U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation into Apple’s Redesigned Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the conclusion of its investigation into Apple Inc.’s redesigned light-based physiological measurement devices. The investigation, known as No. 337-TA-1276, focused on whether Apple’s new devices infringed upon patents held by Masimo Corporation and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc. The investigation began in August 2021. Masimo and Cercacor alleged that Apple’s devices violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by infringing on their patents. The ITC found that some of Apple’s products did infringe certain patent claims. In October 2023, the ITC issued a final decision. They found that some of Apple’s products violated specific claims of Masimo’s patents. The ITC issued a limited exclusion order (LEO) and a cease and desist order against Apple. In September 2025, Masimo requested the ITC to modify the orders. They wanted clarification on whether Apple’s new product designs still violated their patents. In November 2025, the ITC started a new proceeding to examine Apple’s redesigned devices. The goal was to see if these products infringed any patents. On March 18, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decided that Apple’s redesigned products did not violate any of the asserted patent claims. Masimo and Apple each requested a review of this decision. On April 17, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the ALJ’s decision. This means the investigation is now closed. The ITC will not exclude Apple’s redesigned products from the market. This decision was made under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is conducting reviews of wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China. These reviews are identified as Investigation Nos. 701-TA-636 and 731-TA-1470. The purpose of the reviews is to decide if cancelling certain duty orders on these products might lead to harm to U.S. industry. The duty orders in question are antidumping and countervailing duties. The reviews will be expedited, meaning they will proceed quickly. This decision was made because the response from domestic groups was strong, while the response from groups in China was weak. Comments about the review should be submitted by May 29, 2026. Participants will not be allowed to include new factual information in these comments. If any comments contain sensitive business information, they must adhere to specific rules set by the Commission. The USITC also announced that these reviews are very complex. Because of this, the Commission has decided to extend the review period by an extra 90 days. The USITC scheduled these reviews and published notice of them on April 7, 2026. The Commission issued the notice in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 76, which came out on April 21, 2026. The document number is 2026-07684. If you want more information, you can visit the USITC’s website at www.usitc.gov or check out their electronic docket system at edis.usitc.gov. Contact Alexis Yim at the USITC for any questions or more details. Her phone number is 202-708-1446. For those with hearing impairments, the TDD terminal number is 202-205-1810. You can also contact the Office of the Secretary if you need special help accessing the Commission. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on April 16, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Announces Expedited Reviews on Economic Measures Related to PVLT Tires from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced plans to begin expedited reviews on specific economic measures. These reviews will focus on antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders. The primary concern is passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires imported from China. The expedited reviews are under the Tariff Act of 1930. They aim to decide if removing these orders will cause harm to the U.S. industry. This review checks if ongoing or future damage is likely. The expedited process will help determine this quickly. The review decision date was April 7, 2026. The USITC staff has prepared a report with important information for the reviews. Parties involved in the review will receive it by June 2, 2026. A version without sensitive information will be available later. Comments from interested parties or related groups are due by June 9, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The review is complex, so the USITC may extend it by 90 days if needed. This step ensures a careful and thorough evaluation. The reviews are part of routine procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. For more details, the USITC website provides additional resources and information on this matter. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Proposed Changes to U.S. Tariff Schedule: Public Comments Welcome Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is thinking about making changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. These changes aim to align with updates recommended by the World Customs Organization (WCO). The modifications are set to take effect on January 1, 2028. On April 17, 2026, the Commission shared its proposed recommendations on its website. Federal agencies and the public have until May 18, 2026, to send in their written opinions on these recommendations. These updates are important because they help keep the U.S. HTS in line with global customs guidelines. The Commission will send a report with its recommendations to the President in December 2026. This report will include a summary of all the feedback it receives. A big part of the proposed changes involves HTS subheading 3004.90.92. This part covers specific medicaments—a type of medicine. Right now, there are over 70 different codes under this heading. The ITC wants to split it into nine new subheadings. This will create more space for new codes in the future. Government officials, businesses, and other interested parties can view and comment on the proposed changes. They can find more information on the ITC’s website under “Investigation No. 1205-14.” For those with special needs, access assistance is available at the Commission’s office. All comments must be sent electronically and received by 5:15 p.m. on May 18, 2026. If the comments include confidential business information, they need to meet specific guidelines for submission. The Commission’s final report will provide a summary of the feedback and detail the likely economic impact of the changes. This ensures that any modification is well-informed and considers various perspectives. The overall goal of these proposed updates is to improve the efficiency and accuracy of U.S. customs processes. Your participation is crucial. Share your thoughts by the deadline to have your voice heard. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments On Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This inquiry involves certain motorized self-balancing vehicles. On April 10, 2026, a judge appointed by the ITC issued an Initial Determination. This determination concerns a possible violation of Section 337. Additionally, the judge recommended certain actions related to remedy and bonding if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is now asking for public input on issues that could affect the public. Comments are welcome from both the public and government agencies. The Commission is considering whether to exclude specific motorized self-balancing vehicles. These vehicles are imported and sold by companies named Golabs Inc., known as Gotrax, and Zhejiang TaoTao Vehicles Co., Ltd. The investigation involves possible infringement on two patents, namely U.S. Patent Nos. RE46,964 and RE49,608. The ITC is also considering issuing a cease and desist order against Gotrax. Comments should be filed by May 14, 2026. The ITC wants to understand how the possible exclusion of these vehicles might affect public health, the U.S. economy, production of similar products, and U.S. consumers. Further, the ITC is interested in knowing how these vehicles are used in the U.S. It also wants to identify any health or safety concerns related to this case. The Commission seeks information on whether other U.S. companies can make similar products. They are also interested in knowing if these companies can meet the demand if the current products are excluded. To file a comment, individuals must follow specific instructions set by the ITC. It is important to refer to the investigation number 337-TA-1440 in submissions. Comments containing confidential information must be marked and handled as confidential. The ITC’s electronic docket system, EDIS, is used for submissions and accessing case documents. This investigation is carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930, which aims to protect U.S. trade and consumers. The ITC emphasizes the need for input from different stakeholders to make informed decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Case on Crafting Machines Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is reviewing a case involving crafting machines. This investigation is called Investigation No. 337-TA-1426. It started because a company named Cricut, Inc. complained about certain machines being imported into the United States. They say these machines infringe on their patents. The case includes several patents. These are important legal protections for inventions. Cricut claims that other companies are using their patented ideas without permission. This is against Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation began on December 11, 2024. The complaint involves crafting machines and their parts. Cricut says these machines infringe on six of their patents. The patents are numbered U.S. Patent No. 11,208,758, U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646, U.S. Design Patent No. D893,563, U.S. Design Patent No. D910,724, U.S. Design Patent No. D926,237, and U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. The investigation names several companies from China as respondents. These companies include Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co. Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co., Ltd., LiPing Zhan, Hunan Sijiu Technology, Co. Ltd., Guangdong Rongtu Technology Co., Ltd., and SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. Some companies have already been found in default. A company is in “default” when it does not respond or participate in the investigation. These companies are part of two groups called the Vevor Respondents and Konduone. Default findings mean that these companies did not defend themselves in the case. The investigation also includes a review of a new type of crafting machine made by HTVRONT. This review is to decide if the new machine infringes on Cricut’s patents. On January 21, 2026, a decision was made. The decision found that Konduone violated Section 337 as to some patents. It also found that the Vevor Respondents violated Section 337 for a specific design patent. However, it found no violation for other patents because Cricut did not provide evidence for those. If the final decision finds violations, it could result in an exclusion order. An exclusion order would stop these machines from being imported into the U.S. Another possible outcome is a cease and desist order. This would stop the companies from selling these machines in the U.S. The ITC is now asking for written comments from the public and interested parties. They want to know how any orders might affect the public and the economy. They also want to know if any bond should be required during a review period. The ITC has set deadlines for these comments. They should be submitted by April 28, 2026. There can be replies to these submissions by May 5, 2026. The outcome of this investigation is important. It will decide if the machines will continue to be sold or imported into the United States. It is also an important case for those who hold patents, as it deals with protecting inventions. By order of the Commission, this investigation and its details are part of the official record. This ensures a fair and thorough process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Announces Expedited Reviews of Indian Matchbooks Impact Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an important update. They are starting quick reviews about matchbooks from India. These reviews will check if stopping certain trade rules could hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews start on March 16, 2026. They will look at antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These orders help prevent foreign companies from selling products at very low prices, which could harm U.S. companies. The USITC said that they got enough responses from U.S. companies but not enough from Indian companies. Because of this, the reviews will be faster and simpler. Commissioner Johanson had a different idea. He thought that the review should be more detailed. The reviews will follow specific rules. These rules from the Tariff Act of 1930 make sure everything is done correctly. There will be a report with more information. This will be for people on a special service list, and others can see a public version later. People can write comments about these reviews. These comments help decide what should happen next. Comments must be sent by May 19, 2026. No new facts can be included. If the Department of Commerce needs more time, they will delay the final comments. For companies and other parties involved, they must follow strict rules when sending documents. They need to make sure everyone involved gets a copy. The USITC thinks these reviews are very complicated. They decided to take more time to get everything right. They might take up to 90 extra days. This process is under the Tariff Act of 1930. All of these details are based on official orders from the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on PTMEG Imports Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of investigations on April 13, 2026. This is about polytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMEG) coming from China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The investigations aim to find out if these imports are hurting U.S. industries. The investigations started because BASF Corporation, located in Florham Park, New Jersey, filed a petition on April 8, 2026. They believe that PTMEG is being sold in the U.S. at less than its real value. The Commission has only 45 days to decide if there is a reasonable indication of harm. This means they need to make a preliminary decision by May 26, 2026. The Commission will then send their findings to the Department of Commerce by June 2, 2026. People who are interested and want to be part of the investigations must contact the Commission. They must do this within seven days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. Those who wish to look at more information or how to get involved can go to the Commission’s website or contact them directly. They will be having a staff conference on April 29, 2026, for the investigations. The USITC takes these steps to protect the industries in the United States. They want to make sure that trading is fair and no industry is hurt by cheaper foreign goods sold in the U.S. For those who have evidence or opinions on this, a written brief can be submitted by May 4, 2026. This is an important chance for people in the industry to share what they know. The USITC has rules about how to handle documents and these must be followed strictly. This helps make sure all information is accurate and complete. The investigations are being done under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC is acting by law to look into these cases and make sure there is fair trade happening. These investigations help keep U.S. industries strong against unfair foreign competition. The Commission will continue to update the public as the investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation on Screen Protectors Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an investigation into certain screen protectors and their application systems. This investigation stems from a complaint filed by Belkin International, Inc. Belkin International, based in El Segundo, California, filed this complaint on March 9, 2026. A supplement to the complaint followed on March 13, 2026. Belkin alleges that the import, sale for import, and sale within the United States of specific screen protector products violate U.S. patent laws. These alleged violations concern three different patents. They are U.S. Patent No. 10,675,817, U.S. Patent No. 10,782,746, and U.S. Patent No. 11,772,320. The complaint claims that the products infringe on certain claims of these patents. It also states that there is a related industry within the United States. The USITC will look into whether these claims hold true. It will also check if an industry exists as Belkin states. The Commission is seeking to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order upon investigating. Belkin names Superior Communications, Inc. as the respondent. The company allegedly violates Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The respondent has 20 days to respond to the complaint and investigation notice. The investigation will focus on screen protectors for devices like mobile phones, smartwatches, and tablets. It will also look into the application systems used for these screen protectors, including trays and films. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will assign a presiding Administrative Law Judge to handle this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be part of this investigation. Respondents must file their responses promptly. Failing to respond on time may lead to penalties. These penalties may include an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against the respondent. The USITC will use its rules and procedures to carry out this investigation. The Commission is working to ensure that all rules are followed and the investigation proceeds as required. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, has issued this notice of investigation. It was officially filed on April 10, 2026. The document is available from the Federal Register and can be accessed online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. ITC Receives Complaint on Coated Confectionery Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced it received a complaint. The complaint is about certain coated confectionery products. The complaint, identified as DN 3900, was filed by Promotion in Motion, Inc. on April 8, 2026. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves the importation and sale of certain coated candy. The products named in the complaint are alleged to infringe on laws when imported and sold in the United States. The respondents named in the complaint include Cibo Vita, Inc., Cibo Vita Founders, Inc., New Cibo Vita, LLC, and AnaBio Technologies, LTD. These companies are located in the United States and Ireland. The complainant is requesting the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they want the ITC to stop the import and sale of the infringing candies. They are also asking for a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. The ITC is asking the public to comment. They want to know how the issue might affect public health and the U.S. economy. They are also interested in knowing if there are similar products made in the U.S. that can replace the imported candy. Comments must be submitted within eight calendar days of this notice’s publication. The ITC will only accept electronic filings. No paper documents will be accepted until further notice. Filings must refer to the docket number 3900. People can contact Lisa R. Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, for further information. The ITC will continue to review submissions. They will decide based on the public’s comments and other information gathered. This process is under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Allows Cosentino to Join Investigation Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding an ongoing investigation. This decision was announced on April 8, 2026. The ITC has decided not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge. The investigation looks into certain processed slabs and how they are made. A company called Cambria Company LLC from Minnesota started the investigation. They believe that some slabs are being sold in the U.S. that might be breaking patent rules. These patents are issued by the U.S. government to protect inventions. The investigation considers whether any foreign companies are violating U.S. patent laws. It focuses on the import and sale of processed slabs. If any slabs break U.S. patents, they cannot be sold in the U.S. Several companies are being investigated. These include Architectural Surfaces Group LLC and Arizona Tile, LLC, among others. These companies are the main responders in this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also involved. Recently, a non-party company, C&C North America, Inc., doing business as Cosentino North America, asked to join the investigation. They wanted to join because their slab products might also be affected by any rulings. Cosentino believes that without joining, they might not be able to protect their own products. The administrative law judge considered Cosentino’s request. On March 19, 2026, the judge decided that Cosentino’s request to join should be granted. This means that Cosentino is now officially a respondent in the investigation. The Commission’s decision to accept this was based on certain rules. One important rule looked at whether Cosentino was involved early in the process. Another rule ensured that Cosentino had a clear interest. The judge also checked if any delay might occur because Cosentino joined. No party disagreed with the decision to let Cosentino join. Now, Cosentino will join the investigation alongside other respondents. This means they will now defend their products in a formal setting. The ITC is making sure that each company has a fair chance to present their case. This case is being watched closely. It involves large companies and the outcome can impact how products are sold in the U.S. Knowing who can sell products and who cannot is very important for these businesses. The ITC is working under the rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. It ensures all decisions follow these rules carefully. Stay informed as this case unfolds. The ITC will continue to release updates as the investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Comments on USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin Questionnaire Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is asking the public for comments. This request is about a questionnaire related to a report on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) Automotive Rules of Origin. This request is part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The USITC plans to send a questionnaire. This is an important step. It is for the Commission’s investigation. The investigation looks at the economic impact and operation of the USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin. The Commission wants to make sure it gets all comments by a certain time. To be considered, comments must be received within 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. The questionnaire helps the Commission learn important things. They want to know how rules about where car parts come from affect the U.S. economy. The Commission is making five reports and this is the third one. The reports help understand how these rules affect U.S. competitiveness and technology changes. The first report is already done. It was delivered on July 1, 2025. This investigation started on February 11, 2026. The Commission plans to deliver the report by July 1, 2027. The Commission will collect information through the questionnaire. They will ask motor vehicle producers many questions. These questions will help the Commission understand how the rules impact various factors. The Commission will ask 25 respondents to complete the questionnaire. Each respondent will spend about 25 hours to finish it. The answers will stay private and confidential. The questionnaire will be online. Respondents will get an email link to fill out the form. When the form is complete, they will click a submit button to send it. The Commission is asking the public to give feedback. This feedback can help improve the questionnaire. It can also help make sure the questions are necessary and the time estimate to complete it is correct. If anyone wants to see the draft questionnaire, they can visit the USITC website. Comments about the draft can be sent to a specific email. The USITC also reminds people not to include private or confidential business information in their comments. This notice was issued on April 6, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint on Pickleball Paddles Estimated reading time: 2 minutes April 10, 2026—The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced today that it has received a new complaint. This complaint is about “Certain Pickleball Paddles.” The registration number for this complaint is DN 3898. The ITC is now asking for public comments on this issue. Contacting the ITC For more information, you can contact Lisa R. Barton. She is the Secretary to the Commission. You can reach her by phone at (202) 205-2000. You can also find the complaint online. Go to the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Details of the Complaint The complaint was filed by Sport Squad, Inc. on April 7, 2026. It claims violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves some pickleball paddles being imported and sold in the U.S. The companies named in the complaint include Franklin Sports, Inc., Proton Sports, Inc., and others. Sport Squad, Inc. wants the ITC to stop these products from entering the U.S. They are asking for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Public Comments Needed The ITC is asking for public comments. They are interested in how this issue might affect public health and the economy. They also want to know if there are similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the ones in question. Comments must be submitted no later than eight days after this notice. How to Submit Comments Comments should be filed electronically. They must be no longer than five pages. Include “Docket No. 3898” on the first page. Use the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted. Confidential Information If you want to keep your information private, you must ask for confidential treatment. Those requests should go to the Secretary to the Commission. Include a reason for why it should stay confidential. Next Steps The ITC will continue to accept comments and submissions. It will use these to make a final decision. Stay tuned for more updates as this investigation progresses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Glass Substrates Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case about certain glass substrates for liquid crystal displays. This review involves products that contain these glass substrates, along with the methods used to manufacture them. On April 7, 2026, an administrative law judge issued an Initial Determination. It was about a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This judge also recommended potential remedies and bonding measures if a violation is confirmed. The USITC is now asking for public comments on public interest issues. These issues relate to potential remedies if a violation is found. People and government agencies can submit comments. The comments should focus on how the remedies might affect public health, welfare, competitive conditions, and consumer interests in the United States. The products in question were imported, sold, or manufactured by companies like Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. and TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Public comments can address five key points: How the glass substrates are used in the United States. Any public health or safety concerns related to the potential remedies. If there are other similar products made in the United States that could replace these glass substrates. Whether manufacturers can produce enough to cover the number of substrates subject to the remedies. How these remedies would impact U.S. consumers. Submissions can be up to five pages long and must be filed by May 8, 2026. Interested parties must follow specific electronic filing procedures. For questions, people can contact the Commission Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Confidential information must be clearly marked and will be treated with privacy. There are rules for submitting information confidentially. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public review. The Commission operates under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. This act helps the Commission decide on whether to exclude certain imported products from the United States. This can happen when these imports violate U.S. trade laws. The Commission must think about how such exclusions affect the U.S. economy and consumers. Issued on April 8, 2026, the notice seeks to ensure all voices are heard before any decisions are made. This step illustrates the Commission’s commitment to transparency and public engagement in trade matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Oil Country Tubular Goods from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews. This will determine if stopping antidumping and countervailing duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) from China would cause harm to U.S. industry. The investigative process began on March 6, 2026. The USITC found the response from domestic parties to be adequate. However, the response from foreign parties was inadequate. This means the reviews will be expedited. An expedited review is a quicker process under the Tariff Act of 1930. The findings will tell if removing duties would negatively impact U.S. businesses. The USITC staff has prepared a report on the topic. It was placed in the nonpublic record for those with proper access. A public version will follow. Interested parties have a deadline for written comments. These are due by 5:15 p.m. on April 22, 2026. Comments cannot include new facts. If the Department of Commerce extends its deadline for final review results, the comment deadline changes accordingly. Business proprietary information must meet certain rules. All documents must be served to all review parties. A certificate of service is required with each document. The USITC has declared these reviews as extraordinarily complex. They have extended the review period by up to 90 days. They have the authority to do this under U.S. law. The announcement was issued on April 7, 2026. Official details are available on the USITC’s website. This information affects those involved in the OCTG industry. It shows continued oversight of trade practices to protect U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Ink Cartridge Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a new development in its ongoing investigation into certain ink cartridges and their components. This investigation is referenced as Investigation No. 337-TA-1452. The administrative law judge handling this case has given a Summary Determination on a Violation of Section 337. This refers to a law that regulates international trade by excluding certain products from the U.S. if they violate certain trade rules. The judge also made a suggestion on what actions to take if a violation is confirmed. This could include excluding the products from entering the U.S. or issuing a cease-and-desist order to involved companies. The ITC is asking for comments from the public and government agencies on these suggested actions. They want to know how these actions might affect the public, the economy, and consumers in the United States. They are also interested in knowing if other companies could produce similar products in the U.S. to replace the ones being investigated. Comments from the public should be submitted to the ITC by April 30, 2026. Each submission can be up to five pages long including any attachments. Submissions must be filed online and should clearly mention the investigation number. If someone wants to submit confidential information, they must follow specific rules to keep that information private. The ITC is acting under its authority according to the Tariff Act of 1930 and its own rules. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, issued this notification. For further details or help with submissions, individuals can contact Namo Kim, Esq., at the Office of the General Counsel of the ITC. Public records related to the investigation can be viewed online through the ITC’s electronic docket system. This notice is important for companies involved in producing or selling ink cartridges and their components, as well as consumers and competitors in this market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Conduct Expedited Reviews on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews concerning non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) imports. These reviews are essential to determine whether removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on NOES from China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan will cause material injury to the U.S. industry. The Commission began these reviews following its determination on March 6, 2026, that the response from domestic interested parties was adequate, whereas the respondent interested party group response was found inadequate. Hence, the decision was made to conduct expedited reviews as laid out in the Tariff Act of 1930. For inquiries, individuals are directed to contact Camille Bryan at the Office of Investigations, USITC. The Commission also allows for communication through their TDD terminal for hearing-impaired persons. Those with mobility impairments should contact the Office of the Secretary for assistance. The next step involves a staff report with detailed information about the reviews, which will be available to designated individuals on April 2, 2026. A public version will follow. Interested parties have until April 15, 2026, to file written comments on the Commission’s determinations. These comments must adhere to specific rules, especially if they contain proprietary information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review period, comments about their final results are due three business days after issuance. The Commission expects these reviews to be complicated, and it has used its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days, emphasizing the gravity of these proceedings. The announcement concludes under the authority vested by the Tariff Act of 1930, as affirmed by the Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton. The Federal Register has documented this notice as part of its public records. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Investigation Launched on Display Devices Import Violations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation. The investigation was prompted by a complaint. InnoTV Labs, LLC filed the complaint. The company is based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Complaint Details The complaint alleges that certain display devices, streaming players, and their components are being imported illegally. The issue is about patents. The patents allegedly being infringed include: U.S. Patent No. 7,965,918 U.S. Patent No. 12,096,066 U.S. Patent No. 10,018,863 U.S. Patent No. RE50,251 U.S. Patent No. 11,714,306 U.S. Patent No. 12,038,636 Investigation Scope The ITC has ordered a detailed investigation. The investigation will explore if there are violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Section 337 deals with unfair practices in import trade. The products being investigated include smart televisions, LED televisions, streaming devices, and related hardware and software components. Respondents in the Case Several companies are named in the complaint. These companies are alleged to be involved in the violation. They are: Hisense Co., Ltd (China) Hisense International Co., Ltd (China) Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd (China) Hisense USA Corporation (USA) Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation (USA) Hisense Monterrey Home Appliance Manufacturing (Mexico) Roku, Inc (USA) Purple Tag Media Technology (Shanghai) Ltd and its branch in Shenzhen (China) Purple Tag Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) Case Procedure The ITC will consider the complaint and determine if there is a violation. The complainant, InnoTV Labs, LLC, seeks a limited exclusion order. They also seek cease and desist orders. Responses to the complaint must be submitted by the named respondents. Responses are to follow section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules. Time extensions for responses will not be granted easily. If any respondent fails to respond on time, it may waive their right to contest. It could result in an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against them. Administrative Details The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will designate the presiding judge for this investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate in this case. The proceedings are open for public viewing through the ITC’s electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. For more information, the contact person is Susan Orndoff at the U.S. International Trade Commission. She can be reached by telephone at 202-205-1802. The investigation order was issued on April 1, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Assess L-Lysine Imports from China Estimated reading time: 4 minutes U.S. International Trade Commission to Assess L-Lysine Imports from China The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations into the import of animal feed-grade L-lysine from China. This announcement follows the preliminary findings by the Department of Commerce that suggested these imports were subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. Reason for Investigation The investigation seeks to determine whether the United States’ L-lysine industry has been harmed or threatened by these imports from China. L-lysine is an important amino acid used in animal feed for the biosynthesis of proteins. The specific imports under investigation include lysine monohydrochloride (HCL), lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine, among other forms, as noted in their respective Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers. Industry Participation Needed Parties interested in participating in these investigations, such as industrial users and potential consumer organizations, must file an entry of appearance with the USITC. This should be done within a timeframe specified by the commission. The Secretary will then maintain a public service list of all participants. Hearings and Submissions A hearing for these investigations will occur on July 14, 2026. Parties hoping to present at the hearing must submit written requests by July 9, 2026. Additional guidelines govern the submission of written testimonies and presentations. These must be filed by July 13, 2026, along with any pre- and post-hearing briefs that must adhere to the detailed provisions outlined by the Commission. Release of Information and Final Comments The USITC plans to release a prehearing staff report by June 30, 2026. This report will be available to authorized parties who applied in compliance with the Commission’s rules. The release of additional information for comment by participants will happen on August 11, 2026. Final comments from interested parties must be submitted by August 13, 2026. Conclusion These investigations aim to enforce the fair trade practices under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC is ensuring transparency and compliance with Commission rules. Interested parties in the agricultural and industrial sectors should take note of the rules and deadlines to participate effectively. This development highlights the US government’s commitment to protecting domestic industries from unfair international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes US International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review on Steel Shelving from China On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a five-year review. This review is about imports of boltless steel shelving units from China. The purpose is to see whether revoking existing trade orders will harm the U.S. industry. Background On October 21, 2015, the Department of Commerce made orders about these imports. These were antidumping and countervailing duty orders. They were put in place because the imported shelving units were sold cheaper than they should have been. This caused concern for U.S. producers. In May 2021, another review continued these orders. Now, the USITC is reviewing them again. Details of Review The review started on April 1, 2026. The USITC wants information from people interested in this matter by May 1, 2026. Comments on the responses can be filed until June 9, 2026. Rachel Devenney at USITC is the contact person for more information. Definitions and Participation The review will look at several factors: Subject Merchandise: This is the product being reviewed, which is the shelving units from China. Domestic Like Product: This is the similar product made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: This is U.S. companies that produce the like product. Importer and Participation: Companies involved in importing, or looking to participate, must file for participation within 21 days of the notice. Former Commission employees can also take part, thanks to an ethics update. Business information will be protected under special orders, and such information must be filed within 21 days. Information Requested Interested parties need to provide specific information by May 1, 2026. They need to describe their operations in 2025, including production, sales, and financial details. The companies in the U.S. and China have to submit information about their production and exports. Public Reporting and Additional Information Public reporting details are available, and it’s estimated to take 15 hours to respond to this request. All submissions will be electronic, and no paper documents will be accepted. Conclusion The USITC is reviewing the impact of removing trade orders on Chinese steel shelving. They ask for detailed information from interested companies and parties. This information is important to ensure a fair decision is made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a review. This review looks at imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China. The review will check if revoking orders will hurt U.S. industries. These orders involve antidumping and countervailing duties. Duties are extra charges on products when they enter a country. The review can help decide if these duties should continue or end. The USITC is asking for information from interested parties. These parties must give their responses by May 1, 2026. Comments on these responses must be sent by June 9, 2026. Caitlyn Hendricks-Costello from the Office of Investigations can provide more information. She can be reached at (202) 205-2058. The antidumping duty was first made on June 29, 2010. The countervailing duty was added on July 7, 2010. These duties were reviewed in 2015 and again in 2021. Now, the USITC is looking to review them again. This review is very detailed. It will look at things like imports, prices, and how they affect U.S. industries. The USITC will assess this information to decide its next steps. People or groups who want to take part must file an entry of appearance. They have to do this no later than 21 days after this news was published in the Federal Register. The USITC will also handle business proprietary information (BPI) under special rules. Those who want to see this information must apply within 21 days. The process has rules to ensure all submissions are accurate. These rules include making certifications about the data submitted. The review is for anyone interested in steel wire strands. This can be producers, importers, or anyone affected by these duties. They must share specific information like their name, address, and the likely effects of removing duties. The investigation wants to see the impact on U.S. industries. It will gather data from 2025 as part of this process. The review also seeks to understand changes in supply and demand after 2019. There is an option for participants to agree or disagree with the definitions given in the review. This review is part of ongoing efforts under the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order for this review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Reviews on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started reviews related to small vertical shaft engines from China. This is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The reviews will find out if removing the existing duties on these engines from China could hurt the U.S. industry again. These reviews started on April 1, 2026. Anyone interested in this issue should provide information by May 1, 2026. Comments about the adequacy of responses can be submitted by June 9, 2026. The background of this issue started on May 4, 2021, when the Department of Commerce put duties on small vertical shaft engines from China. These reviews will help decide if keeping the duties is necessary to protect U.S. producers. Definitions are important in these reviews. “Subject Merchandise” refers to engines from China. The “Domestic Industry” includes U.S. engine makers like Briggs & Stratton and Honda Power. The reviews also talk about “Subject Country,” which is China, and “Domestic Like Product,” which are U.S. similar engines. Interested parties can be involved by adding their names to a public service list. People who have worked for the Commission before may participate if there’s no conflict of interest. For this review, some business information may be shared with authorized people through an administrative protective order. Written submissions are required for formal replies. Submission details and specifications are outlined by the Commission’s rules. Responses should include detailed company information, business data, and judgments on the effect of duties on the Domestic Industry. This includes the volume of imports, their price impact, and effects on U.S. job markets. Producers and importers should provide specific data about production and sales both in the U.S. and with exports. All responses should be as detailed as possible. Finally, the USITC seeks to identify any significant changes in the market since the orders began, focusing on supply, demand, and competition both in the U.S. and abroad. The reviews are held under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, as noted in the official notice by the USITC Secretary, Lisa Barton. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review on Mattress Imports Estimated reading time: 8–10 minutes On April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of reviews concerning imported mattresses. This review will look at mattresses from several countries, including Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The purpose is to determine if lifting current trade duties would harm U.S. mattress makers. In 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce placed special duties on these mattresses to protect local producers. The review will see if these duties are still needed or not. Key Dates and Participation The review started on April 1, 2026. Responses to the notice must be submitted by May 1, 2026. Comments about these responses are due by June 9, 2026. Information for Participants Alejandro Orozco, at 202-205-3177, is the point of contact. People with hearing or mobility problems can get assistance by contacting the USITC. Definitions and Procedures The review will look at “Subject Merchandise,” which refers to mattresses from the listed countries. The review aims to decide if ending duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. U.S. producers, importers, and other parties interested in this review can participate by filing paperwork correctly. Previous USITC workers can join if they meet specific rules. Information and Details Needed for Responses Participants must submit detailed information, including: Business name, contact details, and an official certifier. Statement showing if the participant is affected by the review. Willingness to participate and provide requested information. Impact statement on the U.S. mattress industry if duties are lifted. The review will also gather data about producers, changes since the duties started, and any economic impacts. Submission and Filing Process All responses are to be submitted online through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System. No paper submissions will be accepted. Additional Information If a participant cannot provide requested details, they must inform the USITC as soon as possible, explaining why. This information is crucial for the review process. The USITC will use this data to decide if the special duties should remain or end. The outcome of these reviews will impact U.S. mattress producers, importers, and exporters. For the document display, the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 26-5-683, ending on June 30, 2026. Participants can find more procedural information on the USITC’s website. Conclusion This review by the USITC is an important step in deciding the future of trade duties on mattresses from these countries. The involved parties have specific deadlines to meet to have their input considered. For more details, participants are encouraged to contact the USITC directly or visit its website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Begins Review on Chassis and Subassemblies from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On Wednesday, April 1, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of a review. This review is about chassis and subassemblies from China. The USITC wants to decide if removing certain trade orders will hurt U.S. industries. The USITC is looking at antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are special taxes on items from China. The review will see if taking away these duties might cause harm to U.S. companies. The USITC wants feedback from interested parties. They have until May 1, 2026, to reply. In May and July of 2021, antidumping and countervailing orders were placed. These orders aimed to protect U.S. industries. The current review will check if U.S. industries still need this protection. The USITC has set up rules for this review. The rules will help decide if they need a full or short review. The next step depends on how many people reply. The public can watch this process. Many details are online. People can visit websites like https://www.usitc.gov for info. There’s an electronic system to see details related to this review. People and companies in the U.S. that care about the outcome can join. They need to file their intent to participate soon. Those involved will be on a special list. This list helps the USITC know who is part of the review. Former USITC employees can be part of this review. This is allowed even if they worked on similar past issues. There are rules and ethics to follow. For ethics questions, they should contact Charles Smith at the General Counsel’s Office. The USITC will keep some information private. They will follow certain rules to do this. Some people can see this private info if they meet certain criteria. They will use a special order to control who can see what. Those who want to submit opinions and data must make sure their information is accurate. There are rules on how to send in documents. They can see these rules on the USITC website. The USITC wants information from manufacturers, importers, and other important groups. They will look at this info carefully. Whether these duties stay or go will affect many businesses. The review will cover many points. They will look at the amount of goods coming in. How these goods affect prices and their impact on U.S. businesses are key points. All views on possible changes in supply and demand are important. It’s not just about what is happening right now. The USITC wants to know what might happen later too. This review is important for the U.S. economy. It will guide decisions on trade with China. The USITC is working hard to ensure they make the right choice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Begins Review on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of a five-year review process. This review will determine if the removal of existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on non-refillable steel cylinders from China would continue to harm the U.S. industry. This decision is based on the Tariff Act of 1930, which is used to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. The review process began on April 1, 2026. Interested parties must submit their responses by May 1, 2026. The USITC will receive comments on whether these responses are adequate by June 9, 2026. For more information, details can be obtained by contacting Alexis Yim at 202-708-1446 in the Office of Investigations. Electronic access to documents is also available through the USITC’s website. The original antidumping and countervailing duty orders were issued by the Department of Commerce on May 11, 2021. These orders were designed to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices concerning non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The review will assess several factors. These include whether revoking the orders will lead to continued or repeat injury to U.S. producers. Details about the type of merchandise and the domestic industry involved are clearly defined by the USITC. USITC rules and processes will guide the review. These include evaluating how parties respond to the notice of institution. Former USITC employees can appear in this review process, provided they meet specific conditions. Certain information is considered business proprietary information (BPI). The Secretary of the Commission will disclose this under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). All parties must ensure their submitted information is accurate and complete. This applies to submissions throughout the entire review process. Responses must contain specific information. This includes details about their firm and the likely effects of revoking the duties. The USITC has laid out detailed instructions for participants wishing to submit information. U.S. producers, importers, and other interested parties must provide detailed figures about their operations from calendar year 2025 in their responses. The Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during the review process. All documents must be submitted using the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Parties unable to provide the requested information must notify the Commission promptly and explain why they cannot provide it. This review is crucial for determining the continuation of duties that protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices involving Chinese steel cylinders. For more comprehensive details, parties can visit the USITC website. The review ensures that the U.S. industry is not adversely affected by international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes March 31, 2026 The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new complaint. This complaint is about semiconductor devices. A company named GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. filed it. Details of the Complaint This complaint was filed on March 26, 2026. It talks about violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint mentions certain semiconductor devices and products that contain these devices. GlobalFoundries claims some companies imported them into the United States and sold them here. Companies Mentioned Tower Semiconductor Ltd. from Israel. Tower Partners Semiconductor Co., Ltd. from Japan. Tower Semiconductor Italy S.R.L. from Italy. Tower US Holdings, Inc. from Newport Beach, CA. Tower Semiconductor San Antonio, Inc. from San Antonio, TX. Tower NPB Holdings, Inc. from San Jose, CA. Tower Semiconductor Newport Beach, Inc. from Newport Beach, CA. Newport Fab LLC from Newport Beach, CA. Requested Action GlobalFoundries wants the Commission to take action. The company seeks a limited exclusion order. It also requests cease and desist orders. This means stopping these companies from selling the semiconductor devices during a special 60-day review period. Public Interest Comments The USITC is asking for comments from the public. People can share their thoughts on how these actions might affect public health and welfare in the U.S. They can also share views on the impact on the U.S. economy and consumers. The Commission wants to know: How are these semiconductor devices used in the U.S.? Are there health, safety, or welfare concerns with the requested actions? Can other companies in the U.S. make similar products to replace the imports? Can U.S. companies increase production to replace the imported products in a reasonable time? How will taking these actions affect U.S. consumers? Deadlines for Comments Those who wish to comment have eight days to do so after this notice is published. GlobalFoundries can reply to these comments within three days. Filing Submissions All submissions must be made electronically. They should be filed through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The docket number for these submissions is “Docket No. 3896”. If someone wants to keep information confidential, they must request it separately. All public documents will be available for inspection. Conclusion The case will continue under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this notice on March 26, 2026. The official document is listed under FR Doc. 2026-06143 in the Federal Register. The Commission is actively seeking feedback on the public interest issues related to this matter. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Update on U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation on Dental Burs Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important announcement. The Commission decided not to review an initial determination. This means there are changes in an ongoing investigation about dental burs and related kits. The investigation began on January 20, 2026. It was based on a complaint by two companies. These companies are Huwais IP Holding LLC and Versah, LLC. Both are from Jackson, Michigan. They allege violations related to imports, sales, and the infringement of patents and trademarks. The patents mentioned are U.S. Patent Nos. 9,326,778 and 11,712,250. Trademarks include Registration Nos. 6,261,888; 6,261,886; and 4,689,471. The investigation covers many companies around the world. These companies are in places like Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, and Australia. The Commission’s latest action is to amend the complaint. This amendment adds Research Industries of Sialkot, Pakistan, as a respondent. This decision followed a motion by the complainants on February 23, 2026. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this motion. The Administrative Law Judge overseeing this case decided in favor of the amendment. The decision was made on March 3, 2026, with no objections. The change does not harm public interest or the rights of any parties. The Commission took a vote on March 25, 2026, confirming the decision to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. This is now part of the official records. For further information, Mr. Ronald A. Traud, Esq., from the USITC can be contacted. He is available at the Commission’s main office in Washington, DC. The investigation and its results are guided by section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as revised. The specific rules followed are in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on March 25, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins New Investigation on Memory Chips Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Complaint Filed by MonolithIC 3D Inc. A company named MonolithIC 3D Inc., based in Texas, filed a complaint. They claim that some memory chips being brought into the United States have violated their patents. A patent is a special right given to an inventor for their invention. MonolithIC 3D Inc. believes that these imported memory chips infringe on their own patented technology. Patents Involved The complaint mentions several patents. Some of these are U.S. Patent No. 12,035,531 and U.S. Patent No. 12,125,737. These patents are for specific features and designs related to memory chips. Scope of Investigation The investigation will look into whether these memory chips were imported illegally because they infringe on the company’s patents. The ITC will also check if there is an established industry in the U.S. that uses this patented technology. Companies Being Investigated Several companies are named in this investigation. They include KIOXIA Holdings Corporation and SK hynix Inc., among others. These companies are believed to be importing the chips that may be infringing on the patents. Next Steps The ITC has appointed a Chief Administrative Law Judge to oversee this investigation. The law judge will listen to both sides. They will consider any evidence provided. Responses Required The companies named in the investigation must respond to the complaint. They need to do this within 20 days. If any company fails to respond, it might lose its chance to defend itself. Possible Outcomes If the investigation finds that these companies have violated patents, several things could happen. The Commission might stop these companies from importing more of these chips. They could also issue orders for the companies to cease and desist, meaning they would have to stop certain activities. The ITC will continue to update the public on this investigation. This matter is important for the technology industry and will be closely watched. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on TOPCon Solar Products Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an official investigation. This investigation is about certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, and their components. It is important because it checks if companies are breaking the law by selling these products in the U.S. The investigation started because of a complaint by First Solar, Inc., a company based in Phoenix, Arizona. They believe their U.S. Patent No. 9,130,074, called the ‘074 patent, is being used without permission. This patent is about making solar cells. First Solar thinks other companies are using it illegally. First Solar filed this complaint on February 24, 2026. They added more information to the complaint on March 10, 2026. The Commission is trying to find out if there is a violation of the law. They want to know if companies are bringing these solar products to the U.S. without permission. If the investigation finds problems, they might stop companies from bringing these products into the country. The Commission might also stop them from selling these products in the U.S. Several companies are part of the investigation. These companies are from many countries, including the U.S., Germany, Canada, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, India, Jordan, Korea, and Japan. Some companies on the list are AXITEC, Canadian Solar, JA Solar, JinkoSolar, Mundra Solar, Philadelphia Solar, Hanwha Q CELLS, Runergy, Trina Solar, T1 Energy, Vietnam Sunergy, and Toyo. Each has different addresses and places where they operate. The USITC will tell these companies about the investigation. These companies must respond to the complaint and the investigation notice within 20 days. If they don’t respond, they might lose their chance to defend themselves. This could mean they will not be able to sell their products in the U.S. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint someone to oversee the investigation. The appointed judge will look at all the evidence. They will listen to what everyone has to say and make a decision about the public interest. The investigation is a serious matter. Companies need to respect U.S. laws. They must ensure that they are not using patented technology without permission. The Commission’s decision will help protect inventors and their inventions. The Commission keeps public documents on its electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. People with hearing or mobility issues can contact the USITC for assistance. In conclusion, the USITC’s investigation is crucial. It ensures fair trade and protects intellectual property in the solar energy industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Ban on Certain Electrolyte Beverages Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important decision about certain electrolyte drinks. These drinks are banned from being brought into the United States if they misuse certain registered trademarks. The investigation started in February 2025. Complaints came from businesses in Texas and New York, as well as a company in Mexico. They said some drinks use their trademarks without permission. The Commission looked into this claim under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Eight companies from Mexico were named in the investigation. Some companies settled the matter by agreeing to certain conditions, and two companies had the case against them withdrawn. Four companies did not respond to the investigation or show why they were not guilty. In July 2025, the businesses who complained asked for a decision without a full trial because the companies did not respond. The judge agreed with them. In December, the Commission reviewed part of that decision and agreed that the U.S. industry was being harmed. The Commission decided there was a violation of section 337. They issued a general exclusion order (GEO). The GEO stops the unlicensed import of electrolyte drinks that misuse the identified trademarks. The GEO also includes packaging and labeling of these beverages. The Commission considered public interest but found no reason to stop the order. The decision details how the four companies did not follow certain rules, which led to this GEO. The Commission’s decision ensures that U.S. businesses are protected from unfair imports. The action took place on March 26, 2026, and was acknowledged by the President and the U.S. Trade Representative. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation on In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has started an investigation about in-vehicle infotainment systems. This investigation starts because of a complaint filed on February 24, 2026. The company Zync Inc., located in San Francisco, California, filed this complaint. The complaint talks about products like infotainment systems used in cars. These systems help passengers enjoy music, maps, and more. According to the complaint, the concern is about some companies using secrets from Zync Inc. without permission. This situation is dangerous as it may harm an industry in the United States. Zync Inc. wants the investigation to lead to certain actions. They wish for an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. These actions would stop certain products from coming into the U.S. if they use stolen secrets. The companies named in the investigation are Bayerische Motoren Werke AG from Germany and BMW of North America, LLC from New Jersey. They are believed to be using Zync Inc.’s technology without permission. The investigation process will have important steps. The investigation was ordered by the Commission on March 25, 2026. The Chief Administrative Law Judge at the US International Trade Commission will oversee the investigation. The respondents need to reply to the complaint. They have 20 days after receiving the complaint to respond. This is necessary under the Commission’s rules. If the companies named do not respond in time, they might lose the chance to explain their side. People who need more information or special assistance can reach out to the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The U.S. International Trade Commission is committed to following the rules and protecting industries in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Announces Full Five-Year Reviews on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of full five-year reviews. These reviews focus on oil country tubular goods from five countries: India, South Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam. The purpose is to decide if removing certain trade duties would harm U.S. Industries. Purpose of the Reviews The reviews will determine if canceling countervailing and antidumping duties on tube goods would hurt the U.S. industry. Specifically, the decisions involve countervailing duties for India and Turkey and antidumping duties for all five countries. The ITC aims to see if removing these duties would cause damage within a reasonable time. Additional Information For more information, contact Jesse Sanchez from the Office of Investigations at (202) 205-2402. Persons with hearing or mobility disabilities can also reach out using specified contact numbers. Review Process The ITC decided on November 24, 2025, to conduct full reviews due to the type of responses received. The scheduling follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Participants and representatives must file an entry to appear within 45 days of the notice’s publication. Participation Details Industrial users and consumer organizations can take part by filing an entry of appearance. Those who filed a notice before do not need to file again. A public service list of participants will be maintained. Filing and Disclosure The Secretary’s Office will only accept electronic filings via the Electronic Document Information System. Business proprietary information will be disclosed only to authorized applicants under certain protective measures. Key Dates in 2026 July 8: Nonpublic staff report will be released, followed by a public version. July 23: An in-person hearing is scheduled. July 22: A prehearing conference may be held. July 16: Deadline for prehearing briefs. Parties must follow specific rules and timelines to submit written or oral testimony. Extraordinary Complications The ITC considers these reviews to be complex and has extended the period by up to 90 days for deeper analysis. Reporting and Rules The reviews follow the Tariff Act of 1930’s guidelines and ITC practice rules. All submissions should follow rules on timing and format. Conclusion This step by the ITC is crucial to safeguarding U.S. Industries while considering international trade relationships. The decisions made will directly impact how oil country tubular goods from these countries are managed in U.S. markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Full Reviews Announced for Forged Steel Fittings from India and South Korea Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced its decision to conduct full reviews of the duties on forged steel fittings from India and South Korea. This decision follows a notice regarding the situation last issued on December 1, 2025. The duty reviews are important to decide if removing certain trade orders would lead to injury in the industry. The orders under review include a countervailing duty order on forged steel fittings from India and antidumping duty orders on the same products from both India and South Korea. The Commission is tasked with understanding if scrapping these duties will harm the U.S. industry in the coming years. On March 6, 2026, the ITC confirmed its plan for full reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930. The reviews are done to see if the removal of these orders will hurt domestic markets. Specifically, they want to know if injury might happen again if the orders no longer exist. The ITC received enough responses from interested parties concerning imports from South Korea. Based on this, it decided to do a comprehensive review. Meanwhile, responses from India did not meet the required adequacy. Even so, the ITC opted for a full review for India, citing the need for administrative efficiency due to their comprehensive review commitment regarding South Korea. The decision means further work ahead. A timeline for these reviews will be given later. An official record of the voting process by Commissioners will be available, allowing transparency in how decisions are reached. Information and documents related to this can be accessed online. The ITC provides options for those who need special assistance or further information. This guarantees that everyone can stay informed and engaged with this process. Lisa Barton, as the Secretary to the Commission, has officially issued this announcement. The related document was filed on March 18, 2026, and can be found in the Federal Register—Volume 91, Number 53. It includes details about why these reviews are important and how they follow the rules set by national laws. This notice ensures that all stakeholders are aware of the ongoing process and what to expect next. The ITC’s work is vital in maintaining fair trade practices while supporting local industries in the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission to Review Trade Practices on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of an expedited review. This review aims to decide if lifting the antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China will cause harm to the U.S. industry. What Is Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol? Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is a chemical used in making other chemicals, polymers, and chemical processing. It is important in various industrial processes. Why Is The Review Happening? The review comes under the Tariff Act of 1930. The goal is to check if ending the extra taxes on this chemical from China would harm U.S. businesses. The Review Timeline The review officially started on February 23, 2026. The USITC decided to have a quicker review because the feedback from U.S. companies was strong, while that from Chinese companies was weak. How Will It Work? The Commission will gather information and write a report. This report will be available to certain people on March 27, 2026. A version for the public will come later. Interested parties can share their thoughts on what the Commission should decide. The deadline for comments is April 2, 2026. Comments cannot include new facts not already shared. Commission’s Rules If writing comments, parties must follow USITC’s rules. They must also share their comments with others involved in the review process. Extra Time for Review The Commission decided this review is very complex. They have chosen to give themselves 90 extra days to finish the review. Authority and Rules This review is under the Tariff Act of 1930. Announcements about it will follow the Commission’s rules. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, stated these details in the notice issued on March 17, 2026. The review represents the USITC’s ongoing efforts to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. It ensures that the removal of duties will not cause harm to domestic businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Finds Trade Violation in Urine Splash Guards Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) found a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This was in connection to a case about urine splash guards. The investigation was titled Investigation No. 337-TA-1430. The case started on January 13, 2025. It was based on a complaint from a company called Kids By Parents, Inc. They are based in Potomac, Maryland. The complaint was about certain urine splash guards and components thereof. These were allegedly being imported and sold in the USA while infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,870,619 and U.S. Patent No. 11,812,901. The ITC found that five companies from China violated U.S. trade law. The companies were Maomaohouse, Le Sengyu, HealthSTEC, Edermurs, and Lishian. These companies are collectively known as the Defaulting Respondents. The ITC issued a General Exclusion Order. This means no Company can import the infringing products. The ITC also issued Cease and Desist Orders. These orders are specifically for Maomaohouse, Le Sengyu, HealthSTEC, and Lishian. The investigation found that the products infringe on two claims of the ‘619 patent and two claims of the ‘901 patent. However, one claim of the ‘901 patent was not proven to be violated. The ITC set a bond of 100% on the infringing products’ value during the Presidential review period. This is to protect the domestic industry. Other companies involved settled before a final decision. These companies are Tigaman, Junyxin, Eurbus, Sunyoka123, and SeLucky. The ITC reviewed the case and decided that a domestic industry requirement was met. They found in favor of Kids By Parents, Inc. The Commission made sure that the public interest factors do not prevent the orders issued. The Commission’s decision was sent to the President and the United States Trade Representative. The decision marks the end of the investigation. The Commission completed its vote on March 12, 2026. This decision shows how serious the ITC is about protecting patents and stopping unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.