U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Steel Pipe Sales Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-10-06 In a recent development, the U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its review concerning certain steel pipes from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The review determined that some producers and exporters made sales of these steel pipes at prices lower than usual during the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. This is according to the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 192. The products in question are called circular welded carbon-quality steel pipes. These pipes are used in a variety of industries for their strength and durability. Commerce found that two main companies, Conares Metal Supply Limited and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE, sold these pipes at dumping margins of 3.15 percent and 5.11 percent, respectively. Other companies involved will have a dumping margin of 4.68 percent applied to their products. Dumping margins help measure how much a product is sold below normal value. The Department published these findings to ensure that all companies follow the rules of fair trade. When companies sell products below their normal value, it can hurt U.S. businesses. The review process included careful examination and comments from different interested parties. Changes were made based on these comments to ensure fair calculations. The ruling means that these companies must now pay certain duties to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This will help balance the market and protect the U.S. industry from unfair pricing. Commerce uses a special method to decide the duty rates for companies not directly investigated. They look at rates of similar companies to make fair assessments. The results of this review will help ensure fair trade practices and safeguard U.S. businesses. All parties involved are reminded to follow these guidelines and regulations to ensure a level playing field in international trade. For more detailed information about the review and the decisions made, you can visit the official website of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Review on Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of countervailing duties placed on corrosion inhibitors from China. The review covered the year 2024. These duties are extra charges placed on imports from another country if those imports are helped by the foreign government. The Department found that certain Chinese companies received help from the Chinese government, which makes their products cheaper to produce. Key Companies Reviewed: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. got a subsidy rate of 18.64%. Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. got a higher rate of 48.45%. Some other companies, such as Connect Chemicals GMBH and Gold Chemical Limited, will follow an average rate of 36.40%. Background Information: Commerce started this review on May 26, 2026. They wanted to see if any changes were needed to the duties. They focused on subsidies from the Chinese government to these companies. Subsidies Detected: A subsidy means the Chinese government gave money to these companies. This can include helping them buy things cheaper or giving them direct money support. Because of these subsidies, the U.S. places extra duties on products to make sure it is fair for American companies. The review found these subsidies are specific, meaning only certain companies got them. These subsidies give those companies an unfair advantage because their production costs are lower than without the subsidies. Next Steps: Customs will start collecting these duties 35 days after this notice is published. These duties will apply to any shipments from January 1 to December 31, 2024. The Department has told Customs to use the rates they found. Companies that were not reviewed will stick to their current duties. The duties will remain until further notice. This ensures that companies importing these inhibitors pay a fair price without undercutting U.S. businesses unfairly. This act tries to keep U.S. trade fair, ensuring every company plays on the same field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Preliminary Review on Steel Rebar from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Background of the Review The review began following requests submitted on August 22, 2025. This involves looking into sales made during the time from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The United States aims to discover if Turkish companies are selling rebar at lower prices in the U.S. than in Türkiye, which might affect U.S. businesses unfairly. Companies Under Review The review includes several Turkish companies. Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. and Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. are selected as key respondents in this investigation. The review mainly targets these companies to assess their sales practices related to rebar. Rescission of Some Reviews The Commerce Department decided to rescind, or cancel, reviews for three companies. These are Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S., Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim A.S., and Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S., for which no notable entries were found during the review period. Method of Review The review process involves various calculations and adjustments. Commerce follows specific rules and methods under the U.S. Tariff Act and regulations. They compare U.S. sale prices against normal values like domestic prices in Türkiye, to decide on dumping activities. Preliminary Findings Colakoglu, the main company under the spotlight, was found to have a dumping margin of 13.11%. This means their exported rebar to the U.S. was sold significantly cheaper than in their home market. Ekinciler Demir ve Celik Sanayi A.S., another company reviewed but not individually assessed, also received a preliminary dumping margin of 13.11%. Future Steps The Commerce Department allows interested parties to comment on these findings before final results are issued. The parties can submit their comments by specified deadlines and request a hearing if needed. Cash Deposit Requirements The outcome of this preliminary review affects the future cash deposits required for imported rebar. If the determined rate is above zero, affected companies might need to deposit additional funds to continue selling in the U.S. without duty offsetting advantages. Conclusion These actions and decisions aim to maintain fair competition in the U.S. steel market. The Commerce Department’s ongoing efforts scrutinize foreign trade practices, ensuring domestic producers face fair competition according to established trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duty Review for Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Agency Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings of an antidumping duty review concerning oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine. This review pertains to sales made between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The goods in question are typically used in oil and gas well operations. This study was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a section within the Department of Commerce that enforces trade laws and agreements. Key Findings The Department of Commerce believes that a Ukrainian company, Interpipe, has sold products in the United States at prices below normal value. A preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 18.43% has been calculated for Interpipe. About Interpipe Interpipe comprises several entities: Interpipe Ukraine LLC, Interpipe Europe S.A., LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, and PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant, collectively named Interpipe. Background on the Review Process The antidumping review began on September 11, 2025, following requests from U.S. stakeholders. Although Interpipe withdrew their request for a review on November 19, 2025, the process continued because the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association also sought the review. The review faced delays due to a 47-day government shutdown and additional tolling of deadlines by 21 days, extending the time for preliminary results. Public Involvement Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. The Department of Commerce has sought case briefs to be submitted within 21 days after the public notice and rebuttal briefs within five days following that. Parties can request a hearing to discuss the issues further. Next Steps The Commerce Department plans to release the final results following these preliminary findings. They will then inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection of any adjustments to assessment rates on these goods imported from Ukraine. Information Access The Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which details the methodologies used, is publicly accessible online. Conclusion This review highlights the U.S. government’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor and adjust procedures to uphold these standards. The final determination will set future cash deposit requirements for Ukrainian OCTG exported to the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Breaking News: U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Tire Duty Order Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This review focused on countervailing duties, which are taxes placed on foreign imports thought to benefit from government subsidies. The department concluded that lifting these duties on Vietnamese tires could lead to more government support for companies there. This could hurt American tire makers by creating unfair competition in prices. The decision affects companies like Kumho Tire (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., and Sailun (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., among others. These companies might continue to receive government help, making their products cheaper in the U.S. market. The U.S. union, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, participated in this review. They represent workers in the tire industry in the United States and believe that maintaining these duties is important for their livelihood. The Department of Commerce has provided specific percentages indicating how much support Vietnamese tire companies could still receive. Kumho Tire (Vietnam) might receive a 7.89% subsidy, and Sailun (Vietnam) could receive a 6.23% subsidy. Other companies may get a 6.46% subsidy rate. These numbers are crucial as they reflect the level of financial advantage these companies would have if the duties were removed. This finding by the Department of Commerce is based on a process known as a “sunset review.” This type of evaluation is standard procedure to decide if duties should remain in place after five years. The department also informed the U.S. International Trade Commission about its findings. This communication ensures that the right discussions and policies are maintained to protect U.S. industries from unfair international competition. The decision highlights the importance of balancing international trade while protecting domestic jobs and industries. Stay tuned for more updates on international trade and commerce affairs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty on Potassium Phosphate Salts from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a significant decision regarding potassium phosphate salts imported from China. The decision comes as part of an “expedited third sunset review” related to the antidumping duty order on these salts. The Department has determined that removing the antidumping duty on this product could result in continued dumping of the product in the U.S. market. Dumping occurs when a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. at a price lower than fair value. This decision means that the current antidumping duties will remain in place. The decision was officially recorded in the Federal Register on October 5, 2026. The document notes that there is a risk of Chinese manufacturers continuing to undercut U.S. prices if the duties are removed. The dumping margins, which indicate the extent of underpricing, could reach up to 95.40%. This figure suggests that without duties, potassium phosphate salts from China could be sold for significantly less than their fair value, harming U.S. producers. The International Trade Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, conducted the review. ICL Specialty Products Inc. and Prayon, Inc., both U.S.-based companies that produce similar products, participated in the review. They claimed that removing the antidumping duties would harm the U.S. industry. The process began earlier in June 2026, with a notice of intent to review the existing order. Following a substantive response from domestic producers and a lack of response from foreign respondents, the department conducted an expedited review process. This quick review helped determine the final outcome, ensuring that the current duties remain to protect the U.S. market. In conclusion, this decision underscores the Department of Commerce’s commitment to counter unfair trade practices and support domestic industries. The continued enforcement of antidumping duties will help maintain fair competition in the U.S. market for potassium phosphate salts. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Continuation of Potassium Phosphate Salt Subsidies Order Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Key Findings The Department of Commerce has found that ending the countervailing duty order would lead to a continuation or recurrence of subsidies. This order has been in place for some time to address unfair trade practices from China. Background The original order was published on July 22, 2010. On June 1, 2026, the third review of this order began. This review is commonly known as a “sunset review.” It is required by law and ensures that duties are still needed. The review was expedited since there wasn’t an adequate response from the interested parties in China. Hence, the U.S. conducted a quick (120-day) review. Companies Involved Several companies in China are listed in the findings. These include: Lianyungang Mupro Import Export Co., Ltd. Mianyang Aostar Phosphate Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Shifang Anda Chemicals Co., Ltd. All these companies have a countervailable subsidy rate set at 109.11 percent. What Happens Next The notice serves to remind parties about handling confidential information. Those with access to certain information must either return or destroy it promptly, as per regulations. This Federal Register notice also informs interested parties about these final results. The continuation of the order follows sections of U.S. trade law, which include specifics about subsidies and rates. The Department of Commerce, along with the International Trade Administration, will continue to monitor and enforce these duties to ensure fair trade practices. Contact Information For further details, Sarah Keith can be contacted at the U.S. Department of Commerce, using the phone number provided in the notice. This notification concludes the review process for now, but may be revisited if circumstances change. It’s a step to ensure that the U.S. market is not harmed by subsidized imports from China, thereby maintaining fair competition and protecting domestic producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice Issued for Final Results of Large Diameter Welded Pipe Review from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has issued a correction notice regarding the final results of an administrative review. This review concerns the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe from the Republic of Türkiye for the years 2024-2025. The original notice, published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2026, contained an error in the company name of Cimtas Boru Imalatlari ve Ticaret Ltd. It was mistakenly listed as Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd. This correction is also applicable to previous notices. The incorrect company name appeared in the Initiation Notice dated June 25, 2025, and in the Preliminary Results notice dated May 27, 2026. Both of these documents incorrectly referred to the company as Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd. The correction notice ensures the correct company name, Cimtas Boru Imalatlari ve Ticaret Ltd., is used consistently. Interested parties are informed that this correction adheres to the provisions of sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice also follows the regulatory guidelines outlined in 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). The correction notice was signed on September 30, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This official update aims to maintain accuracy in the records of the Department of Commerce and ensure clear communication with stakeholders involved in international trade matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Results of Antidumping Duty Reviews on Steel Plate from China and Russia Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of the expedited fifth sunset reviews regarding the antidumping duty orders on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and Russia. The reviews were conducted by the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. The findings concluded that revoking these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping occurs when foreign producers sell goods in the United States at a price lower than the fair value, which can harm domestic industries. The orders were first put in place to address this issue and protect American businesses. These reviews are in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930. They ensure that the antidumping duty orders remain effective and appropriate for managing unfair trade practices. In this case, the Department of Commerce determined that the levels of dumping likely to occur if the orders were revoked would be up to 128.59 percent for China and 185.00 percent for Russia. Domestic companies Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Nucor Corporation, and SSAB Enterprises LLC participated in the review process by expressing their intent and providing substantive responses. The Department of Commerce published a notice of these reviews on June 1, 2026. It informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of the responses received from domestic parties but noted that there were no substantive responses from any foreign respondents. As no foreign parties responded, the Department conducted expedited reviews and confirmed the necessity of continuing the antidumping duty orders to prevent unfair competition from foreign producers dumping their products in the U.S. market. The decision has been made in accordance with the legal requirements and frameworks set out to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. This announcement serves as a reminder to parties subject to Administrative Protective Orders (APO) about their responsibilities concerning the handling of proprietary information. Failure to comply with APO regulations can lead to sanctions. The detailed findings and supporting documents can be accessed through the Department of Commerce’s official channels to assist interested parties in understanding the decision and its implications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Prepares to Rescind Antidumping Duty Review on Mattresses from Poland Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes October 5, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary decision to rescind an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on mattresses from Poland. This decision comes after a detailed inquiry over the sale activities during the period of July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Background of the Review The original antidumping duty order for mattresses from Poland was published on July 11, 2024. An opportunity for review was announced on June 30, 2025, with requests for administrative review made by entities including EBI, LLC, CORRECT—K. Błaszczyk i Wspólnicy Sp. K. (CORRECT), and COM40 Sp. z o.o. Sp. K. (COM 40). Investigation and Findings The Department of Commerce initiated the review on August 22, 2025. However, upon examination, it was found that the companies CORRECT and COM 40 did not have any reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Moreover, CORRECT informed Commerce that it had no sales of the subject merchandise during this period. Delays in Process Due to a lapse in government appropriations, there were significant delays in the review process. The Department of Commerce issued several memos extending deadlines by a total of 181 days. The final deadline for the preliminary results was set for October 7, 2026. Preliminary Decision to Rescind Based on findings that there were no bona fide sales or entries subject to review during the period of interest, the Department of Commerce has preliminarily decided to rescind the review. The preliminary decision indicates that, without reviewable entries, there is no basis for reassessment of duties for the companies involved. Next Steps Interested parties may submit comments on this preliminary decision within 21 days. The Department of Commerce will consider these comments before issuing its final decision, expected within 120 days after the preliminary announcement. This decision is in line with Commerce’s practice of rescinding reviews where no reviewable entries exist, maintaining compliance with regulatory standards. The process ensures that antidumping duties continue to serve their purpose of providing fair competition and avoiding the harm caused by unfair pricing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duty on Melamine from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duty on melamine coming from China. This is because removing the duty could lead to more unfair pricing practices. Melamine is a type of chemical used in making many products, such as laminates, adhesives, and dinnerware. The U.S. has been checking the pricing practices related to melamine from China to make sure they are fair. The decision from the Department of Commerce happened after a review that started on June 1, 2026. This review is called a sunset review. In this review, the Department looks into whether taking away the duty would cause dumping to start again. Dumping is when a country sells a product cheaper in another country than in its own. The Department found that if the antidumping duty were removed, it could lead to dumping again. This means the U.S. believes that without the duty, China might sell melamine at unfairly low prices. A company called Cornerstone Chemical Company was involved in the review. They make melamine in the U.S. and showed interest in keeping the duty. In the review, the U.S. International Trade Commission was also informed about the decision. This is another way of making sure that everyone is aware of the pricing practices. The final decision shows that the U.S. plans to keep a check on melamine coming from China. The goal is to stop unfair trade practices and make sure U.S. companies can compete fairly. Because of the review, a dumping margin of up to 363.31 percent might apply. A dumping margin is a kind of tax rate on imported goods that are being dumped. This decision is important to U.S. companies that make melamine. It helps them to make and sell their products without facing unfair competition from imports. This careful approach supports fair trade practices and ensures the U.S. market remains competitive and fair for all producers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce to Maintain Antidumping Duties on Methionine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, has announced the final results of the expedited first sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on methionine from France, Japan, and Spain. This determination follows a review process carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930 and its later amendments. The Commerce Department concluded that ending the antidumping duty orders would likely result in continued or new instances of dumping. Dumping is when a product is sold in the U.S. at less than its fair value. The antidumping orders were put in place to protect U.S. industries by imposing duties on the imported methionine that is sold at unfairly low prices. The antidumping duty orders for methionine, which is an important animal feed supplement, were originally published on July 13, 2021, for France, and on September 14, 2021, for Japan and Spain. These orders were set to expire but were reviewed as part of the sunset review process. This process helps determine whether there is a likelihood of dumping continuing or recurring if the orders were revoked. The review began on June 1, 2026, after the publication of the initiation notice. Novus International, a U.S. company involved in the production of methionine, participated actively in the review. They submitted substantive responses supporting the continuation of the orders. By July 27, 2026, no responses were received from other interested parties, prompting an expedited review by Commerce. The review process led Commerce to determine likely dumping margins if the orders were revoked, with rates of up to 43.82% for France, 76.50% for Japan, and 37.53% for Spain. Commerce’s findings ensure that the antidumping duties will remain in place, thereby continuing to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to dumping. These findings were detailed in a memorandum and a public notice, both accessible through official channels. Overall, this decision reflects the U.S. government’s commitment to defending its markets and industries from unfair trade practices while ensuring that local manufacturers remain competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on Aluminum from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an official inquiry. This inquiry is about aluminum products from China. The inquiry is called a “circumvention inquiry.” It will check if some aluminum products are avoiding certain U.S. rules. These rules are called antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These orders have been in place since 2019. They are for common alloy aluminum sheets from China. Why is This Inquiry Happening? The inquiry was started because of some information found during a previous investigation. This investigation is about aluminum composite panels (ACPs) made by a company in China named Alumetal. These panels are used to build things. They have a special core made from low-density polyethylene (LDPE). They also have aluminum sheets on the outside. The inquiry will determine if these panels are the same as the sheets covered by the AD and CVD orders. What Happens Next? The inquiry officially began on October 2, 2026. During the inquiry, the Commerce Department will look at all the information very carefully. The inquiry has several steps. First, the Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The CBP will make sure any questionable products stay on hold. This way, they will pay extra fees if needed as the inquiry finds more information. The Inquiry Process The inquiry has rules it must follow. It must follow the Tariff Act of 1930 and the rules in 19 CFR 351.226(b). These rules help decide if a product is changed only a little bit to avoid paying fees. The inquiry will look at details like the product’s shape, how people use it, and how it is sold. The Commerce Department aims to make a decision on the inquiry in about 300 days. During this time, the public can access more information about the inquiry on the government’s electronic systems. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is working to ensure fair trade. This inquiry is important as it will determine if certain aluminum products from China are avoiding U.S. trade rules. The detailed and fair inquiry process helps maintain a balanced market for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Changes Rules on Steel Fittings from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3 minutes IntroductionThe U.S. Department of Commerce has made important changes regarding certain steel fittings from China and Vietnam. This change came after a court decision. BackgroundThe U.S. imports many products. Sometimes, they place special rules to make sure imports are fair. One such rule is on steel pipe fittings from China. These are special parts used to join pipes. Court DecisionRecently, the U.S. Court of International Trade said that the previous rule was not right. They decided that unfinished pipe fittings from China, which are then finished in Vietnam, still belong under the same rules as if they were from China. Commerce’s CorrectionDue to the court’s decision, the Department of Commerce changed its rule about these pipe fittings. Previously, there was confusion about whether these parts from Vietnam should follow the same rule. Now, they confirmed that these parts are still under the rule. Suspension of LiquidationCommerce also announced a few steps: The government will continue to hold these unfinished pipe fittings to the rule by keeping their import records. There is a new rule for parts not yet checked by the government since September 26, 2022. Parts that entered between November 4, 2021, and September 26, 2022, will also be held and checked. Future ExpectationsThis means anyone importing these parts must follow the new rules. The U.S. will now ensure these imports are handled correctly. The changes are meant to make sure trade is fair and correct. ConclusionThe Department of Commerce wants everyone to follow the rules correctly. By working with the Court’s decision, they aim to keep trade fair and balanced. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Duties on Chinese Melamine Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue duties on melamine from China. This is to prevent harmful economic effects. Revoking these duties could lead to unfair subsidies. The order adds extra costs to melamine from China entering the U.S. It aims to protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing. Background and Review The initial order was made in 2015. After reviewing in 2021, the order was kept. A second review began in June 2026. Cornerstone Chemical Company, a U.S. maker of melamine, supported keeping the order. They believe the duties help them compete fairly. China gave no input or response during this review. This led the Commerce Department to conduct a fast-track review. Results of the Review The Commerce Department decided that removing the order would likely lead to subsidies from China resuming. These subsidies make it unfair for U.S. companies to compete. The order will remain, with specific rates applied to Chinese companies: Far-Reaching Chemical Co., Ltd.: 154.00% M and A Chemicals Corp China: 154.00% Qingdao Unichem International Trade Co., Ltd.: 154.00% Shandong Liaherd Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.: 156.90% Zhongyuan Dahua Group Co., Ltd.: 154.00% All Others: 154.58% Importance of the Order Melamine is used in various products like laminates and plastics. These duties help U.S. companies like Cornerstone Chemical. They aim to create a level playing field for American products. The decision demonstrates the U.S. commitment to fair trade practices. It hopes to prevent negative impacts on U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. Next Steps The order will continue, and details will be monitored. Companies must comply with regulations to avoid penalties. This decision by the Commerce Department is part of broader trade strategies. It aims to support domestic industries and fair international competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Foil from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final results on the countervailing duty review of certain aluminum foil from the Republic of Türkiye. This review was conducted during the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. According to the findings, producers and exporters of aluminum foil in Türkiye received subsidies. The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance wing of the International Trade Administration, which is a part of the Department of Commerce. It was noted that countervailable subsidies, which are financial aids given to local companies, were provided by the Turkish government to certain aluminum foil producers and exporters. The review began with preliminary results published earlier this year, on May 6, 2026. Following comments and further analysis, the final results were released on October 2, 2026. The companies under review include Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Panda Aluminyum A.S. They received countervailable subsidy rates of 2.65% and 3.82% respectively. The merchandise in question falls under the countervailing duty order issued on November 12, 2021. This order aims to regulate how much financial benefit companies can get from their government. For the companies reviewed, the Department of Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle future cash deposits for duties on affected imports. The rates applicable are based on the results of this review. For those not reviewed, they will follow previously established rates. Everyone involved in these reviews had a chance to comment. These comments were addressed in the final document. It is important for those bound by an administrative protective order to handle the information carefully and follow specific guidelines. This decision helps maintain fair trading practices by ensuring that U.S. industries aren’t harmed by unfair subsidies elsewhere. For more information, you can access the full document and results online via platforms provided by the government. This announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on September 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds PET Film Sales from Taiwan Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings concerning the sale of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film from Taiwan. This review was carried out by the International Trade Administration, a division of the Department of Commerce. It examined sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Key Findings: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation: The Department of Commerce determined that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation was selling PET film at less than normal value. Therefore, a weighted-average dumping margin of 3.95 percent has been preliminarily imposed on Nan Ya. Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC) / Shinkong Synthetic Fiber Corporation (SSFC): This entity did not have any reviewable entries of PET film during the period of review. Consequently, the agency plans to rescind this part of the review. The initial data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection supported this finding. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce is inviting comments from interested parties on these preliminary results. Any comments must be submitted seven calendar days after the notice’s publication. Rebuttal comments are also welcome and should be filed within seven days after the comments’ submission. Disclosure: The Department plans to disclose its calculation methods to interested parties. This will occur within five days following the public announcement or the notice’s publication. Assessment Rates: If the preliminary results are finalized without changes, Nan Ya will face an antidumping duty rate of 3.95 percent. For other producers/exporters not previously reviewed or investigated, the cash deposit rate will remain at 2.40 percent unless otherwise specified. These rates will apply to entries made on or after the publication date of the final results. Public Comment and Hearing: Interested parties may submit written comments or request a hearing. Any hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days of this notice’s publication. The hearing will focus on issues raised in written comments. This careful examination and the prospect of duties aim to ensure fair trade practices between countries, maintaining the integrity of U.S. markets. All interested parties are advised to comply with the established timelines and procedures for comments and hearings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Preliminary Determination on Truck Bed Covers from China Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision regarding truck bed covers imported from the People’s Republic of China. The decision found that these items are being sold in the United States for less than what it costs to make them, also known as “less than fair value.” Background and Timeline The investigation started on March 20, 2026. On July 14, 2026, the Department of Commerce decided to extend the time it would take to make their preliminary decision. As of September 23, 2026, this preliminary determination has now been made. Investigation Details The investigation looks at truck bed covers from China sold between July 1, 2025, and December 31, 2025. Truck bed covers are used to protect and cover the cargo area of a pickup truck. The covers can be made of various materials like aluminum, steel, fiberglass, and even water-resistant fabric. Affected Parties There are a few companies in China that are being examined. These companies have been found to sell their truck bed covers in the U.S. at lower prices than it costs to make them. Hangzhou Golden Sun Autoparts Co., Ltd. Wenzhou Tianmao Automobile Parts Co., LTD More companies also listed in the official investigation document. Key Findings The investigation finds the dumping margins, which is how much less they are selling the products for compared to their normal value. For instance, Hangzhou Golden Sun Autoparts Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 51.35%. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will now send these findings to another U.S. agency, the International Trade Commission. This agency will decide if these imports harm U.S. businesses. If they agree, more rules might be placed on these imports, like extra taxes. Hearing Requests People or companies interested in having a say about this can ask for a hearing. They need to make a request within 30 days of the announcement. Postponement and Provisional Measures The companies involved have asked to postpone the final decision, which means it will take up to 135 days for a final determination to be made. In the meantime, the companies may have to adjust their prices or face more duties. This situation is being closely watched by U.S. businesses and importers who might be affected by these preliminary determinations and any final decisions that will follow. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Air Compressors from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On October 1, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary determination that air compressors from Vietnam have received unfair subsidies from the Vietnamese government. This decision is part of an investigation into countervailing duties (CVD) on imports from Vietnam. Background The investigation started on May 27, 2026. The examined period is between January 1 and December 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce suspects that air compressors from Vietnam are benefiting from subsidies that harm U.S. manufacturers. This investigation comes under the Tariff Act of 1930. Details of Investigation The products investigated are stationary and portable air compressors. These include various models powered by electricity, gasoline, or batteries, with tanks ranging from 1 to 80 gallons. The Department focused on certain reciprocating air compressors. Findings So far, the Department of Commerce sees evidence that some Vietnamese companies are receiving subsidies. These include financial assistance from government authorities, which creates an unfair advantage. Commerce has made two significant findings: Hybest-Vietnam, Limited Liability Company has a de minimis subsidy rate, meaning it is too insignificant to countervail. Other companies, like Hongkong Sun Rise Trading Limited, face preliminary CVD rates due to uncooperative behavior in providing requested information. Preliminary Duty Rates The Commerce Department has assigned preliminary subsidy rates to different companies. Most have a rate of 74.39 percent, but Hybest-Vietnam’s rate is only 0.35 percent. The “all others” rate is set at 37.20 percent. Actions and Next Steps As a result, most Vietnamese air compressors will need to pay a cash deposit equal to the subsidy rates when entering the U.S. This is to ensure U.S. companies have a fair competition field. The Department will investigate further to confirm these findings. The final determination of the investigation is aligned with the related antidumping investigation. Commerce expects to finalize the results by February 10, 2027. Invitation for Comments The Department invites comments from interested parties. These comments must be submitted before the final determination to be considered. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also review these findings. They must decide if these subsidies harm U.S. companies. If affirmed, the duties will continue to be imposed on Vietnamese air compressors. Conclusion This investigation highlights the effort to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from foreign government assistance that unfairly skews competition. The Commerce Department, by examining subsidy practices, aims to maintain a level playing field for domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Chinese Companies Receive Illegal Help Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On October 1, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce made a big announcement. They think that Chinese companies that make air compressors are getting unfair help from their government. Air compressors are machines that push out air, and they can be used for different things. The Department of Commerce has been checking this since May 27, 2026. They found that two Chinese companies took money or special deals that break U.S. trade rules. They believe that these companies did not follow the rules on purpose. There is still time for more people to talk about this. The Department of Commerce will listen to what others have to say. They plan to make a final decision on February 10, 2027. Right now, the U.S. government will start charging these Chinese companies when they bring their air compressors into the United States. They will also tell the U.S. International Trade Commission what they found. This group will decide if what China did can hurt businesses in the United States. Until then, the Department of Commerce will keep looking into this very carefully. They want to be sure about their final decision. People and companies can still send their thoughts and comments to help the investigation. This is a big deal because it means the U.S. is taking action. They want to make sure everything is fair for companies that make air compressors in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Malaysian Air Compressors Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about air compressors coming from Malaysia. It has found that some Malaysian companies are receiving government help, known as subsidies, for making and selling these products. What’s Happening? The government support is for products called stationary and portable air compressors. These compressors are machines that create and move air for different purposes. The investigation looked into the time period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. Key Players Some companies named in the report include Alton Intelligent Technology Sdn. Bhd, Panasonic Industrial Device Sales, and Puma Air Compressors. They are found to be receiving these subsidies. Why Is This Important? The Department of Commerce checks to make sure that companies do not sell products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Subsidies can make products cheaper when they enter the U.S., which can hurt American companies. What Will Happen Next? As a result of their findings, the Department has made a move to stop the products from being sold without special checks. They will require that a cash deposit equal to the estimated subsidy rate must be paid. This is like a financial guarantee that ensures everything is fair. Checking the Details The Commerce Department said that they found out the Malaysian companies did not completely cooperate with their investigation. This led them to use specific methods to decide on the subsidy rates. What’s the Subsidy Rate? They set the subsidy rate at 92.86% for the involved companies and all others. This means almost the entire price of the product might be covered by subsidies from the Malaysian government. Next Steps for U.S. Government The U.S. International Trade Commission will look at this matter further. Its job is to decide if these imports harm American industries. This decision is scheduled to happen by February 2027. What about the Future? After this preliminary decision, there might be comments and discussions from different groups. Interested parties are allowed to provide input, which the Commerce Department will consider before making a final decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce: Final Results of Review on Superabsorbent Polymers from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes Department of Commerce: Final Results of Review on Superabsorbent Polymers from Korea The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on Certain Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP) from the Republic of Korea. This review covered the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. The Commerce Department has determined that the SAP from Korea was not sold in the United States at less than the normal value. Specifically, the company reviewed, LG Chem, Ltd. (LGC), did not sell its SAP at unfair prices during this period. Therefore, there will be no antidumping duties applied to LGC’s SAP entries during this review period. Background and Process In May 2026, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the review. Stakeholders were invited to comment, but no feedback was received. The final decision remains unchanged from the preliminary findings. The administrative review ensured that imports from Korea complied fully with U.S. trade laws. The Department followed procedures outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930. Disclosure and Assessment Rates Since there were no changes from the preliminary results, the Department of Commerce will not release new calculation details. For entries made by LGC, customs will liquidate them without any duty because the final dumping margin is 0.00%. Cash Deposit Requirements The cash deposit rate for LG Chem, Ltd. will now be zero percent for future shipments. For companies not part of this review, the last determined rates will apply. If neither the exporter nor the producer was covered in past reviews, a rate of 26.05% would apply. Responsibilities and Reminders Importers must file certificates regarding antidumping duty reimbursements before the completion of the review process. The failure to file may result in penalties. Parties involved with confidential data in this review are reminded to return or destroy sensitive information according to the guidelines. These results are public and will be published in accordance with U.S. trade laws. This notice emphasizes the Department’s commitment to fair trade and its vigilance in monitoring compliance with trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Turkish Pipe Sold for Less Than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its review of large diameter welded pipe from Türkiye. It discovered that the pipe sold in the U.S. between May 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, was priced lower than normal. Elizabeth Beuley, from the Commerce Department, provided details. The review was part of the antidumping duty to check if products are sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The review showed that HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and another company, Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd, were selling the pipes at reduced prices. Both companies had a dumping margin of 1.89 percent. Usually, the Commerce Department shows how they calculate these results. But this time, no changes were made from a previous review, so there are no new calculations to show. Once the results are published, new cash deposit rates will start. These rates will apply to new shipments of the pipe from Türkiye. This decision is to make sure all companies play fair and help U.S. businesses compete equally. The Commerce Department will continue to review these cases to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Indian Freight Rail Couplers Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its investigation and has announced a final decision regarding subsidies for freight rail couplers and parts from India. The investigation covered the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Key Details from the Investigation The investigation found that producers and exporters of freight rail couplers from India received countervailable subsidies. This means that the government of India provided financial help to these companies, giving them an advantage in exporting these products. The U.S. Department of Commerce, also known as Commerce, worked on this case following a preliminary decision released on March 3, 2026. At that time, interested parties were given a chance to comment. The final decision was driven by detailed analysis and responses received during the verification process. Subsidy Rates Determined For the Indian company, Kharagpur Metal Reforming Industries Pvt Ltd, or KMRI, the determined subsidy rate is 9.71%. Another company, Texmaco Rail and Engineering Limited, received a much higher subsidy rate of 75%, based entirely on the information available because they did not fully cooperate with the investigation. Similarly, Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd and Jupiter Wagons Ltd were given a 75% rate. Other producers and exporters not specifically investigated received the same rate as KMRI, 9.71%. Next Steps and Potential Outcomes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is now involved. They will decide if the imported couplers from India are hurting the U.S. industry. If the ITC agrees that the U.S. industry is harmed, this means that companies importing such items will have to pay duties. On the other hand, if the ITC finds no harm, the investigation will end without such duties. Suspension of Liquidation Following the preliminary decision, Commerce had instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect deposits and stop liquidation of the items involved. This began on March 3, 2026. On July 1, 2026, provisional measures were no longer in effect, so they stopped the suspension but will resume if the ITC finds harm. This ensures that duties may be applied in the event of a final affirmative injury determination. Conclusion The Department of Commerce has taken a keen interest in ensuring fair trade practices are followed. The decision in this investigation emphasizes the importance of compliance and cooperation by international trade partners. This complex investigation reflects Commerce’s ongoing efforts to uphold fair trade and protect domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Decision on Korean Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Period of Review The review covered sales from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Findings The Department determined that OCTG from Korea were sold in the United States at less than their normal value during this period. This means that certain Korean sellers were selling these products at lower prices in the U.S. than in Korea. Key Companies Involved The review specifically examined two companies: NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. Their respective weighted-average dumping margins were calculated as follows: NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.: 29.94% SeAH Steel Corporation: 9.80% For other companies not individually examined, a simple average margin of 19.87% was applied. Process Details The U.S. Department of Commerce relied on several methodologies to determine these figures. They used U.S. benchmark prices for market adjustments and calculated constructed value (CV) profits and selling expenses for the companies involved. Impact on Duties As a result of these findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess antidumping duties accordingly. The CBP will follow specific instructions to apply these duties based on the determined margins. Cash Deposit Rates The Department set new cash deposit requirements for subject merchandise shipped on or after the publication date of these results. The cash deposit rate will be based on the dumping margin established in this review. Next Steps The Department will disclose the final calculations within five days of the publication of these results. There is a possibility for companies to challenge this decision in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which could delay the assessment procedures. This announcement serves as a reminder for importers to file necessary documents regarding any reimbursement of antidumping duties. Compliance is essential to avoid additional charges. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to monitor and enforce trade laws to ensure fair competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies from China on Tris Exporters Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding subsidies on a chemical product known as Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, or simply Tris, from the People’s Republic of China. This determination was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 184, on September 24, 2026. Tris is a chemical used in various applications, including pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. The investigation covers the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. According to the Department of Commerce, some producers and exporters from China are receiving government subsidies that affect the U.S. market. The case was initiated as part of an effort to determine whether Chinese producers of Tris are receiving unfair financial support from their government. Such subsidies can make it difficult for U.S. producers to compete. The Department of Commerce postponed the preliminary determination, which was initially scheduled earlier, and shifted the date to September 18, 2026. The purpose of the delay was to conduct a thorough analysis and gather more evidence. In its investigation, the Department found that subsidies were indeed provided by the Chinese government to certain producers and exporters. One such company, Changzhou Peicheng Imp. & Exp. Co., was found to be benefiting from these subsidies. As a result, this company was given a rate based on adverse facts available, which is the highest rate determined in the investigation. Conversely, another firm, Suzhou Yacoo Science Co., Ltd., received a much lower subsidy rate compared to Changzhou Peicheng. The rate for “all others,” meaning companies not individually reviewed, is the same as the rate for Suzhou Yacoo. The investigation also considered the aspect of critical circumstances. This refers to the possibility of a surge in imports causing harm to local industries. The Department determined that such critical circumstances exist for Changzhou Peicheng but do not apply to Suzhou Yacoo and other companies. The final results of this investigation will be aligned with another investigation on antidumping measures, which is scheduled for February 1, 2027. The U.S. International Trade Commission will also be involved to determine if these imports are causing material injury to U.S. industry. In the meantime, the U.S. government has instructed customs officials to suspend the liquidation of Tris entries and hold them until a final decision is made. This means that imports of Tris from China will have extra checks and will require deposits to be made based on the preliminary subsidy rates. The U.S. government maintains transparency in these investigations by offering opportunities for public comment and holding hearings. This ensures that all stakeholders, including affected businesses and the general public, can be heard. The case represents the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Tapered Roller Bearings from China Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its review of trade duties on tapered roller bearings from China. This review looked at imports from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The review covered only one company called Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai). In this review, the Department decided that Tainai did not qualify for a “separate rate.” This means Tainai is treated as part of the larger group of Chinese companies, known as the “China-wide entity.” The rate for this group is 92.84%. Commerce first shared their initial findings on this matter on May 15, 2026. No one commented on these results. As a result, the final decision is the same as the preliminary one. The Department of Commerce will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply duties based on the China-wide rate. The public can expect these instructions to be shared in about 35 days. If there is a legal challenge, this process might take longer. New cash deposit rules will start once these final results are made public. These rules will affect shipments of the subject merchandise from China. If a Chinese company has a separate rate, that rate will remain the same. If not, the cash deposit will follow the China-wide rate of 92.84%. Importers must file a certificate to show they haven’t been reimbursed for these duties. This is based on the law, to avoid any penalties of double duties. The Department reminds everyone about handling business information responsibly. If anyone has protection under administrative protective orders, they should handle and return items as needed. These actions follow the sections of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are a routine part of trade law enforcement. The news reflects Commerce’s ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade and compliance with trade regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Review on Antidumping Duties of Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has finalized their review of antidumping duties on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period of September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Commerce has determined that these products were not sold at prices below their normal value during this time. This review involved two main companies: HiSteel Co., Ltd. and Dong-A-Steel Co., Ltd. Additional information was provided by Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. Commerce found that both HiSteel and Dong-A-Steel had no dumping margins, meaning their margins were zero percent. As a result, Kukje Steel, which was not individually reviewed, also received a rate of zero percent. For those not individually reviewed, Commerce used the same method as in previous cases. This means the rates for companies not selected for detailed review were calculated based on the zero margins of the reviewed companies, resulting in no dumping duties for these companies as well. Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how to assess duties. Since HiSteel and Dong-A-Steel had zero dumping margins and reported the value of their U.S. sales, CBP will not charge any antidumping duties on these entries. The report also mentions that Commerce extended deadlines during their review process. They initially extended the deadline by 53 days to September 9, 2026, and then extended it again by 7 days to September 16, 2026. New cash deposit requirements will be in place following the review’s publication. The cash deposit rate for companies reviewed will be zero percent. For other companies, the rate will follow past review results or remain at the standard rate if there’s no current data. Commerce highlights the responsibility of importers to file certificates concerning antidumping duty reimbursements properly. This ensures no issues with duties on future entries. The details and analysis of the review are outlined in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available publicly through the Commerce’s electronic system. Overall, the review concluded with no evidence of dumping by the main companies reviewed, and as such, there will be no new antidumping duties applied to affected imports from Korea. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Findings on Copper Pipe Imports from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings regarding the import of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico. This review covers sales made during the period from November 1, 2024, to October 31, 2025. Findings on Nacional de Cobre The review finds that Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Cobre) sold copper pipe and tube in the U.S. at prices below their normal value. This practice is often referred to as “dumping,” as it can harm domestic manufacturers by undercutting prices. As a result, a preliminary antidumping duty margin of 56.43% has been determined for Cobre. Partial Rescission The review has been partially rescinded for two companies: GD Affiliates S. De R. L. de C.V. (Golden Dragon) and IUSA, S.A. de C.V. (IUSA). This means that these two companies are no longer subject to this particular review process. The decision to rescind the review for these companies comes after domestic interested parties withdrew their requests for review. Methodology Used The U.S. Department of Commerce relied on facts available to determine Cobre’s dumping margin since Cobre failed to provide necessary information. The Department also applied an adverse inference, which means they assumed less favorable facts due to Cobre’s lack of cooperation in providing information. Public Comment Invitation Interested parties are invited to submit comments on these preliminary results. The deadlines for these comments are strictly set: case briefs must be submitted within 14 days of the notice’s publication, and rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Any party wishing for a hearing must request it within 14 days. Future Implications For Cobre, the determined antidumping margin will affect all shipments made on or after the final results of this review are published. The calculated deposit rates will apply to future entries until there are further changes. Conclusion This announcement from the Department of Commerce indicates serious actions against certain imports of copper pipes and tubes from Mexico, notably impacting Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. The final results of this administrative review will provide clearer directions and any adjustments on duties applied. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chinese Tin Mill Products Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released a preliminary report indicating that tin mill products from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the United States at prices below fair value. This decision is crucial as it affects the pricing and competition standards within the U.S. market. Timeframe and Investigation Details The period of investigation for this case includes transactions between October 1, 2025, and March 31, 2026. The Department of Commerce urges interested parties to provide comments on this preliminary determination, to help ensure a fair and thorough analysis. Products Under Investigation The inquiry centers around tin mill products, which are flat-rolled steel products coated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides. These products include tinplate and tin-free steel, essential materials in packaging and manufacturing industries. Scope Adjustments The investigation has undergone scope modifications based on feedback. Certain steel tapes used specifically in telecommunications are excluded from the inquiry due to their specialized nature. Determinations Made Dumping Margin: The estimated average dumping margin for the Chinese entities is set at 136.52%. Critical Circumstances: The investigation found that imports from China might have caused injury to the U.S. domestic industry. Because of this, imports of these products that entered the U.S. around three months before this notice may be subjected to backdated duties. Suspension and Cash Deposit Requirements From the date this notice is published, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend the liquidation of entries and require cash deposits equal to the identified dumping margin. These cash deposits could adjust based on future reviews or findings, especially related to subsidies. Next Steps and Public Participation Further assessments and comments are welcomed, which may influence the final determination due in approximately 75 days. Interested parties are encouraged to participate actively by reviewing detailed methodologies and submitting feedback. This preliminary ruling by the U.S. Department of Commerce is a significant move to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from potential injury due to unfair trade practices. It reflects the ongoing efforts to maintain a balanced international trade environment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Determines Dalmine Sold Tubing Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Findings of the Review The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review concerning certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel from Italy. The review focused on the activities of the company Dalmine S.p.A. during the period extending from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Commerce found that Dalmine sold the tubing in the United States at prices lower than the normal value. This determination was made under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The findings align with the preliminary results released earlier by Commerce on May 14, 2026. Antidumping Duty Determination Dalmine was assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 68.95 percent. This margin was calculated using adverse facts available, a measure applied due to lack of necessary information provided by the company. Assessment and Cash Deposits Commerce decided that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess antidumping duties according to these final results. A specific rate of 68.95 percent will be applied to all entries of Dalmine’s tubing during the review period. For future shipments, a cash deposit rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin is required for Dalmine’s merchandise. This rate will take effect upon publication and remain until further notice. Other Producers and Exporters In the absence of specific producer or exporter information for other companies during this review, Commerce will continue using rates from previously completed reviews. These include a default “all-others” rate set at 47.87 percent ad valorem. Compliance and Notices Importers must file a certificate concerning the reimbursement of duties prior to the liquidation of entries. Non-compliance could lead to the assumption of duty reimbursement and further assessments. This notice reaffirms the responsibilities of parties holding sensitive information under an Administrative Protective Order, ensuring proper handling and disposition. Commerce remains committed to thorough assessments to enforce fair trade laws, maintaining an equitable trading environment for U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping in Solar Products from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final results concerning the sale of crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, or solar products, from Taiwan. The findings come from an administrative review for the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The review checked if these products were sold in the United States at prices below what they cost normally. During this time, a company called EEPV Corp. was examined closely. The Department of Commerce found that EEPV Corp. did not sell their solar products at unfairly low prices. This means that EEPV did not dump products during the review period. As a result, their dumping margin, which shows unfair pricing, was found to be 0.00 percent. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection not to charge extra duties on these imports from EEPV. This is because their pricing did not break any rules. Instead, these entries will be processed like regular imports. For companies not covered under this review period, usual rules and duties still apply. If products were from a producer or exporter not previously examined, standard rates might be used. The Department of Commerce is quite clear about the next steps. They plan to issue instructions for processing imports. These directions will be given to Customs in around 35 days, provided no legal challenges arise. Cash deposit rules will also change. For EEPV, future shipments will not need extra deposits for now. But if a producer is not covered in the review, the previous rates will still apply. This decision is important for importers. They must be careful to follow rules about filing certificates. These documents say they haven’t been refunded antidumping duties. If they don’t, they could face double duties. In short, the Department of Commerce’s findings show EEPV’s fair pricing during the review year, which affects how their products will be treated when entering the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Amends Antidumping Duty on Korean Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a crucial decision about wind towers from Korea. This decision was not in agreement with the previous results from the U.S. Department of Commerce. The decision affects the antidumping duty review for the period from August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. The Department of Commerce is now changing the results of that review. Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd., a company from Korea, had to change how its dumping margin was calculated. The Court of International Trade agreed with the new calculations for Dongkuk’s costs. This means the final dumping margin for Dongkuk is now slightly lowered. From a former rate of 1.95%, the new dumping margin is now 1.90%. Even though the dumping margin has changed, Dongkuk won’t see a change in its current cash deposit rate. This is because there have been newer results since the 2021-2022 review. Currently, the liquidation of Dongkuk’s entries is on hold by order of the court. If this decision is not appealed, or the appeal favors the court’s decision, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs to assess antidumping duties accordingly. This decision is an important update in the ongoing monitoring and regulation of international trade duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Trade Regulations on L-Lysine from China: Import Duties Announced Estimated reading time: 4-5 minutes Background On July 23, 2026, Commerce announced its final decision that L-lysine from China was being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. Additionally, it was determined that Chinese producers received unfair subsidies for L-lysine production. The ITC later confirmed that these imports have harmed U.S. industries. Scope of the Orders The orders cover animal feed grade L-lysine. This includes various forms like lysine HCL, lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. The products may also be mixed with other substances but only the lysine component is covered by the orders. Antidumping Duty Order Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on relevant L-lysine entries from China. These duties apply to products entered on or after March 6, 2026, when initial determinations were published. A cash deposit reflecting the estimated dumping margins must be made for future imports. Key Details Different producers and exporters are assigned specific dumping margins, with some based on adverse facts available, which means higher penalty rates apply due to lack of cooperation from some organizations. Countervailing Duty Order Similarly, the CVD order results from findings that Chinese producers benefit from unfair subsidies. Duties are now assessed on products entered on or after January 22, 2026. Like the AD order, unliquidated entries before the ITC’s final determinations will escape these duties. Maintaining Compliance Importers should ensure compliance with these new measures to avoid penalties. The orders are part of efforts to level the playing field for U.S. producers by countering unfair trade practices. While these orders aim to help U.S. industries, they highlight ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Importers should stay informed about such regulations to navigate the complex international trade landscape effectively. For more specific details like estimated weighted-average dumping margins or subsidy rates, refer to the Federal Register notice on these orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China Under Review for Dumping in U.S. Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is checking if some chemicals from China were sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. These chemicals, called chlorinated isocyanurates, are used mainly for cleaning purposes like in swimming pools. The review period is from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Commerce is looking into the sales of these chemicals by three Chinese companies: Achlor Chemical Ltd., Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd., and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. The review is part of an ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from low-priced imports that could hurt local businesses. However, Commerce found that Achlor Chemical Ltd. did not have any sales entries of these chemicals during the review period and decided not to include them in the current review. This leaves Heze Huayi and Kangtai as the only companies being reviewed for selling these chemicals at less than normal value. In the past, the China-wide rate for these chemicals was set at 285.63 percent. Since no one requested a fresh review of this overall rate, it remains unchanged in this evaluation. Commerce will be checking if Heze Huayi and Kangtai deserve a different rate based on their current sales activities. Preliminary results show that Heze Huayi has a dumping margin of 90.65 percent, while Kangtai has a margin of 72.63 percent. Businesses and other interested parties can send their comments to the Commerce department. They can also ask for a hearing if needed. All comments must be submitted electronically. Commerce aims to finish the review by the end of the year and expects to make the final results available 120 days after the current review’s publication date. Until then, the cash deposit rates for these companies will stay as decided in the final results of this review. Conclusion This review matters because it helps maintain fair pricing of imported goods and supports local industries. It also ensures that companies pay the correct duties when bringing products into the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Final Results on Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final results regarding the antidumping duty review of sodium nitrite imports from India. This review covered the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance division. Their findings show certain Indian producers and exporters sold sodium nitrite in the United States at prices less than normal value during this time. Key Outcomes: Deepak Nitrite Limited, an Indian producer, has been assigned a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd and Kutch Chemical Industries Ltd face a dumping margin of 42.76 percent. The review also included a decision to rescind the administrative review for non-examined companies, Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. This decision was based on the absence of suspended entries during the review period. Cash Deposit Requirements: The cash deposit rate for goods from companies reviewed is based on these results. Companies not reviewed will continue under their last known rate. For exports where the producer is covered but the exporter is not, the producer’s rate will apply. The all-others rate remains at 42.76 percent. Upcoming Actions: The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on applicable entries. These instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the announcement date. The report also reminds importers about their duty to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties. This compliance is important to avoid penalties. The review has been completed without any changes or revisions to the preliminary findings. The Commerce Department follows a set process for reviewing antidumping actions, and this review was conducted in line with those guidelines. The findings are official and published according to the regulations of the Trade Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Solar Cells from Indonesia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has concluded that crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Indonesia are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The final determination includes the period of investigation from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Background and Investigation Process The process began earlier this year in April when Commerce invited comments on its preliminary findings. By May, revisions and extensions were made to ensure accurate results. This comprehensive investigation led to a final determination by September 10, 2026. For gathering information, Commerce conducted a thorough verification of the records from PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. They examined relevant sales and costs. However, PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia did not provide required information, which resulted in Commerce using adverse facts available against them. Critical Circumstances Commerce has also determined that there are critical circumstances associated with the import of these solar cells from Indonesia. This finding suggests that significant injury was caused or threatened to the domestic industry due to sudden large volumes of imports. Application of Adverse Facts Available Due to the lack of cooperation from companies like Blue Sky, as well as the deficiency in complete information from REC Solar, Commerce determined the use of facts available with adverse inferences (AFA). Both companies have been assigned a high dumping margin as a result. Dumping Margins and All-Others Rate The estimated dumping margins for both PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia are 94.36 percent each. This rate is based on adverse facts available. The same rate applies to all other producers and exporters. Implications and Next Steps The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend liquidation of these products at specified rates pending further instructions. This ensures compliance until a final antidumping order is issued, provided the U.S. International Trade Commission confirms the material injury. Scope of Investigation The investigation covers specific solar cells and modules from Indonesia. It includes solar cells of particular thickness and characteristics. Products like thin film photovoltaic cells and small integrated cells in consumer products are excluded. Commerce’s detailed examination of this case aims to protect the domestic industry from unfair trading practices by ensuring solar cells are sold at fair value in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies in Indonesian Solar Products Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a key decision concerning solar products from Indonesia. On September 16, 2026, the department made a final affirmative determination related to countervailable subsidies. This decision is aimed at crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. These are solar cells made from crystals and might be assembled into modules or panels. The investigation covered products from Indonesia for the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department believes that producers in Indonesia received help from their government to manufacture these solar products. This is called a subsidy. Sometimes, subsidies can lead to unfair pricing when these products are sold in other countries, including the U.S. Scope and Products Covered The product in question includes solar cells and modules, whether assembled or not. They help generate electricity from sunlight. However, it does not cover thin film products made from certain materials like amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS). It also excludes small cells in consumer goods, some small panels, and modules made elsewhere. The Commerce Department assessed various subsidy programs in Indonesia. They looked at evidence from different parties. The department also visited Indonesian companies like PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. This helped verify the information collected. Findings and Rates The investigation led to different subsidy rates for Indonesian companies. PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia faced a rate of 173.70%, which was based on facts available since complete data was not provided. Meanwhile, PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia was given a lower rate of 73.20%. This latter rate also applies to other Indonesian producers. Commerce also examined if these subsidies began affecting the U.S. sooner. They found “critical circumstances,” meaning imports surged, causing harm to U.S. businesses before the official investigation. This conclusion applies to Blue Sky but not to REC Solar. Next Steps The Commerce Department has asked the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to see if these subsidized imports harm U.S. industries. If the ITC confirms this, the Department will order duties on these imports. This means extra charges on these solar products when they come into the U.S. This decision can lead to changes in how solar cells are imported and traded. It aims to ensure fair competition for U.S. companies. Keep watching as this investigation wraps up and further decisions are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Decides on Solar Cells from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision about solar cells from Laos. They say that these solar cells are being sold in the U.S. at prices that are too low. They also think some imports from Laos might hurt American businesses. The time they looked at for their investigation was from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. This decision was made final on September 16, 2026. Solar cells are devices that turn sunlight into electricity. The ones from Laos were investigated to see if they are priced less than they should be. Investigation Background The investigation began when Commerce published a preliminary decision in April 2026. They asked people to give comments about the decision. By September 10, 2026, they had to make a final decision. The decision includes how much lower the prices of these solar cells are compared to fair value. Commerce also looked at whether there were unusual price drops that needed attention. Companies Involved The main company in Laos that was looked at is Solarspace Technology (Laos). Another company, SolarSpace Technology (Hong Kong), is considered the same as Solarspace for this investigation. There are other companies involved too, like JA Solar and Trina Solar from Vietnam and Thailand. Critical Circumstances The decision also talks about “critical circumstances.” This means that certain imports from Laos could cause quick and severe harm to U.S. industries. For most companies, they found these circumstances to be true, but not for Solarspace. Separate Companies Not all companies are treated the same. Some companies got their own special rates because they showed they are separate from the larger group. Final Decision The U.S. Department of Commerce decided on the following points: The solar cells from Laos are priced too low in the U.S. Some companies have special rates for their exports. Solarspace and SolarSpace (Hong Kong) are treated as one company. The overall weighted average dumping margin is set at 65.43%. Next Steps The U.S. has taken steps to make sure these lower-priced solar cells from Laos don’t hurt U.S. businesses. They have asked the U.S. Customs to keep a close watch on these imports. If the U.S. International Trade Commission also finds that these imports harm U.S. businesses, there will be more taxes on these imports. This is called an “antidumping duty order.” If no harm is found, there will be no extra charges. This investigation is part of making sure trade is fair and does not harm businesses in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Solar Cells from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes What is Happening? The U.S. Department of Commerce found that some producers and exporters of these solar cells in Laos are receiving subsidies. A subsidy is when a government provides financial support to businesses, which can help make their products cheaper in other countries. The Investigation This investigation looked at activities from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Solar cells from Laos were checked to see if they were receiving benefits from their government that were unfair. Final Results The Department found out that companies like Solarspace Technology in Laos benefited from these subsidies. One company, Vietnam Sunergy, was found to be receiving significant help. Because of this, specific extra charges called countervailing duties will be put on these products when they come into the U.S. Critical Circumstances The announcement also mentioned “critical circumstances.” This term refers to situations where imports might have increased a lot quickly. The Department found that, for some companies, these circumstances applied, and extra duties will apply starting from a date 90 days earlier than when the first decision was made public. Verification and Methodology The decision included looking at documents and checking information during the summer of 2026. This is called verification. The process was thorough to make sure all details were correct. Impact The impact of this decision is that certain products from Laos will now cost more when they enter the United States. This pricing change aims to balance out the extra help Lao companies receive from their government. Further Steps The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if the U.S. industry suffers because of these imports. They will complete this decision within 45 days. Conclusion This significant ruling by the Department of Commerce shows its dedication to ensuring fair competition in the markets. As this process continues, there may be further developments based on the ITC verdict. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Indian Solar Cells Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about certain solar cells from India. These are called crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells. The Department says they were sold in the United States at prices less than their fair value. This happened during the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. What Was Decided? The decision, published on September 16, 2026, means that these solar cells were not priced fairly when sold in the U.S. This decision follows an earlier report from April 28, 2026, where Commerce said it found similar issues. Important Companies Several Indian companies were involved. These include Mundra Solar PV Limited, Mundra Solar Energy Limited, Kowa Company Ltd, and Premier Energies Photovoltaic Private Limited. They were all part of this decision. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce also found something called “critical circumstances.” This means urgent action was needed because of how the solar cells were being sold. This is true for the companies named above. What Happens Next? For these companies, duties will be applied to their products from January 28, 2026. This date is important because it’s before the first report from April 2026. Rates and Duties The companies will have to pay an estimated extra fee of 123.04% on their solar cell exports to the U.S. Other producers and exporters will also have to pay this fee. What About Others? If a company was not investigated but makes these solar cells, it must also pay the extra fee. This ensures that all similar products are treated the same way. Future Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will check if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If they agree, the decisions and fees will become permanent. Conclusion This move by the Department aims to protect U.S. businesses and ensure fair trade. By adjusting the fees, the Department seeks to level the playing field for American companies involved in solar cell production. The next step involves further review by the ITC to ensure U.S. industries are not adversely affected by these imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Reports Affirmative Determination on Solar Cells from India Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The Department of Commerce has concluded its investigation into subsidies for crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, also known as solar cells, from India. It has determined, with finality, that Indian producers and exporters of these solar cells receive unlawful subsidies that benefit and support their production. This investigation covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. In line with U.S. trade laws, the Department of Commerce found that some companies in India, such as Mundra Solar Energy Limited and Mundra Solar PV Limited, receive financial benefits from their government that give them an unfair advantage in the marketplace. These benefits are called countervailable subsidies. The Commerce Department’s findings also identify that critical circumstances exist for these companies. Critical circumstances refer to instances where massive imported quantities of subsidized products can potentially harm U.S. industries before trade measures can take effect. Importantly, the report covers solar cells that are not fully assembled into other products, such as modules and laminates, which were temporarily assembled or partially made. However, the report specifies which goods are not covered. For instance, certain small solar panels permanently integrated into consumer goods which are not primarily for power generation, and some panels used for special applications, are not included. The Commerce Department has ruled that the producers in India will face countervailing duties, which are financial charges on their imported goods. These duties aim to level the playing field by offsetting the unfair financial advantage provided through subsidies. While the investigation notes instances where particular Indian producers and exporters did not cooperate, the department based its findings on facts otherwise available, using adverse presumptions. This means if a company didn’t participate, the Commerce Department assumed the worst-case scenario regarding their subsidy benefits. For other Indian producers not reviewed individually, a general rate of 126.09 percent has been applied, which is calculated following regulatory guidelines. The International Trade Commission (ITC) must now make a decision within 45 days on whether these subsidized imports have harmed or could harm American industries. Should the ITC agree with the affirmative findings, a countervailing duty order will be issued by the Commerce Department. This ensures all imports of the subsidized product will face the same duties, helping protect U.S. jobs and industries. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce finds itself aligned with regulations to foster fair trade, ensuring a level playing field for American companies against unfair foreign advantages. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.