U.S. Finds Subsidies for Brazilian Pulp Producers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes U.S. Finds Subsidies for Brazilian Pulp Producers The United States Department of Commerce has made a final decision about producers and exporters of high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This important decision is that these companies received help from their government, called countervailable subsidies, during 2024. What This Means When a country gives companies special help, like government money or special loans, it can make their products unfairly cheaper. This is called a subsidy. The U.S. government says the Brazilian companies got this kind of help and it is against trade rules. Detailed Investigation The investigation looked at how these companies got help from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce used many rules and calculations to figure this out. They checked companies’ records and spoke with officials in May and June of 2026. Who Is Affected The main company named in the report is Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A., along with other connected companies. This group of companies received a subsidy rate of 9.37 percent. This means a charge can be added to their product price when sold to the U.S. Next Steps If the U.S. International Trade Commission agrees that these subsidies hurt U.S. companies, more actions will be taken. The U.S. can add extra fees to the Brazilian pulp to make trade fairer again. Waiting for More Decisions The International Trade Commission will decide soon if these subsidies caused injury to U.S. industries. If they do, Commerce will put in place these new rules to level the playing field. This decision is part of efforts to make sure trade is fair and that no country has an unfair advantage. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Brazilian Dissolving Pulp Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-16 By: [Your Name] The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding the sale of high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. The department determined that these products are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This conclusion comes after thorough investigations. Investigation Background The investigation period stretched from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce had published a preliminary affirmative determination on May 27, 2026. Following this, the period for reaching the final determination was extended by 135 days, concluding on October 9, 2026. During this time, interested parties were invited to comment on the preliminary findings. Product in Focus The investigation focused on high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This product has an alpha cellulose percentage of 90 percent or higher, and a brightness level of 90 percent or higher. The product can be derived from any virgin or recycled cellulose fiber source. Key Findings and Decisions The Department verified sales and cost data submitted by Bracell Bahia Specialty Celulose S.A. and Bracell SP Celulose Ltda. The findings revealed that Bracell’s goods were sold below fair value. Commerce calculated a dumping margin of 6.50 percent for Bracell’s products. This same rate applies to all other producers not individually investigated. Impact of the Decision As a result of this decision, the Department will continue to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all related entries of the subject merchandise. This applies to goods entered or withdrawn for consumption starting May 27, 2026. Deposit requirements for antidumping duties will now reflect these final findings. Next Steps The case will now proceed to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC will determine whether the import of Brazilian high purity dissolving pulp injures or threatens the U.S. industry. They are expected to conclude their investigation within 45 days. If the ITC finds no injury, actions will terminate, existing deposits will be refunded, and suspensions lifted. Conversely, if injury is confirmed, an antidumping duty order will be issued to guide further actions. The ITC is tasked with safeguarding U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. Results from their decision will be pivotal moving forward. Stay tuned for further developments as the case unfolds in subsequent weeks. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Norwegian Company Selling Pulp Unfairly Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a final report. It says that high purity dissolving pulp from Norway is being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. These prices are below what is considered fair value. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The U.S. found that Borregaard AS, a Norwegian company, and other producers, sold the pulp for less than it costs to make. Because of this, the U.S. will continue to hold and check any imported high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. This started from May 27, 2026. Importers will have to pay extra money, called a cash deposit, when they bring this pulp into the U.S. The rate for this deposit is 6.51%. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) now has 45 days to decide if these unfair sales have hurt pulp producers in the U.S. If the ITC finds there is no harm, the investigation will stop, and all extra charges will be canceled. But if there is harm, more steps will be taken to stop these sales. The pulp involved here is special. It must be at least 90% pure and very bright. It is usually made from wood or plants that are treated with chemicals. This pulp can come in many forms, like liquids or sheets. There are some types of pulp not included in this decision. This includes pulp with low thickness or made mostly from cotton fibers. These rules and extra charges will stay in place until further notice. If you are a company or person affected, you have a responsibility to follow them. This situation is part of how the U.S. makes sure that trade is fair, and all companies compete equally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Duty Review Results for Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a decision about some products from China. The products are known as wood mouldings and millwork products. These items come from companies in China named China Cornici Co., Ltd. and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. The CIT’s judgment on September 23, 2026, was different from what the Department of Commerce (Commerce) had decided earlier. The issue has to do with taxes known as countervailing duties (CVDs) from June 12, 2020, to December 31, 2021. In September 2023, the Commerce Department thought these two companies should not be reviewed because there was no record of some details at that time. Specifically, information about whether these companies paid certain taxes was missing when it was time to make a decision. However, when the companies gave more information later and the CIT reviewed it, the CIT found new evidence. This new evidence showed that China Cornici and RaoPing had paid what they were supposed to. So, the CIT told the Commerce Department to change its decision. Now, these companies have a cash deposit rate of 8.89%. This rate will be used for future imports to ensure they pay the right amount. The CIT reminded that the Commerce Department cannot change any taxes that were already paid and cleared. The decision is final unless there are more appeals, which could change things in the future. This decision was noted by Commerce Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton, on October 9, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Certain Pasta from Italy Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary findings from its review of antidumping duties on certain pasta imported from Italy. The review covers the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. During this time, it was found that some producers and exporters from Italy sold pasta in the United States for less than the normal value, which is known as dumping. The review started on August 22, 2025, after timely requests according to U.S. regulations. The companies selected as key respondents for this review are La Molisana and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo. These companies were chosen because they are major exporters. Several companies had initially requested to be part of the review but later withdrew their requests. This includes companies like La Doria, Di Martino, Frescobaldi, and Barilla. As these companies withdrew their requests within the specified time, the review was rescinded with respect to 15 companies. The Department of Commerce has used specific methods to calculate the dumping margins. For La Molisana, the margin is 3.62%. For Garofalo, it is 6.47%. Other companies not individually reviewed are given an average rate of 5.05%. These rates are calculated to ensure fair pricing and to protect U.S. manufacturers. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. They can also provide feedback through public comments and request a hearing if necessary. The final results will be used to assess duties on future imports and to adjust deposit requirements for customs. Overall, these actions help maintain fair competition and protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. This review is part of regular checks by the Department of Commerce to ensure compliance with international trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results of Steel Nails Dumping Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results regarding the review of antidumping duties on steel nails from the Sultanate of Oman. This examination covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The main focus of this review was Oman Fasteners LLC, the only company from Oman selected for individual examination. The Department has preliminarily found that Oman Fasteners did not sell steel nails in the United States at less than normal value during this period. This means Oman Fasteners has not engaged in dumping practices for the year reviewed. Additionally, the Commerce Department expressed its intent to rescind the review for 15 other companies. This rescission is due to these companies having no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise during the period of review. These companies include Al Ansari Teqmark LLC, Al Sarah Building Materials LLC, and Gulf Nails Manufacturing, LLC, among others. The Department is also responsible for setting a dumping margin, which indicates the amount by which the export price is lower than the normal value. For Oman Fasteners, this margin is preliminarily set at zero percent. For another company, Gulf Nails LLC, which was not individually reviewed, the margin is set at 9.10 percent. This rate is based on previous investigations. Interested parties have the opportunity to comment on these preliminary results. Both case briefs and rebuttal briefs can be submitted within set deadlines following the publication of this notice. If necessary, these parties may also request a hearing to discuss their concerns. The next steps involve the Department of Commerce disclosing its calculations to interested parties. The final results of the review will determine the assessment of duties and future deposit requirements for imports of the merchandise in question. This review is significant as it influences the trade and pricing mechanisms for steel nails imported from Oman to the United States. It also affects the duties imposed and serves as a guide for future entries of steel nails merchandise. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Changes Antidumping Duty Rates for Italian Company Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 2, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final decision. This decision affects how the U.S. government handles certain imports from Italy. The case was about forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy. The U.S. Department of Commerce had reviewed the prices of these blocks from July 23, 2020, to December 31, 2021. They found that Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A., an Italian company, was dumping the blocks into the U.S. market at a lower price than normal. Initially, they set a dumping margin of 2.97 percent. Ellwood City Forge Company did not agree with this result. They took the case to court. The CIT told the Department of Commerce to look at the data again. This included looking at how they calculated costs and profits for Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. After re-examining the data in July 2026, the Department of Commerce made two changes. They removed two companies, Cogne and Ciscato, from their profit calculations. They also changed the way they calculated market-price benchmarks. This led to a higher dumping margin of 7.55 percent for Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. The CIT agreed with these changes on October 2, 2026. The court’s ruling means that the previous decision was not correct. This decision becomes final on October 12, 2026. Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. won’t change its current cash deposit rates. These rates were set in a later review that happened after the period from 2020 to 2021. The CIT has stopped the liquidation of certain entries by Lucchini Mame Forge S.p.A. These entries are from the 2020 to 2021 period. They will remain on hold until any appeals are finished. If no one appeals, or if appeals support the CIT, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to apply the new dumping margins. This means that when the new rate is not zero or almost zero, they will collect antidumping duties. This decision by the CIT and the changes by the Department of Commerce show how the U.S. government ensures fair competition in trade. Such actions aim to stop companies from selling goods at unfairly low prices, which can harm U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Changes in Duties for Wood Mouldings from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade made a final decision. This decision was for a case about wood mouldings and millwork products from China. Two companies, China Cornici Co., Ltd. and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd., took their case to court. The court’s decision was different from what the Department of Commerce had decided. Now, China Cornici is included in the review for the period from August 12, 2020, to January 31, 2022. A new cash deposit rate of 220.87% is given to China Cornici. This is because they were not given a separate rate in the review. The Department of Commerce will change the instructions for cash deposits. These instructions go to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The other company, Chen Chiu Global Corp., is not given a separate rate. So, the cash deposit instructions for them remain the same. The Department of Commerce says it cannot reliquidate entries. This means they cannot reassess duties on goods already processed. Only the court can order changes or reliquidation of these entries. This decision affects products from China for a certain period. This news is important for all businesses involved in trading these products. It helps people understand the changes in trade and duties between the United States and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Binational Panel Issues Decision on Softwood Lumber Dispute Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On October 8, 2026, a Binational Panel made a significant decision regarding softwood lumber products from Canada. This decision was part of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) under Article 10.12. The panel reviewed the Final Determination on countervailing duties for softwood lumber from Canada. The panel affirmed some parts of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s determination. However, it also required a remand on other parts. This means some elements need to be reviewed further. The review covers the countervailing duty administrative review for the years 2017 to 2018. The case number for this is USA-CDA-2020-10.12-01. The USMCA provides a way to settle disputes between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. If there is a trade remedy determination, a Binational Panel can review it. The panel’s decisions are binding. To learn about the panel’s procedures, you can look at the Article 10.12 Binational Panel Reviews rules. These rules were agreed upon by all three countries in the agreement. For more information, contact Vidya Desai, who is the United States Secretary for the USMCA Secretariat. She can be found at the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC. This update was provided by Vidya Desai on October 8, 2026. The official document number is 2026-20894. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Imports from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results from a review on steel products from Taiwan. The review focuses on corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE). These results suggest that these products were sold in the U.S. at prices below their normal value from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The review began after requests from several steel companies, including Prosperity Tieh Enterprise and others in the U.S. These companies asked for the review in July 2025. The review includes nine firms. However, only two, Prosperity and Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. (SYSCO), were chosen for detailed examination. Due to delays caused by a government shutdown and a backlog of documents, the review was slow. Now, the preliminary results are finally available. They show that both Prosperity and SYSCO had dumping margins. This means they sold their products at unfairly low prices in the U.S. The review also looked at a company, Great Grandeul Steel Company Limited (Samoa), which was not individually examined. This company was given a dumping margin based on an average of the rates found for Prosperity and SYSCO. Not all the companies initially included in the review had sales during the examined period. These companies were not part of the final results as they had no entries during the period of review. The products under review are flat-rolled steel products coated with metals like zinc. These products are used because they resist corrosion. The Department of Commerce encourages interested parties to comment on these results. They will accept comments and rebuttals in the near future. The final results of the review are expected to be out within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Once the final results are out, the Department will decide on the duties on steel from Taiwan. If a company has a dumping margin above the minimum level, duties will be applied to their imports. If a margin is too low or zero, no duties will be charged. The new cash deposit requirements will come into effect after the final results. These deposits are a kind of anticipated duty on future imports. They will be based on the newly calculated rates. This review serves as a reminder for importers. They need to file a certificate about any refund of antidumping duties before they finalize their entries during the review period. The Department will keep interested parties informed and will publish updates when available. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Steel Nail Antidumping Review Announced by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-14 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new findings regarding the sale of certain steel nails from Malaysia. The findings are part of an administrative review related to antidumping duty. This review covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The review finds that producers of steel nails in Malaysia sold these products in the United States at less than their normal value. This means they sold the nails at a very low price, which could harm U.S. businesses. This practice is often called ‘dumping.’ The Department of Commerce has decided to stop reviewing 40 of the companies because there were no entries of nails from them during the review period. This means these companies did not send steel nails to the United States between July 2024 and June 2025. For the companies that are still under review, the Department of Commerce has calculated a dumping margin. This margin is a measure of how much lower the price was compared to the normal value. The margin determined is 2.01 percent. Region International Co., Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd., collectively known as “Region,” were the main focus of this review. The sales practices of these companies were closely examined. The review found that their dumping margin was 2.01 percent, which is not allowed. The department plans to use this dumping margin to calculate duties for other companies not individually reviewed. The International Trade Administration conducted the review through its Enforcement and Compliance office. Tyler Weinhold, part of the AD/CVD Operations at the department, can provide further information. He can be reached at (202) 482-1121. Public comments are invited, and all interested parties can give their input. The department will review these comments before making a final decision. The public will have access to a detailed report. This report will give more information on how decisions were made about dumping and the steps undertaken in this review. Cash deposits for steel nails from Malaysia will be adjusted based on this review’s results. New rates will take effect when the final results are determined. These cash deposits ensure that appropriate duties are paid if the final decision confirms dumping practices. The Department of Commerce is committed to fair trade practices and will continue to monitor and address any further issues that arise in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Examines Xanthan Gum Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, under the International Trade Administration, has released the preliminary results of a review concerning the import of xanthan gum from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Preliminary Findings The Department found that certain exporters from China sold xanthan gum at prices below its normal value in the U.S. market. This means they sold the gum for less than what it costs in China. Involved Companies The initial review included several companies, but some have been excluded from this ongoing process. The companies that are no longer under review are CP Kelco Shandong, Deosen Biochemical Ltd., Langfang Meihua Biotechnology, Meihua Group International Trading from Hong Kong, and Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd. Review Process Adjustments The process faced some delays due to federal government shutdowns. These caused the deadlines to be extended several times. As a result, the preliminary results were released later than initially planned. Scope of the Review The review focuses on xanthan gum imported from China. It aims to determine the correct value of these products to ensure fair trade practices. Cancellation of Part of the Review The Department has canceled the review for CP Kelco Shandong as they withdrew their request. There were no requests from other parties to review this company, leading to their review cancellation. Evaluations and Decisions During the review process, it was decided that Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd. and Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies would be the main companies to be examined. Data from these companies will help determine if products were sold at less than normal value. Future Steps Parties interested in the preliminary results have 21 days from the publication date to submit comments. Key Decisions For companies that were not individually examined but deserve a separate rate, the average rates for examined companies will be applied. Next Phases The Department will finalize their findings after they receive comments from involved parties. Once done, it will help ensure fair pricing in the import of xanthan gum and guide future import duties. This review showcases the Department of Commerce’s commitment to monitoring and maintaining fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Boltless Steel Shelving Units from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 14, 2026, the Department of Commerce announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China. These orders mean that duties will still apply to these items to prevent unfair competition. Boltless steel shelving units are shelves that you can assemble without using nuts and bolts. They often come in prepackaged sets, ready for sale to customers. The rules also cover add-on kits that let you extend existing shelving units. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC) both agree that if these orders were taken away, there would be more dumping and unfair trade from China. This could hurt the U.S. industry that makes these shelving units. The orders first started in 2015. A review of these orders began on April 1, 2026. This review looked at whether removing these orders would harm the U.S. industry. On September 29, 2026, the ITC confirmed that revoking the orders could cause harm. The duty orders cover most types of boltless steel shelving. They are shelves made from steel vertical supports and horizontal supports. They might have decks, which are the surfaces where items are placed. However, they exclude wall-mounted shelving, wire shelving, and custom-made shelving systems. The orders will continue to help ensure that U.S. Customs and Border Protection collects duties on these imports from China at the current rates. The continuation date is September 29, 2026. The document also reminds those with access to confidential information to handle it properly. They must follow rules about returning or destroying this information after use. The Department of Commerce plans to review these orders again before the fifth anniversary of the latest ITC decision. This ensures that the orders are still needed to protect U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Results of Antidumping Review on Hot-Rolled Steel from Japan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review for certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. This review covers the period from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce has determined that some Japanese producers and exporters sold hot-rolled steel in the U.S. at prices below the normal value. This finding means that these companies charged less for their products in the U.S. than they did in Japan, allowing them to undercut U.S. producers. The agency examined two companies closely. Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), along with its affiliates Nippon Steel Nisshin Co., Ltd., and Nippon Steel Trading Corporation, received a calculated dumping margin of 13.96 percent. On the other hand, Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. was found to have a zero percent margin, which means it did not sell at unfairly low prices. Several other companies, including JFE Steel Corporation and Honda Trading Corporation, were not individually reviewed but were assigned the same margin as Nippon Steel due to the administrative process. The results of this review will affect future imports of hot-rolled steel from these companies. When U.S. Customs and Border Protection liquidates the entries, they will apply the calculated rates. If no legal challenges change these assessments, the companies will face the specified duties on their imports. The cash deposit rates for future entries of hot-rolled steel will also be adjusted based on these final results. Companies that were part of this review will have new rates, while those not reviewed will keep their existing ones, unless covered by prior proceedings. Both importers and exporters need to be aware of their obligations under the law. Importers are reminded to certify that they have not been reimbursed for antidumping duties, as failure to do so can lead to double assessments. The Department of Commerce conducted this review according to the Tariff Act of 1930, designed to address unfair trade practices. This decision is part of ongoing efforts to ensure a level playing field for U.S. industries. For detailed information about this review, interested parties can access all supporting documents through the U.S. Department of Commerce’s online portal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Paper Shopping Bags from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary results from a recent review concerning paper shopping bags imported from Vietnam. The review looked at sales of these bags between January 3, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The main focus of the review was the International Packaging Limited Company (IPSC). The Department found that IPSC sold the bags at prices lower than what is considered normal. The review also led to the cancellation of reviews for four other companies. This means only the results for one company, IPSC, are being reported. The preliminary results suggest a dumping margin of 28.52% for IPSC. Many important deadlines were extended throughout the review process due to government shutdowns and document backlogs. This delayed both reviews and final decisions. This process is in line with U.S. trade law, which allows reviews to determine if foreign companies are selling products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This can help protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. The full text of these preliminary results is available online, where the public can access it through relevant U.S. government websites. For parties affected by these preliminary results, there is an opportunity to submit comments and feedback to the Department. The timeline for these submissions has been laid out clearly in the official notices. As the review continues, the Department of Commerce will finalize its decisions and issue any necessary directives to U.S. Customs for the assessment of duties on subject merchandise moving forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Preliminary Review on Countervailing Duties on PET Film from India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is announcing preliminary results from its review of countervailing duties on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. This material is used in various applications like packaging and electronics. According to their findings, during the review period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, the company SRF Limited, a producer and exporter from India, was receiving government subsidies. These subsidies are considered countervailable, meaning they provide unfair advantages in international trade. For SRF Limited, the preliminary subsidy rate is 3.98 percent. This rate is an important factor in determining how much extra cost is added when their products enter the U.S. The Department of Commerce uses this rate to ensure a level playing field for U.S. companies by balancing out any unfair government support that SRF Limited receives in India. The investigation also resulted in the rescission of review concerning nine other companies. These companies include Chiripal Poly Films Limited, Cosmo First Ltd., and others. A review can be rescinded if companies request it within 90 days after an initiation notice. Since no other interested party requested reviews on these companies, the Department granted their rescission requests. The Department of Commerce follows a strict process for these reviews. The investigation was delayed at multiple points due to government shutdowns and procedural backlogs. Despite these delays, the Department extended its deadlines appropriately to complete the review. Interested parties are allowed to comment on the preliminary findings before final results are published. There are opportunities for public engagement through case briefs. These contributions are important for ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of the investigation. Ultimately, the investigation seeks to affirm fair trade practices and protect U.S. industries. The outcome affects how duties are assessed on imports from India, impacting both international producers and domestic markets. The Department will continue to monitor the situation until final results are determined. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Review of Antidumping Duties on Vietnamese Steel Pipes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background of the Review This review is part of an ongoing effort to enforce U.S. antidumping laws. The focus is on whether these pipes were sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Preliminary conclusions suggest some sales were indeed made at these low prices, triggering action. Companies Under Review The Department plans to rescind the review for seven companies. These companies did not have any suspended entries of the subject merchandise during the review period. Suspended entries are required for an administrative review. Among these companies are Sonha International and Vinlong. These companies will not face the review for this period. The Vietnam-wide entity remains under review, which includes companies not specifically reviewed. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce has applied a rate of 90.80% for the Vietnam-wide entity. This rate is based on adverse facts available. This measure is intended to counteract the effects of selling at unfairly low prices. Interested parties can comment on these findings. The Commerce Department will include these comments in their final assessment. Next Steps for Importers Importers must stay aware of their obligations regarding antidumping duties. They need to file certificates concerning the reimbursement of duties. This is important before the liquidation of relevant entries happens. Public Participation The public can participate in this review process. They have the opportunity to submit comments and request a hearing. These steps allow the public to voice their opinions and concerns. Final Notes The preliminary findings are a crucial step in enforcing trade fairness. The aim is to address and rectify any unfair pricing practices. The final results will be published after considering all comments and inputs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

NAFTA Panel Decision on Softwood Lumber from Canada Estimated reading time: 2 minutes On October 5, 2026, a Binational Panel made an important ruling. This decision concerns softwood lumber products from Canada. It confirms a determination by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The decision relates to an affirmative countervailing duty. This decision comes after a request for a Panel Review. A Binational Panel was formed to review the case. They are tasked with examining trade remedy determinations. These determinations involve the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. This process is part of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA. Specifically, it involves Chapter 19 of Article 1904. This part of NAFTA outlines how disputes are settled. The goal is to ensure fair trade practices are followed. Vidya Desai, the U.S. Secretary for the NAFTA Secretariat, announced the decision. The notice was published in the Federal Register. This is an official publication that records government actions. The Binational Panel decision is binding. It provides a resolution to the trade issue at hand. Details of the rules for these reviews are established by the three governments. These rules help guide how panels make their decisions. For those interested in the specific rules for Binational Panel Reviews, more information can be found at the NAFTA Secretariat’s website. The decision is an important step in maintaining balanced trade relations between the involved countries. For further details about the decision or the process, Vidya Desai can be contacted. She is available at the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC. Her contact information includes a phone number for direct inquiries. This decision illustrates the ongoing process of managing international trade relationships. It highlights the collaboration between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico to resolve trade disputes peacefully and fairly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Review of Antidumping Duties on Vietnamese Steel Pipes Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings in a review of antidumping duties on welded stainless steel pressure pipes imported from Vietnam. During the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025, these products were sold in the United States at less than their normal value. This review examines the sales conducted by Vietnamese exporters to determine if they impacted fair trade. The Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration indicated that some Vietnamese imports were sold at prices lower than normal, suggesting unfair competitive practices. The investigation primarily aimed to ensure fair market conditions by examining specific companies involved in selling these products in the U.S. The Department also announced a possible partial rescission of seven specific Vietnamese companies from the review. This decision is pending, based on available data indicating no significant shipments during the reviewed period. The companies under scrutiny include Sonha International and Vinasteel, among others. The Department suggests that due to the lack of entries by certain companies during the period, there might not be a need for continued review of those specific entities. Such entries would typically be subject to antidumping tariffs to adjust prices to fair market levels. The Vietnam-wide entity, an encompassing group if no specific company review is requested, is under investigation as well. It faces a preliminary rough average dumping margin of approximately 90.80 percent. This percentage reflects the differences discovered between the actual sales prices and the prices applied to U.S. markets. Stakeholders, including companies and trade bodies, are invited to submit comments or requests for a public meeting to discuss these preliminary findings. The final results will be drawn after considering these inputs. For future imports, cash deposits will be adjusted in line with findings. This measure is intended to ensure fair pricing and protect domestic markets from underpriced imports. These rules ensure that duties correspond to current trade conditions, encouraging fair competition. The Department of Commerce requests importers to declare whether antidumping duties have been reimbursed. This notice emphasizes the need for transparency and adherence to trade laws. The public is advised to stay informed of updates following this review as part of adherence to fair trade practices worldwide. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Binational Panel Affirms Decision on Canadian Softwood Lumber Dispute Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 5, 2026, a significant decision was made regarding the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and Canada over softwood lumber. A Binational Panel issued its Decision on the Second Redetermination on Remand concerning Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. The case originated from a Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, identified under Secretariat File Number: USA-CDA-2017-1904-02. The Binational Panel upheld the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Second Redetermination on Remand, affirming the Department’s findings. The Binational Panel’s decision is part of a special process set up under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904. This process allows for a panel of representatives from the involved countries to review and make decisions on trade disputes like this one. For information, interested parties can contact Vidya Desai, Secretary of the United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat. The office is located in Washington, DC, and can be reached at (202) 482-2311. This decision is an example of the dispute settlement mechanisms established under NAFTA. These mechanisms help resolve disagreements about trade between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This particular review process follows specific Rules of Procedure, which both countries, along with Mexico, have adopted. Further details on these procedures can be found through the NAFTA Secretariat website. The website provides comprehensive information on how these panels are formed and how they operate to ensure fair trade between the countries involved. The announcement of the Binational Panel’s Decision was published in the Federal Register, ensuring formal and public recognition of the decision. This provides accountability and transparency in international trade relations. Dated October 8, 2026, this notice serves as an official record of the affirmation of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s stance on the matter. This decision plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of trade practices and agreements among NAFTA countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.