U.S. Department of Commerce Determines Subsidies for Aluminum Foil from Oman Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-09-15 The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a decision regarding aluminum foil imported from the Sultanate of Oman. The decision concerns countervailable subsidies provided to producers and exporters in Oman, specifically the Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC). The review period is from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. During this time, Commerce found that countervailable subsidies were given to OARC. These subsidies are money or help from the government that gives an advantage to a company. Because of this, it was concluded that a countervailable subsidy rate of 11.38% should be applied to aluminum foil from OARC. Commerce plans to tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect these duties on aluminum foil from OARC. The collection will start from the publication date, September 15, 2026. If a legal challenge is made, CBP will be directed not to collect the duties immediately. This will allow all parties time to seek further legal action. The cash deposit rates for other companies that were not reviewed will remain the same as before this decision. This ensures that past rates continue for those companies. Commerce has reassured the parties involved that they must handle all private information with care. Guidelines on how to return or destroy private information have been provided to ensure compliance. The decision was finalized and published by Christopher Abbott, who is acting as the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. This decision is part of Commerce’s ongoing efforts to enforce trade laws fairly and to ensure a level playing field. The complete details and methodology behind these final results can be accessed online through the Federal Register or Commerce’s website for public records. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Indian Glycine Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has finalized its review regarding the import of glycine from India. The review determined that Indian producers and exporters have been selling glycine in the U.S. at prices below its normal value. This review examined the period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Key Findings The final results confirm the preliminary findings issued earlier this year. The preliminary results had found that some Indian companies were selling glycine at unfairly low prices. The companies Medilane Healthcare Private Limited and Mulji Mehta Enterprises were found to have dumping margins of 57.17%. Implications The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on these imports. The cash deposit rate for Medilane Healthcare Private Limited and Mulji Mehta Enterprises will be set at 57.17%. Additional Details Cash deposit rates for other companies will depend on whether they were part of this review or a previous one. If a company was not reviewed, rates from the most recent segment will apply. If neither the exporter nor the producer has previously been reviewed, a standard rate of 7.23% will apply. Responsibilities for Importers Importers must file a certificate concerning the reimbursement of any antidumping or countervailing duties before their entries are liquidated. If they fail to do so, they could face double duties or increased duties. Privacy and Compliance Parties involved should respect agreements regarding proprietary information as laid out by the Department of Commerce. These results have been issued according to U.S. law and will be enforced to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Releases Results of Korean Oil Tubular Goods Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-09-15 On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of an administrative review concerning oil country tubular goods from South Korea. The period under review was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review focused on whether companies received unfair financial help, called subsidies, from the government that would hurt U.S. competitors. Key Findings: The review looked at SeAH Steel Corporation, a company from Korea that makes and sells oil tubular goods. The Department of Commerce found that SeAH Steel did not receive unfair government subsidies during the review period. A subsidy would mean that the government provided financial help that favored the company over others in the market. The findings concluded that the subsidy rate for SeAH Steel was de minimis. This means the rate was so small that it was practically zero. As a result, no extra duties will be charged on their good. Review Rescission: The review also mentioned Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. This company was originally included in the review. However, because there were no import entries that the review could assess, the Department decided not to include them in the final review. Process and Methodology: The Department conducted this review following certain rules. They checked for any financial help from the government to the company that would affect trade. They also ensured transparency by making the details of the review public online. The final results and the technical information are kept in a special online system, ensuring that the process remains open to officials and interested parties. Next Steps: The Commerce Department will tell U.S. Customs not to impose extra duties on SeAH’s goods. This instruction will take effect soon. Other companies that were not a part of this review will still be subject to the original duty rates as updated last year. The rates will continue until new instructions or reviews occur. This review serves as an example of ongoing monitoring of international trade practices. It ensures fair competition in the U.S. market by evaluating imports’ financial backing from foreign governments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Oil Country Tubular Goods from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Commerce Department Reviews Oil Country Tubular Goods from Türkiye The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings in its review of countervailing duties on certain Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from Türkiye. These goods are a type of steel pipes used in the oil and gas industry. The review is for the period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Key Details: The department has found that Borusan Birleşik Boru Fabrikaları Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Borusan), a major producer and exporter, received subsidies. A subsidy is a financial help given by the government. For the specified period, Borusan has been given a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent. The review started after requests made in 2025, and it includes extensions due to government shutdowns. Important Dates: The notice was published on September 15, 2026. Case briefs, where interested parties can comment, are due 21 days from this date. Rebuttal briefs, which respond to case briefs, are due five days after case briefs. Public Participation: Interested parties can submit comments and request a hearing to discuss the issues. Such requests must include the requester’s details and list of discussion points. Next Steps: Commerce plans to release the final results within 120 days of this notice, unless the timeline is extended. Cash deposit instructions related to the findings will guide future duty collections. This review process helps ensure fair trade practices by evaluating and acting on subsidies that might affect the U.S. market. Interested parties are encouraged to participate actively for transparency and informed outcomes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Trade Orders on Silicon Metal Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue certain trade orders. These orders are about silicon metal from four countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Malaysia, and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Commerce and the ITC believe that ending these orders would allow unfair trade practices to continue. This could hurt businesses in the United States. So, they are keeping the orders in place. The orders are of two types. One type is called antidumping duty (AD) orders, and the other is countervailing duty (CVD) orders. AD orders are for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia. The CVD order is for Kazakhstan. These orders cover all forms and sizes of silicon metal. However, silicon that is very pure, called semiconductor grade silicon, does not fall under these orders. The ITC first looked at this matter on March 2, 2026. The ITC and Commerce checked if ending the orders would be bad for U.S. industries. They decided that it would. So, on September 3, 2026, they published their decision to keep the orders. Commerce will keep collecting fees on silicon metal imports. These fees help ensure that unfair trade practices do not happen. These reviews happen every five years. Commerce plans to check these orders again before five years are up. For now, the orders will stay. The goal is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair trade practices. This decision will help keep competition fair in the silicon metal market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Chinese Steel Racks Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a significant decision regarding the import of certain steel racks and their parts from China. The decision reveals that some companies from China sold steel racks in the US at prices lower than the normal value. This review covers the period from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. Findings from the Review The review shows that certain Chinese exporters, including Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., were involved in dumping. Dumping means selling goods in another country at a lower price than in the home market. As a result, a weighted-average dumping margin of 10.34 percent is applied to these companies. Jiangsu JISE Intelligent Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. also falls under this category. Steps Taken by the Department of Commerce Review Process: The Commerce Department applied rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. It used this legal framework to conduct a detailed review of the imports. Rescission of Review: The Commerce Department decided to rescind, or cancel, the review for Nanjing Kingmore Logistics Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., due to a lack of evidence for any suspended entries of their products during the period. Separate Rates and China-Wide Rate: Companies that cooperated and proved their case received a separate rate of 10.34 percent. Companies that did not cooperate are part of the China-wide entity and face a rate of 144.50 percent. This includes firms like Guangdong Xinmiao Storage Equipment Co., Ltd., among others. Implications for Importers Cash Deposits: Importers must now provide cash deposits based on the new rates when bringing these products into the US. For Jiangsu Nova and Jiangsu JISE, the rate is 10.34 percent. If the company is part of the China-wide entity, the rate is 144.50 percent. Reimbursement Certificate: Importers are reminded of their duty to file a certificate about whether antidumping duties were reimbursed. This step is crucial to avoid penalties. Next Steps Assessment Instructions: Within 35 days of this announcement, Commerce will send instructions to the US Customs and Border Protection regarding the collection of duties. Confidential Information: Companies must adhere to rules about returning or destroying confidential information shared during the review process. In conclusion, this decision by the US Department of Commerce aims to ensure fair pricing and maintain competitive markets by addressing the issue of dumping from Chinese steel rack exporters. Importers in the US need to follow the new guidelines to comply with the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Preliminary Determination: Tin Mill Products from China Face Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Investigation Details The period of the investigation covers the entire year of 2025. This is part of an ongoing examination under the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce began the investigation in May 2026 and has been working towards gathering the necessary information to assess the situation. Scope of Investigation Tin mill products are flat-rolled steel items, either coated with tin or chromium. These products, known as tinplate and tin-free steel, are used in various industries. The scope of this investigation covers all tin mill products from China, regardless of their specific characteristics. Findings According to the preliminary findings, companies like Shougang Holding Trade (Hong Kong) Ltd. and Shougang Jingtang United Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. have been identified as receiving countervailable subsidies. Commerce has applied an adverse inference due to a lack of cooperation from these companies in providing requested information. Critical Circumstances Commerce also finds critical circumstances existing, which impacts how duties are applied. This designation means that duties may be imposed on retroactive imports, dating back 90 days before the initial suspension decision. Next Steps Those interested are invited to comment on this preliminary decision. The decision on final duties will be aligned with the final determination in a companion antidumping duty investigation. This is expected to be finalized by November 30, 2026. Public Participation Commerce has opened the floor for case briefs and comments from interested parties. Deadlines have been set for submissions, and a hearing may be scheduled if requested. It is crucial for stakeholders to participate actively to ensure their perspectives are considered. Notification to ITC The International Trade Commission (ITC) has been notified of these findings. It is up to the ITC to determine whether the imports in question are injuring or threatening U.S. industries. The Department of Commerce remains committed to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign subsidies. The outcomes of these determinations have significant implications for trade relations and industry stakeholders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Brass Rod Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Published: 2026-09-14 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings in its review of brass rod imports from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Key Findings The review focused on two Korean companies: Booyoung Industry (BYI) and Daechang Co., Ltd. (Daechang). The preliminary results show that both companies sold brass rods in the United States at prices lower than the normal value. This means they sold their products for less than it costs to produce them. About the Review Process The review began in July 2025, following requests to look into the antidumping duty order on brass rods from Korea. An antidumping duty is a protectionist tariff imposed on foreign imports believed to be priced below fair market value. The U.S. Department of Commerce selected BYI and Daechang as the main companies for this review. The review experienced delays due to a government shutdown, leading to extensions of the deadlines. Methodology The Department of Commerce used an extensive process to come to these preliminary conclusions. This involved checking the companies’ sales data and comparing it to the normal value. They calculated export prices and constructed export prices based on U.S. laws. Preliminary Results For the period covered, BYI has a dumping margin of 9.28%, while Daechang Co., Ltd., along with the associated companies Seowon Co. Ltd. and IMI Co. Ltd., has a margin of 5.22%. These percentages reflect how much lower their sales prices were compared to the normal value. Next Steps Interested parties, such as importers and industry stakeholders, have an opportunity to comment on these preliminary results. They must submit their comments in writing, including summaries of their main points, within 21 days from the notice. A final decision will be made after reviewing these comments. The decisions will affect how much duty importers must pay on brass rods from Korea in the future. Impact on Importers Importers of Korean brass rods will need to pay duties based on the preliminary dumping margins. If the final results confirm or change these margins, the duties will be adjusted accordingly. This can affect the final price of the brass rods for U.S. buyers. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking steps to address the issue of brass rods being sold for less than their production cost. Through the antidumping review, they aim to ensure fair competition and support U.S. manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: No Shipments from C.S. Aluminium Corporation Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes September 14, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision about C.S. Aluminium Corporation (CSAC). They have found that CSAC did not ship any common alloy aluminum sheet to the United States during the review period. This period was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The announcement was made in the Federal Register on September 14, 2026. It was confirmed by Sarah Keith from the Department of Commerce. The Department of Commerce first published their preliminary findings on May 14, 2026. They invited people to give comments on these findings. However, no one gave any comments. Because of this, the preliminary findings were used in the final announcement. According to the Department, since there were no shipments, there is no need for detailed calculations of dumping margins. They did not have to disclose any calculations, as there were none to make. For those who might be affected by antidumping duties, the Department of Commerce has set rules. They have determined that for products by CSAC, there will be no duties to pay because there were no shipments. Any products that might have mistakenly come to the U.S. will be taxed at a general rate of 17.50 percent. The Department has procedures in place if someone wants to seek an injunction through the U.S. Court of International Trade. This means certain steps will be taken to delay any immediate actions. The cash deposit rates will not change for CSAC because there were no shipments. If other companies have participated in past reviews, those rates will remain in effect. For new companies without any reviews, the deposit rate will be the same as the general rate, which is 17.50 percent. Lastly, this notice reminds importers that they need to file important certificates about antidumping duties. If they don’t, the Department might assume they are avoiding duties. This means they may have to pay double duties. This acts as a final notice to parties involved and ensures compliance with the laws concerning aluminum imports from Taiwan. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Belgian Citric Acid Sales for Antidumping Compliance Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings from its review of citric acid and citrate salts imported from Belgium. The review, conducted by the International Trade Administration, focused on the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The main subject of the review was the Belgian company Citribel N.V. The investigation aimed to determine if Citribel was selling these products in the United States at unfairly low prices that could harm U.S. businesses. Preliminary Findings The preliminary results show that Citribel did not sell the products at prices below the normal value, meaning their practices were in compliance with U.S. law. This marks a significant outcome for Citribel, as no unfair pricing was detected during the review period. Background and Procedures The investigation into Belgian citric acid began after an antidumping duty order was published in July 2018. The Department of Commerce started this specific review in August 2025. Due to federal delays, the department had to extend deadlines. Finally, they issued the preliminary results on September 8, 2026. Throughout the review, the Department closely studied Citribel’s pricing and sales data. They also verified the company’s information to ensure accuracy in the preliminary findings. Next Steps for Public Comments The Department of Commerce is open to public comments on these findings. Interested parties have 21 days from the notice’s publication to submit their comments. Rebuttal comments are also welcome, provided they comply with the Department’s regulatory requirements. Comments must include tables of contents and authorities, and submissions must be made electronically. The Department emphasizes the importance of clear and concise comments, limited to 450 words per issue. Final Results and Future Implications The final results of this review are expected within 120 days. They will determine future duties and cash deposit requirements for Citribel’s products. The Commerce Department will use these results to guide future regulations concerning imports of citric acid from Belgium. Conclusion This review is part of ongoing efforts by the Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. industries. It provides reassurance to consumers and businesses about the integrity of international trade relations. The final results will clarify any further actions required for compliance and fair market practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Results of Shrimp Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-14 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made amendments to the results of a recent trade review. This review focused on the countervailing duty on frozen warmwater shrimp from Ecuador. The review period was from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. The changes were made to fix errors that occurred earlier. The Department of Commerce oversees international trade and ensures fair practices. They had to amend the final results of their review to fix what are termed “ministerial errors.” These errors included mistakes in calculations or clerical errors. The initial final results came out on August 6, 2026. However, on August 12, companies were informed that they could comment on any errors. By August 17, the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee pointed out these mistakes. Another party, Empacadora del Pacifico S.A. (known as Edpacif), responded with comments on August 24, 2026. A “ministerial error” arises from simple calculation mistakes or copying errors. It does not result from any major change in policy or procedure. The Department of Commerce’s regulations ensure that such errors can be identified and corrected. In this case, two companies were affected by these errors: Edpacif and Nirsa/Proposorja. For Edpacif, an incorrect figure was used in the final calculations. As a result, their subsidy rate changed slightly from 15.17 percent to 15.18 percent. For Nirsa/Proposorja, the department failed to apply a necessary revision, increasing their subsidy rate from 2.21 percent to 2.23 percent. The revised results will affect how duties are collected in the future. The Department uses these results to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on the rates they should apply to imports. This also impacts the cash deposits companies must make when importing these goods into the U.S. The detailed memorandum that discusses these errors and the department’s rationale is available online for registered users. This information is logged in a centralized electronic system where interested parties can access it. This amendment ensures fair trade practices are upheld and serves as a reminder of the importance of accuracy in international trade assessments by government agencies. The department has announced that these changes will be published in the Federal Register and are now effective. This means any shipments of impacted goods brought into the U.S. will follow these revised rates. This announcement serves as a reminder to companies about the importance of following trade regulations closely and the obligations related to any agreements or protections in place. Compliance with these requirements is crucial for fair international trade operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Preliminary Findings on Glycine from Japan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 14, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an announcement regarding the import of glycine from Japan. This announcement is about the preliminary results of a review on antidumping duties. Antidumping duties are taxes added to goods to make foreign products more expensive when they are sold for less than they are worth. The Department of Commerce reported that some companies in Japan have been selling glycine to the United States at prices that are less than normal. These sales happened between June 1, 2024, and May 31, 2025. The Department is asking people who are interested to comment on these findings. The main report from the Department of Commerce includes some history. It notes that an order was first made on June 21, 2019, to control these sales. The Department started a review process on June 3, 2025, inviting requests for a more detailed check. The requests for this review officially began on July 25, 2025. The process of reviewing was delayed because of a government shutdown. Because of this, the deadlines were extended. The Department has now extended the deadline for review results to September 8, 2026. The Department also plans to explain their methods in doing this review. They calculate different types of prices like “export price” and “normal value.” These check how much products should cost on their way to the U.S. from Japan. The Department decided to stop the review for four companies that did not meet certain requirements. These companies include Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Ajinomoto Healthcare, Inc., Sojitz Corporation, and Sojitz Logistics Corporation. There will not be any checks on them anymore. The Department found that some companies have been selling their glycine products to the U.S. at dumping margins. Dumping margins show how much less they are selling their products for in the U.S. Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./Nagase & Co., Ltd. had a margin of 3.25 percent. However, Resonac Corporation had a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. The Department is planning to disclose more information soon and is inviting comments from the public. People can submit written comments within 21 days after this notice, followed by rebuttal comments to be submitted five days later. The Department also encourages those wanting a hearing to submit their requests. The next steps include calculating duties that are due based on the findings. If there are no penalties or low margins found, some companies might not have to pay extra duties. For now, the cash deposit rates will continue for certain companies while others will keep their deposit rates the same as before. The final results and decision will be shared within 120 days from the notice date. This is to ensure that importers know how much antidumping duty they might need to pay. Importers are reminded to file important certificates about paying antidumping duties on time. This is crucial to avoid double payments. The Department of Commerce is committed to updating all interested parties and maintaining fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Methionine from Spain Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results for an administrative review of antidumping duties on methionine imported from Spain. This review covered the period of September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The findings revealed that methionine from Spain was sold in the United States at less than its normal value. This review focused only on Adisseo España S.A., a producer and exporter of methionine from Spain. The Department of Commerce first published preliminary findings on this matter in March 2026. The deadline for these final results was extended twice, with the final publication date set for September 8, 2026. Results: The review concluded that Adisseo España S.A. sold methionine at an average dumping margin of 8.20 percent. This means that the prices at which they sold methionine in the U.S. were significantly lower than those in the Spanish market. Scope of the Order: The order pertains specifically to methionine produced in Spain. Methionine is an important additive in animal feed, used to ensure proper nutrition for livestock. Assessment Rates: The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess antidumping duties on relevant entries of methionine produced by Adisseo. For entries during the review period, duties will be applied based on the 8.20 percent dumping margin. For entries from other exporters or producers, the standard rate from previous investigations, which is 37.53 percent, will apply. This rate will also apply if Adisseo exported methionine without knowledge that it was destined for the United States. Cash Deposit Requirements: New cash deposit rates will apply for all shipments of methionine from Spain entering the U.S. from the publication date of these final results. The specific rate for Adisseo will be 8.20 percent. Other producers and exporters will either use their established rates or the standard rate of 37.53 percent. Reimbursement of Duties: Importers are reminded to file a certificate if they aren’t reimbursing antidumping duties. This action must be taken before liquidating entries during the review period. Failure to file may result in doubled duties being assessed. Conclusion: These results ensure that U.S. Customs and Commerce regulations are upheld, maintaining fair trade practices. Importers and exporters should remain aware of their responsibilities under these antidumping duties to prevent repercussions. For more details or questions, interested parties can contact the Department of Commerce. The full report is available electronically through the department’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Quartz Surface Product Imports from India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding the import of certain quartz surface products from India for the review period of June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department has found that some Indian exporters sold quartz surfaces in the U.S. market at prices below the normal value, which is known as “dumping.” The companies Cuarzo and Beyyond Rocks Private Limited (collectively known as Cuarzo/Beyyond) have been identified for such sales. On the contrary, it has been determined that Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited (PESL) did not engage in dumping during the review period. The Department of Commerce is now proposing a new dumping margin of 4.91% for Cuarzo/Beyyond. PESL, however, could maintain a margin of 0.00%, indicating no dumping of its products. The Department has also decided to rescind the review for 53 companies and plans to rescind it for four more companies, having found either no dumped entries or no entries subject to review during the period. The companies whose cases were rescinded include firms like Global Stones Pvt Ltd. and Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP. In accordance with the legal procedures, interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results. They have until September 15, 2026, to provide comments, while rebuttal comments are due by September 22, 2026. The merchandise under review is quartz surface products originating from India. The review started following requests in July 2025, with a selection of Cuarzo and PESL as mandatory respondents in March 2026. A series of extensions due to government shutdown and backlog pushed the preliminary results announcement to September 8, 2026. The calculated dumping margin will impact future import rates and duties, adjusting based on a calculated sample rate for companies not individually reviewed. The final results and implications for cash deposits on future imports will be known after the full review, anticipated to conclude within 120 days after this preliminary announcement. The Commerce Department’s efforts aim to ensure fair trade practices and level competition for U.S. industries affected by unfair pricing strategies from international companies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Argentine Honey Dumped at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 6–8 minutes Preliminary Results Announced The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary findings in the administrative review of antidumping duties on raw honey imported from Argentina. The review looked at the period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Commerce found that two Argentine companies, NEXCO S.A. (NEXCO) and Villamora S.A. (Villamora), sold raw honey in the United States at prices below the normal value. These are preliminary results, and interested parties are invited to comment on these findings. Commerce selected NEXCO and Villamora as the main companies to review, along with other non-examined companies. Review Background and Procedures The Commerce Department started the review on July 25, 2025, after receiving requests for it. The review was delayed due to a government shutdown. However, it resumed once routine operations were restored. The preliminary findings were extended multiple times, with the final preliminary results being announced just before the new deadline on September 8, 2026. Merchandise and Methodology The merchandise in focus is raw honey from Argentina. Commerce conducted the review according to U.S. trade laws, specifically sections 751 and 772 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The export price was calculated accordingly, and the normal value was determined to identify any price differences. Findings for Non-Examined Companies For companies that were part of the review but were not individually examined, Commerce calculated a rate using the weighted average of the rates given to NEXCO and Villamora. This rate came out to 3.48 percent. This is in line with the procedure for determining rates for non-selected companies when it is not possible to investigate every company individually. Preliminary Dumping Margins The preliminary results show the estimated dumping margins. NEXCO was found to have a dumping margin of 1.93 percent, and Villamora had a margin of 6.80 percent. Opportunities to Comment Commerce will disclose its calculation results to parties. Interested parties can submit written comments and case briefs up to 21 days after this announcement. They can also submit rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised in others’ briefs five days later. Parties can request a hearing if needed. They must submit such requests electronically with specific details about participants and issues to be discussed. Market Impact and Next Steps The review assesses the impact of dumped goods on the U.S. market and determines additional duties to level the playing field. Following the completion of this review, adjusted cash deposit rates for future shipments of honey from Argentina will be set based on these preliminary results. The ongoing assessments will also affect importers. Commerce ensures no double duties are collected by verifying if duties are reimbursed before liquidating entries. Publication and Enforcement These preliminary findings are published as a formal notice in the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and allowing for fair market practices in international trade. This announcement forms a part of Commerce’s efforts to regulate fair trade and maintain competitive markets in the U.S. The final results of this review can potentially affect future imports and trade practices concerning honey from Argentina. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Raw Honey Imports from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Did the Review Find? The United States Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision on raw honey imports from Vietnam. The decision is part of an antidumping duty administrative review. The review covers the period from June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce found that some companies in Vietnam sold raw honey in the U.S. at prices less than the normal value. This means they sold honey at a lower price than it usually costs in their own country. Companies Reviewed The review looked closely at two companies: Ban Me Thuot Honeybee Joint Stock Company (BMT) and Daklak Honeybee Joint Stock Company (DakHoney). These companies are the main focus because they are large exporters of honey to the U.S. Preliminary Results BMT was found to have a dumping margin of 30.21 percent. DakHoney was found to have a dumping margin of 39.61 percent. The dumping margin is the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price. Eight other companies were also reviewed. They were not individually examined, but they met certain qualifications. These companies received a dumping margin of 34.91 percent. Companies Not Reviewed Some companies from Vietnam were not part of the reviewed group. For these companies, the wider Vietnam entity rate of 60.03 percent still applies. This is a standard rate used for companies not individually reviewed or that do not qualify for separate rates. Upcoming Steps The Department of Commerce has shared these preliminary results. Parties involved have the opportunity to submit comments. These comments can be filed in case briefs within 21 days of the date of publication of this notice. After the comments are reviewed, a final decision will be made. In summary, the preliminary results of this review could lead to changes in how raw honey from Vietnam is imported into the U.S. Future cash deposit rates may be adjusted based on these results. This review aims to ensure fair trade practices between the U.S. and Vietnam. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Brazilian Honey Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings on the antidumping duty review of raw honey from Brazil. This review covered the period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The department has found that certain companies in Brazil sold honey in the U.S. at less than its normal value. Main Companies Reviewed: The review targeted two main companies: Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindústria Ltda. Minamel Agroindústria Ltda. Both companies were found to have sold honey at prices lower than normal value. Review Details: The review began on July 25, 2025. The U.S. Department of Commerce selected Melbras and Minamel as the primary subjects of this review. The review considered data from a period when several federal delays altered timelines. Rescissions: The department decided to rescind the review of 11 other companies, including Apis Nativa Agroindustrial Exportadora Ltda, as they did not have entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Methodology: The department considered both the export price and the constructed export price. They also evaluated the normal value of Brazilian honey. For companies not individually reviewed, an average margin was applied. Preliminary Results: Melbras received a preliminary dumping margin of 1.67 percent. Minamel received a margin of 2.64 percent. Additional Information: Interested parties can comment on these findings, and responses must include a public executive summary. All documents should be filed via the department’s electronic service system. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce expects to finalize these preliminary findings in the coming months. Cash deposit rates apply to shipments of honey from Brazil based on these preliminary results. U.S. importers must continue to ensure compliance with antidumping duties. These findings are part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. to maintain fair trade practices and evaluate imports for dumping activities. The department plans to continue its thorough review process to ensure that American producers are not harmed by unfair pricing practices from foreign entities. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies in Glycine Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-14 Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a preliminary decision about glycine products imported from India. They think that some companies in India received unfair money help from their government, which makes selling their products cheaper in the U.S. This is part of an ongoing investigation to make sure trade rules are fair. Background Glycine is a product that the U.S. monitors closely. In 2019, a rule was set to make sure India was not giving unfair help to their companies for glycine. Commerce has done a review for the year 2024 to check if these rules were followed. They started this talk in July 2025 and chose two main companies, Kumar Industries and Mulji Mehta Enterprises, to look at closely. Decision to Rescind for Some Companies Commerce has decided to stop looking at 27 companies because nobody wanted a review for them anymore. This means those companies will not be part of this decision about unfair subsidies. Reason for the Review A review is done to make sure there are no unfair practices. The U.S. laws state there should be no unfair help from governments to companies that could harm fair trade. Commerce found that some companies may have received help, which means they sold glycine at lower prices unfairly. Results and Method For this review, Commerce found that Kumar Industries and Mulji Mehta Enterprises took part in these programs. They gave Kumar a subsidy rate of 39.75% and Mulji Mehta Enterprises a rate of 104.92%. Mulji Mehta Pharma, linked to Mulji Mehta Enterprises, also got Kumar’s rate of 39.75% because it wasn’t separately checked. What Happens Next? Commerce will allow people to talk about this decision before making it final. Anyone interested in giving thoughts must do so within 21 days from today’s announcement. The final decision will be made after listening to these comments. Conclusion This step ensures fair trade practices between the U.S. and India concerning glycine. Commerce’s actions aim to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition while ensuring they follow international trade rules. Families and industries relying on fair pricing will be kept informed as the review continues. For more detailed information, parties are invited to access the full preliminary review memorandum online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Findings on PC Strand from Ukraine Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken a significant step in its review of trade activities. The department, through the International Trade Administration, has released preliminary findings regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Ukraine. This process involves verifying if the goods were sold in the United States at a price lower than the normal value. The specific company under review is PJSC Stalkanat. The review period considered by the department is from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The preliminary findings have determined that PJSC Stalkanat did not sell these products at prices below the normal value during this period. This means they have not engaged in what is known as “dumping.” These findings are important, as dumping can harm the local market by underselling domestic goods. Hence, countries impose duties to protect their industries from such practices. This process is part of an antidumping duty administrative review. The Department of Commerce first initiated this review back on July 25, 2025. The government shutdowns affected the timeline for these reviews, causing several extensions. Originally, extensions were made in April, July, and August of 2026 to ensure thoroughness in the review process. The department now invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Interested individuals or businesses have the opportunity to submit their case briefs or written comments. The timeline for providing these submissions will be communicated at a later date. Those wishing to file rebuttal briefs, specifically countering the issues raised, have five days following the submission deadline for case briefs to do so. The final results of this administrative review are expected to be issued within 120 days of the publication of this preliminary notice. This will include analysis of the all issues raised from submitted comments or briefs. The department will provide specific instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for assessing the appropriate antidumping duties based on the final results. If PJSC Stalkanat’s margin remains zero or is determined to be less than 0.50 percent, no duties will be collected. If the margin is more than 0.50 percent, duties will be applied to future shipments. The findings and updates about this process are available for public viewing through official government online portals. The detailed information is accessible electronically for those with interest in the trade compliance practices. This notice also reminds importers of their need to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties before they finalize the transaction of goods. This ensures transparency and compliance with U.S. trade regulations. This process is overseen by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, who is acting in this role for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Update: Preliminary Results on Brass Rod from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary findings from its review of brass rod imports from Brazil. This review specifically focuses on Termomecanica Sao Paulo S.A., a Brazilian producer and exporter. Background On June 13, 2024, Commerce established an antidumping duty order on brass rod from Brazil. The current review covers the period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025, initiated due to timely requests. Preliminary Findings Commerce has found that Termomecanica made sales of brass rod at less than normal value during the review period. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Termomecanica is 22.07 percent. Methodology The review was conducted according to the Tariff Act of 1930. The calculation involved export price, constructed export price, and normal value. Public Comment Commerce invites public comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties may submit case briefs by following specific timelines and formats. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements Upon finalizing the review, Commerce will determine and direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on duty assessments. New cash deposit rates will be set for shipments on or after the final results’ publication. Next Steps The final results of this review are expected within 120 days of the notice’s publication. Commerce will continue to ensure compliance with established procedures and regulations. Conclusion This review is part of Commerce’s ongoing efforts to regulate international trade and ensure fair pricing practices. Further details and updates can be accessed through the Federal Register or Commerce’s online portals. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Ends Orders on Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Department of Commerce Ends Orders on Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to revoke orders on certain walk-behind lawn mowers from China and Vietnam. This decision came after a review process that found no domestic company interested in continuing the orders. Background and Review Process In 2021, Commerce placed orders to manage the dumping and countervailing duties on walk-behind lawn mowers from these countries. This was to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing practices. On June 1, 2026, Commerce started a review to decide if these orders should remain. No Interest from U.S. Companies AxenTech LLC initially showed interest in the review process. They are a domestic wholesaler who wanted to participate. However, they withdrew their interest, which led to no participation from any domestic party. Due to the lack of interest, the Department of Commerce will revoke the orders. What is Covered Under the Orders The orders covered walk-behind lawn mowers with specific engines and features. These lawn mowers are powered by internal combustion engines with less than 3.7 kilowatts. They also must meet certain safety standards, whether finished or not. Impact of Revocation Revoking these orders means that as of July 13, 2026, lawn mowers from China and Vietnam are no longer subject to these specific trade protections. Customs and Border Protection will stop the suspension of liquidation for these mowers from this date onward. Final Note This marks an end to a trade protection measure that was initially put in place to support domestic producers. The Department of Commerce made this decision because no U.S. companies showed interest in continuing the measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Brazilian Brass Rods Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings from the administrative review of antidumping duties on brass rods from Brazil. This review focuses specifically on the Brazilian company, Termomecanica Sao Paulo S.A., which is a producer and exporter of brass rods. Finding Details The review covers a period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. During this time, Termomecanica made sales of brass rods at prices less than normal value. In simple terms, this means they sold products at lower prices in the U.S. than in Brazil. The estimated dumping margin for Termomecanica is determined to be 22.07 percent. What’s Next The public can comment on these findings. The Commerce Department will take comments into account before making a final decision. Interested parties have 21 days from the notice’s publication to submit written comments. After that, there is an additional five-day period to submit rebuttal comments. Assessment and Cash Deposit Rates If the final results of the review confirm the preliminary findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be directed to assess antidumping duties on applicable entries from the period reviewed. Additionally, the cash deposit rate for future entries of brass rods from Brazil, through Termomecanica, will be updated to reflect these final results. This new rate will apply to shipments entering the U.S. after the final decision. Impact on Importers Importers need to be aware of these potential changes. Importers should file certificates about the reimbursement of antidumping duties before the final liquidation occurs. If they fail to do so, they might have to pay double the duties. Public Hearing Requests Those interested in a public hearing can submit a request within 30 days after this notice is published. They need to provide their name, contact details, and the issues they plan to discuss. Final Results Timeline The Department of Commerce aims to publish the final results within 120 days, although this could be extended if needed. The review ensures fair international trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. For more information or to participate, stakeholders can access detailed documentation online through the U.S. Department of Commerce’s electronic service systems. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Ends Trade Orders on Lawn Mowers from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to revoke trade orders on certain walk-behind lawn mowers from China and Vietnam. This decision follows a process called a “sunset review.” The sunset review began on June 1, 2026. This is when the Department of Commerce looks at old orders to decide if they should still be in place. The orders being reviewed were first made on July 13, 2021. They were made to prevent dumping and unfair pricing of lawn mowers from China and Vietnam in the U.S. market. During the review, no U.S. company or interested party came forward to express continued support for the orders by the set deadline of July 1, 2026. Without such support, the Department of Commerce can revoke the orders. AxenTech LLC initially showed interest in participating but later withdrew, leaving no domestic parties involved. The Department of Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission about its intention to revoke the orders. This means that after July 13, 2026, the orders will no longer apply. The lawn mowers, which are powered by engines of less than 3.7 kilowatts, can now enter the U.S. without the extra trade duties. Before the effective date, any imported lawn mowers will still be subject to the suspension of liquidation and duty requirements. After this date, the lawn mowers will be free to enter the U.S. without these restrictions. This decision is a part of the regular process to ensure that trade orders are only used when necessary. The revocation allows for the possibility of more competitive pricing and a better market environment for lawn mowers in the U.S. For more information, interested parties can contact the Department of Commerce representatives, Alexander Wolfe or Madeline Robinson, at the numbers provided in the official notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Hand Trucks from China to Continue Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts from the People’s Republic of China. This decision comes after findings that ending the order would probably lead to dumping and harm the U.S. industry. The initial order on hand trucks from China was introduced on December 2, 2004. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce both agreed that revoking the order will likely cause dumping and result in material injury to the local industry. The Commerce Department reviewed this situation as part of its fourth sunset reviews. These reviews are conducted under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, which helps determine if duties need to continue. The ITC also published their findings on August 18, 2026, reinforcing the risk of injury without the order. The order applies to hand trucks made from any material. These hand trucks could be assembled or unassembled and include parts like the vertical frame, handling area, and the projecting edges or toe plate. The order is intended to prevent hand trucks under these descriptions from being dumped in the U.S. market. Specific exclusions to this order include small utility carts for personal bags, motorized hand trucks, and vertical carriers for golf bags. As a result of the findings by both the Commerce Department and the ITC, the antidumping duty order remains effective as of August 18, 2026. Importers will need to continue making antidumping cash deposits for these products. The next review of this order is expected to happen before the fifth anniversary of the most recent ITC determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Austrian Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination concerning oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Austria. The agency has found that producers and exporters in Austria are receiving countervailable subsidies. The investigation scrutinized the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A countervailable subsidy is when a government provides financial help to its businesses, making their products cheaper for international buyers. The investigation started on April 28, 2026. The preliminary determination was postponed from an earlier date and released on August 31, 2026. The Commerce Department used specific criteria to measure if a subsidy existed. They looked into financial contributions by the Austrian authorities and checked if these provided any benefits to the companies. The investigation is linked to another inquiry concerning unfair pricing practices. The Commerce Department intends to align its final countervailing duty determination with the final results of the related antidumping investigation. Voestalpine Tubulars GmbH & Co KG from Austria, the primary company examined, was found to have a 10.17% subsidy rate. This same rate applies to all other Austrian exporters and producers of OCTG. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend any imports of these goods from September 3, 2026, marking the date of this notice. An equivalent cash deposit is also required from importers. Any interested parties have a chance to comment before final decisions are made. The U.S. International Trade Commission will be notified and will assess if these imports harm U.S. industry. If the final ruling is affirmative, measures will be in place to protect the U.S. markets. The full scope of the investigation covers any OCTG from Austria. These are hollow steel products like casing and tubing used in oil and gas. Certain products, such as those containing more than 10.5% chromium, are excluded. The investigation ensures fair trade practices, protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Results for Antidumping Review on Spanish Steel Flanges Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from Spain. The review covers the period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce found that the Spanish producer and exporter, ULMA Forja, S.Coop, sold these flanges in the United States at prices less than normal value. The preliminary results reveal a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.22 percent for ULMA during the review period. The Department conducted this review under the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce calculated export prices and normal value according to this law. Interest parties may comment on these preliminary results. Commerce will accept comments seven days after the last verification report in the review. For any questions, people can contact Mason Harkleroad at the International Trade Administration with the phone number (202) 482-0905. Additionally, petitions showed interest in Commerce verifying ULMA’s questionnaire responses. The Department plans to verify the information in the final results. If ULMA’s margin stays above zero in the final results, Commerce will calculate specific assessment rates for imports. Duties will be adjusted based on the margin found. Cash deposit requirements have also been set. After final results are announced, the cash deposit rate for ULMA will reflect the final dumping margin percentage if it is above de minimis. If the rate is de minimis, no deposit will be required. Previously reviewed firms maintain existing rates, and others will continue at the rate of 18.81 percent. Commerce aims to provide the final review results within 120 days of these preliminary findings. This review is crucial to ensure fair trading practices by monitoring dumping activities. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction to Antidumping Duty Review on Stainless Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction regarding the administrative review of stainless steel flanges imported from India. On August 20, 2026, Commerce published the final results of its 2023-2024 review of these products. A mistake was made in the name of a company involved in this review. The correct name is “Viraj Profiles Private Limited,” previously listed as “Viraj Profiles Limited.” The review involved a group of companies known as the BFN/Viraj collective entity. These companies include: BFN Forgings Private Limited Flanschen werk Bebitz GmbH Viraj Alloys, Ltd. Viraj Forgings, Ltd. Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd. Viraj Profiles Private Limited The Department has confirmed that “Viraj Profiles Private Limited” is the successor in interest to “Viraj Profiles Limited.” No comments were made about this correction. Thus, Commerce maintains its decision that Viraj Profiles Private Limited takes over the role of Viraj Profiles Limited. The Commerce’s findings are important. They help ensure fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair pricing in international trade. This correction is made to ensure accurate information in official records. The details of this review and correction were published by the Federal Register on September 3, 2026. This notification is made under sections 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213. The announcement was officially issued by Christopher Abbott from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds South African Brass Rods Sold Below Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary findings on the sale of brass rods from South Africa. These findings concern a review period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Background Information In June 2024, an order was issued concerning the sale of brass rods from Brazil. In July 2025, a review began for the brass rods from South Africa. This was during a time when there were shutdowns in the U.S. government, causing delays in the review process. These delays led to extensions, with the preliminary results finally coming out in September 2026. Key Findings Non-Ferrous Metal Works (SA) (PTY) Ltd., also known as NFMW, was found to have sold brass rods at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold it cheaper than expected or fair. The U.S. Department of Commerce calculated that the dumping margin, or the difference between normal value and sale price, was 19.82%. Next Steps The Department of Commerce is open to comments from interested parties regarding these findings. They have set a deadline for submitting briefs on the case. This is a formal way that people can give their opinions on the matter. After the comments are reviewed, more analysis will follow. A detailed memorandum, called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, explains these findings further. It is available online for anyone interested. Final Decisions The Department of Commerce will make the final decision after considering the comments and any new findings. These final results will be published, and any duties will be calculated based on this final decision. Conclusion For the time being, the importers of these brass rods will need to use a specific cash deposit rate. The deposit rate will follow what has been established in previous reviews unless the new findings suggest a different rate. This process is essential for fair trade and ensures that U.S. businesses compete on a level playing field with foreign companies. The final review and decisions will help determine the future of these duties and trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Tubing from India for Antidumping Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining whether some Indian exporters sold steel tubing in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This review looks at a period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The steel products in question are called “cold-drawn mechanical tubing.” These are special steel tubes used in different industries. The Commerce Department is focusing on two main companies from India. These companies are Goodluck India Limited and Tube Products of India, Ltd. Preliminary results show that both companies sold their products at prices below what they cost to make. For Goodluck India Limited, the unfair pricing is measured at a level called a “dumping margin,” which is 2.73 percent. For Tube Products of India, Ltd., the margin is 4.54 percent. The Commerce Department explained their methods for reviewing these cases. They followed laws and guidelines in their investigation. The department is asking interested parties to comment on these preliminary findings. Companies and individuals must submit their comments within 21 days of the notice. There will also be a chance for responses to these comments, called rebuttal briefs. These need to be submitted within five days after the initial comment period ends. If the findings remain the same after the review, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will charge duties on imported goods to counter the unfair pricing. More details about this review and its methods can be found in the full report on the Commerce Department’s website. The final decision will be made after considering all the comments and inquiries from interested parties. This will also determine what future actions might be needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its review on heavy walled rectangular pipes and tubes imported from Mexico during the 2023-2024 period. After a thorough examination, the Department determined that two main companies in Mexico, Forza Steel S.A. de C.V. and Productos Laminados de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa), sold their pipes and tubes in the United States at prices lower than normal. This is called “dumping.” The time covered in this review was from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The results announced on September 3, 2026, showed that both companies had dumping margins. Forza Steel’s dumping margin was 31.23 percent, while Prolamsa’s was 7.45 percent. This review also included companies that were not examined individually. The weighted-average dumping margin for these non-examined companies was determined to be 16.84 percent. The review was conducted according to U.S. trade laws and followed inspections both in Mexico and the United States. These inspections helped ensure the accuracy and compliance of all data provided by the companies involved. The U.S. Department of Commerce announced these findings publicly and has shared the calculations used in this review with the involved parties. The details can be accessed electronically for further transparency. The Commerce has provided instructions for assessing duties on these imports. Assessments will be applied based on specific calculations tied to each company and their sales values. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will follow these guidelines for all applicable entries during the review period. In addition, there are updates on cash deposit requirements for any future imports of these products from Mexico. The new rates, reflecting the results of this review, are applicable immediately. For importers, it is crucial to file necessary documents about reimbursements of duties to avoid penalties. This process helps ensure that all parties involved in the import and sale of these pipes and tubes comply with U.S. trade regulations. Overall, the Department’s actions aim to maintain fair market conditions by adjusting and enforcing duties on imported goods that are traded unfairly. This helps protect U.S. industries and keeps trade competition equal. These findings are part of continuous efforts to enforce trade laws effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continued Dumping of Certain Steel Nails Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its sunset reviews on certain steel nails imported from five countries. These reviews found that if current antidumping duty orders are removed, dumping would likely continue or happen again. The countries affected include the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. What Happened: On May 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce started reviewing the orders issued in 2015, which aimed to prevent unfair pricing by foreign producers. These orders concern certain steel nails, which include different types of nails made of steel that are sold in large amounts to the United States. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., a producer of nails in the United States, took part in these reviews. On May 15, 2026, Mid Continent sent a notice to the Department of Commerce showing their interest in keeping the orders. They met the deadline for sending this notice, as per the rules in place. On June 1, 2026, Mid Continent also provided more detailed responses about the nail imports from the five countries. These responses further supported their stance against letting go of the orders. The Department of Commerce did not get significant responses from the companies in the countries that produce these nails. The Results: The reviews found that removing the current antidumping duty orders would most likely lead to continued dumping. This means that the nails would be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. producers. Here’s a breakdown of the likely dumping margins if the orders were lifted: Korea: Up to 11.80% Malaysia: Up to 39.35% Oman: Up to 9.10% Taiwan: Up to 2.24% Vietnam: Up to 323.99% These percentages indicate how much lower the prices could be compared to fair market value. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce will continue to enforce these orders to prevent dumping. The companies who had access to private information under a protective order must now follow rules to return or destroy this information. This announcement serves as a reminder of their duty to handle this information properly, as breaking these rules can lead to penalties. For further details, the full text of the Department of Commerce’s decision, along with other information, is available online through their official document platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Rescinds Review of Steel Imports from Japan Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes What Happened? The United States Department of Commerce has announced the rescission of an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. This review covered the period from December 1, 2024, to November 30, 2025. On December 8, 2025, the Commerce Department allowed requests for reviews on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. wanted a review of imports by Nippon Steel Corporation. The Commerce Department started this review on February 20, 2026. Later, Nippon Steel Corporation reported that it did not export or sell this type of steel to the United States during the review period. The Commerce Department found no evidence of any sales or entries of this steel into the United States during this time. As a result, the Department decided to cancel the review. What Does This Mean? The rescission of the review means the current cash deposit rates for duties remain unchanged. These rates will continue to apply until further notice. The Commerce Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on any relevant entries based on the deposit rates at the time of the entry. The instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the rescission notice. Important Reminders This notice serves as a reminder for parties involved in the administrative protective order (APO) process. They must return or destroy any proprietary information disclosed during the review. They need to comply with regulations, or they might face sanctions. Conclusion The decision to rescind the review confirms that no non-oriented electrical steel from Japan was imported into the U.S. during the specified period. This ensures the reliability of the duty system and maintains fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Antidumping Investigation on Steel Cylinders from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared preliminary findings from a review of antidumping duties on certain non-refillable steel cylinders imported from India. This relates to concerns that the merchandise was sold in the United States at less than its normal value. The review period spans from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Preliminary Findings The Commerce Department has focused on producers such as Bhiwadi Cylinders Private Limited and Sapphire (India) Private Limited, collectively known as Bhiwadi/Sapphire, as well as Mauria Udyog Limited. They found that while Bhiwadi/Sapphire had a zero percent dumping margin, suggesting they did not sell their products at unfairly low prices, Mauria Udyog Limited was found to have a margin of 3.97 percent. Timeline and Method The administrative review was initiated on July 25, 2025, after timely requests for review, abiding by regulatory procedures. The review was delayed due to a government shutdown, causing all deadlines in this process to be extended several times. The final deadline for this preliminary review was August 31, 2026. Impact on Importers Following these preliminary results, the Department of Commerce is set to disclose its calculations and analyses to the interested parties. Manufacturers with zero or minimal dumping margins could see the duties lifted on their imports, while those facing higher margins may continue to have duties imposed until further adjustments. Next Steps and Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on these findings by submitting case briefs no later than 21 days after the publication notice. The subsequent public hearings will allow parties to discuss further the issues raised in these briefs. Conclusion This ongoing administrative review highlights the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices. The final results will determine the course of action regarding the duties imposed on these steel cylinders from India, aiming to rectify price disparities and ensure fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain Estimated reading time: 4-6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has announced preliminary results in the review of antidumping duties on chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain. Chlorinated isocyanurates are chemicals used for sanitation, particularly in swimming pools. Key Findings: The Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that two Spanish companies, Electroquímica de Hernani, S.A. and Ercros, S.A., have not sold chlorinated isocyanurates in the United States at prices below normal value during the specified review period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. This means these companies are not engaged in dumping, which is the practice of selling goods in a foreign market at an unfairly low price. Review Rescission: The review for another company, Industrias Químicas Tamar, S.L., is being rescinded. This decision was made because there were no entries of chlorinated isocyanurates from Industrias Químicas Tamar that were under suspension during the review period. Without suspended entries, there can be no review. Procedure Details: Commerce started this review on July 25, 2025. However, the initial timeline was affected by a lapse in federal funding. Deadlines were delayed due to a federal government shutdown and backlog issues. The final results were extended, meaning the preliminary findings were announced on August 31, 2026. Public Participation: Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary findings. The public can submit their views after the final verification report is issued. There is a structured process for submitting case briefs and rebuttals, with strict deadlines in place. Next Steps: Commerce intends to verify the data used in making these preliminary determinations. Additionally, if a company’s dumping margin is finalized as zero or below the minimum threshold, the company won’t face additional duties. These procedures ensure that U.S. importers do not face unfair competition from foreign manufacturers. The review is part of regular international trade compliance activities by the Department of Commerce. This announcement is an important step in assessing whether foreign producers are fairly participating in the U.S. market, ensuring balance and fairness in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Trade Protection on Steel Nails from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep certain trade protections in place for steel nails coming from Vietnam. This decision was made after the second sunset review of the countervailing duty order on Vietnamese steel nails. What is this about? A “countervailing duty” is a special tax that is put on products from other countries. This tax helps make sure that local producers aren’t hurt by foreign companies that might get unfair financial help from their governments. The review process began on May 1, 2026. The U.S. Department of Commerce checked whether removing the duty order would allow these unfair subsidies to continue. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., a U.S. nail producer, participated in the review. They showed interest as they are a domestic producer affected by these rules. Interestingly, no other party, including the Government of Vietnam, responded in this review. Because of this, Commerce did an expedited review. Commerce found that if the duty was removed, subsidized goods from Vietnam would likely continue. This finding ensures that the original duty order stays in place. The tax rates will be as follows: Region Industries Co., Ltd. will have a tax rate of 288.56%, United Nail Products Co. Ltd. will have a tax rate of 313.97%, and all other producers will face a tax rate of 301.27%. These rates help protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. It’s important to follow the rules about sensitive business data. If any company got private information during this process, they need to either return or destroy that information to comply with the law. This decision is a part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to monitor international trade practices. The aim is to ensure fair competition for U.S. companies in the global market. This report was officially signed by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 28, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Review Finds Continued Risk of Dumping for Welded Line Pipe from Korea and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings from the recent sunset review of antidumping duty orders concerning welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Türkiye. The review determined that ending these orders would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Antidumping duty orders for welded line pipe from Korea and Türkiye were first put in place on December 1, 2015. As required by law, the Commerce Department began a second review of these orders on May 1, 2026. The review checks if dumping would start again if the orders were lifted. Findings The Commerce Department’s investigation found significant risks. It concluded that if the orders were removed, there could be a continuation or recurrence of dumping, meaning welded line pipe could be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. In particular, the department determined that the possible dumping margins — the percentage differences between normal value and export price — could reach up to 6.22% for Korea and 22.95% for Türkiye. Process and Participation Eligible parties, including American manufacturers of similar goods, actively participated in the review process. These parties submitted their intentions to participate in May 2026, meeting the deadlines set by Commerce regulations. However, no submissions were received from respondents in Korea or Türkiye. By June 1, 2026, American manufacturers provided timely and detailed responses, leading the Commerce Department to conclude an expedited 120-day review because no foreign responses were provided. Implications This decision reaffirms the need for continued antidumping duties. The results aim to prevent unfair pricing practices that can harm U.S. manufacturers and maintain fair competition in the market. Next Steps The Commerce Department has published these findings and will maintain the current antidumping measures. This ongoing action is crucial for protecting domestic manufacturers from foreign companies potentially selling below-cost goods. The decision and all supporting documentation are available through the Commerce Department’s Enforcement and Compliance division for public access. The department has reminded all parties involved about their responsibilities concerning the handling of sensitive information under administrative protective orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Corrects Error in Review of PET Resin Antidumping Order Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has corrected a mistake in its review of an antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin from Oman. This resin is used to make products like plastic bottles. The review originally covered shipments from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024, and involved a producer and exporter, OCTAL SAOC FZC. In an earlier report published on May 18, 2026, the Commerce Department said it had made a clerical error. The mistake involved the calculation of costs related to how long products stayed in U.S. storage. The department used the wrong numbers from OCTAL’s cost reports. APG Polytech LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America pointed out this mistake. After checking, the department agreed with these companies and decided to fix the mistake. Now, they will use the correct costs from the most recent database. With the error corrected, Commerce has updated the dumping margin for OCTAL from Oman to 3.02 percent. This means the company needs to adjust the prices of its products sold in the U.S. The Commerce Department wants to display transparency and plans to reveal the corrected calculations to involved parties within five days. They will also inform the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle duties on imports of PET resin from Oman during the review period. The department set procedures, such as how taxes should be charged when rates are not zero or almost zero. For importers, it is crucial to submit required documents on duties before their goods from Oman are processed. Failing to do so may cause fines. Also, any private information involved in this case must be returned or destroyed as per rules to protect confidential data. The rules on cash deposits for future shipments have changed. The rate for OCTAL will be based on the new 3.02 percent margin. For other companies involved in the production or export of the PET resin, the rate depends on specific rates from recent reviews. The standard rate stated in the original investigation is 7.62 percent. The Commerce Department’s actions highlight its commitment to fair trade practices by ensuring proper calculations and oversight in all antidumping measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Antidumping Duties on Steel Pipe from UAE Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a pivotal decision regarding the antidumping duties on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This came after Universal Tube & Plastic Industries, Ltd. appealed the results of an antidumping duty order that was initially issued in May 2023. The Department of Commerce had previously set a dumping margin of 2.63 percent for Universal, which also includes THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC and KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC. The court’s recent judgment, however, disagrees with this earlier assessment by Commerce. Following the appeal, the court asked Commerce to reconsider its methods for analyzing price differences. Specifically, Commerce was asked to explain why it used different methods for calculating prices for different quarters, while keeping the same method for individual dumping margins. In January 2026, Commerce presented a revised approach for measuring these price differences. The court has now agreed with Commerce’s revised method, yet it resulted in changing the dumping margin from the original 2.63 percent to 3.64 percent for Universal. For those monitoring the cash deposit rates, this decision does not affect current rates, as these rates have been updated in subsequent administrative reviews. Commerce is currently prevented from processing the liquidation of entries imported by Universal during a specific time frame. This hold will remain until all potential appeals are resolved. If no further appeals are filed, Commerce will advise U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to apply the amended results. They will assess duties based on whether the importer-specific rate is above a minimal level. If the rate is zero or very low, no duties will be applied. This update marks a significant alteration in the handling of antidumping duties for certain steel pipes from the UAE, reflecting ongoing adjustments in international trade regulations. The actions from Commerce and the CIT underline the complexities involved in managing international trade fairness and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Affirmative Countervailing Duty on Van-Type Trailers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-08-31 Source: Federal Register The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination regarding the countervailing duties on van-type trailers from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department decided that Chinese producers and exporters of these trailers receive countervailable subsidies. This determination applies to the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Details: The Commerce Department, under the International Trade Administration, is responsible for this decision. Christopher Doyle, from the AD/CVD Operations of the Office IX, is the contact person for further inquiries. The preliminary determination of this investigation was published on June 5, 2026. The countervailable subsidies are found to be provided to producers like CIMC Baowell Industries Co., Ltd. and Qingdao CIMC Reefer Trailer Co., Ltd. CIMC withdrew from participation after notifying Commerce. The Commerce Department used adverse facts available (AFA) methodology to reach the subsidy rate decision. Subsidy Rates: CIMC Baowell Industries Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 134.75%. The same 134.75% rate applies to non-responsive companies. All other Chinese producers or exporters are also subjected to a 134.75% subsidy rate. Scope of Investigation: The merchandise investigated includes van-type trailers and their subassemblies from China. Van-type trailers are enclosed trailers used to carry goods and typically weigh more than 26,000 pounds. Subassemblies like frames, nose wall, side wall, and roof sections are covered. Components include running gear, door assemblies, and coupler assemblies, among others. The investigation applies whether trailers and subassemblies are finished or unfinished and from any processing country. Next Steps: The ITC will determine if the U.S. industry is harmed by the imports. This decision is expected within 45 days. If the ITC finds material injury, countervailing duties will be assessed on imports by Customs and Border Protection. If no injury is found, any deposits collected will be refunded. Conclusion: This determination marks a crucial step in regulating imports of van-type trailers from China, ensuring fair competition within the U.S. market by addressing unfair subsidies. The decision directly impacts all stakeholders involved in the import and export of van-type trailers between these two regions. The matter is now before the ITC for a final decision on whether these imports harm domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Determines Sale of Chinese Van-Type Trailers at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Background and Process In a recent announcement, the United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) declared its final affirmative determination regarding the sales of van-type trailers from the People’s Republic of China. The agency concluded that these trailers are being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) during the period between April 1, 2025, and September 30, 2025. This decision was released on August 31, 2026, as per the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 167. This determination follows a preliminary analysis published on June 15, 2026. Commerce had invited interested parties to comment on their initial findings. The final decision takes into account the issues raised by an interested party, which are detailed in the associated Issues and Decision Memorandum accessible via Commerce’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Scope of Investigation The investigation centers on van-type trailers from China. These trailers are generally rectangular with a fully enclosed cargo space. The report detailed that the investigation includes both complete trailers and subassemblies, whether finished or unfinished. Subassemblies involve parts such as subframes, door assemblies, and running gear subassemblies. Comments and Outcome Commerce received scope comments from various parties. However, after analysis, they made no changes to the scope of the investigation as detailed in the Final Scope Decision Memorandum. Determination and Implications The determination discovered certain Chinese producers/exporters had a weighted-average dumping margin of 130.86 percent. Commerce will continue to suspend liquidation of entries that fall under their described conditions, instructing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue requiring cash deposits. The cash deposit rate is adjusted to account for export subsidy offsets. Next Steps and Conclusion The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is set to make its final injury determination within 45 days of this announcement. If the ITC confirms material injury or threat thereof, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties accordingly. In the event of a negative determination by ITC, the proceedings will be terminated, refunds of cash deposits will occur, and the suspension of liquidation will be lifted. This determination aims to ensure fair trading practices and address potential harm to the U.S. industry by imported van-type trailers. For further information, parties can consult the Federal Register and various Commerce memoranda for comprehensive details on this ruling. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reopens Review on Steel Wire Rod from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking another look at its decision about steel wire rod from Korea. They are reopening a previous review due to new information about possible fraud. Background on the Review On April 7, 2026, the Department of Commerce published the results of an administrative review. This review was about antidumping duties on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea. A company named POSCO, along with POSCO International Corporation, was involved in the review. The initial finding showed a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. Why Reopen the Review? The Department of Commerce found new evidence. This could mean there were false statements in their previous 2023-2024 review and the ongoing 2024-2025 review. This evidence was brought to their attention through a submission during the 2024-2025 review process. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has decided to reopen the 2023-2024 review. They will look at the records and reconsider their initial findings. A memorandum will be issued to guide the procedural steps. This includes timelines for comments and new information from interested parties. Actions with Customs and Border Protection During this reconsideration, the Department will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries from the 2023-2024 review period. Once the review is concluded, new instructions for assessments will be issued. If the cash deposit rate changes and hasn’t been updated by a new review, it will be revised accordingly. Official Notice These decisions and actions are in line with the Federal Circuit Court’s authority for protecting the integrity of administrative reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Ruling Changes Antidumping Duties on Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes On April 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a decision about certain steel products from Japan. This decision changes past results about antidumping duties. The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has updated its results after this court decision. Background on Steel Review This decision is about hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. The period reviewed was from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019. The original review was done in 2021 by the Commerce Department. In that review, the dumping margin, which is a measure of unfair pricing, was set at 11.70%. Nippon Steel’s Challenge Nippon Steel Corporation, a major steelmaker, challenged the original results. They questioned how Commerce calculated certain sales and duties. Commerce revised the results on a first remand, lowering the dumping margin to 10.12%. Court’s Role and Decisions The CIT reviewed Commerce’s decision twice. On October 10, 2024, the court asked Commerce to explain certain parts of their decision again. Commerce did this and maintained the revised dumping margin. The CIT agreed with this in its final decision on April 8, 2026. Impact of the Decision According to the Timken ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Commerce must publish a notice when a court decision does not align with its findings. This means the revised margin for Nippon Steel is now official, at 10.12%. This publishing is required for legal reasons and informs the public of the change. Future Actions Commerce will not change the cash deposit rate already set for Nippon Steel. If other companies do not have a new cash deposit rate, Commerce will give new instructions for them. The importers affected will have duties assessed on their steel products. If an assessment rate is zero or very low, no duties will be applied. This update acts under laws related to trade, like the Tariff Act of 1930. It shows how global trade rules affect companies and their products. Such court decisions can change how much companies pay in duties when selling products in the U.S. This announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.