U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Antidumping Duty on Granular PTFE Resin from India Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to an earlier decision about the antidumping duty on Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin (Granular PTFE) from India. This change was made to correct a mistake. The review period is from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. The amended final results are applicable starting April 2, 2026. The mistake was found by Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (GFCL), the main company involved in the review. GFCL said the error was in calculating the U.S. Net price for export price sales. The Department of Commerce agreed with GFCL, saying that an unintentional mistake happened during the calculations. The Department of Commerce has fixed this mistake. Now, the new dumping margin is set at 1.80% for Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited. This percentage shows how much less than the fair value the company has been selling the product in the United States. For all the entries of the product between March 1, 2023, and February 29, 2024, the new margins will be used to calculate antidumping duties. The duties will mainly apply to entries of Granular PTFE that GFCL exported to the United States. The Department will pass instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about these amended rates. If CBP finds any entries with a zero or very small margin, they might not charge any dumping duties. Additionally, new cash deposit requirements are being set up. These deposits need to be made for any future imports of the product. The rates will be based on different situations about who exported the product and when. The new deposit rates are meant to ensure fair competition. Lastly, importers have been reminded that they need to file some paperwork with CBP. This paperwork is about whether they got back any antidumping duties. Not filing it could lead to paying extra duties. This notice also reminds companies about their responsibility to protect secret business information. The decision and changes were made official by Christopher Abbott, who currently serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review of R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has finalized its review for the antidumping duty administrative review of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) imported from the People’s Republic of China. This is based on the sales between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. R-134a, a coolant used in air conditioning, was sold in the U.S. at less than normal value. This decision was announced on April 2, 2026. Commerce conducted this review under Section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. They used detailed information to determine if R-134a was dumped, meaning sold below market value. For the final review results, Commerce identified several Chinese companies involved with the product. These companies include Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Jiangsu Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., and Fujian Qingliu Dongying Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. These firms were treated as a single entity, referred to as Sanmei. This review concluded that the dumping margin for these companies is 173.90 percent. This margin indicates how much cheaper the imported product was sold than its regular market value. Changes were made from preliminary results, impacting margin calculations for Sanmei. Commerce analyzed case comments to ensure accuracy and make necessary adjustments. For companies not reviewed in this period, the rate remains 167.02 percent, unchanged from previous reviews. This rate covers companies not explicitly named but included under the China-wide entity. Importers of R-134a must follow specific procedures. If their sales lead to zero or de minimis (too small for legal concern) margins, they will not face antidumping duties. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about these rates, ensuring correct duty applications. The cash deposit requirements are effective immediately for all R-134a shipments. These requirements help enforce the dumping margin rates. Commerce urges importers to submit a certificate regarding any duty reimbursements. Failure to comply could mean paying double antidumping duties. This case continues to serve as a cautionary tale for international trade, emphasizing the importance of compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Launches Inquiry on Steel Products from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation. This is about certain steel products. These are from the Republic of Korea. The investigation is to see if these steel products are avoiding taxes. These taxes are called antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These taxes are on steel from Korea. Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. asked for this investigation. They think the steel products from Korea are finished in Thailand. Then, these products come to the U.S. This may be avoiding the taxes on Korean steel. Details About the Investigation The investigation started on April 2, 2026. This is called a circumvention inquiry. The Department wants to know if the steel products finished in Thailand are really from Korea. It also wants to know if these products should count under the Korean steel orders. What the Inquiry Will Look For The inquiry will check if the products are finished in another country. They will see if the work done in Thailand is minor. They want to know if the main parts come from Korea. The Department will also look at things like: Investment in Thailand Research and development in Thailand How much of the steel is made in Thailand If the parts from Korea are a big part of the final product’s value They also want to prevent any evasion of the duties. How the Inquiry Will Work The Department will select producers in Thailand. They will use data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Comments on this data should be sent within seven days after the Department places the data on the record. Next Steps and Timing The Department aims to make a preliminary decision in 150 days. A final decision will follow in 300 days. They might stop the inquiry earlier if they find enough information. In conclusion, the Department of Commerce is thorough in its investigation. They want to make sure no one is unfairly avoiding taxes on Korean steel products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Oleoresin Paprika from India Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary decision regarding oleoresin paprika from India. The decision finds that this product has been sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation for this is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce has been studying the sales and pricing to make sure products are not being sold unfairly. Companies in India, such as Mane Kancor and Synthite, have been looked at closely. It was found that their oleoresin paprika is being sold at lower prices than it should be. The department has asked for comments from interested parties on this decision. They have invited anyone with an interest in this matter to give their feedback. A critical circumstances analysis was also done. This looks at whether the imports from India have caused harm to the U.S. market. The department found that there were no critical circumstances, meaning the imports have not caused sudden harm. A detail noted in the determination is that oleoresin paprika, a coloring additive from India, must meet certain criteria to be considered under investigation. This includes having an American Spice Trade Association value of at least 500 or a color unit value of at least 20,000. The estimated dumping margins for these companies are 3.33% for Mane Kancor and 5.66% for Synthite. An all-others rate, which is a weighted-average rate for producers not individually examined, is set at 4.60%. The cash deposit rates for these companies are adjusted based on possible export subsidies identified in a related investigation. For now, the cash deposit rate stands at 0.00% for both Mane Kancor and Synthite. The Department explained that this will remain until further notice. There is a postponement of the final determination. This means a more extended investigation period, and provisional measures have been extended. The final decision is expected to be made no later than 135 days after this preliminary announcement. The U.S. International Trade Commission has been notified and will determine if the imports from India are harmful to the U.S. industry. This decision will affect how the situation moves forward. For more details or to participate in comments or hearings, interested parties should follow the guidance from the Department of Commerce. The investigation shows the U.S. government’s role in ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Subsidies on Steel Rebar from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. They found that producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar, called rebar, from Algeria are receiving unfair subsidies. This is according to a notice published in the Federal Register. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce checked if companies in Algeria got unfair help from their government. They used the rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. If a government gives money or help that benefits a company unfairly, it is called a subsidy. A company named Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA did not participate in the investigation. The Government of Algeria did not give the requested information. So, the U.S. Department made a decision based on the information they had. The subsidies provided to rebar producers in Algeria mean U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect extra duties. The rate of this subsidy is 72.94 percent. This means Algerian rebar companies will pay more to export their goods to the U.S. The “all-others” rate, which applies to other companies not individually examined, will also be 72.94 percent. Before this decision becomes final, another U.S. organization needs to agree. This organization is called the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC checks if the U.S. industry is harmed by imports of rebar from Algeria. If the ITC finds U.S. industry is harmed, the Department of Commerce will issue a countervailing duty order. This will make sure any harmful impact on the U.S. industry is addressed. If the ITC does not find any harm, the investigation ends. The Department of Commerce and the ITC will continue to work together. They aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. If there are changes in this determination, the Department of Commerce will update the Federal Register with any new details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announces Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background Information The Department of Commerce conducts these reviews to examine the need for continued duties on certain imports. If not reviewed, the duties can be removed. The reviews are called “Sunset Reviews” and are essential for protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices. Initiation of Review Initiating the review process means the department will assess if duties should remain on different products. The products under review include items like mattresses from countries such as Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Türkiye, and Vietnam. It also includes various products from China. Commerce and ITC Collaboration The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) collaborates with the Department of Commerce. Both institutions publish notices about these reviews to keep the public informed and involved in the process. Contact Information For further inquiry about these reviews, the public can contact officials at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Their offices are located at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Participation in Reviews Parties interested in participating in these reviews must follow specific procedures. Domestic interested parties should file notices by specific deadlines mentioned in the Federal Register notice. Electronic Submissions For submissions, the department has set electronic filing requirements. Interested parties must follow guidelines on submitting relevant information, ensuring accuracy, and complying with certification formats. More details are available on the Department of Commerce’s website. Conclusion This announcement marks the beginning of an important review process impacting international trade. The sunset reviews will determine the future of duties on specific products, helping maintain fair competition in domestic markets. The public and interested parties are encouraged to participate actively in these reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has received scope ruling applications. These applications ask if certain products are covered by antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The Department will issue scope rulings if necessary. The applications were filed in February 2026. The public is being notified as part of the standard procedure. Two specific applications have been highlighted in this notice: Raw Flexible Magnets from China: The products are educational tools like letter magnets and place value disks. These are produced and exported from China. They were submitted by Adams Magnetic Products Co. on February 12, 2026. Hand Trucks from China: The product in question is a heavy-duty industrial cart. It is made from steel and exported from China. American Lubrication Equipment Corporation submitted the application on February 20, 2026. These applications are available for public access online. If the Department of Commerce has not rejected an application within 30 days, it is accepted for a scope inquiry. If the 30th day is a non-business day, the next business day is considered the deadline. If there are antidumping and countervailing duties for the same product from the same country, the inquiry will be on the antidumping record. The Department can apply a scope ruling generally or specifically to certain companies. For more information on filing and participation, interested parties can consult the Scope Ruling Application Guide available online. The public can comment on the completeness of the scope ruling applications. Comments should be sent to Scot Fullerton from the International Trade Administration. This announcement follows regulations set under CFR 19 351.225(d)(3). The Department of Commerce encourages all interested parties to participate in a transparent and fair review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Commences Reviews on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is starting a series of reviews related to antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These reviews are for various products, with some having specific February anniversary dates. The reviews will cover exports from many countries. Some of the countries involved are Egypt, India, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Korea, Vietnam, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and China. Each country has specific products that will be reviewed. For example, from India, products like certain frozen warmwater shrimp, sodium nitrite, and stainless steel bar will be reviewed. From Vietnam, frozen warmwater shrimp are also on the list. Italy has stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings under review. In the case of the product from Egypt, the specific product being reviewed is prestressed concrete steel wire strand. From South Africa, lemon juice is under review. The reviews will determine if the dumping duties have been absorbed by any exporter or producer. If duties are absorbed, it might mean the exporter or producer has sold goods in the United States through an affiliated importer. Also, the Department wants to ensure that reviews are done fairly. They will select companies or respondents based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They may also ask for specific details on sales and exports during the review period. Companies selected as respondents need to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires will help gather information on whether they are separate from government control, especially for non-market economy countries. Commerce has set deadlines for various submissions in these reviews. Parties must follow these deadlines closely to participate in the review process. For antidumping reviews, companies must show that they have no sales if they want to avoid being reviewed. This is possible if there are no suspended entries for a company or entity under review. The Secretary of Commerce, Scot Fullerton, emphasized the importance of this operation. The Department aims to ensure fair trade and protect American industries from unfair practices from abroad. Overall, the reviews are detailed and demand transparency from involved exporters and producers. The Department of Commerce aims to complete these reviews by February 28, 2027. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Makes Preliminary Ruling on Brazilian Dissolving Pulp Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes In a recent development, the U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding high purity dissolving pulp imported from Brazil. This ruling, announced on March 25, 2026, suggests that producers and exporters of this pulp in Brazil are receiving unfair financial support. These supports are referred to as countervailable subsidies. Such subsidies can make products unfairly cheap, affecting U.S. businesses. The period examined covers January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The department’s investigation aims to determine if Brazilian producers received government financial aid, allowing them to sell the product cheaper in the U.S. This can hurt American producers. Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments on this preliminary decision. The investigation started on September 8, 2025, after a notice was published. Originally, the preliminary determination was due earlier but got postponed to March 19, 2026. This was due to government shutdowns, causing delays. Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A. (BSC) is a company in focus. The preliminary findings indicate that they, along with affiliated companies, have benefited from such subsidies. The calculated subsidy rate for them and all other producers and exporters is 3.67%. The Commerce department has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of the high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil. This applies to imports on or after the notice date. A cash deposit matching the subsidy rate must now accompany these goods. The ruling indicates that Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A. and related companies received benefits from the subsidies, and a standard rate applies to other companies. Moving forward, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also review these findings. If they agree with the Commerce Department’s conclusions, they will decide if these imports harm the U.S. industry. This decision is expected within months. The Department of Commerce remains committed to ensuring fair trade practices, ensuring American industries are not unfairly disadvantaged. This determination is a step towards maintaining a balanced playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Investigation into Steel Imports from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has started a new investigation. It is looking into how certain steel products are being brought into the country. The investigation is specifically about corrosion-resistant steel products. The investigation is focused on steel products from Indonesia. These products use hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel initially made in China. The concern is that these products might be avoiding U.S. trade rules. The rules in question are the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel from China. The investigation started on March 25, 2026. Two companies, Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation, requested it. The inquiry will check if these steel products are not following the existing rules. The Commerce Department will work closely with other U.S. government offices. They will look at different factors for the investigation. These factors include how the steel is made, investment in Indonesia, and trade patterns. They want to see if the steel is just slightly changed in Indonesia to avoid extra duties. The investigation will also use data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This data will help identify which companies to focus on in Indonesia. If any company does not fully respond to information requests, they might face penalties. Starting this investigation means some current shipments could face delays or higher costs. The Department of Commerce could apply existing trade rules to these shipments. The investigation could take up to ten months to complete. This action is to ensure that steel trade rules are followed. It aims to prevent any rule-breaking that might harm U.S. businesses. The changes might affect companies in the U.S. and Indonesia that deal with steel. The U.S. Department of Commerce intends to keep everyone informed. They plan to provide updates and continue the investigation as needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Begins Investigation on Vietnamese Steel Circumvention Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Background Information This inquiry starts after a request from Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation. They claim that these steel products should fall under existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) against corrosion-resistant steel from Vietnam. What Are the Orders About? The orders involve flat-rolled steel products. These products might be plated or coated with metals that resist rust, like zinc or aluminum. Such products could also have added layers of paint or plastic coatings. What Is Being Inquired? The inquiry looks at whether steel completed in Indonesia, using materials from Vietnam, is avoiding the duties. The steel products are meant for the U.S. market. If found to be avoiding duties, they will face AD and CVD orders. Steps by Commerce Commerce has guidelines under U.S. trade law to decide if there is circumvention. They look at whether the steel imported into the U.S. is similar to products made in Vietnam, whether the process in Indonesia is minor, and if substantial value comes from Vietnam. They also check if taking steps is necessary to prevent duty evasion. Factors for Consideration Investment level in Indonesia. Research and development efforts there. Production nature and facilities’ extent. Value proportion of the process. The individual factors do not single-handedly decide the issue. Commerce will examine all of them combined to get a complete picture. Looking at Trade Patterns Commerce also examines trade patterns. This includes checking any shifts in how materials are sourced or if trade has increased since the order started. They will study relationships between manufacturers or exports as well. Next Steps and Timeline Commerce will select respondents based on U.S. Customs data. Respondents will likely include Indonesian firms producing the questioned steel. Companies have a duty to provide complete information, or they may face penalties. Suspension Details For products already under suspension due to the orders, Customs will maintain the status quo. If the inquiry finds circumvention, suspended shipments will stay affected. If new items not under suspension are found to skirt the rules, suspension will start from March 25, 2026. Timeline for Decision Commerce plans to issue a preliminary decision in 150 days and a final decision within 300 days. All interested parties will stay informed as the inquiry progresses. Commerce’s decisions aim to ensure fair trade practice and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Trade Orders on Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On March 25, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement. They found that some imports from Mexico are avoiding certain trade rules. These rules are called the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The decision affects specific steel products. Which Products Are Affected? The products involved are low-carbon steel (LCS) wires. These wires are made in Mexico. After they arrive in the U.S., they are turned into welded wire mesh. This mesh is used in construction. It helps make concrete stronger. The Commerce Department decided that some companies are not following the trade rules. How Did This Decision Come About? The Department of Commerce began looking into this issue in September 2025. They had a preliminary decision. Then, they gave more time before making the final decision due to a government shutdown. This final decision was announced on March 20, 2026. Which Companies Are Involved? One company, Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., was found to be avoiding the trade orders. Another company, Impulsora del Alambre S.A. de C.V., was not found to be breaking the rules. What Happens Next? From March 25, 2026, the U.S. will take action to stop these companies from avoiding the rules. All wire shipments from Mexico used to make wire mesh will be watched more closely. The companies must now pay special duties. They also must keep track of what they are importing and prove that they are following the rules. What Are the New Rules? Importers of LCS wire must now follow new rules. They need to show that their products are not avoiding any duties. This is done through certifications. If an importer cannot prove this, they will have to pay the duties. Conclusion This decision affects companies that make and use wire mesh. They need to make sure they follow these new rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce is working hard to make sure everyone plays by the rules. This is how the U.S. is trying to protect its industries and stop unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Opens Inclusions Window for Automobile Parts Tariff Process Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a new update regarding the tariff process on automobile parts. This update comes from the International Trade Administration (ITA). The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is working with the ITA to handle this process. A special time, called the “inclusions window,” is opening for submissions. During this time, people can ask to add more automobile parts to the list under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The President has given permission for certain duties, or taxes, on vehicle parts. The inclusions window will open on April 1, 2026, and will close at 11:59 p.m. ET on April 14, 2026. This window is the time frame during which people can submit requests to include more parts on the tariff list. All submissions must be sent to a specific email. The email address is protected and needs to be accessed responsibly to avoid errors. The process was established by a proclamation from the President on March 26, 2025. This is known as Proclamation 10908, titled “Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States.” It sets out specific duties on automobiles and certain parts. In September 2025, an interim final rule (IFR) was published. This rule created a specific process to include additional parts. The rule established four two-week windows each year: in January, April, July, and October. These windows are for submitting automobile parts for possible inclusion in the tariff duties. This April’s inclusions window will be open for two weeks. Once the window closes, inclusion requests that are accepted will be available for public comment. This will happen on Docket ID ITA-2025-0040 at Regulations.gov. Before submitting a request, make sure the parts are not already part of the duties list. If you have submitted a request before and have not received a decision, do not submit the same request again. Only submit if you have new important information. Andrew Farquharson, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing, provided this update. The document information was filed on March 23, 2026, and carries the billing code 3510-DR-P. For further details or questions, you may contact the email provided in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Completes Review on Citric Acid Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duty on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The review period was from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration under the U.S. Department of Commerce. The agency looked at the sales of RZBC Group Co., Ltd., including RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., in the United States. It was determined that these companies did not sell citric acid at prices below what is considered normal. The review confirms that the decision remains unchanged from the preliminary results shared in September 2025. There were no comments or disputes concerning the preliminary findings, leading to this final decision without alteration. The product discussed in this review is citric acid from China. The review ensures that the product sold in the United States was not sold at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. markets. The review also covered the “China-wide entity,” a status that involves other Chinese exporters. There was no requirement to review this entity in this instance since no requests were made. The earlier set rate of 156.87 percent remains for the China-wide entity. The final results show that RZBC did not sell citric acid at unfairly low prices in the U.S. during the review period, maintaining a zero percent dumping margin. There were no changes to the original calculations or findings from the preliminary review, so no further details will be disclosed. For this review, there are also implications for duties. Since there was no unfair pricing detected, duties on these products will not be applied for the entries made during the review period. Additionally, new cash deposit requirements will be effective with the publication of the results. This means any new shipments of citric acid from China will follow the updated rules. The Commerce Department’s assessments guide how duties are applied to imports that might harm U.S. businesses. This ensures fair trade practices. The review process and its results are crucial for maintaining fair prices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The entire review and its implications are published for transparency and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Gave Extra Help to Some Manufacturers Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has looked at how two Chinese chemical companies, Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd., received extra help from their government. This help, called countervailable subsidies, was given between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Because of this help, the U.S. decided that these companies might have an unfair advantage when selling their products in the United States. The final decision was made on March 16, 2026. The Department of Commerce published the details on March 20, 2026. The companies were checked to see how much help they got from the Chinese government. Zhejiang Yonghe got a subsidy rate of 10.11%, and Zhejiang Sanmei got a 3.02% subsidy rate. This means that they received financial support that could give them an advantage over other companies not receiving such help. The Department of Commerce collected data through a thorough review process. They used the Tariff Act of 1930, a long-standing U.S. law, to guide their analysis. They looked at if the support from the Chinese government was specific and beneficial for these companies. Several extensions were granted during the review to ensure a thorough examination, especially considering delays due to government shutdowns. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now be collecting these extra duties on products shipped from these companies after this decision. This will continue until further notice. The Department wants to make sure American companies can compete fairly with those abroad. For anyone who wants more information, it is available through the ACCESS system, a place where people can see public government documents. Officials ensure that rules about keeping information private are strictly followed, though. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s actions show its commitment to fair trade, making sure all companies play by the same rules, and protecting American businesses from unfair foreign competition. This detailed look into the countervailable subsidies is a clear example of ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition globally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Korean Steel Pipes and Tubes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Review Background The antidumping duty order on these products was first published by Commerce on September 13, 2016. In October 2024, following requests for review, the department started assessing four producers and exporters from Korea. Due to various delays, including extensions and federal shutdowns, Commerce set March 9, 2026, as the deadline for final results. Scope of Merchandise The subject merchandise concerns particular heavy walled welded steel pipes from Korea. The review evaluates if these products were sold in the U.S. at lower than fair value. Findings and Methodology Commerce is conducting the review per U.S. trade laws, focusing on constructed export prices. It confirmed that products from Korea were sold at fair value during this period. Using previously determined rates as references, it was decided that if zero or low margins were found, a different method could be applied for non-reviewed companies based on recent calculations. For Kukje Steel Co., Ltd., a specific rate of 35.11% was recommended while Dong-a-Steel Co., Ltd. and HiSteel Co., Ltd. were preliminarily found to have a zero percent margin. Partial Rescission of Review The review of NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. is rescinded due to no suspended entries of its merchandise during the review period. This decision was made without opposition from parties. Next Steps Interested parties may submit comments on these preliminary findings. There will be a chance to request a hearing within 30 days. A decision on the final results will follow within 120 days of publication. For companies with no individual assessment, the cash deposit rate depends on the most recent official rates. The final instructions to U.S. Customs will follow 35 days after the final result publication. This preliminary review suggests Korean steel pipe exports are compliant with U.S. fair trade laws, pending final evaluation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

The U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a review to look into changes involving large diameter welded pipe from Canada. This review aims to see if a company named Interpro Pipe & Steel Inc. (Interpro) is now acting as the same company as Evraz Inc. NA Canada (Evraz). The reason for this review is because of an antidumping duty order on these pipes from Canada. On March 19, 2026, the Commerce Department announced that, earlier this year, on January 26, 2026, Interpro made a request. They asked the Commerce Department to check if they are the successor to Evraz. This is important because it affects the taxes that Interpro will need to pay when they sell pipes in the United States. The review will look at changes like the company’s name, ownership, and operations. The antidumping duty is a special kind of tax. It is applied when a company sells products in another country at unfairly low prices. On May 2, 2019, the Commerce Department had placed a duty on large diameter welded pipes from Canada. Interpro claims they should have the same rate as Evraz because they are the same business, just with a different name and owner. The Commerce Department will take into account things like changes in management, the factories where the pipes are made, and who sells to and buys from the company. They will check if Interpro is truly different from Evraz. If Interpro is found to be not that different from Evraz, they might have the same duties to pay. This review might take some time. By law, the review should not take more than 270 days unless it is extended. The department plans to publish preliminary findings in the Federal Register soon. This will let people know what they think so far. Everyone interested will then get a chance to say what they think about these results. In conclusion, this review is a detailed check by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It is to make sure that taxes are fair when products are brought into the U.S. from Canada. The Commerce Department wants to see if Interpro and Evraz are operating the same, just under a new name and new ownership. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Happened? The United States Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping duties (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) on utility-scale wind towers. These orders affect imports from Canada, Vietnam, Indonesia, and South Korea. The Department of Commerce, along with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), determined that removing these duties could harm industries in the United States. If the duties were removed, it might lead to dumping and unfair subsidies continuing. This could cause material injury to U.S. companies. Why Is This Important? Dumping happens when a foreign producer sells goods in the United States for less than the cost of production or below prices in their home market. Countervailing duties are used to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments which can make foreign products unfairly cheap. What Products Are Involved? The orders cover certain wind towers made of steel. These towers support wind turbines, which generate electricity. The towers included in these duties are taller than 50 meters and support turbines that produce more than 100 kilowatts of power. Excluded Products Some products are not covered by these duties: Nacelles and rotor blades, even if attached to the towers. Internal or external components not attached to the wind towers. What’s Next? U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD deposits on these wind towers. The continuation of these orders started on March 13, 2026. The Department of Commerce plans to review these duties again before their next fifth anniversary date. For More Information If you have questions or need further details, contact David de Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. He can be reached at (202) 482-2178. This decision ensures that U.S. industries remain competitive and are not harmed by unfair trade practices from foreign markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies for Indian Tire Producers Estimated reading time: 8 minutes Date: 2026-03-19 Location: Washington, DC The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a significant announcement. It found that certain producers and exporters of tires from India have been given subsidized support. This happened during the review period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Commerce carried out this review under legal rules. These are part of the Tariff Act of 1930. The review takes a close look at companies that make pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) in India. The review results show specific subsidy rates. ATC Tires Private Limited has a rate of 5.96%. Another company, Balkrishna Industries Ltd, has a lower rate of 0.57%. Other companies under review have a subsidy rate of 3.97%. Why are these rates important? When tires from India enter the United States, there are cash deposit rules. These rules make sure U.S. Customs collects estimated countervailing duties on these imports. The duties match the subsidy rate of the company. The results of this review will now be used. They affect how much companies must deposit for these estimated duties. This will continue until further notice from the Commerce Department. This is not the end for all companies. Some companies were not chosen for individual review. For them, their rates remain as they were before this new review. Each decision is part of a bigger plan to keep things fair in trade between countries. The U.S. government is always working to keep trade fair. It does this by reviewing and checking on imports like these tires from India. The Department of Commerce helps to make sure that the rules are followed. This way, they can protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. They want everyone to compete on a level playing field. These results are official and based on a complete review. They are important to ensure fair trade and to monitor any financial benefits that companies receive from the government. Keeping a balance in international trade relations is crucial. The announcement shows how serious the U.S. is about fair trade. By making sure rules are followed, it protects its businesses and workers. In addition to these findings, companies must follow specific rules about sensitive information. They must handle information carefully. This is important for keeping business secrets safe. All parties involved are reminded of their responsibilities. They must protect any private information they have during this process. In conclusion, the review by the Department of Commerce highlights the importance of fair trade practices. It plays a key role in maintaining trust in international trading systems. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Portugal’s Navigator Company Sold Paper at Lower Prices Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made an important decision. They found that The Navigator Company, from Portugal, sold uncoated paper in the U.S. at prices below the normal value. This is called “dumping.” Dumping can hurt businesses in the U.S., so it is closely watched. Review Details The review covered the period from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. During this time, Navigator was the sole company under review. The U.S. Department of Commerce studied Navigator’s sales and found the prices in the U.S. during this time were too low compared to normal values. Changes in Dates The review process had some delays. There was a government shutdown, and deadlines were adjusted. The final results were shared on March 19, 2026. The Department of Commerce moved very carefully to ensure the results were accurate. Final Results The review shows a weighted-average dumping margin for Navigator at 10.91 percent. This means that the prices they sold for in the U.S. were 10.91 percent below normal value. Next Steps for Importers The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess the antidumping duties. Companies importing this paper must be ready to pay these duties on past shipments. These duties will now become a regular part of importing from Navigator until further notice. Rules for Cash Deposits For Navigator, the rate is set at the 10.91 percent as discovered. Other companies not covered by this review but previously reviewed will continue with their last known rates. If an exporter is not part of this review, but a producer is, the producer’s rate will be applied. For all other producers and exporters, a different rate of 7.80 percent is set by prior inquiry. A Reminder to Importers Importers must remember to file a certificate confirming they have not been refunded duties. Not doing this may lead to extra charges as a consequence of suspected reimbursement. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is committed to protecting U.S. markets by carefully reviewing and addressing dumping practices. The rules and assessments will be enforced to ensure fair trade and competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Investigates Circumvention of Steel Wheel Duties Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation into whether certain steel wheels from Vietnam are avoiding U.S. trade duties meant for Chinese products. This move comes after a request from two U.S. companies, Accuride Corporation and Maxion Wheels USA LLC. Background In January 2026, Accuride and Maxion asked Commerce to look into steel wheels finished in Vietnam. They claim these wheels use steel from China and then get sent to the U.S. to sidestep duties put on Chinese products since May 2019. Details of the Inquiry Commerce will check if wheels finished in Vietnam, using Chinese materials, are dodging U.S. antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are extra charges on imports to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing or government support in other countries. Commerce uses several rules to decide if products are avoiding duties. For instance, they consider how much of the product is made in China versus Vietnam and whether the changes made in Vietnam are significant. Process and Next Steps Commerce will collect information from Vietnamese producers and exporters. They will use data from U.S. Customs to choose which companies to question further. The companies involved must answer Commerce’s questions fully, or they might face penalties. Impact on Duties If Commerce finds that these wheels are avoiding duties, they will ask U.S. Customs to continue holding any questionable imports and may backdate the duties to November 2021. Timeline Commerce aims to make a preliminary decision within 150 days and a final decision within 300 days from the start of the inquiry. Conclusion This investigation is an important step to ensure U.S. trade laws are being followed and that Chinese products are not avoiding duties by being finished in Vietnam. The outcome will show whether these wheels should face the same duties as those from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duties on Steel Threaded Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Steel Wheels from China: U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Circumvention Inquiry Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Why the Inquiry Started The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has started an investigation. This is to see if steel wheels sent to the U.S. from Thailand are avoiding taxes meant for similar products from China. Two companies in the U.S., Accuride Corporation and Maxion Wheels USA LLC, asked for this investigation. They believe that wheels finished in Thailand, using materials from China, are being sold in the U.S. to get around extra taxes that should be applied to Chinese products. Important Dates The inquiry is officially starting on March 19, 2026. Companies involved have been engaged since early 2026, with key activities in January and February. Details on the Steel Wheels The wheels in question are used on roads and fit tubeless tires. They have rim diameters of 22.5 inches and 24.5 inches. These wheels can be classified under several codes when imported into the U.S. Merchandise Focus The inquiry will specifically look at steel wheels finished in Thailand using hot-rolled steel from China. These are then sent to the U.S. Criteria for the Inquiry The U.S. law allows such inquiries if products are finished in a third country. They must show traits of products that should be taxed. The focus is on whether finishing the products in Thailand is a minor part of the overall process. Respondents and Process The Department of Commerce will pick participants based on data from U.S. Customs. They will gather information from Thailand about steel wheel shipments and where their materials come from. Effect on Imports The inquiry might change how the U.S. handles taxes on these products. If the products are found to be avoiding taxes, new rules could be applied retroactively. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will analyze data and decide whether there’s circumvention. The next significant milestone will be a preliminary decision in about 150 days from the start date. Contact Information For more details, interested parties can contact Thomas Cloyd at the Department of Commerce. This inquiry is crucial to prevent unfair trade practices and ensure fair competition in the market. The outcome will have implications for manufacturers and trade between the U.S., Thailand, and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Antidumping Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary results on the administrative review of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) exported by companies from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This announcement was made on March 16, 2026. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that certain producers and exporters from Vietnam sold their products in the United States at less than the normal value. The main case involves SeAH Steel VINA Corporation, which received a preliminary dumping margin of 12.84 percent. This means the company sold its goods at a price lower than fair value, causing harm to American companies. The review also involved two other companies, Halima Pipe Company (Halima) and Pusan Pipe America, Inc. (PPA). However, the review was rescinded for these two companies. This decision was because there were no suspended entries of their products during the period under review. This means they did not have any questionable sales during the designated time. According to the Department’s policy, a review of the Vietnam-wide entity would only occur if specifically requested or if deemed necessary by the Department. There were no requests for such a review, so the Vietnam-wide entity’s duty rate remains unchanged at 111.47 percent. For all interested parties, the Department has opened a window to submit comments on these preliminary results. Parties are invited to submit their feedback within 21 days from the notice’s publication. This allows stakeholders to raise any points or concerns about the preliminary findings. After the review is complete, antidumping duties will be assessed on all appropriate entries. Duties will be calculated based on the amount of dumping compared to total sales. The intent is to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition that results from foreign producers selling below market value. Importers must comply with these requirements and file certificates regarding reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failing to do so could lead to penalties or additional duties. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce remains committed to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the interests of American industries through vigilant monitoring and enforcement of antidumping measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Lawn Groomers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duties on tow-behind lawn groomers and some parts from China. These duties are there to stop unfair pricing that could hurt U.S. businesses. The duties on lawn groomers first started on August 3, 2009. The U.S. wants to protect industries in the country from low-priced products sold by other countries. On March 10, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) agreed with the Department of Commerce. They said that ending these duties could lead to more unfair pricing and hurt U.S. businesses. What’s Covered The duties apply to non-motorized tow-behind lawn groomers made from any material. Lawn groomers can include lawn sweepers, aerators, dethatchers, and spreaders. These are used to maintain lawns. Lawn groomers usually attach to a vehicle, allowing them to be pulled along the ground. Some have a hitch and a push handle. They may also have some parts that help them work better. The Order includes lawn sweepers, aerators that make holes in the ground, dethatchers that remove dead grass, and spreaders that spread seeds or fertilizer. Size Limits The duties cover lawn dethatchers that weigh 100 pounds or less. Other lawn groomers covered weigh 200 pounds or less. Lawn groomer parts like brush housings and weight trays are also included. Excluded Items Some items are not covered by the duties. These include farm tools like plows, carts, wagons, lawn groomers with motors, and hand-held models. Also excluded are lawn groomers that are more than the specified weight limit and lawn rollers meant solely for flattening grass. The tariff numbers that help identify these items globally are 8432.41.0000, 8432.42.0000, 8432.80.0000, and several others listed. These numbers are for reference purposes only. Next Steps The duties will continue starting March 10, 2026. U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports to ensure fair market competition. The Department of Commerce plans to review these duties again before March 10, 2031. This will be five years after this latest decision. Parties involved must continue to handle confidential information properly. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. This decision helps protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices, ensuring fair competition and supporting local businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results Announced for Antidumping Review on Korean Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the review of antidumping duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea. These products are essential pipes used in the drilling of oil and gas. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that certain OCTG from Korea were not sold in the United States at prices below normal value. This means that the products were not sold at unfairly low prices to undercut local businesses. Two companies from Korea were examined closely in this review. These companies are NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. The Department discovered that both of these companies had a weighted-average dumping margin of zero percent. A margin of zero percent indicates that there was no dumping, or selling below cost, for these companies. For other Korean companies that were not individually reviewed, the Department set different rates. Most of these companies received a rate of 1.18 percent. However, HiSteel Co., Ltd. received a lower rate of 0.77 percent. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd. has a much higher rate of 11.70 percent. The results are open for comments from interested parties. This means that people or businesses who have something to say about these results can share their thoughts before the final decisions are made. The final results of this review are expected to be published soon. This process is important because it ensures that all businesses have a fair chance to compete in the market. The new rules about duties will also come into effect once the final results are out. This review helps maintain fair trade practices. It also protects American producers from unfair competition. This ensures that goods are sold at fair prices, supporting companies on both sides of the trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Exporter Violating Trade Rules Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its review on the sale of a chemical from China. This review covered the period from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. A company called Zhejiang Sanmei Ind. Co., Ltd., or Sanmei, was found to be selling a chemical, named pentafluoroethane or R-125, to the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This means they were selling it below what the normal price should be. An investigation started in July 2025 with preliminary results shared in the Federal Register. Important data collection was disrupted due to a U.S. government shutdown during the investigation. This required extensions on deadlines for completing the review. Sanmei has to follow the rules set by the U.S. for antidumping duties. This means Sanmei’s customers must now pay a special fee when they import R-125 from China. The new rate of this fee is 48.67%. Another company, Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd., known as Yonghe, was considered as part of a larger group of companies based in China. This is because Yonghe couldn’t get a separate rate. The group’s rate is high—267.51%—and this rate will remain because there was no special investigation into the bigger group. The Department of Commerce keeps careful records of these investigations. They use a system called ACCESS to store information about these cases. Anyone interested in detailed information can visit their website. These findings have important effects. Now, the companies that buy R-125 from China will need to pay extra fees to bring the chemical into the U.S. This is to make sure that everyone plays fair in business and that U.S. industries are treated fairly by their overseas competitors. The U.S. plans to keep an eye on these companies in the future. This helps to ensure fair trade continues between the U.S. and other countries. It is important for businesses to remember their responsibilities to avoid getting into trouble with the law. The new rules for buying R-125 from these companies in China will start right away. Importers of this chemical must pay close attention to these changes to avoid any issues with customs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Trade Orders on Corrugated Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C. – On March 16, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce issued important announcements about trade with China. The Department has decided to place new duties on certain products from China. These products are polypropylene corrugated boxes. These boxes are special because they are strong and lightweight. They are made using a special plastic called polypropylene. The government took this step after investigations showed something concerning. Some companies in China have been selling these boxes in the U.S. at unfair prices. These prices are lower than what they sell for in China. This is called “dumping” and it can hurt U.S. companies. The U.S. International Trade Commission found that this practice is hurting American businesses. As a result, the Commerce Department is issuing two types of orders. There are antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Antidumping duty means the U.S. will charge extra money on these imported boxes. This makes the price fairer for U.S. businesses. Countervailing duty means there will be an extra charge on goods that are unfairly subsidized by China’s government. Subsidies are like financial help which lowers production costs in China. The orders say that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect these extra charges. They will collect on all such boxes entering the U.S. from China starting from March 16, 2026. For antidumping duties, they will be checking sales from August 28, 2025. They noted that imports of these boxes from China hurt U.S. industries. These new rules also state the estimated dumping margins. This is how much lower the Chinese prices are compared to fair market prices. For these boxes, the margin is 83.64 percent, which will lead to a cash deposit rate of 82.21 percent. For countervailing duties, the separate subsidy rate is set at 62.27 percent. This applies to various Chinese companies listed by the department. The decision to put these orders in place follows laws that protect U.S. industries. These laws are from the Tariff Act of 1930. The Department of Commerce wants to make sure U.S. industries are fair and competitive. The government also wants anyone interested in these developments to keep up with updates. Businesses and individuals need to check a special list. This list is called the Annual Inquiry Service List. It’s updated every year to include people who are affected or interested. This decision is part of the U.S. government’s larger efforts to ensure a fair and competitive market. It seeks to protect American jobs and industries from unfair foreign pricing practices. For more detailed information, businesses can contact Dan Alexander or Rachel Accorsi at the Department of Commerce. They are in charge of AD and CVD Operations. Their contact numbers are listed in the official announcement. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announcement: Temporary Steel Fencing from China Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision regarding temporary steel fencing imported from China. This decision comes after an extensive investigation by the International Trade Administration. The main finding is that temporary steel fencing from China has been sold in the United States at less than its fair value. This is referred to as “less than fair value” (LTFV) sales. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce also determined that some Chinese companies sold these fences under unusual conditions called “critical circumstances.” This means that they suddenly surged imports into the U.S. under conditions that affected American businesses more than usual. The investigation involves several Chinese companies. Two were looked at closely: Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. However, it was found that they didn’t qualify for separate rate status after all because of issues with verifying their information. As a result, these companies are now part of a larger group collectively referred to as the “China-wide entity.” This group is being hit with an adverse decision because of unfair practices. They now face a dumping margin of 184.27 percent, which is very high. This margin is a penalty that makes the cost of these imports much higher, discouraging the unfair pricing practices. In total, 13 other Chinese companies were investigated as well, and they showed that they deserve a different, separate rate. These companies will face a lower penalty rate of 129.70 percent. The Department of Commerce will work with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue to suspend the liquidation of steel fencing imports from China. This means that these goods will not be allowed into the U.S. market at the current rates until all issues are resolved. The International Trade Commission (ITC) now has to determine if these imports harmed the U.S. industry. If the ITC agrees with the Department’s findings, then an official order will be made to impose these penalties permanently. The penalties mean that Chinese companies exporting such steel products will now need to pay a lot extra to bring their fencing products to the U.S. This action should help protect U.S. businesses from being undercut by cheaper imports. Meanwhile, all involved parties are reminded of their duties to handle confidential information carefully, making sure it is returned or destroyed when no longer needed to comply with regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Chinese Steel Fencing Estimated reading time: 4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that producers and exporters of temporary steel fencing from China are receiving unfair subsidies. This decision comes after a detailed investigation into the matter. The period under review was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce published a preliminary finding in June 2025. After that, interested parties were invited to comment. In February 2026, a post-preliminary analysis was issued by the Department. Due to delays caused by a government shutdown, the final determination was made on March 10, 2026. The investigation focused on whether Chinese producers received financial benefits from their government. It was discovered that some companies had not followed proper procedures, leading to incorrect data. As a result, some subsidy rates were based on available facts. One company, Shijiazhuang SD, faced challenges because of errors in its reported information. The Department used adverse inferences to decide the subsidy rate for this company. The department also verified information from other companies like Hebei Minmetals. For most companies involved, the subsidy rate was determined to be over 49 percent. However, for non-responsive companies, a higher rate of nearly 179 percent was applied. These findings were crucial to ensure fair trade practices between China and the United States. Before this final decision, the Department had asked U.S. Customs to hold imports of this steel fencing. Now, with the final determination, cash deposits will be required for these imports. The decision also involves a review by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the ITC finds that these imports harm U.S. industry, duties will be permanently imposed. If not, the proceedings will be terminated, and previous deposits will be refunded. The Department aims to ensure fair competition while protecting U.S. industries from unfair practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Italian Pasta Sold at Less Than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently released the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review involving pasta imported from Italy. The review covered sales made in the United States from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. This review was part of efforts to ensure that certain pasta products from Italy are not sold in the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value in their home market. The findings indicate that pasta from Italy was sold in the U.S. at prices less than the normal value during this period. The review involved several Italian companies, including La Molisana S.p.A. and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. The U.S. Department of Commerce calculated the estimated weighted-average dumping margins for these companies. La Molisana S.p.A. was assigned a dumping margin of 2.65 percent, while Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. was assigned a dumping margin of 7.00 percent. Other non-selected companies received a weighted-average dumping margin of 5.21 percent. The department’s review process experienced delays due to a lapse in federal appropriations and a government shutdown. As a result, deadlines were extended to accommodate these disruptions. The final results were published in the Federal Register on March 16, 2026. Following the review, certain changes were made to the margin calculations for La Molisana S.p.A. and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A., as well as the rates applied to companies not selected for individual review. Based on the final results, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess antidumping duties on the relevant entries. For companies not individually examined, the antidumping duty assessment will be based on the determined weighted-average dumping margins. Cash deposit requirements will also be updated for all shipments of Italian pasta entering the U.S. after the publication of the review’s final results. The cash deposit rates will be based on the newly established company-specific rates. This review serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility to file a certificate regarding reimbursement of duties. It also underscores the importance of compliance with antidumping and countervailing duty rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue monitoring and conducting such reviews to ensure fair trade practices and adherence to antidumping regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Rebar Subsidies from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of subsidies given to producers of steel concrete reinforcing bar, or rebar, from the Republic of Türkiye. This review is known as a “sunset review.” The report indicates that if the current duties on these imports were removed, it is likely that Türkiye would continue subsidizing its rebar at certain rates. Subsidies are financial benefits given by a government to help companies compete internationally. The duties were first put in place on November 6, 2014, because of these subsidies. The latest review is part of a regular check to see if the duties should stay. The review started on September 2, 2025, and was sped up because not enough opposing arguments were received from Türkiye. According to the Commerce Department, if the duties were removed, certain companies would still receive benefits. One such company, Icdas Celik Enerji Tersanev e Ulasim Sanayi A.S., would remain at a subsidy rate of 7.71 percent. However, another company, Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi, has been excluded from these duties. All other companies will have a rate of 6.58 percent. The report confirms that keeping these duties is important to prevent unfair advantages due to continued subsidies. Commerce says these findings have been outlined in a detailed notice available through their official resources. This notice reminds everyone involved, particularly those with access to protected information, of their duty to handle it responsibly. The Department of Commerce is responsible for making sure trade laws are followed. They do this to protect U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition and to ensure international trade rules are just and balanced. This review is an effort to maintain fair trade practices and is part of Commerce’s ongoing checks to ensure foreign producers do not gain an unfair advantage over U.S. companies through government subsidies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Issues Final Results in 2023–2024 Antidumping Review of Aluminum Sheet from Bahrain Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On February 17, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the final results of its administrative review concerning antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet imported from the Kingdom of Bahrain. The review covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Commerce found that Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO) sold aluminum sheet in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. As a result, Commerce assigned GARMCO a final weighted-average dumping margin of 15.74 percent. Commerce made certain changes to its preliminary findings after analyzing comments from stakeholders. These changes were explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The memorandum is available to the public through Commerce’s online portal (https://access.trade.gov). Background The preliminary results of this review were released on August 6, 2025, and published in the Federal Register (90 FR 37840). This review was conducted in line with Section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Due to a lapse in government funding and a Federal Government shutdown, Commerce tolled deadlines in administrative proceedings twice—first by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and then by an additional 21 days on November 24, 2025. Scope of the Order The order covers aluminum sheet products from Bahrain. A detailed description is included in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results Commerce’s final results establish a 15.74 percent dumping margin for GARMCO for exports made between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Assessment of Duties Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on entries of aluminum sheet from Bahrain made during the review period. For any entries produced by GARMCO but not known by it to be destined for the United States, CBP will apply the “all-others” rate of 4.83 percent if no specific rate applies to the intermediate parties involved. These instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the notice is published. If litigation is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will delay liquidation of subject entries until the period for filing for a statutory injunction expires—90 days after publication. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective the date of publication of the final results: The cash deposit rate for GARMCO will be 15.74 percent. For companies not reviewed but previously assigned a company-specific rate, that rate remains in effect. If only the producer (but not the exporter) is previously rated, that producer’s most recent rate will apply. For all other producers and exporters, the cash deposit rate remains 4.83 percent. These deposit rates will remain in place until further notice. Importer Responsibilities Importers are reminded to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) before liquidation. Failure to file may lead Commerce to assume reimbursement has occurred and impose double duties. Administrative Protective Orders Parties must comply with rules under administrative protective orders (APO), including timely destruction or return of proprietary information. Failure to comply is a violation and can result in sanctions. Authority This notice is issued under Sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: February 10, 2026. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix: Summary of Comments in the Final Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Changes Since the Preliminary Results Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Third-Country Comparison Market Comment 2: Major Input Adjustments Comment 3: Date of Sale Comment 4: By-Product Offsets Comment 5: Billing Adjustment Comment 6: Interest Expense Calculation Recommendation Federal Register Citation: 91 FR 7250–7252 (February 17, 2026) Federal Register Document Number: 2026-02984 BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Chinese Active Anode Material Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced its final determination in the antidumping duty investigation of active anode material from the People’s Republic of China. The agency concluded that the product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) spanned from April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. Commerce first released its preliminary findings on July 22, 2025. At that time, it also postponed the final determination to December 4, 2025. Due to the federal government shutdown and backlog in case filings, all administrative deadlines were later extended by a total of 68 days. As a result, Commerce published its final determination on February 10, 2026. Final dumping margins were assigned to various exporter-producer combinations. Each of them received a margin of 93.50 percent. The China-wide entity was assigned a final dumping margin of 102.72 percent, based on adverse facts available. Commerce also confirmed that certain Chinese exporters were ineligible for separate rates. This was due to changes in product scope and a lack of shipments during the POI. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers active anode material. This product is an anode-grade graphite consisting of at least 90 percent carbon. It includes forms made from synthetic graphite, natural graphite, or blends. It may or may not have coatings. The material can appear in powder, dry, liquid, or block form. It has a maximum size of 80 microns in powder form. The product meets an energy density of at least 330 milliamp hours per gram and a graphitization degree of at least 80 percent. The scope includes products mixed with silicon-based materials or additives. These materials remain covered even when imported as part of an anode slurry, electrode, or subassembly. However, active anode materials already incorporated into imported lithium-ion batteries, battery modules, packs, and electric or hybrid vehicles are excluded. Commerce revised the scope since the preliminary stage. Certain products once included are no longer subject to this determination. Producers and Exporters Receiving Final Dumping Margin of 93.50 Percent: Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE / BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR New Material Group Sales Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR (Jiangsu) New Energy Material Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. Hunan Zhongke Shinzoom Co., Ltd. / Guizhou Zhongke Shinzoom Co., Ltd. Jiangxi Zichen Technology Co., Ltd. / Jiangxi Zichen Technology Co., Ltd. Resonac Corporation / Henan Yicheng New Energy Co., Ltd. Resonac Corporation / PetroChina Daqing Petrochemical Company Resonac Corporation / Qingdao Qingbei Carbon Products Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Inner Mongolia Shanshan Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Sichuan Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Fujian Shanshan Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Ningbo Shanshan New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Final Rate for the China-Wide Entity: 102.72 Percent Adverse facts available were applied to the China-wide entity as certain companies failed to cooperate or provide data. No new facts required a change from the preliminary determination in that regard. Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to require cash deposits. These will match the dumping margins as adjusted for subsidy offsets where applicable. Cash deposit responsibilities depend on producer/exporter combinations. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce previously instructed CBP to suspend liquidation of entries entered on or after July 22, 2025. This was the Preliminary Determination date. CBP was instructed to stop this suspension for entries on or after January 18, 2026. For entries made during the suspension period, CBP must follow the rates listed in the final determination, unless the product falls outside the final scope. Next Steps If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final affirmative injury determination, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. Final suspension of liquidation will be reinstated. If the ITC rules that there is no injury, no order will be issued. CBP will refund cash deposits and end the suspension. Interested parties must dispose of any proprietary data from the investigation according to the Administrative Protection Order (APO) provisions. For a full list of scope details and all topics covered in the decision memorandum, see Appendices I and II of the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Trade Department Sets Final Duties on Battery Anode Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce announced its final decision in a trade case involving active anode material from the People’s Republic of China. This decision was published in the Federal Register on February 17, 2026. The Commerce Department concluded that Chinese producers and exporters of active anode material received unfair subsidies from their government. This ruling is part of a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation. The investigation looked at product entries between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. The Department began the investigation officially on January 25, 2025. A preliminary ruling was issued on May 28, 2025. An amended preliminary ruling followed on July 2, 2025, correcting some errors in the original subsidy rate estimates. The final ruling includes a list of Chinese companies and the countervailing duty rates assigned to each: Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd., and Panasonic Corporation of China: 66.86% BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd., and its affiliates: 66.82% Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat: 66.82% (rate based on adverse facts available) Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd.: 66.82% (rate based on adverse facts available) All Other Chinese producers and exporters: 66.86% The Department used verification procedures to examine records and documents provided during on-site reviews. The process followed required steps under U.S. trade law. Commerce made changes to the subsidy rate calculations from the preliminary review. Details of these changes are in the final Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is available online via the ACCESS system. The Commerce Department used facts available with adverse inferences for some companies, including Shanghai Shaosheng and Huzhou Kaijin. These companies did not respond properly to requests for information. All other producers will receive the same rate as Panasonic. This is because Panasonic was the only cooperating respondent without a zero or de minimis rate and not based only on adverse facts. The Department has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue collecting cash deposits. Suspension of liquidation applies to entries made on or before September 25, 2025. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) also finds material injury to the U.S. industry, CBP will assess duties on all impacted imports after that date. The ITC must now decide if the subsidies caused harm to U.S. producers. If the ITC agrees, the Department of Commerce will issue a final countervailing duty order. If the ITC decides there is no injury, the investigation ends, and duties collected so far will be refunded. The scope of the investigation includes graphite-based anode materials with certain purity and size characteristics. These materials are used in lithium-ion batteries. Certain finished products like electric vehicles, phones, or entire battery systems are excluded. The final determination closes a major step in a trade enforcement process aimed at active anode material from China. All documents related to this case are available to registered users through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.