U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results in PVLT Tires Countervailing Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the administrative review for countervailing duties on certain passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires from China. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce. The Department found that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of PVLT tires from China during the review period. No comments were received from interested parties on the preliminary results, so the Department adopted the preliminary results as final. No changes have been made, and therefore, no decision memorandum was issued with this final notice. Scope of the Order The order covers passenger vehicle and light truck tires imported from China. For a full description of the products involved, reference is made to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum associated with this review. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the period under review: Company Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., Ltd. 125.50 Disclosure Normally, Commerce releases its calculation methods to interested parties. In this case, because there were no changes from the preliminary results, there are no new calculations to disclose. Assessment Rates According to U.S. law, Commerce will have Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assess countervailing duties at the rates listed above. This will apply to all proper entries of the subject merchandise. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results. If a summons is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will not liquidate the relevant entries until the period to file for a statutory injunction expires, which is within 90 days of publication. Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the rates shown above for shipments entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The cash deposit instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order (APO) The notice reminds parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to follow procedures for the return or destruction of proprietary information. Failure to comply with APO rules can result in sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties The Commerce Department published these results in accordance with applicable sections of U.S. trade law. The notice was dated July 7, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review on Steel Racks from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On July 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its administrative review of antidumping duties for certain steel racks and parts from China. This review covers the period from September 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. Background and Review Process The Department of Commerce began this review on October 10, 2024. Interested parties were invited to comment. The deadline for the review was extended several times, with the final results issued on July 3, 2025. The review follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Steel racks and parts are under the scope of this order, as detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Key Results The Department found that some Chinese exporters sold steel racks in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., along with Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. and Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., received a final weighted-average dumping margin of 11.18 percent. Jiangsu Starshine Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. did not get a separate rate and was treated as part of the China-wide entity. The China-wide entity’s dumping margin remains at 144.50 percent and was not reviewed or changed. Differential Pricing Analysis The Commerce Department made changes in its analysis methods for these results. This is based on recent court decisions about statistical tests used to find dumping. The agency used a revised method for analyzing differential pricing, as explained in its memorandum. The method for calculating dumping margins did not change from the preliminary results. Separate Rates Jiangsu Nova received separate rate status. Jiangsu Starshine did not and is included in the China-wide group. This decision is unchanged from the preliminary results. No parties commented on this decision. Assessment Rates Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how much antidumping duty to assess on these products. These instructions will be given no earlier than 35 days after publication of these results. For Jiangsu Nova, assessment rates are based on the total amount of dumping over the value of goods sold to each importer. If the rate for an importer is zero or very small, duties will not be collected. If Jiangsu Nova did not report a sale for certain shipments, those entries will be assessed at the China-wide rate of 144.50 percent. For Starshine, the assessment rate is 144.50 percent, the China-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements Jiangsu Nova: 11.18 percent. Exporters with separate rates not reviewed: their current rate. Other China exporters without a separate rate: 144.50 percent. Non-China exporters without a separate rate: the rate for their China supplier. These rates remain until further notice. Reminders for Importers Importers must file a certificate if antidumping duties have been reimbursed, before liquidation of entries. If not filed, Commerce may assume reimbursement and double the duties. Administrative Protective Order (APO) Parties under APO must return or destroy proprietary information as required. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. Legal Notices These results are issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(5). For more details, the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s website. Contact Information Questions should be directed to Jonathan Hill at (202) 482-3518, U.S. Department of Commerce. Dated: July 3, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Steel Propane Cylinders from China and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on steel propane cylinders from the People’s Republic of China and Thailand. On August 15, 2019, the Department of Commerce first published AD orders on steel propane cylinders from China and Thailand, and a CVD order on steel propane cylinders from China. On July 1, 2024, both Commerce and the ITC began their first five-year “sunset” review of these orders. After reviewing the case, both agencies found that removing these orders would likely lead to new or ongoing dumping, more countervailable subsidies, and harm to the U.S. industry. On July 1, 2025, the ITC confirmed that ending these orders would probably cause continued or new injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably short time. As a result, the orders will remain in place. Scope of the Orders The affected products are steel cylinders used for compressed or liquefied propane or other gases. These cylinders meet certain specifications, like USDOT 4B, 4BA, or 4BW, Transport Canada 4BM, 4BAM, or 4BWM, or United Nations ISO 4706. Steel propane cylinders included range in capacity from 2.5 pounds (about 6 pounds water capacity and 4-6 pounds empty weight) up to 42 pounds (about 100 pounds water capacity and 28-32 pounds empty weight). They can have up to two ports and may come assembled or unassembled. Products such as collars and foot rings for these cylinders are also included. Unfinished or unassembled cylinders (such as unwelded cylinder halves or cylinders missing collars or valves) are covered. Cylinders that fit other standards like ASME or ANSI are included only if they also match the listed USDOT, Transport Canada, or ISO standards. Items that only have extra processing in a third country, such as additional welding, painting, or testing, are still covered by the orders if the processing does not change the basic nature of the propane cylinder. Excluded from the orders are seamless steel propane cylinders, stainless steel cylinders, aluminum cylinders, and composite fiber cylinders. The products mainly fall under Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers 7311.00.0060 and 7311.00.0090, but the written scope matters most. Continuation of Orders With the agencies’ determinations, the Commerce Department has ordered the continuation of the AD and CVD orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting duties (AD and CVD cash deposits) at the rates that are currently in effect for all imports of these products. The effective date for the continuation is July 1, 2025. The next required five-year review is planned before the fifth anniversary of the latest ITC determination. Administrative Protective Order (APO) and Notification This notice reminds all parties of their responsibilities under the APO about returning or destroying confidential information. Timely written notification or conversion of materials is required. Violations of the APO are subject to sanctions. The review and this notice are in line with sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). For More Information Contact Samuel Brummitt at the Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Phone: (202) 482-7851. Date of Issue Dated: July 7, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand On July 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published corrections to earlier antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The corrections address two main issues found in a Federal Register notice from June 24, 2025. Correction for Vietnam Scope Language The first correction adds a missing appendix. This appendix includes full details about the types of solar cells covered in the antidumping order for Vietnam. The original notice only had scope details for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Now, the order on Vietnam has unique language that lists the excluded products and special requirements for imports. Correction for Malaysia Exclusion The second correction adds language related to Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. This company received a zero percent dumping margin. Because of this, shipments from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. are excluded from the antidumping duty order on Malaysia. The exclusion only applies if the company is both the producer and exporter. If the product is shipped by another company, or Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. ships for another exporter, the exclusion does not apply. Updated Table for Malaysia A footnote was added to the table of dumping margins. It notes that Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. is excluded from the antidumping order because it received a zero dumping margin. Scope of Orders: Product Details The orders cover crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells that are 20 micrometers thick or more. These include modules, laminates, and panels whether or not they are assembled into other products. The orders cover products imported as parts if they meet the required definitions. Exclusions from Scope Thin film photovoltaic products made from materials like amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Certain small photovoltaic cells built into consumer products not made for power generation. Small panels with specified voltage, watt, and size limits. Certain off-grid panels, both with and without glass covers, that have unique wiring and packaging characteristics. Off-grid panels made for use in automation or greenhouse systems. Each order for Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam lists all technical product specifications. These include details about size, power output, materials, connectors, and packaging. Commodities Classification The products are listed under various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes, mainly 8541.42.0010 and 8541.43.0010. Specific codes are also listed for possible imports. Legal Notice The correction is published according to sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and in line with 19 CFR 351.205(c). The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Contact Information Vietnam: Deborah Cohen, (202) 482-4521 Cambodia: Hermes Panilla, (202) 482-3477 Thailand: Stephen Bailey, (202) 482-0193 Malaysia: Patrick Barton, (202) 482-0012 These corrections clarify the products covered and not covered by the antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes About the Correction The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued an official correction to its June 24, 2025, Federal Register notice for antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Commerce published a notice on June 24, 2025, about amended final antidumping duty determinations and orders on solar cells from these countries. The correction makes two key changes related to Vietnam and Malaysia. Vietnam Scope Correction The original notice included only one appendix describing the products covered, but two appendices were needed. The corrected notice makes clear there are two appendices, one for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand, and a separate one for Vietnam. Each appendix explains the specific scope of the products under order for those countries. Malaysia Exclusion Correction Commerce also added language about a company named Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. The new information states that solar products made and exported by this company are not covered by the antidumping order on Malaysia. Any products from different combinations of producers or exporters, or by third parties using goods from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., are not excluded. Detailed Product Descriptions Appendix I – Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand Covers crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules, including those partly or fully assembled into other products. Includes cells at least 20 micrometers thick with a p/n junction. Merchandise can be described as parts for finished products, like building-integrated modules. Excludes thin film photovoltaic products made from amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Excludes small crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells not exceeding 10,000 mm² in surface area if permanently integrated into consumer goods with different uses. Excludes various small off-grid solar panels, portable panels, and panels with special shapes, covers, or connections, as described in the appendix. Excludes products already covered by orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. Lists various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes under which the merchandise may enter the U.S. Appendix II – Vietnam Covers the same general types of products as the other countries, but with some differences in the exclusion language. Excludes thin film products, small, integrated cells in consumer goods, and many small off-grid panels. Excludes products used in off-grid greenhouse shade tracking systems with detailed technical criteria. Excludes products already covered by orders on Chinese crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. Lists the same group of HTSUS codes. Table of Malaysia Dumping Margins Lists companies and their dumping margins. Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. has a 0.00% margin and is excluded. Other companies have margins ranging from 8.59% to 81.24%. What This Means The notice clarifies which solar products from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand are covered by these U.S. antidumping duty orders. It also details which products and companies are excluded. The corrections ensure all parties know which specific products are subject to duties. The document was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For more details or questions, interested parties are directed to contact the Commerce officials listed in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets and Vanities Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final results in the first sunset review on the antidumping duty order for wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department of Commerce states that ending the antidumping duty order would likely lead to more dumping of these products from China into the United States. The antidumping duty order was first published on April 21, 2020. It covers wooden cabinets, vanities, and their components made in China. The first sunset review started on March 3, 2025. The review checks if the order should stay or end, as required under the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC, are the parties in the United States who took part in this review. Both groups proved they are part of the U.S. industry involved. No companies or groups from China responded to Commerce during the review. The U.S. Department of Commerce conducted an expedited review because only domestic U.S. parties responded. This process took 120 days. After its review, the Department found that lifting the duties would likely lead to continued dumping. Dumping means selling products in the United States for less than their fair value. The dumping margins, or the amounts by which prices would be less than fair value, could reach up to 262.18 percent. The Department of Commerce’s detailed decisions, including all issues and topics discussed, can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum available to the public online. These results mean that the antidumping duties on wooden cabinets and vanities from China will continue. Parties that have access to confidential information because of the case rules were reminded to return or destroy that information according to Department of Commerce regulations. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, acting for Enforcement and Compliance. The order remains in place as required by U.S. law. The public can find the details and all supporting materials online. This notice was officially published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 126, on July 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Scope in Investigation on Brake Drums From China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction to its final determination about certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China. The correction affects what types of brake drums are included in the investigation of sales at less than fair value (LTFV). The original notice was published on June 18, 2025. It did not update the scope in Appendix I to reflect recent changes. This investigation covers certain brake drums made from gray cast iron. These brake drums can be finished or unfinished. The size is important: they must have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches. Each drum must weigh more than 50 pounds. Unfinished brake drums are those that have had some turning or machining done, but are not ready for installation. The investigation includes brake drums whether imported by themselves or with other goods, such as a hub, assembled or unassembled. If a brake drum is imported as part of an assembly, only the brake drum is covered by the scope. Included in the investigation are brake drums that are finished or unfinished, and then processed further in another country or in the United States. This could include assembly or any process that does not remove the product from the investigation’s scope. Adding non-subject merchandise, in the original country or another country, does not remove the subject brake drum from the investigation. Some items are not included. Merchandise that is already covered by the duty orders on certain chassis and subassemblies from China is not included. Also excluded are composite brake drums that have more than 38 percent steel by weight. The brake drums are identified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The main subheading is 8708.30.5020. They might also be listed under these subheadings when imported as parts of assemblies: 8708.30.5090, 8716.90.5060, 8704.10, 8704.23.01, 8704.32.01, 8704.43.00, 8704.52.00, 8704.60.00, 8708.50.61, 8708.50.6500, 8716.90.5010, 8716.31.00, 8716.39.00, and 8716.40.00. However, the written description of the merchandise is what decides if a product is covered by the investigation. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 30, 2025. The correction is published according to section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Will Keep Countervailing Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a decision on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department finished its first expedited five-year (sunset) review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order. This decision is about wooden cabinets, vanities, and the parts that go with them. Review Process The review began on March 3, 2025. The Commerce Department followed the law in section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC took part as interested parties. They sent their responses by the deadlines set in the rules. No response came from any companies in China or from the Government of China. No one asked for a hearing. Because of the lack of response, the Department of Commerce moved to an expedited review. What Was Reviewed The order covers all wooden cabinets and vanities that are made in China. The detailed scope of the products in the order is found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is public and can be read online at the Department of Commerce website. Final Results The Department determined that ending (revoking) the CVD order would mean countervailable subsidies would likely start again. Subsidies are when the government helps pay to make products cheaper to export. Producers/Exporters Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. 13.33 Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 18.27 Rizhao Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Co. 31.18 Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co., Ltd. 293.45 Deway International Trade Co., Ltd. 293.45 All Others 20.93 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also tells interested parties to follow the rules about handling private information from the case. They must return or destroy sensitive materials on time, or risk penalties. How to Read More Full details of all topics covered, including the background, history, and decision, are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available to the public at https://access.trade.gov. When Does This Start? This decision applies starting July 2, 2025. Who Made the Decision? Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the notice for the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the expedited third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from China. The Department found that ending the antidumping duties would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping margins could be as high as 159.64 percent if the order were removed. Background The original antidumping duty order was published on February 26, 2009. The current review is the third to check if the order should remain. This review follows requirements in the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce started this third sunset review on March 3, 2025. Domestic companies Tokai Carbon GE LLC and GrafTech International Ltd. sent in their notice to participate and filed a substantive response on time. No responses were received from companies in China or other respondent parties. Scope of the Order The antidumping order applies to small diameter graphite electrodes from China. Full details on what is covered are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Review Process Because only domestic interested parties responded, the Department held an expedited, 120-day review. The review looked at whether dumping would likely restart if the order ended and what margins might result. Details are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system. Final Results The Commerce Department determined that removing the antidumping duty order would likely cause dumping to continue or return. The likely dumping margins would be weighted-average margins up to 159.64 percent. Administrative Notes Those subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) should return or destroy all confidential business information as required. Notices for compliance are included. Details Available Results and related documents are available through the Department of Commerce and are filed under Federal Register Document No. 2025-12372. The Issues and Decision Memorandum discusses all major topics, including the likelihood of continued dumping and likely dumping margins. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 27, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Change in Cabinet Import Duties from China Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes On June 12, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final judgment about the countervailing duty investigation into wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This investigation reviewed products made from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The Department of Commerce found that some Chinese exporters received unfair help, or subsidies, from their government. Because of this, extra import taxes, called countervailing duties, were put on these items in 2020. Several companies, including The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. (Meisen), and a U.S. importer called Cabinets to Go, LLC, disagreed with Commerce’s findings. They took the case to court. The main problem was about a program called the Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP). The court wanted proof that the companies did not use this program. Commerce tried to get this information from Ancientree, Meisen, and their customers. Meisen did not give the needed information. Ancientree provided some proof, but not for all customers. After several remand (do-over) decisions, the court told Commerce to calculate new subsidy rates for Ancientree. Commerce was told to only count benefits from the EBCP where they could not prove Ancientree’s customers did not use the support. Commerce recalculated the rates. For Ancientree, the new subsidy rate is 5.06 percent. The new “all others” rate is 18.17 percent. These are changes from the previous rates based on new evidence and the court’s instructions. Ancientree has a different cash deposit rate already set by a later review, so this change will not affect Ancientree’s current cash deposit. Commerce will update cash deposit instructions for other companies using the new “all others” rate. Commerce still cannot liquidate (finalize) the import duties for some entries by Ancientree, Meisen, and other named companies because there are court injunctions in place. These entries will remain on hold while any possible appeals are finished. This notice was published to follow court requirements. The Department of Commerce is following the law and the court’s direction for how to handle these cabinet imports from China. Issued by: Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Date: June 27, 2025 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Amends Preliminary Findings in Countervailing Duty Case on Active Anode Material from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Background On May 28, 2025, the Department of Commerce published a decision saying that there were unfair subsidies for active anode material from China. After this, the American Active Anode Material Producers claimed there was an important ministerial mistake in the calculated subsidy rates for Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of China (together known as Panasonic) and BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic and BTR disagreed and submitted their comments on June 2, 2025. Period of Investigation The investigation covers January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Scope This case focuses on active anode material from China. More details about what is covered can be found in the Preliminary Determination. Analysis of Ministerial Errors A ministerial error is an unintentional mistake like adding incorrectly or copying data wrongly. A significant ministerial error means the mistake changes a company’s countervailing duty rate by five percentage points or more, or moves a rate from “zero” or “de minimis” to above that level. The Department of Commerce agreed that such an error happened when calculating the subsidy rate for Panasonic. Other, smaller errors were also found and corrected. Amended Preliminary Determination After fixing the errors, the Department announced new preliminary net countervailable subsidy rates: Company Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd.; Panasonic 11.58 Corporation of China Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat * 721.03 Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. * 721.03 All Others 11.58 *The rates marked with an asterisk are based on facts with adverse inferences. Panasonic is a trading company. It sold active anode material made by BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd., its affiliates, and other connected companies. The Department of Commerce combined all the subsidy benefits from BTR, its affiliates, and Panasonic into one rate for Panasonic. Cash Deposits and Suspension of Liquidation The cash deposit and suspension of liquidation will now use the new, amended rates. The new, higher rates for Panasonic and all others will start on the date this notice is published in the Federal Register. Notification The U.S. International Trade Commission will be notified of the amended preliminary determination. This official notice was dated June 27, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, who is performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Countervailing Duty Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On 2025-06-24, the U.S. Department of Commerce began investigations into steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam. These are called countervailing duty (CVD) investigations. The investigations will look at whether the governments in these countries gave unfair subsidies to their rebar producers, which could hurt American companies. Background The Rebar Trade Action Coalition, a group of U.S. rebar makers, filed the petitions for these investigations on 2025-06-04. This group said that the governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam were giving unfair help to rebar companies in their countries. The U.S. Department of Commerce also received other petitions asking for antidumping investigations into rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. Who Is Involved The governments named are: Government of Algeria (GOA) Government of Egypt (GOE) Government of Vietnam (GOV) The U.S. companies who support the case are producers of rebar. Investigation Period The period being investigated is from 2024-01-01, through 2024-12-31. What Products Are Included The investigations cover steel rebar used in concrete. Rebar can be straight or in coils. It does not matter how long, wide, or thick it is, or what type of metal it is made from. Rebar that has been further processed (like being cut, painted, or coated) is still covered. “Plain rounds” (smooth, non-bumpy rebar) are not covered. The U.S. government uses Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) numbers to track imports. Most rebar comes in under numbers: 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but other numbers may also be used. Scope Comments Commerce asked for comments about exactly what should be covered in these investigations. Interested parties can submit comments by 2025-07-14. Rebuttal comments are due by 2025-07-24. All comments must be filed electronically. Industry Support The government checked whether enough U.S. producers support the petition. The law says the petitioners must make at least 25% of all U.S. rebar, and more than 50% of rebar made by companies supporting or opposing the petition. The petition met both requirements, so the investigation moves forward. Injury Allegation The U.S. petitioners say rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam is being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices because of government help and is hurting the U.S. rebar industry. They say imports are high, local companies are losing sales, prices are being pushed down, and American companies are doing worse financially. Programs Under Investigation There are 24 programs being looked at in Algeria, 25 in Egypt, and 39 in Vietnam. Each program may involve different types of government support, such as loans or grants. Respondents Commerce plans to select certain companies in each country as “mandatory respondents.” They will likely use U.S. import data to pick which companies to examine most closely. Four companies are identified in Algeria. Thirteen companies are identified in Egypt. Ten companies are identified in Vietnam. Process and Timeline Commerce started the investigations on 2025-06-24. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days from 2025-06-04, if U.S. industry is hurt by these imports. If the ITC finds no injury for a country, the investigation ends for that country. Submissions and Deadlines All filings must be electronic. There are rules for submitting information. If anyone needs more time to file, they must ask before the deadline. All information submitted must be accurate. Notification The governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam have been notified about these actions. Parties interested in these cases must follow special procedures if they want to see confidential information. Next Steps Commerce and the ITC will continue the investigations. If unfair subsidies are found and there is injury to the U.S. industry, extra duties could be placed on rebar from these countries. Appendix—Product Definition The investigations are for steel rebar, in straight form or coils, used in concrete, except for smooth (plain round) bars. The scope is based on the written description, not just the HTSUS numbers. This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 123 on 2025-06-30. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Starts Antidumping Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of antidumping investigations for steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. This action follows petitions filed by the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its member companies. What Are the Investigations About? The investigations are about whether rebar from these four countries is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, known as “dumping.” The petitions say this has caused injury to the U.S. rebar industry. For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt: April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. For Vietnam: October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Product Under Investigation The rebar includes steel concrete reinforcing bar in straight or coil form, regardless of size, length, or grade. Plain rounds (nondeformed or smooth rebar) are excluded. The rebar can be processed further, such as cutting or coating, and still be under investigation. How Are Comments Handled? Commerce asks interested parties to give comments on the scope of the investigations and the physical features of the rebar by July 14, 2025. Rebuttals are due by July 24, 2025. All comments must be submitted using the ACCESS online system. Industry Support Commerce checked that the petitioners represent the U.S. industry making similar rebar. The petitions are supported by domestic producers holding over 50% of the total U.S. production of rebar. Claims of Material Injury The petitioners claim that large volumes of dumped imports have hurt the U.S. industry. Evidence includes lost sales, reduced market share, price drops, and declining production and profits for U.S. companies. Alleged Dumping Margins The estimated dumping margins are: Algeria: 127.32% Bulgaria: 27.79% Egypt: 110.87% to 128.98% Vietnam: 117.61% Respondent Selection Process For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt, Commerce will choose companies for investigation based on U.S. import data and comments from interested parties. For Vietnam, which is a non-market economy, Commerce will use quantity and value questionnaires sent to identified exporters. Separate Rates for Vietnamese Exporters Vietnamese companies that want a separate rate must return both the quantity and value questionnaire and the separate rate application. These are due within specific deadlines after the notice. Mandatory Certification and Procedures All parties submitting information must certify its accuracy. Commerce details how to get access to confidential information and what forms to use. Information should be detailed, accurate, and submitted on time. ITC Review The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days if the imports are harming the U.S. rebar industry. If they decide there is no harm from a country, the investigation for that country will stop. Scope Details The affected products are listed mainly under HTSUS codes 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but may also enter under several other codes. The written description in the scope controls what products are covered. Key Dates and Deadlines Comments on scope or characteristics: July 14, 2025 Rebuttals: July 24, 2025 Vietnamese Q&V questionnaire: July 8, 2025 Separate rate application deadline: 21 days after this notice’s publication Further Action Commerce will make preliminary determinations by 140 days after this initiation unless the timeline is changed. The investigations will continue following all laws and regulations. This article is based entirely on the official Federal Register notice published June 30, 2025 (FR Doc No: 2025-12045). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Delays Preliminary Decisions in Silicon Metal Trade Cases Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a delay in the preliminary determinations for its ongoing countervailing duty (CVD) investigations into silicon metal imports from Australia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos), Norway, and Thailand. The Commerce Department started these investigations on May 14, 2025. The original deadline for the preliminary decisions was July 18, 2025. However, the department received timely requests from the petitioners—Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC—to extend the deadline. Under U.S. law, Commerce can delay a preliminary determination if the petitioner makes a timely request or if the investigation is especially complex. Petitioners must ask for a delay at least 25 days before the original deadline and explain why they need it. Commerce usually grants the request unless there is a strong reason to deny it. The petitioners said the extra time was needed because the current schedule does not allow enough time for Commerce to review the subsidies producers and exporters of silicon metal might be receiving in the four countries. The requests were submitted on June 18 and 23, 2025. Commerce agreed with the petitioners’ reasons and found no reason to deny the request. Because of this, the deadline for the preliminary determinations is now pushed back to September 22, 2025. The new date reflects the need to move the deadline to the next business day, as September 21 falls on a weekend. The final determinations in these investigations will now come 75 days after the new preliminary determination date. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on June 26, 2025. This postponement follows the rules under the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Code of Federal Regulations. If you want more information about these cases, you can contact: Kyle Clahane for Australia at (202) 482-5449 Shane Subler for Laos at (202) 482-6241 Mary Kolberg for Norway at (202) 482-1785 George McMahon for Thailand at (202) 482-1167 All contacts are at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Reviews on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes What Happened On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) began official reviews of many antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews check if companies around the world are selling goods in the U.S. at unfair prices or getting unfair help from their governments. How the Reviews Work Commerce gets requests to review different products every year. For this round, the reviews cover products with May anniversary dates. These reviews use special rules and deadlines. Companies are chosen for detailed checks using trade data from U.S. Customs or from questionnaires about their sales. Commerce can group related companies together if they operated as one in earlier reviews. If a company should be grouped with others, they must list those companies and share past review details. Companies Must Respond Quickly If a company did not send products to the U.S. during the review time, they must tell Commerce within 30 days. If a company wants to stop its review request, it must do so within 90 days. If companies believe the market is not acting fairly (called a Particular Market Situation), they must send this information no later than 20 days after handing in some required paperwork. Special Rules for Non-Market Economy Countries For countries where the government controls businesses, like China, Commerce gives one AD rate to all companies. However, companies can apply to get their own rate if they prove they are not controlled by their government. To do this, they must fill out special forms. These forms are due within 14 days after this notice was published. List of Products and Countries Reviewed Commerce started reviews for many products and countries. Some of these include: Steel products from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Taiwan, Türkiye, and the U.S. Mattresses from Indonesia and Malaysia. Soybean meal from India. Stainless steel from Belgium and Taiwan. Aluminum extrusions from China. Mushrooms from the Netherlands and Poland. Cylinders from China. Large diameter welded pipe from Canada, Greece, Korea, and Türkiye. Optical brightening agents from Taiwan and China. Vertical shaft engines from China. Certain steel nails from United Arab Emirates. Commerce also started CVD reviews for some of these products and countries. Rules for Certification and Deadlines Some companies can apply to get a special certification to ship both reviewed and non-reviewed products. The Certification Eligibility Application form is also due within 30 days. No Requests for Suspension Agreements There were no new requests for suspension agreements in this review round. Duty Absorption and Gap Period Commerce may also check if companies are absorbing (not passing on) the duties. For the first reviews of new orders, no duties are charged for goods imported in a temporary “gap” between two important dates. Steps for Legal Protection and Data Submission Interested parties must apply for access to protected information and follow Commerce’s detailed rules about submitting information and letters. There are five types of factual information, each with strict time limits and special ways to submit them. If a company does not certify its information correctly, its information may be rejected. Extensions for deadlines must be requested before the deadline, and follow very specific rules. Where to Find More Information All deadlines, forms, and rules are available on the Commerce website or from the contact listed in the notice. This notice and the reviews are issued as required by law under section 751(a) of the Act. Who Signed the Notice The notice was signed on June 18, 2025, by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Scope Ruling Applications in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register listing new scope ruling applications in antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) cases. These applications ask the Department to decide if certain products are covered by current AD or CVD orders. What is a Scope Ruling Application? A scope ruling application is a request made to the Department of Commerce to determine if a product is included under an existing AD or CVD order. The orders are trade actions that add duties on imports to offset unfair pricing or government subsidies. New Applications Received in May 2025 Three new applications were filed in May 2025: Printed Fashion File Folder from China Order: A-570-147 (Antidumping) Description: Paper file folders made with CMYK offset printing on 250gsm paper and full plastic lamination. The sheets are die-cut, folded, glued, and assembled into folders. Produced in and exported from: China Applicant: A2V Trade Limited (A2V) Date Filed: May 13, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Fashion File Folder” Certain Forged Steel Fittings from China Orders: A-570-067 (Antidumping), C-570-068 (Countervailing) Description: Automotive brake hose fittings made of 12L14 steel. The fittings have detailed limits on material composition. Lengths range from 3/16 inch to 1/4 inch, and threading dimensions vary. Produced and exported from: China Applicant: AGS Company Automotive Solutions (AGS) Date Filed: May 20, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Brake Hose Fittings” Certain Forged Steel Wheels from China Orders: A-570-090 (Antidumping), C-570-091 (Countervailing) Description: Steel wheels ranging from 14 to 18 inches in diameter and 4 to 10 inches in width. They have bolt hole patterns of four to eight holes, bolt spacing from 4.5 to 6.69 inches, hub bore sizes from 81.7 to 130.8 mm, offset values from -39 to 50 mm, and load capacity from 1,210 to 3,650 lbs. Produced in and exported from: China Applicant: Vision Wheel, Inc. (Vision Wheel) Date Filed: May 21, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Vision Wheel” How Are Applications Processed? The Department has 30 days to accept or reject a scope application. If not rejected or acted upon in that time, the application is considered accepted and a scope inquiry is started on day 31. If a deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, the next business day is used. For products covered by both AD and CVD orders, the scope inquiry is done as part of the AD proceeding. The Department may issue rulings that apply to all similar products from the same country, or just for a specific company. Access to Application Details All applications are available in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. How to Participate Interested parties must file an entry of appearance under specific regulations to join a scope inquiry and be added to the public service list. Parties can comment on the monthly list’s completeness and may request to receive documents during the order’s anniversary month. For more information about filing through ACCESS, see the Scope Ruling Application Guide at https://access.trade.gov/help/Scope_Ruling_Guidance.pdf. Contact Information Questions may be directed to Yasmin Bordas at the Department of Commerce, phone (202) 482-3813. This notice is published in line with federal regulations to inform the public about scope ruling applications received in May 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Issues Correction on Antidumping Duty Measures for Alkyl Phosphate Esters From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction regarding the antidumping duty order for certain alkyl phosphate esters from the People’s Republic of China. The notice corrects a date mistake found in an earlier publication. The publication, dated June 11, 2025, listed an incorrect ending date for the provisional period of the antidumping duty measures. The error involved the last day that provisional measures were in place. The previous notice stated the end date as June 2, 2025. The correct end date is June 1, 2025. The corrected sentence now reads: The provisional measures period, beginning on the date of publication of the Less-Than-Fair-Value (LTFV) Preliminary Determination, ended on June 1, 2025. In line with section 733(d) of the Tariff Act and current practice, Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection to end the suspension of liquidation. Customs will liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, entries of alkyl phosphate esters from China that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, after June 1, 2025. This will be in place until the day before the International Trade Commission’s final injury determination is published. Commerce directs interested parties to the full text of the correction for legal references. The notice was signed by Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Abbott. This notice was published following the requirements in section 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. For further information, parties are told to contact Dennis McClure at the Department of Commerce, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII. The correction ensures the lawful administration of antidumping duty and countervailing duty matters related to imports of certain alkyl phosphate esters from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes High Antidumping Duties on Some Chinese Electric Vehicles Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Commerce Finds Dumping The Department of Commerce found that these LSPTVs from China are being sold in the United States for less than their fair value. This means that U.S. companies are hurt because Chinese companies are selling LSPTVs at unfairly low prices. The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products affected are low speed personal transportation vehicles and their parts, even if they are unfinished or unassembled. LSPTVs are small vehicles, with four wheels, a steering wheel, and seats next to each other. They can run on electric or gas power, and cannot go faster than 25 miles per hour. Go-karts, off-road vehicles, mobility scooters, and some other vehicle types are not included. Who Is Affected Many Chinese companies were investigated. Two major companies, Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangdong Lvtong) and Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), were looked at closely. Other companies also asked for lower rates because they said they were different from the main group of Chinese companies. Some of these companies received different rates based on their information. Final Dumping Margins The Department set very high antidumping rates. Here are the dumping margins: Guangdong Lvtong: 119.39% Xiamen Dalle: 312.31% Other Companies with Separate Rates: 291.04% All Other Chinese Companies (China-wide rate): 478.09% This China-wide rate is based on the highest number provided in the investigation because some companies did not work with the Department. Cash Deposit Requirements Now, U.S. Customs will keep holding back money (cash deposits) when these vehicles are brought from China. This deposit matches the rates listed. Liquidation of these imports (final acceptance) will be stopped for entries made after January 30, 2025. Critical Circumstances The Department found that, in some cases, companies were bringing in a lot of LSPTVs just before these new rates would start. For Guangdong Lvtong, many separate rate companies, and the China-wide group, stricter rules now apply for goods entered as far back as November 1, 2024. Certification Rules for Importers Special certification rules now apply for LSPTV parts, like seat assemblies and motors, that could be used to build these vehicles in the U.S. Importers must show detailed proof that these parts do not arrive with unfinished vehicles or rolling chassis. If not enough proof is given, the highest duty rate (China-wide rate) will be required. What Happens Next The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will check if U.S. companies are materially hurt by the Chinese LSPTV imports. If the ITC finds no harm, all the cash deposits will be refunded, and the case will stop. If harm is found, the Department of Commerce will order final duties on the products. List of Companies with Separate Rates Thirty-eight Chinese exporter and producer pairs qualified for individual rates, including companies like Dongguan Excar Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd., Haike EV Co., Ltd., and Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Further Information The full government announcement, including detailed product definitions, specific legal references, and certification requirements, can be reviewed at the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 118, pages 26530-26535, dated June 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Subsidies for Low-Speed Vehicles from China, Sets Duties Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On June 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its final determination in the investigation of certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. The Department found that subsidies are being given to producers and exporters of these vehicles in China. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. Background The Department of Commerce started this process by publishing its preliminary findings in December 2024 and collecting opinions from interested parties. The investigation looked closely at the facts and information provided by companies involved, especially Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Lvtong), Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), as well as two non-responsive companies, Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD., and Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd. Scope of Investigation The investigation covers certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These are mainly open-air vehicles powered by electric motors or gas engines and have traditional seating, four wheels, and a gross weight of no more than 5,500 pounds. Vehicles with a fixed roof and integrated doors or windows are not covered. The investigation also includes unfinished vehicles and subassemblies, also called “rolling chassis,” with or without parts like seats, roofs, or tires. Certain components, like seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, and motors, are not included if they come by themselves and have the right certification. However, if they arrive together with LSPTVs or their subassemblies, or without proper certification, they are included. Methodology and Changes After reviewing all submissions and conducting verification of the information, Commerce made some changes to subsidy calculations from the preliminary stage. The Department used facts available and sometimes adverse findings when companies did not provide all required data. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following subsidy (duty) rates for the period investigated: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD.: 679.44% * Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 679.44% * Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% All Other Producers/Exporters: 41.14% *Rates with a star (*) are based on adverse facts available. Critical Circumstances The Department found that “critical circumstances” applied, meaning that for some companies, duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the preliminary determination (December 6, 2024). This now includes Lvtong, Xiamen Dalle, all others, and the non-responsive companies. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs will collect deposits and suspend liquidation (final settlement) on subject imports that entered the U.S. on or after December 6, 2024. Suspension for entries made after April 5, 2025 (the end of provisional measures), was discontinued, but entries before April 4, 2025, remain suspended. Because of the critical circumstances decision, Customs will suspend liquidation and collect deposits for imports from Xiamen Dalle and all others that entered up to 90 days before December 6, 2024. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that the domestic U.S. industry is injured by these imports, a countervailing duty (CVD) order will be issued, and Customs will continue to collect duties. If the ITC finds no injury, all duties will be refunded. Certification Requirements Commerce now requires importers of certain LSPTV components (Chinese-origin seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, or motors) to certify that these parts are not being combined with subject LSPTVs or subassemblies. Specific certification procedures and records are required, as detailed in the official notice. Importers must keep this documentation for at least five years after the last entry covered or three years after any court cases are finished. If an importer fails to follow these rules, all their affected entries may be considered subject to duties. Next Steps The Commerce Department will notify the ITC of its decision. The ITC will decide within 45 days if imports of LSPTVs from China are causing harm to the U.S. industry. If the answer is yes, Commerce will issue a formal CVD order. If not, the case will end, and money collected will be returned. Appendices The notice includes the full legal definition (“scope”) of the products covered, the importer certification form, and a full list of topics addressed in Commerce’s Issues and Decision Memorandum. For further details, all documents are on file with the U.S. Department of Commerce and available online. Contact Information For questions, contact Dan Alexander in the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce: (202) 482-4313. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.