U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Monosodium Glutamate Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed an important review. They looked at duties on a product called monosodium glutamate (MSG). MSG is from Indonesia and China. This review is part of something called the “sunset review.” What is Antidumping Duty Order? Antidumping means stopping countries from selling goods too cheaply. They do this to protect American businesses. The U.S. made orders to place duties on MSG from these countries in 2014. This means they add extra fees when MSG from Indonesia and China is sold in the U.S. Why Review These Orders? Every few years, the Department of Commerce checks these orders. They want to see if they still need them. They ask if ending the orders would let countries sell MSG at unfairly low prices again. Review Process The Department of Commerce began this second review in October 2025. They checked if they needed to keep the antidumping duties on MSG. One important company involved is Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. Final Results The Department of Commerce decided that removing the duties would likely cause unfair sales of MSG again. For Indonesia, the duty rate could go up to 6.19%. For China, it could be as much as 40.41%. Importance of Following Rules When companies deal with sensitive information, they follow special rules. These rules protect private details. Everyone involved must respect these rules. If they do not, there could be penalties. This review shows the U.S. is careful. They want to keep trade fair and protect American jobs and businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Antidumping Order on Canadian Pipes Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes April 10, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has officially canceled its review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipes from Canada. The review period was scheduled from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. Background The antidumping order was first published on May 2, 2019. The order was in place to monitor and regulate the selling of these pipes from Canada at an unfairly low price in the U.S. market. At the beginning of this review period, requests were made by Evraz Inc. and the petitioner to review the antidumping order. On June 25, 2025, the Commerce Department initiated a review process for 36 companies. These companies were identified according to the Tariff Act of 1930. During the process, various data were released. This included U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for entries during the review period. Withdrawal of Requests On September 23, 2025, the petitioner withdrew review requests for five companies. These companies were: Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd. Pipe & Piling Supplies Canam Forterra Hyperscon Inc. After the withdrawal, no other requests for review of these companies were made. Reasons for Cancellation The Commerce Department can cancel a review if all requests for such a review are withdrawn within 90 days of the notice’s publication. The department checked and found that Evraz Inc. had no shipments to the U.S. during the review period. Without any shipments or entries during this period, the department found there was nothing to review. This led to the cancellation of the review for the entire period. Next Steps Antidumping duties will be assessed on all related entries. The duties will match the estimated duties required when these items first entered the U.S. Instruction for the assessment of duties will be sent no earlier than 41 days from the notice’s publication date. Final Note The Commerce Department reminds parties of their responsibilities regarding the handling and return of private information disclosed during the review. Failure to comply with these rules can lead to penalties. The official cancellation notice was dated April 7, 2026, and was signed by Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This notice is shared according to sections of the Tariff Act of 1930, making it a significant document for companies dealing with trade and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Invites AI Export Proposals Under New Program Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-04-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce, through the International Trade Administration (ITA), has announced a call for proposals under the American Artificial Intelligence (AI) Exports Program. This initiative, a result of Executive Order 14320, aims to promote the export of U.S. AI technology. It offers industry-led consortia the chance to showcase full-stack AI technology packages. Key Dates and Submission Details The proposal submission window is open from April 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. All proposals should be submitted online through the American AI Exports Program portal at https://aiexports.gov/consortia/apply. The Department will review proposals on a rolling basis. Program Overview The American AI Exports Program seeks to support U.S. leadership in AI technology. It does this by facilitating the export of complete AI packages. These packages will include software, AI-optimized hardware, data pipelines, and cybersecurity measures. The program encourages the formation of ‘pre-set’ consortia. These are groups of companies that collaborate to offer comprehensive AI solutions to foreign markets. Notably, these consortia don’t need to have a specific foreign buyer identified for their proposals. Proposal Requirements Eligible consortia must provide a full-stack AI package. This includes: AI-optimized hardware Data pipelines and systems AI models and systems Security measures for AI AI applications for various sectors Each layer of the AI stack must have a major contributing member who provides significant value. The anchor member, or lead entity, must manage the proposal submission and must be headquartered in the U.S. National Champion Enterprises In exceptional cases, foreign companies might lead certain parts of the AI package. These cases will be considered if they advance U.S. national interests. Foreign firms, known as National Champion Enterprises (NCEs), can participate when designated by the Department. Eligibility and Content Requirements Proposals need to show significant U.S. content in their hardware and software. Companies from countries of concern, as defined by U.S. law, cannot be part of the consortia. A national interest focus is key to gaining program designation. Benefits of Program Designation Designated packages will gain U.S. government advocacy. This includes introductions to foreign buyers, priority in government events, and potential export licensing benefits. The program also aligns proposals with federal financing options. Review Process Proposals will undergo an initial review within 14 days, followed by a 60-day substantive review process. Decisions on the designation will consider compliance with program goals and potential national interest advancement. Further Information Public questions can be submitted starting April 1, 2026. Responses will be available at https://aiexports.gov/faq. The program will adhere to U.S. regulations, including export controls and antitrust laws. For more information on submitting a proposal or on program regulations, visit the official portal. Contact Details For more inquiries, contact Brandon Remington, AI Exports Team, at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Phone: 202-839-0393, or email: [email protected] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Public Comment Invited on Duty-Free Entry Applications for Scientific Instruments Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Commerce is inviting public comments on a key process. It concerns the collection of information for duty-free entries of scientific instruments or apparatus. This process is done according to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This law helps us understand the impact of information collection and reduces the burden on the public. Comments about this process must be received on or before June 9, 2026. Interested individuals can send comments by mail to Eva Kim. She is an Import Analyst at the International Trade Administration. You can also contact her by phone at (202) 482-8283. Her email is [email protected] Remember to refer to OMB Control Number 0625-0037. Do not send any confidential business information. For more details, questions can also be directed to Eva Kim at the same phone number or email address. The Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security ensure nonprofit institutions have duty-free entries for scientific instruments. This process is under the Florence Agreement. Form ITA-338P is important here. This form lets Homeland Security check if eligibility requirements are met. The Commerce Department compares instruments to see if similar ones are made in the U.S. You can download Form ITA-338P from the website http://enforcement.trade.gov/sips/sipsform/ita-338p.pdf. Or you can request a copy from the Department. Once the form is filled, it goes to Homeland Security. If accepted, Homeland Security sends it to the Commerce Department for further review. The control number for this task is 0625-0037. The form number is ITA-338P. This review is a regular submission and an extension of a current information collection. This affects state or local governments, federal agencies, and not-for-profit institutions. There are about 90 respondents expected. Each response takes about 2 hours. So, the total annual burden is 180 hours. The cost to the public is around $2,974.50. Participation is voluntary. The legal authority for this is 19 U.S.C. 1202; 15 CFR 301. The public can help improve this process. Comments can reassess if the collection is necessary and useful. Comments also check the accuracy of time and cost estimates. They can suggest ways to improve clarity and reduce burden with better technology. Comments respondents provide will be public records. Each comment will be included or summarized in a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Comments should not include personal information if privacy is a concern. Sheleen Dumas, from the Commerce Department, is the Departmental PRA Compliance Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Notice: Continuation of Countervailing Duties on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its fourth sunset review on the countervailing duty (CVD) order concerning prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from India. The review determined that lifting the CVD order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. The review is part of the ongoing process that started with the original order on February 4, 2004. The order aims to counteract subsidies provided by the Indian government to Indian producers and exporters of the PC strand. On October 3, 2025, the Department of Commerce announced the start of this fourth review, as outlined by section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On October 20, 2025, domestic producers Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp expressed their interest in the review. These companies are considered domestic interested parties, as they produce similar products in the U.S. By November 3, 2025, these domestic parties provided a substantive response, providing information on why the CVD order should remain in place. No response was received from the Government of India or any Indian exporters. As a result, the Department of Commerce conducted an expedited review, concluding on April 7, 2026. Due to governmental delays, such as a federal shutdown in November 2025 which led to additional tolling of deadlines, the final results were released later than originally scheduled. The review concludes that if the CVD order were revoked, Indian producers and exporters would likely continue to benefit from subsidies at a rate of 62.92 percent. These findings are crucial for the domestic PC strand industry, as the continuation of subsidies by Indian producers could affect U.S. market conditions. This decision ensures the CVD order remains in place, maintaining fair competition in the market. This notice also acts as a reminder to all parties involved in this proceeding to manage any proprietary information acquired during this process. Proper handling under the administrative protective order (APO) guidelines is stressed to avoid sanctions. The final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930. This announcement is made by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Findings on Korean Hot-Rolled Steel Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On April 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the preliminary results of its review of certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Korea. This decision was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 69. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Findings: Subsidies Detected: It was found that producers and exporters of certain hot-rolled steel from Korea received countervailable subsidies during the review period. Countervailable subsidies are government financial aid measures that provide a benefit to local producers and are specific to certain enterprises or industries. Companies Assessed: The review primarily focused on two companies, Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO. Hyundai Steel is also associated with companies like Hyundai Green Power and Hyundai ITC Co., Ltd., while POSCO includes affiliates like POSCO International Corporation and others. Subsidy Rates: The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily set countervailable subsidy rates at 1.28% for Hyundai Steel Company and 3.71% for POSCO. Partial Rescission of Review: The Department of Commerce decided to rescind the review for 13 companies as they had no entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Some of these companies include Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd., Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd., and POSCO Daewoo Corporation. Processes and Procedures: – The review began with a notice on November 14, 2024, and covered countervailable subsidies as per the regulations in the Tariff Act of 1930. – Information was verified for accuracy. The interested parties are invited to submit comments on the preliminary findings. They may file case briefs and request hearings for further discussions. Final Results and Next Steps: After considering feedback from interested parties, the Department of Commerce will finalize its findings. It expects to issue the final results within 120 days of the preliminary announcement. The conclusion of this review will impact future cash deposits for countervailing duties on Korean steel products entering the United States. This detailed process reflects the ongoing commitment of the U.S. government to enforce fair trade practices and ensure a level playing field in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Continued Dumping of Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Japan Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the antidumping duty on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC Strand) from Japan would likely lead to more dumping. This conclusion comes from an expedited sunset review. The review found that dumping could continue or happen again at rates up to 13.30 percent. Background The Commerce Department reviewed the antidumping duty finding first announced on December 8, 1978. This review began on October 3, 2025. This process is under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Participants Some American companies participated in this review. Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp. showed interest. They want antidumping duties to stay in place because these companies produce similar products in the U.S. Process The review started when domestic companies showed interest. They sent a notice of intent on October 20, 2025. By November 3, 2025, these companies sent a complete response to the review. There were no responses from Japanese companies. Because of this, the Commerce Department did a quick 120-day review. Deadlines shifted because of a government shutdown during November 2025. The final results came out on April 7, 2026. Final Results The Commerce Department decided that ending the antidumping duty could lead to more dumping. They expect the dumping margin to be up to 13.30 percent. Conclusion The Commerce Department’s decision affects the market for PC Strand from Japan. By keeping antidumping duties, the U.S. aims to protect domestic producers. This report also reminds those with access to protected information to handle it carefully. This decision is now official and followed the laws in sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Strand Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the final results of the fourth sunset reviews of antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from five countries: Brazil, India, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand. This decision, officially released in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026, finds that ending these duties would likely lead to continued dumping of the product in the U.S. market. The antidumping duties were first ordered in January 2004. Commerce reviewed the orders again starting October 3, 2025, to decide if the duties were still needed. This process is called a sunset review. Commerce received timely notices from U.S. producers who want to keep the duties. These companies are Insteel Wire Products, Sumiden Wire Products, and Wire Mesh Corp. They are considered “domestic interested parties.” These U.S. producers sent Commerce detailed responses by November 3, 2025. No foreign producers responded to the review. Because of this, Commerce conducted an expedited review. The publication explains that the government shutdown in November 2025 delayed some deadlines. However, they were able to complete their findings by April 7, 2026. Commerce decided that removing the duties would likely lead to continued dumping. This means foreign producers might sell their products at unfair prices in the U.S. market again. Commerce says that if the duties ended, dumping margins would likely be as high as 118.75% for Brazil, 102.07% for India, 77.20% for Mexico, 54.19% for Korea, and 12.91% for Thailand. Commerce’s role is to protect U.S. companies from unfair trade practices. They will continue to enforce these duties, and interested parties must follow the rules for handling sensitive information related to this case. This decision helps ensure fair competition and supports U.S. producers in the steel industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Does Not Find Dumping in Steel Threaded Rods from India Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The United States Department of Commerce recently completed an investigation into carbon and alloy steel threaded rods shipped from India. This review was focused on goods imported between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Findings of the Review The investigation involved Mangal Steel Enterprises Limited, the only producer and exporter reviewed. Commerce discovered that Mangal did not sell their steel threaded rods in the United States at prices lower than the normal value. This is significant as selling at below normal value, known as “dumping,” would normally mean imposing extra tariffs or duties to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Background Events Initially, the results of the review were started on April 8, 2025. However, various delays, including a government shutdown, extended the process. This caused the final results to be announced by April 10, 2026, as reported in the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 69. Consequences of the Review Since Mangal Steel’s pricing was found to be fair and equal to the normal value, the United States will not impose extra duties on the company’s imported steel threaded rods. This means that any of Mangal’s products entering the U.S. during the particular review time frame won’t face additional antidumping duties. However, for those who didn’t specify their products as being meant for the U.S., their imports will be treated according to previous findings. Future Steps Commerce will ensure the proper calculation and disclosure of this determination. This will occur within five days of publicising the final report. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials will receive instructions no sooner than 35 days after this announcement to guide the liquidation of concerned entries. Cash Deposits and Importer Responsibilities Going forward, the cash deposit rate for Mangal’s exports will be based on this review’s results. If any other companies are mentioned in past reviews, their previously set rates will continue. Importers should always be conscious of their obligations to accurately declare duties to avoid additional penalties, such as double tariffs, especially those related to antidumping laws. Final Reminder Commerce reminds all involved parties of their responsibilities under protective orders. Proper handling of confidential information remains a legal obligation. This report concludes the thorough review done by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding steel threaded rod imports from India. Further notices will be guided by ongoing commerce assessments and findings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Part of Antidumping Duty Review on Frozen Shrimp from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a partial rescission of an antidumping duty review on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India. This review focused on shipments made between February 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. In March 2025, the Commerce Department began reviewing the case for 391 companies. The review was set to examine whether these companies were selling shrimp in the United States at prices below fair value. However, it has been decided that the review for certain companies will stop because they did not have any reviewable entries of shrimp during the period in question. The decision applies to companies that had no shipments of subject merchandise during that time. The Commerce Department provided a list of these companies, which can be found in Appendix I of the official announcement. This means the Commerce Department had no grounds to calculate new duty rates for them, as there was no activity to review. For the companies not affected by this decision, the antidumping duty review will continue as planned. The companies that remain under review are listed in Appendix II. Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties based on cash deposits that were required at the time of entry of the merchandise into the United States. This process will begin no earlier than 35 days following the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to provide a certificate under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties. If importers fail to provide this certificate, there is a presumption of reimbursement, and they could face doubled duties. For parties under administrative protective orders, the announcement calls for adherence to the requirements about returning or destroying proprietary information. Non-compliance could lead to sanctions. This rescission is part of regular procedures under U.S. trade laws to ensure fair pricing in international commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Review of Hot-Rolled Steel from Japan Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings on the administrative review of antidumping duties for certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Japan. This review covers the period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. The findings highlight that one of two main producers/exporters sold goods in the United States at less than their normal value. A partial review has been rescinded for one company. Key Findings: Producers Reviewed: The review initially included assessments of 15 producers and exporters. Commerce selected two main companies for a detailed review: Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC) and Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Rescission of Reviews: Commerce, following requests, has partly rescinded the review concerning JFE Shoji Trade America. This was due to a withdrawal request from the petitioners, a group comprising several U.S. steel producers. Preliminary Weighted-Average Dumping Margins: Nippon Steel Corporation: 13.07% Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd: 0.00% For other companies not individually examined, a rate of 13.07% has been preliminarily applied, based on prior assessments. Methodology and Analysis: The administrative review was conducted in alignment with the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751(a), and corresponding regulations, utilizing a calculated export price and a constructed export price for analysis. Assessment Rates: Following the review, Commerce will determine specific assessment rates for merchandise entries if the margins remain above zero and de minimis levels. Public Commentary: Interested parties can submit comments and request hearings within the set deadlines. Commerce has outlined procedures to submit both case briefs and rebuttal briefs, allowing stakeholders to engage with the process leading up to the final results. Next Steps: Commerce aims to issue its final results and assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection within 120 days following these preliminary results unless an extension is warranted. The complete memorandum and further details of the preliminary results can be accessed through Commerce’s electronic service system. This ongoing review supports the enforcement of fair trade practices in line with U.S. trade laws, ensuring that domestic industries are not unfairly disadvantaged by lower-priced imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Rescinds Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Reviews Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to stop certain investigations on trades. They call these investigations “administrative reviews.” The department has canceled them because everyone who wanted the reviews changed their minds and asked for a stop. This means no one else requested reviews, and all requests were withdrawn on time. The Commerce Department is part of the U.S. government. It checks to make sure things are fair in business between other countries and the U.S. They have laws about extra charges on products, called antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These charges are there to stop unfair price differences or money support in trade. The reviews they stopped were listed in a table. For example, there were reviews for products like steel tubing from Germany, mattresses from Taiwan, and hot-rolled steel from the Netherlands. The department planned to review the sales and look at the duties between the years 2024 and 2026. Other products affected include diamond sawblades and fresh garlic from China, and certain tires also from China. Each product had a specific review period and was part of the stop in reviews. When the department stops a review, they follow certain rules. These rules allow them to stop if everyone who asked for a review changes their mind within 90 days of the announced start date. Since the reviews are canceled, the Commerce Department will tell the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to charge the normal duty fees. This means that anyone bringing in the related products must pay the fees they were originally charged when they first brought the goods into the U.S. They will send these instructions 35 days after this decision to stop reviews is published. The timeline changes slightly if it involves Canada or Mexico, becoming 41 days instead. Also, the Commerce Department reminds importers that they must confirm they did not get any money back on these duties. If they don’t, it can cause extra fees later. Lastly, there is a reminder to folks who have special access to information from these cases under a protective agreement. It is important they return or destroy this information soon, following the agreed rules. Not following these rules can result in problems. This decision by the Commerce Department is part of their regular checks on international trade to ensure fair practices in line with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Sheet from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background Information: The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review was delayed for several reasons, including a government shutdown and backlog issues. Despite these challenges, the final results have now been published. Key Changes and Findings: The Department has revised the subsidy calculations for two main Turkish companies: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. The revisions were based on feedback from interested parties and a closer examination of the information on record. Subsidy Rates: Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and its affiliated companies now have a subsidy rate of 4.28%. Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. has a de minimis (very small amount) subsidy rate of 0.33%. Other companies not specifically reviewed will also have a subsidy rate of 4.28%. Methodology Explanation: The Department used the rates found during the examination of Assan and Teknik. They excluded zero or minimal rates from their overall calculations to determine subsidy rates for other companies. Cash Deposit and Assessment Information: The Commerce Department will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits based on the new rates for future imports of the aluminum sheets. Due to Teknik’s low subsidy rate, they will not require a cash deposit rate. These instructions will take effect as soon as this notice is published. If you have any items under administrative protective order, there is a reminder to return or destroy these materials promptly, keeping in line with the prescribed regulations. These results are an integral part of maintaining fair trading practices and are aimed at ensuring fair competition between U.S. industries and international exporters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Determines No Dumping of German Steel Blocks in U.S. Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes In a recent review, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that German forged steel fluid end blocks were not sold in the United States at unfair prices. This decision covers the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department’s review process began when the Ellwood City Forge Company and others requested a detailed review. The department followed up by checking the sales records of BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH, a German company. On April 2, 2026, the Commerce Department shared their early findings. They found no signs of selling these steel blocks below normal value. This assessment was based on careful calculations and checking export prices against normal values. Public feedback on these findings is now invited. People have until April 29, 2026, to submit more information or ask for changes. The department will review all submissions before making a final decision. Cash deposit requirements will adjust based on the final results. Right now, a 0.00% margin was found, meaning no extra charges. If the final margin stays the same, no extra fees will apply for these products from Germany. Importers are reminded to file necessary documents with the Commerce Department. Proper filing ensures smooth future transactions and compliance with regulations. The final results are expected within 120 days of this notice. These will depend on public input and any new facts presented. This decision helps maintain fair competition and legal trade practices between the U.S. and Germany. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

No Review on Swiss Steel Tubing Case by U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision about steel tubing from Switzerland. They have decided to stop their review of a rule that could add extra costs, known as antidumping duties, on certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing. These reviews usually help decide if companies are selling products in the U.S. at very low prices that harm U.S. businesses. The period of review was from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Why was the Review Stopped? The review was stopped because key companies did not have shipments of the tubing to the United States during the review period. The companies involved are Benteler Rothrist AG, Mubea Präzisionsstahlrohr AG, and Mubea Inc. Since there were no shipments to review, the Commerce Department said there is nothing to assess. Background Information The rule to add extra costs to these types of steel tubing started on June 11, 2018. This was to help protect U.S. steel makers from unfair pricing by foreign companies. The review was set to determine if new assessments were needed. Several U.S. companies requested this review in June 2025. They wanted to check for any possible unfair competition. However, since no imports from the Swiss companies occurred during the review period, the review was canceled. What Happens Next? Right now, there will be no changes to the costs or rules for importing these products from Switzerland. The current rules will stay the same. The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs on how to manage any past shipments. No new costs will be added for this time period. Final Reminders Parties involved in this case should remember to handle sensitive information carefully. They need to make sure they follow all rules about sharing private information, or they could face penalties. This decision is important because it ensures fairness in trade practices while protecting U.S. businesses. The termination of this review means that only past rules and costs for steel tubing from Switzerland will remain unchanged for now. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Issued for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Review Periods Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently corrected a notice about antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. This correction was related to a mistake in the period of review for a specific product. On February 13, 2026, the Department of Commerce published a notice about rescinding some administrative reviews. This notice had a mistake about the review period for a product from Taiwan. The product is boltless steel shelving units that are prepacked for sale. The initial notice listed an incorrect period of review for these shelving units. It originally stated the review period as June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The correct period of review is November 29, 2023, to May 31, 2025. This correction was officially published on April 8, 2026, in the Federal Register. The correction notice helps ensure that the right information is available for enforcement and compliance processes. The revised notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This step ensures the accuracy of data used in international trade matters. For further questions, Joy Zhang at the Department of Commerce can be contacted. Her contact number is (202) 482-1168. This correction is important for parties interested in international trade regulations and compliance. The original and revised notices can be accessed via the Government Publishing Office’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Colombian Citric Acid Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its decision regarding the sale of citric acid and certain citrate salts from Colombia, determining that these products have been sold in the United States at prices below their normal value. The review covers the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. The decision comes from the International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance unit. They found that the Colombian producer, Sucroal S.A., sold citric acid in the United States at prices lower than what they charge in their home market. This is known as dumping. The review of these imports began with preliminary results published on August 5, 2025. However, the timeline was extended due to a government shutdown that delayed proceedings. For the designated period, the Commerce Department determined that the weighted-average dumping margin for Sucroal S.A. is 4.69 percent. This means that the difference between the fair market price and the price their products were sold at in the U.S. is 4.69 percent. The cash deposit rate for Sucroal S.A. will be set at this 4.69 percent rate for future entries of citric acid from Colombia. For companies that weren’t specifically named in this review but have been part of previous proceedings, their cash deposit rate will remain as previously determined unless updated in their specific review. The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to assess duties on the reviewed products within 35 days of the notice being published. This includes assessing duties based on the dumping margin found during the review. If a company did not know their product was destined for the U.S., certain antidumping duties may not apply. This measure helps protect U.S. companies from unfair pricing practices by foreign exporters. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to file the necessary certificates and to return or destroy any protected information as per the regulations. This decision concludes the review process, maintaining the commitment to fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Turkish Rebar Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction: The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. They have completed their review of steel concrete reinforcing bars, also known as rebar, from Türkiye. This decision is about how much the rebar is sold for in the United States from July 2023 to June 2024. Review Findings: The Commerce Department looked at sales made by certain Turkish producers and exporters. They found that one company, Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. along with Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S., has been selling rebar at prices lower than those in Türkiye. This is called “dumping.” The dumping margin they found for this company is 18.87 percent. Background on the Review: This review started after preliminary results were published in August 2025. The review was delayed several times due to factors like federal government shutdowns. But now, the final results are ready. Scope of the Review: The review only covers rebar from Türkiye. The complete list of topics discussed during this review includes how the rebar prices were calculated, and whether certain trade practices were fair. Impact on Importers: Due to this finding, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess extra duties on Turkish rebar coming into the United States. These extra duties will make sure that the dumped rebar does not unfairly compete with U.S.-made products. Also, new cash deposit requirements for future imports are established to reflect the dumping margin of 18.87 percent. Next Steps for Importers: Importers have responsibilities to respond to these findings. They must submit certificates about any reimbursement of duties. If they fail to do this, they might pay extra duties. Conclusion: The U.S. government has taken steps to protect American manufacturers from unfair pricing practices. These decisions show how important it is for trade to be fair and balanced. The review’s results ensure that there are consequences for selling products at less than their normal value. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Announces Preliminary Results on Polyethylene Bags from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce has published preliminary findings on the anti-dumping review for polyethylene retail carrier bags imported from China. This includes key developments about Crown Polyethylene Products (International) Ltd. (Crown) and Dongguan Nozawa Plastics Products Co., Ltd., and United Power Packaging, Ltd. (Nozawa). Background The anti-dumping duty order for polyethylene retail carrier bags from China has been in place since August 9, 2004. In 2025, Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag Corporation requested a review of imports made by Crown and Nozawa for the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. The review was initiated on September 25, 2025. Crown Polyethylene Products The Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that Crown did not qualify for a separate rate and is considered part of the China-wide entity. As a result, Crown will not be individually examined and remains subject to the China-wide entity rate of 77.57 percent, based on entries during the review period. Partial Rescission of Review Commerce is rescinding the review for Nozawa after finding no reviewable, suspended entries during the period under review. This means that Nozawa will not be subject to additional anti-dumping duties beyond their existing cash deposit rate for the review period. Public Comment and Next Steps The Department of Commerce is inviting parties to comment on these preliminary results. The deadline for written comments is 21 days after the publication of the notice. Rebuttal briefs can be submitted within five days of the initial deadline. Conclusion The Department of Commerce plans to issue final results within 120 days. The results will guide the assessment of anti-dumping duties on subject merchandise entries made by Crown. If no shipments are made during the review period, a rate of 77.57 percent will be applied to relevant entries. Commerce emphasizes the importance for importers to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties before the relevant entries of merchandise are liquidated. Future Implications The final results of this review will affect cash deposit requirements for shipments from China entered or withdrawn from the warehouse and remain effective until further notice. Customers and importers must remain aware of these requirements to ensure compliance with anti-dumping duty obligations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Corrects Previous Notice on Sodium Nitrite from India Estimated reading time: 1 minute The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction to a previous notice published in the Federal Register. The correction concerns the 2022-2023 countervailing duty administrative review of sodium nitrite from India. The original notice, dated February 24, 2026, inadvertently omitted the partial rescission of the review. The omission involved three companies: Kutch Chemical Industries, Palvi Industries Limited, and Lotus Global Pvt. Ltd. The Commerce Department had analyzed data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It found that these three companies had no reviewable entries of sodium nitrite during the period of review. The Department received no further comments or additional information regarding these companies. Therefore, it rescinded the administrative review for these organizations. This correction notice is issued according to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(5). For further information, contact Joshua Jacobson at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Telephone: (202) 482-0266. The full correction is available online with the Federal Register www.gpo.gov. This notice is an official communication from the Department of Commerce via the Government Publishing Office. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Issues Antidumping Duty on Float Glass Products from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Introduction On April 6, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce announced an important decision. They issued an antidumping duty order on float glass products from China. This decision aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. Background The U.S. Department of Commerce found that float glass products from China were being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This means they were sold at prices lower than their normal value. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) also confirmed that this practice harmed U.S. industries. Scope of the Order The order covers float glass products. These are made by floating molten glass over a metal bath. This process creates a smooth and continuous strip of glass. The glass is then cooled and cut to the right size. The glass must be at least 2.0 mm thick and cover an area of at least 0.37 square meters. Effective Date and Procedures The antidumping duty order became effective on April 6, 2026. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties based on the difference between the normal value and the export price. These duties apply to products entered on or after July 15, 2025. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits The U.S. Department of Commerce will instruct CBP to reinstate the suspension of liquidation. This means that the entry of these products into the U.S. will be monitored closely. Importers will need to pay cash deposits based on estimated dumping margins. These margins are adjusted for any subsidies. Estimated Dumping Margins The estimated margins show how much higher the normal value is than the export price. For example, many companies have a margin of 151.29%. The China-wide entity has an even higher margin of 181.54%. Provisional Measures The suspension of liquidation initially took effect after a preliminary determination on July 15, 2025, and lasted for six months. This period ended on January 10, 2026. During this time, free of antidumping duties, the entries can still occur. However, suspension will resume alongside the final determination’s publication in the Federal Register. Establishment of the Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual list of parties interested in the order. Interested parties must file an entry of appearance within 30 days of the notice. This list will help manage and distribute information about the order. Special Instructions for Petitioners and Foreign Governments The Department of Commerce will add petitioners and foreign governments to the list once. After this, they do not need to reapply each year. However, they must update their information as needed. Conclusion This antidumping duty order is a significant step to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. It ensures that Chinese float glass products sold in the U.S. meet fair pricing standards. This decision highlights the ongoing effort to maintain fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Trade Orders on Glass Products from China and Malaysia Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Summary of Orders The orders were put in place because Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) found that certain glass products, known as float glass, are being subsidized in China and Malaysia. This means that these products are sold for less than they should be because the governments of these countries help pay for them. As a result, industries in the United States are hurt because they cannot compete fairly. Important Dates These orders are effective from April 6, 2026. That means any glass products imported from these countries may be taxed more from this date on. Product Details The product in question is called float glass. It is a type of glass made in a special way that involves floating molten glass on a tin bath. It’s used in many things, from windows and mirrors to shower doors. Duties and Costs The duties, or extra taxes, that will be collected are based on how much subsidy the products received. For example, in China, a company called Xinyi Group was found to have a subsidy rate of 19.75%. In Malaysia, Xinyi Energy Smart has a rate of 28.45%. These percentages are added as extra costs when the glass products enter the U.S. Suspension of Liquidation Suspension of liquidation means that imported goods are held before duties are imposed. All entries made on or after May 19, 2025, will have duties assessed, except during a gap period from September 16, 2025, to before the final notice publication. Scope of the Orders These orders cover only certain types of float glass. It must be clear or coated and thicker than 2 mm. Some types of glass like wired glass, patterned glass, or glass already subject to other U.S. trade orders are not affected. Monitoring and Lists Commerce will maintain a list called the annual inquiry service list. This list helps track who is interested in the trade orders. Interested parties must add their names within 30 days of these orders being published. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Deadline Extended for Tomato Import Certifications from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced an important update for importers of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. The deadline to complete necessary certifications has been extended. This change affects fresh tomatoes imported for processing. Background On February 18, 2026, the Department of Commerce provided clarification. This was about the antidumping duty order on fresh tomatoes from Mexico. Importers were required to use specific forms. These forms are the “Importer’s Exempt Commodity Form” and the “Processing Tomatoes Certification Form.” Certification Process Importers had to complete, sign, and date these forms. They upload these forms to the document imaging system, known as DIS, in ACE. This is the system that handles customs documents. Extension Notice The original deadline required forms for tomatoes imported between February 18, 2026, and April 15, 2026. The new deadline allows more time. Now, the forms can be uploaded to DIS by May 15, 2026. Future Entries For tomatoes imported on or after April 15, 2026, the old deadline still applies. Forms must be completed and uploaded at the time of filing the entry summary. Conclusion This extension is a crucial detail for importers to note. Timely completion of certifications helps ensure compliance with Commerce regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Antidumping Duty on Granular PTFE Resin from India Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to an earlier decision about the antidumping duty on Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin (Granular PTFE) from India. This change was made to correct a mistake. The review period is from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. The amended final results are applicable starting April 2, 2026. The mistake was found by Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (GFCL), the main company involved in the review. GFCL said the error was in calculating the U.S. Net price for export price sales. The Department of Commerce agreed with GFCL, saying that an unintentional mistake happened during the calculations. The Department of Commerce has fixed this mistake. Now, the new dumping margin is set at 1.80% for Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited. This percentage shows how much less than the fair value the company has been selling the product in the United States. For all the entries of the product between March 1, 2023, and February 29, 2024, the new margins will be used to calculate antidumping duties. The duties will mainly apply to entries of Granular PTFE that GFCL exported to the United States. The Department will pass instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about these amended rates. If CBP finds any entries with a zero or very small margin, they might not charge any dumping duties. Additionally, new cash deposit requirements are being set up. These deposits need to be made for any future imports of the product. The rates will be based on different situations about who exported the product and when. The new deposit rates are meant to ensure fair competition. Lastly, importers have been reminded that they need to file some paperwork with CBP. This paperwork is about whether they got back any antidumping duties. Not filing it could lead to paying extra duties. This notice also reminds companies about their responsibility to protect secret business information. The decision and changes were made official by Christopher Abbott, who currently serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review of R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has finalized its review for the antidumping duty administrative review of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) imported from the People’s Republic of China. This is based on the sales between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. R-134a, a coolant used in air conditioning, was sold in the U.S. at less than normal value. This decision was announced on April 2, 2026. Commerce conducted this review under Section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. They used detailed information to determine if R-134a was dumped, meaning sold below market value. For the final review results, Commerce identified several Chinese companies involved with the product. These companies include Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Jiangsu Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., and Fujian Qingliu Dongying Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. These firms were treated as a single entity, referred to as Sanmei. This review concluded that the dumping margin for these companies is 173.90 percent. This margin indicates how much cheaper the imported product was sold than its regular market value. Changes were made from preliminary results, impacting margin calculations for Sanmei. Commerce analyzed case comments to ensure accuracy and make necessary adjustments. For companies not reviewed in this period, the rate remains 167.02 percent, unchanged from previous reviews. This rate covers companies not explicitly named but included under the China-wide entity. Importers of R-134a must follow specific procedures. If their sales lead to zero or de minimis (too small for legal concern) margins, they will not face antidumping duties. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about these rates, ensuring correct duty applications. The cash deposit requirements are effective immediately for all R-134a shipments. These requirements help enforce the dumping margin rates. Commerce urges importers to submit a certificate regarding any duty reimbursements. Failure to comply could mean paying double antidumping duties. This case continues to serve as a cautionary tale for international trade, emphasizing the importance of compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Launches Inquiry on Steel Products from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation. This is about certain steel products. These are from the Republic of Korea. The investigation is to see if these steel products are avoiding taxes. These taxes are called antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD). These taxes are on steel from Korea. Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. asked for this investigation. They think the steel products from Korea are finished in Thailand. Then, these products come to the U.S. This may be avoiding the taxes on Korean steel. Details About the Investigation The investigation started on April 2, 2026. This is called a circumvention inquiry. The Department wants to know if the steel products finished in Thailand are really from Korea. It also wants to know if these products should count under the Korean steel orders. What the Inquiry Will Look For The inquiry will check if the products are finished in another country. They will see if the work done in Thailand is minor. They want to know if the main parts come from Korea. The Department will also look at things like: Investment in Thailand Research and development in Thailand How much of the steel is made in Thailand If the parts from Korea are a big part of the final product’s value They also want to prevent any evasion of the duties. How the Inquiry Will Work The Department will select producers in Thailand. They will use data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Comments on this data should be sent within seven days after the Department places the data on the record. Next Steps and Timing The Department aims to make a preliminary decision in 150 days. A final decision will follow in 300 days. They might stop the inquiry earlier if they find enough information. In conclusion, the Department of Commerce is thorough in its investigation. They want to make sure no one is unfairly avoiding taxes on Korean steel products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Oleoresin Paprika from India Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary decision regarding oleoresin paprika from India. The decision finds that this product has been sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation for this is from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce has been studying the sales and pricing to make sure products are not being sold unfairly. Companies in India, such as Mane Kancor and Synthite, have been looked at closely. It was found that their oleoresin paprika is being sold at lower prices than it should be. The department has asked for comments from interested parties on this decision. They have invited anyone with an interest in this matter to give their feedback. A critical circumstances analysis was also done. This looks at whether the imports from India have caused harm to the U.S. market. The department found that there were no critical circumstances, meaning the imports have not caused sudden harm. A detail noted in the determination is that oleoresin paprika, a coloring additive from India, must meet certain criteria to be considered under investigation. This includes having an American Spice Trade Association value of at least 500 or a color unit value of at least 20,000. The estimated dumping margins for these companies are 3.33% for Mane Kancor and 5.66% for Synthite. An all-others rate, which is a weighted-average rate for producers not individually examined, is set at 4.60%. The cash deposit rates for these companies are adjusted based on possible export subsidies identified in a related investigation. For now, the cash deposit rate stands at 0.00% for both Mane Kancor and Synthite. The Department explained that this will remain until further notice. There is a postponement of the final determination. This means a more extended investigation period, and provisional measures have been extended. The final decision is expected to be made no later than 135 days after this preliminary announcement. The U.S. International Trade Commission has been notified and will determine if the imports from India are harmful to the U.S. industry. This decision will affect how the situation moves forward. For more details or to participate in comments or hearings, interested parties should follow the guidance from the Department of Commerce. The investigation shows the U.S. government’s role in ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Government Finds Subsidies on Steel Rebar from Algeria Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. They found that producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar, called rebar, from Algeria are receiving unfair subsidies. This is according to a notice published in the Federal Register. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce checked if companies in Algeria got unfair help from their government. They used the rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. If a government gives money or help that benefits a company unfairly, it is called a subsidy. A company named Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA did not participate in the investigation. The Government of Algeria did not give the requested information. So, the U.S. Department made a decision based on the information they had. The subsidies provided to rebar producers in Algeria mean U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect extra duties. The rate of this subsidy is 72.94 percent. This means Algerian rebar companies will pay more to export their goods to the U.S. The “all-others” rate, which applies to other companies not individually examined, will also be 72.94 percent. Before this decision becomes final, another U.S. organization needs to agree. This organization is called the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC checks if the U.S. industry is harmed by imports of rebar from Algeria. If the ITC finds U.S. industry is harmed, the Department of Commerce will issue a countervailing duty order. This will make sure any harmful impact on the U.S. industry is addressed. If the ITC does not find any harm, the investigation ends. The Department of Commerce and the ITC will continue to work together. They aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. If there are changes in this determination, the Department of Commerce will update the Federal Register with any new details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announces Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background Information The Department of Commerce conducts these reviews to examine the need for continued duties on certain imports. If not reviewed, the duties can be removed. The reviews are called “Sunset Reviews” and are essential for protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices. Initiation of Review Initiating the review process means the department will assess if duties should remain on different products. The products under review include items like mattresses from countries such as Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Türkiye, and Vietnam. It also includes various products from China. Commerce and ITC Collaboration The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) collaborates with the Department of Commerce. Both institutions publish notices about these reviews to keep the public informed and involved in the process. Contact Information For further inquiry about these reviews, the public can contact officials at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Their offices are located at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Participation in Reviews Parties interested in participating in these reviews must follow specific procedures. Domestic interested parties should file notices by specific deadlines mentioned in the Federal Register notice. Electronic Submissions For submissions, the department has set electronic filing requirements. Interested parties must follow guidelines on submitting relevant information, ensuring accuracy, and complying with certification formats. More details are available on the Department of Commerce’s website. Conclusion This announcement marks the beginning of an important review process impacting international trade. The sunset reviews will determine the future of duties on specific products, helping maintain fair competition in domestic markets. The public and interested parties are encouraged to participate actively in these reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has received scope ruling applications. These applications ask if certain products are covered by antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The Department will issue scope rulings if necessary. The applications were filed in February 2026. The public is being notified as part of the standard procedure. Two specific applications have been highlighted in this notice: Raw Flexible Magnets from China: The products are educational tools like letter magnets and place value disks. These are produced and exported from China. They were submitted by Adams Magnetic Products Co. on February 12, 2026. Hand Trucks from China: The product in question is a heavy-duty industrial cart. It is made from steel and exported from China. American Lubrication Equipment Corporation submitted the application on February 20, 2026. These applications are available for public access online. If the Department of Commerce has not rejected an application within 30 days, it is accepted for a scope inquiry. If the 30th day is a non-business day, the next business day is considered the deadline. If there are antidumping and countervailing duties for the same product from the same country, the inquiry will be on the antidumping record. The Department can apply a scope ruling generally or specifically to certain companies. For more information on filing and participation, interested parties can consult the Scope Ruling Application Guide available online. The public can comment on the completeness of the scope ruling applications. Comments should be sent to Scot Fullerton from the International Trade Administration. This announcement follows regulations set under CFR 19 351.225(d)(3). The Department of Commerce encourages all interested parties to participate in a transparent and fair review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.