U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Investigation Into Fall Detection Wearable Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has started an investigation into certain wearable devices with fall detection and their components. The investigation relates to complaints made by UnaliWear, Inc., a company from Austin, Texas. The complaint was filed on December 12, 2025. UnaliWear, Inc. claims that some products imported or sold in the United States infringe its patents. The patents mentioned are U.S. Patent No. 10,051,410 and U.S. Patent No. 10,687,193. The company also says there is an industry in the United States connected to these patents. The ITC will look at the following products: “electronic watches with the capability to detect when a user has suffered a fall, and components thereof.” The investigation will focus on whether these devices are being imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. after importation, in violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies listed as respondents are: Apple, Inc., Cupertino, California Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon-si, Republic of Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Google LLC, Mountain View, California Garmin Ltd., Schaffhausen, Switzerland Garmin International, Inc., Olathe, Kansas Garmin USA, Inc., Olathe, Kansas The ITC will decide if these companies have violated the law by infringing the patents. The Commission may issue orders to stop the sale and importation of such devices if a violation is found. The presiding Administrative Law Judge will take evidence and hear arguments regarding the public interest. This will include looking at facts and making a recommendation. The deadlines are firm. The named companies must respond to the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days of receiving them. If they do not respond on time, they may lose the right to contest the allegations. The ITC could then issue an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against them. More information about the investigation can be found at https://edis.usitc.gov or by contacting the Office of Unfair Import Investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice on January 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Final Phase in Torsion Springs Case from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the final phase schedule for its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. This action follows final affirmative determinations from the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) regarding imports of these springs from both China and India. Commerce found imports had been subsidized and sold at less than fair value. The USITC previously determined that imports of these springs from China caused material injury to the U.S. industry. These products are classified under subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Recent final determinations by Commerce regarding India were published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2025 (90 FR 61366 and 90 FR 61369). In response, the USITC is setting deadlines for the next steps in this investigation. The deadline for filing supplemental party comments is 5:15 p.m. on January 15, 2026. These comments must focus only on Commerce’s final determinations about imports from India. The rules require that supplemental comments do not include new facts and remain within five pages. The USITC staff’s supplemental report on these investigations will appear in the nonpublic record on January 28, 2026. A public version of the report will come afterward. All filings related to this investigation must be electronic. Filings are accepted through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted at this time. Every document submitted by parties must be served on all other participants in the investigation and must be accompanied by a certificate of service. The Secretary will not accept any document for filing without this certificate. Except for submissions requested directly by a Commissioner or staff, or unless good cause is shown, no additional written submissions will be accepted. This investigation is conducted under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and published under section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. For further details, contact Peter Stebbins of the Office of Investigations at (202) 205-2039. Information for hearing-impaired persons is available at (202) 205-1810. Persons needing mobility assistance should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Issued January 8, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. (Federal Register Doc. 2026-00347, Filed 1-9-26, 8:45 am, Billing Code 7020-02-P) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Begins Trade Investigation Into Chromium Trioxide Imports from India and Turkey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started an investigation about chromium trioxide coming from India and Turkey. This decision is because there may be unfair trade. The USITC found signs that a U.S. industry is being hurt by imported chromium trioxide. These imports are thought to be sold in the United States at prices less than fair value. This is called “less than fair value” or LTFV. Chromium trioxide is used in making special chemicals and other products. The investigation also looks at chromium trioxide from India that may be getting financial help, or “subsidies,” from the Indian government. Imports from both India and Turkey are included, but subsidies are only being checked for India. The product is listed under code 2819.10.00 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. The case started after American Chrome & Chemicals, Inc. from Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, filed written requests on September 29, 2025. They said U.S. businesses are being harmed because of the imported chemicals from India and Turkey. Because of this, the USITC began two types of investigations: a countervailing duty investigation, number 701-TA-779, and antidumping investigations, numbers 731-TA-1765 and 1766. Notices about the investigations, and a meeting for the public to share their views, were posted at the USITC office and published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2025 (Volume 90, Page 47820). The official meeting took place on December 4, 2025. Everyone who asked to speak was allowed to take part. The USITC’s work was delayed at different times because of a government shutdown. New schedules were announced on November 11, December 18, and December 30, 2025, all published in the Federal Register as required. The USITC followed U.S. law in making its decisions, following sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission finished and filed its decisions on January 2, 2026. Details of the decisions are in USITC Publication 5968, “Chromium Trioxide from India and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-779 and 731-TA-1765-1766 (Preliminary)” dated January 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the official order. The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2026 (91 FR 1197). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Makes Determinations on Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On January 6, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a key decision about lightweight thermal paper from China. The Commission looked at whether removing certain trade rules could hurt U.S. companies. These rules are called countervailing and antidumping duty orders. They help protect American industries from unfair trade practices. In this case, the USITC found that if the orders on lightweight thermal paper from China were taken away, it would likely cause material injury to companies in the United States. This injury could happen again or continue if the orders were removed. The Commission’s review started on June 2, 2025. At that time, they opened investigation numbers 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126. The USITC later decided to conduct expedited reviews. These reviews moved quickly to examine the facts. There was a delay in the schedule because of a government funding issue, but the schedule was changed and continued as planned. The decision was made according to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC finished and filed its findings on January 6, 2026. The full views of the Commission can be found in USITC Publication 5967, titled “Lightweight Thermal Paper from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126 (Third Review).” Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the official order. This notice was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Opens Investigation Into Screen Protector Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 7, 2026, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the start of an investigation. The case is about certain screen protectors, screen protector systems, and their parts. The case number is 337-TA-1474. The complaint was filed on December 3, 2025. Superior Communications Inc., from Irwindale, California, is the complainant. The complaint says that some products coming into the United States may break the rules found in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint says that some companies are importing, selling, or selling after importation, screen protectors and systems that may infringe on these United States patents: U.S. Patent No. 9,931,823 U.S. Patent No. 10,021,818 U.S. Patent No. 10,399,315 U.S. Patent No. 11,155,067 Superior Communications says that there is an industry for these products in the United States, or that an industry is being made. Superior Communications is asking for two things from the ITC: A limited exclusion order Cease and desist orders. The investigation will look at whether the named companies broke the law by bringing accused products into the US, selling them to be imported, or selling them after they got here. These products include: Screen protector applicator systems Screen protectors used with application trays Screen protectors and application trays Screen protectors used with application machines Screen protectors and application machines, and Their components The ITC named these parties in the investigation: Complainant: Superior Communications Inc., 5027 Irwindale Avenue, Suite 900, Irwindale, California 91706 Respondents: Belkin International, Inc., 555 South Aviation Boulevard, Suite 180, El Segundo, California 90245-4852 Belkin Inc., 555 South Aviation Boulevard, Suite 180, El Segundo, California 90245-4852 The ITC has assigned an Administrative Law Judge to oversee the investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be a party in this case. The named respondents must reply to the complaint and notice of investigation, following the instructions in section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Responses must be received no later than 20 days after the complaint and notice are served. If a respondent does not respond on time, they may lose their right to contest the allegations. The ITC and Administrative Law Judge may then make findings and issue orders such as a limited exclusion order or a cease and desist order against the respondent. For further information, contact Susan Orndoff at the Office of Docket Services, US International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-1802. The official notice and non-confidential documents can be viewed on the ITC’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. General information about the Commission is available at https://www.usitc.gov. The investigation began by order of the Commission on January 2, 2026. The notice was issued by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States Imposes Duties on Certain Fiber Products from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On January 5, 2026, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a final decision about some fiber products from China and Vietnam. The Commission decided that the U.S. industry is being hurt by imports of thermoformed molded fiber products (TMFPs) from these two countries. These products are listed under subheading 4823.70.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. According to the USITC, the U.S. Department of Commerce found that these products from China and Vietnam are being sold in the United States at “less than fair value,” which means they are being dumped. Commerce also found that the governments of China and Vietnam have given subsidies to their companies making these products. As a result of these findings, the United States will put duties on these imports. These actions follow the laws set by the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation started on October 8, 2024, after petitions from the American Molded Fiber Coalition. The Coalition includes Genera Inc. from Tennessee, Tellus Products, LLC from Florida, and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW). The Department of Commerce made early findings that these imports were being unfairly subsidized and dumped. The USITC then held a public hearing on September 30, 2025. Everyone who wanted to take part was allowed to participate. There was also a delay in the investigation schedule because the USITC had to stop work during a funding lapse. The schedule was changed, and a new notice was published in November 2025. The USITC also found that imports from Vietnam, which are covered by Commerce’s “critical circumstances” determination, could seriously hurt the impact of the duties. However, Commissioner Johanson disagreed with this part of the decision. The full views of the Commission are in USITC Publication 5964, called “Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-739-740 and 731-TA-1716-1717 (Final).” This notice was issued by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff and published on January 7, 2026, in the Federal Register (Volume 91, Number 4, pages 537–538). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Reviews for Calcium Hypochlorite from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On December 9, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. These reviews are for antidumping and countervailing duty orders on calcium hypochlorite from China. The aim is to decide if ending these orders would likely lead to continued or future harm to the U.S. industry. The Commission noted its decision was based on responses received by September 5, 2025. The domestic interested party group gave an adequate response. However, the respondent group’s response was inadequate. There were no other reasons to conduct a full review. As a result, the Commission will move forward with expedited reviews following section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). There was also a mention of time delays. These were due to a lack of funding and a temporary stop in Commission operations. This caused deadlines in the case to be tolled, or paused. For additional procedures and rules, the notice refers to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. These are listed under 19 CFR part 201 and 19 CFR part 207, which cover different parts of the process. A staff report about these reviews is on the Commission’s nonpublic record. It will be shared with people under the Administrative Protective Order on January 9, 2026. A public version will be made available later, under the Commission’s rules. Written comments can be filed by January 15, 2026. Only interested parties that provided adequate responses may submit these comments. Comments cannot contain new factual information. Other parties not involved in the reviews may submit brief written statements by the same date, also without new facts. If comments have sensitive business information, they must meet the rules in 19 CFR 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. The Commission has found that only responses from Innovative Water Care LLC were individually adequate, so comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. Every document filed by a party must be sent to all other parties. A certificate of service must also be filed. The Secretary will not accept any document without it. The Commission has found these reviews are extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, they are extending the review period by up to 90 days, using their authority under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). This process is part of the ITC’s work under the Tariff Act of 1930, as noted by the official order. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 5, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission to Conduct Full Reviews on Pipe and Tube Imports Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes On December 8, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced it will conduct full reviews for certain trade orders. These orders affect light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey. The reviews will follow the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC will decide if removing the special fees, called the countervailing and antidumping duty orders, would hurt U.S. companies. These fees are meant to stop unfair imports. The review will check if ending these fees would likely cause harm to U.S. businesses again. The ITC will share a schedule for the reviews soon. The decision was made on November 24, 2025. The ITC found that both groups in Mexico — from the U.S. and responders in Mexico — gave enough information. So, the ITC chose a full review for Mexico. For China, South Korea, and Turkey, the ITC found the group responses were not enough. Still, to be efficient, the ITC decided to review orders for these countries along with the Mexico review. Kenneth Gatten III from the Office of Investigations can be contacted for more details at 202-708-1447. People who need special help or who are hearing impaired can also get information by calling the ITC’s special numbers. Official records are available on the ITC website at https://www.usitc.gov. The public can also view case details online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The reviews follow ITC rules in 19 CFR parts 201 and 207, which guide how the ITC handles these cases. The official record of the vote will be available from the Office of the Secretary and on the ITC’s website. The notice was signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and issued on December 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Violation Decision on Imported Urine Splash Guards Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Investigation Background The investigation, numbered 337-TA-1430, began on January 13, 2025. It was based on a complaint from Kids By Parents, Inc. of Potomac, Maryland. The complaint said certain companies were importing and selling urine splash guards and components that violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The alleged violation involves infringement of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,870,619 and claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. 11,812,901. List of Respondents The investigation named companies from China as respondents. There are two groups: Defaulting Respondents (Did not respond to the complaint): Maomaohouse (Shenzhen) Le Sengyu (Guangzhou) HealthSTEC (Hefei City) Edermurs (Shenzhen) Lishian (Shenzhen) Settling Respondents (Resolved with settlement): Tigaman (Shenzhen) Junyxin (Xiamen City) Eurbus (Shenzhen) Sunyoka123 (Shenzhen) SeLucky (Shenzhen) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations also participated. Key Decisions and Orders Previously, the Settling Respondents were removed from the investigation due to settlements. The Defaulting Respondents were found in default after failing to reply to official notices and orders. On June 30, 2025, Kids By Parents, Inc. filed a motion for summary determination of a violation of section 337 against the Defaulting Respondents. The motion requested: A general exclusion order (GEO) Cease and desist orders (CDOs) A bond of 100% of the import value of infringing products during the period of Presidential review The Office of Unfair Import Investigations supported this motion. On September 17, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an initial decision (ID): The motion was granted for claims 1 and 2 of the ‘619 patent and claims 1 and 2 of the ‘901 patent. The motion was not granted for claim 3 of the ‘901 patent. Recommended a GEO and CDOs for Maomaohouse, Le Sengyu, HealthSTEC, and Lishian (not Edermurs). Recommended a 100% bond on infringing articles during Presidential review. Kids By Parents, Inc. filed to end the investigation concerning claim 3 of the ‘901 patent. The ALJ agreed, and the investigation was partially terminated for that claim. Commission Review and Request for Comments The ITC decided to review the initial decision regarding the domestic industry requirement. Other findings will not be reviewed. The ITC may issue: Exclusion orders, which could block the product from entering the U.S. Cease and desist orders, which would require companies to stop further violations. The Commission is asking for written comments on: What kind of remedy should be ordered Effects of any remedy on public health, competitive conditions, U.S. production, and consumers Bond amount if a remedy is ordered Deadlines for submitting comments are: December 19, 2025 (initial submissions) January 5, 2026 (reply submissions) Written submissions must follow all Commission rules. Submissions may be public or confidential, but confidential documents must be labeled and handled according to the rules. Next Steps The President or U.S. Trade Representative has 60 days to take action on the ITC’s remedy, once ordered. During this time, products may still enter the U.S. if the required bond is posted. Further information can be found on the ITC’s website. The official vote on this decision was held on December 3, 2025. Contact for More Information Houda Morad, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, (202) 708-4716. ITC Electronic Docket: https://edis.usitc.gov Issued December 3, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Asks for Comments in Semiconductor Devices Case Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a major step in its ongoing investigation about certain semiconductor devices. This is Investigation No. 337-TA-1414. On December 2, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an Initial Determination stating there was a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ALJ also gave a Recommended Determination on what remedy or action the ITC should take if a violation is found. After this, the ITC is now asking for public comments. These comments should focus on the public interest issues related to the possible actions the ITC may take. This request only asks for comments from the public and government agencies. What Is Section 337? Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 lets the ITC stop goods from coming into the U.S. if they break certain laws. However, before stopping the goods, the ITC must think about: The effect on public health and welfare in the United States The effect on competition in the U.S. economy The effect on making similar items in the U.S. How U.S. consumers would be affected Companies Involved The companies named in this case are: Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co., Ltd. Innoscience (Suzhou) Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd. Innoscience America, Inc. The recommended remedy is a limited exclusion order. This means the ITC could stop these companies’ semiconductor devices and products containing them from being brought into the U.S., sold for importation, or sold after importation. The ITC is also considering cease and desist orders against each company. Details for Submitting Comments The ITC is asking for written comments, no longer than five pages, on how stopping these products might: Affect public health, safety, or welfare in the U.S. Change competition and the U.S. economy Impact U.S. production of similar products Affect U.S. consumers The ITC also asks commenters to: Explain how the affected articles are used in the U.S. Point out any public health or welfare issues. Identify U.S.-made or available products that could replace the subject items. Say whether companies in the U.S. could provide enough replacements in a reasonable time. Describe the effects on U.S. consumers. All submissions must be filed electronically by the close of business on January 5, 2026. Comments must reference “Inv. No. 337-TA-1414” above or on the first page. To file, use the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help, contact the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. More details on electronic filing are available in the Commission’s Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures. Confidential documents must have appropriate markings and a non-confidential redacted version must also be submitted, following specific Commission Rules. Non-confidential comments will be available for public viewing on EDIS. Additional Information For further information, you may contact Joelle P. Justus, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 205-2593, or visit https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons can call the TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810. This notice is issued under authority from Section 337 of the Tariff Act, as updated, and the rules in 19 CFR part 210. Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Trade Commission Finds Patent Violation in Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Date: 2025-12-09 On December 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced its final decision in Investigation No. 337-TA-1236. The case looked at the importation of polycrystalline diamond compacts and related articles into the United States. Companies Found to Violate U.S. Patent Law The ITC found that several companies broke Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The companies were: SF Diamond Co., Ltd. (Henan, China) SF Diamond USA, Inc. (Spring, Texas) Iljin Diamond Co., Ltd., Iljin Holdings Co., Ltd., Iljin USA Inc., Iljin Europe GmbH, Iljin Japan Co., Ltd., Iljin China Co., Ltd. (Korea, USA, Germany, Japan, China) Henan Jingrui New Material Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Zhenzghou New Asia Superhard Materials Composite Co., Ltd. (China) International Diamond Services, Inc. (USA) CR Gems Superabrasives Co., Ltd. (China) Fujian Wanlong Superhard Material Technology Co., Ltd. (China) Guangdong Juxin Materials Technology Co., Inc. (China) Shenzhen Haimingrun Superhard Materials Co., Ltd. (China) These companies were found to have imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. certain polycrystalline diamond compacts and articles that violated claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502. Remedies Ordered by the Commission Because of the violation, the ITC issued two major orders: A limited exclusion order (LEO): This stops the listed companies from importing products that infringe the patent. A cease and desist order (CDO): This order stops SF Diamond USA, Inc. from selling the infringing products in the United States. The ITC also set a bond at zero percent of the value of the excluded products imported during the period when the President reviews the order. Background of the Investigation The case began on December 29, 2020, after a complaint from US Synthetic Corporation (USS) of Orem, Utah. The company said some imports were breaking patent laws in the United States. The ITC first found that there was no violation about some of the patents in question. Some patents and companies were dropped from the investigation as the case went on. After a hearing in October 2021, the ITC originally found no violation for three of the patents. USS appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On February 13, 2025, the Federal Circuit reversed the ITC’s earlier finding about U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 and asked the ITC to reconsider. The Commission then found a violation regarding this patent. Details on the Commission’s Review After reviewing new evidence and legal arguments, the ITC: Agreed USS could use a new method to show its U.S. industry was harmed. Decided that the economic prong of the law, which shows harm to U.S. business, was met. Decided that public interest did not stop them from issuing the orders. The ITC delivered its orders and opinion to the President and the United States Trade Representative. Investigation Ended The ITC’s orders and opinion were dated December 4, 2025. The investigation is now closed. Contacts and More Information Information about this case is available from Cathy Chen in the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission. Documents can be seen at https://edis.usitc.gov. General Commission information is found at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Glycerol Esters of Rosin Imports Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On December 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it has received a complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Glycerol Esters of Rosin and Packaging Thereof, DN 3864.” The complaint was filed by T&R Chemicals, Inc. on December 4, 2025. The USITC is asking for comments about public interest concerns related to this complaint. The complaint says companies may have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This law deals with unfair imports into the United States. The companies named in the complaint are Caragum International from France, and Kemi Pine Rosins Portugal S.A. from Portugal. T&R Chemicals, Inc. is asking the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order. This order would stop the import of certain articles into the United States. The company is also asking for cease and desist orders and a bond on the products during the 60-day Presidential review period. The USITC wants comments on how these actions might affect the public. The USITC is interested in these points: How are the articles used in the United States? Are there any public health, safety, or welfare concerns? Are there similar articles made in the U.S. that could replace the imports if they are excluded? Can U.S. companies or their partners supply enough products to replace the imports if a ban happens? How would U.S. consumers be affected by these actions? Anyone who wants to comment must send in their comments within eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. The USITC will accept other comments only if they are requested. Replies to comments may be filed within three days after the main comment deadline. All submissions must be filed electronically. Paper copies are not accepted at this time. Documents should mention “Docket No. 3864” clearly. Filings should be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Anyone seeking confidential treatment for their documents must request this directly from the Secretary to the Commission and provide reasons for confidentiality. All non-confidential submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. For more details, the public can view the complaint and information on EDIS at https://edis.usitc.gov. Questions about filing can be sent to the Secretary at [email address as listed in the original notice] or by calling (202) 205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons can use (202) 205-1810 for information. This notice is issued under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Issued on December 4, 2025. Lisa Barton,Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Announces Remand Proceedings on Chinese Freight Rail Coupler Investigation Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On December 10, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) released a notice about remand proceedings for its investigations of certain freight rail couplers and parts from China. This notice follows a court order from the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). Background of the Investigation In July 2023, the Commission decided that a U.S. industry was hurt because freight rail couplers and their parts from China were being sold in the U.S. for less than fair value. These items were also being subsidized by the Chinese government. This decision was made in Investigation Nos. 701-TA-682 and 731-TA-1592. The decision was challenged in court by Strato, Inc. and Wabtec Corporation. The CIT ordered the Commission to reconsider or further explain its choice not to exclude Amsted from the domestic industry. This order is in Wabtec v. United States, Court No. 22-00157, Slip Opinion 25-134. Who Can Take Part in the Remand Only people and groups who were already active in the first investigation—and who are also part of the court appeal—can join these remand proceedings. These parties do not need to file again unless they are adding new people for access to business proprietary information (BPI). The Secretary will keep lists of all participants and those allowed to see BPI. Rules for Written Submissions The Commission is not reopening the record and will not accept new factual information. Parties can file comments about how the Commission should respond to the court’s remand instructions. All comments must use only the information already in the Commission’s record. Comments cannot include new facts or arguments not related to the court’s remanded issue. The deadline to file comments is January 2, 2026. Comments must not be longer than ten double-spaced, single-sided pages. These rules apply to attachments and exhibits as well. All written submissions must follow the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This includes part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207). Submissions with BPI must also meet the rules in sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. All filings must be sent electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings or paper copies will be accepted until further notice. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing provides more guidance and is available online. Further written submissions will not be accepted unless there is good reason or unless a Commissioner or Commission staff asks for them specifically. Serving Documents According to sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, every document filed must be served on all other parties in the investigation, as shown on the public or BPI service list. Each document must include a certificate of service. The Secretary will not accept any document that is missing this certificate. Contact Information For questions, parties can contact Lawrence Jones at (202) 205-3358 (Office of Investigations) or Michael Haldenstein at (202) 205-3041 (Office of General Counsel). Further information is available at https://www.usitc.gov and at https://edis.usitc.gov. Issued by order of the Commission on December 5, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Expedited Review of Collated Steel Staples from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On December 16, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the start of expedited five-year reviews. The reviews will look at antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain collated steel staples from China. The ITC will decide if ending these orders would likely cause injury to U.S. industries again. The case is based on sections 701-TA-626 and 731-TA-1452 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The key date for this review is September 5, 2025. On that date, the ITC found that the response from domestic parties was strong enough. It also found there was not enough response from parties in China. For this reason, the review will be expedited instead of a full review. Staff will prepare a special report about the review. This report will first be placed in the nonpublic record. It will be given to certain people who are part of the administrative protective order service list on December 29, 2025. A public version will be made available after that. People or companies who are allowed to join the review can send their written comments to the ITC. These comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on January 5, 2026. Comments cannot include any new facts. If there are delays in related reviews by the Department of Commerce, the comment deadline will change to three business days after Commerce shares its results. Anyone who is not a party or an interested party can send in a short written statement by January 5, 2026. These statements also must not include new facts. All documents that are sent in must be shared with other parties in the review. A certificate of service is also required when filing. The ITC says that this review is “extraordinarily complicated.” Because of this, the ITC will take up to 90 days longer to finish the review. This review is managed under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the ITC’s rules. More information about the process and deadlines can be found on the ITC’s website. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this announcement on December 11, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Receives Complaint on Wearable Devices with Fall Detection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a complaint called “Certain Wearable Devices with Fall Detection and Components Thereof,” DN 3865. The Commission is asking for comments from the public on any issues related to the public interest. The complaint was filed by UnaliWear, Inc. on December 12, 2025. UnaliWear says that some companies are violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The alleged problems involve importing, selling for import, or selling after import certain wearable devices with fall detection and their parts in the United States. The complaint names several companies as respondents: Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, NJ Google LLC of Mountain View, CA Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, KS Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, KS UnaliWear asks the USITC to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The company also asks for a bond to be put on the products named in the complaint during the 60-day Presidential review, as described in the law. The public, as well as interested parties and agencies, are invited to comment on how the requested actions might affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competition in the U.S. economy Making of similar or the same products in the United States U.S. consumers In particular, the USITC wants comments that: Explain how the devices in question are used in the U.S. Identify any health, safety, or welfare concerns about the orders requested. List similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the ones named, if excluded. Say if the complainant, its licensees, or third-party suppliers could make enough replacement products quickly. Explain how the orders would impact consumers in the U.S. All written comments about the public interest must be submitted within eight calendar days after this Federal Register notice. After the investigation’s first decision, more chances to comment will be available. Replies to written comments must be filed within three calendar days after the first submissions are due. Submissions and replies are limited to five pages, including attachments. All documents must be filed electronically by the deadlines. Use the docket number “Docket No. 3865” on the cover or first page. Only electronic filings are accepted at this time, through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies will be accepted until further notice. For help with electronic filing, contact the Secretary at the email provided in the notice. Anyone asking for confidential treatment of documents must explain why, following 19 CFR 201.6. All nonconfidential documents will be available for public inspection at the Secretary’s Office and on EDIS. This action is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The notice was issued on December 15, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Certain Wearable Devices Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint titled “Certain Wearable Devices, DN 3866.” This notice was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 2025. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed the complaint on December 15, 2025. The complaint claims violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The alleged violations relate to importing, selling for import, and sales after import of certain wearable devices in the United States. Named as respondents in the case are Ouraring Inc. of San Francisco, California, and Oura Health Oy of Finland. Samsung has asked the Commission to issue several orders: A limited exclusion order against the respondents. Cease and desist orders. A bond on the products during the 60-day Presidential review period as described in 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The USITC is now asking for comments from the public and interested parties on issues about the public interest. The questions include whether excluding the products would impact public health, U.S. economy, production of similar products in the U.S., or U.S. consumers. The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the wearable devices are used in the U.S. Show any public health, safety, or welfare concerns related to excluding these products. Identify U.S.-made products that could replace these devices if they are excluded. Say if Samsung, their licensees, or other companies can provide enough replacements quickly. Explain how the exclusion would affect U.S. consumers. Anyone wishing to comment must do so within eight calendar days of the notice’s publication. Replies to comments must be filed within three calendar days after the original deadline. Each comment or reply can be up to five pages long. All filings must be electronic. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Submissions must include “Docket No. 3866” and be made using the Electronic Document Information System at https://edis.usitc.gov. Requests for confidential treatment must give clear reasons. All materials are available for inspection and may be shared with certain government personnel. This action is organized under the authority of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. The order was signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and issued on December 15, 2025. For more details or to access the complaint, visit the Commission’s website or EDIS at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation Into Vaporizers Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On December 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a new investigation. This investigation is about certain vaporizer devices, cartridges used with them, and their parts. The investigation was started after a complaint was filed on September 30, 2025. Who Filed the Complaint? The complaint was filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC. Both companies are located in Washington, DC. They also filed extra information for the complaint in November and December 2025. What is the Complaint About? The complaint says that some products are being sold in the U.S. that break certain U.S. patents. The patents listed are U.S. Patent No. 11,134,722 and U.S. Patent No. 11,606,981. The complaint says these products are vaporizer devices, which are also called ENDS devices, cartridges (sometimes called “pods”), and certain parts like cartridge housings, atomizers, atomizer subassemblies, and device subassemblies. The complaint says this is against section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC say an industry in the U.S. is hurt by these products being imported and sold. Who Are the Respondents? Two companies are named in the complaint: Glas, Inc. Glas, LLC Both have addresses at 2127 Westwood Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025. What Will Happen Next? The USITC began its investigation on December 16, 2025. The Commission will look to see if section 337 of the Tariff Act has been broken. This includes checking if the accused products break any claims in the listed patents. The investigation will cover: Claims 1-2, 4-7, and 9-21 of the ‘722 patent. Claims 1-2, 4-5, and 8-18 of the ‘981 patent. The Commission may issue a limited exclusion order or cease and desist orders if it finds that the law was broken. How Are Responses Handled? The named companies must answer the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days after being served. They must follow 19 CFR 210.13. If companies do not respond on time, they may lose the right to take part. The administrative law judge and the Commission may then decide the facts as given in the complaint and notice. This could lead to an exclusion order or a cease and desist order against those companies. Contact Information For information, contact Susan Orndoff at (202) 205-1802. People who need special help can call (202) 205-2000 or use the TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810. More information is at https://www.usitc.gov. The complaint is available at https://edis.usitc.gov, except for any confidential parts. Issued by: Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Date: 2025-12-16 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation into Certain Semiconductor Devices Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has begun an investigation into possible patent violations related to semiconductor devices. This investigation started after a complaint was filed on November 17, 2025. The complainants are Adeia, Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc., and Adeia Holdings Inc., all located in San Jose, California. The complaint claims that some companies have imported, sold for import, or sold in the U.S. certain semiconductor devices, computing products with those devices, and their parts. The complaint says these actions may violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is based on the claimed infringement of these U.S. patents: No. 11,978,681, No. 12,199,069, No. 12,322,650, and No. 12,381,173. The investigation will focus on whether there was a violation of the law by bringing into the United States, selling for import, or selling after import, the products listed. The products targeted are: AMD semiconductor devices, including processors and integrated circuits with hybrid bonded or direct bonded structures. Computing devices, such as servers, desktops, and laptops, that have or use these AMD semiconductor devices. The Commission will also decide if an industry in the United States exists or is being set up, as required by the law. The named companies accused of violating the law are: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) of Santa Clara, California Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China Super Micro Computer, Inc. of San Jose, California These companies must reply to the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days after receiving the documents. If any company does not respond in time, the Commission may decide the facts as stated by the complainants. This could lead to a limited exclusion order or a cease and desist order against the company. The investigation will be run by an Administrative Law Judge as named by the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the U.S. International Trade Commission. The judge will hear arguments and review evidence from all interested parties. The findings must focus on public interest factors set in federal law. The public version of the complaint is available on the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. Anyone needing special help to access USITC buildings should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Receives Complaint on Wireless Communication Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On December 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new legal complaint. The case is called “Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Components Thereof,” listed as Docket Number 3867. The complaint was submitted by Active Wireless Technologies LLC on December 16, 2025. It claims there have been violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). This law deals with products that are brought into the United States in ways that may not follow trade rules. Several companies have been named as respondents in the complaint. They are: BLU Products, Inc. of Doral, Florida Coosea USA Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California DISH Wireless, LLC of Englewood, Colorado EchoStar Corporation of Englewood, Colorado HTC Corporation of Taiwan LG Electronics Inc. of South Korea OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of China Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California TCL Communication Ltd. of Hong Kong TTE Technology, Inc. (doing business as TCL North America) of Irvine, California TCL Technology Group Corporation of China T-Mobile USA, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington The complaint asks the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. It also requests the Commission to require a bond for certain products during a 60-day Presidential review period as allowed under the law. The USITC is now asking for public comments about this investigation. Comments should cover if banning these products would affect public health, welfare, U.S. competition, U.S. production of similar products, or U.S. consumers. The USITC is especially interested in comments answering these questions: How are the products that may be banned used in the United States? Are there any health, safety, or welfare concerns if these products are banned? Are there similar products made in the United States that could replace these imported products? Can the complainant or other U.S. companies quickly replace the supply if the ban happens? How would a ban affect U.S. consumers? Written comments on public interest issues must be sent in by the end of the business day, eight days after the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. There will be more chances to comment after an initial decision is made in this investigation. Comments must be no more than five pages and should be sent electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper submissions will be accepted at this time. If someone wants to send a comment and keep it confidential, they must request this in their submission and explain why. Public documents will be available for viewing online. This notice was issued by Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 16, 2025. This action comes under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related Commission rules. For further details, contact the USITC or visit their website at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Receives Complaint on Dental Burs and Kits Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a complaint about certain dental burs and kits. This notice was published on December 19, 2025, in the Federal Register. The complaint was filed by Huwais IP Holding LLC and Versah, LLC on December 16, 2025. It claims violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The complaint covers the import and sale of certain dental burs and kits in the United States. The list of companies named in the complaint includes: Pawn Move of Pakistan Raheela Instruments of United Arab Emirates Ali House of Dental of Pakistan Dental68 of Grapevine, TX Mahfooz Instruments of Pakistan Medsal International of Pakistan Hamsan International d/b/a Hamsan Surgical of Pakistan Arck Instruments UK LTD of United Kingdom Denshine of Rancho Cucamonga, CA DentalBTC of Pakistan iDentalShop of Elk Grove Village, IL Dyna International of Pakistan Merit Surgical of Canada Skeema Dental Italia of Italy Orthodonticdenal of Australia New Med Instruments of Pakistan The complainants ask the USITC for a general exclusion order. If that is not possible, they ask for a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also ask the Commission to impose a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period as per 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The USITC is now asking for comments from the public and interested groups. Comments should focus on: How the dental burs and kits are used in the United States Any public health, safety, or welfare concerns related to the orders requested If there are similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the foreign items if excluded Whether complainant, their licensees, or third parties can meet demand if the products are excluded within a reasonable time How the requested orders would affect U.S. consumers Comments about the public interest must be sent in no later than eight calendar days after the notice’s publication. Replies to comments must be sent no later than three days after the original submission deadline. Comments and replies must be no longer than five pages. All written submissions must be sent electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted at this time. Anyone who wants to submit a document with confidential information must request confidential treatment as per USITC rules. Non-confidential submissions are available for review at the Secretary’s Office and on EDIS. This process is held under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more information, contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, USITC, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Phone: (202) 205-2000. Further help is available at https://www.usitc.gov or by email to the Secretary. Issued December 16, 2025, by order of the Commission. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Starts Investigation on Certain Vaporizer Devices and Cartridges Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a new investigation. The official notice was published on December 23, 2025, in the Federal Register. The investigation is about certain vaporizer devices, cartridges used with them, and their parts. This includes electronic nicotine delivery systems (called “ENDS” devices), also known as e-cigarettes. The parts covered include pods, pod mouthpieces, cartridge housings, cartridge bases, liquid nicotine solutions, atomizers, wicks, atomizer subassemblies, device subassemblies, and chargers. Who Made the Complaint The complaint was filed on September 22, 2025, and updated on December 3, 2025. The complainants are: NJOY, LLC Altria Group Distribution Company Altria Client Services LLC All three companies are based at 6601 W. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia. The complaint says that certain vaporizer products sold in or brought into the United States may be breaking the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930, Section 337. The complainants say that JUUL Labs, Inc. is violating the law by importing and selling products that use inventions covered under two United States Patents: Patent No. 12,115,303 (the ‘303 patent) Patent No. 12,194,227 (the ‘227 patent) The investigation will look at claims 1-7 of the ‘303 patent and claims 1-6 of the ‘227 patent. Who Is the Respondent The respondent named in the investigation is: JUUL Labs, Inc., 1000 F Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004. This company is the one NJOY and Altria accuse of patent infringement. What the Investigation Will Cover USITC will investigate if: JUUL Labs, Inc. is selling or importing products that use the patented inventions without permission. There is an industry for these products in the United States, or if one is being started, as required by law. Possible Outcomes The complainants want the Commission to issue: A limited exclusion order (to stop the import of infringing products) Cease and desist orders (to stop sales and other actions inside the United States) How the Case Will Proceed JUUL Labs, Inc. must reply to the complaint and notice within 20 days of being served. Late responses might be counted as giving up the right to respond. If JUUL Labs, Inc. does not answer on time, the Commission may assume the facts in the complaint are true and may issue orders as requested. The Chief Administrative Law Judge from the USITC will choose a judge for the case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be part of this investigation. Members of the public can view the complaint (except for confidential parts) on the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. For more information, you may contact Susan Orndoff at the Office of Docket Services, USITC, at (202) 205-1802. Notice Issued By The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Open-Ear Earpiece Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On December 23, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it will start an investigation related to certain open-ear earpiece devices. The investigation is case number 337-TA-1470. Why the Investigation Was Started Bose Corporation, a company in Framingham, Massachusetts, filed a complaint on September 23, 2025. Bose claims that companies are importing and selling open-ear earpiece devices in the United States that infringe on several Bose patents. Bose says this causes unfair competition and hurts U.S. industry. The complaint was updated several times, most recently on December 9, 2025. Bose lists six patents that it says are being violated. These patents are: U.S. Patent No. 11,140,469 U.S. Patent No. 11,659,313 U.S. Patent No. 11,997,442 U.S. Patent No. 12,356,132 U.S. Patent No. 12,155,984 U.S. Patent No. D1,051,103 Bose wants the USITC to issue an order that would prevent the import and sale of these devices in the United States. In addition, Bose asks for cease and desist orders to be given. What Products Are Named The products involved are described as “earpiece devices, or more specifically, open-ear earbuds which, unlike traditional in-ear or over-ear headphones, do not block the ear canal, allowing users to hear both their audio and ambient sounds simultaneously.” Who Is Involved The USITC has named Bose Corporation as the complainant. The following are the companies and people named as respondents in the investigation: Dongguan Yuanyu Electronic Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ituoray (China) Liu, Yiming d/b/a Yomdud (China) King Lucky Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong) Shenzhen Zhichuang All Technology Co., Ltd. and/or, Abbott Sanag (UK) Group Co., Ltd. d/b/a Sanag (China) Z015 (England) Lingzhong Zhao d/b/a Jzones (China) Shenzhen Mengmengwei Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Lytmi (China) Shenzhen Maosong Tech. Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ansten (China) U2O Global Co., Ltd. d/b/a IWalk (China) Shenzhen Meichi Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a HOMSCAM (China) Shenzhen Shixinhe Dianzi Shangwu Co., Ltd. d/b/a XINHESHUMA (China) Shenzhen Landscape Art Co., Ltd. d/b/a Piluyaa (China) Shenzhen Zhiquhui Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Yeabomy (China) Shenzhen Carnival Digital Technology Co., Ltd. and/or, Shenzhen Lida Tech. Communication Co., Ltd. d/b/a Shijiaet (China) Shenzhen Shibaishi Dianzi Shangwu Co., Ltd., d/b/a Jiayuu and/or YouDaxing (China) Buy Worry-Free Trade Co., Ltd. d/b/a BST Supply I (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Shihui Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Wdingxing (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Chuanboyao Technology Ltd., d/b/a Mmanage and/or Ffaithful (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Dora Cross-Border Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a Doraomi (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Santaizi Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a STZ Sport (Hong Kong) Shenzhen Shiyi Gian Maoyi Co., Ltd. d/b/a Classic Innovation (China) Shenzhen Yanyin Technology Co., Ltd. (China) The U.S. International Trade Commission’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also named as a party. What Happens Next On December 18, 2025, the USITC ordered the investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and section 210.10 of the Commission’s rules. A presiding Administrative Law Judge will be chosen to oversee the case. The named companies and individuals must respond to the complaint and the notice. They must reply within 20 days after they are served. If they do not respond in time, they may lose the right to contest the case. The USITC may issue an exclusion order or cease and desist order without further notice. More Information The non-confidential version of the complaint can be found at https://edis.usitc.gov. For more help, people may contact the Office of Unfair Import Investigations at (202) 205-2560. The public can learn more by visiting https://www.usitc.gov. This order was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Clear Aligners Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has started an investigation into certain clear aligners and parts used to make them. A complaint was filed on September 23, 2025, by Align Technology, Inc. from Tempe, Arizona. They said that clear plastic aligners and their parts, including the tri-layer material for the aligners, are being imported and sold in the U.S. without their permission. The complaint was updated on November 20, 2025. Align Technology claims that some companies are using their inventions covered by these U.S. patents: Patent No. 11,766,313 Patent No. 11,766,314 Patent No. 8,899,977 Patent No. 12,059,321 Patent No. 10,980,616 Patent No. 11,490,996 The focus will be on these claims: Claims 1 and 16 of the ‘313 patent Claims 1, 11, and 21 of the ‘314 patent Claims 1 and 9 of the ‘977 patent Claim 1 of the ‘321 patent Claims 1, 12, and 20 of the ‘616 patent Claims 1, 17, and 21 of the ‘996 patent The accused companies in the investigation are: Angelalign Technology Inc., Shanghai, China Wuxi EA Medical Instruments Technologies Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China Wuxi EA Bio-Tech Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China Shanghai EA Medical Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China USA Angelalign Technology Corp., Newark, Delaware The Commission will look to see if there is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about importing goods that infringe U.S. patents. If the companies are found to have broken the rules, the Commission may stop imports or sales, and issue cease and desist orders. The investigation started on December 19, 2025. The main products being looked at are clear plastic aligners for treating misaligned teeth and bites, along with key parts used to make them. Respondents must answer the complaint within 20 days of being served. If they do not respond in time, they may lose their right to defend themselves. The Commission and an Administrative Law Judge can then decide the case based on the claims. This may lead to orders stopping the import or sale of the accused products. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be a party to this investigation. Anyone can view the public version of the complaint online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Processed Slabs Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On December 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a new complaint. The case is titled “Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same, DN 3870.” The USITC announced this in an official notice on December 29, 2025. Nature of the Complaint The complaint was filed by Cambria Company LLC. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The accusations relate to importing, selling for importation, and selling after importation certain processed slabs and related methods. Companies Named in the Complaint The following companies are named as respondents: Surface Warehouse, L.P. (d/b/a US Surfaces and Vadara Quartz Surfaces), Austin, TX M S International Inc. (d/b/a MSI), Orange, CA Arizona Tile, LLC, Tempe, AZ OHM International Inc., Monroe Twp, NJ Architectural Surfaces Group LLC, Spicewood, TX Caesarstone Ltd., Israel Caesarstone USA, Inc., Charlotte, NC LX Hausys, Ltd., South Korea LX Hausys America, Inc., Alpharetta, GA Mohawk Industries, Inc., Calhoun, GA Dal-Tile, LLC, Dallas, TX Requested Actions Cambria Company LLC requests the Commission to: Issue a limited exclusion order. Issue cease and desist orders. Impose a bond on the allegedly infringing articles, pending the 60-day Presidential review period, as allowed by 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Invitation for Public Comments The USITC invites comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. Comments should address whether the requested relief would affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competitive conditions in the U.S. economy Production of competing products in the U.S. U.S. consumers The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the products subject to possible orders are used in the U.S. Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns about the requested orders. Identify who makes similar or competing products in the U.S. State if U.S. producers can replace the volume in question within a reasonable time. Explain how U.S. consumers would be affected by the requested orders. Filing Deadlines and Rules Written submissions must be filed no later than eight days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Parties may respond to comments no later than three days after initial comments are due. Each submission is limited to five pages, including attachments. All documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper or in-person filings will be accepted at this time. The complainant and other parties should refer to Docket No. 3870 on submissions. Confidential Information Anyone submitting confidential documents must request confidential treatment and include reasons as required by 19 CFR 201.6. Information may be disclosed to USITC staff and contractors, as outlined in the rules. Additional Information General information is available at https://www.usitc.gov, and the public record of this case is online at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help with EDIS, email [email protected]. For confidential filings, contact [email protected]. Authority This action is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and Commission rules 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. The full public version of this notice and further documents are available through the USITC. [FR Doc. 2025-23806 Filed 12-23-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Schedule for Expedited Review of Ferrovanadium Duties Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews for antidumping duty orders on ferrovanadium from China and South Africa. This notice follows the requirements of the Tariff Act of 1930. The purpose of these reviews is to decide if removing the current antidumping duties would likely cause continued or new harm to U.S. industries within a short, predictable time. The ITC decided on November 24, 2025, that the domestic interested party group response was adequate. The response from foreign interested parties was found to be inadequate. No other reasons to hold full reviews were identified. Therefore, the ITC will move forward with expedited reviews under section 751(c)(3) of the Act. A staff report with information about the reviews is in the nonpublic record. It will be provided to certain parties on January 30, 2026. A public version will be shared later, as the Commission’s rules state. Written comments can be filed by interested parties and others. These comments are due by February 4, 2026. They cannot include new facts. If the U.S. Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its review, then the deadline for comments will be three business days after Commerce announces its results. All documents from parties in the reviews must be shared with every other party, and a certificate of service must be included. Documents will not be accepted by the Secretary without this certificate. The ITC has decided that these reviews are unusually complex. For this reason, the Commission is using its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This action is done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 22, 2025. The full notice can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 245, page 60741. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Terminates Investigation Into Composite Intermediate Bulk Containers for Most Respondents, Seeks Comments On Relief Against Remaining Defaulted Firm Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has closed its investigation against three companies involved in importing certain composite intermediate bulk containers. The companies—Shanghai Sakura Plastic Products Co., Ltd. (also called Shanghai Yinghua Plastic Products Co., Ltd.), Shandong Jinshan Jieyuan Container Co., Ltd., and Zibo Jielin Plastic Pipe Manufacture Co. Ltd.—were removed from the investigation after agreeing to settlement terms and consent orders. Each company is based in China. The decision follows three unopposed motions for termination, which were granted by the Chief Administrative Law Judge on December 8, 2025. No party objected to these orders. As a result, the USITC issued consent orders to these companies, and has ended the investigation for them. The investigation originally started on January 27, 2025, after a complaint was filed by Schütz Container Systems, Inc. of New Jersey and Protechna S.A. of Switzerland. The complaint alleged patent violations related to bulk containers. Several U.S. patents were named in the complaint. Hebei Shijiheng Plastics, Co., Ltd., also from China, was another respondent in the investigation. This company did not respond to the complaint and was found in default on July 7, 2025. The USITC is now focusing only on Hebei Shijiheng. The Commission is inviting written comments from the public, complainants, and government agencies. The Commission requests detailed comments on what remedies should be applied against the defaulted company, Hebei Shijiheng. This may include an order to stop the company’s goods from entering the United States, or a requirement to stop certain unfair business activities. The USITC also wants information on how any order might affect public health, U.S. consumers, competition in the U.S., and similar products made in America. The public and interested parties are encouraged to share their opinions on these subjects. If a remedy is issued, the US Trade Representative has 60 days to approve, disapprove, or take no action. During this time, the accused products may still enter the country, but a bond may be required. Comments about the bond amount are also requested. Written submissions must be sent electronically by January 9, 2026. Reply submissions are due by January 16, 2026. Submissions should clearly list the investigation number 337-TA-1434. Guidelines and rules for submitting confidential documents are also provided by the Commission. This decision was made by Commission vote on December 22, 2025. The USITC’s authority for this decision is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more details or to view non-confidential documents, visit the Commission’s electronic docket system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Starts Five-Year Review of Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a five-year review. This review is for wood mouldings and millwork products that come from China. The review started on January 2, 2026. The USITC will check if ending certain trade orders will hurt companies in the United States. These orders are called countervailing and antidumping duty orders. They were first put in place on February 16, 2021. The review looks at whether removing these orders would cause damage to U.S. businesses making similar products. The review covers both injury that could stay the same and injury that could happen again. The USITC has rules for how it does these reviews. The rules can be found in 19 CFR part 201 and part 207. The commission will decide if the review needs to be full or can be done quickly. Key Definitions in the Review: “Subject Merchandise” is the kind of wood products covered by these reviews. The “Subject Country” is China. The “Domestic Like Product” means the same kind of product made in the U.S. The “Domestic Industry” includes U.S. companies that make these products. The “Order Date” is February 16, 2021. An “Importer” is someone who brings the subject goods to the U.S. How to Participate: People or companies wanting to take part must file an “entry of appearance.” This must be done within 21 days from when the notice was published. Former USITC employees can participate in this review, even if they worked on the earlier, related cases. There are special rules for handling business information. Some business data can be protected under an administrative order if it is filed on time. Anyone giving information must certify that it is true and complete. The information may be used by the USITC and other U.S. government staff for work and for security checks. Deadlines for Responses: All responses must be sent by 5:15 p.m. on February 2, 2026. Comments on the responses are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 16, 2026. All documents must be sent in electronically. No paper copies are allowed right now. Filings should be made through the USITC’s EDIS system (https://edis.usitc.gov). Information Requested by the USITC: The commission wants detailed information from companies, groups, and associations. They are encouraged to use a special Excel form found at https://usitc.gov/reports/response_noi_worksheet. Information to provide includes: Name, address, and contact details of the firm or group. If the group is an interested party and why. Willingness to take part fully in the review. The likely effects of ending these trade orders on U.S. companies and on the person or group filing. A list of U.S. makers of these products and details on related parties. A list of current importers and exporters from China. Names of top buyers in the U.S. for these products. Where to find price information for these items. U.S. producer data, including amounts made, capacity, shipments, and sales values for 2025. U.S. importer data for 2025. Foreign producer/exporter data for 2025. Any major changes in supply or demand in the U.S. or China since the orders started, and expected changes. (Optional) If the filer agrees with the definitions used in the review. If any group cannot provide the requested data, they must explain why and suggest other ways to give similar information. Failing to provide information could mean the USITC makes decisions against that party based on what it knows. This review uses the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice was signed by Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney, and published on January 2, 2026. For more information, the public can contact Alexis Yim at the USITC or visit https://www.usitc.gov. The document number for this review is 2025-24194. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts New Review on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is Happening? The Commission is checking if canceling the current countervailing and antidumping duty orders would likely cause problems for U.S. businesses that make these tires. The duties were first ordered in 2015 and then continued in 2021 after previous reviews. Who Can Respond? Anyone who is involved in making, importing, or selling these tires can send a response. This includes U.S. tire producers, importers, unions, worker groups, trade groups, and producers or exporters in China. Representative consumer and industrial user groups may also take part. To join, groups or people must file a notice with the USITC within 21 days from when the notice was published. What Information Should Be Sent? Interested parties need to provide detailed information for the year 2025. The questions cover: The name and address of the company or group Details about being involved in the tire trade or market Willingness to provide more information Views on how removing the duties would affect U.S. industry Lists of tire producers, importers, exporters, and major buyers Information on tire prices and sources Sales, production, and profit numbers Details about big changes in supply, demand, or technology since 2019 U.S. producers need to share data on their tire output, market share, and financial results. Importers and exporters should report how many tires they handled and their value. How to Send Responses All documents must be filed electronically through the USITC’s online system at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies are allowed. The deadline for sending responses is 5:15 p.m. on February 2, 2026. Comments on the quality of responses are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 16, 2026. Important Rules All submitted information must be accurate and full. Special rules protect business confidential information. Parties cannot leave out required information without explaining why and suggesting how they can give similar data. Failing to do this may count against them. Need More Help? More details, filing instructions, and the response worksheet can be found on the Commission’s website: https://usitc.gov/reports/response_noi_worksheet For questions, contact Laurel Schwartz at 202-205-2398 or visit https://www.usitc.gov. Authority This review follows U.S. law under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was approved and published by order of the USITC on December 23, 2025, by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff. OMB Information The request for information is approved under OMB number 3117 0016/USITC No. 25-5-664, with an expiration date of June 30, 2026. End of Notice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Revises Schedule for Monosodium Glutamate Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a revised schedule for its investigation related to monosodium glutamate (MSG) from China and Indonesia. The investigation numbers are 731-TA-1229-1230 and are part of the second review process. The changes were made because a lapse in appropriations caused the Commission to stop its operations for a time. Responses to the notice of institution are now due by December 17, 2025. Comments on the adequacy of those responses, and on whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or a full review, are due by January 27, 2026. If anyone, such as industrial users or representative consumer organizations, wishes to participate as a party, the deadline to file an entry of appearance, which was originally set for 21 days after publication on October 1, 2025, has been extended by 47 days. For more information, the public can contact Rachel Devenney at the USITC. The public record for the proceeding can be viewed online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The investigation is under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows the Commission’s rules for such proceedings. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 1, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.