pursuant to those inquiries. In accordance with Commerce's regulations, we are notifying the public of the filing of the scope ruling applications listed below in the month of February 2026. 2. Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06326/initiation-of-five-year-sunset-reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders and suspended investigations listed below. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same orders and suspended investigations. 3. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06325/antidumping-or-countervailing-duty-order-finding-or-suspended-investigation-advance-notification-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 4. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Algeria: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06265/steel-concrete-reinforcing-bar-from-algeria-final-affirmative-countervailing-duty-determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Algeria. The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-01
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-01 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From China Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06313/kitchen-appliance-shelving-and-racks-from-china Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06293/non-refillable-steel-cylinders-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on non-refillable steel cylinders from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 3. Chassis and Subassemblies From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06292/chassis-and-subassemblies-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on chassis and subassemblies from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 4. Mattresses From Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06290/mattresses-from-cambodia-china-malaysia-serbia-thailand-turkey-and-vietnam-institution-of-five-year Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on mattresses from China and antidumping duty orders on mattresses from Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 5. Small Vertical Shaft Engines From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06289/small-vertical-shaft-engines-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on small vertical shaft engines from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 6. Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06288/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire stand from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 7. Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/01/2026-06287/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-institution-of-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units prepackaged for sale from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-31
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-31 1) Executive Summary Two U.S. trade policy developments related to China were published today in the Federal Register. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) received a new Section 337 complaint concerning semiconductor devices, while the Department of Commerce (DOC) initiated a broad set of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) administrative reviews, including multiple AD/CVD orders involving Chinese exports such as frozen warmwater shrimp, aluminum sheet, photovoltaic products, gas-powered pressure washers, and wood mouldings. Key authorities involved are the ITC and the DOC’s International Trade Administration (ITA). The policy tools include Section 337 enforcement and AD/CVD administrative reviews. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (USITC) Semiconductor Devices — Section 337 Investigation (Complaint Receipt and Public Interest Solicitation) The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a complaint titled *Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing Same, and Components Thereof* (Docket No. 3896), filed by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. on March 26, 2026. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 related to the importation and sale of certain semiconductor devices and components. Respondents include Tower Semiconductor entities in the United States, Israel, Japan, and Italy. The complainant requests issuance of a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and imposition of a bond during the Presidential review period. The ITC is soliciting public comments on potential effects of the requested remedies on U.S. public health, welfare, competition, production, and consumers. – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission – Policy Type: ITC 337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: None – Key Identifiers: Docket No. 3896; Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) – Key Dates: Complaint filed March 26, 2026; notice published March 31, 2026 – Source: Link DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA) Multiple Products — AD/CVD Administrative Reviews Initiated (Annual Review Initiation Notice) The U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA), Enforcement and Compliance Division, announced the initiation of administrative reviews of existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders covering numerous countries with February anniversary dates. The notice includes extensive listings for Chinese-origin products under active AD/CVD orders, such as certain frozen warmwater shrimp, common alloy aluminum sheet, crystalline silicon photovoltaic products and cells, gas-powered pressure washers, wood mouldings and millwork, and truck and bus tires. The reviews cover entries during calendar years 2025 and 2026. Commerce outlines its procedures for respondent selection, separate rate applications in non-market economy proceedings, possible duty absorption reviews, and submission timelines for factual information and extension requests. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (Enforcement and Compliance) – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: Explicit – Key Identifiers: Federal Register Vol. 91, No. 61 (FR Doc. 2026-06127) – Key Dates: Applicable March 31, 2026; review periods vary by product segment – Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC initiated a new Section 337 investigation request concerning semiconductor devices filed by GlobalFoundries, with potential import restrictions on named respondents. The ITC invited public comment on the potential impact of proposed Section 337 remedies under Docket No. 3896. The U.S. Department of Commerce started annual administrative reviews of multiple AD/CVD orders, including several involving exports from China across diverse manufacturing sectors. Chinese-origin products named for review include shrimp, aluminum sheet, photovoltaic goods, pressure washers, wood mouldings, and tires. Both updates underscore ongoing trade remedy enforcement under established statutory frameworks—Section 337 for intellectual property–linked investigations and Section 751 for duty orders. 4) Full Source Links (Index) ITC | Semiconductor Devices Section 337 Complaint (GlobalFoundries) DOC | AD/CVD Administrative Reviews Initiation (Multiple Products including China) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Department of Commerce Commences Reviews on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is starting a series of reviews related to antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These reviews are for various products, with some having specific February anniversary dates. The reviews will cover exports from many countries. Some of the countries involved are Egypt, India, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Korea, Vietnam, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and China. Each country has specific products that will be reviewed. For example, from India, products like certain frozen warmwater shrimp, sodium nitrite, and stainless steel bar will be reviewed. From Vietnam, frozen warmwater shrimp are also on the list. Italy has stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings under review. In the case of the product from Egypt, the specific product being reviewed is prestressed concrete steel wire strand. From South Africa, lemon juice is under review. The reviews will determine if the dumping duties have been absorbed by any exporter or producer. If duties are absorbed, it might mean the exporter or producer has sold goods in the United States through an affiliated importer. Also, the Department wants to ensure that reviews are done fairly. They will select companies or respondents based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They may also ask for specific details on sales and exports during the review period. Companies selected as respondents need to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires will help gather information on whether they are separate from government control, especially for non-market economy countries. Commerce has set deadlines for various submissions in these reviews. Parties must follow these deadlines closely to participate in the review process. For antidumping reviews, companies must show that they have no sales if they want to avoid being reviewed. This is possible if there are no suspended entries for a company or entity under review. The Secretary of Commerce, Scot Fullerton, emphasized the importance of this operation. The Department aims to ensure fair trade and protect American industries from unfair practices from abroad. Overall, the reviews are detailed and demand transparency from involved exporters and producers. The Department of Commerce aims to complete these reviews by February 28, 2027. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes March 31, 2026 The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new complaint. This complaint is about semiconductor devices. A company named GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. filed it. Details of the Complaint This complaint was filed on March 26, 2026. It talks about violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint mentions certain semiconductor devices and products that contain these devices. GlobalFoundries claims some companies imported them into the United States and sold them here. Companies Mentioned Tower Semiconductor Ltd. from Israel. Tower Partners Semiconductor Co., Ltd. from Japan. Tower Semiconductor Italy S.R.L. from Italy. Tower US Holdings, Inc. from Newport Beach, CA. Tower Semiconductor San Antonio, Inc. from San Antonio, TX. Tower NPB Holdings, Inc. from San Jose, CA. Tower Semiconductor Newport Beach, Inc. from Newport Beach, CA. Newport Fab LLC from Newport Beach, CA. Requested Action GlobalFoundries wants the Commission to take action. The company seeks a limited exclusion order. It also requests cease and desist orders. This means stopping these companies from selling the semiconductor devices during a special 60-day review period. Public Interest Comments The USITC is asking for comments from the public. People can share their thoughts on how these actions might affect public health and welfare in the U.S. They can also share views on the impact on the U.S. economy and consumers. The Commission wants to know: How are these semiconductor devices used in the U.S.? Are there health, safety, or welfare concerns with the requested actions? Can other companies in the U.S. make similar products to replace the imports? Can U.S. companies increase production to replace the imported products in a reasonable time? How will taking these actions affect U.S. consumers? Deadlines for Comments Those who wish to comment have eight days to do so after this notice is published. GlobalFoundries can reply to these comments within three days. Filing Submissions All submissions must be made electronically. They should be filed through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The docket number for these submissions is “Docket No. 3896”. If someone wants to keep information confidential, they must request it separately. All public documents will be available for inspection. Conclusion The case will continue under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this notice on March 26, 2026. The official document is listed under FR Doc. 2026-06143 in the Federal Register. The Commission is actively seeking feedback on the public interest issues related to this matter. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-31
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-31 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the Adequacy of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions: Lithium Hexafluorophosphate From the People’s Republic of China Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/31/2026-06128/notice-of-extension-of-the-deadline-for-determining-the-adequacy-of-the-antidumping-and Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/31/2026-06127/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders with February anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-31
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-31 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/31/2026-06143/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing Same, and Components Thereof, DN 3896; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2. Float Glass Products From China and Malaysia; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/31/2026-06129/float-glass-products-from-china-and-malaysia-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-30
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-30 1) Executive Summary Today’s report covers five Section 337 (ITC_337) proceedings published by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The events include new investigations involving solar cells, semiconductor memory chips, and in-vehicle infotainment systems, as well as determinations on dental burs and electrolyte beverages. The cases collectively involve requests for general and limited exclusion orders, cease and desist orders, and address claims of patent infringement, trademark infringement, and trade secret misappropriation. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC — U.S. International Trade Commission) TOPCon Solar Cells — ITC_337 (Institution of Investigation) The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1494 following a complaint filed by First Solar, Inc. on February 24, 2026, alleging violations of Section 337 concerning importation and sale of certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, and related products. The alleged infringement involves U.S. Patent No. 9,130,074. Respondents include multiple entities from China and other countries, including CSI Solar Co., Ltd., JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd., JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., and Trina Solar Co., Ltd. The complainant seeks a general or limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Explicit (multiple Chinese respondents) Investigation No.: 337-TA-1494 Key Dates: Complaint filed February 24, 2026; investigation instituted March 25, 2026 Source: Link NAND and DRAM Memory Chips — ITC_337 (Institution of Investigation) On March 25, 2026, the ITC instituted Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1492 based on a complaint by MonolithIC 3D Inc. of Texas. The case alleges violations of Section 337 regarding importation and sale of NAND and DRAM memory chips that allegedly infringe several U.S. patents. The complainant seeks a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None specified in notice Investigation No.: 337-TA-1492 Key Dates: Complaint filed February 17, 2026; investigation instituted March 25, 2026 Source: Link In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems — ITC_337 (Institution of Investigation) The ITC initiated Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1493 on March 25, 2026, following a complaint from Zync Inc. of San Francisco. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 due to misappropriation of trade secrets and tortious interference concerning in‑vehicle infotainment systems used by BMW AG and BMW of North America. The complainant seeks a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Investigation No.: 337-TA-1493 Key Dates: Complaint filed February 24, 2026; supplement filed March 3, 2026; investigation instituted March 25, 2026 Source: Link Electrolyte Containing Beverages — ITC_337 (Final Determination) The ITC announced a final determination in Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1435, finding a violation of Section 337 involving trademark infringement of several registered U.S. trademarks related to electrolyte beverages and labeling. The Commission affirmed an initial determination granting a summary finding of violation and issued a general exclusion order (GEO). The investigation, which included respondents located in Mexico, is now terminated. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Investigation No.: 337-TA-1435 Key Dates: Investigation vote March 26, 2026; termination following issuance of GEO Source: Link Dental Burs and Kits — ITC_337 (Commission Determination Not to Review ID) The ITC decided not to review an initial determination (Order No. 6) issued by the Administrative Law Judge in Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1479, which amended the complaint and notice of investigation to add Research Industries of Pakistan as a respondent. The case concerns alleged violations of Section 337 involving infringement of U.S. patents and trademarks related to dental burs and kits. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Investigation No.: 337-TA-1479 Key Dates: Complaint amendment approved March 3, 2026; decision not reviewed March 25, 2026 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC published five Section 337‑related decisions and notices on March 30, 2026. Two new investigations were instituted—one targeting Chinese and global solar cell makers (First Solar case) and another involving semiconductor memory chips (MonolithIC 3D case). A final determination in the electrolyte beverages case resulted in a general exclusion order based on trademark infringement findings. The infotainment systems complaint filed by Zync Inc. prompted a fresh investigation encompassing trade secret misappropriation claims. The dental burs proceeding shows an administrative amendment to include a new respondent without altering the substantive scope of the case. 4) Full Source Links (Index) TOPCon Solar Cells — ITC Institution of Investigation NAND and DRAM Memory Chips — ITC Institution of Investigation In‑Vehicle Infotainment Systems — ITC Institution of Investigation Electrolyte Containing Beverages — ITC Final Determination, GEO Issued Dental Burs and Kits — ITC Determination Not to Review ID 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Dental Burs and Kits Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
Update on U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation on Dental Burs Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important announcement. The Commission decided not to review an initial determination. This means there are changes in an ongoing investigation about dental burs and related kits. The investigation began on January 20, 2026. It was based on a complaint by two companies. These companies are Huwais IP Holding LLC and Versah, LLC. Both are from Jackson, Michigan. They allege violations related to imports, sales, and the infringement of patents and trademarks. The patents mentioned are U.S. Patent Nos. 9,326,778 and 11,712,250. Trademarks include Registration Nos. 6,261,888; 6,261,886; and 4,689,471. The investigation covers many companies around the world. These companies are in places like Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, and Australia. The Commission’s latest action is to amend the complaint. This amendment adds Research Industries of Sialkot, Pakistan, as a respondent. This decision followed a motion by the complainants on February 23, 2026. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this motion. The Administrative Law Judge overseeing this case decided in favor of the amendment. The decision was made on March 3, 2026, with no objections. The change does not harm public interest or the rights of any parties. The Commission took a vote on March 25, 2026, confirming the decision to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. This is now part of the official records. For further information, Mr. Ronald A. Traud, Esq., from the USITC can be contacted. He is available at the Commission’s main office in Washington, DC. The investigation and its results are guided by section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as revised. The specific rules followed are in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on March 25, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain NAND and DRAM Memory Chips; Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Begins New Investigation on Memory Chips Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Complaint Filed by MonolithIC 3D Inc. A company named MonolithIC 3D Inc., based in Texas, filed a complaint. They claim that some memory chips being brought into the United States have violated their patents. A patent is a special right given to an inventor for their invention. MonolithIC 3D Inc. believes that these imported memory chips infringe on their own patented technology. Patents Involved The complaint mentions several patents. Some of these are U.S. Patent No. 12,035,531 and U.S. Patent No. 12,125,737. These patents are for specific features and designs related to memory chips. Scope of Investigation The investigation will look into whether these memory chips were imported illegally because they infringe on the company’s patents. The ITC will also check if there is an established industry in the U.S. that uses this patented technology. Companies Being Investigated Several companies are named in this investigation. They include KIOXIA Holdings Corporation and SK hynix Inc., among others. These companies are believed to be importing the chips that may be infringing on the patents. Next Steps The ITC has appointed a Chief Administrative Law Judge to oversee this investigation. The law judge will listen to both sides. They will consider any evidence provided. Responses Required The companies named in the investigation must respond to the complaint. They need to do this within 20 days. If any company fails to respond, it might lose its chance to defend itself. Possible Outcomes If the investigation finds that these companies have violated patents, several things could happen. The Commission might stop these companies from importing more of these chips. They could also issue orders for the companies to cease and desist, meaning they would have to stop certain activities. The ITC will continue to update the public on this investigation. This matter is important for the technology industry and will be closely watched. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on TOPCon Solar Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an official investigation. This investigation is about certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, and their components. It is important because it checks if companies are breaking the law by selling these products in the U.S. The investigation started because of a complaint by First Solar, Inc., a company based in Phoenix, Arizona. They believe their U.S. Patent No. 9,130,074, called the ‘074 patent, is being used without permission. This patent is about making solar cells. First Solar thinks other companies are using it illegally. First Solar filed this complaint on February 24, 2026. They added more information to the complaint on March 10, 2026. The Commission is trying to find out if there is a violation of the law. They want to know if companies are bringing these solar products to the U.S. without permission. If the investigation finds problems, they might stop companies from bringing these products into the country. The Commission might also stop them from selling these products in the U.S. Several companies are part of the investigation. These companies are from many countries, including the U.S., Germany, Canada, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, India, Jordan, Korea, and Japan. Some companies on the list are AXITEC, Canadian Solar, JA Solar, JinkoSolar, Mundra Solar, Philadelphia Solar, Hanwha Q CELLS, Runergy, Trina Solar, T1 Energy, Vietnam Sunergy, and Toyo. Each has different addresses and places where they operate. The USITC will tell these companies about the investigation. These companies must respond to the complaint and the investigation notice within 20 days. If they don’t respond, they might lose their chance to defend themselves. This could mean they will not be able to sell their products in the U.S. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint someone to oversee the investigation. The appointed judge will look at all the evidence. They will listen to what everyone has to say and make a decision about the public interest. The investigation is a serious matter. Companies need to respect U.S. laws. They must ensure that they are not using patented technology without permission. The Commission’s decision will help protect inventors and their inventions. The Commission keeps public documents on its electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. People with hearing or mobility issues can contact the USITC for assistance. In conclusion, the USITC’s investigation is crucial. It ensures fair trade and protects intellectual property in the solar energy industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Ban on Certain Electrolyte Beverages Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important decision about certain electrolyte drinks. These drinks are banned from being brought into the United States if they misuse certain registered trademarks. The investigation started in February 2025. Complaints came from businesses in Texas and New York, as well as a company in Mexico. They said some drinks use their trademarks without permission. The Commission looked into this claim under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Eight companies from Mexico were named in the investigation. Some companies settled the matter by agreeing to certain conditions, and two companies had the case against them withdrawn. Four companies did not respond to the investigation or show why they were not guilty. In July 2025, the businesses who complained asked for a decision without a full trial because the companies did not respond. The judge agreed with them. In December, the Commission reviewed part of that decision and agreed that the U.S. industry was being harmed. The Commission decided there was a violation of section 337. They issued a general exclusion order (GEO). The GEO stops the unlicensed import of electrolyte drinks that misuse the identified trademarks. The GEO also includes packaging and labeling of these beverages. The Commission considered public interest but found no reason to stop the order. The decision details how the four companies did not follow certain rules, which led to this GEO. The Commission’s decision ensures that U.S. businesses are protected from unfair imports. The action took place on March 26, 2026, and was acknowledged by the President and the U.S. Trade Representative. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation on In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has started an investigation about in-vehicle infotainment systems. This investigation starts because of a complaint filed on February 24, 2026. The company Zync Inc., located in San Francisco, California, filed this complaint. The complaint talks about products like infotainment systems used in cars. These systems help passengers enjoy music, maps, and more. According to the complaint, the concern is about some companies using secrets from Zync Inc. without permission. This situation is dangerous as it may harm an industry in the United States. Zync Inc. wants the investigation to lead to certain actions. They wish for an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. These actions would stop certain products from coming into the U.S. if they use stolen secrets. The companies named in the investigation are Bayerische Motoren Werke AG from Germany and BMW of North America, LLC from New Jersey. They are believed to be using Zync Inc.’s technology without permission. The investigation process will have important steps. The investigation was ordered by the Commission on March 25, 2026. The Chief Administrative Law Judge at the US International Trade Commission will oversee the investigation. The respondents need to reply to the complaint. They have 20 days after receiving the complaint to respond. This is necessary under the Commission’s rules. If the companies named do not respond in time, they might lose the chance to explain their side. People who need more information or special assistance can reach out to the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The U.S. International Trade Commission is committed to following the rules and protecting industries in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-03-30
Justice Department Briefing 2026-03-30 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Census of Prosecutor Offices Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06118/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-reinstatement-with Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Pharmaron Manufacturing Services (US) LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06053/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-pharmaron-manufacturing-services-us-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Pharmaron Manufacturing Services (US) LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 3. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Chemtos, LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06052/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-chemtos-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Chemtos, LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 4. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Usona Institute Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06051/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-usona-institute Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Usona Institute. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-30
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-30 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06126/certain-in-vehicle-infotainment-systems-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 24, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Zync Inc. of San Francisco, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on March 3, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation and the sale of certain in- vehicle infotainment systems, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 2. Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06125/certain-electrolyte-containing-beverages-and-labeling-and-packaging-thereof-ii-notice-of-a Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined to affirm, with supplemental findings and modified reasoning, an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 18) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting a motion for summary determination of violation. The Commission has determined to issue a general exclusion order (“GEO”) prohibiting the importation of electrolyte containing beverages and labeling and packaging thereof that infringe one or more of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,222,726; U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,833,885; U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,717,350; and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,717,232 (collectively, the “Asserted Trademarks”). The investigation is terminated. 3. Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06121/certain-topcon-solar-cells-modules-panels-components-thereof-and-products-containing-same Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 24, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of First Solar, Inc. of Phoenix, Arizona. The complaint was supplemented on March 10, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,130,074 (“the ‘074 patent”). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. 4. Certain NAND and DRAM Memory Chips; Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06113/certain-nand-and-dram-memory-chips-institution-of-investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 17, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of MonolithIC 3D Inc. of Allen, Texas. Supplements to the complaint were filed on February 25, 2026, and March 16, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain NAND and DRAM memory chips by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,035,531 (“the ‘531 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 12,125,737 (“the ‘1- 737 patent”); U.S. Patent No.12,243,765 (“the ‘765 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,342,214 (“the ‘214 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,476,181 (“the ‘181 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,594,473 (“the ‘473 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,862,503 (“the ‘503 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 12,225,737 (“the ‘2-737 patent”). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 5. Certain Dental Burs and Kits Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06033/certain-dental-burs-and-kits-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 6) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”), amending the complaint and notice of investigation to add respondent Research Corporation d/b/a Research Industries of Sialkot, Pakistan (“Research Industries”). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-25
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-25 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers four trade remedy actions published by the U.S. Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration). All actions involve antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) proceedings. Key instruments include preliminary and final determinations, circumvention initiations, and enforcement of liquidation and cash deposit requirements. One circumvention inquiry explicitly concerns Chinese-origin steel inputs routed through Indonesia. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration High Purity Dissolving Pulp from Brazil — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Determination) The Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that producers and exporters of high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil receive countervailable subsidies. The investigation covers the 2024 calendar year. The individually examined respondent, Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A., received a preliminary subsidy rate of 3.67 percent, which also serves as the “all others” rate. Commerce aligned the final countervailing duty determination with the forthcoming final antidumping duty decision for the same product. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: Preliminary determination – Key dates: Published March 25, 2026; final determination expected by August 3, 2026 – Key identifiers: C-351-867 – China Indicator: None – Link: Source Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh — AD/CVD (Final Determination of Circumvention) Commerce issued a final affirmative determination that imports of certain low-carbon steel wire produced in Mexico and completed into standard steel welded wire mesh in the United States circumvent the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded wire mesh from Mexico. The determination applies on a country-wide basis, finding circumvention by Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. but not by Impulsora del Alambre S.A. de C.V. Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation and collect cash deposits for relevant entries after specified dates. Importer certification and documentation requirements are established for compliance. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: Final determination (circumvention) – Key identifiers: A-201-853, C-201-854 – Key date: Applicable March 25, 2026 – China Indicator: None – Link: Source Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Vietnam — AD/CVD (Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry) Commerce initiated a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) completed in Indonesia using cold-rolled steel manufactured in Vietnam are evading the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on CORE from Vietnam. The request was filed by Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation. The inquiry will evaluate whether production in Indonesia is minor or insignificant under section 781(b) of the Tariff Act. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: Initiation of circumvention inquiry – Key date: Applicable March 25, 2026 – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: A-552-843, C-552-844 – Link: Source Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from China — AD/CVD (Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry) Commerce initiated a separate country-wide circumvention inquiry to assess whether corrosion-resistant steel completed in Indonesia using Chinese-origin hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel is circumventing the AD/CVD orders on corrosion-resistant steel from China. The request by Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation asserts that Indonesian processing operations are minor and use Chinese steel inputs. Respondent selection will be based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, and entries remain subject to liquidation suspension under the orders. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: Initiation of circumvention inquiry – Key identifiers: A-570-026, C-570-027 – Key date: Applicable March 25, 2026 – China Indicator: Explicit – Link: Source 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – Commerce published one preliminary subsidy determination (Brazil) and one final circumvention finding (Mexico) alongside two new circumvention inquires (China- and Vietnam-origin inputs via Indonesia). – Both new circumvention inquiries allege that Indonesian processing of third-country materials may evade existing AD/CVD orders. – The steel-related cases reflect continued monitoring of supply chain redirection through Southeast Asia. – The Mexican determination introduces importer certification requirements tied to liquidation suspension and cash deposit obligations. – All actions are aligned with established Commerce procedures under section 781 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations (19 CFR 351.226). 4) Full Source Links (Index) – High Purity Dissolving Pulp from Brazil — Preliminary CVD Determination – Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico — Final Circumvention Determination – Corrosion-Resistant Steel from Vietnam — Circumvention Inquiry Initiation – Corrosion-Resistant Steel from China — Circumvention Inquiry Initiation 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Department of Commerce Makes Preliminary Ruling on Brazilian Dissolving Pulp Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes In a recent development, the U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding high purity dissolving pulp imported from Brazil. This ruling, announced on March 25, 2026, suggests that producers and exporters of this pulp in Brazil are receiving unfair financial support. These supports are referred to as countervailable subsidies. Such subsidies can make products unfairly cheap, affecting U.S. businesses. The period examined covers January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The department’s investigation aims to determine if Brazilian producers received government financial aid, allowing them to sell the product cheaper in the U.S. This can hurt American producers. Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments on this preliminary decision. The investigation started on September 8, 2025, after a notice was published. Originally, the preliminary determination was due earlier but got postponed to March 19, 2026. This was due to government shutdowns, causing delays. Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A. (BSC) is a company in focus. The preliminary findings indicate that they, along with affiliated companies, have benefited from such subsidies. The calculated subsidy rate for them and all other producers and exporters is 3.67%. The Commerce department has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of the high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This applies to imports on or after the notice date. A cash deposit matching the subsidy rate must now accompany these goods. The ruling indicates that Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A. and related companies received benefits from the subsidies, and a standard rate applies to other companies. Moving forward, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also review these findings. If they agree with the Commerce Department’s conclusions, they will decide if these imports harm the U.S. industry. This decision is expected within months. The Department of Commerce remains committed to ensuring fair trade practices, ensuring American industries are not unfairly disadvantaged. This determination is a step towards maintaining a balanced playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Launches Investigation into Steel Imports from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has started a new investigation. It is looking into how certain steel products are being brought into the country. The investigation is specifically about corrosion-resistant steel products. The investigation is focused on steel products from Indonesia. These products use hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel initially made in China. The concern is that these products might be avoiding U.S. trade rules. The rules in question are the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel from China. The investigation started on March 25, 2026. Two companies, Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation, requested it. The inquiry will check if these steel products are not following the existing rules. The Commerce Department will work closely with other U.S. government offices. They will look at different factors for the investigation. These factors include how the steel is made, investment in Indonesia, and trade patterns. They want to see if the steel is just slightly changed in Indonesia to avoid extra duties. The investigation will also use data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This data will help identify which companies to focus on in Indonesia. If any company does not fully respond to information requests, they might face penalties. Starting this investigation means some current shipments could face delays or higher costs. The Department of Commerce could apply existing trade rules to these shipments. The investigation could take up to ten months to complete. This action is to ensure that steel trade rules are followed. It aims to prevent any rule-breaking that might harm U.S. businesses. The changes might affect companies in the U.S. and Indonesia that deal with steel. The U.S. Department of Commerce intends to keep everyone informed. They plan to provide updates and continue the investigation as needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
Commerce Begins Investigation on Vietnamese Steel Circumvention Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Background Information This inquiry starts after a request from Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation. They claim that these steel products should fall under existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) against corrosion-resistant steel from Vietnam. What Are the Orders About? The orders involve flat-rolled steel products. These products might be plated or coated with metals that resist rust, like zinc or aluminum. Such products could also have added layers of paint or plastic coatings. What Is Being Inquired? The inquiry looks at whether steel completed in Indonesia, using materials from Vietnam, is avoiding the duties. The steel products are meant for the U.S. market. If found to be avoiding duties, they will face AD and CVD orders. Steps by Commerce Commerce has guidelines under U.S. trade law to decide if there is circumvention. They look at whether the steel imported into the U.S. is similar to products made in Vietnam, whether the process in Indonesia is minor, and if substantial value comes from Vietnam. They also check if taking steps is necessary to prevent duty evasion. Factors for Consideration Investment level in Indonesia. Research and development efforts there. Production nature and facilities’ extent. Value proportion of the process. The individual factors do not single-handedly decide the issue. Commerce will examine all of them combined to get a complete picture. Looking at Trade Patterns Commerce also examines trade patterns. This includes checking any shifts in how materials are sourced or if trade has increased since the order started. They will study relationships between manufacturers or exports as well. Next Steps and Timeline Commerce will select respondents based on U.S. Customs data. Respondents will likely include Indonesian firms producing the questioned steel. Companies have a duty to provide complete information, or they may face penalties. Suspension Details For products already under suspension due to the orders, Customs will maintain the status quo. If the inquiry finds circumvention, suspended shipments will stay affected. If new items not under suspension are found to skirt the rules, suspension will start from March 25, 2026. Timeline for Decision Commerce plans to issue a preliminary decision in 150 days and a final decision within 300 days. All interested parties will stay informed as the inquiry progresses. Commerce’s decisions aim to ensure fair trade practice and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Trade Orders on Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On March 25, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement. They found that some imports from Mexico are avoiding certain trade rules. These rules are called the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The decision affects specific steel products. Which Products Are Affected? The products involved are low-carbon steel (LCS) wires. These wires are made in Mexico. After they arrive in the U.S., they are turned into welded wire mesh. This mesh is used in construction. It helps make concrete stronger. The Commerce Department decided that some companies are not following the trade rules. How Did This Decision Come About? The Department of Commerce began looking into this issue in September 2025. They had a preliminary decision. Then, they gave more time before making the final decision due to a government shutdown. This final decision was announced on March 20, 2026. Which Companies Are Involved? One company, Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., was found to be avoiding the trade orders. Another company, Impulsora del Alambre S.A. de C.V., was not found to be breaking the rules. What Happens Next? From March 25, 2026, the U.S. will take action to stop these companies from avoiding the rules. All wire shipments from Mexico used to make wire mesh will be watched more closely. The companies must now pay special duties. They also must keep track of what they are importing and prove that they are following the rules. What Are the New Rules? Importers of LCS wire must now follow new rules. They need to show that their products are not avoiding any duties. This is done through certifications. If an importer cannot prove this, they will have to pay the duties. Conclusion This decision affects companies that make and use wire mesh. They need to make sure they follow these new rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce is working hard to make sure everyone plays by the rules. This is how the U.S. is trying to protect its industries and stop unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-25
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-25 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/25/2026-05809/standard-steel-welded-wire-mesh-from-mexico-final-affirmative-determination-of-circumvention Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain low-carbon steel (LCS) wire that are produced in Mexico and assembled or completed into standard steel welded wire mesh (welded wire mesh) in the United States are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on welded wire mesh from Mexico. 2. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/25/2026-05808/certain-corrosion-resistant-steel-products-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-initiation-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In response to a request from Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation (collectively, the requesters), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) completed in Indonesia using cold-rolled steel (CRS) manufactured in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CORE from Vietnam. 3. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/25/2026-05807/certain-corrosion-resistant-steel-products-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-initiation-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In response to a request from Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation (collectively, the requesters), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) completed in Indonesia using hot-rolled steel (HRS) and cold-rolled steel (CRS) manufactured in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CORE from China. 4. Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and India: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/25/2026-05806/citric-acid-and-certain-citrate-salts-from-canada-and-india-postponement-of-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 5. High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/25/2026-05805/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-preliminary-affirmative-countervailing-duty-determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of high purity dissolving pulp (dissolving pulp) from Brazil. The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-24
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-24 1) Executive Summary Today’s report covers three events from U.S. trade authorities. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews for oil country tubular goods from multiple countries, while the Department of Commerce, through the International Trade Administration (ITA), published final results of an antidumping duty review on citric acid from China and issued a procedural notice opening the April 2026 inclusion window for Section 232 automobile parts tariffs. The main instruments involved are antidumping and countervailing duty measures, and Section 232 tariff inclusion procedures. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Oil Country Tubular Goods — AD/CVD (Scheduling Notice for Full Five-Year Reviews) The U.S. International Trade Commission announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on such goods from India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. The Commission will extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the case. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: Trade Remedy Review Scheduling China Indicator: None Key Identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701‑TA‑499‑500 and 731‑TA‑1215‑1216, 1221‑1223 (Second Review) Key Dates: Notice issued March 18, 2026; hearing scheduled July 23, 2026; prehearing briefs due July 16, 2026; posthearing briefs due August 3, 2026. Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/oil-country-tubular-goods-from-india-south-korea-turkey-ukraine-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-full-five-year-reviews/ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the People’s Republic of China — Antidumping Duty (Final Results of Administrative Review 2023–2024) Commerce released final results of its 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The agency determined that RZBC Group Co., Ltd., RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value during the period May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024. The final margin for RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd. was 0.00 percent, and associated entries will be liquidated without regard to antidumping duties. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty Event Type: Final Results of Administrative Review China Indicator: Explicit Key Identifiers: Case No. A‑570‑937 Key Dates: Applicable March 24, 2026; final results signed March 18, 2026. Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/citric-acid-and-certain-citrate-salts-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Section 232 Automobile Parts — Procedural Notice (Opening of April 2026 Inclusion Window) The International Trade Administration announced the opening of the April 2026 inclusions window for automobile parts under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Working with the Bureau of Industry and Security, ITA will accept submissions to request inclusion of additional automobile parts subject to duties established by Presidential Proclamation 10908. The window opens April 1, 2026 and closes April 14, 2026; accepted requests will later be open for public comment on Regulations.gov. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Procedural Notice (Section 232 Tariff Inclusions) Event Type: Policy Notice China Indicator: None Key Dates: Submissions accepted April 1–14, 2026. Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-the-opening-of-the-inclusions-window-for-the-section-232-automobile-parts-tariff-inclusions-process/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC initiated full five-year reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders concerning oil country tubular goods from five countries, with the review period extended due to complexity. Commerce found no dumping by RZBC Group entities for citric acid from China for 2023–2024, maintaining a 0.00 percent rate for that exporter. The China-wide entity rate for citric acid remains unchanged at 156.87 percent as it was not subject to review. The ITA opened the April 2026 submission window for Section 232 automobile parts inclusion requests, continuing the regular quarterly process. All actions were published in the Federal Register on March 24, 2026, highlighting ongoing AD/CVD enforcement and trade-policy administration activities. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Oil country tubular goods – scheduling of five-year reviews (ITC) Citric acid from China – AD administrative review final results (DOC) Section 232 automobile parts – April 2026 inclusion window notice (DOC) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Notice of the Opening of the Inclusions Window for the Section 232 Automobile Parts Tariff Inclusions Process
Department of Commerce Opens Inclusions Window for Automobile Parts Tariff Process Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a new update regarding the tariff process on automobile parts. This update comes from the International Trade Administration (ITA). The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is working with the ITA to handle this process. A special time, called the “inclusions window,” is opening for submissions. During this time, people can ask to add more automobile parts to the list under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The President has given permission for certain duties, or taxes, on vehicle parts. The inclusions window will open on April 1, 2026, and will close at 11:59 p.m. ET on April 14, 2026. This window is the time frame during which people can submit requests to include more parts on the tariff list. All submissions must be sent to a specific email. The email address is protected and needs to be accessed responsibly to avoid errors. The process was established by a proclamation from the President on March 26, 2025. This is known as Proclamation 10908, titled “Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States.” It sets out specific duties on automobiles and certain parts. In September 2025, an interim final rule (IFR) was published. This rule created a specific process to include additional parts. The rule established four two-week windows each year: in January, April, July, and October. These windows are for submitting automobile parts for possible inclusion in the tariff duties. This April’s inclusions window will be open for two weeks. Once the window closes, inclusion requests that are accepted will be available for public comment. This will happen on Docket ID ITA-2025-0040 at Regulations.gov. Before submitting a request, make sure the parts are not already part of the duties list. If you have submitted a request before and have not received a decision, do not submit the same request again. Only submit if you have new important information. Andrew Farquharson, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing, provided this update. The document information was filed on March 23, 2026, and carries the billing code 3510-DR-P. For further details or questions, you may contact the email provided in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Completes Review on Citric Acid Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duty on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The review period was from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration under the U.S. Department of Commerce. The agency looked at the sales of RZBC Group Co., Ltd., including RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., in the United States. It was determined that these companies did not sell citric acid at prices below what is considered normal. The review confirms that the decision remains unchanged from the preliminary results shared in September 2025. There were no comments or disputes concerning the preliminary findings, leading to this final decision without alteration. The product discussed in this review is citric acid from China. The review ensures that the product sold in the United States was not sold at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. markets. The review also covered the “China-wide entity,” a status that involves other Chinese exporters. There was no requirement to review this entity in this instance since no requests were made. The earlier set rate of 156.87 percent remains for the China-wide entity. The final results show that RZBC did not sell citric acid at unfairly low prices in the U.S. during the review period, maintaining a zero percent dumping margin. There were no changes to the original calculations or findings from the preliminary review, so no further details will be disclosed. For this review, there are also implications for duties. Since there was no unfair pricing detected, duties on these products will not be applied for the entries made during the review period. Additionally, new cash deposit requirements will be effective with the publication of the results. This means any new shipments of citric acid from China will follow the updated rules. The Commerce Department’s assessments guide how duties are applied to imports that might harm U.S. businesses. This ensures fair trade practices. The review process and its results are crucial for maintaining fair prices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The entire review and its implications are published for transparency and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
United States International Trade Commission Announces Full Five-Year Reviews on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews. These reviews focus on oil country tubular goods from five countries: India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam. The purpose is to decide if removing certain trade duties would harm U.S. Industries. Purpose of the Reviews The reviews will determine if canceling countervailing and antidumping duties on tube goods would hurt the U.S. industry. Specifically, the decisions involve countervailing duties for India and Turkey and antidumping duties for all five countries. The ITC aims to see if removing these duties would cause damage within a reasonable time. Additional Information For more information, contact Jesse Sanchez from the Office of Investigations at (202) 205-2402. Persons with hearing or mobility disabilities can also reach out using specified contact numbers. Review Process The ITC decided on November 24, 2025, to conduct full reviews due to the type of responses received. The scheduling follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Participants and representatives must file an entry to appear within 45 days of the notice’s publication. Participation Details Industrial users and consumer organizations can take part by filing an entry of appearance. Those who filed a notice before do not need to file again. A public service list of participants will be maintained. Filing and Disclosure The Secretary’s Office will only accept electronic filings via the Electronic Document Information System. Business proprietary information will be disclosed only to authorized applicants under certain protective measures. Key Dates in 2026 July 8: Nonpublic staff report will be released, followed by a public version. July 23: An in-person hearing is scheduled. July 22: A prehearing conference may be held. July 16: Deadline for prehearing briefs. Parties must follow specific rules and timelines to submit written or oral testimony. Extraordinary Complications The ITC considers these reviews to be complex and has extended the period by up to 90 days for deeper analysis. Reporting and Rules The reviews follow the Tariff Act of 1930’s guidelines and ITC practice rules. All submissions should follow rules on timing and format. Conclusion This step by the ITC is crucial to safeguarding U.S. Industries while considering international trade relationships. The decisions made will directly impact how oil country tubular goods from these countries are managed in U.S. markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-24
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-24 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/24/2026-05737/citric-acid-and-certain-citrate-salts-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to determine that RZBC Group Co., Ltd., RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd. (RZBC IE), and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, RZBC) did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. 2. Notice of the Opening of the Inclusions Window for the Section 232 Automobile Parts Tariff Inclusions Process Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/24/2026-05681/notice-of-the-opening-of-the-inclusions-window-for-the-section-232-automobile-parts-tariff Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), working with the International Trade Administration (ITA) has established a process for including additional automobile parts within the scope of the duties authorized by the President under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This notice opens the April 2026 inclusions window for submissions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-24
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-03-24 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/24/2026-05675/oil-country-tubular-goods-from-india-south-korea-turkey-ukraine-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-full Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. 2. Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From China, India, Taiwan, and the United Arab Emirates; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/24/2026-05665/polyethylene-terephthalate-film-sheet-and-strip-from-china-india-taiwan-and-the-united-arab-emirates Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-03-23
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-03-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of 3-Methoxyphencyclidine (1-(1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl)piperidine) in Schedule I Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/23/2026-05618/schedules-of-controlled-substances-placement-of-3-methoxyphencyclidine Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: With the issuance of this final rule, the Drug Enforcement Administration places substance 3-methoxyphencyclidine (1-(1-(3- methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl)piperidine; 3-MeO-PCP), including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers, in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. This action is being taken, in part, to enable the United States to meet its obligations under the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. This action imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or possess) or propose to handle 3-MeO-PCP. 2. Notice of Lodging of Proposed Modification to Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/23/2026-05593/notice-of-lodging-of-proposed-modification-to-consent-decree-under-the-comprehensive-environmental Sub: Justice Department Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-20
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-20 1) Executive Summary Two trade remedy determinations were published today by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA). Both concern administrative reviews under antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) laws. One concerns imports from the Republic of Korea, while the other addresses products from the People’s Republic of China. The notices involve preliminary and final results of reviews, subsidy determinations, and duty assessment instructions under Commerce’s Enforcement and Compliance framework. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration (ITA) Pentafluoroethane (R-125) from China — Countervailing Duty (Final Results)Commerce issued the final results of the 2023 countervailing duty administrative review on pentafluoroethane (R‑125) from the People’s Republic of China. The agency determined that two Chinese producers—Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. (and its cross-owned affiliates) and Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd.—received countervailable subsidies during the review period covering January 1 through December 31, 2023. Key Details: Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Administrative review (final results) China Indicator: Explicit Companies and Rates (percent ad valorem): Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. – 10.11% Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. – 3.02% Period of Review: January 1 – December 31, 2023 Applicable Date: March 20, 2026 Citation: [FR Doc. 2026‑05466] Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/pentafluoroethane-r-125-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-review-2023/ Heavy Walled Rectangular Steel Pipes and Tubes from Korea — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Results)Commerce preliminarily determined that heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from the Republic of Korea were not sold at less than normal value during the review period September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. The review covers multiple Korean producers, with preliminary margins of zero for two companies and 35.11 percent for one non-selected company. Commerce also announced a partial rescission with respect to one firm due to lack of suspended entries. Interested parties are invited to comment before final results are issued. Key Details: Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD) Event Type: Administrative review (preliminary results and partial rescission) China Indicator: Not specified Investigation Number: A‑580‑880 Companies and Preliminary Margins (percent): Dong‑a‑Steel Co., Ltd. – 0.00% HiSteel Co., Ltd. – 0.00% Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. – 35.11% Rescission: NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. (no suspended entries) Period of Review: September 1, 2023 – August 31, 2024 Applicable Date: March 20, 2026 Citation: [FR Doc. 2026‑05467] Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/heavy-walled-rectangular-welded-carbon-steel-pipes-and-tubes-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The U.S. Department of Commerce finalized countervailing duty findings for Chinese producers of pentafluoroethane (R‑125) for the 2023 review period. Two Chinese firms were assigned subsidy rates of 10.11% and 3.02%, with continued cash deposit and assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Commerce issued preliminary antidumping duty results for Korean heavy walled rectangular steel pipe and tube producers; two firms received zero margins. The Korean review included one rescission and a review-specific rate assignment for an unexamined company. Both reviews followed multiple extensions and tolling adjustments associated with prior government shutdown delays. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Pentafluoroethane (R‑125) from China — Final CVD Results Heavy Walled Rectangular Steel Pipe and Tube from Korea — Preliminary AD Results 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Pentafluoroethane (R-125) From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Finds China Gave Extra Help to Some Manufacturers Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has looked at how two Chinese chemical companies, Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd., received extra help from their government. This help, called countervailable subsidies, was given between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Because of this help, the U.S. decided that these companies might have an unfair advantage when selling their products in the United States. The final decision was made on March 16, 2026. The Department of Commerce published the details on March 20, 2026. The companies were checked to see how much help they got from the Chinese government. Zhejiang Yonghe got a subsidy rate of 10.11%, and Zhejiang Sanmei got a 3.02% subsidy rate. This means that they received financial support that could give them an advantage over other companies not receiving such help. The Department of Commerce collected data through a thorough review process. They used the Tariff Act of 1930, a long-standing U.S. law, to guide their analysis. They looked at if the support from the Chinese government was specific and beneficial for these companies. Several extensions were granted during the review to ensure a thorough examination, especially considering delays due to government shutdowns. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now be collecting these extra duties on products shipped from these companies after this decision. This will continue until further notice. The Department wants to make sure American companies can compete fairly with those abroad. For anyone who wants more information, it is available through the ACCESS system, a place where people can see public government documents. Officials ensure that rules about keeping information private are strictly followed, though. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s actions show its commitment to fair trade, making sure all companies play by the same rules, and protecting American businesses from unfair foreign competition. This detailed look into the countervailable subsidies is a clear example of ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition globally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Reviews Korean Steel Pipes and Tubes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Review Background The antidumping duty order on these products was first published by Commerce on September 13, 2016. In October 2024, following requests for review, the department started assessing four producers and exporters from Korea. Due to various delays, including extensions and federal shutdowns, Commerce set March 9, 2026, as the deadline for final results. Scope of Merchandise The subject merchandise concerns particular heavy walled welded steel pipes from Korea. The review evaluates if these products were sold in the U.S. at lower than fair value. Findings and Methodology Commerce is conducting the review per U.S. trade laws, focusing on constructed export prices. It confirmed that products from Korea were sold at fair value during this period. Using previously determined rates as references, it was decided that if zero or low margins were found, a different method could be applied for non-reviewed companies based on recent calculations. For Kukje Steel Co., Ltd., a specific rate of 35.11% was recommended while Dong-a-Steel Co., Ltd. and HiSteel Co., Ltd. were preliminarily found to have a zero percent margin. Partial Rescission of Review The review of NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. is rescinded due to no suspended entries of its merchandise during the review period. This decision was made without opposition from parties. Next Steps Interested parties may submit comments on these preliminary findings. There will be a chance to request a hearing within 30 days. A decision on the final results will follow within 120 days of publication. For companies with no individual assessment, the cash deposit rate depends on the most recent official rates. The final instructions to U.S. Customs will follow 35 days after the final result publication. This preliminary review suggests Korean steel pipe exports are compliant with U.S. fair trade laws, pending final evaluation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-03-20
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-03-20 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Exempt Chemical Preparations Under the Controlled Substances Act Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05486/exempt-chemical-preparations-under-the-controlled-substances-act Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: The applications for exempt chemical preparations received by the Drug Enforcement Administration between September 1, 2024, and December 31, 2025, as listed below, were accepted for filing and have been approved or denied as indicated. This publication addresses preparations through December 31, 2025, that were not included in previous Federal Register notices, and it does not affect preparations that have been previously published. 2. Ordering Schedule I and II Controlled Substances Using DEA Form 222; Technical Amendments Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05482/ordering-schedule-i-and-ii-controlled-substances-using-dea-form-222-technical-amendments Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: On September 30, 2019, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published the final rule, New Single-Sheet Format for U.S. Official Order Form for Schedule I and II Controlled Substances (DEA Form 222). The final rule implemented a new single sheet format for DEA Form 222 and provided for a two-year transition period to switch from the triplicate form. This technical amendment corrects certain regulations erroneously not amended in the final rule which creates ambiguities. The amendment clarifies that a DEA Form 222 Power of Attorney may only be executed or revoked by a registrant, a partner of the registrant, or an officer of a registrant corporate entity. It resolves ambiguity over who may sign a DEA Form 222 and removes the obsolete transition provision for the triplicate version of DEA Form 222. These are conforming revisions that do not make any substantive changes to the regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-20
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-03-20 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Truck Bed Covers From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05536/truck-bed-covers-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-initiation-of-countervailing-duty-investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Truck Bed Covers From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of a Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05535/truck-bed-covers-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-initiation-of-a-less-than-fair-value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of China and India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05496/large-diameter-graphite-electrodes-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-india-initiation-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 4. Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of China and India: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05495/large-diameter-graphite-electrodes-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-india-initiation-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 5. Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05467/heavy-walled-rectangular-welded-carbon-steel-pipes-and-tubes-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipe and tube) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were not sold at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results of review. 6. Pentafluoroethane (R-125) From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/20/2026-05466/pentafluoroethane-r-125-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Yonghe) and Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. (Sanmei), received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-03-19
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-03-19 1) Executive Summary Eight trade-related events were published today involving the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and the Department of Justice (DEA). The majority concern antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) matters under the Tariff Act of 1930, including reviews, circumvention inquiries, and continuation decisions. The DOC initiated and continued several China-related investigations on steel wheels, threaded rod, and other products. The ITC announced scheduling of an expedited review for tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China. Policy tools used include administrative review, five-year sunset review, circumvention inquiry, and changed circumstances review. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (U.S. ITC) Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol — Antidumping Duty Order (Expedited Five-Year Review Scheduling) The ITC has scheduled an expedited review under the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revoking the antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Explicit Investigation No.: 731-TA-1046 (Fourth Review) Key Dates: Domestic responses adequate; public comments due by April 2, 2026. Source: [Link] Forged Steel Fittings — AD/CVD Five-Year Review (Full Review Determination) The ITC announced it will conduct full reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on forged steel fittings from India and South Korea to assess whether revocation would lead to injury continuation or recurrence. A schedule will be published later. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-631 and 731-TA-1463-1464 Key Date: March 6, 2026 Source: [Link] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (International Trade Administration) Steel Wheels — Country-Wide Circumvention Inquiry (Vietnam) The DOC initiated a circumvention inquiry to assess whether certain steel wheels produced in Vietnam from Chinese-origin hot-rolled steel are evading existing AD/CVD orders on similar products from China. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Explicit Key Dates: Initiation on March 19, 2026; preliminary determination expected within 150 days. Source: [Link] Steel Wheels — Country-Wide Circumvention Inquiry (Thailand) In a companion action, the DOC initiated an inquiry to determine whether certain steel wheels from Thailand, made using Chinese-origin hot-rolled steel, are circumventing existing AD/CVD orders on Chinese steel wheels. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Explicit Key Dates: Applicable March 19, 2026; questionnaires forthcoming to Thai producers/exporters. Source: [Link] Alloy and Carbon Steel Threaded Rod — Preliminary Results of AD Administrative Review (China) Commerce preliminarily determined that alloy and carbon steel threaded rod from China was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the April 2024–March 2025 review period. Two firms had no reviewable entries and were rescinded. Authority: DOC, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Explicit Key Dates: Preliminary results issued March 19, 2026; case briefs due 21 days after publication. Source: [Link] Utility Scale Wind Towers — Continuation of AD/CVD Orders (Canada, Vietnam, Indonesia, Korea) Following ITC and DOC determinations, Commerce will continue the AD/CVD orders on utility scale wind towers from the four countries. Revocation was found likely to lead to continued dumping or subsidization and U.S. industry injury. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (Sunset Review Continuation) Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Effective Date: March 16, 2026 Source: [Link] Large Diameter Welded Pipe — Initiation of AD Changed Circumstances Review (Canada) Commerce initiated a review to determine whether Interpro Pipe & Steel Inc. is the successor-in-interest to Evraz Inc. NA Canada under the AD order on large diameter welded pipe. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (Changed Circumstances Review) Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Key Date: Initiation March 19, 2026 Source: [Link] Uncoated Paper — Final Results of AD Administrative Review (Portugal) Commerce found that The Navigator Company, S.A. sold uncoated paper from Portugal in the United States below normal value for the March 2023–February 2024 review period. A final weighted-average dumping margin of 10.91 percent was established. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Source: [Link] Off-the-Road Tires — Final Results of CVD Administrative Review (India) Commerce found countervailable subsidies for producers/exporters of pneumatic off-the-road tires from India during 2023. Final rates were 5.96 percent for ATC Tires and 0.57 percent for Balkrishna Industries Ltd. Authority: DOC, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (CVD Review) Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: None Source: [Link] DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Drug Enforcement Administration) Pisgah Laboratories — Importer Application for Controlled Substances Pisgah Laboratories Inc. applied to be registered as an importer of several Schedule II controlled substances for bulk manufacture, including phenylacetone, ecgonine, thebaine, and tapentadol. Authority: Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration Policy Type: Other Event Type: OTHER China Indicator: None Key Date: Comments or hearing requests due by April 20, 2026 Source: [Link] 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Commerce initiated two country-wide circumvention inquiries on steel wheels related to Chinese-origin materials processed in Thailand and Vietnam. The ITC began an expedited five-year review for tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China. Commerce preliminarily found dumping of alloy and carbon steel threaded rod from China for 2024–2025. A continuation of AD/CVD orders was confirmed for utility scale wind towers from four countries. Commerce opened a changed circumstances review in Canada and concluded AD/CVD reviews for products from Portugal and India. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China – ITC Expedited Review Forged Steel Fittings from India and South Korea – ITC Full Reviews Steel Wheels from Vietnam – Circumvention Inquiry Steel Wheels from Thailand – Circumvention Inquiry Threaded Rod from China – Preliminary AD Review Utility Scale Wind Towers – Continuation of AD/CVD Orders Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada – CCR Initiation Uncoated Paper from Portugal – Final AD Review Off-the-Road Tires from India – Final CVD Review Pisgah Laboratories – DEA Importer Application 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S.
