International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-20 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Lamb Meat; Institution of Investigation, Scheduling of Public Hearings, and Determination That the Investigation Is Extraordinarily Complicated Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14602/lamb-meat-institution-of-investigation-scheduling-of-public-hearings-and-determination-that-the Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Following receipt of a request from the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") on July 13, 2026, the Commission has instituted Investigation No. TA-201-80 pursuant to section 202 of the Trade Act of 1974 ("the Act") to determine whether lamb meat is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof, to the domestic industry producing an article like or directly competitive with the imported article. The Commission has determined that this investigation is "extraordinarily complicated" within the meaning of section 202(b)(2)(B) of the Act and will make its injury determination within 123 days after the petition was filed, or by November 13, 2026. The Commission will submit to the President the report required under section 202(f) of the Act within 180 days after the date on which the petition was filed, or by January 11, 2027. 2. Lattice-Boom Crawler Cranes (LBCCs) From Japan; Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14597/lattice-boom-crawler-cranes-lbccs-from-japan-determination Sub: International Trade Commission 3. Certain Foundry Coke; Notice of Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14596/certain-foundry-coke-notice-of-institution-of-investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 15, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of SunCoke Technology and Development LLC of Lisle, Illinois and Jewell Coke Company L.P. of Lisle, Illinois. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on July 1, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain foundry coke by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,600,915 ("the '915 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 12,331,367 ("the '367 patent"). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 4. Preserved Mushrooms From Chile, China, India, and Indonesia Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14595/preserved-mushrooms-from-chile-china-india-and-indonesia Sub: International Trade Commission 5. Welded Stainless Steel Line and Pressure Pipe From India, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14594/welded-stainless-steel-line-and-pressure-pipe-from-india-turkey-and-the-united-arab-emirates Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-800-801 and 731-TA-1796- 1798 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of welded stainless steel line and pressure pipe from India, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates, provided for in subheadings 7305.31.60, 7306.11.00, 7306.40.50, and may also enter in under subheading 7306.40.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and alleged to be subsidized by the Governments of India and Turkey. Unless the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 days, or in this case by August 31, 2026. The Commission's views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by September 8, 2026. 6. Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (II); Notice of Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/20/2026-14535/certain-dynamic-random-access-memory-dram-devices-products-containing-the-same-and-components Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 16, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Netlist, Inc. of Irvine, California. Supplements to the complaint were filed on June 24 and 25, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain dynamic random access memory (DRAM) devices, products containing the same, and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,646,537 ("the '537 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 12,650,937 ("the '937 patent"). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-07-15
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-07-15 1) Executive Summary Four new notices from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) are covered today, each pertaining to Section 337 trade remedy procedures. The events involve complaints or determinations concerning various imported products, including melanoma predictive tests, mobile electronic devices, energy drinks, and glow fish tape and safety helmet systems. These ITC proceedings include solicitations for public interest comments and an administrative amendment. The primary instruments involved are exclusion orders, cease and desist orders, and administrative determinations under the Tariff Act of 1930. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests — Public Interest Comments (ITC_337) The ITC announced the receipt of a complaint in Certain Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests and Components Thereof (Docket No. 3921), filed by Castle Biosciences, Inc. The Commission seeks public comments on potential public interest issues arising from requested relief under Section 337. Respondents include SkylineDx Holding B.V., SkylineDx USA, Inc., Qiagen GmbH, and Qiagen LLC. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key Identifiers: Docket No. 3921 Key Dates: Complaint filed July 10, 2026; comments due within eight calendar days of publication (July 15, 2026 notice). Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest-34/ Mobile Electronic Devices — Public Interest Comments (ITC_337) The ITC received a complaint in Certain Mobile Electronic Devices (Docket No. 3922) from Maxell, Ltd., alleging violations of Section 337 by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The Commission invites public interest comments regarding potential issuance of exclusion and cease and desist orders. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key Identifiers: Docket No. 3922 Key Dates: Complaint filed July 10, 2026; comments due eight calendar days from notice publication (July 15, 2026). Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest-33/ Energy Drinks and Packaging — Complaint Amendment (ITC_337) The ITC issued a determination not to review an initial determination (Order No. 4) granting Monster Energy Company’s request to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1502). The amendment corrects the address of respondent Creative Trading Corporation. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key Identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1502 Key Dates: Initial determination issued June 23, 2026; non-review determination issued July 13, 2026. Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-energy-drinks-and-labeling-and-packaging-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-amending-the-complaint-and-notice-of-investigation/ Glow Fish Tape and Safety Helmet Systems — Public Interest Submissions (ITC_337) The ITC issued a notice requesting public interest submissions in Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and Components Thereof (Investigation No. 337-TA-1442). The Chief Administrative Law Judge issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond on June 5, 2026. The Commission seeks public input on potential exclusion or cease and desist orders directed to Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key Identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1442 Key Dates: Initial Determination June 5, 2026; comments due August 13, 2026. Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-glow-fish-tape-systems-safety-helmet-systems-and-components-thereof-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Four ITC Section 337 notices were published in the Federal Register on July 15, 2026. Two new complaints were filed, concerning melanoma diagnostic tests and mobile electronic devices. One proceeding advanced through an amendment by Monster Energy to correct respondent information. Another case reached the public comment stage regarding potential exclusion orders affecting Milwaukee Electric Tool products. Each notice allows for public submissions addressing how proposed remedies might affect U.S. health, welfare, competition, and consumers. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests — Public Interest Comments Mobile Electronic Devices — Public Interest Comments Energy Drinks and Packaging — Complaint Amendment Glow Fish Tape and Safety Helmet Systems — Public Interest Submissions 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint: Public Comments Needed Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently announced the receipt of a complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests and Components Thereof,” and is identified as “DN 3921.” The USITC is asking the public for comments. The focus is on any public interest issues concerning the complaint. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure allow for this public input. Castle Biosciences, Inc. filed the complaint on July 10, 2026. The complaint claims there have been violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section addresses unfair practices in import trade. The alleged violations involve the importation and sale of certain melanoma tests. The complaint lists four respondents. They include SkylineDx Holding B.V. from the Netherlands and SkylineDx USA, Inc. from San Diego, California. Qiagen GmbH from Germany and QIAGEN LLC from Germantown, Maryland, are also named. Castle Biosciences wants the Commission to take action. They ask for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also want a bond set during the 60-day Presidential review period. The Commission seeks comments from various stakeholders. Proposed respondents, interested parties, and government agencies are invited to provide input. The Commission is interested in several key points: How the melanoma tests are used in the United States. Any public health concerns related to the requested orders. Availability of similar articles made in the U.S. that can replace the subject tests. Ability to replace the volume of possibly excluded articles quickly. Impact of the orders on U.S. consumers. Comments must be submitted within eight days of this notice. Further commenting opportunities will be available after a final initial determination. Submissions should refer to Docket No. 3921. They are limited to five pages. All documents must be filed electronically. The Commission will accept filings through their Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Guidance on electronic filing is available in the Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures. Confidential submissions are allowed, but must be properly justified. These will be treated according to the Commission’s regulations. The action is authorized under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure also govern the process. Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, issued this notice. It was filed on July 14, 2026, and published in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
US International Trade Commission Updates Investigation Details Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made an important update regarding its investigation into certain energy drinks. The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1502, focuses on the labeling and packaging of these drinks. Monster Energy Company, a well-known energy drink maker, filed a complaint. Monster says that some energy drinks coming into the United States are infringing on their trademarks. This means other companies might be using Monster’s protected logos and designs without permission. The investigation started on June 4, 2026, and names several companies as respondents. These companies are involved in importing and selling energy drinks. They include Gig Wholesale Corp. in New York, The Elegant Inc. in Sri Lanka, and Creative Trading in New York, among others. Monster Energy asked to change the address of one respondent, Creative Trading Corporation. They wanted to update it from a P.O. Box to a street address in East Rockaway, New York. This change makes it easier to send important documents. On June 23, 2026, the chief administrative law judge decided to allow this address change. This decision was based on Commission Rules. No one opposed this request, and no other parties asked to review it. The Commission agreed with the judge’s decision. This change will not harm any involved parties or the public. As of July 13, 2026, the documents in this investigation have been updated with the new address. This decision follows section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The act helps protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The ITC continues to look into the matter to ensure fair trade practices are maintained. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, released this information on July 13, 2026. The Commission stresses the importance of protecting registered trademarks and fair business practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Mobile Electronic Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced its receipt of a new complaint. This complaint is about certain mobile electronic devices. Maxell, Ltd., a well-known company, filed the complaint. They did this on July 10, 2026. The complaint claims that there are violations, which are against U.S. laws. These laws are part of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The problem is about bringing these devices into the United States. It also involves selling these devices within the U.S. after they come in. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. from South Korea is named in the complaint. Also, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., which is located in Ridgefield Park, NJ, is named too. Maxell, Ltd. wants the Commission to act. They want a limited exclusion order. This would stop certain products from entering the U.S. Maxell, Ltd. also asks for cease and desist orders. This would stop certain activities in the United States. They also want a bond during a special review period. The Commission is now asking for comments from others. They want to hear from people and groups that may be impacted by this complaint. The comments should focus on how the public might be affected. Some key questions the Commission has include: How are these devices used in the U.S.? Are there any health or safety concerns with these devices? Are there similar products made in the U.S. that could replace these devices? Can the complainant or others make enough new products to replace the ones affected? How would these actions impact U.S. consumers? Anyone who wants to comment must send their comments soon. The deadline is eight days after this notice is published. Replies to these comments are also allowed. These replies must be sent within three days after the comments are due. All comments and replies must be short and only five pages long. People must file their comments online using the Commission’s system. If someone wants their comments to be private, they must ask for this. They need to explain why privacy is needed. This matter relates to section 337 of the Tariff Act. This is a law that deals with unfair trade practices in the United States. Contact Information: For more details, you can contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. You can call her at (202) 205-2000. If you have trouble accessing their online system, you can email the ITC. Visit their website for more information: www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Input on Import Restrictions for Certain Safety Items Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a request for public comments. The request is part of an ongoing investigation. This investigation is about certain glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems. On June 5, 2026, the Chief Administrative Law Judge made a decision. This decision is about a possible rule violation. The rule is Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge also made suggestions on what to do if a rule was broken. The USITC now wants to know what people think. They want to know how the rule might affect the public. The input is needed if the Commission finds a rule violation. They want to know if it is a good idea to stop these items from being imported. The USITC is interested in certain areas. They want to know how these items are used in the U.S. They want to know if there are any health and safety issues. They also want to know if there are U.S.-made items that can replace the imported ones. They need to know if U.S. companies can make enough to meet demand. Lastly, they want to understand how this might affect consumers. Comments can be sent to the USITC by August 13, 2026. Everyone can send their thoughts. You can find more information on how to send your comments by visiting the USITC website. The Commission wants to hear from everyone. They want to make the best decision for the U.S. people. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-07-15
Justice Department Briefing 2026-07-15 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection, eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; TitleLaw Enforcement Public Contact Data Collection Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14250/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-extension-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, FBI, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2. Civil Monetary Penalties Inflation Adjustments for 2026 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14236/civil-monetary-penalties-inflation-adjustments-for-2026 Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (“the Department” or “DOJ”) is notifying the public that its civil monetary penalty amounts will not increase for the 2026 calendar year. DOJ is generally required by statute to amend its regulations annually to adjust for inflation the civil monetary penalties assessed or enforced by components of the Department. However, in accordance with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”), DOJ will continue to use the 2025 civil monetary penalty levels because there will be no cost-of-living adjustment for 2026. 3. Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14211/notice-of-lodging-of-proposed-consent-decree-under-the-clean-water-act Sub: Justice Department Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-15
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-15 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14234/certain-glow-fish-tape-systems-safety-helmet-systems-and-components-thereof-notice-of-request-for Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2026, the presiding chief administrative law judge ("CALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommendation on Remedy and Bond, should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. 2. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14227/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Mobile Electronic Devices, DN 3922; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 3. Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14223/certain-energy-drinks-and-labeling-and-packaging-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 4) of the chief administrative law judge ("CALJ"), granting complainant Monster Energy Company's ("Monster's") motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the address for respondent Creative Trading Corporation. 4. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/15/2026-14192/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests and Components Thereof, DN 3921; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-07-13
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-07-13 1) Executive Summary Today’s summary covers five China-related developments published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration in the Federal Register. All events involve antidumping (AD) or countervailing duty (CVD) administrative reviews, reflecting Commerce’s ongoing enforcement of trade remedy laws. The notices concern the following products: certain activated carbon, aluminum foil, wooden cabinets and vanities, and carbon steel threaded rod from China. Each update relates to preliminary administrative review results or partial rescissions, providing updated duty margins or subsidy rates for the covered period. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Certain Activated Carbon — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily determined that Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (DJAC) and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. sold activated carbon from China in the United States at less than normal value during the 2024–2025 period of review. The Department also rescinded the review for Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. after finding no reviewable entries. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key Identifiers: A-570-904; Period of Review (POR): April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025 Weighted-Average Dumping Margins: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.: 0.83 USD/kg Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.: 0.86 USD/kg Non-examined separate rate companies: 0.84 USD/kg Source: Federal Register Notice Certain Aluminum Foil — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Results) Commerce preliminarily found that producers/exporters in China, including Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. and affiliates, sold certain aluminum foil at less than normal value during April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025. A separate rate of 61.85 percent was preliminarily assigned to Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Co., Ltd. Companies that did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate remain part of the China-wide entity. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key Identifiers: A-570-053; POR: April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025 Margins: Jiangsu Dingsheng and related entities: 61.85% Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd.: 61.85% China-wide rate (unchanged): 105.80% Source: Federal Register Notice Wooden Cabinets and Vanities — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily determined that Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. sold wooden cabinets and vanities from China below normal value during April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025. The review was rescinded for 42 companies, and three additional firms were granted separate rates of 7.48 percent. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key Identifiers: A-570-106; POR: April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025 Margins: Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd.: 7.48% Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd.: 7.48% Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.: 7.48% Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd.: 7.48% Source: Federal Register Notice Wooden Cabinets and Vanities — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily found that countervailable subsidies were provided to Chinese producers/exporters of wooden cabinets and vanities during January 1 – December 31, 2024. The review was partially rescinded for 29 companies. Subsidy rates ranged from 5.48 percent to 113.08 percent, with higher rates applied where adverse facts available were used. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key Identifiers: C-570-107; POR: January 1 – December 31, 2024 Subsidy Rates: Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd.: 5.48% KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.; Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd.: 113.08% Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd.: 5.48% Source: Federal Register Notice Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily determined that countervailable subsidies were provided to Indian producers/exporters of carbon and alloy steel threaded rod during January 1 – December 31, 2024, setting a reference for related proceedings that often include China. The review was rescinded in part with respect to five companies. The preliminary subsidy rate for Nishant Steel Industries was calculated at 2.54 percent. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: Related multilateral comparative case (not specific to China) Key Identifiers: C-533-888; POR: January 1 – December 31, 2024 Subsidy Rate: Nishant Steel Industries: 2.54% Source: Federal Register Notice 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce continues to enforce antidumping and countervailing duties on multiple product categories involving China-based manufacturers. Activated carbon, aluminum foil, and wooden cabinets remain under sustained administrative review cycles with recalculated margins. Separate rate eligibility remains a central issue for Chinese companies in non-market economy proceedings. Wooden cabinet producers faced both AD and CVD findings, reflecting dual trade remedy application. Reviews also included comparative cases from India, demonstrating parallel monitoring of steel and industrial goods supply chains. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Activated Carbon – Preliminary AD Results (China) Aluminum Foil – Preliminary AD Results (China) Wooden Cabinets – Preliminary AD Review (China) Wooden Cabinets – Preliminary CVD Review (China) Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod – Preliminary CVD (India) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Kingdom of Bahrain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheets from Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently shared preliminary findings regarding the review of antidumping duties on aluminum sheets imported from Bahrain. The review focused on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation zeroed in on a specific company, Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO), a major exporter of aluminum sheets to the United States. Commerce found that GARMCO has been selling its aluminum sheets at prices lower than the normal value, which means they are priced below what is expected or fair. This is known as “dumping.” The purpose of providing such dumping assessments is to protect U.S. industries from unfair and underpriced competition from foreign entities. Due to this determination, an antidumping margin, or extra duty, is set. For GARMCO, a weighted-average dumping margin of 6.25 percent is proposed. This percentage represents the level of unfair pricing detected by the Department of Commerce. The Commerce Department reached this finding through a series of extended reviews. Initially, there were delays because of government shutdowns and backlogs, which pushed the deadlines back multiple times. But by July 7, 2026, Commerce was ready to release its preliminary results. Now, the review will go through further processing. Interested parties can comment on these preliminary results. Commerce invites written comments often called case briefs, within 21 days of this announcement’s publication. They allow rebuttal briefs within five days after that, specifically to address concerns raised in the case briefs. Commerce plans to disclose its calculations and analysis supporting these preliminary results. To ensure transparency, they will provide the information within ten days to public stakeholders. The public has 30 days to request a hearing about these preliminary findings. If requested, hearings will be scheduled, allowing for oral presentations on issues raised in the written comments. Final results are expected within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Depending on the final outcome, the antidumping duties for imports from GARMCO may be adjusted accordingly. Meanwhile, cash deposit requirements based on these margins are set to be effective upon the final results’ publication. The proposed margin of 6.25 percent could increase import costs once enforced. The Department of Commerce enforces these duties to ensure fair competition. They protect U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair trade practices. For now, the preliminary results highlight necessary steps to correct such practices. This protection aims to create a level playing field for U.S. aluminum sheet producers to compete against imports priced lower than what is deemed fair. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From Bahrain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies Given to Aluminum Producers in Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that producers in Bahrain received subsidies for producing aluminum sheets. This was announced on July 13, 2026. The review focused on the time from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The review is part of a regular check under the countervailing duty order on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. Gulf Aluminum Rolling Mill, often called GARMCO, was the main company checked in this review. The Commerce Department used special rules to decide if subsidies were provided. If a government helps a company financially, and this help benefits the company, it might be a subsidy. The review found that GARMCO received a subsidy rate of 18.97%. These findings mean that the U.S. might charge extra fees, or duties, on aluminum sheets from Bahrain when they are sent to the U.S. This will be decided after the final review results. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They can submit their comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce within 21 days of this announcement. Once the review is complete, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will use the results to decide the duties on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to complete the final review in about 120 days. At that point, they will share their final decision, considering all the feedback and findings. These processes ensure that international trade rules are followed and that U.S. industries are not hurt by unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheet Imports from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has revealed preliminary findings in its recent administrative review concerning antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet imports from the Republic of Türkiye. The review, which focuses on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, has found that some producers/exporters sold aluminum sheets in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Background and Details: The antidumping duty order on aluminum sheets from Türkiye was first announced in April 2021. This current review began following an opportunity notice published on April 1, 2025, which allowed interested parties to request an administrative review of the order. Subsequently, the Department of Commerce initiated the review for five producers/exporters from Türkiye. Due to a lapse in government appropriations and subsequent backlog in document processing, there were several extensions to the review deadline. The current deadline for preliminary results was set to July 7, 2026. The review focused on two key companies: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. The Department preliminarily determined that Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. had a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.45 percent. Conversely, Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a margin of 0.00 percent, indicating no dumping within the reviewed period. Additionally, ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., a non-examined company, was preliminarily assigned Teknik’s calculated rate of 26.45 percent. Public Involvement: The Department invites public comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties have a specific time frame to submit their written comments and may file rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised in the initial briefs. Furthermore, parties can request a hearing to discuss their concerns in consideration of the final review results. Future Steps and Impact: The final results of this administrative review are anticipated to be published within 120 days after the notice, impacting future cash deposit requirements for aluminum sheet imports from Türkiye. The Department of Commerce’s findings will guide the assessment of antidumping duties on the subject merchandise entries and dictate the direction for future deposits of estimated duties. This step underscores the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Department of Commerce to enforce trade laws and ensure fair competition by addressing and mitigating the effects of unfair pricing practices in the U.S. trading system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of an administrative review regarding countervailing duties on common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. This review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests from interested parties. The Department of Commerce selected key companies for examination: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. These companies were chosen due to their significant participation in exporting aluminum sheets to the United States. Findings The Department of Commerce has initially found that producers and exporters from Türkiye benefited from countervailable subsidies. This means that these companies received financial assistance from their government, which is not allowed under U.S. trade law as it may harm American businesses. Methodology The review checks if there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial help from the government, that benefits companies in a way that is unfair to United States businesses. The review follows guidelines to ensure fairness as set in the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsidy Rates The preliminary results show specific subsidy rates for the reviewed companies. Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a subsidy rate of 2.64 percent. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. got a rate of 2.47 percent. Other companies not directly examined but involved in the review, namely ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and P.M.S. Metal Profil Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., each received a 2.56 percent rate. Upcoming Steps Interested parties are now invited to comment on these preliminary results. There is a process for submitting briefs and requesting a hearing, and the Department of Commerce will continue to verify the information before making the final ruling. Conclusion This review is significant as it affects the duties charged on aluminum sheets from Türkiye, impacting prices for industries using aluminum in the U.S. The final results will determine future trade practices. Further Information For those who want more details, the full preliminary decision memorandum can be accessed online. Interested parties can also follow updates on the review process as deadlines approach for further comments and final results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
Preliminary Results of Duty Review on Steel Threaded Rod from India Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings from its review of subsidies provided to producers and exporters of carbon and alloy steel threaded rod from India. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some subsidies are countervailable, meaning they unjustly help manufacturers by providing government financial assistance. Review Details The preliminary review was initiated following requests from interested parties in 2025. The review aims to ensure fair trade practices by evaluating if producers in India received unfair subsidies. Companies Involved The review initially included several companies, such as Nishant Steel Industries and Kanika Fasteners Pvt Ltd. Later, companies like Bee Dee Cycle Industries, Maharaja International, and R K Fasteners withdrew their requests for review. Consequently, the Department of Commerce rescinded its review of these companies, meaning it will not continue examining them. Methodology The Commerce Department uses specific criteria to assess subsidies. They check for financial assistance from authorities, benefits to recipients, and specificity of the subsidy. Subsidies are considered unfair if they meet these criteria. Preliminary Findings The Department preliminarily found that producers, like Nishant Steel Industries, received subsidies totaling a 2.54 percent rate of advantage. This rate determines the countervailing duties (extra taxes) imposed on the products to offset the unfair subsidy. Next Steps Parties may submit comments on these preliminary results until the final review decision, expected within 120 days of the notice. Interested parties can submit written comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. Final decisions will guide future assessments of duties on these imports to the U.S. Instructions to Customs The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on assessing duties for companies under review. For companies withdrawn from review, customs duties remain at prior rates. Conclusion The preliminary review indicates that some subsidies provided to steel threaded rod producers in India are countervailable. The final review will include comments and further analysis before making a conclusive determination. This process ensures trade practices remain fair and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review regarding certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to determine if these products were sold in the U.S. at prices below their normal value, which would violate antidumping policies. According to the Department of Commerce, it found that the steel products from Korea were not sold below normal value during this review period. This outcome means that for the companies Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO, including POSCO International Corporation, the weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. This indicates that these companies were not selling their products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. For three other companies—Ameri-Source Korea, Hanawell Co Ltd, and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd—the review assigned a dumping margin of 2.28 percent. This percentage is based on the most recent above-de minimis rate from the last review period. The Department also set forth assessment rates. For Hyundai and POSCO, no antidumping duties will be assessed because their products were not found to be sold at dumping margins. The department has made clear instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, explaining how to handle entries of the merchandise in question. Cash deposit requirements for future shipments have also been detailed. These stipulations include a zero deposit rate for the companies reviewed. If a company was previously found to be dumping, the cash deposit will continue as per the last determined rate. For new companies entering the market, the deposit will match the existing rate for other similar producers, which is currently set at 20.33 percent. This notice from the Department of Commerce is a reminder for importers to comply with regulations, such as filing a certificate to confirm they haven’t received reimbursements for antidumping duties. Finally, this update serves as a reminder to parties involved of their responsibilities concerning the handling of proprietary information under established protective orders. Failure to adhere to these rules can lead to violations and sanctions. The Department published this notice on the Federal Register on July 13, 2026. This information is part of the ongoing enforcement of trade laws to ensure fair competition within the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Review Results for Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review concerning certain corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of Korea. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review found that producers and exporters of these steel products from Korea received countervailable subsidies. Countervailing duties are tariffs levied on imported goods to offset subsidies provided to producers or exporters in the exporting country. These measures ensure a level playing field for U.S. industries competing with foreign manufacturers. The Department of Commerce conducted this review in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies that were reviewed include Hyundai Steel Company and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. For Hyundai Steel Company, which includes its cross-owned companies like Hyundai Green Power and Hyundai ITC, the subsidy rate determined was 1.28 percent. For KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., also known as KG Steel Corporation, the subsidy rate was determined to be 5.34 percent. There are also several other companies that were part of the review but not selected as mandatory respondents. These include POSCO, POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd., POSCO International, POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd., SeAH Coated Metal, and SeAH Steel Corporation. Each of these companies received a subsidy rate of 2.88 percent. The Department intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits of these estimated countervailing duties on imports that are withdrawn from warehouses for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The findings are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is referenced in the Federal Register notice. Various aspects of the review, including methodology and assessment, are discussed thoroughly in the document. This review is part of ongoing monitoring by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to counteract any subsidies that may harm U.S. industries. These final results are part of a broader effort to uphold international trade laws and regulations. The new cash deposit requirements will apply until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Finds Korean Tire Companies Sold Tires Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that two leading Korean tire manufacturers, Hankook Tire & Technology Co. Ltd. and Nexen Tire Corporation, sold passenger vehicle and light truck tires in the United States at prices less than their normal value. This finding is a result of their administrative review of antidumping duties for the period from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce is responsible for enforcing laws aimed at protecting U.S. businesses from unfair pricing practices. In this case, they found that the prices of the tires from Hankook and Nexen were lower than what would be considered fair. In their review, the Department calculated dumping margins for these companies. A dumping margin is the difference between the fair price of a product and the price it is being sold for in the U.S. Hankook was found to have a dumping margin of 13.03 percent. Nexen’s dumping margin was determined to be 8.02 percent. Another company, Kumho Tire Co., Inc., was assigned a rate of 10.53 percent. The final results of this review mean that these companies may have to pay additional duties to make up for the unfair pricing. Duties are extra fees that are applied to the products to raise their prices to a fair level. These results will also affect the future cash deposits required for these companies’ imports. Cash deposits are payments made upfront to ensure that the correct amount of duty will be collected when the product enters the U.S. The Department of Commerce ensures that their findings and actions are transparent. Interested parties can view all the documents and calculations used in this review on their public access system. In conclusion, this review is part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. government to maintain fair trade practices and protect domestic businesses from unfair competition through pricing below what is deemed normal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Review of Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings from an administrative review regarding antidumping duties on certain activated carbon imported from China. The period under review is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. This review evaluates whether certain Chinese companies sold activated carbon in the United States at less than the normal value, which could harm domestic producers. Key Companies Involved The review specifically examined two major companies: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (DJAC) and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. (Ningxia Huahui). The Department of Commerce has initially determined that both companies sold activated carbon in the United States at prices below the normal value. An important part of the review also concerned Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (BPACP). The review for BPACP has been rescinded because there were no entries of subject merchandise from this company during the period. Timeline and Procedures The review process started on May 20, 2025, due to timely requests as per the rules outlined in 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Originally, the review was set to be completed earlier, but delays were encountered due to a lapse in government operations, leading to multiple extensions. Scope of the Review The review considers all activated carbon exported from China that is covered by the antidumping duty order that originated on April 27, 2007. This ensures that any goods exported in violation of trade agreements are identified and duties are adjusted as necessary. Preliminary Results The preliminary findings have determined dumping margins, which are additional duties imposed on imported goods that are sold below fair market value, at 0.83 USD per KG for DJAC and 0.86 USD per KG for Ningxia Huahui. For other companies not individually examined but which qualify for a separate rate, a rate of 0.84 USD per KG applies. Review of the China-Wide Entity The review also involves the China-wide entity, which refers to any companies not specifically requested or self-initiated for review. In this case, the China-wide entity’s duty rate remains at 2.42 USD per KG, established in previous reviews and not subject to change in this cycle. Next Steps and Comment Period Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments and case briefs on these preliminary findings. These will be accepted until 21 days after the publication of this notice. A hearing may be requested within 30 days of the publication date, where parties can present their views on the issues raised. Final Note In conclusion, the preliminary findings highlight the importance of ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the domestic activated carbon industry. The review and its outcomes will help guide future assessments and duties imposed on imported activated carbon from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for PET Film from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of countervailing duties for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covers subsidies given to producers and exporters from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Findings The review found that subsidies were provided to manufacturers in India. These subsidies helped companies produce more PET film at a lower cost. Two companies were specifically mentioned in the review: Cosmo First Limited and JPFL Films Private Ltd. Cosmo First Limited received a subsidy rate of 10.07 percent, while JPFL Films Private Ltd. received a much higher rate of 135.38 percent. Review Process The review began with preliminary results published on January 8, 2026. Companies involved were allowed to submit comments. The final results were scheduled for release by July 7, 2026, after a 60-day extension. The document outlining the results used a method called adverse facts available. This method is used when companies do not provide enough information. What Happens Next The Department of Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how to collect duties on the imported PET film from these companies. These instructions should come within 35 days after the results are published in the Federal Register. If a legal action is filed within 90 days, Customs will wait to collect the duties until the case is resolved. Future Implications The findings affect how much importers will pay in customs duties when bringing PET film into the United States. The review will help ensure fair trade by making sure Indian exporters do not receive unfair government help. Contact Information For more details, Dusten Hom and Suresh Maniam from the U.S. Department of Commerce are available for contact. Interested parties can reach them by phone at (202) 482-5075 or (202) 482-0176. Final Note This decision demonstrates the steps the U.S. Department of Commerce takes to maintain fair business practices between countries. The duties ensure that the playing field remains level for companies competing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Recission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has conducted a review of wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. This review covered the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department found that Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. sold these products at prices less than normal value during this time. Review Background In May 2025, the Commerce Department started this review based on requests they received. They initially chose two companies to focus on: KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export Co., Ltd. However, both companies later withdrew. As a result, the department added Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd., and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. as the new focus companies. Ancientree also withdrew from this review shortly after. The Commerce Department extended deadlines for issuing their preliminary results on several occasions due to a government shutdown and other challenges. Results and Decisions The review found Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. to have sold wooden cabinets at a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.48 percent. Three other companies—Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd., Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd.—also got the same rate as they qualified for a separate rate in this review. The department has rescinded reviews for 42 different companies. Some of these companies had their review requests withdrawn, while others had no entries of subject merchandise. China-Wide Entity For some companies that did not participate or didn’t respond to requests, the Commerce Department considers them part of the China-wide entity. Those companies are subject to a higher rate of 251.64 percent, as they were not independently reviewed. Final Steps Interested parties have 21 days to submit written comments or concerns. These parties can also request a public hearing to discuss the issues further. The final results of this review will influence future imports and duties. This review by the Department of Commerce is a part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade and competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
Preliminary Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from China by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding countervailing duties on wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. These findings are part of an administrative review conducted by the International Trade Administration. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some producers and exporters from China received countervailable subsidies. Background The administrative review was initiated on May 20, 2025, following requests for a review of the countervailing duty order on these products. Companies reviewed include KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd, among others. The department faced delays due to a government shutdown and backlogs, extending the deadline for the preliminary results multiple times, leading up to the current report with a deadline of July 7, 2026. Scope of the Order This order focuses on wooden cabinets and vanities and includes any components thereof that are produced in China. The department evaluates whether subsidies were granted in ways that harm U.S. industry. Partial Rescission Some companies will no longer be part of this review. Commerce has decided to rescind its review for 28 companies. This is because some withdrew their requests, and for others, no reviewable entries were found during the period of review. Methodology The review process involves checking whether financial contributions providing benefits to these companies qualify as specific countervailable subsidies. This includes the use of adverse inferences where necessary, especially when companies fail to cooperate. For companies like KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd., adverse inferences were applied due to non-cooperation. Preliminary Results The preliminary subsidy rates for companies involved in this review have been released. These rates help us understand the level of subsidies that companies received, which might help in gaining unfair market advantage. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 5.48%. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. both received a subsidy rate of 113.08%. The review also determines that non-selected companies will, in general, have rates calculated as a weighted average or based on other reasonable methods. Public Comment and Final Results The Department of Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. There will be a period for public comment. Case briefs or written responses must be submitted by a specific deadline. A hearing may be requested for oral presentations. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is conducting a detailed review of subsidy practices related to wooden cabinet imports from China. This review aims to ensure fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair competition. The findings will remain open for comment until finalized, with further analysis determining final subsidy rates expected to be released after the comment period. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Aluminum Foil from China Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings on aluminum foil imports from China. The announcement came on July 13, 2026. The department found that some exporters from China sold aluminum foil at prices less than the normal value. The period of review was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The review was part of the antidumping duty measures to protect U.S. industries. Commerce selected Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co. and other related companies as key respondents. These companies are referred to as Dingsheng. There were delays in the review process due to a government shutdown. Because of this, the department postponed deadlines in November 2025. The preliminary results were eventually extended to July 7, 2026. The merchandise under review is aluminum foil from China. The department used special rules because China is considered a non-market economy. Commerce also found that another company, Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Co., is eligible for a separate rate. This means they will not follow the same rate as the general “China-wide” category. The China-wide rate, costing 105.80%, remains unchanged. This is because no one requested a review of this rate. According to the results, Dingsheng had a weighted-average dumping margin of 61.85%. This percentage shows how much less than the normal value the aluminum foil was sold for. Interested parties can comment on these results. They have 21 days from this notice’s date to submit comments. If they wish to have a hearing, they must request it within 30 days. When it comes to cash deposits, new rules will apply once final results are out. The deposits will help future entries comply with U.S. regulations. This finding is a preliminary step in ensuring fair trade practices. The final results will guide how duties are collected and may impact future imports from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Department of Commerce Examines Steel Threaded Rod Imports from India Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce is looking into whether some steel threaded rods from India are being sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. These rods are important materials for construction and manufacturing. This study covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation helps ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. Background In May 2025, an official review began to check if companies from India are selling steel threaded rods at unfair prices. The review includes 20 companies, with a special focus on two companies: Nishant Steel Industries and Shree Luxmi Fasteners. This study follows rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. Current Findings Preliminary results suggest that some Indian companies might be selling products at prices that are lower than those in India. This can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department is also stopping a review for four companies. Three companies do not have any entries during the review time, and one company withdrew its request to be reviewed. Detailed Processes During the government’s shutdown in late 2025, many deadlines were affected. This caused delays in reviewing and processing documents. The Department used tolling, which is a method to extend deadlines to accommodate delays. Despite these challenges, the investigation is ongoing. Next Steps The Department plans to continue reviewing and finalizing results by July 7, 2026. The American legal rules say that companies must not sell below the normal value to protect fair trade. Request for Public Comment The Department invites anyone who is interested to share their thoughts about these preliminary findings. This can ensure that all views are considered before making any final decisions. What This Means If companies are found guilty of unfair pricing, they might have to pay extra duties. These duties help balance out the unfair prices and protect local businesses. The investigation looks into whether any U.S. business was unfairly affected by these priced imports. Conclusion This review helps maintain fair trade between the United States and India. The Department of Commerce will continue working closely with other government agencies to ensure that international trade rules are followed. This ensures that U.S. industries have a fair chance to compete with foreign imports. The final results will be published later this year. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-13
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14069/carbon-and-alloy-steel-threaded-rod-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that carbon and alloy steel threaded rod (steel threaded rod) from India was sold in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. We are also rescinding the review for three companies with no suspended entries during the POR and one company for which all review requests were withdrawn. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 2. Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes From India: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14067/large-diameter-graphite-electrodes-from-india-postponement-of-preliminary-determination-in-the Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14066/certain-aluminum-foil-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 4. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14031/wooden-cabinets-and-vanities-and-components-thereof-from-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers/ exporters of wooden cabinets and vanities and components thereof (wooden cabinets) from the People’s Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Further, Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to 29 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 5. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Recission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14030/wooden-cabinets-and-vanities-and-components-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. (Pengjia Technology) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to 42 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 6. Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14029/polyethylene-terephthalate-film-sheet-and-strip-from-india-final-results-of-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 7. Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/13/2026-14028/certain-activated-carbon-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (DJAC) and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. (Ningxia Huahui) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (BPACP), for which there were no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-07-10
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-07-10 1) Executive Summary This briefing covers five China-related trade actions published on July 10, 2026. The primary U.S. authorities involved are the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). The policy instruments include antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD), Section 337 investigations, and circumvention inquiries. Actions span determinations involving steel racks, paper plates, and crafting machines. 2) Updates by Authority Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair — ITC 337 (Enforcement Termination)The USITC determined not to review an initial determination by an administrative law judge terminating an enforcement proceeding filed by JBS Hair Inc. against Dae Do Inc. d/b/a Vivace. The termination followed the complainant’s withdrawal of the enforcement complaint under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Authority: International Trade CommissionPolicy Type: ITC 337Event Type: Trade RemedyKey identifiers: Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1415 (Enforcement)Key date: Commission vote on July 8, 2026China Indicator: NoneSource: Federal Register – USITC Notice Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof — ITC 337 (Final Violation Determination)The Commission found a violation of Section 337 in an investigation concerning certain crafting machines and components thereof. It issued:– a general exclusion order (GEO) for products infringing U.S. Design Patent No. D893,563;– limited exclusion orders (LEOs) against LiPing Zhan (Konduone) and the “Vevor Respondents” covering separate patents; and– cease‑and‑desist orders (CDOs) against those parties.The complainant was Cricut Inc. and several Chinese respondents were defaulted. Authority: International Trade CommissionPolicy Type: ITC 337Event Type: Trade RemedyChina Indicator: ExplicitKey identifiers: Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1426; patents D893,563, 11,905,646, D1,029,090Key date: Commission vote on July 7, 2026Source: Federal Register – USITC Notice Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof — AD (CIT Final Judgment and Amended Final Results)Commerce notified that the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a final judgment in *Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. United States* sustaining Commerce’s remand results for the 2021‑2022 antidumping review. The judgment was not in harmony with the original final results, so Commerce amended them, assigning Dongsheng a 25.00 percent weighted‑average dumping margin. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade AdministrationPolicy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD)Event Type: Trade RemedyChina Indicator: ExplicitKey identifiers: A‑570‑088; Court No. 24‑00085Key dates: CIT final judgment June 23, 2026; effective July 3, 2026Source: Federal Register – Commerce Notice Certain Paper Plates Completed in the Kingdom of Cambodia — AD/CVD (Circumvention Preliminary Determination)Commerce preliminarily determined that paper plates completed in Cambodia using Chinese‑origin paperboard circumvent the existing AD and CVD orders on paper plates from China. Liquidation of such imports is suspended pending a final determination. Importer and exporter certifications were established to identify goods not produced with Chinese inputs. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade AdministrationPolicy Type: AD/CVD Circumvention InquiryEvent Type: Trade RemedyChina Indicator: ExplicitKey identifiers: A‑570‑164, C‑570‑165 (third‑country cases A‑555‑164, C‑555‑165)Key date: Applicable July 10, 2026Source: Federal Register – Commerce Notice (Cambodia) Certain Paper Plates Completed in Malaysia — AD/CVD (Circumvention Preliminary Determination)Commerce likewise preliminarily determined that paper plates completed in Malaysia using paperboard produced in China circumvent the AD and CVD orders on paper plates from China. The agency proposed importer/exporter certification procedures and continued suspension of liquidation for affected entries. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade AdministrationPolicy Type: AD/CVD Circumvention InquiryEvent Type: Trade RemedyChina Indicator: ExplicitKey identifiers: A‑570‑164, C‑570‑165 (third‑country cases A‑557‑164, C‑557‑165)Key date: Applicable July 10, 2026Source: Federal Register – Commerce Notice (Malaysia) 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The USITC concluded two Section 337 proceedings: one enforcement case terminated upon withdrawal, and one final violation finding involving Chinese manufacturers of crafting machines resulting in multiple exclusion orders. Commerce amended the antidumping results for Chinese steel racks following a sustained CIT remand, lowering the rate to a company‑specific 25 percent for Nanjing Dongsheng. Commerce issued preliminary affirmative circumvention findings for paper plates manufactured in both Cambodia and Malaysia using Chinese paperboard, extending AD/CVD coverage to those products. Both circumvention cases established importer/exporter certification programs and suspension of liquidation measures effective August 22, 2025, with cash deposit requirements tied to the China orders. No new export controls or USTR actions were reported in this set of notices. 4) Full Source Links (Index) USITC | Pre‑Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair – Enforcement Termination USITC | Crafting Machines – Violation and Orders Commerce | Steel Racks From China – CIT Judgment Amending AD Results Commerce | Paper Plates (Cambodia) – Preliminary Circumvention Commerce | Paper Plates (Malaysia) – Preliminary Circumvention 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Paper Plates From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Duties on Paper Plates from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On July 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary finding regarding paper plates imported into the United States. The department determined that certain paper plates made in Cambodia using paperboard from China are circumventing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders originally placed on Chinese products. This investigation began after antidumping and countervailing duty orders were applied to certain paper plates from China in March 2025. These orders were designed to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing and government subsidies that harm American businesses. On August 22, 2025, the Commerce Department started investigating whether paper plates completed in Cambodia with materials from China were avoiding these duties. The companies Cherish Industrial (Cambodia) Co., Ltd. and Namper Packaging (Cambodia) Co., Ltd. were first examined in this inquiry. Later, Hengrong International (Cambodia) was included as another respondent after initial challenges in contacting Namper Packaging. Due to a government shutdown in November 2025, there were delays in proceedings. However, by June 26, 2026, the department was able to issue its preliminary determination. The paper plates involved may have different shapes, colors, and materials. They may have printing, coatings, or finishes, and can be made from various plant or synthetic materials. This investigation specifically targets plates made using Chinese paperboard shipped through Cambodia. In response to the findings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now require certification processes for these imports. If companies do not comply with the requirements, duties will apply. For entries between August 22, 2025, and July 10, 2026, certifications need to be completed by August 7, 2026. The Department of Commerce is open to comments from interested parties, which must be submitted no later than 14 days from this notice. The final determination will be decided after reviewing submitted comments. This circumvention issue highlights the importance of enforcing fair trade practices to ensure that all goods entering the U.S. abide by trade rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Paper Plates From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Paper Plates from China Circumventing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about certain paper plates from China. This decision involves paper plates made in Malaysia using paperboard from China. Background In March 2025, the Department of Commerce issued antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on paper plates imported from China. In August 2025, the Department started an investigation to see if paper plates made in Malaysia, using Chinese paperboard, were avoiding these duties. Investigation Timeline The investigation faced delays due to a government shutdown in November 2025. Deadlines were extended several times, with the preliminary decision now issued in July 2026. Findings The Department of Commerce has initially found that the paper plates made in Malaysia with Chinese paperboard are indeed circumventing the duty orders. This means they will be subject to duties as they are considered part of the original orders on China. Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend these paper plates from Malaysia if they were entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after August 22, 2025. Importers need to file for post-summary corrections to ensure the entries comply with the antidumping and countervailing duties. Certifications Importers and exporters can use certifications to prove the paper plates were not made with Chinese paperboard. For certain companies, this certification regime might not be available if they have been found circumventing, like Huiming, unless they prove otherwise in future reviews. Public Involvement Interested parties can comment on these findings and certification requirements. This can be done by submitting case briefs to the Department of Commerce within a set time. If needed, a hearing will take place to discuss these issues further. Conclusion The Department of Commerce aims to ensure fair trading practices by confirming if Malaysian-made paper plates circumvent existing orders. The final decisions and verifications will determine the appropriate duties to be applied. This process helps protect U.S. industries by enforcing the rules on imported goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
U.S. Court Changes Commerce Department’s Decision on Steel Racks from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final decision about steel racks and parts from China. This case involved Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. The court disagreed with a past decision made by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The court’s decision changes how the Commerce Department will handle this case going forward. The U.S. Department of Commerce finished reviewing an antidumping duty order on steel racks from China on April 10, 2024. Antidumping duties are tariffs set on foreign imports priced below fair market value. In this decision, the Commerce Department did not select Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent. It assigned Dongsheng the China-wide antidumping duty rate because Dongsheng did not submit a required form on time. Dongsheng was not happy with this decision and took it to the court. On June 16, 2025, the CIT told the Commerce Department to revisit its decision. The court said the Commerce Department was wrong not to select Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent just because the form was late. In February 2026, the Commerce Department took another look. This time, it treated Dongsheng as a mandatory respondent. It checked Dongsheng’s sales and production information and gave Dongsheng a dumping margin of 25.00 percent. Now, with the court’s June 23 judgment, the earlier decision by the Commerce Department is officially changed. This means the dumping margin for Dongsheng will be 25.00 percent. There have been new official instructions that will change how future cases are handled. The cash deposit requirements for Dongsheng will not change because there’s already a new rate in place from another review. The entries that haven’t been finished will stay on hold until a final decision is made. For now, the U.S. Court has stopped the Department of Commerce from collecting duties on certain steel rack entries made by Dongsheng. These entries are for products brought into the U.S. from September 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. The Commerce Department will wait to see if the Court’s decision is appealed or if it becomes final. This notice was officially published on July 3, 2026, by Christian L. Bush, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order, Limited Exclusion Orders, and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Orders in Crafting Machines Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 10, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a significant decision regarding certain crafting machines and their components. This decision results from an investigation into violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation focused on imported crafting machines that infringe on specific U.S. patents. The ITC has issued several orders: General Exclusion Order (GEO): This order bans the importation of crafting machines that violate U.S. Patent No. D893,563. Limited Exclusion Orders (LEOs): One LEO was directed at the respondent, LiPing Zhan, known as Konduone, for infringing U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646. Another LEO was aimed at Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co., Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co. Ltd. (collectively called Vevor Respondents) for infringing U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. Cease and Desist Orders (CDOs): These were issued against Konduone and the Vevor Respondents to prevent further violations. The investigation commenced on December 11, 2024, based on a complaint by Cricut, Inc. from South Jordan, Utah. The complaint alleged violations due to the importation and sale of certain crafting machines that infringe various patents held by Cricut. During the investigation, several developments occurred: SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. was initially part of the investigation but was terminated based on a consent order. Respondents like HSET were terminated, while other companies like HK Sijiu International Share Co., Ltd. were added. Claims were dropped or resolved through consent orders as the investigation progressed. The final determination found violations regarding certain patents, while others were found non-infringing or moot. The ITC ordered remedies, including a bond requirement during a Presidential review period. The Commission finalized its decision on July 7, 2026, and delivered its conclusion along with orders to the relevant authorities. This decision is based on legal statutes in the Tariff Act of 1930 and ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on Withdrawal of the Enforcement Complaint; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation into Synthetic Braiding Hair Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to stop its investigation into certain synthetic braiding hair products. This decision was made after JBS Hair, the company that filed the complaint, withdrew its request. The investigation began on September 9, 2024. JBS Hair, based in Atlanta, Georgia, believed that certain products were imported and sold in the U.S. illegally. They said these products violated specific patents, like the ‘478 patent and the ‘301 patent. The products in question were synthetic braiding hair and its packaging. Vivace, also known as Dae Do Inc., was named in the complaint as a company selling these products. Previously, on February 24, 2025, the ITC found Vivace in default. Because of this, on September 29, 2025, the ITC issued orders to stop certain companies, including Vivace, from selling these products in the U.S. On December 18, 2025, JBS Hair filed another complaint, asking the ITC to enforce its orders against Vivace. The ITC agreed to look into this complaint on January 22, 2026. Later, on June 8, 2026, the ITC corrected the name of Vivace in the documents. A few days later, on June 9, 2026, JBS Hair decided to withdraw its enforcement complaint. The ITC received this request and found no issues, allowing the withdrawal. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this withdrawal too. The Administrative Law Judge, overseeing this case, agreed with JBS Hair’s request on June 18, 2026. The judge confirmed that all rules were followed for the withdrawal. No one opposed this decision, and the judge noted that there were no secret deals between the parties. Finally, the ITC chose not to review the case any further on July 8, 2026. This means the investigation is officially over. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this final order. The ITC’s actions are based on the Tariff Act of 1930 and their own rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Briefing 2026-07-10
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-07-10 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Timothy Genetta, D.O.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13992/timothy-genetta-do-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 2. Ruth Jones, D.O.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13991/ruth-jones-do-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 3. Mariana Moualem, F.N.P.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13990/mariana-moualem-fnp-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 4. Mark Allen, D.D.S.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13989/mark-allen-dds-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 5. Frederick Tanzer, M.D.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13988/frederick-tanzer-md-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 6. Certification of Tennessee Capital Counsel Mechanism Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13970/certification-of-tennessee-capital-counsel-mechanism Sub: Justice Department Content: Federal law makes certain procedural benefits available to States in federal habeas corpus review of capital cases, where the Attorney General certifies that the State has established a postconviction capital counsel mechanism satisfying the requirements of chapter 154 of title 28 of the United States Code. The Attorney General certifies in this notice that Tennessee has such a mechanism, which was established on July 1, 1997. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-10
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-10 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Fatty Acids From Indonesia and Malaysia: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13976/certain-fatty-acids-from-indonesia-and-malaysia-postponement-of-preliminary-determinations-in-the Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13975/certain-steel-racks-and-parts-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-notice-of-court-decision Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court no. 24-00085, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s first remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain steel racks and parts thereof (steel racks) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period September 1, 2021, through August 31, 2022. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Dongsheng). 3. Certain Paper Plates From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13974/certain-paper-plates-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of certain paper plates (paper plates), completed in Malaysia using paperboard produced in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on paper plates from China. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 4. Certain Paper Plates From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13973/certain-paper-plates-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of certain paper plates (paper plates), completed in the Kingdom of Cambodia (Cambodia) using paperboard produced in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on paper plates from China. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-10
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-10 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on Withdrawal of the Enforcement Complaint; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13993/certain-pre-stretched-synthetic-braiding-hair-and-packaging-therefor-notice-of-commission Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("the Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 53) issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting complainant JBS Hair, Inc.'s ("JBS Hair") unopposed motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding against respondent Dae Do Inc. d/b/a Vivace ("Vivace") based on withdrawal of the enforcement complaint. The enforcement proceeding is terminated. 2. Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order, Limited Exclusion Orders, and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/10/2026-13926/certain-crafting-machines-and-components-thereof-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in this investigation and has issued a general exclusion order ("GEO") prohibiting the importation of certain crafting machines and components thereof that infringe U.S. Patent No. D893,563 ("the D563 patent"), a limited exclusion order ("LEO") directed to defaulting respondent LiPing Zhan ("Konduone") with respect U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646 ("the '646 patent"), an LEO directed to defaulting respondents Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co. Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Sishun E- Commerce Co., Ltd. (collectively, the "Vevor Respondents") with respect to U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090 ("the D090 patent"), and cease and desist orders ("CDO") directed to Konduone and the Vevor Respondents. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-07-09
Justice Department Briefing 2026-07-09 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division; User Fee Schedule; Correction Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/09/2026-13886/fbi-criminal-justice-information-services-division-user-fee-schedule-correction Sub: Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation Content: The Federal Bureau of Investigation published a document in the Federal Register of June 8, 2026, concerning the Criminal Justice Information Services Division User Fee Schedule. The document was published without including the footnotes for the new fee amounts table. 2. Designation of Phenethyl Halides as List I Chemicals Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/09/2026-13825/designation-of-phenethyl-halides-as-list-i-chemicals Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: The Drug Enforcement Administration is proposing the control of phenethyl halides as list I chemicals under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Phenethyl halides are important to the illicit manufacture of fentanyl, as well as fentanyl analogues, and fentanyl- related substances as they are often used in synthetic routes to manufacture these substances. Further, in the respective synthetic routes in which they are used to manufacture fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and fentanyl-related substances, various phenethyl halides, such as phenethyl bromide and phenethyl chloride, can be substituted for each other. If finalized, the proposed rule would subject handlers of phenethyl halides to the chemical regulatory provisions of the CSA and its implementing regulations. This proposed rulemaking does not establish a threshold for domestic and international transactions of phenethyl halides. As such, all transactions of phenethyl halides regardless of size or concentration, shall be regulated and would be subject to control under the CSA. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-09
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-09 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Silicon Metal From Australia and Norway; Supplemental Schedule for the Final Phase of the Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/09/2026-13891/silicon-metal-from-australia-and-norway-supplemental-schedule-for-the-final-phase-of-the Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From Vietnam; Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/09/2026-13819/polypropylene-corrugated-boxes-from-vietnam-determination Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-07-08
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-07-08 1) Executive Summary Seven U.S. trade policy events are covered today. The main authorities involved are the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), including its International Trade Administration (ITA). Key instruments include Section 337 investigations, antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings, administrative reviews, and public comment solicitations. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC – U.S. International Trade Commission) Mobile Electronic Devices (Samsung) — ITC Section 337 (Public Interest Request) The ITC announced that its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an Initial Determination on July 1, 2026, finding a violation of Section 337 in the investigation of certain mobile electronic devices. The Commission is seeking public comments on issues related to potential remedies, including a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders directed to Samsung Electronics, should the Commission affirm the violation. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Investigation No.: 337-TA-1432 Key Date: Comments due by August 6, 2026 Source: Link Boiler Protection for Absorption Refrigeration Systems — ITC Section 337 (Partial Review and Public Comment Request) The Commission determined to review in part an Initial Determination granting summary determination of a violation under Section 337 regarding certain boiler protection systems and components. The case involves multiple Chinese respondents found in default. The Commission invites written submissions on remedies, public interest, and bonding in relation to possible exclusion and cease and desist orders. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation No.: 337-TA-1453 Key Dates: Initial submissions due July 20, 2026; replies due July 27, 2026 Source: Link Silicon Metal — AD/CVD Expedited Five-Year Review Scheduling The ITC announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revocation of the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia would likely lead to continued or recurrent material injury. Written comments are due August 7, 2026. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-652 and 731-TA-1524–1526 Key Dates: Staff report to be issued July 31, 2026; comments due August 7, 2026 Source: Link DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (International Trade Administration – ITA) Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee — Procedural Meeting Notice The International Trade Administration announced an in-person meeting of the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) on July 14, 2026. The meeting will review recommendations on export promotion and compliance programs supporting U.S. environmental technologies. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: PROCEDURAL_NOTICE Event Type: POLICY_NOTICE China Indicator: NONE Key Date: July 14, 2026 (meeting date) Source: Link Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco — Temporary Duty-Free Authorization (Emergency Relief) Following a presidential emergency declaration, the Department of Commerce authorized temporary duty-free importation of phosphate fertilizers from Morocco under Section 318(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The waiver suspends countervailing duties under specific filing conditions for up to 60 days from notification approval. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Order: CVD Order C-714-001 Effective Date: July 8, 2026 Source: Link Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India — Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 2023–2024 The Department of Commerce finalized the administrative review of PET film imports from India, assigning Cosmo First Limited a weighted-average dumping margin of 24.14% based on total adverse facts available. The results apply for the period July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Period of Review: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Source: Link Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Algeria — Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Commerce preliminarily determined that producers and exporters of carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Algeria received countervailable subsidies. The preliminary subsidy rate for SPA Algerian Qatar Steel and all others is 73.33 percent. Suspension of liquidation will follow publication. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Investigation No.: C-721-003 Period of Investigation: January 1 – December 31, 2025 Source: Link Glycine from India — Correction of Final Results Notice Commerce corrected a June 12, 2026, Federal Register notice that contained a typographical error in the name of a company listed in the rate table for the antidumping duty administrative review. “Paras Intermediaries Private Limited” was corrected to “Paras Intermediates Private Limited.” Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Correction Date: July 1, 2026 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The U.S. International Trade Commission announced separate Section 337 actions, including one involving Samsung mobile devices and another concerning boiler protection systems from China-based respondents. The ITC commenced expedited five-year reviews for silicon metal trade remedies covering several non-Chinese countries. The Department of Commerce issued a temporary CVD duty suspension for Moroccan phosphate fertilizers following a presidential emergency declaration. Commerce published multiple determinations under the AD/CVD framework, including a final AD review for PET film from India, a CVD preliminary ruling on Algerian steel, and a clerical correction to a prior glycine AD review. The International Trade Administration scheduled a public ETTAC meeting on July 14, 2026, focused on export policy for environmental technologies. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Mobile electronic devices – ITC Section 337 public interest request Boiler protection systems – ITC Section 337 review and remedy request Silicon metal – AD/CVD expedited reviews notice Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee – meeting notice Phosphate fertilizers from Morocco – temporary duty-free authorization Polyethylene terephthalate film from India – final AD review results Carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Algeria – preliminary CVD determination Glycine from India – final results correction notice 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the
Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024; Correction
U.S. Department of Commerce Corrects Company Name in Antidumping Duty Review Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction to a previous notice regarding the antidumping duty on glycine from India. This notice was originally published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2026. The initial notice contained a mistake in the name of a company. The company, Paras Intermediates Private Limited, was incorrectly listed as “Paras Intermediaries Private Limited.” The Department of Commerce has corrected this error. The correction is part of the final results for the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from India. This means that the official records now show the correct name for the export/producer as “Paras Intermediates Private Limited.” The Department of Commerce handles these administrative reviews to ensure companies comply with trade laws. Antidumping duties are put in place to protect local industries from unfair pricing practices by foreign companies. Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the correction notice. The correction was officially dated and published on July 1, 2026. For further information, you can contact Tyler Weinhold or Harrison Tanchuck at the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are located at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC. This correction helps maintain accuracy in official trade records and ensures compliance with U.S. trade laws. The Department of Commerce continues its efforts in monitoring and enforcing trade regulations. This correction ensures all interested parties have the correct information. This notice was published in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Code of Federal Regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Algeria: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies on Steel Wire Rod from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a notice about a new investigation. This investigation is about carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Algeria. The department found that subsidies were given to producers and exporters in Algeria. The period they looked at was from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The department wants people who are interested to comment on this. You can find more details about the investigation in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The product they are looking at is a type of steel called wire rod. No changes have been made to the scope of what is being investigated. This scope was announced on May 1, 2026, and was made clear at that time. The Department of Commerce has found that subsidies are being given by the Algerian government. These subsidies help Algerian companies by giving them financial support. This gives the Algerian companies an unfair advantage. The final rates for the subsidies are very high, at 73.33%. This applies to one company named SPA Algerian Qatar Steel. It also applies to all other companies involved. Until more is found out, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will hold back imports of these steel rods from Algeria. They will wait until the date of this report, published today, before making any decisions. If someone wants to comment or ask for a hearing, they have 30 days to do so. Officials will not verify anything more due to the lack of cooperation from Algeria. Importantly, there is no need for any injury determination. This is because Algeria doesn’t have a subsidies agreement with the U.S. Public comments are welcome. Interested people can write about their opinions on this within the next 30 days. If someone wants a hearing, they must ask for it by following the rules in the notice. This news affects steel producers and the economy of both Algeria and the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Indian PET Film Dumped Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review of imports related to Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) film from India. The review assessed sales during the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The assessment concluded that Cosmo First Limited, an Indian company, sold PET film in the United States at prices lower than those in India. The Department applied a measure known as “total adverse facts available” (AFA) and assigned Cosmo a dumping margin of 24.14 percent. These results were made official and are effective as of July 8, 2026. Earlier in January, preliminary findings were published. They indicated potential dumping, which led to further review. The Department extended the deadline for final results to ensure a thorough evaluation. The process followed the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. PET film covers a range of products, including film, sheet, and strip materials. These materials are used in packaging, insulating, and many other applications. The U.S. Government had previously established rules to address such dumping practices. Interested parties raised concerns during the review process, and these comments were addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Despite comments, there were no changes from the preliminary results. The public can access detailed information about this review and the memorandum online. It is hosted through the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Due to the determined dumping, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on these imported goods. Further instructions are to be issued 35 days after the final results are published. Importers should be aware of cash deposit requirements that will apply to future entries. For Cosmo, the deposit rate will now be 24.14 percent. Other companies may also have differing rates based on previous reviews or investigations. If neither the company nor the producer was reviewed, a general rate of 5.71 percent applies. Importers also have a responsibility to prove that they have not been reimbursed for dumping duties. This avoids the assessment of double duties. The review carried out by the Department of Commerce serves to enforce fair trade practices. These results are released in accordance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Countervailing Duty Order of Phosphate Fertilizers From the Kingdom of Morocco: Temporary Duty Free Importation
Temporary Duty-Free Importation of Phosphate Fertilizers from Morocco Approved Estimated reading time: 3 minutes In an important move, the United States has temporarily allowed phosphate fertilizers from Morocco to enter the country without certain duties. This decision follows a declaration of emergency by the President on June 29, 2026. The goal is to ensure that farmers in the U.S. have enough fertilizers for their crops. This emergency measure was taken so that food production in the country can meet the needs of everyone living here. The U.S. Department of Commerce is involved in this process. They are responsible for letting exporters or importers bring in phosphate fertilizers from Morocco without countervailing duties. These duties are usually fees added to imported goods. The order to remove these duties is based on laws from the Tariff Act of 1930. The waiver is specifically for phosphate fertilizers in all forms – whether solid or liquid, with or without extra chemicals to prevent clumping. To make use of this opportunity, companies interested in importing fertilizers without these duties must submit a written request. This request needs to be sent to the Commerce Department and follow certain guidelines. Once a company’s request is approved, they have about 60 days to get their shipment into the United States. If they miss this window of time, regular duties will apply to their goods. For the request process, companies need to file paperwork electronically. This is done through a special system managed by the Trade Administration. If approved, both the company and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be notified. This means the CBP will allow the goods into the country without the usual duties. Lastly, businesses that want to follow this process should register and send in the necessary forms to be added to the service list. This ensures they receive all important information and updates about the importation rules and procedures. This action by the government provides crucial support to U.S. farmers, ensuring they have the resources needed to produce food effectively during an emergency situation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee
Open Meeting Announcement: Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) is having an important meeting soon. The meeting will take place on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. People who are interested can join the meeting. The meeting will be held from 11:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). The meeting will happen in the Commerce Research Library at the U.S. Department of Commerce. The address is 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. If you want to be part of the meeting, you need to register by Friday, July 10, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EDT. You can register online by visiting https://www.trade.gov/ettac. It’s important to register early because spaces are limited. This meeting is open to the public. During the meeting, members will show the recommendation letters they have submitted. They will also hear updates from key agencies about U.S. Government activities. You can send in comments or ask for special help, like sign language interpretation. To ask for these, you should contact Ms. Megan Hyndman by email at [email protected] or by phone at 202-482-1297. Make sure to do this at least one week before the meeting. Even if you send your request after that, they will try to help you. If you want to send written comments about ETTAC, you can do so anytime. But if you want them considered during the meeting, send them by July 7, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EDT. More details like the agenda and any materials will be available a week before the meeting. You can find this information on the website https://www.trade.gov/ettac. After the meeting, draft minutes and materials will also be posted on the website within 30 days. Edward O’Malley, the Director of the Office of Energy and Environmental Industries, announced this meeting on July 1, 2026. For more details, check Federal Register Volume 91, Number 129, published on July 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Silicon Metal From Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Five-Year Reviews on Silicon Metal Imports Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews for silicon metal imports. These reviews are related to imports from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia. The reviews are to determine if revoking the existing duties on these imports would cause harm to the U.S. industry. The announcement was made in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 129, dated Wednesday, July 8, 2026. The decision of the expedited reviews follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Review Details The Commission decided to conduct expedited reviews because the domestic response was found adequate, but the response from the foreign parties was not. This decision aligns with section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act. Date Set for Review The official start date for these reviews was announced as June 5, 2026. Contact Information For more details, Nitin Joshi from the Office of Investigations can be contacted at 202-708-1669. Public Access The public can view the records of these reviews on the Commission’s electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. Schedule for Comments and Reports A staff report related to the reviews will be available on July 31, 2026. Written comments from interested parties are due by August 7, 2026. These comments must not include new factual information. Technical Compliance Parties making comments that contain business proprietary information must comply with sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. Each document filed must also be served to all parties related to the reviews. Determination and Authority The Commission has labeled the reviews as extraordinarily complicated. This allows the review period to extend by up to 90 days. The reviews are conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice on July 6, 2026. This announcement is critical as it impacts the trade and market dynamics of silicon metal within the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Boiler Protection for Absorption Refrigeration Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Violation Case Involving Refrigeration Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-07-08 The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case involving the importation and sale of certain boiler protection systems for refrigeration. This review is based on finding possible violations of Section 337. The Investigation The investigation started on June 18, 2025. It was based on a complaint by ARPC LLC and Paul N. Unmack from Butte, Montana. They said there were violations concerning refrigeration systems. Patent Infringement Allegations The complaint said that some companies were importing and selling boiler protections that infringed on U.S. Patent No. 8,056,360. The patent is about specific claims related to refrigeration systems. Named Respondents The investigation named 10 respondents. These companies are mostly from China. They were accused of selling and importing products that might infringe the patent. Default and Termination of Respondents Some respondents, like Koofang and Bydorunce, did not respond to show-cause orders. Therefore, they were found in default. Some respondents like Hofantek were removed from the investigation. Summary Determination On May 21, 2026, the case had a summary decision. It said there was a violation by certain respondents. These respondents were found to have imported products infringing the patent. Economic Requirement Reviewed The USITC decided to review the findings related to economic requirements. They want to be sure about these findings before moving forward with any action. Possible Remedies The investigation can lead to exclusion orders. It can stop the entry of certain products into the U.S. This could also include cease and desist orders which would make companies stop unfair acts. Public Interest Considerations If any remedy is ordered, USITC must consider public interest. This includes looking at the effect on public health, the economy, and U.S. consumers. Opportunity for Written Submissions Parties, government agencies, and public are invited to give written submissions about remedies and public interest. The submissions are important in deciding the final decision. Timeline The written submissions must be filed by July 20, 2026. Reply submissions are due by July 27, 2026. Commission Vote and Authority The Commission made its decision on this matter on July 6, 2026. It operates under the Tariff Act of 1930 and Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. For more information, contact the U.S. International Trade Commission or visit their website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Mobile Electronic Devices; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Samsung Investigation Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has issued a notice about an important investigation involving Samsung. The investigation is about certain mobile electronic devices made by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., based in South Korea, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., located in New Jersey. The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1432, focuses on a possible violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. An administrative law judge has issued an Initial Determination stating there is a violation. If this violation is confirmed, the USITC may prohibit Samsung’s devices from being imported into the United States. The USITC is requesting comments from the public and government agencies about how the decision might affect people and the economy. Some questions for comment are: How are Samsung devices being used in the United States? Are there any health or safety issues related to this decision? Are there American-made products that can replace Samsung’s devices? Can these replacements be available in a reasonable time? How will consumers in the United States be impacted? Comments should not be more than five pages long and must be submitted by August 6, 2026. For more information or assistance, contact Namo Kim at the USITC. All comments must refer to the investigation number and follow the USITC’s filing procedures. People can find more information or ask questions about submitting their comments through the USITC website or by contacting the Secretary. The USITC stresses that any confidential information should be clearly marked and filed according to the Rules of Practice and Procedure. All submitted information may be used by the Commission and the U.S. government for investigation and other purposes. For additional details and updates, interested parties can visit the USITC website or view documents through the Commission’s electronic docket system. By order of the Commission,Issued July 6, 2026,Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-08
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-07-08 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13800/environmental-technologies-trade-advisory-committee Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) will hold an in-person meeting on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. The meeting is open to the public with registration instructions provided below. This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed topics for the meeting. 2. Countervailing Duty Order of Phosphate Fertilizers From the Kingdom of Morocco: Temporary Duty Free Importation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13796/countervailing-duty-order-of-phosphate-fertilizers-from-the-kingdom-of-morocco-temporary-duty-free Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On June 29, 2026, the President of the United States issued a declaration of emergency and authorization for temporary duty free importation of phosphate fertilizers (fertilizers) from the Kingdom of Morocco (Morocco), pursuant to section 318(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is temporarily allowing exporters and/or importers to request that imports of fertilizers from Morocco, subject to the countervailing duty Order, be entered into the United States free of countervailing duties, pursuant to 19 CFR 358.\2\ ————————————————————————— 3. Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13795/polyethylene-terephthalate-film-sheet-and-strip-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Cosmo First Limited (Cosmo), the sole mandatory respondent in this administrative review, made sales of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India at less than normal value during the period of review July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. Based on the application of total adverse facts available (AFA), Commerce is assigning Cosmo a weighted-average dumping margin of 24.14 percent. 4. N-Cyclohexylbenzothiazole-2-Sulfenamide From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13792/n-cyclohexylbenzothiazole-2-sulfenamide-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-postponement-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 5. UChicago Argonne LLC et. al; Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13789/uchicago-argonne-llc-et-al-applications-for-duty-free-entry-of-scientific-instruments Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 6. Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Algeria: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13784/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-algeria-preliminary-affirmative-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of carbon and alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Algeria. The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 7. Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024; Correction Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13780/glycine-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024-correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the Federal Register of June 12, 2026, in which Commerce issued the final results of the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on glycine from India. In that notice, Commerce misspelled the name of Paras Intermediates Private Limited in the rate table. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-08
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-07-08 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Mobile Electronic Devices; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13811/certain-mobile-electronic-devices-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on July 1, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. 2. Certain Boiler Protection for Absorption Refrigeration Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13783/certain-boiler-protection-for-absorption-refrigeration-systems-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination ("ID") issued by the presiding chief administrative law judge ("CALJ") granting a motion for summary determination of violation of section 337. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding, under the schedule set forth below. 3. Silicon Metal From Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/07/08/2026-13767/silicon-metal-from-bosnia-herzegovina-iceland-kazakhstan-and-malaysia-scheduling-of-expedited Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-07-07
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-07-07 1) Executive Summary Today’s update covers six events published by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The actions include one antidumping/countervailing duty review notice and several Section 337 investigations and determinations. The policy tools involved are AD/CVD five-year reviews, Section 337 intellectual property and unfair import investigations, and procedural notices regarding information collection. China is explicitly referenced in several ITC_337 investigations relating to flash-spun nonwoven materials, ink cartridges, and antibody drug conjugates. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (U.S. International Trade Commission) Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand — AD/CVD (Full Five-Year Review) The ITC announced that it will proceed with full reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether the revocation of the countervailing duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Turkey and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on PC strand from multiple countries would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the U.S. industry. A schedule will be issued later. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-646 and 731-TA-1502–1516 – Key dates: Determination to conduct full reviews dated April 7, 2026; notice issued July 2, 2026 – Link: Source Flash-Spun Nonwoven Materials — ITC_337 (Public Interest Submission) The Commission issued a request for submissions on the public interest following an Initial Determination by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) finding a violation of Section 337. The notice concerns possible general or limited exclusion orders relating to flash-spun nonwoven materials, with potential respondents including Kingwills New Material Technology, Jiangsu Qingyun New Materials, and other Chinese firms. Submissions are due by August 3, 2026. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1424 – Key dates: Initial Determination dated July 1, 2026; submission deadline August 3, 2026 – Link: Source Antibody Drug Conjugates — ITC_337 (Termination Based on Complaint Withdrawal) The ITC determined not to review an Initial Determination issued by an ALJ that terminates the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation, initiated on AbbVie’s complaint against ProfoundBio and others, is now closed. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1466 – Key dates: ALJ Order No. 17 issued June 16, 2026; Commission determination July 1, 2026 – Link: Source USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin — Procedural Notice (Information Collection) The Commission submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for approval of an information collection plan related to the investigation “USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin: Economic Impact and Operation, 2027 Report.” The data gathered will inform the third of five biennial reports required by the USMCA Implementation Act. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: PROCEDURAL_NOTICE – Event Type: POLICY_NOTICE – China Indicator: NONE – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 332-608 – Key dates: Issued July 1, 2026 – Link: Source Vehicle Space Guards — ITC_337 (Institution of Investigation) The ITC instituted an investigation under Section 337 based on a complaint by Johnathan Black Kotyk of Florida alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,527,314 related to vehicle space guards. The complainant requests a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: NONE – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1509 – Key dates: Complaint filed June 1, 2026; investigation instituted July 1, 2026 – Link: Source Ink Cartridges — ITC_337 (Partial Review of Summary Determination) The ITC announced a partial review of an ALJ’s Initial Determination granting summary determination of violation concerning certain ink cartridges and components thereof. The respondents include multiple China-based entities such as Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology and others. The Commission requests written submissions on issues of remedy, public interest, and bonding. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1451 – Key dates: Initial Determination May 15, 2026; written submissions due July 15, 2026; replies due July 22, 2026 – Link: Source Microcurrent Facial Toning Devices — ITC_337 (Termination Based on Settlement) The ITC determined not to review an Initial Determination terminating an investigation on microcurrent facial toning devices based on settlement between ZIIP Inc. and The Carol Cole Co. The case is now closed. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: NONE – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1463 – Key dates: ALJ Order No. 12 issued June 11, 2026; Commission determination July 1, 2026 – Link: Source 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC initiated full five-year reviews of AD/CVD orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from multiple countries under the Tariff Act of 1930. – Several Section 337 investigations advanced or concluded, reflecting a range of intellectual property and unfair import concerns, including cases involving Chinese respondents. – The ITC requested public interest comments relating to proposed exclusion orders in the flash-spun nonwoven materials investigation. – Multiple cases were terminated—one due to withdrawal of a complaint (AbbVie) and another through settlement (ZIIP Inc.). – The ITC submitted a procedural questionnaire to the OMB for the 2027 USMCA automotive rules of origin study. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand — Five-Year Review – Flash-Spun Nonwoven Materials — Public Interest Submission – Antibody Drug Conjugates — Termination Based on Withdrawal – USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin — OMB Review Notice – Vehicle Space Guards — Institution of Investigation – Ink Cartridges — Partial Review of Summary Determination – Microcurrent Facial Toning Devices — Termination Based on Settlement 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority.
Certain Microcurrent Facial Toning Devices and Systems Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Terminates Investigation on Facial Toning Devices Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to end its investigation concerning certain microcurrent facial toning devices and systems. This decision comes after a settlement was reached between the involved parties. The investigation, known as Investigation No. 337-TA-1463, started on November 28, 2025. It began with a complaint by ZIIP, Inc. of Pleasant Hill, California, and The Beauty Tech Group Ltd. from the United Kingdom. They filed a case against The Carol Cole Company, also known as NuFACE, which is based in Vista, California. The complaint alleged that there were violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It was claimed that certain facial devices infringed on patent claims. On May 29, 2026, the involved companies, ZIIP, Inc., The Beauty Tech Group Ltd., and The Carol Cole Company, filed a joint motion. They requested to terminate the investigation based on a settlement they had reached. The Administrative Law Judge granted this motion on June 11, 2026. It was found that the request followed the rules and was not against the public interest. The ITC decided not to review this initial decision. Thus, the investigation stopped entirely. The decision was finalized after a vote by the Commission on July 1, 2026. The investigation’s authority is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure also provide authority for the decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order for termination on July 1, 2026. This marks the formal end of this investigation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof I; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Summary Determination of Violation; Request for Written Submissions on the Issue Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission to Review Ink Cartridges Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case involving certain ink cartridges and their parts. This case, labeled Investigation No. 337-TA-1451, involves multiple companies and allegations of patent infringement. The investigation started because of a complaint from Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. These companies are from the U.S. and Japan. They claim that certain patents related to ink cartridges were violated. The patents in question include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,540,347, 9,061,508, 11,535,037, 11,820,150, and 12,246,539. The complaint says that ink cartridges were imported and sold in the U.S. without permission. The USITC began investigating on June 17, 2025. Several companies from China and Hong Kong, like Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., and others, were named as respondents. Companies based in the U.S. were also named. Some respondents were removed from the investigation because the complaint against them was withdrawn. These include companies like Shenzhen Hongxinyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. and Qiong Wang. There are companies that have been found in default. This means they did not respond to the complaints. These defaulting companies include Tatrix International China Co., Hengyunda Electronics Co., and Mountain Peak, Inc. Certain patent claims from the complaint have been dropped. This includes specific claims from the ‘347, ‘508, ‘037, ‘150, and ‘539 patents. The investigation continues with other claims from these patents. The USITC is especially focused on certain legal questions. They want to know about indirect infringement and economic activity in the U.S. related to these ink cartridges. They are also asking for written opinions about possible actions they might take. The USITC can decide to stop the importation of products that violate U.S. patent laws. They are seeking inputs about how such actions might affect public health, the economy, and U.S. consumers. Parties involved are expected to submit their views by July 15, 2026. They should also propose potential remedies if the USITC decides action is necessary. Follow-up replies are due by July 22, 2026. The commission’s final decision could include exclusion orders, which would stop the products from entering the U.S. They are interested in knowing how this might impact the public. If a remedy is imposed, the U.S. Trade Representative has 60 days to review the decision. During this time, the products can still enter the U.S. but under certain conditions. The USITC’s decision on these issues will set important precedents for future trade and patent-related cases. The commission expects detailed replies with clear legal references from all parties involved. The objective is to reach a fair conclusion based on the law and evidence available. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Vehicle Space Guards; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Investigation Launched into Alleged Patent Violation of Vehicle Space Guards Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the start of an investigation. This is due to a complaint concerning certain vehicle space guards. The investigation falls under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Background Information: The complaint was filed on June 1, 2026. It was submitted by Johnathan Black Kotyk from Atlantic Beach, Florida. He later made changes to the complaint on June 17, 2026, and added more information on June 22, 2026. The complaint claims that there are violations of section 337. It says that there is illegal importation and sale of specific vehicle space guards. The claim focuses on the infringement of certain sections of U.S. Patent No. 7,527,314. This patent is referred to as the ‘314 patent. The complaint also supports that there is an industry in the United States linked to this. The complainant asked for an investigation. He also requested a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Details of the Investigation: The ITC reviewed the complaint. On July 1, 2026, they decided to start an investigation. It will determine if there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337. This involves the importation, sale for importation, or sale within the United States, after importation, of the said products due to infringement of certain claims of the ‘314 patent. The investigation refers to products described as “vehicle space guards having attachment means for car seats.” Involved Parties: Entities reported to be in violation include: Drop Stop, LLC The Container Store, Inc. Walmart, Inc. 232 Technologies Inc. Sportman’s Market Inc. (Sporty’s) The ITC’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations will also be involved. Legal Process: The respondents must reply to the amended complaint and this notice within 20 days of receiving them. This follows section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Extensions for this period will be rare unless valid reasons are provided. If a respondent does not respond on time, they may lose their right to contest the allegations. This means the facts could be decided in favor of the complainant. It may also lead to the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will select a presiding judge for this investigation. Additional information can be accessed on the ITC’s website at www.usitc.gov. Issued by the order of the Commission on July 1, 2026, signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
