U.S. International Trade Commission: Investigations on Tin Mill Products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey Estimated reading time: 1–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the final phase of its investigations regarding certain tin mill products imported from China, Taiwan, and Turkey. These investigations concern whether the U.S. industry is affected by these imports, which are allegedly subsidized and sold at less-than-fair value. On September 28, 2026, the USITC provided notice about these final investigations. The products in question are tin mill flat-rolled products coated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides. These are commonly used in making tinplate and tin-free steel. The import of these products is being investigated to see if it harms U.S. manufacturers. The concerns were raised in petitions filed by the United States Steel Corporation and the United Steelworkers Union in April 2026. The final findings of the USITC, in cooperation with the Department of Commerce, might result in the application of additional duties if imports are found to be unfairly subsidized or priced. Public hearings are set to begin on December 4, 2026. Interested parties should submit their appearances by November 25, 2026. The USITC has invited various stakeholders, including industrial users and representative consumer organizations, to participate. For transparency, the USITC will provide a staff report by November 18, 2026, with a public version issued later. The hearings and the submission of statements offer the public and interested parties a chance to contribute to the investigation. Final comments on the investigation data are due by December 30, 2026. The investigation could lead to changes in the tariffs applied to these imports. Such tariffs aim to protect domestic industries from unfair international competition. The USITC is conducting these investigations under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. For more information, parties can visit the USITC’s official websites or contact the Commission directly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission to Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews on Tire Imports Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a decision to conduct full reviews concerning imports of passenger vehicle and light truck tires. These reviews focus on tires imported from South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The reviews are part of the regular process under the Tariff Act of 1930. The aim is to decide if ending the duties would lead to harm for the US tire industry. The specific duties in question include a countervailing duty order on tires from Vietnam. There are also antidumping duty orders on similar tires from South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. The decision was made on September 4, 2026. The reviews will follow a schedule, which will be announced later. The Commission found responses from South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam to be adequate to move forward with full reviews. Though the response from Taiwan was found inadequate, the Commission decided to include it in the reviews. This choice is to ensure efficient administration alongside other countries involved. The public can access the Commission’s records and vote details through their official website or electronic docket system. For more information, individuals can contact Alec Resch at the USITC. The Commission also provides special assistance for those with mobility impairments or hearing difficulties. The reviews are authorized under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, with the notice officially published under the Commission’s rules. This decision is part of the USITC’s responsibility to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Investigation Initiated on Certain DRAM Devices by U.S. International Trade Commission Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a new investigation concerning certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) devices. This is following a complaint filed by Netlist, Inc. on August 11, 2026. A supplement to this complaint was also filed on August 25, 2026. The complaint claims there are violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It involves the importation and sale of DRAM devices within the United States. These violations are due to the infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,025,731, 10,217,523, 12,373,366, and 12,675,407. The USITC is asked to investigate and, if necessary, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they might stop certain DRAM devices from being sold if they infringe on these patents. The investigation will look into whether an industry in the U.S. is already established or is in the process of being established. To find out more, the public can look at the electronic docket of the USITC at edis.usitc.gov. The parties accused of violating the law include Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Super Micro Computer, Inc. These companies must respond to the complaint within 20 days after receiving it. If they don’t respond in time, they could lose the chance to present their side. This could mean the USITC will proceed with the investigation and could lead to more actions against them. The USITC seeks a detailed investigation into whether a domestic industry is impacted. They will review evidence and arguments to decide if the United States industry is being protected. The process is based on the rules of the USITC and aims to reach a fair decision on the matter. The decision to start this investigation was made on September 22, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this order on September 23, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Receives Complaint on Wearable Monitoring Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the receipt of a new complaint. This complaint is about certain devices. The devices are wearable activity and health monitoring systems. The complaint was filed by a company named UnaliWear, Inc. They filed it on September 21, 2026. The complaint concerns some companies. These companies include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. from South Korea, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. from New Jersey. Google LLC from Mountain View, California is also named. Garmin Ltd. from Switzerland and Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc. from Kansas are part of the complaint too. The complaint states that these companies have broken U.S. trade laws. The laws say that they cannot import, sell for import, or sell in the U.S. after importing, certain devices that might be infringing UnaliWear’s rights. UnaliWear wants the Commission to take action. They are asking for a limited exclusion order. This order would stop the devices from being sold in the United States. UnaliWear also wants a cease and desist order. This would require the companies to stop selling the devices. The Commission is asking for public comments. They want to know if these actions would affect the public interest. This means they want to know if it would affect the health, safety, and welfare of people in the United States. They also want to know how it would affect competition in the United States. People can send comments to the Commission. They need to do this by a certain date. This date is eight days after this notice is published. The comments should only be five pages long. People can send their comments through the Commission’s electronic document system online. This notice and request for comments were issued by Lisa R. Barton, the Secretary to the Commission. The notice was filed on September 23, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Ruling on Boiler Protection Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) made an important decision on September 21, 2026. They found a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves some boiler protection systems and their parts. The systems in question are used for absorption refrigeration. They were found to infringe on claims 1, 4, 6, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,056,360. This patent belongs to ARPC LLC and Paul N. Unmack from Butte, Montana. A general exclusion order was issued. This order stops the import of the infringing boiler protection systems into the U.S. Cease and desist orders were also issued against companies that did not respond to the orders. The investigation started on June 18, 2025. The complaint alleged that certain companies imported and sold these infringing products in the U.S. These companies include Koofang, Bydorunce, RVGIVE, and more, mainly based in China. Several companies were found in default for not responding. These are Koofang, RVGIVE, Little Bear Pocket, and VISVIC. On May 21, 2026, the final decision supported the complainants. The commission confirmed the violation concerning the claims in the patent. The economic impact of these violations was considered and found significant. Finally, a bond of 100% of the value of the infringing products is required during the President’s review period. This decision highlights the importance of protecting U.S. patents from unfair import practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Violation Case Involving Flash-Spun Nonwoven Materials Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a decision to review parts of a case involving flash-spun nonwoven materials. The Commission is examining allegations of violating Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This investigation, numbered 337-TA-1424, looks at unfair trade practices. The case began after DuPont, a company based in Delaware, filed a complaint. DuPont claims that certain products were illegally imported, sold, and impacted their business in the U.S. The products involved are flash-spun nonwoven materials. DuPont says its trade secrets and trademarks, such as the TYVEK Word Marks and the Blue Octagon Mark, were misused. There are several companies involved. Respondents include some based in China, like Kingwills New Material Technology and Xiamen Dangs, among others. Some U.S. companies involved are Harbourpoint Innovations in North Carolina and Emedia Group in South Carolina. The ITC had found that certain companies were not following the rules. They have already made decisions about some companies. For instance, Harbourpoint, Shenzhen Zhengming, Emedia, and endur-tec agreed to consent orders, which means they agreed to stop certain practices. In July 2026, an administrative law judge found that Kingwills and other companies violated some rules. They misused DuPont’s trade secrets and infringed on trademarks. The ITC is also looking at what kind of punishment or remedy to apply. They could stop more of these products from entering the U.S. with something called an exclusion order. There might also be orders to stop unfair practices. The Commission wants people to send in their views about what should be done. They are especially interested in how a decision might affect the public. The topics include the impact on health, competition, and consumers in the U.S. Written submissions are due by October 5, 2026, for initial comments and October 12, 2026, for replies. The Commission will take all the information into account before deciding. The decision by the Commission is based on detailed rules from the section 337 of the Tariff Act and will look at all angles, including effects on businesses in the United States. The ITC’s decision illustrates their ongoing work to ensure fair trade and protect U.S. companies against unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Case on Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a review of a decision in a case involving glass substrates for liquid crystal displays. This case is called Investigation No. 337-TA-1433. The investigation started because Corning Incorporated, a company from New York, said there were violations of a law called Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint by Corning said that some businesses were importing and selling glass substrates that might have been made using Corning’s trade secrets. Trade secrets are special information a company uses to make its products. Corning believes that using these trade secrets without permission could harm their business in the U.S. Some companies were part of this investigation. These include LG Electronics U.S.A., VIZIO, HKC Corporation, Hisense USA, Caihong Display, TCL China Star Optoelectronics, TTE Technology, CHOT, and others. Over time, some of these companies were not part of the investigation anymore because of settlements or other reasons. Recently, a judge found that certain companies, like Caihong Display, CHOT, CSOT, and TCL, violated Section 337. The violation was about misusing trade secrets. On July 23, 2026, the judge made this decision. Later, on August 6, 2026, the judge recommended that if the Commission agrees with the findings, they should issue a limited exclusion order. This order could last about 5 to 6 years. It might stop certain products from coming into the U.S. Also, a cease and desist order might be issued for TCL, meaning they have to stop certain activities related to this case. As part of their review, the Commission is looking at various points. They are asking questions about the relationships between companies like CHOT and CSOT and their connection to the case. The Commission wants to know if these companies knew about the trade secrets being misused. The Commission is also asking for written submissions on other issues related to the public interest and how this situation affects the market and consumers. They are also interested in what kind of penalties or remedies should be in place. Everyone involved, like government agencies, companies, and other interested parties, can send their opinions to the Commission by October 5, 2026. Replies to these submissions should be sent by October 13, 2026. There are strict guidelines about how long these submissions can be. The final decision might include actions like keeping some goods from entering the U.S. or making companies stop certain business practices. This process is meant to protect U.S. businesses and the economy while considering public interest. The USITC will vote on its final decision. Any remedies or actions taken will be reviewed by the U.S. Trade Representative. The representative will decide whether to approve the decision or not. In conclusion, this case is important for maintaining fair trade practices and protecting valuable trade secrets. The USITC will continue to review and decide the best course of action. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Wearable Breast Pumps Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a new investigation about some wearable breast pumps. This investigation began because of a complaint filed on August 20, 2026. The complaint was from Willow Innovations, Inc., a company from Mountain View, California, and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd. from the United Kingdom. The complaint says that some wearable breast pumps and milk storage containers are being imported and sold in the United States. This happens after they come into the country. The complaint claims that these products infringe, which means they violate, certain U.S. patents. A patent gives someone the right to be the only person making, using, or selling their invention. The patents in question are U.S. Patent No. 11,660,380, U.S. Patent No. 12,370,292, U.S. Patent No. D1,053,344, U.S. Patent No. 11,813,388, and U.S. Patent No. D1,031,993. The complaint also says that there is a related industry in the United States. It asks the Commission to look into this issue and to possibly stop the importing and selling of these products. The products being looked at are described as “wearable breast pumps, associated milk storage containers, and components including separately sold milk collection containers and replacement parts.” The investigation started officially on September 21, 2026. The purpose is to see if the breast pumps and related products really do infringe on these patents. The investigation also wants to see if there is an industry in the United States for these products or if such an industry is being built. The companies being investigated are based in different parts of the world, including China, Hong Kong, and the United States. Some of them are: Shenzhen Root Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. in China, Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Ltd. in Colorado, USA, and Root Technology, Ltd. in California, USA. The USITC won’t have the Office of Unfair Import Investigations participate as a party in this investigation. For those named in the investigation, they must respond to the complaint within 20 days. If they don’t, they might not be able to defend themselves later. This investigation could lead to some companies not being allowed to import or sell certain breast pumps in the United States if they are found guilty. By: USITC News Desk Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Related to Vertical Power Delivery Systems Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently received a complaint involving vertical power delivery systems. This complaint was filed by Vicor Corporation on September 9, 2026. The complaint alleges that there are violations of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves certain vertical power delivery systems coming into the United States. The systems are part of computing systems and their components. Vicor Corporation named several companies in the complaint. These companies are from different parts of the world, including the United States, Taiwan, Germany, China, and Canada. The companies include Delta Electronics, Inc., Infineon Technologies AG, and Foxconn, among others. The USITC has asked for public comments on this complaint. They want to know if there are any public interest issues. The comments should focus on how the requested relief would impact public health and welfare, the economy, and competitive conditions in the U.S. The USITC also wants to know how such orders could affect U.S. consumers. People can send comments electronically no later than eight days after the USITC’s notice is published. The USITC will handle this case using section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This act helps manage issues with imported goods that may harm U.S. industries. It also allows the USITC to act if they find the complaint valid. Contact Lisa R. Barton at the USITC, if more information is needed. The Commission’s electronic filing system, called EDIS, is available for document submissions. This is an important case, and the USITC is keen to hear from the public about possible impacts on America. They encourage people and companies to share their views. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Dolby Joins Investigation on Video Devices and Patents Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a significant decision. They decided not to review an initial decision about Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Dolby wanted to join an investigation as an “intervenor.” An “intervenor” is someone who is not directly involved but wants to take part because it affects them. The administrative law judge agreed, and the ITC will not change this decision. The investigation began on April 2, 2026. InterDigital, Inc., a company based in Wilmington, Delaware, filed a complaint. They were joined by InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc., also from Wilmington, and InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS from Paris, France. Together, they wanted the ITC to look into certain electronic devices. The complaint said these devices, like smart TVs and monitors, might be infringing on U.S. Patents. The patents in question have numbers. For example, U.S. Patent No. 8,085,846, and a few others. They believe these devices are being imported or sold in the U.S. while infringing on these patents. The notice named specific companies involved. They are from China, Hong Kong, Vietnam, and the United States. Some of these companies include TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. and Hisense Co., Ltd. These companies are collectively called “Respondents.” Dolby Laboratories, not initially involved, filed a motion in July. They wanted to join in because two patents in the investigation, ‘168 and ‘751, concerned them. Dolby said they should have participation rights. This means they want to be involved in discussions about these patents. Complainants were against Dolby’s motion, but the Respondents did not oppose it. On August 12, 2026, the administrative law judge issued an order. This order, known as Order No. 17, agreed with Dolby. While Dolby can be an “intervenor,” they will not be a “respondent.” Being an intervenor means Dolby can join in discussions and decisions about the patents mentioned. The ITC’s action means Dolby can fully participate regarding these two patents. Their involvement starts with Order No. 17 and relates to all claims and defenses in the investigation about these patents. This decision is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific ITC rules. The ITC made their decision official on September 9, 2026. Lisa Barton, the ITC’s Secretary, issued this announcement. This showcases how important patents are in the technology industry and how companies protect their innovations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Investigations on Pizza Boxes from China, Malaysia, and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C. — The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of investigations on corrugated pizza boxes imported from China, Malaysia, and Turkey. The investigations begin today as a preliminary step to determine if these imports harm U.S. industry. The investigations will focus on whether the imported pizza boxes are sold at unfairly low prices, known as “dumping.” Additionally, they will examine if the Turkish government is unfairly supporting its manufacturers, known as “subsidizing.” The USITC has 45 days, until October 26, 2026, to make a preliminary determination. By November 2, 2026, the Commission will share its findings with the Department of Commerce. This action follows petitions submitted on September 9, 2026, by the American Pizza Boxes Manufacturers Coalition. This coalition consists of companies like Smurfit Westrock plc, Pratt Industries, Inc., and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW). Anyone interested in participating in these investigations must file by September 21, 2026. A list of all interested parties will be developed for future communication. A conference will be held on September 30, 2026, to discuss the investigations further. This meeting will be held via videoconference, and guidelines are available online at the USITC Public Calendar. Written submissions are also accepted. These must be submitted by October 5, 2026, and may include presentations from participants. It is important that all documents adhere to the provided guidelines and are filed promptly through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Participants must certify the accuracy of their submissions and be aware that their information can be used during the investigations. These investigations are being conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. For more information, you can reach Alejandro Orozco at 202-205-3177 or view the public record online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Investigates Citric Acid Imports Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations concerning imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts. These investigations aim to determine if these imported products are causing harm to the U.S. industry. The investigations focus on imports from Canada, India, and China. The Commission will determine if these imports are subsidized by foreign governments or sold in the U.S. at less-than-fair-value. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. They are included whether they are dry, in solution, or packaged. It covers all forms, sizes, and blends of these substances. Intermediate products, like calcium citrate, are also included. Background Information The investigations began after petitions were filed by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Cargill International, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC. They are checking if imports from Canada sell at fair prices, and whether Canadian and Indian imports receive unfair subsidies. Hearing Information A hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2027, at 9:30 a.m. Those wishing to appear must notify by January 6, 2027. Some witnesses can appear via video if necessary. The hearing will help the Commission understand the issues better. Participation and Written Submissions Parties wishing to participate need to file entries of appearance 21 days before the hearing. They must submit evidence and arguments about the case. Prehearing briefs are due by January 5, 2027. Posthearing briefs are due by January 20, 2027. The Commission will release information on February 2, 2027. Final comments from parties are due by February 4, 2027. The Commission is conducting its investigation under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Public interest and fair trade are at the core of these investigations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Review on Certain Safety and Glow Fish Tape Systems Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced it will review a decision regarding some glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems. This is based on allegations that Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Background of the Case On March 19, 2025, Klein Tools, Inc. filed a complaint, claiming Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation had infringed on certain patents related to glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems. The patents in question involve U.S. Patent Nos. 11,452,327, 11,713,209, and 12,187,573, among others. The investigation named Milwaukee as a respondent, and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part. Findings and Review On June 5, 2026, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (CALJ) concluded that Milwaukee violated the ‘265 patent, a helmet patent but did not infringe on others. The ITC plans to review specific findings related to both helmet and glow fish tape patents to check for any possible errors in construction, infringement findings, and domestic industry requirements. Call for Submissions The ITC is inviting detailed submissions on intricate aspects of patents and industry standards. This includes comparing foreign and local investments by Klein, the motivation for combining prior patents, and analyzing the public interest regarding potential remedies. Potential Remedies Should there be a violation finding, the ITC may issue exclusion orders and cease-and-desist orders against Milwaukee. Considerations are being made on how these actions may affect public health, competition, U.S. production, and consumers. Public Interest and Bonding The Commission is taking public interest into account before any orders. During a possible 60-day review by the U.S. Trade Representative, imported items could be allowed in but under a bond. Deadline for Submissions Parties connected to this case are asked to submit their input by September 18, 2026, with responses by September 25, 2026. The ITC is ensuring that the review process respects confidentiality rules while seeking thorough submissions addressing key issues. This situation remains under close observation by involved agencies and parties, as it could influence industry practices related to patent infringements and trade actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Details of the Complaint The complaint was filed by trinamiX Sensing LLC and trinamiX GmbH on September 4, 2026. It claims violations of the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically section 337. This section is about importation issues. The complaint targets Apple, Inc. from Cupertino, CA, saying they are involved in improper importation and sale of mobile devices and components. Request for Orders TrinamiX wants the Commission to issue several orders. They ask for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Additionally, they want a bond imposed during a 60-day Presidential review period. Public Comments Invited The USITC invites comments from the public, government, and other parties. They are interested in understanding how these orders might affect the public in the U.S. How the articles in question are used in the U.S. Concerns about public health, safety, or welfare. If there are similar products made in the U.S. If these U.S products can quickly replace the imports. How the orders might affect U.S. consumers. Comment Submission Details Comments must be submitted no later than eight days after this notice is published. If any complaints reply to the comments, they must do so three days after initial submissions are due. Submissions can only be made electronically. They should refer to “Docket No. 3934.” The Commission will only accept electronic filings unless an exemption is granted. Confidentiality Requests If anyone wants their submissions to be confidential, they must request it specifically. They should provide reasons for the confidentiality request according to the rules. Conclusion This new complaint is a significant issue. The USITC is carefully considering the impact of potential orders on the U.S. public and economy. They are asking everyone to submit comments to help them make informed decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments on Discriminations Against US Commerce Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is calling for public comments on how it should implement its duties under Section 338(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission is responsible for keeping informed about any discrimination against United States commerce by foreign countries. It must also report these findings to the President and provide recommendations. The USITC is seeking suggestions from interested persons on how to fulfill these responsibilities effectively. Deadline for Comments Comments must be submitted by November 9, 2026. Interested persons should submit their comments to Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, at the USITC’s address in Washington, DC, or through the online portal. How to Submit Comments Comments can be submitted via the USITC website or by email. When submitting, include the docket number MISC-053 in any correspondences. The Commission will post all comments on its website without changes, including personal information. Contact Information For information, contact Margaret Macdonald, General Counsel, Office of OGC. Media inquiries can be directed to Jennifer Andberg in the Office of External Relations. Hearing-impaired individuals can use the TDD terminal. Submitting Confidential Information If comments contain confidential information, they must comply with specific rules on confidentiality, including clear labeling of confidential content. Information Requests The USITC is asking for comments on several topics: Definition of “unreasonable” and “discriminatory” actions by foreign governments in international commerce. Methods that foreign countries use to impose unfair burdens on U.S. commerce. Processes for the USITC to obtain relevant information from the public, including methods to protect sensitive information. How the USITC should analyze the gathered information and communicate findings to the President. The USITC aims to gather comprehensive input to guide its future actions under Section 338(g). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Semiconductor Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) decided not to review a key initial determination. This decision was related to Investigation No. 337-TA-1443. The investigation was about foreign-made semiconductor devices. It also involved products using these devices and their components. The investigation was based on a complaint from Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited. These companies are located in Dublin, Ireland. The complaint suggested violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It was about importing semiconductor devices into the United States. The complaint also covered selling these products for importation and domestic sales after importation. The complaint said these actions violated certain patent rights. Five U.S. patents were named in the complaint. These were U.S. Patent Nos. 7,745,847; 9,093,473; 9,147,747; 9,184,292; and 9,953,880. Some companies were named as respondents. They included Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Apple, Broadcom Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies, OnePlus Technology, and Qualcomm Inc. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also a party to this investigation. During the investigation, some amendments were made. For instance, Lenovo Group Limited was replaced with other Lenovo entities. Initially, certain claims of the patents were dropped from the investigation. These decisions were based on withdrawal requests from the Complainants. Later, the claim against Apple was settled through an agreement. On July 14, 2026, the Complainants and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation. They reached a settlement agreement. The motion had support from the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. On August 5, 2026, the administrative law judge granted the motion to terminate the investigation entirely. This decision considered all parties involved and the connections between them. As a result, the USITC decided not to review this initial determination. The investigation concluded completely. This determination follows the rules and authority given by section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, along with the Commission’s Procedures rules. By this conclusion, all actions and claims in Investigation No. 337-TA-1443 are now closed. This outcome was officially documented by Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently made a decision regarding an important investigation. The investigation focused on certain foreign-made semiconductor devices. These devices were made overseas and then brought into the United States. The investigation began on March 26, 2025. It was based on a complaint filed by two companies from Dublin, Ireland. These companies are Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited. They claimed that some semiconductor products were entering the U.S. illegally, in violation of certain patent rights. These products were alleged to infringe on several U.S. Patents related to semiconductor devices. The investigation named several big companies as respondents. These include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Apple, Broadcom Inc., Lenovo, Motorola, OnePlus, and Qualcomm. All these companies were accused of having products that might use the patented technology without permission. During the investigation, changes happened. Lenovo Group Limited was replaced with their different regional offices, including Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina, in the investigation list. Some claims related to other patents were also ended when the complaints were withdrawn. On June 26, 2026, Apple was removed from the investigation. This was because Apple settled the matter through an agreement. In July 2026, the companies involved, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC), decided to settle the matter. They filed a joint motion to end the investigation. The motion was not opposed by the other parties. On August 5, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge approved this motion. After review according to the Commission’s rules, the investigation was ended entirely. The Commission decided not to review the judge’s decision, officially terminating the investigation on September 3, 2026. This means that the investigation is completely over. The case showed how companies can resolve matters through settlement even in complex international trade issues. The decision is backed by U.S. laws related to unfair trade practices. These laws are part of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more detailed information, people can visit the USITC’s electronic docket service online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Welded Line Pipe from South Korea and Turkey: Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has officially announced its schedule for expedited five-year reviews concerning welded line pipe imports. These reviews aim to assess whether canceling the antidumping duty orders on welded line pipe from South Korea and Turkey, as well as the countervailing duty order on similar products from Turkey, might cause continued harm to U.S. industries. The Commission initially declared its intention to conduct these reviews on August 4, 2026. The domestic parties responded adequately to this notice. However, the response from the respondent interested party group was deemed inadequate. This lack of adequate response led to the decision to proceed with expedited reviews. Commissioner Amy A. Karpel did not take part in this decision. Interested parties are invited to submit written comments related to the determinations of these reviews. The deadline for these submissions is October 29, 2026. It is important to note that these comments should not include any new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review timeline, comments on their final results must be submitted within three business days. The USITC staff will prepare a report to be included in the nonpublic record. It will be available to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews by October 22, 2026. A public version will be released later. The reviews have been classified as extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, the USITC has decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This action is authorized by the Tariff Act of 1930. All documents filed by parties must be served on all other parties involved in the reviews. A certificate of service is required for the acceptance of the documents for filing. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this order, confirming the scheduling and procedural details. The USITC has published this information under the specific authority granted by the Tariff Act of 1930. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Tech Products Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided to end an investigation involving certain electronic devices. The investigation was about video-capable laptops, desktop computers, handheld computers, tablets, televisions, and projectors. The investigation began on May 19, 2025. It was based on a complaint by Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Corporation from Finland. The complaint said that some products violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. These products were being imported and sold in the United States. They said this was happening because of the infringement of four U.S. patents. The companies listed in the complaint were Hisense, Acer, and ASUS. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also involved. During the investigation, several patent claims were terminated for different reasons over time. Some claims were settled, while others were removed based on specific orders. Finally, on July 17, 2026, Nokia, Acer, and ASUS made a joint request to end the investigation completely. They said this decision was due to arbitration agreements. The U.S. International Trade Commission agreed not to review this motion. Thus, the investigation has ended entirely. This decision was made official on August 31, 2026. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued the order. The authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Partially Reviews FID on Patent Violation Investigation Involving Samsung Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a decision to review parts of a Final Initial Determination (FID) in a patent infringement case. This case involves certain mobile electronic devices. The Commission is specifically revisiting key findings regarding Samsung Electronics. Background of the Investigation The investigation began on January 23, 2025. It was initiated by a complaint from Maxell, Ltd., a company based in Kyoto, Japan. Maxell claims Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with unfair practices in import trade. Maxell alleges that Samsung has imported mobile devices infringing on several patents. Focus on Specific Patents and Claims The investigation looks into several patents. These include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,130,280 (‘280’), 11,490,004 (‘004’), 11,750,915 (‘915’), 11,509,953 (‘953’), 12,108,103 (‘103’), and 11,445,241 (‘241’). The FID issued by the Administrative Law Judge found a violation concerning the ‘004 patent but not the others. Major Actions and Decisions Judicial Notice and Briefing Disputes: In May 2026, Samsung requested judicial notice of a Final Written Decision (FWD) by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which found certain claims of the ‘241 patent unpatentable. This request was granted, but Samsung’s motion for supplemental briefing was denied. Final Initial Determination: The FID, dated July 1, 2026, concluded: A violation of section 337 for the ‘004 patent. No violation for the ‘280, ‘103, ‘953, and ‘241 patents. Consideration for a limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders against Samsung. Commission’s Current Review The Commission has decided to review: The findings related to the ‘004, ‘103, ‘953, and ‘241 patents completely. The economic aspect concerning the ‘280 patent. Additional Submissions from Parties The Commission requests further clarification on certain technical points: The meaning of “frame” in the ‘004 patent. Differences in how redesigned products use the focus setting region. The interpretation of display requirements in the claim language. Public Interest Concerns Both Maxell and Samsung have submitted statements on public interest. Maxell believes public interest does not oppose excluding infringing Samsung products. Conversely, Samsung thinks public interest factors argue against providing such a remedy. Next Steps and Deadlines Parties and interested agencies must submit written responses on remedy, public interest, and bonding by September 14, 2026. Replies are due by September 21, 2026. The Commission will consider these submissions carefully as it finalizes its review of the FID. The USITC continues to serve its role in regulating trade practices, ensuring compliance with U.S. laws, and considering the greater public interest in such matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Recliner Mechanisms Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the receipt of a new complaint. This complaint is about certain powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms. These mechanisms are used in seating units. The complaint was filed by Ultra-Mek, Incorporated; Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; and L & P Property Management Company. It focuses on imports of these mechanisms into the United States. The complaint states that these imports violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about unfair trade practices. The complaint lists several companies as respondents. These companies are from countries like China, Vietnam, and Singapore. The USITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know if this issue affects public health and welfare. The Commission is also interested in competitive conditions in the U.S. economy. They want to learn about how these imports might affect U.S. consumers. The Commission has a process for how complaints are handled. They have asked people to submit their thoughts within eight days. The public can view the complaint on the Commission’s website. People with hearing problems can use a special phone number to get information. The complaint requests a limited exclusion order. It also asks for cease and desist orders. If these orders are made, they could stop the sale of certain products. The Commission uses special rules to handle these kinds of cases. People can submit comments and confidentiality requests following these rules. If you are interested in this issue, you can check the USITC website for more details. This action is important because it affects how trade rules are enforced in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Notice of Investigation: Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a new investigation. This investigation is about melanoma predictive and prognostic tests. Castle Biosciences, Inc. from Friendswood, Texas filed a complaint. This was done on July 10, 2026. The complaint states that there are unfair acts related to importing these tests into the U.S. It involves false and misleading advertising. This may threaten an industry in the U.S. Castle Biosciences wants the Commission to look into this. They also want certain orders issued. The investigation will see if there is a violation. This falls under subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The accused products include melanoma predictive and prognostic CP-GEP tests and components. The named respondents include: SkylineDx Holding B.V., based in Rotterdam, Netherlands. SkylineDx USA, Inc., located in San Diego, California, USA. Qiagen GmbH, from Hilden, Germany. QIAGEN LLC, based in Germantown, Maryland, USA. Responses to the complaint and notice of investigation are needed within 20 days. This is according to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. If respondents do not reply in time, they may lose the right to contest. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will oversee the proceedings. The Commission aims for a clear and fair examination of the issue. This move shows the USITC’s ongoing duty to maintain fair competition. They are looking to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews on Steel Grating from China Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews. This will determine if removing duties on steel grating from China will cause harm to U.S. companies. These reviews are conducted under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission decided on August 4, 2026, that the response from U.S. companies was adequate. However, the response from Chinese companies was inadequate. Due to this, the Commission will not conduct a full review. Instead, they will perform expedited reviews as allowed by law. Commissioner Johanson voted for full reviews, but the majority chose expedited reviews. The staff report provides private information about the reviews and will be released for those with permission on October 14, 2026. A public version will be available later. Comments from interested parties are due by October 21, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The USITC will accept comments from parties involved in the review, but others may submit a short statement. If the Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its reviews, comments will be due three days afterward. Comments containing confidential business information must follow the rules. Documents filed must be shared with all parties involved and include proof of service. The Secretary will not accept any filings without this proof. The Commission has declared these reviews very complicated. It has extended the review period by up to 90 days. This is allowed by law. These reviews are managed under the authority of the Tariff Act. The announcement is published according to the Commission’s rules. By order of The Commission, issued on August 20, 2026, by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Wearable Breast Pumps Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced receiving a complaint regarding Certain Wearable Breast Pumps, Associated Milk Storage Containers, and their Components. This complaint was registered under Docket Number 3932. The complaint was filed on August 20, 2026, by Willow Innovations, Inc., and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd. The complaint states there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the import, sale for import, and sale within the United States. The goods in question are wearable breast pumps and related items. Who Is Involved? The complaint has named several respondents. These include Shenzhen Root Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Ltd. of Aurora, CO, and Root Technology, Ltd. of Beverly Hills, CA. Other companies involved are Share Info, Inc. of Flushing, NY, Shenzhen TPH Technology Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Horigen Mother & Baby Products Co., Ltd. of China. The list also includes Anker Innovations Limited of China, Fantasia Trading, LLC of Ontario, CA, Power Mobile Life LLC of Bellevue, WA, TPH Technology Malaysia Sdn Bhd of Malaysia, Foshan Shunde Ruiteng Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Youmeng Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. of China. What Is Being Requested? The complainant has asked the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. It also asks to impose a bond on the respondents’ alleged infringing products during the 60-day Presidential review period, as per 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Call for Public Comments The Commission is asking the public for comments on any public interest issues related to the complaint. They welcome input on how the requested relief might affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the economy, and the production of similar articles in the country. Comments are also needed on how this would impact U.S. consumers. Specifically, the commission wants to know: How the articles are used in the U.S. Any public health concerns related to the orders. If there are similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the subject articles. Whether the complainant or others have the capacity to replace the volume of articles if excluded. How the orders would affect U.S. consumers. Deadline for Comments Written submissions on the public interest must be submitted no later than eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. Following any final initial determination, there will be more chances for public input. Replies to any submissions should be filed within three days of the initial submission deadline. Submission Guidelines Submissions must be filed electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings will be accepted unless granted an exemption. Questions about filing should be directed to the Secretary at the USITC. Confidential Treatment Requests Anyone wishing to submit documents in confidence must request confidential treatment and provide reasons. The Commission will only treat submitted documents as confidential if the request is properly made. Nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection. The action is authorized under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). By order of the Commission, issued on August 20, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

ITC Terminates Investigation on LCD Device Patents Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a decision regarding an investigation involving liquid crystal display devices. This decision, officially recorded in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026, concludes a matter that began in November 2025. The investigation was labeled as Investigation No. 337-TA-1462. This case involved a complaint filed by BH Innovations LLC, along with Longitude Licensing Limited and 138 East LCD Advancements Ltd. from Ireland. They claimed that certain companies were infringing on their patents. The complaint specifically mentioned U.S. Patent Nos. 7,705,948 and 7,570,334. The complaint alleged that certain companies were involved in unauthorized importation and sales of products that used these patents. The list of companies involved included many from China and the United States. Major companies named were LG Electronics from South Korea and Westinghouse Electric Corporation from Pennsylvania. On July 16, 2026, the Complainants decided to withdraw their complaint. They submitted a second amended motion for this purpose. The respondents did not oppose this motion. The motion included settlement agreements that had been missing in earlier filings. On July 22, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge approved this motion. The judge agreed that ending the investigation would save resources. No party requested a review of this decision. On August 20, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the judge’s decision. Thus, the investigation is officially terminated. The legal basis for this decision is section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and part 210 of the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This announcement was made by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The official document number for this decision is 2026-17295, filed on August 24, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Battery Imports Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation concerning certain secondary cylindrical batteries. This investigation is based on a complaint filed by LG Energy Solution Ltd. of Korea and LG Energy Solution Arizona, Inc. on July 21, 2026. The filing is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint alleges that certain secondary cylindrical batteries and related products infringe on several U.S. patents held by LG Energy Solution. These patents include U.S. Patent No. 8,420,257, U.S. Patent No. 11,749,866, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,924, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,965, and U.S. Patent No. 12,646,735. The complaint states that improper importation and sale have occurred, violating section 337. The complainants seek an investigation and request the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order. They also seek cease and desist orders to prevent further infringement. On August 20, 2026, the ITC considered the complaint. It ordered an investigation to determine if the alleged violations occurred. The investigation will assess if there is infringement of claims on these patents and if a U.S. industry is being established. The accused products, described plainly, are secondary (rechargeable) cylindrical batteries and their components. Products containing these batteries are also included in the investigation. Several respondents are named in the investigation. They include EVE Energy Co., Ltd. from China and several other associated entities. Also named are Robert Bosch GmbH from Germany, Koki Holdings Co., Ltd. from Japan, and Chervon (China) Trading Co., Ltd. from China, among others. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will designate a presiding Administrative Law Judge for the investigation. Respondents must submit responses within 20 days of the service of the complaint. If a respondent fails to provide a timely response, this may lead to a waiver of their right to contest the allegations. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. This legal process highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property in international trade. The investigation will determine if the involved parties have indeed violated U.S. laws on imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Electronic Devices with Certain Audio Technologies” and is listed under Docket Number 3931. The complaint was filed by BoomCloud 360 Inc. They submitted it on August 14, 2026. The complaint alleges violations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States of certain electronic devices. The respondents named in the complaint are Apple, Inc. from Cupertino, CA; Samsung Electronics America Co., LTD. from South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. from Ridgefield Park, NJ; and Google LLC from Mountain View, CA. BoomCloud 360 Inc. wants the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and impose a bond on the alleged infringing items for a 60-day Presidential review period. The Commission is asking for comments about any public interest issues the complaint may raise. This is in line with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments should discuss whether providing the requested relief will affect public health and welfare in the United States. They should also consider competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, and the production of similar articles in the U.S. The Commission is interested in comments that discuss: How the articles could be used in the United States. Any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. Similar articles made in the United States. Whether BoomCloud 360 and other suppliers can replace the items quickly. How the orders would impact U.S. consumers. Comments on public interest are due eight calendar days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. The complaint filer may respond to comments three days later. Submissions should not be longer than five pages, including attachments. Documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The docket number 3931 should be on the cover page. Requests for confidential treatment must explain why it is needed. Only electronic filings are accepted unless an exemption is granted. The actions are based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wireless Devices Case Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking for public comments about a possible legal case. This case is about some wireless communication devices and their parts. On August 14, 2026, a judge from ITC said there might be a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about keeping certain products out of the U.S. if they break trade rules. The Commission wants to know if removing these products from companies like Dell Technologies, Dell Products, and Lenovo (United States) Inc. would be good or bad for the public. They want to know how it might affect people’s health, the U.S. economy, and the choices U.S. consumers have. The ITC is asking for details on these points: How are these devices used in the U.S.? Are there any health or safety concerns if these products are removed? Are there similar products made in the U.S. that can replace these items? Can these U.S. makers quickly supply enough products to replace the ones that might be removed? How will this affect consumers in the U.S.? People and government agencies can send their comments. They must keep comments to five pages. The deadline for sending comments is September 15, 2026. The comments must be filed online. Each comment must have “Investigation No. 337-TA-1429” visible on the first page. If someone wants to keep their comment private, they have to mark it clearly and follow the rules for private comments. The ITC will use the information to decide if they should stop these devices from coming into the U.S. or not. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the ITC, made this announcement on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) published a notice to start an investigation. This investigation involves certain transformers and their components. The investigation began after a complaint was filed on July 16, 2026. Ayr Energy, Inc., based in Mountain View, California, is the company that filed the complaint. They claim that some transformers coming into the United States break certain laws. The complaint says these transformers are brought to the U.S. illegally. The reasons include misuse of trade secrets, misleading advertising, and unfair competition. The complaint also accuses the transformers of trademark infringement and false labeling. These actions might harm the industry in the U.S. The complaint wants the Commission to check the issue. Ayr Energy asks for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they want certain imports stopped and specific actions to stop. The transformers in question include power transformers, inverter duty transformers, distribution transformers, and their parts. These parts might include core steel, windings, tanks, and insulation systems. Four companies are named as respondents in the complaint. They are Zetwerk Manufacturing Businesses Private Limited from India, Zetwerk Manufacturing USA Inc. in San Francisco, KRYFS Power Components Ltd. from India, and Unimacts Global, LLC from Massachusetts. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is involved in this case. They will ensure fair procedures are followed. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint an Administrative Law Judge to oversee the case. The respondents must respond to the complaint within 20 days of receiving it. If they don’t, it might mean they agree with the complaint’s claims. This could lead to stopping certain imports or activities from the respondents. The public can view the complaint details online. The USITC has also provided contact information for those needing assistance or information about this investigation. In conclusion, the USITC is taking necessary steps to address potential illegal activities involving transformer products. This investigation shows the seriousness of protecting U.S. industries and upholding trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Amazon and InterDigital Due to Arbitration Agreement Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has ended an investigation involving certain video-capable electronic devices. This decision was made because of an arbitration agreement between InterDigital, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. The investigation, known as 337-TA-1481, started on January 23, 2026. It was looking into whether devices imported into the United States infringed on patents owned by InterDigital. InterDigital is based in Wilmington, Delaware. The investigation named Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC as respondents. Both companies are based in Seattle, Washington. The investigation was about several patents. These patents were related to video-capable electronic devices. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations chose not to participate in this investigation. In April 2026, the ITC decided to end part of the investigation. This concerned one of the claims related to U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674. On July 13, 2026, InterDigital and Amazon asked to terminate the investigation. They filed a joint motion. They based their request on an arbitration agreement. On July 17, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) agreed to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion to terminate was proper because of the arbitration agreement. The rule says that investigations can be ended if parties agree to arbitration. The ALJ said there were no other agreements between the parties. Ending the investigation did not harm the public interest. No one asked to review the ALJ’s decision. The ITC decided not to review it either. The investigation is now fully terminated. The decision happened on August 13, 2026. The ITC used authority from the Tariff Act of 1930 and its procedures to make this decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this decision. The full notice was published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Off-Road Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding the investigation of certain off-road vehicles and their components. The investigation is numbered 337-TA-1490. The matter involves the company Polaris and claims about imported vehicles. The ITC has chosen not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge (ALJ). This decision was about changes to the case, called an initial determination (ID), under Order No. 10. The investigation started on March 9, 2026. It is based on complaints from Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Sales Inc. These companies are located in Medina, Minnesota. They claim violations of the Tariff Act of 1930 regarding some off-road vehicles imported into the U.S. The investigation focuses on certain patents held by Polaris. These patents include U.S. Patent Nos. 7,819,220; 7,950,486; 8,613,337; 9,217,501; and 12,187,127. The ITC is looking at whether these patents have been infringed upon. They are also checking if there is a domestic industry issue due to these imports. The respondents named in this investigation are Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co. from Hangzhou, China, and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. from Plymouth, Minnesota. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part in this investigation. On June 26, 2026, Polaris made a motion. They wanted to change the complaint. They asked to include new claims related to their patents. Polaris wanted to focus on the ZFORCE® Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles. They also wished to end some claims about another patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220. The judge agreed with Polaris and said the changes would not harm the public or those involved. There were no oppositions to this motion. No one asked for a review of this decision. The ITC decided not to carry out a review. This means claims 7 and 8 of one Polaris patent are no longer part of the investigation. New claims from two other patents are now being focused on. The Commission voted on this issue on August 13, 2026. The actions and decisions follow the rules in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. This update helps clarify what the ITC is doing in this investigation and what changes have been made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Takes Action Against Ink Cartridge Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has taken a significant step to protect American businesses and consumers. In a recent decision, the ITC found that certain ink cartridges and their components violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC has issued a General Exclusion Order. This means that products infringing specific patents cannot be imported into the United States. The infringing products include those violating claims of patents numbered: 8,764,172, 9,370,934, 11,535,038, 12,240,248, and 12,240,249. The ITC has also issued Cease and Desist Orders. These orders are against two companies: Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. These companies are prohibited from importing and selling the offending products in the U.S. The investigation started on June 17, 2025. The investigation was based on a complaint by Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. The complaint alleged that certain companies were infringing on specific Epson patents by selling and importing particular ink cartridges. The ITC named numerous companies in the investigation. Many of these companies are based in China. The ITC found several companies in default as they did not respond to the investigation. The companies include Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd., and others. Some companies were removed from the investigation on January 8, 2026, due to different circumstances. On March 24, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination. The judge found evidence that supported Epson’s claims. This determination served as a basis for the ITC’s final decision. The ITC reviewed the effect of its orders on public interest. They considered health and safety, competitive conditions in the U.S., and the impact on American consumers. After a thorough review, the ITC decided that issuing the orders would not harm public interest. The decision was finalized on August 13, 2026. The ITC has implemented a bond during the Presidential review period. This bond is set at 100% of the value of goods imported. The Commission’s action demonstrates its commitment to upholding intellectual property rights. It aims to support American industries and prevent unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-08-12 The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is taking an important step. The ITC is looking at prestressed concrete steel wire strand that comes from China. They want to decide if taking away antidumping and countervailing duty orders will harm U.S. producers. The ITC announced that these reviews started on July 6, 2026. The purpose of these reviews is to see if cancelling current duties would lead to problems. These problems could happen if Chinese products start to hurt U.S. businesses. The ITC has chosen to do expedited reviews. This means they are trying to work quickly. They decided this because not enough responses were received from Chinese parties. The domestic groups gave enough responses, but Chinese groups did not. A special report will be available on October 7, 2026. This report will be a staff report and will help the investigation. Those who have permission can see it sooner. The public will get to see a version of this report later. The public can also participate. People can send comments to the ITC by October 14, 2026. These comments will help decide the final outcome. However, people need to follow certain rules. They cannot include new facts in their comments. The ITC is also prepared to extend the review period if needed. They have the power to add up to 90 more days to their process. The ITC is following special rules and laws. They are using the Tariff Act of 1930 to guide their review. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this information. This is an important event to watch. It affects companies in the U.S. and how they compete with products from China. Keep an eye on the ITC for more updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Expedited Review for Boltless Steel Shelving From China: A Legal Update Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an expedited review process. This will examine antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China. The review is crucial to decide if canceling these duties would hurt the U.S. industry. This review is important as it affects trade and helps protect U.S. businesses. The USITC noted that the domestic group’s response to the review notice was adequate. However, the response from the respondent group in China was inadequate. The expedited review began in July 2026. The final comments and written submissions are due by September 1, 2026. Documents must be served to everyone involved in the reviews. A certificate of service has to be filed as well. The USITC has extended the review period as it is complicated. The extension allows for up to 90 more days for the review process. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order on August 7, 2026. The detailed legal notice is available in the Federal Register. This process is part of a routine review to ensure fair trade practices. The USITC plays a key role in maintaining a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.