Page Not Found on GovInfo: A Guide to Resolving the Issue Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes An error has occurred. The page you requested on the GovInfo website cannot be found. This issue is commonly referred to as a “Page Not Found” error. It means the web address or URL you tried to visit does not exist on the server. Steps to Report This Error: Contact Support: Please report this error to the GovInfo Support Team. You can contact them through the provided askGPO link. Provide Necessary Information: To help resolve the problem, provide the following details: The URL or web address you attempted to access. The steps you followed before encountering this error. Any specific search or browsing terms you used. A screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Additional Guidance: Help and Support: If you need further assistance, please visit the Help page for search tips and other resources. Return to Homepage: You can return to the GovInfo Homepage to continue browsing. Feedback and Contact: Submit feedback or contact GovInfo through their Contact page for any other inquiries or support needs. Your patience is appreciated while they work to resolve this issue. Thank you for aiding in improving the efficiency and accessibility of the GovInfo platform. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Error: Page Not Found on GovInfo Estimated reading time: 1 minute On March 1, 2022, an error message was reported on the GovInfo website indicating that a page could not be found. This error affects users trying to access information on the site. Details of the Error The error message is clear: “Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found.” Users are advised to report the error to askGPO. They are encouraged to provide the URL of the page they attempted to visit, describe the steps that led to the error, and include any specific search or browse terms. A screenshot of the error page is also suggested to assist in resolving the issue. Resolution Efforts Users are directed to visit the askGPO page to report the error. The GovInfo team requests that users provide as much detail as possible. This includes the steps taken when the error occurred and the page’s URL. Such details will help the team fix the problem quickly. Contact and Further Information For further assistance, users can visit the homepage of GovInfo. Additional resources for searching and finding information are available through links provided on the site. Conclusion This error highlights the importance of user feedback in maintaining the functionality of government information websites. By reporting errors, users help ensure that the site remains a reliable source of government information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Changes Made to Antidumping Duty Review on Thai Shrimp Exports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-08 The United States Department of Commerce has updated the results of its review on antidumping duties for certain frozen shrimp exported from Thailand. These changes come after errors were found and corrected. The review covers a time period from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The review looked at whether shrimp from Thailand was sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. Companies must pay extra fees if they are found to be selling products below a fair price. Thai Union Group, one of the companies involved, pointed out mistakes that were affecting their final duty rates. These mistakes included errors in calculating specific rates for importers and in assigning costs. The American Shrimp Producers Association responded by saying Commerce usually sets its own costs for control numbers or sales. After looking into these concerns, the Department of Commerce changed the calculations to fix the errors. As a result, Thai Union’s dumping margin, which is a measure of how much they sold below fair value, is now set at 1.24 percent. This is a reduction from the earlier number of 2.01 percent. Other companies not individually reviewed also receive this new rate. Charoen Pokphand Foods, another company involved, was given a higher duty rate due to adverse facts available (AFA). This means they did not cooperate fully in the review. The duty rate for them changed from 17.38 percent to 26.66 percent after the corrections. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for collecting these duties from applicable entries. Items will be assessed using the amended results starting from February 20, 2026. Companies like Phatthana Frozen Food and Thai Union Manufacturing were found not to have shipped any shrimp to the U.S. during this review period. If an importer’s margin is too low, meaning less than 0.5 percent, they do not have to pay extra duties. The rate for all companies not included in this specific review will remain at 5.34 percent, as given by a previous decision. This rate is for situations where there are no individual company rates. The new rules are applied to shipments entering the U.S. after February 20, 2026. These changes make sure that shrimp imported from Thailand are sold at fair prices and protect American shrimp producers from unfair competition. The stakeholders are reminded of their duty to follow the rules mentioned in the Administrative Protective Order. The Department of Commerce will also notify importers of these cash deposit requirements. These updates help ensure fair trade and protect U.S. businesses. The full details of the corrections and how they affect duties are available through the Department of Commerce and related publications. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register: Final Review of Subsidies on Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Background Information The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has announced the final results of its Countervailing Duty Administrative Review on finished carbon steel flanges from India. This review covered the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The review began with preliminary results, which were shared on February 3, 2026. These results invited comments from interested parties. The review period looked at subsidies provided to producers and exporters of steel flanges from India. A document detailing all related issues and decisions is available online. Scope of the Order The review focused on finished carbon steel flanges imported from India. This is part of a countervailing duty order that has been in place to address subsidies that Indian companies might receive, which can affect fair trade. Findings and Methodology The review adhered to procedures set out by the Tariff Act of 1930. Countervailable subsidies are those where government financial support leads to specific benefits for producers and exporters. The review confirmed that Norma (India) Ltd. and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd., along with other companies, received such subsidies. Final Results Norma (India) Ltd. and its associated entities retained a subsidy rate of 2.40%. R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd. received a subsidy rate of 2.27%. Non-examined companies were assigned a rate of 2.32%, based on the weighted average of the examined companies. Assessment and Cash Deposits The U.S. Department of Commerce will direct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties on relevant imports. New cash deposit rates will be applied to shipments entering the U.S. These rates will reflect the subsidy rates from the review, unless they are below a minimal threshold. Conclusion The review ensures that actions taken are consistent with trade laws, maintaining fair competition by countering the effects of foreign government subsidies. This is intended to protect U.S. industry and workers from unfair trade practices. For more information, parties are encouraged to consult the official documents available online. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Duty Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced that it is stopping the review of the antidumping duty on aluminum wire and cable coming from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant for the period from December 1, 2023, to November 30, 2024. What is an Antidumping Duty? An antidumping duty is a special tax the U.S. puts on products from other countries. It helps to make sure local companies can compete fairly. If a foreign company sells a product in the U.S. for less than it costs at home, it is called “dumping.” This can hurt U.S. businesses. Why Did Commerce Rescind the Review? The Department of Commerce began the review because Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. (Tanghenam) asked for it. They are a company in China that makes aluminum wire and cable. The review found that there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam during the review period. Process and Timeline The review was initiated on January 27, 2025, based on a request from Tanghenam. On September 9, 2025, a memo was released to show that there were no entries of the product during the time of review. Commerce then planned to cancel the review on December 11, 2025, due to this lack of entries. There were some delays because of the government shutdown and other issues, which made deadlines longer. Deadlines were extended by 47 days due to a government shutdown and another 21 days because of technical issues. Commerce extended the deadline for preliminary results by another 110 days on February 9, 2026. The final decision was set for May 28, 2026. Rescission Decision Commerce uses a special rule that lets them stop a review if there are no entries of the product during the review time. Since there were no entries of aluminum wire and cable from Tanghenam, Commerce decided to stop the review. Next Steps Since the review is canceled, the cash deposit rates for antidumping duties will stay the same as before. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be told not to change how they assess duties on these products. Important Notifications The notice also reminds everyone involved that they have to return or destroy any private or protected information they used for this review. They have to send a written note to confirm this. Not doing so could lead to penalties. This decision and the reasons for it are available publicly, and the Commerce Department welcomes interested parties to review the related materials for in-depth understanding. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Review on Aluminum Wire and Cable from China Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its decision to rescind the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on aluminum wire and cable imported from the People’s Republic of China. The review period was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Department of Commerce, specifically the International Trade Administration, was responsible for this decision. They determined there were no reviewable entries of aluminum wire and cable from China during this time. Originally, a request for an administrative review was made for Tanghenam Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd. This request led to the initiation of the review process in January 2025. However, the Department found that there were no shipments or entries to review. This conclusion came after analyzing data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This decision means that there will be no change in current cash deposit requirements. The cash deposit rate will remain as it is, based on previously set rates. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess duties on any entries deemed appropriate. This assessment will not occur until a minimum of 35 days after the rescission notice is published. This rescission is aligned with Commerce’s regulations, ensuring that only merchandise with suspended entries are reviewed. This decision will be followed by no changes to cash deposits for future entries. This announcement serves as a reminder to parties involved in the process about their ongoing obligations under Administrative Protective Orders. Parties must return or destroy any proprietary information obtained in this review process. The rescission aligns with section 751 of relevant U.S. law, ensuring compliance with legal and procedural guidelines. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds No Dumping in Review of Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published its final decision regarding the sale of chlorinated isocyanurates, also known as chlorinated isos, from Spain. The decision covers the period from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The finding is that these products were not sold in the United States at prices less than their normal value during this time. Chlorinated isos are chemicals that come from another substance called cyanuric acid. The company from Spain involved in this review was Ercros S.A. The Department of Commerce found that Ercros did not sell its products at unfairly low prices. As a result, the company was given a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent. This means there is no penalty or additional duty due to dumping. The Department of Commerce reviews cases like this one according to rules from the Tariff Act of 1930. This process ensures that products from other countries are not being sold at unfairly low prices that can harm U.S. companies. The decision to not change the preliminary results comes after asking for comments, but receiving none. Thus, there was no need for a separate decision document. For products entering the U.S. from Spain now, the cash deposit rate for Ercros will be 0 percent because of the zero dumping margin. The Department of Commerce has specific rules about handling these cases. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will handle all entries on or after the announcement date according to these rules. For any previous cases without an assigned rate, the all-others rate will be 24.83 percent. This rate will stay until further announcements. The Department reminds all parties involved about the correct procedure for returning or destroying any proprietary information. They emphasize the importance of following these guidelines to avoid penalties. This decision was issued by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He was also performing duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. This announcement was made on June 1, 2026, and published in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Findings on Corrosion Inhibitors from China by the U.S. Department of Commerce Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary findings regarding certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. This announcement, made on June 4, 2026, indicates that Chinese producers/exporters sold these inhibitors in the U.S. at less than their normal value. Background Information The review, which spans from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025, follows a decision to investigate 10 Chinese companies. The main focus was on two key companies: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. These companies were picked as the mandatory respondents for this review. Methodology Used To determine the sale prices, the Department of Commerce used specific methods outlined in the U.S. trade laws. Because China is considered a non-market economy, the normal value of these products was evaluated differently, using section 773(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Findings of the Review The preliminary findings showed that Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. had dumping margins of 61.51% and 86.96%, respectively. Other companies involved in this review, Gold Chemical Limited and Kanghua Chemical Co., Ltd., were assigned a dumping margin of 73.75%. Separate Rates Determination The investigation also identified several companies eligible for a separate rate, distinct from those under the general Chinese entity rate. This includes the two main companies investigated and two other companies that were not individually examined but still eligible for a separate status. China-Wide Entity Six companies reviewed failed to claim separate status and are thus part of the China-wide entity. Consequently, these companies are subject to a 241.02% duty rate as determined by the department’s policy. Future Steps and Public Involvement The U.S. Department of Commerce will provide a chance for interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. They have set a timeline for public comments and planned a verification process for information used in the final results. Next Actions for Importers Importers of the affected products must comply with filing requirements concerning antidumping and/or countervailing duties. This will involve filing a certificate regarding the reimbursement of duties before entry liquidation. In summary, the preliminary results indicate significant dumping margins for corrosion inhibitors from China sold in the U.S. The Department intends to proceed with verification and review public comments before finalizing the results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Japanese Cranes Sold for Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently made a final decision on the sale of lattice boom crawler cranes from Japan. They found these cranes are being sold in the United States for less than they should be. This is called selling at “less than fair value” or LTFV. The Department of Commerce looked at crane sales from Japan from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. The investigation results were first shared on January 16, 2026. Back then, Commerce said they believed Japanese cranes were indeed being sold below fair value. In their final decision, the Department confirmed that two Japanese companies were involved. These companies are Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Heavy Industries Construction Cranes Co., Ltd. Kobelco was found to have a dumping margin of 12.36%, and Sumitomo had a margin of 20.00%. Other companies will have a margin of 16.18%. This means these companies were marking down prices too low in America, which can harm U.S. businesses selling cranes. So, to fix this, the Department will require extra fees, known as dumping duties, on these cranes when they are brought into the U.S. These extra fees will match the dumping margins found. Before this final decision, the Department checked documents and visited the company’s sites. They made sure all facts were correct. The changes made after the first findings were small. These changes were shared in a special document, the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Now, the Department will tell the International Trade Commission about their final decision. The Commission will then decide if these low-price sales are hurting U.S. businesses. If they agree there’s harm, U.S. Customs will start collecting these extra fees. If not, the case will be closed, and no extra fees will be added. All companies must follow rules about handling private information given during this investigation. This ensures that company secrets stay safe. This decision is important because it helps keep fair trade between countries. It makes sure that companies in the U.S. can compete fairly with those from other countries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Freight Rail Couplers from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results on the antidumping duty review concerning freight rail couplers from Mexico. This review is for the period from May 3, 2023, to October 31, 2024. It found that these products were sold in the United States at prices lower than their normal value. Commerce started this review because they wanted to check if these products were being sold at unfair prices in the U.S. The agency uses laws from the Tariff Act of 1930 to conduct these reviews. The products being reviewed are called “freight rail couplers,” which are parts used in trains. Commerce found that the products from the Amsted Rail Company and its subsidiary, ASF-K de Mexico, had a dumping margin of 6.50%. The Commerce report mentions that there were no changes from the preliminary findings published earlier. They will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply duties on an ad valorem basis. This means duties will be assessed based on the value of the products, rather than a per-unit fee. The business or company involved may need to pay additional duties. If a company has zero or very low sales margins, they might not pay any duties. Commerce will give detailed instructions to CBP on how to handle these duties within 41 days. Commerce will also update cash deposit rates for future shipments. The rates differ based on whether the company was involved in previous reviews or if they are new to this case. For other producers or exporters, the rate remains at 48.10%, which was set in a past investigation. Importers must also submit a certificate showing if they were reimbursed for any duties, before completed entries are processed for liquidation. Failure to submit this could lead to double duty assessments. Finally, companies under the administrative protective order (APO) must handle all sensitive business details according to Commerce’s rules. Any mishandling of such information will lead to legal consequences. This update ensures fair trading and market practices in the rail industry, while protecting U.S. manufacturers and workers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Commerce Department’s Preliminary Findings on Welded Pipe Subsidies from Türkiye The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its preliminary results on a review concerning large diameter welded pipes (LDWP) imported from the Republic of Türkiye. The findings reveal that HDM Çelik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. (HDM Çelik), a notable producer and exporter from Türkiye, received countervailable subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Background and Review Process The review began on June 25, 2025, following requests for an administrative review in line with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). HDM Çelik was selected as the mandatory respondent on July 14, 2025. However, due to a government shutdown starting November 14, 2025, the deadlines for administrative proceedings were delayed by 47 days. An additional delay of 21 days occurred due to a backlog from the shutdown. The timeline was also extended on March 13, 2026, resulting in a final due date for preliminary results on May 29, 2026. Scope of Review The review centers on LDWP from Türkiye, assessing whether these products received unfair government subsidies. These subsidies, defined by financial contributions that benefit the recipient in a specific manner, fall under scrutiny to ensure fair trade practices. Partial Rescission Decision In part of the review, it was decided to rescind the administrative review for 11 companies. This decision is based on the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the period of review (POR). The companies affected by this rescission will have their entries assessed at the rate established at the time of entry, as dictated by 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Subsidy Rates and Methodology For HDM Çelik, the preliminary subsidy rate is set at 3.37 percent ad valorem. This rate considers various subsidy programs in which financial contributions benefit and specify how they are allocated to companies. The methodology used adheres to the legal framework aimed at identifying specific financial assistance benefiting the recipient. Next Steps and Public Participation The Commerce Department plans to disclose its full calculations for these preliminary results soon after the announcement. There will be an opportunity for interested parties to comment on these findings, with case briefs due following the issuance of the last verification report. Parties are encouraged to submit their comments with structured tables of content and authorities. Additionally, requests for a hearing should be submitted at least 30 days after this notice’s publication, including details of participants and discussion issues. Finality and Future Instructions The final results of this review are expected within 120 days from the notice publication, pending any timeline extensions. The findings will impact the cash deposit instructions for future imports from Türkiye. Conclusion The preliminary results signal ongoing diligence by the U.S. Department of Commerce in assessing international trade practices and ensuring fair economic competition. The focus remains on transparent and lawful assessments that uphold trade agreements and standards. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Antidumping Duties on Steel Wire Strand Continue Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue antidumping duties on prestressed concrete steel wire strand. Countries affected are Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and Thailand. The Commerce Department, along with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), decided these duties should stay. The reason is to stop companies in these countries from selling at very low prices in the U.S. The duties began on January 28, 2004, for most countries and February 4, 2004, for India. These duties are to balance out any unfair subsidies that companies might get from their governments. The decision to continue these duties came after reviews in 2025. The reviews showed that without the duties, dumping and subsidies would probably continue. Prestressed concrete steel wire strand is a special type of steel used in building. The duties make sure companies in America can compete fairly with those in the other countries. The rates of duties will stay the same as before. This decision was officially made on June 2, 2026. The duties help protect jobs and industries in the United States. The next review to decide if these duties should continue will happen before the fifth anniversary of this decision. All companies must follow rules about how to handle information about these duties. This is important to make sure everything stays fair and private. This ongoing action ensures that American businesses dealing with these products are not unfairly harmed by international trading practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results Published for Antidumping Review of Steel Pipe from the UAE Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily determined that some steel pipe producers and exporters from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) sold their products in the United States at less than normal value. The preliminary results cover the period from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The review focuses on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe, a specific type of steel pipe used in various applications. The review was initiated in January 2025 due to requests for a closer look at trade practices. The companies specifically examined are Conares Metal Supply Limited and Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE, along with its related entities THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC and KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC. Determination Process The U.S. Department of Commerce used several methods to calculate whether the companies sold their products at unfairly low prices. These methods include examining export prices and constructed export prices. The goal is to determine if such prices are less than the normal value, which would affect fair competition. Preliminary results show that the companies have different dumping margins. A dumping margin indicates how much the export price is less than the normal value. Major companies in the review like Conares and Universal have dumping margins that are not zero, meaning they were selling at less than normal value. Rates and Procedures Conares Metal Supply Limited: Preliminary dumping margin is 3.15%. Universal Tube and Pipe Industries FZE and Related Entities: Preliminary dumping margin is 6.16%. Other Companies Not Individually Examined: These companies have been assigned a weighted average dumping margin of 5.50%. For companies not individually examined, their rates are based on the overall results of the reviewed companies. After these preliminary findings, the Commerce Department will accept more comments, allowing interested parties to submit their opinions. The opportunity to submit written comments will last for 21 days from the notice’s publication date. Rebuttals or responses to these comments are allowed for five days after the initial comment period. If requested, the Department will hold a hearing allowing further discussion. Such requests must be submitted within 30 days of this announcement. Upon completion of all final reviews and issuance of results, cash deposit requirements will be updated, affecting future shipments and indicating future compliance requirements. These results provide important insights into how international trade laws are monitored and enforced. The findings and the comments received during this period will help inform the final decision, ensuring fair international trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Keeps Extra Taxes on Chinese Engines Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important decision. They decided to keep extra taxes, called countervailing duties, on certain engines from China. These engines are large, vertical shaft engines. They range from 225cc to 999cc in size. The Department thinks that removing these duties would lead to Chinese companies continuing to receive unfair help from their government. This kind of help is known as a subsidy. Subsidies can make products cheaper, making it hard for other countries to compete. The decision is based on a review that started on February 2, 2026. The review checked if these subsidies would continue without the duties in place. The main companies in the U.S. that care about this decision are Briggs & Stratton, LLC and Discovery Energy, LLC. These companies gave their thoughts to the Department of Commerce by March 4, 2026. The Government of China and other Chinese companies did not respond with their thoughts. The review found rates for subsidies that would likely continue. For Loncin Motor Co., the rate is 18.96 percent. For Chongqing Zongshen General Power Machine Co., the rate is 20.38 percent. All other companies would have a rate of 19.85 percent. This decision means the U.S. will keep the extra taxes on these engines. This helps protect American companies from unfair competition. The decision was announced by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The Department of Commerce’s review shows how important it is to check on foreign subsidies. They want to make sure trade with other countries is fair for everyone. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results on Malaysia Steel Wire Strand Review Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes Date: 2026-06-03 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of an important review involving prestressed concrete steel wire strand imported from Malaysia. This review focused on determining if Malaysian companies sold this wire strand in the United States at unfairly low prices. The companies reviewed were Kiswire Sdn. Bhd., Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd., and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. The period reviewed was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The Commerce Department found that these companies did not sell the wire strand below its normal value during this time. This means they sold it at fair prices in the U.S. market. The review’s findings are officially effective as of June 3, 2026. The agency involved is the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Contact persons for more details are Monica Gillis and Peter Shaw from the AD/CVD Operations office. They can be reached at (202) 482-6384 or (202) 482-0697 for inquiries. Earlier on October 3, 2025, a preliminary result was published. This preliminary finding was delayed due to a government shutdown that tolled deadlines by 47 days. Further delays resulted in an additional tolling of 21 days. However, Commerce verified responses from Kiswire and Wei Dat through verification sessions in March 2026. The review specifically assessed if goods from these companies were sold at prices lower than normal value. It was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. For the companies not individually examined, such as Southern PC Steel, the Act suggests a reasonable calculation method. The result is a zero percent margin for them as well. Based on these results, all reviewed companies – Kiswire, Wei Dat, and Southern PC Steel, have a dumping margin of 0.00 percent for the period. This means no extra antidumping duties are required on their products for this review period. The Commerce Department will disclose full calculation details following this review. Usually, this happens within five days of the announcement. The customs and border authority, CBP, will assess the covered entries of wire strand without imposing additional antidumping duties, following the finalized results. For future imports of the wire strand from Malaysia, the cash deposit rates will now align with these findings. The special zero rate applies to the named companies. For others not reviewed, the previous rates from earlier investigations still apply. This process involves significant documentation and the handling of proprietary information. Importers are reminded of their duty to submit respective certificates before liquidation to avoid double duties. This review helps ensure fair trade practices and confirms that the selling practices of Malaysian wire strand imports align with U.S. trade laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Raw Honey from Brazil Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Background and Review Details The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review on raw honey imported from Brazil. This review, conducted by the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce, determined that raw honey from Brazil was sold in the U.S. at prices below normal value. The period of review was from June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. The review involved 14 producers and exporters of raw honey from Brazil. Among them were Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindustrial Ltda. and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda., which acted as mandatory respondents in the investigation. The preliminary results were published on September 30, 2025, and public comments were invited. However, due to a federal government shutdown later that year, the Commerce extended deadlines for the review several times. The final results were scheduled and released by May 29, 2026. The review was conducted according to U.S. law, specifically Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce based this review on its findings, which involved public comments and extensive data analysis. The final decisions were detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum made available to registered users and directly accessible online. Scope and Examination of Imports The product under review included raw honey as defined in the original antidumping duty orders. The review continued to investigate other shipments from Brazil, especially those involving companies not individually examined in this review. Final Results and Antidumping Margins Based on the review, the weighted-average dumping margins for the examined companies were determined. Melbras Importadora faced a 4.48% dumping margin, while Minamel Agroindústria was subject to a 10.48% margin. For companies not individually reviewed, an average margin of 7.48% was applied. Disclosure and Compliance Instructions The Department of Commerce intends to disclose detailed findings and calculations from this review. Companies are required to comply with all instructions regarding antidumping assessments and cash deposits due after these final results. Notably, a reminder was issued to importers about filing certificates concerning the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective immediately, all U.S. entries of raw honey from Brazil will have updated cash deposit requirements matching the review’s final results. These requirements will remain in place until further notifications are given by the Department of Commerce. Conclusion and Further Notifications This announcement echoes the compliance terms set by U.S. trade laws for imported raw honey. Importers and other stakeholders must remain aware of the updated duties and follow federal regulations to ensure proper execution of trade practices. The review and subsequent announcements are essential to maintain fair trade and protect domestic markets from unfair pricing methods used by some international exporters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Unfair Paper Sales from Portugal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced preliminary findings about paper sales from Portugal. This decision involves uncoated paper. The period under review was from March 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. The review investigates if Portuguese companies sold paper in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The focus was on The Navigator Company, S.A., a major producer. The company faced scrutiny over its pricing practices. The Department found that Navigator had sold paper at prices lower than normal value. They calculated a dumping margin of 2.70%. A dumping margin shows how much a company’s sale price undershoots a fair market price. The findings came from a process involving many calculations and rules. The Department looked at export prices and the normal values in Portugal. They used specific methods outlined in U.S. law. This announcement opens a window for further comments. Each party in the review can share their thoughts on this preliminary result. They have 21 days from the announcement to file their case briefs. Rebuttal comments can be filed five days after that. There is also a chance for a hearing. Interested parties must request this within 30 days of the announcement. They must include the names of participants and the issues they want to discuss. The findings lead to certain actions by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. If the dumping margin is above de minimis (0.50%), they will assess duties. If Navigator’s margin is zero or very low, there will be no duties. The Commerce Department has made instructions for customs. They want to ensure all regulations are followed properly. The next steps depend on any final decisions after this review. These measures aim to ensure fair trade practices. The U.S. is protecting its market from unfair pricing practices. The process involves detailed reviews and public participation before any final decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.