U.S. Commerce Department Finds Malaysian Mattresses Underpriced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released final results regarding the pricing of mattresses imported from Malaysia. The investigation found that these mattresses were sold at prices lower than their normal value in the U.S. market. This decision comes after a thorough review for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. The announcement was made in a notice published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2026. During the review, no comments were submitted from interested parties in response to the preliminary findings released earlier this year on April 15. As a result, the preliminary results have been adopted as final, without any changes. The scope of the investigation covered various companies involved in the production and export of mattresses from Malaysia. It has been determined that several Malaysian producers, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD, Orient GIC Global, and Lion YTT World, all had a weighted-average dumping margin of 42.92 percent. This means they were selling their products significantly cheaper than what is considered fair. The United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be responsible for assessing these antidumping duties on all relevant entries of mattresses from Malaysia. The new cash deposit rates will come into effect immediately for all shipments entering the country on or after the publication date. This action reinforces the U.S. commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign pricing strategies. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor trade activities closely to uphold these standards. Finally, companies importing mattresses are reminded of the importance of complying with all international trade regulations. Failure to declare the reimbursement of antidumping duties as required could lead to heavier penalties, including the possibility of paying double duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chinese Aluminum Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Agency Involved The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Review Details The review period spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. It is part of an administrative review process to ensure fair trade practices. Outcome of the Review The review found that certain companies in China have benefited from countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are financial aid that unfairly benefits a foreign exporter. Companies Affected The final results apply to several Chinese companies. These include Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, and others. Subsidy Rate The companies mentioned have been assigned a countervailable subsidy rate. This rate is 164.29 percent. No Changes from Preliminary Results The Department made no changes from the preliminary review published in April 2026. No comments were submitted from interested parties during the review process. Facts Available with Adverse Inferences For the six non-responsive companies, the Department applied adverse facts available. This decision means they determined the companies did not cooperate with the review. Instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) The Department will instruct the CBP to assess countervailing duties. These duties apply to entries of aluminum extrusions covered by the review. Cash Deposit Instructions From now on, the CBP will collect cash deposits for estimated duties. These deposits are based on the subsidy rates determined in this review. Scope of the Order The order applies to various aluminum extrusions. These include shapes and forms made from certain aluminum alloys. Exclusions Many items are excluded from the order, like certain finished goods and specific aluminum alloys not meeting certain criteria. Conclusion This review ensures that trade practices remain fair. The Department of Commerce continues to monitor and enforce trade laws diligently. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Initiates Reviews on Various Trade Issues Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It has begun a series of administrative reviews on antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These reviews focus on products with June anniversary dates, according to the Federal Register notice published on August 10, 2026. What Are These Reviews? Administrative reviews help check if foreign companies are selling goods at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This is called dumping. If they do, extra taxes called antidumping duties can be applied. The reviews also check if foreign companies receive unfair help from their governments. This is called a countervailable subsidy. In such cases, countervailing duties can be applied. Which Products Are Under Review? Some of the products under review include raw honey from Argentina and Brazil, brass rods from Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea, and crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Other products include certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing from Germany, India, and Switzerland; quartz surface products from India; glycine from Japan and India; and laminated woven sacks from Vietnam. What Is the Procedure? The reviews allow any parties, like companies and producers, to request that their cases be looked at by the Department of Commerce. There are deadlines for submitting information, comments, and responses. For instance, separate rate applications for non-market economy countries must be filed. The companies in the reviews need to prove their independence from their governments to avoid being assigned a single antidumping deposit rate. Applications are due 14 calendar days after this Federal Register notice. Respondents and Deadlines Commerce will select companies for individual examination based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data or through questionnaires requesting sales information. Respondent selection decisions will be made within 35 days of the notice publication. Comments on Customs data or questionnaire data should be submitted within seven days after these are recorded. Companies should also complete the Quantity and Value (Q&V) questionnaire separately for accuracy in respondent selection. Notices of No Sales and Deadlines If there is no sale or entry during the examination period, a notice of no sales must be filed within 30 days of the initiation notice. Additionally, if a market situation affects normal pricing, companies have 20 days after initial questionnaire submissions to notify Commerce. Conclusion The Commerce Department aims to conclude these reviews by June 30, 2027. These actions ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from unfair foreign practices. This process is a crucial part of maintaining healthy international trade relations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Decision on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding carbazole violet pigment 23. This pigment comes from India and China. On May 1, 2026, the Department began a review of antidumping duties on this pigment. The review aimed to decide if the duties should continue. No domestic company responded to this review. This resulted in the revocation of these duties. Antidumping duties are taxes on foreign products. They aim to protect domestic businesses from cheap foreign imports. These duties were first put in place in 2004. The main purpose was to prevent unfair pricing from foreign companies. The pigment involved in this case is known by its specific chemical names and formulas. It is also identified under a special code called the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. This helps customs officials classify products. With the revocation, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop suspending the liquidation of this pigment. This affects goods entered or withdrawn from warehouses after June 15, 2026. However, products entered before this date will still face the old rules. Reviews can still happen for merchandise entered before the revocation date. The notice was published on August 7, 2026, by Christopher Abbott. Abbott serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This decision follows the laws and regulations mentioned in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Ends Special Trade Rules for a Chemical from India Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to change the trade rules for a chemical called carbazole violet pigment 23 that comes from India. On May 1, 2026, the Department started what they call a “sunset review.” This is where they check whether they should keep extra taxes on a product when it is imported into the United States. Carbazole violet pigment 23 is used to make paints and inks. The chemical has a special code, C34H22Cl2N4O2, and is known by its Color Index No. 51319. Normally, if American companies think they need the extra tax to compete with foreign products, they tell the Department they want to be involved. But this time, no American company said they wanted to be involved. Because of this, the Department decided to stop the extra tax starting on August 7, 2026. This decision means that carbazole violet pigment 23 from India can enter the U.S. without the extra tax. But any of the chemical imported before June 15, 2026, will still have to pay it. This change could make it cheaper for companies in the U.S. to buy this pigment from India. But it also means American companies that make similar products might have to adjust because they won’t have the tax to help them compete. The Department made this decision because it follows trade laws that say if nobody shows interest in having the tax, it should be removed. This decision will be managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who will make sure the rules are followed. The Department of Commerce shared this decision in an official notice signed by Christopher Abbott. This change reflects how trade rules can change based on the needs and interests of businesses in the U.S. and those who make the decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken steps in an important trade case. The department looked at whether a Turkish company sold steel pipes in the U.S. for less than the normal value during a certain period. Background of the Case The case is about circular welded carbon steel pipes from Turkey. This review is for the time between May 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025. Borusan Birleşik Boru, a company from Turkey, is the only company being looked at in this review. In 1986, the U.S. started putting antidumping duties on these products because they believed they were being sold in the U.S. for less than they should be. In 2025, Borusan asked for a review of these duties. Preliminary Findings The Commerce Department found that Borusan did sell the steel pipes at less than the normal value. This could mean that their prices in the U.S. were unfair and harmed American companies. The department used specific rules and laws to figure this out. They examined how the pipes were sold and compared the prices. They followed the law set in the Tariff Act of 1930 to make their decision. Weighted Average Dumping Margin For the period being reviewed, the department found that Borusan’s dumping margin was 4.91 percent. This number shows how much lower their prices were compared to what would be normal. Next Steps and Comments Commerce has shared these preliminary results so that interested parties can comment on them. People can send their thoughts on the findings for the next few weeks. Both case briefs and rebuttal briefs can be submitted to provide different perspectives. Future Actions The final decision on this review will come within 120 days from now. Depending on the results, Borusan might have to pay more duties. Responsibilities for Importers Importers need to pay attention to this review. They have to file a special certificate if they want to avoid extra duties. The U.S. government might assume they are not following the rules if they do not file this certificate properly. This preliminary decision is an important step in making sure trade is fair. The U.S. government is working to ensure American companies can compete on a level playing field with foreign products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States Department of Commerce Releases Final Review Results on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of their review on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China. This review was for the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Crown Polyethylene Products is part of the China-wide entity. This means they are not eligible for a special rate. The rate for the China-wide entity remains at 77.57 percent. This rate has not changed because no one asked for a review of it. The department did not change anything from their first review results. Because of this, they did not include any new calculations. When goods come into the US, there is a cash deposit needed. This deposit will stay until new rules are made. Chinese exporters without a special rate pay 77.57 percent. If a Chinese exporter gave goods to another country’s exporter, that rate applies. Importers of these bags need to file a certificate before their goods are processed. This tells whether they have already paid any of these charges. Otherwise, they might have to pay them twice. Lastly, businesses must return private info used in this review. This is important to keep private business info safe. Not doing so can lead to problems with the law. These results are officially published by the Deputy Assistant Secretary. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Review on Malaysian Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its final review of the sale of polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Malaysia in the United States. This review shows that these bags were sold at normal value during the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. This decision was published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2026. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a division of the Department of Commerce. The final review included comments from different parties and considered all issues related to the sale of these bags. For instance, changes were made to how the companies Euro SME Sdn Bhd and Euro Nature Green Sdn. Bhd, known collectively as Euro SME, were examined. A weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent was assigned to Euro SME. This result means that the bags they exported to the United States did not have unfairly low prices. For future entries of these bags, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will use these final results to determine duties. Since Euro SME’s margins showed no dumping, CBP will liquidate entries without extra duties. Cash deposit rates will apply differently based on the exporter and producer relationship, continuing at 84.94 percent for others not directly reviewed. These rates will remain until further notice. Parties who import these bags have responsibilities, including filing a certificate regarding antidumping duties. They must also handle proprietary information carefully under administrative protective order rules. This update highlights the ongoing efforts to maintain fair trade practices between Malaysia and the United States regarding plastic bags. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Mushrooms from Poland Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results of its review on certain preserved mushrooms from Poland. The review focused on sales from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. The Department’s International Trade Administration has determined that Okechamp S.A., the sole company reviewed, sold mushrooms at less than normal value during this period. The review comes under the Department’s efforts to enforce antidumping duties, ensuring fair trade practices. According to the Department, Okechamp had a dumping margin of 0.54 percent for their mushroom sales. Due to government shutdowns in late 2025, the process experienced delays, including a 68-day extension. The Commerce Department intends to verify all information before finalizing results and invites public comments. Parties can submit their views seven days post-verification. Rebuttals can follow within five days after that. Should Okechamp’s margin remain above zero, U.S. Customs will assess duties on affected entries. The Department will instruct on duties only if margins remain above a de minimis level. Otherwise, liquidation will occur without duties. In summary, the Department continues to enforce duties, maintaining fair market conditions for U.S. businesses. They remind importers to follow regulations and submit necessary certificates to avoid higher duties in cases of reimbursement. More updates will follow as the review progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Preliminary Review on Nickel-Plated Steel Products from Japan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding the sale of diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. The focus of this review is the sales period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. Key Information: Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd., a Japanese company, has been assessed in this review. The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that Toyo Kohan did not sell its steel products at less than normal value during this period. Additional Details: A review was initially conducted on multiple companies. However, for 14 of these companies, the review has been rescinded due to the lack of suspended entries of merchandise during the review period. These companies include Higuchi Manufacturing Co., Ltd., IHI Corporation, JFE Shoji Corporation, and several others. Methodology and Next Steps: The review is conducted under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and in line with sections 772 and 773 of the Act. Calculations and analysis methods are detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, available to registered users online. Public Participation: Interested parties can comment on the preliminary results. Case briefs may be filed within seven days after the verification report issue date. Rebuttal briefs can follow within five days after the case briefs. Comments and briefs should be filed electronically using the Commerce department’s system. Assessment and Future Actions: If the finding is not zero or de minimis, customs will calculate specific duty rates for importers based on the weighted-average dumping margin. The current estimated dumping margin for Toyo Kohan is 0.00 percent. Cash Deposit Requirements: Effective from the final results publication, new cash deposit rules will be applied for Toyo Kohan and other relevant companies. Existing cash deposit rates will continue until further notifications. The review underscores the efforts to ensure fair trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. The complete details are available for public review through official government publications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Critical Circumstances in Indonesian Fatty Acids Import Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made an important decision. They have found that critical circumstances exist for some imports of fatty acids from Indonesia. This is part of an investigation into potential unfair trade practices. Background Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. filed a complaint. They believe that imports of fatty acids from Indonesia are harming the U.S. industry. This led Commerce to start a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation on March 9, 2026. Critical Circumstances Claim On June 29, 2026, the petitioner claimed that imports of fatty acids from Indonesia showed critical circumstances. They said the subsidies Indonesia gives are against international rules. They also noted a big increase in imports during early 2026 compared to late 2025. Investigation Details For Commerce to decide if critical circumstances exist, they look for two things: They check if the subsidies are against international agreements. They see if there has been a large increase in imports in a short time. Findings Commerce found some subsidies from Indonesia violate international rules. These are linked to tax exemptions for bonded zones and import duty exemptions. When checking for import increases, they compared shipping data for two periods: September 2025 to January 2026 against February to June 2026. They found massive imports from PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia and others but not from PT Musim Mas. Immediate Impact Because of these findings, shipments from PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia and others will face increased duties. This applies to goods entered into the U.S. since April 24, 2026. For PT Musim Mas, there are no extra duties yet. Further Steps Commerce will continue its investigation and give a final decision later. People can submit their thoughts or request a hearing on this matter. Conclusion This determination impacts how U.S. companies compete with foreign imports. It shows Commerce’s role in ensuring fair trade practices according to international laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews by the Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically the International Trade Administration, began the five-year Sunset Reviews. Sunset Reviews look at certain products to see if they can continue to have extra trade duties. The reviews started for some products from China. These products include seamless carbon and alloy steel. The purpose of the review is to check if duties are still needed to stop unfair pricing. The process for these reviews follows rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. There are detailed procedures in place to ensure fairness and accuracy. Several rules from 1998 and 2005 guide how the reviews are conducted. The reviews are detailed and require careful checking of information. The department uses a method to calculate costs and decide if dumping is happening. The following cases are being reviewed: Antidumping Duty on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel from China. Countervailing Duty on the same products from China. Currently, there are no suspended investigations needing review in August 2026. Anyone wanting to send information for these reviews must follow strict rules. These include how to format, translate, and serve documents. Submissions must be filed electronically. Those who want to take part in these reviews need to submit their interest quickly. A notice of intent to participate is due 15 days after this notice. If no interest is shown, the review for that case stops. Participants must follow Commerce’s rules to ensure all information is complete and truthful. There are special rules in place for sharing information securely. For those wanting to participate, filing a complete response is necessary within 30 days of the announcement. This applies to domestic and foreign parties. Information must meet specific requirements based on the participant’s role. Commerce asks for clear summaries of comments made during the process. Summaries must be brief and supported by footnotes where needed. This notice ensures transparency and fairness as the department reviews these important trade duty cases. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Thermal Paper from Germany Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has finalized its administrative review concerning the sale of thermal paper from Germany. This review was conducted to determine if the paper was sold in the United States at less than its normal value during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The Department has confirmed that thermal paper from Germany was not sold in the United States at less than normal value during this period. This means that there were no unfair sales practices involved in the selling of this paper in the U.S. market. The main company examined during this review was Koehler Paper SE along with its affiliate, Koehler Kehl GmbH. The review results showed that these companies had a zero percent dumping margin, meaning they sold the paper at fair prices, not undercutting U.S. market prices. Other companies, Convertidoras PCM, S.A. de C.V., and Papeles y Conversiones de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which were not individually reviewed, were given a dumping margin rate of 0.76 percent. This rate was determined based on the most recent previous calculations in this proceeding. Normally, a detailed decision memo accompanies such announcements, but since there were no changes from the preliminary findings earlier this year, no such memo was issued. The Department emphasized that because no unfair prices were found, the Koehler companies will see their entries liquidated without additional duties. Meanwhile, the other reviewed companies will have duties assessed based on the rates provided. Instructions have been prepared for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to carry out these assessments. These instructions will be implemented 35 days after this announcement, unless legal actions delay the process. Cash deposit requirements for future entries of thermal paper from these producers will adjust to these final results. Specifically, Koehler faces a zero percent rate, while Convertidoras and Papeles have a 0.76 percent rate. If a company was not part of this review, existing rates from prior reviews will still apply. The Department of Commerce reminded importers about their duty to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Ensuring compliance is critical to proving that no reimbursements occurred, which could otherwise lead to doubling of duties. This review and related actions help ensure fair trade practices and were conducted following specific sections of the Tariff Act of 1930. These efforts are part of ongoing work to maintain a level playing field in U.S. markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Chinese Boltless Steel Shelving Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its second expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty on boltless steel shelving units from China. Following the review, the Department has decided to keep the duty in place. This decision stems from findings that removing the duty could lead to a return or continuation of dumping practices by Chinese manufacturers. The antidumping duty on these shelving units was first imposed on October 21, 2015. The Department of Commerce evaluated the situation, examining past and current data, to decide if the duty should remain. The review process started on April 1, 2026, under the Tariff Act of 1930. Edsal Manufacturing Company Inc., an American business that makes similar products, actively participated in the review. As the petitioner in the original investigation, Edsal sought to maintain these duties. They provided a detailed response supporting the need for continued protection against unfair trading. No other interested parties joined Edsal in submitting responses. Consequently, the Department conducted the review quickly, wrapping it up in 120 days. The duty covers boltless steel shelving units that are prepackaged and ready for sale. These products may include decks or be sold without them. The Department’s final decision hinges on the belief that Chinese manufacturers would continue dumping these products at a rate of up to 112.68% without the duty. Maintaining this duty aims to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair trade practices and ensure a level playing field. Such protective measures are vital in safeguarding domestic jobs and supporting U.S. industries. All parties who handled proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) are reminded to responsibly manage or destroy these materials, aligning with the Department’s regulations. Violating APO terms can lead to serious penalties. The Department has publicly shared the full review results, accessible through the Federal Register and the Department’s electronic systems. This transparency allows interested parties to understand the review’s rationale and conclusions. For more detailed information on the review and its implications, the documentation is available through government channels. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty Orders on Mattresses Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed the expedited first sunset reviews of antidumping duty (AD) orders on mattresses from several countries. These countries are Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, the Republic of Türkiye, and Vietnam. The reviews aim to determine if revoking these orders would lead to dumping and harming the domestic industry. The reviews started when Commerce published a notice on April 1, 2026. This notice initiated the reviews of the orders placed on May 14, 2020. Domestic parties, like producers of mattresses in the United States and a certified union, showed their intent to participate in these reviews. They are the ones who requested Commerce to continue with the reviews. Commerce found that removing the orders would likely lead to dumping again. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. As a result, Commerce decided to keep the antidumping duty orders in place. The intention is to protect U.S. mattress producers from unfair competition from these countries. Commerce’s analysis shows that the dumping margins—meaning the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price—are significant. For example, Cambodia has a margin of 103.79 percent and Serbia has a margin of 112.11 percent. Thailand recorded a much higher margin of 763.28 percent, while Vietnam’s margin is 668.38 percent. Malaysia and Türkiye have margins of 42.92 percent and 20.03 percent, respectively. Commerce’s final decision highlights the possibility of continued dumping if the orders are revoked. This would hurt U.S. mattress producers. Therefore, these orders remain crucial for maintaining fair competition in the market. This decision is not just about numbers and countries. It affects many people who work in mattress production in the United States. Continued support through these orders ensures that domestic industries remain competitive and can keep providing jobs and products. The U.S. Department of Commerce took this decision on July 28, 2026, and it is effective from July 31, 2026. Those with administrative protective orders must handle proprietary information carefully, following set regulations. This outcome illustrates the role of the Department of Commerce in promoting fair trade and protecting U.S. industries. It ensures mattresses sold in the U.S. from these countries do not harm local businesses through unfair pricing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Orders Continue on Certain Preserved Mushrooms Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia. This decision follows findings by the Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that stopping the orders would likely lead to more dumping and harm to U.S. industries. On December 2, 1998, and February 19, 1999, the Commerce Department first put these AD orders in place. They were meant to protect U.S. businesses from unfair foreign pricing on preserved mushrooms imported from the mentioned countries. In February 2026, the ITC started its fifth review to consider if the AD orders should continue. The Commerce Department, as part of this review, found that removing the orders might cause dumping to continue. It informed the ITC about these findings. On July 16, 2026, the ITC agreed. It stated that ending the orders would likely result in harm to the U.S. mushroom industry. Therefore, the AD orders will stay in effect. The orders cover preserved mushrooms from the species Agaricus Bisporus and Agaricus Bitorquis. These can be whole, sliced, diced, or in pieces. They are preserved by cleaning, blanching, and are often in liquid such as water or brine. Notably, other types of mushrooms, fresh, frozen, dried, pickled, or marinated mushrooms are not included in the order. Customs will keep collecting AD cash deposits for these mushrooms at current rates. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this decision. The continued enforcement of these orders emphasizes the Commerce Department’s efforts to support fair trade practices and safeguard U.S. industries against foreign market disruptions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Findings on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced important findings regarding certain engines from China. The engines are called “small vertical shaft engines.” They range between 99cc and 225cc capacity. The Department of Commerce found that getting rid of extra charges on these engines could cause problems. This would likely lead to more dumping. Dumping is when goods are sold at very low prices that hurt local businesses. On July 31, 2026, the Commerce Department finalized its review. They said that revoking the current antidumping rules could allow this unfair practice to continue. The decision to keep the rules is based on a law from 1930. This law helps protect U.S. businesses from dumping practices. The review began on April 1, 2026. Domestic interested parties, like Briggs & Stratton, LLC, took part. They expressed concerns about dumping practices. The Commerce Department did not get much feedback from foreign parties. Because of this, they finished their review in 120 days. The small vertical shaft engines from China will still have antidumping duties. These duties can be as high as 541.75 percent. This decision is important for American engine makers. It aims to prevent unfair pricing from foreign companies. Commerce’s findings are now part of the Federal Register. This ensures that everyone knows about the results. The details of this review are public. They are stored in a centralized electronic system. People can read more about the decision if they want. In conclusion, the Commerce Department is working to keep fair prices in the U.S. engine market. The aim is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice for Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Sheets from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction notice regarding the final results of an administrative review of antidumping duties on aluminum sheets from the Sultanate of Oman. This correction notice was published on July 31, 2026, in the Federal Register. The original notice was published on May 29, 2026. It covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The review aimed to determine the appropriate antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. In the original notice, an error was made in listing the company “Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC.” The company was incorrectly listed under an “exporter” header. It should have been listed under an “exporter/producer” header instead. This correction is important for clarity in trade documentation. Proper categorization ensures accurate tracking and application of duties. For questions, Javeria Ali is the contact person. She is part of the AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, within the International Trade Administration. You can reach her at (202) 482-0462. This correction notice is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s ongoing efforts to maintain clear and precise trade practices. The Department ensures transparency and accuracy in documenting trade activities. The notice was issued by Christopher Abbott. He is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This action aligns with the rules in the Tariff Act of 1930. This correction is now part of the legal documentation for trade with Oman concerning aluminum sheets. The Department stays committed to accurate enforcement and compliance actions. This correction applies to interested parties involved in international trade and commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Subsidies on Truck Bed Covers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It says companies in China are getting subsidies to make and sell truck bed covers. This decision was announced on July 31, 2026. The period of investigation took place from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce wants to hear what people think about this decision. The investigation found that several Chinese companies received financial help that makes their products cheaper. These companies include Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd., and several others. The Department of Commerce has set different subsidy rates for these companies. Changzhou Sunwood International Trading Co., Ltd. has a rate of 30.38 percent. Hangzhou Golden Sun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. has a rate of 8.72 percent. Other companies have a much higher rate based on available information. Because of this finding, U.S. Customs will hold back the truck bed covers. This means that while the investigation continues, these goods won’t be sold in the U.S. without paying a deposit. The Department will share its calculations with interested parties. This ensures that the process remains transparent. If the investigation finds more information, the Department of Commerce might change its decision. A hearing could take place, giving interested parties a chance to discuss the decision. The International Trade Commission will also hear about this decision. They need to decide if these imports are hurting businesses in the U.S. The investigation looked at specific products. These include truck bed covers that protect the open area of a pickup truck. Various types of truck bed covers were considered. These are made from materials like aluminum, steel, plastic, and fabric. Truck caps, which make the truck bed bigger, are not included in this investigation. The Department is using online systems to share documents related to this investigation. They want to keep the process open and clear for everyone involved. The U.S. Department of Commerce wants to make sure trade is fair for all. This investigation is a step towards ensuring that U.S. companies can compete fairly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Changes in Trade Duty for Steel Pipes from Thailand Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Court of International Trade (CIT) recently made a decision affecting trade with Thailand. On July 17, 2026, the court ruled in a case involving steel pipes from Thailand. This case is known as Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Company Limited v. United States, Court No. 21-00627. The U.S. Department of Commerce had reviewed the case, and the court decided that their review’s results were not correct. This case is about the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The Department of Commerce originally calculated a high dumping margin, which is the amount a product is sold for less than fair value. Before, they set this at 36.97% for two companies: Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Co., Ltd. and Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd. During the case, the CIT asked the Department of Commerce to look at some information again. They wanted to check whether certain sales should be included and whether some companies were related in a way that affects prices. The court stayed involved to make sure everything was correct, asking for more reviews in 2022, 2023, and 2024. After several reviews, the Department of Commerce adjusted the results. They changed their mind about how some companies are related and recalculated the dumping margin to 14.74% for Saha Thai and Thai Premium. The CIT agreed with these new results on July 17, 2026. The law needs the Department of Commerce to inform the public when a court decision changes one of its own. This is important because the decision supports fair pricing in trade. As a result of these changes, the cash deposit rates for Saha Thai and Thai Premium will not change, as they apply due to newer results from another review. The CIT’s decision also affects how suspended entries, or items brought into the country without full clearance, are handled. The CIT has stopped these items from being finalized (or liquidated) by Customs until all legal processes and appeals are finished. This ruling is a part of how trade laws help keep prices fair and protect industries from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Duties on Chinese Vertical Engines Amid Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a key decision in its ongoing efforts to enforce fair trade practices. On July 31, 2026, it announced the final results of the first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on certain vertical shaft engines from China. The decision means that duties on these engines will continue. A countervailing duty (CVD) order was first put in place to address unfair subsidies given by foreign governments to manufacturers. This order targets vertical shaft engines between 99cc and up to 225cc, originating from the People’s Republic of China. The decision highlights the essential role of the Commerce Department in ensuring U.S. manufacturers face a level playing field. According to the department, removing the existing order could see unfair subsidies resume, harming U.S. companies. The review started on April 1, 2026. It was part of a regular process, known as a sunset review, which assesses if the countervailing duties should continue. Briggs & Stratton, LLC, a U.S. producer of vertical engines, actively took part in the review. They provided the necessary information to support the continuation of the duties. The department carried out an expedited review because they did not receive enough responses from other interested parties. As a result, they finished the review in just 120 days. The final duty rates are set as follows: Chongqing Kohler Engines Ltd: 2.84% Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co: 18.13% All Others: 10.46% These rates show the extra costs that these companies would face if they export engines to the U.S. This decision aims to ensure that U.S. producers can compete fairly and continue to thrive in the market. The document containing this information is publicly available. It can be viewed online on the Government Publishing Office’s portal. The department reminds parties involved to comply with regulations regarding confidential information. This decision marks an important step in the U.S. government’s duty to protect domestic industries from unfair international competition. The duties will remain effective, helping to maintain fair pricing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Are Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes? Large diameter graphite electrodes are used in furnaces. They help generate very high temperatures needed for melting metals. These electrodes are larger than 425 millimeters across and are important in steel production. What Has Commerce Found? Commerce has looked into whether these electrodes from India are being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices because of subsidies. It found that Indian producers are indeed getting unfair help from their government. The period examined was from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. What Happens Next? Because Commerce is concerned about these subsidies, they have decided that until a final decision is made, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will hold off on finalizing transactions, or “liquidating,” when these electrodes are imported into the U.S. This step will start from July 30, 2026. Who is Affected? The companies directly involved and studied in this investigation are Graphite India Limited and HEG Limited. Others that ship these kinds of electrodes from India to the U.S. will also be impacted. Estimated Subsidy Rates Graphite India Limited has a subsidy rate of 3.68%. HEG Limited has a subsidy rate of 6.99%. Other companies not individually assessed have an average rate of 5.87%. Public Involvement The Department of Commerce is open to hearing thoughts from interested groups or people about this decision. They have until seven days after the next report is available to share their comments. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will continue its investigation and plans to verify the information before making a final decision. If a hearing is requested, Commerce will schedule it accordingly. All parties must follow specific guidelines to submit their comments and concerns. In conclusion, this preliminary decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce indicates concerns over unfair pricing because of subsidies on large diameter graphite electrodes imported from India. This investigation continues as the Department seeks further clarity on the issue to ensure fair trade practices are upheld. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Preliminary Decision on Graphite Electrodes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Investigation Details The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a preliminary affirmative determination on countervailable subsidies for large diameter graphite electrodes from the People’s Republic of China (China). This came after finding evidence that such subsidies were provided to Chinese producers and exporters. The investigation covers a period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A decision was postponed earlier but was issued on July 24, 2026. The Department of Commerce encourages interested parties to submit comments on this determination. Scope of the Investigation The scope includes large graphite electrodes used in furnaces from China. These have a diameter over 425 millimeters and might be attached to specific joining systems. The investigation also covers large graphite pins. Any graphite electrode identified under HTSUS statistical reporting number 8545.11.0020 is included. Certain thermal energy storage (TES) graphite blocks, defined by specific dimensions and properties, are excluded from this investigation’s scope. Methodology and Findings The U.S. Department of Commerce followed procedures set by the Tariff Act of 1930. This involved identifying financial contributions that might give subsidies. Commerce used facts and drew adverse conclusions since the respondents did not provide all required information. Preliminary Determination The preliminary determination found a subsidy rate of 103.49% for certain Chinese companies in the graphite electrode sector. These include Dantan New Materials Co., Ltd. and Shanxi Juxian Graphite New Material Co., Ltd. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend the liquidation of entries related to these imports, enforcing cash deposits at the subsidy rates found. Public Comment and ITC Notification The Department invites public comments on non-scope related issues by a specified date and acknowledges the importance of hearing parties on the matter. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will determine the injury status to U.S. industries related to these imports following Commerce’s findings. This decision is part of a larger enforcement and compliance strategy by the Department to address potential unfair trade practices concerning large diameter graphite electrodes from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of HFC Blends from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-07-30 No Shipments for Zhejiang Yonghe During the review, it was determined that Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. made no shipments to the United States during the review period. Details of Review The Department of Commerce began this review on February 10, 2026. They extended deadlines and gathered comments from various interested parties. The review was carried out in accordance with U.S. trade laws. Scope of Review The review covered HFC blends exported from China. These chemicals are used in air conditioning and refrigeration. Findings The review confirmed that Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. sold HFC blends at dumping margins of 182.61%. This means they were sold below fair value in the U.S. China-Wide Entity Companies that did not qualify for separate rates, listed in Appendix II, are considered part of the China-wide entity. They face a 216.37% duty rate. Assessment and Cash Deposits The Commerce Department will instruct how duties should be assessed on imports. Certain cash deposit rates will be maintained or adjusted based on the review. These rates ensure that trading is fair and within rules. Conclusion The Department of Commerce remains committed to fair trade and will continue monitoring imports to ensure compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.