Investigations on Air Compressors from China, Malaysia, and Vietnam by USITC Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of investigations into air compressors imported from China, Malaysia, and Vietnam. These investigations are preliminary and focus on potential issues of antidumping and countervailing duties. The investigations aim to determine if an industry in the United States is being harmed by these imports. The imports include air compressors described in subheading 8414.80.16 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The focus is on whether these items are sold in the U.S. at less than fair value and if they receive subsidies from the governments of China, Malaysia, and Vietnam. MAT Industries, LLC from Long Grove, Illinois, filed the petitions that prompted these investigations. The investigations are being conducted under sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC must make a preliminary decision by June 15, 2026. Their decision will be sent to the Department of Commerce by June 23, 2026. Individuals or organizations wishing to take part in these investigations must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission. This must be done within seven days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. There is also a public service list that includes the names and addresses of all parties involved in these investigations. The USITC will hold a staff conference about the investigations at 9:30 a.m. on May 21, 2026. Requests to be part of this conference should be sent by email by noon on May 19, 2026. This conference will discuss the investigations’ preliminary phase and offer information on procedures, the format, and how to be a witness via videoconference. The Secretary’s Office will only accept electronic filings. These must be submitted through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings will be accepted at this time. Written submissions of information and arguments related to the investigations can be submitted to the Commission by May 27, 2026, at 5:15 p.m. Parties wishing to submit written testimony and supplementary material must do so by May 20, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Anyone submitting information during investigations must certify that it is accurate and complete. The information may be used by the Commission or other U.S. government employees as part of the investigation. This process is governed by title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. This notice was issued by the USITC on April 30, 2026, and published by order of the Commission. Secretary Lisa Barton issued it, and it is filed under the Federal Register Doc number 2026-08683. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Amends Complaint in Screen Protector Case Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made an important decision regarding a case about screen protectors. The ITC decided to change a complaint about some patents related to screen protectors and their systems. Superior Communications Inc. made the complaint. They are based in Irwindale, California. They said there was a problem with how some companies were using their patents. These patents are special rights given for new inventions. The case is about different patents, like the ‘818 patent and the ‘823 patent. The ITC said that Superior Communications can now add a new claim about the ‘818 patent in their complaint. This means that they can argue about a different part of the patent. At the same time, Superior Communications will stop talking about some claims related to the ‘818, ‘823, ‘315, and ‘067 patents. This means they won’t argue about some specific parts of these patents anymore. The case involves two companies. These companies are Belkin International, Inc. and Belkin Inc. Both companies are from El Segundo, California. The ITC decided on April 29, 2026, not to review any more information about this change. This means they agree with the change to the complaint. The ITC is followed specific rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. They also used their own rules listed in Part 210. These rules help to make sure the process is fair and correct. This decision was communicated by Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, on May 1, 2026. The ITC makes decisions like this to protect inventors and make sure trade is fair. They use their authority to handle disputes involving patents and trade between countries. For more details, people can contact B. Rashmi Borah, Esq., from the U.S. International Trade Commission. The ITC helps keep electronic records so people can see what happens in these cases. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Active Electrical Cables Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-04 The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has ended its investigation into certain active electrical cables and components. This decision follows the settlement of disputes involving the remaining companies involved. The investigation began on April 18, 2025. It was based on a complaint from Credo Semiconductor Inc., based in San Jose, California, and Credo Technology Group Ltd. from the Cayman Islands. These companies claimed that some companies were importing and selling electrical cable products that infringed on their patents. They mentioned U.S. Patent Nos. 10,877,233, 11,012,252, and 11,032,111 in their complaint. Initially, the investigation included three companies: Amphenol Corporation from Connecticut, Molex, LLC from Illinois, and TE Connectivity PLC from Ireland. Later, TE Connectivity Corporation (TECC) from Pennsylvania replaced TE Connectivity PLC. Amphenol Corporation reached a settlement, and on September 24, 2025, the investigation related to them was completed. On December 3, 2025, the investigation on Patent No. 10,877,233 was ended because Credo withdrew their complaint about this patent. On March 26, 2026, Credo and Molex agreed to a settlement. They both filed a motion to end the investigation against Molex based on this agreement. TECC did not object. On the same day, Credo and TECC also agreed to a settlement and requested to end the investigation against TECC. The administrative law judge (ALJ) assessed these settlements. On April 14, 2026, the ALJ issued orders to terminate the investigation as to Molex and TECC. They found the agreements complied with USITC rules and did not harm the public interest. The USITC decided not to review these decisions, meaning the investigation ends for Molex and TECC, and this concludes the entire case. The Commission’s decision was finalized on April 29, 2026. This investigation followed the rules stated in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Begins Review of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Orders Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of a review concerning carbazole violet pigment 23. This pigment comes from China and India, and the review will determine if removing certain trade orders will harm domestic industries. Background of the Review The Department of Commerce first introduced these trade orders in 2004. They include a countervailing duty order for India and antidumping duty orders for both China and India. The purpose was to prevent unfair pricing and subsidies that could hurt U.S. businesses. Reviews have been conducted every five years since then, with the last review happening in 2021. Participation and Deadlines The review began on May 1, 2026. Interested parties, like U.S. producers, importers, or foreign businesses, must respond by June 1, 2026. They should provide information about how these orders affect them and if they think the orders should remain. Comments on these responses are due by July 13, 2026. Important Definitions Subject Merchandise: This refers to the specific type of pigment under review. Domestic Like Product: A similar product made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: American businesses making this pigment. Submitting Information Interested parties should submit detailed information about their operations. This includes production and sales data, to help the commission make their decision. Legal and Ethical Guidelines Former USITC employees involved in previous investigations may participate in this review. All submissions must be accurate and complete, following the Commission’s rules. Sensitive business data will be protected if submitted under a special order. Documentation Process The USITC only accepts electronic submissions. Filings should be done using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System. Conclusion The USITC is committed to ensuring fair trade practices. The outcome of this review will influence the U.S. industry’s future competition and pricing in relation to carbazole violet pigment 23. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Review of Steel Nails Imports Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has begun a new review about steel nails. This review focuses on imports from Malaysia, Oman, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The main question is whether stopping certain duties on these nails would hurt the U.S. industry by bringing in too much foreign competition. The review started on May 1, 2026. Interested people and companies need to reply by June 1, 2026. They can also comment on these replies by July 13, 2026. These reviews happen every five years. The USITC wants everyone involved to share important information on time. They want to know details about production, imports, and exports of the steel nails. In 2015, the Department of Commerce put duties on these nails from the five countries. This was to stop them being sold too cheaply in the U.S. This year, Commerce is thinking about if these duties should still remain. The outcome can affect many parts of nail production and selling in the U.S. People who are part of this review include U.S. producers, importers, and foreign exporters. They need to give details about their business, like the amount of nails they make and sell. Also, they are asked to explain how the competition from foreign nails affects them. The USITC will decide if these duties are needed to protect U.S. nail makers. The process involves checking data, listening to comments, and understanding industry conditions. All this helps make sure the decision supports a healthy U.S. industry without unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Steel Grating from China: U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started its third five-year reviews. They are reviewing orders on steel grating from China. These orders are about countervailing and antidumping duties. The USITC wants to know if ending these orders would hurt U.S. industry. The reviews began on May 1, 2026. People who are interested need to respond by June 1, 2026. Later, comments on the responses can be made by July 13, 2026. If you want more information, you can contact Rachel Devenney at 202-205-3172. People who have trouble hearing can call the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. The USITC’s website, available at www.usitc.gov, also has information. You can check the public records at edis.usitc.gov. In 2010, the Department of Commerce added duties on steel grating from China. These duties were reviewed earlier in 2015 and 2021. The current review will decide if the orders will continue. The commission will look at facts and decide if the U.S. industry will be harmed if these duties are removed. There are important terms in these reviews. “Subject Merchandise” refers to the steel grating from China. The “Subject Country” is China. “Domestic Like Product” means the similar product made in the U.S. “Domestic Industry” is all U.S. producers of steel grating. People who want to be part of this review need to file an entry of appearance. They must do this within 21 days of this notice. The Secretary to the Commission will keep a list of the participants. Former commission employees can participate in the review. They do not need special permission to do so. Business proprietary information can be disclosed to authorized applicants. These applicants must file within 21 days of the notice. A separate list will be made for those who can receive this information. All information submitted must be correct and complete. If a firm cannot give requested information, they should notify the Commission soon. If they do not notify, an adverse inference may be taken. Responses must be filed by June 1, 2026. Comments on these responses should be filed by July 13, 2026. All filings will be electronic through edis.usitc.gov. The Commission is not accepting in-person paper filings. If you import steel grating from China, you need to give detailed information. This includes import details, shipment values, and other data. Producers and exporters should also provide their details. Significant changes in the market after 2019 should be reported. This includes changes in supply, demand, and technology. This review happens under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice ends by confirming the authority under which the Commission is conducting these reviews. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, issued the notice on April 27, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Reviews Orders on Welded Line Pipe from South Korea and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a series of reviews concerning welded line pipe from South Korea and Turkey. They are investigating orders that apply special duties on these products. The reviews are being held according to the Tariff Act of 1930. The goal is to determine if revoking these duties might cause harm to the U.S. market or industry. The duties in question are: A countervailing duty order on welded line pipe from Turkey. Antidumping duty orders on welded line pipe from both South Korea and Turkey. The USITC started these reviews on May 1, 2026. Interested parties must respond by June 1, 2026. They can also make comments on the adequacy of responses by July 13, 2026. What These Reviews Aim to Discover The reviews aim to find out if removing these duties will likely cause material harm to the U.S. industry once again. The Commission wants to ensure that the domestic producers of these pipes are not negatively affected by imports from these countries. Participation and Rules Interested parties can participate by submitting specific information to the Commission. They need to file for participation within 21 days of this notice’s publication. Former Commission employees can also participate under certain guidelines. Confidential Information Business proprietary information can be shared under a protective order. Only authorized people can access this information. Data Collection The Commission requests information from domestic producers, importers, and exporters. This includes data on production, capacity, U.S. shipments, and financial performance during 2025. Key Terms Domestic Like Product: This is the product similar to the imported product, made in the U.S. Subject Merchandise: These are the products imported from the subject countries. Domestic Industry: U.S. producers as a whole for these products. Importer: A person or company that brings in these products to the U.S. Why This Matters These reviews aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing and practices by foreign competitors. The decisions could impact trade relationships and the economy. For more information, law firms, businesses, or individuals concerned about these products can contact Lawrence Jones at the USITC. This matter underscores the balance between international trade and protecting domestic industries. The outcome could have significant implications for companies and workers involved in producing and using welded line pipes in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided not to review an earlier decision to close an investigation. This investigation involved certain semiconductor devices and computing products containing these devices. The investigation started because Adeia, Inc., a company based in San Jose, California, filed a complaint. The complaint said that there were violations related to the import and sale of some semiconductor devices. These devices were allegedly infringing on specific U.S. patents. The investigation officially began on December 19, 2025. Several companies were named in the complaint. This included Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and Super Micro Computer, Inc. On March 11, 2026, Adeia and AMD reached a settlement agreement. They decided to end the investigation as it pertained to AMD. Adeia also withdrew its complaint against the other companies involved. Earlier, there was a problem with the settlement agreement. TOO much information was hidden from the public. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) asked Adeia and AMD to provide an amended version. They complied, filing the corrected version on March 27, 2026. On March 31, 2026, the ALJ agreed to terminate the investigation. They said the agreement met all rules and regulations. There were no extraordinary reasons to continue the investigation. No one filed a petition asking for the decision to be reviewed. The investigation is now officially closed. The USITC vote to close the investigation took place on April 27, 2026. The investigation has ended completely. This action is supported by the legal authority in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The proper procedures were followed under the Commission’s rules. This decision was formally issued by Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, on April 27, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation into Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an investigation. It focuses on certain semiconductor devices. These devices include products and components containing such devices. The investigation started because of a complaint. GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. from Malta, New York, filed the complaint. They filed it on March 26, 2026. There was also a supplement filed on April 1, 2026. The complaint says that there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It talks about importing, selling for importation, and selling within the U.S. after import. The complaint says this happened because of patent infringements. Patents involved are U.S. Patent No. 8,330,235, U.S. Patent No. 8,507,983, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,425, U.S. Patent No. 9,865,546, U.S. Patent No. 10,062,748, and U.S. Patent No. 10,707,167. These are often called the ‘235, ‘983, ‘425, ‘546, ‘748, and ‘167 patents. GlobalFoundries wants the Commission to investigate. They also ask for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The full complaint is available. Except for any confidential information, it can be viewed online. The electronic docket is on the Commission’s EDIS site. People who need help using the site can email for assistance. Hearing-impaired individuals can use the TDD terminal for more information at (202) 205-1810. The investigation’s goal is to see if the import, sale for import, or sale after import violates section 337. The investigation looks at certain products that may infringe on specific patent claims. The products are semiconductor devices. They are made using different Tower processes like RF, power management, BCD, logic, SiGe, and BiCMOS. They include wafers and chips. The investigation will have specific parties. GlobalFoundries is listed as the complainant. Respondents listed are Tower Semiconductor companies and other connected entities. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint a presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not join the investigation as a party. Responses to the complaint and notice must be submitted on time. They are due within 20 days of the date of service. Late responses may lead to a waiver of rights to contest the complaint. Failure to respond may lead to findings against the respondents. This includes exclusion orders or cease and desist orders. This investigation is an important development in international trade and patent law enforcement. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Proposes New Disclosure Rules for Section 337 Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has proposed new rules. These rules aim to amend the current procedures for Section 337 investigations. The proposed changes focus on requiring more disclosure from parties involved in these investigations. The Commission wants to improve transparency. This will be done by making parties reveal information about ownership and financial interests. This information will relate to those who have a stake in the investigation. Entities involved in Section 337 investigations must now disclose: Any parent corporation or entity owning stock. Any person or entity with a legal right to bring the investigation. Any funder or entity that needs to approve litigation or settlement decisions. These proposed rules include a requirement for business addresses and places of formation of any entity to be disclosed. If there are no such entities, parties must state their lack of knowledge of any. The ITC seeks comments from the public about these changes. They are interested in knowing if the rules are clear and how they can be improved. The public is encouraged to comment on the impact of these changes and if they impose any undue burden. Comments on these rules must be submitted by June 29, 2026. Comments can be sent via various methods including mail, email, and online portals. Once comments are reviewed, the ITC will decide if these rules will be finalized. The goal is to ensure better transparency, reduce conflicts of interest, and aid in the settlement process. The ITC’s new rules aim to align more closely with existing federal court practices on disclosure. Overall, these changes are part of the ITC’s ongoing efforts for effective regulation and improved procedural rules. The outcomes of these rules will lead to more clarity and fairness in trade investigations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Discontinues Lithium Hexafluorophosphate Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On April 14, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission announced important news. They received a letter from a company called Mexichem Fluor Inc. doing business as Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials. This company is based in Boston, Massachusetts. They decided to take back their requests for investigations. These investigations were about a chemical called lithium hexafluorophosphate. It comes from China. The investigations were called antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Department of Commerce did not start these investigations. They follow rules from a law. This law is called the Tariff Act of 1930. The rules are in sections 702(c) and 732(c). Because Mexichem Fluor took back their requests, the Commission has stopped their investigations. These investigations had numbers. They were numbers 701-TA-790 and 731-TA-1778. They were at the preliminary stage. The official end date for these investigations is April 14, 2026. The public can find more information on this matter. They can contact Peter Stebbins at the U.S. International Trade Commission. His phone number is 202-205-2039. People with hearing issues can get information too. They can call the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. If someone has difficulty moving, they can contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000 for help. More details about the Commission can be found online. Their website is https://www.usitc.gov. The public can also look at the electronic records for these cases at https://edis.usitc.gov. The Commission issued this notice on April 20, 2026. The Supervisory Attorney, Susan Orndoff, signed it. This notice was made official on April 22, 2026. It is part of the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 78. The billing code for this is 7020-02-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Energy Drinks Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received an important complaint related to energy drinks. This complaint is titled “Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof” with docket number 3902. The complaint comes from Monster Energy Company. Monster Energy says there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves importing certain energy drinks into the United States. The company believes that some products and their packaging are illegal when brought into the U.S., sold for importation, or sold after importation. The complaint names several companies that are allegedly involved in this issue. These companies are from different places, including Florida, New York, Illinois, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Texas, Michigan, Panama, and New Jersey. Monster Energy Company is asking the USITC to take certain actions. They want a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also want a bond on the allegedly infringing products during a 60-day Presidential review period. The USITC is asking for comments from the public and interested parties. The comments should focus on public interest issues that the complaint raises. People can share their views on whether the relief requested by Monster Energy would affect health and welfare in the U.S., or impact competition or consumers. The Commission is interested in knowing how the energy drinks are used in the country. They want to know if there are any health, safety, or welfare concerns. The USITC is also looking for feedback on whether there are other products made in the U.S. that can replace the imported energy drinks. They also want to know if there is enough supply in the U.S. to replace these products. The Commission is also interested in how the orders requested by Monster Energy would impact U.S. consumers. We encourage people to write their feedback and submit it through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System. The deadline for submitting these comments is eight days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. The Commission might ask for more comments after any further decisions are made in this investigation. If anyone wants to submit documents confidentially, they must request confidential treatment. All non-confidential submissions will be available for public viewing. Submissions must be electronic, as no paper documents will be accepted right now. This investigation is important because it relates to the U.S. economy and consumers. It also involves big names in the energy drink market. We will keep following this story and will provide updates as they become available. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation into Apple’s Redesigned Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the conclusion of its investigation into Apple Inc.’s redesigned light-based physiological measurement devices. The investigation, known as No. 337-TA-1276, focused on whether Apple’s new devices infringed upon patents held by Masimo Corporation and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc. The investigation began in August 2021. Masimo and Cercacor alleged that Apple’s devices violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by infringing on their patents. The ITC found that some of Apple’s products did infringe certain patent claims. In October 2023, the ITC issued a final decision. They found that some of Apple’s products violated specific claims of Masimo’s patents. The ITC issued a limited exclusion order (LEO) and a cease and desist order against Apple. In September 2025, Masimo requested the ITC to modify the orders. They wanted clarification on whether Apple’s new product designs still violated their patents. In November 2025, the ITC started a new proceeding to examine Apple’s redesigned devices. The goal was to see if these products infringed any patents. On March 18, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decided that Apple’s redesigned products did not violate any of the asserted patent claims. Masimo and Apple each requested a review of this decision. On April 17, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the ALJ’s decision. This means the investigation is now closed. The ITC will not exclude Apple’s redesigned products from the market. This decision was made under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is conducting reviews of wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China. These reviews are identified as Investigation Nos. 701-TA-636 and 731-TA-1470. The purpose of the reviews is to decide if cancelling certain duty orders on these products might lead to harm to U.S. industry. The duty orders in question are antidumping and countervailing duties. The reviews will be expedited, meaning they will proceed quickly. This decision was made because the response from domestic groups was strong, while the response from groups in China was weak. Comments about the review should be submitted by May 29, 2026. Participants will not be allowed to include new factual information in these comments. If any comments contain sensitive business information, they must adhere to specific rules set by the Commission. The USITC also announced that these reviews are very complex. Because of this, the Commission has decided to extend the review period by an extra 90 days. The USITC scheduled these reviews and published notice of them on April 7, 2026. The Commission issued the notice in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 76, which came out on April 21, 2026. The document number is 2026-07684. If you want more information, you can visit the USITC’s website at www.usitc.gov or check out their electronic docket system at edis.usitc.gov. Contact Alexis Yim at the USITC for any questions or more details. Her phone number is 202-708-1446. For those with hearing impairments, the TDD terminal number is 202-205-1810. You can also contact the Office of the Secretary if you need special help accessing the Commission. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on April 16, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Announces Expedited Reviews on Economic Measures Related to PVLT Tires from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced plans to begin expedited reviews on specific economic measures. These reviews will focus on antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders. The primary concern is passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires imported from China. The expedited reviews are under the Tariff Act of 1930. They aim to decide if removing these orders will cause harm to the U.S. industry. This review checks if ongoing or future damage is likely. The expedited process will help determine this quickly. The review decision date was April 7, 2026. The USITC staff has prepared a report with important information for the reviews. Parties involved in the review will receive it by June 2, 2026. A version without sensitive information will be available later. Comments from interested parties or related groups are due by June 9, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The review is complex, so the USITC may extend it by 90 days if needed. This step ensures a careful and thorough evaluation. The reviews are part of routine procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. For more details, the USITC website provides additional resources and information on this matter. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Proposed Changes to U.S. Tariff Schedule: Public Comments Welcome Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is thinking about making changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. These changes aim to align with updates recommended by the World Customs Organization (WCO). The modifications are set to take effect on January 1, 2028. On April 17, 2026, the Commission shared its proposed recommendations on its website. Federal agencies and the public have until May 18, 2026, to send in their written opinions on these recommendations. These updates are important because they help keep the U.S. HTS in line with global customs guidelines. The Commission will send a report with its recommendations to the President in December 2026. This report will include a summary of all the feedback it receives. A big part of the proposed changes involves HTS subheading 3004.90.92. This part covers specific medicaments—a type of medicine. Right now, there are over 70 different codes under this heading. The ITC wants to split it into nine new subheadings. This will create more space for new codes in the future. Government officials, businesses, and other interested parties can view and comment on the proposed changes. They can find more information on the ITC’s website under “Investigation No. 1205-14.” For those with special needs, access assistance is available at the Commission’s office. All comments must be sent electronically and received by 5:15 p.m. on May 18, 2026. If the comments include confidential business information, they need to meet specific guidelines for submission. The Commission’s final report will provide a summary of the feedback and detail the likely economic impact of the changes. This ensures that any modification is well-informed and considers various perspectives. The overall goal of these proposed updates is to improve the efficiency and accuracy of U.S. customs processes. Your participation is crucial. Share your thoughts by the deadline to have your voice heard. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments On Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This inquiry involves certain motorized self-balancing vehicles. On April 10, 2026, a judge appointed by the ITC issued an Initial Determination. This determination concerns a possible violation of Section 337. Additionally, the judge recommended certain actions related to remedy and bonding if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is now asking for public input on issues that could affect the public. Comments are welcome from both the public and government agencies. The Commission is considering whether to exclude specific motorized self-balancing vehicles. These vehicles are imported and sold by companies named Golabs Inc., known as Gotrax, and Zhejiang TaoTao Vehicles Co., Ltd. The investigation involves possible infringement on two patents, namely U.S. Patent Nos. RE46,964 and RE49,608. The ITC is also considering issuing a cease and desist order against Gotrax. Comments should be filed by May 14, 2026. The ITC wants to understand how the possible exclusion of these vehicles might affect public health, the U.S. economy, production of similar products, and U.S. consumers. Further, the ITC is interested in knowing how these vehicles are used in the U.S. It also wants to identify any health or safety concerns related to this case. The Commission seeks information on whether other U.S. companies can make similar products. They are also interested in knowing if these companies can meet the demand if the current products are excluded. To file a comment, individuals must follow specific instructions set by the ITC. It is important to refer to the investigation number 337-TA-1440 in submissions. Comments containing confidential information must be marked and handled as confidential. The ITC’s electronic docket system, EDIS, is used for submissions and accessing case documents. This investigation is carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930, which aims to protect U.S. trade and consumers. The ITC emphasizes the need for input from different stakeholders to make informed decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Case on Crafting Machines Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is reviewing a case involving crafting machines. This investigation is called Investigation No. 337-TA-1426. It started because a company named Cricut, Inc. complained about certain machines being imported into the United States. They say these machines infringe on their patents. The case includes several patents. These are important legal protections for inventions. Cricut claims that other companies are using their patented ideas without permission. This is against Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation began on December 11, 2024. The complaint involves crafting machines and their parts. Cricut says these machines infringe on six of their patents. The patents are numbered U.S. Patent No. 11,208,758, U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646, U.S. Design Patent No. D893,563, U.S. Design Patent No. D910,724, U.S. Design Patent No. D926,237, and U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. The investigation names several companies from China as respondents. These companies include Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co. Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co., Ltd., LiPing Zhan, Hunan Sijiu Technology, Co. Ltd., Guangdong Rongtu Technology Co., Ltd., and SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. Some companies have already been found in default. A company is in “default” when it does not respond or participate in the investigation. These companies are part of two groups called the Vevor Respondents and Konduone. Default findings mean that these companies did not defend themselves in the case. The investigation also includes a review of a new type of crafting machine made by HTVRONT. This review is to decide if the new machine infringes on Cricut’s patents. On January 21, 2026, a decision was made. The decision found that Konduone violated Section 337 as to some patents. It also found that the Vevor Respondents violated Section 337 for a specific design patent. However, it found no violation for other patents because Cricut did not provide evidence for those. If the final decision finds violations, it could result in an exclusion order. An exclusion order would stop these machines from being imported into the U.S. Another possible outcome is a cease and desist order. This would stop the companies from selling these machines in the U.S. The ITC is now asking for written comments from the public and interested parties. They want to know how any orders might affect the public and the economy. They also want to know if any bond should be required during a review period. The ITC has set deadlines for these comments. They should be submitted by April 28, 2026. There can be replies to these submissions by May 5, 2026. The outcome of this investigation is important. It will decide if the machines will continue to be sold or imported into the United States. It is also an important case for those who hold patents, as it deals with protecting inventions. By order of the Commission, this investigation and its details are part of the official record. This ensures a fair and thorough process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Announces Expedited Reviews of Indian Matchbooks Impact Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an important update. They are starting quick reviews about matchbooks from India. These reviews will check if stopping certain trade rules could hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews start on March 16, 2026. They will look at antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These orders help prevent foreign companies from selling products at very low prices, which could harm U.S. companies. The USITC said that they got enough responses from U.S. companies but not enough from Indian companies. Because of this, the reviews will be faster and simpler. Commissioner Johanson had a different idea. He thought that the review should be more detailed. The reviews will follow specific rules. These rules from the Tariff Act of 1930 make sure everything is done correctly. There will be a report with more information. This will be for people on a special service list, and others can see a public version later. People can write comments about these reviews. These comments help decide what should happen next. Comments must be sent by May 19, 2026. No new facts can be included. If the Department of Commerce needs more time, they will delay the final comments. For companies and other parties involved, they must follow strict rules when sending documents. They need to make sure everyone involved gets a copy. The USITC thinks these reviews are very complicated. They decided to take more time to get everything right. They might take up to 90 extra days. This process is under the Tariff Act of 1930. All of these details are based on official orders from the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on PTMEG Imports Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of investigations on April 13, 2026. This is about polytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMEG) coming from China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The investigations aim to find out if these imports are hurting U.S. industries. The investigations started because BASF Corporation, located in Florham Park, New Jersey, filed a petition on April 8, 2026. They believe that PTMEG is being sold in the U.S. at less than its real value. The Commission has only 45 days to decide if there is a reasonable indication of harm. This means they need to make a preliminary decision by May 26, 2026. The Commission will then send their findings to the Department of Commerce by June 2, 2026. People who are interested and want to be part of the investigations must contact the Commission. They must do this within seven days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. Those who wish to look at more information or how to get involved can go to the Commission’s website or contact them directly. They will be having a staff conference on April 29, 2026, for the investigations. The USITC takes these steps to protect the industries in the United States. They want to make sure that trading is fair and no industry is hurt by cheaper foreign goods sold in the U.S. For those who have evidence or opinions on this, a written brief can be submitted by May 4, 2026. This is an important chance for people in the industry to share what they know. The USITC has rules about how to handle documents and these must be followed strictly. This helps make sure all information is accurate and complete. The investigations are being done under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC is acting by law to look into these cases and make sure there is fair trade happening. These investigations help keep U.S. industries strong against unfair foreign competition. The Commission will continue to update the public as the investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation on Screen Protectors Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an investigation into certain screen protectors and their application systems. This investigation stems from a complaint filed by Belkin International, Inc. Belkin International, based in El Segundo, California, filed this complaint on March 9, 2026. A supplement to the complaint followed on March 13, 2026. Belkin alleges that the import, sale for import, and sale within the United States of specific screen protector products violate U.S. patent laws. These alleged violations concern three different patents. They are U.S. Patent No. 10,675,817, U.S. Patent No. 10,782,746, and U.S. Patent No. 11,772,320. The complaint claims that the products infringe on certain claims of these patents. It also states that there is a related industry within the United States. The USITC will look into whether these claims hold true. It will also check if an industry exists as Belkin states. The Commission is seeking to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order upon investigating. Belkin names Superior Communications, Inc. as the respondent. The company allegedly violates Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The respondent has 20 days to respond to the complaint and investigation notice. The investigation will focus on screen protectors for devices like mobile phones, smartwatches, and tablets. It will also look into the application systems used for these screen protectors, including trays and films. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will assign a presiding Administrative Law Judge to handle this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be part of this investigation. Respondents must file their responses promptly. Failing to respond on time may lead to penalties. These penalties may include an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against the respondent. The USITC will use its rules and procedures to carry out this investigation. The Commission is working to ensure that all rules are followed and the investigation proceeds as required. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, has issued this notice of investigation. It was officially filed on April 10, 2026. The document is available from the Federal Register and can be accessed online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. ITC Receives Complaint on Coated Confectionery Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced it received a complaint. The complaint is about certain coated confectionery products. The complaint, identified as DN 3900, was filed by Promotion in Motion, Inc. on April 8, 2026. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves the importation and sale of certain coated candy. The products named in the complaint are alleged to infringe on laws when imported and sold in the United States. The respondents named in the complaint include Cibo Vita, Inc., Cibo Vita Founders, Inc., New Cibo Vita, LLC, and AnaBio Technologies, LTD. These companies are located in the United States and Ireland. The complainant is requesting the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they want the ITC to stop the import and sale of the infringing candies. They are also asking for a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. The ITC is asking the public to comment. They want to know how the issue might affect public health and the U.S. economy. They are also interested in knowing if there are similar products made in the U.S. that can replace the imported candy. Comments must be submitted within eight calendar days of this notice’s publication. The ITC will only accept electronic filings. No paper documents will be accepted until further notice. Filings must refer to the docket number 3900. People can contact Lisa R. Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, for further information. The ITC will continue to review submissions. They will decide based on the public’s comments and other information gathered. This process is under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Allows Cosentino to Join Investigation Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding an ongoing investigation. This decision was announced on April 8, 2026. The ITC has decided not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge. The investigation looks into certain processed slabs and how they are made. A company called Cambria Company LLC from Minnesota started the investigation. They believe that some slabs are being sold in the U.S. that might be breaking patent rules. These patents are issued by the U.S. government to protect inventions. The investigation considers whether any foreign companies are violating U.S. patent laws. It focuses on the import and sale of processed slabs. If any slabs break U.S. patents, they cannot be sold in the U.S. Several companies are being investigated. These include Architectural Surfaces Group LLC and Arizona Tile, LLC, among others. These companies are the main responders in this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also involved. Recently, a non-party company, C&C North America, Inc., doing business as Cosentino North America, asked to join the investigation. They wanted to join because their slab products might also be affected by any rulings. Cosentino believes that without joining, they might not be able to protect their own products. The administrative law judge considered Cosentino’s request. On March 19, 2026, the judge decided that Cosentino’s request to join should be granted. This means that Cosentino is now officially a respondent in the investigation. The Commission’s decision to accept this was based on certain rules. One important rule looked at whether Cosentino was involved early in the process. Another rule ensured that Cosentino had a clear interest. The judge also checked if any delay might occur because Cosentino joined. No party disagreed with the decision to let Cosentino join. Now, Cosentino will join the investigation alongside other respondents. This means they will now defend their products in a formal setting. The ITC is making sure that each company has a fair chance to present their case. This case is being watched closely. It involves large companies and the outcome can impact how products are sold in the U.S. Knowing who can sell products and who cannot is very important for these businesses. The ITC is working under the rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. It ensures all decisions follow these rules carefully. Stay informed as this case unfolds. The ITC will continue to release updates as the investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Comments on USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin Questionnaire Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is asking the public for comments. This request is about a questionnaire related to a report on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) Automotive Rules of Origin. This request is part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The USITC plans to send a questionnaire. This is an important step. It is for the Commission’s investigation. The investigation looks at the economic impact and operation of the USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin. The Commission wants to make sure it gets all comments by a certain time. To be considered, comments must be received within 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. The questionnaire helps the Commission learn important things. They want to know how rules about where car parts come from affect the U.S. economy. The Commission is making five reports and this is the third one. The reports help understand how these rules affect U.S. competitiveness and technology changes. The first report is already done. It was delivered on July 1, 2025. This investigation started on February 11, 2026. The Commission plans to deliver the report by July 1, 2027. The Commission will collect information through the questionnaire. They will ask motor vehicle producers many questions. These questions will help the Commission understand how the rules impact various factors. The Commission will ask 25 respondents to complete the questionnaire. Each respondent will spend about 25 hours to finish it. The answers will stay private and confidential. The questionnaire will be online. Respondents will get an email link to fill out the form. When the form is complete, they will click a submit button to send it. The Commission is asking the public to give feedback. This feedback can help improve the questionnaire. It can also help make sure the questions are necessary and the time estimate to complete it is correct. If anyone wants to see the draft questionnaire, they can visit the USITC website. Comments about the draft can be sent to a specific email. The USITC also reminds people not to include private or confidential business information in their comments. This notice was issued on April 6, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint on Pickleball Paddles Estimated reading time: 2 minutes April 10, 2026—The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced today that it has received a new complaint. This complaint is about “Certain Pickleball Paddles.” The registration number for this complaint is DN 3898. The ITC is now asking for public comments on this issue. Contacting the ITC For more information, you can contact Lisa R. Barton. She is the Secretary to the Commission. You can reach her by phone at (202) 205-2000. You can also find the complaint online. Go to the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Details of the Complaint The complaint was filed by Sport Squad, Inc. on April 7, 2026. It claims violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves some pickleball paddles being imported and sold in the U.S. The companies named in the complaint include Franklin Sports, Inc., Proton Sports, Inc., and others. Sport Squad, Inc. wants the ITC to stop these products from entering the U.S. They are asking for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Public Comments Needed The ITC is asking for public comments. They are interested in how this issue might affect public health and the economy. They also want to know if there are similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the ones in question. Comments must be submitted no later than eight days after this notice. How to Submit Comments Comments should be filed electronically. They must be no longer than five pages. Include “Docket No. 3898” on the first page. Use the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted. Confidential Information If you want to keep your information private, you must ask for confidential treatment. Those requests should go to the Secretary to the Commission. Include a reason for why it should stay confidential. Next Steps The ITC will continue to accept comments and submissions. It will use these to make a final decision. Stay tuned for more updates as this investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Glass Substrates Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case about certain glass substrates for liquid crystal displays. This review involves products that contain these glass substrates, along with the methods used to manufacture them. On April 7, 2026, an administrative law judge issued an Initial Determination. It was about a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This judge also recommended potential remedies and bonding measures if a violation is confirmed. The USITC is now asking for public comments on public interest issues. These issues relate to potential remedies if a violation is found. People and government agencies can submit comments. The comments should focus on how the remedies might affect public health, welfare, competitive conditions, and consumer interests in the United States. The products in question were imported, sold, or manufactured by companies like Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. and TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Public comments can address five key points: How the glass substrates are used in the United States. Any public health or safety concerns related to the potential remedies. If there are other similar products made in the United States that could replace these glass substrates. Whether manufacturers can produce enough to cover the number of substrates subject to the remedies. How these remedies would impact U.S. consumers. Submissions can be up to five pages long and must be filed by May 8, 2026. Interested parties must follow specific electronic filing procedures. For questions, people can contact the Commission Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Confidential information must be clearly marked and will be treated with privacy. There are rules for submitting information confidentially. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public review. The Commission operates under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. This act helps the Commission decide on whether to exclude certain imported products from the United States. This can happen when these imports violate U.S. trade laws. The Commission must think about how such exclusions affect the U.S. economy and consumers. Issued on April 8, 2026, the notice seeks to ensure all voices are heard before any decisions are made. This step illustrates the Commission’s commitment to transparency and public engagement in trade matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Oil Country Tubular Goods from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews. This will determine if stopping antidumping and countervailing duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from China would cause harm to U.S. industry. The investigative process began on March 6, 2026. The USITC found the response from domestic parties to be adequate. However, the response from foreign parties was inadequate. This means the reviews will be expedited. An expedited review is a quicker process under the Tariff Act of 1930. The findings will tell if removing duties would negatively impact U.S. businesses. The USITC staff has prepared a report on the topic. It was placed in the nonpublic record for those with proper access. A public version will follow. Interested parties have a deadline for written comments. These are due by 5:15 p.m. on April 22, 2026. Comments cannot include new facts. If the Department of Commerce extends its deadline for final review results, the comment deadline changes accordingly. Business proprietary information must meet certain rules. All documents must be served to all review parties. A certificate of service is required with each document. The USITC has declared these reviews as extraordinarily complex. They have extended the review period by up to 90 days. They have the authority to do this under U.S. law. The announcement was issued on April 7, 2026. Official details are available on the USITC’s website. This information affects those involved in the OCTG industry. It shows continued oversight of trade practices to protect U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Ink Cartridge Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a new development in its ongoing investigation into certain ink cartridges and their components. This investigation is referenced as Investigation No. 337-TA-1452. The administrative law judge handling this case has given a Summary Determination on a Violation of Section 337. This refers to a law that regulates international trade by excluding certain products from the U.S. if they violate certain trade rules. The judge also made a suggestion on what actions to take if a violation is confirmed. This could include excluding the products from entering the U.S. or issuing a cease-and-desist order to involved companies. The ITC is asking for comments from the public and government agencies on these suggested actions. They want to know how these actions might affect the public, the economy, and consumers in the United States. They are also interested in knowing if other companies could produce similar products in the U.S. to replace the ones being investigated. Comments from the public should be submitted to the ITC by April 30, 2026. Each submission can be up to five pages long including any attachments. Submissions must be filed online and should clearly mention the investigation number. If someone wants to submit confidential information, they must follow specific rules to keep that information private. The ITC is acting under its authority according to the Tariff Act of 1930 and its own rules. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, issued this notification. For further details or help with submissions, individuals can contact Namo Kim, Esq., at the Office of the General Counsel of the ITC. Public records related to the investigation can be viewed online through the ITC’s electronic docket system. This notice is important for companies involved in producing or selling ink cartridges and their components, as well as consumers and competitors in this market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Conduct Expedited Reviews on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews concerning non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) imports. These reviews are essential to determine whether removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on NOES from China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan will cause material injury to the U.S. industry. The Commission began these reviews following its determination on March 6, 2026, that the response from domestic interested parties was adequate, whereas the respondent interested party group response was found inadequate. Hence, the decision was made to conduct expedited reviews as laid out in the Tariff Act of 1930. For inquiries, individuals are directed to contact Camille Bryan at the Office of Investigations, USITC. The Commission also allows for communication through their TDD terminal for hearing-impaired persons. Those with mobility impairments should contact the Office of the Secretary for assistance. The next step involves a staff report with detailed information about the reviews, which will be available to designated individuals on April 2, 2026. A public version will follow. Interested parties have until April 15, 2026, to file written comments on the Commission’s determinations. These comments must adhere to specific rules, especially if they contain proprietary information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review period, comments about their final results are due three business days after issuance. The Commission expects these reviews to be complicated, and it has used its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days, emphasizing the gravity of these proceedings. The announcement concludes under the authority vested by the Tariff Act of 1930, as affirmed by the Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton. The Federal Register has documented this notice as part of its public records. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Investigation Launched on Display Devices Import Violations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation. The investigation was prompted by a complaint. InnoTV Labs, LLC filed the complaint. The company is based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Complaint Details The complaint alleges that certain display devices, streaming players, and their components are being imported illegally. The issue is about patents. The patents allegedly being infringed include: U.S. Patent No. 7,965,918 U.S. Patent No. 12,096,066 U.S. Patent No. 10,018,863 U.S. Patent No. RE50,251 U.S. Patent No. 11,714,306 U.S. Patent No. 12,038,636 Investigation Scope The ITC has ordered a detailed investigation. The investigation will explore if there are violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Section 337 deals with unfair practices in import trade. The products being investigated include smart televisions, LED televisions, streaming devices, and related hardware and software components. Respondents in the Case Several companies are named in the complaint. These companies are alleged to be involved in the violation. They are: Hisense Co., Ltd (China) Hisense International Co., Ltd (China) Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd (China) Hisense USA Corporation (USA) Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation (USA) Hisense Monterrey Home Appliance Manufacturing (Mexico) Roku, Inc (USA) Purple Tag Media Technology (Shanghai) Ltd and its branch in Shenzhen (China) Purple Tag Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) Case Procedure The ITC will consider the complaint and determine if there is a violation. The complainant, InnoTV Labs, LLC, seeks a limited exclusion order. They also seek cease and desist orders. Responses to the complaint must be submitted by the named respondents. Responses are to follow section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules. Time extensions for responses will not be granted easily. If any respondent fails to respond on time, it may waive their right to contest. It could result in an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against them. Administrative Details The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will designate the presiding judge for this investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate in this case. The proceedings are open for public viewing through the ITC’s electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. For more information, the contact person is Susan Orndoff at the U.S. International Trade Commission. She can be reached by telephone at 202-205-1802. The investigation order was issued on April 1, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Assess L-Lysine Imports from China Estimated reading time: 4 minutes U.S. International Trade Commission to Assess L-Lysine Imports from China The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations into the import of animal feed-grade L-lysine from China. This announcement follows the preliminary findings by the Department of Commerce that suggested these imports were subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. Reason for Investigation The investigation seeks to determine whether the United States’ L-lysine industry has been harmed or threatened by these imports from China. L-lysine is an important amino acid used in animal feed for the biosynthesis of proteins. The specific imports under investigation include lysine monohydrochloride (HCL), lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine, among other forms, as noted in their respective Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers. Industry Participation Needed Parties interested in participating in these investigations, such as industrial users and potential consumer organizations, must file an entry of appearance with the USITC. This should be done within a timeframe specified by the commission. The Secretary will then maintain a public service list of all participants. Hearings and Submissions A hearing for these investigations will occur on July 14, 2026. Parties hoping to present at the hearing must submit written requests by July 9, 2026. Additional guidelines govern the submission of written testimonies and presentations. These must be filed by July 13, 2026, along with any pre- and post-hearing briefs that must adhere to the detailed provisions outlined by the Commission. Release of Information and Final Comments The USITC plans to release a prehearing staff report by June 30, 2026. This report will be available to authorized parties who applied in compliance with the Commission’s rules. The release of additional information for comment by participants will happen on August 11, 2026. Final comments from interested parties must be submitted by August 13, 2026. Conclusion These investigations aim to enforce the fair trade practices under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC is ensuring transparency and compliance with Commission rules. Interested parties in the agricultural and industrial sectors should take note of the rules and deadlines to participate effectively. This development highlights the US government’s commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a five-year review. This review is about imports of boltless steel shelving units from China. The purpose is to see whether revoking existing trade orders will harm the U.S. industry. Background On October 21, 2015, the Department of Commerce made orders about these imports. These were antidumping and countervailing duty orders. They were put in place because the imported shelving units were sold cheaper than they should have been. This caused concern for U.S. producers. In May 2021, another review continued these orders. Now, the USITC is reviewing them again. Details of Review The review started on April 1, 2026. The USITC wants information from people interested in this matter by May 1, 2026. Comments on the responses can be filed until June 9, 2026. Rachel Devenney at USITC is the contact person for more information. Definitions and Participation The review will look at several factors: Subject Merchandise: This is the product being reviewed, which is the shelving units from China. Domestic Like Product: This is the similar product made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: This is U.S. companies that produce the like product. Importer and Participation: Companies involved in importing, or looking to participate, must file for participation within 21 days of the notice. Former Commission employees can also take part, thanks to an ethics update. Business information will be protected under special orders, and such information must be filed within 21 days. Information Requested Interested parties need to provide specific information by May 1, 2026. They need to describe their operations in 2025, including production, sales, and financial details. The companies in the U.S. and China have to submit information about their production and exports. Public Reporting and Additional Information Public reporting details are available, and it’s estimated to take 15 hours to respond to this request. All submissions will be electronic, and no paper documents will be accepted. Conclusion The USITC is reviewing the impact of removing trade orders on Chinese steel shelving. They ask for detailed information from interested companies and parties. This information is important to ensure a fair decision is made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a review. This review looks at imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China. The review will check if revoking orders will hurt U.S. industries. These orders involve antidumping and countervailing duties. Duties are extra charges on products when they enter a country. The review can help decide if these duties should continue or end. The USITC is asking for information from interested parties. These parties must give their responses by May 1, 2026. Comments on these responses must be sent by June 9, 2026. Caitlyn Hendricks-Costello from the Office of Investigations can provide more information. She can be reached at (202) 205-2058. The antidumping duty was first made on June 29, 2010. The countervailing duty was added on July 7, 2010. These duties were reviewed in 2015 and again in 2021. Now, the USITC is looking to review them again. This review is very detailed. It will look at things like imports, prices, and how they affect U.S. industries. The USITC will assess this information to decide its next steps. People or groups who want to take part must file an entry of appearance. They have to do this no later than 21 days after this news was published in the Federal Register. The USITC will also handle business proprietary information (BPI) under special rules. Those who want to see this information must apply within 21 days. The process has rules to ensure all submissions are accurate. These rules include making certifications about the data submitted. The review is for anyone interested in steel wire strands. This can be producers, importers, or anyone affected by these duties. They must share specific information like their name, address, and the likely effects of removing duties. The investigation wants to see the impact on U.S. industries. It will gather data from 2025 as part of this process. The review also seeks to understand changes in supply and demand after 2019. There is an option for participants to agree or disagree with the definitions given in the review. This review is part of ongoing efforts under the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order for this review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Reviews on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started reviews related to small vertical shaft engines from China. This is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The reviews will find out if removing the existing duties on these engines from China could hurt the U.S. industry again. These reviews started on April 1, 2026. Anyone interested in this issue should provide information by May 1, 2026. Comments about the adequacy of responses can be submitted by June 9, 2026. The background of this issue started on May 4, 2021, when the Department of Commerce put duties on small vertical shaft engines from China. These reviews will help decide if keeping the duties is necessary to protect U.S. producers. Definitions are important in these reviews. “Subject Merchandise” refers to engines from China. The “Domestic Industry” includes U.S. engine makers like Briggs & Stratton and Honda Power. The reviews also talk about “Subject Country,” which is China, and “Domestic Like Product,” which are U.S. similar engines. Interested parties can be involved by adding their names to a public service list. People who have worked for the Commission before may participate if there’s no conflict of interest. For this review, some business information may be shared with authorized people through an administrative protective order. Written submissions are required for formal replies. Submission details and specifications are outlined by the Commission’s rules. Responses should include detailed company information, business data, and judgments on the effect of duties on the Domestic Industry. This includes the volume of imports, their price impact, and effects on U.S. job markets. Producers and importers should provide specific data about production and sales both in the U.S. and with exports. All responses should be as detailed as possible. Finally, the USITC seeks to identify any significant changes in the market since the orders began, focusing on supply, demand, and competition both in the U.S. and abroad. The reviews are held under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, as noted in the official notice by the USITC Secretary, Lisa Barton. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Mattress Imports Estimated reading time: 8–10 minutes On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of reviews concerning imported mattresses. This review will look at mattresses from several countries, including Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The purpose is to determine if lifting current trade duties would harm U.S. mattress makers. In 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce placed special duties on these mattresses to protect local producers. The review will see if these duties are still needed or not. Key Dates and Participation The review started on April 1, 2026. Responses to the notice must be submitted by May 1, 2026. Comments about these responses are due by June 9, 2026. Information for Participants Alejandro Orozco, at 202-205-3177, is the point of contact. People with hearing or mobility problems can get assistance by contacting the USITC. Definitions and Procedures The review will look at “Subject Merchandise,” which refers to mattresses from the listed countries. The review aims to decide if ending duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. U.S. producers, importers, and other parties interested in this review can participate by filing paperwork correctly. Previous USITC workers can join if they meet specific rules. Information and Details Needed for Responses Participants must submit detailed information, including: Business name, contact details, and an official certifier. Statement showing if the participant is affected by the review. Willingness to participate and provide requested information. Impact statement on the U.S. mattress industry if duties are lifted. The review will also gather data about producers, changes since the duties started, and any economic impacts. Submission and Filing Process All responses are to be submitted online through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System. No paper submissions will be accepted. Additional Information If a participant cannot provide requested details, they must inform the USITC as soon as possible, explaining why. This information is crucial for the review process. The USITC will use this data to decide if the special duties should remain or end. The outcome of these reviews will impact U.S. mattress producers, importers, and exporters. For the document display, the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 26-5-683, ending on June 30, 2026. Participants can find more procedural information on the USITC’s website. Conclusion This review by the USITC is an important step in deciding the future of trade duties on mattresses from these countries. The involved parties have specific deadlines to meet to have their input considered. For more details, participants are encouraged to contact the USITC directly or visit its website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.