U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Related to Vertical Power Delivery Systems Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently received a complaint involving vertical power delivery systems. This complaint was filed by Vicor Corporation on September 9, 2026. The complaint alleges that there are violations of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves certain vertical power delivery systems coming into the United States. The systems are part of computing systems and their components. Vicor Corporation named several companies in the complaint. These companies are from different parts of the world, including the United States, Taiwan, Germany, China, and Canada. The companies include Delta Electronics, Inc., Infineon Technologies AG, and Foxconn, among others. The USITC has asked for public comments on this complaint. They want to know if there are any public interest issues. The comments should focus on how the requested relief would impact public health and welfare, the economy, and competitive conditions in the U.S. The USITC also wants to know how such orders could affect U.S. consumers. People can send comments electronically no later than eight days after the USITC’s notice is published. The USITC will handle this case using section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This act helps manage issues with imported goods that may harm U.S. industries. It also allows the USITC to act if they find the complaint valid. Contact Lisa R. Barton at the USITC, if more information is needed. The Commission’s electronic filing system, called EDIS, is available for document submissions. This is an important case, and the USITC is keen to hear from the public about possible impacts on America. They encourage people and companies to share their views. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Dolby Joins Investigation on Video Devices and Patents Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a significant decision. They decided not to review an initial decision about Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Dolby wanted to join an investigation as an “intervenor.” An “intervenor” is someone who is not directly involved but wants to take part because it affects them. The administrative law judge agreed, and the ITC will not change this decision. The investigation began on April 2, 2026. InterDigital, Inc., a company based in Wilmington, Delaware, filed a complaint. They were joined by InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc., also from Wilmington, and InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS from Paris, France. Together, they wanted the ITC to look into certain electronic devices. The complaint said these devices, like smart TVs and monitors, might be infringing on U.S. Patents. The patents in question have numbers. For example, U.S. Patent No. 8,085,846, and a few others. They believe these devices are being imported or sold in the U.S. while infringing on these patents. The notice named specific companies involved. They are from China, Hong Kong, Vietnam, and the United States. Some of these companies include TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. and Hisense Co., Ltd. These companies are collectively called “Respondents.” Dolby Laboratories, not initially involved, filed a motion in July. They wanted to join in because two patents in the investigation, ‘168 and ‘751, concerned them. Dolby said they should have participation rights. This means they want to be involved in discussions about these patents. Complainants were against Dolby’s motion, but the Respondents did not oppose it. On August 12, 2026, the administrative law judge issued an order. This order, known as Order No. 17, agreed with Dolby. While Dolby can be an “intervenor,” they will not be a “respondent.” Being an intervenor means Dolby can join in discussions and decisions about the patents mentioned. The ITC’s action means Dolby can fully participate regarding these two patents. Their involvement starts with Order No. 17 and relates to all claims and defenses in the investigation about these patents. This decision is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific ITC rules. The ITC made their decision official on September 9, 2026. Lisa Barton, the ITC’s Secretary, issued this announcement. This showcases how important patents are in the technology industry and how companies protect their innovations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Investigations on Pizza Boxes from China, Malaysia, and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C. — The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of investigations on corrugated pizza boxes imported from China, Malaysia, and Turkey. The investigations begin today as a preliminary step to determine if these imports harm U.S. industry. The investigations will focus on whether the imported pizza boxes are sold at unfairly low prices, known as “dumping.” Additionally, they will examine if the Turkish government is unfairly supporting its manufacturers, known as “subsidizing.” The USITC has 45 days, until October 26, 2026, to make a preliminary determination. By November 2, 2026, the Commission will share its findings with the Department of Commerce. This action follows petitions submitted on September 9, 2026, by the American Pizza Boxes Manufacturers Coalition. This coalition consists of companies like Smurfit Westrock plc, Pratt Industries, Inc., and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW). Anyone interested in participating in these investigations must file by September 21, 2026. A list of all interested parties will be developed for future communication. A conference will be held on September 30, 2026, to discuss the investigations further. This meeting will be held via videoconference, and guidelines are available online at the USITC Public Calendar. Written submissions are also accepted. These must be submitted by October 5, 2026, and may include presentations from participants. It is important that all documents adhere to the provided guidelines and are filed promptly through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Participants must certify the accuracy of their submissions and be aware that their information can be used during the investigations. These investigations are being conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. For more information, you can reach Alejandro Orozco at 202-205-3177 or view the public record online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Investigates Citric Acid Imports Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations concerning imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts. These investigations aim to determine if these imported products are causing harm to the U.S. industry. The investigations focus on imports from Canada, India, and China. The Commission will determine if these imports are subsidized by foreign governments or sold in the U.S. at less-than-fair-value. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. They are included whether they are dry, in solution, or packaged. It covers all forms, sizes, and blends of these substances. Intermediate products, like calcium citrate, are also included. Background Information The investigations began after petitions were filed by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Cargill International, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC. They are checking if imports from Canada sell at fair prices, and whether Canadian and Indian imports receive unfair subsidies. Hearing Information A hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2027, at 9:30 a.m. Those wishing to appear must notify by January 6, 2027. Some witnesses can appear via video if necessary. The hearing will help the Commission understand the issues better. Participation and Written Submissions Parties wishing to participate need to file entries of appearance 21 days before the hearing. They must submit evidence and arguments about the case. Prehearing briefs are due by January 5, 2027. Posthearing briefs are due by January 20, 2027. The Commission will release information on February 2, 2027. Final comments from parties are due by February 4, 2027. The Commission is conducting its investigation under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Public interest and fair trade are at the core of these investigations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Review on Certain Safety and Glow Fish Tape Systems Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced it will review a decision regarding some glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems. This is based on allegations that Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Background of the Case On March 19, 2025, Klein Tools, Inc. filed a complaint, claiming Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation had infringed on certain patents related to glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems. The patents in question involve U.S. Patent Nos. 11,452,327, 11,713,209, and 12,187,573, among others. The investigation named Milwaukee as a respondent, and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part. Findings and Review On June 5, 2026, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (CALJ) concluded that Milwaukee violated the ‘265 patent, a helmet patent but did not infringe on others. The ITC plans to review specific findings related to both helmet and glow fish tape patents to check for any possible errors in construction, infringement findings, and domestic industry requirements. Call for Submissions The ITC is inviting detailed submissions on intricate aspects of patents and industry standards. This includes comparing foreign and local investments by Klein, the motivation for combining prior patents, and analyzing the public interest regarding potential remedies. Potential Remedies Should there be a violation finding, the ITC may issue exclusion orders and cease-and-desist orders against Milwaukee. Considerations are being made on how these actions may affect public health, competition, U.S. production, and consumers. Public Interest and Bonding The Commission is taking public interest into account before any orders. During a possible 60-day review by the U.S. Trade Representative, imported items could be allowed in but under a bond. Deadline for Submissions Parties connected to this case are asked to submit their input by September 18, 2026, with responses by September 25, 2026. The ITC is ensuring that the review process respects confidentiality rules while seeking thorough submissions addressing key issues. This situation remains under close observation by involved agencies and parties, as it could influence industry practices related to patent infringements and trade actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Details of the Complaint The complaint was filed by trinamiX Sensing LLC and trinamiX GmbH on September 4, 2026. It claims violations of the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically section 337. This section is about importation issues. The complaint targets Apple, Inc. from Cupertino, CA, saying they are involved in improper importation and sale of mobile devices and components. Request for Orders TrinamiX wants the Commission to issue several orders. They ask for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Additionally, they want a bond imposed during a 60-day Presidential review period. Public Comments Invited The USITC invites comments from the public, government, and other parties. They are interested in understanding how these orders might affect the public in the U.S. How the articles in question are used in the U.S. Concerns about public health, safety, or welfare. If there are similar products made in the U.S. If these U.S products can quickly replace the imports. How the orders might affect U.S. consumers. Comment Submission Details Comments must be submitted no later than eight days after this notice is published. If any complaints reply to the comments, they must do so three days after initial submissions are due. Submissions can only be made electronically. They should refer to “Docket No. 3934.” The Commission will only accept electronic filings unless an exemption is granted. Confidentiality Requests If anyone wants their submissions to be confidential, they must request it specifically. They should provide reasons for the confidentiality request according to the rules. Conclusion This new complaint is a significant issue. The USITC is carefully considering the impact of potential orders on the U.S. public and economy. They are asking everyone to submit comments to help them make informed decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments on Discriminations Against US Commerce Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is calling for public comments on how it should implement its duties under Section 338(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission is responsible for keeping informed about any discrimination against United States commerce by foreign countries. It must also report these findings to the President and provide recommendations. The USITC is seeking suggestions from interested persons on how to fulfill these responsibilities effectively. Deadline for Comments Comments must be submitted by November 9, 2026. Interested persons should submit their comments to Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, at the USITC’s address in Washington, DC, or through the online portal. How to Submit Comments Comments can be submitted via the USITC website or by email. When submitting, include the docket number MISC-053 in any correspondences. The Commission will post all comments on its website without changes, including personal information. Contact Information For information, contact Margaret Macdonald, General Counsel, Office of OGC. Media inquiries can be directed to Jennifer Andberg in the Office of External Relations. Hearing-impaired individuals can use the TDD terminal. Submitting Confidential Information If comments contain confidential information, they must comply with specific rules on confidentiality, including clear labeling of confidential content. Information Requests The USITC is asking for comments on several topics: Definition of “unreasonable” and “discriminatory” actions by foreign governments in international commerce. Methods that foreign countries use to impose unfair burdens on U.S. commerce. Processes for the USITC to obtain relevant information from the public, including methods to protect sensitive information. How the USITC should analyze the gathered information and communicate findings to the President. The USITC aims to gather comprehensive input to guide its future actions under Section 338(g). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Semiconductor Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) decided not to review a key initial determination. This decision was related to Investigation No. 337-TA-1443. The investigation was about foreign-made semiconductor devices. It also involved products using these devices and their components. The investigation was based on a complaint from Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited. These companies are located in Dublin, Ireland. The complaint suggested violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It was about importing semiconductor devices into the United States. The complaint also covered selling these products for importation and domestic sales after importation. The complaint said these actions violated certain patent rights. Five U.S. patents were named in the complaint. These were U.S. Patent Nos. 7,745,847; 9,093,473; 9,147,747; 9,184,292; and 9,953,880. Some companies were named as respondents. They included Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Apple, Broadcom Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies, OnePlus Technology, and Qualcomm Inc. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also a party to this investigation. During the investigation, some amendments were made. For instance, Lenovo Group Limited was replaced with other Lenovo entities. Initially, certain claims of the patents were dropped from the investigation. These decisions were based on withdrawal requests from the Complainants. Later, the claim against Apple was settled through an agreement. On July 14, 2026, the Complainants and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation. They reached a settlement agreement. The motion had support from the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. On August 5, 2026, the administrative law judge granted the motion to terminate the investigation entirely. This decision considered all parties involved and the connections between them. As a result, the USITC decided not to review this initial determination. The investigation concluded completely. This determination follows the rules and authority given by section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, along with the Commission’s Procedures rules. By this conclusion, all actions and claims in Investigation No. 337-TA-1443 are now closed. This outcome was officially documented by Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently made a decision regarding an important investigation. The investigation focused on certain foreign-made semiconductor devices. These devices were made overseas and then brought into the United States. The investigation began on March 26, 2025. It was based on a complaint filed by two companies from Dublin, Ireland. These companies are Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited. They claimed that some semiconductor products were entering the U.S. illegally, in violation of certain patent rights. These products were alleged to infringe on several U.S. Patents related to semiconductor devices. The investigation named several big companies as respondents. These include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Apple, Broadcom Inc., Lenovo, Motorola, OnePlus, and Qualcomm. All these companies were accused of having products that might use the patented technology without permission. During the investigation, changes happened. Lenovo Group Limited was replaced with their different regional offices, including Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina, in the investigation list. Some claims related to other patents were also ended when the complaints were withdrawn. On June 26, 2026, Apple was removed from the investigation. This was because Apple settled the matter through an agreement. In July 2026, the companies involved, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC), decided to settle the matter. They filed a joint motion to end the investigation. The motion was not opposed by the other parties. On August 5, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge approved this motion. After review according to the Commission’s rules, the investigation was ended entirely. The Commission decided not to review the judge’s decision, officially terminating the investigation on September 3, 2026. This means that the investigation is completely over. The case showed how companies can resolve matters through settlement even in complex international trade issues. The decision is backed by U.S. laws related to unfair trade practices. These laws are part of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more detailed information, people can visit the USITC’s electronic docket service online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Welded Line Pipe from South Korea and Turkey: Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has officially announced its schedule for expedited five-year reviews concerning welded line pipe imports. These reviews aim to assess whether canceling the antidumping duty orders on welded line pipe from South Korea and Turkey, as well as the countervailing duty order on similar products from Turkey, might cause continued harm to U.S. industries. The Commission initially declared its intention to conduct these reviews on August 4, 2026. The domestic parties responded adequately to this notice. However, the response from the respondent interested party group was deemed inadequate. This lack of adequate response led to the decision to proceed with expedited reviews. Commissioner Amy A. Karpel did not take part in this decision. Interested parties are invited to submit written comments related to the determinations of these reviews. The deadline for these submissions is October 29, 2026. It is important to note that these comments should not include any new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review timeline, comments on their final results must be submitted within three business days. The USITC staff will prepare a report to be included in the nonpublic record. It will be available to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews by October 22, 2026. A public version will be released later. The reviews have been classified as extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, the USITC has decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This action is authorized by the Tariff Act of 1930. All documents filed by parties must be served on all other parties involved in the reviews. A certificate of service is required for the acceptance of the documents for filing. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this order, confirming the scheduling and procedural details. The USITC has published this information under the specific authority granted by the Tariff Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Tech Products Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided to end an investigation involving certain electronic devices. The investigation was about video-capable laptops, desktop computers, handheld computers, tablets, televisions, and projectors. The investigation began on May 19, 2025. It was based on a complaint by Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Corporation from Finland. The complaint said that some products violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. These products were being imported and sold in the United States. They said this was happening because of the infringement of four U.S. patents. The companies listed in the complaint were Hisense, Acer, and ASUS. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also involved. During the investigation, several patent claims were terminated for different reasons over time. Some claims were settled, while others were removed based on specific orders. Finally, on July 17, 2026, Nokia, Acer, and ASUS made a joint request to end the investigation completely. They said this decision was due to arbitration agreements. The U.S. International Trade Commission agreed not to review this motion. Thus, the investigation has ended entirely. This decision was made official on August 31, 2026. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued the order. The authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Partially Reviews FID on Patent Violation Investigation Involving Samsung Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a decision to review parts of a Final Initial Determination (FID) in a patent infringement case. This case involves certain mobile electronic devices. The Commission is specifically revisiting key findings regarding Samsung Electronics. Background of the Investigation The investigation began on January 23, 2025. It was initiated by a complaint from Maxell, Ltd., a company based in Kyoto, Japan. Maxell claims Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with unfair practices in import trade. Maxell alleges that Samsung has imported mobile devices infringing on several patents. Focus on Specific Patents and Claims The investigation looks into several patents. These include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,130,280 (‘280’), 11,490,004 (‘004’), 11,750,915 (‘915’), 11,509,953 (‘953’), 12,108,103 (‘103’), and 11,445,241 (‘241’). The FID issued by the Administrative Law Judge found a violation concerning the ‘004 patent but not the others. Major Actions and Decisions Judicial Notice and Briefing Disputes: In May 2026, Samsung requested judicial notice of a Final Written Decision (FWD) by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which found certain claims of the ‘241 patent unpatentable. This request was granted, but Samsung’s motion for supplemental briefing was denied. Final Initial Determination: The FID, dated July 1, 2026, concluded: A violation of section 337 for the ‘004 patent. No violation for the ‘280, ‘103, ‘953, and ‘241 patents. Consideration for a limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders against Samsung. Commission’s Current Review The Commission has decided to review: The findings related to the ‘004, ‘103, ‘953, and ‘241 patents completely. The economic aspect concerning the ‘280 patent. Additional Submissions from Parties The Commission requests further clarification on certain technical points: The meaning of “frame” in the ‘004 patent. Differences in how redesigned products use the focus setting region. The interpretation of display requirements in the claim language. Public Interest Concerns Both Maxell and Samsung have submitted statements on public interest. Maxell believes public interest does not oppose excluding infringing Samsung products. Conversely, Samsung thinks public interest factors argue against providing such a remedy. Next Steps and Deadlines Parties and interested agencies must submit written responses on remedy, public interest, and bonding by September 14, 2026. Replies are due by September 21, 2026. The Commission will consider these submissions carefully as it finalizes its review of the FID. The USITC continues to serve its role in regulating trade practices, ensuring compliance with U.S. laws, and considering the greater public interest in such matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Recliner Mechanisms Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the receipt of a new complaint. This complaint is about certain powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms. These mechanisms are used in seating units. The complaint was filed by Ultra-Mek, Incorporated; Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; and L & P Property Management Company. It focuses on imports of these mechanisms into the United States. The complaint states that these imports violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about unfair trade practices. The complaint lists several companies as respondents. These companies are from countries like China, Vietnam, and Singapore. The USITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know if this issue affects public health and welfare. The Commission is also interested in competitive conditions in the U.S. economy. They want to learn about how these imports might affect U.S. consumers. The Commission has a process for how complaints are handled. They have asked people to submit their thoughts within eight days. The public can view the complaint on the Commission’s website. People with hearing problems can use a special phone number to get information. The complaint requests a limited exclusion order. It also asks for cease and desist orders. If these orders are made, they could stop the sale of certain products. The Commission uses special rules to handle these kinds of cases. People can submit comments and confidentiality requests following these rules. If you are interested in this issue, you can check the USITC website for more details. This action is important because it affects how trade rules are enforced in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Notice of Investigation: Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a new investigation. This investigation is about melanoma predictive and prognostic tests. Castle Biosciences, Inc. from Friendswood, Texas filed a complaint. This was done on July 10, 2026. The complaint states that there are unfair acts related to importing these tests into the U.S. It involves false and misleading advertising. This may threaten an industry in the U.S. Castle Biosciences wants the Commission to look into this. They also want certain orders issued. The investigation will see if there is a violation. This falls under subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The accused products include melanoma predictive and prognostic CP-GEP tests and components. The named respondents include: SkylineDx Holding B.V., based in Rotterdam, Netherlands. SkylineDx USA, Inc., located in San Diego, California, USA. Qiagen GmbH, from Hilden, Germany. QIAGEN LLC, based in Germantown, Maryland, USA. Responses to the complaint and notice of investigation are needed within 20 days. This is according to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. If respondents do not reply in time, they may lose the right to contest. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will oversee the proceedings. The Commission aims for a clear and fair examination of the issue. This move shows the USITC’s ongoing duty to maintain fair competition. They are looking to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews on Steel Grating from China Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews. This will determine if removing duties on steel grating from China will cause harm to U.S. companies. These reviews are conducted under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission decided on August 4, 2026, that the response from U.S. companies was adequate. However, the response from Chinese companies was inadequate. Due to this, the Commission will not conduct a full review. Instead, they will perform expedited reviews as allowed by law. Commissioner Johanson voted for full reviews, but the majority chose expedited reviews. The staff report provides private information about the reviews and will be released for those with permission on October 14, 2026. A public version will be available later. Comments from interested parties are due by October 21, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The USITC will accept comments from parties involved in the review, but others may submit a short statement. If the Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its reviews, comments will be due three days afterward. Comments containing confidential business information must follow the rules. Documents filed must be shared with all parties involved and include proof of service. The Secretary will not accept any filings without this proof. The Commission has declared these reviews very complicated. It has extended the review period by up to 90 days. This is allowed by law. These reviews are managed under the authority of the Tariff Act. The announcement is published according to the Commission’s rules. By order of The Commission, issued on August 20, 2026, by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Wearable Breast Pumps Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced receiving a complaint regarding Certain Wearable Breast Pumps, Associated Milk Storage Containers, and their Components. This complaint was registered under Docket Number 3932. The complaint was filed on August 20, 2026, by Willow Innovations, Inc., and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd. The complaint states there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the import, sale for import, and sale within the United States. The goods in question are wearable breast pumps and related items. Who Is Involved? The complaint has named several respondents. These include Shenzhen Root Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Ltd. of Aurora, CO, and Root Technology, Ltd. of Beverly Hills, CA. Other companies involved are Share Info, Inc. of Flushing, NY, Shenzhen TPH Technology Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Horigen Mother & Baby Products Co., Ltd. of China. The list also includes Anker Innovations Limited of China, Fantasia Trading, LLC of Ontario, CA, Power Mobile Life LLC of Bellevue, WA, TPH Technology Malaysia Sdn Bhd of Malaysia, Foshan Shunde Ruiteng Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Youmeng Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. of China. What Is Being Requested? The complainant has asked the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. It also asks to impose a bond on the respondents’ alleged infringing products during the 60-day Presidential review period, as per 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Call for Public Comments The Commission is asking the public for comments on any public interest issues related to the complaint. They welcome input on how the requested relief might affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the economy, and the production of similar articles in the country. Comments are also needed on how this would impact U.S. consumers. Specifically, the commission wants to know: How the articles are used in the U.S. Any public health concerns related to the orders. If there are similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the subject articles. Whether the complainant or others have the capacity to replace the volume of articles if excluded. How the orders would affect U.S. consumers. Deadline for Comments Written submissions on the public interest must be submitted no later than eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. Following any final initial determination, there will be more chances for public input. Replies to any submissions should be filed within three days of the initial submission deadline. Submission Guidelines Submissions must be filed electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings will be accepted unless granted an exemption. Questions about filing should be directed to the Secretary at the USITC. Confidential Treatment Requests Anyone wishing to submit documents in confidence must request confidential treatment and provide reasons. The Commission will only treat submitted documents as confidential if the request is properly made. Nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection. The action is authorized under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). By order of the Commission, issued on August 20, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

ITC Terminates Investigation on LCD Device Patents Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a decision regarding an investigation involving liquid crystal display devices. This decision, officially recorded in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026, concludes a matter that began in November 2025. The investigation was labeled as Investigation No. 337-TA-1462. This case involved a complaint filed by BH Innovations LLC, along with Longitude Licensing Limited and 138 East LCD Advancements Ltd. from Ireland. They claimed that certain companies were infringing on their patents. The complaint specifically mentioned U.S. Patent Nos. 7,705,948 and 7,570,334. The complaint alleged that certain companies were involved in unauthorized importation and sales of products that used these patents. The list of companies involved included many from China and the United States. Major companies named were LG Electronics from South Korea and Westinghouse Electric Corporation from Pennsylvania. On July 16, 2026, the Complainants decided to withdraw their complaint. They submitted a second amended motion for this purpose. The respondents did not oppose this motion. The motion included settlement agreements that had been missing in earlier filings. On July 22, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge approved this motion. The judge agreed that ending the investigation would save resources. No party requested a review of this decision. On August 20, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the judge’s decision. Thus, the investigation is officially terminated. The legal basis for this decision is section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and part 210 of the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This announcement was made by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The official document number for this decision is 2026-17295, filed on August 24, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Battery Imports Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation concerning certain secondary cylindrical batteries. This investigation is based on a complaint filed by LG Energy Solution Ltd. of Korea and LG Energy Solution Arizona, Inc. on July 21, 2026. The filing is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint alleges that certain secondary cylindrical batteries and related products infringe on several U.S. patents held by LG Energy Solution. These patents include U.S. Patent No. 8,420,257, U.S. Patent No. 11,749,866, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,924, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,965, and U.S. Patent No. 12,646,735. The complaint states that improper importation and sale have occurred, violating section 337. The complainants seek an investigation and request the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order. They also seek cease and desist orders to prevent further infringement. On August 20, 2026, the ITC considered the complaint. It ordered an investigation to determine if the alleged violations occurred. The investigation will assess if there is infringement of claims on these patents and if a U.S. industry is being established. The accused products, described plainly, are secondary (rechargeable) cylindrical batteries and their components. Products containing these batteries are also included in the investigation. Several respondents are named in the investigation. They include EVE Energy Co., Ltd. from China and several other associated entities. Also named are Robert Bosch GmbH from Germany, Koki Holdings Co., Ltd. from Japan, and Chervon (China) Trading Co., Ltd. from China, among others. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will designate a presiding Administrative Law Judge for the investigation. Respondents must submit responses within 20 days of the service of the complaint. If a respondent fails to provide a timely response, this may lead to a waiver of their right to contest the allegations. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. This legal process highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property in international trade. The investigation will determine if the involved parties have indeed violated U.S. laws on imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Electronic Devices with Certain Audio Technologies” and is listed under Docket Number 3931. The complaint was filed by BoomCloud 360 Inc. They submitted it on August 14, 2026. The complaint alleges violations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States of certain electronic devices. The respondents named in the complaint are Apple, Inc. from Cupertino, CA; Samsung Electronics America Co., LTD. from South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. from Ridgefield Park, NJ; and Google LLC from Mountain View, CA. BoomCloud 360 Inc. wants the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and impose a bond on the alleged infringing items for a 60-day Presidential review period. The Commission is asking for comments about any public interest issues the complaint may raise. This is in line with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments should discuss whether providing the requested relief will affect public health and welfare in the United States. They should also consider competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, and the production of similar articles in the U.S. The Commission is interested in comments that discuss: How the articles could be used in the United States. Any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. Similar articles made in the United States. Whether BoomCloud 360 and other suppliers can replace the items quickly. How the orders would impact U.S. consumers. Comments on public interest are due eight calendar days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. The complaint filer may respond to comments three days later. Submissions should not be longer than five pages, including attachments. Documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The docket number 3931 should be on the cover page. Requests for confidential treatment must explain why it is needed. Only electronic filings are accepted unless an exemption is granted. The actions are based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wireless Devices Case Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking for public comments about a possible legal case. This case is about some wireless communication devices and their parts. On August 14, 2026, a judge from ITC said there might be a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about keeping certain products out of the U.S. if they break trade rules. The Commission wants to know if removing these products from companies like Dell Technologies, Dell Products, and Lenovo (United States) Inc. would be good or bad for the public. They want to know how it might affect people’s health, the U.S. economy, and the choices U.S. consumers have. The ITC is asking for details on these points: How are these devices used in the U.S.? Are there any health or safety concerns if these products are removed? Are there similar products made in the U.S. that can replace these items? Can these U.S. makers quickly supply enough products to replace the ones that might be removed? How will this affect consumers in the U.S.? People and government agencies can send their comments. They must keep comments to five pages. The deadline for sending comments is September 15, 2026. The comments must be filed online. Each comment must have “Investigation No. 337-TA-1429” visible on the first page. If someone wants to keep their comment private, they have to mark it clearly and follow the rules for private comments. The ITC will use the information to decide if they should stop these devices from coming into the U.S. or not. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the ITC, made this announcement on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) published a notice to start an investigation. This investigation involves certain transformers and their components. The investigation began after a complaint was filed on July 16, 2026. Ayr Energy, Inc., based in Mountain View, California, is the company that filed the complaint. They claim that some transformers coming into the United States break certain laws. The complaint says these transformers are brought to the U.S. illegally. The reasons include misuse of trade secrets, misleading advertising, and unfair competition. The complaint also accuses the transformers of trademark infringement and false labeling. These actions might harm the industry in the U.S. The complaint wants the Commission to check the issue. Ayr Energy asks for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they want certain imports stopped and specific actions to stop. The transformers in question include power transformers, inverter duty transformers, distribution transformers, and their parts. These parts might include core steel, windings, tanks, and insulation systems. Four companies are named as respondents in the complaint. They are Zetwerk Manufacturing Businesses Private Limited from India, Zetwerk Manufacturing USA Inc. in San Francisco, KRYFS Power Components Ltd. from India, and Unimacts Global, LLC from Massachusetts. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is involved in this case. They will ensure fair procedures are followed. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint an Administrative Law Judge to oversee the case. The respondents must respond to the complaint within 20 days of receiving it. If they don’t, it might mean they agree with the complaint’s claims. This could lead to stopping certain imports or activities from the respondents. The public can view the complaint details online. The USITC has also provided contact information for those needing assistance or information about this investigation. In conclusion, the USITC is taking necessary steps to address potential illegal activities involving transformer products. This investigation shows the seriousness of protecting U.S. industries and upholding trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Amazon and InterDigital Due to Arbitration Agreement Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has ended an investigation involving certain video-capable electronic devices. This decision was made because of an arbitration agreement between InterDigital, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. The investigation, known as 337-TA-1481, started on January 23, 2026. It was looking into whether devices imported into the United States infringed on patents owned by InterDigital. InterDigital is based in Wilmington, Delaware. The investigation named Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC as respondents. Both companies are based in Seattle, Washington. The investigation was about several patents. These patents were related to video-capable electronic devices. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations chose not to participate in this investigation. In April 2026, the ITC decided to end part of the investigation. This concerned one of the claims related to U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674. On July 13, 2026, InterDigital and Amazon asked to terminate the investigation. They filed a joint motion. They based their request on an arbitration agreement. On July 17, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) agreed to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion to terminate was proper because of the arbitration agreement. The rule says that investigations can be ended if parties agree to arbitration. The ALJ said there were no other agreements between the parties. Ending the investigation did not harm the public interest. No one asked to review the ALJ’s decision. The ITC decided not to review it either. The investigation is now fully terminated. The decision happened on August 13, 2026. The ITC used authority from the Tariff Act of 1930 and its procedures to make this decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this decision. The full notice was published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Off-Road Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding the investigation of certain off-road vehicles and their components. The investigation is numbered 337-TA-1490. The matter involves the company Polaris and claims about imported vehicles. The ITC has chosen not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge (ALJ). This decision was about changes to the case, called an initial determination (ID), under Order No. 10. The investigation started on March 9, 2026. It is based on complaints from Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Sales Inc. These companies are located in Medina, Minnesota. They claim violations of the Tariff Act of 1930 regarding some off-road vehicles imported into the U.S. The investigation focuses on certain patents held by Polaris. These patents include U.S. Patent Nos. 7,819,220; 7,950,486; 8,613,337; 9,217,501; and 12,187,127. The ITC is looking at whether these patents have been infringed upon. They are also checking if there is a domestic industry issue due to these imports. The respondents named in this investigation are Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co. from Hangzhou, China, and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. from Plymouth, Minnesota. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part in this investigation. On June 26, 2026, Polaris made a motion. They wanted to change the complaint. They asked to include new claims related to their patents. Polaris wanted to focus on the ZFORCE® Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles. They also wished to end some claims about another patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220. The judge agreed with Polaris and said the changes would not harm the public or those involved. There were no oppositions to this motion. No one asked for a review of this decision. The ITC decided not to carry out a review. This means claims 7 and 8 of one Polaris patent are no longer part of the investigation. New claims from two other patents are now being focused on. The Commission voted on this issue on August 13, 2026. The actions and decisions follow the rules in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. This update helps clarify what the ITC is doing in this investigation and what changes have been made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Takes Action Against Ink Cartridge Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has taken a significant step to protect American businesses and consumers. In a recent decision, the ITC found that certain ink cartridges and their components violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC has issued a General Exclusion Order. This means that products infringing specific patents cannot be imported into the United States. The infringing products include those violating claims of patents numbered: 8,764,172, 9,370,934, 11,535,038, 12,240,248, and 12,240,249. The ITC has also issued Cease and Desist Orders. These orders are against two companies: Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. These companies are prohibited from importing and selling the offending products in the U.S. The investigation started on June 17, 2025. The investigation was based on a complaint by Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. The complaint alleged that certain companies were infringing on specific Epson patents by selling and importing particular ink cartridges. The ITC named numerous companies in the investigation. Many of these companies are based in China. The ITC found several companies in default as they did not respond to the investigation. The companies include Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd., and others. Some companies were removed from the investigation on January 8, 2026, due to different circumstances. On March 24, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination. The judge found evidence that supported Epson’s claims. This determination served as a basis for the ITC’s final decision. The ITC reviewed the effect of its orders on public interest. They considered health and safety, competitive conditions in the U.S., and the impact on American consumers. After a thorough review, the ITC decided that issuing the orders would not harm public interest. The decision was finalized on August 13, 2026. The ITC has implemented a bond during the Presidential review period. This bond is set at 100% of the value of goods imported. The Commission’s action demonstrates its commitment to upholding intellectual property rights. It aims to support American industries and prevent unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-08-12 The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is taking an important step. The ITC is looking at prestressed concrete steel wire strand that comes from China. They want to decide if taking away antidumping and countervailing duty orders will harm U.S. producers. The ITC announced that these reviews started on July 6, 2026. The purpose of these reviews is to see if cancelling current duties would lead to problems. These problems could happen if Chinese products start to hurt U.S. businesses. The ITC has chosen to do expedited reviews. This means they are trying to work quickly. They decided this because not enough responses were received from Chinese parties. The domestic groups gave enough responses, but Chinese groups did not. A special report will be available on October 7, 2026. This report will be a staff report and will help the investigation. Those who have permission can see it sooner. The public will get to see a version of this report later. The public can also participate. People can send comments to the ITC by October 14, 2026. These comments will help decide the final outcome. However, people need to follow certain rules. They cannot include new facts in their comments. The ITC is also prepared to extend the review period if needed. They have the power to add up to 90 more days to their process. The ITC is following special rules and laws. They are using the Tariff Act of 1930 to guide their review. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this information. This is an important event to watch. It affects companies in the U.S. and how they compete with products from China. Keep an eye on the ITC for more updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Expedited Review for Boltless Steel Shelving From China: A Legal Update Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an expedited review process. This will examine antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China. The review is crucial to decide if canceling these duties would hurt the U.S. industry. This review is important as it affects trade and helps protect U.S. businesses. The USITC noted that the domestic group’s response to the review notice was adequate. However, the response from the respondent group in China was inadequate. The expedited review began in July 2026. The final comments and written submissions are due by September 1, 2026. Documents must be served to everyone involved in the reviews. A certificate of service has to be filed as well. The USITC has extended the review period as it is complicated. The extension allows for up to 90 more days for the review process. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order on August 7, 2026. The detailed legal notice is available in the Federal Register. This process is part of a routine review to ensure fair trade practices. The USITC plays a key role in maintaining a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Review on Mattress Import Duties Scheduled Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. The reviews concern import duties on mattresses from Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The reviews will decide if removing trade duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. The duties include countervailing duties on mattresses from China and antidumping duties on mattresses from the other six countries. The reviews began on July 6, 2026. USITC decided to have expedited reviews because the response from domestic parties was strong. In contrast, the response from foreign parties was weak, making full reviews unnecessary. For more information, contact Alejandro Orozco at 202-205-3177. Those with hearing impairments can use TDD at 202-205-1810. Information is available on the Commission’s website at www.usitc.gov. A staff report with details will be available on September 22, 2026, to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will also be released. Interested parties can file comments by September 29, 2026. They should not include new facts. Only those who responded properly to the notice of institution can submit comments. The Commission determined that these reviews are very complex. Therefore, they are extending the review period by up to 90 days. This review is being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice came out thanks to the order of the Commission, issued by Secretary Lisa Barton on August 6, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission: No Violation Found in Braiding Hair Patent Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has concluded its investigation into certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products and their packaging. The decision was announced on August 11, 2026, and it marks the termination of the investigation. The case was registered under Investigation No. 337-TA-1457. The investigation began on August 7, 2025, following a complaint from JBS Hair, Inc., a company based in Atlanta, Georgia. JBS Hair claimed that certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products imported into the U.S. violated section 337. The products allegedly infringed upon specific patents owned by JBS Hair. These patents included the ‘026 patent, the ‘301 patent, the ‘478 patent, and the ‘616 patent. Several companies were named as respondents in the investigation. These included Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd., Hair Zone, Inc., Beauty Essence, Inc., SLI Production Corp., Mane Concept Inc., and Beauty Plus Trading Co., Inc. Additional respondents were Beauty Elements Corporation, Royal Imex, Inc., GS Imports, Inc., Eve Hair, Inc., Midway International, Inc., Mayde Beauty Inc., Model Model Hair Fashion, Inc., New Jigu Trading Corp., Shake N Go Fashion, Inc., Hair Plus Trading Co., Inc., Optimum Solution Group LLC, Chade Fashions, Inc., and Amekor Industries, Inc. The administrative law judge (ALJ) released the Final Initial Determination on June 5, 2026. The ALJ found no violation of section 337. The judge said that the patents were either invalid or not infringed. JBS Hair appealed the findings, but the ITC decided to review only some parts of the case. Concerning three patents, the Commission reviewed whether they were anticipated by previous products called the Asante Short Braid and Abuja Short Braid. The ITC took no position on this. For the ‘478 patent, the ITC affirmed some findings but chose not to take a position on other issues. The ITC’s decision followed reviews of petitions from JBS Hair, respondents, and an independent party, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The Commission’s review concluded with a finding of no violation, and no changes to the Final Initial Determination. The case can be further referenced in the Federal Register’s Volume 91, Number 153, listed as FR Doc. 2026-16303. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Child Car Seats Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided to stop an investigation about child car seats. The decision was made because the parties involved reached a settlement agreement. The official decision was made on August 6, 2026, and the investigation is now completely over. The investigation started on August 28, 2025. It was based on a complaint by several companies, including Wonderland Switzerland AG from Switzerland and Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc. from Pennsylvania, USA. These companies claimed that some child car seats being sold in the United States were infringing on their patents. A patent is a special license that gives an inventor rights to certain products. The companies said that the child car seats violated two specific U.S. patents. One of them was Patent No. 7,625,043, but this was later removed from the investigation. The companies also claimed there was an industry being made or already made in the U.S. related to these patents. The investigation included many groups named as respondents. These included Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. from Massachusetts, and several others from Canada and China. However, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations was not part of this investigation. On July 2, 2026, a joint motion was filed to end the investigation because the parties reached a settlement agreement. This means they agreed to stop the investigation by resolving the issues in the complaint without further legal action. The judge overseeing the case, called the administrative law judge (ALJ), agreed with ending the investigation. It was decided that this would save resources and avoid unnecessary legal actions. Importantly, it was found that ending the investigation would not go against the public interest. The decision was filed under Federal Register Volume 91, Number 153 on August 11, 2026. The decision to end the investigation was not reviewed one more time and is now finalized. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Finds Violation in Glass Substrates Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its decision on an important case. This case involved certain glass substrates used in liquid crystal displays (LCDs). It looked into products and methods for making these displays. The investigation began when Corning Incorporated filed a complaint. They are based in Corning, New York. The complaint said that some companies were violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint claimed these companies imported, sold for import, and sold within the United States specific glass substrates and products. The investigation started on March 7, 2025. It named nine respondents. Some of these companies were from the United States and others were from China. Over time, some respondents were removed from the investigation due to settlement agreements. On April 7, 2026, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found a violation of section 337. The ALJ gave recommendations on what actions to take. On June 8, 2026, the Commission agreed to review parts of the ALJ’s decision. After a detailed examination, the Commission agreed that there was a violation of section 337. This decision was made regarding two U.S. patents. These patents were about the glass substrates for LCDs. The Commission decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO). This order stops the entry of infringing products that are not licensed. The LEO applies to products made or imported by the respondents or their connected entities. The Commission also issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against one company, TTE Technology, Inc. This company operates as TCL North America in Irvine, California. The Commission found no public interest concerns that would prevent applying the orders. A zero percent bond will be in effect during the Presidential review period. The investigation is now finished. The Commission made this decision to protect American businesses and innovation. The authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Calls for Public Input on Glass Substrate Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking into a case involving glass substrates. These substrates are used in liquid crystal displays, which are common in televisions and monitors. The ITC is concerned about certain companies importing these materials in ways that may violate U.S. trade laws. On July 23, 2026, an initial decision was made about a violation of Section 337. Then, on August 6, 2026, there was a suggestion on what should happen next if a violation is found. This decision involves possible restrictions on bringing in these glass substrates and related products. The ITC is now asking for public feedback. They want opinions on whether putting limits on these imports is fair and how it might affect things like public health, safety, and the economy. They are interested in hearing if other companies in the U.S. could make similar products if imports are stopped. Four companies are mentioned in this investigation. They include Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. and TCL China Star Optoelectronics in China, as well as TTE Technology, Inc., known as TCL North America, in California. These companies might face restrictions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is also considering a cease and desist order, which could stop TCL from certain actions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC encourages people and government agencies to send in their comments. These comments should be no more than five pages. The focus should be on public interest matters, such as how the decision might impact consumers and the economy. Written comments should be submitted by September 8, 2026. They should be sent electronically following the ITC’s filing procedures. Confidential information should be clearly marked and treated accordingly. For more information, you can contact the ITC or visit their website. All public comments will be available for people to see. The ITC works under the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows strict rules and procedures for such cases. The decision from this investigation could have wide-ranging effects on the market for liquid crystal displays. Public input is crucial in helping the ITC make a fair and informed decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wi-Fi Device Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This follows an initial determination issued by a presiding administrative law judge on August 6, 2026. The investigation, identified as No. 337-TA-1454, focuses on certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, and related components. The investigation is centered on potential violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. If found in violation, the ITC may exclude the articles in question from entering the United States. The decision will include considerations about how this exclusion might affect public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, production of similar products in the U.S., and impact on U.S. consumers. The companies involved include ASUStek Computer Inc. from Taiwan; ASUS Computer International based in Fremont, CA; and Plume Design Inc. located in Palo Alto, CA. There are possible limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders being considered against these entities. Public submissions will help the ITC decide whether the recommended actions are in the public interest. They invite comments that cover how these affected products are used in the U.S., and any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. The Commission also wants to know if there are U.S.-made products that could replace the imported goods. People interested in submitting comments must do so by September 8, 2026. The document submissions should be electronic and can’t exceed five pages. Submissions must prominently reference the investigation number “Inv. No. 337-TA-1454.” Confidential information can be submitted but must be marked according to Commission rules. Information submitted could be used internally by the Commission or U.S. government employees, especially for cybersecurity purposes. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public inspection on the ITC’s electronic docket system. For more information, the public can contact Cathy Chen, Esq., in the ITC’s Office of the General Counsel at the provided contact details. This announcement forms part of the ITC’s ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and the protection of U.S. markets against unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Announces Final Phase Schedule for Truck Bed Cover Investigations Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the schedule for the final phase of investigations into truck bed covers imported from China. These investigations concern potential antidumping and countervailing duties. The investigations aim to find out if a U.S. industry has been harmed or is threatened by these imports. The truck bed covers are thought to be sold in the U.S. at prices below fair market value. The Department of Commerce believes these covers are subsidized by the Chinese government. The truck bed covers in question are protective covers made from materials like aluminum, steel, fiberglass, carbon fiber, plastic, or water-resistant fabric. They fit over the open area of a pickup truck bed. There are different types of these covers, including folding, roll-up, one-piece, and retractable. The scope of the investigation includes parts that come with the truck bed covers. These parts can include hardware for mounting the covers or other related items. However, truck caps, which are higher enclosures for truck beds, are not included in this investigation. The investigations were initiated because of petitions filed by RealTruck, Inc., which is based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The final phase of the investigations follows affirmative preliminary determinations by Commerce. Interested parties, including those representing consumer organizations, need to file an entry of appearance at least 21 days before the scheduled hearing. The USITC plans to hold a hearing on October 15, 2026, and expects written testimonies from interested parties by October 8, 2026. The prehearing staff report will be ready by October 1, 2026. Posthearing briefs should be filed by October 22, 2026. The Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) is being used for filings, and only electronic filings are accepted. The rules and procedures for the hearing and written submissions are detailed on the Commission’s website. The investigations are being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice was issued by order of the Commission on August 5, 2026, and it was published on August 10, 2026. The public can view the document on the Government Publishing Office’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of new investigations. These investigations focus on imports of a chemical called perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India. There are concerns that these imports are harming industries in the United States. The investigations are called antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The USITC needs to decide if imports from India are being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also need to find out if the Indian government is giving special help to its producers of this chemical. The investigations are important because they could help protect U.S. companies and workers. If the USITC finds problems, they might recommend actions to balance the unfair trade. The investigations started because a company called The Chemours Company FC, LLC filed petitions on August 5, 2026. The USITC has 45 days to make a preliminary determination. This means a decision needs to be made by September 21, 2026. People interested in these investigations can find more information on the USITC’s website. There are also opportunities for people to participate or share their thoughts. However, to do this, you must meet certain deadlines and rules. The USITC will hold a staff conference about these investigations on August 26, 2026. People who want to be part of this event need to send an email request before noon on August 24, 2026. Written comments and arguments about the investigations can be submitted to the Commission by 5:15 p.m. on August 31, 2026. These comments should add helpful information to the investigations. The USITC is working under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. All information shared with the Commission must be true and complete, as false information can cause problems. Information provided to the Commission can be used for security and internal checks. By order of the Commission, these actions are necessary to ensure fair trade practices. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, confirmed the issuance of this notice on August 5, 2026. The Commission’s electronic systems are important for handling documents. This means all filings should be done online, as paper-based filings are not allowed for now. These investigations are an important step in making sure trade practices are fair and help protect U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Allows New Participant in Solar Trade Case Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding its investigation into certain solar products. The case focuses on TOPCon solar cells and related items. The ITC has decided not to review an important initial decision. This decision was to let IC Star Solar (USA) LLC, also known as Imperial Star, join the investigation. The investigation began on March 30th, 2026. It is based on a complaint by First Solar, Inc. First Solar is based in Phoenix, Arizona. They claim there are violations of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves the import of TOPCon solar items. First Solar says these products infringe on a U.S. patent they own. The Commission’s investigation names different groups as respondents. These groups include companies from the U.S., China, Canada, Germany, and other countries. They are involved in making and selling the solar products in question. First Solar had already agreed that IC Star Solar (USA) LLC could join the investigation, as long as it did not delay the process. They believe more time is needed for everything to go smoothly. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations agreed with this, too. The addition of IC Star Solar (USA) LLC was decided on June 25, 2026. No one opposed this decision. The ITC vote to keep this decision was made on July 27, 2026. This case shows the ITC’s role in handling trade disputes in the U.S. It also highlights the complex nature of international trade in solar products. The authority for this decision comes from the Tariff Act of 1930. It highlights how laws from the past continue to affect today’s trade issues. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.