U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Extra Taxes on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision. They decided to keep extra taxes, called countervailing duties, on certain engines from China. These engines are large, vertical shaft engines. They range from 225cc to 999cc in size. The Department thinks that removing these duties would lead to Chinese companies continuing to receive unfair help from their government. This kind of help is known as a subsidy. Subsidies can make products cheaper, making it hard for other countries to compete. The decision is based on a review that started on February 2, 2026. The review checked if these subsidies would continue without the duties in place. The main companies in the U.S. that care about this decision are Briggs & Stratton, LLC and Discovery Energy, LLC. These companies gave their thoughts to the Department of Commerce by March 4, 2026. The Government of China and other Chinese companies did not respond with their thoughts. The review found rates for subsidies that would likely continue. For Loncin Motor Co., the rate is 18.96 percent. For Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., the rate is 20.38 percent. All other companies would have a rate of 19.85 percent. This decision means the U.S. will keep the extra taxes on these engines. This helps protect American companies from unfair competition. The decision was announced by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The Department of Commerce’s review shows how important it is to check on foreign subsidies. They want to make sure trade with other countries is fair for everyone. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Malaysia Steel Wire Strand Review Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of an important review involving prestressed concrete steel wire strand imported from Malaysia. This review focused on determining if Malaysian companies sold this wire strand in the United States at unfairly low prices. The companies reviewed were Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that these companies did not sell the wire strand below its normal value during this time. This means they sold it at fair prices in the U.S. market. The review’s findings are officially effective as of June 3, 2026. The agency involved is the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Contact persons for more details are Monica Gillis and Peter Shaw from the AD/CVD Operations office. They can be reached at (202) 482-6384 or (202) 482-0697 for inquiries. Earlier on October 3, 2025, a preliminary result was published. This preliminary finding was delayed due to a government shutdown that tolled deadlines by 47 days. Further delays resulted in an additional tolling of 21 days. However, Commerce verified responses from Kiswire and Wei Dat through verification sessions in March 2026. The review specifically assessed if goods from these companies were sold at prices lower than normal value. It was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. For the companies not individually examined, such as Southern PC Steel, the Act suggests a reasonable calculation method. The result is a zero percent margin for them as well. Based on these results, all reviewed companies – Kiswire, Wei Dat, and Southern PC Steel, have a dumping margin of 0.00 percent for the period. This means no extra antidumping duties are required on their products for this review period. The Commerce Department will disclose full calculation details following this review. Usually, this happens within five days of the announcement. The customs and border authority, CBP, will assess the covered entries of wire strand without imposing additional antidumping duties, following the finalized results. For future imports of the wire strand from Malaysia, the cash deposit rates will now align with these findings. The special zero rate applies to the named companies. For others not reviewed, the previous rates from earlier investigations still apply. This process involves significant documentation and the handling of proprietary information. Importers are reminded of their duty to submit respective certificates before liquidation to avoid double duties. This review helps ensure fair trade practices and confirms that the selling practices of Malaysian wire strand imports align with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Raw Honey from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Review Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review on raw honey imported from Brazil. This review, conducted by the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce, determined that raw honey from Brazil was sold in the U.S. at prices below normal value. The period of review was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The review involved 14 producers and exporters of raw honey from Brazil. Among them were Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindustrial Ltda. and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda., which acted as mandatory respondents in the investigation. The preliminary results were published on September 30, 2025, and public comments were invited. However, due to a federal government shutdown later that year, the Commerce extended deadlines for the review several times. The final results were scheduled and released by May 29, 2026. The review was conducted according to U.S. law, specifically Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce based this review on its findings, which involved public comments and extensive data analysis. The final decisions were detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum made available to registered users and directly accessible online. Scope and Examination of Imports The product under review included raw honey as defined in the original antidumping duty orders. The review continued to investigate other shipments from Brazil, especially those involving companies not individually examined in this review. Final Results and Antidumping Margins Based on the review, the weighted-average dumping margins for the examined companies were determined. Melbras Importadora faced a 4.48% dumping margin, while Minamel Agroindústria was subject to a 10.48% margin. For companies not individually reviewed, an average margin of 7.48% was applied. Disclosure and Compliance Instructions The Department of Commerce intends to disclose detailed findings and calculations from this review. Companies are required to comply with all instructions regarding antidumping assessments and cash deposits due after these final results. Notably, a reminder was issued to importers about filing certificates concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective immediately, all U.S. entries of raw honey from Brazil will have updated cash deposit requirements matching the review’s final results. These requirements will remain in place until further notifications are given by the Department of Commerce. Conclusion and Further Notifications This announcement echoes the compliance terms set by U.S. trade laws for imported raw honey. Importers and other stakeholders must remain aware of the updated duties and follow federal regulations to ensure proper execution of trade practices. The review and subsequent announcements are essential to maintain fair trade and protect domestic markets from unfair pricing methods used by some international exporters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unfair Paper Sales from Portugal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced preliminary findings about paper sales from Portugal. This decision involves uncoated paper. The period under review was from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. The review investigates if Portuguese companies sold paper in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The focus was on The Navigator Company, S.A., a major producer. The company faced scrutiny over its pricing practices. The Department found that Navigator had sold paper at prices lower than normal value. They calculated a dumping margin of 2.70%. A dumping margin shows how much a company’s sale price undershoots a fair market price. The findings came from a process involving many calculations and rules. The Department looked at export prices and the normal values in Portugal. They used specific methods outlined in U.S. law. This announcement opens a window for further comments. Each party in the review can share their thoughts on this preliminary result. They have 21 days from the announcement to file their case briefs. Rebuttal comments can be filed five days after that. There is also a chance for a hearing. Interested parties must request this within 30 days of the announcement. They must include the names of participants and the issues they want to discuss. The findings lead to certain actions by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. If the dumping margin is above de minimis (0.50%), they will assess duties. If Navigator’s margin is zero or very low, there will be no duties. The Commerce Department has made instructions for customs. They want to ensure all regulations are followed properly. The next steps depend on any final decisions after this review. These measures aim to ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. is protecting its market from unfair pricing practices. The process involves detailed reviews and public participation before any final decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Starts New Trade Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has begun new administrative reviews. These are for antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These are important because they help ensure that products imported to the U.S. are fairly priced. The reviews started on June 2, 2026. The Commerce Department received requests for reviews concerning various products. Many of these products have April anniversary dates. What Products Are Being Reviewed? Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet: This product is used in buildings and transportation. Companies in countries like Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, and several more are being reviewed. Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod: Used in construction, items from companies in India and China are under review. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a): This chemical is used in refrigeration. Companies in China are being checked. Activated Carbon: This product cleans air and water. Companies in China are under review. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities: Used in homes, these products from China are being looked at. And many more products and companies from countries like Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Türkiye, and Slovenia. Why Are These Reviews Important? These reviews help to check if foreign companies are selling their products too cheaply in the U.S. This is called “dumping”. Products sold this way can hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews make sure companies are charging fair prices. What Will Happen Next? Once the reviews are done, the Commerce Department will decide if any actions are needed. They may impose extra duties on some products if they find problems. This process helps keep trade fair and protects American companies. It is important for companies who want to keep their separate tax rates to fill out certain forms. They need to do this 14 days after the notice came out. Companies that are part of these reviews need to keep track of their sales carefully. The Commerce Department will finish these reviews by April 30, 2027. This gives them time to make sure everything is fair and accurate. What Should Interested Parties Do? If anyone is interested in these reviews, they should apply for access to information. They need to follow the rules given by the Commerce Department. There are specific ways to share information and facts. This ensures that the reviews are transparent. Commerce will not be able to share information unless a party asks for it in the right way. As the reviews continue, the Commerce Department remains focused on maintaining fair trade for all involved. These actions ensure a level-playing field in the market. Stay informed as this process progresses and further decisions are made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Amends Results of Antidumping Duty Review on Activated Carbon from China Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced changes to the results of its review of antidumping duties on certain activated carbon from China. This review looked at imports from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. On April 23, 2026, the Commerce Department released the original results. However, errors were found by several companies involved. These companies included Calgon Carbon Corporation and Norit Americas, Inc., along with Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. and Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. The errors were seen as ‘ministerial,’ meaning they were mistakes like math errors or incorrect copying. The law says these kinds of mistakes can be fixed. Specific Errors Corrected: The errors affected how some costs were calculated. For Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., mistakes included how a by-product was excluded and the costs of electricity and packing were added up. For Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., errors included using incorrect export numbers and mislabeled units of measure. Correcting these errors changed the dumping margin for Ningxia Huahui from $0.56 per kilogram to $0.04 per kilogram. This change also affected other non-selected companies, setting their new rate at $0.04 per kilogram. Amended Results: After corrections, the estimated dumping margins are: Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.: $0.00 per kilogram. Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.: $0.04 per kilogram. Cash Deposit Requirements: With these new results, new cash deposit requirements will take effect. Companies must deposit an amount equal to their dumping margin for any future shipments. For example, Datong Juqiang will deposit $0.00 per kilogram, and Ningxia Huahui will deposit $0.04 per kilogram. Conclusion: These changes ensure that the duties applied are based on accurate information. The Department of Commerce will give specific instructions on how to handle affected imports to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision aims to protect U.S. businesses by ensuring a fair trade environment with China in the activated carbon market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Panel Review Request Filed Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes A new development has taken place under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). A Request for Panel Review was filed on May 4, 2026. This involves Certain oil country tubular goods from the United States. The request was submitted to the Canadian Section of the USMCA Secretariat. The request was filed on behalf of Maverick Tube Corporation. The case has been given the number CDA-USA-2026-10.12-01. The panel review is about a final result from the Canadian Border Services Agency. This result was published in the Canada Gazette on April 4, 2026. USMCA Article 10.12 allows countries to settle disputes about trade remedy determinations. These determinations come from the United States, Canada, or Mexico. When a panel review is requested, a Binational Panel is formed. This panel reviews the determination and gives a binding decision. The USMCA has specific Rules for Article 10.12 reviews. These rules were agreed upon by the three countries. The filing of requests must follow Rule 40. Details about these rules can be found on the official USMCA Secretariat website. There are steps for parties interested in the panel review: A Complaint must be filed no later than 30 days after the first Request for Panel Review. This means the Complaint deadline is June 3, 2026. Anyone who wants to participate in the review must file a Notice of Appearance. This must be done no later than 45 days after the first Request for Panel Review. The deadline for this is June 18, 2026. The panel review will focus on errors of fact or law. It can also include challenges to the jurisdiction of the authority. The focus will be on errors and defenses raised in the panel review. Further information can be obtained by contacting Vidya Desai. She is the United States Secretary of the USMCA Secretariat. This development marks an important step in resolving trade disputes under USMCA rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Wind Towers Dumped Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its review concerning utility scale wind towers from the Republic of Korea. The review determined that these wind towers, produced by Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. from Korea, were sold in the United States at below their normal value during the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Dumping Margin Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. has been assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 4.99%. This means that the Department of Commerce found that the company sold its wind towers in the U.S. at prices that were 4.99% less than their fair value. Background The Department had made a preliminary determination earlier in January 2026, which it has now finalized. Interested parties were invited to comment on these preliminary results. Dongkuk S&C was the sole producer or exporter reviewed in this period. Scope of the Order The order covers utility scale wind towers from Korea, which are subject to U.S. antidumping laws. These laws are intended to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling goods at unfairly low prices. Assessment and Cash Deposits Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess additional duties on imports at the determined dumping margin. The Department also confirmed that there would be no changes to the preliminary margin calculation. It outlined that CBP would liquidate entries of Dongkuk’s wind towers at these rates unless they had no knowledge of the items’ destination being the U.S. The new cash deposit rate for future imports will be set at Dongkuk’s determined margin of 4.99%, effective from the date of publication of these findings. For others, different historical rates or a rate of 5.41% will apply. Legal and Administrative Details Commerce’s determination is part of its routine enforcement under the Tariff Act of 1930. Companies involved in importing must comply with these requirements or face penalties. The information used in this determination can be accessed on the Department’s electronic systems by registered users. For more details or further information, Anne Entz from AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, can be contacted at the Department of Commerce. The U.S. government continues to monitor and enforce trade laws to ensure fair competition and protect domestic industries from practices like dumping. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes Commerce Preliminarily Finds Dumping of Off-the-Road Tires from India, Begins Review Process The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding the import of certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) from India. According to the Department, producers and exporters in India sold some of these tires in the United States at unfairly low prices, violating trading rules. The review period spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. Companies Under Review Commerce selected two companies for detailed examination: ATC Tires Private Ltd., which includes ATC Tires AP Private Limited, and Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited (MTPL). These companies are referred to as the mandatory respondents. Government Shutdown Impact and Timing Adjustments Due to a lapse in U.S. federal funding and a government shutdown, the review process faced delays. Commerce extended deadlines twice to account for these interruptions. Initially, deadlines were moved back 47 days, then an additional 21 days were added, delaying the preliminary results to May 26, 2026. Scope of Review The review focuses on OTR tires from India and seeks to determine if they were sold in U.S. markets at less than the normal value. Normal value is the price at which goods are sold in the exporter’s home market. If exported products are sold for less, it’s considered dumping. Methodology and Preliminary Findings Commerce is conducting the review under specific U.S. trade rules. Both export price and normal value are determined according to legal guidelines. Commerce calculates the margin of unfair pricing to decide on possible penalties. The Department found that the two scrutinized companies had dumping margins of 2.01% for ATC and 1.07% for MTPL during the review period. For other companies not individually reviewed, a margin of 1.87% was established. Next Steps for Public Participation The decision is open for public comment. Interested parties have the opportunity to file their views in writing. Comments should be filed within seven days after the last verification report related to this review. Rescission for Certain Companies The Department has also decided to rescind the review for 25 companies, concluding there were no entries of interest during the review period. These companies will have their antidumping duties assessed based on their previous rates. Cash Deposit Requirements After the review, new cash deposit rates are set for the companies based on their calculated margins. These rates will be applied to all future shipments from June 1, 2026, onward. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s preliminary determination and ongoing review process aim to ensure fair trading practices in the importation of OTR tires from India. This step reflects broader efforts to maintain competitive market conditions in the U.S. tire industry. The final decision is pending further investigations and will ultimately direct the trade measures applied to these imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Court Ruling Changes Antidumping Measures for Japanese Steel Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a significant decision on May 22, 2026, concerning steel products from Japan. The case involves the company Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. The CIT ruled in favor of Toyo Kohan by upholding the Department of Commerce’s revised findings about antidumping duties on specific steel products. The products in question are diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. The review covers sales from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. The Department of Commerce originally calculated a dumping margin of 4.44 percent. Toyo Kohan did not agree with this result and appealed the decision. The CIT found issues with how Commerce evaluated the U.S. sales data. It asked Commerce to review how it determines the “date of sale” and to perform a different analysis for price differences, aligning with suggestions from the Federal Circuit’s Marmen decision. Following the CIT’s guidance, Commerce revised its evaluation. It slightly increased the dumping margin for Toyo Kohan from 4.44 percent to 4.58 percent. The CIT’s latest ruling is a definitive judgment, meaning it does not support the original Commerce’s results. This means Commerce had to amend its previous decision with this updated dumping rate. However, Toyo Kohan’s cash deposit rate will not change because newer results exist from subsequent reviews. Furthermore, the CIT has blocked the liquidation of Toyo Kohan’s entries during the review period. Whether the CIT’s decision stands or if it is challenged in higher courts will affect how duties are assessed. For now, antidumping duties will follow the amended margin if there are no further appeals. The decision brought by the CIT marks a crucial moment for international trade relations and duties on Japanese steel products. This ruling is essential for companies involved in the steel import business, as it influences how duties and prices are configured. The Department of Commerce’s updates in response to CIT’s decision reflect the ongoing regulatory adjustments and international trade’s legal framework’s complexity. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department of Commerce Begins Five-Year Sunset Reviews The International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce, has begun the process of five-year reviews, also known as Sunset Reviews. These reviews look at antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. They also check on suspended investigations of certain products. This step is in line with the Tariff Act of 1930. Purpose and Background The aim of these reviews is to see if the existing duties are still needed to stop unfair trading activities. Procedures for these Sunset Reviews are outlined in past notices from 1998 and 2005. In 2012, a final adjustment was made to guide how Commerce conducts these reviews. Products Under Review Many products from different countries are under review. Some of them include: Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from China and Russia. Melamine from China. Potassium Phosphate Salts from China. Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers from China and Vietnam. Methionine from France, Japan, and Spain. Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Each product has a specified case number for identification and is assigned a Commerce contact for inquiries. Important Dates and Contacts These reviews become applicable from May 29, 2026. If you need more information, you can contact officials from the AD/CVD Operations, based at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Filing Information The Commerce Department encourages interested parties to visit its website for more details about the process. They have set specific rules for submissions that include electronic filing. Participation Parties wanting to participate in the reviews must submit necessary documentation, including a letter of appearance. This helps in being listed as an interested party. Conclusion The initiation of these reviews is a critical process that ensures fair trading practices. It allows the Department of Commerce to evaluate whether trade duties are still needed. The department encourages participation to maintain a fair trade environment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Decides on Antidumping Duties for Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision about the duties on a chemical called Difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This chemical is used in air conditioners and refrigeration. The decision is part of a process called a sunset review. What is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a check to see if stopping a duty would cause the problem to start again. Duties are extra costs added to products from other countries. These are added to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. Background of the Order In 2021, the U.S. put an antidumping duty on Difluoromethane from China. The duty was due to reports that China was selling the chemical at a very low price, hurting U.S. businesses. Recent Developments In February 2026, Commerce started its first sunset review of this order. A group of U.S. producers showed that they wanted the duty to continue. They believe ending it would let China sell Difluoromethane cheaply again. Commerce did not get responses from other interested parties. Because of this, Commerce decided to do an expedited review, which is faster than the regular one. Conclusion of the Review Commerce decided that if the duty were removed, dumping would likely begin again. It decided the dumping margin, or amount by which the product is sold below market value, could be as high as 221.06%. Next Steps and Notifications The Commerce Department will notify relevant parties of this decision. This includes those involved with trade and duties. This reminder is important for parties who had access to special or private information during the review. They must follow rules on handling this information after the review ends. This decision shows how the U.S. tries to ensure fair play in trade and protect its industries from unfair practices by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Continuation of Dumping if Duties End Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duties on large vertical shaft engines from China. These engines have sizes ranging from 225cc to 999cc. The review concluded that removing these duties could lead to the return of dumping practices. The antidumping duties were first put in place in March 2021. They target specific engines and parts from the People’s Republic of China. The main goal of these duties is to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing. The sunset review had its start on February 2, 2026. A sunset review happens every five years. It decides if the duties should stay or be lifted. This process ensures that foreign products are not sold below fair value in the U.S. By February 17, 2026, U.S. domestic parties showed their interest in having the duties remain. Two companies, Discovery and Brigg & Stratton, submitted letters. They affirmed their status as domestic producers of the covered products. Commerce confirmed that there was no formal response from Chinese producers. Commerce decided to perform an expedited review. This means they made their decision faster than usual. The review confirmed the risk of dumping was high if duties end. The final decision shows the potential dumping margin could reach 468.33 percent. This is a very high percentage. It means that removing the duties may lead to very cheap imports that hurt U.S. businesses. Commerce’s findings make sure that U.S. companies can compete fairly. Duties like these help in keeping the market balanced and protect jobs in America. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton signed off on the conclusion. The findings were published in the Federal Register. These results underline the importance of maintaining the current duties against China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Ruling Impacts Antidumping Duties on Xanthan Gum From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-12 On May 12, 2026, a significant legal decision was made by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The case involved xanthan gum imported from the People’s Republic of China. This decision is important because it changes how some Chinese companies are charged for selling xanthan gum in the United States. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce had looked into the sale of xanthan gum from China. They wanted to ensure that the gum was not being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This process is called an “antidumping duty review.” The review covered the period from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. At first, the Commerce Department found that companies like Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group were selling xanthan gum at a dumping margin of 17.36 percent. Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group did not agree with this finding. They went to court, challenging the way the Commerce Department calculated their costs, especially related to energy and coal. Court Decisions: In December 2024, the CIT asked the Commerce Department to explain their calculations better. They wanted more details about how energy costs were valued and why a certain code was used for coal. The Commerce Department responded in May 2025, but the court was only partly satisfied. They agreed with some of the Commerce Department’s methods but not all. Finally, in April 2026, the Commerce Department changed their methods. They used a different code for coal, which significantly lowered the dumping margin for Fufeng Biotechnologies and Meihua Group. Instead of a 17.36 percent margin, the companies now have a 0.00 percent margin. Implications: This decision means that these companies are no longer considered to be dumping xanthan gum into the U.S. market at unfair prices. The CIT’s decision is final unless appealed. However, for now, the companies will not have to pay extra duties based on a 17.36 percent margin. Current Actions: The Commerce Department has said they will not change the cash deposit rates for these companies because there are newer reviews with different results. Also, due to a court order, certain entries of xanthan gum from these companies are not allowed to be finalized, or “liquidated,” until the appeals process is settled. This ongoing legal situation highlights how complex international trade can be. Companies and governments must carefully navigate rules and laws to ensure fair trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Updates Investigation on Solar Cells from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to its investigation into solar cells imported from Indonesia. These cells are known as crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. The Commerce Department believes these solar cells were sold in the U.S. at less than their fair value. This process is often referred to as “dumping.” The investigation period covers July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Initially, on April 28, 2026, the Department had shared its first findings. However, it has now made some important updates. The Department found it needed more information about a company named PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia. Due to missing details, the Department has decided to use other facts to make their decisions. PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia did not cooperate with the Department’s request for more information. This meant the Department had to use something called “adverse facts available,” or AFA. This is a method used when a company does not provide the necessary information. Because of this, PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia now faces a higher dumping margin, set at 94.36 percent. This margin is like a penalty rate. The changes will affect cash deposits and the way the imports are handled at customs. The new cash deposit rate will be in effect from May 27, 2026. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will also be informed of these changes. These steps by the Department aim to protect U.S. industries by ensuring fair competition and pricing. If you would like more information, you can contact Myrna Lobo or Thomas Cloyd at the numbers provided by the Department. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Korean Monomers and Oligomers Sold at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding the sale of certain chemicals from Korea. These chemicals are called monomers and oligomers. They are important materials used in making different products. The period that the Department looked at was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. They found that these chemicals were being sold in the United States for less than what they should cost. This is known as “less than fair value” or LTFV. The investigation began on January 5, 2026, when the Department published its preliminary findings. They then extended these findings to be finalized by May 20, 2026. After reviewing further comments from interested parties, they finalized their determination that the chemicals were being sold at unfair prices. Companies Involved Several companies in Korea were part of this investigation. One of them is called Green Chemical Co., Ltd. This company and its affiliate were found to have sold products at unfair prices. Another company involved is Miwon Specialty Chemical Co., Ltd. The Department found that it was using unfair pricing. As a result, they gave this company a high penalty rate of 155.42%. Kukdo Chemicals Co., Ltd., another company, was also found to be selling at unfairly low prices. They received the same penalty rate as Miwon. Scope of Investigation The chemicals in question include various monomers and oligomers with different scientific names. These chemicals have uses in manufacturing other goods, but specific names were not changed during the investigation. No changes were made to the scope of the investigation since its preliminary findings. The Department didn’t receive any comments on this from interested parties. Final Decision on Critical Circumstances The Department found that there were critical circumstances involved. This means that the imports of these chemicals were causing harm more quickly than usual. This finding applied to all companies involved, including others not directly examined. Looking Ahead As a result of these findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to hold these chemicals at the border. They will collect extra duties on them to protect U.S. businesses from being harmed. The International Trade Commission will decide next if these low-priced imports are hurting U.S. industries. They have 45 days to make this decision. If the Commission agrees with the Department, the duties will become official, and the U.S. will continue to monitor these imports closely. This decision shows the government’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices that protect American businesses and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Review Results on Antidumping Duties for Welded Pipe from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has released preliminary results for the antidumping duty review on large diameter welded pipes from the Republic of Türkiye for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. This latest update indicates that certain Türkish producers and exporters have been selling these pipes at prices lower than normal value in the United States. Key Findings: The agency determined that HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. was the primary company of focus during this review. HDM Celik Boru and Cimtas Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd received a preliminary dumping margin of 1.89 percent for this period. The review has been rescinded for 12 companies, as no other parties requested a review for these companies. Reason for Rescission: For some companies, the rescission was due to timely withdrawal requests from the American Line Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee. Others were rescinded as there were no reviewable entries or evidence of suspended merchandise subject to duties during the review period across these companies. The Commerce Department carefully monitors the import of welded pipes to ensure fair competition and address any cases of dumping, which occurs when a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges in its home market. Process Overview: The review was initiated following requests in 2025, and deadlines were modified due to government shutdowns and backlogs. The decision-making process included entries review, margin calculations, and open opportunities for comments and hearings. Next Steps: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments or case briefs. Parties may also request a hearing on these preliminary results. Commerce will issue instructions based on these preliminary findings and any updated results. These proceedings are part of the ongoing efforts to ensure that American producers are not unfairly disadvantaged by international trade practices. The results remain pivotal for future import regulations and duties related to Türkish welded pipes. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Low-Price Sales of Dissolving Pulp from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has discovered that high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil may be sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This means Brazilian companies might be undercutting U.S. prices. The period reviewed for this finding was from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. This announcement invites interested parties to comment on the findings. High purity dissolving pulp is used for textiles and other products. The investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce looks at selling prices and compares them to the cost of production. This ensures that trade is fair and U.S. companies are not harmed by unfair pricing practices. Commerce began this investigation on September 8, 2025. Due to government shutdowns, their deadlines were delayed. The preliminary findings were planned for May 18, 2026. The result suggests that a Brazilian company, Bracell Bahia Specialty Cellulose S.A., and its partner Bracell SP Celulose Ltda., might be selling pulp at unfairly low prices. Their estimated dumping margin is 7.20 percent. This means U.S. companies might lose out because of Brazil’s low prices. The investigation also affects cash deposits for Brazilian pulp imports. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend certain financial transactions. This step is to protect U.S. industries until there is a final decision. Commerce welcomes comments and feedback from parties by a set date. If any company disagrees with these results, they can provide their evidence during the comment period. The Department of Commerce will carefully check the evidence before making a final decision. A hearing might take place if requested. Depending on comments, a final decision might involve other details and evidence. This investigation aims to make trade fair. The findings will help U.S. businesses by ensuring they don’t suffer from unfair practices. The goal is to ensure that all competitors trade on an equal playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Updates Antidumping Duty on Chinese Aluminum Foil Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Summary The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced an update on antidumping duties for certain aluminum foil products from China. The change is due to a ministerial error corrected in the most recent review results. The updated rates cover the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The revised duties become effective from May 27, 2026. Background The Department of Commerce had earlier published results on April 16, 2026, regarding duties on aluminum foil from China. However, the Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group identified an error. This group consists of firms like JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC. Ministerial Error A ministerial error occurred in calculating costs for selling, general and administrative expenses, and interest. This oversight was identified by the petitioners. The Department of Commerce has agreed to this error and corrected it accordingly. Corrected Dumping Margins After correcting the error, the following companies have new dumping margins: Jiangsu Dingsheng and related companies: 26.60% Jiangsu Zhongji and its affiliates: 29.89% Companies receiving a separate rate like Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Eastern Valley Co., and others: 28.01% Disclosure and Assessment Rates The Department intends to disclose the detailed calculations within five days. Duties will be assessed according to the corrected review findings. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) will follow these amended results for merchandise entries. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit rates for these companies will apply for products entering the U.S. on or after the published date. Different rates apply based on whether the exporter has specific rates or falls under the China-wide entity. Important Reminders Importers must remember to file a certificate regarding antidumping duties. No compliance might lead to doubled duties. Those under administrative protective orders should return or destroy confidential information to avoid violations. Final Notes These updates were made to ensure fair pricing of imported goods into the U.S., protecting local industries from unfair competition. The changes reflect the commitment of the U.S. to maintain balanced trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Norwegian Dissolving Pulp Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding the import of high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. It was found that this product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This brings concerns about fair competition in the market. Key Details: Agency Involved: The determination was made by the International Trade Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce. This agency is responsible for enforcing laws related to international trade. Product in Focus: The investigation centers on high purity dissolving pulp from Norway. This pulp is often used in making textiles, cellophane, and certain chemicals. Investigation Period: The period under investigation spans from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Preliminary Findings: Commerce has found that dissolving pulp from Norway is sold in the U.S. at prices below fair value. The estimated dumping margin is set at 6.54 percent. This margin reflects the difference between the price in the U.S. and what is considered a fair market price. Borregaard AS, a company based in Norway, is the primary subject of this investigation. It is noted that this company is responsible for a significant portion of such exports to the U.S. All other producers and exporters of this type of pulp from Norway will also face the same rate of 6.54 percent. Next Steps and Procedures: The Commerce Department will now direct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of this merchandise. Importers will need to deposit cash for antidumping duties. Interested parties have been invited to comment on these preliminary findings. Final comments and briefs are expected following a verification process. A final determination is expected to be released later, after further examination and inputs from stakeholders. Public Participation: The public and interested parties are encouraged to submit comments. Comments will be considered before the final determination is made. A public hearing may be requested by interested parties. However, requests must clearly outline the topics to be discussed. Importance of Decision: This decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce is critical. It ensures that trade practices remain fair and competitive. It also protects U.S. industries from unfair pricing in the international market. This finding reflects a serious approach by U.S. authorities to uphold trade laws and ensure domestic industries are not harmed by unfair international practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Subsidies for Corrosion Inhibitors from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has found that producers and exporters of corrosion inhibitors from China received subsidies. These preliminary results are part of an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on these products. The review covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Companies Reviewed Commerce reviewed submissions for two main Chinese companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. These companies were chosen for examination because of their involvement in exporting corrosion inhibitors. The review found that subsidies were given to these companies by Chinese authorities. Rate Calculation Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 19.31 percent. Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. got a higher rate of 48.45 percent. This means that these companies benefited from financial aid affecting their pricing. For other Chinese companies that were part of the review but not individually investigated, a rate of 36.67 percent was preliminarily assigned. Rescission and Methodology Commerce also decided to rescind the administrative review for five companies. These companies did not have any reviewable entries during the period. Without any entries, there was no basis for assessment. Commerce’s review is based on legal standards. These standards check for subsidies from authorities that provide a financial gain. The subsidy must be specific, meaning it targets only certain goods or companies. Public Participation Interested parties can comment on these findings. The public comment period is open and Commerce will establish a briefing schedule. Organizations and individuals can submit their opinions or requests for hearings. Next Steps Upon finalizing this review, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on the necessary duties. The cash deposit system will adjust based on the final results, affecting future imports. Overall, the Commerce Department’s work ensures fair trade practices and addresses unfair foreign subsidies. Exact calculations and procedures support U.S. industries affected by international competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Decision Leads to Change in Antidumping Duties on Colombian Paper Bags Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On April 13, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) made a big decision. The court agreed with changes made by the U.S. Department of Commerce in a case about paper shopping bags from Colombia. This decision affects the antidumping duties. Antidumping duties are extra costs put on products sold below a fair price. The company involved is Ditar, S.A., which sells paper bags. They were investigated because it was thought they sold bags in the U.S. for less than they should have. The case looked at paper bag sales between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. At first, Commerce said Ditar’s dumping margin, or the amount sold below fair price, was 11.06%. Later, because of court findings, this changed to 11.16%. This new number affects both Ditar and other paper bag sellers, as Ditar was the only company studied closely in this case. The main reason for the change was how a test was used in the investigation. The court found the test was not used correctly in figuring out if a sale was for the U.S. or Colombia. After looking again, Commerce found Ditar knew the bags would go to the U.S. This led to changing their dumping margin. The court’s decision is final. It also means Commerce will change how they handle deposits. When companies bring goods into the U.S., they pay a deposit to cover possible duties. New instructions will be given about how much Ditar and other companies must deposit. This decision and the new rates are important for those who trade in paper shopping bags. It shows how carefully rules are checked to make sure trade is fair. The notice was officially published on May 20, 2026, and aims to keep the trading system fair for everyone involved. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Updates Solar Cell Investigation from Laos Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Background Information Earlier this year, on April 28, 2026, the Department of Commerce released a preliminary report suggesting there was less-than-fair-value (LTFV) sales involving solar cells from Laos. Following this, a petition by the Alliance for American Solar Manufacturing and Trade brought forward details of calculation mistakes made during the initial assessment. Details of the Errors Two main errors were flagged. Firstly, Commerce used surrogate value data for a year, rather than the relevant six-month period. Secondly, there was a mistake in converting truck freight values from a per-kilogram basis to a per-square meter basis. This conversion was necessary to match the values of solar glass. Due to these errors, the initial findings undervalued the weighted-average dumping margin for Solarspace Technology (Laos) Sole Co., Ltd. Revised Findings After correcting these errors, the dumping margin for Solarspace increased from 22.46% to 33.57%. This is a significant change, as it is more than five percentage points higher than the original figure and at least 25% greater overall. These changes not only affect Solarspace but also impact other associated firms and the Laos-wide entity involved in the investigation. Amended Rates and Future Steps The new cash deposit rates are effective immediately, according to the amended findings. These adjusted rates will remain until further notice. The Department of Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission of this updated determination. Conclusion This development is important as it gives further insight into fair trade practices and ensures that U.S. industries are protected from unfair international trade activities. The Department of Commerce has made it clear that they intend to follow these revised preliminary findings until more definitive results are found. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chromium Trioxide from India Sold at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about chromium trioxide, a chemical product from India. They found that this product is likely being sold in the United States at prices lower than fair value. This finding is part of an investigation that took place from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is asking people who are interested in this case to share their thoughts about this preliminary finding. These comments need to follow certain rules and be sent by a deadline. Chromium trioxide is an inorganic compound used in many products. The investigation covers chromium trioxide in all forms and purities. No one has raised any issues regarding the range of products in this investigation. This investigation is happening under U.S. law. The Department of Commerce looks into claims that products from other countries are sold at very low prices in the U.S. This is sometimes called “dumping.” One company, Vishnu Chemicals Limited, is a main focus of this investigation. The Department of Commerce found that this company did not provide all the information needed to calculate if they were dumping the product. Because of this, the Department used evidence from other sources to make their decision. They found an average dumping margin of 14.44% for Vishnu Chemicals and all other companies that did not provide enough information. Because of these findings, the Department of Commerce will make sure that U.S. Customs collects a deposit when this product comes into the U.S. This is a common step in cases like this, to ensure fair trade practices. Next, there will be a few more steps. People can submit written comments on this finding, and there might be a hearing. If these steps happen, they would help the Department finalize its decision. Finally, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will receive information about this decision. The ITC will decide if the sale of this product is hurting U.S. companies that make similar products. This decision is important because it helps keep fair trade practices and supports U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Chromium Trioxide from Türkiye Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination regarding the sale of chromium trioxide from the Republic of Türkiye. The result shows that this chemical compound is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This preliminary decision covers the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department of Commerce is inviting interested parties to comment on this determination. The agency responsible for this investigation is the International Trade Administration, which is a part of the Department of Commerce. The contact person for more information is Monica Gillis from AD/CVD Operations, Office V. The product being investigated is chromium trioxide from Türkiye. This investigation follows section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. According to the findings, chromium trioxide from Türkiye has an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 40.88 percent. This margin applies to Türkiye Şi[ş]e ve Cam Fabrikaları A.Ş., the main respondent in the investigation, and all other producers not individually examined. The Department applies an adverse facts available (AFA) rate to the main respondent for not providing the necessary information for calculation. The Department instructs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of these entries of chromium trioxide. The CBP will now require a cash deposit equal to the estimated dumping margin. The public document detailing this decision is available on the Enforcement and Compliance website. The deadline for interested parties to submit comments is 14 days after the notice publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days later. To request a hearing, parties must submit a written request within 30 days after this notice. The final decision on this investigation is expected within 75 days of the preliminary determination. This determination means that chromium trioxide is sold more cheaply in the U.S. than in Türkiye, possibly harming U.S. industries. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will investigate further to determine if these imports are materially injuring U.S. industries. The Department’s decision is focused on ensuring fair trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Confirms Subsidies on Palladium from Russia Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Introduction: On May 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a final decision about palladium coming from Russia. They found that Russian producers and exporters of unwrought palladium receive unfair financial help, also called subsidies, from their government. This decision comes after a detailed investigation. Background: The U.S. Department of Commerce, also known as Commerce, started looking into these subsidies on January 1, 2024. The investigation covered palladium produced and sold before December 31, 2024. Palladium is a valuable metal used in many industries. Two main Russian companies were looked at: JSC Urals Innovative Technologies and Prioksky Plant of Non Ferrous Metals. Findings: Commerce found enough evidence to prove that the Russian government provided financial benefits or subsidies to these companies. These benefits give them an unfair advantage in the U.S. market. The Department used facts available, including some unfavorable assumptions, to conclude their decision. This approach is called using adverse facts available. Subsidy Rates: Both of the main companies looked at, along with other Russian producers and exporters, were assigned a subsidy rate of 109.10 percent. This means that these companies benefited from government help equal to 109.10 percent of the value of their palladium exports. Suspension of Liquidation: As a result of this decision, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits from these companies for their palladium exports. This action started on March 11, 2026, when the preliminary findings were first announced. Next Steps: The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now take 45 days to decide if the U.S. industry is harmed by these imports. If the ITC agrees with the findings, further actions, like a countervailing duty order, might follow. This will ensure that U.S. industries compete fairly. Conclusion: The decision emphasizes the commitment of the U.S. to follow fair trade practices. It aims to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. The document also highlights a detailed investigation process to reach a fair and lawful conclusion. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review of Mushroom Imports from Poland Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its review of mushroom imports from Poland. This review looked at whether the Polish company Okechamp S.A. sold preserved mushrooms in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This practice is called “dumping.” The review covered the period from November 3, 2022, to April 30, 2024. Commerce found that Okechamp did sell mushrooms at prices below the normal value, which is considered dumping. As a result, Commerce calculated a dumping margin of 2.55 percent for Okechamp S.A. The rules for how this decision affects the import of Polish mushrooms have also been set. Shipments from Okechamp will now have a cash deposit rate equal to the dumping margin of 2.55 percent. This means importers have to pay this percentage as a deposit for duties. For other companies, the rate will continue as previously set, depending on their specific case history or the general rate of 34.32 percent if they are new or have no specific rate. Commerce will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) about how to assess duties for these shipments. Some shipments could be charged duties based on the found margin, while others might not be if they fall below a certain threshold. Commerce has also outlined what importers should do with any advance payments made on duties. If they paid too much or too little based on this new decision, adjustments will have to be made. In summary, Commerce is imposing new cash deposit rates and assessment procedures on companies dealing with preserved mushrooms from Poland. This action aims to ensure fair trade practices and uphold U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

No Dumping Found for Korean Superabsorbent Polymers: U.S. Commerce Department Report Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In a recent report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, it was announced that LG Chem, Ltd., a company from the Republic of Korea, did not engage in dumping superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in the United States market. This decision is based on the preliminary results of an antidumping duty administrative review. The review period examined was from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. During this time, LG Chem, Ltd. was found to have no sales of SAP in the U.S. market at less than the normal value. This means that LG Chem sold its products at fair market prices. The Department of Commerce is responsible for monitoring and enforcing trade laws in the U.S. to prevent dumping. Dumping is when a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it charges in its home market. This can harm local industries in the importing country. The results of the review are not final yet. Interested parties have been invited to comment on these preliminary findings. The Department of Commerce will finalize its decision after reviewing these comments. The findings will also have an impact on cash deposit requirements for future imports of SAP from Korea. If the final results remain the same, there will be no additional duties on SAP products from LG Chem, Ltd. Importers have responsibilities too. They need to submit a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. If they do not comply, the Department of Commerce might assume that duties have been reimbursed, leading to double charges. The Department plans to issue final results no later than 120 days after this announcement. It is a way to ensure fair trade practices continue and that the U.S. market isn’t negatively impacted by unfair pricing practices from abroad. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Steel Nails from UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its review for the period of May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024, concerning certain steel nails imported from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Department found that some producers and exporters sold steel nails at prices lower than their normal value. This could impact how much U.S. buyers pay for these imports. Two companies were the focus of this review: Master Nails and Pins Manufacturing, LLC/Middle East Manufacturing Steel, LLC (together known as Master) and Rich Well Steel Industries LLC. The review determined that these companies engaged in unfair pricing practices, known as “dumping.” Final Findings: For Master, the Department calculated a dumping margin of 81.82%. For Rich Well, the margin was found to be 2.59%. These margins indicate how much the sales price of the nails in the U.S. was below their normal value. Higher percentages show more significant underpricing. Background and Process: The review process was lengthy and involved several extensions due to government shutdowns in late 2025. These delays affected the timeline but not the outcome. From comments and data, the Department adjusted the calculations for the final results. The process included evaluating comments from interested parties. The Department made changes to the calculations for both Rich Well and Master, based on the feedback received. Each step was done under the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. What’s Next? The Department will share its findings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They will assess duties based on these results. Duties are taxes on goods from abroad. They help ensure prices are fair and competitive. For Rich Well, duties will be calculated based on sales during the review period. Master will have duties assessed using their final review margin of 81.82%. If the margin is zero or very low (less than 0.5%), some companies may not have to pay these duties. The CBP will follow specific procedures to apply these duties effectively. Finally, there are set requirements for cash deposits on future imports. These deposits help cover potential duties. The rate for Master and Rich Well will match their review results, while others will follow previous guidelines. This decision remains effective until further notice, impacting any shipments entering the U.S. after the decision’s publication date. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Vietnamese Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipes Confirmed Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes In May 2026, a notable decision was announced by the Department of Commerce in the United States. This decision is important for businesses involved in trade between the U.S. and Vietnam. It is about welded stainless steel pressure pipes from Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Commerce completed its review of these pipes from Vietnam. They found that they were being sold at lower prices than normal in America. This was during a time from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Key Points of the Decision The Department made a final decision that confirms earlier findings. They say that the Vietnam-wide entity has been selling these pipes at unfairly low prices. A “Vietnam-wide entity” means all companies from Vietnam selling these pipes. The Vietnam-wide entity now has a duty rate of 90.80 percent. This means they must pay extra money when they sell these pipes in the U.S. Important Dates and Information This decision is effective from May 20, 2026. The review checks whether any rules, like selling at low prices, were broken. No new comments or changes came after their first findings in January. Next Steps U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now collect these duties. They will wait 35 days after May 20 to start. If anyone disagrees with this decision, they can go to the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash Deposit Requirements Vietnam-wide entity must deposit 90.80 percent. Others with special rates keep their rates. No special rate? Then deposit 90.80 percent. These deposits last until further notice. Trade Compliance It’s essential for importers to meet these new rules. If they don’t, they might have to pay even more. The Department of Commerce reminded parties to handle any special information safely. They are responsible for its return or destruction after use. Conclusion This decision reinforces trade fairness rules between the U.S. and Vietnam for welded stainless steel pipes. The Department is clear about its findings and future expectations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Delays Solar Cell Investigation Decision Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is extending its investigation. This investigation is about the sales of solar cells from India. The investigation checks if these sales are at less-than-fair value. This means they might be sold at unfairly low prices. The final decision was supposed to come soon. Now, it will come by September 10, 2026. The provisional measures will also last longer. These are rules that were set for four months. Now, they will last up to six months. This change is due to a request from Mundra Solar Energy Limited and Mundra Solar PV Limited. These companies make and sell many of the solar cells in question. They asked for more time to prepare. The Department of Commerce agreed to this request. No other reasons were found to say no. The investigation started back in August 2025. It covers sales from July 2024 to June 2025. The decision impacts the trade of solar cells from India to the U.S. The aim is to ensure fair trading and competition. Commerce will use this extra time to gather all needed information. They want to make sure the decision is correct and fair. This decision comes under the laws that govern trade and tariffs. These rules make sure that trade is fair for everyone involved. Commerce’s final decision will be important for solar cell trade from India. It will help decide future trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Vietnam Sold Polypropylene Boxes at Unfair Prices Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding imports of polypropylene corrugated boxes from Vietnam. Here’s what this means: What Happened? The Department of Commerce looked into the sale of these boxes from Vietnam between July and December 2024. They found that the boxes were sold for less than what they should be, which is called “less than fair value.” This is sometimes known as dumping. They also noticed that these cheaper imports have been coming in very quickly, which could be harmful to U.S. companies. Important Dates: The investigation period covered July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This announcement took effect on May 20, 2026. Company Involvement: The investigation focused on a Vietnamese company, Jia Bao Rui, but this company stopped participating in the investigation. Because they didn’t cooperate, the U.S. has decided to treat Jia Bao Rui as part of a larger group, called the Vietnam-wide entity. This group is now being held responsible for selling the boxes at unfair prices. Outcome: The Department of Commerce determined that the wide Vietnam-wide group was guilty of these unfair trade practices. As a result, imports from this group face a high duty rate of 130.58% to make up for the underpricing. This rate is meant to level the playing field for U.S. manufacturers. What’s Next? The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will look into whether the U.S. industry was indeed hurt by these underpriced imports. If they decide there was harm, then additional duties will be permanently applied to these imports. All these steps, like putting the extra fees on these boxes, will continue until further talks or changes happen. For now, U.S. Customs will keep an eye on imports from the Vietnam-wide group to ensure the new rules are followed. This decision shows how the U.S. takes steps to protect its markets from unfair foreign pricing. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Ends Review on Chinese Freight Rail Couplers Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Date: 2026-05-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to stop its review of freight rail couplers from China. This review was about possible unfair pricing of these products in the U.S. This process is known as an antidumping duty review. The review period was between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The decision was published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2026. This review started after a group called the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers asked for it. They wanted the Department of Commerce to look at certain companies in China that might be selling freight rail couplers at unfair prices. On August 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce began this review. They checked records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to see if there were any entries of these products into the U.S. market. On December 8, 2025, the Department made it clear which companies they were looking into more closely. They also decided not to look into some other companies. In February 2026, the Department shared its plan to stop the review since it found no entries of the couplers during the review period. The department invited comments from interested parties, including the Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers and a U.S. importer called Greenbrier Central LLC. The Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers wanted the review to continue because of an ongoing investigation by CBP. But Greenbrier argued against continuing the review, as there were no couplers from those companies recorded by CBP during the review period. The review process had been delayed twice due to government shutdowns, in November 2025. These pauses extended the review timeline by 68 days in total. The Department of Commerce will inform CBP about handling the duties related to any entries. Since the review was stopped, the current cash deposit rates for these products will stay the same. This notice also acts as a reminder for interested parties to handle all sensitive information properly. They must return or destroy any private data in line with U.S. regulations. This decision by the Department of Commerce is part of their efforts to manage and enforce fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Confirms Continued Dumping on Crepe Paper from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded its fourth expedited sunset review regarding certain crepe paper products from China. The review focused on whether to revoke the antidumping duty order on these products. Importantly, it was determined that revoking this order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping practices. This conclusion stems from a detailed analysis undertaken by the Commerce team. On January 25, 2005, the initial antidumping duty order was published in the Federal Register. The recent review process began in earnest on February 2, 2026. Commerce issued a notice of its intent to review this order, as per the Tariff Act of 1930. By February 3, 2026, domestic manufacturers expressed their interest in participating in the review. Their involvement reflected significant concern over the potential impacts of revocation. No substantive response was received from respondents representing the Chinese exporters. This led to Commerce proceeding with an expedited review due to the lack of respondent input. The final review results confirm that continuation of the antidumping measures is necessary. The dumping margins could remain significant, at rates as high as 266.83 percent. This outcome reaffirms the ongoing concerns of domestic manufacturers about unfair pricing practices and reinforces the protection offered to U.S. industry. All parties handling proprietary information from this review must adhere to strict guidelines concerning its return or destruction. This is in line with the regulations overseeing administrative protective orders. The decision is now published and available for review, ensuring transparency in the enforcement of fair trade practices aimed at maintaining equitable market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.