U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies in Glycine Imports from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-14 Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a preliminary decision about glycine products imported from India. They think that some companies in India received unfair money help from their government, which makes selling their products cheaper in the U.S. This is part of an ongoing investigation to make sure trade rules are fair. Background Glycine is a product that the U.S. monitors closely. In 2019, a rule was set to make sure India was not giving unfair help to their companies for glycine. Commerce has done a review for the year 2024 to check if these rules were followed. They started this talk in July 2025 and chose two main companies, Kumar Industries and Mulji Mehta Enterprises, to look at closely. Decision to Rescind for Some Companies Commerce has decided to stop looking at 27 companies because nobody wanted a review for them anymore. This means those companies will not be part of this decision about unfair subsidies. Reason for the Review A review is done to make sure there are no unfair practices. The U.S. laws state there should be no unfair help from governments to companies that could harm fair trade. Commerce found that some companies may have received help, which means they sold glycine at lower prices unfairly. Results and Method For this review, Commerce found that Kumar Industries and Mulji Mehta Enterprises took part in these programs. They gave Kumar a subsidy rate of 39.75% and Mulji Mehta Enterprises a rate of 104.92%. Mulji Mehta Pharma, linked to Mulji Mehta Enterprises, also got Kumar’s rate of 39.75% because it wasn’t separately checked. What Happens Next? Commerce will allow people to talk about this decision before making it final. Anyone interested in giving thoughts must do so within 21 days from today’s announcement. The final decision will be made after listening to these comments. Conclusion This step ensures fair trade practices between the U.S. and India concerning glycine. Commerce’s actions aim to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition while ensuring they follow international trade rules. Families and industries relying on fair pricing will be kept informed as the review continues. For more detailed information, parties are invited to access the full preliminary review memorandum online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Findings on PC Strand from Ukraine Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken a significant step in its review of trade activities. The department, through the International Trade Administration, has released preliminary findings regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Ukraine. This process involves verifying if the goods were sold in the United States at a price lower than the normal value. The specific company under review is PJSC Stalkanat. The review period considered by the department is from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The preliminary findings have determined that PJSC Stalkanat did not sell these products at prices below the normal value during this period. This means they have not engaged in what is known as “dumping.” These findings are important, as dumping can harm the local market by underselling domestic goods. Hence, countries impose duties to protect their industries from such practices. This process is part of an antidumping duty administrative review. The Department of Commerce first initiated this review back on July 25, 2025. The government shutdowns affected the timeline for these reviews, causing several extensions. Originally, extensions were made in April, July, and August of 2026 to ensure thoroughness in the review process. The department now invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Interested individuals or businesses have the opportunity to submit their case briefs or written comments. The timeline for providing these submissions will be communicated at a later date. Those wishing to file rebuttal briefs, specifically countering the issues raised, have five days following the submission deadline for case briefs to do so. The final results of this administrative review are expected to be issued within 120 days of the publication of this preliminary notice. This will include analysis of the all issues raised from submitted comments or briefs. The department will provide specific instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for assessing the appropriate antidumping duties based on the final results. If PJSC Stalkanat’s margin remains zero or is determined to be less than 0.50 percent, no duties will be collected. If the margin is more than 0.50 percent, duties will be applied to future shipments. The findings and updates about this process are available for public viewing through official government online portals. The detailed information is accessible electronically for those with interest in the trade compliance practices. This notice also reminds importers of their need to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties before they finalize the transaction of goods. This ensures transparency and compliance with U.S. trade regulations. This process is overseen by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, who is acting in this role for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Update: Preliminary Results on Brass Rod from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Introduction The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary findings from its review of brass rod imports from Brazil. This review specifically focuses on Termomecanica Sao Paulo S.A., a Brazilian producer and exporter. Background On June 13, 2024, Commerce established an antidumping duty order on brass rod from Brazil. The current review covers the period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025, initiated due to timely requests. Preliminary Findings Commerce has found that Termomecanica made sales of brass rod at less than normal value during the review period. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Termomecanica is 22.07 percent. Methodology The review was conducted according to the Tariff Act of 1930. The calculation involved export price, constructed export price, and normal value. Public Comment Commerce invites public comments on these preliminary results. Interested parties may submit case briefs by following specific timelines and formats. Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements Upon finalizing the review, Commerce will determine and direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on duty assessments. New cash deposit rates will be set for shipments on or after the final results’ publication. Next Steps The final results of this review are expected within 120 days of the notice’s publication. Commerce will continue to ensure compliance with established procedures and regulations. Conclusion This review is part of Commerce’s ongoing efforts to regulate international trade and ensure fair pricing practices. Further details and updates can be accessed through the Federal Register or Commerce’s online portals. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Ends Orders on Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Department of Commerce Ends Orders on Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to revoke orders on certain walk-behind lawn mowers from China and Vietnam. This decision came after a review process that found no domestic company interested in continuing the orders. Background and Review Process In 2021, Commerce placed orders to manage the dumping and countervailing duties on walk-behind lawn mowers from these countries. This was to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing practices. On June 1, 2026, Commerce started a review to decide if these orders should remain. No Interest from U.S. Companies AxenTech LLC initially showed interest in the review process. They are a domestic wholesaler who wanted to participate. However, they withdrew their interest, which led to no participation from any domestic party. Due to the lack of interest, the Department of Commerce will revoke the orders. What is Covered Under the Orders The orders covered walk-behind lawn mowers with specific engines and features. These lawn mowers are powered by internal combustion engines with less than 3.7 kilowatts. They also must meet certain safety standards, whether finished or not. Impact of Revocation Revoking these orders means that as of July 13, 2026, lawn mowers from China and Vietnam are no longer subject to these specific trade protections. Customs and Border Protection will stop the suspension of liquidation for these mowers from this date onward. Final Note This marks an end to a trade protection measure that was initially put in place to support domestic producers. The Department of Commerce made this decision because no U.S. companies showed interest in continuing the measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Antidumping Duties on Brazilian Brass Rods Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary findings from the administrative review of antidumping duties on brass rods from Brazil. This review focuses specifically on the Brazilian company, Termomecanica Sao Paulo S.A., which is a producer and exporter of brass rods. Finding Details The review covers a period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. During this time, Termomecanica made sales of brass rods at prices less than normal value. In simple terms, this means they sold products at lower prices in the U.S. than in Brazil. The estimated dumping margin for Termomecanica is determined to be 22.07 percent. What’s Next The public can comment on these findings. The Commerce Department will take comments into account before making a final decision. Interested parties have 21 days from the notice’s publication to submit written comments. After that, there is an additional five-day period to submit rebuttal comments. Assessment and Cash Deposit Rates If the final results of the review confirm the preliminary findings, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be directed to assess antidumping duties on applicable entries from the period reviewed. Additionally, the cash deposit rate for future entries of brass rods from Brazil, through Termomecanica, will be updated to reflect these final results. This new rate will apply to shipments entering the U.S. after the final decision. Impact on Importers Importers need to be aware of these potential changes. Importers should file certificates about the reimbursement of antidumping duties before the final liquidation occurs. If they fail to do so, they might have to pay double the duties. Public Hearing Requests Those interested in a public hearing can submit a request within 30 days after this notice is published. They need to provide their name, contact details, and the issues they plan to discuss. Final Results Timeline The Department of Commerce aims to publish the final results within 120 days, although this could be extended if needed. The review ensures fair international trade and compliance with U.S. trade laws. For more information or to participate, stakeholders can access detailed documentation online through the U.S. Department of Commerce’s electronic service systems. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Ends Trade Orders on Lawn Mowers from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to revoke trade orders on certain walk-behind lawn mowers from China and Vietnam. This decision follows a process called a “sunset review.” The sunset review began on June 1, 2026. This is when the Department of Commerce looks at old orders to decide if they should still be in place. The orders being reviewed were first made on July 13, 2021. They were made to prevent dumping and unfair pricing of lawn mowers from China and Vietnam in the U.S. market. During the review, no U.S. company or interested party came forward to express continued support for the orders by the set deadline of July 1, 2026. Without such support, the Department of Commerce can revoke the orders. AxenTech LLC initially showed interest in participating but later withdrew, leaving no domestic parties involved. The Department of Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission about its intention to revoke the orders. This means that after July 13, 2026, the orders will no longer apply. The lawn mowers, which are powered by engines of less than 3.7 kilowatts, can now enter the U.S. without the extra trade duties. Before the effective date, any imported lawn mowers will still be subject to the suspension of liquidation and duty requirements. After this date, the lawn mowers will be free to enter the U.S. without these restrictions. This decision is a part of the regular process to ensure that trade orders are only used when necessary. The revocation allows for the possibility of more competitive pricing and a better market environment for lawn mowers in the U.S. For more information, interested parties can contact the Department of Commerce representatives, Alexander Wolfe or Madeline Robinson, at the numbers provided in the official notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Hand Trucks from China to Continue Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts from the People’s Republic of China. This decision comes after findings that ending the order would probably lead to dumping and harm the U.S. industry. The initial order on hand trucks from China was introduced on December 2, 2004. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce both agreed that revoking the order will likely cause dumping and result in material injury to the local industry. The Commerce Department reviewed this situation as part of its fourth sunset reviews. These reviews are conducted under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, which helps determine if duties need to continue. The ITC also published their findings on August 18, 2026, reinforcing the risk of injury without the order. The order applies to hand trucks made from any material. These hand trucks could be assembled or unassembled and include parts like the vertical frame, handling area, and the projecting edges or toe plate. The order is intended to prevent hand trucks under these descriptions from being dumped in the U.S. market. Specific exclusions to this order include small utility carts for personal bags, motorized hand trucks, and vertical carriers for golf bags. As a result of the findings by both the Commerce Department and the ITC, the antidumping duty order remains effective as of August 18, 2026. Importers will need to continue making antidumping cash deposits for these products. The next review of this order is expected to happen before the fifth anniversary of the most recent ITC determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies for Austrian Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination concerning oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Austria. The agency has found that producers and exporters in Austria are receiving countervailable subsidies. The investigation scrutinized the period from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. A countervailable subsidy is when a government provides financial help to its businesses, making their products cheaper for international buyers. The investigation started on April 28, 2026. The preliminary determination was postponed from an earlier date and released on August 31, 2026. The Commerce Department used specific criteria to measure if a subsidy existed. They looked into financial contributions by the Austrian authorities and checked if these provided any benefits to the companies. The investigation is linked to another inquiry concerning unfair pricing practices. The Commerce Department intends to align its final countervailing duty determination with the final results of the related antidumping investigation. Voestalpine Tubulars GmbH & Co KG from Austria, the primary company examined, was found to have a 10.17% subsidy rate. This same rate applies to all other Austrian exporters and producers of OCTG. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend any imports of these goods from September 3, 2026, marking the date of this notice. An equivalent cash deposit is also required from importers. Any interested parties have a chance to comment before final decisions are made. The U.S. International Trade Commission will be notified and will assess if these imports harm U.S. industry. If the final ruling is affirmative, measures will be in place to protect the U.S. markets. The full scope of the investigation covers any OCTG from Austria. These are hollow steel products like casing and tubing used in oil and gas. Certain products, such as those containing more than 10.5% chromium, are excluded. The investigation ensures fair trade practices, protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Results for Antidumping Review on Spanish Steel Flanges Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from Spain. The review covers the period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce found that the Spanish producer and exporter, ULMA Forja, S.Coop, sold these flanges in the United States at prices less than normal value. The preliminary results reveal a weighted-average dumping margin of 1.22 percent for ULMA during the review period. The Department conducted this review under the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce calculated export prices and normal value according to this law. Interest parties may comment on these preliminary results. Commerce will accept comments seven days after the last verification report in the review. For any questions, people can contact Mason Harkleroad at the International Trade Administration with the phone number (202) 482-0905. Additionally, petitions showed interest in Commerce verifying ULMA’s questionnaire responses. The Department plans to verify the information in the final results. If ULMA’s margin stays above zero in the final results, Commerce will calculate specific assessment rates for imports. Duties will be adjusted based on the margin found. Cash deposit requirements have also been set. After final results are announced, the cash deposit rate for ULMA will reflect the final dumping margin percentage if it is above de minimis. If the rate is de minimis, no deposit will be required. Previously reviewed firms maintain existing rates, and others will continue at the rate of 18.81 percent. Commerce aims to provide the final review results within 120 days of these preliminary findings. This review is crucial to ensure fair trading practices by monitoring dumping activities. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction to Antidumping Duty Review on Stainless Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction regarding the administrative review of stainless steel flanges imported from India. On August 20, 2026, Commerce published the final results of its 2023-2024 review of these products. A mistake was made in the name of a company involved in this review. The correct name is “Viraj Profiles Private Limited,” previously listed as “Viraj Profiles Limited.” The review involved a group of companies known as the BFN/Viraj collective entity. These companies include: BFN Forgings Private Limited Flanschen werk Bebitz GmbH Viraj Alloys, Ltd. Viraj Forgings, Ltd. Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd. Viraj Profiles Private Limited The Department has confirmed that “Viraj Profiles Private Limited” is the successor in interest to “Viraj Profiles Limited.” No comments were made about this correction. Thus, Commerce maintains its decision that Viraj Profiles Private Limited takes over the role of Viraj Profiles Limited. The Commerce’s findings are important. They help ensure fair trade practices and protect domestic industries from unfair pricing in international trade. This correction is made to ensure accurate information in official records. The details of this review and correction were published by the Federal Register on September 3, 2026. This notification is made under sections 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213. The announcement was officially issued by Christopher Abbott from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds South African Brass Rods Sold Below Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On September 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary findings on the sale of brass rods from South Africa. These findings concern a review period from December 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025. Background Information In June 2024, an order was issued concerning the sale of brass rods from Brazil. In July 2025, a review began for the brass rods from South Africa. This was during a time when there were shutdowns in the U.S. government, causing delays in the review process. These delays led to extensions, with the preliminary results finally coming out in September 2026. Key Findings Non-Ferrous Metal Works (SA) (PTY) Ltd., also known as NFMW, was found to have sold brass rods at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold it cheaper than expected or fair. The U.S. Department of Commerce calculated that the dumping margin, or the difference between normal value and sale price, was 19.82%. Next Steps The Department of Commerce is open to comments from interested parties regarding these findings. They have set a deadline for submitting briefs on the case. This is a formal way that people can give their opinions on the matter. After the comments are reviewed, more analysis will follow. A detailed memorandum, called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, explains these findings further. It is available online for anyone interested. Final Decisions The Department of Commerce will make the final decision after considering the comments and any new findings. These final results will be published, and any duties will be calculated based on this final decision. Conclusion For the time being, the importers of these brass rods will need to use a specific cash deposit rate. The deposit rate will follow what has been established in previous reviews unless the new findings suggest a different rate. This process is essential for fair trade and ensures that U.S. businesses compete on a level playing field with foreign companies. The final review and decisions will help determine the future of these duties and trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Tubing from India for Antidumping Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is examining whether some Indian exporters sold steel tubing in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This review looks at a period from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The steel products in question are called “cold-drawn mechanical tubing.” These are special steel tubes used in different industries. The Commerce Department is focusing on two main companies from India. These companies are Goodluck India Limited and Tube Products of India, Ltd. Preliminary results show that both companies sold their products at prices below what they cost to make. For Goodluck India Limited, the unfair pricing is measured at a level called a “dumping margin,” which is 2.73 percent. For Tube Products of India, Ltd., the margin is 4.54 percent. The Commerce Department explained their methods for reviewing these cases. They followed laws and guidelines in their investigation. The department is asking interested parties to comment on these preliminary findings. Companies and individuals must submit their comments within 21 days of the notice. There will also be a chance for responses to these comments, called rebuttal briefs. These need to be submitted within five days after the initial comment period ends. If the findings remain the same after the review, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will charge duties on imported goods to counter the unfair pricing. More details about this review and its methods can be found in the full report on the Commerce Department’s website. The final decision will be made after considering all the comments and inquiries from interested parties. This will also determine what future actions might be needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its review on heavy walled rectangular pipes and tubes imported from Mexico during the 2023-2024 period. After a thorough examination, the Department determined that two main companies in Mexico, Forza Steel S.A. de C.V. and Productos Laminados de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa), sold their pipes and tubes in the United States at prices lower than normal. This is called “dumping.” The time covered in this review was from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The results announced on September 3, 2026, showed that both companies had dumping margins. Forza Steel’s dumping margin was 31.23 percent, while Prolamsa’s was 7.45 percent. This review also included companies that were not examined individually. The weighted-average dumping margin for these non-examined companies was determined to be 16.84 percent. The review was conducted according to U.S. trade laws and followed inspections both in Mexico and the United States. These inspections helped ensure the accuracy and compliance of all data provided by the companies involved. The U.S. Department of Commerce announced these findings publicly and has shared the calculations used in this review with the involved parties. The details can be accessed electronically for further transparency. The Commerce has provided instructions for assessing duties on these imports. Assessments will be applied based on specific calculations tied to each company and their sales values. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will follow these guidelines for all applicable entries during the review period. In addition, there are updates on cash deposit requirements for any future imports of these products from Mexico. The new rates, reflecting the results of this review, are applicable immediately. For importers, it is crucial to file necessary documents about reimbursements of duties to avoid penalties. This process helps ensure that all parties involved in the import and sale of these pipes and tubes comply with U.S. trade regulations. Overall, the Department’s actions aim to maintain fair market conditions by adjusting and enforcing duties on imported goods that are traded unfairly. This helps protect U.S. industries and keeps trade competition equal. These findings are part of continuous efforts to enforce trade laws effectively. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Continued Dumping of Certain Steel Nails Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-09-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its sunset reviews on certain steel nails imported from five countries. These reviews found that if current antidumping duty orders are removed, dumping would likely continue or happen again. The countries affected include the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. What Happened: On May 1, 2026, the Department of Commerce started reviewing the orders issued in 2015, which aimed to prevent unfair pricing by foreign producers. These orders concern certain steel nails, which include different types of nails made of steel that are sold in large amounts to the United States. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., a producer of nails in the United States, took part in these reviews. On May 15, 2026, Mid Continent sent a notice to the Department of Commerce showing their interest in keeping the orders. They met the deadline for sending this notice, as per the rules in place. On June 1, 2026, Mid Continent also provided more detailed responses about the nail imports from the five countries. These responses further supported their stance against letting go of the orders. The Department of Commerce did not get significant responses from the companies in the countries that produce these nails. The Results: The reviews found that removing the current antidumping duty orders would most likely lead to continued dumping. This means that the nails would be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. producers. Here’s a breakdown of the likely dumping margins if the orders were lifted: Korea: Up to 11.80% Malaysia: Up to 39.35% Oman: Up to 9.10% Taiwan: Up to 2.24% Vietnam: Up to 323.99% These percentages indicate how much lower the prices could be compared to fair market value. Next Steps: The Department of Commerce will continue to enforce these orders to prevent dumping. The companies who had access to private information under a protective order must now follow rules to return or destroy this information. This announcement serves as a reminder of their duty to handle this information properly, as breaking these rules can lead to penalties. For further details, the full text of the Department of Commerce’s decision, along with other information, is available online through their official document platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Rescinds Review of Steel Imports from Japan Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes What Happened? The United States Department of Commerce has announced the rescission of an administrative review concerning antidumping duties on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. This review covered the period from December 1, 2024, to November 30, 2025. On December 8, 2025, the Commerce Department allowed requests for reviews on non-oriented electrical steel from Japan. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. wanted a review of imports by Nippon Steel Corporation. The Commerce Department started this review on February 20, 2026. Later, Nippon Steel Corporation reported that it did not export or sell this type of steel to the United States during the review period. The Commerce Department found no evidence of any sales or entries of this steel into the United States during this time. As a result, the Department decided to cancel the review. What Does This Mean? The rescission of the review means the current cash deposit rates for duties remain unchanged. These rates will continue to apply until further notice. The Commerce Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on any relevant entries based on the deposit rates at the time of the entry. The instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the rescission notice. Important Reminders This notice serves as a reminder for parties involved in the administrative protective order (APO) process. They must return or destroy any proprietary information disclosed during the review. They need to comply with regulations, or they might face sanctions. Conclusion The decision to rescind the review confirms that no non-oriented electrical steel from Japan was imported into the U.S. during the specified period. This ensures the reliability of the duty system and maintains fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.