International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-06-15
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
1. Commodity Matchbooks From India; Determinations
Sub: International Trade Commission
2. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells Whether or Not Partially or Fully Assembled Into Other Products: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Import Relief; Cancellation of Hearing for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Import Relief
Sub: International Trade Commission
3. Certain NAND and DRAM Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 11, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of MonolithIC 3D Inc. of Allen, Texas. Supplements to the complaint were filed on May 28, 2026 and June 1, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain NAND and DRAM memory chips and products containing the same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,250,830 (“the ‘830 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 12,362,330 (“the ‘330 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 12,400,961 (“the ‘961 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 12,464,734 (“the ‘734 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 12,564,006 (“the ‘006 patent”). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
4. Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Tesla, Inc.’s Motion To Intervene
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 10) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting a motion to intervene filed by non-party Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”).
Legal Disclaimer
This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
