US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-25 Executive Summary Today’s brief covers 6 events from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). ITC actions include a Section 337 investigation termination, a new Section 337 complaint with a public interest solicitation, and expedited five-year (sunset) reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel grating from China. OFAC published multiple SDN List additions under Executive Orders addressing counterterrorism, illicit drugs, and Venezuela sanctions. Policy tools involved are AD/CVD, Section 337, and sanctions listings. Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Liquid Crystal Display Devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The Commission determined not to review the administrative law judge’s Initial Determination (Order No. 30) terminating the Section 337 investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. As a result, Investigation No. 337-TA-1462 is terminated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1462; Order No. 30; FR Doc. 2026-17295 Key dates: Commission vote August 20, 2026; Issued August 21, 2026; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-liquid-crystal-display-devices-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-terminating-the-investigation/ Wearable Breast Pumps and Components — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:ITC received a complaint titled “Certain Wearable Breast Pumps, Associated Milk Storage Containers, and Components Thereof,” DN 3932, and solicits public interest comments. The complainant seeks a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Docket No. 3932; FR Doc. 2026-17272 Key dates: Complaint filed August 20, 2026; Written submissions due no later than close of business eight calendar days after publication; Replies due three calendar days after initial submissions; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest-38/ Steel Grating — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:ITC scheduled expedited third five-year reviews to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel grating from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission found the domestic response adequate and the respondent response inadequate and will conduct expedited reviews; the review period may be extended by up to 90 days as extraordinarily complicated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-465 and 731-TA-1161 (Third Review); FR Doc. 2026-17261 Key dates: Determination to expedite dated August 4, 2026; Staff report to APO parties October 14, 2026; Comments due October 21, 2026; Issued August 20, 2026; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/steel-grating-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury) Hizballah/IRGC-QF-Related Designations — SANCTIONS_LISTING (SANCTIONS) Summary:OFAC added multiple individuals and an entity to the SDN List pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended, for support to Hizballah and the IRGC-Qods Force. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from transactions with these designees. Key Details (bullets): Authority: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Office of Foreign Assets Control Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING Event Type: SANCTIONS Key identifiers: Executive Order 13224 (as amended by E.O. 13886); FR Doc. 2026-17332 Key dates: Action issued August 20, 2026; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-25/ Illicit Drug Trafficking (Ecuador) Designations and Vessels — SANCTIONS_LISTING (SANCTIONS) Summary:OFAC designated individuals, entities, and fishing vessels under Executive Order 14059 for involvement in the global illicit drug trade, and also made related designations under Executive Order 13224, as amended. The vessels were identified as property in which blocked persons have an interest. Key Details (bullets): Authority: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Office of Foreign Assets Control Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING Event Type: SANCTIONS Key identifiers: Executive Order 14059; Executive Order 13224 (as amended); FR Doc. 2026-17265 Key dates: Action issued August 20, 2026; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-26/ Venezuela Oil Sector Entity — SANCTIONS_LISTING (SANCTIONS) Summary:OFAC designated one entity, Bluwaves Properties Limited, under Executive Order 13850 for operating in the oil sector of the Venezuelan economy. Property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealings. Key Details (bullets): Authority: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Office of Foreign Assets Control Policy Type: SANCTIONS_LISTING Event Type: SANCTIONS Key identifiers: Executive Order 13850; FR Doc. 2026-17263 Key dates: Action issued August 7, 2026; Federal Register publication August 25, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-27/ Key Takeaways (Factual) ITC terminated Section 337 Investigation No. 337-TA-1462 on certain liquid crystal display devices following withdrawal of the complaint. ITC is soliciting public interest comments on a new Section 337 complaint involving wearable breast pumps, with short submission deadlines following publication. ITC scheduled expedited third sunset reviews of AD/CVD orders on steel grating from China, with a staff report to APO parties due October 14, 2026 and comments due October 21, 2026. OFAC published counterterrorism designations under E.O. 13224, including individuals linked to Hizballah and the IRGC-QF. OFAC also issued sanctions under E.O. 14059 targeting illicit drug networks in Ecuador (including vessels) and designated a Venezuela oil-sector entity under E.O. 13850. Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-liquid-crystal-display-devices-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-terminating-the-investigation/ (ITC 337 LCD termination) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest-38/ (ITC 337 breast pumps public interest) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/steel-grating-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ (ITC steel grating China reviews) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-25/ (OFAC terrorism designations) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-26/ (OFAC illicit drugs/vessels Ecuador) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-27/ (OFAC Venezuela oil) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
OFAC Sanctions Notice: New Addition to SDN List Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-08-25 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced a new addition to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This step is part of ongoing efforts to enforce sanctions related to Venezuela. On August 7, 2026, OFAC identified BLUWAVES PROPERTIES LIMITED as an entity whose property and interests in property within U.S. jurisdiction are now blocked. BLUWAVES PROPERTIES LIMITED, established on March 5, 2021, operates out of the British Virgin Islands, with registration number 2056404. This designation is pursuant to Executive Order 13850, dated November 1, 2018. The Executive Order targets individuals and entities contributing to the situation in Venezuela, specifically those operating in the oil sector of the Venezuelan economy. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with BLUWAVES PROPERTIES LIMITED. This restriction is part of a broader strategy to address the national emergency regarding Venezuela, as outlined in Executive Order 13857, dated January 25, 2019. For further information, individuals can contact OFAC. The Associate Director for Global Targeting is available at 202-622-2420. The Assistant Director for Licensing is reachable at 202-622-2480. Meanwhile, inquiries regarding sanctions compliance can be directed to the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. More details can be found on OFAC’s website. Bradley T. Smith, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, announced this action. This notice is officially recorded in the Federal Register with document number 2026-17263, filed on August 24, 2026. Stay informed about further updates through the Government Publishing Office’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
OFAC Sanctions Announcement on Ecuadorian Individuals, Entities, and Vessels Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has updated its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This update includes new names of individuals, entities, and vessels that have been sanctioned. This decision was made after determining certain legal criteria were met. All U.S. property of the listed persons is blocked. U.S. individuals cannot conduct transactions with them. This includes both people and vessels. Individuals Sanctioned: Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin, born in Manta, Manabi, Ecuador. He was involved in international illicit drug trade. Milton Edixson Martinez Mendoza, from Manabi, Ecuador. He supported Los Choneros and Los Lobos. Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales, from Manta, Manabi, Ecuador, also involved in the drug trade. Roberth Alfonso Mero Arcentales, from Manabi, Ecuador. He is involved in drug trafficking activities. Byron Aladino Mero Bermello, from Manabi, Ecuador. He has engaged in drug trade activities. Julio Javier Mero Franco, also known as “Javico”, linked to Los Choneros. Alfonso Mero Mero, from Montecristi, Ecuador, involved in drug activities. Jhonny Francisco Verz Laz, known as “Baron Poncho”, linked to Julio Javier Mero Franco. Entities Sanctioned: ALHO FISH, S.A., based in Manabi, Ecuador, linked to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. ARCASDENOE, S.A., also based in Manabi, connected to Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales. GLOBALDISTRIAL, S.A.S., identified with Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. JAH-HMH, S.A.S., associated with Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. NEGOCIOS JIMAR, S.A.S., tied to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. PROYECTOS NEYZOA, S.A.S., connected to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. SOISAMAR, S.A.S., linked to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. Vessels Sanctioned: ARCA DE NOE III, belonging to Edwar Alexis and Roberth Alfonso Mero Arcentales. ARCA DE NOE III JR, linked to Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales. ARCA DE NOE IV, connected to Alfonso Mero Mero. ARCA DE NOE V, property of Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales. CONQUISTA, identified with Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales. COSTA MARLIN, connected to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. REY DE ARCA, belonging to Alfonso Mero Mero. SIEMPRE MI ARCA, tied to Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales. SOLO ES MEJOR, linked to Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. TODOS VUELVEN also known as ARCA DE NOE I and MI NARCISA DE JESUS, linked to Edwar Alexis Mero Arcentales and Jimmy Leonidas Alarcon Holguin. This decision by OFAC blocks all property and interests of these individuals and entities within U.S. control. The names added to the SDN List emphasize the U.S. government’s effort to combat international drug trafficking and related activities. The designated persons and entities are involved in activities that contribute to drug trafficking networks. U.S. citizens and companies are expected to comply with the sanctions, ensuring they do not engage in prohibited transactions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Announces New Sanctions Against Certain Individuals and Entities Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced new sanctions. These sanctions are against specific individuals and entities. The announcement was made on August 25, 2026. OFAC has added several names to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This decision is based on OFAC’s finding that certain legal criteria are met. Property and interests in property of these individuals and entities that are in the United States are now blocked. U.S. persons are not allowed to engage in transactions with them. The list of individuals includes Vasfi Akyuz, Onder Dede, Halil Ibrahim Kacmaz, Feyyad Karasalih, Masoud Mousafar, Yunus Alper Yilmaz, Mehmet Acur, Mehmet Akyuz, Emrah Ayaz, and Gulay Kaya Savci. These individuals have been designated for providing support to terrorist organizations. This support includes financial, material, or technological aid. The terrorist groups linked to these individuals include Hizballah and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF). The entity sanctioned by OFAC is Hizballah. Hizballah is a transnational terrorist organization. It is also linked to the IRGC-QF. The sanctions are issued under Executive Order 13224, as amended by Executive Order 13886. This order is designed to block property of persons engaged in terrorism and those providing support for terrorism. For more information, the public can visit the OFAC website. Details about the SDN List and sanctions programs are available online. These actions show the United States’ commitment to combating terrorism and those who support it. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Steel Grating From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews on Steel Grating from China Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews. This will determine if removing duties on steel grating from China will cause harm to U.S. companies. These reviews are conducted under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission decided on August 4, 2026, that the response from U.S. companies was adequate. However, the response from Chinese companies was inadequate. Due to this, the Commission will not conduct a full review. Instead, they will perform expedited reviews as allowed by law. Commissioner Johanson voted for full reviews, but the majority chose expedited reviews. The staff report provides private information about the reviews and will be released for those with permission on October 14, 2026. A public version will be available later. Comments from interested parties are due by October 21, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The USITC will accept comments from parties involved in the review, but others may submit a short statement. If the Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its reviews, comments will be due three days afterward. Comments containing confidential business information must follow the rules. Documents filed must be shared with all parties involved and include proof of service. The Secretary will not accept any filings without this proof. The Commission has declared these reviews very complicated. It has extended the review period by up to 90 days. This is allowed by law. These reviews are managed under the authority of the Tariff Act. The announcement is published according to the Commission’s rules. By order of The Commission, issued on August 20, 2026, by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
US International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Wearable Breast Pumps Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced receiving a complaint regarding Certain Wearable Breast Pumps, Associated Milk Storage Containers, and their Components. This complaint was registered under Docket Number 3932. The complaint was filed on August 20, 2026, by Willow Innovations, Inc., and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd. The complaint states there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the import, sale for import, and sale within the United States. The goods in question are wearable breast pumps and related items. Who Is Involved? The complaint has named several respondents. These include Shenzhen Root Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Ltd. of Aurora, CO, and Root Technology, Ltd. of Beverly Hills, CA. Other companies involved are Share Info, Inc. of Flushing, NY, Shenzhen TPH Technology Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Horigen Mother & Baby Products Co., Ltd. of China. The list also includes Anker Innovations Limited of China, Fantasia Trading, LLC of Ontario, CA, Power Mobile Life LLC of Bellevue, WA, TPH Technology Malaysia Sdn Bhd of Malaysia, Foshan Shunde Ruiteng Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of China, and Guangdong Youmeng Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. of China. What Is Being Requested? The complainant has asked the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. It also asks to impose a bond on the respondents’ alleged infringing products during the 60-day Presidential review period, as per 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Call for Public Comments The Commission is asking the public for comments on any public interest issues related to the complaint. They welcome input on how the requested relief might affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the economy, and the production of similar articles in the country. Comments are also needed on how this would impact U.S. consumers. Specifically, the commission wants to know: How the articles are used in the U.S. Any public health concerns related to the orders. If there are similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the subject articles. Whether the complainant or others have the capacity to replace the volume of articles if excluded. How the orders would affect U.S. consumers. Deadline for Comments Written submissions on the public interest must be submitted no later than eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. Following any final initial determination, there will be more chances for public input. Replies to any submissions should be filed within three days of the initial submission deadline. Submission Guidelines Submissions must be filed electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings will be accepted unless granted an exemption. Questions about filing should be directed to the Secretary at the USITC. Confidential Treatment Requests Anyone wishing to submit documents in confidence must request confidential treatment and provide reasons. The Commission will only treat submitted documents as confidential if the request is properly made. Nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection. The action is authorized under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). By order of the Commission, issued on August 20, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation
ITC Terminates Investigation on LCD Device Patents Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a decision regarding an investigation involving liquid crystal display devices. This decision, officially recorded in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026, concludes a matter that began in November 2025. The investigation was labeled as Investigation No. 337-TA-1462. This case involved a complaint filed by BH Innovations LLC, along with Longitude Licensing Limited and 138 East LCD Advancements Ltd. from Ireland. They claimed that certain companies were infringing on their patents. The complaint specifically mentioned U.S. Patent Nos. 7,705,948 and 7,570,334. The complaint alleged that certain companies were involved in unauthorized importation and sales of products that used these patents. The list of companies involved included many from China and the United States. Major companies named were LG Electronics from South Korea and Westinghouse Electric Corporation from Pennsylvania. On July 16, 2026, the Complainants decided to withdraw their complaint. They submitted a second amended motion for this purpose. The respondents did not oppose this motion. The motion included settlement agreements that had been missing in earlier filings. On July 22, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge approved this motion. The judge agreed that ending the investigation would save resources. No party requested a review of this decision. On August 20, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the judge’s decision. Thus, the investigation is officially terminated. The legal basis for this decision is section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and part 210 of the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This announcement was made by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The official document number for this decision is 2026-17295, filed on August 24, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-24
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-24 1) Executive Summary Today’s brief covers three events involving the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Actions include a Section 337 investigation at the ITC and two BIS final rules amending the Entity List under the Export Administration Regulations. Policy tools featured are Section 337 (unfair import investigations) and export controls (Entity List modifications). Two items explicitly reference China or Hong Kong; one pertains to Turkey. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) – Headline (one line, bold):Secondary cylindrical batteries — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1518 based on a complaint by LG Energy Solution Ltd. and LG Energy Solution Arizona, Inc. alleging violations of Section 337 concerning certain secondary (rechargeable) cylindrical batteries, components, and products containing the same. The complaint alleges infringement of specified claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,420,257; 11,749,866; 12,412,924; 12,412,965; and 12,646,735, and asserts a domestic industry is in the process of being established. The complainants request a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders; the Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate. Key Details: Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1518 Scope description: “Secondary (i.e., rechargeable) cylindrical batteries, components thereof (e.g., top cap assembly, electrode windings, separator, battery housings, and assemblies thereof), and products containing the same” Respondents (selected): EVE Energy Co., Ltd. (China); EVE Energy North America Corporation; EVE Energy U.S. Holding LLC; Robert Bosch GmbH; Robert Bosch Tool Corporation; Koki Holdings Co., Ltd.; Koki Holdings America Ltd.; Chervon (China) Trading Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Chervon Industry Co., Ltd.; Chervon North America, Inc. Key dates: Complaint filed July 21, 2026; supplement filed August 5, 2026; investigation instituted August 20, 2026; Federal Register notice published August 24, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-secondary-cylindrical-batteries-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice-of-institution-of-investigation/ BIS (Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce) – Headline (one line, bold):Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. — Export Administration (EXPORT_CONTROL) Summary:BIS issued a final rule revising the Entity List by removing two addresses associated with Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. under the destination of China. This action follows BIS’s November 2025 removal of Arrow China Electronics Trading Co., Ltd. and six aliases for Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Bureau of Industry and Security Policy Type: EXPORT_ADMIN Event Type: EXPORT_CONTROL China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Docket No. 260818-0014; RIN 0694-AK49 Effective date: August 21, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/revisions-to-the-entity-list-3/ – Headline (one line, bold):Atempo Proje Taahhüt Ses ve Görüntü Sistemleri A.Ş. İstanbul Şubesi (Turkey) — Export Administration (EXPORT_CONTROL) Summary:BIS issued a final rule removing one entity, Atempo Proje Taahhüt Ses ve Görüntü Sistemleri Anonim Şirketi İstanbul Şubesi (Bülent Ecevit Bulvarı), from the Entity List under the destination of Turkey. The removal followed End-User Review Committee procedures under the EAR. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Bureau of Industry and Security Policy Type: EXPORT_ADMIN Event Type: EXPORT_CONTROL Key identifiers: Docket No. 260818-0012; RIN 0694-AK52 Effective date: August 21, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/removal-from-the-entity-list/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC instituted a Section 337 investigation into certain secondary cylindrical batteries and components following an LG Energy Solution complaint; requested remedies include a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Named respondents in the ITC case include entities in China and the United States, with a defined scope covering rechargeable cylindrical batteries and assemblies. BIS revised the Entity List by removing two addresses tied to Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. under China, effective August 21, 2026. BIS also removed one entity under Turkey from the Entity List, effective August 21, 2026. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-secondary-cylindrical-batteries-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice-of-institution-of-investigation/ (Secondary cylindrical batteries — ITC 337) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/revisions-to-the-entity-list-3/ (Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) — Entity List addresses) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/removal-from-the-entity-list/ (Turkey entity — Entity List removal) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Removal From the Entity List
U.S. Commerce Department Removes Turkish Entity from Export Control List Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has updated its regulations by removing one entity from the Entity List under the destination of Turkey. This change was published in the Federal Register on August 24, 2026. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) manages the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). These rules involve controls on exports, reexports, and transfers of certain items. The revised rule is effective from August 21, 2026. The specific entity removed is “Atempo Proje Taahhüt Ses ve Görüntü Sistemleri Anonim Şirketi İstanbul Şubesi, Bülent Ecevit Bulvarı.” The Entity List notes entities that might be involved in activities threatening to U.S. national security or foreign policy. Listing an entity imposes extra license requirements on certain transactions. The End-User Review Committee, made up of members from several U.S. government departments, unanimously decided to remove this entity. Their decision came after reviewing information and procedures outlined in the EAR. The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) provides the legal basis for these updates. The ECRA supports regulations to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy. The changes were made under various rulemaking requirements, but do not need public comments. This is due to the national security function and specific exemptions in U.S. law. The BIS confirms there is no anticipated change to the burden hours of information collection due to this rule. This regulation involves an information collection approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0694-0088. The removal of the entity from the list is part of broader efforts to manage U.S. export controls effectively. These measures ensure that trade policies align with national security interests. This update signifies the ongoing assessment and management of the Entity List by the U.S. Department of Commerce and associated committees. Their continuous review ensures that the list reflects current international and security considerations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Revisions to the Entity List
Department of Commerce Makes Changes to the Entity List Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the Department of Commerce, has changed the Export Administration Regulations. They have removed two addresses of Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. from the Entity List. This change is under the destination of China, People’s Republic of (China). The change is effective from August 21, 2026. The Entity List is important because it names entities that might harm the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These entities face extra license requirements for exporting, reexporting, or transferring items. Any company on this list will face a presumption of denial for license requests. The End-User Review Committee, which includes members from several government departments, makes decisions about this list. They decided to remove two addresses associated with Arrow Electronics in Hong Kong after a careful review. The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 gives the BIS the authority to make these changes. This Act helps in regulating exports and maintaining a list of foreign concerns that might pose a threat to U.S. national interests. This rule is considered not significant under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. It bears no collection of information requirements that need a control number from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The changes have no policies impacting federalism or requiring a regulatory flexibility analysis. In conclusion, BIS has amended part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations to reflect these changes. The Entity List now does not include two addresses of Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. under the destination of China. The update in the Federal Register is a move to keep the export regulations in line with national security concerns. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Secondary Cylindrical Batteries, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
US International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Battery Imports Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated an investigation concerning certain secondary cylindrical batteries. This investigation is based on a complaint filed by LG Energy Solution Ltd. of Korea and LG Energy Solution Arizona, Inc. on July 21, 2026. The filing is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint alleges that certain secondary cylindrical batteries and related products infringe on several U.S. patents held by LG Energy Solution. These patents include U.S. Patent No. 8,420,257, U.S. Patent No. 11,749,866, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,924, U.S. Patent No. 12,412,965, and U.S. Patent No. 12,646,735. The complaint states that improper importation and sale have occurred, violating section 337. The complainants seek an investigation and request the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order. They also seek cease and desist orders to prevent further infringement. On August 20, 2026, the ITC considered the complaint. It ordered an investigation to determine if the alleged violations occurred. The investigation will assess if there is infringement of claims on these patents and if a U.S. industry is being established. The accused products, described plainly, are secondary (rechargeable) cylindrical batteries and their components. Products containing these batteries are also included in the investigation. Several respondents are named in the investigation. They include EVE Energy Co., Ltd. from China and several other associated entities. Also named are Robert Bosch GmbH from Germany, Koki Holdings Co., Ltd. from Japan, and Chervon (China) Trading Co., Ltd. from China, among others. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will designate a presiding Administrative Law Judge for the investigation. Respondents must submit responses within 20 days of the service of the complaint. If a respondent fails to provide a timely response, this may lead to a waiver of their right to contest the allegations. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. This legal process highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property in international trade. The investigation will determine if the involved parties have indeed violated U.S. laws on imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-20
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-20 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 6 events involving the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). Actions include Section 337 procedural developments and multiple antidumping/countervailing duty (AD/CVD) outcomes. The ITC requested public interest submissions in one investigation and solicited comments upon receipt of a new complaint. Commerce issued final results in two AD administrative reviews, corrected an initiation notice to add two reviews, and continued AD/CVD orders on certain large vertical shaft engines from China following sunset reviews. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Headline (one line, bold):Wireless communications devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – The presiding ALJ issued an Initial Determination on violation of Section 337 and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding on August 14, 2026, in Inv. No. 337-TA-1429. The Commission is inviting public interest submissions addressing the recommended relief, which includes a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders directed to Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Dell entities, should the Commission find a violation. Comments are limited to five pages and must address public health and welfare, competitive conditions, U.S. production of like articles, and consumer impact. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1429– Key dates: ALJ Initial Determination and Recommended Determination issued August 14, 2026; written submissions due by close of business on September 15, 2026; Federal Register notice issued August 18, 2026; published August 20, 2026– Scope of requested relief: Limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders for certain wireless communications devices and components thereof imported/sold by Dell and Lenovo Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-wireless-communications-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ Headline (one line, bold):Electronic devices with audio technologies — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – The ITC received a complaint titled “Certain Electronic Devices with Certain Audio Technologies,” DN 3931, filed by BoomCloud 360 Inc. on August 14, 2026. The complaint alleges Section 337 violations involving imports by Apple, Samsung entities, and Google and seeks a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and a bond during the Presidential review period. The Commission solicits public interest comments (five-page limit) on potential effects of the requested relief on U.S. health and welfare, competition, domestic production of like articles, and consumers. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Docket No. 3931– Key dates: Complaint filed August 14, 2026; initial public interest comments due no later than eight calendar days after publication (five-page limit)– Respondents named: Apple, Inc.; Samsung Electronics America Co., LTD; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Google LLC Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest-37/ DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce — International Trade Administration) Headline (one line, bold):PC Strand (Malaysia) and Boltless Steel Shelving (Vietnam) — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – Commerce corrected its August 10, 2026 initiation of AD/CVD administrative reviews to include Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Malaysia (A-557-819) and Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale from Vietnam (A-552-835), along with the companies under review. The periods of review are June 1, 2025 through May 31, 2026. Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-557-819 (Malaysia PC Strand); A-552-835 (Vietnam Boltless Steel Shelving)– Key dates: Applicable August 20, 2026; original initiation published August 10, 2026– Companies added: As listed in the notice for each country/order Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews-correction-3/ Headline (one line, bold):Light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (Mexico) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – Commerce issued final results of the AD administrative review, finding sales at less than normal value during the POR August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024. Final weighted-average dumping margins were calculated for mandatory respondents and a review-specific rate assigned to non-selected companies based on those results; cash deposit and assessment instructions will follow per regulation. Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-201-836– Key dates: Applicable August 20, 2026; preliminary results published February 23, 2026; deadline for final results extended to August 14, 2026– POR: August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024– Select company margins (percent): Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (10.23); Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (6.36); non-selected companies (8.16) Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/light-walled-rectangular-pipe-and-tube-from-mexico-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline (one line, bold):Stainless steel flanges (India) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – Commerce finalized the AD administrative review for the POR October 1, 2023–September 30, 2024, finding sales below normal value. Chandan Steel Limited received a 0.60 percent margin; a collective entity (BFN/Viraj) received 50.72 percent; non-selected companies were assigned 0.60 percent consistent with statute and practice. Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-533-877– Key dates: Applicable August 20, 2026; preliminary results published February 18, 2026; final deadline extended to August 17, 2026– POR: October 1, 2023–September 30, 2024– Select margins (percent): Chandan Steel Limited (0.60); BFN/Viraj collective entity (50.72); companies not selected (0.60) Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/stainless-steel-flanges-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline (one line, bold):Large vertical shaft engines (China) — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: – Following first five-year (sunset) reviews, Commerce is continuing the AD order (A-570-119) and CVD order (C-570-120) on certain large vertical shaft engines between 225cc and 999cc, and parts thereof, from China. Commerce and the ITC determined that revoking the orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury; cash deposit collection will continue at current rates. Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: A-570-119; C-570-120– Key dates: Effective August 11, 2026; ITC final injury determination published August 11, 2026; orders originally published March 4, 2021 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-large-vertical-shaft-engines-between-225cc-and-999cc-and-parts-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-continuation-of-antidumping-duty-order-and-countervailing-duty-order/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC advanced two Section 337 matters: seeking public interest submissions after an Initial Determination in a wireless communications devices case (potential remedies targeting Lenovo and Dell) and soliciting comments upon receipt of a new audio technologies complaint naming Apple, Samsung, and Google.
Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Vertical Shaft Engines from China Estimated reading time: 2 minutes In a recent notice, the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the continuation of antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on vertical shaft engines from China. These engines are between 225cc and 999cc and are mainly used in lawn mowers and other outdoor equipment. The decision is based on findings that removing these orders might lead to continued dumping, unfair subsidies, and injury to U.S. industries. The notice was published on August 20, 2026, and the effective date for this continuation is August 11, 2026. The notice states that these engines usually have to meet environmental standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The engines are typically classified under certain tariff codes for customs purposes. The Commerce Department and ITC have determined that revoking the orders could harm U.S. businesses. Therefore, duties will continue to be collected on these products. The next review of these orders will be initiated before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s last determination. This continuation ensures that U.S. laws protect domestic industries from unfair trade practices, helping maintain fair competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Date: 2026-08-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has found that some producers and exporters of stainless steel flanges from India sold their products in the U.S. at prices below normal value. This finding is part of an antidumping duty administrative review for the period from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. The review determined that Chandan Steel Limited made sales at a dumping margin of 0.60 percent. Another group of companies, known together as BFN/Viraj, had a weighted-average dumping margin of 50.72 percent. Several other companies were also reviewed but not individually examined. These companies, which include Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd., CD Industries, and others, were assigned a dumping margin of 0.60 percent. The Department of Commerce used adverse facts available for BFN/Viraj due to issues found during the review. This led to the higher dumping margin for these companies. For companies not individually reviewed, the dumping margin applied is the rate determined for Chandan, which is 0.60 percent. These results lead to certain requirements for U.S. importers. Importers of these flanges will need to pay cash deposits based on these margins. For BFN/Viraj, the rate is 50.72 percent. For others, it’s 0.60 percent. If a seller does not know the final destination of its sales, duties might be based on a higher rate. For importers, this means they might owe more duties on stainless steel flanges coming from India. This is to make sure Indian producers sell at fair prices in the U.S. The Department will not change the cash deposit requirements from before, aside from the adjustments made in this review. These rules will stay until they are updated again in a future review. The Department of Commerce will follow up by issuing instructions for assessing these duties. This will happen no earlier than 35 days after this announcement. Rates for unreviewed producers will depend on past decisions if those are available. This decision plays a crucial role in protecting fair trade practices in the United States by ensuring imported products do not harm American businesses by being priced unfairly low. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Mexican Pipe and Tube Sold at Less than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Mexican Pipe and Tube Sold at Less than Normal Value The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized the results of an investigation into the sale of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico. The findings indicate that these products were sold in the United States at a price lower than their normal value during the review period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. This practice is known as dumping. The department announced these results on August 20, 2026. The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance unit of the International Trade Administration, a branch of the Department of Commerce. Key Contact Information: For any further details, the department suggests reaching out to either John Conniff or Charles Doss at the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are with the enforcement and compliance division and can be contacted at (202) 482-1009 or (202) 482-4474, respectively. Background of the Review: The department had earlier published preliminary results in February 2026 and allowed interested parties to comment on these outcomes. After extending its deadline, the final results are now published. Scope of the Order: The order and focus were specifically on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube products from Mexico. A detailed description of what products are covered by the order is available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Feedback: The department considered all feedback from different parties. Changes were made to the calculations as a result, particularly affecting Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. and Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. (Regiopytsa). This is explained in detail in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results: The final results indicate various weighted-average dumping margins for different Mexican producers and exporters. Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. was assigned a margin of 10.23 percent. Regiopytsa received a 6.36 percent rate. Other companies, like Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V. and Maquilacero S.A. de C.V., were assigned a rate of 8.16 percent. Disclosure Plans: The Department of Commerce will share the calculations used for these results with interested parties within five days of the notice’s publication. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements: The department will determine antidumping duties which U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess. Companies with zero or minimal dumping margins will not face additional duties. The Department of Commerce will also enforce new cash deposit rates for all shipments of the subject merchandise made from the review’s publish date onward. Administrative Reminders: Importers are reminded of their responsibility to submit a certificate regarding duty reimbursements. All parties are also reminded to handle confidential information, disclosed under administrative protective orders, with care. This notice highlights the Department of Commerce’s continuous work in ensuring fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews; Correction
Correction Notice for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued a correction notice concerning its previous initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. Initially published in the Federal Register on August 10, 2026, the notice inadvertently omitted certain products and their corresponding reviews. Commerce’s original publication failed to include the Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (PC Strand) from Malaysia and Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. These omissions have now been rectified with a correction notice dated August 20, 2026. The specific corrections include the addition of review information for certain companies. For Malaysia’s PC Strand, companies under review for the period from June 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026, include Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. For Vietnam’s Boltless Steel Shelving, the companies now included in the review are: Great Star Vietnam Co. Ltd., Cuong Nghia Imp. Exp., Quoc Ham Co., Ltd., Thanh Phong Production and Trade Limited Company, Xinguang (Vietnam) Logistic Equipment Co., Ltd, Parkway Thanh Phong Co., Ltd., Vietnam Shuntong Metal Products Co. Ltd., Kang Yang Vietnam Co., Ltd., Huang Ding Hardware Co., Ltd, Savimex Corporation, and Royal Corinthian Vietnam Co. The period of review for these companies is also from June 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026. The correction notice emphasizes the commerce department’s commitment to accurately maintain the integrity of trade reviews and notifications in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the Code of Federal Regulations. This document is overseen by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, and was officially filed and published on August 19, 2026. This information is issued and published to inform relevant parties and stakeholders. This correction ensures transparency and provides accurate data for proper regulatory compliance and enforcement. For further details or inquiries, interested parties are advised to contact Brenda E. Brown at the International Trade Administration. This action is crucial for maintaining fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfairly priced or subsidized imports. Readers are encouraged to refer to the full text of the correction notice issued in the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 160, for additional context and comprehensive details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives New Complaint Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Electronic Devices with Certain Audio Technologies” and is listed under Docket Number 3931. The complaint was filed by BoomCloud 360 Inc. They submitted it on August 14, 2026. The complaint alleges violations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States of certain electronic devices. The respondents named in the complaint are Apple, Inc. from Cupertino, CA; Samsung Electronics America Co., LTD. from South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. from Ridgefield Park, NJ; and Google LLC from Mountain View, CA. BoomCloud 360 Inc. wants the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and impose a bond on the alleged infringing items for a 60-day Presidential review period. The Commission is asking for comments about any public interest issues the complaint may raise. This is in line with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments should discuss whether providing the requested relief will affect public health and welfare in the United States. They should also consider competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, and the production of similar articles in the U.S. The Commission is interested in comments that discuss: How the articles could be used in the United States. Any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. Similar articles made in the United States. Whether BoomCloud 360 and other suppliers can replace the items quickly. How the orders would impact U.S. consumers. Comments on public interest are due eight calendar days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. The complaint filer may respond to comments three days later. Submissions should not be longer than five pages, including attachments. Documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The docket number 3931 should be on the cover page. Requests for confidential treatment must explain why it is needed. Only electronic filings are accepted unless an exemption is granted. The actions are based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Wireless Communications Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wireless Devices Case Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking for public comments about a possible legal case. This case is about some wireless communication devices and their parts. On August 14, 2026, a judge from ITC said there might be a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about keeping certain products out of the U.S. if they break trade rules. The Commission wants to know if removing these products from companies like Dell Technologies, Dell Products, and Lenovo (United States) Inc. would be good or bad for the public. They want to know how it might affect people’s health, the U.S. economy, and the choices U.S. consumers have. The ITC is asking for details on these points: How are these devices used in the U.S.? Are there any health or safety concerns if these products are removed? Are there similar products made in the U.S. that can replace these items? Can these U.S. makers quickly supply enough products to replace the ones that might be removed? How will this affect consumers in the U.S.? People and government agencies can send their comments. They must keep comments to five pages. The deadline for sending comments is September 15, 2026. The comments must be filed online. Each comment must have “Investigation No. 337-TA-1429” visible on the first page. If someone wants to keep their comment private, they have to mark it clearly and follow the rules for private comments. The ITC will use the information to decide if they should stop these devices from coming into the U.S. or not. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the ITC, made this announcement on August 18, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-19
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-19 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 3 events from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). – The policy tools featured include Section 337 investigations, countervailing duty (CVD) administrative review amendments following court judgment, and procedural updates for Section 232-related tariff submissions under USMCA. – Actions include the ITC’s institution of a Section 337 investigation on transformer products, DOC’s amended CVD results for phosphate fertilizers from Russia pursuant to a CIT decision, and DOC’s alignment of USMCA automobile U.S.-content submission timelines with medium- and heavy-duty vehicle procedures. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) – Headline (one line, bold):Transformers and components — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) – Summary:The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1517 based on a July 16, 2026 complaint by Ayr Energy, Inc. alleging violations of Section 337 involving certain transformers and components. Allegations include misappropriation of trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin. The complainant seeks a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. – Key Details (bullets): – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1517 – Scope description: “Certain transformer products, including power transformers, inverter duty transformers, distribution transformers, and components thereof, such as core steel, windings, tanks, and insulation systems” – Key dates: Complaint filed July 16, 2026; Investigation instituted August 14, 2026; Issued August 17, 2026; Federal Register notice published August 19, 2026 – Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-transformers-and-components-thereof-notice-of-institution-of-investigation/ DOC (Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration) – Headline (one line, bold):Phosphate fertilizers (Russia) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) – Summary:Commerce announced that the U.S. Court of International Trade’s August 12, 2026 final judgment in Archer Daniels Midland Co v. United States is not in harmony with Commerce’s prior CVD administrative review results for phosphate fertilizers from Russia (POR: Nov 30, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Commerce is amending the final results for Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit), setting a total ad valorem subsidy rate of 22.86 percent. This notice fulfills Timken publication requirements and explains that current cash deposit instructions remain unchanged due to a superseding rate. – Key Details (bullets): – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key identifiers: Case No. C-821-825; CIT Consol. Court No. 23-00239 – POR: November 30, 2020–December 31, 2021 – Amended rate: JSC Apatit at 22.86 percent ad valorem – Key dates: CIT final judgment August 12, 2026; Applicable August 22, 2026; Notice dated August 14, 2026; Federal Register publication August 19, 2026 – Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/phosphate-fertilizers-from-the-russian-federation-notice-of-court-decision-not-in-harmony-with-the-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-review-notice-of-amended-final-results/ – Headline (one line, bold):Automobiles under USMCA — PROCEDURAL_NOTICE (POLICY_NOTICE) – Summary:Commerce amended the procedures for importer submissions identifying U.S. content in automobiles qualifying for USMCA preferential treatment, aligning the automobile timeline with the medium- and heavy-duty vehicle schedule set under Proclamation 10984. Eligibility determinations will now generally apply for one-year periods (December 1 to November 30), with specified submission deadlines to ensure timely processing. – Key Details (bullets): – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: PROCEDURAL_NOTICE – Event Type: POLICY_NOTICE – Key identifiers: Docket No. 260811-0485; RIN 0625-XC062 – Submission start date: On or after August 19, 2026 – Validity and deadlines: Determinations for automobiles imported Dec 1, 2026–Nov 30, 2027; submissions due by Sept 30, 2026; For imports on/after Dec 1, 2027, submissions due by Sept 1 preceding the one-year period – Continuity: Prior determinations remain valid for vehicles imported before Dec 1, 2026 – Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/amending-procedures-for-submissions-by-importers-of-automobiles-qualifying-for-preferential-tariff-treatment-under-the-usmca-to-determine-u-s-content/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC instituted Section 337 Investigation No. 337-TA-1517 concerning certain transformer products and components, following a complaint alleging multiple unfair acts. – Commerce amended the 2020–2021 CVD administrative review results for Russian phosphate fertilizers, setting JSC Apatit’s subsidy rate at 22.86 percent after the CIT sustained Commerce’s second remand. – The DOC aligned USMCA automobile U.S.-content submission procedures with medium- and heavy-duty vehicle timelines, moving to one-year validity windows running December 1–November 30. – The amended USMCA procedure sets near-term deadlines: Sept 30, 2026 for models imported on/after Dec 1, 2026; Sept 1 preceding the one-year period for later years. – Commerce’s Timken notice confirms the CIT decision is not in harmony with prior CVD results and outlines that existing cash deposit instructions remain unaffected due to a superseding rate. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-transformers-and-components-thereof-notice-of-institution-of-investigation/ (Transformers — ITC 337 institution) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/phosphate-fertilizers-from-the-russian-federation-notice-of-court-decision-not-in-harmony-with-the-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-review-notice-of-amended-final-results/ (Phosphate fertilizers — CVD amended results) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/amending-procedures-for-submissions-by-importers-of-automobiles-qualifying-for-preferential-tariff-treatment-under-the-usmca-to-determine-u-s-content/ (USMCA autos — submission procedures) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Amending Procedures for Submissions by Importers of Automobiles Qualifying for Preferential Tariff Treatment Under the USMCA To Determine U.S. Content
New Procedures for Importers of Automobiles Under the USMCA Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2026, new procedures were announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce. These concern the way importers of automobiles can submit documentation for preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA. The changes aim to manage and review submissions more efficiently. Background In March 2025, President issued Proclamation 10908. This proclamation imposed tariffs on certain automobiles and parts, citing national security concerns. Importers under the USMCA could submit documentation to show U.S. content in their vehicles. In May 2025, procedures to submit and review these documents were established. In October 2025, Proclamation 10984 was issued. It addressed imports of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Changes brought these procedures in line with those for automobiles. New Procedures The new procedures align the submission timelines for automobiles with those set for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Importers can submit documents from August 19, 2026. Submissions must be electronic. Eligibility determinations for automobiles imported from December 1, 2026, to November 30, 2027, will be valid for one year. Importers must submit documentation by September 30, 2026, to ensure timely processing. Eligibility Criteria Only automobiles eligible for USMCA preferential treatment can benefit from the reduced tariff on the non-U.S. content. The preferential tariff benefits apply to automobiles imported from Mexico and Canada. Submission Details Importers need to detail the automobile’s U.S. and non-U.S. content. The value must be certified by a senior officer. Other required details include: Total customs value of the automobile. Production locations and country of assembly. Certification of USMCA preferential treatment. Review Process The Department of Commerce will check documents for accuracy. They might ask for more information if needed. Once verified, importers and CBP will be informed of the non-U.S. content value. The additional tariff will apply to this value. Changes in automobile production must be reported. This includes increased or decreased U.S. content. Consequences for Errors If inaccuracies are found, the tariff will apply to the full value of the automobiles. This includes past and future imports until the error is rectified. Confidential Business Information All submissions containing confidential business information must be clearly marked. No Change to USMCA Status These procedures do not affect the eligibility of vehicles for USMCA tariff preferences. Conclusion The new procedures help streamline the review process for importers seeking tariff benefits under the USMCA. They ensure consistent application of tariffs, benefiting the U.S. economy and maintaining national security. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Court Decision Leads to Changes in Duty Rates for Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 12, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made an important decision. It supported the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final results about the duty on phosphate fertilizers from Russia. These results came from an administrative review about countervailing duties. This review happened from November 30, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The Department of Commerce reviewed a company called Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit). They looked at how much subsidy, or help, the company got from the Russian government when buying phosphate ore mining rights. Originally, they set the subsidy rate at 28.50 percent. But they decided to change it after a deeper examination. The examination was because Archer Daniels Midland Company disagreed with the first decision. The court asked the Department of Commerce to review its work. The department then found that the subsidy rate for JSC Apatit was actually 22.86 percent. The new decision, made on August 12, 2026, is not the same as the first decision from the Department of Commerce. The court ordered that these new results must be noted and that the previous claims were not right. The changes in the subsidy rate mean that if JSC Apatit is importing to the U.S., the duty is now based on this new lower rate. This might affect how much they have to pay when selling phosphate fertilizers to the U.S. Yet, JSC Apatit still has a different rate from another review. So, until all court cases finish, they will not change the deposit rate they use currently. Right now, JSC Apapit’s import entries are put on hold by the court. This is called an injunction. This means their goods that entered through November 30, 2020, to December 31, 2021, will stay on hold. If no one appeals the court’s August 12, 2026, decision, or if the appeal does not change anything, Commerce will instruct Customs and Border Protection on how to apply duties based on the new rate. The news about these changes was made public on August 14, 2026. The U.S. Department of Commerce is keeping all interested groups updated about these developments. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Transformers and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigation into Transformers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) published a notice to start an investigation. This investigation involves certain transformers and their components. The investigation began after a complaint was filed on July 16, 2026. Ayr Energy, Inc., based in Mountain View, California, is the company that filed the complaint. They claim that some transformers coming into the United States break certain laws. The complaint says these transformers are brought to the U.S. illegally. The reasons include misuse of trade secrets, misleading advertising, and unfair competition. The complaint also accuses the transformers of trademark infringement and false labeling. These actions might harm the industry in the U.S. The complaint wants the Commission to check the issue. Ayr Energy asks for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. This means they want certain imports stopped and specific actions to stop. The transformers in question include power transformers, inverter duty transformers, distribution transformers, and their parts. These parts might include core steel, windings, tanks, and insulation systems. Four companies are named as respondents in the complaint. They are Zetwerk Manufacturing Businesses Private Limited from India, Zetwerk Manufacturing USA Inc. in San Francisco, KRYFS Power Components Ltd. from India, and Unimacts Global, LLC from Massachusetts. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is involved in this case. They will ensure fair procedures are followed. The Chief Administrative Law Judge will appoint an Administrative Law Judge to oversee the case. The respondents must respond to the complaint within 20 days of receiving it. If they don’t, it might mean they agree with the complaint’s claims. This could lead to stopping certain imports or activities from the respondents. The public can view the complaint details online. The USITC has also provided contact information for those needing assistance or information about this investigation. In conclusion, the USITC is taking necessary steps to address potential illegal activities involving transformer products. This investigation shows the seriousness of protecting U.S. industries and upholding trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-18
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-18 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers 3 U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Section 337 matters. The actions include a final determination issuing a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders in an ink cartridges investigation, an amendment of claims and products in an off-road vehicles case involving a Chinese respondent, and a full termination of a video-capable devices case due to an arbitration agreement. Key policy instruments are Section 337 patent enforcement remedies, including a GEO, CDOs, and procedural terminations. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Headline (one line, bold):Ink Cartridges — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The U.S. International Trade Commission found a violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-1452 concerning certain ink cartridges and components. The Commission issued a general exclusion order covering products that infringe claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172; 9,370,934; 11,535,038; 12,240,248; and 12,240,249, and issued cease and desist orders against Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. The investigation is terminated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation No.: 337-TA-1452 Orders/Findings: General Exclusion Order; CDOs against Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP; bond set at 100% of entered value during Presidential review Noted procedural history: ALJ ID (Order No. 16) granted summary determination; Commission reviewed DI economic prong and affirmed with supplemental analysis Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted June 17, 2025 Patents/Claims: Claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172; 9,370,934; 11,535,038; 12,240,248; 12,240,249 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-ink-cartridges-and-components-thereof-ii-notice-of-a-commission-determination-finding-a-violation-under-section-337-issuance-of-a-general-exclusion-order-and-cease-and-desist-orders-termina/ Headline (one line, bold):Off-Road Vehicles (ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4) — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The Commission determined not to review an ALJ initial determination (Order No. 10) granting Polaris’s unopposed motion to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-1490 and to terminate the investigation as to certain claims. The amendments add claim 31 of the ’486 patent and claims 9–15 and 22 of the ’127 patent against the CFMOTO ZFORCE Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles, and terminate claims 7 and 8 of the ’220 patent. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation No.: 337-TA-1490 Parties: Complainants Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., Polaris Sales Inc.; Respondents Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. Orders/Findings: ID (Order No. 10) unreviewed; claims 7–8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220 terminated; added claim 31 of U.S. Patent No. 7,950,486 and claims 9–15, 22 of U.S. Patent No. 12,187,127 against ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4 Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted March 9, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-off-road-vehicles-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-an-unopposed-motion-to-amend-the-complaint-and-notice-of-investig/ Headline (one line, bold):Video-Capable Electronic Devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The Commission determined not to review an ALJ initial determination (Order No. 18) granting a joint motion by InterDigital and Amazon to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-1481 in its entirety due to an arbitration agreement. The investigation is terminated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: 337-TA-1481 Parties: Complainants InterDigital, Inc. and InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.; Respondents Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC Orders/Findings: ID (Order No. 18) granted termination based on arbitration agreement; earlier termination of claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674 (Order No. 8; unreviewed May 4, 2026) Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted January 23, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-a-joint-motion-to-terminate-the-investigation-in-its-entirety-due-to-an-a/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC issued a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders in the ink cartridges case (Inv. No. 337-TA-1452), with a 100% bond during Presidential review. In the Polaris v. CFMOTO off-road vehicles matter (Inv. No. 337-TA-1490), the ITC allowed claim amendments adding ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4 and terminated two prior claims. The InterDigital v. Amazon video-capable devices investigation (Inv. No. 337-TA-1481) was terminated in full based on an arbitration agreement. Two of today’s Section 337 actions involve China-based or China-affiliated respondents. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-ink-cartridges-and-components-thereof-ii-notice-of-a-commission-determination-finding-a-violation-under-section-337-issuance-of-a-general-exclusion-order-and-cease-and-desist-orders-termina/ (Ink cartridges — GEO/CDOs) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-off-road-vehicles-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-an-unopposed-motion-to-amend-the-complaint-and-notice-of-investig/ (Off-road vehicles — amendment) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-a-joint-motion-to-terminate-the-investigation-in-its-entirety-due-to-an-a/ (Video devices — arbitration termination) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Video-Capable Electronic Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Due to an Arbitration Agreement; Termination of Investigation
International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Amazon and InterDigital Due to Arbitration Agreement Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has ended an investigation involving certain video-capable electronic devices. This decision was made because of an arbitration agreement between InterDigital, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. The investigation, known as 337-TA-1481, started on January 23, 2026. It was looking into whether devices imported into the United States infringed on patents owned by InterDigital. InterDigital is based in Wilmington, Delaware. The investigation named Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC as respondents. Both companies are based in Seattle, Washington. The investigation was about several patents. These patents were related to video-capable electronic devices. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations chose not to participate in this investigation. In April 2026, the ITC decided to end part of the investigation. This concerned one of the claims related to U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674. On July 13, 2026, InterDigital and Amazon asked to terminate the investigation. They filed a joint motion. They based their request on an arbitration agreement. On July 17, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) agreed to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion to terminate was proper because of the arbitration agreement. The rule says that investigations can be ended if parties agree to arbitration. The ALJ said there were no other agreements between the parties. Ending the investigation did not harm the public interest. No one asked to review the ALJ’s decision. The ITC decided not to review it either. The investigation is now fully terminated. The decision happened on August 13, 2026. The ITC used authority from the Tariff Act of 1930 and its procedures to make this decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this decision. The full notice was published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Off-Road Vehicles and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Terminate the Investigation as to Certain Claims
U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Off-Road Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding the investigation of certain off-road vehicles and their components. The investigation is numbered 337-TA-1490. The matter involves the company Polaris and claims about imported vehicles. The ITC has chosen not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge (ALJ). This decision was about changes to the case, called an initial determination (ID), under Order No. 10. The investigation started on March 9, 2026. It is based on complaints from Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Sales Inc. These companies are located in Medina, Minnesota. They claim violations of the Tariff Act of 1930 regarding some off-road vehicles imported into the U.S. The investigation focuses on certain patents held by Polaris. These patents include U.S. Patent Nos. 7,819,220; 7,950,486; 8,613,337; 9,217,501; and 12,187,127. The ITC is looking at whether these patents have been infringed upon. They are also checking if there is a domestic industry issue due to these imports. The respondents named in this investigation are Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co. from Hangzhou, China, and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. from Plymouth, Minnesota. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part in this investigation. On June 26, 2026, Polaris made a motion. They wanted to change the complaint. They asked to include new claims related to their patents. Polaris wanted to focus on the ZFORCE® Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles. They also wished to end some claims about another patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220. The judge agreed with Polaris and said the changes would not harm the public or those involved. There were no oppositions to this motion. No one asked for a review of this decision. The ITC decided not to carry out a review. This means claims 7 and 8 of one Polaris patent are no longer part of the investigation. New claims from two other patents are now being focused on. The Commission voted on this issue on August 13, 2026. The actions and decisions follow the rules in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. This update helps clarify what the ITC is doing in this investigation and what changes have been made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof II; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation Under Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Takes Action Against Ink Cartridge Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has taken a significant step to protect American businesses and consumers. In a recent decision, the ITC found that certain ink cartridges and their components violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC has issued a General Exclusion Order. This means that products infringing specific patents cannot be imported into the United States. The infringing products include those violating claims of patents numbered: 8,764,172, 9,370,934, 11,535,038, 12,240,248, and 12,240,249. The ITC has also issued Cease and Desist Orders. These orders are against two companies: Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. These companies are prohibited from importing and selling the offending products in the U.S. The investigation started on June 17, 2025. The investigation was based on a complaint by Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. The complaint alleged that certain companies were infringing on specific Epson patents by selling and importing particular ink cartridges. The ITC named numerous companies in the investigation. Many of these companies are based in China. The ITC found several companies in default as they did not respond to the investigation. The companies include Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd., and others. Some companies were removed from the investigation on January 8, 2026, due to different circumstances. On March 24, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination. The judge found evidence that supported Epson’s claims. This determination served as a basis for the ITC’s final decision. The ITC reviewed the effect of its orders on public interest. They considered health and safety, competitive conditions in the U.S., and the impact on American consumers. After a thorough review, the ITC decided that issuing the orders would not harm public interest. The decision was finalized on August 13, 2026. The ITC has implemented a bond during the Presidential review period. This bond is set at 100% of the value of goods imported. The Commission’s action demonstrates its commitment to upholding intellectual property rights. It aims to support American industries and prevent unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-13
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-13 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 4 Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) actions. All items involve antidumping duty (AD) administrative reviews. Actions include one final review with partial rescission (Vietnam fish fillets), one preliminary review with partial rescission (India organic soybean meal), one preliminary review (Korea wire rod), and one final review (Indonesia wind towers). No China-related measures were reported in today’s items. 2) Updates by Authority N/A (DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration) Headline: Frozen fish fillets (Vietnam) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce issued the final results of the 2023–2024 antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company were found to have made sales at less than normal value, while two non-examined separate-rate companies received a review-specific rate. Commerce also rescinded the review in part for 25 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity; the Vietnam-wide entity rate remains unchanged. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-552-801 Final margins (USD/kg), POR 2023-08-01 to 2024-07-31: Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd.: 1.00 NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company: 0.38 Non-selected separate rate respondents (Can Tho Import Export Seafood JSC; Nam Viet Corporation): 0.84 Vietnam-wide entity: review rescinded; rate remains $2.39/kg Partial rescission: 25 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity Publication date: August 13, 2026; Final results signed August 10, 2026 Preliminary results published: February 11, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-final-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline: Organic soybean meal (India) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce published the preliminary results of the 2024–2025 AD administrative review of organic soybean meal from India. Commerce calculated a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for the sole individually examined respondent and assigned the same rate to companies not selected for individual review; the review was rescinded for 145 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment, with deadlines set by regulation. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-533-901 Preliminary margin (percent), POR 2024-05-01 to 2025-04-30: Ecopure: 26.60 Companies not selected for individual review (Appendix II): 26.60 Rescission in part: 145 companies (Appendix III) Deadlines: Case briefs: no later than 21 days after publication Rebuttal briefs: 5 days after case briefs Hearing requests: within 30 days after publication Publication date: August 13, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline: Carbon and alloy steel wire rod (Republic of Korea) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce issued preliminary results for the 2024–2025 AD review of carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea, finding that POSCO and POSCO International Corporation did not sell below normal value during the period of review. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-580-891 Preliminary margin (percent), POR 2024-05-01 to 2025-04-30: POSCO/POSCO International Corporation: 0.00 Deadlines: Case briefs: within 7 days after issuance of verification report Rebuttal briefs: 5 days after case briefs Hearing requests: within 30 days after publication Publication date: August 13, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline: Utility scale wind towers (Indonesia) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce finalized the 2023–2024 AD administrative review for utility scale wind towers from Indonesia, determining that PT. Kenertec Power System did not sell at less than normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-560-833 Final margin (percent), POR 2023-08-01 to 2024-07-31: PT. Kenertec Power System: 0.00 Publication date: August 13, 2026; Final results signed August 10, 2026 Preliminary results published: February 10, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-indonesia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – Commerce completed one final review with partial rescission for Vietnamese frozen fish fillets, setting company-specific per-kilogram dumping margins and maintaining the Vietnam-wide rate. – The preliminary review of Indian organic soybean meal assigns a 26.60 percent margin to the examined firm and non-selected companies; 145 companies were rescinded from review. – Preliminary results for Korean carbon and alloy steel wire rod show a 0.00 percent margin for POSCO. – Final results for Indonesian utility scale wind towers confirm a 0.00 percent margin for PT. Kenertec Power System. – All actions are antidumping duty administrative reviews; no China-related actions were reported. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-final-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ (Frozen fish fillets — Vietnam) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (Organic soybean meal — India) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (Wire rod — Korea) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-indonesia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ (Wind towers — Indonesia) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Utility Scale Wind Towers From Indonesia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Wind Tower Imports from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of utility scale wind towers imported from Indonesia. The review covered the period between August 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. The Department found that Indonesian wind towers were being sold in the United States at fair prices. This means they were not sold at less than their normal value. The review focused on PT. Kenertec Power System (Kenertec), a major producer of these wind towers. After reviewing all data and comments from involved parties, the Department confirmed that Kenertec did not engage in unfair pricing practices. As a result, Kenertec’s products will not face additional duties from the U.S. The final results of this review were set to be published on August 13, 2026. The Department’s decision comes after examining several comments and making necessary changes to the initial calculations. The changes ensured accuracy and fairness in determining the duties on Kenertec’s wind towers. The Department will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection about this decision. This will help guide the agency in handling entries of wind towers from Indonesia. As Kenertec was found to have a zero percent dumping margin, these entries will not be subject to additional duties. Importers need to ensure that they comply with regulations and confirm no reimbursement of duties has occurred. This will prevent the assessment of extra duties on their products. Lastly, cash deposit rates for these products will reflect the Department’s final decision. Rates can differ based on whether the companies or products were covered in previous reviews. However, for all other products not specified, a standard rate of 8.53 percent will still apply. This standard rate remains effective unless future reviews dictate otherwise. This conclusion helps to maintain fair trade practices and supports the smooth operation of the wind tower industry between the U.S. and Indonesia. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Review on Steel Wire Rod from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its antidumping duty review on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea. This review is under the responsibility of the department’s Enforcement and Compliance section. The focus is on POSCO and POSCO International Corporation (PIC), key producers and exporters from Korea. From May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025, it was found that POSCO did not sell wire rod in the U.S. at prices below what is considered normal. This means, according to this preliminary review, there was no dumping. The department is inviting comments from interested parties on these findings. The original antidumping duty order was published in 2018. In subsequent years, some parts of the order were revoked, specifically for wire rods used in tires and valve springs. This recent review began in 2025 to check the actions of POSCO. During this process, the government faced some delays. There was a government shutdown, which led to deadlines being extended. More delays occurred because of backlog issues with electronically filed documents. This pushed preliminary results to be released on August 7, 2026. The review included a close examination of pricing for the products, comparing export prices and standard normal values. POSCO used a constructed export price method to determine these figures. Now, with preliminary results made public, Commerce must share their calculations with all parties involved. There will be a verification phase where the collected information is double-checked. Interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or briefs. These must be submitted after the verification report is issued. Rebuttal briefs will follow the initial comments. If any disagreements arise, a hearing can be requested. The assessment of duties will occur after final results are published. Depending on these results, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will adjust duties on imports for the review period. For entries made during this period, if POSCO was unaware that merchandise was destined for the U.S., these entries might be assessed based on all-others rates set during the investigation in 2018. Deposit requirements for shipments will be updated after final results are published. The final results will dictate the cash deposit rate for POSCO. These guidance instructions will remain active until further notice. This notice also reminds importers of their duty to file a certificate regarding duty reimbursements before liquidation of entries. Failure to do this could result in double duties. The Department of Commerce is set to issue final results within 120 days, concluding this review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Organic Soybean Meal From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
United States Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Review Results on Organic Soybean Meal from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes August 13, 2026 The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary results concerning the review of the antidumping duty on organic soybean meal imported from India. The review covers the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. This follows the ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices involving Indian exporters. Background Commerce originally initiated the review process on May 16, 2022, after receiving requests for the review in line with the government regulation 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Respondent companies Ecopure Specialities Ltd. and Bergwerff Organic (India) Pvt., Ltd. were selected for mandatory examination in August 2025. Notably, two significant requests for withdrawals were made by Perdue Agribusiness LLC and Organic Soybean Producers of America (OSPA) on September 23, 2025. Consequently, this review focused solely on Ecopure. Preliminary Findings Commerce has preliminarily determined that Indian producers and exporters have not sold organic soybean meal in the United States at less than normal value during the specified review period. As part of the review’s progression, Commerce extended the timeline for preliminary results on a couple of occasions, adding up to a significant 113-day delay due to administrative adjustments, government shutdowns, and backlog. For the companies not individually reviewed, including 145 entities listed for rescission, those whose assessments were withdrawn are slated for exclusion from review action. The enforcement dictates imply these companies won’t undergo the review procedure as per 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Methodology and Findings In evaluating Ecopure Specialities Ltd., results showed a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.60 percent. This indicates that the sales were not below the normal value as delineated in the Tariff Act of 1930. The same margin applies to companies not selected for individual review unless separate determinations are merited. Deadline Extension and Comments Owing to unforeseen delays, Commerce had tolled several deadlines, notably including extensions on April 7 and July 24, 2026. Following regulations enabled the complete extension of the preliminary findings deadline to August 7, 2026. Commerce invites comments and case briefs from interested parties, citing a 21-day grace period post-publication to facilitate public discourse. Participants are encouraged to focus on content found in the published preliminary results. The department has established a procedural framework for conducting subsequent hearings and will issue final notice thereafter. Assessment and Cash Deposits The publication delineates methodology for establishing assessment rates. Ecopure and the rest under review will be subject to either calculated rates or all-other rates determined in earlier segments. The cash deposit rate will continue, barring further adjustments. This memorandum hints at systematic adherence to fair trade policies between the United States and foreign trade partners, safeguarding both domestic industries and international market equilibriums. — Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. The review took place from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Background The Department assessed whether companies from Vietnam sold fish fillets in the U.S. below their normal value. Selling goods at this lower value is known as dumping. Dumping can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department looked at two main companies: Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company. They found these companies sold the fillets for less than they should have. New Rates Set Bien Dong now has a dumping margin of $1.00 per kilogram. NTSF’s margin is $0.38 per kilogram. Two other companies, Cantho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company and Nam Viet Corporation, also have a rate. They are set at $0.84 per kilogram. Partial Cancellation The Department canceled the review for some companies. This happened because there were no sales with prices to review. They also dropped the Vietnam-wide entity from the review, which means this group’s rate of $2.39 per kilogram will not change. New Rules The Department issued new rules for these companies: The cash deposit rate for U.S. shipments will match the new rates. For companies without their own rate, the Vietnam-wide rate ($2.39 per kilogram) will apply. What’s Next? U.S. Customs will collect the new deposit rates from now on. If companies bought the fillets and are still storing them, they should pay the right duty to avoid extra charges. These findings are important. They make sure trade is fair. They also protect U.S. businesses from unfair prices. Companies and importers need to follow these new rules carefully. This will help the trade between the U.S. and Vietnam stay fair and balanced. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-12
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-12 1) Executive Summary Three U.S.–China trade remedy events are covered today. The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) issued two scheduling notices for expedited five-year (sunset) reviews involving China. The Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) published the final results of an antidumping administrative review on wooden bedroom furniture from China. The main policy instruments are AD/CVD orders, expedited sunset reviews, and administrative review procedures. 2) Updates by Authority United States International Trade Commission (USITC) Boltless steel shelving units — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The USITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units prepackaged for sale from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission found the domestic interested party response adequate and the respondent interested party response inadequate, and therefore will conduct expedited reviews. Key Details: Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-523 and 731-TA-1259 (Second Review) Key dates: Adequacy determination: July 6, 2026 Staff report (nonpublic) available to APO parties: August 25, 2026; public version to follow Written comments deadline: 5:15 p.m., September 1, 2026 (with timing adjustment if Commerce extends its final results) Review period extended by up to 90 days under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B) Issued: August 7, 2026; published August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Prestressed concrete steel wire strand — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The USITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission found the domestic interested party response adequate and the respondent response inadequate and opted for expedited reviews; Chairman Johanson voted to conduct full reviews. Key Details: Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Third Review) Key dates: Adequacy determination: July 6, 2026 Staff report (nonpublic) available to APO parties: October 7, 2026; public version to follow Written comments deadline: October 14, 2026 (with timing adjustment if Commerce extends its final results) Review period extended by up to 90 days under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B) Issued: August 7, 2026; published August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) Wooden bedroom furniture — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2024 antidumping administrative review of wooden bedroom furniture from China and continues to determine that 11 companies under review did not establish entitlement to a separate rate. These companies are part of the China-wide entity and are subject to the China-wide rate; assessment and cash deposit instructions were outlined. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Case No.: A-570-890 Period of Review: January 1, 2024–December 31, 2024 Companies found part of the China-wide entity (11): Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd.; Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen Kinwai International Furniture Co., Ltd.; Nathan International Ltd., Nathan Rattan Factory; Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd., Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd., Dorbest Ltd.; Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade Co. Ltd.; Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd. Assessment: Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess duties at the China-wide rate no earlier than 35 days after publication; if a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will be directed not to liquidate entries until the injunction request period (within 90 days of publication) expires. Cash deposits: For exporters without a separate rate, deposits equal to the China-wide rate of 216.01 percent; existing rates continue for exporters with separate rates. Applicable date: August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The USITC scheduled expedited five-year (sunset) reviews for AD/CVD orders on boltless steel shelving units and prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China after finding inadequate respondent party participation. Both USITC reviews were deemed extraordinarily complicated and the review periods were extended by up to 90 days. The USITC set staff report release dates and public comment deadlines for each review (August 25/September 1, 2026 for shelving; October 7/October 14, 2026 for PC strand). Commerce’s final 2024 administrative review of wooden bedroom furniture from China concluded that 11 companies remain part of the China-wide entity, with assessment and deposit instructions including the 216.01 percent China-wide rate for exporters without separate rates. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ (Boltless steel shelving — expedited reviews) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ (Prestressed concrete strand — expedited reviews) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024/ (Wooden bedroom furniture — AD review final) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Trade Ruling on Chinese Wooden Bedroom Furniture Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement regarding the import of wooden bedroom furniture from China. Eleven Chinese companies did not qualify for a separate rate and are now part of the China-wide entity. This means they face the China-wide duty rate of 216.01 percent. The review period for this decision was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This decision follows an earlier report in April 2026. There were no new comments on the preliminary findings, so the results remain the same. The wooden bedroom furniture case has been open since 2005 when a notice was issued about sales at less than fair value. The Department followed section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for this review. They decided to keep the preliminary results as final. A list of 11 companies will be impacted by this decision. Some of these companies are Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd., Jesse Furniture Industries Co., Ltd., and Nathan International Ltd. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will begin assessing antidumping duties. This will happen no sooner than 35 days after the notice was published. An injunction might change the timeline for some entries if a timely summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. For future shipments, different cash deposit rules will apply. Separate rates will continue for exporters that already have them. For those without separate rates, the China-wide rate will apply. Non-China exporters without a separate rate will face the rate applied to the China exporter that supplied them. Importers need to make sure they file a certificate about the reimbursement of duties. This should be done before the liquidation of entries during the 2024 review period. The notice also reminds all parties to handle confidential information carefully. Materials need to be returned or destroyed to comply with regulations. These updates follow the rules set out by sections of the Tariff Act and Department of Commerce’s regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-08-12 The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is taking an important step. The ITC is looking at prestressed concrete steel wire strand that comes from China. They want to decide if taking away antidumping and countervailing duty orders will harm U.S. producers. The ITC announced that these reviews started on July 6, 2026. The purpose of these reviews is to see if cancelling current duties would lead to problems. These problems could happen if Chinese products start to hurt U.S. businesses. The ITC has chosen to do expedited reviews. This means they are trying to work quickly. They decided this because not enough responses were received from Chinese parties. The domestic groups gave enough responses, but Chinese groups did not. A special report will be available on October 7, 2026. This report will be a staff report and will help the investigation. Those who have permission can see it sooner. The public will get to see a version of this report later. The public can also participate. People can send comments to the ITC by October 14, 2026. These comments will help decide the final outcome. However, people need to follow certain rules. They cannot include new facts in their comments. The ITC is also prepared to extend the review period if needed. They have the power to add up to 90 more days to their process. The ITC is following special rules and laws. They are using the Tariff Act of 1930 to guide their review. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this information. This is an important event to watch. It affects companies in the U.S. and how they compete with products from China. Keep an eye on the ITC for more updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
Expedited Review for Boltless Steel Shelving From China: A Legal Update Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an expedited review process. This will examine antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China. The review is crucial to decide if canceling these duties would hurt the U.S. industry. This review is important as it affects trade and helps protect U.S. businesses. The USITC noted that the domestic group’s response to the review notice was adequate. However, the response from the respondent group in China was inadequate. The expedited review began in July 2026. The final comments and written submissions are due by September 1, 2026. Documents must be served to everyone involved in the reviews. A certificate of service has to be filed as well. The USITC has extended the review period as it is complicated. The extension allows for up to 90 more days for the review process. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order on August 7, 2026. The detailed legal notice is available in the Federal Register. This process is part of a routine review to ensure fair trade practices. The USITC plays a key role in maintaining a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-11
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-11 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 12 items from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). – Actions span Section 337 investigations, antidumping/countervailing duty (AD/CVD) administrative and sunset reviews, changed circumstances reviews, a continuation of an AD order, and review rescissions. – Several notices involve China explicitly (e.g., aluminum extrusions CVD final results, R-32 AD continuation, common alloy aluminum sheet CCRs) alongside multi-country AD/CVD actions and ITC 337 proceedings. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Headline:Wi‑Fi Routers and Mesh Wi‑Fi Devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The presiding ALJ issued an Initial Determination on violation and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding in Inv. No. 337-TA-1454. The Commission seeks public interest submissions regarding potential relief (e.g., exclusion and cease and desist orders) should a violation be found. Comments are invited from the public and government agencies only. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1454– Key dates: ALJ ID and RD issued August 6, 2026; Public interest comments due by September 8, 2026; Notice issued August 7, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-wi-fi-routers-wi-fi-devices-mesh-wi-fi-network-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ Headline:Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1433, the ALJ issued an Initial Determination on violation (July 23, 2026) and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding (August 6, 2026). The Commission requests public interest submissions on recommended relief, including a limited exclusion order for 5–6 years and a cease-and-desist order directed to specified respondents. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1433– Key dates: ALJ ID July 23, 2026; RD August 6, 2026; Comments due September 8, 2026; Notice issued August 7, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for-manufacturing-the-same-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ Headline:Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays (II) — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The Commission found a violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-1441 and will issue a limited exclusion order covering infringing glass substrates for LCDs (and products/methods as described) and a cease and desist order against TTE Technology, Inc. The Commission set a bond of 0% during Presidential review and terminated the investigation. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1441– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for-manufacturing-the-same-ii-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination-finding-a-violation-of-sec/ Headline:Child Car Seats — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1459, the Commission declined to review the ALJ’s Initial Determination granting a joint motion to terminate based on settlement. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1459– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-child-car-seats-notice-of-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-terminating-the-investigation-based-on-settlement-termination-of-the-investigation-in-its-entirety/ Headline:Pre‑Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1457, the Commission reviewed in part, and on review, affirmed in part and took no position in part on the Final ID finding no violation of Section 337. The investigation is terminated with a final finding of no violation. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1457– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-pre-stretched-synthetic-braiding-hair-and-packaging-thereof-ii-notice-of-the-commissions-determination-to-review-in-part-and-on-review-to-affirm-in-part-and-take-no-position-in-part-on/ Headline:Mattresses (Various Countries) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The ITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revocation of the CVD order on mattresses from China and AD orders on mattresses from Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. The Commission set a schedule for staff reporting and written submissions and extended the review period by up to 90 days due to extraordinary complexity. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Inv. Nos. 701-TA-645; 731-TA-1495, 1497–1501 (Review)– Key dates: Adequacy determination July 6, 2026; Staff report placement September 22, 2026; Comments due September 29, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/mattresses-from-cambodia-china-malaysia-serbia-thailand-turkey-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce — International Trade Administration) Headline:Aluminum Extrusions from China — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2024 CVD administrative review, finding Chinese producers/exporters received countervailable subsidies. Six non-responsive companies received rates based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA). Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Case No. C-570-968; POR January 1–December 31, 2024– Final rates (AFA): 164.29% for six named companies; Cash deposit and assessment instructions to follow– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/aluminum-extrusions-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-review-2024/ Headline:Mattresses from Malaysia — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce issued final results of the 2024–2025 AD administrative review, determining sales at less than normal value. The weighted-average dumping margin is 42.92% for the listed companies and non-selected companies receiving a review-specific rate. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Case No. A-557-818; POR May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/mattresses-from-malaysia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline:Ripe Olives from Spain — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2023–2024 AD administrative review, finding sales at less than normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 3.54% for Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And., and for Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L.; the review was partially rescinded for one firm. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Case No. A-469-817; POR August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/ripe-olives-from-spain-final-results-and-partial-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline:Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet (Multiple Countries including China) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce initiated and issued preliminary results of changed circumstances reviews proposing to revoke the AD/CVD orders, in part, with respect to certain aluminum can stock, retroactively for all unliquidated entries. The proposal modifies the aluminum can stock scope exclusion language; interested parties are invited to comment. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Multiple cases including
Difluoromethane (R-32) From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty (AD) order on difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This decision is the result of findings by Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They agreed that getting rid of this duty could lead to more dumping and harm to U.S. industries. The ITC and Commerce looked into this matter as part of their normal review process. The initial order was put in place on March 11, 2021. Earlier this year, both agencies started their first “sunset review” to decide if the order should stay. After reviewing, it was clear that without the order, U.S. industries might suffer from low-priced R-32 from China harming local businesses. R-32 is used in air conditioners and refrigeration systems. The chemical is identified by a specific CAS registry number: 75-10-5. It can be in different forms or levels of purity. This order covers R-32, whether it is pure or in blends where R-32 makes up a large part of the mix. However, R-32 that is part of blends covered by a different order—specifically for hydrofluorocarbon blends from China—is not included. The duty applies to R-32 classified under certain subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Customs will keep applying these duties on R-32 imports from China. This will ensure fair pricing and protect U.S. industries. The continuation order became effective on August 4, 2026. This means that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect deposits for the duty. These deposits are collected at the same rates as when the goods enter the country. Commerce aims to start the next review of this order roughly five years from now. This schedule helps ensure that the duty remains necessary and effective. Parties who were allowed to see certain private information during the review must now handle it appropriately. They need to either return or destroy the information. This decision fulfills the legal requirements and reflects the procedures set by the U.S. government in reviewing and extending such trade measures. The continuation aims to protect U.S. industry from unfair foreign pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Rescission of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Reviews of Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has taken a significant step by deciding to cancel some of its ongoing antidumping and countervailing duty reviews. This decision was made because all the requests for these reviews were withdrawn on time. This means there were no more requests remaining for these reviews. Commerce had started these reviews to look into certain companies and countries. These reviews were meant to make sure no unfair pricing or financial help was being given that could hurt U.S. businesses. Here is a list of the products and countries involved in these cancelled reviews: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, South Africa, and Taiwan. Brass Rod from Israel. Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy. Forged Steel Fittings from the Republic of Korea. Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkmenistan. Gas Powered Pressure Washers from Vietnam and China. Polyester Textured Yarn and Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand. Various Products including certain plastic decorative ribbons, vertical shaft engines, crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, lightweight thermal paper, mattresses, seamless refined copper pipe and tube, wooden bedroom furniture, and wooden cabinets and vanities from the People’s Republic of China. For all these products, Commerce will not continue its review process. Instead, it will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to take action based on the original duties set when the products first entered the U.S. Importers of these products have responsibilities. They need to file certain papers about paying the right duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay double. Commerce has also reminded those involved in these reviews to properly handle private information according to the laws. The decision to stop the reviews was published officially on August 11, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, who is acting as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This notice is part of the ongoing efforts to manage trade fairly and according to the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews and Intent To Revoke the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, in Part
Commerce Starts Review to Change Aluminum Sheet Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the beginning of a review of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheet. These orders affect products from China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Türkiye. What is Happening? Commerce is considering changes to these orders. They might take away part of these rules, specifically about certain aluminum can stock. Why the Change? The reviews are happening because the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group asked for them. They want to change the rules to make sure that some aluminum used for beverage cans is not part of these orders. Who is Involved? The Aluminum Association Working Group includes companies like Arconic Corporation, Commonwealth Rolled Products Inc., Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC, JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Texarkana Aluminum, Inc. Important Dates The changes could happen on August 11, 2026. Companies and people interested in this review can also comment on the preliminary results. Scope of the Orders The orders are about aluminum sheets that are flat-rolled and have a certain thickness. These sheets can be made into many products. However, aluminum used for making beverage cans is mainly not part of these orders. Proposed Changes Some aluminum can stock is already not covered by the orders. The review will look at whether to keep it that way. The Aluminum Association wants to make clear that all aluminum can stock is excluded, no matter how it is classified in trade codes. How to Get Involved People can send in their comments and opinions. There are ways to send these comments to the Commerce Department. Also, people can ask for a hearing to discuss their views. Timeline for Final Decision Commerce will try to finish the review as quickly as possible. They might make a final decision in 270 days, unless everyone quickly agrees on the outcome. Why Care About This? These trade orders can affect prices and supply of aluminum products in the U.S. market. This review is important for companies that use or produce these aluminum sheets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Ripe Olives from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final results on the antidumping review for ripe olives from Spain. The review period ran from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that some producers or exporters sold ripe olives in the United States at prices below what they normally sell for. This practice is known as dumping. The final results impact companies like Agro Sevilla and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. These companies had a calculated dumping margin of 3.54 percent. This rate means they sold olives in the U.S. at 3.54 percent less than the normal value. For other companies not chosen for a detailed review, the Department often uses the average rate from reviewed companies. So, Angel Camacho received the same rate as Agro Sevilla at 3.54 percent. The Department also looked at Alimentary Group DCOOP, S.Coop.And. But this company had no entries of ripe olives during the review period. So, the review for this company was canceled. The review process included steps like checking sales records in both the U.S. and Spain. These steps help ensure the information is correct. The Department plans to give instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon. The CBP will collect antidumping duties based on the final results. If a company slightly price-dumped their products, those products might not face extra duties. For products that Agro Sevilla sold, if they are not reported correctly, the CBP might use a duty rate of 19.98 percent. This rate is based on the original investigation finding against Spanish olives. Now that the results are final, the cash deposit rate for future olive sales from these companies in the U.S. will change. The new rate will be the one calculated in this review, unless the company can adjust its practices. This decision is important for importers. They must file the right paperwork about duties before bringing products into the U.S. If they don’t, they might have to pay double the duties. In case any importer or exporter has sensitive information protected by an Administrative Protective Order (APO), they must handle the information according to the rules. This means they need to confirm if they are returning or destroying the information to prevent any violations. The Department’s announcement clarifies the results as well as future actions. These results are part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and protect industries in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Malaysian Mattresses Underpriced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released final results regarding the pricing of mattresses imported from Malaysia. The investigation found that these mattresses were sold at prices lower than their normal value in the U.S. market. This decision comes after a thorough review for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. The announcement was made in a notice published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2026. During the review, no comments were submitted from interested parties in response to the preliminary findings released earlier this year on April 15. As a result, the preliminary results have been adopted as final, without any changes. The scope of the investigation covered various companies involved in the production and export of mattresses from Malaysia. It has been determined that several Malaysian producers, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD, Orient GIC Global, and Lion YTT World, all had a weighted-average dumping margin of 42.92 percent. This means they were selling their products significantly cheaper than what is considered fair. The United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be responsible for assessing these antidumping duties on all relevant entries of mattresses from Malaysia. The new cash deposit rates will come into effect immediately for all shipments entering the country on or after the publication date. This action reinforces the U.S. commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign pricing strategies. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor trade activities closely to uphold these standards. Finally, companies importing mattresses are reminded of the importance of complying with all international trade regulations. Failure to declare the reimbursement of antidumping duties as required could lead to heavier penalties, including the possibility of paying double duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chinese Aluminum Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Agency Involved The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Review Details The review period spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. It is part of an administrative review process to ensure fair trade practices. Outcome of the Review The review found that certain companies in China have benefited from countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are financial aid that unfairly benefits a foreign exporter. Companies Affected The final results apply to several Chinese companies. These include Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, and others. Subsidy Rate The companies mentioned have been assigned a countervailable subsidy rate. This rate is 164.29 percent. No Changes from Preliminary Results The Department made no changes from the preliminary review published in April 2026. No comments were submitted from interested parties during the review process. Facts Available with Adverse Inferences For the six non-responsive companies, the Department applied adverse facts available. This decision means they determined the companies did not cooperate with the review. Instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) The Department will instruct the CBP to assess countervailing duties. These duties apply to entries of aluminum extrusions covered by the review. Cash Deposit Instructions From now on, the CBP will collect cash deposits for estimated duties. These deposits are based on the subsidy rates determined in this review. Scope of the Order The order applies to various aluminum extrusions. These include shapes and forms made from certain aluminum alloys. Exclusions Many items are excluded from the order, like certain finished goods and specific aluminum alloys not meeting certain criteria. Conclusion This review ensures that trade practices remain fair. The Department of Commerce continues to monitor and enforce trade laws diligently. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
Federal Review on Mattress Import Duties Scheduled Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. The reviews concern import duties on mattresses from Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The reviews will decide if removing trade duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. The duties include countervailing duties on mattresses from China and antidumping duties on mattresses from the other six countries. The reviews began on July 6, 2026. USITC decided to have expedited reviews because the response from domestic parties was strong. In contrast, the response from foreign parties was weak, making full reviews unnecessary. For more information, contact Alejandro Orozco at 202-205-3177. Those with hearing impairments can use TDD at 202-205-1810. Information is available on the Commission’s website at www.usitc.gov. A staff report with details will be available on September 22, 2026, to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will also be released. Interested parties can file comments by September 29, 2026. They should not include new facts. Only those who responded properly to the notice of institution can submit comments. The Commission determined that these reviews are very complex. Therefore, they are extending the review period by up to 90 days. This review is being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice came out thanks to the order of the Commission, issued by Secretary Lisa Barton on August 6, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of the Commission’s Determination To Review in Part, and, on Review, To Affirm in Part and Take No Position in Part on a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission: No Violation Found in Braiding Hair Patent Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has concluded its investigation into certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products and their packaging. The decision was announced on August 11, 2026, and it marks the termination of the investigation. The case was registered under Investigation No. 337-TA-1457. The investigation began on August 7, 2025, following a complaint from JBS Hair, Inc., a company based in Atlanta, Georgia. JBS Hair claimed that certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products imported into the U.S. violated section 337. The products allegedly infringed upon specific patents owned by JBS Hair. These patents included the ‘026 patent, the ‘301 patent, the ‘478 patent, and the ‘616 patent. Several companies were named as respondents in the investigation. These included Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd., Hair Zone, Inc., Beauty Essence, Inc., SLI Production Corp., Mane Concept Inc., and Beauty Plus Trading Co., Inc. Additional respondents were Beauty Elements Corporation, Royal Imex, Inc., GS Imports, Inc., Eve Hair, Inc., Midway International, Inc., Mayde Beauty Inc., Model Model Hair Fashion, Inc., New Jigu Trading Corp., Shake N Go Fashion, Inc., Hair Plus Trading Co., Inc., Optimum Solution Group LLC, Chade Fashions, Inc., and Amekor Industries, Inc. The administrative law judge (ALJ) released the Final Initial Determination on June 5, 2026. The ALJ found no violation of section 337. The judge said that the patents were either invalid or not infringed. JBS Hair appealed the findings, but the ITC decided to review only some parts of the case. Concerning three patents, the Commission reviewed whether they were anticipated by previous products called the Asante Short Braid and Abuja Short Braid. The ITC took no position on this. For the ‘478 patent, the ITC affirmed some findings but chose not to take a position on other issues. The ITC’s decision followed reviews of petitions from JBS Hair, respondents, and an independent party, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The Commission’s review concluded with a finding of no violation, and no changes to the Final Initial Determination. The case can be further referenced in the Federal Register’s Volume 91, Number 153, listed as FR Doc. 2026-16303. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Child Car Seats; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation in Its Entirety
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Child Car Seats Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided to stop an investigation about child car seats. The decision was made because the parties involved reached a settlement agreement. The official decision was made on August 6, 2026, and the investigation is now completely over. The investigation started on August 28, 2025. It was based on a complaint by several companies, including Wonderland Switzerland AG from Switzerland and Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc. from Pennsylvania, USA. These companies claimed that some child car seats being sold in the United States were infringing on their patents. A patent is a special license that gives an inventor rights to certain products. The companies said that the child car seats violated two specific U.S. patents. One of them was Patent No. 7,625,043, but this was later removed from the investigation. The companies also claimed there was an industry being made or already made in the U.S. related to these patents. The investigation included many groups named as respondents. These included Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. from Massachusetts, and several others from Canada and China. However, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations was not part of this investigation. On July 2, 2026, a joint motion was filed to end the investigation because the parties reached a settlement agreement. This means they agreed to stop the investigation by resolving the issues in the complaint without further legal action. The judge overseeing the case, called the administrative law judge (ALJ), agreed with ending the investigation. It was decided that this would save resources and avoid unnecessary legal actions. Importantly, it was found that ending the investigation would not go against the public interest. The decision was filed under Federal Register Volume 91, Number 153 on August 11, 2026. The decision to end the investigation was not reviewed one more time and is now finalized. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same II; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation
US International Trade Commission Finds Violation in Glass Substrates Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its decision on an important case. This case involved certain glass substrates used in liquid crystal displays (LCDs). It looked into products and methods for making these displays. The investigation began when Corning Incorporated filed a complaint. They are based in Corning, New York. The complaint said that some companies were violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint claimed these companies imported, sold for import, and sold within the United States specific glass substrates and products. The investigation started on March 7, 2025. It named nine respondents. Some of these companies were from the United States and others were from China. Over time, some respondents were removed from the investigation due to settlement agreements. On April 7, 2026, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found a violation of section 337. The ALJ gave recommendations on what actions to take. On June 8, 2026, the Commission agreed to review parts of the ALJ’s decision. After a detailed examination, the Commission agreed that there was a violation of section 337. This decision was made regarding two U.S. patents. These patents were about the glass substrates for LCDs. The Commission decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO). This order stops the entry of infringing products that are not licensed. The LEO applies to products made or imported by the respondents or their connected entities. The Commission also issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against one company, TTE Technology, Inc. This company operates as TCL North America in Irvine, California. The Commission found no public interest concerns that would prevent applying the orders. A zero percent bond will be in effect during the Presidential review period. The investigation is now finished. The Commission made this decision to protect American businesses and innovation. The authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Calls for Public Input on Glass Substrate Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking into a case involving glass substrates. These substrates are used in liquid crystal displays, which are common in televisions and monitors. The ITC is concerned about certain companies importing these materials in ways that may violate U.S. trade laws. On July 23, 2026, an initial decision was made about a violation of Section 337. Then, on August 6, 2026, there was a suggestion on what should happen next if a violation is found. This decision involves possible restrictions on bringing in these glass substrates and related products. The ITC is now asking for public feedback. They want opinions on whether putting limits on these imports is fair and how it might affect things like public health, safety, and the economy. They are interested in hearing if other companies in the U.S. could make similar products if imports are stopped. Four companies are mentioned in this investigation. They include Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. and TCL China Star Optoelectronics in China, as well as TTE Technology, Inc., known as TCL North America, in California. These companies might face restrictions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is also considering a cease and desist order, which could stop TCL from certain actions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC encourages people and government agencies to send in their comments. These comments should be no more than five pages. The focus should be on public interest matters, such as how the decision might impact consumers and the economy. Written comments should be submitted by September 8, 2026. They should be sent electronically following the ITC’s filing procedures. Confidential information should be clearly marked and treated accordingly. For more information, you can contact the ITC or visit their website. All public comments will be available for people to see. The ITC works under the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows strict rules and procedures for such cases. The decision from this investigation could have wide-ranging effects on the market for liquid crystal displays. Public input is crucial in helping the ITC make a fair and informed decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
US International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wi-Fi Device Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This follows an initial determination issued by a presiding administrative law judge on August 6, 2026. The investigation, identified as No. 337-TA-1454, focuses on certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, and related components. The investigation is centered on potential violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. If found in violation, the ITC may exclude the articles in question from entering the United States. The decision will include considerations about how this exclusion might affect public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, production of similar products in the U.S., and impact on U.S. consumers. The companies involved include ASUStek Computer Inc. from Taiwan; ASUS Computer International based in Fremont, CA; and Plume Design Inc. located in Palo Alto, CA. There are possible limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders being considered against these entities. Public submissions will help the ITC decide whether the recommended actions are in the public interest. They invite comments that cover how these affected products are used in the U.S., and any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. The Commission also wants to know if there are U.S.-made products that could replace the imported goods. People interested in submitting comments must do so by September 8, 2026. The document submissions should be electronic and can’t exceed five pages. Submissions must prominently reference the investigation number “Inv. No. 337-TA-1454.” Confidential information can be submitted but must be marked according to Commission rules. Information submitted could be used internally by the Commission or U.S. government employees, especially for cybersecurity purposes. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public inspection on the ITC’s electronic docket system. For more information, the public can contact Cathy Chen, Esq., in the ITC’s Office of the General Counsel at the provided contact details. This announcement forms part of the ITC’s ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and the protection of U.S. markets against unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-10
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-10 1) Executive Summary Today’s brief covers 3 events from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). The ITC instituted preliminary AD/CVD investigations on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India and scheduled the final phase of AD/CVD investigations on truck bed covers from China. The DOC initiated administrative reviews of multiple antidumping and countervailing duty orders with June anniversary dates, including several China-related products. The primary policy instruments across these items are AD/CVD investigations and administrative reviews. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) – Headline: Perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA) — AD/CVD (Institution of investigations; preliminary phase scheduling) Summary: The ITC instituted preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigations (Nos. 701-TA-805 and 731-TA-1804) on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India, alleged to be sold at less than fair value and subsidized. Unless Commerce extends the time for initiation, the ITC must reach its preliminary injury determination by September 21, 2026, and transmit its views to Commerce by September 28, 2026. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-805 and 731-TA-1804 (Preliminary) – Key dates: Petitions filed August 5, 2026; ITC staff conference August 26, 2026; requests to appear due by noon August 24, 2026; pre-conference submissions due August 25, 2026; written briefs due August 31, 2026; ITC preliminary determination due by September 21, 2026; views due to Commerce by September 28, 2026. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/perfluoroalkoxy-alkane-from-india-institution-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-investigations-and-scheduling-of-preliminary-phase-investigations/ – Headline: Truck bed covers — AD/CVD (Final phase scheduling) Summary: The ITC scheduled the final phase of AD/CVD investigations (Nos. 701-TA-789 and 731-TA-1777) on truck bed covers from China. Commerce preliminarily found subsidization by the Government of China; Commerce’s preliminary less-than-fair-value determinations are pending. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-789 and 731-TA-1777 (Final) – Key dates: Scheduling notice dated July 27, 2026; prehearing staff report October 1, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026 (requests to appear due October 8, 2026); prehearing briefs due October 8, 2026; posthearing briefs due October 22, 2026; final party comments on new information due November 6, 2026. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/truck-bed-covers-from-china-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing-duty-and-antidumping-duty-investigations/ DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration) – Headline: AD/CVD administrative reviews — multiple orders (Initiation notice) Summary: Commerce initiated administrative reviews of numerous antidumping and countervailing duty orders with June anniversary dates. The notice outlines respondent selection, separate rate application/certification procedures for non-market economy cases, certification eligibility, and timelines for submissions. The scope includes products from multiple countries, with several China-related proceedings (e.g., certain alkyl phosphate esters, chlorinated isocyanurates, citric acid/citrate salts, crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, mattresses, gas powered pressure washers, disposable aluminum containers, and stainless steel flanges). Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Federal Register notice (FR Doc. 2026-16265); multiple case numbers listed in the notice – Key dates: Applicable August 10, 2026; Separate Rate Applications/Certifications due 14 calendar days after publication; Certification Eligibility Applications due 30 calendar days after publication; Commerce intends to issue final results of these reviews by June 30, 2027. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews-7/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC launched preliminary AD/CVD investigations on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India, with a preliminary injury determination due by September 21, 2026. – The ITC set the final phase schedule for AD/CVD investigations on truck bed covers from China, including an October 15, 2026 hearing. – Commerce initiated administrative reviews of a broad set of AD/CVD orders with June anniversaries, including several China-origin products across chemicals, solar components, consumer goods, and metals. – For NME proceedings covered in Commerce’s notice, Separate Rate Applications/Certifications are due within 14 days of publication; final results of the reviews are targeted by June 30, 2027. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/perfluoroalkoxy-alkane-from-india-institution-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-investigations-and-scheduling-of-preliminary-phase-investigations/ (Perfluoroalkoxy alkane — ITC prelim) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/truck-bed-covers-from-china-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing-duty-and-antidumping-duty-investigations/ (Truck bed covers — ITC final phase) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews-7/ (DOC initiation — AD/CVD administrative reviews) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Commerce Department Initiates Reviews on Various Trade Issues Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It has begun a series of administrative reviews on antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These reviews focus on products with June anniversary dates, according to the Federal Register notice published on August 10, 2026. What Are These Reviews? Administrative reviews help check if foreign companies are selling goods at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This is called dumping. If they do, extra taxes called antidumping duties can be applied. The reviews also check if foreign companies receive unfair help from their governments. This is called a countervailable subsidy. In such cases, countervailing duties can be applied. Which Products Are Under Review? Some of the products under review include raw honey from Argentina and Brazil, brass rods from Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea, and crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Other products include certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing from Germany, India, and Switzerland; quartz surface products from India; glycine from Japan and India; and laminated woven sacks from Vietnam. What Is the Procedure? The reviews allow any parties, like companies and producers, to request that their cases be looked at by the Department of Commerce. There are deadlines for submitting information, comments, and responses. For instance, separate rate applications for non-market economy countries must be filed. The companies in the reviews need to prove their independence from their governments to avoid being assigned a single antidumping deposit rate. Applications are due 14 calendar days after this Federal Register notice. Respondents and Deadlines Commerce will select companies for individual examination based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data or through questionnaires requesting sales information. Respondent selection decisions will be made within 35 days of the notice publication. Comments on Customs data or questionnaire data should be submitted within seven days after these are recorded. Companies should also complete the Quantity and Value (Q&V) questionnaire separately for accuracy in respondent selection. Notices of No Sales and Deadlines If there is no sale or entry during the examination period, a notice of no sales must be filed within 30 days of the initiation notice. Additionally, if a market situation affects normal pricing, companies have 20 days after initial questionnaire submissions to notify Commerce. Conclusion The Commerce Department aims to conclude these reviews by June 30, 2027. These actions ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from unfair foreign practices. This process is a crucial part of maintaining healthy international trade relations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
