Commerce Issues Countervailing Duty Order on Steel Rebar from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imported from Algeria. This decision follows an affirmative final determination by Commerce. On March 27, 2026, Commerce published its final determination. It found that producers and exporters of rebar from Algeria are receiving countervailable subsidies. The International Trade Commission (ITC) closed its investigation on May 18, 2026. The ITC stated that Algeria is not considered a Subsidies Agreement country. Scope of the Order The order covers steel concrete reinforcing bars, which can be imported in straight length or coil form. They come in various metals, lengths, and diameters. Some processing of the rebar may occur, like cutting, grinding, or painting. But these processes do not affect the rebar’s inclusion in the order. The order does not cover plain, nondeformed rebar. Countervailing Duty Rates Commerce has established a subsidy rate of 72.94% for the company Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA and all others. Provisional Measures and Actions Commerce instructed the suspension of liquidation of rebar. Liquidation means clearing goods through customs, often with duties paid. This instruction applies to merchandise entered or withdrawn since May 13, 2026. Suspension resumed with the ITC’s closure of its investigation. Cash deposits are required at the established subsidy rates. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list. Interested parties must add themselves to this list within 30 days of order publication. Law firms representing parties should designate a lead attorney. This list will update annually. The petitioner and foreign governments will be included automatically after the initial request. They need to update their list details during the annual period. The CVD order is now active and published as required by regulations. For further details, parties can view current antidumping and countervailing duty orders online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Orders: Review Results for Steel Pipes Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Commerce’s Findings The United States Department of Commerce has released new findings. It carried out a review on antidumping duty orders about steel pipes. These steel pipes are from the Czech Republic, South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine. The review shows that removing these duties could lead to more dumping. Dumping is when foreign producers sell goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This can hurt U.S. producers. Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duties. These measures aim to prevent unfair price competition. What Is Covered The orders are about seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipes. These pipes come from four countries: the Czech Republic, South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine. Timeline and Process The antidumping duty order for the Czech Republic was first published in April 2021. The orders for South Korea, Russia, and Ukraine followed in August 2021. Commerce began this first sunset review in March 2026. A sunset review checks if duties should stay to prevent dumping. Participant and Responses Vallourec Star, LP, a U.S. producer, participated in the review. They argued to keep the duties. Other parties did not respond or participate. Conclusion Commerce predicts that without these duties, dumping could continue. The review found these specific dumping margins: Czech Republic: up to 51.70% South Korea: 4.48% Russia: 209.72% Ukraine: 23.75% These results mean duties will remain. They aim to protect U.S. businesses from unfairly low-priced imports. The decision was finalized and publicized on July 6, 2026. This ensures a fair trade environment and supports local industry sustainability. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Sunset Review on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea and Russia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the expedited first sunset review of countervailing duty orders on seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe. These pipes come from the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation. Summary of Findings The review finds that canceling the countervailing duty orders would likely lead to more countervailable subsidies. This means that if the duties were removed, Korea and Russia might continue to unfairly subsidize their steel pipe exports to the U.S. This could harm U.S. producers. Background of Orders The countervailing duty orders were originally published on August 23, 2021. These orders aimed to protect U.S. industries from unfairly subsidized imports from Korea and Russia. On March 2, 2026, the Commerce Department began the first sunset review of these orders. A sunset review is a check to decide if the duties are still needed. Participation in the Review The domestic company, Vallourec Star, LP, took part in the review. Vallourec is a U.S. producer of similar steel products. They showed that they have a stake in ensuring fair competition and filed their intent to participate on March 16, 2026. Findings on Subsidy Rates For Korea: ILJIN Steel Corporation and All Others have a subsidy rate of 1.78%. For Russia: PAO TMK/Volzhsky Pipe Plant Joint Stock Company and All Others have a subsidy rate of 48.38%. Scope of the Orders The orders cover seamless pipes made from carbon and alloy steel. These are standard, line, and pressure pipes used for various industrial purposes. Conclusion The Department of Commerce concluded that removing the countervailing duties would lead to continued or repeated subsidies from Korea and Russia. Therefore, the duties will remain to protect U.S. industries. Notification to Parties Commerce reminds parties involved in administrative protective orders to handle proprietary information with care. They must return or destroy such information as required, helping to ensure fair trade practices. For further information, interested parties can refer to detailed documents available through the U.S. Department of Commerce. These results ensure that the U.S. market remains fair for all players involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Final Results on Aluminum Sheet Subsidy Review Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced the final results of its first expedited sunset reviews of countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheets from Bahrain, India, and the Republic of Türkiye. This decision reveals that getting rid of the CVD orders would likely lead to the continuation or repetition of subsidies that are not fair. The original CVD orders were issued on April 27, 2021. In March 2026, Commerce began the first sunset review process following the Tariff Act of 1930. Only domestic parties like the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and Aluminum Dynamics, LLC, showed interest in the review. The governments of Bahrain, India, and Türkiye did not participate. The review’s purpose was to decide if continued CVD orders protected U.S. industries from unfair subsidies. Commerce found that removing the orders could lead to more unfair subsidies. Here are the subsidy rates: Bahrain: Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C: 6.44% All Others: 6.44% India: Hindalco Industries Limited: 35.67% Manaksia Aluminium Company Limited: 5.70% All Others: 30.77% Türkiye: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S: 6.28% Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S: 4.94% All Others: 7.59% The document states this as the last reminder for parties involved to handle proprietary information carefully according to administrative protective orders. Violating these regulations can lead to penalties. The Commerce Department published these results according to legal directives under the Tariff Act of 1930. They are part of consistent efforts to maintain fair trade practices for U.S. industries. The final results are dated June 30, 2026, and the details were presented by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. These efforts are important to support U.S. industries and maintain a fair trade environment worldwide. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Measures on Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has decided to continue duties on steel welded wire mesh from Mexico. This comes after reviewing the order first put in place on August 9, 2021. Commerce looked closely at the situation and decided that if the duties were removed, there might be more dumping. Dumping is when goods are sold at a very low price in a foreign market. The decision taken is effective as of July 6, 2026. Commerce said there could be a return to unfair pricing, and if dumping happens again, these actions protect U.S. producers. The Department issued an order in 2021, which aimed to prevent unfair competition from foreign companies. They started this review on March 2, 2026, and got a lot of comments from U.S. businesses that make similar products. These businesses said they want the duties to remain, acting in line with U.S. trade laws and helping maintain fair prices. Commerce did not receive enough feedback from Mexican companies arguing against the duties. Now, U.S. companies making steel wire mesh continue to receive support. The duties help them compete fairly, keeping jobs and business within the U.S. The decision shows Commerce’s commitment to fair trade and supporting U.S. businesses. It aims to stop unfair pricing that could harm local industries and workers. The U.S. wants to ensure a level playing field in the international market and will keep these types of measures in place as needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continued Dumping of Aluminum Sheets Estimated reading time: 4 minutes Summary of Findings The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results that confirm the continuation of dumping in the common alloy aluminum sheet market. The decision follows the expedited first sunset reviews of antidumping duty orders on aluminum sheets imported from multiple countries. The Department has concluded that canceling the antidumping duty orders would likely result in ongoing dumping. Countries involved include Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye. Detailed Results Antidumping orders were first published on April 27, 2021. The latest review began on March 2, 2026, and findings were officially announced on July 6, 2026. Key stakeholders such as the Aluminum Association and Aluminum Dynamics expressed their participation in this review. Process Overview Between March 30 and April 1, 2026, several domestic parties submitted their responses. These parties are involved in manufacturing and trading aluminum sheets. No responses came from the interested parties representing the countries under review. Dumping Margins The Department of Commerce found dumping margins as follows: Bahrain: Up to 4.83% Brazil: 137.06% Croatia: 3.19% Egypt: 12.11% Germany: 242.80% India: 47.92% Indonesia: 32.12% Italy: 29.13% Oman: 5.29% Romania: 37.26% Serbia: 25.84% Slovenia: 13.43% South Africa: 8.85% Spain: 24.23% Taiwan: 17.50% Türkiye: 13.56% Legal Framework The inquiry was carried out under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930. These sections relate to the processes and responsibilities involved in trade agreements and commerce. Conclusion The Department’s decision serves as notification to interested parties of the finality of the results. It also highlights the importance of compliance with administrative protective orders concerning proprietary information. Failure to comply can result in sanctions. The findings imply that unless the orders remain in place, dumping behaviors are likely to continue, affecting the U.S. aluminum sheet market adversely. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Orders on Silicon Metal Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Findings of the Review The United States Department of Commerce has completed expedited reviews of antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia. These reviews were conducted to determine the potential for continued dumping if the orders were revoked. The Commerce Department found that ending the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continued or recurring dumping of silicon metal from these countries. The expected rates of dumping are up to 21.41% for Bosnia and Herzegovina, 47.54% for Iceland, and 12.27% for Malaysia. Background Information The antidumping orders were initially published in 2021. The order for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland was issued on April 19, 2021, while the order for Malaysia followed on August 19, 2021. The Commerce Department initiated the first sunset reviews of these orders on March 2, 2026. Participation and Response Domestic producers showed interest in maintaining the orders. They filed notices of intent to participate and provided substantive responses. No responses were received from the affected foreign respondents, which led the Commerce Department to expedite the review process. Scope of the Orders The orders cover silicon metal from the specified countries. Silicon metal is an important material used in various industrial applications, including the production of aluminum and electronics. Final Results and Next Steps Commerce’s final determination supports the continuation of antidumping duties. These duties help to prevent unfair pricing and protect domestic industries from foreign competition that could harm U.S. jobs and production. Interested parties are reminded of their responsibilities under administrative protective orders. Proper handling of proprietary information disclosed during the review is required, and mishandling could lead to sanctions. The Commerce Department’s comprehensive review and findings ensure ongoing fair trade practices and safeguard the domestic market against potentially harmful dumping practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Final Antidumping Duty on Aluminum Sheet from Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 17, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a judgment concerning the antidumping duty investigation of common alloy aluminum sheets from Turkey. This ruling affects the original decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, made in March 2021. The Department had calculated dumping margins for certain Turkish producers. The CIT’s decision now alters this. Background of Investigation In March 2021, Commerce published its final determination. The investigation covered January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Commerce assigned a 2.02 percent dumping margin for Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Assan). Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. was assigned 13.56 percent. Other producers got a 4.85 percent rate. Court Involvement and Remands Both Assan and the Aluminum Association filed appeals against the final determination. The CIT consolidated these appeals. On March 1, 2023, the CIT remanded Commerce’s determination, asking for reconsideration of certain elements. Specifically, it asked for a review of the duty drawback adjustment methodology. After several remands and redeterminations, including consideration of Assan’s submissions and recalculation of margins, Commerce completed its third remand in September 2025. This remand set Assan’s dumping margin to 2.14 percent, slightly higher than the original 2.02 percent. Timken Notice and Legal Obligations According to the Timken Court decision, Commerce is required to publish a notice when a court judgment is not in harmony with its prior determination. This ensures proper communication to all parties involved. Amended Determination As a result of the CIT’s final judgment, the dumping margin for Assan is now amended to 2.14 percent. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. remains at 13.56 percent, while the rate for all other producers stays 4.85 percent. Implications for Cash Deposit Requirements The decision affects cash deposit instructions with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Assan’s current cash deposit rate will remain unchanged due to a previously finalized administrative review. However, for other producers without a new deposit rate, Commerce will provide CBP with updated instructions. The decision marks an important conclusion to a lengthy legal process regarding aluminum sheets imported from Turkey. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Steel Wire Rod from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results for the antidumping duty review concerning carbon and certain alloy steel wire rods from Mexico. The review covers sales made from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The Department determined that the products were sold in the United States at less than normal value during this period. The specific companies involved in the review were Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V., jointly referred to as Deacero/Deacero Summit. The final weighted-average dumping margin for these companies is determined to be 14.67 percent. This means they sold the goods at a price 14.67 percent less than their usual value, according to the review. Nucor Corporation and Commercial Metal Company, along with Deacero/Deacero Summit, submitted their views on these findings in March 2026. These views were considered before finalizing the results. The Department followed strict rules and regulations laid out in the Tariff Act of 1930 to conduct this review. Detailed calculations and analyses are available through the Enforcement and Compliance’s centralized electronic system. Customs and Border Protection will assess duties based on these findings. This helps ensure that the companies comply with U.S. trade laws. The effective cash deposit rates will be applied to future imports at rates specified by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The Department is committed to monitoring international trade and safeguarding fair trade practices, ensuring a level playing field for domestic producers. These measures also serve as a careful reminder to importers about their duty to report accurately to avoid paying extra duties. Failure to adhere to these requirements could result in severe penalties under U.S. trade law. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s review shows a significant commitment to ensuring that trade regulations are met, protecting domestic interests, and maintaining fair market competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Diamond Sawblades Antidumping Duty Order Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Purpose The antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from China was originally published on November 4, 2009. The purpose of this order is to prevent unfair pricing and protect domestic industries from dumping, which is selling goods below market value. Current Review In March 2026, the Department of Commerce initiated its third sunset review of this order. A sunset review assesses whether ending the order would likely result in continued dumping. Domestic manufacturers expressed interest, showing support for continuing this order. They argue they could be harmed if the order is lifted. Analysis and Findings The Commerce Department has evaluated data and comments about possible continued dumping. They used a detailed process to see if ending the order would likely result in cheaper, unfairly priced imports from China. The review concluded that lifting the order could likely lead to more dumping. The duty margins could reach as high as 164.09 percent, according to the department’s findings. Final Decision The Department of Commerce decided that the antidumping duty order should remain in place. This will help ensure fair competition and support U.S. manufacturers. Next Steps Parties involved in this process must comply with rules about handling private information. Adherence to regulations is essential. Failure to follow these can result in penalties. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses by curbing unfair trading practices. The Department of Commerce will continue monitoring and may conduct future reviews. For more details, visit the Federal Register or the Department of Commerce’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on China’s Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has initiated an investigation regarding certain steel products from China. The inquiry began on July 6, 2026, following a request by Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. The investigation focuses on “corrosion-resistant steel products,” often called CORE. The concern is that these steel products are completed in Thailand using parts made in China and then exported to the United States. This inquiry aims to determine if these actions are attempts to avoid the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders that apply to steel products coming from China. Background of the Inquiry On February 26, 2026, the requesters filed a request, alleging circumvention. They claim that CORE completed with Chinese parts in Thailand should be included in the existing duty orders. The products involved fall under previous orders dating back to July 2016. These orders affect several countries but focus particularly on China. Details on the Circumventing Merchandise This inquiry reviews CORE made in Thailand using Chinese-origin components. These products are later exported from Thailand to the United States. Regulatory Steps and Criteria Commerce follows specific rules for starting such an investigation. According to section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, Commerce checks multiple criteria to see if circumvention is happening. To decide, they look at aspects such as: The process of production in another country. Value added through minor changes. If the process outside China is minor or insignificant. They also consider trade patterns and any increase in imports after starting the original investigation. Commerce’s Next Steps Commerce will collect data from U.S. Customs. They plan to choose respondents based on this data. Interested parties will be able to access this data through an online system. Commerce will send questionnaires to producers in Thailand for more information on their processes. Non-compliance might lead to adverse outcomes for those businesses. Impact on Product Suspensions While this inquiry is ongoing, Commerce has instructed border protection to continue the suspension of liquidation on affected products. If preliminary findings suggest circumvention, the suspension rules might change. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce aims to complete the preliminary determination within 150 days from the start date, with a final decision by 300 days. The outcome will affect how products meet existing U.S. trade laws. This announcement was officially made by Christopher Abbott on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue their measures against some wood products from China. These products include wood mouldings and millwork products. The decision affects antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Without these measures, there could be more unfair trading. The U.S. industry could be at risk of material injury. The decision was officially published on June 30, 2026. But the actual move to continue these orders started on June 24, 2026. The Background The AD and CVD orders were first applied in February 2021. These orders aim to prevent dumping and unfair subsidies that could harm U.S. industries. On January 2, 2026, Commerce and the ITC began reviewing these orders. After the review, they found that removing the orders would likely lead to the return of unfair trading. As a result, the ITC announced its decision on June 24, 2026. The orders will continue to protect U.S. companies from the adverse impact of unfair competition. The Products Covered The orders cover wood mouldings and millwork products. These are made from wood, bamboo, and other materials. They are shaped and detailed into different profiles, like door frames and paneling. Some products are not covered by these orders. Excluded products are countertops, fencing, decking, siding, and certain types of doors and flooring. Additional products from specific antidumping orders, such as those regarding hardwood plywood, are also excluded. What This Means The continuation of these orders allows for more checks at U.S. borders. Customs will keep collecting duties on imports of these products at rates set when they enter the U.S. The Department of Commerce will start the next review of these measures before their fifth anniversary. This ensures that trading stays fair in the future as well. Notification Businesses involved must handle any confidential information carefully. They need to follow regulations for its return or destruction. This decision by the U.S. protects local industries from possible threats caused by unfair import practices. It also keeps the playing field level for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty Orders on Polyvinyl Alcohol from Japan and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently released its final results on the expedited fourth sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) from Japan and China. These reviews were conducted by the International Trade Administration (ITA) under the Commerce Department. The main conclusion of these reviews is that revoking the antidumping duty orders on PVA from these countries would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping is when products are sold at less than fair value, making it hard for domestic producers to compete. Commerce first published the antidumping duty order on PVA from Japan on July 2, 2003, and from China on October 1, 2003. The most recent reviews started on March 2, 2026, in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. By March 17, 2026, domestic interested parties, meaning U.S. producers, expressed their intent to participate in the reviews. They provided the needed information within the necessary timeframe. However, no respondent, meaning no company or country that would be affected by the removal of the duties, provided comments or rebuttals. On April 1, 2026, domestic interested parties filed their substantive response, which is their detailed explanation and evidence on why these duties should stay. Since no companies from Japan or China responded, the Commerce Department proceeded with an expedited review. The final result says that removing the duties would likely lead to as much as 144.16% dumping from Japan and 97.86% from China. Therefore, the duties will remain to protect U.S. producers from unfair competition. For those handling confidential information related to this case, the Department reminds parties to follow rules about returning or destroying information appropriately. This decision underscores the ongoing vigilance by the U.S. Department of Commerce to maintain fair trading practices and protect domestic industries from unfair pricing by foreign competitors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Order on Twist Ties from China Remains in Effect Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its first sunset review of the antidumping duty (AD) order concerning twist ties from the People’s Republic of China. Commerce announced that revoking this order would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping is when foreign producers sell goods in the U.S. at prices lower than the fair value. The determination was made on June 30, 2026. Commerce stated that the dumping margins could be as high as 72.96 percent if the order were revoked. Background of the Order Commerce first issued the antidumping order on April 14, 2021. The order was put in place to protect U.S. producers from unfair pricing by foreign companies. The review process ensures that the order is still needed. Review Process The review began with a notice of initiation on March 2, 2026. This was part of a routine five-year sunset review to check if the order should continue. Bedford Industries, Inc., a U.S. company, participated in the review. They argued that removing the order would harm U.S. producers. No foreign producers from China responded to the review. Conclusion of the Review Based on the review, Commerce decided that lifting the order would hurt U.S. businesses. The anticipated consequence would be the return of dumping practices by Chinese producers. Commerce is responsible for enforcing trade laws to ensure fair competition. This decision reflects their commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair competition practices. What Happens Next? The order remains in place, continuing to impose duties on twist ties imported from China. These duties counteract the negative effects of dumping by ensuring that imported goods are priced fairly compared to domestic products. For more information, materials related to this decision can be accessed through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. This move signifies a broader effort by the United States to maintain fair trade practices and protect local industries against unfair competition from foreign markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Upholds Subsidy Duties on Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding phosphate fertilizers from Russia. They have chosen to keep the countervailing duty (CVD) order in place. This action is based on findings that removing the order could lead to unfair subsidy practices continuing or restarting. Background Information In 2021, a CVD order was placed on phosphate fertilizers from Russia. This order was made to prevent unfair trading advantages due to subsidies. The government reviews such orders every five years to decide if they should continue. This review process is called a “sunset review.” Review and Responses The sunset review for this order began on March 2, 2026. The Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, two U.S. fertilizer producers, showed interest in this review. They argued that the CVD order should not be revoked. Their timely responses were part of the review procedure. However, neither the Russian government nor any Russian fertilizer producers responded adequately. Because of this, the review was fast-tracked, lasting only 120 days. Outcome of the Review The review concluded that canceling the CVD order could lead to the continuation of subsidies by Russian producers. Therefore, the Commerce Department decided to keep the order active. This decision aims to ensure fair competition. Subsidy Rates The review outlined specific subsidy rates for Russian producers if the order was to be revoked. EuroChem would have a rate of 24.11%, JSC Apatit at 14.64%, and all other producers at 16.64%. Next Steps This notice serves as a reminder for anyone involved in this case under the Administrative Protective Order (APO) to properly handle confidential information. The Department of Commerce emphasizes the importance of this regulation. In summary, the Department of Commerce has decided to maintain the CVD order on Russian phosphate fertilizers. This decision aims to protect the U.S. market from unfair trading and ensure a level playing field for all producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Determines Silicon Metal from Australia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that silicon metal from Australia is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This decision comes after a detailed investigation by the department’s International Trade Administration. The investigation looked at the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The final finding from the investigation was made on June 30, 2026, and says that the silicon metal imported from Australia is being sold for less than what it’s worth. Commerce’s thorough checks included examining the sales and cost information of Simcoa Operations Pty Ltd., the main producer involved. The information was verified following strict procedures. This included looking at the company’s sales records and original documents to ensure accuracy. The investigation also confirmed that no parties raised concerns about the scope, which describes that only non-semiconductor grade silicon metal is covered. The silicon must contain between 85.00 and 99.99 percent silicon. Silicon considered “semiconductor grade” is not part of this investigation. The final results of this investigation set a dumping margin of 6.16 percent. This means that the specific producer, Simcoa, as well as other producers not individually investigated, fall under this margin. All other producers and exporters will have this same margin applied. As a result of this finding, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold off on finalizing the customs charges on these imports, keeping them in a temporary status. This applies to goods arriving after February 9, 2026, and will continue until new directions are issued. The U.S. International Trade Commission is also involved in this process. They will decide if the underpriced imports have harmed the domestic industry within 45 days of this determination. If they find no harm was done, the process will end, and any held funds will be returned. If they find the opposite, measures to counteract the unfair pricing will be reinforced. This decision and all related processes follow the guidelines and regulations in place for international trade. The detailed process aims to ensure fairness and protect domestic industry from unfair pricing practices. For detailed information on the scope of the investigation, one can refer to the scope appendices provided. These clearly define the measures and specific silicon types covered under this investigation. The enforcement of existing rules aims to maintain a fair market environment. It’s a vital part of ensuring that imported products are priced appropriately when entering the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Subsidies on Silicon Metal from Australia Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about silicon metal from Australia. They found that producers and exporters of silicon metal there receive subsidies. A subsidy is when the government helps by providing financial support or other aid. This investigation is an important step in understanding trade relations. Time Period of Investigation The investigation looked at how things were between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. This time frame is called the period of investigation. Commerce wants to make sure that trade is fair and that no one is getting an unfair advantage. What is Silicon Metal? The investigation focuses on silicon metal from Australia. Silicon metal is used in many products, from electronics to solar panels. It contains at least 85.00 percent silicon but less than 99.99 percent. The investigation did not cover semiconductor grade silicon, which is even purer and used mainly in electronics and technology. Details of the Investigation Commerce began by issuing a preliminary decision in September 2025. They invited input and comments from interested parties. Then, they examined the situation further with responses and evidence taken from Simcoa Operations Pty, Ltd. This is the main company involved in the case. They verified all information provided by Simcoa and the Australian Government. Verification involves checking documents and making sure the information given is correct and trustworthy. Final Findings The investigation resulted in a finding that Simcoa receives a subsidy rate of 32.57 percent. This is the amount of financial aid or benefit measured compared to typical market conditions. Because Simcoa was the only company closely looked at, all other related companies will receive the same subsidy rate. Next Steps Commerce has informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of its determination. The ITC will now decide if these subsidies harm or threaten to harm U.S. industries. Their decision will determine whether or not further actions, like tariffs, will be applied. Importance of Fair Trade This investigation is part of efforts to ensure that trade is fair between countries. Unfair subsidies can make it difficult for U.S. companies to compete. By finding these subsidies, Commerce can help protect industries and jobs in the United States. This ruling will have significant effects on trade relations and the companies involved. The investigation sheds light on how important and complex international trade can be. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Silicon Metal from Norway Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-30 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a decision about silicon metal from Norway. They have found that producers in Norway are receiving countervailable subsidies. This means the U.S. believes that the Norwegian government is giving unfair financial support to these producers. The Department looked at the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They reviewed the situation thoroughly and decided that these subsidies are affecting the U.S. market. Elkem ASA, a major producer from Norway, was specifically investigated. They were found to have received subsidies at a rate of 17.27%. This rate will apply to all other producers/exporters from Norway as well. The Commerce Department follows a specific process to determine these subsidies. They check if there is a financial contribution by an authority that offers a benefit to the company receiving it. If this action is specific, it can be labeled as a countervailable subsidy. The investigation included several programs. The department also conducted verification visits to Norway. They looked at sales and accounting records to ensure accuracy. If no major changes occur, the U.S. will continue to impose duties on silicon metal from Norway. This is to make sure that the U.S. industry is protected from unfair competition. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now make its own decision. They will decide if U.S. industry is being harmed by these subsidized imports. If they agree, there will be a formal order to impose duties. For now, cash deposits are being collected on products imported since September 26, 2025. These are held until the final decision is confirmed. If the ITC finds no harm, the process will be stopped, and duties will be refunded. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce is taking steps to address subsidies on silicon metal from Norway. They aim to ensure fair competition and protect U.S. producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Silicon Metal from Norway Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes June 30, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a significant announcement regarding silicon metal imported from Norway. They have determined that this product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means that the prices at which it is being sold are lower than the regular market value, potentially hurting U.S. businesses. Background of the Investigation Back in February 2026, the Commerce Department started looking into the pricing of silicon metal from Norway. This investigation focused on sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. They had initially found that Norwegian silicon metal was being sold at unfair prices, and now they have finalized this decision on June 24, 2026. Details of the Final Decision The investigation specifically looked at a company called Elkem ASA. They found that this company was selling silicon metal at a dumping margin of 2.47%. A dumping margin shows how much lower the selling price is compared to the normal market value. This same margin of 2.47% will apply to all other producers and exporters from Norway, as Elkem was the only company looked into in this process. What Happens Next Now, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold off on finalizing sales (or suspend liquidation) of these products that were brought into the U.S. from February 2026 onwards. Importers will need to put down cash deposits to cover estimated antidumping duties, which are protections against unfairly low-priced imports. Role of the International Trade Commission The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now look at whether the U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. They have 45 days from this final determination to make their decision. If they find no harm, then the duties won’t go into effect, and any deposits made will be refunded. However, if they do find harm, the Department of Commerce will ask Customs and Border Protection to officially apply the duties. This final step in the process helps ensure fair competition between imported products and those made domestically in the U.S., protecting local industries from being undercut by low-priced foreign goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Made to Antidumping Review by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to its recent notice about antidumping duties. These duties concern chlorinated isocyanurates from China. On March 11, 2026, the Department published the final results of an antidumping duty review. The review looked at products from China between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2024. But there was a mistake in the dates. The notice originally said that the review period ended on May 3, 2024. This was wrong. The correct end date is May 31, 2024. Antidumping duties are charges placed on goods sold below cost. They protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing by foreign countries. The correction was published in the Federal Register. It serves as an official update to the record. For more information, contact Dan Alexander at (202) 482-4313. He works in the AD/CVD Operations Office at the International Trade Administration. This update is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notification is part of regular government procedures. It ensures that all interested parties have the correct information. The U.S. Department of Commerce is responsible for these notices. Christopher Abbott is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He performed these duties related to the correction. For further official information, visit www.gpo.gov. This correction is now part of the permanent public record. It ensures the transparency and accuracy of trade actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.