U.S. Government Confirms Subsidies on Hexamine From China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes What Happened On July 18, 2025, the Federal Register posted this announcement. The decision affects shipments that entered the United States from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Key Companies The following Chinese companies are involved: Changzhou Highassay Chemical Co. China Bluestar International Chemical Co., Ltd. Fengchen Group Co., Ltd. Hutubi Ruiyuantong Chemicals Co., Ltd. Jiangsu Guotai Guomian Trading Jiaozuo Runhua Chemical Industry Co. Qingdao Sun Chemical Corp. Ltd. Runhua Chemical Industry Shandong Aojin Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. All other exporters of hexamine from China are also covered. Countervailing Duty Rates All of these companies face a countervailing duty rate of 420.73 percent. This is based on available facts and an adverse inference because the companies and the Chinese government did not supply needed information. Product Details The product in question is hexamine in granular form. It has a particle size of five millimeters or less. It can be stabilized or unstabilized, blended or pure, and must have at least 50 percent hexamine by weight. This product can come under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule code 2933.69.5000. Other names for hexamine include HMT, HMTA, or hexamethylene tetramine. Method and Process The Department of Commerce says it used data and methods as outlined in the law. It used “adverse facts available” because key companies and the Chinese government did not help in the investigation. There were no changes to the methods used in the first decision. The department found the same problems as before, especially about lack of cooperation from the Chinese companies. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect cash deposits for these imports. Entries made from March 7, 2025, through July 4, 2025, are covered. Future steps will depend on a decision by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). What Comes Next Now, the ITC will decide if U.S. industries have been hurt by these imports. The ITC has 45 days to check if material injury has happened. If the ITC agrees with Commerce, a countervailing duty order will go into effect. If the ITC does not find injury, the case will end and all deposits will be returned. More Information The full issues and decision memorandum is available online at the U.S. Department of Commerce website. Dates to Remember July 18, 2025: Date of the Commerce Department’s final decision. March 7, 2025 to July 4, 2025: Imports covered by cash deposit requirements. Next 45 days: Time for the ITC decision on injury. Contact For questions, contact Eliza DeLong at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, phone: (202) 482-3878. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Chinese Float Glass is Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 7-10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about float glass products from China. They found that these glass products are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. This is sometimes called “dumping.” The period of investigation is April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. What Is Float Glass? Float glass is a type of soda-lime-silica glass. It is made by floating melted glass over a bath of tin to make it flat and smooth. This glass is often used for windows, doors, and mirrors. The trade investigation covers float glass that is at least 2 millimeters thick and has at least 0.37 square meters surface area. Some float glass can have coatings, be colored, or be made stronger with special treatments. Key Findings Commerce found that many Chinese companies are exporting float glass to the U.S. at prices lower than their fair value. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins for most companies are 246.68%, with an adjusted cash deposit rate of 246.66%. The China-wide entity, which includes companies not given a separate rate, faces a margin of 311.81%, with an adjusted cash deposit rate of 311.79%. These deposit rates must be paid when float glass products are imported into the U.S. A list of exporters and producers and their dumping margins is in the official notice. Separate Rates and China-Wide Entity Commerce gave some companies “separate rates.” These are for companies that proved to the Commerce Department that they are independent from the Chinese government. For these companies, Commerce used the average rates from the original petition because the main companies being checked did not give the required information. Companies that did not reply are counted as part of the “China-wide entity.” These companies get the highest dumping rates. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers float glass made in China. The country of origin is where the glass is first made by the float process, no matter where finishing is done. Some products are included even if they are finished or assembled differently, like laminated glass, glass units for insulation, and mirrors with LED lights. Some products are excluded, such as wired glass, car glazing certified to certain safety standards, and solar glass with very specific properties. A full description of what is covered and what is excluded is listed in Appendix I of the official notice. What Happens Next U.S. Customs will suspend liquidation of float glass from China. This means they will stop finalizing import entries and will instead collect the cash deposit amounts listed for each exporter-producer group or for the China-wide entity. Commerce will accept public comments from interested parties about non-scope issues for these findings. These comments can be submitted until 30 days after the notice date. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Requests for a hearing can also be made. Because the main companies under review did not cooperate, there will be no verification process. Postponement of Final Determination The final decision was postponed because a company called Shandong Jinjing requested it. Now, the final determination will happen no later than 135 days after the preliminary notice. What’s Next for the U.S. Industry The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will look at whether these imports hurt U.S. companies. If the final determination finds injury, extra duties might remain for float glass from China. The official notice was published July 15, 2025, as required by U.S. law. For more details, see the full Federal Register notice, Volume 90, Number 133. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Delays Preliminary Finding on Chinese MDI Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is delaying its preliminary decision in an investigation on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) imports from China. The investigation began on March 4, 2025. It examines if MDI from China is sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This kind of investigation is called a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. A preliminary determination was due by July 22, 2025. But, on June 24, 2025, the Ad Hoc MDI Fair Trade Coalition, the petitioner, requested more time. The group said this extra time is needed so Commerce can review the questionnaire responses from the mandatory respondents. It will also help Commerce ask for more information if needed. Rules say the Department of Commerce can approve this kind of delay if a request is made 25 days before the scheduled decision. The Department will allow such a request unless there is a strong reason not to. Now, the Department is postponing its preliminary determination by 50 days. This means the new deadline is September 10, 2025. The Department says there are no reasons to deny the petitioner’s request. After the preliminary decision, the final determination will be due 75 days after the preliminary result is published, unless it is postponed again. This notice was made official on July 8, 2025, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This announcement follows U.S. law and federal rules. For further information, the contacts at the Department of Commerce are Christopher Maciuba at (202) 482-0413 and Kayden Jenson at (202) 482-0967. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Releases Preliminary Results on Countervailing Duties for Wooden Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Countervailable Subsidies Determined Commerce has found that Chinese producers and exporters received subsidies that are subject to countervailing duties. The two main companies reviewed were KM Cabinetry Co., Limited and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. Both received subsidy rates above the minimum level. KM Cabinetry Co., Limited received a preliminary net subsidy rate of 11.85 percent. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. received a preliminary net subsidy rate of 9.33 percent. Other companies that were not individually reviewed received a review-specific average rate of 9.51 percent. Partial Review Rescission Commerce has partially rescinded this review for 31 companies. This includes 21 companies that had their requests for review withdrawn on time, and 10 companies with no reviewable entries during the review period. Lists of these companies are in Appendix II and Appendix III, respectively. Methodology and Procedures Commerce conducted this review under section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930. They found that subsidies were provided by the Chinese government and were specific to certain recipients. For companies not selected for individual review, Commerce calculated a weighted average rate, following guidelines from the Trade Act. Public Comment and Hearing Requests Commerce is inviting comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties can submit case briefs within 21 days of the notice. Rebuttal briefs may be filed within five days after case briefs. Parties who want to request a hearing must do so within 30 days after the publication of the notice. Cash Deposit and Assessment Rates After the final results, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits at the new rates for shipments entered on or after the date of publication. For non-reviewed companies, the all-others rate of 20.93 percent remains in effect. Companies for which the review is rescinded will be assessed at their cash deposit rate during the review period. Final Results Timeline Commerce expects to issue the final results within 120 days of the publication of the preliminary results. Contact Information For more information, interested parties may contact Suresh Maniam or Michael Romani in the AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-1603 or (202) 482-0198. Appendices Appendix I: Topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Appendix II: Companies that withdrew requests for review on time. Appendix III: Companies with no reviewable entries during the period. Appendix IV: Non-selected companies subject to the review. The full document and detailed procedures can be accessed via the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at http://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on R-125 from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the preliminary results of its latest antidumping duty review on pentafluoroethane (R-125) imported from China. This review covers shipments made from March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. Antidumping Review Background An antidumping duty order on R-125 from China has been in place since March 3, 2022. The recent review was started after requests from several companies and a U.S. petitioner. The companies included Shandong Dongyue Chemical Co. Ltd. (Dongyue), Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. (Sanmei), and Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd (Yonghe). Sanmei was chosen as the main respondent for this review. The Department set and changed several deadlines for reviewing the case, with the current preliminary results dated July 7, 2025. Scope of the Review The order covers pentafluoroethane (R-125) coming from China. The full scope is detailed in the preliminary decision memorandum, available online. Partial Rescission of Review The Department decided to rescind, or cancel, the review for Dongyue. There were no reviewable shipments by Dongyue during the period of review. This decision follows standard practice. Separate Rates Eligibility The Department reviewed which companies could get their own separate rates, rather than being grouped with all exporters from China. Sanmei submitted all required documents and remains eligible for a separate rate. Yonghe did not send in a separate rate certification. This means Yonghe will not get its own separate rate. Instead, it is grouped with the China-wide entity. Treatment of the China-Wide Entity Yonghe is now considered part of the China-wide group since it did not qualify for a separate rate. The China-wide entity’s rate stands at 267.51 percent and is not being changed in this review. Preliminary Dumping Margin For the review period, the Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 60.08 percent for Sanmei (including its named affiliates). Next Steps The Department will release its calculations to interested parties within five days. Parties have 21 days after this publication to submit comments, called briefs. Rebuttal briefs, limited to arguments in case briefs, may be filed within five days after that. Parties must submit all briefs electronically, following the rules for formatting and service. They should also provide a summary for each issue they raise, no longer than 450 words. A hearing can be requested within 30 days. The Department intends to issue its final results within 120 days unless an extension is needed. Assessment of Duties When the review is finalized, the Department will tell U.S. Customs how much antidumping duty to collect on entries covered by the review. For Sanmei, this will be based on either entered values or quantity, depending on the details reported. For Dongyue, since the review was rescinded, duties will be assessed at the rate in place when the goods entered the U.S. For Yonghe, now part of the China-wide entity, a rate of 267.51 percent will be applied. Cash Deposit Requirements After final results are published, new cash deposit rates will take effect for future entries according to these rules: For exporters listed with new rates, those rates apply. For Chinese and non-Chinese exporters who received a separate rate previously, those rates stay the same. For all other Chinese exporters without a separate rate, the 267.51 percent rate for the China-wide entity applies. For non-Chinese exporters without a specific rate, the rate of the Chinese supplier applies. Importer Responsibilities Importers must file a certificate about reimbursement of duties. Not filing can lead to double collection of antidumping duties. Review Process These preliminary results are published according to U.S. law and regulations. The Department reminds all interested parties to comply with procedural requirements as the review continues. For more details, documents, and the full decision memorandum, see the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Moves Forward With Countervailing Duties on Chinese R-125 Chemical Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of a review of countervailing duties on pentafluoroethane (R-125) from the People’s Republic of China. This chemical is used in refrigerants. The review looked at the time from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review was for two companies: Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. (Sanmei) and Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. (Yonghe). Other linked companies were also included as “cross-owned” with each main company. Subsidy Rates Found Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd. and cross-owned company: Subsidy rate at 3.02 percent ad valorem. Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd. and cross-owned companies: Subsidy rate at 182.51 percent ad valorem. Countervailing duties are taxes on imports that get subsidies from their home country. U.S. law says the government should collect them if subsidies give companies a special advantage. Process and Timeline Commerce started its review after it received requests on time. Questionnaires about subsidies were sent to the Government of China to forward to the companies. The review followed laws in the Tariff Act of 1930. The review included looking at financial help from the Chinese government and its effect. Commerce used some “facts available with adverse inferences.” This means if information was missing or unclear, decisions could be made based on facts that may not favor the company missing the data. Public Comment and Hearings Interested parties can send comments on these results. Written comments are due no later than 21 days after the notice is published. Rebuttal comments are due five days after that. All documents must be sent electronically and include a table of contents and a list of sources. Executive summaries for each issue discussed must be included at the start of briefs. If anyone wants a hearing, they must ask within 30 days of the publication of the notice. Hearings, if scheduled, will focus only on issues raised in the written briefs. Assessment and Cash Deposits Once the review is final, Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) how much duty to collect on the affected imports during the review period. This will be done at least 35 days after the final results are published. After the final results, Commerce will also tell CBP to collect cash deposits on future imports at the rates in this review. Other companies not reviewed will keep using the most recent rates. Next Steps This is not the final decision. Commerce plans to finish the review within 120 days of these preliminary results, unless they extend the deadline. The public can read the full Preliminary Decision Memorandum through the online system ACCESS. Key Dates Preliminary results published: July 11, 2025 Final results expected in about 120 days Deadlines for comments and hearing requests set after publication Federal Register notice number: 2025-12956 Contact for more information: Seth Brown, AD/CVD Operations, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-0029. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Inquiry on Engine Import Rules From China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce began a new inquiry. This is about if some engines from China are trying to avoid U.S. import rules. These rules add extra taxes, called antidumping and countervailing duties, to certain engines from China. Briggs & Stratton, a U.S. engine maker, asked for this inquiry. They want to know if two engine models made by Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., Ltd. in China are bypassing the current rules. The models are called 5C65M0 and BC70M0. These engines are currently not included in the import rules. They are labeled “Commercial” or “Heavy Commercial” engines, which are usually excluded. But Briggs & Stratton says these two engine models were made after the original rules were set. They believe these models are only slightly different from engines already restricted, and should now be included in the list that gets the extra taxes. The U.S. Department of Commerce will look at several things, including: Do these new engines look and work the same as the ones already covered by the rules? Are the buyers’ hopes and uses the same? Are they sold the same way as the other engines? Are the engines advertised like the ones already restricted? Were these engines available in stores or ready to sell before the rule-making started? If engines are found to fit these, they may be added to the rule. This would mean the special taxes will apply. The inquiry will not only review Zongshen’s engine models. It may cover all small commercial vertical shaft engines from China. Engines without some commercial features or with some home-use features might also be part of the review, no matter who makes or sells them. The Department of Commerce expects to decide within 150 days of this notice. This means there could be a decision by the end of 2025. The engines discussed in these rules are small, spark-ignited, vertical shaft engines, with a size between 99 cubic centimeters (cc) and less than 225 cc. They are mainly used for walk-behind lawn mowers and other outdoor power tools like pressure washers. Engines covered by these rules must follow certain EPA air pollution standards. Some engines are excluded, like “Commercial” or “Heavy Commercial” types. To be excluded, an engine must: Be at least 160 cc in size, Have a cast iron cylinder liner, Have an automatic compression release, Have a muffler with at least three chambers and a volume over 400 cc. Currently, only the parts for these engines are under the extra tax if imported together. Mounting the engine on equipment does not keep it out of the rules; only the engine is taxed. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep holding any engines that may be part of this review. The Department of Commerce has put full details on their website. All interested companies and people have been notified about this new inquiry. More updates will come as the Commerce Department continues its review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Countervailing Duties on Tungsten Shot from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Background of Investigation The United States Department of Commerce has announced its final determination that producers and exporters of certain tungsten shot from the People’s Republic of China are receiving countervailable subsidies. The period of investigation covers January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. This action follows a preliminary determination published on December 20, 2024, and further analysis issued on February 6, 2025. The investigation examined whether Chinese producers of tungsten shot received unfair government subsidies. There were no comments from interested parties challenging the scope of the investigation. Commerce checked documents from companies involved, especially Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd. (KJ Super), using standard inspection and verification methods. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers tungsten spheres or balls, known as shot, that are at least 92.6 percent tungsten by weight, not counting any coatings. The examined shot measures from 1.5 millimeters to 10.0 millimeters in diameter. This can also be called “Tungsten Super Shot.” The shot may be coated with other metals, and may enter U.S. customs under tariff codes 9306.29.0000 or 8101.99.8000. Final Subsidy Rates Commerce found the following subsidy rates for January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023: Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd.: 55.64% subsidy rate All others: 55.64% subsidy rate Seven other named companies: 292.84% subsidy rate* These companies are Luoyang Combat Tungsten & Molybdenum Materials Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Hypersolid Metal Tech Co., Ltd.; Mudanjiang North Alloy Tools Co., Ltd.; Shaanxi Xinheng Rare Metal Co., Ltd.; Xi’an Refractory & Precise Metals Co., Ltd.; Zhuzhou Oston Carbide Co., Ltd.; Zhuzhou Tungsten Man Materials Co., Ltd. (*Rates with an asterisk are based on facts available with adverse inferences.) Investigation Methods and Findings Commerce followed legal steps set out in section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Each subsidy program was checked for financial contributions by government authorities, benefits to companies, and whether the subsidies were targeted. Some results used “facts available” because certain information was missing. In these cases, adverse inferences were applied according to the law. Commerce also updated benchmark prices for tungsten and freight expenses, and revised certain rates after reviewing information verified during the investigation. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is holding cash deposits and has suspended liquidation on tungsten shot from China for entries made on or after December 20, 2024. This suspension stopped for entries made after April 19, 2025, but remains in place for previous entries. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds in its final review that the domestic U.S. industry is hurt by these imports, Commerce will issue a permanent countervailing duty order. If the ITC finds no harm, all duties collected will be refunded. ITC and Disclosure Commerce will share its final determination with the ITC. The ITC will determine within 45 days if U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. During this period, parties can see Commerce’s calculations. This includes detailed information about rates and subsidy programs. Administrative Protective Order Commerce reminded parties under an administrative protective order (APO) to destroy or return all confidential material as required by federal rules. Appendices The notice includes: Appendix I: Full technical definition of what products are covered. Appendix II: Summary topics from the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including discussion points such as calculation of benchmark prices, government role, use of adverse facts, and treatment of business information. Contact For questions, parties may contact Samuel Evans at the U.S. Department of Commerce, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX. Official Publication The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 11, 2025, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidy Rates for Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidy Rates for Corrosion Inhibitors from China On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its preliminary findings for the 2023 countervailing duty administrative review on certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers products imported into the U.S. between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Companies Reviewed The review included two main companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. (ATC) and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. (Botao). The Department also looked at several other companies that were not chosen for individual examination. Preliminary Subsidy Rates The preliminary findings show: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd.: 44.65% subsidy rate Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd.: 44.06% subsidy rate For companies not individually examined but still under review, the preliminary subsidy rate is set at 44.36%. These companies include: Connect Chemicals China Co., Ltd. Connect Chemicals GMBH Gold Chemical Limited Kanghua Chemical Co., Ltd. Partial Rescission of Review The Department has decided to end the review early for five companies. For Jiangyin Delian Chemical Co., Ltd., the review was withdrawn by request. For Relic Chemicals, Sagar Specialty Chemicals Pvt., Ltd., Vcare Medicines, and Yasho Industries Pvt. Ltd., there were no entries of the product during the review period. Thus, no further review was needed for them. Method Used Commerce conducted its review according to U.S. law. They looked at which companies got subsidies from the Chinese government and if those matched the law’s definition of a subsidy. Some decisions relied on information from “adverse facts available” under certain situations. Verification and Public Comment The Department plans to check (verify) the information provided by ATC and Botao. Interested parties can send in case briefs and written comments. Specific timelines for these comments will be told to the parties. A short executive summary is required for each issue in briefs, and parties can also request a hearing. All documents and briefs must be filed electronically through the government’s ACCESS system. Cash Deposits and Assessment If these preliminary rates are finalized, U.S. Customs will collect cash deposits based on these subsidy rates for relevant imports from the date the final notice is published. If a company’s final rate is zero or “de minimis,” no cash deposits will be required. Companies for which the review has been rescinded will have duties assessed at the cash deposit rate in effect at the time of entry. Assessment instructions will follow after the final results are published, no sooner than 35 days after publication. Next Steps Unless the deadline changes, the Department will issue the final results within 120 days of this preliminary announcement. The final results will include analysis of arguments and further details. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets High Dumping Rate on Tungsten Shot From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a final finding in its investigation of certain tungsten shot from China. Officials found that tungsten shot from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The time covered by this investigation is from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Scope of the Investigation The products covered are tungsten spheres or balls, often called shot or “Tungsten Super Shot.” These are 92.6% or more tungsten by weight. Their sizes range from 1.5 millimeters to 10.0 millimeters in diameter. The product may also have coatings such as copper, nickel, iron, or metal alloys. It is usually classified under HTSUS codes 9306.29.0000 and 8101.99.8000. Investigation and Comments No changes were made to what is considered part of this investigation, as no interested parties commented on the scope after the first decision. The Department could not verify information sent by Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd. (KJ Super) due to restrictions by the Chinese government. Final Decision and Dumping Margin The Commerce Department reviewed all the information and comments. They used adverse facts available (AFA) against KJ Super because the information given could not be verified. As a result, KJ Super is considered part of the “China-wide entity” for the purposes of this decision. The final estimated dumping margin (or the rate of price undercutting) for the China-wide entity is 201.32 percent. This was the highest rate claimed in the original petition. Suspension of Liquidation Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to hold up liquidation of any tungsten shot from China, entered or withdrawn from a warehouse for use since February 19, 2025. Importers must pay a cash deposit as security for possible antidumping duties. The Department of Commerce did not adjust the dumping rate because there is no active countervailing duty (CVD) order involving export subsidies for this product. Next Steps and ITC Role The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the U.S. industry has been hurt by these imports. The ITC has 45 days from July 11, 2025, to make its final decision. If the ITC finds injury or threat of injury, an antidumping duty order will be issued, and duties must be paid on all relevant tungsten shot imports from China. If the ITC does not find injury, the investigation will end, cash deposits will be returned, and held imports will be released. Additional Information Anyone handling private information for this investigation must follow the rules for returning or destroying such information. The written description of the tungsten shot is the official scope of this finding, even though product codes are listed for convenience. For full details, see Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 131 (July 11, 2025), pages 30849-30850. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is available through the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system, ACCESS. The decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Inquiry Into Circumvention of Aluminum Container Duties Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started formal investigations into imports of disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids made in Thailand and Vietnam using Chinese aluminum foil. Officials are checking if these products are avoiding existing antidumping and countervailing duties on aluminum containers from China. Who Requested the Inquiry The inquiry follows a request from the Aluminum Foil Containers Manufacturers Association and its members. These include Durable Packaging International; D&W Fine Pack, LLC; Handifoil Corp.; Penny Plate, LLC; Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC; Shah Foil Products, Inc.; Smart USA, Inc.; and Trinidad/Benham Corp. Scope of the Duties The duties in question target disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids produced from flat-rolled aluminum. This includes aluminum containers of any shape or size, whether wrinkled or smooth. What is Being Investigated The focus is on aluminum containers made in Thailand and Vietnam using Chinese-origin aluminum foil, and then shipped to the United States. Investigators want to know if these steps are used to bypass existing trade duties on Chinese products. Legal Background Commerce is acting under section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and specific federal rules. The rule states that if products are completed in a third country from materials or goods subject to a trade order, and the final step is minor or adds little value, then those products can also be included under the original duty orders. Investigators will consider several points: Is the final assembly or processing in Thailand or Vietnam minor or basic? How much value does the Chinese aluminum add compared to the final product’s value? What are the investment and production levels in the third countries? Are there changes in trade patterns since the duties on China started? Are the companies in Thailand or Vietnam tied to those in China? Next Steps Commerce has found enough information to start a country-wide inquiry. They will ask certain companies in Thailand and Vietnam about their aluminum container production and exports to the U.S. Using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data, Commerce will choose the companies to contact. They will update their electronic system, ACCESS, within five days of this notice. Interested parties can comment within seven days after the data is posted. If the companies do not answer fully, Commerce may use available facts, which could include adverse conclusions. Suspension of Liquidation CBP will continue holding the entries of these aluminum products and require cash deposits as if they were covered under current duty orders. If Commerce eventually decides these products are avoiding duties, the suspension will continue, and additional measures may be taken for entries after November 4, 2021, per current regulations. Timeline Commerce aims to make a preliminary decision in 150 days and a final ruling in 300 days from the July 11, 2025 notice date, unless extended or changed. Official Notice This investigation is led by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. The public can see detailed rules and findings through the Federal Register and related checklists. Contact Information For more information: – Justin Enck: (202) 482-1614 – Yun Liang (Vietnam): (202) 482-3108 – Ann Marie Caton (Thailand): (202) 482-2607 These officials are with the Trade Remedy Counseling and Initiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results in PVLT Tires Countervailing Duty Review Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the administrative review for countervailing duties on certain passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires from China. This review covers the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce. The Department found that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of PVLT tires from China during the review period. No comments were received from interested parties on the preliminary results, so the Department adopted the preliminary results as final. No changes have been made, and therefore, no decision memorandum was issued with this final notice. Scope of the Order The order covers passenger vehicle and light truck tires imported from China. For a full description of the products involved, reference is made to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum associated with this review. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the period under review: Company Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., Ltd. 125.50 Disclosure Normally, Commerce releases its calculation methods to interested parties. In this case, because there were no changes from the preliminary results, there are no new calculations to disclose. Assessment Rates According to U.S. law, Commerce will have Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assess countervailing duties at the rates listed above. This will apply to all proper entries of the subject merchandise. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results. If a summons is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will not liquidate the relevant entries until the period to file for a statutory injunction expires, which is within 90 days of publication. Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the rates shown above for shipments entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results. The cash deposit instructions will remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order (APO) The notice reminds parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to follow procedures for the return or destruction of proprietary information. Failure to comply with APO rules can result in sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties The Commerce Department published these results in accordance with applicable sections of U.S. trade law. The notice was dated July 7, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duty Review on Steel Racks from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On July 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its administrative review of antidumping duties for certain steel racks and parts from China. This review covers the period from September 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. Background and Review Process The Department of Commerce began this review on October 10, 2024. Interested parties were invited to comment. The deadline for the review was extended several times, with the final results issued on July 3, 2025. The review follows the Tariff Act of 1930. Steel racks and parts are under the scope of this order, as detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Key Results The Department found that some Chinese exporters sold steel racks in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., along with Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. and Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd., received a final weighted-average dumping margin of 11.18 percent. Jiangsu Starshine Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. did not get a separate rate and was treated as part of the China-wide entity. The China-wide entity’s dumping margin remains at 144.50 percent and was not reviewed or changed. Differential Pricing Analysis The Commerce Department made changes in its analysis methods for these results. This is based on recent court decisions about statistical tests used to find dumping. The agency used a revised method for analyzing differential pricing, as explained in its memorandum. The method for calculating dumping margins did not change from the preliminary results. Separate Rates Jiangsu Nova received separate rate status. Jiangsu Starshine did not and is included in the China-wide group. This decision is unchanged from the preliminary results. No parties commented on this decision. Assessment Rates Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection how much antidumping duty to assess on these products. These instructions will be given no earlier than 35 days after publication of these results. For Jiangsu Nova, assessment rates are based on the total amount of dumping over the value of goods sold to each importer. If the rate for an importer is zero or very small, duties will not be collected. If Jiangsu Nova did not report a sale for certain shipments, those entries will be assessed at the China-wide rate of 144.50 percent. For Starshine, the assessment rate is 144.50 percent, the China-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements Jiangsu Nova: 11.18 percent. Exporters with separate rates not reviewed: their current rate. Other China exporters without a separate rate: 144.50 percent. Non-China exporters without a separate rate: the rate for their China supplier. These rates remain until further notice. Reminders for Importers Importers must file a certificate if antidumping duties have been reimbursed, before liquidation of entries. If not filed, Commerce may assume reimbursement and double the duties. Administrative Protective Order (APO) Parties under APO must return or destroy proprietary information as required. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. Legal Notices These results are issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(5). For more details, the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s website. Contact Information Questions should be directed to Jonathan Hill at (202) 482-3518, U.S. Department of Commerce. Dated: July 3, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Steel Propane Cylinders from China and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided to continue antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on steel propane cylinders from the People’s Republic of China and Thailand. On August 15, 2019, the Department of Commerce first published AD orders on steel propane cylinders from China and Thailand, and a CVD order on steel propane cylinders from China. On July 1, 2024, both Commerce and the ITC began their first five-year “sunset” review of these orders. After reviewing the case, both agencies found that removing these orders would likely lead to new or ongoing dumping, more countervailable subsidies, and harm to the U.S. industry. On July 1, 2025, the ITC confirmed that ending these orders would probably cause continued or new injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably short time. As a result, the orders will remain in place. Scope of the Orders The affected products are steel cylinders used for compressed or liquefied propane or other gases. These cylinders meet certain specifications, like USDOT 4B, 4BA, or 4BW, Transport Canada 4BM, 4BAM, or 4BWM, or United Nations ISO 4706. Steel propane cylinders included range in capacity from 2.5 pounds (about 6 pounds water capacity and 4-6 pounds empty weight) up to 42 pounds (about 100 pounds water capacity and 28-32 pounds empty weight). They can have up to two ports and may come assembled or unassembled. Products such as collars and foot rings for these cylinders are also included. Unfinished or unassembled cylinders (such as unwelded cylinder halves or cylinders missing collars or valves) are covered. Cylinders that fit other standards like ASME or ANSI are included only if they also match the listed USDOT, Transport Canada, or ISO standards. Items that only have extra processing in a third country, such as additional welding, painting, or testing, are still covered by the orders if the processing does not change the basic nature of the propane cylinder. Excluded from the orders are seamless steel propane cylinders, stainless steel cylinders, aluminum cylinders, and composite fiber cylinders. The products mainly fall under Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers 7311.00.0060 and 7311.00.0090, but the written scope matters most. Continuation of Orders With the agencies’ determinations, the Commerce Department has ordered the continuation of the AD and CVD orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting duties (AD and CVD cash deposits) at the rates that are currently in effect for all imports of these products. The effective date for the continuation is July 1, 2025. The next required five-year review is planned before the fifth anniversary of the latest ITC determination. Administrative Protective Order (APO) and Notification This notice reminds all parties of their responsibilities under the APO about returning or destroying confidential information. Timely written notification or conversion of materials is required. Violations of the APO are subject to sanctions. The review and this notice are in line with sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). For More Information Contact Samuel Brummitt at the Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Phone: (202) 482-7851. Date of Issue Dated: July 7, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes U.S. Corrects Antidumping Duty Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand On July 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published corrections to earlier antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The corrections address two main issues found in a Federal Register notice from June 24, 2025. Correction for Vietnam Scope Language The first correction adds a missing appendix. This appendix includes full details about the types of solar cells covered in the antidumping order for Vietnam. The original notice only had scope details for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Now, the order on Vietnam has unique language that lists the excluded products and special requirements for imports. Correction for Malaysia Exclusion The second correction adds language related to Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. This company received a zero percent dumping margin. Because of this, shipments from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. are excluded from the antidumping duty order on Malaysia. The exclusion only applies if the company is both the producer and exporter. If the product is shipped by another company, or Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. ships for another exporter, the exclusion does not apply. Updated Table for Malaysia A footnote was added to the table of dumping margins. It notes that Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. is excluded from the antidumping order because it received a zero dumping margin. Scope of Orders: Product Details The orders cover crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells that are 20 micrometers thick or more. These include modules, laminates, and panels whether or not they are assembled into other products. The orders cover products imported as parts if they meet the required definitions. Exclusions from Scope Thin film photovoltaic products made from materials like amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Certain small photovoltaic cells built into consumer products not made for power generation. Small panels with specified voltage, watt, and size limits. Certain off-grid panels, both with and without glass covers, that have unique wiring and packaging characteristics. Off-grid panels made for use in automation or greenhouse systems. Each order for Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam lists all technical product specifications. These include details about size, power output, materials, connectors, and packaging. Commodities Classification The products are listed under various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes, mainly 8541.42.0010 and 8541.43.0010. Specific codes are also listed for possible imports. Legal Notice The correction is published according to sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and in line with 19 CFR 351.205(c). The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Contact Information Vietnam: Deborah Cohen, (202) 482-4521 Cambodia: Hermes Panilla, (202) 482-3477 Thailand: Stephen Bailey, (202) 482-0193 Malaysia: Patrick Barton, (202) 482-0012 These corrections clarify the products covered and not covered by the antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Corrects Antidumping Orders on Solar Cells from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes About the Correction The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued an official correction to its June 24, 2025, Federal Register notice for antidumping duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Commerce published a notice on June 24, 2025, about amended final antidumping duty determinations and orders on solar cells from these countries. The correction makes two key changes related to Vietnam and Malaysia. Vietnam Scope Correction The original notice included only one appendix describing the products covered, but two appendices were needed. The corrected notice makes clear there are two appendices, one for Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand, and a separate one for Vietnam. Each appendix explains the specific scope of the products under order for those countries. Malaysia Exclusion Correction Commerce also added language about a company named Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. The new information states that solar products made and exported by this company are not covered by the antidumping order on Malaysia. Any products from different combinations of producers or exporters, or by third parties using goods from Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., are not excluded. Detailed Product Descriptions Appendix I – Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand Covers crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules, including those partly or fully assembled into other products. Includes cells at least 20 micrometers thick with a p/n junction. Merchandise can be described as parts for finished products, like building-integrated modules. Excludes thin film photovoltaic products made from amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide. Excludes small crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells not exceeding 10,000 mm² in surface area if permanently integrated into consumer goods with different uses. Excludes various small off-grid solar panels, portable panels, and panels with special shapes, covers, or connections, as described in the appendix. Excludes products already covered by orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. Lists various Harmonized Tariff System (HTSUS) codes under which the merchandise may enter the U.S. Appendix II – Vietnam Covers the same general types of products as the other countries, but with some differences in the exclusion language. Excludes thin film products, small, integrated cells in consumer goods, and many small off-grid panels. Excludes products used in off-grid greenhouse shade tracking systems with detailed technical criteria. Excludes products already covered by orders on Chinese crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. Lists the same group of HTSUS codes. Table of Malaysia Dumping Margins Lists companies and their dumping margins. Hanwha Q Cells Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. has a 0.00% margin and is excluded. Other companies have margins ranging from 8.59% to 81.24%. What This Means The notice clarifies which solar products from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Thailand are covered by these U.S. antidumping duty orders. It also details which products and companies are excluded. The corrections ensure all parties know which specific products are subject to duties. The document was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For more details or questions, interested parties are directed to contact the Commerce officials listed in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets and Vanities Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final results in the first sunset review on the antidumping duty order for wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department of Commerce states that ending the antidumping duty order would likely lead to more dumping of these products from China into the United States. The antidumping duty order was first published on April 21, 2020. It covers wooden cabinets, vanities, and their components made in China. The first sunset review started on March 3, 2025. The review checks if the order should stay or end, as required under the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC, are the parties in the United States who took part in this review. Both groups proved they are part of the U.S. industry involved. No companies or groups from China responded to Commerce during the review. The U.S. Department of Commerce conducted an expedited review because only domestic U.S. parties responded. This process took 120 days. After its review, the Department found that lifting the duties would likely lead to continued dumping. Dumping means selling products in the United States for less than their fair value. The dumping margins, or the amounts by which prices would be less than fair value, could reach up to 262.18 percent. The Department of Commerce’s detailed decisions, including all issues and topics discussed, can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum available to the public online. These results mean that the antidumping duties on wooden cabinets and vanities from China will continue. Parties that have access to confidential information because of the case rules were reminded to return or destroy that information according to Department of Commerce regulations. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, acting for Enforcement and Compliance. The order remains in place as required by U.S. law. The public can find the details and all supporting materials online. This notice was officially published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 126, on July 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Scope in Investigation on Brake Drums From China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On July 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction to its final determination about certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China. The correction affects what types of brake drums are included in the investigation of sales at less than fair value (LTFV). The original notice was published on June 18, 2025. It did not update the scope in Appendix I to reflect recent changes. This investigation covers certain brake drums made from gray cast iron. These brake drums can be finished or unfinished. The size is important: they must have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches. Each drum must weigh more than 50 pounds. Unfinished brake drums are those that have had some turning or machining done, but are not ready for installation. The investigation includes brake drums whether imported by themselves or with other goods, such as a hub, assembled or unassembled. If a brake drum is imported as part of an assembly, only the brake drum is covered by the scope. Included in the investigation are brake drums that are finished or unfinished, and then processed further in another country or in the United States. This could include assembly or any process that does not remove the product from the investigation’s scope. Adding non-subject merchandise, in the original country or another country, does not remove the subject brake drum from the investigation. Some items are not included. Merchandise that is already covered by the duty orders on certain chassis and subassemblies from China is not included. Also excluded are composite brake drums that have more than 38 percent steel by weight. The brake drums are identified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The main subheading is 8708.30.5020. They might also be listed under these subheadings when imported as parts of assemblies: 8708.30.5090, 8716.90.5060, 8704.10, 8704.23.01, 8704.32.01, 8704.43.00, 8704.52.00, 8704.60.00, 8708.50.61, 8708.50.6500, 8716.90.5010, 8716.31.00, 8716.39.00, and 8716.40.00. However, the written description of the merchandise is what decides if a product is covered by the investigation. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 30, 2025. The correction is published according to section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Will Keep Countervailing Duties on Chinese Wooden Cabinets Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a decision on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. The Department finished its first expedited five-year (sunset) review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order. This decision is about wooden cabinets, vanities, and the parts that go with them. Review Process The review began on March 3, 2025. The Commerce Department followed the law in section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (AKCA) and MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC took part as interested parties. They sent their responses by the deadlines set in the rules. No response came from any companies in China or from the Government of China. No one asked for a hearing. Because of the lack of response, the Department of Commerce moved to an expedited review. What Was Reviewed The order covers all wooden cabinets and vanities that are made in China. The detailed scope of the products in the order is found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is public and can be read online at the Department of Commerce website. Final Results The Department determined that ending (revoking) the CVD order would mean countervailable subsidies would likely start again. Subsidies are when the government helps pay to make products cheaper to export. Producers/Exporters Subsidy Rate (Percent ad valorem) The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. 13.33 Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 18.27 Rizhao Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Co. 31.18 Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co., Ltd. 293.45 Deway International Trade Co., Ltd. 293.45 All Others 20.93 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also tells interested parties to follow the rules about handling private information from the case. They must return or destroy sensitive materials on time, or risk penalties. How to Read More Full details of all topics covered, including the background, history, and decision, are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is available to the public at https://access.trade.gov. When Does This Start? This decision applies starting July 2, 2025. Who Made the Decision? Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the notice for the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On July 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the expedited third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from China. The Department found that ending the antidumping duties would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping margins could be as high as 159.64 percent if the order were removed. Background The original antidumping duty order was published on February 26, 2009. The current review is the third to check if the order should remain. This review follows requirements in the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce started this third sunset review on March 3, 2025. Domestic companies Tokai Carbon GE LLC and GrafTech International Ltd. sent in their notice to participate and filed a substantive response on time. No responses were received from companies in China or other respondent parties. Scope of the Order The antidumping order applies to small diameter graphite electrodes from China. Full details on what is covered are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Review Process Because only domestic interested parties responded, the Department held an expedited, 120-day review. The review looked at whether dumping would likely restart if the order ended and what margins might result. Details are available on the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system. Final Results The Commerce Department determined that removing the antidumping duty order would likely cause dumping to continue or return. The likely dumping margins would be weighted-average margins up to 159.64 percent. Administrative Notes Those subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) should return or destroy all confidential business information as required. Notices for compliance are included. Details Available Results and related documents are available through the Department of Commerce and are filed under Federal Register Document No. 2025-12372. The Issues and Decision Memorandum discusses all major topics, including the likelihood of continued dumping and likely dumping margins. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 27, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Change in Cabinet Import Duties from China Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes On June 12, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a final judgment about the countervailing duty investigation into wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This investigation reviewed products made from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The Department of Commerce found that some Chinese exporters received unfair help, or subsidies, from their government. Because of this, extra import taxes, called countervailing duties, were put on these items in 2020. Several companies, including The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. (Meisen), and a U.S. importer called Cabinets to Go, LLC, disagreed with Commerce’s findings. They took the case to court. The main problem was about a program called the Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP). The court wanted proof that the companies did not use this program. Commerce tried to get this information from Ancientree, Meisen, and their customers. Meisen did not give the needed information. Ancientree provided some proof, but not for all customers. After several remand (do-over) decisions, the court told Commerce to calculate new subsidy rates for Ancientree. Commerce was told to only count benefits from the EBCP where they could not prove Ancientree’s customers did not use the support. Commerce recalculated the rates. For Ancientree, the new subsidy rate is 5.06 percent. The new “all others” rate is 18.17 percent. These are changes from the previous rates based on new evidence and the court’s instructions. Ancientree has a different cash deposit rate already set by a later review, so this change will not affect Ancientree’s current cash deposit. Commerce will update cash deposit instructions for other companies using the new “all others” rate. Commerce still cannot liquidate (finalize) the import duties for some entries by Ancientree, Meisen, and other named companies because there are court injunctions in place. These entries will remain on hold while any possible appeals are finished. This notice was published to follow court requirements. The Department of Commerce is following the law and the court’s direction for how to handle these cabinet imports from China. Issued by: Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Date: June 27, 2025 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Amends Preliminary Findings in Countervailing Duty Case on Active Anode Material from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Background On May 28, 2025, the Department of Commerce published a decision saying that there were unfair subsidies for active anode material from China. After this, the American Active Anode Material Producers claimed there was an important ministerial mistake in the calculated subsidy rates for Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of China (together known as Panasonic) and BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic and BTR disagreed and submitted their comments on June 2, 2025. Period of Investigation The investigation covers January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Scope This case focuses on active anode material from China. More details about what is covered can be found in the Preliminary Determination. Analysis of Ministerial Errors A ministerial error is an unintentional mistake like adding incorrectly or copying data wrongly. A significant ministerial error means the mistake changes a company’s countervailing duty rate by five percentage points or more, or moves a rate from “zero” or “de minimis” to above that level. The Department of Commerce agreed that such an error happened when calculating the subsidy rate for Panasonic. Other, smaller errors were also found and corrected. Amended Preliminary Determination After fixing the errors, the Department announced new preliminary net countervailable subsidy rates: Company Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd.; Panasonic 11.58 Corporation of China Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat * 721.03 Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. * 721.03 All Others 11.58 *The rates marked with an asterisk are based on facts with adverse inferences. Panasonic is a trading company. It sold active anode material made by BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd., its affiliates, and other connected companies. The Department of Commerce combined all the subsidy benefits from BTR, its affiliates, and Panasonic into one rate for Panasonic. Cash Deposits and Suspension of Liquidation The cash deposit and suspension of liquidation will now use the new, amended rates. The new, higher rates for Panasonic and all others will start on the date this notice is published in the Federal Register. Notification The U.S. International Trade Commission will be notified of the amended preliminary determination. This official notice was dated June 27, 2025, and signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, who is performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Countervailing Duty Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On 2025-06-24, the U.S. Department of Commerce began investigations into steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam. These are called countervailing duty (CVD) investigations. The investigations will look at whether the governments in these countries gave unfair subsidies to their rebar producers, which could hurt American companies. Background The Rebar Trade Action Coalition, a group of U.S. rebar makers, filed the petitions for these investigations on 2025-06-04. This group said that the governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam were giving unfair help to rebar companies in their countries. The U.S. Department of Commerce also received other petitions asking for antidumping investigations into rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. Who Is Involved The governments named are: Government of Algeria (GOA) Government of Egypt (GOE) Government of Vietnam (GOV) The U.S. companies who support the case are producers of rebar. Investigation Period The period being investigated is from 2024-01-01, through 2024-12-31. What Products Are Included The investigations cover steel rebar used in concrete. Rebar can be straight or in coils. It does not matter how long, wide, or thick it is, or what type of metal it is made from. Rebar that has been further processed (like being cut, painted, or coated) is still covered. “Plain rounds” (smooth, non-bumpy rebar) are not covered. The U.S. government uses Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) numbers to track imports. Most rebar comes in under numbers: 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but other numbers may also be used. Scope Comments Commerce asked for comments about exactly what should be covered in these investigations. Interested parties can submit comments by 2025-07-14. Rebuttal comments are due by 2025-07-24. All comments must be filed electronically. Industry Support The government checked whether enough U.S. producers support the petition. The law says the petitioners must make at least 25% of all U.S. rebar, and more than 50% of rebar made by companies supporting or opposing the petition. The petition met both requirements, so the investigation moves forward. Injury Allegation The U.S. petitioners say rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam is being sold in the U.S. at unfair prices because of government help and is hurting the U.S. rebar industry. They say imports are high, local companies are losing sales, prices are being pushed down, and American companies are doing worse financially. Programs Under Investigation There are 24 programs being looked at in Algeria, 25 in Egypt, and 39 in Vietnam. Each program may involve different types of government support, such as loans or grants. Respondents Commerce plans to select certain companies in each country as “mandatory respondents.” They will likely use U.S. import data to pick which companies to examine most closely. Four companies are identified in Algeria. Thirteen companies are identified in Egypt. Ten companies are identified in Vietnam. Process and Timeline Commerce started the investigations on 2025-06-24. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days from 2025-06-04, if U.S. industry is hurt by these imports. If the ITC finds no injury for a country, the investigation ends for that country. Submissions and Deadlines All filings must be electronic. There are rules for submitting information. If anyone needs more time to file, they must ask before the deadline. All information submitted must be accurate. Notification The governments of Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam have been notified about these actions. Parties interested in these cases must follow special procedures if they want to see confidential information. Next Steps Commerce and the ITC will continue the investigations. If unfair subsidies are found and there is injury to the U.S. industry, extra duties could be placed on rebar from these countries. Appendix—Product Definition The investigations are for steel rebar, in straight form or coils, used in concrete, except for smooth (plain round) bars. The scope is based on the written description, not just the HTSUS numbers. This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 123 on 2025-06-30. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Starts Antidumping Investigations on Steel Rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the start of antidumping investigations for steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. This action follows petitions filed by the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its member companies. What Are the Investigations About? The investigations are about whether rebar from these four countries is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, known as “dumping.” The petitions say this has caused injury to the U.S. rebar industry. For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt: April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. For Vietnam: October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Product Under Investigation The rebar includes steel concrete reinforcing bar in straight or coil form, regardless of size, length, or grade. Plain rounds (nondeformed or smooth rebar) are excluded. The rebar can be processed further, such as cutting or coating, and still be under investigation. How Are Comments Handled? Commerce asks interested parties to give comments on the scope of the investigations and the physical features of the rebar by July 14, 2025. Rebuttals are due by July 24, 2025. All comments must be submitted using the ACCESS online system. Industry Support Commerce checked that the petitioners represent the U.S. industry making similar rebar. The petitions are supported by domestic producers holding over 50% of the total U.S. production of rebar. Claims of Material Injury The petitioners claim that large volumes of dumped imports have hurt the U.S. industry. Evidence includes lost sales, reduced market share, price drops, and declining production and profits for U.S. companies. Alleged Dumping Margins The estimated dumping margins are: Algeria: 127.32% Bulgaria: 27.79% Egypt: 110.87% to 128.98% Vietnam: 117.61% Respondent Selection Process For Algeria, Bulgaria, and Egypt, Commerce will choose companies for investigation based on U.S. import data and comments from interested parties. For Vietnam, which is a non-market economy, Commerce will use quantity and value questionnaires sent to identified exporters. Separate Rates for Vietnamese Exporters Vietnamese companies that want a separate rate must return both the quantity and value questionnaire and the separate rate application. These are due within specific deadlines after the notice. Mandatory Certification and Procedures All parties submitting information must certify its accuracy. Commerce details how to get access to confidential information and what forms to use. Information should be detailed, accurate, and submitted on time. ITC Review The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days if the imports are harming the U.S. rebar industry. If they decide there is no harm from a country, the investigation for that country will stop. Scope Details The affected products are listed mainly under HTSUS codes 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010, but may also enter under several other codes. The written description in the scope controls what products are covered. Key Dates and Deadlines Comments on scope or characteristics: July 14, 2025 Rebuttals: July 24, 2025 Vietnamese Q&V questionnaire: July 8, 2025 Separate rate application deadline: 21 days after this notice’s publication Further Action Commerce will make preliminary determinations by 140 days after this initiation unless the timeline is changed. The investigations will continue following all laws and regulations. This article is based entirely on the official Federal Register notice published June 30, 2025 (FR Doc No: 2025-12045). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Delays Preliminary Decisions in Silicon Metal Trade Cases Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a delay in the preliminary determinations for its ongoing countervailing duty (CVD) investigations into silicon metal imports from Australia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos), Norway, and Thailand. The Commerce Department started these investigations on May 14, 2025. The original deadline for the preliminary decisions was July 18, 2025. However, the department received timely requests from the petitioners—Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC—to extend the deadline. Under U.S. law, Commerce can delay a preliminary determination if the petitioner makes a timely request or if the investigation is especially complex. Petitioners must ask for a delay at least 25 days before the original deadline and explain why they need it. Commerce usually grants the request unless there is a strong reason to deny it. The petitioners said the extra time was needed because the current schedule does not allow enough time for Commerce to review the subsidies producers and exporters of silicon metal might be receiving in the four countries. The requests were submitted on June 18 and 23, 2025. Commerce agreed with the petitioners’ reasons and found no reason to deny the request. Because of this, the deadline for the preliminary determinations is now pushed back to September 22, 2025. The new date reflects the need to move the deadline to the next business day, as September 21 falls on a weekend. The final determinations in these investigations will now come 75 days after the new preliminary determination date. The notice was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on June 26, 2025. This postponement follows the rules under the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Code of Federal Regulations. If you want more information about these cases, you can contact: Kyle Clahane for Australia at (202) 482-5449 Shane Subler for Laos at (202) 482-6241 Mary Kolberg for Norway at (202) 482-1785 George McMahon for Thailand at (202) 482-1167 All contacts are at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.