International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-06-01
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
1. Fluid End Blocks From China, Germany, India, and Italy; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on fluid end blocks from China and India, and the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on fluid end blocks from Germany and Italy, would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days.
2. Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on passenger and vehicle light truck tires (“PVLT tires”) from Vietnam and the revocation of the antidumping duty orders on PVLTs from South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
3. Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From China, Russia, and Ukraine; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and the termination of the suspended investigations on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Russia and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
4. Methionine From France, Japan, and Spain; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on methionine from France, Japan, and Spain would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
5. Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers From China and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on walk-behind lawn mowers (“mowers”) from China and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on mowers from China and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
6. Potassium Phosphate Salts From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing and the antidumping duty orders on potassium phosphate salts from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
7. Melamine From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on melamine from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.
8. Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Intervene
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting a motion to intervene filed by non-party BYD America LLC (“BYD”).
9. Certain Coated Confectionery Products and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Sub: International Trade Commission
Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on April 8, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Promotion in Motion, Inc. of Park Ridge, New Jersey. A supplement to the complaint was filed on May 6, 2026. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain coated confectionery products and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,750,267 (“the ‘267 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 11,317,640 (“the ‘640 patent”). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
Legal Disclaimer
This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
