Antidumping Duty Review on Cold-Rolled Steel from the UK Rescinded Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding cold-rolled steel from the United Kingdom. They have decided to rescind, or cancel, the administrative review on antidumping duties for the period from September 1, 2024, to August 31, 2025. Antidumping duties are extra charges on products from other countries that are sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This can hurt U.S. companies. The review was supposed to check if the right amount of extra duties was being charged on cold-rolled steel from the UK during the review period. The review was canceled because there were no entries of cold-rolled steel from the UK into the U.S. during that time. Without any entries to review for that period, the U.S. Commerce Department decided there was no need to proceed with the review. This decision means that the current cash deposit rates for cold-rolled steel from the UK will stay the same. Cash deposit rates are the extra money importers pay when bringing goods into the U.S. The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle any duties owed. The duties will be equal to the cash deposits made when the goods first arrived in the U.S. For those involved in the case and have access to private information protected under Administrative Protective Order (APO), they must follow certain rules about handling this information. They must either return or destroy this information properly. The decision was officially documented on April 14, 2026, and signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This information was published in the Federal Register, a daily journal of the United States government, on April 17, 2026. This publication is important for keeping everyone informed and ensuring transparency in government actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies in Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review concerning phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation. These fertilizers are produced by Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit). The Department found that JSC Apatit received subsidies from the Russian government during 2023. The review covered the period from January 1 to December 31, 2023. This review is part of the Department’s efforts to ensure fair trade practices. The results became applicable on April 17, 2026. The Department determined that JSC Apatit received a subsidy rate of 12.71 percent. This means that JSC Apatit benefitted from financial contributions by the Russian government that are specific to them. As a result, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess duties on JSC Apatit’s phosphate fertilizers. The Department extended the deadline for its final results several times due to various delays, including a government shutdown. The final results were completed by April 13, 2026. The Department used specific methods to review the subsidies. It looked into different government programs that might have helped JSC Apatit. The review also considered comments from interested parties. Each subsidy program was examined to ensure that it provided specific financial help to JSC Apatit. The Department used various data prompts to calculate the subsidy amounts. The Department will issue instructions to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect duties on these subsidies. The duties will apply to products entering the U.S. on or after the date of publication of the review. The results of this review highlight the Department’s ongoing work to maintain fair trade by ensuring that foreign companies do not benefit unfairly from government subsidies. These findings are important for U.S. businesses competing in the fertilizer market. The final report includes detailed discussions of issues raised during the review process. This includes the use of facts available and adverse facts available regarding data on file. For more detailed information, parties with interests can refer to the full Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is accessible online for any registered users. The Department also issued a reminder to parties subject to the Administrative Protective Order about the proper handling of sensitive information. These actions reflect the U.S. Department of Commerce’s commitment to enforcing trade laws and ensuring fair competition in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Korean Fiber Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes April 17, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded an investigation into imports of low melt polyester staple fiber from the Republic of Korea. This inquiry was focused on the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The findings indicate that Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Inc. (TAK) sold this type of fiber at prices lower than its regular value in the U.S. market. This activity is known as dumping. The department determined that the margin by which the fiber was sold below normal value was 3.02 percent. A margin tells us the extent to which the price was cut. This decision follows a preliminary finding issued in February 2026. During the review process, TAK submitted comments on the initial results. However, the Commerce Department did not make any changes to the final calculations from the preliminary findings. The original investigation into this type of fiber began with an antidumping order in August 2018. This order targets synthetic staple fibers that melt at low temperatures, specifically designed for certain manufacturing uses. The review was delayed due to government shutdowns and document backlogs last year. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess and apply the appropriate duties to shipments covered by this review. The duties are designed to bring the import prices closer to the usual market values and protect American producers from unfair foreign pricing. The department has also outlined the new cash deposit requirements. These deposits are a form of security for future imports and must be made for all new shipments entering the U.S. They vary depending on whether the producer or exporter was covered in this or previous reviews. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to certify that no antidumping duties have been reimbursed, which could lead to penalty duties if not complied with. This action is part of continued efforts by the U.S. government to enforce fair trade and ensure a level playing field for domestic industries. This notice was signed and dated April 13, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Finds Oman Aluminum Company Sold Sheets at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The Department of Commerce has completed a review of the sale of aluminum sheets from the Sultanate of Oman. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a branch of the Department of Commerce. It was found that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC) sold these products in the United States at prices below the normal value. This review covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Summary of Findings The final results are published by the Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration. After a careful review, OARC was determined to have a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.71 percent. This means they were selling the aluminum sheets for much less than they should have been. The review began after preliminary results were published in August 2025. Following this, OARC and other interested parties submitted their comments. Background In November 2025, there was a federal government shutdown that impacted this review. The deadline for the results was delayed several times due to the backlog of documents and additional complications. Additional details about these events can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, a public document available online. Scope of the Review The review pertains to common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. This product was first subjected to an anti-dumping duty order in April 2021. During the review, it was found that OARC sold the sheets at underpriced rates in the U.S. Changes and Assessment From the preliminary results, certain changes were made to how the dumping margins were calculated. The Department of Commerce has disclosed these calculations. The assessment rates are determined based on detailed rules. If importers have a margin of 0 or less than 0.5 percent, they may not have to pay these additional duties. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will give instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to proceed with the assessment of duties. However, if there is an appeal in the U.S. Court of International Trade, action may be delayed further. Cash Deposit Requirements These findings also set the cash deposit rates for future shipments. The new deposit rate for OARC will be the same as the determined dumping margin. For others, the rate from previous reviews will be applied. It emphasizes that these requirements will remain until further changes are made. Important Notices Importers are reminded of their responsibility to file the certificate regarding reimbursement before liquidating entries. The Department of Commerce warns that non-compliance may result in doubled duties. Conclusion This notice marks an important find in the ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce remains vigilant in upholding trade laws and ensuring fair market value for imported goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Aluminum Sheet from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Date: 2026-04-16 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of a review about aluminum sheets coming from Taiwan. They found that a company sold aluminum sheets at prices lower than usual during 2023 and 2024. Important Dates The findings are effective from April 16, 2026. Background In August 2025, the Department asked for opinions on the matter. There were delays due to a government shutdown and technical issues. Because of these reasons, the final results were delayed until April 16, 2026. Scope of the Review The review looked at common alloy aluminum sheets from Taiwan to see if they were priced too low. Findings The review showed that C.S. Aluminium Corporation, a producer from Taiwan, had a dumping margin of 0.71 percent. Next Steps The Commerce Department will work with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to apply duties on the aluminum sheets. These duties are based on how much the products were underpriced. Cash Deposit Requirements For future imports, a cash deposit based on these findings will be needed. If there is no specific rate for a company, a default rate of 17.50 percent will apply. Notification to Importers Importers need to follow rules about reimbursing antidumping duties to avoid penalties. End Note These results are official as of April 16, 2026, by the Department of Commerce, ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Antidumping Duties for Chinese Mobile Access Equipment Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued its final results in the review of antidumping duties on certain mobile access equipment and parts from China. This review focused on sales made from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024, and involved Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli). Commerce found that Dingli sold these products in the U.S. at prices below their normal value during this time period. This finding means that Dingli will continue to face duties when exporting these specific products to the United States. The final results of the review, published on April 16, 2026, indicate a dumping margin of 18.27 percent for Dingli. Other companies such as Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd., and Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. were also reviewed and given the same margin rate. These results come after the preliminary findings reported on August 8, 2025, which underwent several deadline extensions due to a government shutdown and backlog issues. The Commerce Department conducted this review following the processes outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930 and used data drawn from various submissions during the review period to make its calculations. CBP will assess duties based on these final results. Importers will have to pay cash deposits at the rates determined in this review when these goods enter the U.S. This measure aims to ensure fair trade and level the playing field for U.S. industries. The products affected by this measure are manufactured in China. The Department has made detailed changes since the preliminary review, and these are recorded in official documents available through designated online government platforms. These findings are part of ongoing efforts to enforce trade laws and protect domestic companies from unfair competition due to dumping. The declarations made are a reminder to importers of the importance of compliance with trade regulations to avoid financial penalties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Review on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China and Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the countervailing duty orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from China and Taiwan. These orders were first published on December 3, 2014, as a means to address the unfair subsidization of these products by the governments of China and Taiwan. According to the Department, removing these countervailing duties could lead to continued or renewed subsidies. This could potentially harm the U.S. industry that produces similar products. Therefore, the Department has decided to maintain the duties. The countervailing duties for Chinese producers, such as Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., are set at 158.88%. The same rate applies to all other producers from China under the “all others” category. For Taiwanese producers, the company Leicong Industrial Company, Ltd. faces a countervailing duty rate of 17.12%. Other producers from Taiwan are subjected to a reduced rate of 8.61%. The review process began on December 1, 2025, when the Department announced its intention to examine the necessity of the orders. The process included adequate responses from domestic parties, such as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and the United States Steel Corporation. However, no substantive responses were received from the governments of China and Taiwan or any respondent parties. Due to government shutdowns and subsequent procedural delays, the deadline for these final results was extended to April 14, 2026. This notice also reminds parties involved of their obligation to manage administrative protective orders. Such measures ensure the protection of confidential information during trade investigations. For more details or to access the full report, interested parties can visit the Government Publishing Office’s website or use the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Keeps Antidumping Duties on Electrical Steel Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement. They have decided to continue duties on a special kind of steel called Non-Oriented Electrical Steel (NOES). This steel comes from countries like Sweden, Germany, China, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. The Commerce Department wants to stop unfair pricing, also known as “dumping.” Why Are There Duties? In 2014, the U.S. put these duties in place. This was to stop other countries from selling their steel at very cheap prices in the U.S. These low prices harm U.S. businesses. Now, after reviewing the situation, the Commerce Department believes lifting these duties would result in more dumping. What Did the Review Find? The review, also known as a “sunset review,” started in December 2025. It looked at whether stopping the duties would lead to more unfair pricing. The review found that the unfair pricing, or dumping, would likely continue without these duties. For example, the review found dumping margins range from 6.88% in Korea to as high as 407.52% in China. Who Is Involved? Two major companies, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and United States Steel Corporation, showed interest in this review. Both are big U.S. steel producers. They want to keep the duties in place to protect their businesses. How Does This Affect International Trade? The Commerce Department’s decision means these duties will stay. This helps keep the playing field fair between U.S. and foreign steel producers. It also means that the U.S. wants to keep supporting its own steel industry. What’s Next? The decision was signed on April 14, 2026. Now, parties that use this steel must continue following the duties. The Commerce Department says these actions are in line with laws that ensure fair international trade. This careful decision aims to protect U.S. industries and workers from practices that could harm them. By keeping these duties, the Commerce Department shows its commitment to fair trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Antidumping Duty Orders Issued on Silicon Metal Imports from Angola and Laos Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new antidumping duty orders on silicon metal imports from Angola and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos). These measures are set to apply starting April 16, 2026. The antidumping duty orders follow investigations by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both bodies concluded that silicon metal from these countries is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This practice is harmful to U.S. industries. The investigations found that imports from Angola and Laos have injured U.S. industries. This finding is based on sections 735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Department of Commerce published its final determination on February 23, 2026. The ITC concluded its final determination on April 6, 2026. The silicon metal covered by these orders contains at least 85% but less than 99.99% silicon. It also has less than 4% iron by weight. Semiconductor grade silicon with 99.99% or more silicon is excluded from these orders. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess duties on these imports from Angola and Laos. These duties are based on the difference between the normal value of the silicon metal and its export price. Suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements will resume with the ITC’s final injury determination. Importers will need to submit cash deposits when bringing in silicon metal from these countries. Angola’s PC Silicon Co. Limited and Wanhongda International Limited are affected. They have a dumping margin of 68.45%. In Laos, Lao Silicon Co., Ltd has a dumping margin of 94.44%. The duty order includes an annual inquiry service list, which interested parties can join. This list will help them with future inquiries or applications related to these orders. These actions are part of efforts to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. They ensure that all imported goods compete fairly in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Issues Duty Order on Silicon Metal from Laos Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States government has issued a countervailing duty order on silicon metal. This order comes from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos). The U.S. Department of Commerce made an affirmative final determination. It found that subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from Laos. On April 6, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) confirmed this decision. It said the U.S. industry is being hurt by these imports. The order is effective from April 16, 2026. The duty order covers all forms of silicon metal. This includes silicon metal powder. The metal in question must contain at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight. However, silicon used in semiconductors is excluded. This specific type of silicon has at least 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight. The U.S. will now assess countervailing duties. This applies to entries from Laos entered or taken from warehouses for consumption. This covers imports on or after September 26, 2025. Lao Silicon Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 69.10 percent. The same rate applies to all other producers or exporters from Laos. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of these imports. This action aims to protect the U.S. industry from unfair competition. It also applies cash deposit requirements on incoming silicon metal shipments described in the order. Finally, the order will be in effect until the review for the following year. The new list for service and inquiry will be updated annually. The Department of Commerce issues this order following the proper procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. The government continues to enforce measures to support fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Final Results for Antidumping Review of Steel Plates from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has released the final results of its review on antidumping duties concerning certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plates from the Republic of Korea. This decision was announced on April 16, 2026, and applies to the period of May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The department found that the group of companies, referred to as the POSCO single entity—which includes POSCO, POSCO International Corporation, POSCO Mobility Solution, Taechang Steel Co., Ltd., and Winsteel Co., Ltd.—did not sell the steel plates at prices lower than the normal value during the reviewed period. This conclusion means that these companies will not face additional antidumping duties on their products shipped to the United States for the specified review period. The review began with preliminary results published on September 11, 2025. During the review, only the POSCO single entity, the mandatory respondent, submitted comments. Despite some delays in the administrative process due to a federal government shutdown, the final determination was completed without altering the initial findings. The Commerce Department’s decisions, including the confirmation of zero percent dumping margins for the POSCO single entity, mean that no additional fees will be levied on their steel plate exports. Commerce has outlined how U.S. Customs and Border Protection will proceed with assessments for the subject merchandise. This includes instructions for all the entries during the review period, including those involving intermediaries unaware that the steel was destined for the U.S. Final cash deposit requirements have also been set. These rules are essential for all future shipments of the steel plates from Korea entering the U.S. All cash deposits for subject merchandise will continue under guidelines that offer clarity on rates for companies outside the current review but covered in earlier segments of the proceedings. The department has issued a reminder to importers about their responsibilities to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties. This action is to ensure that Commerce doesn’t presume the occurrence of reimbursements, which could lead to doubled duties. Overall, the Commerce Department’s findings reflect thorough administrative processes. The results demonstrate compliance with international trade laws, ensuring fair trade practices between the U.S. and Korea in the steel industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Aluminum Foil from China Sold at Cheaper Prices Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently published its final findings for an investigation on some aluminum foil products imported from China. The investigation looked at the sale of these products from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The results showed that certain Chinese producers and sellers sold the aluminum foil at prices lower than what is considered normal. This is known as selling at “less than normal value.” The Department of Commerce, which works on issues like international trade, carried out this review. They released the preliminary findings last year in August and gave people time to comment. However, the process faced delays due to government shutdowns and document backlogs. These final results were released on April 16, 2026. In the investigation, some changes were made to the calculations for certain companies from China. The companies involved are Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Zhejiang Dingsheng, and Zhongji, among others. The review made sure to check if these companies could prove they should be treated separately from the rest of their country. This is important because it affects the rates of duties they must pay. Five companies succeeded in showing they should get separate rates. However, other companies will be treated as part of the bigger China-wide entity and face a higher duty rate of 105.80 percent. The next steps are for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect duties, based on these findings. The Department of Commerce will tell them how much to charge within 35 days, unless some legal actions change this plan. For companies that worked to get separate treatment, the new duty rates will apply for any aluminum foil they bring into the U.S. Extra rules will apply for companies without their own rates, and they will continue to use either the China-wide rate or other existing rates, depending on their situation. Anyone bringing these products into the U.S. must remember their responsibilities, like filing the right forms about duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay twice the regular amount. This decision comes after careful checking and reviewing the facts. The goal is to ensure fair trade practices between countries. The new rules start immediately and will continue until further updates from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Announces Antidumping Review on Mattresses from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that several companies sold mattresses from Malaysia at prices below normal value from May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. As a result, the Department is partially rescinding its review of certain companies which had no entries of the merchandise during the period under review. The announcement came in a notice published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2026. The Department is inviting interested parties to comment on the preliminary findings. Background of the Review The Department of Commerce initiated the antidumping duty order on mattresses from Malaysia on May 14, 2021. On May 5, 2025, it announced a chance to request an administrative review. In June 2025, the petitioners requested a review for 19 companies. Respondent Selection and Examination The Department selected several companies, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD and Premier High Ventures, for mandatory examination. However, these companies, along with others like Pinnacle Salute SDN BHD and Weld Tack Industries, did not respond timely to the Department’s requests for information. Partial Rescission of Review For eight companies with no entries of merchandise during the period, the Department will rescind the administrative review. These companies are APM Auto Parts Marketing, Comfort Coil Technology SDN BHD, Delandis Furniture (M) SDN BHD, Ever Want (M) SDN BHD, Far East Foam, Industries SDN BHD, GGC Global, Irama Furniture SDN BHD, and Vision Foam Ind. SDN BHD. Application of Adverse Facts Available The Department will use adverse facts available to assign estimated dumping margins to companies that were uncooperative, such as CS Vision and others. These companies will face a rate of 42.92 percent, which is consistent with rates applied in previous segments of this proceeding. Comments and Further Actions Interested parties can submit comments within 21 days of the notice’s publication. The Department of Commerce plans to publish the final results within 120 days, determining the final duties on the mattresses. Future Instructions Upon final results, the Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection on assessment rates for the concerned companies. The cash deposit rate will remain effective until further notice. The Department emphasizes the importance for importers to comply with the requirement to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties before the liquidation of entries during the review period. This announcement by the Department of Commerce marks a critical step in enforcing trade regulations and ensuring fair competition in the international mattress market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Extrusions from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department Announces Preliminary Results The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has announced the preliminary results of the Countervailing Duty (CVD) Administrative Review on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China. This notice was published under Federal Register Volume 91, Number 72, on April 15, 2026. Scope of the Review The review looked into whether some Chinese manufacturers and exporters of aluminum extrusions received illegal government subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Partial Rescission Commerce has rescinded this review in part. Specifically, the administrative review was withdrawn for 79 companies. This was at the request of the petitioner, the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee. Additionally, there was no review performed on 12 companies as there were no customs entries during the review period. Methodology The review was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Six companies were found to not respond to the requests and were given a countervailable subsidy rate based on data, implying adverse inferences. Preliminary Results The preliminary finding imposed a subsidy rate of 164.29 percent ad valorem for the following six companies: Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, Dezhou Huoamei Windows and Doors, Ewellix Motion Technologies, Ningbo Lianda Winch, and Shanghai Zesheng Automotive Technology. Public Comment and Hearing Stakeholders are invited to submit comments. Case briefs should be filed within 21 days of this notice, and rebuttal briefs within five days after case briefs. An executive summary for each issue should be included in briefs. Hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days. Next Steps The Commerce Department plans to issue the final results within 120 days of these preliminary results. The department will also notify the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for assessment rates and cash deposit instructions. Conclusion This announcement marks an important stage in the enforcement of trade laws concerning aluminum extrusions from China. It demonstrates ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices. The results remain subject to change pending final assessment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department’s Review of Antidumping Duties on Chinese Citric Acid Stays In Place Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding citric acid from China. The department found that ending the antidumping duty order on citric acid and citrate salts from China could lead to dumping again. Dumping is when products are sold in another country at unfairly low prices. This decision is part of an important process called the “Expedited Third Sunset Review.” Background Information Back in 2009, the U.S. started putting extra charges on citric acid and some citrate salts from China. They did this to stop dumping. Every five years, they review to see if these charges are still needed. This is now the third time they are doing this review. On December 1, 2025, they started the review process. Some American companies like Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Cargill, Inc. told Commerce they want the charges to stay. These companies make the same products and were worried that ending the duties could hurt them. Review Process The review followed set rules. The American companies told the department why they believed the duties should stay. They sent a detailed response on December 22, 2025. Nobody from China’s side gave a formal response to the review. Because of this, the Commerce Department had no need to do a longer review and instead did a quicker 120-day review. This was due to a lack of responses from China. Due to some delays, including a government shutdown, they finished their final review on April 14, 2026. What This Means The department decided that if the duties were removed, dumping could start again. They believe the Chinese companies would likely go back to selling citric acid at unfairly low prices in the U.S. They also decided that the dumping margin could be as high as 156.87 percent. This decision means that the current additional charges on citric acid from China will stay in place. This helps protect American companies who make similar products. Closing Notes The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to making sure trade rules are fair. This decision is important for keeping a fair market for citric acid producers in the U.S. The decision shows dedication to preventing unfair trade practices from happening again. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton signed the final decision on April 10, 2026. The ultimate goal is to ensure American companies can compete on a level playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes April 15, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding certain frozen fish fillets imported from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. They have decided not to remove the antidumping duties currently in place. What This Decision Means Antidumping duties are in place to prevent products from other countries being sold at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce has determined that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of fish fillets by Vietnam. This means they believe Vietnam might continue to sell fish fillets at very low prices in the United States, making it hard for U.S. companies to compete. Background of the Decision The Department first set these duties in August 2003. Every five years, they review if these duties are still needed. This is known as a “sunset review.” The recent review began on December 1, 2025. The Catfish Farmers of America, as well as some individual U.S. catfish processors and producers, showed interest in keeping these duties. They believe these duties help protect their businesses from unfair pricing by Vietnamese exporters. The Review Process The Department of Commerce received feedback from U.S. catfish farmers, processors, and producers, showing their support to keep the duties. They said they are important to ensure fair competition. However, the Vietnamese companies did not respond with any comments. As a result, the review was done quickly, and the decision was made within 120 days. Future Steps The decision means that the U.S. will continue to have duties of up to 63.88% on certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. This helps protect U.S. companies from the negative effects of dumping. Any parties involved must follow the rules about confidentiality and the use of information. The details are governed by the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty laws. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s decision shows their commitment to ensuring fair trade practices. The duties aim to support U.S. businesses and maintain competitive market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Continuation of Subsidies on Oil Country Tubular Goods from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Date: 2026-04-15 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its expedited third sunset review of the countervailing duty order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the People’s Republic of China. This review, which is part of a regular five-year cycle, evaluates whether removing the duty order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of subsidies. According to the Department of Commerce, if the countervailing duty order were revoked, it is likely that countervailable subsidies would continue or reoccur. This means that Chinese companies might still be receiving unfair financial support from their government, which could harm U.S. businesses. The product in question, OCTG, is essential for the oil and gas industry. It includes pipes used to drill and transport oil and gas from wells. The sunset review began on December 1, 2025. United States Steel Tubular Products and the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association, representing domestic interests, showed intent to participate in the review. They provided responses supporting the continuation of the duty order. During the review, the Department of Commerce received no adequate responses from China or any Chinese companies. As a result, they decided to conduct an expedited 120-day review. The Department of Commerce’s findings specify net countervailable subsidy rates that range from 20.90% to 26.19% for various Chinese producers and exporters. These include companies like Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co., Tianjin Pipe (Group) Co., and Zhejiang Jianli Enterprise Co. Ltd. Finally, the Department of Commerce will continue to enforce the countervailing duty order to help maintain fair competition within the U.S. market. They stress the importance of companies understanding their responsibilities concerning any shared private information during this process. This decision aims to protect American jobs and ensure that U.S. companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Continued Duties on Citric Acid from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its third sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from the People’s Republic of China. The findings indicate that revoking the CVD order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. This decision was announced on April 15, 2026, and is effective immediately. Background Information The countervailing duty order on citric acid from China was first published by the Commerce Department on May 29, 2009. Under U.S. trade laws, these orders are subject to sunset reviews every five years to assess their continued necessity. The third sunset review began on December 1, 2025. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC, as domestic interested parties, participated in the review. These companies claimed interested party status because they manufacture, produce, or wholesale the domestic like product in the United States. Process and Findings The review was expedited, taking 120 days to complete. Commerce did not receive a substantive response from the Government of China or any respondent interested party. As a result, the U.S. International Trade Commission was notified, and the expedited review proceeded. The department found that revoking the order would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of subsidies with the following net countervailable subsidy rates: TTCA Co., Ltd. (also known as Shandong TTCA Biochemistry Co., Ltd.): 60.07% Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd., and Yixing Union Cogeneration Co., Ltd.: 52.22% Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd.: 166.34% All other producers/exporters: 55.53% Scope and Impact The order covers citric acid and citrate salts from China. This decision plays a crucial role in maintaining fair competition in the U.S. market by addressing unfair subsidies received by Chinese exporters. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will continue with the countervailing duties on the specified Chinese products. This notice also serves as a reminder for parties under an Administrative Protective Order to handle proprietary information accordingly. This decision aligns with the department’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. The Department of Commerce is responsible for enforcing compliance with trade agreements and conducting duties like these sunset reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Countervailing Duty on Indian Steel Fittings Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently reviewed a duty order on forged steel fittings from India. This was part of their first “sunset review,” which checks if certain duties should continue. The findings showed that if this duty is canceled, it may lead to more unfair subsidies. The duty order began on December 11, 2020. The review started on December 1, 2025. This is as per U.S. trade laws. The review was to see if stopping the duty would cause harm to U.S. industries. U.S. companies like Bonney Forge Corporation participated in the review. They have a strong interest as they make similar products in the U.S. Unions involved in the production also took part in the review. Only the U.S. side gave detailed feedback during this review. There was little response from India or other companies interested in this case. Due to this, the review was completed quickly, in 120 days. There were delays in the process because of a government shutdown. This caused all deadlines to be pushed back. The final results were finally published on April 14, 2026. The main product involved here is called forged steel fittings. These are small parts used in things like plumbing and pipelines. The review found that Indian companies, like Shakti Forge, might continue to get unfair help from their government. They found a subsidy rate of up to 300.77% for some companies. This review helps decide if U.S. industries are competing fairly. These results will guide what happens next with duties on these products. The Commerce Department’s decision and related documents are available online. These give a full picture of why this decision was made. The full results can be found on the Department’s website for those who want more details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue applying antidumping duties on forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany and Italy. This decision follows an expedited first sunset review. The department found that if these duties were removed, it would likely lead to further instances of dumping, where products are sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. These duties were first set on January 29, 2021. The reviews started on December 1, 2025, as explained in a Commerce notice. This review process is part of the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751(c), which requires these evaluations every five years to determine if duties should continue. Review Process On December 11, 2025, domestic parties who support these duties submitted their intent to participate. They represent U.S. producers of these steel blocks. The Department of Commerce followed this with a notification to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on December 23, 2025, confirming receipt of participation notices. By December 22, 2025, these parties also provided detailed responses supporting why the duties should remain. The department did not receive any such responses from the opposing parties, which could mean those from Germany and Italy did not contest against these duties. Expected Dumping Margins The review, led by Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton, concluded that removing the duties would likely allow dumping to continue. The expected dumping margins could be as high as 78.36% for German products and 58.48% for Italian products. Impact of Decision This decision is an important measure to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. By keeping these duties, the department aims to support fair competition and aid domestic producers. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce will keep the antidumping duties. This decision helps prevent future dumping of forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany and Italy. The full explanation and details can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum on the department’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Review on Forged Steel Fittings from India and Korea Estimated reading time: 4–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made important findings about forged steel fittings from India and the Republic of Korea. These findings come from a detailed review regarding the antidumping duties placed on these products. The Department of Commerce looked at past orders issued on December 11, 2020, which applied duties to these steel fittings. These duties were put in place to prevent unfair pricing and competition in the United States. Commerce began a new review on December 1, 2025, to see if these duties should continue. This review is called a “sunset review,” and it follows the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. Several companies and a union in the U.S. have shown interest in keeping these duties. These groups included Bonney Forge Corporation, Phoenix Forging Company/Capital Manufacturing Company, LLC, and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. They argued that taking away these duties would lead to unfair pricing again. Commerce decided to conduct an “expedited” review. This involves a quicker process that takes 120 days. They made this decision because no other countries or companies provided enough information to argue against the duties. During the review, some deadlines were affected by a government shutdown in November. The deadlines were extended twice, once by 47 days and then by 21 days, to ensure that everything was reviewed properly. The review confirmed that if the duties were not continued, dumping would likely continue or happen again. Commerce found high dumping margins of up to 293.40% for India and 198.38% for Korea. This decision also reminded businesses involved to handle sensitive information carefully, following specific rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce has published these findings officially. They are working to ensure fair trade practices continue by keeping these antidumping duties in place. This decision aims to support U.S. manufacturers and workers by preventing unfair competition from foreign companies that might sell products at artificially low prices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Results on Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of its first sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on forged steel fluid end blocks. These reviews involve imports from the People’s Republic of China (China), the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany), India, and Italy. The purpose of the review was to determine if removing the current duties would lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. Background The CVD orders were first published on January 29, 2021. These orders were established to protect U.S. industries from unfair subsidies on forged steel fluid end blocks from the mentioned countries. On December 1, 2025, Commerce began the process of reviewing these orders to decide their future. On December 11, 2025, the Coalition for Fair Trade in Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks expressed its intention to participate in the review. This group includes American producers like Ellwood City Forge Company and A. Finkl & Sons. They represent a majority of U.S. manufacturers of these fluid end blocks. For the review, Commerce had a 30-day deadline to receive responses from interested parties. However, they did not receive any substantive responses from the countries involved or any other interested parties. Review Process Due to a backlog of documents from a federal government shutdown, the deadlines for administrative proceedings were extended by 21 days. The deadline for the final results was eventually set for April 14, 2026. Scope of the Orders The orders under review specifically address forged steel fluid end blocks. These are important parts used in machinery and equipment within various industries. Final Results of the Review Commerce found that if the current orders are lifted, countervailable subsidies at previous rates are likely to continue or recur. Here are the subsidy rates that are likely to prevail if the orders are revoked: For China, rates range from 16.80% to 337.07%, depending on the exporter or producer. For Germany, the rates range from 7.10% to 14.74%. For India, Bharat Forge Limited and others would maintain a rate of 5.92%. For Italy, companies would see rates from 13.40% to 44.86%, based on the specific company. Conclusion These results underline the importance of maintaining the current protections for U.S. industries against subsidies from China, Germany, India, and Italy. The findings ensure that U.S. industries can compete fairly in the market. The decision reflects Commerce’s commitment to enforcing trade laws and protecting American manufacturing sectors. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Confirms Continuation of Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its expedited third sunset review concerning certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) imported from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department has decided that revoking the existing antidumping duty order on these goods would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping in the United States. This decision is important because dumping refers to selling goods in a foreign market at less than their fair value, which can harm the domestic industry. The initial antidumping duty order was issued on May 21, 2010. Commerce conducted this sunset review as mandated by the Tariff Act of 1930, which requires periodic reviews of such orders to determine if they should be continued or revoked. The review process began on November 3, 2025. Notices of intent to participate in the review were submitted by domestic interested parties, including United States Steel Tubular Products, Inc. and the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association, in December 2025. The domestic parties argued that revoking the order would hurt U.S. producers of oil country tubular goods. The Commerce Department found merit in these arguments because no substantive response was received from the respondent parties, which are usually foreign producers or exporters. Due to a delay caused by a lapse in federal government appropriations, the deadline for these final results was extended. This has been adjusted and now finalized as of April 14, 2026. The specific scope of the order includes certain tubular goods used in oil drilling processes, imported from China. The review determined a high likelihood of continued dumping, with potential margins of up to 99.14 percent, which are very significant. This suggests that without the anti-dumping duties, Chinese products could considerably undercut domestic prices, negatively affecting U.S. manufacturers. Commerce will continue to enforce its decision as per regulatory guidelines. This notice also reminds parties under an Administrative Protective Order to adhere to procedures regarding proprietary information, ensuring its protection or removal in compliance with federal regulations. The final decision reflects the Department’s ongoing effort to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices, using legal frameworks established for international trade compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Antidumping Review for PET Film from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review concerning polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) for this investigation was from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. The department has determined that these products were sold in the United States at less than normal value. Background of the Investigation Commerce initially published the Preliminary Results on October 3, 2025, and invited interested parties to comment. Due to unforeseen events like the Federal Government shutdown, which caused a delay in proceedings, Commerce extended its deadlines. The final results were due on April 7, 2026. The review was based on the period specified, examining entries of PET film from Taiwan. Commerce reviewed comments and documents submitted by interested parties before reaching its final decisions. Final Decisions and Rescission of Review Commerce decided to rescind part of its review regarding entries from Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation and Shinkong Synthetic Fiber Corporation. The review found no entries of PET film from these entities during the POR for which duties could be assessed. Therefore, as there were no entries, the review was partially rescinded in accordance with the law. Final Results of the Review Commerce has concluded that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, a producer/exporter, sold PET film in the U.S. at a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.06 percent. Commerce will now calculate and apply antidumping duties on the entries of subject merchandise based on these findings. Details for Importers Importers need to act in accordance with Commerce’s decision to file appropriate certificates regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failure to comply may result in double antidumping duties being assessed. Cash Deposit and Assessment Rates Following this notice’s publication, new cash deposit requirements will apply to shipments of PET film from Taiwan entered into the U.S. The cash deposit rate for companies covered by this review will reflect the final dumping margin. For companies not covered, the previous rates from completed segments will remain in effect. Commerce will provide detailed instructions to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the assessment of duties. These instructions will be sent no earlier than 35 days after this notice’s publication to provide parties an opportunity to seek an injunction if necessary. This announcement completes the administrative review in accordance with U.S. trade law, solidifying the process by which the U.S. monitors and enforces fair trade practices regarding imported goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Low-Value Sales of MDI from China Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about a chemical called methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. They found that it is likely being sold in the United States for less than it is worth. This decision covers sales between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The decision was announced on April 13, 2026. The Department of Commerce checked sales records from China to see if the prices were fair. They found that the prices were not fair and were lower than the usual value. This is called “less than fair value” (LTFV) pricing. Earlier, the Department had found some early results and shared them with the public. They allowed people to give their comments on the findings but did not make any changes based on those comments. The scope of this investigation included looking at the specific type of MDI from China to determine if it was being sold at lower prices. No arguments were made that changed their initial expectations. Verification showed that the main company from China, involved in these sales, did not meet the necessary requirements for a separate rate. As a result, this company is grouped with a larger China-wide entity that does not get special treatment. The Department of Commerce decided not to verify the company’s records because they were not helping enough in the investigation. Certain companies were given separate rates because they met all the necessary conditions. These companies include Covestro Polymers (China) Co., Ltd. and Shandong Mingko Co., Ltd. They both received a weighted-average dumping margin of 85.11 percent. For companies that did not cooperate or did not qualify for separate rates, like the China-wide entity, the dumping margin is set at 159.04 percent. This means that their sales are found to be significantly below fair value. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if the low prices of MDI from China hurt U.S. companies. If they agree, the U.S. will put taxes on MDI from China to make import prices fairer. This is called an antidumping duty order. If the ITC does not think U.S. companies are hurt, there will be no extra taxes, and the case will be closed. The Department of Commerce will continue to keep a close watch on sales records and prices for fairness in international trade. They will work to make sure U.S. businesses are not harmed by unfair pricing from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duties on Spanish Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Key Findings The review found TYCSA made sales below normal value. This means TYCSA sold its products in the United States for less than they would sell them at home in Spain. The weighted-average dumping margin for TYCSA was determined to be 11.32%. Background The process for determining these dumping margins began with preliminary results published on October 3, 2025. Some parties involved submitted their opinions on these initial findings. TYCSA submitted their comments on November 3, 2025, with additional responses from U.S. companies on December 29, 2025. Due to a federal government shutdown in late 2025, the process took longer than expected. Deadlines were extended to allow for the shutdown and a backlog in filing. The new deadline for the final results was set for April 7, 2026. Scope and Procedures The affected products are specifically prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. The products have been under review since an order was issued on June 4, 2021, which was part of a broader case concerning similar products from other countries. Next Steps Commerce plans to disclose its calculations to interested parties soon. They will also instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on how to assess or refund antidumping duties for the affected entries. If a sale’s dumping margin is less than 0.50%, it is considered minimal, and no duties will be collected. Future Cash Deposit Requirements The new cash deposit rates, which exporters must pay, will take effect for all shipments. The rate will be 11.32% for TYCSA, based on the latest findings, unless a new review occurs. Importance Notice to Importers Importers are reminded to submit certificates indicating whether they were reimbursed for duties, ensuring that they are compliant with federal regulations. This review and its conclusions are an important part of the U.S. government’s ongoing efforts to ensure that trade is fair and that domestic industries are not harmed by unfair pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Chinese Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain kitchen appliance shelving and racks from the People’s Republic of China. This decision is based on findings that removing these orders could lead to continued or increased dumping and unfair subsidies. It could also harm U.S. industries. The orders were originally put in place in September 2009. They aim to protect American industries from unfair competition due to dumped and subsidized imports. These orders require that extra duties be paid on Chinese kitchen racks that are sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The government can also impose duties when the products are made using unfair subsidies. The Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) reviewed the orders in what is called a “sunset review.” A sunset review is a routine five-year check to decide whether such orders are still needed. Both agencies concluded that removing the orders would likely lead to harm for U.S. companies that make similar products. The scope of these orders covers a variety of kitchen shelving and racks. These include shelves, baskets, and side racks made from carbon or stainless steel. They range in size and are made from wire or metal sheets of certain thicknesses. Products with glass shelving surfaces are not included. The orders are now officially continued as of April 1, 2026. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting the required antidumping and countervailing duties for all imports of these products from China. The next review of these orders is planned to start before the five-year anniversary of this decision. Companies or individuals under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must also return or destroy sensitive information, as required by law. This announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Duties on Steel Rebar from Mexico and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar, also known as rebar, from Mexico and Turkey. This decision follows findings that ending these orders would likely lead to dumping, subsidies, and harm to U.S. industries. On April 8, 2026, both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finalized their decisions. They found that removing these duties would likely cause continued harm, such as unfair pricing and financial aid to foreign producers, which could damage U.S. companies. The orders were first put into place on November 6, 2014. These measures were created to protect U.S. industries from harm because of unfair trade practices by other countries. The scope of these orders includes rebar imported in various forms and sizes, except plain rounds and some specific steel wire. This rebar is often used in construction and is classified under several Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers. The result of these reviews means U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting cash deposits from businesses that import this steel rebar. This ensures they pay the correct antidumping and countervailing duties. The continuation of these orders is effective from April 8, 2026. This means that these protective measures will stay in place without interruption. The next review of this order will happen in five years. This will make sure that the protective measures are still needed and effective. The U.S. Department of Commerce will announce the next review 30 days before it starts. Parties involved in these reviews need to manage their sensitive information carefully. They are required to follow strict rules about returning or destroying proprietary data. This notice serves as a reminder of these requirements and the serious consequences of not following the rules. This decision helps ensure fair trade practices and supports U.S. industries by maintaining these protective trade measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Chinese Wooden Bedroom Furniture Released Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published preliminary results regarding an antidumping duty review of wooden bedroom furniture from China. This review covers exports from China during 2024. The review examines if companies sold wooden bedroom furniture in the U.S. at less than fair value, a practice known as dumping. Here are the key points from the report: Companies Under Review: The Commerce Department reviewed 29 Chinese companies for potential dumping activities. Eleven of these companies were found not to have earned a separate rate and are thus considered part of the China-wide entity. This entity is a collective for companies in China presumed to engage in dumping. Rescinded Reviews: The review was rescinded for 18 companies. These companies had their requests for review withdrawn within the required timeline, or they reported no relevant shipments during the period. This means their cases were closed, and no dumping determination will be made against these companies for now. Separate Rates and Entity Status: Commerce separated companies that could prove their operations from those that could not. Companies requesting a different treatment in reviews must prove they operate independently of the Chinese government. Eleven companies failed to submit necessary documentation for this, and they were grouped under the China-wide entity, which faces a duty rate of 216.01%. China-Wide Entity Review: The China-wide entity was not individually reviewed during this period. No requests were made, so their existing antidumping rate stands without change. Public Participation and Next Steps: The Department of Commerce invites public comment on these preliminary findings. Interested parties can submit their opinions within a set timeframe. They can also request a public hearing if needed. Final Decisions: The final results are expected within 120 days of this announcement. These results will set the definitive duties or actions against the involved companies. Important Dates: April 13, 2026: Date of preliminary findings. April 8, 2026: Deadline for preliminary results of the review. Comments on the review are due 21 days from the publication date. Replies to these comments are due 5 days after the comments deadline. The Department of Commerce takes these reviews seriously, as dumping can significantly impact U.S. manufacturers and market balance. This review is part of ongoing efforts to regulate fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Antidumping Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of their review concerning the antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) from the People’s Republic of China. This announcement means that the duties will remain in place to prevent unfair pricing in the U.S. market. The original order was published back in August 2004. It was meant to stop dumping, which is when foreign companies sell goods in the U.S. at prices lower than normal to harm local companies. On October 3, 2025, the Commerce Department started a review of this order to decide if it should stay in place. This review is called a “sunset review.” It happens every five years and looks at whether removing the order would likely lead to continued dumping. Domestic parties, or companies in the U.S., showed their interest in keeping the order. They think that without it, dumping would likely happen again. On October 9, 2025, these U.S. companies filed their notice of intent to participate in the review. They provided important information by October 31, 2025, stating their belief that removing the order would hurt their business by letting prices go down too low. The Commerce Department didn’t get any responses or arguments from any companies in China against the order or its renewal. Because of that, the review was expedited, meaning it was completed faster than usual. During the process, there was a government shutdown, which affected the review timelines. The shutdown led the Commerce Department to add extra days to their deadline. This made the final result announcement due by April 7, 2026. In the end, the Commerce Department decided that removing the order would lead to continued or repeated dumping of the product. They concluded that keeping the order is necessary to maintain fair trade practices. They determined that the dumping rate could be as high as 136.86 percent if the order were removed. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition and make sure prices remain stable in the market. The public can access detailed documents from this review through official government trade websites. The Commerce Department made it clear that interested parties need to follow the rules regarding protected information. They also reminded everyone about the importance of legal standards in maintaining a fair trading environment. The decision underlines the U.S. government’s ongoing commitment to ensuring fair trading conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Commodity Matchbooks from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-04-10 By: [Your Name] The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duty on commodity matchbooks from India. This review focuses on the potential continuation or recurrence of dumping if the duty is revoked. The Department of Commerce believes that removing the antidumping duty could lead to more dumping. They expect the dumping margins to remain at high levels, particularly up to 66.07 percent. Background The investigation into the dumping of commodity matchbooks from India started on December 11, 2009. In October 2025, the Department of Commerce began reviewing this case for the third time. This review is done every five years, as per the Tariff Act of 1930. Participation and Responses In December 2025, a group interested in keeping the duty active asked for more time to express their intention to participate in the review. They were granted an extension until January 12, 2026. By January 8, 2026, the domestic group officially showed its intention to participate. They are recognized as producers of similar products in the U.S. On January 23, 2026, the Department of Commerce acknowledged their participation to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The Department of Commerce did not receive any responses from other interested parties. Since no other responses were submitted, they proceeded with an expedited review. Review Process Due to a government shutdown, many deadlines were delayed. This pushed the final decision date to April 7, 2026. The Department of Commerce used the time to make sure all aspects were reviewed carefully. Conclusion The Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the duty could lead to a continuation or new cases of dumping. They emphasized the potential for high dumping margins if measures are not maintained. Parties involved in the review must remember their responsibilities. They need to handle sensitive information correctly and follow regulations. This review is important for ensuring fair trade between countries. The U.S. aims to protect its industries from unfair practices, such as dumping. For more details, you can check the full report available on the Federal Register’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Countervailing Duty on Matchbooks from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its decision to continue imposing countervailing duties on commodity matchbooks imported from India. This decision was made after completing the third sunset review of the countervailing duty order, which took place on April 10, 2026. The countervailing duty order means that matchbooks from India will still have extra charges. These charges are designed to prevent unfair advantages due to subsidies. Subsidies are financial help from the government, and they can make Indian matchbooks cheaper than those made in the U.S. The original order was established back on December 11, 2009. The review process started on October 3, 2025. Without this order, there might be a risk of more unfair subsidies. The Commerce Department analyzed the situation and concluded that these subsidies would likely continue if the duty order was removed. During the review, the domestic industry showed interest by participating in the process. They requested more time to submit their intention. The Commerce gave approval for this extension, and they filed their intent to participate in January 2026. The Indian government nor any other interested parties did not respond to the review. This lack of response allowed the Commerce Department to expedite the review, finishing it in 120 days. The Commerce Department informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) about not receiving sufficient responses from India. The duties aim for a fair level playing field between U.S. producers and Indian competitors. The net countervailable subsidy rate is set at 9.88 percent for the matchbooks from India. This notice also reminds people handling sensitive information to return or destroy it in line with regulations. Violating these rules can result in consequences. This decision will be published in the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and public awareness. The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed the decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Results on Aluminum Sheet Imports from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The United States Department of Commerce has concluded its review on the import of common alloy aluminum sheets from Türkiye. The final decision confirms that these aluminum sheets were sold in the U.S. at prices less than their normal value during the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The Commerce Department started this review after publishing initial findings on August 8, 2025. These initial findings suggested that aluminum sheets from Türkiye were being sold at unfair prices. Due to unforeseen delays, including a government shutdown, the final results were extended several times. The deadline for these results was April 6, 2026. Key Findings Commerce looked closely at the prices and trade practices during the review period. The review specifically examined companies like Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. The final results showed that Assan had a dumping margin of 4.01% while Teknik had a margin of 14.19%. A non-examined company, ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., received a margin of 9.10%. Changes and Analysis After the preliminary results, some changes were made. The review process included feedback from interested parties, which led to adjustments in the calculated margins for the companies under review. The changes were based on the analysis of sales and cost information. Next Steps Now that the final results are published, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect duties on the aluminum sheets imported from Türkiye. These duties will match the final rates determined by the Commerce Department. Assan and Teknik will have to pay the specified percentages on their imports to the U.S. If the calculated rate is less than 0.5%, the company may not need to pay any duties. Companies that were not examined in detail but are part of this review will also face duties based on the rates outlined. CBP will start collecting these duties but must wait at least 35 days after these results have been made public, to give time for any legal actions. Protective Orders and Importers’ Responsibility Importers need to comply with specific rules regarding the handling of sensitive information related to this review. The deadline for handling proprietary information in accordance with Administrative Protective Orders is still in effect. Conclusion This notice serves as a reminder of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices. The final results offer guidance to importers and exporters on how to comply with U.S. trade regulations related to aluminum sheets from Türkiye. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Monosodium Glutamate Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed an important review. They looked at duties on a product called monosodium glutamate (MSG). MSG is from Indonesia and China. This review is part of something called the “sunset review.” What is Antidumping Duty Order? Antidumping means stopping countries from selling goods too cheaply. They do this to protect American businesses. The U.S. made orders to place duties on MSG from these countries in 2014. This means they add extra fees when MSG from Indonesia and China is sold in the U.S. Why Review These Orders? Every few years, the Department of Commerce checks these orders. They want to see if they still need them. They ask if ending the orders would let countries sell MSG at unfairly low prices again. Review Process The Department of Commerce began this second review in October 2025. They checked if they needed to keep the antidumping duties on MSG. One important company involved is Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. Final Results The Department of Commerce decided that removing the duties would likely cause unfair sales of MSG again. For Indonesia, the duty rate could go up to 6.19%. For China, it could be as much as 40.41%. Importance of Following Rules When companies deal with sensitive information, they follow special rules. These rules protect private details. Everyone involved must respect these rules. If they do not, there could be penalties. This review shows the U.S. is careful. They want to keep trade fair and protect American jobs and businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Antidumping Order on Canadian Pipes Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes April 10, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has officially canceled its review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipes from Canada. The review period was scheduled from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. Background The antidumping order was first published on May 2, 2019. The order was in place to monitor and regulate the selling of these pipes from Canada at an unfairly low price in the U.S. market. At the beginning of this review period, requests were made by Evraz Inc. and the petitioner to review the antidumping order. On June 25, 2025, the Commerce Department initiated a review process for 36 companies. These companies were identified according to the Tariff Act of 1930. During the process, various data were released. This included U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for entries during the review period. Withdrawal of Requests On September 23, 2025, the petitioner withdrew review requests for five companies. These companies were: Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd. Pipe & Piling Supplies Canam Forterra Hyperscon Inc. After the withdrawal, no other requests for review of these companies were made. Reasons for Cancellation The Commerce Department can cancel a review if all requests for such a review are withdrawn within 90 days of the notice’s publication. The department checked and found that Evraz Inc. had no shipments to the U.S. during the review period. Without any shipments or entries during this period, the department found there was nothing to review. This led to the cancellation of the review for the entire period. Next Steps Antidumping duties will be assessed on all related entries. The duties will match the estimated duties required when these items first entered the U.S. Instruction for the assessment of duties will be sent no earlier than 41 days from the notice’s publication date. Final Note The Commerce Department reminds parties of their responsibilities regarding the handling and return of private information disclosed during the review. Failure to comply with these rules can lead to penalties. The official cancellation notice was dated April 7, 2026, and was signed by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This notice is shared according to sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, making it a significant document for companies dealing with trade and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Invites AI Export Proposals Under New Program Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-04-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce, through the International Trade Administration (ITA), has announced a call for proposals under the American Artificial Intelligence (AI) Exports Program. This initiative, a result of Executive Order 14320, aims to promote the export of U.S. AI technology. It offers industry-led consortia the chance to showcase full-stack AI technology packages. Key Dates and Submission Details The proposal submission window is open from April 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. All proposals should be submitted online through the American AI Exports Program portal at https://aiexports.gov/consortia/apply. The Department will review proposals on a rolling basis. Program Overview The American AI Exports Program seeks to support U.S. leadership in AI technology. It does this by facilitating the export of complete AI packages. These packages will include software, AI-optimized hardware, data pipelines, and cybersecurity measures. The program encourages the formation of ‘pre-set’ consortia. These are groups of companies that collaborate to offer comprehensive AI solutions to foreign markets. Notably, these consortia don’t need to have a specific foreign buyer identified for their proposals. Proposal Requirements Eligible consortia must provide a full-stack AI package. This includes: AI-optimized hardware Data pipelines and systems AI models and systems Security measures for AI AI applications for various sectors Each layer of the AI stack must have a major contributing member who provides significant value. The anchor member, or lead entity, must manage the proposal submission and must be headquartered in the U.S. National Champion Enterprises In exceptional cases, foreign companies might lead certain parts of the AI package. These cases will be considered if they advance U.S. national interests. Foreign firms, known as National Champion Enterprises (NCEs), can participate when designated by the Department. Eligibility and Content Requirements Proposals need to show significant U.S. content in their hardware and software. Companies from countries of concern, as defined by U.S. law, cannot be part of the consortia. A national interest focus is key to gaining program designation. Benefits of Program Designation Designated packages will gain U.S. government advocacy. This includes introductions to foreign buyers, priority in government events, and potential export licensing benefits. The program also aligns proposals with federal financing options. Review Process Proposals will undergo an initial review within 14 days, followed by a 60-day substantive review process. Decisions on the designation will consider compliance with program goals and potential national interest advancement. Further Information Public questions can be submitted starting April 1, 2026. Responses will be available at https://aiexports.gov/faq. The program will adhere to U.S. regulations, including export controls and antitrust laws. For more information on submitting a proposal or on program regulations, visit the official portal. Contact Details For more inquiries, contact Brandon Remington, AI Exports Team, at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Phone: 202-839-0393, or email: [email protected] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Public Comment Invited on Duty-Free Entry Applications for Scientific Instruments Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Commerce is inviting public comments on a key process. It concerns the collection of information for duty-free entries of scientific instruments or apparatus. This process is done according to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This law helps us understand the impact of information collection and reduces the burden on the public. Comments about this process must be received on or before June 9, 2026. Interested individuals can send comments by mail to Eva Kim. She is an Import Analyst at the International Trade Administration. You can also contact her by phone at (202) 482-8283. Her email is [email protected] Remember to refer to OMB Control Number 0625-0037. Do not send any confidential business information. For more details, questions can also be directed to Eva Kim at the same phone number or email address. The Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security ensure nonprofit institutions have duty-free entries for scientific instruments. This process is under the Florence Agreement. Form ITA-338P is important here. This form lets Homeland Security check if eligibility requirements are met. The Commerce Department compares instruments to see if similar ones are made in the U.S. You can download Form ITA-338P from the website http://enforcement.trade.gov/sips/sipsform/ita-338p.pdf. Or you can request a copy from the Department. Once the form is filled, it goes to Homeland Security. If accepted, Homeland Security sends it to the Commerce Department for further review. The control number for this task is 0625-0037. The form number is ITA-338P. This review is a regular submission and an extension of a current information collection. This affects state or local governments, federal agencies, and not-for-profit institutions. There are about 90 respondents expected. Each response takes about 2 hours. So, the total annual burden is 180 hours. The cost to the public is around $2,974.50. Participation is voluntary. The legal authority for this is 19 U.S.C. 1202; 15 CFR 301. The public can help improve this process. Comments can reassess if the collection is necessary and useful. Comments also check the accuracy of time and cost estimates. They can suggest ways to improve clarity and reduce burden with better technology. Comments respondents provide will be public records. Each comment will be included or summarized in a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Comments should not include personal information if privacy is a concern. Sheleen Dumas, from the Commerce Department, is the Departmental PRA Compliance Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Continuation of Countervailing Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its fourth sunset review on the countervailing duty (CVD) order concerning prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from India. The review determined that lifting the CVD order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. The review is part of the ongoing process that started with the original order on February 4, 2004. The order aims to counteract subsidies provided by the Indian government to Indian producers and exporters of the PC strand. On October 3, 2025, the Department of Commerce announced the start of this fourth review, as outlined by section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On October 20, 2025, domestic producers Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp expressed their interest in the review. These companies are considered domestic interested parties, as they produce similar products in the U.S. By November 3, 2025, these domestic parties provided a substantive response, providing information on why the CVD order should remain in place. No response was received from the Government of India or any Indian exporters. As a result, the Department of Commerce conducted an expedited review, concluding on April 7, 2026. Due to governmental delays, such as a federal shutdown in November 2025 which led to additional tolling of deadlines, the final results were released later than originally scheduled. The review concludes that if the CVD order were revoked, Indian producers and exporters would likely continue to benefit from subsidies at a rate of 62.92 percent. These findings are crucial for the domestic PC strand industry, as the continuation of subsidies by Indian producers could affect U.S. market conditions. This decision ensures the CVD order remains in place, maintaining fair competition in the market. This notice also acts as a reminder to all parties involved in this proceeding to manage any proprietary information acquired during this process. Proper handling under the administrative protective order (APO) guidelines is stressed to avoid sanctions. The final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930. This announcement is made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Findings on Korean Hot-Rolled Steel Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On April 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the preliminary results of its review of certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Korea. This decision was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 69. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Findings: Subsidies Detected: It was found that producers and exporters of certain hot-rolled steel from Korea received countervailable subsidies during the review period. Countervailable subsidies are government financial aid measures that provide a benefit to local producers and are specific to certain enterprises or industries. Companies Assessed: The review primarily focused on two companies, Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO. Hyundai Steel is also associated with companies like Hyundai Green Power and Hyundai ITC Co., Ltd., while POSCO includes affiliates like POSCO International Corporation and others. Subsidy Rates: The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily set countervailable subsidy rates at 1.28% for Hyundai Steel Company and 3.71% for POSCO. Partial Rescission of Review: The Department of Commerce decided to rescind the review for 13 companies as they had no entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Some of these companies include Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd., Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd., and POSCO Daewoo Corporation. Processes and Procedures: – The review began with a notice on November 14, 2024, and covered countervailable subsidies as per the regulations in the Tariff Act of 1930. – Information was verified for accuracy. The interested parties are invited to submit comments on the preliminary findings. They may file case briefs and request hearings for further discussions. Final Results and Next Steps: After considering feedback from interested parties, the Department of Commerce will finalize its findings. It expects to issue the final results within 120 days of the preliminary announcement. The conclusion of this review will impact future cash deposits for countervailing duties on Korean steel products entering the United States. This detailed process reflects the ongoing commitment of the U.S. government to enforce fair trade practices and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Continued Dumping of Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Japan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the antidumping duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC Strand) from Japan would likely lead to more dumping. This conclusion comes from an expedited sunset review. The review found that dumping could continue or happen again at rates up to 13.30 percent. Background The Commerce Department reviewed the antidumping duty finding first announced on December 8, 1978. This review began on October 3, 2025. This process is under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Participants Some American companies participated in this review. Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp. showed interest. They want antidumping duties to stay in place because these companies produce similar products in the U.S. Process The review started when domestic companies showed interest. They sent a notice of intent on October 20, 2025. By November 3, 2025, these companies sent a complete response to the review. There were no responses from Japanese companies. Because of this, the Commerce Department did a quick 120-day review. Deadlines shifted because of a government shutdown during November 2025. The final results came out on April 7, 2026. Final Results The Commerce Department decided that ending the antidumping duty could lead to more dumping. They expect the dumping margin to be up to 13.30 percent. Conclusion The Commerce Department’s decision affects the market for PC Strand from Japan. By keeping antidumping duties, the U.S. aims to protect domestic producers. This report also reminds those with access to protected information to handle it carefully. This decision is now official and followed the laws in sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Strand Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of the fourth sunset reviews of antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from five countries: Brazil, India, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand. This decision, officially released in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026, finds that ending these duties would likely lead to continued dumping of the product in the U.S. market. The antidumping duties were first ordered in January 2004. Commerce reviewed the orders again starting October 3, 2025, to decide if the duties were still needed. This process is called a sunset review. Commerce received timely notices from U.S. producers who want to keep the duties. These companies are Insteel Wire Products, Sumiden Wire Products, and Wire Mesh Corp. They are considered “domestic interested parties.” These U.S. producers sent Commerce detailed responses by November 3, 2025. No foreign producers responded to the review. Because of this, Commerce conducted an expedited review. The publication explains that the government shutdown in November 2025 delayed some deadlines. However, they were able to complete their findings by April 7, 2026. Commerce decided that removing the duties would likely lead to continued dumping. This means foreign producers might sell their products at unfair prices in the U.S. market again. Commerce says that if the duties ended, dumping margins would likely be as high as 118.75% for Brazil, 102.07% for India, 77.20% for Mexico, 54.19% for Korea, and 12.91% for Thailand. Commerce’s role is to protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. They will continue to enforce these duties, and interested parties must follow the rules for handling sensitive information related to this case. This decision helps ensure fair competition and supports U.S. producers in the steel industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Does Not Find Dumping in Steel Threaded Rods from India Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The United States Department of Commerce recently completed an investigation into carbon and alloy steel threaded rods shipped from India. This review was focused on goods imported between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Findings of the Review The investigation involved Mangal Steel Enterprises Limited, the only producer and exporter reviewed. Commerce discovered that Mangal did not sell their steel threaded rods in the United States at prices lower than the normal value. This is significant as selling at below normal value, known as “dumping,” would normally mean imposing extra tariffs or duties to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Background Events Initially, the results of the review were started on April 8, 2025. However, various delays, including a government shutdown, extended the process. This caused the final results to be announced by April 10, 2026, as reported in the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 69. Consequences of the Review Since Mangal Steel’s pricing was found to be fair and equal to the normal value, the United States will not impose extra duties on the company’s imported steel threaded rods. This means that any of Mangal’s products entering the U.S. during the particular review time frame won’t face additional antidumping duties. However, for those who didn’t specify their products as being meant for the U.S., their imports will be treated according to previous findings. Future Steps Commerce will ensure the proper calculation and disclosure of this determination. This will occur within five days of publicising the final report. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials will receive instructions no sooner than 35 days after this announcement to guide the liquidation of concerned entries. Cash Deposits and Importer Responsibilities Going forward, the cash deposit rate for Mangal’s exports will be based on this review’s results. If any other companies are mentioned in past reviews, their previously set rates will continue. Importers should always be conscious of their obligations to accurately declare duties to avoid additional penalties, such as double tariffs, especially those related to antidumping laws. Final Reminder Commerce reminds all involved parties of their responsibilities under protective orders. Proper handling of confidential information remains a legal obligation. This report concludes the thorough review done by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding steel threaded rod imports from India. Further notices will be guided by ongoing commerce assessments and findings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Part of Antidumping Duty Review on Frozen Shrimp from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a partial rescission of an antidumping duty review on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review focused on shipments made between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. In March 2025, the Commerce Department began reviewing the case for 391 companies. The review was set to examine whether these companies were selling shrimp in the United States at prices below fair value. However, it has been decided that the review for certain companies will stop because they did not have any reviewable entries of shrimp during the period in question. The decision applies to companies that had no shipments of subject merchandise during that time. The Commerce Department provided a list of these companies, which can be found in Appendix I of the official announcement. This means the Commerce Department had no grounds to calculate new duty rates for them, as there was no activity to review. For the companies not affected by this decision, the antidumping duty review will continue as planned. The companies that remain under review are listed in Appendix II. Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties based on cash deposits that were required at the time of entry of the merchandise into the United States. This process will begin no earlier than 35 days following the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to provide a certificate under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. If importers fail to provide this certificate, there is a presumption of reimbursement, and they could face doubled duties. For parties under administrative protective orders, the announcement calls for adherence to the requirements about returning or destroying proprietary information. Non-compliance could lead to sanctions. This rescission is part of regular procedures under U.S. trade laws to ensure fair pricing in international commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Review of Hot-Rolled Steel from Japan Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings on the administrative review of antidumping duties for certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. This review covers the period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. The findings highlight that one of two main producers/exporters sold goods in the United States at less than their normal value. A partial review has been rescinded for one company. Key Findings: Producers Reviewed: The review initially included assessments of 15 producers and exporters. Commerce selected two main companies for a detailed review: Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC) and Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Rescission of Reviews: Commerce, following requests, has partly rescinded the review concerning JFE Shoji Trade America. This was due to a withdrawal request from the petitioners, a group comprising several U.S. steel producers. Preliminary Weighted-Average Dumping Margins: Nippon Steel Corporation: 13.07% Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd: 0.00% For other companies not individually examined, a rate of 13.07% has been preliminarily applied, based on prior assessments. Methodology and Analysis: The administrative review was conducted in alignment with the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751(a), and corresponding regulations, utilizing a calculated export price and a constructed export price for analysis. Assessment Rates: Following the review, Commerce will determine specific assessment rates for merchandise entries if the margins remain above zero and de minimis levels. Public Commentary: Interested parties can submit comments and request hearings within the set deadlines. Commerce has outlined procedures to submit both case briefs and rebuttal briefs, allowing stakeholders to engage with the process leading up to the final results. Next Steps: Commerce aims to issue its final results and assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection within 120 days following these preliminary results unless an extension is warranted. The complete memorandum and further details of the preliminary results can be accessed through Commerce’s electronic service system. This ongoing review supports the enforcement of fair trade practices in line with U.S. trade laws, ensuring that domestic industries are not unfairly disadvantaged by lower-priced imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Rescinds Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to stop certain investigations on trades. They call these investigations “administrative reviews.” The department has canceled them because everyone who wanted the reviews changed their minds and asked for a stop. This means no one else requested reviews, and all requests were withdrawn on time. The Commerce Department is part of the U.S. government. It checks to make sure things are fair in business between other countries and the U.S. They have laws about extra charges on products, called antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These charges are there to stop unfair price differences or money support in trade. The reviews they stopped were listed in a table. For example, there were reviews for products like steel tubing from Germany, mattresses from Taiwan, and hot-rolled steel from the Netherlands. The department planned to review the sales and look at the duties between the years 2024 and 2026. Other products affected include diamond sawblades and fresh garlic from China, and certain tires also from China. Each product had a specific review period and was part of the stop in reviews. When the department stops a review, they follow certain rules. These rules allow them to stop if everyone who asked for a review changes their mind within 90 days of the announced start date. Since the reviews are canceled, the Commerce Department will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to charge the normal duty fees. This means that anyone bringing in the related products must pay the fees they were originally charged when they first brought the goods into the U.S. They will send these instructions 35 days after this decision to stop reviews is published. The timeline changes slightly if it involves Canada or Mexico, becoming 41 days instead. Also, the Commerce Department reminds importers that they must confirm they did not get any money back on these duties. If they don’t, it can cause extra fees later. Lastly, there is a reminder to folks who have special access to information from these cases under a protective agreement. It is important they return or destroy this information soon, following the agreed rules. Not following these rules can result in problems. This decision by the Commerce Department is part of their regular checks on international trade to ensure fair practices in line with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.