U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping in Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of its review concerning large diameter welded pipe imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. This review was administered by the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce focusing on enforcing trade laws and agreements. In its findings, the Department of Commerce established that the major producers and exporters of the pipe from Korea did not sell the merchandise at prices less than the normal value in the United States during the period under review. The reviewed companies, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. (HSP), and SeAH Steel Corporation, were examined separately, and both received results showing a zero percent dumping margin. The Department’s methodology in such reviews involves examining whether products were sold at less than their fair value, which can be detrimental to local manufacturers. If dumping is discovered, additional duties could be imposed. However, since the dumping margin for the two companies was calculated to be zero, no duties for improper pricing will be collected against them. The review process is detailed and includes many steps to ensure accuracy and fairness. Initially initiated on June 25, 2025, the review process experienced some delays due to the Federal Government’s shutdown around that time, but it eventually concluded with preliminary results. Moreover, the Department of Commerce also mentioned rescinding the review concerning 15 companies because there were no suspended entries during the review period. When there are no shipments recorded, specific reviews can be terminated following the regulations of the Department of Commerce. The current review also addresses the duty rates for non-individually examined companies. Since HSP and SeAH both received a zero percent margin, other companies not individually reviewed are assigned an earlier established duty rate of 0.80 percent from a previous period. Public comments on the preliminary results of this review are welcomed until the completion of the process, with specific instructions provided to ensure they follow the review’s procedural regulations. Additionally, a verification process of the information used is intended before the final results are published. Lastly, following the preliminary outcome, adjustments to cash deposits required by U.S. importers have been set to mirror the findings of this review, stipulating zero duties when no dumping margin is detected while maintaining existing duty levels where necessary. These results highlight compliance with U.S. antidumping policies by Korean manufacturers during the period reviewed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Ripe Olives from Spain Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its review concerning the import of ripe olives from Spain. The review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. During this period, certain exporters and producers in Spain received countervailable subsidies. Background Information The examination began with a preliminary report released on February 10, 2026. From March 9 to March 13, 2026, officials from Commerce verified the data provided by the Spanish companies Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop.And. and Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with their olive growers. Final Results The Commerce Department determined that there were countervailable subsidies—these are government financial aids that benefit specific companies. These help certain exporters and producers of ripe olives from Spain. The subsidies arose from financial contributions by the government, which provided benefits to certain growers and exporters. Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop.And. had a subsidy rate of 4.80%. Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with its cross-owned companies like Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., showed a much higher subsidy rate of 25.21%. Methodology and Changes Throughout the process, Commerce used a detailed methodology to assess the subsidies. This included using facts available, sometimes with an adverse inference. This means that if a company did not provide enough information, Commerce relied on the information available to determine the subsidy amount. In the final assessment, adjustments were made to certain calculations. These involved changes in programs deemed countervailable and determinations were made for applying adverse facts, such as when incorrect information was found. Implications With the final results, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can collect countervailing duties on all affected entries from this review period. These duties are essentially extra taxes on imported goods that received subsidies. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to issue instructions to CBP within 35 days after this notice. This may result in holding off on liquidating relevant entries for up to 90 days if a legal challenge, called a summons, is filed in time. Cash Deposits Required The announcement also means new cash deposit requirements for estimated countervailing duties on shipments of ripe olives entering the U.S. These deposits are based on the established subsidy rates and will remain in place until further notice. For companies not reviewed, the cash deposit rate is set at 11.08%. These procedures are important to ensure fair trade and to counteract subsidies that might otherwise lead to unfair competition in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Makes Changes to Honey Imports from Argentina Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced changes to the rules about importing raw honey from Argentina. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. These changes are about antidumping duties, which are extra taxes put on goods that are priced lower than what they usually cost in the U.S. This helps to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. Background On June 12, 2026, the Department of Commerce published the results of the review of raw honey imports from Argentina. Right after that, a group called “Asociación de Cooperativas Argentinas” (ACA) pointed out some mistakes in how their duty (a kind of tax) was calculated. Ministerial Errors Found The Department of Commerce found that they accidentally counted some honey sales twice. This was a mistake in math. Removing the mistake changed ACA’s tax rate to 17.76%. Correction The Department also found problems with converting costs from kilograms to metric tons. They fixed this too. This means for ACA and other companies not selected for individual evaluation, the dumping margin is now 17.76%. Companies that were not listed before, but were mistakenly not exempted, have been corrected too. Assessment Rates Once a shipment comes into the U.S., Customs will charge a fee based on the corrected rates. Customs will use these new corrected tax levels when checking shipments entered between June 2023 and May 2024. Cash Deposit Requirements For honey imports after the review period, new cash deposits will be needed. If a specific company has a rate from before, they will use that rate. If not, they will use the rate for the honey’s producer. For everyone else not covered before, the tax rate will be 16.92%. This information is important for importers to note because failing to file certain paperwork might mean extra charges and doubled duties. What’s Next The Department has informed importers about their responsibilities to file documents showing they haven’t been reimbursed for duties. They are also reminding parties about handling sensitive data properly. Anyone who doesn’t follow these rules might face penalties. Conclusion The Department is committed to correcting mistakes and ensuring fair trade practices with these amended final results for honey from Argentina. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Confirms Subsidies on Rebar from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a decision about steel concrete reinforcing bars, commonly known as rebar, coming from Vietnam. They have found that Vietnamese producers and exporters of rebar have been getting unfair financial help from their government. This decision covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Investigation Overview The Commerce Department started looking into this matter on January 13, 2026. They published their preliminary decision soon after, inviting public comments. They based their investigation on U.S. laws that relate to countervailing duties, which aim to offset unfair government subsidies. Scope and Methodology The investigation focused solely on rebar from Vietnam, which was the product at the center of this case. Commerce followed strict rules to ensure their findings were accurate. They even went to Vietnam to check details about the rebar production and see if the subsidies were truly unfair. Findings Commerce found that the Hoa Phat Group, a major steel producer in Vietnam, received a subsidy rate of 6.80%. This means that the financial help they got from their government made their products cheaper to produce. This subsidy gave them an unfair advantage over competitors in the U.S. Implications The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if these imports from Vietnam harm the U.S. rebar industry. If the ITC agrees with Commerce’s findings, a special tax, called a countervailing duty, will apply to rebar imports from Vietnam. If they disagree, the case will end, and any fees collected will be refunded. Next Steps The Commerce Department has shared their findings with the ITC. In the meantime, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep an eye on imports from Vietnam. If the final decision stands, it will impact how much tax companies have to pay to bring Vietnamese rebar into the U.S. This development marks a significant step for both the U.S. and Vietnamese steel industries and will have lasting effects depending on the ITC’s final determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Rebar from Vietnam Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Vietnam is being sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This decision is aimed at protecting American industry from unfair competition. Investigation Overview The investigation period was from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department began looking into the claims in March 2026 and postponed the final decision until July 27, 2026. Scope of Investigation The investigation covered rebar from Vietnam. It included rebar that underwent processing in Vietnam or other countries but did not remove it from the scope if the rebar was originally manufactured in Vietnam. Plain rounds and smooth rebar are not part of this investigation. Vietnam-Wide Entity and Results Commerce maintains that certain producers in Vietnam did not cooperate effectively. Therefore, they used adverse facts to assign a dumping margin of 136.57% to the entire Vietnam-wide entity. Separate Rates Hoa Phat Dung Quat Steel Joint Stock Company, Hoa Phat Hai Duong Steel Joint Stock Company, Hoa Phat Hung Yen Steel Limited Liability Company, and Hoa Phat Prestressed Concrete Company Limited, collectively known as Hoa Phat Steel, were granted a separate rate. Their weighted-average dumping margin was set at 128.53%. Cash Deposits and Duties As of March 13, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to require cash deposits. The cash deposit for Hoa Phat Steel is adjusted for certain subsidy offsets. For others that did not qualify for separate rates, the Vietnam-wide rate applies. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the imports are harming U.S. industry. If the ITC finds significant injury or threat, an antidumping duty order will be issued, finalizing the application of antidumping duties on Vietnamese rebar. This process is crucial for ensuring fair competition and supporting domestic production. Issue List Commerce addressed many issues during this investigation. Some were about whether Hoa Phat Steel failed to report all U.S. sales or water consumption accurately. Other concerns included which financial data to use for calculating costs and other technical factors impacting the margins. This determination by the Commerce Department is essential in supporting fair trade practices and ensuring fair treatment of U.S. industries against unfair foreign practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Unfair Financial Help by Egypt for Rebar Producers Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision confirming that Egypt is providing unfair financial help to its producers of steel concrete reinforcing bar, commonly known as rebar. This decision means that Egypt gives special benefits to companies, making it unfair to U.S. producers. During an investigation that examined events from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, the Department found that these benefits, also known as subsidies, were being provided. The main company involved is the Ezz Group, which includes Al-Ezz Dekheila Steel Alexandria Company and others. These companies will face a countervailable subsidy rate of 23.27 percent, which means they will have to pay extra charges when their products enter the U.S. market. The investigation shows how Egypt is giving these companies cheaper access to resources like natural gas and electricity. By doing this, they have advantages over companies in the U.S., which goes against fair trade rules. The Department is continuing to hold off on certain entries of rebar into the U.S. After January 13, 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection began collecting deposits for these products and stopped liquidation, ensuring no further financial action until decisions were taken. This was halted on May 13, 2026, but the Department says that if the International Trade Commission (ITC) confirms injury to U.S. companies, it will resume imposing fees. The ITC plays a vital role in this process and will decide if U.S. companies have been hurt because of these practices by September 2026. Depending on their findings, the U.S. may continue further actions or drop the case. If the ITC supports the Commerce Department’s findings, U.S. customs will oversee extra fees on similar shipments coming in from Egypt. If ITC does not find harm, all deposits made will be refunded to those companies. This case highlights how global trade rules are overseen and ensures fairness for all parties involved. The focus remains on fair competition and ensuring that no country gives undue advantages to their domestic industries at the expense of international trade norms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Steel Rebar from Egypt Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently declared that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Egypt is being sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This means Egyptian companies are selling their steel for less in the U.S. than they do in their own country or other countries. This practice is called dumping. The investigation looked at sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department’s announcement, made on July 30, 2026, is the final decision in this case. Companies Involved The main company involved in the investigation is the Ezz Group. This group consists of Al-Ezz Dekheila Steel Alexandria Company S.A.E., Ezz Steel Company S.A.E., Ezz Rolling Mills Company S.A.E., and Al-Ezz Flat Steel Company S.A.E. Other companies like El Marakby Steel and Suez Steel Company also faced accusations, but their dumping margins were based on adverse facts available because they did not fully cooperate with the investigation. What Are Dumping Margins? A dumping margin is the amount by which the normal value of a product exceeds the export price. Here are the margins found: Ezz Group: 34.20% El Marakby Steel: 52.73% Suez Steel Company: 52.73% All Others: 34.20% These percentages show how much cheaper these companies were selling their products in the United States compared to their home market. Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold up these imports until a final decision is made. Importers will need to leave a deposit that matches these margins. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these low prices harm the U.S. industry. If the ITC finds that U.S. steel producers are being hurt, the Commerce Department will make an antidumping duty order. This order will impose extra duties on these imports to level the playing field for U.S. producers. The ITC’s decision is expected within 45 days. If they conclude no harm is done to the U.S. industry, the case will close, deposits will be refunded, and the suspension of imports will end. This ruling stresses the U.S. commitment to fair trade practices and protecting local industries from unfair foreign competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Steel Rebar from Bulgaria Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final decision on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from Bulgaria. The findings indicate that these steel imports were sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value. The period of investigation spans from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department’s analysis has led to the conclusion that there is evidence of unfair pricing for rebar from Bulgaria during this period. The main company under investigation was Promet Steel JSC. It was found that the company sold rebar at a dumping margin of 53.27%. This same rate is also applied to all other Bulgarian producers and exporters not individually examined in this investigation. The Commerce Department followed standard procedures, which included verification of sales and cost data provided by Promet. They looked at accounting records and other relevant documents to ensure accurate determinations. Going forward, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep holding deposits on rebar imports at the newly established dumping rates from March 13, 2026. This suspension will remain until further notice. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) concludes that these imports cause material injury to the U.S. industry, antidumping duties will be enforced. This decision is expected within 45 days following the Commerce Department’s final determination. The ITC’s decision will directly affect if cash deposits transform into finalized duties. If the ITC finds no injury, the deposits will be refunded, and the suspension of liquidation will be lifted. The Commerce Department has ensured that all involved parties are informed of their responsibilities concerning the handling of business proprietary information. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signs off on this determination, which was entered and published as official in accordance with pertinent sections of the Trade Act. The scope of this investigation includes steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form but excludes smooth, non-deformed rebar. It primarily involves harmonized tariff numbers including 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, among others. This decision impacts the pricing and importation practices of steel rebar from Bulgaria, ensuring fair competition and protection of U.S. market participants. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Inquiry on Import Rules for Spray-Foam Systems Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun an investigation to check if certain imports are breaking trade laws. This inquiry is focused on spray-foam systems from Canada that use special esters made in China. The inquiry was requested by ICL-IP America, Inc. They believe that some imports are avoiding rules that were put in place on products from China. The antidumping and countervailing duty rules are meant to stop unfair trade practices. These rules make sure that products are not sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S. The rules also stop countries from giving extra help to their industries unfairly. The review will decide if spray-foam systems from Canada are being made with parts from China in a way that breaks these rules. If the products are found to be breaking the rules, new charges could be placed on them. This process started after ICL-IP America, Inc. filed requests. They asked for an inquiry back in March 2026. They said the imports might not be following existing orders that started in June 2025. The Department of Commerce sent questions to get more information from ICL-IP America in March and May 2026. They answered these questions in April and May 2026. The Department of Commerce has set up rules to guide this inquiry. They include checking if the making of the spray-foam systems is a minor part that helps avoid the rules. Once the inquiry is finished, the Department of Commerce will decide if changes are needed. If products are found to be breaking the rules, suspension of trade and extra charges might happen. The inquiry will keep going throughout the year. The aim is to protect fair trading practices between countries. The findings might lead to changes for businesses that import these goods. They will need to watch for updates from the Department of Commerce. This will help them comply with any new rules that are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Initiates Inquiry on Alkyl Phosphate Esters from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Washington D.C., July 23, 2026 – The Department of Commerce has begun a scope inquiry related to certain alkyl phosphate esters from the People’s Republic of China. This inquiry aims to determine if spray-foam systems imported from China are covered by existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Commerce received a request from ICL-IP America, Inc. They allege that these spray-foam systems might be bypassing the orders. The request was filed on March 3, 2026. This request leads the Department of Commerce to start a scope inquiry. The scope inquiry will check if the esters-containing side of spray-foam systems, imported separately or as part of a system, falls under the orders. The orders target merchandise with specific chemical compositions. The inquiry will establish if these imports meet the criteria. Commerce has decided to defer the circumvention inquiry pending the outcomes of the scope inquiry. The department will gather information to make informed conclusions. All interested parties have been notified about this development. The scope inquiry is an important step in maintaining fair trade practices. The inquiry will also inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection about its initiation. They will continue the suspension of liquidation on entries connected to the inquiry. This applies to those already under suspension of liquidation. A final scope ruling by Commerce is expected within 120 days from today’s notice. Commerce may extend this period to 180 days if needed. This notice is a part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade in the U.S. market. It reflects the commitment of the Department of Commerce to enforce trade laws strictly and compliantly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Corrects Notice on Trade Reviews Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In a recent update from the U.S. Department of Commerce, there has been a correction in the notice regarding the initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. This update was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2026. The correction addresses omissions from an earlier notice published on July 9, 2026. The original notice failed to include Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan and Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea. These products, along with specific companies, were not listed in the initial publication. The correction is important for businesses and stakeholders involved in these trade sectors. For Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan, the companies under review include: Karaganda Complex Alloys Plant LLP KSP Steel TELF AG TNC Kazchrome JSC Eurasian Energy Corporation JSC Shubarkol Komir JSC YDD Corporation LLP ASIA Ferroalloys LLP KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP The period of review for Kazakhstan’s Ferrosilicon is from September 10, 2024, to December 31, 2025. For Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea, the companies under review include: Kudo Chemical Co., Ltd. Kukdo Finechem Co., Ltd. Kumho P&B Chemicals Inc. The period of review for Korea’s Epoxy Resins is from April 3, 2025, to December 31, 2025. This correction ensures that all relevant products and companies are included in the review process. This update is critical for ensuring the fairness and transparency of trade practices. The notice was issued by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. It adheres to the legal requirements under the Tariff Act of 1930 and its amendments. For further information, interested parties can contact Brenda E. Brown at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Her contact details are provided in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Decision on Malaysian Fatty Acids by the U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has delivered a preliminary affirmative determination concerning countervailable subsidies on imports of certain fatty acids from Malaysia. This decision follows an investigation that spanned the entire calendar year of 2025. In this determination, Commerce found that producers and exporters from Malaysia received countervailable subsidies. The investigation initially commenced back on March 13, 2026. However, Commerce announced a postponement on April 29, 2026, moving the preliminary determination to July 17, 2026. Brandon James and Rachel Accorsi, from the International Trade Administration, are responsible for overseeing this case. They can be reached for further inquiries at (202) 482-7472 and (202) 482-3149, respectively. This investigation and determination process are executed under section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce released the notices and findings via the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and public access to the information. A detailed Description and a list of topics discussed can be accessed through the Preliminary Decision Memorandum available at the provided links: access.trade.gov and access.trade.gov/frnotices. The specific products under scrutiny are certain fatty acids from Malaysia, as defined in Appendix I of the investigation document. The determination found countervailable subsidies under 701 of the Act, with noted financial contributions that offered specific benefits to participants. As documented, facts available and adverse inferences were applied due to non-cooperative responses from certain respondents. Alignment to ensure consistent final determinations across sectors, Commerce has aligned the final Consequential Value Determination (CVD) with its less-than-fair-value (LTFV) findings. Malaysia-based companies must now contend with the outcome that sets forth an ‘all-others’ rate—derived based on non-zero or non-de minimis subsidy rates—to ensure uniform application of determinations. The determined preliminary assessments are as follows: Evyap Sabun Malaysia Sdn Bhd received a subsidy rate of 4.40 percent. Palm-Oleo Sdn Bhd, and its affiliates, were marked at 4.19 percent. Other enterprises were assigned an average rate of 4.32 percent. Commerce has instructed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of related imports and cash deposits are now mandated at specified rates for involved companies. This suspension is applicable from the document’s publication date. Detailed calculations of these determinations are expected to be disclosed soon, providing additional insights into Commerce’s decision-making process. Moreover, verification processes will be employed to affirm the accuracy of the provided details. The issue remains under review, with public comment and hearing opportunities open for stakeholders to express concerns or additional observations. Comments, case briefs, or requests for hearings should be submitted within designated timelines post-verification. This matter is now awaiting evaluation by the U.S. International Trade Commission, which will determine the broader market impact of this preliminary decision and its implications on domestic industries. Interested parties, stakeholders, and relevant agencies are informed of these proceedings and encouraged to monitor developments as Commerce advances toward final determinations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Decision on Fatty Acids from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision on the investigation of certain fatty acids imported from Indonesia. These fatty acids are organic acids made from hydrocarbons. They are often used in the production of various goods. The preliminary findings show that these fatty acids from Indonesia received unfair financial help, or subsidies, from the Indonesian government. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. It started on March 13, 2026, and was supposed to end earlier, but the preliminary decision was delayed to July 17, 2026. In this investigation, the Department looked at whether the fatty acids were sold at unfair prices due to government help. They found evidence of subsidies for Indonesian producers. The companies examined in this case are PT Musim Mas and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. They are two of the largest producers exporting fatty acids from Indonesia. The preliminary subsidy rates found for these companies are 16.47% for PT Musim Mas and 16.48% for PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. These rates mean these companies received financial benefits allowing them to sell their products at lower prices than they should. The decision also affects all other Indonesian producers of fatty acids not specifically examined in this investigation. These producers have been given an estimated subsidy rate of 16.48%. The Department of Commerce will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to start collecting deposits on these imports. These deposits will be based on the subsidy rates mentioned above. This means importers must pay extra when bringing fatty acids from Indonesia into the U.S. This extra is held as a precaution while the investigation is finalized. The investigation is not over yet. The Department plans to verify the information provided by Indonesian companies. They will double-check the findings to ensure accuracy before making a final decision. Public comments on this case are invited. Interested parties may submit written feedback on the matter. There will be a hearing where these comments are discussed. The final decision will then be made after reviewing all input. This important preliminary decision is a step towards fair trade practices. It ensures that U.S. markets are not hurt by unfair imports. The International Trade Commission will also look into the effects of these imports on U.S. industries. The final decision is set to be released by November 30, 2026, unless further delays occur. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announces Antidumping Duty Order on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 4 minutes On July 23, 2026, the Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This action follows an affirmative final determination by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Earlier, on June 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce found that lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan were being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This decision was based on sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsequently, on July 16, 2026, the ITC confirmed that the U.S. industry was being harmed by these dumped imports. Scope of the Order The order covers lattice boom crawler cranes and their parts from Japan. These cranes have specific components: Lattice boom assemblies. Lower carriage assembly. Crawler assembly. Upper carriage assembly. Hoisting assembly. Jib assemblies. The order includes all cranes, whether they have additional features or not. Antidumping Duties Unliquidated entries of these cranes from Japan are now subject to antidumping duties. These duties apply to entries made on or after January 16, 2026, the date of the preliminary determination. The dumping margins for the major exporters are as follows: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.: 12.36% Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd.: 20.00% All other producers: 16.18% Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of these cranes and require cash deposits. This will continue until further notice. Provisional Measures Provisional measures started on January 16, 2026, and ended on July 15, 2026. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are not subject to antidumping duties. However, from July 20, 2026, suspension of liquidation resumes. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for each order. Interested parties can be added to this list for future notifications. Notification This notice establishes the antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. For a comprehensive list of antidumping and countervailing duty orders, visit the Commerce website. Commerce’s goal is to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. This order reflects their continued commitment to these principles. For further details, access the full Federal Register document online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Low-Value Sales of L-Lysine from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final findings on the importation of L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China. They have found that this important animal feed ingredient is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. Investigation Details The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation and reporting were completed by the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. Key Players and Companies Several key companies from China were involved in the investigation. These include Changchun Dahe Bio Technology Development Co., Eppen Asia Pte. Ltd., and Shouguang Golden Corn Biotechnological Co. Ltd. The Eppen Group and Zhengzhou Longgu Trading Co. Ltd. were particularly notable. Findings and Results The Department of Commerce used a method called “adverse facts available” to decide the outcomes, especially for companies that did not co-operate fully, like Longgu and Heshu. The investigation revealed dumping margins, which are differences between the prices in China and the U.S., suggesting that L-lysine was sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Implications and Actions As a result of these findings, the Department of Commerce will continue to suspend the entry of this product into the U.S. The cash deposit rates have been set for these imports. Companies will have to pay duties when they bring in L-lysine from China, ensuring fair pricing. What Happens Next The International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these imports have hurt U.S. businesses. If they conclude that they have caused harm, the duties will remain. If not, the investigation’s outcomes will change. For those involved in the importation and use of lysine, this decision is crucial. It aims to protect the U.S. market from unfairly priced imports and ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Decision on L-Lysine Import from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision. It will place a countervailing duty on L-lysine from China. This means extra charges will be added to the cost of L-lysine coming from China. What is L-Lysine? L-lysine is a type of amino acid. Animals need it to help them grow. It helps in making proteins. Farmers add L-lysine to animal feed for pigs, chickens, and cows. It’s important for animal health. Period of Investigation The Department of Commerce checked how L-lysine was sent from China. They looked at data from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They wanted to see if producers in China had unfair help from their government. The investigation started on January 22, 2026. The Findings The investigation found that Chinese producers received unfair help, called subsidies, from their government. This helps them sell products cheaper in the United States. This hurts American producers. Companies Involved Researchers examined several companies, like Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd, and found some were given unfair advantages. Three Chinese companies have to face these duties. They are Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd, and Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. Rates Announced Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd will have a countervailing duty of 48.21%. Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd will both face a duty rate of 82.11%. This rate is harsher because they didn’t provide the necessary information. All other producers will have the same rate as Inner Mongolia Eppen, which is 48.21%. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission will look at this decision. They will decide if U.S. businesses are being hurt. They have 45 days to make this decision. If they agree, the duties will stay. If they disagree, the duties will be removed. Final Steps All companies involved must respect the new rules. They should also make sure any private information shared with the U.S. Department of Commerce is kept safe. This decision is important for trade between the United States and China. It ensures a fair marketplace for goods like L-lysine. The U.S. continues to watch out for its businesses and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Department of Commerce: Review of Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is Happening? On July 24, 2026, the Department of Commerce shared that the removal of the CVD on fertilizers from Morocco is likely to lead to the continuance of unfair subsidies. The subsidies are benefits given by the Moroccan government to their local fertilizer producers, making their products cheaper in the U.S. Background Information Initially, the CVD order was put in place on April 7, 2021, to level the playing field for U.S. producers by counteracting the Moroccan government’s support. This review began on March 2, 2026, to decide whether this order should continue. Two U.S. companies, Mosaic Company and J.R. Simplot Company, are involved in this review. They provided timely notices showing their interest in continuing the examination of this issue. Findings So Far The Department of Commerce thinks that if the CVD were removed, Morocco’s producers, like OCP S.A., would keep receiving a subsidy rate of 20.04% from their government. This could mean they maintain an unfair advantage over U.S. producers. What’s Next? Interested people or companies can give their opinions or share their views. They have 30 days from the date of this announcement to submit their case briefs. If necessary, they may request a hearing to discuss these issues further. The Department of Commerce plans to publish its final decision within the next 240 days. They will consider all the comments and information submitted before making their final decision. This process is significant because it impacts both the Moroccan producers and U.S. companies selling fertilizers. Balancing fair trade practices is essential to ensure competitiveness within the global market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement about crepe paper from China. The department has decided to keep a special rule, called an antidumping duty order, on certain crepe paper products from the People’s Republic of China. This decision comes after careful examination and agreement with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). What is Crepe Paper? Crepe paper is a type of paper with a wrinkled texture, often used for decoration. It can come in various forms such as streamers and is sometimes treated to resist flames. Crepe paper can be colored or have different designs on it. It is usually packaged in rolls or different types of packaging for consumers. Why the Special Rule? The U.S. wants to make sure the local industry is not harmed by unfair pricing practices. When a country sells a product at a lower price in another country, it can hurt the industries in the importing country. This is called dumping. The U.S. government believes that ending the antidumping duty on crepe paper from China could lead to more dumping, which might hurt American companies that make similar products. What Happens Next? The rule to keep the antidumping duty will still apply from July 14, 2026. This means that for now, extra fees from the antidumping duty will be added to crepe paper from China entering the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting these fees. The U.S. Department of Commerce will review the situation again in five years. They will start this new review not later than 30 days before the five-year anniversary of the current decision. This decision is a reminder for all companies involved in the case to handle private information correctly and return or destroy it as required. By continuing this rule, both Commerce and ITC aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition and ensure they remain strong and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Reviews Subsidies for Pasta from Italy Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding countervailable subsidies for certain pasta from Italy. These subsidies were given to producers and exporters during 2023. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The department is responsible for checking if subsidies from foreign governments hurt U.S. businesses. They found that some Italian companies received help from the Italian government. This help, called subsidies, can make it unfair for U.S. pasta makers to compete. Two main companies in Italy, De Matteis Agroalimentare and Pastificio Attilo Mastromauro-Granoro, were part of this review. These companies were investigated to see if they received extra help that U.S. companies did not get. The review showed they did receive such help. This means they benefited from Italian government programs that influenced their production costs. The U.S. Department of Commerce has set new rates at which these companies must pay duties, which are like taxes, when they send pasta to the U.S. De Matteis Agroalimentare now has a rate of 3.32%, and Granoro’s rate is 3.21%. Other Italian companies, like Antiche Tradizioni di Gragnano and Pastificio Sgambaro, are also part of this review, and they have a rate of 3.32%. These new rates mean these companies need to pay extra when they bring their pasta into the U.S. This is to make sure they are not unfairly beating U.S. companies by using government help. Moreover, the report explains that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or CBP, will collect these duties. This will happen when the pasta enters the U.S. The aim is to level the playing field for American pasta producers and ensure fair competition. In addition, it is also crucial for the companies involved to handle sensitive information properly. They have received a reminder to protect any business secrets they learned during the investigation. The new decisions on subsidies and rates are important. They help ensure that U.S. pasta companies do not suffer because some Italian companies received unfair government help. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Keeps Tariffs on Chinese Mattresses Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided not to cancel the countervailing duty on mattresses from China. This decision is important for American companies that make mattresses because they believe it would be bad for their business if the duty was revoked. Background The duty, or tax, on Chinese mattresses started on May 24, 2021. This was called an “Order.” Its purpose was to stop unfair funding, or subsidies, that Chinese mattress makers were getting. These subsidies allowed them to sell mattresses at a lower price, which is unfair to U.S. companies. The Review Process On April 1, 2026, the Department began a review to decide if they should keep the duty in place. This was called a “sunset review.” During this review, U.S. mattress companies expressed their opinion that the duty should remain. They sent a letter to the Department on April 15, 2026. Submissions and Responses By May 1, 2026, the U.S. companies had provided detailed reasons why the duty should not be removed. But, the Chinese government and Chinese mattress companies did not send any arguments against the duty. Because there was no opposition from China, the Department moved quickly in their review. Results of the Review The Department of Commerce finished the review and decided to keep the duty in place. This decision means that the Chinese companies will continue to face charges of 97.78% on their mattress products when they sell them in the U.S. Conclusion and Responsibilities This decision is final for this review cycle. U.S. companies with access to special information must handle it properly according to the rules. This update should help those interested in trade and business between the U.S. and China understand what’s happening with the mattress market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Monomers and Oligomers from South Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized an antidumping duty order on certain monomers and oligomers from South Korea. This decision comes after the International Trade Commission confirmed that U.S. industries were harmed by imports sold at unfairly low prices. The order took effect on July 28, 2026. It affects imports from South Korea of specific monomers and oligomers, including those used in making inks, coatings, and varnishes. The purpose is to stop them from being sold at less than fair value in the United States. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on these products. These duties are the difference between their normal value and the price they were sold for here. Monomers and oligomers from South Korea will be taxed at rates between 65.72% and 155.42%, depending on the company. Some companies face higher rates due to a lack of cooperation in the investigation. The suspension of liquidation means businesses must put up cash deposits when importing these products. These deposits equal the estimated dumping margins. Suspension applies to entries made on or after January 5, 2026. For earlier entries, suspension lifted from October 7, 2025, to January 4, 2026, for which duties will be refunded. A new “annual inquiry service list” will allow interested parties to stay informed. Law firms and businesses must submit entries of appearance to be added. The Department of Commerce will update the list annually. The initial update occurs within 30 days after the order is published. This order aims to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition and secure a level playing field. The detailed list of materials affected is available through the official register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Continues Subsidy Protection for US Chassis Industry Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C., July 29, 2026 – The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its decision regarding certain chassis and their subassemblies from China. The decision is part of the expedited first sunset review of a countervailing duty order. Background: On April 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce started the first sunset review of the countervailing duty order issued on May 10, 2021. The order concerns the import of certain chassis and their subassemblies from the People’s Republic of China. Process: The review was prompted by the coalition of American Chassis Manufacturers. This group includes the Cheetah Chassis Corporation, Stoughton Trailer LLC, Pratt Intermodal Chassis, and Pratt Industries. These parties expressed their intent to continue the order because they believe it helps protect U.S. businesses. Lack of Response: Although the American manufacturers made their case, the Chinese government and other interested parties from China did not respond. Their lack of response was noted by the Department of Commerce. Expedited Review: Given the absence of response from China, the Department of Commerce proceeded with an expedited review, taking only 120 days to reach a decision. Results: The review results confirmed that revocation of the order could lead to continued or renewed subsidies on Chinese chassis. The Department of Commerce determined a subsidy rate of 44.32% for Chinese companies involved. Implications for U.S. Chassis Manufacturers: This decision means that countervailing duties will continue, ensuring that Chinese manufacturers do not have an unfair advantage due to subsidies. These duties serve as a protective measure for U.S. businesses. Administrative Measures: Parties to this review are reminded that they must return or destroy proprietary information shared under the administrative protective order. This is in accordance with U.S. regulations and compliance requirements. Conclusion: The continuation of the countervailing duty order shows the Department of Commerce’s commitment to maintaining fair competition for U.S. manufacturers. This ensures a level playing field for domestic producers of chassis and their subassemblies. The decision reflects the Department’s dedication to enforcing trade laws effectively. Contact Information: For further details, stakeholders can contact Mary Kolberg at the Department of Commerce, using the telephone number provided in the official release. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Begins Review of Solar Panel Duties Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has initiated a review process to consider making changes to certain trade duties on solar panels imported from China. This review was requested by RNG International, Inc., a company that makes and exports these solar panels. The solar panels in question are known as crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) panels. There are specific rules about which panels are covered by these duties. Certain small off-grid panels may now be excluded from the current duties. On December 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce set up rules to impose duties on certain solar cells from China. More rules were added in February 2015. These duties help prevent dumping, which is when products are sold at unfairly low prices. They also counter subsidies, which some governments give to help their industries unfairly. RNG International wants the Department to change these rules to exclude certain types of small, portable solar panels. These panels are usually used off-grid and are not fixed to buildings. On April 23, 2026, RNG submitted a formal request to review the rules. They want panels that are under 200 watts and with a maximum size of 16,000 square cm to be excluded. These panels must not have an inverter built-in. Other specifics include how the panels are packaged and connected with wires. Two groups in the U.S. that make solar panels, the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing and T1 Energy Inc., agree with this proposed change. They filed letters saying they do not oppose this idea. The Department of Commerce is asking for public input. This means people can share their thoughts on whether these specific solar panels should be excluded from the duties. The Department plans to make a preliminary decision soon, and they will allow more time for comments after their preliminary announcement. This review shows that trade rules can change. It is important to watch these developments if you are interested in solar energy or international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Procedures Announced to Help U.S. Engine Manufacturers Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Understanding Import Adjustment Offsets The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new procedures. These are for automobile engines and medium-and heavy-duty vehicle (MHDV) engines. The goal is to provide import adjustment offsets. This helps reduce the tax on some engine parts brought into the U.S. These offsets balance the extra charges set by past decisions. It started in 2025 when President talked about national safety concerns. Extra charges came onto vehicle parts to protect U.S. markets. The new rules will help U.S. engine makers by lowering their costs. Who Can Apply? Starting July 29, 2026, U.S. engine makers can apply. They must show details of their engine production. Applications have to be complete and sent electronically. Makers should provide engine production forecasts, value, and more. They should also detail component origins. Importance of U.S. Parts Engines made here need U.S. core components for approval. At first, two main parts need to be U.S. made. Later on, four parts must be from the U.S. This ensures U.S. industry growth, jobs, and strong supply connections. What Are The Recent Changes? The new rules outline ways for U.S. engine makers to gain advantages. Makers get 3.75% of their total U.S. assembled engine values as offsets. These help pay for certain import taxes. The offsets apply to engines made between 2025 and 2030. Government’s Role The U.S. Commerce office will check all applications. Accurate details are a must. False info can lead to penalties. Approved applications receive help through lowered import taxes. Program Goals The rules seek to make U.S. industries stronger. They help secure supply chains and create jobs. This keeps U.S. industry healthy and competitive. Information and reviews enhance market security. All the details about the offset program come from a notice on July 29, 2026. It aims to support U.S.-based engine manufacturers in reducing extra taxes. This is key to strengthening the U.S. manufacturing base. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Investigates Alkyl Phosphate Esters from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has opened an investigation. They are looking into certain chemicals called alkyl phosphate esters. These come from the People’s Republic of China. The Department wants to know if these chemicals are included in existing trade rules. The inquiry started because of a request by ICL-IP America, Inc. This company asked the Department to check if spray-foam systems from China are avoiding rules made to stop unfair trading. The rules are called antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The Department is not starting a full investigation yet. They will first look at what is included in the trade rules. This is called a scope inquiry. For now, the bigger investigation, called a circumvention inquiry, will wait. They will decide if the Chinese spray-foam systems fall under the current rules. If parts of these systems include the esters in question, then they might be covered by the orders. The purpose of the investigation is to find out if the esters meet certain rules. The rules say that the esters must make up a big part, at least 20 percent, of the spray-foam systems. While the investigation is happening, the Department will ask U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to keep holding on to any of these spray-foam systems coming into the U.S. This means that the companies involved will have to pay a deposit. This deposit is a protection in case the Department decides that the rules do apply. The Department will use specific sections of their rules to guide this investigation. They plan to finish the investigation within 120 days, but they can take up to 180 days if needed. They will understand more about these imports and decide if they need to pay the duties under existing orders. The products being investigated come from an order that covers various chemicals like TCPP, TDCP, and TEP. These are special esters used in many products as a fire retardant. The chemicals have specific names and numbers to identify them. The investigation is technical, but very important. It helps keep American businesses safe from unfair practices. This inquiry shows that the U.S. takes its trade rules seriously. For more details, please refer to the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 140 published on July 23, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice: U.S. Department of Commerce Adds Missing Items to Review List Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice. This notice was published in Volume 91, Number 140 of the Federal Register. It addresses a recent oversight by the department, specifically omitting certain items from a previous document. The action mentioned is a correction to the Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews. Originally, these reviews were published on July 9, 2026. The initial notice left out important entries related to Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan and Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea. These missing entries concerned specific companies. For Kazakhstan, the companies under review include: Karaganda Complex Alloys Plant LLP KSP Steel TELF AG TNC Kazchrome JSC; Eurasian Energy Corporation JSC; Shubarkol Komir JSC YDD Corporation LLP; ASIA Ferroalloys LLP; KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP For the Republic of Korea, the companies related to Certain Epoxy Resins are: Kudo Chemical Co., Ltd. Kukdo Finechem Co., Ltd. Kumho P&B Chemicals Inc. The period under review for Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan is from September 10, 2024, to December 31, 2025. For Epoxy Resins from Korea, the period is from April 3, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The notice is issued following sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. It also aligns with regulation 19 CFR 351.213. The correction aims to ensure that all interested parties have the correct and complete information. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed the document. The complete details of this notice are available in the Federal Register. This publication is accessible through the Government Publishing Office’s website. This correction is fundamentally important to stakeholders in the international trade community. It ensures all relevant entities are correctly accounted for in the trade review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. This decision is about fatty acids from Indonesia. It says that Indonesian producers and exporters are getting unfair help. This help is called a “countervailable subsidy.” What is a Countervailable Subsidy? This is when the government helps to make goods cheaper. This help could be money or other support. The U.S. law says this could hurt U.S. businesses. Investigation Period The investigation was for one year. It started on January 1, 2025, and ended on December 31, 2025. Background The U.S. started looking into these subsidies in March 2026. This was after companies in the U.S. complained. They said the subsidies were unfair. They claimed the subsidies caused problems for them. Company-Specific Rates Two companies in Indonesia were checked carefully. They are Wilmar and PT Musim Mas. Each got a countervailable subsidy rate of about 16.5%. All-Others Rate Other companies that did not get checked also received a rate. This rate is almost the same as the two main companies. Their rate is 16.48%. What Happens Next? The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop certain products from Indonesia. This will start after this notice goes public. Indonesia-exported fatty acids will need a cash deposit for the same percentage as their subsidy rate. Public Comments Interested people can give their opinion. They need to do this after the last check report is available. There is a set schedule for these comments. They can call for a hearing if they want. Critical Circumstances Check A critical look at these situations will happen by July 29, 2026. This is 30 days after the first issue was raised. What’s Next? The U.S. will keep checking. There will be a final decision by the end of November 2026. If they find the subsidies are unfair, they might take more actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan The U.S. Department of Commerce, along with the International Trade Commission (ITC), has issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This decision follows affirmative findings from both departments, which said that these cranes were being sold at less than fair value. What Does this Mean? Starting July 23, 2026, antidumping duties will be levied. This means that additional taxes will be applied to cranes coming from Japan to make the pricing fair. Background Details On June 4, the Department of Commerce announced their final affirmative determination regarding the sales of these cranes at less than fair value. Then, on July 16, the ITC confirmed their decision of material injury to the U.S. industry. Scope of the Order The order includes all lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. These cranes are often used for heavy lifting in construction and other industries. If you need more details, check the appendix on the original notice for a deeper description. Antidumping Duty Rates Several companies in Japan will face specific duty rates: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. will face a 12.36% duty. Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. will face a 20.00% duty. All other relevant companies will face a 16.18% duty rate. Provisional Measures The suspension of liquidation started on January 16, 2026, back when the preliminary determination was made. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are NOT subject to these duties. These entries should be liquidated without paying antidumping fees. Forward Steps It’s important that stakeholders keep up with the annual inquiry service list. This list will help ensure all parties are well-informed about the case proceedings and any updates to duties or regulations. Keep an eye on updates and notifications for any changes and to ensure compliance with this new order. This order aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing strategies by enforcing duties on products from Japan that do not adhere to fair pricing. Stay informed, and make sure you or your business fully understands the implications if you’re involved in importing these cranes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Provides Subsidies on L-Lysine Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision regarding an investigation into L-lysine (lysine) exports from China. This decision found that Chinese producers and exporters receive countervailable subsidies. This investigation focused on activities from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What is L-Lysine? Lysine is an essential amino acid. It is often added to animal feed to help in protein synthesis. The investigation covered lysine in all forms, including lysine monohydrochloride, lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. Investigation Findings The Commerce Department determined that Chinese lysine producers benefited from subsidies. These subsidies allow them to export lysine at lower costs. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd. was the main company investigated. Evidence showed financial contributions that helped these companies, making their exports unfairly cheap. The investigation also found that these subsidies were specific, meaning they were not available to all. Impact on Chinese Companies Different rates were calculated for the subsidies. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. was given a 48.21% subsidy rate. Two other companies, Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd., received a higher rate of 82.11%. This was based on adverse facts available. Future Actions The Commerce Department instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect deposits for these duties since January 22, 2026. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) confirms injury to U.S. industry, duties will continue to be applied. If not, the deposits will be refunded. The ITC will decide within 45 days if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If they find injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued. If not, the investigation will be closed, and no duties will be imposed. This decision marks a significant step in addressing trade imbalances. It aims to ensure fair competition for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.