U.S. Delays Preliminary Finding on Chinese MDI Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is delaying its preliminary decision in an investigation on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) imports from China. The investigation began on March 4, 2025. It examines if MDI from China is sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This kind of investigation is called a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. A preliminary determination was due by July 22, 2025. But, on June 24, 2025, the Ad Hoc MDI Fair Trade Coalition, the petitioner, requested more time. The group said this extra time is needed so Commerce can review the questionnaire responses from the mandatory respondents. It will also help Commerce ask for more information if needed. Rules say the Department of Commerce can approve this kind of delay if a request is made 25 days before the scheduled decision. The Department will allow such a request unless there is a strong reason not to. Now, the Department is postponing its preliminary determination by 50 days. This means the new deadline is September 10, 2025. The Department says there are no reasons to deny the petitioner’s request. After the preliminary decision, the final determination will be due 75 days after the preliminary result is published, unless it is postponed again. This notice was made official on July 8, 2025, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This announcement follows U.S. law and federal rules. For further information, the contacts at the Department of Commerce are Christopher Maciuba at (202) 482-0413 and Kayden Jenson at (202) 482-0967. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Releases Preliminary Results on Countervailing Duties for Wooden Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Countervailable Subsidies Determined Commerce has found that Chinese producers and exporters received subsidies that are subject to countervailing duties. The two main companies reviewed were KM Cabinetry Co., Limited and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. Both received subsidy rates above the minimum level. KM Cabinetry Co., Limited received a preliminary net subsidy rate of 11.85 percent. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. received a preliminary net subsidy rate of 9.33 percent. Other companies that were not individually reviewed received a review-specific average rate of 9.51 percent. Partial Review Rescission Commerce has partially rescinded this review for 31 companies. This includes 21 companies that had their requests for review withdrawn on time, and 10 companies with no reviewable entries during the review period. Lists of these companies are in Appendix II and Appendix III, respectively. Methodology and Procedures Commerce conducted this review under section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930. They found that subsidies were provided by the Chinese government and were specific to certain recipients. For companies not selected for individual review, Commerce calculated a weighted average rate, following guidelines from the Trade Act. Public Comment and Hearing Requests Commerce is inviting comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties can submit case briefs within 21 days of the notice. Rebuttal briefs may be filed within five days after case briefs. Parties who want to request a hearing must do so within 30 days after the publication of the notice. Cash Deposit and Assessment Rates After the final results, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits at the new rates for shipments entered on or after the date of publication. For non-reviewed companies, the all-others rate of 20.93 percent remains in effect. Companies for which the review is rescinded will be assessed at their cash deposit rate during the review period. Final Results Timeline Commerce expects to issue the final results within 120 days of the publication of the preliminary results. Contact Information For more information, interested parties may contact Suresh Maniam or Michael Romani in the AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-1603 or (202) 482-0198. Appendices Appendix I: Topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Appendix II: Companies that withdrew requests for review on time. Appendix III: Companies with no reviewable entries during the period. Appendix IV: Non-selected companies subject to the review. The full document and detailed procedures can be accessed via the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at http://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on R-125 from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the preliminary results of its latest antidumping duty review on pentafluoroethane (R-125) imported from China. This review covers shipments made from March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. Antidumping Review Background An antidumping duty order on R-125 from China has been in place since March 3, 2022. The recent review was started after requests from several companies and a U.S. petitioner. The companies included Shandong Dongyue Chemical Co. Ltd. (Dongyue), Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. (Sanmei), and Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd (Yonghe). Sanmei was chosen as the main respondent for this review. The Department set and changed several deadlines for reviewing the case, with the current preliminary results dated July 7, 2025. Scope of the Review The order covers pentafluoroethane (R-125) coming from China. The full scope is detailed in the preliminary decision memorandum, available online. Partial Rescission of Review The Department decided to rescind, or cancel, the review for Dongyue. There were no reviewable shipments by Dongyue during the period of review. This decision follows standard practice. Separate Rates Eligibility The Department reviewed which companies could get their own separate rates, rather than being grouped with all exporters from China. Sanmei submitted all required documents and remains eligible for a separate rate. Yonghe did not send in a separate rate certification. This means Yonghe will not get its own separate rate. Instead, it is grouped with the China-wide entity. Treatment of the China-Wide Entity Yonghe is now considered part of the China-wide group since it did not qualify for a separate rate. The China-wide entity’s rate stands at 267.51 percent and is not being changed in this review. Preliminary Dumping Margin For the review period, the Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 60.08 percent for Sanmei (including its named affiliates). Next Steps The Department will release its calculations to interested parties within five days. Parties have 21 days after this publication to submit comments, called briefs. Rebuttal briefs, limited to arguments in case briefs, may be filed within five days after that. Parties must submit all briefs electronically, following the rules for formatting and service. They should also provide a summary for each issue they raise, no longer than 450 words. A hearing can be requested within 30 days. The Department intends to issue its final results within 120 days unless an extension is needed. Assessment of Duties When the review is finalized, the Department will tell U.S. Customs how much antidumping duty to collect on entries covered by the review. For Sanmei, this will be based on either entered values or quantity, depending on the details reported. For Dongyue, since the review was rescinded, duties will be assessed at the rate in place when the goods entered the U.S. For Yonghe, now part of the China-wide entity, a rate of 267.51 percent will be applied. Cash Deposit Requirements After final results are published, new cash deposit rates will take effect for future entries according to these rules: For exporters listed with new rates, those rates apply. For Chinese and non-Chinese exporters who received a separate rate previously, those rates stay the same. For all other Chinese exporters without a separate rate, the 267.51 percent rate for the China-wide entity applies. For non-Chinese exporters without a specific rate, the rate of the Chinese supplier applies. Importer Responsibilities Importers must file a certificate about reimbursement of duties. Not filing can lead to double collection of antidumping duties. Review Process These preliminary results are published according to U.S. law and regulations. The Department reminds all interested parties to comply with procedural requirements as the review continues. For more details, documents, and the full decision memorandum, see the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Moves Forward With Countervailing Duties on Chinese R-125 Chemical Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of a review of countervailing duties on pentafluoroethane (R-125) from the People’s Republic of China. This chemical is used in refrigerants. The review looked at the time from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review was for two companies: Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. (Sanmei) and Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. (Yonghe). Other linked companies were also included as “cross-owned” with each main company. Subsidy Rates Found Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. and cross-owned company: Subsidy rate at 3.02 percent ad valorem. Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. and cross-owned companies: Subsidy rate at 182.51 percent ad valorem. Countervailing duties are taxes on imports that get subsidies from their home country. U.S. law says the government should collect them if subsidies give companies a special advantage. Process and Timeline Commerce started its review after it received requests on time. Questionnaires about subsidies were sent to the Government of China to forward to the companies. The review followed laws in the Tariff Act of 1930. The review included looking at financial help from the Chinese government and its effect. Commerce used some “facts available with adverse inferences.” This means if information was missing or unclear, decisions could be made based on facts that may not favor the company missing the data. Public Comment and Hearings Interested parties can send comments on these results. Written comments are due no later than 21 days after the notice is published. Rebuttal comments are due five days after that. All documents must be sent electronically and include a table of contents and a list of sources. Executive summaries for each issue discussed must be included at the start of briefs. If anyone wants a hearing, they must ask within 30 days of the publication of the notice. Hearings, if scheduled, will focus only on issues raised in the written briefs. Assessment and Cash Deposits Once the review is final, Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) how much duty to collect on the affected imports during the review period. This will be done at least 35 days after the final results are published. After the final results, Commerce will also tell CBP to collect cash deposits on future imports at the rates in this review. Other companies not reviewed will keep using the most recent rates. Next Steps This is not the final decision. Commerce plans to finish the review within 120 days of these preliminary results, unless they extend the deadline. The public can read the full Preliminary Decision Memorandum through the online system ACCESS. Key Dates Preliminary results published: July 11, 2025 Final results expected in about 120 days Deadlines for comments and hearing requests set after publication Federal Register notice number: 2025-12956 Contact for more information: Seth Brown, AD/CVD Operations, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-0029. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on Engine Import Rules From China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce began a new inquiry. This is about if some engines from China are trying to avoid U.S. import rules. These rules add extra taxes, called antidumping and countervailing duties, to certain engines from China. Briggs & Stratton, a U.S. engine maker, asked for this inquiry. They want to know if two engine models made by Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., Ltd. in China are bypassing the current rules. The models are called 5C65M0 and BC70M0. These engines are currently not included in the import rules. They are labeled “Commercial” or “Heavy Commercial” engines, which are usually excluded. But Briggs & Stratton says these two engine models were made after the original rules were set. They believe these models are only slightly different from engines already restricted, and should now be included in the list that gets the extra taxes. The U.S. Department of Commerce will look at several things, including: Do these new engines look and work the same as the ones already covered by the rules? Are the buyers’ hopes and uses the same? Are they sold the same way as the other engines? Are the engines advertised like the ones already restricted? Were these engines available in stores or ready to sell before the rule-making started? If engines are found to fit these, they may be added to the rule. This would mean the special taxes will apply. The inquiry will not only review Zongshen’s engine models. It may cover all small commercial vertical shaft engines from China. Engines without some commercial features or with some home-use features might also be part of the review, no matter who makes or sells them. The Department of Commerce expects to decide within 150 days of this notice. This means there could be a decision by the end of 2025. The engines discussed in these rules are small, spark-ignited, vertical shaft engines, with a size between 99 cubic centimeters (cc) and less than 225 cc. They are mainly used for walk-behind lawn mowers and other outdoor power tools like pressure washers. Engines covered by these rules must follow certain EPA air pollution standards. Some engines are excluded, like “Commercial” or “Heavy Commercial” types. To be excluded, an engine must: Be at least 160 cc in size, Have a cast iron cylinder liner, Have an automatic compression release, Have a muffler with at least three chambers and a volume over 400 cc. Currently, only the parts for these engines are under the extra tax if imported together. Mounting the engine on equipment does not keep it out of the rules; only the engine is taxed. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep holding any engines that may be part of this review. The Department of Commerce has put full details on their website. All interested companies and people have been notified about this new inquiry. More updates will come as the Commerce Department continues its review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Countervailing Duties on Tungsten Shot from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Background of Investigation The United States Department of Commerce has announced its final determination that producers and exporters of certain tungsten shot from the People’s Republic of China are receiving countervailable subsidies. The period of investigation covers January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. This action follows a preliminary determination published on December 20, 2024, and further analysis issued on February 6, 2025. The investigation examined whether Chinese producers of tungsten shot received unfair government subsidies. There were no comments from interested parties challenging the scope of the investigation. Commerce checked documents from companies involved, especially Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd. (KJ Super), using standard inspection and verification methods. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers tungsten spheres or balls, known as shot, that are at least 92.6 percent tungsten by weight, not counting any coatings. The examined shot measures from 1.5 millimeters to 10.0 millimeters in diameter. This can also be called “Tungsten Super Shot.” The shot may be coated with other metals, and may enter U.S. customs under tariff codes 9306.29.0000 or 8101.99.8000. Final Subsidy Rates Commerce found the following subsidy rates for January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023: Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd.: 55.64% subsidy rate All others: 55.64% subsidy rate Seven other named companies: 292.84% subsidy rate* These companies are Luoyang Combat Tungsten & Molybdenum Materials Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Hypersolid Metal Tech Co., Ltd.; Mudanjiang North Alloy Tools Co., Ltd.; Shaanxi Xinheng Rare Metal Co., Ltd.; Xi’an Refractory & Precise Metals Co., Ltd.; Zhuzhou Oston Carbide Co., Ltd.; Zhuzhou Tungsten Man Materials Co., Ltd. (*Rates with an asterisk are based on facts available with adverse inferences.) Investigation Methods and Findings Commerce followed legal steps set out in section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Each subsidy program was checked for financial contributions by government authorities, benefits to companies, and whether the subsidies were targeted. Some results used “facts available” because certain information was missing. In these cases, adverse inferences were applied according to the law. Commerce also updated benchmark prices for tungsten and freight expenses, and revised certain rates after reviewing information verified during the investigation. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is holding cash deposits and has suspended liquidation on tungsten shot from China for entries made on or after December 20, 2024. This suspension stopped for entries made after April 19, 2025, but remains in place for previous entries. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds in its final review that the domestic U.S. industry is hurt by these imports, Commerce will issue a permanent countervailing duty order. If the ITC finds no harm, all duties collected will be refunded. ITC and Disclosure Commerce will share its final determination with the ITC. The ITC will determine within 45 days if U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. During this period, parties can see Commerce’s calculations. This includes detailed information about rates and subsidy programs. Administrative Protective Order Commerce reminded parties under an administrative protective order (APO) to destroy or return all confidential material as required by federal rules. Appendices The notice includes: Appendix I: Full technical definition of what products are covered. Appendix II: Summary topics from the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including discussion points such as calculation of benchmark prices, government role, use of adverse facts, and treatment of business information. Contact For questions, parties may contact Samuel Evans at the U.S. Department of Commerce, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX. Official Publication The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 11, 2025, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidy Rates for Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidy Rates for Corrosion Inhibitors from China On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its preliminary findings for the 2023 countervailing duty administrative review on certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers products imported into the U.S. between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Companies Reviewed The review included two main companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. (ATC) and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. (Botao). The Department also looked at several other companies that were not chosen for individual examination. Preliminary Subsidy Rates The preliminary findings show: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd.: 44.65% subsidy rate Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd.: 44.06% subsidy rate For companies not individually examined but still under review, the preliminary subsidy rate is set at 44.36%. These companies include: Connect Chemicals China Co., Ltd. Connect Chemicals GMBH Gold Chemical Limited Kanghua Chemical Co., Ltd. Partial Rescission of Review The Department has decided to end the review early for five companies. For Jiangyin Delian Chemical Co., Ltd., the review was withdrawn by request. For Relic Chemicals, Sagar Specialty Chemicals Pvt., Ltd., Vcare Medicines, and Yasho Industries Pvt. Ltd., there were no entries of the product during the review period. Thus, no further review was needed for them. Method Used Commerce conducted its review according to U.S. law. They looked at which companies got subsidies from the Chinese government and if those matched the law’s definition of a subsidy. Some decisions relied on information from “adverse facts available” under certain situations. Verification and Public Comment The Department plans to check (verify) the information provided by ATC and Botao. Interested parties can send in case briefs and written comments. Specific timelines for these comments will be told to the parties. A short executive summary is required for each issue in briefs, and parties can also request a hearing. All documents and briefs must be filed electronically through the government’s ACCESS system. Cash Deposits and Assessment If these preliminary rates are finalized, U.S. Customs will collect cash deposits based on these subsidy rates for relevant imports from the date the final notice is published. If a company’s final rate is zero or “de minimis,” no cash deposits will be required. Companies for which the review has been rescinded will have duties assessed at the cash deposit rate in effect at the time of entry. Assessment instructions will follow after the final results are published, no sooner than 35 days after publication. Next Steps Unless the deadline changes, the Department will issue the final results within 120 days of this preliminary announcement. The final results will include analysis of arguments and further details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets High Dumping Rate on Tungsten Shot From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a final finding in its investigation of certain tungsten shot from China. Officials found that tungsten shot from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The time covered by this investigation is from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Scope of the Investigation The products covered are tungsten spheres or balls, often called shot or “Tungsten Super Shot.” These are 92.6% or more tungsten by weight. Their sizes range from 1.5 millimeters to 10.0 millimeters in diameter. The product may also have coatings such as copper, nickel, iron, or metal alloys. It is usually classified under HTSUS codes 9306.29.0000 and 8101.99.8000. Investigation and Comments No changes were made to what is considered part of this investigation, as no interested parties commented on the scope after the first decision. The Department could not verify information sent by Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd. (KJ Super) due to restrictions by the Chinese government. Final Decision and Dumping Margin The Commerce Department reviewed all the information and comments. They used adverse facts available (AFA) against KJ Super because the information given could not be verified. As a result, KJ Super is considered part of the “China-wide entity” for the purposes of this decision. The final estimated dumping margin (or the rate of price undercutting) for the China-wide entity is 201.32 percent. This was the highest rate claimed in the original petition. Suspension of Liquidation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to hold up liquidation of any tungsten shot from China, entered or withdrawn from a warehouse for use since February 19, 2025. Importers must pay a cash deposit as security for possible antidumping duties. The Department of Commerce did not adjust the dumping rate because there is no active countervailing duty (CVD) order involving export subsidies for this product. Next Steps and ITC Role The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the U.S. industry has been hurt by these imports. The ITC has 45 days from July 11, 2025, to make its final decision. If the ITC finds injury or threat of injury, an antidumping duty order will be issued, and duties must be paid on all relevant tungsten shot imports from China. If the ITC does not find injury, the investigation will end, cash deposits will be returned, and held imports will be released. Additional Information Anyone handling private information for this investigation must follow the rules for returning or destroying such information. The written description of the tungsten shot is the official scope of this finding, even though product codes are listed for convenience. For full details, see Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 131 (July 11, 2025), pages 30849-30850. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is available through the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system, ACCESS. The decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Inquiry Into Circumvention of Aluminum Container Duties Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started formal investigations into imports of disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids made in Thailand and Vietnam using Chinese aluminum foil. Officials are checking if these products are avoiding existing antidumping and countervailing duties on aluminum containers from China. Who Requested the Inquiry The inquiry follows a request from the Aluminum Foil Containers Manufacturers Association and its members. These include Durable Packaging International; D&W Fine Pack, LLC; Handifoil Corp.; Penny Plate, LLC; Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC; Shah Foil Products, Inc.; Smart USA, Inc.; and Trinidad/Benham Corp. Scope of the Duties The duties in question target disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids produced from flat-rolled aluminum. This includes aluminum containers of any shape or size, whether wrinkled or smooth. What is Being Investigated The focus is on aluminum containers made in Thailand and Vietnam using Chinese-origin aluminum foil, and then shipped to the United States. Investigators want to know if these steps are used to bypass existing trade duties on Chinese products. Legal Background Commerce is acting under section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific federal rules. The rule states that if products are completed in a third country from materials or goods subject to a trade order, and the final step is minor or adds little value, then those products can also be included under the original duty orders. Investigators will consider several points: Is the final assembly or processing in Thailand or Vietnam minor or basic? How much value does the Chinese aluminum add compared to the final product’s value? What are the investment and production levels in the third countries? Are there changes in trade patterns since the duties on China started? Are the companies in Thailand or Vietnam tied to those in China? Next Steps Commerce has found enough information to start a country-wide inquiry. They will ask certain companies in Thailand and Vietnam about their aluminum container production and exports to the U.S. Using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data, Commerce will choose the companies to contact. They will update their electronic system, ACCESS, within five days of this notice. Interested parties can comment within seven days after the data is posted. If the companies do not answer fully, Commerce may use available facts, which could include adverse conclusions. Suspension of Liquidation CBP will continue holding the entries of these aluminum products and require cash deposits as if they were covered under current duty orders. If Commerce eventually decides these products are avoiding duties, the suspension will continue, and additional measures may be taken for entries after November 4, 2021, per current regulations. Timeline Commerce aims to make a preliminary decision in 150 days and a final ruling in 300 days from the July 11, 2025 notice date, unless extended or changed. Official Notice This investigation is led by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. The public can see detailed rules and findings through the Federal Register and related checklists. Contact Information For more information: – Justin Enck: (202) 482-1614 – Yun Liang (Vietnam): (202) 482-3108 – Ann Marie Caton (Thailand): (202) 482-2607 These officials are with the Trade Remedy Counseling and Initiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results in PVLT Tires Countervailing Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the administrative review for countervailing duties on certain passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires from China. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce. The Department found that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of PVLT tires from China during the review period. No comments were received from interested parties on the preliminary results, so the Department adopted the preliminary results as final. No changes have been made, and therefore, no decision memorandum was issued with this final notice. Scope of the Order The order covers passenger vehicle and light truck tires imported from China. For a full description of the products involved, reference is made to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum associated with this review. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the period under review: Company Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., Ltd. 125.50 Disclosure Normally, Commerce releases its calculation methods to interested parties. In this case, because there were no changes from the preliminary results, there are no new calculations to disclose. Assessment Rates According to U.S. law, Commerce will have Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assess countervailing duties at the rates listed above. This will apply to all proper entries of the subject merchandise. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results. If a summons is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will not liquidate the relevant entries until the period to file for a statutory injunction expires, which is within 90 days of publication. Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the rates shown above for shipments entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The cash deposit instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order (APO) The notice reminds parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to follow procedures for the return or destruction of proprietary information. Failure to comply with APO rules can result in sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties The Commerce Department published these results in accordance with applicable sections of U.S. trade law. The notice was dated July 7, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review on Steel Racks from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On July 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its administrative review of antidumping duties for certain steel racks and parts from China. This review covers the period from September 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. Background and Review Process The Department of Commerce began this review on October 10, 2024. Interested parties were invited to comment. The deadline for the review was extended several times, with the final results issued on July 3, 2025. The review follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Steel racks and parts are under the scope of this order, as detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Key Results The Department found that some Chinese exporters sold steel racks in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., along with Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. and Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., received a final weighted-average dumping margin of 11.18 percent. Jiangsu Starshine Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. did not get a separate rate and was treated as part of the China-wide entity. The China-wide entity’s dumping margin remains at 144.50 percent and was not reviewed or changed. Differential Pricing Analysis The Commerce Department made changes in its analysis methods for these results. This is based on recent court decisions about statistical tests used to find dumping. The agency used a revised method for analyzing differential pricing, as explained in its memorandum. The method for calculating dumping margins did not change from the preliminary results. Separate Rates Jiangsu Nova received separate rate status. Jiangsu Starshine did not and is included in the China-wide group. This decision is unchanged from the preliminary results. No parties commented on this decision. Assessment Rates Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how much antidumping duty to assess on these products. These instructions will be given no earlier than 35 days after publication of these results. For Jiangsu Nova, assessment rates are based on the total amount of dumping over the value of goods sold to each importer. If the rate for an importer is zero or very small, duties will not be collected. If Jiangsu Nova did not report a sale for certain shipments, those entries will be assessed at the China-wide rate of 144.50 percent. For Starshine, the assessment rate is 144.50 percent, the China-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements Jiangsu Nova: 11.18 percent. Exporters with separate rates not reviewed: their current rate. Other China exporters without a separate rate: 144.50 percent. Non-China exporters without a separate rate: the rate for their China supplier. These rates remain until further notice. Reminders for Importers Importers must file a certificate if antidumping duties have been reimbursed, before liquidation of entries. If not filed, Commerce may assume reimbursement and double the duties. Administrative Protective Order (APO) Parties under APO must return or destroy proprietary information as required. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. Legal Notices These results are issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(5). For more details, the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s website. Contact Information Questions should be directed to Jonathan Hill at (202) 482-3518, U.S. Department of Commerce. Dated: July 3, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Steel Propane Cylinders from China and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on steel propane cylinders from the People’s Republic of China and Thailand. On August 15, 2019, the Department of Commerce first published AD orders on steel propane cylinders from China and Thailand, and a CVD order on steel propane cylinders from China. On July 1, 2024, both Commerce and the ITC began their first five-year “sunset” review of these orders. After reviewing the case, both agencies found that removing these orders would likely lead to new or ongoing dumping, more countervailable subsidies, and harm to the U.S. industry. On July 1, 2025, the ITC confirmed that ending these orders would probably cause continued or new injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably short time. As a result, the orders will remain in place. Scope of the Orders The affected products are steel cylinders used for compressed or liquefied propane or other gases. These cylinders meet certain specifications, like USDOT 4B, 4BA, or 4BW, Transport Canada 4BM, 4BAM, or 4BWM, or United Nations ISO 4706. Steel propane cylinders included range in capacity from 2.5 pounds (about 6 pounds water capacity and 4-6 pounds empty weight) up to 42 pounds (about 100 pounds water capacity and 28-32 pounds empty weight). They can have up to two ports and may come assembled or unassembled. Products such as collars and foot rings for these cylinders are also included. Unfinished or unassembled cylinders (such as unwelded cylinder halves or cylinders missing collars or valves) are covered. Cylinders that fit other standards like ASME or ANSI are included only if they also match the listed USDOT, Transport Canada, or ISO standards. Items that only have extra processing in a third country, such as additional welding, painting, or testing, are still covered by the orders if the processing does not change the basic nature of the propane cylinder. Excluded from the orders are seamless steel propane cylinders, stainless steel cylinders, aluminum cylinders, and composite fiber cylinders. The products mainly fall under Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers 7311.00.0060 and 7311.00.0090, but the written scope matters most. Continuation of Orders With the agencies’ determinations, the Commerce Department has ordered the continuation of the AD and CVD orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting duties (AD and CVD cash deposits) at the rates that are currently in effect for all imports of these products. The effective date for the continuation is July 1, 2025. The next required five-year review is planned before the fifth anniversary of the latest ITC determination. Administrative Protective Order (APO) and Notification This notice reminds all parties of their responsibilities under the APO about returning or destroying confidential information. Timely written notification or conversion of materials is required. Violations of the APO are subject to sanctions. The review and this notice are in line with sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). For More Information Contact Samuel Brummitt at the Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Phone: (202) 482-7851. Date of Issue Dated: July 7, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand On July 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published corrections to earlier antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The corrections address two main issues found in a Federal Register notice from June 24, 2025. Correction for Vietnam Scope Language The first correction adds a missing appendix. This appendix includes full details about the types of solar cells covered in the antidumping order for Vietnam. The original notice only had scope details for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Now, the order on Vietnam has unique language that lists the excluded products and special requirements for imports. Correction for Malaysia Exclusion The second correction adds language related to Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. This company received a zero percent dumping margin. Because of this, shipments from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. are excluded from the antidumping duty order on Malaysia. The exclusion only applies if the company is both the producer and exporter. If the product is shipped by another company, or Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. ships for another exporter, the exclusion does not apply. Updated Table for Malaysia A footnote was added to the table of dumping margins. It notes that Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. is excluded from the antidumping order because it received a zero dumping margin. Scope of Orders: Product Details The orders cover crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells that are 20 micrometers thick or more. These include modules, laminates, and panels whether or not they are assembled into other products. The orders cover products imported as parts if they meet the required definitions. Exclusions from Scope Thin film photovoltaic products made from materials like amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Certain small photovoltaic cells built into consumer products not made for power generation. Small panels with specified voltage, watt, and size limits. Certain off-grid panels, both with and without glass covers, that have unique wiring and packaging characteristics. Off-grid panels made for use in automation or greenhouse systems. Each order for Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam lists all technical product specifications. These include details about size, power output, materials, connectors, and packaging. Commodities Classification The products are listed under various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes, mainly 8541.42.0010 and 8541.43.0010. Specific codes are also listed for possible imports. Legal Notice The correction is published according to sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and in line with 19 CFR 351.205(c). The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Contact Information Vietnam: Deborah Cohen, (202) 482-4521 Cambodia: Hermes Panilla, (202) 482-3477 Thailand: Stephen Bailey, (202) 482-0193 Malaysia: Patrick Barton, (202) 482-0012 These corrections clarify the products covered and not covered by the antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes About the Correction The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued an official correction to its June 24, 2025, Federal Register notice for antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Commerce published a notice on June 24, 2025, about amended final antidumping duty determinations and orders on solar cells from these countries. The correction makes two key changes related to Vietnam and Malaysia. Vietnam Scope Correction The original notice included only one appendix describing the products covered, but two appendices were needed. The corrected notice makes clear there are two appendices, one for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand, and a separate one for Vietnam. Each appendix explains the specific scope of the products under order for those countries. Malaysia Exclusion Correction Commerce also added language about a company named Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. The new information states that solar products made and exported by this company are not covered by the antidumping order on Malaysia. Any products from different combinations of producers or exporters, or by third parties using goods from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., are not excluded. Detailed Product Descriptions Appendix I – Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand Covers crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules, including those partly or fully assembled into other products. Includes cells at least 20 micrometers thick with a p/n junction. Merchandise can be described as parts for finished products, like building-integrated modules. Excludes thin film photovoltaic products made from amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Excludes small crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells not exceeding 10,000 mm² in surface area if permanently integrated into consumer goods with different uses. Excludes various small off-grid solar panels, portable panels, and panels with special shapes, covers, or connections, as described in the appendix. Excludes products already covered by orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. Lists various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes under which the merchandise may enter the U.S. Appendix II – Vietnam Covers the same general types of products as the other countries, but with some differences in the exclusion language. Excludes thin film products, small, integrated cells in consumer goods, and many small off-grid panels. Excludes products used in off-grid greenhouse shade tracking systems with detailed technical criteria. Excludes products already covered by orders on Chinese crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. Lists the same group of HTSUS codes. Table of Malaysia Dumping Margins Lists companies and their dumping margins. Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. has a 0.00% margin and is excluded. Other companies have margins ranging from 8.59% to 81.24%. What This Means The notice clarifies which solar products from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand are covered by these U.S. antidumping duty orders. It also details which products and companies are excluded. The corrections ensure all parties know which specific products are subject to duties. The document was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For more details or questions, interested parties are directed to contact the Commerce officials listed in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets and Vanities Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final results in the first sunset review on the antidumping duty order for wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department of Commerce states that ending the antidumping duty order would likely lead to more dumping of these products from China into the United States. The antidumping duty order was first published on April 21, 2020. It covers wooden cabinets, vanities, and their components made in China. The first sunset review started on March 3, 2025. The review checks if the order should stay or end, as required under the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC, are the parties in the United States who took part in this review. Both groups proved they are part of the U.S. industry involved. No companies or groups from China responded to Commerce during the review. The U.S. Department of Commerce conducted an expedited review because only domestic U.S. parties responded. This process took 120 days. After its review, the Department found that lifting the duties would likely lead to continued dumping. Dumping means selling products in the United States for less than their fair value. The dumping margins, or the amounts by which prices would be less than fair value, could reach up to 262.18 percent. The Department of Commerce’s detailed decisions, including all issues and topics discussed, can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum available to the public online. These results mean that the antidumping duties on wooden cabinets and vanities from China will continue. Parties that have access to confidential information because of the case rules were reminded to return or destroy that information according to Department of Commerce regulations. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, acting for Enforcement and Compliance. The order remains in place as required by U.S. law. The public can find the details and all supporting materials online. This notice was officially published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 126, on July 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Scope in Investigation on Brake Drums From China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction to its final determination about certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China. The correction affects what types of brake drums are included in the investigation of sales at less than fair value (LTFV). The original notice was published on June 18, 2025. It did not update the scope in Appendix I to reflect recent changes. This investigation covers certain brake drums made from gray cast iron. These brake drums can be finished or unfinished. The size is important: they must have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches. Each drum must weigh more than 50 pounds. Unfinished brake drums are those that have had some turning or machining done, but are not ready for installation. The investigation includes brake drums whether imported by themselves or with other goods, such as a hub, assembled or unassembled. If a brake drum is imported as part of an assembly, only the brake drum is covered by the scope. Included in the investigation are brake drums that are finished or unfinished, and then processed further in another country or in the United States. This could include assembly or any process that does not remove the product from the investigation’s scope. Adding non-subject merchandise, in the original country or another country, does not remove the subject brake drum from the investigation. Some items are not included. Merchandise that is already covered by the duty orders on certain chassis and subassemblies from China is not included. Also excluded are composite brake drums that have more than 38 percent steel by weight. The brake drums are identified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The main subheading is 8708.30.5020. They might also be listed under these subheadings when imported as parts of assemblies: 8708.30.5090, 8716.90.5060, 8704.10, 8704.23.01, 8704.32.01, 8704.43.00, 8704.52.00, 8704.60.00, 8708.50.61, 8708.50.6500, 8716.90.5010, 8716.31.00, 8716.39.00, and 8716.40.00. However, the written description of the merchandise is what decides if a product is covered by the investigation. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 30, 2025. The correction is published according to section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Will Keep Countervailing Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a decision on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department finished its first expedited five-year (sunset) review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order. This decision is about wooden cabinets, vanities, and the parts that go with them. Review Process The review began on March 3, 2025. The Commerce Department followed the law in section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC took part as interested parties. They sent their responses by the deadlines set in the rules. No response came from any companies in China or from the Government of China. No one asked for a hearing. Because of the lack of response, the Department of Commerce moved to an expedited review. What Was Reviewed The order covers all wooden cabinets and vanities that are made in China. The detailed scope of the products in the order is found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is public and can be read online at the Department of Commerce website. Final Results The Department determined that ending (revoking) the CVD order would mean countervailable subsidies would likely start again. Subsidies are when the government helps pay to make products cheaper to export. Producers/Exporters Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. 13.33 Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 18.27 Rizhao Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Co. 31.18 Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co., Ltd. 293.45 Deway International Trade Co., Ltd. 293.45 All Others 20.93 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also tells interested parties to follow the rules about handling private information from the case. They must return or destroy sensitive materials on time, or risk penalties. How to Read More Full details of all topics covered, including the background, history, and decision, are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available to the public at https://access.trade.gov. When Does This Start? This decision applies starting July 2, 2025. Who Made the Decision? Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the notice for the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the expedited third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from China. The Department found that ending the antidumping duties would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping margins could be as high as 159.64 percent if the order were removed. Background The original antidumping duty order was published on February 26, 2009. The current review is the third to check if the order should remain. This review follows requirements in the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce started this third sunset review on March 3, 2025. Domestic companies Tokai Carbon GE LLC and GrafTech International Ltd. sent in their notice to participate and filed a substantive response on time. No responses were received from companies in China or other respondent parties. Scope of the Order The antidumping order applies to small diameter graphite electrodes from China. Full details on what is covered are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Review Process Because only domestic interested parties responded, the Department held an expedited, 120-day review. The review looked at whether dumping would likely restart if the order ended and what margins might result. Details are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system. Final Results The Commerce Department determined that removing the antidumping duty order would likely cause dumping to continue or return. The likely dumping margins would be weighted-average margins up to 159.64 percent. Administrative Notes Those subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) should return or destroy all confidential business information as required. Notices for compliance are included. Details Available Results and related documents are available through the Department of Commerce and are filed under Federal Register Document No. 2025-12372. The Issues and Decision Memorandum discusses all major topics, including the likelihood of continued dumping and likely dumping margins. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 27, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Change in Cabinet Import Duties from China Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes On June 12, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final judgment about the countervailing duty investigation into wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This investigation reviewed products made from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The Department of Commerce found that some Chinese exporters received unfair help, or subsidies, from their government. Because of this, extra import taxes, called countervailing duties, were put on these items in 2020. Several companies, including The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. (Meisen), and a U.S. importer called Cabinets to Go, LLC, disagreed with Commerce’s findings. They took the case to court. The main problem was about a program called the Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP). The court wanted proof that the companies did not use this program. Commerce tried to get this information from Ancientree, Meisen, and their customers. Meisen did not give the needed information. Ancientree provided some proof, but not for all customers. After several remand (do-over) decisions, the court told Commerce to calculate new subsidy rates for Ancientree. Commerce was told to only count benefits from the EBCP where they could not prove Ancientree’s customers did not use the support. Commerce recalculated the rates. For Ancientree, the new subsidy rate is 5.06 percent. The new “all others” rate is 18.17 percent. These are changes from the previous rates based on new evidence and the court’s instructions. Ancientree has a different cash deposit rate already set by a later review, so this change will not affect Ancientree’s current cash deposit. Commerce will update cash deposit instructions for other companies using the new “all others” rate. Commerce still cannot liquidate (finalize) the import duties for some entries by Ancientree, Meisen, and other named companies because there are court injunctions in place. These entries will remain on hold while any possible appeals are finished. This notice was published to follow court requirements. The Department of Commerce is following the law and the court’s direction for how to handle these cabinet imports from China. Issued by: Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Date: June 27, 2025 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Amends Preliminary Findings in Countervailing Duty Case on Active Anode Material from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Background On May 28, 2025, the Department of Commerce published a decision saying that there were unfair subsidies for active anode material from China. After this, the American Active Anode Material Producers claimed there was an important ministerial mistake in the calculated subsidy rates for Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of China (together known as Panasonic) and BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic and BTR disagreed and submitted their comments on June 2, 2025. Period of Investigation The investigation covers January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Scope This case focuses on active anode material from China. More details about what is covered can be found in the Preliminary Determination. Analysis of Ministerial Errors A ministerial error is an unintentional mistake like adding incorrectly or copying data wrongly. A significant ministerial error means the mistake changes a company’s countervailing duty rate by five percentage points or more, or moves a rate from “zero” or “de minimis” to above that level. The Department of Commerce agreed that such an error happened when calculating the subsidy rate for Panasonic. Other, smaller errors were also found and corrected. Amended Preliminary Determination After fixing the errors, the Department announced new preliminary net countervailable subsidy rates: Company Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd.; Panasonic 11.58 Corporation of China Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat * 721.03 Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. * 721.03 All Others 11.58 *The rates marked with an asterisk are based on facts with adverse inferences. Panasonic is a trading company. It sold active anode material made by BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd., its affiliates, and other connected companies. The Department of Commerce combined all the subsidy benefits from BTR, its affiliates, and Panasonic into one rate for Panasonic. Cash Deposits and Suspension of Liquidation The cash deposit and suspension of liquidation will now use the new, amended rates. The new, higher rates for Panasonic and all others will start on the date this notice is published in the Federal Register. Notification The U.S. International Trade Commission will be notified of the amended preliminary determination. This official notice was dated June 27, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, who is performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Countervailing Duty Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On 2025-06-24, the U.S. Department of Commerce began investigations into steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam. These are called countervailing duty (CVD) investigations. The investigations will look at whether the governments in these countries gave unfair subsidies to their rebar producers, which could hurt American companies. Background The Rebar Trade Action Coalition, a group of U.S. rebar makers, filed the petitions for these investigations on 2025-06-04. This group said that the governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam were giving unfair help to rebar companies in their countries. The U.S. Department of Commerce also received other petitions asking for antidumping investigations into rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. Who Is Involved The governments named are: Government of Algeria (GOA) Government of Egypt (GOE) Government of Vietnam (GOV) The U.S. companies who support the case are producers of rebar. Investigation Period The period being investigated is from 2024-01-01, through 2024-12-31. What Products Are Included The investigations cover steel rebar used in concrete. Rebar can be straight or in coils. It does not matter how long, wide, or thick it is, or what type of metal it is made from. Rebar that has been further processed (like being cut, painted, or coated) is still covered. “Plain rounds” (smooth, non-bumpy rebar) are not covered. The U.S. government uses Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) numbers to track imports. Most rebar comes in under numbers: 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but other numbers may also be used. Scope Comments Commerce asked for comments about exactly what should be covered in these investigations. Interested parties can submit comments by 2025-07-14. Rebuttal comments are due by 2025-07-24. All comments must be filed electronically. Industry Support The government checked whether enough U.S. producers support the petition. The law says the petitioners must make at least 25% of all U.S. rebar, and more than 50% of rebar made by companies supporting or opposing the petition. The petition met both requirements, so the investigation moves forward. Injury Allegation The U.S. petitioners say rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam is being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices because of government help and is hurting the U.S. rebar industry. They say imports are high, local companies are losing sales, prices are being pushed down, and American companies are doing worse financially. Programs Under Investigation There are 24 programs being looked at in Algeria, 25 in Egypt, and 39 in Vietnam. Each program may involve different types of government support, such as loans or grants. Respondents Commerce plans to select certain companies in each country as “mandatory respondents.” They will likely use U.S. import data to pick which companies to examine most closely. Four companies are identified in Algeria. Thirteen companies are identified in Egypt. Ten companies are identified in Vietnam. Process and Timeline Commerce started the investigations on 2025-06-24. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days from 2025-06-04, if U.S. industry is hurt by these imports. If the ITC finds no injury for a country, the investigation ends for that country. Submissions and Deadlines All filings must be electronic. There are rules for submitting information. If anyone needs more time to file, they must ask before the deadline. All information submitted must be accurate. Notification The governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam have been notified about these actions. Parties interested in these cases must follow special procedures if they want to see confidential information. Next Steps Commerce and the ITC will continue the investigations. If unfair subsidies are found and there is injury to the U.S. industry, extra duties could be placed on rebar from these countries. Appendix—Product Definition The investigations are for steel rebar, in straight form or coils, used in concrete, except for smooth (plain round) bars. The scope is based on the written description, not just the HTSUS numbers. This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 123 on 2025-06-30. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Starts Antidumping Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of antidumping investigations for steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. This action follows petitions filed by the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its member companies. What Are the Investigations About? The investigations are about whether rebar from these four countries is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, known as “dumping.” The petitions say this has caused injury to the U.S. rebar industry. For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt: April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. For Vietnam: October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Product Under Investigation The rebar includes steel concrete reinforcing bar in straight or coil form, regardless of size, length, or grade. Plain rounds (nondeformed or smooth rebar) are excluded. The rebar can be processed further, such as cutting or coating, and still be under investigation. How Are Comments Handled? Commerce asks interested parties to give comments on the scope of the investigations and the physical features of the rebar by July 14, 2025. Rebuttals are due by July 24, 2025. All comments must be submitted using the ACCESS online system. Industry Support Commerce checked that the petitioners represent the U.S. industry making similar rebar. The petitions are supported by domestic producers holding over 50% of the total U.S. production of rebar. Claims of Material Injury The petitioners claim that large volumes of dumped imports have hurt the U.S. industry. Evidence includes lost sales, reduced market share, price drops, and declining production and profits for U.S. companies. Alleged Dumping Margins The estimated dumping margins are: Algeria: 127.32% Bulgaria: 27.79% Egypt: 110.87% to 128.98% Vietnam: 117.61% Respondent Selection Process For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt, Commerce will choose companies for investigation based on U.S. import data and comments from interested parties. For Vietnam, which is a non-market economy, Commerce will use quantity and value questionnaires sent to identified exporters. Separate Rates for Vietnamese Exporters Vietnamese companies that want a separate rate must return both the quantity and value questionnaire and the separate rate application. These are due within specific deadlines after the notice. Mandatory Certification and Procedures All parties submitting information must certify its accuracy. Commerce details how to get access to confidential information and what forms to use. Information should be detailed, accurate, and submitted on time. ITC Review The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days if the imports are harming the U.S. rebar industry. If they decide there is no harm from a country, the investigation for that country will stop. Scope Details The affected products are listed mainly under HTSUS codes 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but may also enter under several other codes. The written description in the scope controls what products are covered. Key Dates and Deadlines Comments on scope or characteristics: July 14, 2025 Rebuttals: July 24, 2025 Vietnamese Q&V questionnaire: July 8, 2025 Separate rate application deadline: 21 days after this notice’s publication Further Action Commerce will make preliminary determinations by 140 days after this initiation unless the timeline is changed. The investigations will continue following all laws and regulations. This article is based entirely on the official Federal Register notice published June 30, 2025 (FR Doc No: 2025-12045). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Delays Preliminary Decisions in Silicon Metal Trade Cases Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a delay in the preliminary determinations for its ongoing countervailing duty (CVD) investigations into silicon metal imports from Australia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos), Norway, and Thailand. The Commerce Department started these investigations on May 14, 2025. The original deadline for the preliminary decisions was July 18, 2025. However, the department received timely requests from the petitioners—Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC—to extend the deadline. Under U.S. law, Commerce can delay a preliminary determination if the petitioner makes a timely request or if the investigation is especially complex. Petitioners must ask for a delay at least 25 days before the original deadline and explain why they need it. Commerce usually grants the request unless there is a strong reason to deny it. The petitioners said the extra time was needed because the current schedule does not allow enough time for Commerce to review the subsidies producers and exporters of silicon metal might be receiving in the four countries. The requests were submitted on June 18 and 23, 2025. Commerce agreed with the petitioners’ reasons and found no reason to deny the request. Because of this, the deadline for the preliminary determinations is now pushed back to September 22, 2025. The new date reflects the need to move the deadline to the next business day, as September 21 falls on a weekend. The final determinations in these investigations will now come 75 days after the new preliminary determination date. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on June 26, 2025. This postponement follows the rules under the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Code of Federal Regulations. If you want more information about these cases, you can contact: Kyle Clahane for Australia at (202) 482-5449 Shane Subler for Laos at (202) 482-6241 Mary Kolberg for Norway at (202) 482-1785 George McMahon for Thailand at (202) 482-1167 All contacts are at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Reviews on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes What Happened On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) began official reviews of many antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews check if companies around the world are selling goods in the U.S. at unfair prices or getting unfair help from their governments. How the Reviews Work Commerce gets requests to review different products every year. For this round, the reviews cover products with May anniversary dates. These reviews use special rules and deadlines. Companies are chosen for detailed checks using trade data from U.S. Customs or from questionnaires about their sales. Commerce can group related companies together if they operated as one in earlier reviews. If a company should be grouped with others, they must list those companies and share past review details. Companies Must Respond Quickly If a company did not send products to the U.S. during the review time, they must tell Commerce within 30 days. If a company wants to stop its review request, it must do so within 90 days. If companies believe the market is not acting fairly (called a Particular Market Situation), they must send this information no later than 20 days after handing in some required paperwork. Special Rules for Non-Market Economy Countries For countries where the government controls businesses, like China, Commerce gives one AD rate to all companies. However, companies can apply to get their own rate if they prove they are not controlled by their government. To do this, they must fill out special forms. These forms are due within 14 days after this notice was published. List of Products and Countries Reviewed Commerce started reviews for many products and countries. Some of these include: Steel products from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Taiwan, Türkiye, and the U.S. Mattresses from Indonesia and Malaysia. Soybean meal from India. Stainless steel from Belgium and Taiwan. Aluminum extrusions from China. Mushrooms from the Netherlands and Poland. Cylinders from China. Large diameter welded pipe from Canada, Greece, Korea, and Türkiye. Optical brightening agents from Taiwan and China. Vertical shaft engines from China. Certain steel nails from United Arab Emirates. Commerce also started CVD reviews for some of these products and countries. Rules for Certification and Deadlines Some companies can apply to get a special certification to ship both reviewed and non-reviewed products. The Certification Eligibility Application form is also due within 30 days. No Requests for Suspension Agreements There were no new requests for suspension agreements in this review round. Duty Absorption and Gap Period Commerce may also check if companies are absorbing (not passing on) the duties. For the first reviews of new orders, no duties are charged for goods imported in a temporary “gap” between two important dates. Steps for Legal Protection and Data Submission Interested parties must apply for access to protected information and follow Commerce’s detailed rules about submitting information and letters. There are five types of factual information, each with strict time limits and special ways to submit them. If a company does not certify its information correctly, its information may be rejected. Extensions for deadlines must be requested before the deadline, and follow very specific rules. Where to Find More Information All deadlines, forms, and rules are available on the Commerce website or from the contact listed in the notice. This notice and the reviews are issued as required by law under section 751(a) of the Act. Who Signed the Notice The notice was signed on June 18, 2025, by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Scope Ruling Applications in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register listing new scope ruling applications in antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) cases. These applications ask the Department to decide if certain products are covered by current AD or CVD orders. What is a Scope Ruling Application? A scope ruling application is a request made to the Department of Commerce to determine if a product is included under an existing AD or CVD order. The orders are trade actions that add duties on imports to offset unfair pricing or government subsidies. New Applications Received in May 2025 Three new applications were filed in May 2025: Printed Fashion File Folder from China Order: A-570-147 (Antidumping) Description: Paper file folders made with CMYK offset printing on 250gsm paper and full plastic lamination. The sheets are die-cut, folded, glued, and assembled into folders. Produced in and exported from: China Applicant: A2V Trade Limited (A2V) Date Filed: May 13, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Fashion File Folder” Certain Forged Steel Fittings from China Orders: A-570-067 (Antidumping), C-570-068 (Countervailing) Description: Automotive brake hose fittings made of 12L14 steel. The fittings have detailed limits on material composition. Lengths range from 3/16 inch to 1/4 inch, and threading dimensions vary. Produced and exported from: China Applicant: AGS Company Automotive Solutions (AGS) Date Filed: May 20, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Brake Hose Fittings” Certain Forged Steel Wheels from China Orders: A-570-090 (Antidumping), C-570-091 (Countervailing) Description: Steel wheels ranging from 14 to 18 inches in diameter and 4 to 10 inches in width. They have bolt hole patterns of four to eight holes, bolt spacing from 4.5 to 6.69 inches, hub bore sizes from 81.7 to 130.8 mm, offset values from -39 to 50 mm, and load capacity from 1,210 to 3,650 lbs. Produced in and exported from: China Applicant: Vision Wheel, Inc. (Vision Wheel) Date Filed: May 21, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Vision Wheel” How Are Applications Processed? The Department has 30 days to accept or reject a scope application. If not rejected or acted upon in that time, the application is considered accepted and a scope inquiry is started on day 31. If a deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, the next business day is used. For products covered by both AD and CVD orders, the scope inquiry is done as part of the AD proceeding. The Department may issue rulings that apply to all similar products from the same country, or just for a specific company. Access to Application Details All applications are available in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. How to Participate Interested parties must file an entry of appearance under specific regulations to join a scope inquiry and be added to the public service list. Parties can comment on the monthly list’s completeness and may request to receive documents during the order’s anniversary month. For more information about filing through ACCESS, see the Scope Ruling Application Guide at https://access.trade.gov/help/Scope_Ruling_Guidance.pdf. Contact Information Questions may be directed to Yasmin Bordas at the Department of Commerce, phone (202) 482-3813. This notice is published in line with federal regulations to inform the public about scope ruling applications received in May 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Issues Correction on Antidumping Duty Measures for Alkyl Phosphate Esters From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction regarding the antidumping duty order for certain alkyl phosphate esters from the People’s Republic of China. The notice corrects a date mistake found in an earlier publication. The publication, dated June 11, 2025, listed an incorrect ending date for the provisional period of the antidumping duty measures. The error involved the last day that provisional measures were in place. The previous notice stated the end date as June 2, 2025. The correct end date is June 1, 2025. The corrected sentence now reads: The provisional measures period, beginning on the date of publication of the Less-Than-Fair-Value (LTFV) Preliminary Determination, ended on June 1, 2025. In line with section 733(d) of the Tariff Act and current practice, Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to end the suspension of liquidation. Customs will liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, entries of alkyl phosphate esters from China that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, after June 1, 2025. This will be in place until the day before the International Trade Commission’s final injury determination is published. Commerce directs interested parties to the full text of the correction for legal references. The notice was signed by Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Abbott. This notice was published following the requirements in section 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. For further information, parties are told to contact Dennis McClure at the Department of Commerce, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII. The correction ensures the lawful administration of antidumping duty and countervailing duty matters related to imports of certain alkyl phosphate esters from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes High Antidumping Duties on Some Chinese Electric Vehicles Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Commerce Finds Dumping The Department of Commerce found that these LSPTVs from China are being sold in the United States for less than their fair value. This means that U.S. companies are hurt because Chinese companies are selling LSPTVs at unfairly low prices. The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products affected are low speed personal transportation vehicles and their parts, even if they are unfinished or unassembled. LSPTVs are small vehicles, with four wheels, a steering wheel, and seats next to each other. They can run on electric or gas power, and cannot go faster than 25 miles per hour. Go-karts, off-road vehicles, mobility scooters, and some other vehicle types are not included. Who Is Affected Many Chinese companies were investigated. Two major companies, Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangdong Lvtong) and Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), were looked at closely. Other companies also asked for lower rates because they said they were different from the main group of Chinese companies. Some of these companies received different rates based on their information. Final Dumping Margins The Department set very high antidumping rates. Here are the dumping margins: Guangdong Lvtong: 119.39% Xiamen Dalle: 312.31% Other Companies with Separate Rates: 291.04% All Other Chinese Companies (China-wide rate): 478.09% This China-wide rate is based on the highest number provided in the investigation because some companies did not work with the Department. Cash Deposit Requirements Now, U.S. Customs will keep holding back money (cash deposits) when these vehicles are brought from China. This deposit matches the rates listed. Liquidation of these imports (final acceptance) will be stopped for entries made after January 30, 2025. Critical Circumstances The Department found that, in some cases, companies were bringing in a lot of LSPTVs just before these new rates would start. For Guangdong Lvtong, many separate rate companies, and the China-wide group, stricter rules now apply for goods entered as far back as November 1, 2024. Certification Rules for Importers Special certification rules now apply for LSPTV parts, like seat assemblies and motors, that could be used to build these vehicles in the U.S. Importers must show detailed proof that these parts do not arrive with unfinished vehicles or rolling chassis. If not enough proof is given, the highest duty rate (China-wide rate) will be required. What Happens Next The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will check if U.S. companies are materially hurt by the Chinese LSPTV imports. If the ITC finds no harm, all the cash deposits will be refunded, and the case will stop. If harm is found, the Department of Commerce will order final duties on the products. List of Companies with Separate Rates Thirty-eight Chinese exporter and producer pairs qualified for individual rates, including companies like Dongguan Excar Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd., Haike EV Co., Ltd., and Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Further Information The full government announcement, including detailed product definitions, specific legal references, and certification requirements, can be reviewed at the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 118, pages 26530-26535, dated June 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Subsidies for Low-Speed Vehicles from China, Sets Duties Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On June 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its final determination in the investigation of certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. The Department found that subsidies are being given to producers and exporters of these vehicles in China. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. Background The Department of Commerce started this process by publishing its preliminary findings in December 2024 and collecting opinions from interested parties. The investigation looked closely at the facts and information provided by companies involved, especially Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Lvtong), Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), as well as two non-responsive companies, Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD., and Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd. Scope of Investigation The investigation covers certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These are mainly open-air vehicles powered by electric motors or gas engines and have traditional seating, four wheels, and a gross weight of no more than 5,500 pounds. Vehicles with a fixed roof and integrated doors or windows are not covered. The investigation also includes unfinished vehicles and subassemblies, also called “rolling chassis,” with or without parts like seats, roofs, or tires. Certain components, like seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, and motors, are not included if they come by themselves and have the right certification. However, if they arrive together with LSPTVs or their subassemblies, or without proper certification, they are included. Methodology and Changes After reviewing all submissions and conducting verification of the information, Commerce made some changes to subsidy calculations from the preliminary stage. The Department used facts available and sometimes adverse findings when companies did not provide all required data. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following subsidy (duty) rates for the period investigated: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD.: 679.44% * Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 679.44% * Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% All Other Producers/Exporters: 41.14% *Rates with a star (*) are based on adverse facts available. Critical Circumstances The Department found that “critical circumstances” applied, meaning that for some companies, duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the preliminary determination (December 6, 2024). This now includes Lvtong, Xiamen Dalle, all others, and the non-responsive companies. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs will collect deposits and suspend liquidation (final settlement) on subject imports that entered the U.S. on or after December 6, 2024. Suspension for entries made after April 5, 2025 (the end of provisional measures), was discontinued, but entries before April 4, 2025, remain suspended. Because of the critical circumstances decision, Customs will suspend liquidation and collect deposits for imports from Xiamen Dalle and all others that entered up to 90 days before December 6, 2024. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that the domestic U.S. industry is injured by these imports, a countervailing duty (CVD) order will be issued, and Customs will continue to collect duties. If the ITC finds no injury, all duties will be refunded. Certification Requirements Commerce now requires importers of certain LSPTV components (Chinese-origin seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, or motors) to certify that these parts are not being combined with subject LSPTVs or subassemblies. Specific certification procedures and records are required, as detailed in the official notice. Importers must keep this documentation for at least five years after the last entry covered or three years after any court cases are finished. If an importer fails to follow these rules, all their affected entries may be considered subject to duties. Next Steps The Commerce Department will notify the ITC of its decision. The ITC will decide within 45 days if imports of LSPTVs from China are causing harm to the U.S. industry. If the answer is yes, Commerce will issue a formal CVD order. If not, the case will end, and money collected will be returned. Appendices The notice includes the full legal definition (“scope”) of the products covered, the importer certification form, and a full list of topics addressed in Commerce’s Issues and Decision Memorandum. For further details, all documents are on file with the U.S. Department of Commerce and available online. Contact Information For questions, contact Dan Alexander in the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce: (202) 482-4313. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Preliminary Results on Tapered Roller Bearings from China Estimated reading time: 3–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings (TRBs) and parts from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period of June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2024. Key Actions Commerce is rescinding the administrative review in part. This means that some companies will no longer be under review. The companies removed from the review are: Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. (CPZ) C&U Metallurgy Bearing Co., Ltd. Sichuan C&U Bearing Co., Ltd. C&U Automotive Bearing Co., Ltd. Hangzhou C&U Bearing Co., Ltd. Commerce is also announcing preliminary findings for two other companies: Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai) C&U Group Shanghai Bearing Co., Ltd. (C&U Shanghai Bearing) Tainai Had No Shipments Commerce found that Tainai did not ship any TRBs to the United States during the review period. This was based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Commerce checked the CBP data and information from Tainai and did not find any shipments from Tainai. C&U Shanghai Is Considered Part of the China-Wide Entity C&U Shanghai Bearing did not apply for a separate rate in this review. Companies without a separate rate are considered to be part of the “China-wide entity.” The rate for the China-wide entity is 92.84 percent. Commerce will apply this rate to C&U Shanghai Bearing. Review Details The review originally included several companies after requests from JTEKT Bearings North America LLC (a domestic company) and CPZ. After business and procedural steps: CPZ withdrew from the review. Four other companies had no entries of subject merchandise. Commerce decided to rescind the review for these companies. Scope of Products The order covers all shipments of finished and unfinished tapered roller bearings and parts from China. It also covers different units and housings that include tapered roller bearings. The products fall under many Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes, such as 8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, and others. Public Participation Parties can submit case briefs or comments about these preliminary results within 21 days of the notice publication. Rebuttal briefs are allowed five days after initial briefs. Hearings can be requested within 30 days, and all submissions must be filed electronically. Assessment and Cash Deposits For companies no longer under review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at the rates on record when the goods were imported. For companies still under review, any duties owed would be based on final results. Tainai’s entries, if any, will be assessed at the China-wide rate of 92.84 percent. The same rate applies to C&U Shanghai Bearing for any subject merchandise during the review period. These cash deposit requirements are effective from the date the final results are published and remain in force until further notice. Next Steps Commerce plans to release final results within 120 days of the preliminary results, unless otherwise extended. These results will help decide the assessment of duties for the review period and future deposit rates. Reminders This notice also reminds parties involved of their responsibilities in handling confidential information according to rules set for Administrative Protective Orders. Contact For more information, contact Jerry Xiao at the U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: (202) 482-2273. Official Publication These actions are taken under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The official notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Chinese Temporary Steel Fencing Gets Unfair Subsidies Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary decision in a trade case about temporary steel fencing from China. The Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of this fencing are getting support from their government. This help is called a “countervailable subsidy.” What Is Being Investigated The investigation looks at “temporary steel fencing.” This fencing includes steel fence panels and stands. The panels have steel tubing and inside material like chain link or steel wire mesh. Most panels are 10 to 12 feet long and 6 to 8 feet high. Both the panels and stands are covered, whether they are imported together or by themselves. Period of the Investigation The period reviewed is from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Companies and Rates Two companies were closely investigated: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd.: 33.27% subsidy rate Shijiazhuang SD Company Ltd.: 139.20% subsidy rate Five companies did not answer questions from U.S. officials. These are: Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd. Sichuan Gold-Link Industry Sourcing Solution Co., Ltd. Tianjin Mengsheng Metal Products These non-responsive companies got a rate of 301.83%. This rate is based on “adverse facts available” because they did not cooperate. “All-other” producers and exporters who were not individually investigated received an 86.24% subsidy rate. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce found “critical circumstances” for some imports. This means they believe companies rushed products into the U.S. to avoid possible duties. The companies affected by this are Hebei Minmetals, the five non-responsive companies, and all-other companies. One company, Shijiazhuang SD, was not found to have critical circumstances. Suspension of Liquidation For the affected companies with critical circumstances, U.S. Customs will hold back (“suspend liquidation” of) entries made on or after 90 days before this notice was published. For Shijiazhuang SD, the suspension begins on the date of notice. Importers must pay a cash deposit for the above rates. Scope of Products Covered The fencing includes panels and stands, coated or not, in any size over six square feet and weighing more than four pounds. The scope also covers items finished or packed in another country, as long as they match these rules. Only the fencing from China is covered, not any extra parts or accessories that may come with it. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will now check (“verify”) the information used for this preliminary finding. Interested parties can submit arguments (“case briefs”) after the last verification report is released. Hearings may also be requested. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the imports hurt U.S. companies. If the final decision stays the same, these duties will continue. This finding is open to public review. All related details and documents are available to the public online. Key Dates Notice published: June 20, 2025 Final determination expected: October 27, 2025 (unless delayed) Contact Information Questions may be directed to Natasia Byrd or Janaé Martin at the Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VI, Washington, DC. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025), Document Number: 2025-11383 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Chinese Brake Drums Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about certain brake drums from China. The Department says these brake drums are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. What Is the Product? The investigation looked at brake drums made from gray cast iron. They must have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches. The brake drums must weigh more than 50 pounds. Brake drums are included if they are finished or unfinished, imported alone or with non-subject items like a hub. Assemblies are covered, but only the brake drum itself is part of this case. Some brake drums are excluded, like composite drums with more than 38 percent steel by weight, and some covered by other antidumping orders. Investigation Timeline The Department started the investigation on January 29, 2025. The period looked at sales between October 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Changes were made since the preliminary decision after reviewing comments and documents from companies. Companies Involved The investigation looked at several Chinese companies, including Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. The Department checked sales and production information from these companies. Dumping Margins and Results The Department determined the following estimated dumping margins: Producer Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (%) Cash Deposit Rate (%) Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co. Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co. 77.14 77.14 Hebei OE Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Ningbo Qingchen Intl. Trade Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Longyao County Yiheng Auto Parts Co. Qingdao Jasmine Intl. Trade Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Lingang Nonferrous Metals Co. Qingdao Tordon Brake Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Qiqihar Beimo Auto Parts Mfg Co., Ltd. Qiqihar Beimo Auto Parts Mfg Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Lingang Nonferrous Metals Co. Shandong Haoxin Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Hongma Engineering Machinery Shandong Hongma Engr. Machinery Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Longyao Gucheng Automobile Parts Factory Shandong North Autotech Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Longji Machinery Co., Ltd. Shanghai Winsun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 China-Wide Entity 160.79* 150.25 *The higher margin for the China-Wide Entity is based on facts available with adverse inferences. Rates and Instructions U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep suspending the liquidation of entries for these products after January 29, 2025. Importers must place cash deposits at the rates shown. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds U.S. industry injured by these products, antidumping duties will be ordered. Possible Changes If the ITC decides there is no injury, the process will stop, and any deposits will be returned. If injury is found, the cash deposit rates may be updated for subsidies. Where to Find More Information The full Issues and Decision Memorandum, including changes and comments from interested parties, is available online at here. Conclusion The Department of Commerce has finished its investigation. Many Chinese companies exporting certain brake drums to the U.S. will face high dumping margins. The final decision now goes to the ITC to determine if these sales harmed U.S. industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Countervailable Subsidies for Certain Brake Drums from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Countervailable Subsidies for Certain Brake Drums from China The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued its final determination that producers and exporters of certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China receive countervailable subsidies. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Investigation Background On December 3, 2024, the Department of Commerce published its preliminary findings in the Federal Register. CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd., a key respondent, withdrew from the case on February 21, 2025. A post-preliminary analysis was released on April 1, 2025. All events and comments submitted by interested parties were taken into account in the final determination. Scope of the Investigation The products under investigation are gray cast iron brake drums from China. These brake drums have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches, and weigh more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are included. The detailed description of the products is set out in Appendix I of the final notice. Certain drum and chassis products from China covered by earlier antidumping and countervailing duty orders are excluded from the scope. Brake drums with more than 38 percent steel by weight are also excluded. Changes to Product Scope During the investigation, comments were received regarding the scope of products. The Department issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum and later added more Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings in response to comments. These changes are reflected in Appendix I. Verification of Information In January 2025, the Department verified information provided by Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd. and Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. (collectively, ConMet). Standard procedures were used to check accounting records and source documents. Analysis and Methodology The Department reviewed various subsidy programs. The final decision outlines which programs were found to be countervailable. The official record provides a detailed list of the issues raised by interested parties. The full methodology is available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Department determined if subsidies existed by confirming financial contributions from authorities, proof of benefit to recipients, and specificity. The Department relied partly on facts available and used adverse inferences, especially concerning CAIEC’s withdrawal and data gaps. Details are in the preliminary memorandum and the final Issues and Decision Memorandum. Calculation Changes The subsidy rate for ConMet was changed based on comments and verification. For CAIEC, the calculation relied on adverse inferences. The adverse facts available (AFA) rate was updated to include rates for three additional programs and corrections. All-Others Rate The ‘all-others’ rate is based on ConMet’s revised rate, because its rate is not zero, de minimis, or entirely based on facts otherwise available. Final Subsidy Rates The Department assigned these rates: Company Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd. / Trailer Master CVS Inc. 446.83* Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd./Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. 11.94 Guangzhou Joyhand Import & Export Co. 446.83* Hebei Iruijin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Henan Broad Top Metal Work, Llc 446.83* Henan Valiant Braking System Co. 446.83* HTS (Tianjin) Supply Chain Co., Ltd. 446.83* Panasia CVS (HK), Ltd. 446.83* Raw King Brake Parts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Tianjin Textile Group Import and Export Inc. 446.83* Xiamen Tinmy Industrial Co., Ltd. 446.83* Xingtai Xunchiyoute Auto Parts Co. 446.83* Yancheng Terbon Auto Parts Co. 446.83* Yantai Hongtian Autoparts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Zhejiang Firsd Group Co., Ltd. 446.83* All Others 11.94 *Rates marked with an asterisk are based on facts available with adverse inferences. Suspension of Liquidation On December 3, 2024, the Department told U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits and suspend liquidation of relevant entries. Suspension was lifted for entries after April 2, 2025, but remains for earlier entries. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) gives a final injury determination, the Department will order more actions, including duty deposits on future entries. ITC Process The Department will notify the ITC about its findings. The ITC must decide within 45 days whether U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. If not, the process ends and deposits are refunded. Access to Documents Interested parties may access all public documents online through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. Administrative Protective Orders The notice reminds parties of their responsibilities to return or destroy proprietary information as required by law. Official Signing The determination was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 13, 2025. For More Information Contact Nathan James at (202) 482-5305 or Olivia Woolverton at (202) 482-7452. See the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 116, pages 26002-26004, for the complete notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Chinese Aluminum Wire and Cable Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum wire and cable from the People’s Republic of China. This action follows findings that canceling these orders would likely lead to more dumping, subsidies, and injury to U.S. companies. Background The original AD and CVD orders began on December 23, 2019. In November 2024, the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce started their first “sunset reviews” to check if the orders should stay in place. These reviews are required by law every five years. Experts at the Department of Commerce found that removing the orders would likely allow dumping and government support for Chinese companies to start again. They shared their findings with the ITC. On June 13, 2025, the ITC determined that removing the orders would harm the U.S. industry that makes aluminum wire and cable. Scope of the Orders The orders cover assemblies of one or more electrical conductors made from specific aluminum alloys. At least one conductor must be insulated and have a voltage rating above 80 volts but not more than 1,000 volts. At least one conductor must be stranded and sized between 16.5 thousand circular mil (kcmil) and 1,000 kcmil. The assembly can have extra parts like a grounding conductor, different metal coverings, connectors, shields, jackets, or fillers. Most products match certain National Electrical Code and Underwriters Laboratories standards, but this is not required. Aluminum wire and cable products shorter than six feet, even if they arrive as part of equipment, are not included. The products usually fall under trade codes 8544.49.9000 or 8544.42.9090 in U.S. records. However, the exact written scope decides what is covered. Continued Orders Customs officers will keep collecting AD and CVD cash deposits on these products from China at the rates set when the goods enter the country. This continuation started on June 13, 2025. The Department of Commerce will launch the next five-year review of these orders no more than 30 days before June 13, 2030. Protecting Proprietary Information The Department reminds all parties to return or destroy any business secrets shared under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). Not following these rules can lead to penalties. Review Information This continuation, and the reviews leading up to it, were carried out under U.S. law and rules. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Antidumping Duties on Steel Nails from China: Final 2022-2023 Review Results Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review of antidumping duties on certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers shipments made from August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Company Found Dumping Steel Nails The department determined that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. (also known as Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd.) sold steel nails in the United States at prices less than the normal value during the time studied. Final Antidumping Duty Rate Announced For the review period, Commerce found that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. will face a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.73 percent. Companies Removed from Review Commerce has rescinded the review for eight companies because there was no evidence of suspended entries during the review period. The companies are: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. China-Wide Entity and S-Mart S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd. remains part of the China-wide entity because it did not submit a separate rate application. The China-wide antidumping duty rate is set at 118.04 percent. How Duties Will Be Assessed Commerce will order U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on all applicable entries. For Shanghai Yueda, duties will be set at the rate of 11.73 percent for each importer, unless the amount is less than 0.5 percent. If the rate is lower than 0.5 percent, entries will not be charged duties. For sales not reported by Shanghai Yueda, Commerce will use the China-wide rate. Entries made by companies in the China-wide entity, including S-Mart, will be assessed at the rate of 118.04 percent. For the eight companies with rescinded reviews, duties will be based on the deposit rate at the time of entry. Commerce plans to send assessment instructions to Customs 35 days after the final results notice is published, unless a summons is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash Deposit Instructions These cash deposit requirements will be implemented at the time of publication: For Shanghai Yueda, the rate is 11.73 percent. For other exporters with a separate rate from prior reviews, their existing rate continues. For all exporters from China without a separate rate, the rate is 118.04 percent. For non-Chinese exporters without a separate rate, the Chinese supplier’s rate applies. These rates will stay in effect until Commerce announces otherwise. Importer and Legal Reminders Importers must file a certificate about reimbursement of duties. Not doing so may result in Commerce charging double duties. Parties under an Administrative Protective Order must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. Not following these rules can lead to sanctions. Additional Information The scope, background, and detailed points from this review are included in the official Issues and Decision Memorandum, available to the public at the Commerce Department’s online ACCESS system. This final decision was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 10, 2025. The official notice was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it will continue the antidumping duty order on malleable cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s Republic of China. This decision follows findings by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both agencies determined that canceling this order would likely result in more dumping of these pipe fittings from China. They also found that such dumping would likely harm the U.S. industry. The original antidumping duty order was published on December 12, 2003. A new review of the order began in November 2024. The ITC started its review on November 1, 2024. The Department of Commerce began its review on November 4, 2024. This was the fourth five-year (sunset) review for this order. The Department of Commerce found that removing the order would likely bring back dumping of these products at similar rates seen before. They sent their findings to the ITC. The ITC agreed that getting rid of the order would likely lead to more injury to U.S. businesses within a short period. The products under this order are certain malleable iron pipe fittings that are cast and not grooved. These items are from China. They are currently listed under U.S. tariff numbers 7307.19.90.30, 7307.19.90.60, and 7307.19.90.80. Metal compression couplings are not covered by this order, even if they have similar tariff codes. Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting antidumping cash deposits for these imports. The continuation of the order started on June 10, 2025. The Department of Commerce plans to start the next five-year review of this order before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s latest decision. This notice also reminds parties with access to confidential records about the need to return or destroy any protected information, or change it to a judicial order, as the law requires. For more details, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at the U.S. Department of Commerce, at (202) 482-0473. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 10, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Wood Mouldings and Millwork from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the preliminary results for its review of wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China. The review covers the period from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Key Findings The Commerce Department found that certain Chinese exporters sold wood mouldings and millwork products in the U.S. at prices lower than normal value. This means those companies were selling items for less than the usual price, or below “fair value.” Companies Reviewed The Department reviewed 38 companies or groups. Later, the review was stopped for 20 of these companies because there were either no requests to continue, or no entries of merchandise needing review. Four companies were removed from the review after all requests concerning them were withdrawn. Separate Rate Status The Commerce Department said that some companies proved they are separate from the Chinese government and can get their own rates. These included Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd.; Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd.; Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd.; and 12 other companies. Antidumping Margins Preliminary results show the following estimated dumping margins for the period: Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd. / Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd.: 140.79% Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. / Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd.: 101.70% 12 other companies that qualified for separate rates: 109.42% For companies that did not qualify for their own rate, the China-wide dumping margin remains at 220.87 percent. Customs and Assessment Cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties will be applied to shipments entered on or after the date of the final decision. Importers must be ready to file certificates proving they did not get reimbursed for dumping or countervailing duties. Failure to do so could mean paying extra duties. Next Steps and Deadlines The Commerce Department is sharing these results for public comment. Parties who wish to comment have up to 21 days after publication to submit their case briefs. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Any hearing request must be filed within 30 days of this notice. The Department expects to announce the final results of this review within 120 days of this preliminary notice. Appendices The notice also lists, in detail, all companies included in each group: those receiving separate rates, those rescinded from review due to withdrawn requests, and those rescinded from review because there were no entries during the review period. Responsibility of Importers This announcement reminds importers to follow all rules about paperwork and proof of duty payments. Not following the rules could lead to extra penalties. This news is based on official information from the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 114, published June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Opens Antidumping Investigations on Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced the start of less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigations into imports of hardwood and decorative plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. This means Commerce is looking into whether these products are being sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. Background On May 22, 2025, a group of U.S. plywood producers (the Coalition for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood) filed petitions asking for these investigations. The same day, they also filed petitions for countervailing duties on imports from all three countries. Commerce reviewed the petitions and asked for more information. The group provided all requested details between May 28 and June 10, 2025. Scope of Investigations The investigations cover hardwood and decorative plywood from these three countries. This includes flat, multilayered plywood panels with face or back veneers made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. The product can have other surface coatings, coverings, or minor processing. The full description and all relevant product codes (HTSUS) are included in the official notice. Some items are excluded, like structural plywood stamped for specific standards, cork-faced plywood, multilayered wood flooring, certain bamboo products, fully assembled furniture, and others. Investigation Periods For Indonesia, the study covers sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. For China and Vietnam, which are considered non-market economies, the period is October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Industry Support To start an investigation, Commerce checks if there is enough support from U.S. producers. The Coalition represents more than 50% of U.S. hardwood and decorative plywood makers who support the petition. They also meet the requirement of representing at least 25% of total U.S. production. Allegations of Injury The petitions claim that U.S. industry is being hurt by these imports due to increasing import volumes, prices under U.S. market rates, shifting market share, and financial harm. The petitions say each country’s imports are high enough to meet investigation rules. Alleged Dumping Margins The estimated dumping margins (how much lower the prices are compared to fair value) are listed as follows: China: 540.07% Indonesia: 84.94% Vietnam: 138.04% to 152.41% Investigation Procedures Commerce will choose companies from each country to study closely. For Indonesia, companies will receive questionnaires, and the largest firms will be examined based on sales data. For China and Vietnam, Commerce will use special methods because these are non-market economies. Companies must apply for “separate rates” if they want to be treated apart from government-run businesses. Parties have deadlines to comment on scope (July 1, 2025) and to respond to product characteristic questions or other requests. Timeline and Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days if there is a reasonable sign that U.S. industry is being injured. If the ITC finds no injury by imports from any of the countries, the investigation regarding that country will stop. Commerce will make a preliminary decision within 140 days unless postponed. Legal and Filing Details All parties must use the Enforcement and Compliance Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) for submissions unless exceptions apply. There are clear instructions and timelines for submitting information, requesting deadline extensions, and applying for participation rights. Commerce has set rules for how information should be filed and certified. These requirements ensure submissions are complete and accurate. Product Codes Products are most commonly imported under many specific HTSUS codes, which are detailed in the official notice. The written product description controls the investigation, not the HTSUS codes. Contact Information Questions can be directed to: Theodora Mattei (China) at (202) 482-4834. Joy Zhang (Indonesia) at (202) 482-1168. Kabir Archuletta (Vietnam) at (202) 482-2593. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 11, 2025. The full text with all technical details and codes is available through the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.