U.S. Department of Commerce Finds South African Brass Rods Sold Below Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary findings on the sale of brass rods from South Africa. These findings concern a review period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Background Information In June 2024, an order was issued concerning the sale of brass rods from Brazil. In July 2025, a review began for the brass rods from South Africa. This was during a time when there were shutdowns in the U.S. government, causing delays in the review process. These delays led to extensions, with the preliminary results finally coming out in September 2026. Key Findings Non-Ferrous Metal Works (SA) (PTY) Ltd., also known as NFMW, was found to have sold brass rods at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold it cheaper than expected or fair. The U.S. Department of Commerce calculated that the dumping margin, or the difference between normal value and sale price, was 19.82%. Next Steps The Department of Commerce is open to comments from interested parties regarding these findings. They have set a deadline for submitting briefs on the case. This is a formal way that people can give their opinions on the matter. After the comments are reviewed, more analysis will follow. A detailed memorandum, called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, explains these findings further. It is available online for anyone interested. Final Decisions The Department of Commerce will make the final decision after considering the comments and any new findings. These final results will be published, and any duties will be calculated based on this final decision. Conclusion For the time being, the importers of these brass rods will need to use a specific cash deposit rate. The deposit rate will follow what has been established in previous reviews unless the new findings suggest a different rate. This process is essential for fair trade and ensures that U.S. businesses compete on a level playing field with foreign companies. The final review and decisions will help determine the future of these duties and trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Tubing from India for Antidumping Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining whether some Indian exporters sold steel tubing in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This review looks at a period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The steel products in question are called “cold-drawn mechanical tubing.” These are special steel tubes used in different industries. The Commerce Department is focusing on two main companies from India. These companies are Goodluck India Limited and Tube Products of India, Ltd. Preliminary results show that both companies sold their products at prices below what they cost to make. For Goodluck India Limited, the unfair pricing is measured at a level called a “dumping margin,” which is 2.73 percent. For Tube Products of India, Ltd., the margin is 4.54 percent. The Commerce Department explained their methods for reviewing these cases. They followed laws and guidelines in their investigation. The department is asking interested parties to comment on these preliminary findings. Companies and individuals must submit their comments within 21 days of the notice. There will also be a chance for responses to these comments, called rebuttal briefs. These need to be submitted within five days after the initial comment period ends. If the findings remain the same after the review, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will charge duties on imported goods to counter the unfair pricing. More details about this review and its methods can be found in the full report on the Commerce Department’s website. The final decision will be made after considering all the comments and inquiries from interested parties. This will also determine what future actions might be needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its review on heavy walled rectangular pipes and tubes imported from Mexico during the 2023-2024 period. After a thorough examination, the Department determined that two main companies in Mexico, Forza Steel S.A. de C.V. and Productos Laminados de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa), sold their pipes and tubes in the United States at prices lower than normal. This is called “dumping.” The time covered in this review was from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The results announced on September 3, 2026, showed that both companies had dumping margins. Forza Steel’s dumping margin was 31.23 percent, while Prolamsa’s was 7.45 percent. This review also included companies that were not examined individually. The weighted-average dumping margin for these non-examined companies was determined to be 16.84 percent. The review was conducted according to U.S. trade laws and followed inspections both in Mexico and the United States. These inspections helped ensure the accuracy and compliance of all data provided by the companies involved. The U.S. Department of Commerce announced these findings publicly and has shared the calculations used in this review with the involved parties. The details can be accessed electronically for further transparency. The Commerce has provided instructions for assessing duties on these imports. Assessments will be applied based on specific calculations tied to each company and their sales values. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will follow these guidelines for all applicable entries during the review period. In addition, there are updates on cash deposit requirements for any future imports of these products from Mexico. The new rates, reflecting the results of this review, are applicable immediately. For importers, it is crucial to file necessary documents about reimbursements of duties to avoid penalties. This process helps ensure that all parties involved in the import and sale of these pipes and tubes comply with U.S. trade regulations. Overall, the Department’s actions aim to maintain fair market conditions by adjusting and enforcing duties on imported goods that are traded unfairly. This helps protect U.S. industries and keeps trade competition equal. These findings are part of continuous efforts to enforce trade laws effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continued Dumping of Certain Steel Nails Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its sunset reviews on certain steel nails imported from five countries. These reviews found that if current antidumping duty orders are removed, dumping would likely continue or happen again. The countries affected include the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. What Happened: On May 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce started reviewing the orders issued in 2015, which aimed to prevent unfair pricing by foreign producers. These orders concern certain steel nails, which include different types of nails made of steel that are sold in large amounts to the United States. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., a producer of nails in the United States, took part in these reviews. On May 15, 2026, Mid Continent sent a notice to the Department of Commerce showing their interest in keeping the orders. They met the deadline for sending this notice, as per the rules in place. On June 1, 2026, Mid Continent also provided more detailed responses about the nail imports from the five countries. These responses further supported their stance against letting go of the orders. The Department of Commerce did not get significant responses from the companies in the countries that produce these nails. The Results: The reviews found that removing the current antidumping duty orders would most likely lead to continued dumping. This means that the nails would be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. producers. Here’s a breakdown of the likely dumping margins if the orders were lifted: Korea: Up to 11.80% Malaysia: Up to 39.35% Oman: Up to 9.10% Taiwan: Up to 2.24% Vietnam: Up to 323.99% These percentages indicate how much lower the prices could be compared to fair market value. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce will continue to enforce these orders to prevent dumping. The companies who had access to private information under a protective order must now follow rules to return or destroy this information. This announcement serves as a reminder of their duty to handle this information properly, as breaking these rules can lead to penalties. For further details, the full text of the Department of Commerce’s decision, along with other information, is available online through their official document platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Rescinds Review of Steel Imports from Japan Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes What Happened? The United States Department of Commerce has announced the rescission of an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. This review covered the period from December 1, 2024, to November 30, 2025. On December 8, 2025, the Commerce Department allowed requests for reviews on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. wanted a review of imports by Nippon Steel Corporation. The Commerce Department started this review on February 20, 2026. Later, Nippon Steel Corporation reported that it did not export or sell this type of steel to the United States during the review period. The Commerce Department found no evidence of any sales or entries of this steel into the United States during this time. As a result, the Department decided to cancel the review. What Does This Mean? The rescission of the review means the current cash deposit rates for duties remain unchanged. These rates will continue to apply until further notice. The Commerce Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on any relevant entries based on the deposit rates at the time of the entry. The instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the rescission notice. Important Reminders This notice serves as a reminder for parties involved in the administrative protective order (APO) process. They must return or destroy any proprietary information disclosed during the review. They need to comply with regulations, or they might face sanctions. Conclusion The decision to rescind the review confirms that no non-oriented electrical steel from Japan was imported into the U.S. during the specified period. This ensures the reliability of the duty system and maintains fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Antidumping Investigation on Steel Cylinders from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared preliminary findings from a review of antidumping duties on certain non-refillable steel cylinders imported from India. This relates to concerns that the merchandise was sold in the United States at less than its normal value. The review period spans from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Preliminary Findings The Commerce Department has focused on producers such as Bhiwadi Cylinders Private Limited and Sapphire (India) Private Limited, collectively known as Bhiwadi/Sapphire, as well as Mauria Udyog Limited. They found that while Bhiwadi/Sapphire had a zero percent dumping margin, suggesting they did not sell their products at unfairly low prices, Mauria Udyog Limited was found to have a margin of 3.97 percent. Timeline and Method The administrative review was initiated on July 25, 2025, after timely requests for review, abiding by regulatory procedures. The review was delayed due to a government shutdown, causing all deadlines in this process to be extended several times. The final deadline for this preliminary review was August 31, 2026. Impact on Importers Following these preliminary results, the Department of Commerce is set to disclose its calculations and analyses to the interested parties. Manufacturers with zero or minimal dumping margins could see the duties lifted on their imports, while those facing higher margins may continue to have duties imposed until further adjustments. Next Steps and Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on these findings by submitting case briefs no later than 21 days after the publication notice. The subsequent public hearings will allow parties to discuss further the issues raised in these briefs. Conclusion This ongoing administrative review highlights the U.S. government’s commitment to fair trade practices. The final results will determine the course of action regarding the duties imposed on these steel cylinders from India, aiming to rectify price disparities and ensure fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain Estimated reading time: 4-6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has announced preliminary results in the review of antidumping duties on chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain. Chlorinated isocyanurates are chemicals used for sanitation, particularly in swimming pools. Key Findings: The Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that two Spanish companies, Electroquímica de Hernani, S.A. and Ercros, S.A., have not sold chlorinated isocyanurates in the United States at prices below normal value during the specified review period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. This means these companies are not engaged in dumping, which is the practice of selling goods in a foreign market at an unfairly low price. Review Rescission: The review for another company, Industrias Químicas Tamar, S.L., is being rescinded. This decision was made because there were no entries of chlorinated isocyanurates from Industrias Químicas Tamar that were under suspension during the review period. Without suspended entries, there can be no review. Procedure Details: Commerce started this review on July 25, 2025. However, the initial timeline was affected by a lapse in federal funding. Deadlines were delayed due to a federal government shutdown and backlog issues. The final results were extended, meaning the preliminary findings were announced on August 31, 2026. Public Participation: Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary findings. The public can submit their views after the final verification report is issued. There is a structured process for submitting case briefs and rebuttals, with strict deadlines in place. Next Steps: Commerce intends to verify the data used in making these preliminary determinations. Additionally, if a company’s dumping margin is finalized as zero or below the minimum threshold, the company won’t face additional duties. These procedures ensure that U.S. importers do not face unfair competition from foreign manufacturers. The review is part of regular international trade compliance activities by the Department of Commerce. This announcement is an important step in assessing whether foreign producers are fairly participating in the U.S. market, ensuring balance and fairness in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Trade Protection on Steel Nails from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep certain trade protections in place for steel nails coming from Vietnam. This decision was made after the second sunset review of the countervailing duty order on Vietnamese steel nails. What is this about? A “countervailing duty” is a special tax that is put on products from other countries. This tax helps make sure that local producers aren’t hurt by foreign companies that might get unfair financial help from their governments. The review process began on May 1, 2026. The U.S. Department of Commerce checked whether removing the duty order would allow these unfair subsidies to continue. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., a U.S. nail producer, participated in the review. They showed interest as they are a domestic producer affected by these rules. Interestingly, no other party, including the Government of Vietnam, responded in this review. Because of this, Commerce did an expedited review. Commerce found that if the duty was removed, subsidized goods from Vietnam would likely continue. This finding ensures that the original duty order stays in place. The tax rates will be as follows: Region Industries Co., Ltd. will have a tax rate of 288.56%, United Nail Products Co. Ltd. will have a tax rate of 313.97%, and all other producers will face a tax rate of 301.27%. These rates help protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. It’s important to follow the rules about sensitive business data. If any company got private information during this process, they need to either return or destroy that information to comply with the law. This decision is a part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to monitor international trade practices. The aim is to ensure fair competition for U.S. companies in the global market. This report was officially signed by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 28, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Review Finds Continued Risk of Dumping for Welded Line Pipe from Korea and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its findings from the recent sunset review of antidumping duty orders concerning welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Türkiye. The review determined that ending these orders would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Antidumping duty orders for welded line pipe from Korea and Türkiye were first put in place on December 1, 2015. As required by law, the Commerce Department began a second review of these orders on May 1, 2026. The review checks if dumping would start again if the orders were lifted. Findings The Commerce Department’s investigation found significant risks. It concluded that if the orders were removed, there could be a continuation or recurrence of dumping, meaning welded line pipe could be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. In particular, the department determined that the possible dumping margins — the percentage differences between normal value and export price — could reach up to 6.22% for Korea and 22.95% for Türkiye. Process and Participation Eligible parties, including American manufacturers of similar goods, actively participated in the review process. These parties submitted their intentions to participate in May 2026, meeting the deadlines set by Commerce regulations. However, no submissions were received from respondents in Korea or Türkiye. By June 1, 2026, American manufacturers provided timely and detailed responses, leading the Commerce Department to conclude an expedited 120-day review because no foreign responses were provided. Implications This decision reaffirms the need for continued antidumping duties. The results aim to prevent unfair pricing practices that can harm U.S. manufacturers and maintain fair competition in the market. Next Steps The Commerce Department has published these findings and will maintain the current antidumping measures. This ongoing action is crucial for protecting domestic manufacturers from foreign companies potentially selling below-cost goods. The decision and all supporting documentation are available through the Commerce Department’s Enforcement and Compliance division for public access. The department has reminded all parties involved about their responsibilities concerning the handling of sensitive information under administrative protective orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Corrects Error in Review of PET Resin Antidumping Order Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has corrected a mistake in its review of an antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin from Oman. This resin is used to make products like plastic bottles. The review originally covered shipments from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024, and involved a producer and exporter, OCTAL SAOC FZC. In an earlier report published on May 18, 2026, the Commerce Department said it had made a clerical error. The mistake involved the calculation of costs related to how long products stayed in U.S. storage. The department used the wrong numbers from OCTAL’s cost reports. APG Polytech LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America pointed out this mistake. After checking, the department agreed with these companies and decided to fix the mistake. Now, they will use the correct costs from the most recent database. With the error corrected, Commerce has updated the dumping margin for OCTAL from Oman to 3.02 percent. This means the company needs to adjust the prices of its products sold in the U.S. The Commerce Department wants to display transparency and plans to reveal the corrected calculations to involved parties within five days. They will also inform the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle duties on imports of PET resin from Oman during the review period. The department set procedures, such as how taxes should be charged when rates are not zero or almost zero. For importers, it is crucial to submit required documents on duties before their goods from Oman are processed. Failing to do so may cause fines. Also, any private information involved in this case must be returned or destroyed as per rules to protect confidential data. The rules on cash deposits for future shipments have changed. The rate for OCTAL will be based on the new 3.02 percent margin. For other companies involved in the production or export of the PET resin, the rate depends on specific rates from recent reviews. The standard rate stated in the original investigation is 7.62 percent. The Commerce Department’s actions highlight its commitment to fair trade practices by ensuring proper calculations and oversight in all antidumping measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Alters Antidumping Duties on Steel Pipe from UAE Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a pivotal decision regarding the antidumping duties on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This came after Universal Tube & Plastic Industries, Ltd. appealed the results of an antidumping duty order that was initially issued in May 2023. The Department of Commerce had previously set a dumping margin of 2.63 percent for Universal, which also includes THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC and KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC. The court’s recent judgment, however, disagrees with this earlier assessment by Commerce. Following the appeal, the court asked Commerce to reconsider its methods for analyzing price differences. Specifically, Commerce was asked to explain why it used different methods for calculating prices for different quarters, while keeping the same method for individual dumping margins. In January 2026, Commerce presented a revised approach for measuring these price differences. The court has now agreed with Commerce’s revised method, yet it resulted in changing the dumping margin from the original 2.63 percent to 3.64 percent for Universal. For those monitoring the cash deposit rates, this decision does not affect current rates, as these rates have been updated in subsequent administrative reviews. Commerce is currently prevented from processing the liquidation of entries imported by Universal during a specific time frame. This hold will remain until all potential appeals are resolved. If no further appeals are filed, Commerce will advise U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to apply the amended results. They will assess duties based on whether the importer-specific rate is above a minimal level. If the rate is zero or very low, no duties will be applied. This update marks a significant alteration in the handling of antidumping duties for certain steel pipes from the UAE, reflecting ongoing adjustments in international trade regulations. The actions from Commerce and the CIT underline the complexities involved in managing international trade fairness and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Affirmative Countervailing Duty on Van-Type Trailers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-08-31 Source: Federal Register The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination regarding the countervailing duties on van-type trailers from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department decided that Chinese producers and exporters of these trailers receive countervailable subsidies. This determination applies to the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Details: The Commerce Department, under the International Trade Administration, is responsible for this decision. Christopher Doyle, from the AD/CVD Operations of the Office IX, is the contact person for further inquiries. The preliminary determination of this investigation was published on June 5, 2026. The countervailable subsidies are found to be provided to producers like CIMC Baowell Industries Co., Ltd. and Qingdao CIMC Reefer Trailer Co., Ltd. CIMC withdrew from participation after notifying Commerce. The Commerce Department used adverse facts available (AFA) methodology to reach the subsidy rate decision. Subsidy Rates: CIMC Baowell Industries Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 134.75%. The same 134.75% rate applies to non-responsive companies. All other Chinese producers or exporters are also subjected to a 134.75% subsidy rate. Scope of Investigation: The merchandise investigated includes van-type trailers and their subassemblies from China. Van-type trailers are enclosed trailers used to carry goods and typically weigh more than 26,000 pounds. Subassemblies like frames, nose wall, side wall, and roof sections are covered. Components include running gear, door assemblies, and coupler assemblies, among others. The investigation applies whether trailers and subassemblies are finished or unfinished and from any processing country. Next Steps: The ITC will determine if the U.S. industry is harmed by the imports. This decision is expected within 45 days. If the ITC finds material injury, countervailing duties will be assessed on imports by Customs and Border Protection. If no injury is found, any deposits collected will be refunded. Conclusion: This determination marks a crucial step in regulating imports of van-type trailers from China, ensuring fair competition within the U.S. market by addressing unfair subsidies. The decision directly impacts all stakeholders involved in the import and export of van-type trailers between these two regions. The matter is now before the ITC for a final decision on whether these imports harm domestic industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Determines Sale of Chinese Van-Type Trailers at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Background and Process In a recent announcement, the United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) declared its final affirmative determination regarding the sales of van-type trailers from the People’s Republic of China. The agency concluded that these trailers are being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) during the period between April 1, 2025, and September 30, 2025. This decision was released on August 31, 2026, as per the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 167. This determination follows a preliminary analysis published on June 15, 2026. Commerce had invited interested parties to comment on their initial findings. The final decision takes into account the issues raised by an interested party, which are detailed in the associated Issues and Decision Memorandum accessible via Commerce’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Scope of Investigation The investigation centers on van-type trailers from China. These trailers are generally rectangular with a fully enclosed cargo space. The report detailed that the investigation includes both complete trailers and subassemblies, whether finished or unfinished. Subassemblies involve parts such as subframes, door assemblies, and running gear subassemblies. Comments and Outcome Commerce received scope comments from various parties. However, after analysis, they made no changes to the scope of the investigation as detailed in the Final Scope Decision Memorandum. Determination and Implications The determination discovered certain Chinese producers/exporters had a weighted-average dumping margin of 130.86 percent. Commerce will continue to suspend liquidation of entries that fall under their described conditions, instructing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue requiring cash deposits. The cash deposit rate is adjusted to account for export subsidy offsets. Next Steps and Conclusion The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is set to make its final injury determination within 45 days of this announcement. If the ITC confirms material injury or threat thereof, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties accordingly. In the event of a negative determination by ITC, the proceedings will be terminated, refunds of cash deposits will occur, and the suspension of liquidation will be lifted. This determination aims to ensure fair trading practices and address potential harm to the U.S. industry by imported van-type trailers. For further information, parties can consult the Federal Register and various Commerce memoranda for comprehensive details on this ruling. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reopens Review on Steel Wire Rod from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking another look at its decision about steel wire rod from Korea. They are reopening a previous review due to new information about possible fraud. Background on the Review On April 7, 2026, the Department of Commerce published the results of an administrative review. This review was about antidumping duties on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea. A company named POSCO, along with POSCO International Corporation, was involved in the review. The initial finding showed a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. Why Reopen the Review? The Department of Commerce found new evidence. This could mean there were false statements in their previous 2023-2024 review and the ongoing 2024-2025 review. This evidence was brought to their attention through a submission during the 2024-2025 review process. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has decided to reopen the 2023-2024 review. They will look at the records and reconsider their initial findings. A memorandum will be issued to guide the procedural steps. This includes timelines for comments and new information from interested parties. Actions with Customs and Border Protection During this reconsideration, the Department will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries from the 2023-2024 review period. Once the review is concluded, new instructions for assessments will be issued. If the cash deposit rate changes and hasn’t been updated by a new review, it will be revised accordingly. Official Notice These decisions and actions are in line with the Federal Circuit Court’s authority for protecting the integrity of administrative reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Ruling Changes Antidumping Duties on Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes On April 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a decision about certain steel products from Japan. This decision changes past results about antidumping duties. The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has updated its results after this court decision. Background on Steel Review This decision is about hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. The period reviewed was from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019. The original review was done in 2021 by the Commerce Department. In that review, the dumping margin, which is a measure of unfair pricing, was set at 11.70%. Nippon Steel’s Challenge Nippon Steel Corporation, a major steelmaker, challenged the original results. They questioned how Commerce calculated certain sales and duties. Commerce revised the results on a first remand, lowering the dumping margin to 10.12%. Court’s Role and Decisions The CIT reviewed Commerce’s decision twice. On October 10, 2024, the court asked Commerce to explain certain parts of their decision again. Commerce did this and maintained the revised dumping margin. The CIT agreed with this in its final decision on April 8, 2026. Impact of the Decision According to the Timken ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Commerce must publish a notice when a court decision does not align with its findings. This means the revised margin for Nippon Steel is now official, at 10.12%. This publishing is required for legal reasons and informs the public of the change. Future Actions Commerce will not change the cash deposit rate already set for Nippon Steel. If other companies do not have a new cash deposit rate, Commerce will give new instructions for them. The importers affected will have duties assessed on their steel products. If an assessment rate is zero or very low, no duties will be applied. This update acts under laws related to trade, like the Tariff Act of 1930. It shows how global trade rules affect companies and their products. Such court decisions can change how much companies pay in duties when selling products in the U.S. This announcement was made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

No Shipments of Chinese Hardwood Plywood to U.S. Says Commerce Department Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes August 28, 2026The U.S. Department of Commerce announced that there have been no shipments of certain hardwood plywood products from China to the United States during specific periods reviewed. This announcement follows a thorough investigation of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The review covered two timeframes: June 17, 2020, through September 25, 2021, and January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. During these periods, one Chinese producer was examined, and no shipments were found. The Department of Commerce reviewed comments on its preliminary findings before finalizing its decision. Taraca Pacific Inc., an importer, submitted a brief during this process. No other parties provided additional comments. Hai Hien Bamboo Wood Joint Stock Company was involved in the review. The company confirmed past shipments to the U.S., but only of non-subject plywood, which the Commerce Department agreed with by confirming no shipments of the subject merchandise. The scope of these orders includes hardwood plywood from China. For this reason, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will not apply duties to entries made by Hai Hien during the reviewed periods. The Commerce Department will continue with cash deposit requirements for future transactions. This means Chinese exporters without separate rates will default to a broad Chinese rate, while others will depend on specific rates previously assigned. Importers must remember to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements to avoid potential penalties. Such compliance ensures the Department does not assume improper reimbursement practices. Parties involved with an administrative protective order are reminded of their responsibilities to return or destroy confidential materials when required. This announcement comes as part of the Department’s commitment to enforcing trade laws and ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Impacts Trade Ruling on Pipe Fittings from China Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On July 29, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade made a key decision. It relates to certain carbon steel pipe fittings. These are called “butt-weld pipe fittings.” The U.S. Department of Commerce had a rule about these pipe fittings. This rule involved products from China. It included products sent to Vietnam for more work. The court said the Department’s decision was not right. The issue began on October 20, 2023. At that time, Commerce decided that rough pipe fittings from China were not finished. Even if they were partly made in China and then continued in Vietnam, they were still not considered finished. Hence, they were excluded from certain rules. Two companies disagreed. These were Tube Forgings of America, Inc. and Mills Iron Works, Inc. They went to court. On January 2, 2025, the court sent the decision back to Commerce. The court said the evidence was not enough. In April 2026, the court asked Commerce to look at other factors. After doing this, Commerce changed its stance. Now, these products are included in the order. This means they are covered by the regulations. The court’s final decision came on July 29, 2026. It agreed with Commerce’s new decision. This means unfinished fittings, partly made in China, and finished in Vietnam, are ruled by U.S. rules. This decision has important effects. The Department of Commerce will make sure to follow the new ruling. This will include guiding customs on what to do. Products that fit these conditions will have liquidation suspended. They will be assessed under new instructions. All interested parties should note this change. The decision aligns with U.S. trade law requirements. It ensures compliance with duties and tariffs on products made partly in China and altered in Vietnam. This official note is now part of the Federal Register, ensuring transparency and public access to trade decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Page Not Found on GovInfo Website Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes An error has occurred on the GovInfo website. The webpage you attempted to reach cannot be found. When encountering this issue, GovInfo encourages users to report the error. To help resolve the problem, please provide the following information: The URL of the page you were trying to access. The steps you followed to produce the error. Any specific search or browse terms you used. A screenshot of the page where the error occurred. GovInfo appreciates your patience while this issue is being addressed. For more assistance, you can visit the GovInfo homepage or explore their “Search Tips” to improve your browsing experience. If you continue to experience issues, the askGPO service is available to assist with resolving the error. You can reach askGPO at this link. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Citric Acid From India Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In an important announcement, the U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision regarding citric acid and certain citrate salts from India. The Department found that these products are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means that the products are sold for less than they should be, which could harm U.S. businesses that make similar products. Investigation Period and Preliminary Findings The investigation looked at sales from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce began this investigation in February 2026 and had to postpone the preliminary findings, which were finally issued on August 26, 2026. The investigation discovered that one company, Daffodil Pharmachem Private Limited, may have been selling these products at unfair prices. Because Daffodil stopped participating in the investigation, the Department of Commerce had to rely on information available to determine the company’s dumping margin. All-Others Rate Calculated The Department also calculated what they called an “all-others rate.” This is an estimated dumping margin for other companies that were not directly investigated. This rate helps determine what other Indian exporters should pay if they are also selling at less-than-fair values in the U.S. Suspension of Liquidation Following the findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has been instructed to suspend the liquidation of these products. This means that the products can’t be sold or consumed until further notice. CBP has also been directed to ask for a cash deposit from importers. This deposit is a specific amount based on the determined dumping margins, to help protect U.S. manufacturers while the investigation continues. Public Comments and Further Process The Department of Commerce is open to comments from the public about these preliminary findings. Interested parties have 14 days to submit their comments. There will be a chance to ask for a hearing about these findings as well. The final decision is now postponed to later this year to give more time for consideration and review. Next Steps This situation is closely monitored by the U.S. International Trade Commission. If the final determination is also affirmative, a decision will be made on whether these imports are causing harm to U.S. industries. This is an evolving story, and both U.S. businesses and Indian exporters are awaiting the final ruling. Keep an eye out for updates as the investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes In a recent notice, the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the continuation of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on vertical shaft engines from China. These engines are between 225cc and 999cc and are mainly used in lawn mowers and other outdoor equipment. The decision is based on findings that removing these orders might lead to continued dumping, unfair subsidies, and injury to U.S. industries. The notice was published on August 20, 2026, and the effective date for this continuation is August 11, 2026. The notice states that these engines usually have to meet environmental standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The engines are typically classified under certain tariff codes for customs purposes. The Commerce Department and ITC have determined that revoking the orders could harm U.S. businesses. Therefore, duties will continue to be collected on these products. The next review of these orders will be initiated before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s last determination. This continuation ensures that U.S. laws protect domestic industries from unfair trade practices, helping maintain fair competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Date: 2026-08-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has found that some producers and exporters of stainless steel flanges from India sold their products in the U.S. at prices below normal value. This finding is part of an antidumping duty administrative review for the period from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The review determined that Chandan Steel Limited made sales at a dumping margin of 0.60 percent. Another group of companies, known together as BFN/Viraj, had a weighted-average dumping margin of 50.72 percent. Several other companies were also reviewed but not individually examined. These companies, which include Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd., CD Industries, and others, were assigned a dumping margin of 0.60 percent. The Department of Commerce used adverse facts available for BFN/Viraj due to issues found during the review. This led to the higher dumping margin for these companies. For companies not individually reviewed, the dumping margin applied is the rate determined for Chandan, which is 0.60 percent. These results lead to certain requirements for U.S. importers. Importers of these flanges will need to pay cash deposits based on these margins. For BFN/Viraj, the rate is 50.72 percent. For others, it’s 0.60 percent. If a seller does not know the final destination of its sales, duties might be based on a higher rate. For importers, this means they might owe more duties on stainless steel flanges coming from India. This is to make sure Indian producers sell at fair prices in the U.S. The Department will not change the cash deposit requirements from before, aside from the adjustments made in this review. These rules will stay until they are updated again in a future review. The Department of Commerce will follow up by issuing instructions for assessing these duties. This will happen no earlier than 35 days after this announcement. Rates for unreviewed producers will depend on past decisions if those are available. This decision plays a crucial role in protecting fair trade practices in the United States by ensuring imported products do not harm American businesses by being priced unfairly low. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Mexican Pipe and Tube Sold at Less than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Mexican Pipe and Tube Sold at Less than Normal Value The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized the results of an investigation into the sale of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico. The findings indicate that these products were sold in the United States at a price lower than their normal value during the review period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. This practice is known as dumping. The department announced these results on August 20, 2026. The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance unit of the International Trade Administration, a branch of the Department of Commerce. Key Contact Information: For any further details, the department suggests reaching out to either John Conniff or Charles Doss at the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are with the enforcement and compliance division and can be contacted at (202) 482-1009 or (202) 482-4474, respectively. Background of the Review: The department had earlier published preliminary results in February 2026 and allowed interested parties to comment on these outcomes. After extending its deadline, the final results are now published. Scope of the Order: The order and focus were specifically on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube products from Mexico. A detailed description of what products are covered by the order is available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Feedback: The department considered all feedback from different parties. Changes were made to the calculations as a result, particularly affecting Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. and Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (Regiopytsa). This is explained in detail in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results: The final results indicate various weighted-average dumping margins for different Mexican producers and exporters. Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. was assigned a margin of 10.23 percent. Regiopytsa received a 6.36 percent rate. Other companies, like Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V. and Maquilacero S.A. de C.V., were assigned a rate of 8.16 percent. Disclosure Plans: The Department of Commerce will share the calculations used for these results with interested parties within five days of the notice’s publication. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements: The department will determine antidumping duties which U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess. Companies with zero or minimal dumping margins will not face additional duties. The Department of Commerce will also enforce new cash deposit rates for all shipments of the subject merchandise made from the review’s publish date onward. Administrative Reminders: Importers are reminded of their responsibility to submit a certificate regarding duty reimbursements. All parties are also reminded to handle confidential information, disclosed under administrative protective orders, with care. This notice highlights the Department of Commerce’s continuous work in ensuring fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a correction notice concerning its previous initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. Initially published in the Federal Register on August 10, 2026, the notice inadvertently omitted certain products and their corresponding reviews. Commerce’s original publication failed to include the Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (PC Strand) from Malaysia and Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. These omissions have now been rectified with a correction notice dated August 20, 2026. The specific corrections include the addition of review information for certain companies. For Malaysia’s PC Strand, companies under review for the period from June 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026, include Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. For Vietnam’s Boltless Steel Shelving, the companies now included in the review are: Great Star Vietnam Co. Ltd., Cuong Nghia Imp. Exp., Quoc Ham Co., Ltd., Thanh Phong Production and Trade Limited Company, Xinguang (Vietnam) Logistic Equipment Co., Ltd, Parkway Thanh Phong Co., Ltd., Vietnam Shuntong Metal Products Co. Ltd., Kang Yang Vietnam Co., Ltd., Huang Ding Hardware Co., Ltd, Savimex Corporation, and Royal Corinthian Vietnam Co. The period of review for these companies is also from June 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026. The correction notice emphasizes the commerce department’s commitment to accurately maintain the integrity of trade reviews and notifications in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the Code of Federal Regulations. This document is overseen by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, and was officially filed and published on August 19, 2026. This information is issued and published to inform relevant parties and stakeholders. This correction ensures transparency and provides accurate data for proper regulatory compliance and enforcement. For further details or inquiries, interested parties are advised to contact Brenda E. Brown at the International Trade Administration. This action is crucial for maintaining fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfairly priced or subsidized imports. Readers are encouraged to refer to the full text of the correction notice issued in the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 160, for additional context and comprehensive details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Procedures for Importers of Automobiles Under the USMCA Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2026, new procedures were announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce. These concern the way importers of automobiles can submit documentation for preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA. The changes aim to manage and review submissions more efficiently. Background In March 2025, President issued Proclamation 10908. This proclamation imposed tariffs on certain automobiles and parts, citing national security concerns. Importers under the USMCA could submit documentation to show U.S. content in their vehicles. In May 2025, procedures to submit and review these documents were established. In October 2025, Proclamation 10984 was issued. It addressed imports of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Changes brought these procedures in line with those for automobiles. New Procedures The new procedures align the submission timelines for automobiles with those set for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Importers can submit documents from August 19, 2026. Submissions must be electronic. Eligibility determinations for automobiles imported from December 1, 2026, to November 30, 2027, will be valid for one year. Importers must submit documentation by September 30, 2026, to ensure timely processing. Eligibility Criteria Only automobiles eligible for USMCA preferential treatment can benefit from the reduced tariff on the non-U.S. content. The preferential tariff benefits apply to automobiles imported from Mexico and Canada. Submission Details Importers need to detail the automobile’s U.S. and non-U.S. content. The value must be certified by a senior officer. Other required details include: Total customs value of the automobile. Production locations and country of assembly. Certification of USMCA preferential treatment. Review Process The Department of Commerce will check documents for accuracy. They might ask for more information if needed. Once verified, importers and CBP will be informed of the non-U.S. content value. The additional tariff will apply to this value. Changes in automobile production must be reported. This includes increased or decreased U.S. content. Consequences for Errors If inaccuracies are found, the tariff will apply to the full value of the automobiles. This includes past and future imports until the error is rectified. Confidential Business Information All submissions containing confidential business information must be clearly marked. No Change to USMCA Status These procedures do not affect the eligibility of vehicles for USMCA tariff preferences. Conclusion The new procedures help streamline the review process for importers seeking tariff benefits under the USMCA. They ensure consistent application of tariffs, benefiting the U.S. economy and maintaining national security. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Changes in Duty Rates for Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 12, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made an important decision. It supported the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final results about the duty on phosphate fertilizers from Russia. These results came from an administrative review about countervailing duties. This review happened from November 30, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The Department of Commerce reviewed a company called Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit). They looked at how much subsidy, or help, the company got from the Russian government when buying phosphate ore mining rights. Originally, they set the subsidy rate at 28.50 percent. But they decided to change it after a deeper examination. The examination was because Archer Daniels Midland Company disagreed with the first decision. The court asked the Department of Commerce to review its work. The department then found that the subsidy rate for JSC Apatit was actually 22.86 percent. The new decision, made on August 12, 2026, is not the same as the first decision from the Department of Commerce. The court ordered that these new results must be noted and that the previous claims were not right. The changes in the subsidy rate mean that if JSC Apatit is importing to the U.S., the duty is now based on this new lower rate. This might affect how much they have to pay when selling phosphate fertilizers to the U.S. Yet, JSC Apatit still has a different rate from another review. So, until all court cases finish, they will not change the deposit rate they use currently. Right now, JSC Apapit’s import entries are put on hold by the court. This is called an injunction. This means their goods that entered through November 30, 2020, to December 31, 2021, will stay on hold. If no one appeals the court’s August 12, 2026, decision, or if the appeal does not change anything, Commerce will instruct Customs and Border Protection on how to apply duties based on the new rate. The news about these changes was made public on August 14, 2026. The U.S. Department of Commerce is keeping all interested groups updated about these developments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Wind Tower Imports from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of utility scale wind towers imported from Indonesia. The review covered the period between August 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. The Department found that Indonesian wind towers were being sold in the United States at fair prices. This means they were not sold at less than their normal value. The review focused on PT. Kenertec Power System (Kenertec), a major producer of these wind towers. After reviewing all data and comments from involved parties, the Department confirmed that Kenertec did not engage in unfair pricing practices. As a result, Kenertec’s products will not face additional duties from the U.S. The final results of this review were set to be published on August 13, 2026. The Department’s decision comes after examining several comments and making necessary changes to the initial calculations. The changes ensured accuracy and fairness in determining the duties on Kenertec’s wind towers. The Department will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection about this decision. This will help guide the agency in handling entries of wind towers from Indonesia. As Kenertec was found to have a zero percent dumping margin, these entries will not be subject to additional duties. Importers need to ensure that they comply with regulations and confirm no reimbursement of duties has occurred. This will prevent the assessment of extra duties on their products. Lastly, cash deposit rates for these products will reflect the Department’s final decision. Rates can differ based on whether the companies or products were covered in previous reviews. However, for all other products not specified, a standard rate of 8.53 percent will still apply. This standard rate remains effective unless future reviews dictate otherwise. This conclusion helps to maintain fair trade practices and supports the smooth operation of the wind tower industry between the U.S. and Indonesia. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Review on Steel Wire Rod from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its antidumping duty review on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea. This review is under the responsibility of the department’s Enforcement and Compliance section. The focus is on POSCO and POSCO International Corporation (PIC), key producers and exporters from Korea. From May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025, it was found that POSCO did not sell wire rod in the U.S. at prices below what is considered normal. This means, according to this preliminary review, there was no dumping. The department is inviting comments from interested parties on these findings. The original antidumping duty order was published in 2018. In subsequent years, some parts of the order were revoked, specifically for wire rods used in tires and valve springs. This recent review began in 2025 to check the actions of POSCO. During this process, the government faced some delays. There was a government shutdown, which led to deadlines being extended. More delays occurred because of backlog issues with electronically filed documents. This pushed preliminary results to be released on August 7, 2026. The review included a close examination of pricing for the products, comparing export prices and standard normal values. POSCO used a constructed export price method to determine these figures. Now, with preliminary results made public, Commerce must share their calculations with all parties involved. There will be a verification phase where the collected information is double-checked. Interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or briefs. These must be submitted after the verification report is issued. Rebuttal briefs will follow the initial comments. If any disagreements arise, a hearing can be requested. The assessment of duties will occur after final results are published. Depending on these results, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will adjust duties on imports for the review period. For entries made during this period, if POSCO was unaware that merchandise was destined for the U.S., these entries might be assessed based on all-others rates set during the investigation in 2018. Deposit requirements for shipments will be updated after final results are published. The final results will dictate the cash deposit rate for POSCO. These guidance instructions will remain active until further notice. This notice also reminds importers of their duty to file a certificate regarding duty reimbursements before liquidation of entries. Failure to do this could result in double duties. The Department of Commerce is set to issue final results within 120 days, concluding this review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Review Results on Organic Soybean Meal from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes August 13, 2026 The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary results concerning the review of the antidumping duty on organic soybean meal imported from India. The review covers the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. This follows the ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices involving Indian exporters. Background Commerce originally initiated the review process on May 16, 2022, after receiving requests for the review in line with the government regulation 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Respondent companies Ecopure Specialities Ltd. and Bergwerff Organic (India) Pvt., Ltd. were selected for mandatory examination in August 2025. Notably, two significant requests for withdrawals were made by Perdue Agribusiness LLC and Organic Soybean Producers of America (OSPA) on September 23, 2025. Consequently, this review focused solely on Ecopure. Preliminary Findings Commerce has preliminarily determined that Indian producers and exporters have not sold organic soybean meal in the United States at less than normal value during the specified review period. As part of the review’s progression, Commerce extended the timeline for preliminary results on a couple of occasions, adding up to a significant 113-day delay due to administrative adjustments, government shutdowns, and backlog. For the companies not individually reviewed, including 145 entities listed for rescission, those whose assessments were withdrawn are slated for exclusion from review action. The enforcement dictates imply these companies won’t undergo the review procedure as per 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Methodology and Findings In evaluating Ecopure Specialities Ltd., results showed a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.60 percent. This indicates that the sales were not below the normal value as delineated in the Tariff Act of 1930. The same margin applies to companies not selected for individual review unless separate determinations are merited. Deadline Extension and Comments Owing to unforeseen delays, Commerce had tolled several deadlines, notably including extensions on April 7 and July 24, 2026. Following regulations enabled the complete extension of the preliminary findings deadline to August 7, 2026. Commerce invites comments and case briefs from interested parties, citing a 21-day grace period post-publication to facilitate public discourse. Participants are encouraged to focus on content found in the published preliminary results. The department has established a procedural framework for conducting subsequent hearings and will issue final notice thereafter. Assessment and Cash Deposits The publication delineates methodology for establishing assessment rates. Ecopure and the rest under review will be subject to either calculated rates or all-other rates determined in earlier segments. The cash deposit rate will continue, barring further adjustments. This memorandum hints at systematic adherence to fair trade policies between the United States and foreign trade partners, safeguarding both domestic industries and international market equilibriums. — Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. The review took place from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Background The Department assessed whether companies from Vietnam sold fish fillets in the U.S. below their normal value. Selling goods at this lower value is known as dumping. Dumping can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department looked at two main companies: Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company. They found these companies sold the fillets for less than they should have. New Rates Set Bien Dong now has a dumping margin of $1.00 per kilogram. NTSF’s margin is $0.38 per kilogram. Two other companies, Cantho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company and Nam Viet Corporation, also have a rate. They are set at $0.84 per kilogram. Partial Cancellation The Department canceled the review for some companies. This happened because there were no sales with prices to review. They also dropped the Vietnam-wide entity from the review, which means this group’s rate of $2.39 per kilogram will not change. New Rules The Department issued new rules for these companies: The cash deposit rate for U.S. shipments will match the new rates. For companies without their own rate, the Vietnam-wide rate ($2.39 per kilogram) will apply. What’s Next? U.S. Customs will collect the new deposit rates from now on. If companies bought the fillets and are still storing them, they should pay the right duty to avoid extra charges. These findings are important. They make sure trade is fair. They also protect U.S. businesses from unfair prices. Companies and importers need to follow these new rules carefully. This will help the trade between the U.S. and Vietnam stay fair and balanced. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Trade Ruling on Chinese Wooden Bedroom Furniture Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement regarding the import of wooden bedroom furniture from China. Eleven Chinese companies did not qualify for a separate rate and are now part of the China-wide entity. This means they face the China-wide duty rate of 216.01 percent. The review period for this decision was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This decision follows an earlier report in April 2026. There were no new comments on the preliminary findings, so the results remain the same. The wooden bedroom furniture case has been open since 2005 when a notice was issued about sales at less than fair value. The Department followed section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for this review. They decided to keep the preliminary results as final. A list of 11 companies will be impacted by this decision. Some of these companies are Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd., Jesse Furniture Industries Co., Ltd., and Nathan International Ltd. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will begin assessing antidumping duties. This will happen no sooner than 35 days after the notice was published. An injunction might change the timeline for some entries if a timely summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. For future shipments, different cash deposit rules will apply. Separate rates will continue for exporters that already have them. For those without separate rates, the China-wide rate will apply. Non-China exporters without a separate rate will face the rate applied to the China exporter that supplied them. Importers need to make sure they file a certificate about the reimbursement of duties. This should be done before the liquidation of entries during the 2024 review period. The notice also reminds all parties to handle confidential information carefully. Materials need to be returned or destroyed to comply with regulations. These updates follow the rules set out by sections of the Tariff Act and Department of Commerce’s regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty (AD) order on difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This decision is the result of findings by Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They agreed that getting rid of this duty could lead to more dumping and harm to U.S. industries. The ITC and Commerce looked into this matter as part of their normal review process. The initial order was put in place on March 11, 2021. Earlier this year, both agencies started their first “sunset review” to decide if the order should stay. After reviewing, it was clear that without the order, U.S. industries might suffer from low-priced R-32 from China harming local businesses. R-32 is used in air conditioners and refrigeration systems. The chemical is identified by a specific CAS registry number: 75-10-5. It can be in different forms or levels of purity. This order covers R-32, whether it is pure or in blends where R-32 makes up a large part of the mix. However, R-32 that is part of blends covered by a different order—specifically for hydrofluorocarbon blends from China—is not included. The duty applies to R-32 classified under certain subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Customs will keep applying these duties on R-32 imports from China. This will ensure fair pricing and protect U.S. industries. The continuation order became effective on August 4, 2026. This means that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect deposits for the duty. These deposits are collected at the same rates as when the goods enter the country. Commerce aims to start the next review of this order roughly five years from now. This schedule helps ensure that the duty remains necessary and effective. Parties who were allowed to see certain private information during the review must now handle it appropriately. They need to either return or destroy the information. This decision fulfills the legal requirements and reflects the procedures set by the U.S. government in reviewing and extending such trade measures. The continuation aims to protect U.S. industry from unfair foreign pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Reviews of Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has taken a significant step by deciding to cancel some of its ongoing antidumping and countervailing duty reviews. This decision was made because all the requests for these reviews were withdrawn on time. This means there were no more requests remaining for these reviews. Commerce had started these reviews to look into certain companies and countries. These reviews were meant to make sure no unfair pricing or financial help was being given that could hurt U.S. businesses. Here is a list of the products and countries involved in these cancelled reviews: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, South Africa, and Taiwan. Brass Rod from Israel. Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy. Forged Steel Fittings from the Republic of Korea. Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkmenistan. Gas Powered Pressure Washers from Vietnam and China. Polyester Textured Yarn and Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand. Various Products including certain plastic decorative ribbons, vertical shaft engines, crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, lightweight thermal paper, mattresses, seamless refined copper pipe and tube, wooden bedroom furniture, and wooden cabinets and vanities from the People’s Republic of China. For all these products, Commerce will not continue its review process. Instead, it will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to take action based on the original duties set when the products first entered the U.S. Importers of these products have responsibilities. They need to file certain papers about paying the right duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay double. Commerce has also reminded those involved in these reviews to properly handle private information according to the laws. The decision to stop the reviews was published officially on August 11, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, who is acting as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This notice is part of the ongoing efforts to manage trade fairly and according to the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Starts Review to Change Aluminum Sheet Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the beginning of a review of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheet. These orders affect products from China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Türkiye. What is Happening? Commerce is considering changes to these orders. They might take away part of these rules, specifically about certain aluminum can stock. Why the Change? The reviews are happening because the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group asked for them. They want to change the rules to make sure that some aluminum used for beverage cans is not part of these orders. Who is Involved? The Aluminum Association Working Group includes companies like Arconic Corporation, Commonwealth Rolled Products Inc., Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC, JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Texarkana Aluminum, Inc. Important Dates The changes could happen on August 11, 2026. Companies and people interested in this review can also comment on the preliminary results. Scope of the Orders The orders are about aluminum sheets that are flat-rolled and have a certain thickness. These sheets can be made into many products. However, aluminum used for making beverage cans is mainly not part of these orders. Proposed Changes Some aluminum can stock is already not covered by the orders. The review will look at whether to keep it that way. The Aluminum Association wants to make clear that all aluminum can stock is excluded, no matter how it is classified in trade codes. How to Get Involved People can send in their comments and opinions. There are ways to send these comments to the Commerce Department. Also, people can ask for a hearing to discuss their views. Timeline for Final Decision Commerce will try to finish the review as quickly as possible. They might make a final decision in 270 days, unless everyone quickly agrees on the outcome. Why Care About This? These trade orders can affect prices and supply of aluminum products in the U.S. market. This review is important for companies that use or produce these aluminum sheets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Ripe Olives from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final results on the antidumping review for ripe olives from Spain. The review period ran from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that some producers or exporters sold ripe olives in the United States at prices below what they normally sell for. This practice is known as dumping. The final results impact companies like Agro Sevilla and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. These companies had a calculated dumping margin of 3.54 percent. This rate means they sold olives in the U.S. at 3.54 percent less than the normal value. For other companies not chosen for a detailed review, the Department often uses the average rate from reviewed companies. So, Angel Camacho received the same rate as Agro Sevilla at 3.54 percent. The Department also looked at Alimentary Group DCOOP, S.Coop.And. But this company had no entries of ripe olives during the review period. So, the review for this company was canceled. The review process included steps like checking sales records in both the U.S. and Spain. These steps help ensure the information is correct. The Department plans to give instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon. The CBP will collect antidumping duties based on the final results. If a company slightly price-dumped their products, those products might not face extra duties. For products that Agro Sevilla sold, if they are not reported correctly, the CBP might use a duty rate of 19.98 percent. This rate is based on the original investigation finding against Spanish olives. Now that the results are final, the cash deposit rate for future olive sales from these companies in the U.S. will change. The new rate will be the one calculated in this review, unless the company can adjust its practices. This decision is important for importers. They must file the right paperwork about duties before bringing products into the U.S. If they don’t, they might have to pay double the duties. In case any importer or exporter has sensitive information protected by an Administrative Protective Order (APO), they must handle the information according to the rules. This means they need to confirm if they are returning or destroying the information to prevent any violations. The Department’s announcement clarifies the results as well as future actions. These results are part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and protect industries in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Malaysian Mattresses Underpriced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released final results regarding the pricing of mattresses imported from Malaysia. The investigation found that these mattresses were sold at prices lower than their normal value in the U.S. market. This decision comes after a thorough review for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. The announcement was made in a notice published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2026. During the review, no comments were submitted from interested parties in response to the preliminary findings released earlier this year on April 15. As a result, the preliminary results have been adopted as final, without any changes. The scope of the investigation covered various companies involved in the production and export of mattresses from Malaysia. It has been determined that several Malaysian producers, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD, Orient GIC Global, and Lion YTT World, all had a weighted-average dumping margin of 42.92 percent. This means they were selling their products significantly cheaper than what is considered fair. The United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be responsible for assessing these antidumping duties on all relevant entries of mattresses from Malaysia. The new cash deposit rates will come into effect immediately for all shipments entering the country on or after the publication date. This action reinforces the U.S. commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign pricing strategies. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor trade activities closely to uphold these standards. Finally, companies importing mattresses are reminded of the importance of complying with all international trade regulations. Failure to declare the reimbursement of antidumping duties as required could lead to heavier penalties, including the possibility of paying double duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chinese Aluminum Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Agency Involved The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Review Details The review period spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. It is part of an administrative review process to ensure fair trade practices. Outcome of the Review The review found that certain companies in China have benefited from countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are financial aid that unfairly benefits a foreign exporter. Companies Affected The final results apply to several Chinese companies. These include Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, and others. Subsidy Rate The companies mentioned have been assigned a countervailable subsidy rate. This rate is 164.29 percent. No Changes from Preliminary Results The Department made no changes from the preliminary review published in April 2026. No comments were submitted from interested parties during the review process. Facts Available with Adverse Inferences For the six non-responsive companies, the Department applied adverse facts available. This decision means they determined the companies did not cooperate with the review. Instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) The Department will instruct the CBP to assess countervailing duties. These duties apply to entries of aluminum extrusions covered by the review. Cash Deposit Instructions From now on, the CBP will collect cash deposits for estimated duties. These deposits are based on the subsidy rates determined in this review. Scope of the Order The order applies to various aluminum extrusions. These include shapes and forms made from certain aluminum alloys. Exclusions Many items are excluded from the order, like certain finished goods and specific aluminum alloys not meeting certain criteria. Conclusion This review ensures that trade practices remain fair. The Department of Commerce continues to monitor and enforce trade laws diligently. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Initiates Reviews on Various Trade Issues Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It has begun a series of administrative reviews on antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These reviews focus on products with June anniversary dates, according to the Federal Register notice published on August 10, 2026. What Are These Reviews? Administrative reviews help check if foreign companies are selling goods at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This is called dumping. If they do, extra taxes called antidumping duties can be applied. The reviews also check if foreign companies receive unfair help from their governments. This is called a countervailable subsidy. In such cases, countervailing duties can be applied. Which Products Are Under Review? Some of the products under review include raw honey from Argentina and Brazil, brass rods from Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea, and crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Other products include certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing from Germany, India, and Switzerland; quartz surface products from India; glycine from Japan and India; and laminated woven sacks from Vietnam. What Is the Procedure? The reviews allow any parties, like companies and producers, to request that their cases be looked at by the Department of Commerce. There are deadlines for submitting information, comments, and responses. For instance, separate rate applications for non-market economy countries must be filed. The companies in the reviews need to prove their independence from their governments to avoid being assigned a single antidumping deposit rate. Applications are due 14 calendar days after this Federal Register notice. Respondents and Deadlines Commerce will select companies for individual examination based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data or through questionnaires requesting sales information. Respondent selection decisions will be made within 35 days of the notice publication. Comments on Customs data or questionnaire data should be submitted within seven days after these are recorded. Companies should also complete the Quantity and Value (Q&V) questionnaire separately for accuracy in respondent selection. Notices of No Sales and Deadlines If there is no sale or entry during the examination period, a notice of no sales must be filed within 30 days of the initiation notice. Additionally, if a market situation affects normal pricing, companies have 20 days after initial questionnaire submissions to notify Commerce. Conclusion The Commerce Department aims to conclude these reviews by June 30, 2027. These actions ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from unfair foreign practices. This process is a crucial part of maintaining healthy international trade relations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Decision on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding carbazole violet pigment 23. This pigment comes from India and China. On May 1, 2026, the Department began a review of antidumping duties on this pigment. The review aimed to decide if the duties should continue. No domestic company responded to this review. This resulted in the revocation of these duties. Antidumping duties are taxes on foreign products. They aim to protect domestic businesses from cheap foreign imports. These duties were first put in place in 2004. The main purpose was to prevent unfair pricing from foreign companies. The pigment involved in this case is known by its specific chemical names and formulas. It is also identified under a special code called the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. This helps customs officials classify products. With the revocation, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop suspending the liquidation of this pigment. This affects goods entered or withdrawn from warehouses after June 15, 2026. However, products entered before this date will still face the old rules. Reviews can still happen for merchandise entered before the revocation date. The notice was published on August 7, 2026, by Christopher Abbott. Abbott serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This decision follows the laws and regulations mentioned in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Ends Special Trade Rules for a Chemical from India Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to change the trade rules for a chemical called carbazole violet pigment 23 that comes from India. On May 1, 2026, the Department started what they call a “sunset review.” This is where they check whether they should keep extra taxes on a product when it is imported into the United States. Carbazole violet pigment 23 is used to make paints and inks. The chemical has a special code, C34H22Cl2N4O2, and is known by its Color Index No. 51319. Normally, if American companies think they need the extra tax to compete with foreign products, they tell the Department they want to be involved. But this time, no American company said they wanted to be involved. Because of this, the Department decided to stop the extra tax starting on August 7, 2026. This decision means that carbazole violet pigment 23 from India can enter the U.S. without the extra tax. But any of the chemical imported before June 15, 2026, will still have to pay it. This change could make it cheaper for companies in the U.S. to buy this pigment from India. But it also means American companies that make similar products might have to adjust because they won’t have the tax to help them compete. The Department made this decision because it follows trade laws that say if nobody shows interest in having the tax, it should be removed. This decision will be managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who will make sure the rules are followed. The Department of Commerce shared this decision in an official notice signed by Christopher Abbott. This change reflects how trade rules can change based on the needs and interests of businesses in the U.S. and those who make the decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.