U.S. Sets Preliminary Antidumping Duties on Temporary Steel Fencing from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary determination on temporary steel fencing imported from China. Commerce found that temporary steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means Chinese companies are selling these products in the U.S. for less than they charge in their own country. Investigation Period The time frame for this investigation is from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products involved include temporary steel fencing. This type of fencing includes temporary steel fence panels and temporary steel fence stands. These are the fences commonly used at construction sites or events. Both complete and unassembled parts are most often made of steel tubing and mesh, and they fit together to create a free-standing fence. Decorative steel fence panels are excluded from this ruling if they meet certain size and design requirements. Scope of Duties Commerce has decided to charge duties, called “cash deposits,” on these products because of their findings. The duties are different for each company, based on how much they were found to be underpricing their goods: Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd.: 187.69% (cash deposit rate 177.15%) Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. (for three unique producers): 136.57% (cash deposit rate 136.57%) Other Companies with Separate Rates: 136.57% (various producers and exporters; see official notice for details) Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd.: 136.57% (cash deposit rate 126.03%) China-Wide Entity (all other companies not listed above): 187.69% (cash deposit rate 187.69%) These duties apply to the value of the imported products. Critical Circumstances Determination In this case, Commerce also made what is called a “critical circumstances” determination for some exporters. This means that for some companies, the new duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the notice date. This applies to the China-wide entity, and to Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., as well as many companies with separate rates. Separate Rates and Combination Rates Commerce grants certain companies “separate rates” if they can show independence from the Chinese government. Most companies received a rate matching the finding for Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. If a company did not qualify for a separate rate, it gets the higher “China-wide” rate. Suspension of Liquidation Starting from the notice date, U.S. Customs will stop processing the import paperwork (“suspend liquidation”) for these items and will require cash deposits at the rates above. For companies with critical circumstances, this applies to earlier shipments as well. Next Steps Commerce will allow parties to comment and present new arguments. There may be verification of data and possibly a hearing if requested. The final decision could be postponed up to 135 days after this preliminary finding, extending the period during which the duties apply. Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination is also affirmative, the ITC will decide if U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. If so, the duties will become permanent. Details and Further Information Details about what products are included and which companies are affected appear in the official notice and appendices. Commerce’s decision includes a full list of affected exporters and producers, and describes exactly what kinds of panels and stands are covered. Merchandise covered by this order is mainly classified under U.S. tariff code 7308.90.9590 but may also enter under other codes. The U.S. Department of Commerce reminds all interested parties there are procedures for comments, hearings, and filings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Finds Circumvention of Antidumping Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from China via Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued a preliminary affirmative determination that imports of seamless oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Thailand, made with steel billets from China, are circumventing existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on OCTG from China. Background Antidumping and countervailing duty orders have been in place against OCTG from China since 2010. These orders are meant to protect U.S. businesses from goods sold at less than fair value and from unfair subsidies. Commerce began a country-wide circumvention inquiry on December 18, 2024. The question: Are OCTG finished in Thailand from Chinese steel billets avoiding the original orders? Three companies in Thailand were selected for review: Boly Pipe Co., Ltd., Nanobest Limited, and Petroleum Equipment (Thailand) Co., Ltd. On April 23, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for its preliminary determination. This notice, along with the full explanation, can be found online through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Scope of Orders The original orders apply to hollow, round steel products, such as oil well casing and tubing. These items can be made of iron or steel, made by seamless or welded methods. They may have different finishes and may meet various specifications. Both finished and unfinished goods are covered. Merchandise Subject to Inquiry This inquiry focuses on seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using steel billets made in China and then exported to the U.S. Methodology Commerce conducted the inquiry using U.S. law (section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930) and relevant regulations. The full details are included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination Commerce found that seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using Chinese steel billets and then shipped to the U.S. are circumventing the original orders from China on a country-wide basis. As a result, this merchandise should be included in the scope of the existing orders. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation and require cash deposits on entries made on or after December 18, 2024. This is only for OCTG from Thailand made with Chinese steel billets. If the merchandise is made with billets from countries other than China, the cash deposit requirements do not apply. Specific case numbers have been created for these products: A-549-991 and C-549-992. Certification Requirements Importers and exporters can submit certifications showing that the merchandise does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. These certifications must be completed and submitted with supporting documents, such as steel mill certificates, at the time of entry. Steel mill certificates must show the country where the steel was melted and poured. If these certifications are not provided, Commerce may require cash deposits at rates established for the AD and CVD orders on China (99.14% for AD, 13.41% for CVD). For companies with specific rates, those rates apply. Both importers and exporters must keep these records for five years after the last covered entry or three years after any related court cases. Certification Process and Timing For entries made between December 18, 2024, and September 3, 2025, importers and exporters must complete and upload certifications no later than October 3, 2025. Blanket certifications can be used for multiple entries. If non-AD or non-CVD entries were made during this period and cannot be certified, importers must submit a Post Summary Correction and pay any required duties. Public Comments Parties may comment on this finding and on certification procedures. Case briefs are due within fourteen days of this notice, with rebuttals due seven days later. Executive summaries are required for each issue and are limited to 450 words per issue. Requests for a hearing must be filed within 30 days of this notice. Hearings, if requested, will be scheduled later. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission of this preliminary determination. The ITC may seek consultations if it believes there is an injury issue within 60 days of notification. Certification Templates Provided The notice includes detailed importer and exporter certification templates. These templates must be filled out with names, addresses, invoice numbers, and documentation showing that the OCTG does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is taking steps to ensure that seamless OCTG from Thailand using Chinese steel billets is covered by existing orders against China. Suspension of liquidation and cash deposits are required unless proper certifications are provided. For more details, refer to the Federal Register notice and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-19
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-19 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of seamless oil country tubular goods (OCTG), completed in Thailand using steel billets produced in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on OCTG from China. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 2. Quartz Surface Products From India and the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on quartz surface products from India and the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice. 3. Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the Federal Register on July 24, 2025, in which Commerce announced the final results of the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR) from Mexico. In the final results, Commerce incorrectly assigned a review-specific cash deposit rate of 11.80 percent to certain non-examined companies for which the review was rescinded in the Preliminary Results. Commerce is correcting two items in the final results. 4. Certain Monomers and Oligomers From the Republic of Korea: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 5. Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that temporary steel fencing from the People's Republic of China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Rechargeable Batteries and Components and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to the Last Active Respondents Based on Settlement; Request for Briefing on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Closes Investigation on Rechargeable Batteries After Settlements, Requests Comments on Remedy and Public Interest Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Summary of the Action The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has stopped its investigation against Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC. This follows a settlement agreement between these companies and the complainants, LithiumHub, LLC, Lithiumhub Technologies, LLC, and Martin Koebler. Background of the Case The investigation started on October 21, 2024. It was based on a complaint by LithiumHub. LithiumHub claimed unfair imports of certain rechargeable batteries and their parts, saying these products infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 9,412,994 and 9,954,207. The following companies were named as respondents: Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC, Missouri Clean Republic SODO LLC, Washington MillerTech Energy Solutions LLC, Ohio Shenzhen Fbtech Electronics Ltd., China Shenzhen LiTime Technology Co., China Relion Battery (Shenzhen) Technology Co., China Renogy New Energy Co., Ltd., China RNG International Inc., California Navico Group Americas, LLC, Wisconsin Dragonfly Energy Corp. and Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp., Nevada Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD, China The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also a party to the case. Investigation Actions On February 3, 2025, the Commission found Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD in default. Other companies were terminated from the case earlier because they reached settlements. The last active respondents, Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC, filed a joint motion to settle on July 10, 2025. The administrative law judge (ALJ) approved ending the investigation against them on July 22, 2025. No party objected to this decision. Current Focus: Possible Remedy Against Defaulting Respondent Since all other companies are out of the case, only Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD is still facing action. The Commission may issue orders such as: A limited exclusion order (blocking some products from entering the U.S.) A cease and desist order (requiring Shenzhen Yichen to stop certain acts in the U.S.) Request for Public Comments The Commission is now asking for written comments on: What kind of remedy should be issued against the defaulting respondent. How the remedy would affect the public interest, including: Public health and welfare Competition in the U.S. economy U.S. production of similar articles U.S. consumers The amount of the bond that should be set if a remedy is imposed. If the Commission decides on a remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, acting for the President, has 60 days to approve, reject, or take no action. During that time, the products may enter under bond. Instructions for Submission – All initial written submissions and proposed remedial orders are due by close of business on August 28, 2025. – Reply submissions are due by close of business on September 4, 2025. – Submissions must be filed electronically and refer to Investigation No. 337-TA-1421. For confidential submissions, documents should be marked with a header for confidential information. A non-confidential version must also be filed within two business days. Guidance on filing is available at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. Further Information The full record and submissions are available via the USITC’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. Additional queries can be directed to Paul Lall, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, at (202) 205-2043. Authority This action is taken under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and rules in 19 CFR part 210. Issued by order of the Commission on August 14, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Foreign-Fabricated Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Institution
USITC Amends Investigation in Semiconductor Patent Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important change in its ongoing investigation into certain foreign-made semiconductor devices and related products. On March 26, 2025, the USITC began an investigation after a complaint was filed by Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Ltd., both based in Dublin, Ireland. The complaint said that some companies were breaking the law by importing and selling products in the U.S. that used certain patented technology without permission. The patents involved are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,745,847; 9,093,473; 9,147,747; 9,184,292; and 9,953,880. The original investigation named several companies as respondents, including Lenovo Group Ltd. (LGL) of Hong Kong S.A.R., China. Other companies named were: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (Taiwan) Apple Inc. (California) Broadcom Inc. (California) Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies Communication Co. (China) Motorola Mobile Communication Technology Ltd. (China) OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co. (China) Qualcomm Inc. (California) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) also joined the investigation. On July 1, 2025, Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. filed a motion with LGL. They asked to replace LGL with six other Lenovo-related companies in the complaint and to end the investigation for LGL. The new Lenovo companies are: Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Lenovo PC International Ltd. Lenovo PC HK Ltd. Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Lenovo Beijing Co., Ltd. Lenovo (United States) Inc. The motion was not opposed by the OUII or any of the other respondents. On July 21, 2025, the administrative law judge agreed to this change. The judge said it was proper to replace LGL with the Lenovo companies and to end the investigation for LGL. The judge found there was good cause for this step. The order said that there were no secret deals between the complainants and LGL, and that making the change would not hurt anyone’s rights or the public interest. It would also save resources for everyone involved. No party asked for a review of the judge’s decision. On August 14, 2025, the USITC decided not to review the judge’s order. This means the complaint and the investigation now include the six Lenovo companies, and Lenovo Group Ltd. is no longer part of the investigation. This decision was made under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. The statement was made official by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on August 14, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-08-19
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-08-19 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Certain Foreign-Fabricated Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Institution Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 34) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting an unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to substitute certain respondents for respondent Lenovo Group Ltd. (“LGL”) and to terminate LGL from the investigation. 2. Certain Rechargeable Batteries and Components and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to the Last Active Respondents Based on Settlement; Request for Briefing on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 38) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting a joint motion filed by complainants LithiumHub, LLC of Norris, SC, Lithiumhub Technologies, LLC of Marshall, TX, and Martin Koebler of Norris, SC (collectively, “Lithiumhub”) and respondents Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC (collectively, “Bass Pro”), both of Springfield, MO, to terminate the investigation as to Bass Pro, the last active respondents, based on a settlement agreement. The Commission requests submissions on remedy, the public interest, and bonding concerning relief against defaulting respondent Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD (“Shenzhen Yichen”) of Shenzhen, China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-18
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-18 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From the Czech Republic and India: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Request for Comments and Notice of Public Hearing Concerning China’s Compliance With WTO Commitments
USTR Seeks Public Comments on China’s WTO Compliance Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is asking for public comments about how China is following the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). USTR will use the comments to prepare a report for Congress. This happens every year. People can also ask to speak at a public hearing. Key Dates The deadline for sending comments, requests to testify, and summaries of testimony is September 24, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. The public hearing will be on October 7, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. EDT. How to Send Comments USTR wants people to send comments online through www.regulations.gov. Use Docket Number USTR-2025-0015 to find the correct place to submit. If online submission is not possible, contact Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China Affairs, before the deadline at 202.395.9625 or by email. Information to Include Comments or testimony should talk about China’s promises as a WTO member. These areas include: A. Trading rights B. Import rules (such as tariffs, quotas, and licenses) C. Export rules D. Internal trade policies (including subsidies, standards, taxes, and government procurement) E. Intellectual property rights F. Services G. Rule of law (such as transparency and legal reform) H. Other WTO commitments USTR also wants to hear about any unresolved issues. About the Hearing To speak at the hearing, people must send a request and a summary of their talk by the deadline. Each speaker has up to five minutes. No business confidential information should be shared in oral testimony. Small businesses, or groups representing small businesses, should say so in their comments. Written Submission Rules Send comments by September 24, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. Write in English. Keep submissions to 30 single-spaced, letter-size pages in 12-point font. Include: (1) 2025 China WTO Compliance Report, (2) organization’s name, and (3) type of submission (“written comment,” “request to testify,” or “summary of written testimony”). Do not send attachments or cover letters as separate files. All content should be in one file. After submitting, a tracking number will be given. Keep this number. If Submitting Business Confidential Information Clearly mark each page containing business confidential information as “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL.” The file name for confidential submissions must start with “BCI.” Also send a public version labeled “P.” USTR will not share business confidential information with the public. Viewing Comments All non-confidential submissions can be viewed by the public online at www.regulations.gov, using Docket Number USTR-2025-0015. Contact Information Questions or requests for alternative submission methods should be sent to Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China Affairs, at 202.395.9625. General Information More on the USTR can be found at www.ustr.gov. Published by: Edward Marcus, Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative Federal Register, August 18, 2025 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USTR Briefing 2025-08-18
Trade Representative, Office of United States Briefing 2025-08-18 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. 2025 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy: Comment Request Sub: Trade Representative, Office of United States Content: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) requests comments that identify online and physical markets to be considered for inclusion in the 2025 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy (Notorious Markets List). The Notorious Markets List identifies examples of online and physical markets that reportedly engage in or facilitate substantial copyright piracy or trademark counterfeiting. The `issue focus' for the 2025 Notorious Markets List will examine copyright piracy of sports broadcasts. 2. Request for Comments and Notice of Public Hearing Concerning China’s Compliance With WTO Commitments Sub: Trade Representative, Office of United States Content: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is seeking public comments to assist in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on China's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This notice includes the schedule for the submission of comments for the China report and a public hearing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-14
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-14 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology et al., Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and POSCO, producers/exporters of certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), received countervailable subsidies during the period of review January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Exercise Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and a Limited Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Exclusion Orders on Exercise Equipment Patents Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On August 14, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the Commission) announced new actions regarding certain exercise equipment and their subassemblies. Patent Infringement Determined The investigation, started on September 27, 2024, followed a complaint by Balanced Body, Inc. of Sacramento, California. The complaint said that some companies brought products into the U.S. that infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,721,511 (“the ‘511 patent”), U.S. Patent No. D659,208 (“the D’208 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. D659,205 (“the D’205 patent”). The companies named in the case were: Guangzhou Oasis, LLC d/b/a trysauna.com (Trysauna) Ciga Pilates of Hong Kong Shandong Tmax Machinery Technology Co. Ltd. (Tmax) Shandong VOG Sports Products Co. Ltd. (VOG Sports) Dezhou Bodi Fitness Equipment Co., Ltd. (Dezhou) Suzhou Selfcipline Sports Goods Co., Ltd. (Selfcipline) Results of the Investigation Ciga Pilates was removed from the investigation after the complaint was withdrawn against it. The remaining companies—Trysauna, Tmax, VOG Sports, Dezhou, and Selfcipline—did not respond and were found in default. The investigation later only focused on claim 1 and claim 19 of the ‘511 patent, and the claims of the D’205 and D’208 patents. The Commission found that VOG Sports, Dezhou, and Selfcipline imported products infringing claim 1 of the ‘511 patent and the claim of the D’208 patent. It was also found that the needed domestic industry exists in the U.S. Commission Remedies The Commission decided that the correct remedies are: A General Exclusion Order (GEO) that bans all imports infringing claim 1 of the ‘511 patent or the claim of the D’208 patent. A Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) that bans imports of products infringing: claim 19 of the ‘511 patent as to VOG Sports, Dezhou, Selfcipline, and Tmax the claim of the D’205 patent as to Trysauna, VOG Sports, Dezhou, Selfcipline, and Tmax This ban applies to imports by or on behalf of these respondents. Public Interest and Bond The Commission reviewed public interest issues as required by law. No responses were filed by the public. The Commission found that issuing these orders does not go against the public interest. Also, a bond of 100% of the value of the imported products covered by the orders must be posted during the presidential review period. End of Investigation With these orders, the investigation is now closed. The Commission’s actions are based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Additional Information The vote took place on August 11, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-08-14
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-08-14 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Oleoresin Paprika From India Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Certain Exercise Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and a Limited Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined to issue (1) a general exclusion order (“GEO”) prohibiting the importation of products that infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,721,511 (“the ‘511 patent”) or the claim of U.S. Patent No. D659,208 (“the D’208 patent”); and (2) a limited exclusion order (“LEO”) prohibiting entry of products that infringe claim 19 of the ‘511 patent or the claim of U.S. Patent No. D659,205 (“the D’205 patent”) that are imported by or on behalf of certain defaulting respondents. The investigation is terminated. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Z-Wave Alliance, Inc.
Notice of Changes in Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. Membership Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division has published a notice about the Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. This was released in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. On June 18, 2025, Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. sent written notifications. These were sent to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The notifications were sent as required by the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notice is for changes in the members of the Z-Wave Alliance. These changes help limit antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under certain rules. The new companies joining as members are: Copeland Comfort Control LP, St. Louis, AL Saya Life Inc, Los Angeles, CA Hubbell Incorporated, Shelton, CT Shenzhen iSurpass Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA HELTUN Inc., Yerevan, REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA RYSE Inc., Toronto, CANADA FireAvert, LLC, Springville, UT The companies leaving as members are: Canny Electrics, Melbourne, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Nexa Trading AB, Askim, KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Shenzhen Longzhiyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA There have been no other changes to the membership or plans of the Z-Wave Alliance. Membership remains open. Z-Wave Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes again. The Z-Wave Alliance first registered with the Department of Justice on November 19, 2020. This was also shown in a Federal Register notice on December 1, 2020 (85 FR 77241). The last change was filed on March 14, 2025. That change was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16701). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-OPENGMSL ASSOCIATION
OpenGMSL Association Files Antitrust Notification Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 30, 2025, the OpenGMSL Association filed a notice with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The Act allows certain groups to work together on research and production. When they file these notices, their risk for some antitrust damages is limited. The OpenGMSL Association is a group of companies working together. The listed members are: Aptiv, Warren, OH Coilcraft, Cary, IL indie, Aliso Viejo, CA Denso Corporation, Aichi, JAPAN Ethernovia, Inc., San Jose, CA GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Malta, NY Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, GERMANY Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co.KG, Fridolfing, GERMANY TZ Electronic Systems GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, GERMANY Analog Devices Inc., Wilmington, MA Granite River Labs, Santa Clara, CA Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, CA Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation, Atsugi, JAPAN The OpenGMSL Association has several goals. First, it plans to make the GMSL (Gigabit Multimedia Serial Link) technology a worldwide standard. This technology helps send video and data using SerDes transmission. Second, it will keep GMSL and its versions—GMSL2 and GMSL3—compatible for easier use. Third, it wants to keep making GMSL better to support video and data link markets around the world. Fourth, it may use these technologies in other industries if allowed by its Board of Directors. Fifth, it will do other actions that help with these goals. Membership in the OpenGMSL Association is still open. The Association will report changes in members as needed. This notice was provided by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. The record was published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Changes Membership Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On July 3, 2025, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (CableLabs) filed a notification with the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. CableLabs announced that CableVideo Digital S.A., from Buenos Aires, Argentina, has been terminated as a member of its organization. CableLabs gave this notice to extend special legal protections under the Act. These protections can limit the amount of money antitrust plaintiffs may recover to just actual damages under certain situations. There were no other changes to CableLabs’ membership. There were also no new plans or activities announced for the group. Membership in CableLabs is still open. CableLabs will continue to tell the government about any changes to its membership. CableLabs filed its first notice on August 8, 1988. A notice was published in the Federal Register on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593). The last notification before this one was filed on March 20, 2025. That notice was published on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16705). This notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division. The federal register number for this notice is 2025-15372. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.
Department of Justice Updates on PXI Systems Alliance Membership Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On July 8, 2025, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed notifications with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The filing shows there have been changes in the group’s membership. Sigma Advanced Systems Private Limited, based in Telangana, Republic of India, has been added as a new member. Three companies have left the group. They are Stelight Instrument Co., Ltd., from Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; Power Value Technologies Co., Ltd., from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; and JX Instrumentation, also from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. There have been no other changes in either the membership or the planned work of the group research project. Membership in this research group remains open. PXI Systems Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes. The original notification for PXI Systems Alliance was filed on November 22, 2000. The Department of Justice published it in the Federal Register on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971). The most recent notification before this was filed on April 15, 2025. That was published in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24669). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations from the Antitrust Division, confirmed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Training & Readiness Accelerator II
Notice Issued for Training & Readiness Accelerator II by Department of Justice Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 13, 2025, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division posted a notice about the Training & Readiness Accelerator II (TReX II) group. This was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154. This notice was filed under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, which is also called the Act. TReX II filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission showing changes in its membership. These notifications are meant to limit antitrust plaintiffs’ recovery to actual damages only, under certain conditions. New Members Added The document lists new members added to the TReX II group. Some of them are: Infiltron Software Suite LLC, Warner Robins, GA Space Information Laboratories LLC, Santa Maria, CA Duality Robotics, Inc., San Mateo, CA Recon RF, Inc., San Diego, CA Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., Honolulu, HI Bluedrop USA, Inc., Orlando, FL Data Squared USA, Inc., Wilmington, DE Other new members include companies from several states such as California, Florida, Maryland, Alabama, Missouri, New York, Michigan, and more. Parties Withdrawn Several companies have withdrawn from TReX II. Some of these are: Integrated Consultants, Inc., San Diego, CA JackTech LLC, Washington, DC JIRACOR LLC, Orlando, FL Open Source Systems LLC, Suwanee, GA Terida LLC, Pinehurst, NC Symbiosis.io LLC, Smyrna, GA Other withdrawn members are from locations like Virginia, Georgia, Ohio, Massachusetts, California, Texas, and more. No Further Changes There are no other changes to either the membership or the planned activities of the research group. The group’s membership remains open. TReX II plans to continue filing notifications about any membership changes. Past Notifications TReX II filed its first notification about its group on February 17, 2023. The Department of Justice posted a related notice on June 13, 2023. The most recent notification before this one was filed on February 7, 2025, and appeared in the Federal Register on March 7, 2025. Summary This official notice documents the latest changes in the Training & Readiness Accelerator II group’s membership. It also confirms the procedures used for antitrust law protections under the Act. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, issued this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
IEEE Updates Standards Activities Under Federal Antitrust Law Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On June 24, 2025, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This filing was made under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The purpose of this notice is to extend the Act’s provisions. These provisions limit the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under some circumstances. According to the notification, 57 new standards have been started. In addition, 20 existing standards are being revised. More information about these new and revised standards can be found at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/28may2025/ and https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/19jun2025/. There are also new or renewed pre-standards activities related to IEEE Industry Connections Activities. Details are at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/bog/cag/approvals/june202/. IEEE first filed a notification under the Act on September 17, 2004. The Department of Justice published a notice about that on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). The last notification before this one was filed with the Department on April 10, 2025. A notice about that was published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2025 (90 FR 17079). Suzanne Morris is the Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025-15381 Filed 8-12-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas
Department of Justice Releases Notice on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas Membership Changes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice has issued a notice about the Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154, dated Wednesday, August 13, 2025. The notification comes under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. On June 18, 2025, the Southwest Research Institute–Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (called “RIC-Americas”) sent updates about its membership to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Two new organizations were added to the group. These are Edison Welding Institute in Columbus, Ohio, and Zachry Corporation in San Antonio, Texas. At the same time, Tormach, Inc., from Madison, Wisconsin, has withdrawn as a party to this research group. No other changes have been made in the group’s membership or activities. The group’s membership is still open. RIC-Americas will continue to file written updates about any new membership changes. RIC-Americas first filed for coverage under this Act on April 30, 2014. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register on June 9, 2014, about this filing. The last update was sent to the Department on August 29, 2023. A notice for that update appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 2023. This current notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division. For more details, see Federal Register document number 2025-15382. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-08-13
Justice Department, Antitrust Division Briefing 2025-08-13 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 2. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 3. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Training & Readiness Accelerator II Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 4. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 5. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 6. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-OPENGMSL ASSOCIATION Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 7. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Float Glass Products From China and Malaysia; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
U.S. to Investigate Imports of Float Glass from China and Malaysia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the schedule for the final phase of its investigation into float glass products imported from China and Malaysia. The investigation will determine if these imports are harming the U.S. industry or threatening to harm it in the future. What Products Are Being Investigated The investigation covers float glass products made by floating molten glass over a bath of tin, cooling it, and then cutting it to size. These products must be at least 2.0 mm thick and have a surface area of at least 0.37 square meters. They can be clear, colored, or coated, such as Low-E glass or mirror stock. Some glass used in shower doors, laminated glass, insulating glass units, and LED mirrors are also included. Glass is still covered even if further worked—such as cut, drilled, or curved—as long as it meets original standards and is first made in China or Malaysia. What Products Are Not Included Certain kinds of glass are not included. These exclusions are: Wired glass, greenhouse glass, and patterned solar glass Safety glass for vehicles Vacuum insulating glass units Framed mirrors without LEDs Unframed over-the-door mirrors ready for use Smaller washing machine lid glass Some solar glass with specific features Metal-camed glass if the parts are already excluded Any glass covered by other existing trade orders, such as aluminum extrusions from China Background and Rules The U.S. Department of Commerce had made preliminary findings that float glass from China and Malaysia was subsidized and sold below fair value. The petitions for the investigation were filed by Vitro Flat Glass, LLC and Vitro Meadville Flat Glass, LLC. To take part as a party in the investigation’s final phase, a notice of appearance must be filed no later than 21 days before the hearing. Services and document submissions are handled electronically. Certain information in the investigation may be confidential and handled under a protective order. Parties who had access before do not need to reapply. Key Dates to Know The prehearing staff report will be placed in the record on November 10, 2025; a public version will come later. The main hearing will be at 9:30 a.m. on November 25, 2025. Requests to appear must be made by November 19, 2025. Remote testimony is allowed under specific circumstances. Prehearing briefs are due by November 18, 2025. Posthearing briefs and written public statements are due by December 2, 2025. Final comments from parties are due December 18, 2025. All filings must be electronic. Paper copies are not accepted at this time. How to Participate Anyone can submit written statements, even if not a party to the investigation. Any submissions must follow the detailed Commission rules. Documents must be served to all parties, with proof of service filed. Submissions that do not meet requirements will not be accepted. Authority The investigation is being conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice. Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 154 (August 13, 2025), Notice 2025-15343. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Active Anode Material From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
USITC Schedules Final Phase of Investigations Into Active Anode Material Imports From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a notice about the final phase of investigations into imports of active anode material from China. These investigations cover both antidumping and countervailing duties. The aim is to decide if U.S. industries have been harmed or threatened by these imported materials. The case concerns active anode material, which is an anode-grade graphite material with at least 90% carbon by weight. It can be synthetic, natural, or blended graphite. It is included whether or not it has a coating. The material can come as powder, dry, liquid, or block. It is usually up to 80 microns in powder form. It must have an energy density of 330 milliamp hours per gram or more and graphitization of at least 80%. The product counts as active anode material even if mixed with silicon-based materials like silicon-oxide, silicon-carbon, or silicon, or with additives such as carbon black or nanotubes. It does not matter if it is imported alone, as part of a compound, in a battery, as a component of an anode slurry, or within a subassembly such as an electrode. But only the anode-grade graphite is covered in these cases. The Department of Commerce already made preliminary findings that some manufacturers, producers, or exporters in China are getting subsidies, and the material is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The investigation began after petitions were filed on December 18, 2024, by the American Active Anode Material Producers. Its members are Anovion Technologies (Sanborn, NY), Syrah Technologies LLC (Vidalia, LA), NOVONIX Anode Materials LLC (Chattanooga, TN), Epsilon Advanced Materials (Leland, NC), and SKI US, Inc. (Marietta, GA). The schedule for the final phase is as follows: A staff report will go on the nonpublic record on November 14, 2025. A public version will come out after that. A hearing is set for December 4, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at the hearing are due by November 24, 2025. A prehearing conference is set for December 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Written testimony for the hearing is due by noon on December 3, 2025. Prehearing briefs are due by November 21, 2025. Posthearing briefs are due by December 11, 2025. Final comments may be submitted by December 31, 2025. Only electronic filings will be accepted. Submissions must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No in-person paper filings are allowed until further notice. Business proprietary information (BPI) will be shared only with authorized applicants under an administrative protective order (APO). Applications for access must be made at least 21 days before the hearing date. All filings must follow the Commission’s rules. Parties and their representatives must be listed in a public service list, which the Secretary to the Commission will maintain. Each document must be served to all other parties with a certificate of service. Further details on hearing rules, participation as a nonparty, and filing procedures are provided on the USITC’s website at https://www.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on August 11, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From China; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review
U.S. Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review for Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of an expedited five-year review. The review concerns the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China. This notice was published on August 13, 2025, in the Federal Register. The purpose of the review is to decide if lifting the duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China would likely cause continued or new injury to the U.S. industry within a foreseeable time. The review falls under the Tariff Act of 1930. On July 7, 2025, the Commission found the domestic interested party group response to its earlier notice of institution was adequate. The respondent interested party group response was found inadequate. No other circumstances required a full review. As a result, the Commission chose to conduct an expedited review as allowed by section 751(c)(3) of the Act. The staff report with information about the review has been added to the nonpublic record. This report will be available to people on the Administrative Protective Order service list on September 4, 2025. A public version will be released later, according to the Commission’s rules. Those who are parties to the review and who gave adequate responses can submit written comments to the Secretary. The comments must state what determination the Commission should make in the review. Comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on September 9, 2025. These comments cannot include new factual information. Anyone who is not a party to the review or an interested party may submit a brief written statement. These must also be sent by September 9, 2025, and must not contain new facts. If the Department of Commerce extends its review time, comments are due three business days after Commerce announces its results. If comments include business proprietary information, they must follow the requirements in sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s “Handbook on Filing Procedures” gives detailed instructions. The Commission has found responses from Bio-Lab, Inc., Innovative Water Care, LLC, and Occidental Chemical Corporation to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. Every document filed must be served on all other parties, and a certificate of service must be filed. Documents without a certificate of service will not be accepted. This review is considered extraordinarily complicated. The Commission is using its authority to lengthen the review period by up to 90 days, according to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). The review is being done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was published on August 13, 2025. For more information, contact Alexis Yim at the Office of Investigations, USITC, or visit the Commission’s website. Issued by order of the Commission August 11, 2025 Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-08-13
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-08-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Chlorinated Isocyanurates From China; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 2. Active Anode Material From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-752 and 731-TA-1730 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of active anode material from China, provided for in subheadings 2504.10.10, 2504.10.50, 3801.10.50, and 3801.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. 3. Float Glass Products From China and Malaysia; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-748-749 and 731-TA-1726-1727 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of float glass products from China and Malaysia, provided for in subheadings 7005.10.80, 7005.21.10, 7005.21.20, 7005.29.18, 7005.29.25, 7006.00.40, 7007.19.00, 7007.29.00, 7008.00.00, 7009.91.50, and 7009.92.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. 4. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof, DN 3843; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Announces New OFAC Sanctions Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sanctions on August 7, 2025. This action was reported in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 153, on Tuesday, August 12, 2025. OFAC added names to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These changes are based on laws and rules that OFAC uses to decide who should be added. When a person or company is put on the SDN List, all of their property and interests in property under U.S. control are blocked. This means no one in the United States can have business dealings or make transactions with them. OFAC makes information about these actions and its sanctions programs available on its website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. The notice includes both companies and individuals added to the SDN List. The exact list can be seen in the official Federal Register notice. People can contact OFAC for more information by calling these numbers: Associate Director for Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Assistant Director for Licensing: 202-622-2480 Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance: 202-622-2490 Bradley T. Smith is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. This notice was officially filed on August 11, 2025. The billing code is 4810-AL-C. The full details and the names of the people and companies involved are found on the official OFAC website and in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Issues New OFAC Sanctions on Vessels and Companies Estimated reading time: 8–12 minutes On July 30, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) made new changes to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These changes block the property and interests in property of certain people, companies, and ships that are under U.S. jurisdiction. U.S. persons are now not allowed to deal with these people and companies. The listed ships are also considered blocked because they are owned or controlled by blocked persons. List of Affected Companies The Federal Register did not show specific company names in text, but the companies are connected to the blocked ships and are named beside each vessel. List of Blocked Vessels The following ships have been added to the SDN List. They are named, given their type, country flag, year made, and connection to the guiding Executive Order (E.O.) 13902. Linked to MARVISE SMC DMCC: ALE (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9303754) BERTIE (Container Ship, Liberia, 2003, IMO 9241487) LIDIA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2007, IMO 9330501) STAR (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9436484) ZAGOR (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9313242) VANI (Crude Oil Tanker, San Marino, 2004, IMO 9264881) HAKUNA MATATA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2008, IMO 9354167) MOANA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2004, IMO 9292151) PINOCCHIO (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9400112) PUMBA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9302566) RANTANPLAN (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9307023) SIMBA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2015, IMO 9719862) BIGLI (Container Ship, Liberia, 2005, IMO 9307047) TEX (Container Ship, Liberia, 2003, IMO 9246322) TIMON (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9415844) YOGI (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9307009) Linked to THE ZULU SHIPS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION–SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP L.L.C: ETHERA (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9387279) MISHELL (Chemical/Products Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9332315) MYRA (Oil Products Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9336490) AETHER (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2007, IMO 9328170) APATE (Oil Products Tanker, Panama, 2009, IMO 9433016) BRIONT (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2003, IMO 9252955) MANASLU (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9388027) NEMRUT (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9439541) TAGOR (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2005, IMO 9282481) TASSOS (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9408695) TOA PAYOH (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2005, IMO 9298492) Linked to ALGAE SHIP CHARTER–FZCO: CHARMINAR (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9318022) EVENTIN (Crude Oil Tanker, Unknown, 2006, IMO 9308065) ANTARES I (Oil Products Tanker, Liberia, 2008, IMO 9382073) Linked to REEL SHIPPING L.L.C: ACE (Container Ship, St. Vincent and Grenadines, 2001, IMO 9228538) AEOLUS (Container Ship, Liberia, 1996, IMO 9088524) CERUS (Container Ship, St. Kitts and Nevis, 2003, IMO 9259408) DHANU (Container Ship, St. Kitts and Nevis, 2001, IMO 9122473) GAUJA (Container Ship, Panama, 2006, IMO 9348493) ROB (Container Ship, Liberia, 2001, IMO 9236652) TB ANPING (Container Ship, Liberia, 2002, IMO 9237084) Linked to SILVER TETRA MARINE CO.: GUANYIN (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2005, IMO 9299707) Linked to RAVI LINES INC: IANTHE (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Panama, 2012, IMO 9554822) Linked to KANTI LINES INC.: KANTI (LPG Tanker, San Marino, 2004, IMO 9282106) Linked to NEO SHIPPING INC.: ABHRA (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2004, IMO 9282041) Linked to SHAMKHANI, Mohammad Hossein: OMNI (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9400980) URANUS (Crude Oil Tanker, Tanzania, 2002, IMO 9248485) Linked to MEUSE SHIPPING INC.: IRIS (Crude Oil Tanker, Palau, 2002, IMO 9247778) Linked to KYLO SHIPPING INC.: KYLO (Crude Oil Tanker, Comoros, 2001, IMO 9189146) Linked to MAHADEV MARITIME INC: MAHADEV (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Palau, 2011, IMO 9571052) Linked to BACKSTREET PALM CORP: YODAN (Crude Oil Tanker, Vanuatu, 2005, IMO 9304356) Linked to WESER SHIPPING INC.: TRIS GAS (LPG Tanker, Cameroon, 1992, IMO 9041655) Linked to XANTE LINE INC.: XANTE (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Panama, 2010, IMO 9554834) Linked to YUG SHIPPING INC.: YUG (Crude Oil Tanker, Comoros, 2005, IMO 9288875) Linked to ZALE SHIPPING INC.: ZALE (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9321718) Linked to NOVA LINES INC.: ELKE (LPG Tanker, Palau, 1993, IMO 9012886) Legal Basis These sanctions are put in place under Executive Order 13902. This order gives the U.S. power to block property and stop people and companies from making transactions with banned people/entities. Blocked Property All U.S.-linked property of the people, companies, and ships named above is blocked. Anyone in the U.S. is not allowed to make deals or transactions with them. More Information For more on OFAC and these lists, visit the official OFAC website at: https://ofac.treasury.gov Prepared by:Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Register Citation: 90 FR 38890-38906, August 12, 2025.Document Number: 2025-15240. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-08-12
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-08-12 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons and vessels that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. The vessels placed on the SDN List have been identified as property in which a blocked person has an interest. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Amended Final Determination of Countervailing Duty Investigation and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Sets Duties on Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued new antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These orders were announced after final investigations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC found that U.S. industry is suffering because of imports of LSPTVs from China that are sold at less than fair value and are subsidized. Ministerial Error Corrections Commerce also corrected some mistakes in their original decisions called “ministerial errors.” These included small calculation or clerical mistakes. Because of these corrections, the estimated dumping margin for one company, Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd., changed from 312.31% to 312.54%. The rate for separate companies changed from 291.04% to 292.03%. Key Dates The AD order covers LSPTVs from China entered into the U.S. on or after January 30, 2025 (the date the preliminary determination was published). The CVD order applies to goods entered on or after September 7, 2024 (90 days before the preliminary determination). For certain companies, “critical circumstances” were found, so duties may apply to imports made up to 90 days before preliminary measures started. Scope of the Orders The orders cover low-speed personal transportation vehicles and their subassemblies from China. These vehicles: Usually have four wheels. Have side-by-side or in-line seating. Use a steering wheel and foot pedals. Weigh not more than 5,500 pounds. Have a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour or less. Gas and electric models are included. Excluded are vehicles like all-terrain vehicles, go-karts, and mobility aids. Products specifically excluded: All-terrain vehicles Utility vehicles with speeds over 25 mph Recreational vehicles with speeds over 30 mph Go-karts, electric scooters, and mobility aids Product codes under the orders include: HTSUS subheading 8703.10.5030 Also may enter under subheadings 8703.10.5060, 8703.90.0100, 8706.00.1540, and 8707.10.0040 Duties and Cash Deposit Rates The companies and the rates set are: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: AD margin 119.39%, cash deposit 119.33% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: AD margin and cash deposit 312.54% Non-examined separate rate companies: AD margin 292.03%, cash deposit 292.00% China-Wide Entity: AD margin and cash deposit 478.09% For CVD rates: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD: 691.58% Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 691.58% All Others: 41.14% Suspension of Liquidation Customs will suspend liquidation for covered vehicles and collect cash deposits at the rates noted. This will remain until further notice. During times when provisional measures expired but before the final ITC decision, entries are not subject to duties. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will keep annual inquiry service lists. Interested parties can be added by filing in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Law firms should submit a lead attorney. Petitioners and the Chinese government will be included automatically going forward. List of Companies A detailed list of eligible exporters and producers, including over 35 separate rate companies, is provided under Appendix II of the notice. More Information The official notice is listed in Federal Register Volume 90, Number 153, pages 38759-38764. The orders take effect on August 12, 2025. For questions, contact the International Trade Administration at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiries of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Initiates Circumvention Inquiries on Steel Wire Garment Hangers Involving Cambodia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Background on the Case The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the start of new circumvention inquiries. These focus on steel wire garment hangers. The concern is that hangers made in Cambodia, using Chinese or Vietnamese materials, may be avoiding trade duties. M&B Metal Products Co., Inc., a U.S. company, asked Commerce to investigate. They said that steel wire or steel wire with paper parts from China or Vietnam are being sent to Cambodia. In Cambodia, the wire is used to make hangers. The hangers are then shipped to the United States. This may be a way to avoid paying antidumping and countervailing duties placed on hangers from China and Vietnam. Orders in Place There are already orders to stop dumping and unfair support of steel wire garment hangers from: People’s Republic of China (China) Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) These orders help protect American companies from unfairly cheap imports. What Is Being Investigated The investigation covers hangers made in Cambodia from: Steel wire Steel wire and paper accessories The materials are made in China or Vietnam and then shipped to the U.S. from Cambodia. Reason for the Inquiry Under U.S. law, Commerce looks at these cases if: The final product shipped to the U.S. is similar to what is already covered by orders. Parts or pieces come from a country subject to an order, but assembly is done in a different country. The assembly or finishing in the new country is minor. The value of the parts from the original country is a big part of the final product’s value. Taking action is needed to stop people from getting around (circumventing) the trade orders. Factors Studied Commerce will study details about assembly in Cambodia, including: Investment in factories in Cambodia Level of research and development there Nature of the production process Size and extent of production facilities How much value is added by Cambodia compared to the whole product They will also look at: Trade patterns (where parts and finished goods are coming from or going) Company relationships across countries Increases in imports to Cambodia since U.S. orders began What Happens Next Commerce will: Use U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data to find which exporters to ask for information. Send questions to the largest producers and exporters in Cambodia. Review trade and company data to decide if duties should be applied. If companies do not answer questions fully, Commerce may use facts that go against those companies. What Could Change If Commerce finds that hangers from Cambodia are really just made from Chinese or Vietnamese parts and are meant to avoid duties, it can: Order customs to collect cash deposits for these products Continue or start “suspension of liquidation” (holding off on final duty assessments) on suspected products Apply duties on entries made after the date of this notice (August 12, 2025) Timeline Commerce plans to: Make preliminary decisions within 150 days of August 12, 2025 Make final decisions within 300 days Contact Information For questions, contact Samuel Frost at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 202-482-8180. This notice was dated August 6, 2025 and signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Antidumping Duty Orders on Brake Drums from China and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued official antidumping duty orders on certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye. The orders were published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2025. These orders come after findings by the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission that brake drums from China and Türkiye have been sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, causing harm to U.S. industry. Key Details of the Orders The antidumping duty orders cover brake drums made of gray cast iron, with an inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more but not over 16.6 inches, and weighing more than 50 pounds. This includes both finished and unfinished brake drums. The scope of the orders applies to brake drums imported separately or with other parts, such as a hub. If a brake drum is imported with non-subject merchandise, only the brake drum is covered by these orders. Drums processed in other countries, or that are assembled with non-subject parts, are still subject to these orders unless they are specifically excluded. Items excluded from the orders include merchandise already covered by previous antidumping orders on chassis and subassemblies from China, and composite brake drums containing more than 38 percent steel by weight. Covered merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 8708.30.5020, and may also fall under several other related HTSUS subheadings. Antidumping Duty Rates For brake drums from China, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: For the named producers and exporters, such as Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd., Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co., and others: 77.14 percent. For the China-wide entity: 160.79 percent, with a cash deposit rate of 150.25 percent. For brake drums from Türkiye, the weighted-average dumping margins are: EKU Fren ve Dok. San. A.S.: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). Akkus Dokum San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Buyuk Eker Bijon Sanayi Ve Ticaret, and Genk Otomotiv San. Dis Tic. Ltd. Sti.: 149.29 percent (cash deposit rate: 146.93 percent). All Others: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). These cash deposit rates are adjusted for export subsidies where appropriate. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Effective August 12, 2025, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend the liquidation of all entries of subject brake drums from China and Türkiye. Importers must deposit cash in an amount equal to the rates shown above at the time of entry. Antidumping duties will apply to all unliquidated entries made on or after January 29, 2025, the date when preliminary determinations were published. For entries made after July 27, 2025, and before the official order date, liquidation will proceed without regard to antidumping duties. Service List and Administrative Procedures Commerce will set up an annual inquiry service list for these antidumping duty orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance in Commerce’s ACCESS system within 30 days of the order’s publication to be included. The petitioner and the governments of China and Türkiye will automatically stay on the service list each year but are responsible for updating their contact information as needed. Scope of the Orders (Detailed) The orders cover gray cast iron brake drums with 14.75 to 16.6 inches inside diameter, weighing more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are covered, whether or not they are imported with other parts, assembled, or processed in a third country. The scope does not include: Brake drums that are part of certain chassis and subassemblies already under other antidumping or countervailing orders. Composite brake drums with over 38 percent steel by weight. HTSUS numbers include 8708.30.5020 (main), 8708.30.5090 (assemblies), and others as specified. Contact For details, contact Samuel Frost at (202) 482-8180 (China inquiries) and Colin Thrasher at (202) 482-3004 (Türkiye inquiries), U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. This is an official notice under section 736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The orders remain in effect until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Brake Drums from China and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced final countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye. The duties are based on investigations that began in 2024. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that U.S. companies were injured by brake drum imports from China and Türkiye because those imports were subsidized. The Department of Commerce will now order U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect countervailing duties on brake drums from those countries. The duties apply to all unliquidated entries of brake drums from China and Türkiye entered on or after December 3, 2024, except for those made after April 2, 2025, and before the publication of the ITC’s injury determination. Company Rates For China, two groups have the lowest duty rate of 11.94%: Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd./Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. All Others not named separately Several other Chinese exporters, including CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd./Trailer Master CVS Inc., and others, have a higher rate of 446.83%. This high rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences. For Türkiye, EKU Fren ve Dok. San. A.S. and all others not named separately have a rate of 2.80%. Akkus Dokum San.Ve Tic.Ltd.Sti., Buyuk Eker Bijon Sanayi Ve Ticaret, and Genk Otomotiv San.Dis Tic.Ltd.Sti. have a higher rate of 131.60%, also based on facts available with adverse inferences. Scope of the Orders The CVD orders cover gray cast iron brake drums with an actual or nominal inside diameter from 14.75 inches to 16.6 inches and weighing more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are included, whether imported by themselves or with other non-subject parts. The orders also cover brake drums processed in other countries or in the U.S., so long as they keep their classification as brake drums. Brake drums attached to or assembled with other goods are still in scope. However, composite brake drums that have more than 38% steel by weight are excluded. Goods covered by separate antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain chassis and subassemblies from China are not included. Harmonized Tariff Classification These brake drums are mainly classified under HTSUS subheading 8708.30.5020. They may also fall under other related subheadings when they are part of an assembly. Suspension of Liquidation CBP will suspend liquidation and collect cash deposits for these entries from the date of this order. Entries made between April 2, 2025, and the date of publication of the ITC’s injury determination are not subject to the countervailing duty because the provisional measures period expired. Annual Inquiry Service List The Department of Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list related to these orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance on the annual list within 30 days of the order’s publication. Updates and changes should be made as needed. Petitioners and foreign governments will be placed on the annual list after their initial entry and will stay there in following years unless changed by them. Contact Information For more information, contact: Charles Doss (Türkiye): (202) 482-4474 Nathan James (China): (202)-482-5305 A list of current countervailing duty orders is available at https://www.trade.gov/data-visualization/adcvd-proceedings. The CVD orders were signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on August 6, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Recission, in Part, of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Review Results for Wooden Cabinets From China Estimated reading time: 4–10 minutes Date: 2025-08-12 On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review of wooden cabinets and vanities from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Key Findings The review found that two companies, The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree) and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM), sold wooden cabinets and vanities in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.: 112.23% dumping margin The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.: 7.67% dumping margin Fourteen other companies qualified for a separate rate. These companies were assigned a dumping margin of 14.48%. Five companies were found to be part of the China-wide entity, which keeps its rate at 251.64%. No changes were made to the China-wide rate, as no requests were made to review the entity. The review is being partially rescinded for 49 companies. This is because either the requests for review were withdrawn or there were no shipments of cabinets from these companies during the period. Administrative Review Process The antidumping duty order on wooden cabinets from China began on April 21, 2020. On April 1, 2024, the Commerce Department invited interested parties to request a review. The review began with 70 companies. Some parties withdrew their requests to review certain companies. Eleven companies filed no-shipment certifications, and 18 filed for a separate rate. As a result, the review now covers 21 companies, including Ancientree and KM. After tolling and postponing deadlines, the preliminary results were set for August 5, 2025. Separate Rates and Review Results All companies from China are presumed to be under government control unless they prove otherwise. Fourteen companies and the two main respondents did so and qualified for individual rates. Companies receiving individual rates: Anhui Swanch Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Changyi Zhengheng Woodwork Co., Ltd. Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. Goldenhome Living Co., Ltd. Honsoar New Building Material Co., Ltd. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Senke Manufacturing Company Shanghai Zifeng International Trading Co., Ltd. Taishan Oversea Trading Company Ltd. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Xuzhou Yihe Wood Co., Ltd. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. Five companies did not file necessary information and are considered part of the China-wide entity. These companies are: Fujian Leifeng Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Oppein Home Group Inc. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., Ltd. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd. Rescinded Companies The review is being rescinded, in part, for 49 companies either because no requests for their review remain or there were no entries during the period. The full list is given in Appendix IV of the official notice. Next Steps Commerce will release final results within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Parties can submit comments and request hearings. Importers must ensure all paperwork is filed, or they may face extra duties. Cash Deposit Instructions When the final results are published, new cash deposit rates will apply: Companies with a separate rate will receive their assigned margin. Companies without a separate rate default to the China-wide rate (251.64%). Companies not under review keep their previous rates. Contact for Further Information For questions, contact Jacob Keller or Blair Hood at AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, (202) 482-4849 or (202) 482-8329. Official Notification Details Full details, company lists, and methodology are in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 153, August 12, 2025, pages 38727-38730. The notice includes directions for interested parties, assessment instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and deadlines for public comments. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-12
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-12 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Recission, in Part, of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM), made sales of wooden cabinets and vanities and components thereof (cabinets) at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Additionally, Commerce preliminarily determines that 14 companies are eligible for a separate rate and five companies are part of the China- wide Entity. Finally, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to 49 companies. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review. 2. Certain Superabsorbent Polymers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that superabsorbent polymers (SAP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were not sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), June 7, 2022, through November 30, 2023. 3. Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and exporters of certain softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. In addition, Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to one company. 4. Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From the Federal Republic of Germany: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL plate) from the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany) is not being, or is not likely to be, sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 5. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that certain producers/exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye) made sales of subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. In addition, Commerce is rescinding the review, in part, with respect to two companies which had no reviewable entries in the U.S. Customs and Border Production (CBP) data. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 6. Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain brake drums (brake drums) from the People's Republic of China (China) and the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye). 7. Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Antidumping Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain brake drums (brake drums) from the People's Republic of China (China) and the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye). 8. Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiries of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In response to a request from a domestic interested party, M&B Metal Products Co., Inc. (the requester), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating country-wide circumvention inquiries to determine whether imports of steel wire garment hangers (hangers) completed in Cambodia using components manufactured in the People's Republic of China (China) or the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on hangers from China, or the AD and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on hangers from Vietnam. 9. Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Amended Final Determination of Countervailing Duty Investigation and Countervailing Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from the People's Republic of China (China). In addition, Commerce is amending the final less than fair value (LTFV) determination and the final CVD determination for LSPTVs from China to correct ministerial errors. 10. Export Trade Certificate of Review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The Secretary of Commerce, through the Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (OTEA), issued an amended Export Trade Certificate of Review (Certificate) to California Almond Export Association, LLC on July 22, 2025. 11. Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Amended Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico. This notice rescinds this review for 11 companies as a correction. The period of review (POR), August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. 12. United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA),
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Chemtos, LLC
Chemtos, LLC Applies to Make Bulk Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has posted a notice about Chemtos, LLC. The company has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer. This means they want to make large amounts of certain controlled substances. Application Information Chemtos, LLC sent their application on July 4, 2025. Their address is 16713 Picadilly Court, Round Rock, Texas, 78664-8544. Comments and Objections Anyone who is already a registered bulk manufacturer can comment on or object to this application. The deadline for comments or requests for a hearing is October 7, 2025. Comments must be sent online through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. People can type their comments or upload longer files. Submitters will get a Comment Tracking Number after sending in their comments. Controlled Substances Listed Chemtos, LLC has applied to make a large number of controlled substances. These include drugs in both Schedule I and Schedule II. Schedule I drugs have a high chance for abuse and have no accepted medical use in the United States. Schedule II drugs also have a high chance for abuse but are used for some medical treatments. Schedule I Controlled Substances Amineptine Cathinone Methcathinone Mephedrone N-Ethylamphetamine Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Methaqualone Etizolam Fentanyl-related compounds as defined in 21 CFR 1308.11(h) Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) Marihuana (synthetic) Tetrahydrocannabinols (synthetic) Psilocybin Heroin Methyldesorphine Methyldihydromorphine Bufotenine A wide range of synthetic cannabinoids (like JWH-018, UR-144, AB-FUBINACA) Many fentanyl analogs and other synthetic opioids Schedule II Controlled Substances Amphetamine Methamphetamine Lisdexamfetamine Phenmetrazine Methylphenidate Amobarbital Pentobarbital Secobarbital Nabilone Phencyclidine (PCP) Cocaine Codeine Hydrocodone Oxycodone Methadone Morphine Fentanyl Sufentanil Carfentanil Tapentadol The full list includes many more substances and covers several pages. How These Substances Will be Used Chemtos, LLC plans to manufacture and distribute these controlled substances as reference standards. Reference standards are used by labs and agencies for various tests. For the drug codes 7360 (Marihuana) and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company will only make them as synthetic substances. No other activities with these drugs are allowed under this registration. Contact Details and Notices The notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for the DEA. The official document (FR Doc. 2025-15115) was filed on August 7, 2025. The notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 151, dated August 8, 2025, on pages 38502 to 38507. Businesses or people who want to make comments or objections have until October 7, 2025. All comments must be sent using the online portal given by the DEA. This is a public notice. It is provided so people and companies know about Chemtos, LLC’s application and can respond if needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-08-08
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2025-08-08 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Specific Listing for Dipentylone, a Currently Controlled Schedule I Substance Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is establishing a specific listing and DEA Controlled Substances Code Number (drug code) for 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-(dimethylamino)pentan-1-one (dipentylone; N,N-dimethylpentylone) in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Although dipentylone is not specifically listed in schedule I of the CSA with its own unique drug code, it is a schedule I controlled substances in the United States because it is a positional isomer of N-ethylpenthylone (controlled August 31, 2018), which is a schedule I hallucinogen. Therefore, DEA is simply amending the schedule I hallucinogenic substances list in its regulations to separately include dipentylone. 2. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Chemtos, LLC Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Chemtos, LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of Currently Approved Collection Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice, United States Trustee Program, is submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 4. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revisions of Previously Approved Collection. Title-Application for Approval as a Nonprofit Budget and Credit Counseling Agency (Application) Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice, United States Trustee Program, is submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 5. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Application To Transfer and Register NFA Firearm (Tax-Paid), ATF Form 5320.4 (“Form 4”) Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 6. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection: Title-Application To Make and Register NFA Firearm, ATF Form 5320.1 (“Form 1”) Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Finds Dumping of Chinese Mobile Access Equipment for 2023-2024 Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on certain mobile access equipment and subassemblies from China. This comes from a notice published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2025, Volume 90, Issue 151. What Products Are Covered? The review covers mobile access equipment (MAE) and their parts (subassemblies) made in China. The scope of these products is described in detail in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Which Companies Are Reviewed? At first, five companies were included. After Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou) withdrew their request for review, four companies remain: Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli) Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd. Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Dingli was picked as a mandatory respondent. What Did Commerce Find? Commerce found that some companies sold MAE in the U.S. at prices below the normal value (dumping) between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. The preliminary dumping margin rates found are as follows: Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (%) Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. 9.75 Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. 9.75 Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd. 9.75 Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. 9.75 China-Wide Entity Rate The China-wide entity is not under this review because no party asked for it. The China-wide rate remains at 165.14 percent. Process and Methodology Commerce reviewed the sales data from each company following U.S. law. The full method is detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, available to the public at https://access.trade.gov and https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Public Comments Interested parties can submit written comments within 21 days from the notice date. Rebuttal briefs may be filed five days later. Parties should include an executive summary and a table of contents for each issue. Hearings may be requested within 30 days after the notice publication. Assessment and Cash Deposits After final results, Commerce and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on the entries. If the dumping margin is zero or very low (less than 0.50 percent), Commerce will ask CBP to not collect duties. New cash deposit rates will apply after the final results are published. Companies in this review that get a separate rate will have a cash deposit rate equal to their dumping margin. For other exporters not reviewed, the rate will stay the same as before. Next Steps Commerce aims to finalize these results within 120 days, as required by law. Instructions for duty assessment will be given after the final results. Importers: Reminder Importers must file a certificate about duty reimbursement. Not filing could lead to extra duties. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For detailed topics and the full decision memorandum, see the official Federal Register publication pages 38458-38460, document number 2025-15117. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Announces New Countervailing Duty Rates on Aluminum Foil from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Review Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its 2023 review of countervailing duties on certain aluminum foil from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Department began this review on June 12, 2024, after receiving requests from different parties. Two companies were first chosen for full review: Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Later, both companies were dropped from individual review requests. The Department then reviewed Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd., which became the main company examined. Some companies asked to be left out of the review, and their requests were granted. Also, based on customs data, the Department found 26 companies with no shipments during the review period. One company, Prosvic Sales, Inc., was removed from the review for this reason. Scope of the Order The duty order applies to aluminum foil imports from China. Full details are found in the Order and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Review The Department ended the review early for 17 companies after they submitted proper withdrawal requests. All withdrawals were filed on time. These companies are listed in Appendix II. One company, Prosvic Sales, Inc., was removed after review showed it made no shipments. How Rates Are Set for Companies Normally, the Department gives each reviewed company its own duty rate. If there are too many companies, it can review only the biggest ones and average their rates for the others. For this review, only Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. had a calculated rate that was not zero, very small, or based on limited information. The Department assigned this same rate to all the companies that were not reviewed in detail. Methodology The review checks if the government of China gave unfair advantages, known as subsidies, to aluminum foil exporters. The Department found that certain companies received benefits that were specific and provided by authorities. Preliminary Results Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. and its affiliated companies received a preliminary subsidy rate of 25.25 percent. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. received a preliminary rate of 540.55 percent because its rate was based entirely on facts available due to lack of participation. Other companies under review, who were not individually examined, received a preliminary subsidy rate of 27.45 percent. List of Companies and Rates Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. and affiliates: 25.25% Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd.: 540.55% Non-selected companies: 27.45% (see Appendix III for company names) Public Comments and Hearings Anyone interested can submit written comments about the review. Case briefs are due 21 days after this notice, and rebuttals are due five days after that. Summaries of each key point should be given, limited to 450 words per topic. If someone wants a hearing, they must ask for it electronically within 30 days of this notice. The number of participants and a list of topics to discuss must also be included in the request. Assessment Rates After the final results are published, U.S. Customs will collect duties based on the rates set in the review. For companies whose review ended early, duties will be collected at the previous rate that was in effect at the time of entry. If there is a court challenge, Customs will wait before collecting duties. Cash Deposit Instructions New cash deposit rates will be set for reviewed companies after the final results. These rates apply to future imports. For companies not reviewed, previous deposit rates stay in effect. Final Results Deadline The Department plans to publish the final results within 120 days of this notice unless the deadline is changed. Notification This notice follows U.S. laws and rules for duty administrative reviews. Appendices Appendix II: Companies Removed from Review Seventeen companies, including Alcha International Holdings Limited and Zhejiang Zhongjin Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., were removed after timely requests. Prosvic Sales, Inc. had no shipments and was also removed. Appendix III: Non-Selected Companies Under Review Fourteen companies, such as Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd., were not individually examined and received the new 27.45 percent duty rate. For more details, see the full Preliminary Decision Memorandum on the Commerce Department website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duties for R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On August 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Key Findings Commerce determined that Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. and its affiliates sold R-134a at less than normal value during the review period. The weighted-average dumping margin found was 141.22 percent. Scope of the Order The order covers 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, also known as R-134a, or its chemical equivalent, no matter the form, type, or purity. Partial Rescission of Review Commerce is rescinding the review for 28 companies. The petitioners withdrew their request for these companies within 90 days of the initiation notice, and no other party requested a review for them. The companies are listed in Appendix II of the notice. Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. and its affiliates remain under review. China-Wide Entity The China-wide entity’s rate remains unchanged at 167.02 percent. No party requested a review of the China-wide entity, so it is not under review. Zhejiang Sanmei was preliminarily found eligible for a separate rate and is not part of the China-wide entity. Methodology Commerce conducted this review following section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. Export prices for Zhejiang Sanmei were calculated according to section 772(a), and the normal value was calculated under section 773(c), as China is considered a non-market economy. Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs or written comments within 21 days after the publication of the notice. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Each brief should include a table of contents, a table of authorities, and a public executive summary for every issue raised. Parties who want a hearing must request one within 30 days of the publication of the notice. Final Results Timeline The Department will issue final results within 120 days of the publication of the preliminary results, unless extended. Assessment Rates After the final results are issued, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. Assessment instructions will be sent to CBP 35 days after the final results are published, except if a lawsuit delays the process. Individual assessment rates for importers will be calculated based on their entries. If an ad valorem margin or importer- specific rate is zero or de minimis, no duties will be assessed. Sales not reported in the U.S. sales database will be assessed at the China-wide margin rate. For companies rescinded from review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties at the deposit rate in effect at the time of entry. Cash Deposit Requirements After publication of the final results: Zhejiang Sanmei’s cash deposit rate will be the one from the final results, unless it is de minimis. Exporters with an existing separate rate not listed will keep their current rate. Companies with no separate rate will have the China-wide rate of 167.02 percent. Non-Chinese exporters’ rates will match their Chinese suppliers. These deposit requirements stay in effect until further notice. Reminder to Importers Importers must file a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failure to do so can result in double assessments. Companies with Review Rescinded Appendix II lists 25 companies for which the review is being rescinded, including Bestcool Inc., Ltd., Jinhua Binglong Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. Further Information Full details and the list of topics discussed are available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. For questions, contact John Conniff at (202) 482-1009. [Federal Register: 90 FR 38455-38458, August 8, 2025] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023
“`html U.S. Finds Chinese Producers Dumped Aluminum Foil, Issues Preliminary Results Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of aluminum foil from China. The review covers sales from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Preliminary Findings Commerce found that some producers and exporters from China sold aluminum foil below the normal value in the United States. Selling below normal value is called “dumping.” The government will collect extra duties on those products. Companies Reviewed Commerce looked at 24 companies. Some companies were treated as one group because they are connected by ownership or business ties. For example, Commerce grouped nine companies including Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited; and others as a single entity. Another group of six connected companies included Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd.; and their partners. Separate Rates Not all companies are treated the same. Some companies proved they are separate from the Chinese government and received their own dumping rates. These companies are: Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. (as part of a group with Dingsheng) Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (as part of its group) Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd. Eastern Valley Co., Ltd. Korea Aluminium Co., Ltd. Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. Dumping Margins Commerce’s preliminary results assigned these dumping margins: Dingsheng Group: 24.51% Zhongji Group: 30.17% Other companies with separate rates: 26.94% Dumping margin means the percentage added to the product’s price to make it equal to fair value. China-Wide Entity Some companies did not answer all questions or did not apply for a separate rate. These companies are part of the “China-wide entity.” They will get the China-wide dumping rate, which is 105.80%. Companies in this group include: Dongwon Systems Corp. Gränges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Sama Aluminium Co Ltd. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Co., Ltd. No Shipments Some companies said they did not ship aluminum foil to the U.S. during the review period. But since their business partners shipped foil, Commerce did not accept their claim of no shipments. Assessment and Cash Deposits When these results are final, U.S. Customs will collect duties based on these percentages for all shipments entered from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The deposit rates will continue for future shipments until updated. Next Steps Interested parties can comment or ask for a hearing within set deadlines. Commerce will publish final results within 120 days after August 8, 2025, unless the deadline is extended. Notice to Importers Importers must file a certificate about duty reimbursement. If they do not, extra duties may be applied. Official Documents Details and documents can be found at https://access.trade.gov. Appendix: Companies with Separate Rate Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd. Eastern Valley Co., Ltd. Korea Aluminium Co., Ltd. Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. Companies Considered Part of China-Wide Entity Dongwon Systems Corp. Gränges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Sama Aluminium Co Ltd. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Co., Ltd. Details are based on the official Federal Register notice released by the Department of Commerce on August 8, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy. “`
ITA Briefing 2025-08-08
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-08 Estimated reading time: 7 minutes 1. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Sultanate of Oman: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) were made at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 2. Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain producers and/or exporters made sales of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) at below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of this review. 3. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From Bahrain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that countervailable subsidies were provided to a producer and exporter of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from Bahrain during the period of review (POR) from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 4. Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and alloy steel threaded rod (steel threaded rod) from India for the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Commerce preliminary finds that Mangal Steel Enterprises Limited (Mangal) did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 5. Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit), a producer and exporter of phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation (Russia). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. In addition, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to Industrial Group Phosphorite LLC. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 6. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the sole mandatory respondent under review sold 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People’s Republic of China (China) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 7. Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the People’s Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. In addition, Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to 18 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 8. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and/or exporters of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye), during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 9. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain producers/exporters sold common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye) in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review with respect to three companies under review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 10. Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that companies under review sold certain mobile access equipment and subassemblies thereof (MAE) at prices below normal value during the period of review April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. In addition, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 11. Paper File Folders From Sri Lanka: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of paper file folders (file folders) from Sri Lanka are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Department of Justice Announces Religious Liberty Commission’s Second Public Meeting Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) will hold the second meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission on September 8, 2025. This meeting will take place from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting is open to the public. Those who wish to attend in person must register ahead of time on the Religious Liberty Commission’s website at https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. Only the first 300 people who register will be allowed to attend in person. Attendees must show identification and go through a security screening before entering. The meeting will also be recorded and available to watch live at justice.gov/live. Media guests are required to register with the Office of Public Affairs before September 5, 2025, at 5 p.m. Media must also present a government-issued photo ID and valid media credentials, and go through security. For more information about the meeting or to request a reasonable accommodation to attend, contact Mary Margaret Bush, the Designated Federal Officer for the Religious Liberty Commission, at 202-297-3196 or by email. The Religious Liberty Commission was created by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission has a chair, a vice chair, 11 members appointed by the President from private and public sectors, plus three ex-officio members. The Commission’s goal is to advise the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office on important religious liberty policies in the United States. The Commission will provide a full report to the President. The report will cover the foundations of religious liberty in America, the effects of religious liberty on American society, current threats to domestic religious liberty, ways to protect religious liberty in the future, and ideas for programs to promote and celebrate America’s religious diversity. The main topic for this meeting will be religious liberty in public education. The Commission will hear from parents and students. Panels will include elementary, secondary, undergraduate, and graduate students. Experts in religious liberty and public education will also give testimonies. The goal is to understand the history of religious liberty in public schools, identify current threats, and find opportunities to protect religious liberty in schools for the future. The public can send in written comments about religious liberty in public education. Comments must be sent by September 1, 2025. They can be emailed to the Commission or mailed to: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, ATTN: Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706, Washington, DC 20530. This meeting notice is published as required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). Dated: July 28, 2025. Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Title-DEA Voluntary Wellness Program Healthcare Provider Clearance
DOJ Announces New Information Collection for DEA Wellness Program Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Purpose of the Collection The new collection, called the “DEA Voluntary Wellness Program Healthcare Provider Clearance,” is required for DEA employees who want to join physical fitness activities under the Wellness Program. To make sure it is safe for employees to join these activities, they must submit a health assessment form. This form must be filled out by a licensed medical professional before taking part. This process helps keep employees safe and supports the agency’s health and wellness efforts. How the Information Will Be Used The main goal is to check if DEA employees are medically able to safely take part in physical activities. The results will help prevent injuries or worsening of any health conditions. This requirement comes from the DEA Personnel Manual 2792. Employees must get medical clearance before starting any voluntary wellness activities with the agency. Details of the Collection The collection uses form DEA-315c. Only a licensed medical professional can fill out the form. The form is required before an employee can take part in wellness activities. Estimated Burden The DEA estimates about 100 people will respond each year. Each response will take about 45 minutes to complete. The total annual burden is expected to be 75 hours. There is no annual cost burden to the DEA. How to Comment Comments are welcome for 60 days, until October 3, 2025. If you have comments or need a copy of the information collection, you can contact Benjamin Inks, Office of Compliance, Policy Administration Section, 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, phone: 571-672-4524, or email at the address listed in the notice. For Further Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Dated: July 31, 2025. Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer for PRA U.S. Department of Justice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection and Comments Requested; Extension of currently approved collection Title-OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form package
Department of Justice Requests Comments on OJJDP NTTAC Feedback Form Package Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is asking for public comments on a feedback form package. This package is managed by the National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC). The request was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. The OJJDP wants feedback about collecting information from people who use their training and technical help. This information helps the agency know how well they are doing and find ways to help people better. What Is Being Collected The feedback forms are given to: People who get technical help from OJJDP Conference attendees Training and technical help providers Online meeting and in-person meeting participants Focus group participants The forms ask about satisfaction with the help, the quality, efficiency, and resources provided. They also ask about any other needs for training or help. Who Responds People who may need to fill out the forms include: Individuals or households Federal, state, local, or tribal government Nonprofit institutions Businesses How the Information Is Used The data from the forms is used to: Improve support for OJJDP NTTAC users Help the juvenile justice field Improve services and outcomes for youth Estimated Impact The Department of Justice thinks about 4,756 people will respond to these forms. The time it takes to fill out a form is estimated to be between 0.03 hours (about 2 minutes) and 1.5 hours. The total estimated time for all responses in one year is 430.5 hours. How to Comment The comment period is open until September 4, 2025. People may: Ask for a copy of the information collection instrument Make suggestions or comments about the time it takes to respond Contact Jill Molter at OJJDP NTTAC for more information by phone at 202-514-8871 or by email Written comments can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget in Washington, DC. For More Information Anyone needing more information can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, at the Department of Justice’s Washington, DC office. The notice was dated July 31, 2025. This announcement meets the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Certifying Qualifying State Relief from Disabilities Program
Department of Justice Seeks Comments on ATF Program for Relief from Firearm Disabilities Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is asking for public comments. The request is about an information collection program. This program is called “Certifying Qualifying State Relief from Disabilities Program.” The ATF wants to keep collecting information for this program. They are sending a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve it again. This is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. What is the Program? The program comes from the NICS Improvement Act. This Act helps make sure states report mental health records. These records can prevent someone from buying a firearm if they are not allowed to. States can get grants to help them make these reports better. But to get the grants, a state must have a program. This program lets people who were not allowed to have a firearm because of a mental health decision ask for that right back. A state official must certify to ATF that such a program exists. Details about the Collection Type of Collection: This is an extension of a collection that was already approved before. Form Number: ATF Form 3210.12. Who Responds: State, local, and tribal governments. Responding is needed if they want to get or keep grant funding. How Often: Each respondent will complete the collection once every year. Time Needed: It takes about 15 minutes (0.25 hours) for each person to complete. Number of Respondents: ATF expects about 10 responses every year. Total Time Spent: All together, this will add up to about 2.5 hours per year. Total Cost: The estimated cost for all respondents together is $120 a year. Table—Estimated Annual Burden and Cost Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Monetized Value of Time Complete 10 1 10 0.25 2.5 $47.92 $120 How to Comment Comments will be accepted for 60 days. The deadline is October 6, 2025. People can send suggestions or talk about the time needed to respond. Comments can also suggest better ways to collect the information. Contact Information For more information or to get a copy of the collection form, contact Pamela Eisert, FIPB, at ATF. The address is 99 New York Ave NE, Washington, DC 20226. You can also email or call 202-648-7190. If you need more information, you can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, at the U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Official Notice This notice was signed on July 31, 2025, by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a previously approved collection Title-National Tracing Center (NTC) Trace Request/Solicitud de Rastreo del Centro Nacional de Rastreo (NTC)
ATF Updates on Gun Trace Requests: Important Changes Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Collection Renewal and Changes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is making changes to how law enforcement agencies ask for gun traces. These requests use the National Tracing Center (NTC) Trace Request form, also called ATF Form 3312.1 or 3312.1S. The form helps police and other law enforcement agencies get information about guns used in crimes. ATF is asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to renew and approve their information collection. People may send comments for the next 60 days, until October 6, 2025. ATF wants to hear what the public thinks about the collection and if it is useful, the time it takes, and if the form is easy to use. What ATF is Changing The number of law enforcement agencies using the form each year will increase from 1,153 to 17,000. The number of trace requests will rise from 24,490 to 510,000. The total time agencies spend on this will increase from 2,449 hours to 51,000 hours. Total yearly estimated cost to agencies will be $2,443,920. Who Uses the Form? State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies use the form. It is not required by ATF but is needed if an agency wants a gun to be traced. How the Process Works Each law enforcement agency will send about 30 trace requests every year. Filling out each request takes about 6 minutes. ATF does not make a gun registry during this process. Only the agency that requested the information gets the results. Details for Public Comment People who want to comment or want a copy of the form can contact Carrie Robertson at the National Tracing Center Division by mail, email, or phone. The public should tell ATF if the collection is necessary, if the time needed is correct, if the process can be improved, or if there are better ways to collect the information. Contact for More Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the U.S. Department of Justice. Summary Table Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Cost LEA trace requests 17,000 30 510,000 6 minutes 51,000 $47.92 $2,443,920 This notice was dated July 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection Title-Application and Permit To Import Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles
ATF Seeks Comments on Import Form Update for Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) is asking for public comments on a new version of its form called “Application and Permit to Import Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles.” The form is known as ATF Form 5330.3B, or “Form 6, Part II.” Purpose of the Notice The ATF needs to collect information from individuals who want to bring firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the United States. This process is done through the Form 6, Part II document. The form helps ATF check if what someone wants to bring in can be imported. This update is a regular review under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The comment period will last for 60 days, ending October 6, 2025. Changes to the Form The form title will be changed for better readability. New attachment sheets are added. This helps people who need extra space, especially if importing many items at once. The new sheets are for listing defense articles and ammunition. Instructions on the form are updated. These now include current laws, use easier words, and explain things more clearly. Details like office contact information are updated so people know how to reach out if they need help. Grammar and terminology updates are made throughout. There are no changes to the overall procedure or requirements, but the number of people using the form has dropped. Who Uses This Form? Individuals, like returning military members, use Form 6, Part II to ask permission before bringing firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the U.S. Filling out the form is required to get approval to import these items. Annual Use and Burden Estimated number of users per year: 312 people. How often: Each user fills it out once a year. Time to fill out: About 30 minutes per person. Total annual time: 156 hours for all users. Estimated total cost of respondent time: $3,588 per year. Comments Needed The ATF wants feedback from the public and any groups who work with the form. They are looking for comments on: Whether the form is needed and useful. If their numbers and estimates are correct. Any ideas to make the form more helpful or clear. Ways to make the form easier, like by using computers or electronics. How to Respond People who want to comment or get more information can contact Austin Funk at the Firearms and Explosives Import Branch. He can be reached by mail at Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405; by email; or by phone at 304-616-4654. For other information, Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice can also be reached at 145 N Street, NE, Washington, DC. The official notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, on July 31, 2025. The full information is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Extension and Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Application for Cancellation of Removal (Form EOIR-42A) for Certain Permanent Residents; and Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status (Form EOIR-42B) for Certain Nonpermanent Residents
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a request for public comments on two important immigration forms. The forms are used for people in removal proceedings who want to stay in the United States. The two forms are: Form EOIR-42A (Application for Cancellation of Removal for Certain Permanent Residents) Form EOIR-42B (Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents) These forms help the government decide if a person should be allowed to stay in the country even if they are removable. Why Comments Are Needed EOIR wants the public, especially those affected, to comment on whether the forms collect the right information and are easy to use. Comments can also suggest ways to make the process clearer or faster. The goal is to make sure these forms help the agency do its work well. How to Comment Anyone who wants to comment has 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can ask for more information or share thoughts about the time and effort required to fill out the forms. Questions or requests for more details can be sent to: Justine Fuga Associate General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 Phone: (703) 305-0265 Key Details About the Forms According to U.S. law, people who are being removed from the United States may ask the Attorney General to cancel their removal. To receive this help, the person must show they meet requirements in the law. The forms let EOIR collect all necessary information. Changes Being Made The EOIR will update the forms in several ways: Update information about filing fees Add a Privacy Act Notice Show the expiration date for approval on each form Make small formatting changes so the forms are easier to read Who Will Use These Forms? The forms are for individuals in court proceedings who are at risk of being removed from the United States. Completing the forms helps decide if they can stay. How Many People Will Use the Forms and How Long It Takes Each year: About 1,519 people will fill out Form EOIR-42A About 15,757 people will fill out Form EOIR-42B It takes about 5 hours and 50 minutes for a person to complete each form. Total Hours People Will Spend For Form EOIR-42A: About 8,856 hours For Form EOIR-42B: About 91,865 hours Estimated Costs The government also shared the expected cost for filling out these forms. This includes: The average cost for hiring a lawyer or practitioner The cost to file each form For Form EOIR-42A: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $700 per response Total annual responses: 1,519 Total public cost: $1,683,912 each year For Form EOIR-42B: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $1,600 per response Total annual responses: 15,757 Total public cost: $31,640,056 each year The forms can be submitted electronically, so printing or mailing costs can be zero. How These Costs Are Calculated Costs include lawyers’ fees as estimated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the required government form fees. Further Information Anyone needing more information can contact: Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer Justice Management Division United States Department of Justice Two Constitution Square 145 N Street NE, 4W-218 Washington, DC This update was signed by Darwin Arceo of the U.S. Department of Justice on August 1, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection: Application To Transfer and Register NFA Firearm (Tax-Exempt), ATF Form 5320.5 (“Form 5”)
DOJ Announces Changes to NFA Firearm Transfer Form 5 Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), has shared a notice about updates to ATF Form 5320.5, also known as “Form 5”. This form is used by people and organizations who want to transfer or register National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms without paying the usual transfer tax, if they qualify for a tax exemption. Sixty-Day Comment Period for the Public The DOJ is asking people for comments on these updates. The comment period is open for 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can share their opinions about the time it takes to complete the form, the form’s usefulness, and suggestions for improvements. What is Form 5 Used For? Form 5 is for people who want to transfer and register an NFA firearm and believe they do not need to pay the tax. The form is used to: Ask for permission and show why the tax does not apply Support transfers that happen because of law changes, such as when a firearm is inherited through an estate Make it easier to temporarily transfer a firearm for repairs and get it back Who’s Affected? Those affected include: Federal government State or local government People or groups transferring unserviceable firearms People must fill out the form to follow the law and get the benefits offered. Increases and Decreases in Reporting Burden The number of people who fill out this form has increased from 10,591 to 17,322 in 2025. But, the average time needed to do the form has dropped from 30 minutes to 12 minutes. Technology now allows: Electronic forms and signatures Fewer people needing to send in fingerprints or photographs The use of cell phone photos and photocopied IDs Sending documents electronically People also don’t need to make an extra copy for local police anymore. Key Changes to Form 5 Some important changes to the form include: A clearer title Taking out the photo box to let people attach a passport photo or a copy of a photo ID Combining race and ethnicity questions More ways to sign electronically or digitally The fillable PDF form now fills in copy 2 as you fill in copy 1, except for check boxes and signature Added links to eForms and pay.gov Information about the refund process Ending the requirement to notify the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) and to send a copy New instructions for married couples applying together Corrections to small errors in the form Adding email contacts for specific questions Annual Reporting Details An estimated 17,322 people will fill out Form 5 each year Each form takes about 12 minutes, for a total of about 3,464 hours of work by all respondents The total estimated cost to respondents is $79,672 Contact for More Information For more information, contact Meghan Tisserand at the National Firearms Act Division, using the following: Mail: 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405 Email: [contact emails in original document] Phone: 304-616-3219 Official Record This notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, the Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, and filed on August 4, 2025. For more details, see the official notice in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted
Department of Justice Publishes Notice on Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 6, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register about collecting data on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is responsible for this data collection. The FBI will send a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review and approve this activity. The public is invited to share their comments. You have 60 days to send in your comments—until October 6, 2025. Comments should talk about how useful the information is, if the response time estimates are correct, how to make the data better, and ways to reduce the effort needed to answer. The goal of this collection is to help the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. The UCR Program is a national center for collecting and sharing information about crime. Each year, it publishes statistics on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The legal authority for this collection is Title 28, United States Code, Section 534. Key Details of the Collection: Type: This is an extension of a previously approved collection. Form Title: Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. Form Number: 1-705. Responsible Agency: CJIS Division, FBI, Department of Justice. Who Responds: Federal, state, county, city, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. Responding is voluntary. Number of Respondents: In 2024, there were 19,328 possible agencies. Of these, 1,084 agencies submitted LEOKA Form 1-705. Estimated Responses: The highest number of responses in 2024 was 13,008. Time for Each Response: Completing the form takes about 7 minutes per response. Total Annual Burden: The total estimated burden for all responses is about 1,517.6 hours each year. The number of agencies using the summary form (Form 1-705) is expected to decrease over time, as more agencies move to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Agencies using NIBRS report the same information in a different way. If you need more information or have questions, you can contact Linda Shriver, Acting Unit Chief at the FBI CJIS Division, by calling 304-625-4830 or emailing the address in the notice. For more details or to submit comments, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice, at the address listed in the notice. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149, on August 6, 2025, pages 37888-37889. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Title-Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (Form EOIR-60); and Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Immigration Court (Form EOIR-61)
U.S. Department of Justice Seeks Comments on Updated Immigration Forms for Limited Legal Help Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the U.S. Department of Justice has announced updates to two important forms. These forms let lawyers or representatives tell immigration courts or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that they are helping someone just with paperwork, not full legal representation. The forms are called EOIR-60 and EOIR-61. The new changes update how forms can be submitted. Now, attorneys and representatives can file EOIR-60 and EOIR-61 online using the EOIR Courts and Appeals System (ECAS) Respondent Access Portal. The rules for filing by mail are changed, and people are told to look at the EOIR Policy Manual for guidance. There is a new section in the forms that lets users say if they gave documents electronically using ECAS. The updates also fix some legal citations in the Privacy Act notice. The forms now say that case information can be found online, in English or Spanish, through the EOIR Automated Case Information System. A new sentence was added to EOIR-60. It tells people that this limited help is not allowed in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cases that are handled by the Board of Immigration Appeals. These forms are needed for lawyers or representatives who want to help someone with a document or filing, but not appear for the whole case. According to the notice, filling out these forms is required if a person wants to enter a limited appearance in these immigration matters. The Department of Justice says that around 40 people are expected to submit Form EOIR-60 to the BIA each year. Around 22,018 are expected to submit Form EOIR-61 to the immigration courts every year. Each form takes about 6 minutes to fill out. Together, this is about 2,206 total hours of work each year. There are no fees to file, and the forms can be completed electronically. The estimated cost, based on attorney wages, for all these forms each year is about $160,310.02. Comments about these changes are being accepted until September 8, 2025. People who want to give feedback should go to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and find this collection under “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments.” The OMB Control Number is 1125-0021. For more information, contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, EOIR, or Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer. The Department is seeking public comments on whether these forms are needed, their usefulness, the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates, if the information is clear, and ways to make the process easier through technology. This notice was published on August 7, 2025, in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
