U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Orders in Crafting Machines Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 10, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a significant decision regarding certain crafting machines and their components. This decision results from an investigation into violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation focused on imported crafting machines that infringe on specific U.S. patents. The ITC has issued several orders: General Exclusion Order (GEO): This order bans the importation of crafting machines that violate U.S. Patent No. D893,563. Limited Exclusion Orders (LEOs): One LEO was directed at the respondent, LiPing Zhan, known as Konduone, for infringing U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646. Another LEO was aimed at Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co., Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co. Ltd. (collectively called Vevor Respondents) for infringing U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. Cease and Desist Orders (CDOs): These were issued against Konduone and the Vevor Respondents to prevent further violations. The investigation commenced on December 11, 2024, based on a complaint by Cricut, Inc. from South Jordan, Utah. The complaint alleged violations due to the importation and sale of certain crafting machines that infringe various patents held by Cricut. During the investigation, several developments occurred: SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. was initially part of the investigation but was terminated based on a consent order. Respondents like HSET were terminated, while other companies like HK Sijiu International Share Co., Ltd. were added. Claims were dropped or resolved through consent orders as the investigation progressed. The final determination found violations regarding certain patents, while others were found non-infringing or moot. The ITC ordered remedies, including a bond requirement during a Presidential review period. The Commission finalized its decision on July 7, 2026, and delivered its conclusion along with orders to the relevant authorities. This decision is based on legal statutes in the Tariff Act of 1930 and ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation into Synthetic Braiding Hair Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to stop its investigation into certain synthetic braiding hair products. This decision was made after JBS Hair, the company that filed the complaint, withdrew its request. The investigation began on September 9, 2024. JBS Hair, based in Atlanta, Georgia, believed that certain products were imported and sold in the U.S. illegally. They said these products violated specific patents, like the ‘478 patent and the ‘301 patent. The products in question were synthetic braiding hair and its packaging. Vivace, also known as Dae Do Inc., was named in the complaint as a company selling these products. Previously, on February 24, 2025, the ITC found Vivace in default. Because of this, on September 29, 2025, the ITC issued orders to stop certain companies, including Vivace, from selling these products in the U.S. On December 18, 2025, JBS Hair filed another complaint, asking the ITC to enforce its orders against Vivace. The ITC agreed to look into this complaint on January 22, 2026. Later, on June 8, 2026, the ITC corrected the name of Vivace in the documents. A few days later, on June 9, 2026, JBS Hair decided to withdraw its enforcement complaint. The ITC received this request and found no issues, allowing the withdrawal. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this withdrawal too. The Administrative Law Judge, overseeing this case, agreed with JBS Hair’s request on June 18, 2026. The judge confirmed that all rules were followed for the withdrawal. No one opposed this decision, and the judge noted that there were no secret deals between the parties. Finally, the ITC chose not to review the case any further on July 8, 2026. This means the investigation is officially over. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this final order. The ITC’s actions are based on the Tariff Act of 1930 and their own rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Five-Year Reviews on Silicon Metal Imports Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews for silicon metal imports. These reviews are related to imports from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia. The reviews are to determine if revoking the existing duties on these imports would cause harm to the U.S. industry. The announcement was made in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 129, dated Wednesday, July 8, 2026. The decision of the expedited reviews follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Review Details The Commission decided to conduct expedited reviews because the domestic response was found adequate, but the response from the foreign parties was not. This decision aligns with section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act. Date Set for Review The official start date for these reviews was announced as June 5, 2026. Contact Information For more details, Nitin Joshi from the Office of Investigations can be contacted at 202-708-1669. Public Access The public can view the records of these reviews on the Commission’s electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. Schedule for Comments and Reports A staff report related to the reviews will be available on July 31, 2026. Written comments from interested parties are due by August 7, 2026. These comments must not include new factual information. Technical Compliance Parties making comments that contain business proprietary information must comply with sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. Each document filed must also be served to all parties related to the reviews. Determination and Authority The Commission has labeled the reviews as extraordinarily complicated. This allows the review period to extend by up to 90 days. The reviews are conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice on July 6, 2026. This announcement is critical as it impacts the trade and market dynamics of silicon metal within the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Violation Case Involving Refrigeration Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-07-08 The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case involving the importation and sale of certain boiler protection systems for refrigeration. This review is based on finding possible violations of Section 337. The Investigation The investigation started on June 18, 2025. It was based on a complaint by ARPC LLC and Paul N. Unmack from Butte, Montana. They said there were violations concerning refrigeration systems. Patent Infringement Allegations The complaint said that some companies were importing and selling boiler protections that infringed on U.S. Patent No. 8,056,360. The patent is about specific claims related to refrigeration systems. Named Respondents The investigation named 10 respondents. These companies are mostly from China. They were accused of selling and importing products that might infringe the patent. Default and Termination of Respondents Some respondents, like Koofang and Bydorunce, did not respond to show-cause orders. Therefore, they were found in default. Some respondents like Hofantek were removed from the investigation. Summary Determination On May 21, 2026, the case had a summary decision. It said there was a violation by certain respondents. These respondents were found to have imported products infringing the patent. Economic Requirement Reviewed The USITC decided to review the findings related to economic requirements. They want to be sure about these findings before moving forward with any action. Possible Remedies The investigation can lead to exclusion orders. It can stop the entry of certain products into the U.S. This could also include cease and desist orders which would make companies stop unfair acts. Public Interest Considerations If any remedy is ordered, USITC must consider public interest. This includes looking at the effect on public health, the economy, and U.S. consumers. Opportunity for Written Submissions Parties, government agencies, and public are invited to give written submissions about remedies and public interest. The submissions are important in deciding the final decision. Timeline The written submissions must be filed by July 20, 2026. Reply submissions are due by July 27, 2026. Commission Vote and Authority The Commission made its decision on this matter on July 6, 2026. It operates under the Tariff Act of 1930 and Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. For more information, contact the U.S. International Trade Commission or visit their website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Samsung Investigation Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has issued a notice about an important investigation involving Samsung. The investigation is about certain mobile electronic devices made by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., based in South Korea, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., located in New Jersey. The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1432, focuses on a possible violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. An administrative law judge has issued an Initial Determination stating there is a violation. If this violation is confirmed, the USITC may prohibit Samsung’s devices from being imported into the United States. The USITC is requesting comments from the public and government agencies about how the decision might affect people and the economy. Some questions for comment are: How are Samsung devices being used in the United States? Are there any health or safety issues related to this decision? Are there American-made products that can replace Samsung’s devices? Can these replacements be available in a reasonable time? How will consumers in the United States be impacted? Comments should not be more than five pages long and must be submitted by August 6, 2026. For more information or assistance, contact Namo Kim at the USITC. All comments must refer to the investigation number and follow the USITC’s filing procedures. People can find more information or ask questions about submitting their comments through the USITC website or by contacting the Secretary. The USITC stresses that any confidential information should be clearly marked and filed according to the Rules of Practice and Procedure. All submitted information may be used by the Commission and the U.S. government for investigation and other purposes. For additional details and updates, interested parties can visit the USITC website or view documents through the Commission’s electronic docket system. By order of the Commission,Issued July 6, 2026,Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Terminates Investigation on Facial Toning Devices Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to end its investigation concerning certain microcurrent facial toning devices and systems. This decision comes after a settlement was reached between the involved parties. The investigation, known as Investigation No. 337-TA-1463, started on November 28, 2025. It began with a complaint by ZIIP, Inc. of Pleasant Hill, California, and The Beauty Tech Group Ltd. from the United Kingdom. They filed a case against The Carol Cole Company, also known as NuFACE, which is based in Vista, California. The complaint alleged that there were violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It was claimed that certain facial devices infringed on patent claims. On May 29, 2026, the involved companies, ZIIP, Inc., The Beauty Tech Group Ltd., and The Carol Cole Company, filed a joint motion. They requested to terminate the investigation based on a settlement they had reached. The Administrative Law Judge granted this motion on June 11, 2026. It was found that the request followed the rules and was not against the public interest. The ITC decided not to review this initial decision. Thus, the investigation stopped entirely. The decision was finalized after a vote by the Commission on July 1, 2026. The investigation’s authority is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure also provide authority for the decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order for termination on July 1, 2026. This marks the formal end of this investigation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Review Ink Cartridges Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing a case involving certain ink cartridges and their parts. This case, labeled Investigation No. 337-TA-1451, involves multiple companies and allegations of patent infringement. The investigation started because of a complaint from Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. These companies are from the U.S. and Japan. They claim that certain patents related to ink cartridges were violated. The patents in question include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,540,347, 9,061,508, 11,535,037, 11,820,150, and 12,246,539. The complaint says that ink cartridges were imported and sold in the U.S. without permission. The USITC began investigating on June 17, 2025. Several companies from China and Hong Kong, like Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., and others, were named as respondents. Companies based in the U.S. were also named. Some respondents were removed from the investigation because the complaint against them was withdrawn. These include companies like Shenzhen Hongxinyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. and Qiong Wang. There are companies that have been found in default. This means they did not respond to the complaints. These defaulting companies include Tatrix International China Co., Hengyunda Electronics Co., and Mountain Peak, Inc. Certain patent claims from the complaint have been dropped. This includes specific claims from the ‘347, ‘508, ‘037, ‘150, and ‘539 patents. The investigation continues with other claims from these patents. The USITC is especially focused on certain legal questions. They want to know about indirect infringement and economic activity in the U.S. related to these ink cartridges. They are also asking for written opinions about possible actions they might take. The USITC can decide to stop the importation of products that violate U.S. patent laws. They are seeking inputs about how such actions might affect public health, the economy, and U.S. consumers. Parties involved are expected to submit their views by July 15, 2026. They should also propose potential remedies if the USITC decides action is necessary. Follow-up replies are due by July 22, 2026. The commission’s final decision could include exclusion orders, which would stop the products from entering the U.S. They are interested in knowing how this might impact the public. If a remedy is imposed, the U.S. Trade Representative has 60 days to review the decision. During this time, the products can still enter the U.S. but under certain conditions. The USITC’s decision on these issues will set important precedents for future trade and patent-related cases. The commission expects detailed replies with clear legal references from all parties involved. The objective is to reach a fair conclusion based on the law and evidence available. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Investigation Launched into Alleged Patent Violation of Vehicle Space Guards Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the start of an investigation. This is due to a complaint concerning certain vehicle space guards. The investigation falls under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Background Information: The complaint was filed on June 1, 2026. It was submitted by Johnathan Black Kotyk from Atlantic Beach, Florida. He later made changes to the complaint on June 17, 2026, and added more information on June 22, 2026. The complaint claims that there are violations of section 337. It says that there is illegal importation and sale of specific vehicle space guards. The claim focuses on the infringement of certain sections of U.S. Patent No. 7,527,314. This patent is referred to as the ‘314 patent. The complaint also supports that there is an industry in the United States linked to this. The complainant asked for an investigation. He also requested a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Details of the Investigation: The ITC reviewed the complaint. On July 1, 2026, they decided to start an investigation. It will determine if there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337. This involves the importation, sale for importation, or sale within the United States, after importation, of the said products due to infringement of certain claims of the ‘314 patent. The investigation refers to products described as “vehicle space guards having attachment means for car seats.” Involved Parties: Entities reported to be in violation include: Drop Stop, LLC The Container Store, Inc. Walmart, Inc. 232 Technologies Inc. Sportman’s Market Inc. (Sporty’s) The ITC’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations will also be involved. Legal Process: The respondents must reply to the amended complaint and this notice within 20 days of receiving them. This follows section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Extensions for this period will be rare unless valid reasons are provided. If a respondent does not respond on time, they may lose their right to contest the allegations. This means the facts could be decided in favor of the complainant. It may also lead to the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the ITC will select a presiding judge for this investigation. Additional information can be accessed on the ITC’s website at www.usitc.gov. Issued by the order of the Commission on July 1, 2026, signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Calls for Feedback on New Automotive Survey Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) recently announced a request for public comments on a proposed survey. The survey is part of Investigation No. 332-608. This investigation is about the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) Automotive Rules of Origin. The focus is to study their economic impact and operation in the year 2027. The Commission has shared details on how to give feedback. People can send comments about the survey to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It is important that the comments are clear and specific. The survey aims to gather information from motor vehicle makers in the United States. This data is not available to the public. The investigation started on February 11, 2026. A notice was also published later in February in the Federal Register. The USITC will prepare a report from this data. This report helps inform the President and Congress. The information will be shared with the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance. The survey results are expected by July 1, 2027. The survey will gather details from 25 producers. It will take about 25 hours to complete. The findings will remain private. The USITC assures that business information will not be exposed. For more details, the public can visit the USITC’s website. Here, one can find information about the investigation and all important documents. Contact the USITC if you need help accessing their building or information. For questions, reach out to Conor Hargrove at 202-708-5409. This survey is important because it helps to understand how the Automotive Rules of Origin affect the U.S. economy. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Antibody Drug Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has chosen not to review an important decision. This decision involved ending an investigation related to antibody drug conjugates. Antibody drug conjugates are a type of medicine. The ITC began this investigation on December 22, 2025. The investigation followed a complaint from AbbVie Inc. The company is from North Chicago, Illinois. They argued that certain companies were bringing antibody drugs into the U.S. by using their trade secrets. Trade secrets are special information that helps a company create its products. AbbVie said these actions might hurt U.S. industries. The companies AbbVie raised concerns about included ProfoundBio in Seattle, Washington, and other international companies like Genmab in Denmark. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations also took part in the investigation. On June 8, 2026, AbbVie asked to end the investigation. They did this by withdrawing their complaint. No one opposed this request. On June 15, 2026, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this decision too. By June 16, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge agreed to end the investigation. On July 1, 2026, the Commission agreed with this decision and officially closed the case. The rules and laws that guided this conclusion come from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This decision became official on July 2, 2026, as noted by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Input on Flash-Spun Nonwoven Materials Investigation Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is seeking public input on a recent legal investigation. This investigation is about specific materials called “flash-spun nonwoven materials.” On July 1, 2026, an administrative law judge from the ITC made an important decision. The judge said there was a violation of Section 337. This law is part of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge also suggested certain actions, called remedies, to address the violation. Now, the Commission wants to hear from the public and government agencies about these suggestions. Why the Public’s Opinion Matters The Commission is looking for opinions about whether these materials should be banned from entering the U.S. They want to know if banning these materials will affect public health or the economy. The Commission is also considering issuing orders. These could include stopping the import and sale of these materials in the U.S. They are asking what people think about this and how it could affect different groups in the country. How People Can Help The Commission wants people to answer some questions. For example, they want to know how these materials are used in the U.S. They are asking if there are health or safety concerns. They also want to know if other companies can make similar materials in time to replace the ones that might be banned. Anyone who wants to share their thoughts can send a letter to the Commission. These letters should be no longer than five pages. They must be sent by August 3, 2026. How to Send Your Letter People must send their letters electronically. This means using a computer to email the letter by the deadline. If someone wants to keep their letter private, they can request confidential treatment. This means adding a special note at the top of the letter. The Commission has rules for how to do this properly. Why This Matters This investigation is important for many reasons. It could change what materials are allowed into the U.S. It might affect companies and workers who make similar materials in the U.S. It also matters for consumers who use products made from these materials. The ITC wants to make the best decision, so they need a lot of information. That’s why they are asking for help from the public and other government groups. Next Steps After receiving all the input, the Commission will review the information. They will decide if banning or controlling these materials is necessary based on public opinion and legal rules. This process helps ensure that the ITC makes informed decisions that are in the best interest of the country. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Conduct Full Reviews on Steel Wire Import Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced that it will conduct full five-year reviews regarding certain steel wire strands. These strands are made of prestressed concrete. The steel wire strands come from various countries. The USITC wants to see if stopping certain duties would cause harm to U.S. businesses. These duties are known as countervailing and antidumping duties. They help protect American producers from unfair competition. The countries involved in these reviews are Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The review will look at two types of duties for Turkey. The first is the countervailing duty order. It looks at government help or subsidies given to Turkish companies. The second is antidumping duty orders. These orders are for all the other countries. Antidumping duties focus on goods sold at unfairly low prices. The USITC collected responses from interested parties. The responses from the United Arab Emirates were found to be adequate. This means they gave enough information. The responses from the other countries were not as detailed. Despite this, the USITC still plans to review all countries, along with the UAE. This decision helps keep things organized. The USITC’s decision is based on the Tariff Act of 1930. The act helps protect American trade. The decision follows the commission’s rules and procedures. The main goal is to protect domestic industries. The USITC wants to prevent harm from foreign competition. A schedule for these reviews will be announced later. This review is conducted under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Susan Orndoff, a Supervisory Attorney, issued the official notice. It was released on July 2, 2026. Further details and updates can be found on the USITC website. Public records are also available online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Investigations on Glyphosate Imports from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Introduction The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started new investigations. These investigations are about glyphosate imports from China. Glyphosate is a chemical used to kill weeds. It is important for farming. What Are the Investigations About? The investigations will look into whether the import of glyphosate from China is causing harm to U.S. industries. The USITC will see if the imports are sold at prices lower than fair value. This is called “dumping.” The USITC will also check if the Chinese government is unfairly helping glyphosate producers. This is called “subsidizing.” Who Started These Investigations? Monsanto Company and its subsidiary Ruveon LLC filed a petition on June 30, 2026. They are based in St. Louis, Missouri. They requested the investigations to protect U.S. industries. What Are the Next Steps? The USITC must make a preliminary decision by August 14, 2026. They will send their findings to the Department of Commerce by August 21, 2026. How Can the Public Participate? The public can be involved in these investigations. Interested parties must file to participate by a certain date. They need to submit their names and addresses. There will be a conference on July 21, 2026. People can send requests to attend this conference by July 17, 2026. The public can also send written comments by July 24, 2026. Important Information The USITC will only accept electronic filings at this time. All documents must be filed online through their system. Every document must be shared with all other parties involved. A certificate of service must be included to show this was done. Conclusion The investigations on glyphosate imports from China are vital. They aim to protect industries in the United States. It is essential for all parties involved to follow the rules for participation and submission. The process is open to the public for input and transparency. Authority These actions are taken under the Tariff Act of 1930. This provides the legal basis for the investigations. By order of the Commission, issued on June 30, 2026, Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, has announced the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Diamond Sawblades from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced an important update regarding diamond sawblades from China. This news comes from the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 127, published on July 6, 2026. The ITC is conducting an expedited review. This means they are looking at whether ending an antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from China would hurt U.S. businesses. The review is happening under the Tariff Act of 1930. The important date to remember is June 5, 2026. The ITC decided then that responses from U.S. businesses about the review were good enough. However, responses from Chinese parties were not good. Because of this, the ITC is doing a simpler, faster review instead of a full review. The review is under section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). The ITC has also made materials on this subject available online. These materials can be seen at the ITC’s website at www.usitc.gov. The ITC is set to share a report about this on July 22, 2026. First, it will be nonpublic. Then, a public version will be shared for everyone to read. By July 29, 2026, comments from interested parties are due. These comments should say what the ITC should decide in the review. New factual information is not allowed in these comments. If there are any changes in dates due to the Department of Commerce, new deadlines will follow. It is important to file everything on time. Also, all documents must be given to everyone involved in the review. This review is seen as very complicated. So, the ITC might take 90 more days to finish it. This review is done under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice about this was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on July 1, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Wind Tower Orders Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Duty Orders Under Review The ITC is looking at the duties on utility scale wind towers from India, Malaysia, and Spain. These duties make sure that American companies are not hurt by foreign competition selling products at unfair prices. The review will decide if the duties should stay in place. Important Dates The review process began on July 1, 2026. Interested parties must send their responses by July 31, 2026. Comments on the responses are due by September 8, 2026. Background of the Orders In 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued orders. These orders are for countervailing duties on towers from Malaysia and India. They also placed antidumping duty orders on towers from Spain, Malaysia, and India. These orders are meant to protect the U.S. wind tower industry. Purpose of the Review The ITC will decide if removing the duties would harm U.S. companies. They will look at factors like the amount of imports and their effects on prices and the industry. They might keep the duties if there is a risk of harm to U.S. companies. Participation Details Parties who want to join in the review process need to file an appearance with the ITC. There is a public service list for information on involved parties. Former ITC employees may take part in this review even if they were involved in earlier related investigations. Confidential Information Business information can be shared under a special order. This is handled with care to protect sensitive data. Submitting Information Interested parties must give detailed information by July 31, 2026. They need to include their operations, sales, and opinions about the duties. Specific guidelines are provided to ensure all required data is included. Conclusion The review by the ITC is an important check to maintain fair competition in the wind tower market. The decision will impact the U.S. wind energy sector. Keeping the duties may help protect U.S. jobs and companies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Metal Lockers from China Under Five-Year Review by U.S. International Trade Commission Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a five-year review of metal lockers imported from China. This review will decide if cancelling the countervailing and antidumping duty orders would lead to harm to U.S. industries. The USITC wants to know if removing the duty orders will hurt U.S. producers. The review began on July 1, 2026. All interested parties are encouraged to respond by July 31, 2026. Comments about the adequacy of responses should be filed by September 8, 2026. Celia Feldpausch from the Office of Investigations at the USITC is the contact person for more information. The public has access to the complete details on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS). The background of this case dates back to August 20, 2021. Then, the Department of Commerce placed antidumping and countervailing duty orders on Chinese metal lockers. These reviews are conducted to see if dropping these orders would cause more harm to U.S. industries. The review process includes checking interested party responses. The USITC will decide if full or quick reviews are needed. The USITC has laid out clear definitions and key terms related to these reviews. Participants must file an entry of appearance if they want to be a part of the review process. There are specific ethical guidelines for former Commission employees who wish to participate. The USITC has also outlined the steps for limited disclosure of business proprietary information. These disclosures are guided by administrative protective orders (APO) rules. All written submissions in this review must meet the Commission’s rules. Interested parties must describe how the removal of duties might affect the industry and submit comments. The document provides a detailed list of required submissions. This includes data on production, capacity, sales, imports, and exports. All submissions must comply with the Commission’s filing guidelines. The USITC has shared essential information about the status of firms and the conditions in the marketplace. This supports a thorough review process. Various parties need to supply lists of U.S. producers, importers, and customers handling metal lockers. The USITC also wants changes in supply and demand conditions included in the information submitted. The USITC encourages participants to share their views and supply data on how removing duties could impact the U.S. industry. This proceeding is under the Tariff Act of 1930 and highlights how U.S. trade laws protect domestic industries. By Order of the Commission. Issued: June 24, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Review of Copper Pipe Imports from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is reviewing imports of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Vietnam. This review checks if removing a duty, or tax, would hurt U.S. businesses. The review is part of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will see if taking away the duty would lead to more harm to U.S. companies making similar products. The duty was first placed on August 13, 2021, by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It affects copper pipes and tubes that come from Vietnam to the United States. Interested parties must respond by July 31, 2026. They must send comments on the responses by September 8, 2026. All responses must be sent through the USITC’s electronic system. The Commission defines key terms for this review: “Subject Merchandise” refers to the items from Vietnam, while “Domestic Like Product” means similar items made in the U.S. “Domestic Industry” refers to U.S. businesses making these products. Rules and timelines guide the review. People and companies who want to join the review must file an appearance within 21 days of the notice. Former employees of the Commission can participate in this review even if they worked on related investigations before. Business information will be shared only with those who can protect it. Companies must meet deadlines to access detailed business data. The Commission asks U.S. companies to share information from 2025. They want to know how the copper pipes and tubes business is doing. This includes production, sales, costs, and profits. Importers of Vietnamese copper pipes and tubes must also share their data for 2025. They must explain how much they import and sell in the U.S. Vietnamese producers selling to the U.S. must report their production and export numbers. If parties have issues providing information, they must inform the Commission early. Otherwise, the Commission might make decisions without it. Changes in U.S. and Vietnamese market conditions since the duty was put in place should be reported. This includes both supply and demand changes. The Commission’s rules and procedures ensure that the information provided is clear and helps make a fair decision. Contact Information: For more details, Jordan Harriman at the U.S. International Trade Commission can be reached at 202-205-2610. The public can view this proceeding on the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. Authority: The review is conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice follows Section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. This review goes to show how the US monitors its trade practices carefully to protect local industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

International Trade Commission Launches Review of Magnesia Carbon Bricks Import Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has officially begun a new review process. This involves looking at the orders on certain kinds of bricks called magnesia carbon bricks. These bricks come from two countries: China and Mexico. The ITC’s action aims to find out if removing certain orders would cause problems for U.S. industries. One of the orders is called a “countervailing duty order.” This type of order helps U.S. businesses if another country unfairly supports its products. There is also a review for an “antidumping duty order.” This helps if a foreign company sells its products in the U.S. at very low prices to gain a market edge. The review started on July 1, 2026. People or groups interested in this review need to give their information before July 31, 2026. The information they send will help the ITC decide if they should do a full review or a faster, shorter review. Magnesia carbon bricks are important because they are used in industries like steelmaking. The review is taking a close look at whether keeping these duties is essential for U.S. companies that make similar bricks. Back in 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce put these orders into effect. They were first reviewed and continued in 2016, and again in 2021. Now the ITC is checking again to see if the duties should stay in place. This new review process will look into many factors. These include how the bricks from China and Mexico might affect the prices and sales of American-made bricks. People like U.S. producers, importers, and even companies in China and Mexico can talk to the ITC. They can let the ITC know what they think might happen if these orders are removed. The ITC will gather and check all this information. They will look at things like how much people are willing to buy these bricks and how many are being imported from China and Mexico. They will also check if American companies can make enough to meet demand. The investigation needs cooperation from several parties. This includes the producers of the bricks in the U.S., those who import them, and also foreign producers. Each group needs to provide detailed data, such as their production levels and how much they sell. They also need to explain how the duties affect them. The ITC wants to ensure their decisions protect U.S. industries. They want to keep jobs and businesses thriving in America. The outcome of this review will be important for U.S. industries and international trade relations with China and Mexico. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Begins Fourth Review of Antidumping Duty on Ironing Tables from China Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes USITC Announcement: The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the initiation of a five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on ironing tables imported from China. This review is conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. Purpose of Review: The review aims to assess whether revoking the antidumping duty order would lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry. Stakeholders are invited to submit their responses by July 31, 2026, to ensure consideration. Background Information: The antidumping duty order was first issued by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) on August 6, 2004. Since then, the order has undergone three five-year reviews, resulting in the continuation of the duty. The fourth review now aims to determine the potential impact on the domestic industry if the order is revoked. Key Definitions: “Subject Merchandise” refers to the ironing tables from China. “Domestic Like Product” refers to the similar products made in the US. “Domestic Industry” includes US producers of ironing tables. “Importer” is any entity importing the ironing tables from China into the US. Participation and Information Submission: Organizations interested in participating must file an entry of appearance with the Commission. The deadline to become a party to the proceeding is within 21 days of the notice’s publication. Participants may include producers, consumers, trade associations, and more. Confidential Business Information: The Commission will allow limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO). Interested parties must submit an application within 21 days to access this information. Inability to Provide Information: If a party cannot provide the requested information, they must notify the Commission with a full explanation and suggest alternative forms to provide equivalent data. Impact of Revocation: Interested parties are encouraged to discuss potential effects on the domestic industry if the antidumping duty order is revoked. Factors to consider include the likely volume of imports, price impacts, and industry implications. Additional Information Required: Respondents must include information such as the name and address of their firm, the firm’s role as an interested party, and the firm’s willingness to participate. They should provide data on production, capacity, and sales, among other details, for the year 2025. Final Steps: The USITC will evaluate all submissions and determine whether to carry out a full or expedited review. The results will help decide the future of the antidumping duty order on ironing tables from China. The proceedings will be conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, ensuring all regulatory requirements are met. Issued by: Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission For further information, contact Kristina Lara at the USITC Office of Investigations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Comments on Balloon Dilation Devices Violation Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has shared important news. On June 26, 2026, a judge made a decision. This judge is called an administrative law judge. The decision is about a section called 337. The decision talks about a violation. It includes a recommendation on what to do next. The Commission is asking people to send their thoughts. These thoughts should be about public interest. This is if the Commission finds a violation. They want comments from the public and government agencies only. If you want to know more, you can contact Paul Lall. He works for the U.S. International Trade Commission. You can call him at (202) 205-2043. To understand the document better, you can see it online. Go to https://edis.usitc.gov. If you need help, you can send an email to the address in the document. The issue is about balloon dilation devices and systems. These are important medical tools. They are from companies named Fiagon GmbH, Fiagon NA, LLC, and Hemostasis, LLC. People are asked to send short comments. These comments should be no more than five pages. They should focus on public health, safety, and the U.S. economy. The Commission wants to know if other companies in the U.S. can make these products. They also want to know the impact on consumers if these products are excluded. Comments must be sent by July 30, 2026. When sending, mention the investigation number: Inv. No. 337-TA-1449. If you want your comments to stay private, mark them as confidential. You still need to send a non-confidential version too. The Commission will review all comments. This is important to ensure the right decision for the public and economy. This update follows the Tariff Act of 1930 and Commission rules. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, released this information on June 29, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Protein Study Tools Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Redwood City, CA and Boston, MA – The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has begun a new investigation. This is about some important items used to study proteins. Studying proteins helps scientists understand how living things work. A complaint was made to the ITC by two places: Seer, Inc., a company in Redwood City, California, and The Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. They said another company wrongly brought these items into the United States. The investigation began after Seer, Inc. and the hospital said some of their important inventions, covered by specific patents, were used by another company without permission. Patents are like a special ticket that says only the person with the ticket can use the invention. The patents are U.S. Patent No. 11,435,360, U.S. Patent No. 11,630,112, U.S. Patent No. 12,050,222, U.S. Patent No. 12,228,566, and U.S. Patent No. 12,590,948. The ITC will check if these items were bought from another place and brought here to be sold, which might break some rules. They will also see if there is a problem because of how these items are used. The items under investigation include special workstations, software, assay kits, and special tools used in labs. Proteomics study tools, which focus on proteins, involve things like nanoparticles and reagents. The company that might have broken the rules is Nanomics Biotechnology Co., Ltd. This company is located in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. The ITC’s administrative law judge will listen to everyone’s side of the story. They will also check if looking into this matter is important and in the public’s interest. Nanomics Biotechnology Co. has a limited time, just 20 days, to respond to this investigation notice. This short time is to ensure a quick response to the problem. If Nanomics does not respond in time, the ITC can make decisions without hearing from the company. This might lead to a ban on bringing these items into the U.S. or stopping their sale. This investigation shows how protecting inventions is important. How this case ends will matter for companies and researchers studying proteins. Issued on 2026-06-29 by the International Trade Commission, and officially noted by Secretary Lisa Barton. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Expedites Review on Polyvinyl Alcohol from China and Japan Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. These reviews are being conducted under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930. The focus is to determine if lifting antidumping duty orders on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) from China and Japan could cause harm to the U.S. industry. The reviews have been set for an expedited schedule. This means the process will be faster than usual due to specific findings. On June 5, 2026, the Commission found that responses from domestic parties were adequate. However, responses from foreign parties were not. Antidumping duties are taxes on imports. They are used to prevent countries from selling goods at unfair prices. The USITC wants to see if removing these duties on PVA from China and Japan would hurt the U.S. PVA market. A staff report with detailed information has been created. This document is available to certain parties with a special permission list starting August 6, 2026. Later, a version for the public will be released. The USITC provides clear guidelines for written comments from involved parties. Comments must be submitted by 5:15 p.m. on August 13, 2026. Comments cannot have new facts and must follow exact rules for presenting data. The USITC has determined these reviews to be very complicated. Due to this complexity, the review time may extend by up to 90 extra days as allowed by law. This process is in line with Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The official notice was published on July 2, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, has issued this notice. Inquiries concerning these reviews can be directed to Rachel Devenney at the USITC. The public can view information about the proceedings on the Commission’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Impact of the Andean Trade Preference Act on U.S. Industries and Drug Crop Eradication Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Impact of the Andean Trade Preference Act on U.S. Industries and Drug Crop Eradication The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has begun an investigation as part of their 22nd report on the Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA). This report, required by Section 206 of the ATPA, will be sent to Congress and the President by September 30, 2026. The ATPA helps countries in the Andean region to trade with the United States. The focus of this report is to understand how ATPA affects U.S. industries and consumers. It will also look at how ATPA helps in the fight against illegal drug crops by promoting legal crop substitution. Key Dates July 17, 2026: Deadline for public to submit written information. August 21, 2026: Report will be sent to Congress and the President. Submission Details Anyone interested can send written information to the USITC’s Secretary. The documents need to be sent through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Content of the Report The report will examine: The actual impact of ATPA on the U.S. economy and specific industries. The future impact on these areas if ATPA continues. The influence of ATPA on stopping illegal drug crops by encouraging legal crops. Even though no imports received special treatment under ATPA in 2024 and 2025, the report is still necessary. The USITC does not plan to hold a public hearing but encourages written submissions. Confidential Information If you send confidential information, label it clearly as “confidential” and “nonconfidential.” This information will not be part of the report sent to Congress but may be used by the Commission internally. All written submissions will be available to interested persons, except for confidential business information (CBI). Participation Encouraged The USITC invites interested people to send summaries of their views using a special template. The summary should not exceed 500 words and must be sent by July 17, 2026. It should be uploaded as a separate attachment. The outcome of this investigation could influence future trade relationships and policies under the Andean Trade Preference Act. The USITC will include these summaries in the report if they meet requirements and are relevant. This comprehensive report aims to shed light on the ATPA’s effects across various sectors, ensuring that both economic interests and international cooperation in combating illegal drug trade continue to progress effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.