U.S. Commerce Department Finds Continued Dumping of Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Japan

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Introduction

The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the antidumping duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC Strand) from Japan would likely lead to more dumping. This conclusion comes from an expedited sunset review. The review found that dumping could continue or happen again at rates up to 13.30 percent.

Background

The Commerce Department reviewed the antidumping duty finding first announced on December 8, 1978. This review began on October 3, 2025. This process is under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Participants

Some American companies participated in this review. Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp. showed interest. They want antidumping duties to stay in place because these companies produce similar products in the U.S.

Process

The review started when domestic companies showed interest. They sent a notice of intent on October 20, 2025. By November 3, 2025, these companies sent a complete response to the review. There were no responses from Japanese companies. Because of this, the Commerce Department did a quick 120-day review. Deadlines shifted because of a government shutdown during November 2025. The final results came out on April 7, 2026.

Final Results

The Commerce Department decided that ending the antidumping duty could lead to more dumping. They expect the dumping margin to be up to 13.30 percent.

Conclusion

The Commerce Department’s decision affects the market for PC Strand from Japan. By keeping antidumping duties, the U.S. aims to protect domestic producers. This report also reminds those with access to protected information to handle it carefully. This decision is now official and followed the laws in sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act.

Legal Disclaimer

This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.