U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Stainless Steel Bar Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary results of its review on stainless steel bar imports from India. The review aims to determine if the products were sold in the United States at prices below the normal value. Entities Under Review The period of review was from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Eight producers and exporters from India, known collectively as the “Venus Group,” were examined. These include: Atlas Stainless Corporation Private Limited Astrabright LLP Bahubali Steel Industries Eurostahl Tech LLP Venus Metal Corporation Precision Metals Venus Wire Industries Private Limited Hindustan Inox Limited Sieves Manufactures (India) Private Limited The review also covered Laxcon Steels Private Limited. Preliminary Findings The Department of Commerce found that the Venus Group sold products at less than the normal value during the review period. However, it determined that Laxcon’s prices were not below this benchmark. Review Rescission The review for Ambica Steel Limited was rescinded because the request was withdrawn within the given period. Implications for Non-Examined Companies Five other companies were not directly reviewed but were included in the assessment: Aamor Inox Limited Bhansali Bright Bars Pvt. Ltd. Chandan Steel Limited Mangalam Alloys Limited Welspun Specialty Solutions, Ltd. These companies were assigned a rate based on the average findings for Laxcon and Venus Group. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has set specific cash deposit rates for future imports from these companies. These rates are effective upon finalization. Importers must ensure compliance and file certificates to avoid penalties. The final results of the review are expected within 120 days of this notice. Importers should be aware of the responsibilities that include filing certificates under the relevant regulations to avoid double assessment of duties. The Department’s findings help keep the market fair and maintain appropriate trade practices for stainless steel bar imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce released its preliminary findings on May 13, 2026, regarding the antidumping duty review of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Mexico for the period between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The review concluded that Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A. (TAMSA) engaged in sales of merchandise from Mexico at prices lower than normal value. Key Findings: TAMSA, the main producer/exporter under review, was found to have a dumping margin of 1.62 percent for the period specified. The review covered OCTG products originating from Mexico, as ordered under the scope of the administrative review. The Department of Commerce also announced the rescission of its review concerning two companies, Siderca S.A.I.C. and Vallourec Oil & Gas Mexico, S.A. de C.V. This decision was based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the review period. Next Steps: Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Submissions must abide by specified deadlines, with case briefs due no later than 21 days after the notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days following case brief submissions. Public comments must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Parties can submit comments electronically using the ACCESS system. If a hearing is requested, details will be provided to the parties involved. Impact on Importers: The Department of Commerce will determine and direct customs duties on subject merchandise entries covered by this review. Cash deposit requirements will change based on these findings, effective upon finalization of the review results. Conclusion: The preliminary results are a step in the process to ensure fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce’s decision will help maintain a level playing field for U.S. industries by assessing appropriate duties on Mexican imports found to be unfairly priced. Interested parties can continue to engage in the process through public comments and requests for hearings, ensuring a thorough review before the final decision is issued. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings concerning certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The review covers the period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. This announcement relates to the antidumping duty administrative review concerning shrimp imports. In these preliminary results, the Department of Commerce determined that some sales of shrimp from Vietnam were made at prices below normal value. Two main companies, Sao Ta Foods Joint Stock Company (known collectively as Fimex Group) and Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company (STAPIMEX), were examined closely. Their sales were found to be below the normal value. Additionally, 29 other exporters are eligible for separate rates, meaning they will not be included under the Vietnam-wide entity rate, which is higher. However, the review will be rescinded for some exporters. This means that Commerce found no entries of subject merchandise from these exporters during the reviewed period. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Future actions include finalizing the review, with the results providing a basis for future deposits of estimated duties. The review process also revealed that 132 companies did not qualify for separate rate status. These companies are considered part of the Vietnam-wide entity and remain subject to the higher dumping margin. In detail, Fimex Group received a preliminary dumping margin of 10.76 percent, while STAPIMEX received a 6.30 percent margin. A weighted average of these margins will inform the separate rate assigned to the 27 companies that weren’t individually examined but met the standards for a separate rate. The Vietnam-wide entity remains subject to a margin of 25.76 percent. This rate is not under review as no specific request was made to review it. Commerce is conducting this review in line with U.S. laws, using export price calculations and understanding Vietnam as a non-market economy. These steps are consistent with the regulations aimed at ensuring fair trade practices. Businesses involved in importing shrimp from Vietnam should stay updated on the final results, which will impact duty assessments for entries made during the review period. The findings will be integral to future trade dealings and duty estimations. The Department of Commerce will issue instructions on assessing duties on entries made during the review period once the review is concluded. This includes handling companies part of the Vietnam-wide entity differently than those assigned separate rates. The preliminary results are a step in the ongoing process of ensuring trade compliance and fair pricing for shrimp imported from Vietnam. For those interested in the specifics of this review, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and notices are available for consultation, providing comprehensive details of the investigation and its preliminary conclusions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Antidumping Duty Review of Steel Pipes from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary announcement regarding steel pipes imported from Korea. It has found that Hyundai Steel Company and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. sold circular welded non-alloy steel pipes, commonly known as CWP, at prices less than their normal value. The review period for these findings covers November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The investigation has shown that Husteel Co., Ltd., another major exporter, did not sell at less than normal value during this period. The Department of Commerce has decided to end its review of 14 other companies because there were no reviewable entries from these companies during the review period. Readers can contact Benjamin Nathan or Mira Warrier at the Department of Commerce for further information. The contact numbers are (202) 482-3834 and (202) 482-8031. Background The review started after requests were made for a review of the antidumping duty order on CWP from Korea. Hyundai Steel and Husteel were picked as the main companies for the review. However, there were delays due to a government shutdown, which extended the review timeline. After these delays, the preliminary findings were ready by May 2026. The Department of Commerce had already notified companies that the review would be rescinded for those with no entries. None of the parties affected objected, so this plan stands. Scope and Method The review focused on steel pipes from Korea. When looking at companies not individually reviewed, the Department often applies the same method used to find a general rate in past investigations. For companies that were not reviewed individually, a rate was assigned based on findings for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results For the highlighted period, Hyundai Steel/HSP is subjected to a preliminary dumping margin of 4.19%. However, Husteel has a margin of 0.00%, meaning they did not sell below normal value. For six companies not selected for individual review, a rate of 4.19% also applies. Next Steps The public and interested parties can comment on these findings. The Department will share its calculations, and a verification of the information will be conducted. This is an important step to ensure that all details are correct. Anyone interested can submit their opinions or request a hearing. The deadline for these actions will be shortly after all information is finalized. Assessment and Future Steps After the review, duties will be assessed on entries during the period. The specific rates decided will guide how Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will handle duties on imports. For companies where the review has been stopped, the cash deposit rates effective at the time will continue to apply. In conclusion, the findings are significant in determining the duties and pricing policies moving forward. The final decisions will help guide the industry and ensure fairness in trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Strontium Chromate from Austria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released preliminary results regarding the sales of strontium chromate from Austria. This review focused on investigating whether the product was sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. Background Commerce published an antidumping duty order on strontium chromate from Austria in November 2019. This order was put in place to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing by foreign producers. After a timely review request, Commerce began an administrative review specifically targeting an Austrian company named Habich GmbH. Preliminary Findings Preliminary results show that Habich GmbH sold strontium chromate in the U.S. at a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.01 percent. This means the company sold the product significantly below its normal value, impacting fair competition in the U.S. market. Scope of Review The review covers strontium chromate in all forms, including powder and paste. This product is classified under specific subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The written description in the original order takes precedence over these classifications. Next Steps for Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on these findings. Commerce will announce a schedule for submitting case and rebuttal briefs after the publication of these preliminary results. Public hearings may be requested by stakeholders to further discuss the issues at hand. Method of Review Commerce followed specific laws to determine the dumping margin, using export price and normal value comparisons. The review ensures proper enforcement of trade laws to maintain fair business practices. Impact on Future Shipments Once final results are published, new cash deposit requirements will be effective. Companies that have been found to dump their products at unfair prices will face additional duties to prevent future infractions. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to enforcing trade laws to protect U.S. industries. The preliminary findings against Habich GmbH are part of ongoing measures to ensure fair trade and competition. Final results of this review are expected within a few months, allowing time for interested parties to provide additional input. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes In recent developments, the U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings of an investigation into certain wood products imported from China. The investigation revealed that the products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. This is part of an ongoing review concerning the import of wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. The investigation covered a time period from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. Two major companies from China, Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. and Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd., were reviewed in detail. They were found to be selling products in the U.S. at prices substantially lower than they should be. This is also known as “dumping.” As a result of these findings, nine companies have been highlighted in this review. The review initially included 35 companies, but was reduced after requests for withdrawal and no findings of actionable entries for some. Of these, Fujian Hongjia Craft was given a dumping margin of 31.82 percent, while Nanping Huatai was assessed at 58.45 percent. Other companies not directly reviewed but thought to have engaged in similar activities were assigned a margin of 42.04 percent. The Commerce Department also decided to cease reviewing 26 companies after it was determined either no dumping had occurred or there were no entries to assess. The China-wide entity, a catch-all category for companies that have not been given their own rate, remains under scrutiny with a high duty rate of 220.87 percent – though it was not specifically reviewed in this process. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to assess how these products are evaluated and taxed to ensure fair trading practices. The companies involved in the review must now respond and provide any other necessary evidence to clarify their trading activities. The Department is seeking feedback on these preliminary findings, with final decisions expected later in the year. This decision impacts companies both in the U.S. and China, ensuring fair trading practices are upheld. These reviews are crucial in maintaining balanced economic relationships, preventing unfair undercutting, and protecting domestic industries. The ongoing reviews and adjustments in trading policies impact both American businesses and international trade partners. This news comes as part of wider efforts to regulate trade and parity between countries, ensuring American businesses can compete fairly while maintaining economic relationships with international partners. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping of Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is reviewing sodium nitrite imports from India to ensure fair trade practices. The review assesses whether Deepak Nitrite Limited (DNL) and other companies from India are selling sodium nitrite at prices below normal value in the United States. The review period is from February 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025. During this time, the Commerce Department found that DNL did not sell sodium nitrite at less than normal value, which means there was no dumping. The Commerce Department has also said they might stop the review for three companies: Buradon Inc., Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. This is because there were no recorded entries of sodium nitrite from these companies during the review period. For companies that were not individually reviewed, like Kronox Lab Sciences Pvt Ltd. and Kutch Chemical Industries Ltd., the Commerce Department plans to apply a dumping margin of 42.76%. This percentage is based on past findings and will be used as a rate for these companies. Even though the review shows that DNL did not dump products, Commerce will decide on the final results in a few months. Public comments on these findings are welcome, and the final results will be used to set future policies and cash deposit requirements. The next steps involve disclosing detailed calculations and methodology. Businesses and stakeholders can submit their written comments within the specified time frames. Antidumping duties will be assessed based on the final results. If any weighted-average dumping margin exceeds 0.50%, importer-specific duties will be calculated accordingly. Companies showing no dumping will not pay additional duties. These findings help maintain fair trade and ensure that products like sodium nitrite from India are priced properly in the U.S. market. The Commerce Department is committed to using careful analysis to make informed decisions. Stay informed to know about the final results, which will guide future actions and policies regarding sodium nitrite imports from India. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Trade Review Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has released the final results of an important review. This review looked at certain steel plate products from the Republic of Korea. The review focused on cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate products. These are special steel products used in different industries. The review covered sales made between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The Department found that the steel plates were sold in the United States at prices below what they should be. This is called “dumping.” Dumping can harm U.S. producers who cannot compete with such low prices. Two companies from Korea were named in the review: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and Hyundai Steel Company. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. had a dumping margin of 1.18%. Hyundai Steel Company had a margin of 0.94%. This means they sold their products for less than the normal value. The products studied are made of hot-rolled carbon-quality steel. Some of these are known as universal mill plates and have special shapes and thicknesses. Certain types and grades of steel were not included in the review. After the review, the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how much extra duty or tax to collect when these products enter the United States. This is based on the dumping margins found during the review. Also, the Department set cash deposit rates. This is the money importers must pay upfront as a form of guarantee when such products enter the U.S. from Korea. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. will have a 1.18% rate, while Hyundai Steel Company will have a 0.94% rate. If these rates are less than 0.50%, the deposit will be zero as it is considered too small. These measures seek to ensure fair competition. They help protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by foreign companies. The detailed instructions from the Department of Commerce will be issued soon. These will guide how the duties and deposits are handled by customs officials. The cash deposit rates will stay effective until further notice. This action shows how the U.S. is actively reviewing and enforcing fair trade practices. Such measures aim to protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. This is an important step in maintaining healthy trade relationships, ensuring that American industries do not suffer from unfair pricing by foreign competitors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Review on Thermal Paper from Korea Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review regarding the sale of thermal paper from the Republic of Korea. This review was part of an ongoing examination into whether the sole producer/exporter of this paper sold it for less than its usual price during the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The results are significant. The Department of Commerce found that the exporter, Hansol Paper Company, did not sell thermal paper at a lower price than the normal value during this time. This means Hansol is not required to pay any additional duties. The Commerce Department had initially included another company, Tele-Paper (M) Sdn. Bhd., in the review. However, they later decided to remove Tele-Paper from consideration. This decision was due to the withdrawal of review requests from interested parties concerning Tele-Paper. In terms of what this means going forward, Hansol Paper Company will have a cash deposit rate of zero. This rate is important because it determines future trade duties. Other companies not involved in this review will continue with their previous rates. For importers, it is critical to file certificates that confirm they have not been reimbursed for duties on these goods. This step is necessary to avoid paying double customs duties. Also, companies with access to sensitive information, under the administrative protective order, must ensure they handle this data responsibly to avoid legal problems. Overall, the Department of Commerce’s findings offer a clear path forward for all involved in the trade of thermal paper from Korea. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Review on Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China Announced by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings in its countervailing duty administrative review concerning wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, specifically by the Enforcement and Compliance arm. The review, which covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, has so far found that some producers and exporters of these materials did receive financial support from the Chinese government that might be countervailable. Background The review process began on March 28, 2025, following requests for an administrative examination of the existing countervailing duty order related to these products. In May 2025, the Department of Commerce picked two main companies, Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng) and Nanping Huatai Wood and Bamboo Co., Ltd. (Huatai), for further examination. However, Yinfeng later withdrew from participation. Key Findings The Department of Commerce has documented that the mandatory respondents, which include other companies like Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. (Hongjia), received subsidies, which allowed these companies to sell their products at lower prices than they might have otherwise. These subsidies were found to benefit these companies particularly and not equally available to others, falling under the category of “specific” subsidies. Furthermore, due to the withdrawal of requests for review by companies like Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd., the review for these specific firms has been halted. For other companies reviewed that didn’t actively participate during the review period, the Department of Commerce is concluding its review process. Next Steps The results and calculations made by the U.S. Department of Commerce are subject to a public comment period where interested parties can contribute feedback and perspectives. The deadline for public input will be shortly after the verification reports are issued. It is anticipated that these comments will play a significant role in the final determination of subsidy rates. Moreover, affected companies must prepare for the possibility of higher duties based on the preliminary subsidy rates. The Department is working diligently to finalize these rates and determine the impact on trade. Conclusion The results from this review and claims of countervailable subsidies raise concerns about competitive fairness and market integrity. Interested parties and related stakeholders should closely monitor updates from this ongoing review to understand better how it may affect the trade of wood mouldings and millwork products between China and the United States. The U.S. Department of Commerce remains committed to maintaining balanced and fair trade practices. For more information, contact the Department of Commerce or view the complete preliminary decision documentation directly through the U.S. government’s electronic service system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Receives Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-05-08 Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has received several applications related to scope rulings. These applications ask for scope inquiries to find out if certain products fall under antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Scope Ruling Applications Every month, the Commerce Department informs the public about these scope ruling applications. The notice for March 2026 is out, and it lists several applications. Here are some examples: Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from China Product: Stone-Coated Metal Roofing Tiles. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: La Viata Investment Firm LLC. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Certain Steel Racks and Parts from China Product: 4T Ergo Shelf Subassemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: K. Hartwall Oy Ab. Application Date: March 16, 2026. Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China Product: Salon Vanity Desks. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: Vanity Dreams LLC. Application Date: March 20, 2026. Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from China Product: MRCOOL® Pre-Charged Line Set Assemblies. Produced in and exported from China. Applicant: HVAC Distributing, LLC. Application Date: March 23, 2026. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from China Product: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules. Produced in and exported from Vietnam. Applicants: JA Solar Vietnam Company Limited, JA Solar USA Inc., and others. Application Date: March 27, 2026. Understanding the Process The process for handling scope ruling applications involves several steps. Once an application is filed, the Department has 30 days to either reject it or start an inquiry. If nothing happens in 30 days, the application is automatically accepted, and an inquiry begins on the next business day. In some cases, if more than one order covers the same product, the inquiry will be done on the AD record. The Department may decide to apply its ruling to all products from the same country that are similar in nature or limit it to specific companies. Public Participation and Notifications Interested parties can participate in these scope inquiries. They must file an entry to join the public service list for the inquiry segment they are interested in. If individuals want to receive updates, they can request inclusion in the annual inquiry service list. It’s important for parties to follow procedures to be officially involved. Conclusion These applications help determine if certain goods fall under trade regulations meant to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The public can view detailed information and participate in procedures regarding these applications through online platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Antidumping on Strontium Chromate from France Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the antidumping duties regarding strontium chromate from France. The review examined the sales made by Société Nouvelle des Couleurs Zinciques (SNCZ) in the United States within the period from November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It was determined that SNCZ did not sell strontium chromate at less than the normal value during this period. This means SNCZ was not dumping the product at unfairly low prices in the U.S. market. The preliminary results show a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent for SNCZ. This indicates that the sales were made at fair prices. Interested parties can provide comments on these preliminary results. The agency responsible for this review is the Enforcement and Compliance Division of the International Trade Administration under the Department of Commerce. The process began with an antidumping order on strontium chromate from France issued on November 27, 2019. An order provides measures to protect the domestic market from products sold below market value. Following a request from Lumimove Inc., who are doing business as WPC Technologies, an administrative review was initiated on December 18, 2025. The review examines whether dumping occurred during the specified period. Adjustments had to be made during the review process due to various delays. The deadlines for issuing the preliminary results were extended several times. These changes included a 90-day tolling of deadlines in December 2024, a further extension in September 2025, and additional delays owing to a federal government shutdown and related issues. A more detailed explanation of the review process can be found in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. This document is publicly available online, and interested parties can access it for deeper insights. The next steps in the review process involve public comments and a potential hearing. Interested parties are encouraged to submit written comments. These written submissions must follow a specific format and should be filed electronically. The deadline for submitting comments is seven days after the last verification report is issued. Following this, rebuttals to the initial comments may also be submitted. Any requests for a hearing must also be made electronically, and specific information such as a list of issues to be discussed must be provided. The final results of the administrative review are expected within 120 days of the notice publication. Depending on these results, the Department will determine if antidumping duties will need to be adjusted or maintained. Until the final determination is made, cash deposit requirements aligned with the preliminary results will stay in effect. If any adjustments are needed, updates will be announced in the Federal Register. This review ensures fair competition and protects U.S. companies from unfair pricing practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duty on Chinese Wood Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently completed a review concerning the antidumping duty on wood mouldings and millwork products from China. This review is crucial to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by international competitors. On February 16, 2021, the antidumping duty order was first placed on Chinese wood mouldings and millwork products. The order was meant to prevent products sold below their fair value, a practice known as dumping. Dumping can hurt domestic businesses by making it hard for them to compete with cheaper imports. In this case, the products made in China could harm American producers if not priced fairly. In January 2026, the Department of Commerce began a routine five-year review of this order. This is known as a sunset review, as it determines whether the order should continue or “sunset.” The Department evaluates if removing the order would result in continued dumping. A group called the Coalition of American Millwork Producers supported continuing the antidumping duty. This group includes several U.S. companies, like Best Moulding Corporation and Sierra Pacific Industries, which produce similar products domestically. The Department of Commerce looked at all the information and decided to continue the order. They believe that dumping would likely continue or recur if the order were canceled. The review found that the dumping margins, or the difference in selling price, could be as high as 231.60 percent. This means products from China could potentially be sold at prices much lower than what is considered fair. The agency’s findings are meant to help preserve the health of U.S. industries and ensure competitive pricing. By maintaining these duties, the U.S. aims to protect its producers from unfair market practices. The final results and decisions are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. For further information, interested parties can reach out to David De Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Overall, these actions safeguard U.S. industries against unfair pricing and ensure a level playing field for domestic and international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Countervailing Duty Order on Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized a review of countervailing duties on wood mouldings and millwork products from the People’s Republic of China. These duties are important charges placed on imported goods, like wood products, to counteract any unfair advantages from government subsidies in the exporting country. The original order on these wood products was published on February 16, 2021. On January 2, 2026, the Department started a special review called a “sunset review.” This type of review helps decide if duties should continue or end after five years. On January 20, 2026, the Coalition of American Millwork Producers, a group representing U.S. manufacturers, expressed their interest in the review. They wanted to participate because they make similar products in the U.S. The Coalition believes that the duties should continue. By February 2, 2026, the Coalition submitted a detailed response. However, the Government of China and other interested parties did not respond with sufficient reasons or information to oppose the duties. So, the Department of Commerce carried out a quick evaluation, finishing the review in 120 days. The Department determined that stopping the duties might lead to subsidies returning, which could harm U.S. producers. As a result, the duties will stay in place. Specifically, the subsidy rates are 28.17% for Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd., 252.29% for Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and 40.33% for all other producers. This decision helps safeguard U.S. manufacturers from unfair competition due to subsidies provided to some Chinese exporters by their government. It continues to ensure that the playing field is even for American businesses making similar products. The public can access detailed documents and further information about the review through the Department of Commerce’s electronic service system, ACCESS. This system allows people to view decisions and understand the actions taken to protect U.S. industries. The Department has reminded all parties involved to handle the proprietary information responsibly and follow the rules when dealing with confidential data. The decision to keep the duties aims to support U.S. jobs and ensure that American companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-05-05 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of an antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) from China. This decision follows determinations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Their findings suggest that doing away with the order could lead to continued unfair trading practices and harm to U.S. industries. Background The antidumping duty order for THFA from China was first introduced in August 2004. This order was put in place to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices by Chinese exporters. Over the years, multiple reviews have been conducted to evaluate whether the order should stay. The recent review process involved both Commerce and the ITC. Findings Commerce determined that removing this order might lead to a recurrence of dumping, which refers to exporting goods at unfairly low prices. This action can harm U.S. market competition. The ITC supported this view, stating that removing the order could lead to injuries for U.S. industries in the foreseeable future. Product Details Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) is the product in question. It is a clear, water-like liquid but can appear pale yellow. THFA is part of a group of chemicals called furans. It can mix with water and dissolve in many other liquids. THFA is classified under a specific code in the U.S. Tariff Schedule, known as HTSUS subheading 2932.13.00.00. Impact Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will still collect cash deposits linked to these duties on incoming THFA. This continuation seeks to ensure fair market conditions for U.S. manufacturers. Future Actions Commerce plans to start another round of reviews within five years. These reviews aim to check if the order should continue or if conditions have improved, allowing for its removal. Conclusion This decision is seen as an essential step in safeguarding U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair pricing practices from Chinese exporters. By continuing the antidumping order, the U.S. seeks to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results on Frozen Shrimp from India Antidumping Review Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on the import of frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review covers the period between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. The preliminary findings indicate that some producers or exporters from India sold shrimp in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. The Department of Commerce has an important role in enforcing trade laws. It is checking to see if foreign companies are “dumping” products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The review specifically looked at several companies in India, including Devi Fisheries Limited and Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited. The Department calculated a dumping margin for these companies. This margin shows how much lower the prices were than they should have been. For Devi Fisheries Limited and related entities, the margin was found to be 2.36 percent, and for Sandhya Aqua Exports Private Limited, it was 4.30 percent. Other Indian companies not individually examined in the review have been assigned an average dumping margin of 3.33 percent. This average is calculated based on the margins of the companies that were individually examined. The report explains that when the dumping margin is de minimis, or less than 0.5 percent, Customs and Border Protection may not assess duties on those imports. The document also states how duties will be used by Customs for all relevant entries during this reviewed period. The Commerce Department plans to make the results final within 120 days after publishing these preliminary findings. Until then, interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. It is important for companies involved in the seafood industry to be aware of these developments as they can impact import practices and duty liabilities. This preliminary review is part of ongoing efforts by the Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to protect local businesses in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Countervailing Duty Order on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically its International Trade Administration, has recently announced the results of its review concerning certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. In the summary published on May 4, 2026, the Department of Commerce confirmed that if the countervailing duty (CVD) order on these tires is revoked, it would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies from China. The countervailing duty order was first established on August 10, 2015. The idea behind the CVD order is to offset subsidies provided by foreign governments, which can make products from those countries cheaper and harm domestic industries in the United States. This order is specifically against tires from the People’s Republic of China. The review process started on January 2, 2026, as part of the second sunset review. Sunset reviews happen every five years to determine if the duties should continue. On January 14, 2026, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, a domestic interested party, filed a notice to participate in this review. This group claims to represent industries involved in the production of similar products in the United States. The department received adequate information from the domestic interested party. However, there was no substantial response from the Government of China or any related parties. This led the Department of Commerce to undertake an expedited review process for 120 days. The review’s findings showed that if the order is lifted, countervailable subsidies likely to continue would have significant rates. For GITI Tire (Fujian) Co., Ltd., the rate is 38.15%. For Cooper Kunshan Tire Co., Ltd., it’s 21.68%. Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd. faces even a higher rate of 116.73%. Other producers and exporters would have an all-encompassing rate of 31.56%. These findings underline the necessity to keep the duty in place, ensuring no unfair advantage to foreign producers that might harm the U.S. tire industry. This announcement also serves as a reminder regarding the return or destruction of any proprietary information shared under Administrative Protective Orders. Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to penalties. The decision is documented in the Federal Register and was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on April 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Continues Antidumping Duties on Chinese Tires Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of its review on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. The aim of the review was to decide if the antidumping duties should continue. The review began on January 2, 2026. It involved checking if dumping would likely continue or happen again if the duties were removed. The duties were first put in place in August 2015. They were added because Chinese tires were being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The domestic interested party, representing U.S. workers, was the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial Workers Union. They filed a notice to participate on January 14, 2026. The Department of Commerce did not receive responses from any party representing the Chinese industry. This is called a “non-response” situation. As a result, an expedited review took place. This means a quicker decision was made without further investigation. The final decision stated that removing the duties would likely cause dumping to continue or happen again. The dumping margins, or the price differences, could be as high as 87.99 percent if the duties were removed. This decision means the duties will stay in place to protect U.S. industries and jobs from unfair pricing practices by Chinese manufacturers. The conclusion was reached in a document called the “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” The U.S. Department of Commerce emphasizes the need for transparency and fairness in global trade. The decision is intended to ensure a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. The review process is important for maintaining fair trade conditions. The Department of Commerce helps decide when duties are necessary to protect domestic industries. This notice serves as a reminder for all parties involved in the trading of tires to comply with the rules set forth to ensure fair competition. Any proprietary information involved should be handled according to the regulations. Overall, the decision highlights the ongoing importance of trade regulations and their enforcement in protecting domestic markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its expedited first sunset reviews. These reviews focus on the existing antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, also known as PC strand. PC strand is a type of steel wire used in making strong concrete structures. It is designed for use in prestressed concrete applications, both pretensioned and post-tensioned. These reviews involved several countries, including Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates. The Department of Commerce found that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of the PC strand in the U.S. This means foreign companies might sell PC strand at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. manufacturers. As a result, the U.S. plans to keep the antidumping duties in place. These duties are intended to stop or lessen the effects of dumping. The rates of these duties are different for each country. For instance, Argentina faces a duty rate of 60.40 percent, while Saudi Arabia has a much higher rate of 194.40 percent. These rates help ensure fair competition and protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. The original orders for these antidumping duties began on February 1, 2021. The sunset review process started in January 2026. Domestic U.S. producers showed strong support for keeping the duties. These producers sent their intent to participate in the review process and later provided detailed responses about why the duties should remain. There were no detailed responses from companies in the countries affected by the duties. Because there was no opposition, the Department of Commerce was able to complete the review quickly. This led to an expedited decision to extend the duties. The Department of Commerce’s decision is important. It helps control foreign pricing that could damage the U.S. PC strand industry. These duties have provided stability for U.S. producers, ensuring they can compete fairly. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of fair trade and the measures in place to protect domestic industries. The continuation of these duties maintains the balance in trade, allowing U.S. companies to thrive without unfair competition from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Potential Continuation of Trade Measures on Steel Wire from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings regarding the countervailing duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand, known as PC strand, from the Republic of Türkiye. The decision could lead to ongoing trade measures. Background On February 3, 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce introduced a countervailing duty order on PC strand from Türkiye. This was to address unfair subsidies given to producers in Türkiye. This year, they reviewed the order to see if it should continue. Recent Developments On May 4, 2026, the Commerce Department determined that removing the countervailing duty might result in continued unfair subsidies from Türkiye. By law, such reviews are conducted every five years to assess whether these orders should be ended or remain in place. Review Process In January 2026, a sunset review started. This process helps decide if trade measures like tariffs and duties should keep going. Three U.S. companies, Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp., showed interest as they make similar products in the U.S. The government of Türkiye and other interested parties were expected to give comments, but they did not. Because of this, the review was faster than usual. Findings The review found that ending the order might lead to more subsidies from Türkiye. Specific companies in Türkiye are likely to receive help from their government that could affect U.S. businesses. The report lists expected subsidy rates for these companies. Results The U.S. Commerce Department suggests keeping the duties. They believe removing them could harm U.S. companies by allowing cheaper, subsidized products from Türkiye back into the market. Conclusion This decision highlights the careful checks the Commerce Department conducts to ensure fair trade. By maintaining the duties, the intention is to support local U.S. producers and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of administrative reviews for multiple antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews are related to various products with March anniversary dates. The reviews are set to begin on May 4, 2026. Purpose of Reviews The reviews are being conducted to assess whether antidumping duties and countervailing duties on various products are being correctly applied. The reviews help ensure that foreign manufacturers are not selling goods in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also check if foreign governments are subsidizing their producers unfairly. Respondent Selection Process The Department will choose which companies, known as respondents, will be individually reviewed. The choices depend on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and questionnaires submitted by the companies. If the Department limits the number of respondents, it will use specific data to make selections. Notice of No Sales Sometimes, companies may not sell or export goods during the review period. If this is the case, companies should notify the Department within 30 days of the review’s start. The Department will then decide how to handle these cases. Deadline for Withdrawal and Market Situations Companies that request reviews can withdraw their request within 90 days from the start of the review. If there are special market situations affecting the cost of production, companies can inform the Department within 20 days after submitting their initial questionnaire responses. Establishing Separate Rates in NME Countries For companies in non-market economy (NME) countries, they need to prove they are not controlled by their government. If they provide sufficient proof, they can receive separate antidumping duty rates. Companies must submit appropriate applications or certifications to qualify. Certification for Combined Goods Some companies sell both subject and non-subject goods to the U.S. The Department may allow these companies to certify their eligibility based on their tracking systems. Companies wishing to establish eligibility must submit an application within 30 days. Timeframe The final results of these reviews are expected by March 31, 2027. This ensures timely assessment and adjusts any unfair practices. Regulations for Factual Information All factual submission in these reviews must comply with specific categories and timelines. Submissions also require accurate certification. Late submissions may not be accepted, keeping the process clear and organized. This structured review process by the Department of Commerce is crucial in maintaining fair trade practices and ensuring U.S. markets are not negatively impacted by unfair pricing or government subsidies from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a correction to a previous notice about the common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. On April 9, 2026, the Commerce Department announced the final results of a review related to duties on these aluminum sheets for the year 2023 in the Federal Register. However, there was a mistake in the notice regarding the names of companies involved. The notice incorrectly stated that the subsidy rate applies to “Kibar Americas, Inc.” It should have said “Kibar Holding A.S.” This error has now been corrected. Additionally, a footnote was missing. The footnote is important because it tells us which companies are linked together. Specifically, it should have mentioned that the rate also applies to “TAC Metal Ticaret A.S.,” which is linked to “Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.” These corrections were officially published on May 4, 2026, in another Federal Register notice. This is crucial for ensuring that all interested parties have the correct information. The corrections are important for companies involved in international trade, as they affect how duties are applied. Proper reporting ensures fair practices in international commerce. For those needing more information, they can contact Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude at the U.S. Department of Commerce using the provided contact details. This correction notice is made in line with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific regulations that guide how reviews like these are to be published and corrected. The notice was signed and dated on April 29, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, a senior official in the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Releases Final Results on Canadian Welded Pipe Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the results of its review on the import of large diameter welded pipes from Canada from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. This review was conducted by the International Trade Administration. In this review, the Department found that Pipe & Piling Supplies Ltd., a Canadian company, sold these pipes at prices lower than the normal value. This is known as ‘dumping.’ As a consequence, the company faces a penalty tariff, also known as a ‘dumping margin,’ of 50.89 percent. For Evraz Inc. NA, another Canadian company, the Department of Commerce found that they did not sell or ship these pipes to the United States during the review period. The Department used a method called ‘adverse facts available’ to decide on the penalty for Pipe & Piling. This means that if a company does not provide enough information during the investigation, the Department can use the best information available to make its decision. These penalties affect how much American importers pay when they bring these pipes into the U.S. The fees are set to make sure fair pricing is maintained and U.S. companies are not harmed by cheaper imports. Companies in the United States affected by these imports must follow certain rules. For example, they need to declare if they are getting a refund on these penalties before they sell the pipes. If they do not follow the rules, they could have to pay twice the penalty amount. The results of this review and the penalties will stay in place unless there is another review or change announced. The Department will give more instructions on how to handle these penalties to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The results of this review were made public on May 1, 2026, and anyone interested, like importers and consumers, can look up more detailed information about these decisions online or contact the Department directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unwrought Palladium from Russia Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision regarding the sale of unwrought palladium from Russia. They have determined that this metal is being sold in the United States for less than its fair value. This investigation, conducted by the International Trade Administration, covered sales of unwrought palladium during the first half of 2025, from January 1 to June 30. The initial findings, shared on February 19, 2026, indicated that palladium from Russia was sold for less than it should be. No one challenged this preliminary decision. As a result, the final decision did not change from the initial one. The investigation focused on unwrought palladium, which is a form of palladium that includes items like ingots, blocks, lumps, and pellets. All these forms are covered, regardless of how they were produced. The U.S. Department of Commerce did not receive any comments about what products should be included in this investigation. This means the scope of their study remained unchanged. No Russian companies took part in the investigation. This led the Department to assume that all Russian producers of palladium were part of a group known as the “Russia-wide entity.” The Department applied a rule called “adverse facts available” to this group because they did not cooperate. As a result, the Russian producers of palladium face a dumping margin of 132.83 percent. This means that the palladium is considered to be sold for 132.83 percent less than its fair value. The Department of Commerce will keep requiring U.S. Customs and Border Protection to hold any imports of Russian palladium that arrive starting February 19, 2026. Importers must deposit an amount equal to the dumping margin before the goods are released. The U.S. Department of Commerce is also waiting to see if the International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if these sales have harmed the U.S. market. This decision will come within 45 days. If the ITC agrees there is harm, steps will be taken to apply duties on these imports permanently. If not, the investigation and any measures will end. It is important for any parties involved to follow protective orders related to this investigation. These orders protect sensitive business information. Failure to do so can result in penalties. The announcement and the measures outlined reflect the Department’s commitment to fair trade practices. The case emphasizes the importance of regulations in maintaining market balance and protecting domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Korean Pipe Imports for Fair Trade Practices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of large diameter welded pipes imported from the Republic of Korea. This review focused on whether these pipes were sold at unfairly low prices in the United States during the period from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The results are now final. Final Determination The Department confirmed that one company, SeAH Steel Corporation, sold pipes at prices below what is normal. This means they sold their products in the U.S. more cheaply than they would in Korea. However, Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., another company under review, did not sell its pipes below the normal value. Background Information Initially, the process for this review started with preliminary results published on August 29, 2025. The review looked at the activities of 23 producers and exporters from Korea. SeAH Steel Corporation and Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. were chosen for close examination. Unexpected delays, including a government shutdown, interrupted this review. As a result, the deadline for final results was extended several times. The current findings were ultimately concluded by April 27, 2026. Review Outcomes For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., the review found no dumping, giving them a zero percent margin. SeAH Steel Corporation was found to have a dumping margin of 0.80 percent, indicating some underpricing. Companies that weren’t individually examined will use SeAH’s margin of 0.80 percent. Next Steps The Commerce Department will share detailed calculations and findings within five days of this announcement. Instructions will be given to U.S. Customs for collecting duties on relevant imports. For Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., there will be no additional duties. For SeAH and other non-examined companies, duties might be assessed according to the specified margins. Cash Deposit Arrangements The cash deposit rate for Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. remains at zero. For SeAH, and other non-examined businesses, a rate of 0.80 percent will be in effect. Any other companies will follow past determined rates unless exempt or otherwise specified. Important Notices U.S. importers must file necessary reimbursement certificates to avoid penalties. This is part of ensuring compliance with trade rules and is mandatory for those involved in importing these products. The results and actions from this review underscore ongoing efforts to ensure fair trading practices. The Commerce Department remains committed to regulating and ensuring compliance with trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year “Sunset Reviews” on Duties Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun its five-year reviews. These reviews are also known as “Sunset Reviews.” They involve antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These orders are laws to ensure fair trade. They prevent cheap products from other countries from harming U.S. businesses. The reviews will look at whether these duties are still necessary. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is also looking at the same orders at the same time. The reviews started on May 1, 2026. The Department of Commerce will decide if the duties are still needed. The duties help protect American businesses from unfair competition. The reviews involve many countries and products. From China, there are reviews on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 and Steel Grating. From India, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 is under review. From Korea, Steel Nails and Welded Line Pipe are included. Malaysia is being reviewed for Steel Nails. Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam are also reviewed for Steel Nails. Türkiye is reviewed for Welded Line Pipe. There are strict rules on how to give information for the reviews. Parties have to follow the rules set by the Department of Commerce. These rules include how to send documents electronically. Special computer systems are used for this. Those who want to be involved in the review should show interest quickly. There is a 10-day window to submit a letter to participate. The Commerce Department has rules about sharing secret business information. These rules are strict to protect businesses’ secrets. Parties involved need to send a notice within 15 days to show they want to participate. If no one shows interest, the review ends without changes. If interest is shown, parties need to give detailed responses within 30 days. These responses help the Department decide if trade duties should stay or be removed. The aim is to keep U.S. businesses strong and protect them from unfair international practices. These activities are important for fair and strong U.S. trade practices. The process ensures fair competition and helps American industries thrive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Cheap Solar Cell Imports from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a preliminary decision. They believe solar cells from Laos are being sold in the U.S. at very low prices. This could hurt American businesses and workers. The solar cells in question are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. The inquiry began due to claims these solar cells are priced lower than what’s fair. The investigation covers sales from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. Businesses and individuals interested in this topic can provide their comments to the Department of Commerce. Some important actions have been taken. The Department of Commerce has said that those bringing in solar cells need to put a cash deposit. This is to make sure they pay a fair price. Customs officers will be keeping an eye on these imports. The investigation also looks at possible critical situations. It suggests some companies are shipping many solar cells into the U.S. quickly. This could be to avoid any future fees or charges. Several companies have been named in this investigation. This includes Solarspace Technology from Laos. Laos is considered to have a non-market economy, which means they might price goods differently. The investigation studies the reasons behind such low pricing. Following this preliminary inquest, the next steps will determine the final decision. The department plans to conduct thorough checks to verify information. Eventually, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will evaluate the situation. The ITC will decide if these imports significantly hurt or could hurt U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce is careful in examining these issues. The investigation reflects their commitment to ensuring fair trade and protection for U.S. industries. This process will continue, with final results taking several months. The decision can impact international trade relations and solar cell prices. Stakeholders are encouraged to stay engaged and follow updates. The findings from this investigation will guide future trade policies with Laos and possibly other countries, shaping how the U.S. deals with imports that may be sold at unfairly low prices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Indonesia Solar Cells Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes April 28, 2026 – The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination that crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Indonesia are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This determination follows an investigation that began on August 12, 2025. The period of investigation spans from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The products under scrutiny are solar cells, whether assembled into modules or not. Due to a federal government shutdown, deadlines related to this investigation were extended. The preliminary finding was postponed and then finalized on April 21, 2026. The Department of Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 35.17% for exporters such as PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia and PT REC Solar Energy Indonesia. This rate also applies to all other producers from Indonesia. Additionally, the Department found critical circumstances in part. It determined that some producers may face increased duties on entries made in the months preceding this investigation. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend liquidation of the affected solar cell entries. This means the goods will be held at their ports of entry, and a cash deposit will be required at the current dumping margin rates. This investigation follows complaints that Indonesian solar cells were harming U.S. industries. The Department of Commerce aims to protect domestic producers by ensuring fair competition in the solar market. The findings and the methods used are explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Interested parties can access this document online via the Department’s electronic service system. Affected parties may comment on this preliminary determination. The Department of Commerce will hold a hearing if requested, allowing for further discourse on the decision. The final decision regarding these goods and their impact on the U.S. market is expected within 75 days of the preliminary determination. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will also assess whether these imports are injuring U.S. industry. The ITC’s decision will be made after the Department of Commerce’s final determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Indian Solar Cells Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes Date: 2026-04-28 The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) made an important announcement. Commerce has found that certain solar cells from India are sold in the United States below their fair value. This means they are sold at prices less than their normal worth. These solar cells are called “crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells.” Sometimes, they are assembled into larger pieces like modules. What Is Happening? The period checked or investigated was from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. During this time, these solar cells were sold in a way that might harm U.S. businesses because they are cheaper than they should be. Commerce calls this situation “sales at less than fair value” or LTFV. Critical Circumstances Commerce also looked at something called “critical circumstances.” Critical circumstances happen when products are dumped or subsidized, and this could quickly harm U.S. industries. They found such circumstances exist for some companies involved, like Mundra Solar PV Limited and others. But they did not find these circumstances for everyone selling these solar panels. What Happens Next? The companies selling these products must stop certain business actions temporarily. This is to make sure no more under-priced products like these enter the U.S. while the investigation continues. The decision is to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. Further Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also look into this issue. They will check more to decide if these imports harm U.S. companies. If they agree with Commerce’s findings, further actions may follow to continue safeguarding U.S. businesses. Importance of Compliance Companies involved must follow rules outlined for such investigations. They need to provide the right information when asked. Some companies did not cooperate as expected and may face additional challenges due to their non-compliance. This situation underscores the importance of fair trade practices and maintaining a level playing field for businesses in the global market. The U.S. Department of Commerce continues to work diligently to ensure that all trade activities comply with the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chassis from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided that Mexico is giving unfair financial support, called subsidies, to companies that make and sell certain chassis and parts to the United States. This decision is important because these subsidies can make products cheaper in the U.S., making it hard for American companies to compete. The investigation looked at chassis from Mexico. These chassis are frames used to carry containers or other loads on roads, ships, and trains. The investigation covered a period between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce first announced the findings on August 1, 2025. They invited people who were interested to share their thoughts and comments. The Department of Commerce had to pause its work twice in 2025 because of a government shutdown. This pause made the process take longer than planned. After finishing the investigation, the Department found that certain companies in Mexico, including Hyundai de Mexico and others, were getting unfair subsidies. As a result, these companies will have to pay additional taxes, called countervailing duties, when selling their products in the U.S. The duty rate is set at 76.91 percent for these companies. These duties are necessary so that American companies can compete fairly. If the International Trade Commission agrees that American companies have been hurt by these imports, the duties will continue. The Department also learned that some Mexican companies did not provide the needed information during the investigation. Because they were not cooperative, the Department decided to apply these duties to them as well. The companies include BRD Trailers, Carrocerias Gallegos, and several others. A decision will be made by the International Trade Commission to see if these chassis imports have hurt the U.S. industry. If they find that they have, the duties will be enforced permanently. If not, the duties will be removed, and any deposits returned. This decision is part of an effort to ensure fair trade practices and protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor the situation and make sure trade rules are followed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Some Chassis from Thailand Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced that certain chassis and subassemblies from Thailand are being sold in the United States at prices lower than what it considers fair. This practice is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. The investigation looked at chassis sales from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background The investigation started with a preliminary decision in September 2025. The investigation was temporarily delayed due to a government shutdown. The investigation’s final decision was issued on April 20, 2026. The issues raised during the investigation were addressed in a public document. You can find this document on the official government website for more details. Scope of the Investigation The products involved are chassis from Thailand, which are parts of vehicles used to carry containers or other loads. These chassis can be finished or unfinished. The investigation received comments from interested parties, and some changes were made to the scope. Verification and Analysis Commerce verified the information submitted by companies involved in making the chassis. They checked financial records and other important documents. Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Commerce found that one company, Panus Assembly Co., Ltd., obstructed this process. Therefore, Commerce applied an adverse facts available rate of 129.63% to this company. This means they used the worst possible inference against Panus. Final Determination The final decision lists the rates of dumping for different companies. Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 72.85%. Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. has a dumping margin of 129.63%. All other companies have a dumping margin of 72.85%. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce has asked U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop the liquidation process of the involved merchandise. This happened once before and will restart if the International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that this has caused injury to the U.S. industry. ITC Notification The ITC will make its determination of injury within a set period. If they find injury to have occurred, antidumping duties will be applied to imports from Thailand. If not, the duties will be canceled. Conclusion This announcement highlights how Commerce is handling unfair trade practices. The decision can impact U.S. companies and consumers, depending on whether these chassis will face duties or not. The document marks the final decision in the investigation process. This final ruling aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Thai Chassis Producers Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a decision regarding chassis producers in Thailand. They found that the producers received unfair financial help, called subsidies. This decision comes after a thorough investigation. It affects those who make and export chassis, which are frames used under large trucks and trailers. The investigation looked at chassis produced between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. It showed that the Thai government helped companies through financial contributions in ways that are not allowed. This financial help makes it hard for U.S. manufacturers to compete fairly. The Department of Commerce announced that the final subsidy rates are 10.72% for Dee Siam Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and 9.65% for Panus Assembly Co., Ltd. All other producers will have a rate of 10.50%. The investigation process included checking the books and records of the companies involved. The U.S. government checked the details seriously to figure out how much help these companies got from their government. They even took special measures when the data was not clear. When this decision was first announced last August, the U.S. ordered that duties be collected on these products coming into the country. But these collections were stopped in November. Now, if another U.S. body called the International Trade Commission agrees with this decision, the duties will start again. This could mean extra charges for those importing Thai chassis into the U.S. This detailed review and final determination help ensure that competition is fair. It aims to support U.S. industries and jobs by stopping unfair practices from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chassis from Vietnam Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Published: 2026-04-24 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision. It found that certain chassis from Vietnam are being sold in the U.S. for less than they are worth. This decision is part of an investigation that started in 2025. These chassis are parts that can be assembled into a vehicle to carry containers. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The findings were published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2026. This investigation is run by the International Trade Administration. Their job is to make sure trade rules are followed. Background of the Investigation On September 29, 2025, the Commerce Department published an early decision. It found sales of Vietnam-made chassis at less than fair value. Public comments were invited at that time. Due to government shutdowns, deadlines were extended by 68 days. For more details on these events, the Department published an Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available online via ACCESS, the electronic service system. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers chassis and their subassemblies from Vietnam. These products are used for moving containers or payloads. The scope of the investigation, including changes based on public comments, is detailed in Appendix I of the investigation notice. Verification and Analysis In December 2025, Commerce verified information from Thaco, a Vietnamese manufacturer. They examined sales and accounting records. Interested parties could submit their views on the findings until the deadline in 2026. The Commerce Department analyzed comments from interested groups. This led to some changes in how Thaco’s sales were calculated. These changes are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination The Commerce Department determined that the estimated average dumping margin is 186.84%. This applies to Thaco and the Vietnam-wide entity. Suspension of Liquidation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of all entries related to this case. They are holding on to these products until further notice. If the U.S. International Trade Commission finds the U.S. industry harmed, anti-dumping duties will apply. The amount will match the dumping margin found in the investigation. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission needs to decide if U.S. industry is harmed by these sales. If the decision is yes, the Department of Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. If not, the proceeding will be terminated. In conclusion, this investigation is important to keep fair trade in place. It makes sure that the U.S. market isn’t hurt by unfair pricing from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on wooden cabinets and vanities, as well as their components, from the People’s Republic of China. Review Details The administrative review examined sales made by two Chinese companies, The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd., during the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The investigation found that both companies sold their products at prices below the normal value. As a result, these companies face antidumping duties for their exports to the United States. Key Findings Company-Specific Rates: KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. received a dumping margin of 43.92%. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. was assigned a dumping margin of 7.67%. Non-Examined Companies:There were several companies not individually reviewed or examined. These companies will have an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 10.02%. This margin was calculated by averaging the rates assigned to Ancientree and KM. China-Wide Entity:The review did not include the China-wide entity, and thus its rate remains unchanged at 251.64%. This rate applies to all companies that do not have separate rate status. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit requirements are in effect for shipments of wooden cabinets and vanities from China. These requirements specify that: Companies subject to this review will adhere to the rates established. Companies not reviewed will continue with the rates previously determined in past segments. The China-wide rate of 251.64% will apply to any company that has not established a separate rate. Certification and Liquidation Importers must continue to submit certifications as part of the entry process. Instructions have been provided to ensure proper liquidation of entries by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Antidumping duties will be assessed on all entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these final results. Partial Rescission The review was partially rescinded for Fujian Leifeng Cabinetry Co., Ltd. This decision was made after it was determined that the company’s entries were not reviewable. Further Actions Commerce plans to issue assessment instructions to CBP. These instructions will guide the liquidation of entries consistent with the rates determined in the review. Importers must notify CBP if antidumping and/or countervailing duties have been reimbursed to avoid doubled duties. In summary, the final results of the administrative review highlight significant antidumping duties on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. These duties aim to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers and ensure fair pricing. Importers and exporters should closely follow these developments to ensure compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Preserved Mushrooms from the Netherlands Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The Department of Commerce has released its final findings for an important trade case involving preserved mushrooms from the Netherlands. The review period covered sales made between November 3, 2022, and April 30, 2024. Key Findings: The main outcome of the review is that Okechamp B.V., a company that exports these mushrooms to the United States, sold them at prices lower than what is usual. This practice is known as “dumping,” and it can hurt businesses in the U.S. by undercutting local prices. Background: The investigation began in 2025. It involved looking at sales data and documents to see if unfair pricing occurred. Both Okechamp and an American company, Giorgio Foods, submitted their opinions on the matter through official letters. Important Details: Because there was a government shutdown in 2025, all deadlines for the review had to be extended. However, the Commerce Department completed its work and set April 17, 2026, as the new deadline for reporting the final results. Final Decision: For the review period, Okechamp has a dumping margin of $0.44 per kilogram of drained mushrooms. This means that the Department of Commerce has determined how much Okechamp undersold its mushrooms in the U.S. market. Impact on Duties: The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now adjust the duties (taxes) Okechamp must pay based on these findings. If the margin is higher than a small amount known as “de minimis,” duties will be collected. If it’s very small or zero, then no extra duties will be charged. Cash Deposit Requirements: When Okechamp continues to import mushrooms into the U.S., they must make a cash deposit. This deposit will be per unit, not a percentage of the total price, due to a significant difference in their pricing strategies. Conclusion: The Department of Commerce’s findings help ensure that trade is fair. By making sure foreign companies do not sell products too cheaply, they aim to protect U.S. businesses and jobs. This process is part of regular reviews to maintain a level playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Activated Carbon Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its review of imports of activated carbon from China. In this review, it was found that some Chinese companies sold activated carbon in the United States at prices lower than usual. The review period was from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Earlier, on August 15, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce had given preliminary results about this situation. There were some delays due to a government shutdown, which affected the timeline. However, new deadlines were set, and the final results were published on April 23, 2026. Companies Involved Two companies in China that were looked at are Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. had no dumping margin, while Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. showed a dumping margin of 0.56 USD per kilogram. Seven other companies were not looked at individually but were given the same rate as Ningxia Huahui because they were granted a separate rate. China-Wide Entity Some companies were not reviewed and are considered part of a larger group called the China-wide entity. This group has a higher rate of 2.42 USD per kilogram. Five companies did not apply for a separate rate and are included in this China-wide entity. Next Steps The U.S. intends to calculate and assess duties based on these findings. For companies found not dumping or with very low margins, no extra duties will be charged. For others, duties will be assessed based on the margins found. Final Thoughts The review and its results are important for ensuring fair trade. By finalizing this review, the U.S. Department of Commerce aims to protect local industries from unfair pricing and maintain fair competition. For any shipments entering the U.S. after this report, new cash deposit rates, reflecting these findings, will be in effect. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Tariff Adjustment Procedures for Steel and Aluminum Producers Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new procedures for certain steel and aluminum producers. These procedures relate to Proclamation 10984. This Proclamation addresses tariffs on medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and parts. It also covers buses entering the United States. Proclamation 10984 was issued on October 17, 2025. It aims to secure national security by adjusting tariffs. It also refers back to Proclamations 9704 and 9705 from March 8, 2018. These addressed aluminum and steel imports into the United States.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention in Aluminum Container Imports Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision regarding aluminum containers from Vietnam. These containers are made using aluminum foil from China. The Department believes these imports are avoiding duties on aluminum containers from China. This decision may affect many imports. Companies and parties interested are encouraged to comment on this preliminary determination. Background and Investigation Timeline The investigation started in July 2025. The Department wanted to know if aluminum containers made in Vietnam with Chinese foil were bypassing trade rules. This came after antidumping and countervailing duty orders were put on similar Chinese products in May 2025. Due to government shutdowns, the investigation faced delays. On January 16, 2026, the deadline for a preliminary decision was moved to April 15, 2026. Scope of the Orders The orders focus on disposable containers, pans, trays, and lids. These products are usually made from flat-rolled aluminum. When these products are made in Vietnam using Chinese foil, they might be avoiding U.S. duties. Preliminary Determination The Department thinks these imports from Vietnam are circumventing duties meant for China. This means duties might apply to these imports in the future. Impact on Importers and Exporters Importers must provide certifications stating their products are not made with Chinese foil. If they can’t prove it, they must follow the rules for imports from China, including paying duties. Certifications must be submitted at the time of entry. Public Comment and Next Steps Interested parties can submit their views and comments on this determination. They must do so within 14 days after the notice is published. There are processes and deadlines for submitting additional information and requesting hearings. Certifications Companies importing products can certify their goods are not affected by these determinations. Both importers and exporters need to keep documentation to prove compliance with these certifications. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking steps to address potential circumvention of duties on aluminum containers. All parties involved in these kinds of imports and exports need to pay close attention to compliance requirements and deadlines. Further actions and adjustments will depend on the final decisions made by the Department after public and industry feedback. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Duties on Aluminum Containers from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Published: 2026-04-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It found that some products made with aluminum from China are avoiding extra duties. This process is called “circumvention.” The products in question are disposable aluminum containers. These include pans, trays, and lids. They are being made in Thailand using aluminum that comes from China. After that, they are sent to the United States. The aim of this determination is to close any loopholes in the regulations. Commerce wants to ensure that duties on certain products are properly applied. These products are bound by antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These are meant to protect U.S. businesses from unfair foreign trade practices. Commerce made a preliminary finding on April 15, 2026. It invited comments from all interested parties. The circumvention inquiry began because of the AD and CVD orders published in May 2025. Commerce began looking into the matter on July 11, 2025. They were checking if products made in Thailand with Chinese materials were avoiding duties. Two companies in Thailand were chosen for this investigation. They are Peak Legends (Thailand) Co., Ltd. and Wohler Household Products (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Due to government shutdowns, the investigation deadlines were extended. This pushed the preliminary determination date to April 15, 2026. The result of this investigation will affect duties. Importers to the United States must now be more careful. They will need to provide certifications to avoid duties. For products from Thailand entering the U.S. since October 28, 2024, importers must complete certifications. These documents show products were not made with Chinese materials. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will use these certifications to decide if duties apply. If the conditions are not met, duties at high rates may apply. Importers and exporters must keep records of certifications. These include documents like commercial invoices and aluminum mill certificates. They must keep these records for at least five years. Commerce has invited public comments on these certification rules. They also set deadlines for the submission of briefs and hearing requests. This decision by the Department of Commerce underscores the importance of strict trade regulations. The move protects U.S. industries from unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.