U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Countervailing Duty on Wind Towers from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to keep the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from Malaysia. This decision means that Malaysia will continue to face certain subsidies when exporting these wind towers to the U.S. The countervailing duty was first put in place on August 4, 2021. The Department of Commerce started a review of this duty on July 2, 2026. The law requires them to do these reviews every five years to check if the duty is still needed. The decision to keep the duty came after a review process. The Domestic Interested Party, which is a group of U.S. producers, participated in this review. They argued that ending the duty could lead to continued or increased subsidies from Malaysia. The government of Malaysia and other interested parties did not take part in this review. Because of this, the review process was faster and only took 120 days. The review found that ending the duties could allow Malaysian wind towers to continue getting subsidies. This could hurt U.S. producers. The wind towers from Malaysia affected are large structures used for harnessing wind power. They must meet specific size and production criteria to be covered by the duty. The Department of Commerce found that ending the order would likely let subsidies continue at a rate of 6.43 percent for CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd and others. This announcement serves as a reminder to those under an administrative protective order to handle documents properly. They must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. These final results are published in accordance with U.S. trade laws and regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Duties on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On October 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an important update. They have decided to continue with the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain non-refillable steel cylinders from China. This decision was made because removing these orders might hurt the U.S. industry. In May 2021, the U.S. started imposing duties on non-refillable steel cylinders from China. The reason was to prevent unfair competition due to lower prices and subsidies given by the Chinese government. Earlier this year, in April 2026, a review of these orders began. Both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission looked into the matter. They studied if lifting these duties would lead to unfair practices again. Their answer was yes. Without the orders, there might be more dumping, subsidies, and harm to U.S. businesses. The orders cover specific types of steel cylinders. These cylinders are used in many places. They range in size and might be imported with or without valves. It’s important to note that seamless cylinders are not included in these orders. For those importing these cylinders, there are rules. Importers will still need to pay duties when bringing them into the U.S. The orders officially continue from October 14, 2026. Periodic reviews will keep checking if these duties should remain. Businesses that deal with these cylinders need to remain aware. It’s crucial to follow all the rules and ensure they are on top of any changes. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission are focused on protecting local businesses from unfair practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Rescinds Review of Antidumping Duty on Frozen Shrimp from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to rescind the review of the antidumping duty order on frozen shrimp from China. This decision was announced on October 29, 2026. The review covered the period from February 1, 2025, to January 31, 2026. Important Details The antidumping duty (AD) order was first published on February 1, 2005. This order means that shrimp from China was being sold at a price lower than its regular value. The order aimed to make sure the prices were fair. In March 2026, the Department of Commerce started a review as usual. This review would check to see if the Chinese shrimp was being sold at low prices again. However, in April 2026, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shared data showing there were no new entries of shrimp from China during the review period. All companies involved also did not show any activity. Review Process The review is a process where officials check if any shrimp came in at unfair prices. If no shrimp came in, there is no need for a review. Since no entries were recorded from Chinese companies, the Department of Commerce decided to stop the review. Impact Because the review found no wrongdoing, the Department of Commerce will tell Customs to assess duties at the rate previously set. This means nothing changes from before the review started. The main goal is to ensure prices remain fair. Next Steps If there were any duties unpaid, Customs will take care of it according to the rules. They will assess duties based on the original rates. Legal Duties The document reminds the people involved about their legal duties to handle any sensitive information properly. They must destroy or return any information shared under protection according to the law. Conclusion This announcement was made by Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton. The government has a list of all companies involved in the review, which includes many exporters from China. The decision shows the U.S. is closely monitoring trade practices to ensure fairness in the market. The elimination of unfair pricing helps maintain a level field for all countries and companies trading with the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Seeks Public Comments on Softwood Lumber Subsidies Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce is asking for public comments about subsidies. These subsidies are given by some countries that send softwood lumber to the United States. The time for these subsidies is from January 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. The Softwood Lumber Act of 2008 says that the Secretary of Commerce must report to Congress every 180 days. This report is about any subsidies for softwood lumber that other countries send to the U.S. The last report was sent on June 30, 2026. The countries that sent the most softwood lumber to the U.S. from January to June 2026 are Brazil, Canada, Germany, and Sweden. These countries sent enough lumber to make up at least one percent of all imports to the U.S. The Commerce Department will use these same time periods to choose countries for future reports. For example, the next report will be about lumber imports from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. According to U.S. trade law, a subsidy is when a government helps with money or gives support that affects prices. The subsidy can also happen if a government asks someone else to give money or support. If you want to comment, you must include four pieces of information. First, the name of the country that gave the subsidy. Second, the name of the subsidy program. Third, a short description of the program in 3-4 sentences. Fourth, the name of the government body that gave the subsidy. All comments must be sent by November 30, 2026. Comments should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. This ensures your comments are considered for the report. For more details, you can contact Brendan Santschi at the U.S. Department of Commerce. You can call him at (202) 482-4141. Scot Fullerton, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed the notice on October 26, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Review of Countervailing Duties on Aluminum Sheets from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the cancellation of a review. This review was about countervailing duties on aluminum sheets from China. Commerce started the review because some people asked for it. They wanted to look at certain companies: Alcha International, Jiangsu Alcha, Yantai Jintai, and Yinbang. These reviews help check if higher taxes, called duties, are paid on goods from other countries. The government does this to protect U.S. companies from unfair prices. Commerce found that Alcha International and Jiangsu Alcha didn’t have any shipments during the time they were looking at. Without shipments, there is nothing to review. Yantai Jintai asked to stop its review. The petitioner, who wanted the review for Yinbang, also decided to cancel their request. Because there are no more reviews needed, the government is stopping the entire review. No changes will be made to current duty rates. The department will tell Customs to keep duties as they are, and no changes will be made. Everyone who asked for a review will need to follow rules for sending back or destroying private information. This notice was signed on October 19, 2026, by Scot Fullerton from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Steel Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced that it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on standard steel welded wire mesh imported from Mexico. This decision comes after careful investigation and a series of reviews. On September 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made its final determination about these orders. Both the Department of Commerce and the ITC agreed that canceling them would likely lead to the continuation of unfair pricing practices and subsidies. It could also result in harm to U.S. industries focused on making similar products. The orders first came into effect on April 12 and August 9, 2021. They were set up to protect U.S. businesses from foreign companies selling products at unfairly low prices or receiving unfair support from foreign governments. The wire mesh in question is made of smooth or deformed wire. It is used in making concrete and is made by welding wires together in square or rectangular grids. These grids have specific sizes for their wires and spacings. The ITC found that if these orders were canceled, Mexico might continue its past unfair practices. This could hurt American companies by putting them at an unfair disadvantage in the marketplace. Therefore, wire mesh from Mexico will keep having duties added to it. This means that companies will need to pay extra fees when they bring the product into the United States. The aim of these fees is to make market conditions fair. The Department of Commerce plans to check on these orders again in five years. They will make sure the extra fees are still needed to keep the market fair for U.S. producers. The ongoing duties will be in effect starting September 23, 2026. This decision ensures that U.S. companies can compete on a more level playing field with foreign manufacturers. Commerce has reminded all parties involved about the rules to protect private information during these proceedings. This rules-making process is essential to maintaining professional and lawful oversight of trade practices. In summary, the continuation of these orders is part of the U.S. government’s effort to support fair trade and protect local industries from unfair competition due to dumping and improper subsidies by other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review on Carbon Steel Pipes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an important review of heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Mexico. This is officially known as a “Changed Circumstances Review” or CCR. The review involves Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (PLM), which was earlier known as Perfiles y Herrajes LM, S.A. de C.V. (PyH). On October 26, 2026, the Department of Commerce began this review to decide if PLM is the same as PyH. This is important for setting the right taxes that need to be paid when these steel products are sold in the U.S. This needs to be done according to certain rules in trade laws. PLM told the Department that it changed its name back in July 2017. This change in name did not come with major shifts in how the company is run or how it does business. In the beginning, the Department of Commerce wanted more information before starting the review. PLM answered all their questions in time. Now, after looking at this, the Department thinks that PLM is pretty much the same company as PyH in terms of how it operates. The Department will use several factors to decide this, like checking if there has been any major change in management, who owns the company, where products are made, who supplies materials, and who buys these products. After a preliminary check, none of these factors seem to have changed much. Interested parties can comment on these findings. They have to send responses by a set time after the notice publication. The Department will review all comments before making the final decision. Overall, the Department of Commerce wants to make sure that the right rules and taxes are followed when these steel products are brought into the U.S. From what has been seen so far, it looks like PLM works similarly to how PyH did before the name change, so it will likely be treated the same. This case shows how carefully the U.S. checks and manages trade, making sure that companies follow the rules. The result of this review will be finalized soon. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Spanish Steel Wire Strand Sold Below Normal Value Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a decision regarding the sale of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain. The focus was specifically on sales made by Global Special Steel Products S.A.U., also known as Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. The time period for the review of these sales was from June 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. The Department of Commerce concluded that the wire strand from Spain was sold at less than its normal value. This means the price at which it was sold was lower than expected. These findings were made as part of an administrative review. The review process included looking at sales numbers and comparing them to standard prices. The results of the review showed that the dumping margin is 13.57 percent. This is the amount by which the prices were lower than normal. TYCSA, the company responsible for these sales, was found to have this specific margin. There were discussions and decisions made about the case. TYCSA and some other companies discussed these results through case briefs and rebuttals. However, the Department of Commerce found no reason to change the previously calculated rates. As a result of these findings, duties will be assessed on the subject merchandise. This means there will be additional costs for importing these products into the U.S. based on the final review results, with new rates applied starting from October 26, 2026. All parties involved have responsibilities to ensure their practices align with these findings. They have to file certificates to confirm that no unlawful reimbursement of duties took place. The release of this information marks the completion of the Department’s review process, and instructions for applying these duties have been issued accordingly. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Final Review on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 Duties Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of duties on Carbazole Violet Pigment-23 from India. This review focused on Navpad Pigments Private Limited for the year 2023. The review was part of a larger order that examines countervailing duties, which are charges placed on imports to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments. During the review period, Navpad Pigments Private Limited received a subsidy rate of 2.81%. This means that the U.S. charges this percentage as a duty on imports of the pigment from this company. The Department follows strict legal guidelines to ensure fair trade practices. The Department also decided to stop the review for another company, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited. This decision was made because there were no recorded shipments from this company during the review period. Without any shipments, there is no need to review or change the duties. After the review, the Department plans to release more detailed instructions to U.S. Customs. These instructions will help set the exact duties for products coming into the country. They also plan to issue new rules for cash deposits on future imports. The Department ensures transparency by disclosing the calculations and methodologies. This process includes a public memorandum available to interested parties. The Department reminds importers of their duty to file certificates. These certificates help track reimbursement of duties to maintain fair trading practices. Overall, this review helps ensure that trade remains fair for U.S. businesses by adjusting duties on subsidized imports. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Small Vertical Shaft Engines from China Continued Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have announced the continuation of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain small vertical shaft engines from China. This decision comes after findings that removing these orders could lead to further dumping, subsidies, and harm to industries in the United States. Background Information The orders originally began on May 4, 2021. Commerce started reviewing these orders again on April 1, 2026. They found that stopping the orders would likely allow unfair pricing and financial aid problems to continue. Because of this, the Commerce Department decided to keep the orders active. Details on the Engines The engines involved are small vertical shaft engines. These engines have a power capacity between 99cc and 225cc. They are usually used in machines like lawn mowers and pressure washers. These engines work with a particular kind of spark ignition and are non-road, meaning they are used outside. The engines usually have to follow certain environmental rules by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If engines do not meet the EPA standards, they are not always left out of these orders. The covered engines might come with or without being mounted on machines. If an engine from China is attached to a machine, only the engine is part of the order. Unfinished engines with key parts are also included. Certain bigger, heavy-duty engines are not part of these orders. These heavier engines have specific parts that lighter engines do not have. Conclusion The antidumping and countervailing duties will remain in place, starting again on October 20, 2026. This notice means U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports. These duties aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition. The next review of these orders is expected before the fifth anniversary of this last determination. Scot Fullerton, the acting deputy assistant secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, signed this continuation notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Maintains Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 2-4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that certain duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from five countries will continue. These countries are India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Türkiye, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Ukraine. This decision follows findings from both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). According to a recent notice, revoking the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders could lead to more dumping and harmful subsidies. These actions would likely hurt an industry in the United States. So, the Commerce Department has decided to keep these AD and CVD orders in place. The notice is effective starting on September 29, 2026. The orders show a commitment by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from unfair competition. Yang Jin Chun from the International Trade Administration is the contact person for any questions. You can reach Yang Jin Chun at (202) 482-5760. OCTG are hollow steel products used in the oil industry. The orders cover different types of OCTG products from these countries. These include both welded and seamless products. The scope details specific steel products by categorizing them with codes from the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). These codes help in identifying the products for customs purposes. Products high in chromium, drill pipes, and certain other items are not covered by these orders. U.S. Customs will keep collecting duties at existing rates on subject imports to ensure compliance. The decision to continue these duties is part of a five-year review process. The Commerce Department assesses whether ending these orders would harm U.S. industries. The effective date ties back to the ITC’s final determination. Commerce acts on reminding parties about their responsibilities under an administrative protective order (APO). Compliance with APO rules is mandatory, and failure to do so may result in sanctions. This announcement is a part of ongoing efforts by U.S. authorities to protect domestic industries from what they consider unfair trade practices. The decision ensures protection provided by the AD and CVD orders will stay in effect going forward. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Dumping of Stainless Pipes from India Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has completed its review of welded stainless pressure pipes from India. The review examined the sales between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce, tasked with enforcing fair trade practices, found that Suncity Metals and Tubes Private Limited, a key exporter from India, sold these pipes at less than normal value. This means they were sold cheaper than expected, which can be harmful to U.S. businesses. The Department set a new dumping margin of 0.74 percent. This is an important number. If a product has a high dumping margin, it might be subject to more tariffs or duties to even out the competitive landscape between countries. The Department extended the deadline for this review by 43 days. This allowed them to make sure their review was thorough and fair. Changes were made based on comments from Suncity, ensuring that the final results are accurate. The Department will disclose its calculations to the public within five days. This helps maintain transparency. New assessment rates will be applied. These are rules on how much duty should be levied on these pipes from India. Importers will get new instructions soon. The Department emphasizes the importance of certificates that prevent the reimbursement of duties. Importers who don’t comply may face penalties. This conclusion from the Department of Commerce aims to balance trade practices. The ultimate goal is to protect U.S. manufacturers from unfair pricing tactics. The decision will affect deposits and duties as per the new rates. These new rates start from the publication of the review results. Overall, it’s a reminder of the importance of complying with international trade rules. The department’s decision is a win for those advocating for fair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Correction Notice on Antidumping Duty Orders for Dioctyl Terephthalate from Multiple Countries Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made changes to a previous notice about antidumping duties on dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP). This chemical material comes from Malaysia, Poland, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye. These antidumping duties are part of an effort to protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition due to lower-priced foreign goods. On May 22, 2025, the Department of Commerce issued an error in their notice. This error was related to the dates mentioned for terminating certain temporary measures. There was a mistake in stating the end dates for temporary measures and when the suspension of liquidation ended. The document said that the period started on May 4, 2025. However, the correct end date for these temporary measures was actually May 3, 2025. Furthermore, the suspension of liquidation, which means not finalizing entries, should have ended on May 4, 2025. This is one day earlier than what was initially stated. Stakeholders and interested parties should take note of these corrections. The change has legal importance for businesses involved in the import and export of DOTP. Companies should make sure to use these corrected dates in their records and calculations. This information was released officially in the Federal Register under the notice number FR Doc 2026-21457. The correction is a reminder of how important small details can be in legal and trade matters. The person responsible at the Department of Commerce for questions is Dennis McClure. He can be reached at (202) 482-5973. The government remains open to communication and adjustments in trade compliance to ensure accuracy. This correction notice ensures that all processes are aligned and fair, maintaining clear trade rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Investigates Chinese Diamond Sawblades Over Evasion Claims Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation about diamond sawblades coming from China. This investigation is to check if some companies are trying to avoid paying extra taxes when importing these sawblades into the United States. Background The investigation began after U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) received a complaint. The complaint said a company, Dymatec USA, LLC, might be pretending that their sawblades are made in the United Kingdom. This would allow them to dodge taxes put on Chinese goods. What Commerce Will Do The Department of Commerce wants to find out if diamond sawblades made from parts that come from China are being snuck into the U.S. to avoid taxes. They are especially looking at sawblades made in three different ways: Both the core and segments come from China and are put together in the UK. The core comes from China, but the segments do not. They are put together in the UK. The segments come from China, but the core does not. They are put together in the UK. How It Will Work The Commerce Department will allow people and companies to send in their comments and give extra information over the next few weeks. They will check these comments and might even send out questions to gather more facts. After going through all the information, the Department will decide if these sawblades are breaking the rules. They plan to finish this by February 2027. Next Steps If the Department finds out that companies are avoiding taxes, they will tell the Customs office. They will also decide how to handle the taxes on these imports moving forward. Conclusion This investigation is important to make sure everyone follows the rules about importing goods. It helps keep trade fair and makes sure taxes are paid correctly on goods coming into the U.S. For now, people interested in this topic can send in their thoughts and follow the updates from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results on Countervailing Duties for Canadian Softwood Lumber Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the countervailing duty administrative review on softwood lumber products from Canada. This review covered the period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Targeted Products: The review focused on certain softwood lumber products that are imported from Canada. These products are said to have received government subsidies, which may affect fair trade practices. Key Findings: Subsidies Identified: It was determined that Canadian producers and exporters of softwood lumber received countervailable subsidies during the review period. These subsidies are financial contributions from the government that provide a benefit to companies. Specific Company Rates: Resolute FP Canada Inc. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 12.42 percent. West Fraser Mills Ltd. and affiliates received a subsidy rate of 15.31 percent. Other non-selected companies were assigned a weighted average subsidy rate of 14.11 percent. Methodology Used: The research followed the guidelines of the Tariff Act of 1930. Each subsidy program was checked to determine if it was specific and beneficial. Changes and Calculations: Changes were made to certain companies’ calculations after analyzing comments received from interested parties. These changes were reflected in the final subsidy rates. Impact on Companies: For companies not individually reviewed, a rate was based on the average of the evaluated companies. 215 non-selected companies are listed to receive the average rate. Cash Deposit Requirements: Upon publication of these final results, the Department of Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits based on the final subsidy rates. These deposits will be required for future shipments of the identified softwood lumber products from Canada. Conclusion: The final results aim to ensure a fair competitive environment by offsetting the subsidized benefits received by Canadian companies. The U.S. remains committed to enforcing trade rules and maintaining a level playing field for American businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Colombian Citric Acid Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes About the Review The review is about citric acid and some citric salts from Colombia. It covers sales from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. The Department found that Sucroal S.A. sold their products at lower prices than expected. Important Dates The results were shared on October 19, 2026. People interested can comment on these results. Contact Information For questions, contact Charles Doss at the U.S. Department of Commerce. His phone number is (202) 482-4474. What is Being Reviewed? The review looks at citric acid products from Colombia. Citric acid is used in food, drinks, and cleaning products. How is the Review Done? The review checks the prices and values using certain U.S. laws. This includes the Tariff Act of 1930. Preliminary Findings The review found Sucroal S.A. sold its products at prices 3.25% lower than expected. More Information The detailed review is available online. It is called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. It can be found at the website https://access.trade.gov/frnotices. Sharing of Information The results are explained in detail to the interested parties. This will happen within five days of the announcement. Fact Checking A group of companies asked to check if the review information is correct. They looked into it in July 2026. Public Comments The public can send in their thoughts about the review. They have 21 days from the announcement to do so. There is also a chance for people to speak at a hearing if they request it. Tax Rules The review will affect how much tax is paid when these products enter the United States. The exact amount will be decided after the final review. Next Steps Cash deposit rules will change based on the final review findings. These rules will affect how Sucroal S.A and other companies handle money when importing goods. Final Reminder Importers are reminded to follow the rules about paying duties. They must file a certificate showing they paid the right amount of duties. This reminder is important to avoid paying twice. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce continues its efforts to ensure fair business practices in international trade. This detailed review will be finalized soon. Interested parties should keep an eye on further updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Italian Steel Blocks Priced Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the results of its 2024 review on the sale of forged steel fluid end blocks imported from Italy. The review found that certain Italian producers and exporters sold these steel blocks at prices less than their normal value. This means they sold the blocks for much lower prices in the U.S. compared to their usual costs. The review, conducted by the International Trade Administration within the Department, covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department confirmed that companies like Lucchini Mamé Forge S.p.A., Lucchini Industries S.r.l., and Lucchini RS S.p.A. were involved. These companies have been assigned a dumping margin of 58.48 percent, which is based on adverse facts available. This means the Department used special methods to determine prices because they did not provide necessary information. As a result, these companies will have to pay duties at these rates on their steel blocks imported to the U.S. from Italy. These duties will be collected by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The cash deposit rate for future imports of these steel blocks will also be adjusted according to these final results. The Commerce Department will issue assessment instructions to the Customs and Border Protection to enforce these duties. They anticipate sharing these instructions 35 days after this review’s publication. For imports during the review period, where the producers were unaware the blocks were destined for the U.S., the Department will apply a 7.33 percent duty rate. This rate is used when neither the producer nor an exporter involved had a specific rate decided in this review. These actions are part of the U.S. government’s ongoing efforts to protect domestic industries and ensure fair trade practices. The final results of the administrative review have been published and are available through the Department of Commerce’s designated platforms. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Results in Review of Indian PET Film Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced important preliminary findings regarding the trade of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The review covered the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Key Findings: The U.S. Department of Commerce found that certain producers from India sold PET film at prices below the normal value. This means they sold it for less than what it costs to make and sell in their home market. However, the review will not continue for some companies because the request for their review was withdrawn. Companies Involved: Commerce started a review of several companies, but later many were removed from the review because requests to review them were canceled. Here are the details: Companies removed from the review: Cosmo First Ltd. India, Chiripal Poly Films Limited, Ester Industries Ltd., Garware Hi-Tech Films, JPFL Films Private Limited, Polyplex Corporation Ltd., Vacmet India Limited. The review will continue only for SRF Limited. What Happens Next: Commerce examines trade practices to ensure fair competition. If companies sell goods too cheaply, they might hurt U.S. industries. Commerce checks to see if any company breaks these rules. For SRF Limited, they found a dumping margin of 0.61 percent. This number shows how much the prices were below normal value. Procedures and Deadlines: Interested parties have until 21 days after October 19, 2026, to submit written comments or case briefs. They can also submit rebuttal briefs five days after that. If anyone wants a hearing, they must request it within 30 days after the notice. Final Results: Commerce plans to make a final decision within 120 days after the notice was published. Based on the findings, companies might have to pay extra duties on their goods to make up for selling at lower prices. These results are essential as they help keep trade fair and protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing overseas. Let’s wait for the final results, which will give a clear picture of what actions will be taken to ensure fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.