GovInfo Website Experiences Page Not Found Error Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes A technical issue has been identified on the GovInfo website, where users are encountering a “Page Not Found” error. Visitors attempting to access certain pages are greeted with a message stating, “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” Citizens are encouraged to report this error to the GovInfo team. Users should include important details to assist in resolving the problem quickly. This includes the URL of the page they were trying to access, the steps leading to the error, specific search or browse terms, and a screenshot of the page where the error occurred. The GovInfo website, which provides access to official publications from all three branches of the U.S. Federal Government, is urging patience as they resolve the issue. They thank users for their patience and encourage them to visit the homepage or explore other areas of the site to continue their research or information gathering. If users need assistance with searching or browsing, GovInfo provides a variety of resources and help documents. These resources are available through the “Help” and “Search Tips” links on the site. For more detailed navigation support, users are encouraged to utilize the main menu options like Browse, About, Developers, Features, Help, and Feedback, to explore available content. GovInfo remains committed to providing public access to government documents, and apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this technical disruption. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Investigates Alkyl Phosphate Esters from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has opened an investigation. They are looking into certain chemicals called alkyl phosphate esters. These come from the People’s Republic of China. The Department wants to know if these chemicals are included in existing trade rules. The inquiry started because of a request by ICL-IP America, Inc. This company asked the Department to check if spray-foam systems from China are avoiding rules made to stop unfair trading. The rules are called antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The Department is not starting a full investigation yet. They will first look at what is included in the trade rules. This is called a scope inquiry. For now, the bigger investigation, called a circumvention inquiry, will wait. They will decide if the Chinese spray-foam systems fall under the current rules. If parts of these systems include the esters in question, then they might be covered by the orders. The purpose of the investigation is to find out if the esters meet certain rules. The rules say that the esters must make up a big part, at least 20 percent, of the spray-foam systems. While the investigation is happening, the Department will ask U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to keep holding on to any of these spray-foam systems coming into the U.S. This means that the companies involved will have to pay a deposit. This deposit is a protection in case the Department decides that the rules do apply. The Department will use specific sections of their rules to guide this investigation. They plan to finish the investigation within 120 days, but they can take up to 180 days if needed. They will understand more about these imports and decide if they need to pay the duties under existing orders. The products being investigated come from an order that covers various chemicals like TCPP, TDCP, and TEP. These are special esters used in many products as a fire retardant. The chemicals have specific names and numbers to identify them. The investigation is technical, but very important. It helps keep American businesses safe from unfair practices. This inquiry shows that the U.S. takes its trade rules seriously. For more details, please refer to the Federal Register Volume 91, Number 140 published on July 23, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice: U.S. Department of Commerce Adds Missing Items to Review List Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice. This notice was published in Volume 91, Number 140 of the Federal Register. It addresses a recent oversight by the department, specifically omitting certain items from a previous document. The action mentioned is a correction to the Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews. Originally, these reviews were published on July 9, 2026. The initial notice left out important entries related to Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan and Certain Epoxy Resins from the Republic of Korea. These missing entries concerned specific companies. For Kazakhstan, the companies under review include: Karaganda Complex Alloys Plant LLP KSP Steel TELF AG TNC Kazchrome JSC; Eurasian Energy Corporation JSC; Shubarkol Komir JSC YDD Corporation LLP; ASIA Ferroalloys LLP; KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP For the Republic of Korea, the companies related to Certain Epoxy Resins are: Kudo Chemical Co., Ltd. Kukdo Finechem Co., Ltd. Kumho P&B Chemicals Inc. The period under review for Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan is from September 10, 2024, to December 31, 2025. For Epoxy Resins from Korea, the period is from April 3, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The notice is issued following sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. It also aligns with regulation 19 CFR 351.213. The correction aims to ensure that all interested parties have the correct and complete information. The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Scot Fullerton, signed the document. The complete details of this notice are available in the Federal Register. This publication is accessible through the Government Publishing Office’s website. This correction is fundamentally important to stakeholders in the international trade community. It ensures all relevant entities are correctly accounted for in the trade review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Official GovInfo Error Notice: Page Not Found Estimated reading time: 1 minute Error Details: The page displays a strong headline stating “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” Users are encouraged to report this error to askGPO through a dedicated link (https://www.gpo.gov/error-pages/askgpo) to assist in resolving the issue promptly. For effective resolution, the public is advised to provide specific details including: The URL of the page they were attempting to access. The exact steps taken that led to the error. Relevant search or browsing terms. A screenshot of the error page, if possible. Additional Guidance: The message extends gratitude to users for their patience and directs them to visit the GovInfo homepage if they wish to continue browsing. Moreover, users are invited to explore search tips through a provided link to enhance their search efficiency on the site. For any assistance navigating the website or utilizing its features, users can consult the ‘Help’ section. Besides reports and questions, there is a feedback option available through a survey link and a contact page for direct queries. GovInfo remains committed to promptly addressing any errors and maintaining transparency with its users, ensuring that public access to government documents and information is safeguarded. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Indonesian Fatty Acids The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. This decision is about fatty acids from Indonesia. It says that Indonesian producers and exporters are getting unfair help. This help is called a “countervailable subsidy.” What is a Countervailable Subsidy? This is when the government helps to make goods cheaper. This help could be money or other support. The U.S. law says this could hurt U.S. businesses. Investigation Period The investigation was for one year. It started on January 1, 2025, and ended on December 31, 2025. Background The U.S. started looking into these subsidies in March 2026. This was after companies in the U.S. complained. They said the subsidies were unfair. They claimed the subsidies caused problems for them. Company-Specific Rates Two companies in Indonesia were checked carefully. They are Wilmar and PT Musim Mas. Each got a countervailable subsidy rate of about 16.5%. All-Others Rate Other companies that did not get checked also received a rate. This rate is almost the same as the two main companies. Their rate is 16.48%. What Happens Next? The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop certain products from Indonesia. This will start after this notice goes public. Indonesia-exported fatty acids will need a cash deposit for the same percentage as their subsidy rate. Public Comments Interested people can give their opinion. They need to do this after the last check report is available. There is a set schedule for these comments. They can call for a hearing if they want. Critical Circumstances Check A critical look at these situations will happen by July 29, 2026. This is 30 days after the first issue was raised. What’s Next? The U.S. will keep checking. There will be a final decision by the end of November 2026. If they find the subsidies are unfair, they might take more actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Antidumping Duty Order Issued on Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes from Japan The U.S. Department of Commerce, along with the International Trade Commission (ITC), has issued an antidumping duty order on lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. This decision follows affirmative findings from both departments, which said that these cranes were being sold at less than fair value. What Does this Mean? Starting July 23, 2026, antidumping duties will be levied. This means that additional taxes will be applied to cranes coming from Japan to make the pricing fair. Background Details On June 4, the Department of Commerce announced their final affirmative determination regarding the sales of these cranes at less than fair value. Then, on July 16, the ITC confirmed their decision of material injury to the U.S. industry. Scope of the Order The order includes all lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. These cranes are often used for heavy lifting in construction and other industries. If you need more details, check the appendix on the original notice for a deeper description. Antidumping Duty Rates Several companies in Japan will face specific duty rates: Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. will face a 12.36% duty. Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. will face a 20.00% duty. All other relevant companies will face a 16.18% duty rate. Provisional Measures The suspension of liquidation started on January 16, 2026, back when the preliminary determination was made. Entries made between July 15, 2026, and July 19, 2026, are NOT subject to these duties. These entries should be liquidated without paying antidumping fees. Forward Steps It’s important that stakeholders keep up with the annual inquiry service list. This list will help ensure all parties are well-informed about the case proceedings and any updates to duties or regulations. Keep an eye on updates and notifications for any changes and to ensure compliance with this new order. This order aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing strategies by enforcing duties on products from Japan that do not adhere to fair pricing. Stay informed, and make sure you or your business fully understands the implications if you’re involved in importing these cranes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

GovInfo: Page Not Found Error Guidance Estimated reading time: 1 minute When you try to visit a page on GovInfo and encounter a “Page Not Found” message, it means there has been an error in accessing the information you desire. The website displays a clear notification about this error, informing users that the requested page cannot be found. Steps to Take When You See This Message: Reporting the Error: You are encouraged to report this error to askGPO for assistance. In your report, include the URL you attempted to access. Providing Necessary Information: Describe the steps you took before the error appeared. Provide any search terms used or a screenshot of the error page if possible. Useful Links: You can go back to the GovInfo Homepage. If you need help with searching, GovInfo offers Search Tips on their site. Contact Information: If you wish to speak to someone directly, you may reach out through Contact Us. GovInfo appreciates your patience and cooperation as they work to resolve such issues. Always ensure to have the URL and relevant details ready when reporting an error. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Provides Subsidies on L-Lysine Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision regarding an investigation into L-lysine (lysine) exports from China. This decision found that Chinese producers and exporters receive countervailable subsidies. This investigation focused on activities from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What is L-Lysine? Lysine is an essential amino acid. It is often added to animal feed to help in protein synthesis. The investigation covered lysine in all forms, including lysine monohydrochloride, lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. Investigation Findings The Commerce Department determined that Chinese lysine producers benefited from subsidies. These subsidies allow them to export lysine at lower costs. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd. was the main company investigated. Evidence showed financial contributions that helped these companies, making their exports unfairly cheap. The investigation also found that these subsidies were specific, meaning they were not available to all. Impact on Chinese Companies Different rates were calculated for the subsidies. Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. was given a 48.21% subsidy rate. Two other companies, Helionjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd., received a higher rate of 82.11%. This was based on adverse facts available. Future Actions The Commerce Department instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect deposits for these duties since January 22, 2026. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) confirms injury to U.S. industry, duties will continue to be applied. If not, the deposits will be refunded. The ITC will decide within 45 days if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If they find injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued. If not, the investigation will be closed, and no duties will be imposed. This decision marks a significant step in addressing trade imbalances. It aims to ensure fair competition for U.S. businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Plywood from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce released important news on July 21, 2026. They finished an investigation on plywood from Indonesia. They found that Indonesian producers and exporters get subsidies. The International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce, ran the investigation. They looked at the time from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The announcement by the Department means that plywood from Indonesia was sold in the U.S. with the help of these subsidies. U.S. laws don’t allow this. This decision follows a long process. The Department first looked into the matter in January 2026. They called it the Preliminary Determination. They asked people to comment on it. Then, in April 2026, they looked into some programs more. The International Trade Administration, through ACCESS, a system for keeping records, logged all their findings. Anyone can check these details online. In this case, they found that certain Indonesian companies got unfair help from their government. These companies are PT. Mustika Buana Sejahtera, PT. Sengon Indah Mas, and PT. Wijaya Cahaya Timber Tbk. The report says these companies got different levels of help. The U.S. will apply duties on them to make things fair for U.S. producers. For everyone else making plywood in Indonesia, a separate rate applies. Before making this decision, the Department had several discussions. They talked about what products fit into the case. They wanted to make sure they only included the right kinds of plywood. The commission also looked at the rules. They verified information and looked at documents from the Indonesian companies. They wanted accurate data. The U.S. plans to keep track of any subsidies given to plywood makers. If the U.S. International Trade Commission finds that the subsidies hurt American businesses, they will take further action. In conclusion, the U.S. is being careful. They want fair trade. They will monitor how plywood from Indonesia affects American businesses. This step is important for protecting U.S. industries. The Department has given a copy of the investigation report to the International Trade Commission. If they find that these subsidies hurt U.S. industries, they will continue with stricter rules. Otherwise, they will return any cash deposits collected. The decision is now in the hands of the Commission to ensure fairness in trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chinese Plywood Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released a report. It states that hardwood and decorative plywood from China is being sold in the U.S. at prices below the actual value. This is known as “less than fair value” sales. The decision was announced on July 21, 2026. Investigation Timeframe The investigation covered sales from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The report did not change from a previous announcement made on March 2, 2026. Scope of Products The products under investigation include plywood from China. The investigation focused on whether these products were being sold at unfairly low prices. Findings and Decisions Two companies were primarily investigated: Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd. and Xuzhou Shelter Import and Export Co., Ltd. These companies did not cooperate by responding to questionnaires. As a result, they are part of a larger group known as the “China-wide entity.” This group includes several other companies that also did not cooperate. Because these companies did not cooperate, the Department of Commerce used “adverse facts available.” This means they assumed the companies were selling at unfair prices. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce also found “critical circumstances” exist. This means they believe that large shipments of plywood were sold at unfair prices in a short time. This could harm the U.S. market. Suspension of Liquidation Goods will continue to be held, not sold, until the issue is resolved. This applies to products that entered the U.S. starting from December 2, 2025. Final Margin Rates The dumping margins, or the amount by which selling prices are below the normal value, were set. Different rates apply to various Chinese companies. For example, the margin for many companies was 187.27 percent. It implies that these products were being sold at very low prices. Future Steps The final decision will involve the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They will check if the U.S. wood industry is hurt because of cheap plywood from China. If they agree with Commerce’s findings, an antidumping order will be issued. Conclusion The U.S. government’s actions show strong efforts to ensure fair trading practices. The decision aims to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. Further measures will depend on the ITC’s final decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Final Decision on Plywood from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has reached a decision about hardwood and decorative plywood from China. The department has found that certain Chinese plywood producers and exporters are receiving financial assistance, known as subsidies, from the Chinese government. This final decision means that the products are entering the U.S. market at unfair prices. The investigation focused on plywood from the People’s Republic of China. The time period examined was January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department has concluded that these products are being sold in the U.S. at a lower price than fair value due to the subsidies. The Department of Commerce’s decision was announced on July 21, 2026. This decision is important because it helps protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. The decision means that these imports will now face extra taxes, called countervailing duties, to level the playing field for U.S. companies. The duty rates connected to this case were largely based on the failure of two primary Chinese companies to cooperate with the investigation. The companies involved include Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd, and Xuzhou Shelter Import & Export Co., Ltd. These duties also apply to other Chinese companies not specifically investigated. Furthermore, the Commerce Department has established a point of critical circumstances. This refers to the surge in plywood imports from China that are viewed as unfair. Products being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices can harm American companies and workers. By applying countervailing duties, the U.S. government aims to support fair competition. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) now needs to confirm if the imports have indeed caused harm. If the ITC agrees with the Commerce Department, further measures will be imposed on these imports to protect U.S. businesses and workers. If not, the duties will not be applied. In conclusion, this decision emphasizes the importance of fair trade and protecting local industries from unfair international practices. The situation will be closely monitored as the ITC makes its determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Plywood from Indonesia Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination in its investigation of hardwood and decorative plywood from Indonesia. The Department found that this plywood is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The investigation period spans from April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Commerce’s determination means that plywood exporters from Indonesia are selling their products in the U.S. at prices lower than what is considered fair market value. This determination is part of the Department’s efforts to enforce trade laws and ensure fair competition. The Commerce Department investigated several Indonesian companies. It found that two of these companies, PT Sengon Indah Mas and PT Java Wood Industri, had significant dumping margins. PT Wijaya Cahaya Timber TBK and PT Wijaya Triutama Plywood Industri were found to have lower margins, but they were still selling below market value. Another company, PT. Mustika Buana Sejahtera, was found to have the highest dumping margin, which was based on adverse facts available. The Department also verified the sales and cost information provided by the investigated companies. This was done through standard verification procedures, such as examining accounting records and original documents. The outcomes led to some adjustments in the preliminary findings to reach the final figures. As a result of this determination, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend liquidation of entries of the subject merchandise. This means that importers must post a cash deposit equal to the estimated dumping margins. These cash deposit requirements are necessary to maintain fair market conditions. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will now review the final determination to decide if U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. The ITC has 45 days to make its decision. If the ITC confirms injury, an antidumping duty order will be issued, which will enforce duties on imports of Indonesian plywood to prevent further harm to U.S. industries. The Commerce Department follows detailed procedures and relies on facts when making these determinations. This helps to uphold fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. Overall, the decision highlights the importance of enforcing trade laws to ensure that all participants in the market operate within set rules. The focus remains on maintaining a level playing field for all industries involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Vietnamese Plywood Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has officially determined that Vietnam has been providing illegal subsidies to producers and exporters of hardwood and decorative plywood. This results from a thorough investigation by the department. The investigation covered a period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Findings The Department of Commerce found that Vietnamese plywood producers received unfair benefits through subsidies. This action goes against fair trade rules and negatively affects U.S. producers. The period of investigation began after the publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register on January 22, 2026. Companies Affected Two Vietnamese companies, Junma Phu Tho Co., Ltd and Trieu Thai Son Co., Ltd, were primarily investigated. Junma received a countervailing duty rate of 165.39%. This rate was determined using adverse facts due to incomplete verification. Meanwhile, Trieu Thai was given a rate of 47.68%. All other Vietnamese producers or exporters of plywood received the same rate as Trieu Thai. Critical Circumstances Critical circumstances were found to exist for Junma’s products. This means the Department of Commerce believes that massive imports of subsidized products occurred, causing further harm to U.S. industries. The department has directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries from Junma, with measures retroactively applying from a defined date. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now review the case. They will determine if imported plywood harms or threatens the U.S. plywood industry. If the ITC finds evidence of harm, the Department of Commerce will issue a final order. This will require importing companies to pay duties according to the determined rates. Public Access and Notifications The Department of Commerce has ensured public access to all non-sensitive information. They have put in place standard procedures to disclose their calculations to interested parties. Additionally, parties involved must comply with legal requirements regarding sensitive information disclosed during this investigation. This investigation and its results are significant because they aim to create fair trade conditions and protect U.S. industries from harmful foreign practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Vietnam’s Plywood Exports to the U.S. Found at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Investigation Background The period of investigation covered was from October 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Commerce had initially made a preliminary determination on March 2, 2026. The final decision was announced on July 21, 2026. Key Findings The investigation found that certain Vietnamese companies were selling plywood at prices lower than fair market value. This is often referred to as “dumping.” As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 90.12% for these products. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covered hardwood and decorative plywood products from Vietnam. These products must include at least one layer of hardwood, softwood, or bamboo veneer. Various exclusions were noted, such as plywood used for structural purposes. Verification of Data The U.S. Department of Commerce conducted a verification of the sales and production information provided by the involved Vietnamese companies. It involved reviewing sales documents and accounting records. Separate Rates and Entity Findings A total of 52 Vietnamese companies were found eligible for a separate rate in this investigation. The Vietnam-wide entity also received a dumping margin rate similar to some individual companies. Final Rulings The International Trade Commission is tasked with determining if these imports harm U.S. producers. If found harmful, antidumping duties will be imposed, requiring importers to pay cash deposits equivalent to the determined dumping margin. If no harm is found, the matter will be closed. Conclusion The decision reflects ongoing scrutiny by U.S. authorities over international trade practices. The ruling aims to ensure fair competition and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Dillinger France S.A. Avoids Antidumping Duties in U.S. Review Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued preliminary results for its review of Dillinger France S.A., a producer of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plates from France. The review covers the period of May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. According to these preliminary findings, Dillinger France S.A. did not sell the steel plates in the U.S. at prices below normal value, meaning no antidumping duties will be imposed. The review was part of an ongoing process that assesses whether foreign companies sell products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This is known as “dumping.” The review process is essential to ensure fair competition in the U.S. market. Background and Process The review began on June 25, 2025, after entering a request for it, and it covers one main exporter, Dillinger France S.A. The Commerce Department uses several calculations to determine if dumping occurred, comparing the export price to the normal value of the product. During the review, the ongoing U.S. government shutdown caused deadlines to be postponed. This was because Commerce needed time to manage electronically filed documents and the backlog they created. Results and Next Steps The Commerce Department found that Dillinger France S.A. did not sell its steel plates at less than normal value. As a result, the preliminary margins were determined to be zero percent. This decision means Dillinger France S.A. will not face any additional duties on its steel plates imported into the United States during the review period. Interested parties can submit comments on this preliminary review. They have 21 days from the notice date to send case briefs, followed by five days for rebuttal briefs. If any party requests a hearing, it must be submitted within 30 days of the publication date. However, the oral presentations in the hearing will be limited to the issues already mentioned in the written briefs. Future Implications The findings will influence cash deposit requirements for future imports. A final review will determine cash deposit rates and could impact other companies if further investigations occur. The Commerce Department is expected to publish the final results of the review later this year, which will provide more insights and confirm whether any adjustments need to be made to cash deposit rates and assessment rates. This review represents an ongoing effort by the U.S. to ensure fair pricing and competitive practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Determines Antidumping on Tires from Thailand Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Commerce Determines Antidumping on Tires from Thailand The U.S. Department of Commerce has shared the final results of its review of anti-dumping duties on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from Thailand. This review covered the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Key Findings Sentury Tire (Thailand) Co., Ltd. sold tires in the United States at prices that were less than normal value. In contrast, Sumitomo Rubber (Thailand) Co., Ltd. did not sell at prices below the normal value. This means Sentury will face antidumping duties due to their pricing. Antidumping Duty Rates The duty rates set by the Commerce Department are 2.90% for Sentury Tire. Sumitomo Rubber will not face duties as their margin was zero. Other companies not selected for individual review will also have a rate of 2.90%. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements For the entries made during the review period, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be assessing antidumping duties. If a company didn’t know their products were destined for the U.S., these products will be charged at a rate of 17.06%, which is the all-others rate. For future shipments, the cash deposit rates are as follows: 2.90% for Sentury Tire. 0% for Sumitomo Rubber, given their zero-margin rate. 2.90% for companies not individually examined. 17.06% for those not covered before. The new cash deposit rates apply to any shipments made on or after July 20, 2026. These rates will remain in effect until further notice from the Commerce Department. Next Steps The Department of Commerce has also reminded importers about their duties. They must submit a certificate concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties for entries during the period of review. The failure to file could lead to presumption of reimbursement and additional duties. Companies have been advised to follow these new guidelines to avoid legal complications or excess duties as they continue to engage in international trade of tires. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Aluminum Sheets from Oman Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary findings in an important trade review. This involves the import of common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. The agency discovered that these aluminum sheets were sold at prices lower than usual market rates. This is often referred to as “dumping.” The time period reviewed was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Key Findings The sole company under review is Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC). The U.S. Department of Commerce found that OARC had a dumping margin of 2.23%. A dumping margin is the amount by which the normal market price exceeds the selling price. Background This review is part of an antidumping duty order issued by the U.S. against several countries, including Oman. Such orders are meant to protect domestic industries from foreign companies that sell goods at unfairly low prices. This can harm local businesses. The process started on May 20, 2025, when the Department began the review following requests from interested parties. Due to a government shutdown, deadlines were pushed back, with a final preliminary result date of July 7, 2026. Methodology The review was carried out following certain U.S. trade laws. An export price was calculated, which refers to the price at which the goods were sold to U.S. buyers. The normal value represents the typical market price if the goods were sold in Oman. Next Steps Stakeholders can comment on these preliminary results. They have until 21 days after the announcement to submit their views. They can also request a hearing within 30 days if they want to discuss their issues. Final Decisions The Commerce Department will use the findings to instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess duties for these imports. If the final results also show dumping, duties will be applied. These include detailed calculations to ensure fair assessments. The review aims to establish cash deposit rates based on the final dumping margins. Adjustments could mean duties for OARC and other involved parties. Public Engagement The Department invites public feedback to aid in concluding this review. This will help to ensure fair trading practices and address any potential issues raised by stakeholders. The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to promoting fair trade and protecting domestic industries through thorough and detailed reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheets from Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently shared preliminary findings regarding the review of antidumping duties on aluminum sheets imported from Bahrain. The review focused on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation zeroed in on a specific company, Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO), a major exporter of aluminum sheets to the United States. Commerce found that GARMCO has been selling its aluminum sheets at prices lower than the normal value, which means they are priced below what is expected or fair. This is known as “dumping.” The purpose of providing such dumping assessments is to protect U.S. industries from unfair and underpriced competition from foreign entities. Due to this determination, an antidumping margin, or extra duty, is set. For GARMCO, a weighted-average dumping margin of 6.25 percent is proposed. This percentage represents the level of unfair pricing detected by the Department of Commerce. The Commerce Department reached this finding through a series of extended reviews. Initially, there were delays because of government shutdowns and backlogs, which pushed the deadlines back multiple times. But by July 7, 2026, Commerce was ready to release its preliminary results. Now, the review will go through further processing. Interested parties can comment on these preliminary results. Commerce invites written comments often called case briefs, within 21 days of this announcement’s publication. They allow rebuttal briefs within five days after that, specifically to address concerns raised in the case briefs. Commerce plans to disclose its calculations and analysis supporting these preliminary results. To ensure transparency, they will provide the information within ten days to public stakeholders. The public has 30 days to request a hearing about these preliminary findings. If requested, hearings will be scheduled, allowing for oral presentations on issues raised in the written comments. Final results are expected within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Depending on the final outcome, the antidumping duties for imports from GARMCO may be adjusted accordingly. Meanwhile, cash deposit requirements based on these margins are set to be effective upon the final results’ publication. The proposed margin of 6.25 percent could increase import costs once enforced. The Department of Commerce enforces these duties to ensure fair competition. They protect U.S. industries from potential harm due to unfair trade practices. For now, the preliminary results highlight necessary steps to correct such practices. This protection aims to create a level playing field for U.S. aluminum sheet producers to compete against imports priced lower than what is deemed fair. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies Given to Aluminum Producers in Bahrain Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that producers in Bahrain received subsidies for producing aluminum sheets. This was announced on July 13, 2026. The review focused on the time from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The review is part of a regular check under the countervailing duty order on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. Gulf Aluminum Rolling Mill, often called GARMCO, was the main company checked in this review. The Commerce Department used special rules to decide if subsidies were provided. If a government helps a company financially, and this help benefits the company, it might be a subsidy. The review found that GARMCO received a subsidy rate of 18.97%. These findings mean that the U.S. might charge extra fees, or duties, on aluminum sheets from Bahrain when they are sent to the U.S. This will be decided after the final review results. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They can submit their comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce within 21 days of this announcement. Once the review is complete, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will use the results to decide the duties on aluminum sheets from Bahrain. The U.S. Department of Commerce plans to complete the final review in about 120 days. At that point, they will share their final decision, considering all the feedback and findings. These processes ensure that international trade rules are followed and that U.S. industries are not hurt by unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Aluminum Sheet Imports from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has revealed preliminary findings in its recent administrative review concerning antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet imports from the Republic of Türkiye. The review, which focuses on the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, has found that some producers/exporters sold aluminum sheets in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Background and Details: The antidumping duty order on aluminum sheets from Türkiye was first announced in April 2021. This current review began following an opportunity notice published on April 1, 2025, which allowed interested parties to request an administrative review of the order. Subsequently, the Department of Commerce initiated the review for five producers/exporters from Türkiye. Due to a lapse in government appropriations and subsequent backlog in document processing, there were several extensions to the review deadline. The current deadline for preliminary results was set to July 7, 2026. The review focused on two key companies: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. The Department preliminarily determined that Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. had a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.45 percent. Conversely, Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a margin of 0.00 percent, indicating no dumping within the reviewed period. Additionally, ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., a non-examined company, was preliminarily assigned Teknik’s calculated rate of 26.45 percent. Public Involvement: The Department invites public comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties have a specific time frame to submit their written comments and may file rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised in the initial briefs. Furthermore, parties can request a hearing to discuss their concerns in consideration of the final review results. Future Steps and Impact: The final results of this administrative review are anticipated to be published within 120 days after the notice, impacting future cash deposit requirements for aluminum sheet imports from Türkiye. The Department of Commerce’s findings will guide the assessment of antidumping duties on the subject merchandise entries and dictate the direction for future deposits of estimated duties. This step underscores the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Department of Commerce to enforce trade laws and ensure fair competition by addressing and mitigating the effects of unfair pricing practices in the U.S. trading system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of an administrative review regarding countervailing duties on common alloy aluminum sheet from the Republic of Türkiye. This review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests from interested parties. The Department of Commerce selected key companies for examination: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. These companies were chosen due to their significant participation in exporting aluminum sheets to the United States. Findings The Department of Commerce has initially found that producers and exporters from Türkiye benefited from countervailable subsidies. This means that these companies received financial assistance from their government, which is not allowed under U.S. trade law as it may harm American businesses. Methodology The review checks if there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial help from the government, that benefits companies in a way that is unfair to United States businesses. The review follows guidelines to ensure fairness as set in the Tariff Act of 1930. Subsidy Rates The preliminary results show specific subsidy rates for the reviewed companies. Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. received a subsidy rate of 2.64 percent. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. got a rate of 2.47 percent. Other companies not directly examined but involved in the review, namely ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and P.M.S. Metal Profil Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., each received a 2.56 percent rate. Upcoming Steps Interested parties are now invited to comment on these preliminary results. There is a process for submitting briefs and requesting a hearing, and the Department of Commerce will continue to verify the information before making the final ruling. Conclusion This review is significant as it affects the duties charged on aluminum sheets from Türkiye, impacting prices for industries using aluminum in the U.S. The final results will determine future trade practices. Further Information For those who want more details, the full preliminary decision memorandum can be accessed online. Interested parties can also follow updates on the review process as deadlines approach for further comments and final results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results of Duty Review on Steel Threaded Rod from India Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings from its review of subsidies provided to producers and exporters of carbon and alloy steel threaded rod from India. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some subsidies are countervailable, meaning they unjustly help manufacturers by providing government financial assistance. Review Details The preliminary review was initiated following requests from interested parties in 2025. The review aims to ensure fair trade practices by evaluating if producers in India received unfair subsidies. Companies Involved The review initially included several companies, such as Nishant Steel Industries and Kanika Fasteners Pvt Ltd. Later, companies like Bee Dee Cycle Industries, Maharaja International, and R K Fasteners withdrew their requests for review. Consequently, the Department of Commerce rescinded its review of these companies, meaning it will not continue examining them. Methodology The Commerce Department uses specific criteria to assess subsidies. They check for financial assistance from authorities, benefits to recipients, and specificity of the subsidy. Subsidies are considered unfair if they meet these criteria. Preliminary Findings The Department preliminarily found that producers, like Nishant Steel Industries, received subsidies totaling a 2.54 percent rate of advantage. This rate determines the countervailing duties (extra taxes) imposed on the products to offset the unfair subsidy. Next Steps Parties may submit comments on these preliminary results until the final review decision, expected within 120 days of the notice. Interested parties can submit written comments or request a hearing to discuss the findings. Final decisions will guide future assessments of duties on these imports to the U.S. Instructions to Customs The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on assessing duties for companies under review. For companies withdrawn from review, customs duties remain at prior rates. Conclusion The preliminary review indicates that some subsidies provided to steel threaded rod producers in India are countervailable. The final review will include comments and further analysis before making a conclusive determination. This process ensures trade practices remain fair and competitive. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review regarding certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. The purpose of the review was to determine if these products were sold in the U.S. at prices below their normal value, which would violate antidumping policies. According to the Department of Commerce, it found that the steel products from Korea were not sold below normal value during this review period. This outcome means that for the companies Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO, including POSCO International Corporation, the weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. This indicates that these companies were not selling their products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. For three other companies—Ameri-Source Korea, Hanawell Co Ltd, and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd—the review assigned a dumping margin of 2.28 percent. This percentage is based on the most recent above-de minimis rate from the last review period. The Department also set forth assessment rates. For Hyundai and POSCO, no antidumping duties will be assessed because their products were not found to be sold at dumping margins. The department has made clear instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, explaining how to handle entries of the merchandise in question. Cash deposit requirements for future shipments have also been detailed. These stipulations include a zero deposit rate for the companies reviewed. If a company was previously found to be dumping, the cash deposit will continue as per the last determined rate. For new companies entering the market, the deposit will match the existing rate for other similar producers, which is currently set at 20.33 percent. This notice from the Department of Commerce is a reminder for importers to comply with regulations, such as filing a certificate to confirm they haven’t received reimbursements for antidumping duties. Finally, this update serves as a reminder to parties involved of their responsibilities concerning the handling of proprietary information under established protective orders. Failure to adhere to these rules can lead to violations and sanctions. The Department published this notice on the Federal Register on July 13, 2026. This information is part of the ongoing enforcement of trade laws to ensure fair competition within the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Review Results for Korean Steel Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review concerning certain corrosion-resistant steel products from the Republic of Korea. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review found that producers and exporters of these steel products from Korea received countervailable subsidies. Countervailing duties are tariffs levied on imported goods to offset subsidies provided to producers or exporters in the exporting country. These measures ensure a level playing field for U.S. industries competing with foreign manufacturers. The Department of Commerce conducted this review in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies that were reviewed include Hyundai Steel Company and KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. For Hyundai Steel Company, which includes its cross-owned companies like Hyundai Green Power and Hyundai ITC, the subsidy rate determined was 1.28 percent. For KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., also known as KG Steel Corporation, the subsidy rate was determined to be 5.34 percent. There are also several other companies that were part of the review but not selected as mandatory respondents. These include POSCO, POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd., POSCO International, POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd., SeAH Coated Metal, and SeAH Steel Corporation. Each of these companies received a subsidy rate of 2.88 percent. The Department intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits of these estimated countervailing duties on imports that are withdrawn from warehouses for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The findings are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is referenced in the Federal Register notice. Various aspects of the review, including methodology and assessment, are discussed thoroughly in the document. This review is part of ongoing monitoring by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trading practices and to counteract any subsidies that may harm U.S. industries. These final results are part of a broader effort to uphold international trade laws and regulations. The new cash deposit requirements will apply until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Korean Tire Companies Sold Tires Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that two leading Korean tire manufacturers, Hankook Tire & Technology Co. Ltd. and Nexen Tire Corporation, sold passenger vehicle and light truck tires in the United States at prices less than their normal value. This finding is a result of their administrative review of antidumping duties for the period from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. The Department of Commerce is responsible for enforcing laws aimed at protecting U.S. businesses from unfair pricing practices. In this case, they found that the prices of the tires from Hankook and Nexen were lower than what would be considered fair. In their review, the Department calculated dumping margins for these companies. A dumping margin is the difference between the fair price of a product and the price it is being sold for in the U.S. Hankook was found to have a dumping margin of 13.03 percent. Nexen’s dumping margin was determined to be 8.02 percent. Another company, Kumho Tire Co., Inc., was assigned a rate of 10.53 percent. The final results of this review mean that these companies may have to pay additional duties to make up for the unfair pricing. Duties are extra fees that are applied to the products to raise their prices to a fair level. These results will also affect the future cash deposits required for these companies’ imports. Cash deposits are payments made upfront to ensure that the correct amount of duty will be collected when the product enters the U.S. The Department of Commerce ensures that their findings and actions are transparent. Interested parties can view all the documents and calculations used in this review on their public access system. In conclusion, this review is part of ongoing efforts by the U.S. government to maintain fair trade practices and protect domestic businesses from unfair competition through pricing below what is deemed normal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Review of Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings from an administrative review regarding antidumping duties on certain activated carbon imported from China. The period under review is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. This review evaluates whether certain Chinese companies sold activated carbon in the United States at less than the normal value, which could harm domestic producers. Key Companies Involved The review specifically examined two major companies: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (DJAC) and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. (Ningxia Huahui). The Department of Commerce has initially determined that both companies sold activated carbon in the United States at prices below the normal value. An important part of the review also concerned Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (BPACP). The review for BPACP has been rescinded because there were no entries of subject merchandise from this company during the period. Timeline and Procedures The review process started on May 20, 2025, due to timely requests as per the rules outlined in 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Originally, the review was set to be completed earlier, but delays were encountered due to a lapse in government operations, leading to multiple extensions. Scope of the Review The review considers all activated carbon exported from China that is covered by the antidumping duty order that originated on April 27, 2007. This ensures that any goods exported in violation of trade agreements are identified and duties are adjusted as necessary. Preliminary Results The preliminary findings have determined dumping margins, which are additional duties imposed on imported goods that are sold below fair market value, at 0.83 USD per KG for DJAC and 0.86 USD per KG for Ningxia Huahui. For other companies not individually examined but which qualify for a separate rate, a rate of 0.84 USD per KG applies. Review of the China-Wide Entity The review also involves the China-wide entity, which refers to any companies not specifically requested or self-initiated for review. In this case, the China-wide entity’s duty rate remains at 2.42 USD per KG, established in previous reviews and not subject to change in this cycle. Next Steps and Comment Period Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments and case briefs on these preliminary findings. These will be accepted until 21 days after the publication of this notice. A hearing may be requested within 30 days of the publication date, where parties can present their views on the issues raised. Final Note In conclusion, the preliminary findings highlight the importance of ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the domestic activated carbon industry. The review and its outcomes will help guide future assessments and duties imposed on imported activated carbon from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for PET Film from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of countervailing duties for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covers subsidies given to producers and exporters from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Findings The review found that subsidies were provided to manufacturers in India. These subsidies helped companies produce more PET film at a lower cost. Two companies were specifically mentioned in the review: Cosmo First Limited and JPFL Films Private Ltd. Cosmo First Limited received a subsidy rate of 10.07 percent, while JPFL Films Private Ltd. received a much higher rate of 135.38 percent. Review Process The review began with preliminary results published on January 8, 2026. Companies involved were allowed to submit comments. The final results were scheduled for release by July 7, 2026, after a 60-day extension. The document outlining the results used a method called adverse facts available. This method is used when companies do not provide enough information. What Happens Next The Department of Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how to collect duties on the imported PET film from these companies. These instructions should come within 35 days after the results are published in the Federal Register. If a legal action is filed within 90 days, Customs will wait to collect the duties until the case is resolved. Future Implications The findings affect how much importers will pay in customs duties when bringing PET film into the United States. The review will help ensure fair trade by making sure Indian exporters do not receive unfair government help. Contact Information For more details, Dusten Hom and Suresh Maniam from the U.S. Department of Commerce are available for contact. Interested parties can reach them by phone at (202) 482-5075 or (202) 482-0176. Final Note This decision demonstrates the steps the U.S. Department of Commerce takes to maintain fair business practices between countries. The duties ensure that the playing field remains level for companies competing in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has conducted a review of wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. This review covered the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Commerce Department found that Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. sold these products at prices less than normal value during this time. Review Background In May 2025, the Commerce Department started this review based on requests they received. They initially chose two companies to focus on: KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export Co., Ltd. However, both companies later withdrew. As a result, the department added Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd., and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. as the new focus companies. Ancientree also withdrew from this review shortly after. The Commerce Department extended deadlines for issuing their preliminary results on several occasions due to a government shutdown and other challenges. Results and Decisions The review found Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. to have sold wooden cabinets at a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.48 percent. Three other companies—Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd., Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd.—also got the same rate as they qualified for a separate rate in this review. The department has rescinded reviews for 42 different companies. Some of these companies had their review requests withdrawn, while others had no entries of subject merchandise. China-Wide Entity For some companies that did not participate or didn’t respond to requests, the Commerce Department considers them part of the China-wide entity. Those companies are subject to a higher rate of 251.64 percent, as they were not independently reviewed. Final Steps Interested parties have 21 days to submit written comments or concerns. These parties can also request a public hearing to discuss the issues further. The final results of this review will influence future imports and duties. This review by the Department of Commerce is a part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade and competition in the market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from China by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 3–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings regarding countervailing duties on wooden cabinets and vanities imported from China. These findings are part of an administrative review conducted by the International Trade Administration. The review covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The department has determined that some producers and exporters from China received countervailable subsidies. Background The administrative review was initiated on May 20, 2025, following requests for a review of the countervailing duty order on these products. Companies reviewed include KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd, among others. The department faced delays due to a government shutdown and backlogs, extending the deadline for the preliminary results multiple times, leading up to the current report with a deadline of July 7, 2026. Scope of the Order This order focuses on wooden cabinets and vanities and includes any components thereof that are produced in China. The department evaluates whether subsidies were granted in ways that harm U.S. industry. Partial Rescission Some companies will no longer be part of this review. Commerce has decided to rescind its review for 28 companies. This is because some withdrew their requests, and for others, no reviewable entries were found during the period of review. Methodology The review process involves checking whether financial contributions providing benefits to these companies qualify as specific countervailable subsidies. This includes the use of adverse inferences where necessary, especially when companies fail to cooperate. For companies like KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd., adverse inferences were applied due to non-cooperation. Preliminary Results The preliminary subsidy rates for companies involved in this review have been released. These rates help us understand the level of subsidies that companies received, which might help in gaining unfair market advantage. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 5.48%. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. and Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. both received a subsidy rate of 113.08%. The review also determines that non-selected companies will, in general, have rates calculated as a weighted average or based on other reasonable methods. Public Comment and Final Results The Department of Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. There will be a period for public comment. Case briefs or written responses must be submitted by a specific deadline. A hearing may be requested for oral presentations. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is conducting a detailed review of subsidy practices related to wooden cabinet imports from China. This review aims to ensure fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair competition. The findings will remain open for comment until finalized, with further analysis determining final subsidy rates expected to be released after the comment period. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Aluminum Foil from China Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings on aluminum foil imports from China. The announcement came on July 13, 2026. The department found that some exporters from China sold aluminum foil at prices less than the normal value. The period of review was from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The review was part of the antidumping duty measures to protect U.S. industries. Commerce selected Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co. and other related companies as key respondents. These companies are referred to as Dingsheng. There were delays in the review process due to a government shutdown. Because of this, the department postponed deadlines in November 2025. The preliminary results were eventually extended to July 7, 2026. The merchandise under review is aluminum foil from China. The department used special rules because China is considered a non-market economy. Commerce also found that another company, Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Co., is eligible for a separate rate. This means they will not follow the same rate as the general “China-wide” category. The China-wide rate, costing 105.80%, remains unchanged. This is because no one requested a review of this rate. According to the results, Dingsheng had a weighted-average dumping margin of 61.85%. This percentage shows how much less than the normal value the aluminum foil was sold for. Interested parties can comment on these results. They have 21 days from this notice’s date to submit comments. If they wish to have a hearing, they must request it within 30 days. When it comes to cash deposits, new rules will apply once final results are out. The deposits will help future entries comply with U.S. regulations. This finding is a preliminary step in ensuring fair trade practices. The final results will guide how duties are collected and may impact future imports from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Examines Steel Threaded Rod Imports from India Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce is looking into whether some steel threaded rods from India are being sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. These rods are important materials for construction and manufacturing. This study covers the period from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation helps ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. Background In May 2025, an official review began to check if companies from India are selling steel threaded rods at unfair prices. The review includes 20 companies, with a special focus on two companies: Nishant Steel Industries and Shree Luxmi Fasteners. This study follows rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. Current Findings Preliminary results suggest that some Indian companies might be selling products at prices that are lower than those in India. This can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department is also stopping a review for four companies. Three companies do not have any entries during the review time, and one company withdrew its request to be reviewed. Detailed Processes During the government’s shutdown in late 2025, many deadlines were affected. This caused delays in reviewing and processing documents. The Department used tolling, which is a method to extend deadlines to accommodate delays. Despite these challenges, the investigation is ongoing. Next Steps The Department plans to continue reviewing and finalizing results by July 7, 2026. The American legal rules say that companies must not sell below the normal value to protect fair trade. Request for Public Comment The Department invites anyone who is interested to share their thoughts about these preliminary findings. This can ensure that all views are considered before making any final decisions. What This Means If companies are found guilty of unfair pricing, they might have to pay extra duties. These duties help balance out the unfair prices and protect local businesses. The investigation looks into whether any U.S. business was unfairly affected by these priced imports. Conclusion This review helps maintain fair trade between the United States and India. The Department of Commerce will continue working closely with other government agencies to ensure that international trade rules are followed. This ensures that U.S. industries have a fair chance to compete with foreign imports. The final results will be published later this year. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.