Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced that it is stopping the review of the antidumping duty on aluminum wire and cable coming from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant for the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. What is an Antidumping Duty? An antidumping duty is a special tax the U.S. puts on products from other countries. It helps to make sure local companies can compete fairly. If a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. for less than it costs at home, it is called “dumping.” This can hurt U.S. businesses. Why Did Commerce Rescind the Review? The Department of Commerce began the review because Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (Tanghenam) asked for it. They are a company in China that makes aluminum wire and cable. The review found that there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam during the review period. Process and Timeline The review was initiated on January 27, 2025, based on a request from Tanghenam. On September 9, 2025, a memo was released to show that there were no entries of the product during the time of review. Commerce then planned to cancel the review on December 11, 2025, due to this lack of entries. There were some delays because of the government shutdown and other issues, which made deadlines longer. Deadlines were extended by 47 days due to a government shutdown and another 21 days because of technical issues. Commerce extended the deadline for preliminary results by another 110 days on February 9, 2026. The final decision was set for May 28, 2026. Rescission Decision Commerce uses a special rule that lets them stop a review if there are no entries of the product during the review time. Since there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam, Commerce decided to stop the review. Next Steps Since the review is canceled, the cash deposit rates for antidumping duties will stay the same as before. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be told not to change how they assess duties on these products. Important Notifications The notice also reminds everyone involved that they have to return or destroy any private or protected information they used for this review. They have to send a written note to confirm this. Not doing so could lead to penalties. This decision and the reasons for it are available publicly, and the Commerce Department welcomes interested parties to review the related materials for in-depth understanding. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its decision to rescind the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on aluminum wire and cable imported from the People’s Republic of China. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Department of Commerce, specifically the International Trade Administration, was responsible for this decision. They determined there were no reviewable entries of aluminum wire and cable from China during this time. Originally, a request for an administrative review was made for Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. This request led to the initiation of the review process in January 2025. However, the Department found that there were no shipments or entries to review. This conclusion came after analyzing data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision means that there will be no change in current cash deposit requirements. The cash deposit rate will remain as it is, based on previously set rates. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess duties on any entries deemed appropriate. This assessment will not occur until a minimum of 35 days after the rescission notice is published. This rescission is aligned with Commerce’s regulations, ensuring that only merchandise with suspended entries are reviewed. This decision will be followed by no changes to cash deposits for future entries. This announcement serves as a reminder to parties involved in the process about their ongoing obligations under Administrative Protective Orders. Parties must return or destroy any proprietary information obtained in this review process. The rescission aligns with section 751 of relevant U.S. law, ensuring compliance with legal and procedural guidelines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping in Review of Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final decision regarding the sale of chlorinated isocyanurates, also known as chlorinated isos, from Spain. The decision covers the period from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The finding is that these products were not sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value during this time. Chlorinated isos are chemicals that come from another substance called cyanuric acid. The company from Spain involved in this review was Ercros S.A. The Department of Commerce found that Ercros did not sell its products at unfairly low prices. As a result, the company was given a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent. This means there is no penalty or additional duty due to dumping. The Department of Commerce reviews cases like this one according to rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. This process ensures that products from other countries are not being sold at unfairly low prices that can harm U.S. companies. The decision to not change the preliminary results comes after asking for comments, but receiving none. Thus, there was no need for a separate decision document. For products entering the U.S. from Spain now, the cash deposit rate for Ercros will be 0 percent because of the zero dumping margin. The Department of Commerce has specific rules about handling these cases. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will handle all entries on or after the announcement date according to these rules. For any previous cases without an assigned rate, the all-others rate will be 24.83 percent. This rate will stay until further announcements. The Department reminds all parties involved about the correct procedure for returning or destroying any proprietary information. They emphasize the importance of following these guidelines to avoid penalties. This decision was issued by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He was also performing duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. This announcement was made on June 1, 2026, and published in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Corrosion Inhibitors from China by the U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. This announcement, made on June 4, 2026, indicates that Chinese producers/exporters sold these inhibitors in the U.S. at less than their normal value. Background Information The review, which spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025, follows a decision to investigate 10 Chinese companies. The main focus was on two key companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. These companies were picked as the mandatory respondents for this review. Methodology Used To determine the sale prices, the Department of Commerce used specific methods outlined in the U.S. trade laws. Because China is considered a non-market economy, the normal value of these products was evaluated differently, using section 773(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Findings of the Review The preliminary findings showed that Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. had dumping margins of 61.51% and 86.96%, respectively. Other companies involved in this review, Gold Chemical Limited and Kanghua Chemical Co., Ltd., were assigned a dumping margin of 73.75%. Separate Rates Determination The investigation also identified several companies eligible for a separate rate, distinct from those under the general Chinese entity rate. This includes the two main companies investigated and two other companies that were not individually examined but still eligible for a separate status. China-Wide Entity Six companies reviewed failed to claim separate status and are thus part of the China-wide entity. Consequently, these companies are subject to a 241.02% duty rate as determined by the department’s policy. Future Steps and Public Involvement The U.S. Department of Commerce will provide a chance for interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. They have set a timeline for public comments and planned a verification process for information used in the final results. Next Actions for Importers Importers of the affected products must comply with filing requirements concerning antidumping and/or countervailing duties. This will involve filing a certificate regarding the reimbursement of duties before entry liquidation. In summary, the preliminary results indicate significant dumping margins for corrosion inhibitors from China sold in the U.S. The Department intends to proceed with verification and review public comments before finalizing the results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Japanese Cranes Sold for Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently made a final decision on the sale of lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. They found these cranes are being sold in the United States for less than they should be. This is called selling at “less than fair value” or LTFV. The Department of Commerce looked at crane sales from Japan from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation results were first shared on January 16, 2026. Back then, Commerce said they believed Japanese cranes were indeed being sold below fair value. In their final decision, the Department confirmed that two Japanese companies were involved. These companies are Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. Kobelco was found to have a dumping margin of 12.36%, and Sumitomo had a margin of 20.00%. Other companies will have a margin of 16.18%. This means these companies were marking down prices too low in America, which can harm U.S. businesses selling cranes. So, to fix this, the Department will require extra fees, known as dumping duties, on these cranes when they are brought into the U.S. These extra fees will match the dumping margins found. Before this final decision, the Department checked documents and visited the company’s sites. They made sure all facts were correct. The changes made after the first findings were small. These changes were shared in a special document, the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Now, the Department will tell the International Trade Commission about their final decision. The Commission will then decide if these low-price sales are hurting U.S. businesses. If they agree there’s harm, U.S. Customs will start collecting these extra fees. If not, the case will be closed, and no extra fees will be added. All companies must follow rules about handling private information given during this investigation. This ensures that company secrets stay safe. This decision is important because it helps keep fair trade between countries. It makes sure that companies in the U.S. can compete fairly with those from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Freight Rail Couplers from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results on the antidumping duty review concerning freight rail couplers from Mexico. This review is for the period from May 3, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It found that these products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. Commerce started this review because they wanted to check if these products were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. The agency uses laws from the Tariff Act of 1930 to conduct these reviews. The products being reviewed are called “freight rail couplers,” which are parts used in trains. Commerce found that the products from the Amsted Rail Company and its subsidiary, ASF-K de Mexico, had a dumping margin of 6.50%. The Commerce report mentions that there were no changes from the preliminary findings published earlier. They will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply duties on an ad valorem basis. This means duties will be assessed based on the value of the products, rather than a per-unit fee. The business or company involved may need to pay additional duties. If a company has zero or very low sales margins, they might not pay any duties. Commerce will give detailed instructions to CBP on how to handle these duties within 41 days. Commerce will also update cash deposit rates for future shipments. The rates differ based on whether the company was involved in previous reviews or if they are new to this case. For other producers or exporters, the rate remains at 48.10%, which was set in a past investigation. Importers must also submit a certificate showing if they were reimbursed for any duties, before completed entries are processed for liquidation. Failure to submit this could lead to double duty assessments. Finally, companies under the administrative protective order (APO) must handle all sensitive business details according to Commerce’s rules. Any mishandling of such information will lead to legal consequences. This update ensures fair trading and market practices in the rail industry, while protecting U.S. manufacturers and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary results on a review concerning large diameter welded pipes (LDWP) imported from the Republic of Türkiye. The findings reveal that HDM Çelik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. (HDM Çelik), a notable producer and exporter from Türkiye, received countervailable subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background and Review Process The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests for an administrative review in line with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). HDM Çelik was selected as the mandatory respondent on July 14, 2025. However, due to a government shutdown starting November 14, 2025, the deadlines for administrative proceedings were delayed by 47 days. An additional delay of 21 days occurred due to a backlog from the shutdown. The timeline was also extended on March 13, 2026, resulting in a final due date for preliminary results on May 29, 2026. Scope of Review The review centers on LDWP from Türkiye, assessing whether these products received unfair government subsidies. These subsidies, defined by financial contributions that benefit the recipient in a specific manner, fall under scrutiny to ensure fair trade practices. Partial Rescission Decision In part of the review, it was decided to rescind the administrative review for 11 companies. This decision is based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the period of review (POR). The companies affected by this rescission will have their entries assessed at the rate established at the time of entry, as dictated by 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Subsidy Rates and Methodology For HDM Çelik, the preliminary subsidy rate is set at 3.37 percent ad valorem. This rate considers various subsidy programs in which financial contributions benefit and specify how they are allocated to companies. The methodology used adheres to the legal framework aimed at identifying specific financial assistance benefiting the recipient. Next Steps and Public Participation The Commerce Department plans to disclose its full calculations for these preliminary results soon after the announcement. There will be an opportunity for interested parties to comment on these findings, with case briefs due following the issuance of the last verification report. Parties are encouraged to submit their comments with structured tables of content and authorities. Additionally, requests for a hearing should be submitted at least 30 days after this notice’s publication, including details of participants and discussion issues. Finality and Future Instructions The final results of this review are expected within 120 days from the notice publication, pending any timeline extensions. The findings will impact the cash deposit instructions for future imports from Türkiye. Conclusion The preliminary results signal ongoing diligence by the U.S. Department of Commerce in assessing international trade practices and ensuring fair economic competition. The focus remains on transparent and lawful assessments that uphold trade agreements and standards. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Strand Continue Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue antidumping duties on prestressed concrete steel wire strand. Countries affected are Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and Thailand. The Commerce Department, along with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), decided these duties should stay. The reason is to stop companies in these countries from selling at very low prices in the U.S. The duties began on January 28, 2004, for most countries and February 4, 2004, for India. These duties are to balance out any unfair subsidies that companies might get from their governments. The decision to continue these duties came after reviews in 2025. The reviews showed that without the duties, dumping and subsidies would probably continue. Prestressed concrete steel wire strand is a special type of steel used in building. The duties make sure companies in America can compete fairly with those in the other countries. The rates of duties will stay the same as before. This decision was officially made on June 2, 2026. The duties help protect jobs and industries in the United States. The next review to decide if these duties should continue will happen before the fifth anniversary of this decision. All companies must follow rules about how to handle information about these duties. This is important to make sure everything stays fair and private. This ongoing action ensures that American businesses dealing with these products are not unfairly harmed by international trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results Published for Antidumping Review of Steel Pipe from the UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily determined that some steel pipe producers and exporters from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) sold their products in the United States at less than normal value. The preliminary results cover the period from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The review focuses on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe, a specific type of steel pipe used in various applications. The review was initiated in January 2025 due to requests for a closer look at trade practices. The companies specifically examined are Conares Metal Supply Limited and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE, along with its related entities THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC and KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC. Determination Process The U.S. Department of Commerce used several methods to calculate whether the companies sold their products at unfairly low prices. These methods include examining export prices and constructed export prices. The goal is to determine if such prices are less than the normal value, which would affect fair competition. Preliminary results show that the companies have different dumping margins. A dumping margin indicates how much the export price is less than the normal value. Major companies in the review like Conares and Universal have dumping margins that are not zero, meaning they were selling at less than normal value. Rates and Procedures Conares Metal Supply Limited: Preliminary dumping margin is 3.15%. Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE and Related Entities: Preliminary dumping margin is 6.16%. Other Companies Not Individually Examined: These companies have been assigned a weighted average dumping margin of 5.50%. For companies not individually examined, their rates are based on the overall results of the reviewed companies. After these preliminary findings, the Commerce Department will accept more comments, allowing interested parties to submit their opinions. The opportunity to submit written comments will last for 21 days from the notice’s publication date. Rebuttals or responses to these comments are allowed for five days after the initial comment period. If requested, the Department will hold a hearing allowing further discussion. Such requests must be submitted within 30 days of this announcement. Upon completion of all final reviews and issuance of results, cash deposit requirements will be updated, affecting future shipments and indicating future compliance requirements. These results provide important insights into how international trade laws are monitored and enforced. The findings and the comments received during this period will help inform the final decision, ensuring fair international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Extra Taxes on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision. They decided to keep extra taxes, called countervailing duties, on certain engines from China. These engines are large, vertical shaft engines. They range from 225cc to 999cc in size. The Department thinks that removing these duties would lead to Chinese companies continuing to receive unfair help from their government. This kind of help is known as a subsidy. Subsidies can make products cheaper, making it hard for other countries to compete. The decision is based on a review that started on February 2, 2026. The review checked if these subsidies would continue without the duties in place. The main companies in the U.S. that care about this decision are Briggs & Stratton, LLC and Discovery Energy, LLC. These companies gave their thoughts to the Department of Commerce by March 4, 2026. The Government of China and other Chinese companies did not respond with their thoughts. The review found rates for subsidies that would likely continue. For Loncin Motor Co., the rate is 18.96 percent. For Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., the rate is 20.38 percent. All other companies would have a rate of 19.85 percent. This decision means the U.S. will keep the extra taxes on these engines. This helps protect American companies from unfair competition. The decision was announced by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The Department of Commerce’s review shows how important it is to check on foreign subsidies. They want to make sure trade with other countries is fair for everyone. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Malaysia Steel Wire Strand Review Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of an important review involving prestressed concrete steel wire strand imported from Malaysia. This review focused on determining if Malaysian companies sold this wire strand in the United States at unfairly low prices. The companies reviewed were Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that these companies did not sell the wire strand below its normal value during this time. This means they sold it at fair prices in the U.S. market. The review’s findings are officially effective as of June 3, 2026. The agency involved is the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Contact persons for more details are Monica Gillis and Peter Shaw from the AD/CVD Operations office. They can be reached at (202) 482-6384 or (202) 482-0697 for inquiries. Earlier on October 3, 2025, a preliminary result was published. This preliminary finding was delayed due to a government shutdown that tolled deadlines by 47 days. Further delays resulted in an additional tolling of 21 days. However, Commerce verified responses from Kiswire and Wei Dat through verification sessions in March 2026. The review specifically assessed if goods from these companies were sold at prices lower than normal value. It was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. For the companies not individually examined, such as Southern PC Steel, the Act suggests a reasonable calculation method. The result is a zero percent margin for them as well. Based on these results, all reviewed companies – Kiswire, Wei Dat, and Southern PC Steel, have a dumping margin of 0.00 percent for the period. This means no extra antidumping duties are required on their products for this review period. The Commerce Department will disclose full calculation details following this review. Usually, this happens within five days of the announcement. The customs and border authority, CBP, will assess the covered entries of wire strand without imposing additional antidumping duties, following the finalized results. For future imports of the wire strand from Malaysia, the cash deposit rates will now align with these findings. The special zero rate applies to the named companies. For others not reviewed, the previous rates from earlier investigations still apply. This process involves significant documentation and the handling of proprietary information. Importers are reminded of their duty to submit respective certificates before liquidation to avoid double duties. This review helps ensure fair trade practices and confirms that the selling practices of Malaysian wire strand imports align with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Raw Honey from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Review Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review on raw honey imported from Brazil. This review, conducted by the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce, determined that raw honey from Brazil was sold in the U.S. at prices below normal value. The period of review was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The review involved 14 producers and exporters of raw honey from Brazil. Among them were Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindustrial Ltda. and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda., which acted as mandatory respondents in the investigation. The preliminary results were published on September 30, 2025, and public comments were invited. However, due to a federal government shutdown later that year, the Commerce extended deadlines for the review several times. The final results were scheduled and released by May 29, 2026. The review was conducted according to U.S. law, specifically Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce based this review on its findings, which involved public comments and extensive data analysis. The final decisions were detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum made available to registered users and directly accessible online. Scope and Examination of Imports The product under review included raw honey as defined in the original antidumping duty orders. The review continued to investigate other shipments from Brazil, especially those involving companies not individually examined in this review. Final Results and Antidumping Margins Based on the review, the weighted-average dumping margins for the examined companies were determined. Melbras Importadora faced a 4.48% dumping margin, while Minamel Agroindústria was subject to a 10.48% margin. For companies not individually reviewed, an average margin of 7.48% was applied. Disclosure and Compliance Instructions The Department of Commerce intends to disclose detailed findings and calculations from this review. Companies are required to comply with all instructions regarding antidumping assessments and cash deposits due after these final results. Notably, a reminder was issued to importers about filing certificates concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective immediately, all U.S. entries of raw honey from Brazil will have updated cash deposit requirements matching the review’s final results. These requirements will remain in place until further notifications are given by the Department of Commerce. Conclusion and Further Notifications This announcement echoes the compliance terms set by U.S. trade laws for imported raw honey. Importers and other stakeholders must remain aware of the updated duties and follow federal regulations to ensure proper execution of trade practices. The review and subsequent announcements are essential to maintain fair trade and protect domestic markets from unfair pricing methods used by some international exporters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unfair Paper Sales from Portugal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced preliminary findings about paper sales from Portugal. This decision involves uncoated paper. The period under review was from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. The review investigates if Portuguese companies sold paper in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The focus was on The Navigator Company, S.A., a major producer. The company faced scrutiny over its pricing practices. The Department found that Navigator had sold paper at prices lower than normal value. They calculated a dumping margin of 2.70%. A dumping margin shows how much a company’s sale price undershoots a fair market price. The findings came from a process involving many calculations and rules. The Department looked at export prices and the normal values in Portugal. They used specific methods outlined in U.S. law. This announcement opens a window for further comments. Each party in the review can share their thoughts on this preliminary result. They have 21 days from the announcement to file their case briefs. Rebuttal comments can be filed five days after that. There is also a chance for a hearing. Interested parties must request this within 30 days of the announcement. They must include the names of participants and the issues they want to discuss. The findings lead to certain actions by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. If the dumping margin is above de minimis (0.50%), they will assess duties. If Navigator’s margin is zero or very low, there will be no duties. The Commerce Department has made instructions for customs. They want to ensure all regulations are followed properly. The next steps depend on any final decisions after this review. These measures aim to ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. is protecting its market from unfair pricing practices. The process involves detailed reviews and public participation before any final decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Starts New Trade Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has begun new administrative reviews. These are for antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These are important because they help ensure that products imported to the U.S. are fairly priced. The reviews started on June 2, 2026. The Commerce Department received requests for reviews concerning various products. Many of these products have April anniversary dates. What Products Are Being Reviewed? Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet: This product is used in buildings and transportation. Companies in countries like Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, and several more are being reviewed. Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod: Used in construction, items from companies in India and China are under review. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a): This chemical is used in refrigeration. Companies in China are being checked. Activated Carbon: This product cleans air and water. Companies in China are under review. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities: Used in homes, these products from China are being looked at. And many more products and companies from countries like Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Türkiye, and Slovenia. Why Are These Reviews Important? These reviews help to check if foreign companies are selling their products too cheaply in the U.S. This is called “dumping”. Products sold this way can hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews make sure companies are charging fair prices. What Will Happen Next? Once the reviews are done, the Commerce Department will decide if any actions are needed. They may impose extra duties on some products if they find problems. This process helps keep trade fair and protects American companies. It is important for companies who want to keep their separate tax rates to fill out certain forms. They need to do this 14 days after the notice came out. Companies that are part of these reviews need to keep track of their sales carefully. The Commerce Department will finish these reviews by April 30, 2027. This gives them time to make sure everything is fair and accurate. What Should Interested Parties Do? If anyone is interested in these reviews, they should apply for access to information. They need to follow the rules given by the Commerce Department. There are specific ways to share information and facts. This ensures that the reviews are transparent. Commerce will not be able to share information unless a party asks for it in the right way. As the reviews continue, the Commerce Department remains focused on maintaining fair trade for all involved. These actions ensure a level-playing field in the market. Stay informed as this process progresses and further decisions are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced changes to the results of its review of antidumping duties on certain activated carbon from China. This review looked at imports from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. On April 23, 2026, the Commerce Department released the original results. However, errors were found by several companies involved. These companies included Calgon Carbon Corporation and Norit Americas, Inc., along with Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. The errors were seen as ‘ministerial,’ meaning they were mistakes like math errors or incorrect copying. The law says these kinds of mistakes can be fixed. Specific Errors Corrected: The errors affected how some costs were calculated. For Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., mistakes included how a by-product was excluded and the costs of electricity and packing were added up. For Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., errors included using incorrect export numbers and mislabeled units of measure. Correcting these errors changed the dumping margin for Ningxia Huahui from $0.56 per kilogram to $0.04 per kilogram. This change also affected other non-selected companies, setting their new rate at $0.04 per kilogram. Amended Results: After corrections, the estimated dumping margins are: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.: $0.00 per kilogram. Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.: $0.04 per kilogram. Cash Deposit Requirements: With these new results, new cash deposit requirements will take effect. Companies must deposit an amount equal to their dumping margin for any future shipments. For example, Datong Juqiang will deposit $0.00 per kilogram, and Ningxia Huahui will deposit $0.04 per kilogram. Conclusion: These changes ensure that the duties applied are based on accurate information. The Department of Commerce will give specific instructions on how to handle affected imports to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses by ensuring a fair trade environment with China in the activated carbon market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Panel Review Request Filed Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes A new development has taken place under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). A Request for Panel Review was filed on May 4, 2026. This involves Certain oil country tubular goods from the United States. The request was submitted to the Canadian Section of the USMCA Secretariat. The request was filed on behalf of Maverick Tube Corporation. The case has been given the number CDA-USA-2026-10.12-01. The panel review is about a final result from the Canadian Border Services Agency. This result was published in the Canada Gazette on April 4, 2026. USMCA Article 10.12 allows countries to settle disputes about trade remedy determinations. These determinations come from the United States, Canada, or Mexico. When a panel review is requested, a Binational Panel is formed. This panel reviews the determination and gives a binding decision. The USMCA has specific Rules for Article 10.12 reviews. These rules were agreed upon by the three countries. The filing of requests must follow Rule 40. Details about these rules can be found on the official USMCA Secretariat website. There are steps for parties interested in the panel review: A Complaint must be filed no later than 30 days after the first Request for Panel Review. This means the Complaint deadline is June 3, 2026. Anyone who wants to participate in the review must file a Notice of Appearance. This must be done no later than 45 days after the first Request for Panel Review. The deadline for this is June 18, 2026. The panel review will focus on errors of fact or law. It can also include challenges to the jurisdiction of the authority. The focus will be on errors and defenses raised in the panel review. Further information can be obtained by contacting Vidya Desai. She is the United States Secretary of the USMCA Secretariat. This development marks an important step in resolving trade disputes under USMCA rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Wind Towers Dumped Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its review concerning utility scale wind towers from the Republic of Korea. The review determined that these wind towers, produced by Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. from Korea, were sold in the United States at below their normal value during the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Dumping Margin Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. has been assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 4.99%. This means that the Department of Commerce found that the company sold its wind towers in the U.S. at prices that were 4.99% less than their fair value. Background The Department had made a preliminary determination earlier in January 2026, which it has now finalized. Interested parties were invited to comment on these preliminary results. Dongkuk S&C was the sole producer or exporter reviewed in this period. Scope of the Order The order covers utility scale wind towers from Korea, which are subject to U.S. antidumping laws. These laws are intended to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling goods at unfairly low prices. Assessment and Cash Deposits Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess additional duties on imports at the determined dumping margin. The Department also confirmed that there would be no changes to the preliminary margin calculation. It outlined that CBP would liquidate entries of Dongkuk’s wind towers at these rates unless they had no knowledge of the items’ destination being the U.S. The new cash deposit rate for future imports will be set at Dongkuk’s determined margin of 4.99%, effective from the date of publication of these findings. For others, different historical rates or a rate of 5.41% will apply. Legal and Administrative Details Commerce’s determination is part of its routine enforcement under the Tariff Act of 1930. Companies involved in importing must comply with these requirements or face penalties. The information used in this determination can be accessed on the Department’s electronic systems by registered users. For more details or further information, Anne Entz from AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, can be contacted at the Department of Commerce. The U.S. government continues to monitor and enforce trade laws to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from practices like dumping. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding the import of certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) from India. According to the Department, producers and exporters in India sold some of these tires in the United States at unfairly low prices, violating trading rules. The review period spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. Companies Under Review Commerce selected two companies for detailed examination: ATC Tires Private Ltd., which includes ATC Tires AP Private Limited, and Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited (MTPL). These companies are referred to as the mandatory respondents. Government Shutdown Impact and Timing Adjustments Due to a lapse in U.S. federal funding and a government shutdown, the review process faced delays. Commerce extended deadlines twice to account for these interruptions. Initially, deadlines were moved back 47 days, then an additional 21 days were added, delaying the preliminary results to May 26, 2026. Scope of Review The review focuses on OTR tires from India and seeks to determine if they were sold in U.S. markets at less than the normal value. Normal value is the price at which goods are sold in the exporter’s home market. If exported products are sold for less, it’s considered dumping. Methodology and Preliminary Findings Commerce is conducting the review under specific U.S. trade rules. Both export price and normal value are determined according to legal guidelines. Commerce calculates the margin of unfair pricing to decide on possible penalties. The Department found that the two scrutinized companies had dumping margins of 2.01% for ATC and 1.07% for MTPL during the review period. For other companies not individually reviewed, a margin of 1.87% was established. Next Steps for Public Participation The decision is open for public comment. Interested parties have the opportunity to file their views in writing. Comments should be filed within seven days after the last verification report related to this review. Rescission for Certain Companies The Department has also decided to rescind the review for 25 companies, concluding there were no entries of interest during the review period. These companies will have their antidumping duties assessed based on their previous rates. Cash Deposit Requirements After the review, new cash deposit rates are set for the companies based on their calculated margins. These rates will be applied to all future shipments from June 1, 2026, onward. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s preliminary determination and ongoing review process aim to ensure fair trading practices in the importation of OTR tires from India. This step reflects broader efforts to maintain competitive market conditions in the U.S. tire industry. The final decision is pending further investigations and will ultimately direct the trade measures applied to these imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Ruling Changes Antidumping Measures for Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a significant decision on May 22, 2026, concerning steel products from Japan. The case involves the company Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. The CIT ruled in favor of Toyo Kohan by upholding the Department of Commerce’s revised findings about antidumping duties on specific steel products. The products in question are diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. The review covers sales from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. The Department of Commerce originally calculated a dumping margin of 4.44 percent. Toyo Kohan did not agree with this result and appealed the decision. The CIT found issues with how Commerce evaluated the U.S. sales data. It asked Commerce to review how it determines the “date of sale” and to perform a different analysis for price differences, aligning with suggestions from the Federal Circuit’s Marmen decision. Following the CIT’s guidance, Commerce revised its evaluation. It slightly increased the dumping margin for Toyo Kohan from 4.44 percent to 4.58 percent. The CIT’s latest ruling is a definitive judgment, meaning it does not support the original Commerce’s results. This means Commerce had to amend its previous decision with this updated dumping rate. However, Toyo Kohan’s cash deposit rate will not change because newer results exist from subsequent reviews. Furthermore, the CIT has blocked the liquidation of Toyo Kohan’s entries during the review period. Whether the CIT’s decision stands or if it is challenged in higher courts will affect how duties are assessed. For now, antidumping duties will follow the amended margin if there are no further appeals. The decision brought by the CIT marks a crucial moment for international trade relations and duties on Japanese steel products. This ruling is essential for companies involved in the steel import business, as it influences how duties and prices are configured. The Department of Commerce’s updates in response to CIT’s decision reflect the ongoing regulatory adjustments and international trade’s legal framework’s complexity. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews The International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce, has begun the process of five-year reviews, also known as Sunset Reviews. These reviews look at antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. They also check on suspended investigations of certain products. This step is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. Purpose and Background The aim of these reviews is to see if the existing duties are still needed to stop unfair trading activities. Procedures for these Sunset Reviews are outlined in past notices from 1998 and 2005. In 2012, a final adjustment was made to guide how Commerce conducts these reviews. Products Under Review Many products from different countries are under review. Some of them include: Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from China and Russia. Melamine from China. Potassium Phosphate Salts from China. Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers from China and Vietnam. Methionine from France, Japan, and Spain. Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Each product has a specified case number for identification and is assigned a Commerce contact for inquiries. Important Dates and Contacts These reviews become applicable from May 29, 2026. If you need more information, you can contact officials from the AD/CVD Operations, based at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Filing Information The Commerce Department encourages interested parties to visit its website for more details about the process. They have set specific rules for submissions that include electronic filing. Participation Parties wanting to participate in the reviews must submit necessary documentation, including a letter of appearance. This helps in being listed as an interested party. Conclusion The initiation of these reviews is a critical process that ensures fair trading practices. It allows the Department of Commerce to evaluate whether trade duties are still needed. The department encourages participation to maintain a fair trade environment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Decides on Antidumping Duties for Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision about the duties on a chemical called Difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This chemical is used in air conditioners and refrigeration. The decision is part of a process called a sunset review. What is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a check to see if stopping a duty would cause the problem to start again. Duties are extra costs added to products from other countries. These are added to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. Background of the Order In 2021, the U.S. put an antidumping duty on Difluoromethane from China. The duty was due to reports that China was selling the chemical at a very low price, hurting U.S. businesses. Recent Developments In February 2026, Commerce started its first sunset review of this order. A group of U.S. producers showed that they wanted the duty to continue. They believe ending it would let China sell Difluoromethane cheaply again. Commerce did not get responses from other interested parties. Because of this, Commerce decided to do an expedited review, which is faster than the regular one. Conclusion of the Review Commerce decided that if the duty were removed, dumping would likely begin again. It decided the dumping margin, or amount by which the product is sold below market value, could be as high as 221.06%. Next Steps and Notifications The Commerce Department will notify relevant parties of this decision. This includes those involved with trade and duties. This reminder is important for parties who had access to special or private information during the review. They must follow rules on handling this information after the review ends. This decision shows how the U.S. tries to ensure fair play in trade and protect its industries from unfair practices by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Continuation of Dumping if Duties End Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duties on large vertical shaft engines from China. These engines have sizes ranging from 225cc to 999cc. The review concluded that removing these duties could lead to the return of dumping practices. The antidumping duties were first put in place in March 2021. They target specific engines and parts from the People’s Republic of China. The main goal of these duties is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. The sunset review had its start on February 2, 2026. A sunset review happens every five years. It decides if the duties should stay or be lifted. This process ensures that foreign products are not sold below fair value in the U.S. By February 17, 2026, U.S. domestic parties showed their interest in having the duties remain. Two companies, Discovery and Brigg & Stratton, submitted letters. They affirmed their status as domestic producers of the covered products. Commerce confirmed that there was no formal response from Chinese producers. Commerce decided to perform an expedited review. This means they made their decision faster than usual. The review confirmed the risk of dumping was high if duties end. The final decision shows the potential dumping margin could reach 468.33 percent. This is a very high percentage. It means that removing the duties may lead to very cheap imports that hurt U.S. businesses. Commerce’s findings make sure that U.S. companies can compete fairly. Duties like these help in keeping the market balanced and protect jobs in America. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton signed off on the conclusion. The findings were published in the Federal Register. These results underline the importance of maintaining the current duties against China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Impacts Antidumping Duties on Xanthan Gum From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-12 On May 12, 2026, a significant legal decision was made by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The case involved xanthan gum imported from the People’s Republic of China. This decision is important because it changes how some Chinese companies are charged for selling xanthan gum in the United States. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce had looked into the sale of xanthan gum from China. They wanted to ensure that the gum was not being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This process is called an “antidumping duty review.” The review covered the period from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. At first, the Commerce Department found that companies like Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group were selling xanthan gum at a dumping margin of 17.36 percent. Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group did not agree with this finding. They went to court, challenging the way the Commerce Department calculated their costs, especially related to energy and coal. Court Decisions: In December 2024, the CIT asked the Commerce Department to explain their calculations better. They wanted more details about how energy costs were valued and why a certain code was used for coal. The Commerce Department responded in May 2025, but the court was only partly satisfied. They agreed with some of the Commerce Department’s methods but not all. Finally, in April 2026, the Commerce Department changed their methods. They used a different code for coal, which significantly lowered the dumping margin for Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group. Instead of a 17.36 percent margin, the companies now have a 0.00 percent margin. Implications: This decision means that these companies are no longer considered to be dumping xanthan gum into the U.S. market at unfair prices. The CIT’s decision is final unless appealed. However, for now, the companies will not have to pay extra duties based on a 17.36 percent margin. Current Actions: The Commerce Department has said they will not change the cash deposit rates for these companies because there are newer reviews with different results. Also, due to a court order, certain entries of xanthan gum from these companies are not allowed to be finalized, or “liquidated,” until the appeals process is settled. This ongoing legal situation highlights how complex international trade can be. Companies and governments must carefully navigate rules and laws to ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.