U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Copper Pipe and Tube Imports from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of an expedited five-year review. This review will determine if removing the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Vietnam would likely cause harm to U.S. industries. The review is set according to the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC uses this act to decide if continuing the duty is necessary to prevent harm within a reasonable time frame. The process officially began on October 5, 2026. The USITC found that interested parties from the domestic sector responded adequately. However, responses from the respondents’ side were inadequate. Because of this, the Commission decided to conduct an expedited review rather than a full review. Commissioner Samuel T. Negatu will not participate in this review. On December 30, 2026, the Commission will release a staff report with detailed information on the review. This report will initially be available only to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will follow. Comments from interested parties are due by January 7, 2027. The comments can help inform the Commission’s final decision. However, these comments should not include new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its own review time, the deadline for these comments will also be extended. Lastly, the USITC has determined that this review is extraordinarily complicated. They have chosen to extend the review period by up to 90 days. The review is conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. This process is part of the Commission’s rules to ensure fair trade practices. For more details, the public can visit the USITC website or contact the Commission directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Metal Lockers from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the scheduling of expedited reviews for metal lockers imported from China. These reviews will determine if repealing current trade duties would result in harm to U.S. industries. The reviews relate to antidumping and countervailing duty orders on metal lockers. These are measures to protect U.S. producers from foreign practices like selling products at unfairly low prices and receiving unfair government help. The ITC wants to see if removing these duties would damage the U.S. industry. The ITC decided on October 5, 2026, to conduct expedited reviews. This decision followed after finding the U.S. industry’s response to the notice was adequate, while the response from China was inadequate. Details about the reviews, and general application rules, are available in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The ITC staff will place a report in the nonpublic record by January 28, 2027. Persons interested in the reviews may submit comments. These comments are due by February 4, 2027. If the Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its review, the comment deadline may change. Parties that send submissions must also deliver copies to all other parties involved in the reviews. The Secretary will not accept any documents unless accompanied with a certificate that confirms this delivery. These reviews are under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC has issued this notice to inform the public. Lisa Barton serves as the Secretary to the Commission. Issued on November 3, 2026, the Federal Register documented this notice as FR Doc. 2026-22597 and harmonized to the billing code 7020-02-P. For more information, or for special assistance, individuals can contact the Commission through various contact numbers provided. People can also visit the Commission’s official website for further details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Investigation Launched on Extrusion-Coated Magnet Wire Importation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On November 3, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of an investigation into the importation of certain extrusion-coated magnet wire. This investigation stems from a complaint filed on September 29, 2026, by Essex Solutions Inc. and Essex Solutions USA LLC, both based in Atlanta, Georgia. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The allegations suggest that extrusion-coated magnet wire has been imported into the United States in violation of certain patents. These include U.S. Patent No. 8,847,075, U.S. Patent No. 9,224,523, and U.S. Patent No. 10,210,966. The complainants assert that these imports infringe on their patent rights. The USITC received a supplemental complaint on October 13, 2026. The complainants seek a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders against the accused products. The Commission began the investigation process on October 29, 2026. The products under investigation are extrusion-coated magnet wire. These products have an outer layer made from thermoplastic resin. The investigation aims to determine whether the importation and sale of these products violate U.S. patent laws. The entities accused in this case are Wellascent Electronic (Ganzhou) Co., Ltd., based in China, and Wellascent Technologies USA LLC, located in Grand Prairie, Texas. They are alleged to have violated section 337 regarding the importation and sale of these products. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will appoint an Administrative Law Judge to preside over the investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. The USITC seeks to create a complete record to review all relevant factors concerning the domestic industry. Responses to the complaint must be submitted within 20 days from the service date of the complaint and notice of investigation. Failure to respond within the given time may result in a default decision, potentially leading to an exclusion order or cease and desist order against the respondents. The information about the complaint and investigation can be accessed electronically on the USITC’s electronic docket or by contacting their office directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Certain Shrimp Products Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has received a new complaint. The complaint is about certain shrimp and products containing shrimp. It was filed by Versaggi Shrimp Corp. and W&W Dock LLP on October 28, 2026. The complaint alleges that Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 has been violated. This law deals with the unfair importation and sale of products in the United States. The complaint names several respondents. These include Nekkanti Sea Foods Ltd. of India, Eastern Fish Company of Teaneck, NJ, ALDI SÜD Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. oHG of Germany, and others. The complainant wants the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order. They also want cease and desist orders and a bond on respondents’ products during a 60-day review period. The ITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know about any public interest issues related to the complaint. Comments should be about whether the requested actions would affect public health and welfare. The ITC is also interested in how it could impact competitive conditions in the U.S. economy. The ITC wants to know if there are similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the shrimp products. They also want to know if these products can be produced quickly and in large quantities. The deadline for written submissions on the public interest is eight calendar days from the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. These submissions must be filed electronically. For more information, contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. You can also access the public version of the complaint online. This action is taken under the authority of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The ITC continues to uphold its rules of practice and procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Wi-Fi Device Investigation Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) has announced its decision to review a final initial determination (FID) regarding certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi devices, mesh Wi-Fi networks, and related components. This investigation, identified as No. 337-TA-1454, was prompted by a complaint from Estelgia, LLC. Investigation Background The investigation originated from a complaint launched by Estelgia, LLC of Dover, Delaware, on June 23, 2025. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Estelgia claims that certain Wi-Fi products infringe on several U.S. patents, including patents numbered 7,936,714; 11,246,016; 10,735,973; 10,531,518; 9,775,164; and 9,277,591. Respondents in the Investigation Initially, the investigation named seven respondents. These included Linksys Holdings, Inc. and Linksys USA, Inc., ASUStek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International, D-Link Corporation and D-Link Systems, Inc., and Plume Design Inc. The Commission settled with the Linksys Respondents on December 19, 2025. The D-Link Respondents later terminated their involvement on April 27, 2026, through a consent order. Key Findings and Review Points On August 6, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) issued an FID which found violations of section 337 by ASUS and Plume. Following this, various petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined to review the FID partially. The focus of the review includes: The interpretation of claim 13 of the ‘714 patent. Indirect infringement by ASUS of claim 13 of the ‘714 patent. Infringement claims related to the ‘973 patent. Written description and obviousness of the ‘973 patent. The economic aspects of the domestic industry requirement. Commission’s Requests and Extensions The Commission requests further written submissions from involved parties and interested agencies regarding the issues of remedy, public interest, and bonding. The target date for the completion of the investigation has been extended to January 14, 2027. Submission Guidelines The Commission encourages written submissions from parties and third parties on the questions identified. Complainant Estelgia is asked to identify the desired remedies and submit proposed orders. Initial submissions are due by November 12, 2026, with replies due by November 19, 2026. Public Interest and Remedies The Commission is assessing the implications of potential remedies, such as exclusion orders or cease and desist orders, on public health and welfare, competitive conditions, and U.S. consumers. Submissions concerning these public interest factors are encouraged. Conclusion The Commission’s decision will consider the full spectrum of legal and economic factors before deciding on any remedies. Determinations will take into account statutory requirements, party submissions, and public interest considerations. The outcome of this investigation could significantly impact the U.S. market for Wi-Fi devices and technologies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Investigates Shopping Cart Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started investigations into imports of shopping carts and their parts from China. The purpose of these investigations is to see if the US industry is being harmed by these imports. The investigations are part of antidumping and countervailing duty cases. Antidumping is when goods are sold at unfairly low prices. Countervailing duty cases deal with goods supported by foreign government subsidies. The investigation responds to petitions filed by Precision Wire Products, Inc., from California, and Wanzl North America from North Carolina. The investigations cover shopping carts and parts that come into the US under a specific tariff code: subheading 8716.80.50. The USITC must figure out by December 14, 2026, if these imports hurt US companies. If the United States Department of Commerce doesn’t extend the timeline, this is when a preliminary decision is due. A final decision will follow. Participation in these investigations is open to those who file an entry of appearance, including industrial users and possibly consumer groups. The deadline for entering is seven days after the notice’s publication. The Commission’s staff will hold a conference on November 18, 2026, where interested parties can present their views. Written submissions concerning the investigations are due by November 23, 2026. The Commission can only accept electronic filings during this time, through their Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). All information submitted to the Commission must be certified accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. This information may be used for other government purposes including cybersecurity. The investigation is conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930 and is posted pursuant to Section 207.12 of the Commission’s rules. Issued on October 28, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Reviews Twist Ties from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning twist ties imported from China. The purpose of these reviews is to assess if revoking the existing countervailing and antidumping duty orders on twist ties would cause material injury to the U.S. industry within a foreseeable future. The USITC has decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This decision is made under the Tariff Act of 1930, aiming to ensure thorough proceedings. The review process began with a determination by the Commission on June 5, 2026, where it decided that responses warranted full reviews. The full reviews are scheduled according to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Participation in the reviews requires parties to file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission. This includes industrial users and consumer organizations involved with the merchandise. The deadline for filing is 45 days after the publication of this notice. The Commission will be accepting electronic filings only. All filings should be made through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). A hearing related to these reviews is scheduled for March 9, 2027, starting at 9:30 a.m., where parties can make oral presentations. Requests to appear at the hearing should be submitted by March 3, 2027. Witnesses wishing to attend via videoconference, especially due to health reasons like COVID-19, should indicate this in their requests. Parties involved in the review can submit written briefs. The deadline for prehearing briefs is March 1, 2027, with posthearing briefs due by March 22, 2027. Final comments on available information should be submitted by April 20, 2027. These submissions should adhere to the rules mentioned in the Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures. The USITC’s actions are in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, ensuring fair competition and protection against unfair trade practices. Further details, including the procedures and rules applicable to these reviews, are available on the Commission’s website. By order of the Commission, issued on October 28, 2026, and documented by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on DRAM Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On November 2, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a major decision concerning certain dynamic random access memory (DRAM) devices. The announcement came from a notice in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 210. The USITC decided not to review an earlier decision to end an investigation. This investigation involved DRAM devices, their components, and products containing them. The investigation began on July 20, 2026. Netlist, Inc., a company from Irvine, California, had filed a complaint. They claimed there was a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The section concerns unfair practices in import trade, such as patent infringement. Netlist alleged that several companies were infringing on their patents. The allegations involved U.S. Patent Nos. 12,646,537 and 12,650,937. These patents were related to DRAM devices. The companies involved were Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Google LLC, Super Micro Computer, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcom Inc. The investigation aimed to address Netlist’s claims of infringement against these companies. On August 18, 2026, Netlist and Samsung reached a settlement. They then asked to end the investigation for all companies involved. They also sought to keep parts of their settlement agreement confidential. On September 28, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) agreed to end the investigation. The ALJ found that the settlement met the rules of the USITC. It was also determined that the agreement did not negatively impact the public interest. No further reviews of this decision were requested after the judge’s decision. Finally, the USITC confirmed that they would not review the ALJ’s decision on October 28, 2026. This means the investigation is now officially closed. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, made this announcement. The USITC’s authority to decide is based on several sections of the Tariff Act of 1930. For more details, Michael Klancnik at the Office of the General Counsel can be contacted. The full details and documents can be accessed on the USITC website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Expedited Reviews on Utility Scale Wind Towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain Scheduled Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews regarding utility scale wind towers imported from India, Malaysia, and Spain. This decision is based on the Tariff Act of 1930. The purpose is to examine if revoking duty orders could lead to injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission made this determination on October 5, 2026. They noted that the response from the domestic interested party group was adequate, but other responses were inadequate. Therefore, the decision was made not to conduct full reviews. A staff report with information about these reviews will be made available to certain individuals on January 7, 2027. A public version of the report will be issued later. Parties involved in the reviews can file written comments by January 14, 2027. Comments must not include new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review timeline, comments will be due three days after the department issues its results. The Commission wants submissions to follow proper procedures. This includes serving filed documents to all review parties and submitting a certificate of service. The Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the cases. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this notice on October 28, 2026. The reviews are done under the authority of the Tariff Act, with the notice appearing in Section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission to Review Duty Order on Potassium Permanganate from China Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On November 2, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of a review about potassium permanganate from China. The Commission wants to know if stopping special taxes, called antidumping duties, on potassium permanganate from China will hurt American businesses. This discussion is under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC will decide if stopping these duties will lead to problems for the U.S. industry that makes the same product. Antidumping duties mean extra taxes on foreign products priced less than what they are worth. The purpose is to stop unfair competition. People who are interested in this case must reply by December 2, 2026. They must also provide information about the impact of these duties. Comments on whether the review has enough information can be sent by January 12, 2027. The USITC began looking at potassium permanganate from China in 1984 when the Department of Commerce started an antidumping duty order. Over the years, the order has been reviewed and continued several times. Reviews were in 1999, 2005, 2010, 2016, and 2021. The USITC is now doing its sixth review to decide if the order should stay or be revoked. The USITC defines the “Subject Merchandise” as potassium permanganate from China. The “Domestic Like Product” is the same or similar product made in the U.S. The “Domestic Industry” refers to U.S. companies making these products. For any questions or information, people can contact David McDonald at the USITC. Interested companies or persons, like importers, producers, and associations, can participate and have to file an “entry of appearance” within 21 days after this notice. Former Commission employees can join this review even if they were part of previous ones. This review is seen as different from past investigations. For this process, certain confidential business information can be shared under a special order, but applications must be submitted within 21 days after the notice. When giving information, participants need to make sure it is true and complete. All information must be filed electronically at the USITC’s online system, EDIS. Other rules require serving these documents to all involved parties. The USITC notes the paperwork burden is expected to take about 15 hours per response. A valid OMB number must be present on paperwork. Parties unable to provide requested information must explain why and try to provide alternative information. If they don’t, the Commission might assume that the information they need favors the other side. Responses should include information about the U.S. industry, imports, exports, changes since 2020, and opinions on stopping the antidumping duties. Complete details about the firm, their role, and the potential effects of changes on the U.S. industry are needed. The Commission is conducting this review following special rules and plans to make a decision about the antidumping duties. The results affect how potassium permanganate is treated in the U.S. market compared to Chinese imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Review of Mobile Access Equipment Orders from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has started reviews to decide whether to keep or cancel antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain mobile access equipment (MAE) and parts from China. These orders were put in place to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing and subsidies on imports from China. The reviews began on November 2, 2026. The main goal is to see if canceling these orders would lead to serious harm to U.S. businesses. Responding to this notice is important and parties interested must submit their responses by December 2, 2026. If anyone wants to share comments on the adequacy of these responses, they have until January 12, 2027. The ITC has a special online system for viewing the public record of this review. The background of this review involves two significant dates. On December 10, 2021, the Department of Commerce issued a countervailing duty order on MAE imports from China. Later, on April 14, 2022, an antidumping duty order was issued on these imports. The ITC has rules for conducting these reviews. They involve looking at whether the cancellation of these orders would harm the U.S. industry. Different parties, such as U.S. producers, importers, or groups representing these groups, can participate. The review looks at domestic products similar to the imported ones from China. It also examines information about these products’ production and how much they are sold for in the U.S. compared to imported goods. The ITC uses information from businesses and industry groups. This includes production data, capacity to produce, and details about how much they sell in the U.S. market. The ITC also gathers data from U.S. importers and foreign producers from China. They ask for details on imports, like the quantity and value, and data on exports. The review will include significant changes in supply and demand conditions in both U.S. and Chinese markets. These can include technology changes or shifts in demand patterns. The ITC needs all parties involved to be clear and truthful in providing information. They must be sure their responses are complete and accurate to the best of their knowledge. All responses to the ITC should be submitted online due to the current no paper filing policy. If parties cannot provide certain requested information, they should notify the Commission as soon as possible. This review is open to public participation, but there are strict rules on who can submit business proprietary information. If you need further information, contact Richard Whiting from the Office of Investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission. This proceeding is conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930, and the notice is published as per the ITC’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Launches Reviews on Polyester Textured Yarn Imports Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On November 2, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it has started reviews to decide if removing the antidumping duty orders on polyester textured yarn from Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would hurt the US industry. These orders began on December 14, 2021, after the Department of Commerce decided these countries were selling the yarn in the US at unfairly low prices. The Commission’s job now is to check if lifting these duties would cause problems for US producers. Responses needed: The Commission is asking for information from interested parties by December 2, 2026. Comments on whether these reviews are enough can be filed until January 12, 2027. The Commission is looking at whether continuing these duties is still needed. They will follow rules laid out in the Tariff Act of 1930. Rules for submitting information can be found in 19 CFR part 201 and 19 CFR part 207. Interested parties include U.S. yarn producers, foreign producers, and importers. People who want to be involved should file an entry of appearance within 21 days of this notice. The Commission will decide whether a full or quick review is needed based on responses. About polyester textured yarn: It’s a kind of yarn used in making textiles. The Commission will consider the effect of imports on U.S. producers, looking at production, sales, and prices. Parties don’t need to file if they can’t give enough information. But they should explain why and try to provide similar details in another way. The document outlines specific information needed from producers, importers, and exporters, such as production and sales data for 2025. The Commission is also interested in any changes in supply and demand since the duty orders started. They are considering the impact of market changes, alternatives, and competition. All submissions must follow the rules for filing, and current guidelines only accept electronic submissions. The deadline for all information is in December 2026, with further comments due in January 2027. The investigation draws authority from Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC will issue more updates as the review progresses. For further updates or to access the public records, individuals can visit the Commission’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Schedules Expedited Review on Antidumping Duty Order Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of an expedited review. This review is to determine if revoking the antidumping duty order on ironing tables and certain parts from China would cause material harm to the industry. The review began on October 5, 2026. This comes after the domestic parties responded adequately to a prior notice. However, the response from the other parties was inadequate. Therefore, the USITC decided on an expedited review. A staff report was prepared and placed in the nonpublic record. This report will be available to certain people on January 20, 2027. A public version will be available later. Parties involved in the review can send written comments to the Secretary. These comments are due by January 27, 2027. Comments cannot have new facts. Any person not involved in the review may send a brief written statement. The Commission found the response from Seymour Mfg. LLC to be adequate. Other interested parties are not allowed to comment. The review is considered very complex. The Commission decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This decision is according to their authority under U.S. law. For more information, interested persons can visit the Commission’s website. They can also look at the public record for the proceeding online. This review follows rules in the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice about the review was published on October 27, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews on Melamine From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews concerning the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on melamine imports from China. This process is to determine if lifting these duties would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to U.S. industries. The ITC’s decision to conduct expedited reviews comes after assessing responses to a notice issued on June 1, 2026. The Commission found the domestic interested parties’ response to be adequate. However, the response from the respondent interested party group was deemed inadequate. As part of the process, a staff report will be prepared and placed in the nonpublic record. This report will be available to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list by December 23, 2026. A public version of the report will follow. Interested parties who responded adequately to the initial notice can submit written comments about the determination the Commission should reach. These comments must not contain new factual information and are due by December 30, 2026. The ITC has determined that the reviews are extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, it will extend the review period by up to 90 days as allowed under the law. This review process is authorized under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, ensuring fairness and protection for U.S. industries against unfair trade practices. More information about the reviews can be found on the ITC’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Large Diameter Graphite Electrodes from China and India Under Investigation Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is getting ready for a detailed investigation about large diameter graphite electrodes from China and India. These electrodes are used in furnaces and are an important part of making steel. The investigation will check if these electrodes are being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices. On September 30, 2026, it was decided to start the final phase of looking into whether companies in the U.S. are getting hurt because of these imports. This will focus on whether these products from China and India get unfair help from their governments or are sold cheaper than they should be. The electrodes in question are larger than 425 millimeters in diameter and can be either finished or unfinished. This includes parts called graphite pins which are used to join the electrodes. Some products are not included in this probe. This includes large diameter electrodes that are part of a different ongoing case about small diameter electrodes from China. Also not included are certain thermal energy storage (TES) graphite blocks that have specific size and shape requirements. Resonac Graphite America Inc. and Tokai Carbon GE LLC requested this investigation back in February 2026. They asked for help because they believe the U.S. industry might be in danger from these imports. The final step in the investigation will include a public hearing taking place on February 9, 2027. People who want to speak at this hearing need to tell the Commission by February 3, 2027. Companies and other interested parties must send in written information, or briefs, by certain deadlines. These documents usually include arguments and evidence about their stance on the issue. By March 8, 2027, new information will be shared with all interested parties. Final comments on this information are due by March 10, 2027. These steps are part of the USITC’s process to ensure fair competition in the market. The results of this investigation will determine if future actions are necessary to protect U.S. industries. The investigation is guided by rules set out in the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC aims to ensure that all traded items are done so fairly. This maintains a level playing field for all producers involved. For more details, visit the USITC’s official websites or contact the commission offices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Investigates Imports of Steel Pipes from Georgia and India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started new investigations. They are looking into imports of seamless carbon and alloy steel pipes from Georgia and India. These pipes could be sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. The investigations will also check if the Government of India is unfairly helping its producers with subsidies. These investigations are important to see if U.S. businesses are getting hurt by these imports. The investigations started because of a petition. This petition was filed on October 15, 2026, by Vallourec Star, LP and Tenaris USA, both located in Houston, Texas. It was also supported by the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Commission needs to make its first decision by November 30, 2026. After that, their opinions must be sent to the Department of Commerce by December 7, 2026. People who want to be involved in the investigation must send their entries within seven days after the notice is published. There is a public service list which will include all people involved in the investigations. A meeting is scheduled for November 5, 2026. People must ask to join by November 3, 2026. This meeting will help gather more information about the investigations. Anyone can also send written information by November 10, 2026. This information should relate to the investigation and be sent through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). All documents must meet the rules set by the Commission. They also must be shared with all other parties in the investigation. This ensures everyone has the same information. These steps will help determine if the U.S. needs to take action to protect its businesses. The process is guided by the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission is serious about accuracy and transparency in its procedures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Trade Commission Amends Semiconductor Investigation Date: 2026-10-16 Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has made a key decision. This decision is about an important investigation. The investigation involves semiconductor devices and related products. These products are often used in electronics. The Commission decided not to review a ruling. A judge made this ruling earlier. It allowed changes to a complaint made by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. This company is located in Malta, New York. GlobalFoundries asked to amend their complaint. They wanted to add more claims connected to a U.S. patent. The patent number is 8,507,983. The new claims they want to add are numbers 8 to 12 and 19. The complaint is about certain products coming into the U.S. The complaint says these products infringe on several patents. These patents cover semiconductor technology. The investigation began on April 30, 2026. It is based on complaints filed section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This U.S. law helps stop unfair trade practices. The complaint names eight companies as respondents. These companies are from different places. Some are in the U.S., and others are in Israel and Japan. The judge said there was good reason to change the complaint. GlobalFoundries found new information. They did not know this information at the start of the case. The judge also said this change will not harm the public or the other parties. No one disagreed with the judge’s ruling. The final decision was made on October 13, 2026. The Commission’s decision means the case will now include the new claims. This decision follows the rules in the Tariff Act of 1930. It is also in line with the Commission’s procedures. Secretary Lisa Barton signed the order on October 13, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Investigation Launched on Chemical Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes In a significant development, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the commencement of the final phase of investigations into imports of a chemical from China. This investigation focuses on n-cyclohexylbenzothiazole-2-sulfenamide (CBS), a substance used in industry. The investigation, cataloged as Nos. 701-TA-797 and 731-TA-1793, seeks to determine if the imports from China harm industries in the U.S. The investigation will also examine if the imports threaten new industries from starting in the U.S. The chemical is thought to be sold for less than its fair value, which can hurt U.S. businesses. CBS is a powder or granule and may also be found mixed with other substances. It is commonly used in various industrial procedures. This investigation is significant as it assesses whether certain benefits that could harm U.S. industries are being granted to producers of CBS in China. Those who want more information can contact Jack Brower at the USITC. The public can find updates through the USITC’s internet server. Individuals and companies interested in participating in the investigation must register by a specific date. The Commission, during this time, will only accept filing through electronic means. The public hearing related to this investigation will be held on January 14, 2027, at the Commission’s headquarters. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed by January 8, 2027. Written submissions and comments must follow certain rules and deadlines. The USITC will provide information before the hearing through written reports. Further information on hearings and investigations can be accessed through the Commission’s website. The outcome of this investigation could significantly impact trade relations and industry practices related to CBS imports. By order of the Commission, Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, has confirmed all procedures and requirements related to the investigation and hearing process. Details on the procedures are accessible through the Commission’s handbook. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States Begins Final Phase of Fatty Acids Trade Investigation Estimated reading time: 2-4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations into imports of fatty acids from Indonesia and Malaysia. The investigations, identified as Nos. 701-TA-785-786 and 731-TA-1773-1774, aim to determine if these imports harm the U.S. industry. The USITC is focusing on whether these fatty acids are sold in the United States at unfair prices. The U.S. Department of Commerce has found preliminary evidence that the imports are subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. The fatty acids in question include those listed under specific Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States codes. The investigations started with petitions from Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. in Deerfield, Illinois, submitted on January 28, 2026. The petitions claim that the imports from Indonesia and Malaysia are threatening U.S. industry. The USITC invites interested parties to participate in the investigation. Those wishing to join must file an entry of appearance at least 21 days before the hearing date. A hearing will be held on February 4, 2027, at 9:30 a.m. Parties must file requests to appear by January 28, 2027. Prehearing briefs are due by January 28, 2027, and posthearing briefs by February 11, 2027. Parties may submit final comments by March 2, 2027. The prehearing staff report will be available on January 21, 2027. The Commission emphasizes electronic filings through its Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). This investigation follows the rules outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. For further details, contact Stamen Borisson at the USITC or visit their website. The investigations will help determine the impact of imported fatty acids on the U.S. industry and ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Tariffs on Aluminum Sheet Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing tariffs on aluminum sheets. This review is part of a normal process that occurs every five years. The review will decide if removing tariffs on aluminum sheets from several countries would hurt U.S. businesses. These countries include Bahrain, Brazil, and India, among others. The reviews will follow rules set out in the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC has decided to take up to 90 more days than usual to complete the reviews. The aluminum sheets in question are crucial materials. They are used in lots of things, from cans to cars. The review will check if lifting tariffs could hurt American manufacturers of these items. Official documents and notices about the review are available online. Interested parties can also participate by submitting relevant information to the USITC. The review includes both a hearing and the submission of written statements. The hearing will be on March 18, 2027. People wishing to speak at this hearing must apply by March 10, 2027. Written briefs from interested parties are due before the hearing. The deadline to file these briefs is March 9, 2027. These documents will help the USITC decide what to do. The USITC will provide a staff report by March 1, 2027. This report will have detailed information for review. The USITC will make additional information available on April 22, 2027. Final comments on this new information must be submitted by April 26, 2027. This review is important as it affects numerous industries and workers. The USITC aims to make the best decision to benefit the U.S. economy. All processes and decisions in this review will follow official rules and procedures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Washington, D.C. – On October 8, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a complaint from Cytek Biosciences, Inc. The complaint is about certain spectral flow cytometry systems and their parts. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The alleged violations are related to the importation and sale of these systems in the United States. The respondents named in the complaint are Beckman Coulter, Inc., based in Brea, California, and Beckman Coulter Biotechnology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., based in China. Cytek Biosciences requests the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. These orders would stop the importation and sale of the infringing products. The USITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know about any public interest issues caused by this complaint. Public comments are welcome on several topics. One, how these products are used in the United States. Two, concerns about public health, safety, or welfare. Three, if there are similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the imported ones. Four, whether Cytek or others can make enough products to replace the imported ones. Five, how U.S. consumers might be affected. The public can submit comments until eight days after this notice is published. Comments should follow the guidelines and be submitted electronically. Written submissions must refer to Docket No. 3943. They should not be longer than five pages. People can file replies to other submissions by the third day after initial submissions are due. For help with electronic filing, people can contact the Secretary to the Commission through the contact details provided. Confidential treatment of documents can be requested if the information is sensitive. All non-confidential documents will be public. This process is in line with section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. Issued: October 8, 2026 By Order of the Commission: Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Certain Vertical Power Delivery Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes WASHINGTON D.C., October 14, 2026 – The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of an investigation concerning certain vertical power delivery systems and their related components. The investigation also includes computing systems that use these components. The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1526, comes after a complaint filed on September 9, 2026, by Vicor Corporation. Vicor is based in Andover, Massachusetts. They allege that certain imported products violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. They believe these products infringe on specific claims of the U.S. Patent No. 10,903,734. The products at the heart of this case are used in data centers and artificial intelligence systems. They help power AI accelerators, tensor processing units, graphical processing units, and central processing units. The USITC wants to determine if an industry within the United States is affected by this alleged infringement. The Commission will consider several key claims of the ‘734 patent. Vicor Corporation is requesting that the Commission issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders if a violation is confirmed. The investigation will look at whether companies such as Delta Electronics, Infineon Technologies, Luxshare Precision Industry, Monolithic Power Systems, Flex Ltd., Celestica Inc., Quanta Computer, Hon Hai Precision Industry (Foxconn), and others are involved. These companies are accused of importing or selling the infringing products in the United States. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will appoint the presiding Administrative Law Judge for the case. The Commission aims to develop a complete record concerning the domestic industry involved. The accused companies must respond to the complaint and notice within 20 days. Failure to do so might lead to a default judgment against them. The Commission may then issue exclusion or cease and desist orders without further notice. The investigation aims to protect domestic industries and ensure that U.S. patents are upheld. For further details, interested persons can view the complaint on the Commission’s electronic docket. Assistance is available for anyone needing help accessing these documents. The USITC continues to support fair trade practices and protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to patent violations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Schedules Full Five-Year Reviews on Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews on countervailing duty orders for phosphate fertilizers from Morocco and Russia. This review is under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing these duties would cause harm to U.S. industry. These reviews follow a decision made on June 5, 2026, which called for full investigations. The USITC will extend the review period by up to 90 days, making the process very thorough. The aim is to see if lifting the duties could affect the market negatively in a foreseeable time. People interested in joining the reviews need to file an entry of appearance with the Commission’s Secretary. The deadline to do so is 45 days from this notice’s publication. The Secretary will keep a list of all participants. The USITC will hold a public hearing on April 1, 2027. Anyone wishing to appear should register by March 25, 2027. Those who cannot attend in person due to illness or COVID-19 must provide a reason for video appearance requests. Parties involved can submit prehearing briefs by March 24, 2027. They can also file posthearing briefs by April 8, 2027. Additional comments must be submitted by April 29, 2027. Submissions must follow specific rules and contain no new information if classified as final comments. All documents must be served to other parties on the service list and need a certificate of service. These reviews are considered extremely complex. The USITC is making efforts to ensure detailed analysis by extending the time frame. For more details, interested parties can contact Stamen Borisson of the Office of Investigations at the USITC. They can also visit the Commission’s website where public records are available for review. The Secretary’s office is only accepting electronic filings at this time through their Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). This notice serves as an official order by the Commission, issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Terminates DRAM Device Investigation Following Settlement Estimated reading time: 6–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided not to review an initial determination regarding an investigation into certain dynamic random access memory (DRAM) devices. The investigation, known as Investigation No. 337-TA-1472, has now been terminated. This investigation began on January 2, 2026. It was based on a complaint from Netlist, Inc., a company located in Irvine, California. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section deals with unfair practices in import trade, including patent infringement. The alleged violations involved the importation and sale of DRAM devices and related products that infringed on specific U.S. patents. The investigation named several respondents. These included Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. It also named Google LLC and Super Micro Computer, Inc. as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also involved. On August 24, 2026, the investigation was partially terminated concerning some patent claims due to the withdrawal of complaint allegations. Later, on August 18, 2026, Netlist and Samsung filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation completely. They based their motion on a settlement agreement. This agreement resolved the dispute between them and also addressed issues with other respondents receiving products from Samsung. The administrative law judge issued an initial determination granting this motion to terminate the investigation. The judge considered the public interest and found that it favored settlement to conserve resources. The Commission did not receive any petitions against this determination. The USITC’s final decision, made on October 6, 2026, officially terminates the investigation. This decision helps avoid unnecessary litigation and related expenses. The authority for this determination comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related Commission rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Case Vacated Due to Patent Expiration Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has vacated its final decision in the investigation of certain hydrodermabrasion systems. This decision comes after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the investigation moot because the patent expired. The investigation started on July 17, 2024, after a complaint from HydraFacial LLC. The company claimed that Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC and Eunsung Global Corp were violating patent laws. These companies were importing and selling hydrodermabrasion systems that allegedly infringed on HydraFacial’s patent, known as the ‘287 patent. The ITC ended the investigation for Eunsung on January 21, 2025, because of a consent order. Later, on March 23, 2026, the ITC found Cartessa guilty of violating the patent laws. However, any enforcement was paused because the ‘287 patent expired on March 29, 2026, during a review period. Cartessa appealed the decision, stating the case was moot due to the patent expiration. The Federal Circuit agreed. On July 23, 2026, the court vacated ITC’s final decision and ordered the investigation dismissed. The ITC confirmed the termination of the investigation, stating the case was moot because of the patent expiration. The final decision by the ITC was vacated following the Federal Circuit’s order. The vote to terminate the investigation took place on October 3, 2026. This case was conducted under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The situation shows how a patent expiration can cause an ongoing legal case to become irrelevant. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation on Mobile Electronic Devices Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Complaint Details The complaint was filed on September 3, 2026. The organizations involved are trinamiX Sensing LLC from Austin, Texas, and trinamiX GmbH from Germany. A supplement to this complaint was submitted on September 17, 2026. The complaint alleges that certain mobile electronic devices infringe on various U.S. Patents. These patents include Patent numbers 12,530,925; 12,288,421; 12,456,334; 12,361,760; 12,298,394; and 12,332,352. Allegations and Requests The complaint argues that these devices were imported into the United States and sold for importation. It also claims sales were made within the U.S. after importation. The reason stated is the infringement of the mentioned patents. The complainants request that the ITC start an investigation. They also seek limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders. Scope of Investigation The ITC ordered an investigation on October 5, 2026. The Commission will look into whether there are any violations of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337. This section is part of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation will focus on specific mobile products. These products include iPhones and iPads and their components. Notable components are the processor, TrueDepth camera, and Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser (VCSEL). These components offer face authentication, 3D-sensing, and other capabilities. Involved Parties The complainants are trinamiX Sensing LLC and trinamiX GmbH. The respondent named in the complaint is Apple Inc., which is located at One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, CA. Next Steps The Chief Administrative Law Judge at the ITC will designate a presiding judge for the investigation. The ITC will not involve the Office of Unfair Import Investigations as a party in this case. The Commission is keen on developing a thorough record on this issue. This will help review all relevant considerations about the domestic industry. The presiding judge may need additional information to determine domestic industry allegations. Response Requirement Apple Inc., as the named respondent, must respond to the complaint and notice of investigation. These responses should comply with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, specifically section 210.13. Responses are necessary within 20 days from the date the Commission serves the complaint. Extensions for responses will generally not be granted without good cause. Failure to respond might result in a waiver of the right to contest, which could lead to the issuance of exclusion or cease and desist orders. By the Commission’s order, issued on October 6, 2026, under the signature of Secretary Lisa Barton. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Announces Review of Steel Pipe Duties Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a review of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain steel pipes. This review is about seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipes. These pipes come from Czechia, Russia, South Korea, and Ukraine. The review will examine if removing these duty orders will cause harm to the U.S. steel industry. The USITC will check if revoking the orders will likely lead to injury again. On June 5, 2026, the Commission decided a full review was needed. This decision was made because of responses to an earlier notice. The Commission can extend this review by up to 90 days. People interested in this review have 45 days from the notice date to participate. They can file a notice to join the review process. These people can be industrial users of the pipes or consumer organizations. The USITC will only accept electronic filings for now. All filings must be submitted through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The review process involves sharing information. Business proprietary information (BPI) will be available under certain rules. Those interested must apply within 45 days to access this information. A prehearing staff report will be released on February 18, 2027. A hearing is scheduled for March 11, 2027. It will start at 9:30 a.m. at the Commission. Interested parties can submit written thoughts. They can send prehearing briefs by March 1, 2027. Posthearing briefs are due by March 23, 2027. The final comments should be sent by April 16, 2027. The Commission will extend this review by 90 days for thorough evaluation. These actions are under the Tariff Act of 1930. For more information, contact Laurel Schwartz at the USITC. The Commission’s internet server and electronic docket are also available for further details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Updates Investigation on Electric Aircraft Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced an update regarding a patent investigation involving Archer Aviation Inc. The Commission decided not to review an administrative law judge’s decision to change the notice of the investigation’s start to fix a mistake. Archer Aviation Inc. is located in San Jose, California. The company is involved in an investigation that started on April 14, 2026. This investigation focuses on certain electric aircraft and their parts. The investigation looks into whether these items are imported, sold to be imported, or sold in the U.S. after being imported. The investigation wants to see if these actions break certain U.S. patent laws. The patents in question include U.S. Patent No. 11,945,594, U.S. Patent No. 12,162,614, U.S. Patent No. 8,469,306, U.S. Patent No. 12,103,404, and U.S. Patent No. 12,473,087. There was a mistake in the initial notice about one of the patents. The patent number was reported as U.S. Patent No. 12,472,087. However, the correct number is U.S. Patent No. 12,473,087. The respondents, Joby Aero, Inc. and Joby Aviation, Inc. from Santa Cruz, California, are part of this investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a participant. On September 4, 2026, Archer Aviation Inc. asked to change the notice to correct the mistake. The judge agreed to this on September 8, 2026. No one asked for a review of this decision. The Commission’s decision took place on October 6, 2026. The ITC’s decision is based on the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. This correction ensures the investigation into the alleged patent infringement continues accurately. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigations into Amine Compounds from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of investigations regarding certain amine compounds imported from China. These investigations, labeled Nos. 701-TA-808 and 731-TA-1809, will determine if the U.S. market is harmed by these imports. The investigations were commenced as of September 29, 2026. The USITC will investigate if these amine compounds are sold in the U.S. for less than their fair value, and if they are subsidized by the Chinese government. If confirmed, this could mean unfair trade practices are being employed by China regarding these chemicals. The affected chemicals fall under the following statistical reporting numbers in the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule: 2909.11.00.00, 2921.29.00.55, 2922.19.96.90, and 2934.99.90.01. Evonik Corporation from New Jersey and Huntsman International LLC from Texas filed the petition prompting these investigations. These companies represent sectors in the U.S. that might be impacted by these imports. The Commission must provide a preliminary decision by November 13, 2026. This timeline depends on whether the Department of Commerce extends the initiation period for these investigations. A conference will be held on October 20, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. The USITC’s Office of Investigations will conduct this conference. It is a part of the preliminary phase, where evidence and discussions will inform the Commission’s decision-making. The public can participate in these investigations by entering an appearance with the USITC. Interested parties have seven days from the notice’s publication to declare their involvement. There will be a public service list of all participating parties. Special allowances are made for business proprietary information, available to authorized applicants under an administrative protective order. Written submissions regarding these investigations can be filed by any person by October 23, 2026. These must follow USITC’s rules and are essential for thorough examination. By initiating these investigations, the USITC is ensuring that all trading practices affecting U.S. industries are fair and just. The outcome of these investigations will influence future trade and economic policies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Railway Tank Cars from Mexico for Unfair Pricing Practices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started investigations into railway tank cars and parts that come from Mexico. This is in response to claims that these items might be sold for less than fair prices in the United States. The investigations are also looking into whether the government of Mexico is providing unfair help to its exporters, which is called subsidizing. The investigation numbers are 701-TA-809 and 731-TA-1810. They will help decide if American businesses are being harmed by these imports. This might happen if they lose money or if making these goods becomes more difficult in the United States because of lower priced products from other countries. These investigations began after a request from a company called UTLX Manufacturing LLC, located in Chicago, Illinois. They want to find out if the Mexican railway tank cars are priced unfairly and if Mexican businesses get financial help from their government. The investigations started on September 30, 2026. They must be completed within 45 days. This means they need to have a preliminary answer by November 16, 2026. After that, the Commission will share their findings with the Department of Commerce by November 23, 2026. If you want more information, you can contact Celia Feldpausch or Jeff Clark at the USITC. They are in the Office of Investigations. Also, anyone interested in joining these investigations can contact the USITC within seven days after this notice was published. People or groups that use these tank cars can also join the investigation process. A list of all the people participating will be made available to the public once the deadline to join has passed. The USITC will hold a meeting to discuss these issues on October 21, 2026. If you want to be part of the meeting, you should let them know by October 19, 2026. People who have important information but are not part of the investigation may also ask to participate. All information related to these investigations must be submitted electronically. No paper submissions are being accepted at this time. Anyone who wants to share their thoughts in writing can do so until October 26, 2026. If you have important or confidential information, you should follow specific rules to ensure your documents are filed correctly. When giving information, you must also confirm that everything is accurate and complete. This helps ensure the investigations are fair. In conclusion, these investigations aim to make sure that trade between the United States and Mexico is fair and just. This notice is an important step in protecting industries in the United States. The USITC will continue to oversee these proceedings to ensure a fair outcome. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Extrusion-Coated Magnet Wire Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. This complaint is about Certain Extrusion-Coated Magnet Wire. It is numbered as Docket No. 3940. The complaint was filed by Essex Solutions Inc. and Essex Solutions USA LLC on September 29, 2026. The complaint claims there is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This is related to magnet wire being imported into the U.S. The complaint also mentions the sale for importation and sales within the U.S. after importation. The companies named as respondents are Wellascent Electronic (Ganzhou) Co., Ltd. from China and Wellascent Technologies USA LLC from Grand Prairie, TX. The complaint asks for a limited exclusion order. It also requests cease and desist orders. Furthermore, they want a bond imposed on the respondents’ products during a 60-day review period. Public Comments Welcome The Commission invites comments from the public. Comments should focus on public interest issues from the complaint. These can be about public health, competitive conditions in the U.S., and how the orders impact U.S. consumers. Specifically, the Commission is interested in these points: How are the articles used in the U.S.? Are there any public health or safety concerns? Which U.S. products can replace these articles if excluded? Can U.S. suppliers replace the volume of excluded articles in a reasonable time? How would the orders impact U.S. consumers? Deadlines for Comment Comments must be filed by close of business, eight calendar days after this notice is published. There will be more chances for comments after any initial decision in this case. Replies to written comments are due three days after the submission deadline. Submissions must be filed electronically and should refer to Docket No. 3940. For help, contact the Secretary at the USITC at [email protected]. This action falls under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is also under the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). For more details, visit the USITC website at www.usitc.gov or access the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at edis.usitc.gov. Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on September 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews for Chassis and Subassemblies from China Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. These reviews are to determine if lifting the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on chassis and subassemblies from China would cause harm to the U.S. industry. The reviews are under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC uses these reviews to decide if removing duties would lead to problems for U.S. companies making similar products. The Commission decided on July 6, 2026, that the domestic group’s response was enough. However, the response from the Chinese side was not enough. They saw no reason to conduct full reviews and will proceed with expedited reviews. The staff report with all relevant information is put in the nonpublic record. Those under the Administrative Protective Order can access this report from October 5, 2026. Later, a public version will be provided. Interested parties that responded to the review notice or are part of the process can send written comments. The deadline for comments is October 13, 2026. These comments are important for the Commission’s final decision. Commerce might extend its time to complete reviews. If that happens, comments on Commerce’s final results are due three business days post-results. Comments should not include new factual information. These reviews are declared extraordinarily complicated. Thus, the Commission has decided to potentially extend the review period by 90 days. Comments should follow all rules. This includes serving documents to all parties involved and filing a certificate of service. This entire process is under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice about the reviews was published on September 29, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Finds Rule Violation in Investigation on Storage Containers and Toolboxes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 2, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a decision regarding an ongoing investigation concerning storage containers, toolboxes, organizers, component boxes, and coolers. The investigation, identified as No. 337-TA-1409, resulted in findings of violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission determined that there were violations involving two U.S. patents: Patent No. 11,365,026 (known as the ‘026 patent’) and Patent No. 11,794,952 (referred to as the ‘952 patent’). As a remedy, the Commission issued a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) and a Cease and Desist Order (CDO). These orders relate to the infringement activity covered by these patents. Additionally, a bond has been set at eighteen percent (18%) of the entered value for covered articles that are imported or sold during the period of Presidential review. However, the Commission has yet to make a final determination on Patent No. 11,952,167 (referred to as the ‘167 patent’). The investigation started on July 19, 2024, triggered by a complaint from Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation of Wisconsin and Keter Home and Garden Products Ltd. of Israel (collectively known as “Complainants”). They alleged that Klein Tools, Inc. of Illinois infringed on several patent claims by importing and selling products without permission. Throughout the investigation, some claims were withdrawn by the complainants. However, several claims from the ‘026, ‘952, and ‘167 patents remained active. On August 1, 2025, the Chief Administrative Law Judge issued a Final Initial Determination, indicating a violation of Section 337 regarding these claims. Klein Tools, Inc. questioned the findings, particularly regarding the economic and technical domestic industry requirements and some aspects of patent validity. After reviewing claims and arguments, the Commission concluded a violation occurred concerning the ‘026 and ‘952 patents. Remedial orders, including an LEO and CDO, will limit the importation and sale of infringing products by Klein. The ITC found that public interest factors do not prevent issuing these orders. An 18% bond will be applied on covered products during the review period by the President. The investigation related to the ‘167 patent remains unresolved and will continue. The target date for completing the investigation is extended to November 2, 2026. The decision was finalized on September 29, 2026, revealing detailed findings and decisions related to this complex case. The complete authority for this determination comes from Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and related rules, ensuring the maintenance of fair trade practices and patent protection. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint on DRAM Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint on DRAM Devices The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. This complaint is about certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices. Products containing these and their components are also included. Soliciting Public Comments The Commission is asking for comments from the public. These comments should relate to any public interest issues. The comments should focus on the complaint or the complainant’s filing. This request is according to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Details of the Complaint The complaint is filed by Netlist, Inc. It was received on September 28, 2026. The complaint is about violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. These violations involve the importation of certain DRAM devices into the United States. It also includes the sale for importation and sale within the U.S. after importation. Named Respondents The complaint names several respondents. These include Micron Technology, Inc. of Boise, ID. Others are Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. of Boise, ID, NVIDIA Corp. of Santa Clara, CA, Broadcom Inc. of Palo Alto, CA, and Google LLC of Mountain View, CA. Requested Actions Netlist, Inc. is asking for several actions from the Commission. They request a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also want a bond imposed on the respondents’ infringing articles during a 60-day Presidential review period. Public Comments Invited The Commission invites public comments on issues raised by the complaint. They want to know if the requested actions will affect public health and welfare in the U.S. Also, they want to see the impact on competitive conditions and U.S. consumers. Specific Areas of Interest The Commission is interested in comments about five specific areas: How the articles in question are used in the U.S. Public health, safety, or welfare concerns related to the articles. Identification of similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the imported articles. The ability to replace the volume of articles if excluded or ceased. The impact on U.S. consumers. Submission Details Written submissions are due eight calendar days after the notice’s publication. Replies to any written submissions are due three days after the due date for submissions. All submissions must be electronic and refer to Docket No. 3939. This process is under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This action was ordered by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. It is officially recorded as Federal Register Doc. 2026-20081. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Begins Review of Thermal Paper Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the start of a series of five-year reviews. These reviews are to decide if ending the antidumping duty orders on thermal paper from Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Spain would cause harm to U.S. companies. Background Antidumping duty orders were first issued on November 22, 2021. These orders were made to protect U.S. producers from unfair competition by foreign companies selling thermal paper at lower prices. The ITC wants to check if removing these duties might harm U.S. industries. Dates to Remember The reviews began on October 1, 2026. All responses from interested parties must be submitted by November 2, 2026. Comments about the responses’ adequacy are due by December 8, 2026. Participation Information Interested parties, including U.S. thermal paper producers and importers, must notify the Commission if they want to take part. They should submit an entry of appearance within 21 days of the notice’s publication. Filing Information Submissions must follow certain rules. Interested parties need to provide certifications that their information is accurate. No paper-based filings will be accepted; all must be submitted electronically. Review Focus The reviews will look at U.S. producers and importers of thermal paper. They will examine the impact of foreign thermal paper on U.S. markets. Information about production, imports, and industry changes since 2021 will be collected. Industry Participation Producers, importers, and trade associations are invited to provide data. They should share details on production, sales, and import activities. The goal is to understand the potential effects on U.S. industries. Public Service List The Secretary will maintain a list of participants in the proceeding. Business Proprietary Information Limited disclosure of certain business information is allowed under a protective order. Certification and Inability to Provide Information Participants must certify the accuracy of their submissions. If they cannot provide certain information, they should explain why and offer alternatives. Authority The reviews are conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The results will help decide if the duties should remain to protect U.S. interests. This process is vital to ensure that U.S. industries remain competitive and are not negatively impacted by foreign trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Begins Review of Antidumping Duties on Tissue Paper from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has started a review concerning tissue paper products from China. The goal is to determine if revoking the antidumping duty order would lead to the continuation or recurrence of harm to U.S. producers. An antidumping duty order was put in place on March 30, 2005, by the Commerce Department. This order imposes extra import tariffs on tissue paper from China. In past years, through multiple reviews, these duties continued. Now, the ITC is doing a fourth review to check if the order should be canceled or remain. Review Started: October 1, 2026 Response Deadline: November 2, 2026 Comments on Adequacy Deadline: December 8, 2026 Interested parties are asked to send information to the Commission by these dates. Participation as a party in the proceeding requires filing an entry of appearance within 21 days after the notice is published. The ITC is also calling for former Commission employees to participate. They can join the review even if they took part in an earlier investigation or review process. For those wanting access to business information under an administrative protective order, applications must be done within 21 days after publication. Respondents are asked to submit information about their firm’s operations, including production and sales figures. This includes U.S. producers, importers, and foreign producers or exporters of the tissue paper. The ITC is focusing on: The volume of imports The price effects of imports The overall impact on U.S. producers Representatives or firms should use the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System for all filings. Paper filings will not be accepted currently. The review will help determine the future of the antidumping duty order on tissue paper from China. This proceeding is regulated under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, with findings published as ordered by the ITC. For more information, access details on the Commission’s web server or the electronic docket. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Alloy Magnesium Order Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of a review on October 1, 2026. This review will decide if revoking the antidumping duty order on alloy magnesium from China would cause harm to the U.S. industry. The antidumping duty order has been in place since April 15, 2005. The Department of Commerce has reviewed and continued this order three times before. Now, the Commission is conducting a fourth review. Interested parties need to send their responses by November 2, 2026. Comments about whether the review should be full or expedited must be sent by December 8, 2026. This review will focus on the possibility of harm to U.S. producers. The Commission defines U.S. producers as the Domestic Industry. The review will look at how revoking the order would affect the volume, price, and impact of imports. Participants must provide specific information about their firms. This includes details about production capacity and U.S. shipments. They should also list purchasers and sources of price data. People or groups who want to participate must file an entry of appearance within 21 days of the notice’s publication. The Secretary will keep a list of those involved. Limited business proprietary information will be shared with authorized parties. These parties must apply for access within 21 days. All submissions must be electronic, using the Commission’s filing system. No paper copies will be accepted. The Office of Management and Budget requires parties to submit information accurately. The estimated time to complete the response is 15 hours. If parties cannot provide information, they must explain why and offer alternative ways to provide it. Otherwise, the Commission may assume their information is missing. For more information, contact Julie Duffy at the Office of Investigations by calling 202-708-2579. Hearing-impaired persons can use the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. General details can be accessed on the Commission’s website, www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.