US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-22 1) Executive Summary Today’s daily briefing covers seven trade remedy updates issued by U.S. authorities on January 22, 2026. The principal agencies involved are the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The measures include antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) determinations, as well as a Section 337 enforcement proceeding. The covered products include polypropylene corrugated boxes, hardwood and decorative plywood, fiberglass door panels, and L-lysine. Policy instruments addressed today consist of affirmative preliminary and final determinations, subsidy calculations, cash deposit requirements, and a formal ITC enforcement action. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC – U.S. International Trade Commission) Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair — Section 337 Enforcement Proceeding (Institution) The ITC has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding regarding compliance with a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders issued on September 29, 2025, in the investigation Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor. The action concerns alleged violations by Vivace Inc. of Port Washington, NY, a defaulting respondent, relating to potential continued importation or sale of infringing goods. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC Section 337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1415 (Enforcement) Key date: ITC vote January 20, 2026 China Indicator: None stated Source: ITC Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE – INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes — Countervailing Duty (Final Affirmative Determination) Commerce determined that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of polypropylene corrugated boxes from China. The final subsidy rate for all exporters was set at 62.27 percent ad valorem, based on adverse facts available due to non-cooperation by respondents. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Final Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-208 Key date: Final determination issued January 15, 2026 Source: Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final CVD Determination Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes — Antidumping Duty (Final Affirmative Determination) Commerce found that polypropylene corrugated boxes from China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value at a margin of 83.64 percent, adjusted for subsidy offsets. This determination covers all Chinese producers and exporters as part of the China-wide entity. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD) Event Type: Final Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-207 Key date: Final determination issued January 15, 2026 Source: Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final LTFV Determination L-Lysine — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily determined that L-lysine from China received countervailable subsidies. The primary company, Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd., was assigned a subsidy rate of 39.50 percent, while others relying on adverse facts available were assigned 80.37 percent. The final CVD determination will be aligned with the companion AD investigation. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-216 Key date: Preliminary determination effective January 22, 2026 Source: L-Lysine from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Fiberglass Door Panels — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily found that fiberglass door panels from China are being sold at less than fair value, with dumping margins ranging from 38.78 to 147.85 percent. The investigation covers Chinese producers including Dalian Capstone Engineering and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. The final determination was postponed and provisional measures extended. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-209 Key date: Preliminary determination December 23, 2025 Source: Fiberglass Door Panels – Preliminary LTFV Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily found that Chinese producers and exporters of hardwood and decorative plywood benefited from countervailable subsidies, with an 81.34 percent ad valorem rate based on facts available. The determination also found affirmative critical circumstances, applying duties retroactively by 90 days. Final determination will align with the related AD investigation. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-212 Key date: Preliminary determination December 29, 2025 Source: Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Determinations on Indonesia and Vietnam) Although not China-specific, Commerce issued concurrent preliminary affirmative determinations involving Indonesia and Vietnam, both aligned with the corresponding antidumping investigations. The Vietnam notice acknowledges product overlap and scope consistency discussions with the China case. 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce issued multiple AD and CVD determinations, notably on polypropylene corrugated boxes, L-lysine, fiberglass door panels, and hardwood plywood from China. Subsidy and dumping margins for covered Chinese commodities range from about 39 percent to 147 percent. The ITC initiated a formal enforcement proceeding under Section 337, emphasizing ongoing scrutiny of post-order compliance. Several determinations were aligned with companion investigations, ensuring synchronized final decisions for AD and CVD measures. Commerce invoked adverse facts available (AFA) in multiple cases where Chinese respondents or governments did not cooperate. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair – ITC Enforcement Proceeding Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final CVD Determination (China) Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final LTFV Determination (China) L-Lysine from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Fiberglass Door Panels from China – Preliminary AD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from Indonesia – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from Vietnam – Preliminary CVD Determination 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a final ruling about corrugated boxes from China. The government decided that polypropylene corrugated boxes from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. This trade practice is known as dumping. The boxes are used to hold or carry goods. They are made from corrugated polypropylene sheets. These sheets have air pockets that make them strong and lightweight. The final ruling comes after the Department’s review of the investigation period, which ran from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce published its preliminary ruling on August 28, 2025. That ruling also found that dumping had taken place. No one gave public comments to oppose or change the initial decision. Due to a government funding lapse and shutdown, deadlines were changed twice—once on November 14, 2025, adding 47 days, and again on November 24, 2025, adding 21 more days. The final ruling was released on January 15, 2026. No Chinese companies took part in the investigation. So, Commerce used “facts available with adverse inferences” (AFA). This means they based the rate for all box producers in China on facts in the record and assumed the worst outcome for not cooperating. Because no companies got a separate rate, all producers in China are treated as one “China-wide entity.” The final dumping margin is 83.64 percent. The deposit rate (after adjusting for export subsidies) is set at 82.21 percent. No calculations were needed to be shared because the rate used was based entirely on AFA, not on any responses from companies. The product scope includes boxes, bins, totes, and other containers made with corrugated polypropylene sheets from China. These sheets may be known by different names, including fluted or hollow-core sheets. The boxes may be printed or blank, with or without handles, lids, tops, or wires. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep holding back (suspending liquidation of) imports of the products in question. This has been in effect since August 28, 2025. CBP must require cash deposits from importers equal to the dumping margin. For China-based sellers and third-country exporters alike, this deposit rate will be adjusted for export subsidies, as listed in the recent chart. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if the domestic industry in the U.S. is being hurt or is in danger of being hurt by these imports. They have up to 45 days to make this decision. If the ITC says there is no injury, the case will end and cash deposits will be returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department of Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. Such an order would require CBP to collect duties on all subject goods that entered the U.S. after the preliminary ruling date. If the case closes with a negative injury outcome, parties that received sensitive information must destroy or return it, as required under federal protective rules. This decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on January 15, 2026. The product is identified in trade under the code 3923.10.9000 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). However, the written scope of the items is what matters for this decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Finalizes Countervailing Duties on Plastic Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final determination in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation concerning polypropylene corrugated boxes from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of these plastic boxes received unfair government subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The subsidy rates for five Chinese companies were set at 62.27%. These companies are: Dongguan Jian Xin Plastic Products Jinan Mantis Co Ltd Ningbo Luchen Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Shandong PPKG I&E Co. Ltd. Suzhou Huiyuan Plastic Products Co All other Chinese exporters or producers of these boxes will also receive the same rate of 62.27%. The rates are based on “adverse facts available” because these companies and the Government of China did not provide full information requested by the Commerce Department. A verification was not conducted for these companies. The scope of the case covers plastic boxes made from corrugated polypropylene sheets. These boxes may be made in one piece, two pieces, or multiple pieces. They may include features like lids, handles, tabs, printing, or reinforcements. The boxes fall under the U.S. customs code 3923.10.9000. This case started with a preliminary determination published on August 20, 2025. The petitioners in the case are: CoolSeal USA Inc. Inteplast Group Corporation SeaCa Plastic Packaging Technology Container Corp. The final stage in the investigation is now in the hands of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC has 45 days from the Commerce Department’s decision to decide if these imports harm or threaten to harm U.S. industry. If the ITC makes a final affirmative injury finding, the Commerce Department will issue a formal countervailing duty order. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will then collect cash deposits based on the 62.27% rate on all future entries of the subject merchandise. If the ITC finds no harm, this proceeding will end. In that case, all collected deposits will be refunded, and no duties will be applied. The Commerce Department stopped the suspension of liquidation for goods entered after December 17, 2025. However, it will reinstate this suspension — and resume collecting duties — if the ITC makes a positive injury determination. The Commerce Department will also provide non-confidential information from this investigation to the ITC and allow secure access to confidential information under proper procedures. For parties involved under an Administrative Protective Order (APO), if the ITC issues a negative injury determination, they must destroy or return all proprietary information in compliance with federal rules, or convert it to a judicial protective order. This final determination was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on January 15, 2026. The full scope of the investigation and product definitions are included in the official notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Announces Preliminary Countervailing Duties on Chinese Plywood Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a preliminary finding in the Federal Register. The agency found that hardwood and decorative plywood from the People’s Republic of China received unfair subsidies. This is a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation. The period of investigation covers January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Key Findings The Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that certain producers and exporters in China received countervailable subsidies. Subsidies are financial help from the government that gives unfair benefits in trade. The following companies were found to receive such subsidies: Xuzhou Shelter Import and Export Co., Ltd. Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd. Bergey (Tianjin) International Larkcop International Co., Ltd. Linyi Dongstar Import & Export Co., Ltd. Linyi Jiahe Wood Industry Co. Ltd. Linyi Ocean International Trading Co. Xuzhou Edlon Wood Products Co., Ltd. Xuzhou New Defu Wood International Xuzhou Tianshan Wood Co., Ltd. Yishui Win-Win Wood Co., Ltd. These companies did not cooperate with the investigation. The Commerce Department applied “facts available with adverse inferences” (AFA) under section 776 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Based on this, each received a preliminary subsidy rate of 81.34%. The “all others” subsidy rate is also 81.34%, because all individually examined companies received that rate based on adverse facts. Critical Circumstances Commerce made a preliminary affirmative determination of “critical circumstances.” This means that the imports may have surged in a short period, harming the U.S. industry. The determination applies to Linyi Evergreen, Xuzhou Shelter, the non-responsive companies, and all others. As a result, suspension of liquidation and duties will apply to entries made up to 90 days before this public notice. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will: Suspend liquidation of subject imports (plywood from China) entered on or after 90 days before January 22, 2026. Require cash deposits equal to the 81.34% preliminary subsidy rate. Scope of Products The products covered are hardwood and decorative plywood from China. These include multilayered panels that have: Two or more wood veneers with or without a core. At least a face or back veneer made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. The plywood may be coated, covered, or finished. It may also have minor processing like cutting or drilling. It includes plywood processed in third countries that fits the criteria. Products excluded from the investigation include: Structural plywood certified to U.S. standards. Certain bamboo products. Hardwood plywood already under existing orders from 2018. Multilayered wood flooring. Assembled or ready-to-assemble furniture and kitchen cabinets. Finished countertops and table tops. Specific LVL window and door components. Two-ply products not glued to additional plies. Product codes under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) are listed, but Customs may classify the imported goods differently. Alignment With Companion AD Investigation Commerce is aligning the final CVD determination with the final Antidumping Duty (AD) determination in the related case. The final determination is expected by May 11, 2026, unless postponed. Public Comments Interested parties may submit written case briefs within 30 days from publication. Rebuttal briefs may be filed within five days after that. Each brief must have: A table of contents. A table of authorities. A public executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words per issue. Hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days of publication. No Verification Because the companies did not cooperate, Commerce will not conduct on-site verification. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will decide whether the U.S. industry is materially injured or threatened. Next Steps This notice is the preliminary stage. The final decision may confirm or change these findings. Authority The notice is issued under authority of sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: 2025-12-29 Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Indonesian Plywood Producers Received Unfair Subsidies; Imports Face New Duties Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced a preliminary determination in its countervailing duty (CVD) investigation into hardwood and decorative plywood from Indonesia. Commerce determined that Indonesian producers and exporters are benefiting from unfair government subsidies. This investigation covers plywood products exported from Indonesia during the period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The preliminary findings come under section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The investigation was originally announced on June 16, 2025. Due to delays caused by the July 2025 postponement, the November 2025 federal government shutdown, and document backlogs, the preliminary decision was delayed and finalized on December 29, 2025. This determination aligns with the timeline for a related antidumping duty investigation concerning the same product from Indonesia. The final determinations for both investigations are expected by May 11, 2026. Commerce examined three companies. These companies received the following subsidy rates: PT Mustika Buana Sejahtera: 128.66 percent (based on facts available with adverse inferences due to lack of cooperation). PT Sengon Indah Mas (and cross-owned PT Java Wood Industri): 2.40 percent. PT Wijaya Cahaya Timber Tbk. (WCT): 62.68 percent. WCT was found to be cross-owned with six other companies, one of which remains confidential. All other Indonesian producers and exporters received a 43.18 percent subsidy rate. Commerce used the companies’ export sales data to calculate an “all-others” rate. This ensures unexamined companies are fairly accounted for. Commerce relied partly on “facts available” and used “adverse inferences” where companies did not fully cooperate in the investigation. All companies not fully participating may be subject to higher duties based on this approach, as outlined in sections 776(a) and 776(b) of the Tariff Act. As a result of these findings, Commerce will now instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all plywood imports from Indonesia, effective from the date of this notice. Importers must now pay cash deposits based on the subsidy rates listed above. Commerce plans to verify all submitted data before making the final determination. Interested parties may submit written comments after verification. They may also request a hearing within 30 days of this notice. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will independently determine if Indonesian plywood imports harm the U.S. industry. The ITC will make its final injury determination by either 120 days from this notice or 45 days after Commerce’s final determination, whichever is later. This investigation applies to hardwood and decorative plywood, including veneered panels with a wood or bamboo face or back. It excludes structural plywood, bamboo products, ready-to-assemble (RTA) furniture, and other products listed in the full Scope found in Appendix I of the determination. The public version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and full scope language can be accessed via https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. For further information, contact: Benito Ballesteros at (202) 482-7425 Samuel Evans at (202) 482-2420 Both are from the Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Subsidies on Plywood from Vietnam, Sets Preliminary Duties Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision in its investigation of hardwood and decorative plywood from Vietnam. The Commerce Department found that companies in Vietnam received subsidies that violate U.S. trade laws. This investigation covers the period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The case is handled by the International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance unit. The products involved include flat, multilayered plywood panels. These are made of wood veneers, with at least one face or back layer made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. These panels are used in a range of furniture, flooring, and building products. Commerce began its investigation on June 16, 2025. The deadline for the preliminary decision was postponed after a federal government shutdown and a backlog in the filing system. The new deadline became December 29, 2025. Two Vietnamese companies were investigated in detail: Junma Phu Tho Co., Ltd Trieu Thai Son., Ltd Junma received an estimated subsidy rate of 26.75 percent. Trieu Thai received a rate of 4.37 percent. Other companies that were not individually examined received a rate of 15.56 percent. This “all-others” rate is based on a simple average of the two company rates. Commerce used facts available to reach parts of its decision where data was missing. A full explanation is in the preliminary decision memorandum available on the official ACCESS website. Commerce also looked at whether “critical circumstances” exist. This refers to whether imports surged suddenly to avoid duties. Commerce found that this was not the case. So, no early duties will be applied. The final decision in this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation is aligned with the final decision in the related anti-dumping investigation. The final decisions will come by May 11, 2026, unless postponed. Commerce will now instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to stop liquidation of entries of this plywood from Vietnam. This means importers must pay cash deposits using the duty rates listed. Commerce plans to verify the data submitted by the companies. If needed, corrections may be made to this preliminary ruling before the final decision. Parties can submit comments and briefs after verification reports are issued. Rebuttals must follow five days later. Any party that wants a hearing must make their request within 30 days of January 22, 2026. If the final determination is also affirmative, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will then decide whether the imports from Vietnam are harming the U.S. industry. This investigation could impact a wide range of wood-based products imported from Vietnam. The full details, including the scope of products affected and HTSUS codes, are included in the official notice published in the Federal Register on January 22, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fiberglass Door Panels From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Finds Chinese Fiberglass Door Panels Are Being Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–8 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a preliminary finding in its investigation of fiberglass door panels from China. The Commerce Department ruled that fiberglass door panels from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The investigation covers the period from July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. This decision was made under Section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The initial investigation was announced on April 15, 2025. The preliminary determination was delayed by 50 days on August 12, 2025. Due to a government shutdown and a tolling adjustment, the deadline for the preliminary decision was moved to December 23, 2025. The fibreglass panels under investigation include door panels and sidelights made with fiberglass skins. These may be finished or unfinished, with or without frames and glass inserts. These panels may be part of larger entry door systems. All such panels made in China are covered whether processed in another country or not. The products are classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule code 3925.20.0010. They may also fall under other codes such as 4418.29.4000; 4418.29.8030; 4418.29.8060; and 7019.90.5150. Some types of products are excluded. For example, goods already covered under the antidumping duty orders on wood mouldings and float glass from China are not part of this new investigation. Commerce used a separate rate for certain companies that qualified. Two firms were individually examined: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd. was assigned a dumping margin of 38.78%. After adjusting for subsidies, the cash deposit rate is 38.75%. Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. and two related firms — Jiangxi Hangda Tech Co., Ltd. and Jiangxi Onda Tech Co., Ltd. — received a margin of 99.49%, with a cash deposit rate of 99.40%. A “China-wide” entity received a dumping margin of 147.85%. This rate was based on facts available and adverse assumptions due to lack of cooperation. Certain producers not individually examined but eligible for separate treatment received a dumping margin of 68.93%. Their adjusted cash deposit rate is 68.87%. These companies are: Anhui Xinyu Fiberglass Door Co., Ltd. Wuxi Lutong Fiberglass Doors Co., Ltd. (when exported by East Grace Corporation) Wuxi Lutong Fiberglass Doors Co., Ltd. (when exported by Wuxi Xinli New Material Co., Ltd.) Commerce will send instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of subject goods entered on or after January 22, 2026. Importers must post cash deposits equal to rates listed in the determination chart. If the related subsidy investigation ends before this one, importers may need to post higher cash deposits for the remainder of this proceeding. Commerce will conduct a verification of the data used in this case. Interested parties may file case briefs. These are due seven days after the last verification report is released. Rebuttal briefs are allowed within five days after case briefs are submitted. Each brief must include a table of contents, a table of legal authorities, and an executive summary with footnotes. A hearing may be held, if requested, on issues raised in the briefs. Dalian Capstone requested a delay of the final determination and an extension of provisional measures. Commerce granted this request. Now, the final determination will be due no later than 135 days from the publication of this preliminary finding. The U.S. International Trade Commission has also been notified. If the final determination is affirmative, the Commission will determine whether these imports injured or threaten to injure the domestic industry. This decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations on December 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
L-Lysine From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Commerce Department Issues Preliminary Ruling on Chinese Lysine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a preliminary determination in the Federal Register regarding the ongoing countervailing duty (CVD) investigation concerning L-lysine imports from the People’s Republic of China. The Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of L-lysine benefited from countervailable subsidies. These subsidies are financial contributions from authorities, providing benefits that are specific and unfair under U.S. trade law. The investigation covers lysine widely used in animal feed. This includes several types: lysine monohydrochloride (lysine HCL), lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. The scope also includes coated or encapsulated lysine as well as mixtures with other products. The covered products are classified under HTSUS code 2922.41.0090. Other possible classifications include 2922.41.0010, 2922.49.4950, 2309.90.7000, and 2309.90.9500. The period of investigation spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The preliminary determination was originally scheduled for October 27, 2025, but was delayed due to a government shutdown and backlog. The effective date for the preliminary ruling is January 2, 2026. Commerce conducted the investigation under section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It used facts available and adverse inferences where some companies did not fully cooperate in providing requested information. The Department determined the following preliminary subsidy rates: Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd.: 39.50% Heilongjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd.: 80.37% (adverse facts available) Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd.: 80.37% (adverse facts available) All Other Chinese producers/exporters: 39.50% For Inner Mongolia Eppen, various affiliated firms were found to be cross-owned. These include: Heilongjiang Eppen Trading Co., Ltd. Heilongjiang Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd. Heilongjiang Eppen Energy Co. Ningxia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. Star Lake Bioscience Co., Ltd Zhaoqing Guangdong Guangdong Guangxin Holdings Group Ltd. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been directed to suspend the liquidation of all entries of lysine from China that enter the U.S. on or after the publication date. Importers must post cash deposits equal to the subsidy rates listed. Commerce has also aligned the final determination date of this CVD investigation with the final determination date of the companion antidumping duty investigation. The final determinations are expected no later than May 18, 2026, unless postponed. Commerce will release calculation details within five days and allow parties to submit comments. Interested parties may also request a hearing. The timeline for written briefs and hearing requests will be provided later. If the final determination is affirmative, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if imports of lysine from China are causing or threatening injury to the domestic industry. ITC’s decision would be expected within 120 days of this preliminary ruling or 45 days after the final determination, whichever is later. This notice is published under sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.205(c). For additional information, contact: Grant Fuller AD/CVD Operations, Office IX U.S. Department of Commerce (202) 482-6228 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 14 (January 22, 2026), Document No. 2026-01193. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding
U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Enforcement Case Over Synthetic Hair Imports Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has started a formal enforcement proceeding. This action is related to a prior case about certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair and the packaging that comes with it. The new case targets Vivace, Inc. doing business as Dae Do Inc. from Port Washington, New York. Vivace is charged with not following the Commission’s orders from a decision made on September 29, 2025. The initial investigation began on September 9, 2024. It was started after a complaint from JBS Hair of Atlanta, Georgia. The case focused on Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It related to claims that some companies were importing and selling synthetic hair products that infringed on U.S. patents. Three U.S. patents were involved: Patent No. 10,786,026, Patent No. 10,945,478 (called the ‘478 patent), and Patent No. 10,980,301 (called the ‘301 patent). The USITC investigated many companies. These were split into three groups: Defaulting Respondents: This group included Vivace, A-Hair Import Inc., Crown Pacific Group Inc., Loc N Products, LLC, and Zugoo Import Inc. They were found to be in default in separate rulings throughout late 2024 and early 2025. Consent Order Respondents: These companies agreed to settle. They include Chois International, Inc., I & I Hair Corp., Kum Kang Trading USA, Inc., Mink Hair, Ltd., Oradell International Corp., and Twin Peak International, Inc. Remaining Respondents: These firms were removed from the case when the complainant withdrew the complaint against them on April 29, 2025. On September 29, 2025, the Commission issued limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders against the Defaulting Respondents, including Vivace. These types of orders are common under Section 337 to stop companies from selling or importing products found to infringe U.S. laws. On December 18, 2025, JBS Hair filed a follow-up enforcement complaint. The claim was that Vivace continued to sell and import items that infringe claim 20 of the ‘478 patent and claims 1, 4 through 9, and 11 of the ‘301 patent. This would violate the previous orders. After reviewing the complaint and documents, the USITC decided the complaint meets the legal requirements for an enforcement proceeding. Now, a formal enforcement process is underway. The Commission has ordered the Chief Administrative Law Judge to pick an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). This ALJ will conduct the hearings, make findings (called an Enforcement Initial Determination), and suggest further actions if needed. The Commission’s decision to start this process was made on January 20, 2026. This proceeding is under the rules found in 19 CFR 210.75(a). The U.S. Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party in the enforcement action. Issued by the Commission’s Secretary, Lisa Barton, on January 20, 2026. Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01184 For access to case documents, view the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. For general information, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-21
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-21 1) Executive Summary Today’s update covers two notices from the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA). The first addresses an information collection notice related to import procedures for emergency relief supplies. The second concerns final results of an antidumping duty administrative review on uncoated paper from Brazil. The authorities involved are the Department of Commerce and its Enforcement and Compliance unit, and the primary instruments include procedural and antidumping duty measures. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work — Procedural Notice (Policy Notice)The Department of Commerce issued a notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act inviting public comment on the continued information collection related to import procedures for emergency relief work under 19 CFR 358. The regulations provide for waivers of antidumping and countervailing duties on supplies, including food, clothing, and medical goods, imported for use in emergency relief operations. There are no proposed changes to the information collection. Comments are due by March 23, 2026. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Procedural Notice Event Type: Policy Notice Key identifiers: OMB Control Number 0625-0256; Legal authority 19 U.S.C. 1318(a) Key dates: Comments due by March 23, 2026 China Indicator: None Source: Link Uncoated Paper from Brazil — Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (Trade Remedy)The Department of Commerce published the final results of the 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain uncoated paper from Brazil. Commerce determined that exporter Suzano S.A. sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024, with a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.42 percent. No changes were made from the preliminary results. Assessment and cash deposit instructions were outlined consistent with established procedures. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD (Antidumping Duty Administrative Review) Event Type: Trade Remedy China Indicator: None Key identifiers: Case No. A-351-842 Key dates: Applicable January 21, 2026; Period of review March 1, 2023 – February 29, 2024 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce requested public input on continuing information collection requirements relating to import procedures for emergency relief supplies under 19 CFR 358. The information collection supports waivers of antidumping and countervailing duties on emergency relief materials but proposes no regulatory changes. Commerce finalized its 2023–2024 review of the antidumping order on uncoated paper from Brazil, maintaining a 14.42 percent dumping margin for Suzano S.A. No parties submitted comments on the uncoated paper preliminary results, and the final results remain unchanged. Both notices were published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 13 (January 21, 2026). 4) Full Source Links (Index) Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work – Procedural Notice Uncoated Paper from Brazil – Final Antidumping Administrative Review Results 2023–2024 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Final Results Issued in 2023–2024 Antidumping Review of Uncoated Paper from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review on certain uncoated paper from Brazil. The period of review (POR) was from March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. The final determination, published in the Federal Register on January 21, 2026 (Volume 91, Number 13), confirms that Suzano S.A. made sales of uncoated paper to the United States at prices below normal value. Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.42 percent for Suzano S.A. There were no comments submitted after Commerce released its preliminary results on July 10, 2025. As a result, the agency made no changes from the preliminary findings. This review was conducted under section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The scope of the order includes uncoated paper from Brazil. A full description of the scope is provided in the preliminary decision memorandum referenced in the July 2025 notice. Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on entries covered by this review. Because Suzano’s dumping margin is above de minimis (not less than 0.5 percent), importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates will be applied. These are based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping to the total entered value of the sales. If any importer-specific rate is de minimis or zero, CBP will not assess antidumping duties on those entries. For entries of uncoated paper that Suzano produced but did not know were going to the U.S., and where there is no specific rate for the intermediary involved, Commerce will apply the “all-others” rate. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final findings in the Federal Register. If a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will be instructed not to liquidate entries until the applicable statutory timeline for injunction requests has expired. New cash deposit requirements are now in effect as of January 21, 2026: Suzano will have a deposit rate of 14.42 percent. For companies covered in past reviews but not listed in this review, their previous deposit rates remain in effect. If the exporter was not reviewed, but the producer was, the producer’s most recent rate will apply. For all other manufacturers or exporters, the “all-others” deposit rate of 27.11 percent will apply, as established in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Importers are reminded of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to certify whether they were reimbursed for antidumping duties. Failure to make this filing could result in double duties. Parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) must properly dispose of proprietary materials as required under 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Written notices confirming this must be submitted timely. This notice was signed on January 14, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Reference: Federal Register, Doc No. 2026-01025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work
Commerce Department Seeks Comments on Emergency Relief Supplies Duty Waiver Procedures Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 21, 2026, the Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register. The notice concerns an information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The public is invited to submit comments. These comments are related to the process of importing supplies for emergency relief work without paying antidumping and countervailing duties. The regulations at 19 CFR 358.101 through 358.104 allow both for-profit and non-profit groups to import supplies such as food, clothing, and medical items. These must be used in emergency relief work. There are no changes planned to the current rules. However, the Department seeks input to evaluate the process and its impact on those providing information. Each request must be submitted in writing. Three copies are needed. The request should be sent to: Secretary of Commerce Enforcement and Compliance Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 The information collection has the following details: OMB Control Number: 0625-0256 Form Numbers: None Type of Review: Regular submission, extension of a current collection Affected Public: For-profit and not-for-profit organizations Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15 Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $450 Legal Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1318(a) The Department seeks public comments to: Assess the necessity and usefulness of the information collected. Review the accuracy of the estimated time and cost burden. Explore ways to improve data quality and clarity. Reduce the burden on respondents, including through technology. All comments must be received by March 23, 2026. Comments may be submitted by mail or by email. The emails should be addressed to: [email protected] [email protected] Use the subject line: “OMB Control Number 0625-0256”. Do not include confidential or sensitive information in the comments. All comments will become a matter of public record. Personal identifying information may be made public and cannot be guaranteed to be withheld. For questions or more information, contact: Enforcement and Compliance Office of Communications International Trade Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 14th and Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 Phone: 202-482-1413 Email: [email protected] The notice was signed by Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01041 Filed January 20, 2026 Billing Code: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-19
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-19 1) Executive Summary This update covers six U.S. government trade and sanctions events dated January 20, 2026. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued two Section 337 investigation notices concerning alleged patent and trademark infringements, including one involving several China-based respondents. The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued multiple notices of sanctions designations and general licenses under various sanctions programs, including Russian and transnational criminal organization sanctions. The events collectively span areas of import exclusion remedies, public interest submissions, and sanctions compliance authorizations. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Certain Nasal Devices and Components Thereof — Section 337 Investigation (Request for Submissions) The ITC issued a notice requesting written submissions from parties and interested agencies on the issues of remedy, public interest, and bonding in Investigation No. 337-TA-1444. The case involves nasal devices and components imported from several China-based companies found in default. Complainant Aardvark Medical Inc. seeks limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders against the defaulted respondents. – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: Explicit (respondents from Fujian, Chongqing, and Shenzhen, China) – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1444 – Key dates: Initial submissions due January 29, 2026; replies due February 5, 2026 – Source: Link Certain Dental Burs and Kits Thereof — Section 337 Investigation (Institution Notice) The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1479 following a complaint by Huwais IP Holding LLC and Versah, LLC of Michigan. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 through the importation, sale for importation, or post‑import sale of osseodensification dental burs and kits infringing specific patents and registered trademarks. The complainants request a general or limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders. – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1479 – Key date: Investigation instituted January 13, 2026 – Source: Link DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL (OFAC) OFAC Sanctions Action — Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) OFAC published names of additional persons designated on the SDN List after determining that applicable legal criteria under executive orders were met. All property and interests in property within U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from transactions with these entities or individuals. – Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control – Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING – Event Type: SANCTIONS – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: Sanction authorities include E.O. 13553, E.O. 13876, and E.O. 13902 – Key date: January 15, 2026 – Source: Link General License No. 132 — Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations OFAC published General License 132, authorizing certain transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR part 587). The license authorizes transactions related to the Paks II civil nuclear power plant project in Hungary involving specified Russian financial institutions. – Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control – Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING – Event Type: SANCTIONS – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: GL 132, 31 CFR part 587, E.O. 14024 – Key date: Issued November 21, 2025 – Source: Link General License No. 1 — Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations OFAC issued General License 1 authorizing the wind down of transactions involving specific entities under the Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR part 590). The license allows certain transactions through November 13, 2025, provided payments are made into blocked accounts. Covered entities include Prince Holding Group and its affiliates. – Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control – Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING – Event Type: SANCTIONS – China Indicator: Implicit (entities include regional holdings potentially linked to Asia) – Key identifiers: GL 1, 31 CFR part 590 – Key date: Issued October 14, 2025 – Source: Link General License No. 129 — Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations General License 129 authorizes certain transactions involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH and their majority-owned subsidiaries, otherwise restricted under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations. Authorization extends to April 29, 2026. – Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control – Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING – Event Type: SANCTIONS – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: GL 129, 31 CFR part 587 – Key date: Issued October 29, 2025 – Source: Link General License No. 13O — Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations OFAC published General License 13O, superseding GL 13N, to authorize certain administrative transactions such as tax and permit payments prohibited under Directive 4 of Executive Order 14024. The authorization applies to routine operations of U.S. persons in Russia through January 9, 2026. – Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control – Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING – Event Type: SANCTIONS – China Indicator: None – Key identifiers: GL 13O, 31 CFR part 587, E.O. 14024 – Key date: Issued September 29, 2025 – Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC requested public-interest submissions in a Section 337 investigation covering Chinese-origin nasal devices, where all China-based respondents are in default. ITC launched a new Section 337 investigation into dental burs and kits involving patent and trademark infringement allegations with a broad set of overseas respondents. OFAC expanded its SDN List and released several general licenses related to Russian and transnational sanctions regimes. The OFAC general licenses collectively authorized time-limited or project-specific activities otherwise restricted under the sanctions regulations. No new China-targeted sanctions were issued in these OFAC actions, but enforcement and licensing processes remain active. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Certain Nasal Devices and Components — ITC public interest request Certain Dental Burs and Kits — ITC institution of investigation OFAC Notice of Sanctions Action (SDN List) OFAC General License 132 — Russian Sanctions OFAC General License 1 — Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions OFAC General License 129 — Russian Sanctions (Rosneft entities) OFAC General License 13O — Russian Sanctions (Directive 4
Publication of Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations Web General License 13O
Treasury Department Publishes General License 13O Under Russian Sanctions Rules Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 20, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published General License (GL) 13O in the Federal Register. This license is part of the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, listed under 31 CFR Part 587. General License 13O was issued by OFAC on September 29, 2025. It is designed to allow U.S. persons and entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons to carry out specific transactions in Russia that would otherwise be prohibited. GL 13O permits the following activities, only if they are part of normal business work in Russia: Paying taxes. Paying fees. Paying import duties. Getting permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications. Receiving tax refunds. These actions are only allowed if they are ordinarily incident and necessary to daily operations in the Russian Federation. The permission lasts until 12:01 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on January 9, 2026. However, GL 13O does not allow: Any debit from an account at a U.S. financial institution that belongs to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. Any transactions that are separately prohibited under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, including transactions with persons who are blocked under those rules. GL 13O replaces General License 13N, which was dated July 8, 2025. It fully supersedes GL 13N. The text of GL 13O was first made available on OFAC’s website on September 29, 2025. The license is now part of the official records in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 12. For more details and updates, visit OFAC’s website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. This action was signed and dated by Bradley T. Smith, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, on September 29, 2025. [Federal Register Doc. No. 2026-00945] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Publication of Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations Web General License 129
U.S. Treasury Publishes General License 129 for Rosneft Entities Under Russia Sanctions Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published General License No. 129 (GL 129) related to the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations. GL 129 was originally issued on October 29, 2025. It appeared on OFAC’s official website the same day. It is now published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 12, on pages 2301–2302. This license allows some transactions involving two specific companies: Rosneft Deutschland GmbH (also called RN Germany) and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH. OFAC confirms that these transactions, which may otherwise be banned under the sanctions, can legally continue. The license applies to transactions involving: RN Germany and RN Refining & Marketing; Any company where either RN Germany or RN Refining & Marketing owns 50% or more, directly or indirectly. These authorized transactions are allowed through 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 29, 2026. However, some actions are still not allowed. GL 129 does not permit: Any transaction that is still banned under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR part 587); Any transaction involving other blocked persons linked to the Rosneft Oil Company, unless another license allows it. This general license is part of OFAC’s regulatory tools to enforce U.S. sanctions in a targeted and controlled manner. The license was signed by Bradley T. Smith, the Director of OFAC, on October 29, 2025. For more information, visit the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov or contact OFAC at 202-622-4855. Reference: Federal Register Document Number 2026-00947. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Publication of Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations Web General License 1
Treasury Publishes General License for Wind Down of Transactions With Certain Blocked Entities Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On January 20, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published a General License related to the Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations. The license is titled General License No. 1 (GL 1). General License No. 1 was issued on October 14, 2025. The license allows certain transactions that are normally blocked under the regulations. These transactions must be for the purpose of winding down activities with specific blocked entities. The license is valid until 12:01 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 13, 2025. The blocked entities covered by GL 1 are: Prince Holding Group Prince Bank Plc. Prince Huan Yu Real Estate Cambodia Group Co., Ltd Any company in which one or more of these groups owns 50 percent or more, either directly or indirectly. The license allows normal business steps needed to end dealings with these entities. However, any payments to the blocked entities must go into a blocked account, as required by the rules. GL 1 does not permit transactions with any other people or companies blocked under the Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations. It only applies to the names listed above. The license was first made available on the OFAC website on October 14, 2025. The public text version is now included in the official Federal Register. For more information, visit OFAC’s site at https://ofac.treasury.gov/ or contact the OFAC Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs at 202-622-4855. Bradley T. Smith, Director of OFAC, signed the license on October 14, 2025. The license was filed in the Federal Register as document number 2026-00948. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Publication of Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations Web General License 132
U.S. Treasury Publishes General License 132 for Paks II Nuclear Project Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-01-20 Source: Federal Register Volume 91, Number 12, Pages 2302-2303 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published General License (GL) 132. This new license relates to the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, found at 31 CFR Part 587. General License 132 was first issued by OFAC on November 21, 2025. The license allows specific transactions that are usually not allowed under Executive Order 14024. These allowed transactions involve the Paks II civil nuclear power plant project, located in Hungary. The license covers activities involving Paks II Nuclear Power Plant Private Limited Company and any future version of this project. Under GL 132, the following Russian financial institutions may be involved in authorized transactions related to the Paks II project: Gazprombank Joint Stock Company State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs Vnesheconombank Public Joint Stock Company Bank Financial Corporation Otkritie Sovcombank Open Joint Stock Company Public Joint Stock Company Sberbank of Russia VTB Bank Public Joint Stock Company Joint Stock Company Alfa-Bank Public Joint Stock Company Rosbank Bank Zenit Public Joint Stock Company Bank Saint-Petersburg Public Joint Stock Company National Clearing Center (NCC) Any entity where one or more of these institutions own 50% or more The Central Bank of the Russian Federation However, General License 132 does not allow everything. The following actions remain prohibited: Opening or keeping a correspondent or payable-through account for any person under Directive 2 of E.O. 14024. Debiting an account at a U.S. financial institution that belongs to: The Central Bank of the Russian Federation The National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation Any transaction still prohibited under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, except for the transactions listed in paragraph (a) of this license. These still require separate permission if not clearly covered. General License 132 and related information can be found on OFAC’s official website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. Bradley T. Smith, Director of OFAC, signed the general license on November 21, 2025. The Federal Register published this information under docket number 2026-00952. The document was filed on January 16, 2026, and made public on January 20, 2026. For further inquiries, contact the OFAC Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs at 202-622-4855 or online via https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
OFAC Adds New Names to SDN List in January 2026 Action Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 15, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took new sanctions action. The update was officially published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2026, Volume 91, Number 12, on pages 2428 through 2433. These actions include new additions to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). OFAC confirmed that these individuals or entities met the legal requirements under specific Executive Orders. These Executive Orders are: Executive Order 13553, Executive Order 13876, Executive Order 13902. As a result of this action, all property and interests in property of the listed persons that are subject to U.S. jurisdiction are now blocked. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with these designated individuals or entities. The exact names and identifying information of these persons were included in the Federal Register notice and accompanying TIFF image files on pages 2429 to 2433. The public can access the SDN List and additional details about OFAC sanctions at the official OFAC website: https://ofac.treasury.gov The following OFAC officials can be contacted for more information: Associate Director for Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Assistant Director for Licensing: 202-622-2480 Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance: 202-622-2490 The notice is cataloged with the document number 2026-00969. Bradley T. Smith, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, signed the document. This action and all related blocking measures are effective as of January 15, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Dental Burs and Kits Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Opens Investigation Into Dental Bur Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 13, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the beginning of Investigation No. 337-TA-1479. The investigation is about certain imported dental burs and kits. This action follows a complaint filed on December 16, 2025, by Huwais IP Holding LLC and Versah, LLC, both located in Jackson, Michigan. An amended complaint was filed on January 6, 2026. The complaint says certain companies import and sell dental burs and kits in the U.S. that break the rules under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The products are said to violate U.S. patents and trademarks. The two patents involved are: U.S. Patent No. 9,326,778 U.S. Patent No. 11,712,250 The patents cover special kinds of dental tools called “osseodensification dental burs.” The trademarks involved are: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 6,261,888 U.S. Trademark Registration No. 6,261,886 U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,689,471 The complainants say that these intellectual property rights are being violated by importing and selling the products in the United States. The commission will look at: Whether any U.S. patents or trademarks are being violated. Whether there is a business in the U.S. involved in making these products. The complainants want the USITC to issue one of the following: A general exclusion order A limited exclusion order Cease and desist orders The USITC has listed the exact type of products under investigation. They are: “osseodensification dental burs and kits thereof.” The following companies are named as respondents. They are the ones accused of breaking U.S. trade law: Pawn Move, Sialkot, Pakistan Raheela Instruments, UAE Ali House of Dental, Pakistan Dental68, Grapevine, TX, USA Mahfooz Instruments, Pakistan Medsal International, Pakistan Hamsan International/Hamsan Surgical, Pakistan Arck Instruments UK LTD, United Kingdom Denshine, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA DentalBTC/Mediface Instruments, Pakistan and Texas, USA iDentalShop, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA Dyna International, Pakistan Merit Surgical, Canada Skeema Dental Italia, Italy Orthodonticdental/Orthodent, Australia New Med Instruments, Pakistan The USITC named Pathenia M. Proctor of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations as the contact for further information regarding this case. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will assign a judge to handle the case. Companies listed as respondents must reply to the amended complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days of receiving it. If they do not answer in time, the USITC and judge may decide the case without their input. This could lead to exclusion orders or cease and desist orders against those companies. Issued under Commission order dated January 14, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Nasal Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission’s Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments on Remedies in Patent Case for Nasal Devices Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 20, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) released a notice in Federal Register Volume 91, Number 12, regarding Investigation No. 337-TA-1444. The investigation concerns possible violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 related to the importation and sale of certain nasal devices and components. The investigation began on March 26, 2025. Aardvark Medical Inc., based in Denton, Texas, filed the complaint. The company alleges that certain imported nasal devices infringe claims in U.S. Patent Nos. 9,750,856; 11,318,234; 11,883,009; 11,883,010; and 11,889,995. The ITC named the following companies as respondents: Xiamenximier Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Cenny) – Fujian, China Xia Men Deng Jia E-Commerce Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Ronfnea) – Fujian, China Chongqing Moffy Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. – Chongqing City, China Guangdong XINRUNTAO Technology Co., Ltd. – Shenzhen, China Shenzhen Jun&Liang Media Tech Limited – Shenzhen, China RhinoSystems – Brooklyn, Ohio Spa Sciences LP – Port St. Lucie, Florida The Commission determined that the Office of Unfair Import Investigations would not participate in the investigation. Key developments include: On June 17, 2025, the Commission approved a name correction for respondent Spa Sciences LP to Michael Todd Beauty LP d/b/a Spa Sciences (Order No. 9). On August 6, 2025, Michael Todd Beauty LP was terminated from the investigation by joint settlement agreement (Order No. 14). On December 4, 2025, the Commission found Cenny, Ronfnea, Moffy, Xinruntao, and Jun&Liang in default (Order No. 27, partially reviewed and affirmed). On December 22, 2025, RhinoSystems was also terminated from the investigation based on settlement (Order No. 28). All remaining respondents are now in default. On January 5, 2026, Aardvark Medical submitted a declaration under Commission Rule 210.16(c), requesting that the Commission immediately issue: A limited exclusion order (LEO), and A cease and desist order (CDO) against each defaulted respondent. The Commission did not receive any opposing responses to this request. The ITC is now requesting public written submissions on the following topics: What type of remedy, if any, should be issued. The impact of a potential remedy on the public interest. How much bond should be imposed during any President-led review period of the remedy. The Commission will consider effects on: Public health and welfare Competitive conditions in the U.S. economy U.S. production of similar or competitive articles U.S. consumers If any remedy is ordered, the U.S. Trade Representative will have 60 days to review it. During that time, the products may still enter the U.S. under bond. Parties should include the following in their submissions: The type of remedy requested Proposed terms of the remedial orders The expiration date of the patents involved Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings for the implicated products Names of known importers Deadlines for submissions: Initial submissions are due by January 29, 2026. Reply submissions are due by February 5, 2026. No additional submissions will be accepted unless the Commission states otherwise. Documents must be filed electronically according to 19 CFR 210.4(f). Confidential documents must be marked accordingly. Non-confidential versions must be available to the public online through the Commission’s Electronic Docket Information System (EDIS). The Commission made its decision to request these submissions on January 14, 2026. The legal authority for this notice comes from Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and rules in 19 CFR part 210. Issued by: Lisa Barton Secretary to the Commission Date: 2026-01-15 Federal Register Doc. No.: 2026-00955 Billing Code: 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-09
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-09 Executive Summary This briefing covers seven U.S. government actions relating to China published between January 7–9, 2026. The primary authorities involved are the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). All items concern antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings, including final results of sunset reviews, determinations of material injury, and administrative reviews. Key products covered are lightweight thermal paper, thermoformed molded fiber products, light-walled rectangular pipe and tube, xanthan gum, ferrovanadium, and tow-behind lawn groomers. Updates by Authority ITC — U.S. International Trade Commission Lightweight Thermal Paper — AD/CVD (Five-Year Review Determination) The ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on lightweight thermal paper from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry. The Commission’s findings were made under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are contained in Publication 5967 (January 2026). Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD/CVD Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126 (Third Review) Determination date: January 6, 2026 Source Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products — AD/CVD (Final Determinations) The ITC found that a U.S. industry is materially injured by imports of thermoformed molded fiber products from China and Vietnam sold at less than fair value and subsidized by both governments. The determinations were made under sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are contained in USITC Publication 5964 (January 2026). Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD/CVD Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-739‑740 and 731‑TA‑1716‑1717 (Final) Determination date: January 5, 2026 Source DOC / ITA — U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — CVD (Expedited Third Sunset Review Final Results) Commerce determined that revocation of the CVD order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. The final subsidy rates range from 2.20% to 200.58%. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD Investigation: C‑570‑915 Effective date: January 9, 2026 Source Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — AD (Expedited Third Sunset Review Final Results) Commerce concluded that revocation of the AD orders on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China, Korea, Mexico, and Türkiye would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, with margins up to 255.07% for China. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Effective date: January 8, 2026 Source Xanthan Gum — AD (Preliminary Administrative Review, 2023–2024) Commerce preliminarily found that reviewed exporters of xanthan gum from China did not sell below normal value during July 2023–June 2024. Deosen Biochemical Ltd. had no shipments, and the review was rescinded in part for CP Kelco (Shandong). Zero margins were calculated for participating firms. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Investigation ID: A‑570‑985 Effective date: January 9, 2026 Source Ferrovanadium — AD (Expedited Fourth Sunset Review Final Results) Commerce determined that revocation of the AD orders on ferrovanadium from South Africa and China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, with margins up to 66.71% for China. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Effective date: January 8, 2026 Source Tow‑Behind Lawn Groomers — AD (Expedited Third Sunset Review Final Results) Commerce found that revocation of the AD order on tow‑behind lawn groomers and certain parts from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, with margins up to 386.28%. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Effective date: January 8, 2026 Source Key Takeaways (Factual) Both ITC and Commerce issued final or preliminary decisions sustaining duties on several Chinese-origin products. Sunset reviews reaffirm existing AD or CVD orders for light-walled pipe and tube, ferrovanadium, and lawn groomers. The ITC confirmed that injury would likely continue if AD/CVD orders on lightweight thermal paper were revoked. Commerce’s preliminary review found no dumping for xanthan gum producers during 2023–2024. All cases reference China explicitly as the country of origin, demonstrating continued monitoring of Chinese exports under trade remedy law. Full Source Links (Index) Lightweight Thermal Paper — ITC Determinations Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products — ITC Determinations Light‑Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — CVD Sunset Review Final Results Light‑Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — AD Sunset Review Final Results Xanthan Gum — Preliminary AD Review Results Ferrovanadium — Final AD Sunset Review Results Tow‑Behind Lawn Groomers — Final AD Sunset Review Results Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia; Request for Comments Regarding the Institution of a Section 751(b) Review Concerning the Commission’s Affirmative Determinations
U.S. Trade Commission Seeks Comments on Possible Review of Duties on Coated Paper from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is asking for public comments about whether there are new reasons to review existing duties on coated paper imports from Indonesia. This is about special taxes that were put on high-quality print paper from Indonesia to protect U.S. businesses. Background on the Duties In November 2010, the USITC found that imports of certain coated paper from China and Indonesia were hurting the U.S. industry. The U.S. Department of Commerce said those imports were sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices and were getting help from foreign governments. As a result, the U.S. placed antidumping and countervailing duties (special taxes) on these paper imports. The duties were reviewed and continued in 2017 and again in 2022, after the USITC and the Department of Commerce said U.S. industries still needed protection. Request for Changed Circumstances Review On December 3, 2025, two Indonesian paper companies, PT. Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills and PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk., asked the USITC to review its decisions. The companies say there have been big changes in Indonesia’s paper industry. They claim: There has been a large and permanent drop in the ability to make this type of paper in Indonesia. Now, only two companies are making the paper. The industry has strongly shifted to selling paper inside Indonesia, not exporting it to other countries. They argue these changes were not caused by the U.S. duties but by other market reasons. USITC Requests Public Comments The USITC is now asking the public to comment on whether these changes are enough to start a special review. They want to know if a review should begin to see if removing the duties would again hurt U.S. paper businesses. How to Submit Comments Comments must be sent to the USITC’s Secretary by March 4, 2026. All comments must follow the Commission’s rules. If the comment has business secrets, it must follow special rules for confidential information. Right now, comments must be sent electronically through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings or physical copies will be accepted. For More Information For questions, contact Celia Feldpausch at 202-205-2387, or visit the USITC website at http://www.usitc.gov. The full public record can be viewed at http://edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on January 9, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Power Converters and Circuit Systems Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 14, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the receipt of a new complaint concerning “Certain Power Converters, Circuit Board Assemblies, and Computing Systems Containing the Same.” The complaint is officially logged under Docket Number 3874. The complaint was filed by Vicor Corporation. It alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The complaint covers the importation, sale for importation, and sale after importation of specific power converters, circuit board assemblies, and computing systems that contain those parts. Respondents named in the complaint include: Delta Electronics, Inc. (Taiwan) Delta Electronics (Americas) Ltd. (Fremont, CA) DET Logistics (USA) Corporation (Fremont, CA) Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (China) Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd. a/k/a Luxshare-Tech (China) Shanghai Peiyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a MetaPWR Electronics Co., Ltd. and Shanghai MetaPWR Electronics Co., Ltd. (China) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Kirkland, Washington) Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd. (China) MPS International (Shanghai) Ltd. (China) Wistron Corporation (Taiwan) Wiwynn Corporation (Taiwan) Quanta Computer Inc. (Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology Inc. (Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology USA LLC (San Jose, CA) Quanta Computer USA Inc. (Fremont, CA) Vicor Corporation requests that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The company also seeks a bond on respondents’ allegedly infringing products during the 60-day Presidential review period as provided by 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The Commission now seeks public comments about any public interest concerns the complaint may raise. These comments should discuss whether the requested relief would affect public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the U.S., or U.S. consumers. The Commission especially asks for comments on: How the products are used in the United States. Health, safety, or welfare concerns in the U.S. related to the orders requested. Whether similar products are made in the U.S. and could replace the subject articles if excluded. The ability for Vicor, its licensees, or third parties to fill the market if the alleged items are excluded or ordered to cease and desist. The impacts of the requested orders on U.S. consumers. All written submissions about public interest must be filed no later than close of business, eight calendar days after this notice’s publication in the Federal Register. There will be more chances for the public to comment after any final initial determination in this investigation. All submissions and replies must be no more than five pages, including attachments. Submissions must be filed electronically through the Commission’s EDIS system at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper or in-person filings will be accepted at this time. Requests for confidential treatment must be addressed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a statement explaining why confidential treatment should be granted. All contract personnel must sign nondisclosure agreements. Nonconfidential written submissions will be available to view at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS at https://edis.usitc.gov. This notice is issued under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). The Secretary to the Commission for this action is Lisa Barton. The notice was issued on January 12, 2026. For more information, visit https://www.usitc.gov or the EDIS system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
USITC Receives Complaint Concerning Power Converters and Computing Systems Estimated reading time: 7–8 minutes On January 12, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a new complaint. This complaint is titled “Certain Power Converters, Circuit Board Assemblies, and Computing Systems Containing the Same,” Docket Number 3874. The complaint was filed by Vicor Corporation. The company claims that certain products were imported, sold for importation, or sold in the United States after importation in violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The products in question include power converters, circuit board assemblies, and computing systems that use these items. The complaint names several companies as respondents: Delta Electronics, Inc. (Taiwan) Delta Electronics (Americas) Ltd. (Fremont, California) DET Logistics (USA) Corporation (Fremont, California) Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (China) Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Luxshare-Tech (China) Shanghai Peiyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a MetaPWR Electronics Co., Ltd., and Shanghai MetaPWR Electronics Co., Ltd. (China) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Kirkland, Washington) Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd. (China) MPS International (Shanghai) Ltd. (China) Wistron Corporation (Taiwan) Wiwynn Corporation (Taiwan) Quanta Computer Inc. (Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology Inc. (Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology USA LLC (San Jose, California) Quanta Computer USA Inc. (Fremont, California) Vicor Corporation is asking the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Vicor also requests that the Commission impose a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. The USITC is asking for comments from the public on any public interest issues related to the complaint. The focus is on: How the products identified are used in the United States. Any concerns about public health, safety, or welfare if the requested orders are issued. Identification of similar products made in the United States that could replace the disputed items. Whether Vicor, its partners, or other suppliers in the U.S. can meet the demand if the imported products are excluded. How U.S. consumers may be affected by the requested remedial orders. Anyone who wants to submit comments must do so electronically within eight days after publication of the notice. Submissions must reference “Docket No. 3874” and be no longer than five pages. Only electronic filings are allowed at this time. Guidance can be found on the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. Those who want to keep some information confidential must follow the procedures set out in 19 CFR 201.6. Confidential documents can only be reviewed by the Commission and certain authorized personnel. The USITC will provide other opportunities for comments if a final initial determination is made in the investigation. Replies to any comments must be filed within three days after the comments are due. This notice is filed under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more details, refer to the official notice at the Federal Register or contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, at the USITC in Washington, DC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Wearable Devices With Fall Detection and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation Into Fall Detection Wearable Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has started an investigation into certain wearable devices with fall detection and their components. The investigation relates to complaints made by UnaliWear, Inc., a company from Austin, Texas. The complaint was filed on December 12, 2025. UnaliWear, Inc. claims that some products imported or sold in the United States infringe its patents. The patents mentioned are U.S. Patent No. 10,051,410 and U.S. Patent No. 10,687,193. The company also says there is an industry in the United States connected to these patents. The ITC will look at the following products: “electronic watches with the capability to detect when a user has suffered a fall, and components thereof.” The investigation will focus on whether these devices are being imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. after importation, in violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies listed as respondents are: Apple, Inc., Cupertino, California Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon-si, Republic of Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Google LLC, Mountain View, California Garmin Ltd., Schaffhausen, Switzerland Garmin International, Inc., Olathe, Kansas Garmin USA, Inc., Olathe, Kansas The ITC will decide if these companies have violated the law by infringing the patents. The Commission may issue orders to stop the sale and importation of such devices if a violation is found. The presiding Administrative Law Judge will take evidence and hear arguments regarding the public interest. This will include looking at facts and making a recommendation. The deadlines are firm. The named companies must respond to the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days of receiving them. If they do not respond on time, they may lose the right to contest the allegations. The ITC could then issue an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against them. More information about the investigation can be found at https://edis.usitc.gov or by contacting the Office of Unfair Import Investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice on January 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Final Phase in Torsion Springs Case from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the final phase schedule for its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. This action follows final affirmative determinations from the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) regarding imports of these springs from both China and India. Commerce found imports had been subsidized and sold at less than fair value. The USITC previously determined that imports of these springs from China caused material injury to the U.S. industry. These products are classified under subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Recent final determinations by Commerce regarding India were published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2025 (90 FR 61366 and 90 FR 61369). In response, the USITC is setting deadlines for the next steps in this investigation. The deadline for filing supplemental party comments is 5:15 p.m. on January 15, 2026. These comments must focus only on Commerce’s final determinations about imports from India. The rules require that supplemental comments do not include new facts and remain within five pages. The USITC staff’s supplemental report on these investigations will appear in the nonpublic record on January 28, 2026. A public version of the report will come afterward. All filings related to this investigation must be electronic. Filings are accepted through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted at this time. Every document submitted by parties must be served on all other participants in the investigation and must be accompanied by a certificate of service. The Secretary will not accept any document for filing without this certificate. Except for submissions requested directly by a Commissioner or staff, or unless good cause is shown, no additional written submissions will be accepted. This investigation is conducted under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and published under section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. For further details, contact Peter Stebbins of the Office of Investigations at (202) 205-2039. Information for hearing-impaired persons is available at (202) 205-1810. Persons needing mobility assistance should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Issued January 8, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. (Federal Register Doc. 2026-00347, Filed 1-9-26, 8:45 am, Billing Code 7020-02-P) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Chromium Trioxide From India and Turkey; Determinations
U.S. Begins Trade Investigation Into Chromium Trioxide Imports from India and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an investigation about chromium trioxide coming from India and Turkey. This decision is because there may be unfair trade. The USITC found signs that a U.S. industry is being hurt by imported chromium trioxide. These imports are thought to be sold in the United States at prices less than fair value. This is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. Chromium trioxide is used in making special chemicals and other products. The investigation also looks at chromium trioxide from India that may be getting financial help, or “subsidies,” from the Indian government. Imports from both India and Turkey are included, but subsidies are only being checked for India. The product is listed under code 2819.10.00 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. The case started after American Chrome & Chemicals, Inc. from Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, filed written requests on September 29, 2025. They said U.S. businesses are being harmed because of the imported chemicals from India and Turkey. Because of this, the USITC began two types of investigations: a countervailing duty investigation, number 701-TA-779, and antidumping investigations, numbers 731-TA-1765 and 1766. Notices about the investigations, and a meeting for the public to share their views, were posted at the USITC office and published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2025 (Volume 90, Page 47820). The official meeting took place on December 4, 2025. Everyone who asked to speak was allowed to take part. The USITC’s work was delayed at different times because of a government shutdown. New schedules were announced on November 11, December 18, and December 30, 2025, all published in the Federal Register as required. The USITC followed U.S. law in making its decisions, following sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission finished and filed its decisions on January 2, 2026. Details of the decisions are in USITC Publication 5968, “Chromium Trioxide from India and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-779 and 731-TA-1765-1766 (Preliminary)” dated January 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the official order. The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2026 (91 FR 1197). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: AndersonBrecon, Inc. DBA PCI Pharma Services
Federal Notice: AndersonBrecon, Inc. DBA PCI Pharma Services Applies To Import LSD For Clinical Trials Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 8, 2026, the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced a new application from AndersonBrecon, Inc. DBA PCI Pharma Services. The company, based at 5775 Logistics Parkway, Rockford, Illinois 61109-3608, has requested permission to import a controlled substance. The controlled substance is lysergic acid diethylamide, also known as LSD. The drug code for LSD is 7315. LSD is classified by the government as a Schedule I drug. AndersonBrecon, Inc. wants to import LSD only for use in clinical trials. No other activities with LSD are allowed under this application. The company is not allowed to import FDA-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. The DEA states that approval for importing will only happen if the company’s activities match what is allowed under United States law, specifically 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Other companies or people who already make or use LSD in bulk can send comments or objections to the proposed registration. They may also request a hearing. All comments or hearing requests must be submitted by February 9, 2026. Comments should be sent through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. For hearings, requests must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 The DEA notice was signed by Thomas Prevoznik, Deputy Assistant Administrator. This public notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 5, on January 8, 2026, pages 724-725. The docket number is DEA-1638. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
DEA Notice: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Applies to Import Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: January 8, 2026 Who applied: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. applied to be registered as an importer of specific controlled substances. Address: 1440 Olympic Drive, Buildings 1-5 & 7-14, Athens, Georgia 30601-1645. Controlled Substances Requested: Ethylphenidate (Drug code: 1727, Schedule I) Methylphenidate (Drug code: 1724, Schedule II) Purpose: Janssen plans to import these substances only for analytical purposes. No other activities involving these drug codes are permitted under this registration. Regulatory Information: The application follows 21 CFR 1301.34(a). Permit approvals will happen only if the business activity fits U.S. law, specifically 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The permission does not allow the import of finished drugs, whether FDA-approved or not, for sale. Comments and Hearings: Registered bulk manufacturers and applicants can submit electronic comments or objections by February 9, 2026. Requests for a hearing about the application must be submitted by February 9, 2026. Comments must be made at https://www.regulations.gov. Hearing requests must be sent to the DEA at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152, to the Attention of the Hearing Clerk/OALJ, DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, and the Administrator. Notice Published By: Thomas Prevoznik, Deputy Assistant Administrator. Document Number: 2026-00128 Date Filed: January 7, 2026 For more information, visit the official Federal Register website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Curium US LLC
Curium US LLC Applies to Import Controlled Substance Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Curium US LLC has applied to become an importer of a controlled substance. This information was released by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in a notice published on January 8, 2026. The application is for importing a substance called ecgonine. The drug code for ecgonine is 9180. Ecgonine is listed as a Schedule II controlled substance. Curium US LLC is located at 2703 Wagner Place, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043-3421. The company wants to import small amounts of a derivative form of ecgonine. The purpose is to use the substance for manufacturing. No other activities for this drug code are allowed under this registration. Anyone interested in this proposed registration can send a comment or objection. Comments must be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. The deadline to submit comments or requests for a hearing is February 9, 2026. People who want a hearing need to send their request to the DEA at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. The DEA will approve permit applications only if they fit the rules described in 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The authorization does not allow for importing finished dosage forms, whether they are approved or not by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for commercial sale. The notice was signed by Thomas Prevoznik, Deputy Assistant Administrator at the DEA. For more information, see the notice published in the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 5, on January 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Mylan Technologies Inc.
Mylan Technologies Applies to Import Controlled Substances for Testing Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Mylan Technologies Inc. has applied to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of controlled substances. The application was officially filed on October 7, 2025. Mylan Technologies is located at 110 Lake Street, Saint Albans, Vermont 05478-2266. The company seeks to import two specific controlled substances. These are: Methylphenidate (Drug code 1724, Schedule II) Fentanyl (Drug code 9801, Schedule II) Mylan plans to import these substances in finished dosage form (FDF) from foreign sources. The imports will be used for analytical testing and clinical trials. In these trials, the foreign FDF will be compared to the company’s own FDF made in the United States for foreign markets. The registration does not authorize other activities for these drug codes. The permit is only for testing and trials. It does not allow the import of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. The DEA will grant approval only if the registrant’s activities match what is allowed under U.S. law. Other uses are not permitted. People who make these substances or want to make them may submit comments or objections. Comments must be sent electronically by February 9, 2026. Written requests for a hearing on the application must also be sent by this date. Comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov. Written hearing requests must be sent to: 1. Drug Enforcement Administration, Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 2. Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 3. Drug Enforcement Administration, Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152 This notice follows 21 CFR 1301.34(a), which governs the importation of controlled substances. The announcement was issued by Thomas Prevoznik, Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Department of Justice Announces Fifth Religious Liberty Commission Meeting Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the fifth meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission. The meeting will take place on February 9, 2026, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The location will be the World Stage Theatre at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC. The meeting will also be recorded and broadcast online at justice.gov/live. The Religious Liberty Commission is a federal advisory committee. It was established by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission has a chair, a vice chair, and eleven members appointed by the President. Members include people from the private sector, employers, educational institutions, religious communities, States, and three ex-officio members. The Commission gives advice to the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office. They focus on religious liberty policies in the United States. The Commission will create a detailed report for the President. This report will cover the foundations of religious liberty in America, the impact of religious liberty on American society, current threats to religious liberty in the country, strategies to protect religious liberty for the future, and programs to teach about and support America’s peaceful religious diversity. At the February 9, 2026 meeting, the Commission will discuss religious liberty issues related to anti-Semitism. They will also talk about religious liberty issues in the private sector. The meeting is open to the public. People who want to attend in person must register. Registration is available on the Religious Liberty Commission website at https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. Attendance is limited to the number of seats at the venue. All in-person attendees will need to show identification and go through security screening. Media members must register through the Office of Public Affairs by February 5, 2026, at 5 p.m. They must also bring government-issued photo identification and valid media credentials and go through security checks. Anyone can send written comments to the Commission. Comments can be emailed to the contact address listed or sent by mail to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, ATTN: Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706, Washington, DC 20530. The deadline for comments is February 1, 2026. For more information or to request a reasonable accommodation to attend, contact Mary Margaret Bush, Director and Designated Federal Officer for the Religious Liberty Commission, at the Department of Justice. The notice of this meeting is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). Dated: January 6, 2026.Mary Margaret BushDesignated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Department of Justice Announces Sixth Religious Liberty Commission Meeting Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States Department of Justice has announced the sixth Federal advisory committee meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission. The meeting will be open to the public. It is scheduled for March 16, 2026, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The meeting will take place at the World Stage Theatre at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC. The meeting will be recorded and broadcast live online at justice.gov/live. To attend the meeting in person, registration is required. Attendance is limited by the venue’s capacity. People can register on the Religious Liberty Commission website at here. All attendees must bring identification and go through security. Media guests must register with the Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs by March 12, 2026, at 5 p.m. Media should have government-issued photo I.D. and valid media credentials. Mary Margaret Bush is the Director of the Religious Liberty Commission and serves as the Designated Federal Officer. She can be reached by email or phone at 202-514-2046. She can also help people who need a reasonable accommodation to attend. The Religious Liberty Commission was set up by the President through Executive Order 14291. It has a chair, a vice chair, and eleven members chosen by the President. Members include people from the private sector, states, educational institutions, religious communities, and three ex-officio members. The Commission gives advice to the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office on religious liberty policies. It will prepare a report to the President. This report will cover the foundations of religious liberty in America, its impact on society, current threats, ways to protect religious liberty for future generations, and programs to celebrate America’s religious diversity. The agenda for the March 16 meeting will focus on religious liberty issues related to healthcare and humanitarian and social services. People can send in written comments by email or mail. The deadline for comments is March 8, 2026. Comments can be emailed or mailed to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706 Washington, DC 20530. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). The notice was signed by Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission, on January 6, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ferrovanadium From the Republic of South Africa and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Ferrovanadium from South Africa and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the fourth expedited sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ferrovanadium from South Africa and China. The agency found that removing these orders would likely cause dumping to continue or happen again. Background The original antidumping duty orders were announced on January 28, 2003. The fourth sunset reviews started on July 1, 2025. These reviews are required by law to decide if the duties are still needed. The Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers Association (VRPA) told the Commerce Department they wanted to take part in this review. The VRPA is a group whose members make or sell similar products in the U.S. No companies from South Africa or China responded with their own comments during this review. Review Process Domestic parties gave their responses on July 31, 2025. The Commerce Department did not get any responses from companies in South Africa or China. The review moved forward as an expedited process. There were some delays because of a Federal Government shutdown that started in November 2025. All deadlines in these cases were delayed by a total of 68 days. As a result, the final results were due on January 5, 2026. Scope of the Orders The orders cover ferrovanadium from South Africa and China. More details on the scope are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is available to the public online. Findings The Commerce Department decided that taking away the antidumping orders would likely mean dumping would continue or start again. The possible dumping margins are up to 116.00 percent for South Africa, and 66.71 percent for China. Next Steps This notice serves as a reminder to anyone under an administrative protective order to return or destroy proprietary information as required. The final results are issued and published according to U.S. law and regulations. For more details, the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at here. Contacts For questions, contact David De Falco at the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, at 202-482-2178. Official The notice is signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated January 5, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Lawn Groomers from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On January 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its third sunset review of antidumping duties for tow-behind lawn groomers and certain parts from China. The Department of Commerce found that cancelling the antidumping duty order would likely lead to continued or recurring dumping of these products into the U.S. market. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at prices lower than in the home country, which can hurt American companies. This order applies to lawn groomers from China. Agri-Fab, Inc., a U.S. manufacturer, took part as the domestic interested party in this review. The company sent in a notice of its intent to participate and a full response. There was no response from any interested parties in China. Because there was no response from the Chinese side, the review was conducted quickly, as allowed by law. There were some delays due to a government shutdown and extra paperwork, so the deadline for the final results was moved to January 5, 2026. The review found that if the order was lifted, dumping would likely continue or happen again. The Department determined that the dumping margins could be as high as 386.28 percent. This means Chinese exporters would sell lawn groomers in the U.S. at much lower prices than in China. The Department of Commerce followed all rules under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and related regulations. The findings and full details of issues discussed are available in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum” on the Department’s website at https://access.trade.gov or https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. All parties with protected information must follow rules to return or destroy documents as required. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance on January 5, 2026. For questions, contact David De Falco at (202) 482-2178, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Republic of Türkiye, and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Will Keep Antidumping Duties on Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Four Countries Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Decision Details On January 8, 2026, Commerce said that ending the antidumping duties on these pipes and tubes would likely cause dumping to start again or continue. Dumping happens when foreign companies sell products in the U.S. at prices lower than in their home country. Which Countries Are Affected? Korea Mexico Türkiye China Background These duties first started after Commerce published orders in 2008 for these countries. Every five years, the government reviews if these duties are still needed. This review began on July 1, 2025. American companies like Bull Moose Company, Maruichi American Corporation, Nucor Tubular Products Inc., Searing Industries, Inc., Vest LLC, and Atlas Tube filed timely notices saying they want these duties to stay. These companies make, produce, or sell pipe and tube products in the U.S. Commerce found that no companies from Korea, Mexico, Türkiye, or China gave reasons for ending the duties. Review Process and Delays The government shut down in late 2025 caused delays. Commerce added 68 extra days to make up for these delays. The final decision was given on January 5, 2026. Products Covered These orders cover light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from the four countries. More information about which products are covered is in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This is a public document and available online. Dumping Margins If the duties were ended, Commerce said dumping margins would likely be: Up to 30.66% for Korea 11.50% for Mexico 41.71% for Türkiye 255.07% for China These are the weighted-average rates at which foreign producers might sell the products under U.S. prices. Administrative Notices Parties with access to business secrets under an Administrative Protective Order must follow the rules to return or destroy private information. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. Further Information This final decision is in line with U.S. trade laws, including 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). The action was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on January 5, 2026. For detailed topics and the full analysis, the public can read the Issues and Decision Memorandum online at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Lightweight Thermal Paper From China; Determinations
U.S. International Trade Commission Makes Determinations on Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On January 6, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a key decision about lightweight thermal paper from China. The Commission looked at whether removing certain trade rules could hurt U.S. companies. These rules are called countervailing and antidumping duty orders. They help protect American industries from unfair trade practices. In this case, the USITC found that if the orders on lightweight thermal paper from China were taken away, it would likely cause material injury to companies in the United States. This injury could happen again or continue if the orders were removed. The Commission’s review started on June 2, 2025. At that time, they opened investigation numbers 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126. The USITC later decided to conduct expedited reviews. These reviews moved quickly to examine the facts. There was a delay in the schedule because of a government funding issue, but the schedule was changed and continued as planned. The decision was made according to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC finished and filed its findings on January 6, 2026. The full views of the Commission can be found in USITC Publication 5967, titled “Lightweight Thermal Paper from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126 (Third Review).” Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the official order. This notice was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Screen Protectors, Screen Protector Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
US International Trade Commission Opens Investigation Into Screen Protector Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 7, 2026, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the start of an investigation. The case is about certain screen protectors, screen protector systems, and their parts. The case number is 337-TA-1474. The complaint was filed on December 3, 2025. Superior Communications Inc., from Irwindale, California, is the complainant. The complaint says that some products coming into the United States may break the rules found in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint says that some companies are importing, selling, or selling after importation, screen protectors and systems that may infringe on these United States patents: U.S. Patent No. 9,931,823 U.S. Patent No. 10,021,818 U.S. Patent No. 10,399,315 U.S. Patent No. 11,155,067 Superior Communications says that there is an industry for these products in the United States, or that an industry is being made. Superior Communications is asking for two things from the ITC: A limited exclusion order Cease and desist orders. The investigation will look at whether the named companies broke the law by bringing accused products into the US, selling them to be imported, or selling them after they got here. These products include: Screen protector applicator systems Screen protectors used with application trays Screen protectors and application trays Screen protectors used with application machines Screen protectors and application machines, and Their components The ITC named these parties in the investigation: Complainant: Superior Communications Inc., 5027 Irwindale Avenue, Suite 900, Irwindale, California 91706 Respondents: Belkin International, Inc., 555 South Aviation Boulevard, Suite 180, El Segundo, California 90245-4852 Belkin Inc., 555 South Aviation Boulevard, Suite 180, El Segundo, California 90245-4852 The ITC has assigned an Administrative Law Judge to oversee the investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be a party in this case. The named respondents must reply to the complaint and notice of investigation, following the instructions in section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Responses must be received no later than 20 days after the complaint and notice are served. If a respondent does not respond on time, they may lose their right to contest the allegations. The ITC and Administrative Law Judge may then make findings and issue orders such as a limited exclusion order or a cease and desist order against the respondent. For further information, contact Susan Orndoff at the Office of Docket Services, US International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-1802. The official notice and non-confidential documents can be viewed on the ITC’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. General information about the Commission is available at https://www.usitc.gov. The investigation began by order of the Commission on January 2, 2026. The notice was issued by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From China and Vietnam; Determinations
United States Imposes Duties on Certain Fiber Products from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On January 5, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a final decision about some fiber products from China and Vietnam. The Commission decided that the U.S. industry is being hurt by imports of thermoformed molded fiber products (TMFPs) from these two countries. These products are listed under subheading 4823.70.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. According to the USITC, the U.S. Department of Commerce found that these products from China and Vietnam are being sold in the United States at “less than fair value,” which means they are being dumped. Commerce also found that the governments of China and Vietnam have given subsidies to their companies making these products. As a result of these findings, the United States will put duties on these imports. These actions follow the laws set by the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation started on October 8, 2024, after petitions from the American Molded Fiber Coalition. The Coalition includes Genera Inc. from Tennessee, Tellus Products, LLC from Florida, and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW). The Department of Commerce made early findings that these imports were being unfairly subsidized and dumped. The USITC then held a public hearing on September 30, 2025. Everyone who wanted to take part was allowed to participate. There was also a delay in the investigation schedule because the USITC had to stop work during a funding lapse. The schedule was changed, and a new notice was published in November 2025. The USITC also found that imports from Vietnam, which are covered by Commerce’s “critical circumstances” determination, could seriously hurt the impact of the duties. However, Commissioner Johanson disagreed with this part of the decision. The full views of the Commission are in USITC Publication 5964, called “Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-739-740 and 731-TA-1716-1717 (Final).” This notice was issued by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff and published on January 7, 2026, in the Federal Register (Volume 91, Number 4, pages 537–538). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Calcium Hypochlorite From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews for Calcium Hypochlorite from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On December 9, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. These reviews are for antidumping and countervailing duty orders on calcium hypochlorite from China. The aim is to decide if ending these orders would likely lead to continued or future harm to the U.S. industry. The Commission noted its decision was based on responses received by September 5, 2025. The domestic interested party group gave an adequate response. However, the respondent group’s response was inadequate. There were no other reasons to conduct a full review. As a result, the Commission will move forward with expedited reviews following section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). There was also a mention of time delays. These were due to a lack of funding and a temporary stop in Commission operations. This caused deadlines in the case to be tolled, or paused. For additional procedures and rules, the notice refers to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. These are listed under 19 CFR part 201 and 19 CFR part 207, which cover different parts of the process. A staff report about these reviews is on the Commission’s nonpublic record. It will be shared with people under the Administrative Protective Order on January 9, 2026. A public version will be made available later, under the Commission’s rules. Written comments can be filed by January 15, 2026. Only interested parties that provided adequate responses may submit these comments. Comments cannot contain new factual information. Other parties not involved in the reviews may submit brief written statements by the same date, also without new facts. If comments have sensitive business information, they must meet the rules in 19 CFR 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. The Commission has found that only responses from Innovative Water Care LLC were individually adequate, so comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. Every document filed by a party must be sent to all other parties. A certificate of service must also be filed. The Secretary will not accept any document without it. The Commission has found these reviews are extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, they are extending the review period by up to 90 days, using their authority under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). This process is part of the ITC’s work under the Tariff Act of 1930, as noted by the official order. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 5, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission to Conduct Full Reviews on Pipe and Tube Imports Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes On December 8, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced it will conduct full reviews for certain trade orders. These orders affect light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey. The reviews will follow the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC will decide if removing the special fees, called the countervailing and antidumping duty orders, would hurt U.S. companies. These fees are meant to stop unfair imports. The review will check if ending these fees would likely cause harm to U.S. businesses again. The ITC will share a schedule for the reviews soon. The decision was made on November 24, 2025. The ITC found that both groups in Mexico — from the U.S. and responders in Mexico — gave enough information. So, the ITC chose a full review for Mexico. For China, South Korea, and Turkey, the ITC found the group responses were not enough. Still, to be efficient, the ITC decided to review orders for these countries along with the Mexico review. Kenneth Gatten III from the Office of Investigations can be contacted for more details at 202-708-1447. People who need special help or who are hearing impaired can also get information by calling the ITC’s special numbers. Official records are available on the ITC website at https://www.usitc.gov. The public can also view case details online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The reviews follow ITC rules in 19 CFR parts 201 and 207, which guide how the ITC handles these cases. The official record of the vote will be available from the Office of the Secretary and on the ITC’s website. The notice was signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and issued on December 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Urine Splash Guards and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Decision To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant’s Motion for Summary Determination of a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Violation Decision on Imported Urine Splash Guards Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Investigation Background The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1430, began on January 13, 2025. It was based on a complaint from Kids By Parents, Inc. of Potomac, Maryland. The complaint said certain companies were importing and selling urine splash guards and components that violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The alleged violation involves infringement of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,870,619 and claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. 11,812,901. List of Respondents The investigation named companies from China as respondents. There are two groups: Defaulting Respondents (Did not respond to the complaint): Maomaohouse (Shenzhen) Le Sengyu (Guangzhou) HealthSTEC (Hefei City) Edermurs (Shenzhen) Lishian (Shenzhen) Settling Respondents (Resolved with settlement): Tigaman (Shenzhen) Junyxin (Xiamen City) Eurbus (Shenzhen) Sunyoka123 (Shenzhen) SeLucky (Shenzhen) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations also participated. Key Decisions and Orders Previously, the Settling Respondents were removed from the investigation due to settlements. The Defaulting Respondents were found in default after failing to reply to official notices and orders. On June 30, 2025, Kids By Parents, Inc. filed a motion for summary determination of a violation of section 337 against the Defaulting Respondents. The motion requested: A general exclusion order (GEO) Cease and desist orders (CDOs) A bond of 100% of the import value of infringing products during the period of Presidential review The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this motion. On September 17, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an initial decision (ID): The motion was granted for claims 1 and 2 of the ‘619 patent and claims 1 and 2 of the ‘901 patent. The motion was not granted for claim 3 of the ‘901 patent. Recommended a GEO and CDOs for Maomaohouse, Le Sengyu, HealthSTEC, and Lishian (not Edermurs). Recommended a 100% bond on infringing articles during Presidential review. Kids By Parents, Inc. filed to end the investigation concerning claim 3 of the ‘901 patent. The ALJ agreed, and the investigation was partially terminated for that claim. Commission Review and Request for Comments The ITC decided to review the initial decision regarding the domestic industry requirement. Other findings will not be reviewed. The ITC may issue: Exclusion orders, which could block the product from entering the U.S. Cease and desist orders, which would require companies to stop further violations. The Commission is asking for written comments on: What kind of remedy should be ordered Effects of any remedy on public health, competitive conditions, U.S. production, and consumers Bond amount if a remedy is ordered Deadlines for submitting comments are: December 19, 2025 (initial submissions) January 5, 2026 (reply submissions) Written submissions must follow all Commission rules. Submissions may be public or confidential, but confidential documents must be labeled and handled according to the rules. Next Steps The President or U.S. Trade Representative has 60 days to take action on the ITC’s remedy, once ordered. During this time, products may still enter the U.S. if the required bond is posted. Further information can be found on the ITC’s website. The official vote on this decision was held on December 3, 2025. Contact for More Information Houda Morad, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, (202) 708-4716. ITC Electronic Docket: https://edis.usitc.gov Issued December 3, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Asks for Comments in Semiconductor Devices Case Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a major step in its ongoing investigation about certain semiconductor devices. This is Investigation No. 337-TA-1414. On December 2, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an Initial Determination stating there was a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ALJ also gave a Recommended Determination on what remedy or action the ITC should take if a violation is found. After this, the ITC is now asking for public comments. These comments should focus on the public interest issues related to the possible actions the ITC may take. This request only asks for comments from the public and government agencies. What Is Section 337? Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 lets the ITC stop goods from coming into the U.S. if they break certain laws. However, before stopping the goods, the ITC must think about: The effect on public health and welfare in the United States The effect on competition in the U.S. economy The effect on making similar items in the U.S. How U.S. consumers would be affected Companies Involved The companies named in this case are: Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co., Ltd. Innoscience (Suzhou) Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd. Innoscience America, Inc. The recommended remedy is a limited exclusion order. This means the ITC could stop these companies’ semiconductor devices and products containing them from being brought into the U.S., sold for importation, or sold after importation. The ITC is also considering cease and desist orders against each company. Details for Submitting Comments The ITC is asking for written comments, no longer than five pages, on how stopping these products might: Affect public health, safety, or welfare in the U.S. Change competition and the U.S. economy Impact U.S. production of similar products Affect U.S. consumers The ITC also asks commenters to: Explain how the affected articles are used in the U.S. Point out any public health or welfare issues. Identify U.S.-made or available products that could replace the subject items. Say whether companies in the U.S. could provide enough replacements in a reasonable time. Describe the effects on U.S. consumers. All submissions must be filed electronically by the close of business on January 5, 2026. Comments must reference “Inv. No. 337-TA-1414” above or on the first page. To file, use the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help, contact the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. More details on electronic filing are available in the Commission’s Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures. Confidential documents must have appropriate markings and a non-confidential redacted version must also be submitted, following specific Commission Rules. Non-confidential comments will be available for public viewing on EDIS. Additional Information For further information, you may contact Joelle P. Justus, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 205-2593, or visit https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons can call the TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810. This notice is issued under authority from Section 337 of the Tariff Act, as updated, and the rules in 19 CFR part 210. Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts and Articles Containing Same; Notice of a Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337 and Issuing a Limited Exclusion Order and a Cease and Desist Order; Termination of Investigation
U.S. Trade Commission Finds Patent Violation in Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Date: 2025-12-09 On December 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced its final decision in Investigation No. 337-TA-1236. The case looked at the importation of polycrystalline diamond compacts and related articles into the United States. Companies Found to Violate U.S. Patent Law The ITC found that several companies broke Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies were: SF Diamond Co., Ltd. (Henan, China) SF Diamond USA, Inc. (Spring, Texas) Iljin Diamond Co., Ltd., Iljin Holdings Co., Ltd., Iljin USA Inc., Iljin Europe GmbH, Iljin Japan Co., Ltd., Iljin China Co., Ltd. (Korea, USA, Germany, Japan, China) Henan Jingrui New Material Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Zhenzghou New Asia Superhard Materials Composite Co., Ltd. (China) International Diamond Services, Inc. (USA) CR Gems Superabrasives Co., Ltd. (China) Fujian Wanlong Superhard Material Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Guangdong Juxin Materials Technology Co., Inc. (China) Shenzhen Haimingrun Superhard Materials Co., Ltd. (China) These companies were found to have imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. certain polycrystalline diamond compacts and articles that violated claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502. Remedies Ordered by the Commission Because of the violation, the ITC issued two major orders: A limited exclusion order (LEO): This stops the listed companies from importing products that infringe the patent. A cease and desist order (CDO): This order stops SF Diamond USA, Inc. from selling the infringing products in the United States. The ITC also set a bond at zero percent of the value of the excluded products imported during the period when the President reviews the order. Background of the Investigation The case began on December 29, 2020, after a complaint from US Synthetic Corporation (USS) of Orem, Utah. The company said some imports were breaking patent laws in the United States. The ITC first found that there was no violation about some of the patents in question. Some patents and companies were dropped from the investigation as the case went on. After a hearing in October 2021, the ITC originally found no violation for three of the patents. USS appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On February 13, 2025, the Federal Circuit reversed the ITC’s earlier finding about U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 and asked the ITC to reconsider. The Commission then found a violation regarding this patent. Details on the Commission’s Review After reviewing new evidence and legal arguments, the ITC: Agreed USS could use a new method to show its U.S. industry was harmed. Decided that the economic prong of the law, which shows harm to U.S. business, was met. Decided that public interest did not stop them from issuing the orders. The ITC delivered its orders and opinion to the President and the United States Trade Representative. Investigation Ended The ITC’s orders and opinion were dated December 4, 2025. The investigation is now closed. Contacts and More Information Information about this case is available from Cathy Chen in the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission. Documents can be seen at https://edis.usitc.gov. General Commission information is found at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Glycerol Esters of Rosin Imports Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On December 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it has received a complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Glycerol Esters of Rosin and Packaging Thereof, DN 3864.” The complaint was filed by T&R Chemicals, Inc. on December 4, 2025. The USITC is asking for comments about public interest concerns related to this complaint. The complaint says companies may have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with unfair imports into the United States. The companies named in the complaint are Caragum International from France, and Kemi Pine Rosins Portugal S.A. from Portugal. T&R Chemicals, Inc. is asking the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order. This order would stop the import of certain articles into the United States. The company is also asking for cease and desist orders and a bond on the products during the 60-day Presidential review period. The USITC wants comments on how these actions might affect the public. The USITC is interested in these points: How are the articles used in the United States? Are there any public health, safety, or welfare concerns? Are there similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the imports if they are excluded? Can U.S. companies or their partners supply enough products to replace the imports if a ban happens? How would U.S. consumers be affected by these actions? Anyone who wants to comment must send in their comments within eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. The USITC will accept other comments only if they are requested. Replies to comments may be filed within three days after the main comment deadline. All submissions must be filed electronically. Paper copies are not accepted at this time. Documents should mention “Docket No. 3864” clearly. Filings should be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Anyone seeking confidential treatment for their documents must request this directly from the Secretary to the Commission and provide reasons for confidentiality. All non-confidential submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. For more details, the public can view the complaint and information on EDIS at https://edis.usitc.gov. Questions about filing can be sent to the Secretary at [email address as listed in the original notice] or by calling (202) 205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons can use (202) 205-1810 for information. This notice is issued under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Issued on December 4, 2025. Lisa Barton,Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From China; Notice of Remand Proceedings
U.S. International Trade Commission Announces Remand Proceedings on Chinese Freight Rail Coupler Investigation Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On December 10, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) released a notice about remand proceedings for its investigations of certain freight rail couplers and parts from China. This notice follows a court order from the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). Background of the Investigation In July 2023, the Commission decided that a U.S. industry was hurt because freight rail couplers and their parts from China were being sold in the U.S. for less than fair value. These items were also being subsidized by the Chinese government. This decision was made in Investigation Nos. 701-TA-682 and 731-TA-1592. The decision was challenged in court by Strato, Inc. and Wabtec Corporation. The CIT ordered the Commission to reconsider or further explain its choice not to exclude Amsted from the domestic industry. This order is in Wabtec v. United States, Court No. 22-00157, Slip Opinion 25-134. Who Can Take Part in the Remand Only people and groups who were already active in the first investigation—and who are also part of the court appeal—can join these remand proceedings. These parties do not need to file again unless they are adding new people for access to business proprietary information (BPI). The Secretary will keep lists of all participants and those allowed to see BPI. Rules for Written Submissions The Commission is not reopening the record and will not accept new factual information. Parties can file comments about how the Commission should respond to the court’s remand instructions. All comments must use only the information already in the Commission’s record. Comments cannot include new facts or arguments not related to the court’s remanded issue. The deadline to file comments is January 2, 2026. Comments must not be longer than ten double-spaced, single-sided pages. These rules apply to attachments and exhibits as well. All written submissions must follow the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This includes part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207). Submissions with BPI must also meet the rules in sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. All filings must be sent electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings or paper copies will be accepted until further notice. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing provides more guidance and is available online. Further written submissions will not be accepted unless there is good reason or unless a Commissioner or Commission staff asks for them specifically. Serving Documents According to sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, every document filed must be served on all other parties in the investigation, as shown on the public or BPI service list. Each document must include a certificate of service. The Secretary will not accept any document that is missing this certificate. Contact Information For questions, parties can contact Lawrence Jones at (202) 205-3358 (Office of Investigations) or Michael Haldenstein at (202) 205-3041 (Office of General Counsel). Further information is available at https://www.usitc.gov and at https://edis.usitc.gov. Issued by order of the Commission on December 5, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Collated Steel Staples From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Expedited Review of Collated Steel Staples from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On December 16, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the start of expedited five-year reviews. The reviews will look at antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain collated steel staples from China. The ITC will decide if ending these orders would likely cause injury to U.S. industries again. The case is based on sections 701-TA-626 and 731-TA-1452 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The key date for this review is September 5, 2025. On that date, the ITC found that the response from domestic parties was strong enough. It also found there was not enough response from parties in China. For this reason, the review will be expedited instead of a full review. Staff will prepare a special report about the review. This report will first be placed in the nonpublic record. It will be given to certain people who are part of the administrative protective order service list on December 29, 2025. A public version will be made available after that. People or companies who are allowed to join the review can send their written comments to the ITC. These comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on January 5, 2026. Comments cannot include any new facts. If there are delays in related reviews by the Department of Commerce, the comment deadline will change to three business days after Commerce shares its results. Anyone who is not a party or an interested party can send in a short written statement by January 5, 2026. These statements also must not include new facts. All documents that are sent in must be shared with other parties in the review. A certificate of service is also required when filing. The ITC says that this review is “extraordinarily complicated.” Because of this, the ITC will take up to 90 days longer to finish the review. This review is managed under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the ITC’s rules. More information about the process and deadlines can be found on the ITC’s website. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this announcement on December 11, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
USITC Receives Complaint on Wearable Devices with Fall Detection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a complaint called “Certain Wearable Devices with Fall Detection and Components Thereof,” DN 3865. The Commission is asking for comments from the public on any issues related to the public interest. The complaint was filed by UnaliWear, Inc. on December 12, 2025. UnaliWear says that some companies are violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The alleged problems involve importing, selling for import, or selling after import certain wearable devices with fall detection and their parts in the United States. The complaint names several companies as respondents: Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, NJ Google LLC of Mountain View, CA Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, KS Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, KS UnaliWear asks the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The company also asks for a bond to be put on the products named in the complaint during the 60-day Presidential review, as described in the law. The public, as well as interested parties and agencies, are invited to comment on how the requested actions might affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competition in the U.S. economy Making of similar or the same products in the United States U.S. consumers In particular, the USITC wants comments that: Explain how the devices in question are used in the U.S. Identify any health, safety, or welfare concerns about the orders requested. List similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the ones named, if excluded. Say if the complainant, its licensees, or third-party suppliers could make enough replacement products quickly. Explain how the orders would impact consumers in the U.S. All written comments about the public interest must be submitted within eight calendar days after this Federal Register notice. After the investigation’s first decision, more chances to comment will be available. Replies to written comments must be filed within three calendar days after the first submissions are due. Submissions and replies are limited to five pages, including attachments. All documents must be filed electronically by the deadlines. Use the docket number “Docket No. 3865” on the cover or first page. Only electronic filings are accepted at this time, through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies will be accepted until further notice. For help with electronic filing, contact the Secretary at the email provided in the notice. Anyone asking for confidential treatment of documents must explain why, following 19 CFR 201.6. All nonconfidential documents will be available for public inspection at the Secretary’s Office and on EDIS. This action is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The notice was issued on December 15, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Certain Wearable Devices Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint titled “Certain Wearable Devices, DN 3866.” This notice was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 2025. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed the complaint on December 15, 2025. The complaint claims violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The alleged violations relate to importing, selling for import, and sales after import of certain wearable devices in the United States. Named as respondents in the case are Ouraring Inc. of San Francisco, California, and Oura Health Oy of Finland. Samsung has asked the Commission to issue several orders: A limited exclusion order against the respondents. Cease and desist orders. A bond on the products during the 60-day Presidential review period as described in 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The USITC is now asking for comments from the public and interested parties on issues about the public interest. The questions include whether excluding the products would impact public health, U.S. economy, production of similar products in the U.S., or U.S. consumers. The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the wearable devices are used in the U.S. Show any public health, safety, or welfare concerns related to excluding these products. Identify U.S.-made products that could replace these devices if they are excluded. Say if Samsung, their licensees, or other companies can provide enough replacements quickly. Explain how the exclusion would affect U.S. consumers. Anyone wishing to comment must do so within eight calendar days of the notice’s publication. Replies to comments must be filed within three calendar days after the original deadline. Each comment or reply can be up to five pages long. All filings must be electronic. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Submissions must include “Docket No. 3866” and be made using the Electronic Document Information System at https://edis.usitc.gov. Requests for confidential treatment must give clear reasons. All materials are available for inspection and may be shared with certain government personnel. This action is organized under the authority of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. The order was signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and issued on December 15, 2025. For more details or to access the complaint, visit the Commission’s website or EDIS at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation Into Vaporizers Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On December 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a new investigation. This investigation is about certain vaporizer devices, cartridges used with them, and their parts. The investigation was started after a complaint was filed on September 30, 2025. Who Filed the Complaint? The complaint was filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC. Both companies are located in Washington, DC. They also filed extra information for the complaint in November and December 2025. What is the Complaint About? The complaint says that some products are being sold in the U.S. that break certain U.S. patents. The patents listed are U.S. Patent No. 11,134,722 and U.S. Patent No. 11,606,981. The complaint says these products are vaporizer devices, which are also called ENDS devices, cartridges (sometimes called “pods”), and certain parts like cartridge housings, atomizers, atomizer subassemblies, and device subassemblies. The complaint says this is against section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC say an industry in the U.S. is hurt by these products being imported and sold. Who Are the Respondents? Two companies are named in the complaint: Glas, Inc. Glas, LLC Both have addresses at 2127 Westwood Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025. What Will Happen Next? The USITC began its investigation on December 16, 2025. The Commission will look to see if section 337 of the Tariff Act has been broken. This includes checking if the accused products break any claims in the listed patents. The investigation will cover: Claims 1-2, 4-7, and 9-21 of the ‘722 patent. Claims 1-2, 4-5, and 8-18 of the ‘981 patent. The Commission may issue a limited exclusion order or cease and desist orders if it finds that the law was broken. How Are Responses Handled? The named companies must answer the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days after being served. They must follow 19 CFR 210.13. If companies do not respond on time, they may lose the right to take part. The administrative law judge and the Commission may then decide the facts as given in the complaint and notice. This could lead to an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against those companies. Contact Information For information, contact Susan Orndoff at (202) 205-1802. People who need special help can call (202) 205-2000 or use the TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810. More information is at https://www.usitc.gov. The complaint is available at https://edis.usitc.gov, except for any confidential parts. Issued by: Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Date: 2025-12-16 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
