International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-19 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Certain Transformers and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/19/2026-16905/certain-transformers-and-components-thereof-notice-of-institution-of-investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 16, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Ayr Energy, Inc. of Mountain View, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain transformers and components thereof by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and common law trademark infringement, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States or to prevent the establishment of such an industry. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 2. Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/19/2026-16861/light-walled-rectangular-pipe-and-tube-from-china-mexico-south-korea-and-turkey-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 3. Silicon Metal From Australia and Norway; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/19/2026-16848/silicon-metal-from-australia-and-norway-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-18
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-18 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers 3 U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Section 337 matters. The actions include a final determination issuing a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders in an ink cartridges investigation, an amendment of claims and products in an off-road vehicles case involving a Chinese respondent, and a full termination of a video-capable devices case due to an arbitration agreement. Key policy instruments are Section 337 patent enforcement remedies, including a GEO, CDOs, and procedural terminations. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Headline (one line, bold):Ink Cartridges — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The U.S. International Trade Commission found a violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-1452 concerning certain ink cartridges and components. The Commission issued a general exclusion order covering products that infringe claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172; 9,370,934; 11,535,038; 12,240,248; and 12,240,249, and issued cease and desist orders against Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. The investigation is terminated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation No.: 337-TA-1452 Orders/Findings: General Exclusion Order; CDOs against Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP; bond set at 100% of entered value during Presidential review Noted procedural history: ALJ ID (Order No. 16) granted summary determination; Commission reviewed DI economic prong and affirmed with supplemental analysis Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted June 17, 2025 Patents/Claims: Claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172; 9,370,934; 11,535,038; 12,240,248; 12,240,249 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-ink-cartridges-and-components-thereof-ii-notice-of-a-commission-determination-finding-a-violation-under-section-337-issuance-of-a-general-exclusion-order-and-cease-and-desist-orders-termina/ Headline (one line, bold):Off-Road Vehicles (ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4) — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The Commission determined not to review an ALJ initial determination (Order No. 10) granting Polaris’s unopposed motion to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-1490 and to terminate the investigation as to certain claims. The amendments add claim 31 of the ’486 patent and claims 9–15 and 22 of the ’127 patent against the CFMOTO ZFORCE Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles, and terminate claims 7 and 8 of the ’220 patent. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation No.: 337-TA-1490 Parties: Complainants Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., Polaris Sales Inc.; Respondents Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. Orders/Findings: ID (Order No. 10) unreviewed; claims 7–8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220 terminated; added claim 31 of U.S. Patent No. 7,950,486 and claims 9–15, 22 of U.S. Patent No. 12,187,127 against ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4 Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted March 9, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-off-road-vehicles-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-an-unopposed-motion-to-amend-the-complaint-and-notice-of-investig/ Headline (one line, bold):Video-Capable Electronic Devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: The Commission determined not to review an ALJ initial determination (Order No. 18) granting a joint motion by InterDigital and Amazon to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-1481 in its entirety due to an arbitration agreement. The investigation is terminated. Key Details (bullets): Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: 337-TA-1481 Parties: Complainants InterDigital, Inc. and InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.; Respondents Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC Orders/Findings: ID (Order No. 18) granted termination based on arbitration agreement; earlier termination of claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674 (Order No. 8; unreviewed May 4, 2026) Dates: Commission vote August 13, 2026; investigation instituted January 23, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-a-joint-motion-to-terminate-the-investigation-in-its-entirety-due-to-an-a/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC issued a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders in the ink cartridges case (Inv. No. 337-TA-1452), with a 100% bond during Presidential review. In the Polaris v. CFMOTO off-road vehicles matter (Inv. No. 337-TA-1490), the ITC allowed claim amendments adding ZFORCE Z10/Z10-4 and terminated two prior claims. The InterDigital v. Amazon video-capable devices investigation (Inv. No. 337-TA-1481) was terminated in full based on an arbitration agreement. Two of today’s Section 337 actions involve China-based or China-affiliated respondents. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-ink-cartridges-and-components-thereof-ii-notice-of-a-commission-determination-finding-a-violation-under-section-337-issuance-of-a-general-exclusion-order-and-cease-and-desist-orders-termina/ (Ink cartridges — GEO/CDOs) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-off-road-vehicles-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-an-unopposed-motion-to-amend-the-complaint-and-notice-of-investig/ (Off-road vehicles — amendment) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-granting-a-joint-motion-to-terminate-the-investigation-in-its-entirety-due-to-an-a/ (Video devices — arbitration termination) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Video-Capable Electronic Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Due to an Arbitration Agreement; Termination of Investigation
International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Amazon and InterDigital Due to Arbitration Agreement Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has ended an investigation involving certain video-capable electronic devices. This decision was made because of an arbitration agreement between InterDigital, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. The investigation, known as 337-TA-1481, started on January 23, 2026. It was looking into whether devices imported into the United States infringed on patents owned by InterDigital. InterDigital is based in Wilmington, Delaware. The investigation named Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC as respondents. Both companies are based in Seattle, Washington. The investigation was about several patents. These patents were related to video-capable electronic devices. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations chose not to participate in this investigation. In April 2026, the ITC decided to end part of the investigation. This concerned one of the claims related to U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674. On July 13, 2026, InterDigital and Amazon asked to terminate the investigation. They filed a joint motion. They based their request on an arbitration agreement. On July 17, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) agreed to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion to terminate was proper because of the arbitration agreement. The rule says that investigations can be ended if parties agree to arbitration. The ALJ said there were no other agreements between the parties. Ending the investigation did not harm the public interest. No one asked to review the ALJ’s decision. The ITC decided not to review it either. The investigation is now fully terminated. The decision happened on August 13, 2026. The ITC used authority from the Tariff Act of 1930 and its procedures to make this decision. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, confirmed this decision. The full notice was published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Off-Road Vehicles and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Terminate the Investigation as to Certain Claims
U.S. International Trade Commission Updates on Off-Road Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision regarding the investigation of certain off-road vehicles and their components. The investigation is numbered 337-TA-1490. The matter involves the company Polaris and claims about imported vehicles. The ITC has chosen not to review an earlier decision made by an administrative law judge (ALJ). This decision was about changes to the case, called an initial determination (ID), under Order No. 10. The investigation started on March 9, 2026. It is based on complaints from Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Sales Inc. These companies are located in Medina, Minnesota. They claim violations of the Tariff Act of 1930 regarding some off-road vehicles imported into the U.S. The investigation focuses on certain patents held by Polaris. These patents include U.S. Patent Nos. 7,819,220; 7,950,486; 8,613,337; 9,217,501; and 12,187,127. The ITC is looking at whether these patents have been infringed upon. They are also checking if there is a domestic industry issue due to these imports. The respondents named in this investigation are Zhejiang CFMOTO Power Co. from Hangzhou, China, and CFMOTO Powersports Inc. from Plymouth, Minnesota. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part in this investigation. On June 26, 2026, Polaris made a motion. They wanted to change the complaint. They asked to include new claims related to their patents. Polaris wanted to focus on the ZFORCE® Z10 and Z10-4 vehicles. They also wished to end some claims about another patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,819,220. The judge agreed with Polaris and said the changes would not harm the public or those involved. There were no oppositions to this motion. No one asked for a review of this decision. The ITC decided not to carry out a review. This means claims 7 and 8 of one Polaris patent are no longer part of the investigation. New claims from two other patents are now being focused on. The Commission voted on this issue on August 13, 2026. The actions and decisions follow the rules in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. This update helps clarify what the ITC is doing in this investigation and what changes have been made. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof II; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation Under Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Takes Action Against Ink Cartridge Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has taken a significant step to protect American businesses and consumers. In a recent decision, the ITC found that certain ink cartridges and their components violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ITC has issued a General Exclusion Order. This means that products infringing specific patents cannot be imported into the United States. The infringing products include those violating claims of patents numbered: 8,764,172, 9,370,934, 11,535,038, 12,240,248, and 12,240,249. The ITC has also issued Cease and Desist Orders. These orders are against two companies: Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. These companies are prohibited from importing and selling the offending products in the U.S. The investigation started on June 17, 2025. The investigation was based on a complaint by Epson America, Inc., Epson Portland, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation. The complaint alleged that certain companies were infringing on specific Epson patents by selling and importing particular ink cartridges. The ITC named numerous companies in the investigation. Many of these companies are based in China. The ITC found several companies in default as they did not respond to the investigation. The companies include Tatrix International China Co., Ltd., Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd., and others. Some companies were removed from the investigation on January 8, 2026, due to different circumstances. On March 24, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination. The judge found evidence that supported Epson’s claims. This determination served as a basis for the ITC’s final decision. The ITC reviewed the effect of its orders on public interest. They considered health and safety, competitive conditions in the U.S., and the impact on American consumers. After a thorough review, the ITC decided that issuing the orders would not harm public interest. The decision was finalized on August 13, 2026. The ITC has implemented a bond during the Presidential review period. This bond is set at 100% of the value of goods imported. The Commission’s action demonstrates its commitment to upholding intellectual property rights. It aims to support American industries and prevent unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-08-18
Justice Department, Briefing 2026-08-18 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Establishing the National Fraud Enforcement Division Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16846/establishing-the-national-fraud-enforcement-division Sub: Justice Department, Content: This rule amends Part 0 of the Department of Justice's ("Department") organizational regulations in title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations to establish the National Fraud Enforcement Division ("Fraud Division") and set forth its authorities. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection: Title-Certification of Identity Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16814/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: The Office of Information Policy, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 3. Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16775/notice-of-lodging-of-proposed-consent-decree-under-the-clean-water-act Sub: Justice Department Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-18
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-18 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Title: 1. Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From China; Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16816/hand-trucks-and-certain-parts-thereof-from-china-determination Sub: International Trade Commission Title: 2. Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof II; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation Under Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16811/certain-ink-cartridges-and-components-thereof-ii-notice-of-a-commission-determination-finding-a Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to find a violation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and to issue a general exclusion order ("GEO") prohibiting the importation of products that infringe claims 1 and 7 of each of the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172 ("the '172 patent"); 9,370,934 ("the '934 patent"); 11,535,038 ("the '038 patent"); 12,240,248 ("the '248 patent"); and 12,240,249 ("the '249 patent"); and cease and desist orders ("CDOs") against respondents Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. The investigation is terminated. Title: 3. Certain Off-Road Vehicles and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Terminate the Investigation as to Certain Claims Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16789/certain-off-road-vehicles-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 10) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting an unopposed motion to amend the complaint and Notice of Investigation and terminate the investigation as to certain claims. Title: 4. Certain Video-Capable Electronic Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Due to an Arbitration Agreement; Termination of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16788/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-an Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's ("ALJ") initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 18) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety due to an arbitration agreement. Title: 5. Van-Type Trailers and Subassemblies From Canada, China, and Mexico; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/18/2026-16787/van-type-trailers-and-subassemblies-from-canada-china-and-mexico-revised-schedule-for-the-subject Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-08-17
Justice Department Briefing 2026-08-17 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection: Title-Requests for DOJ Certification Letters for T Visa Holders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/17/2026-16747/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-new-collection Sub: Justice Department Content: The Criminal Division, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Juvenile Facility Census Program (JFCP) Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/17/2026-16685/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: The National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fan Zhang Launches the “China-US Lawyer” WeChat Mini Program
Fan Zhang Launches “China-US Lawyer” WeChat Mini Program — Cross-Border Legal Tools, US Briefings & Compliance Self-Checks | Legal Tech Home / AI & Legal Technology / China-US Lawyer WeChat Mini Program Legal Tech · WeChat Mini Program Fan Zhang Launches the “China-US Lawyer” WeChat Mini Program Cross-border legal services, compliance self-assessment tools, and U.S. regulatory briefings — now in your pocket, on WeChat August 13, 2026 6 min read The most valuable legal asset in cross-border business is not a contract — it is knowing what to check before you sign. On August 13, 2026, Fan Zhang, a dual-qualified cross-border lawyer (China & California) and Director of Foreign Legal Affairs at JINGSH Chengdu, launched the “China-US Lawyer” (中美律师) WeChat mini program — a mobile platform that puts practical cross-border legal intelligence and compliance tools directly into the hands of businesses, founders, and legal professionals across China and the United States. The “China-US Lawyer” (中美律师) WeChat mini program — cross-border legal intelligence and compliance tools, on demand. The mini program consolidates the full spectrum of cross-border legal resources into four integrated modules: US Briefings (curated U.S. trade and regulatory intelligence), Tools (practical reference and compliance self-checks), Professional Articles, and Credentials & Honors. It is a direct extension of Fan Zhang’s practice — the same regulatory intelligence that powers her client work, now accessible on demand. What’s Inside the Mini Program The platform is organized around the four areas where cross-border clients most frequently need immediate, reliable guidance: US Briefings Curated updates on U.S. trade, tariff, customs, and regulatory developments — the same intelligence pipeline behind the firm’s publicly available US Briefing Highlights, delivered in a mobile-first format. Tools Practical quick-reference and compliance self-check tools covering Incoterms 2020, international arbitration institutions, cross-border regulations, contracts, CFIUS, data export, and EU foreign subsidies. Some tools are currently in testing and will be released progressively. Professional Articles A growing library of analytical articles on cross-border litigation, arbitration, trade remedies, investment, e-commerce, AI, and technology law — written from the perspective of a practitioner licensed in both China and the United States. Credentials & Honors Verified qualifications including the California State Bar, admission to the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Federal Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, SICC full registration, CIArb Fellowship, ACCA, and DIAC appointment. The Tools: Practical Compliance at Your Fingertips The mini program’s tools are grouped into two categories — Quick Reference (knowledge you need on demand) and Contract & Compliance (self-assessments that flag risks before they become disputes). These tools translate years of cross-border practice into step-by-step checklists that anyone can use. Quick Reference速查参考 · On-Demand Knowledge 01 Incoterms 2020 Quick Reference A concise guide to all 11 Incoterms® 2020 rules — EXW, FCA, CPT, CIP, DAP, DPU, DDP and more — covering risk transfer, cost allocation, and documentary obligations for each term. Coming soon 02 International Arbitration Institution Comparison Side-by-side comparison of major arbitration institutions — HKIAC, SIAC, CIETAC, ICC, LCIA, SCC and others — including rules, costs, timelines, and enforcement characteristics. Coming soon 03 Cross-Border Legal Regulations Library A structured index of key laws and regulations across major jurisdictions relevant to cross-border trade, investment, data, and dispute resolution. Coming Soon Contract & Compliance合同与合规 · Self-Assessment 04 Cross-Border Contract Checklist A structured self-check for cross-border agreements — governing law, jurisdiction clauses, dispute resolution, payment terms, delivery obligations, force majeure, and compliance warranties. Coming soon 05 CFIUS Risk Self-Assessment Evaluate whether a U.S. investment or M&A transaction may trigger CFIUS review — covering industry sensitivity, ownership structure, national security considerations, and filing triggers. Coming Soon 06 Data Export Compliance Self-Check Assess cross-border data transfer obligations under China’s data export regime — including security assessments, standard contracts (SCCs), and certification pathways for personal information and important data. Coming Soon 07 EU FSR Foreign Subsidies Self-Check Identify potential notification and assessment obligations under the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) — covering concentrations, public procurement, and foreign financial contributions. Coming Soon Note on tool availability: The tools are currently being refined and will be released progressively. The quick-reference and contract checklist modules are available now; the CFIUS, data export, and FSR self-assessments are in final testing and will open in the coming weeks. Four Practice Areas, One Platform The mini program reflects the four practice areas that define Fan Zhang’s cross-border practice — each backed by substantive credentials and hands-on case experience: ⚖️ Cross-Border Litigation & Arbitration International commercial disputes, commercial arbitration, and cross-border enforcement — supported by CIArb Fellowship, DIAC appointment, SICC registration, and U.S. federal court admissions. 🌐 Cross-Border Investment & Tax Outbound investment structuring, M&A, and international tax planning — informed by ACCA credentials, LIBF trade & finance certification, and hands-on offshore corporate experience. 📦 Cross-Border E-Commerce & International Trade Trade compliance, customs, anti-dumping/countervailing duty defense, and supply chain advisory — powered by the firm’s AI-powered trade monitoring system and its US Briefing Highlights. 🤖 AI & Technology AI governance, data compliance, technology transactions, and intellectual property — a forward-looking practice area that complements the firm’s own legal technology development. Most cross-border problems are discovered too late — after a contract is signed, after money has moved, after a filing deadline has passed. This mini program is designed to help you find the problem early, when it is still cheap to fix. — Fan Zhang, Director of Foreign Legal Affairs, JINGSH Chengdu Why a Lawyer Built This This is not a generic content aggregator. The mini program was designed and built by a practitioner who has represented clients in U.S. international trade litigation, international arbitration, and cross-border transactions — and who has developed proprietary legal technology, including the AI-powered Cross-Border Trade and Regulatory Monitoring System (software copyright registered). Every checklist and self-assessment in the mini program is grounded in real practice scenarios: the Incoterms reference reflects actual disputes over risk transfer; the contract checklist incorporates clauses that have been tested in cross-border litigation; the CFIUS and FSR tools mirror the questions she asks clients in every cross-border M&A engagement. This is
US Highlights 2026-08-13
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-13 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 4 Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) actions. All items involve antidumping duty (AD) administrative reviews. Actions include one final review with partial rescission (Vietnam fish fillets), one preliminary review with partial rescission (India organic soybean meal), one preliminary review (Korea wire rod), and one final review (Indonesia wind towers). No China-related measures were reported in today’s items. 2) Updates by Authority N/A (DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration) Headline: Frozen fish fillets (Vietnam) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce issued the final results of the 2023–2024 antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company were found to have made sales at less than normal value, while two non-examined separate-rate companies received a review-specific rate. Commerce also rescinded the review in part for 25 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity; the Vietnam-wide entity rate remains unchanged. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-552-801 Final margins (USD/kg), POR 2023-08-01 to 2024-07-31: Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd.: 1.00 NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company: 0.38 Non-selected separate rate respondents (Can Tho Import Export Seafood JSC; Nam Viet Corporation): 0.84 Vietnam-wide entity: review rescinded; rate remains $2.39/kg Partial rescission: 25 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity Publication date: August 13, 2026; Final results signed August 10, 2026 Preliminary results published: February 11, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-final-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline: Organic soybean meal (India) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce published the preliminary results of the 2024–2025 AD administrative review of organic soybean meal from India. Commerce calculated a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for the sole individually examined respondent and assigned the same rate to companies not selected for individual review; the review was rescinded for 145 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment, with deadlines set by regulation. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-533-901 Preliminary margin (percent), POR 2024-05-01 to 2025-04-30: Ecopure: 26.60 Companies not selected for individual review (Appendix II): 26.60 Rescission in part: 145 companies (Appendix III) Deadlines: Case briefs: no later than 21 days after publication Rebuttal briefs: 5 days after case briefs Hearing requests: within 30 days after publication Publication date: August 13, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline: Carbon and alloy steel wire rod (Republic of Korea) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce issued preliminary results for the 2024–2025 AD review of carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea, finding that POSCO and POSCO International Corporation did not sell below normal value during the period of review. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-580-891 Preliminary margin (percent), POR 2024-05-01 to 2025-04-30: POSCO/POSCO International Corporation: 0.00 Deadlines: Case briefs: within 7 days after issuance of verification report Rebuttal briefs: 5 days after case briefs Hearing requests: within 30 days after publication Publication date: August 13, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline: Utility scale wind towers (Indonesia) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary: Commerce finalized the 2023–2024 AD administrative review for utility scale wind towers from Indonesia, determining that PT. Kenertec Power System did not sell at less than normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Investigation No.: A-560-833 Final margin (percent), POR 2023-08-01 to 2024-07-31: PT. Kenertec Power System: 0.00 Publication date: August 13, 2026; Final results signed August 10, 2026 Preliminary results published: February 10, 2026 Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-indonesia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – Commerce completed one final review with partial rescission for Vietnamese frozen fish fillets, setting company-specific per-kilogram dumping margins and maintaining the Vietnam-wide rate. – The preliminary review of Indian organic soybean meal assigns a 26.60 percent margin to the examined firm and non-selected companies; 145 companies were rescinded from review. – Preliminary results for Korean carbon and alloy steel wire rod show a 0.00 percent margin for POSCO. – Final results for Indonesian utility scale wind towers confirm a 0.00 percent margin for PT. Kenertec Power System. – All actions are antidumping duty administrative reviews; no China-related actions were reported. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-final-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ (Frozen fish fillets — Vietnam) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (Organic soybean meal — India) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (Wire rod — Korea) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-indonesia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ (Wind towers — Indonesia) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Utility Scale Wind Towers From Indonesia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Completes Review of Wind Tower Imports from Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of utility scale wind towers imported from Indonesia. The review covered the period between August 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024. The Department found that Indonesian wind towers were being sold in the United States at fair prices. This means they were not sold at less than their normal value. The review focused on PT. Kenertec Power System (Kenertec), a major producer of these wind towers. After reviewing all data and comments from involved parties, the Department confirmed that Kenertec did not engage in unfair pricing practices. As a result, Kenertec’s products will not face additional duties from the U.S. The final results of this review were set to be published on August 13, 2026. The Department’s decision comes after examining several comments and making necessary changes to the initial calculations. The changes ensured accuracy and fairness in determining the duties on Kenertec’s wind towers. The Department will inform U.S. Customs and Border Protection about this decision. This will help guide the agency in handling entries of wind towers from Indonesia. As Kenertec was found to have a zero percent dumping margin, these entries will not be subject to additional duties. Importers need to ensure that they comply with regulations and confirm no reimbursement of duties has occurred. This will prevent the assessment of extra duties on their products. Lastly, cash deposit rates for these products will reflect the Department’s final decision. Rates can differ based on whether the companies or products were covered in previous reviews. However, for all other products not specified, a standard rate of 8.53 percent will still apply. This standard rate remains effective unless future reviews dictate otherwise. This conclusion helps to maintain fair trade practices and supports the smooth operation of the wind tower industry between the U.S. and Indonesia. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Commerce Department Releases Preliminary Review on Steel Wire Rod from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its antidumping duty review on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Korea. This review is under the responsibility of the department’s Enforcement and Compliance section. The focus is on POSCO and POSCO International Corporation (PIC), key producers and exporters from Korea. From May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025, it was found that POSCO did not sell wire rod in the U.S. at prices below what is considered normal. This means, according to this preliminary review, there was no dumping. The department is inviting comments from interested parties on these findings. The original antidumping duty order was published in 2018. In subsequent years, some parts of the order were revoked, specifically for wire rods used in tires and valve springs. This recent review began in 2025 to check the actions of POSCO. During this process, the government faced some delays. There was a government shutdown, which led to deadlines being extended. More delays occurred because of backlog issues with electronically filed documents. This pushed preliminary results to be released on August 7, 2026. The review included a close examination of pricing for the products, comparing export prices and standard normal values. POSCO used a constructed export price method to determine these figures. Now, with preliminary results made public, Commerce must share their calculations with all parties involved. There will be a verification phase where the collected information is double-checked. Interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments or briefs. These must be submitted after the verification report is issued. Rebuttal briefs will follow the initial comments. If any disagreements arise, a hearing can be requested. The assessment of duties will occur after final results are published. Depending on these results, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will adjust duties on imports for the review period. For entries made during this period, if POSCO was unaware that merchandise was destined for the U.S., these entries might be assessed based on all-others rates set during the investigation in 2018. Deposit requirements for shipments will be updated after final results are published. The final results will dictate the cash deposit rate for POSCO. These guidance instructions will remain active until further notice. This notice also reminds importers of their duty to file a certificate regarding duty reimbursements before liquidation of entries. Failure to do this could result in double duties. The Department of Commerce is set to issue final results within 120 days, concluding this review process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Organic Soybean Meal From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
United States Department of Commerce Announces Preliminary Review Results on Organic Soybean Meal from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes August 13, 2026 The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has released preliminary results concerning the review of the antidumping duty on organic soybean meal imported from India. The review covers the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. This follows the ongoing effort to ensure fair trade practices involving Indian exporters. Background Commerce originally initiated the review process on May 16, 2022, after receiving requests for the review in line with the government regulation 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Respondent companies Ecopure Specialities Ltd. and Bergwerff Organic (India) Pvt., Ltd. were selected for mandatory examination in August 2025. Notably, two significant requests for withdrawals were made by Perdue Agribusiness LLC and Organic Soybean Producers of America (OSPA) on September 23, 2025. Consequently, this review focused solely on Ecopure. Preliminary Findings Commerce has preliminarily determined that Indian producers and exporters have not sold organic soybean meal in the United States at less than normal value during the specified review period. As part of the review’s progression, Commerce extended the timeline for preliminary results on a couple of occasions, adding up to a significant 113-day delay due to administrative adjustments, government shutdowns, and backlog. For the companies not individually reviewed, including 145 entities listed for rescission, those whose assessments were withdrawn are slated for exclusion from review action. The enforcement dictates imply these companies won’t undergo the review procedure as per 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Methodology and Findings In evaluating Ecopure Specialities Ltd., results showed a weighted-average dumping margin of 26.60 percent. This indicates that the sales were not below the normal value as delineated in the Tariff Act of 1930. The same margin applies to companies not selected for individual review unless separate determinations are merited. Deadline Extension and Comments Owing to unforeseen delays, Commerce had tolled several deadlines, notably including extensions on April 7 and July 24, 2026. Following regulations enabled the complete extension of the preliminary findings deadline to August 7, 2026. Commerce invites comments and case briefs from interested parties, citing a 21-day grace period post-publication to facilitate public discourse. Participants are encouraged to focus on content found in the published preliminary results. The department has established a procedural framework for conducting subsequent hearings and will issue final notice thereafter. Assessment and Cash Deposits The publication delineates methodology for establishing assessment rates. Ecopure and the rest under review will be subject to either calculated rates or all-other rates determined in earlier segments. The cash deposit rate will continue, barring further adjustments. This memorandum hints at systematic adherence to fair trade policies between the United States and foreign trade partners, safeguarding both domestic industries and international market equilibriums. — Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finalizes Review on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. The review took place from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Background The Department assessed whether companies from Vietnam sold fish fillets in the U.S. below their normal value. Selling goods at this lower value is known as dumping. Dumping can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department looked at two main companies: Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company. They found these companies sold the fillets for less than they should have. New Rates Set Bien Dong now has a dumping margin of $1.00 per kilogram. NTSF’s margin is $0.38 per kilogram. Two other companies, Cantho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company and Nam Viet Corporation, also have a rate. They are set at $0.84 per kilogram. Partial Cancellation The Department canceled the review for some companies. This happened because there were no sales with prices to review. They also dropped the Vietnam-wide entity from the review, which means this group’s rate of $2.39 per kilogram will not change. New Rules The Department issued new rules for these companies: The cash deposit rate for U.S. shipments will match the new rates. For companies without their own rate, the Vietnam-wide rate ($2.39 per kilogram) will apply. What’s Next? U.S. Customs will collect the new deposit rates from now on. If companies bought the fillets and are still storing them, they should pay the right duty to avoid extra charges. These findings are important. They make sure trade is fair. They also protect U.S. businesses from unfair prices. Companies and importers need to follow these new rules carefully. This will help the trade between the U.S. and Vietnam stay fair and balanced. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-13
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Title: 1. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16553/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-final-results-and-rescission-in Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. (Bien Dong) and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (NTSF), made sales of certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Title: 2. Quarterly Update to Annual Listing of Foreign Government Subsidies on Articles of Cheese Subject to an In-Quota Rate of Duty Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16550/quarterly-update-to-annual-listing-of-foreign-government-subsidies-on-articles-of-cheese-subject-to Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Title: 3. Organic Soybean Meal From India: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16549/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters subject to this review did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to 145 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. Title: 4. Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16548/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that POSCO and POSCO International Corporation (PIC) (collectively, POSCO), a producer and exporter of carbon and alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. We invite all interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Title: 5. Utility Scale Wind Towers From Indonesia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16547/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-indonesia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that utility scale wind towers (wind towers) from Indonesia are not being sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Title: 6. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/13/2026-16473/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-12
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-12 1) Executive Summary Three U.S.–China trade remedy events are covered today. The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) issued two scheduling notices for expedited five-year (sunset) reviews involving China. The Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) published the final results of an antidumping administrative review on wooden bedroom furniture from China. The main policy instruments are AD/CVD orders, expedited sunset reviews, and administrative review procedures. 2) Updates by Authority United States International Trade Commission (USITC) Boltless steel shelving units — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The USITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units prepackaged for sale from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission found the domestic interested party response adequate and the respondent interested party response inadequate, and therefore will conduct expedited reviews. Key Details: Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-523 and 731-TA-1259 (Second Review) Key dates: Adequacy determination: July 6, 2026 Staff report (nonpublic) available to APO parties: August 25, 2026; public version to follow Written comments deadline: 5:15 p.m., September 1, 2026 (with timing adjustment if Commerce extends its final results) Review period extended by up to 90 days under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B) Issued: August 7, 2026; published August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Prestressed concrete steel wire strand — AD/CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The USITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission found the domestic interested party response adequate and the respondent response inadequate and opted for expedited reviews; Chairman Johanson voted to conduct full reviews. Key Details: Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Third Review) Key dates: Adequacy determination: July 6, 2026 Staff report (nonpublic) available to APO parties: October 7, 2026; public version to follow Written comments deadline: October 14, 2026 (with timing adjustment if Commerce extends its final results) Review period extended by up to 90 days under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B) Issued: August 7, 2026; published August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) Wooden bedroom furniture — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2024 antidumping administrative review of wooden bedroom furniture from China and continues to determine that 11 companies under review did not establish entitlement to a separate rate. These companies are part of the China-wide entity and are subject to the China-wide rate; assessment and cash deposit instructions were outlined. Key Details: Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Case No.: A-570-890 Period of Review: January 1, 2024–December 31, 2024 Companies found part of the China-wide entity (11): Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd.; Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen Kinwai International Furniture Co., Ltd.; Nathan International Ltd., Nathan Rattan Factory; Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd., Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd., Dorbest Ltd.; Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade Co. Ltd.; Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd. Assessment: Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess duties at the China-wide rate no earlier than 35 days after publication; if a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will be directed not to liquidate entries until the injunction request period (within 90 days of publication) expires. Cash deposits: For exporters without a separate rate, deposits equal to the China-wide rate of 216.01 percent; existing rates continue for exporters with separate rates. Applicable date: August 12, 2026 Source:https://lawyerfanzhang.com/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The USITC scheduled expedited five-year (sunset) reviews for AD/CVD orders on boltless steel shelving units and prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China after finding inadequate respondent party participation. Both USITC reviews were deemed extraordinarily complicated and the review periods were extended by up to 90 days. The USITC set staff report release dates and public comment deadlines for each review (August 25/September 1, 2026 for shelving; October 7/October 14, 2026 for PC strand). Commerce’s final 2024 administrative review of wooden bedroom furniture from China concluded that 11 companies remain part of the China-wide entity, with assessment and deposit instructions including the 216.01 percent China-wide rate for exporters without separate rates. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ (Boltless steel shelving — expedited reviews) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ (Prestressed concrete strand — expedited reviews) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024/ (Wooden bedroom furniture — AD review final) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Trade Ruling on Chinese Wooden Bedroom Furniture Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement regarding the import of wooden bedroom furniture from China. Eleven Chinese companies did not qualify for a separate rate and are now part of the China-wide entity. This means they face the China-wide duty rate of 216.01 percent. The review period for this decision was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This decision follows an earlier report in April 2026. There were no new comments on the preliminary findings, so the results remain the same. The wooden bedroom furniture case has been open since 2005 when a notice was issued about sales at less than fair value. The Department followed section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for this review. They decided to keep the preliminary results as final. A list of 11 companies will be impacted by this decision. Some of these companies are Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd., Jesse Furniture Industries Co., Ltd., and Nathan International Ltd. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will begin assessing antidumping duties. This will happen no sooner than 35 days after the notice was published. An injunction might change the timeline for some entries if a timely summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. For future shipments, different cash deposit rules will apply. Separate rates will continue for exporters that already have them. For those without separate rates, the China-wide rate will apply. Non-China exporters without a separate rate will face the rate applied to the China exporter that supplied them. Importers need to make sure they file a certificate about the reimbursement of duties. This should be done before the liquidation of entries during the 2024 review period. The notice also reminds all parties to handle confidential information carefully. Materials need to be returned or destroyed to comply with regulations. These updates follow the rules set out by sections of the Tariff Act and Department of Commerce’s regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-08-12 The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is taking an important step. The ITC is looking at prestressed concrete steel wire strand that comes from China. They want to decide if taking away antidumping and countervailing duty orders will harm U.S. producers. The ITC announced that these reviews started on July 6, 2026. The purpose of these reviews is to see if cancelling current duties would lead to problems. These problems could happen if Chinese products start to hurt U.S. businesses. The ITC has chosen to do expedited reviews. This means they are trying to work quickly. They decided this because not enough responses were received from Chinese parties. The domestic groups gave enough responses, but Chinese groups did not. A special report will be available on October 7, 2026. This report will be a staff report and will help the investigation. Those who have permission can see it sooner. The public will get to see a version of this report later. The public can also participate. People can send comments to the ITC by October 14, 2026. These comments will help decide the final outcome. However, people need to follow certain rules. They cannot include new facts in their comments. The ITC is also prepared to extend the review period if needed. They have the power to add up to 90 more days to their process. The ITC is following special rules and laws. They are using the Tariff Act of 1930 to guide their review. Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued this information. This is an important event to watch. It affects companies in the U.S. and how they compete with products from China. Keep an eye on the ITC for more updates. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
Expedited Review for Boltless Steel Shelving From China: A Legal Update Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an expedited review process. This will examine antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units from China. The review is crucial to decide if canceling these duties would hurt the U.S. industry. This review is important as it affects trade and helps protect U.S. businesses. The USITC noted that the domestic group’s response to the review notice was adequate. However, the response from the respondent group in China was inadequate. The expedited review began in July 2026. The final comments and written submissions are due by September 1, 2026. Documents must be served to everyone involved in the reviews. A certificate of service has to be filed as well. The USITC has extended the review period as it is complicated. The extension allows for up to 90 more days for the review process. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order on August 7, 2026. The detailed legal notice is available in the Federal Register. This process is part of a routine review to ensure fair trade practices. The USITC plays a key role in maintaining a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-08-12
Justice Department Briefing 2026-08-12 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Information Collection; USAO-PR COMMUNITY OUTREACH REQUEST FORM Feedback Form Package Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16437/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-new-information Sub: Justice Department Content: The USAO-PR, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2. Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of O-Desmethyltramadol in Schedule I Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16413/schedules-of-controlled-substances-temporary-placement-of-o-desmethyltramadol-in-schedule-i Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: The Drug Enforcement Administration issues this temporary order to schedule O-desmethyltramadol (other names: O-DSMT; desmetramadol; 3-[(1R,2R)-2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-1- hydroxycyclohexyl]phenol), including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers, in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. DEA bases this action on a finding that placing O-DSMT in schedule I is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to public safety. This order imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import, export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or possess) or propose to handle O-DSMT. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-12
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-12 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Title:1.UChicago Argonne LLC et al; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16448/uchicago-argonne-llc-et-al-notice-of-decision-on-application-for-duty-free-entry-of-scientific Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Title:2.Pacific Northwest National Laboratory et al; Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16447/pacific-northwest-national-laboratory-et-al-applications-for-duty-free-entry-of-scientific Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Title:3.Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16446/wooden-bedroom-furniture-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to determine that 11 companies under review did not establish their entitlement to a separate rate and are thus part of the People's Republic of China (China)-wide entity and subject to the China-wide entity rate. The period review (POR) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Title:4.Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Steel Import License Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16445/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-12
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-12 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Title: 1.Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16390/boltless-steel-shelving-units-prepackaged-for-sale-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on boltless steel shelving units prepackaged for sale from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Title: 2.Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/12/2026-16380/prestressed-concrete-steel-wire-strand-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-11
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-11 1) Executive Summary – Today’s brief covers 12 items from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). – Actions span Section 337 investigations, antidumping/countervailing duty (AD/CVD) administrative and sunset reviews, changed circumstances reviews, a continuation of an AD order, and review rescissions. – Several notices involve China explicitly (e.g., aluminum extrusions CVD final results, R-32 AD continuation, common alloy aluminum sheet CCRs) alongside multi-country AD/CVD actions and ITC 337 proceedings. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Headline:Wi‑Fi Routers and Mesh Wi‑Fi Devices — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The presiding ALJ issued an Initial Determination on violation and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding in Inv. No. 337-TA-1454. The Commission seeks public interest submissions regarding potential relief (e.g., exclusion and cease and desist orders) should a violation be found. Comments are invited from the public and government agencies only. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1454– Key dates: ALJ ID and RD issued August 6, 2026; Public interest comments due by September 8, 2026; Notice issued August 7, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-wi-fi-routers-wi-fi-devices-mesh-wi-fi-network-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ Headline:Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1433, the ALJ issued an Initial Determination on violation (July 23, 2026) and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding (August 6, 2026). The Commission requests public interest submissions on recommended relief, including a limited exclusion order for 5–6 years and a cease-and-desist order directed to specified respondents. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1433– Key dates: ALJ ID July 23, 2026; RD August 6, 2026; Comments due September 8, 2026; Notice issued August 7, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for-manufacturing-the-same-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ Headline:Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays (II) — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The Commission found a violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-1441 and will issue a limited exclusion order covering infringing glass substrates for LCDs (and products/methods as described) and a cease and desist order against TTE Technology, Inc. The Commission set a bond of 0% during Presidential review and terminated the investigation. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1441– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for-manufacturing-the-same-ii-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination-finding-a-violation-of-sec/ Headline:Child Car Seats — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1459, the Commission declined to review the ALJ’s Initial Determination granting a joint motion to terminate based on settlement. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1459– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-child-car-seats-notice-of-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination-terminating-the-investigation-based-on-settlement-termination-of-the-investigation-in-its-entirety/ Headline:Pre‑Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair — ITC_337 (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:In Inv. No. 337-TA-1457, the Commission reviewed in part, and on review, affirmed in part and took no position in part on the Final ID finding no violation of Section 337. The investigation is terminated with a final finding of no violation. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1457– Key dates: Commission vote August 6, 2026; Notice issued August 6, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-pre-stretched-synthetic-braiding-hair-and-packaging-thereof-ii-notice-of-the-commissions-determination-to-review-in-part-and-on-review-to-affirm-in-part-and-take-no-position-in-part-on/ Headline:Mattresses (Various Countries) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:The ITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews to determine whether revocation of the CVD order on mattresses from China and AD orders on mattresses from Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. The Commission set a schedule for staff reporting and written submissions and extended the review period by up to 90 days due to extraordinary complexity. Key Details:– Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Inv. Nos. 701-TA-645; 731-TA-1495, 1497–1501 (Review)– Key dates: Adequacy determination July 6, 2026; Staff report placement September 22, 2026; Comments due September 29, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/mattresses-from-cambodia-china-malaysia-serbia-thailand-turkey-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce — International Trade Administration) Headline:Aluminum Extrusions from China — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2024 CVD administrative review, finding Chinese producers/exporters received countervailable subsidies. Six non-responsive companies received rates based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA). Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Case No. C-570-968; POR January 1–December 31, 2024– Final rates (AFA): 164.29% for six named companies; Cash deposit and assessment instructions to follow– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/aluminum-extrusions-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-review-2024/ Headline:Mattresses from Malaysia — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce issued final results of the 2024–2025 AD administrative review, determining sales at less than normal value. The weighted-average dumping margin is 42.92% for the listed companies and non-selected companies receiving a review-specific rate. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Case No. A-557-818; POR May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/mattresses-from-malaysia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline:Ripe Olives from Spain — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce finalized the 2023–2024 AD administrative review, finding sales at less than normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 3.54% for Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And., and for Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L.; the review was partially rescinded for one firm. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: Case No. A-469-817; POR August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024– Key dates: Applicable August 11, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/ripe-olives-from-spain-final-results-and-partial-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline:Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet (Multiple Countries including China) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce initiated and issued preliminary results of changed circumstances reviews proposing to revoke the AD/CVD orders, in part, with respect to certain aluminum can stock, retroactively for all unliquidated entries. The proposal modifies the aluminum can stock scope exclusion language; interested parties are invited to comment. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: Multiple cases including
Difluoromethane (R-32) From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
Continuation of Antidumping Duty on Difluoromethane from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to continue the antidumping duty (AD) order on difluoromethane (R-32) from China. This decision is the result of findings by Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They agreed that getting rid of this duty could lead to more dumping and harm to U.S. industries. The ITC and Commerce looked into this matter as part of their normal review process. The initial order was put in place on March 11, 2021. Earlier this year, both agencies started their first “sunset review” to decide if the order should stay. After reviewing, it was clear that without the order, U.S. industries might suffer from low-priced R-32 from China harming local businesses. R-32 is used in air conditioners and refrigeration systems. The chemical is identified by a specific CAS registry number: 75-10-5. It can be in different forms or levels of purity. This order covers R-32, whether it is pure or in blends where R-32 makes up a large part of the mix. However, R-32 that is part of blends covered by a different order—specifically for hydrofluorocarbon blends from China—is not included. The duty applies to R-32 classified under certain subheadings in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Customs will keep applying these duties on R-32 imports from China. This will ensure fair pricing and protect U.S. industries. The continuation order became effective on August 4, 2026. This means that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect deposits for the duty. These deposits are collected at the same rates as when the goods enter the country. Commerce aims to start the next review of this order roughly five years from now. This schedule helps ensure that the duty remains necessary and effective. Parties who were allowed to see certain private information during the review must now handle it appropriately. They need to either return or destroy the information. This decision fulfills the legal requirements and reflects the procedures set by the U.S. government in reviewing and extending such trade measures. The continuation aims to protect U.S. industry from unfair foreign pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Rescission of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Department of Commerce Cancels Reviews of Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has taken a significant step by deciding to cancel some of its ongoing antidumping and countervailing duty reviews. This decision was made because all the requests for these reviews were withdrawn on time. This means there were no more requests remaining for these reviews. Commerce had started these reviews to look into certain companies and countries. These reviews were meant to make sure no unfair pricing or financial help was being given that could hurt U.S. businesses. Here is a list of the products and countries involved in these cancelled reviews: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, South Africa, and Taiwan. Brass Rod from Israel. Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy. Forged Steel Fittings from the Republic of Korea. Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkmenistan. Gas Powered Pressure Washers from Vietnam and China. Polyester Textured Yarn and Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand. Various Products including certain plastic decorative ribbons, vertical shaft engines, crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, lightweight thermal paper, mattresses, seamless refined copper pipe and tube, wooden bedroom furniture, and wooden cabinets and vanities from the People’s Republic of China. For all these products, Commerce will not continue its review process. Instead, it will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to take action based on the original duties set when the products first entered the U.S. Importers of these products have responsibilities. They need to file certain papers about paying the right duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay double. Commerce has also reminded those involved in these reviews to properly handle private information according to the laws. The decision to stop the reviews was published officially on August 11, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, who is acting as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This notice is part of the ongoing efforts to manage trade fairly and according to the law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews and Intent To Revoke the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, in Part
Commerce Starts Review to Change Aluminum Sheet Trade Orders Estimated reading time: 4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the beginning of a review of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheet. These orders affect products from China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Türkiye. What is Happening? Commerce is considering changes to these orders. They might take away part of these rules, specifically about certain aluminum can stock. Why the Change? The reviews are happening because the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group asked for them. They want to change the rules to make sure that some aluminum used for beverage cans is not part of these orders. Who is Involved? The Aluminum Association Working Group includes companies like Arconic Corporation, Commonwealth Rolled Products Inc., Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC, JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Texarkana Aluminum, Inc. Important Dates The changes could happen on August 11, 2026. Companies and people interested in this review can also comment on the preliminary results. Scope of the Orders The orders are about aluminum sheets that are flat-rolled and have a certain thickness. These sheets can be made into many products. However, aluminum used for making beverage cans is mainly not part of these orders. Proposed Changes Some aluminum can stock is already not covered by the orders. The review will look at whether to keep it that way. The Aluminum Association wants to make clear that all aluminum can stock is excluded, no matter how it is classified in trade codes. How to Get Involved People can send in their comments and opinions. There are ways to send these comments to the Commerce Department. Also, people can ask for a hearing to discuss their views. Timeline for Final Decision Commerce will try to finish the review as quickly as possible. They might make a final decision in 270 days, unless everyone quickly agrees on the outcome. Why Care About This? These trade orders can affect prices and supply of aluminum products in the U.S. market. This review is important for companies that use or produce these aluminum sheets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Final Results of Antidumping Review on Ripe Olives from Spain Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final results on the antidumping review for ripe olives from Spain. The review period ran from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that some producers or exporters sold ripe olives in the United States at prices below what they normally sell for. This practice is known as dumping. The final results impact companies like Agro Sevilla and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. These companies had a calculated dumping margin of 3.54 percent. This rate means they sold olives in the U.S. at 3.54 percent less than the normal value. For other companies not chosen for a detailed review, the Department often uses the average rate from reviewed companies. So, Angel Camacho received the same rate as Agro Sevilla at 3.54 percent. The Department also looked at Alimentary Group DCOOP, S.Coop.And. But this company had no entries of ripe olives during the review period. So, the review for this company was canceled. The review process included steps like checking sales records in both the U.S. and Spain. These steps help ensure the information is correct. The Department plans to give instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon. The CBP will collect antidumping duties based on the final results. If a company slightly price-dumped their products, those products might not face extra duties. For products that Agro Sevilla sold, if they are not reported correctly, the CBP might use a duty rate of 19.98 percent. This rate is based on the original investigation finding against Spanish olives. Now that the results are final, the cash deposit rate for future olive sales from these companies in the U.S. will change. The new rate will be the one calculated in this review, unless the company can adjust its practices. This decision is important for importers. They must file the right paperwork about duties before bringing products into the U.S. If they don’t, they might have to pay double the duties. In case any importer or exporter has sensitive information protected by an Administrative Protective Order (APO), they must handle the information according to the rules. This means they need to confirm if they are returning or destroying the information to prevent any violations. The Department’s announcement clarifies the results as well as future actions. These results are part of ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and protect industries in the U.S. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Malaysian Mattresses Underpriced Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released final results regarding the pricing of mattresses imported from Malaysia. The investigation found that these mattresses were sold at prices lower than their normal value in the U.S. market. This decision comes after a thorough review for the period from May 1, 2024, to April 30, 2025. The announcement was made in a notice published in the Federal Register on August 11, 2026. During the review, no comments were submitted from interested parties in response to the preliminary findings released earlier this year on April 15. As a result, the preliminary results have been adopted as final, without any changes. The scope of the investigation covered various companies involved in the production and export of mattresses from Malaysia. It has been determined that several Malaysian producers, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD, Orient GIC Global, and Lion YTT World, all had a weighted-average dumping margin of 42.92 percent. This means they were selling their products significantly cheaper than what is considered fair. The United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be responsible for assessing these antidumping duties on all relevant entries of mattresses from Malaysia. The new cash deposit rates will come into effect immediately for all shipments entering the country on or after the publication date. This action reinforces the U.S. commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting domestic industries from unfair foreign pricing strategies. The Department of Commerce will continue to monitor trade activities closely to uphold these standards. Finally, companies importing mattresses are reminded of the importance of complying with all international trade regulations. Failure to declare the reimbursement of antidumping duties as required could lead to heavier penalties, including the possibility of paying double duties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies on Chinese Aluminum Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Agency Involved The review was conducted by the Enforcement and Compliance division of the International Trade Administration, a part of the Department of Commerce. Review Details The review period spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. It is part of an administrative review process to ensure fair trade practices. Outcome of the Review The review found that certain companies in China have benefited from countervailable subsidies. Countervailable subsidies are financial aid that unfairly benefits a foreign exporter. Companies Affected The final results apply to several Chinese companies. These include Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, and others. Subsidy Rate The companies mentioned have been assigned a countervailable subsidy rate. This rate is 164.29 percent. No Changes from Preliminary Results The Department made no changes from the preliminary review published in April 2026. No comments were submitted from interested parties during the review process. Facts Available with Adverse Inferences For the six non-responsive companies, the Department applied adverse facts available. This decision means they determined the companies did not cooperate with the review. Instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) The Department will instruct the CBP to assess countervailing duties. These duties apply to entries of aluminum extrusions covered by the review. Cash Deposit Instructions From now on, the CBP will collect cash deposits for estimated duties. These deposits are based on the subsidy rates determined in this review. Scope of the Order The order applies to various aluminum extrusions. These include shapes and forms made from certain aluminum alloys. Exclusions Many items are excluded from the order, like certain finished goods and specific aluminum alloys not meeting certain criteria. Conclusion This review ensures that trade practices remain fair. The Department of Commerce continues to monitor and enforce trade laws diligently. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
Federal Review on Mattress Import Duties Scheduled Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the scheduling of expedited five-year reviews. The reviews concern import duties on mattresses from Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. The reviews will decide if removing trade duties would harm the U.S. mattress industry. The duties include countervailing duties on mattresses from China and antidumping duties on mattresses from the other six countries. The reviews began on July 6, 2026. USITC decided to have expedited reviews because the response from domestic parties was strong. In contrast, the response from foreign parties was weak, making full reviews unnecessary. For more information, contact Alejandro Orozco at 202-205-3177. Those with hearing impairments can use TDD at 202-205-1810. Information is available on the Commission’s website at www.usitc.gov. A staff report with details will be available on September 22, 2026, to those on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will also be released. Interested parties can file comments by September 29, 2026. They should not include new facts. Only those who responded properly to the notice of institution can submit comments. The Commission determined that these reviews are very complex. Therefore, they are extending the review period by up to 90 days. This review is being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice came out thanks to the order of the Commission, issued by Secretary Lisa Barton on August 6, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of the Commission’s Determination To Review in Part, and, on Review, To Affirm in Part and Take No Position in Part on a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission: No Violation Found in Braiding Hair Patent Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has concluded its investigation into certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products and their packaging. The decision was announced on August 11, 2026, and it marks the termination of the investigation. The case was registered under Investigation No. 337-TA-1457. The investigation began on August 7, 2025, following a complaint from JBS Hair, Inc., a company based in Atlanta, Georgia. JBS Hair claimed that certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair products imported into the U.S. violated section 337. The products allegedly infringed upon specific patents owned by JBS Hair. These patents included the ‘026 patent, the ‘301 patent, the ‘478 patent, and the ‘616 patent. Several companies were named as respondents in the investigation. These included Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd., Hair Zone, Inc., Beauty Essence, Inc., SLI Production Corp., Mane Concept Inc., and Beauty Plus Trading Co., Inc. Additional respondents were Beauty Elements Corporation, Royal Imex, Inc., GS Imports, Inc., Eve Hair, Inc., Midway International, Inc., Mayde Beauty Inc., Model Model Hair Fashion, Inc., New Jigu Trading Corp., Shake N Go Fashion, Inc., Hair Plus Trading Co., Inc., Optimum Solution Group LLC, Chade Fashions, Inc., and Amekor Industries, Inc. The administrative law judge (ALJ) released the Final Initial Determination on June 5, 2026. The ALJ found no violation of section 337. The judge said that the patents were either invalid or not infringed. JBS Hair appealed the findings, but the ITC decided to review only some parts of the case. Concerning three patents, the Commission reviewed whether they were anticipated by previous products called the Asante Short Braid and Abuja Short Braid. The ITC took no position on this. For the ‘478 patent, the ITC affirmed some findings but chose not to take a position on other issues. The ITC’s decision followed reviews of petitions from JBS Hair, respondents, and an independent party, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The Commission’s review concluded with a finding of no violation, and no changes to the Final Initial Determination. The case can be further referenced in the Federal Register’s Volume 91, Number 153, listed as FR Doc. 2026-16303. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Child Car Seats; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation in Its Entirety
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation on Child Car Seats Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has decided to stop an investigation about child car seats. The decision was made because the parties involved reached a settlement agreement. The official decision was made on August 6, 2026, and the investigation is now completely over. The investigation started on August 28, 2025. It was based on a complaint by several companies, including Wonderland Switzerland AG from Switzerland and Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc. from Pennsylvania, USA. These companies claimed that some child car seats being sold in the United States were infringing on their patents. A patent is a special license that gives an inventor rights to certain products. The companies said that the child car seats violated two specific U.S. patents. One of them was Patent No. 7,625,043, but this was later removed from the investigation. The companies also claimed there was an industry being made or already made in the U.S. related to these patents. The investigation included many groups named as respondents. These included Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. from Massachusetts, and several others from Canada and China. However, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations was not part of this investigation. On July 2, 2026, a joint motion was filed to end the investigation because the parties reached a settlement agreement. This means they agreed to stop the investigation by resolving the issues in the complaint without further legal action. The judge overseeing the case, called the administrative law judge (ALJ), agreed with ending the investigation. It was decided that this would save resources and avoid unnecessary legal actions. Importantly, it was found that ending the investigation would not go against the public interest. The decision was filed under Federal Register Volume 91, Number 153 on August 11, 2026. The decision to end the investigation was not reviewed one more time and is now finalized. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same II; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation
US International Trade Commission Finds Violation in Glass Substrates Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its decision on an important case. This case involved certain glass substrates used in liquid crystal displays (LCDs). It looked into products and methods for making these displays. The investigation began when Corning Incorporated filed a complaint. They are based in Corning, New York. The complaint said that some companies were violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint claimed these companies imported, sold for import, and sold within the United States specific glass substrates and products. The investigation started on March 7, 2025. It named nine respondents. Some of these companies were from the United States and others were from China. Over time, some respondents were removed from the investigation due to settlement agreements. On April 7, 2026, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found a violation of section 337. The ALJ gave recommendations on what actions to take. On June 8, 2026, the Commission agreed to review parts of the ALJ’s decision. After a detailed examination, the Commission agreed that there was a violation of section 337. This decision was made regarding two U.S. patents. These patents were about the glass substrates for LCDs. The Commission decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO). This order stops the entry of infringing products that are not licensed. The LEO applies to products made or imported by the respondents or their connected entities. The Commission also issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against one company, TTE Technology, Inc. This company operates as TCL North America in Irvine, California. The Commission found no public interest concerns that would prevent applying the orders. A zero percent bond will be in effect during the Presidential review period. The investigation is now finished. The Commission made this decision to protect American businesses and innovation. The authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Calls for Public Input on Glass Substrate Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is looking into a case involving glass substrates. These substrates are used in liquid crystal displays, which are common in televisions and monitors. The ITC is concerned about certain companies importing these materials in ways that may violate U.S. trade laws. On July 23, 2026, an initial decision was made about a violation of Section 337. Then, on August 6, 2026, there was a suggestion on what should happen next if a violation is found. This decision involves possible restrictions on bringing in these glass substrates and related products. The ITC is now asking for public feedback. They want opinions on whether putting limits on these imports is fair and how it might affect things like public health, safety, and the economy. They are interested in hearing if other companies in the U.S. could make similar products if imports are stopped. Four companies are mentioned in this investigation. They include Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. and TCL China Star Optoelectronics in China, as well as TTE Technology, Inc., known as TCL North America, in California. These companies might face restrictions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is also considering a cease and desist order, which could stop TCL from certain actions if a violation is confirmed. The ITC encourages people and government agencies to send in their comments. These comments should be no more than five pages. The focus should be on public interest matters, such as how the decision might impact consumers and the economy. Written comments should be submitted by September 8, 2026. They should be sent electronically following the ITC’s filing procedures. Confidential information should be clearly marked and treated accordingly. For more information, you can contact the ITC or visit their website. All public comments will be available for people to see. The ITC works under the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows strict rules and procedures for such cases. The decision from this investigation could have wide-ranging effects on the market for liquid crystal displays. Public input is crucial in helping the ITC make a fair and informed decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
US International Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Wi-Fi Device Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This follows an initial determination issued by a presiding administrative law judge on August 6, 2026. The investigation, identified as No. 337-TA-1454, focuses on certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, and related components. The investigation is centered on potential violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. If found in violation, the ITC may exclude the articles in question from entering the United States. The decision will include considerations about how this exclusion might affect public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, production of similar products in the U.S., and impact on U.S. consumers. The companies involved include ASUStek Computer Inc. from Taiwan; ASUS Computer International based in Fremont, CA; and Plume Design Inc. located in Palo Alto, CA. There are possible limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders being considered against these entities. Public submissions will help the ITC decide whether the recommended actions are in the public interest. They invite comments that cover how these affected products are used in the U.S., and any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. The Commission also wants to know if there are U.S.-made products that could replace the imported goods. People interested in submitting comments must do so by September 8, 2026. The document submissions should be electronic and can’t exceed five pages. Submissions must prominently reference the investigation number “Inv. No. 337-TA-1454.” Confidential information can be submitted but must be marked according to Commission rules. Information submitted could be used internally by the Commission or U.S. government employees, especially for cybersecurity purposes. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public inspection on the ITC’s electronic docket system. For more information, the public can contact Cathy Chen, Esq., in the ITC’s Office of the General Counsel at the provided contact details. This announcement forms part of the ITC’s ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices and the protection of U.S. markets against unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-08-11
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-08-11 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of Suvorexant, Lemborexant, and Daridorexant From Schedule IV Into Schedule V Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16375/schedules-of-controlled-substances-rescheduling-of-suvorexant-lemborexant-and-daridorexant-from Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: The Drug Enforcement Administration proposes to transfer suvorexant ([(7R)-4-(5-chloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-7-methyl-1,4- diazepan-1-yl]-[5-methyl-2-(triazol-2-yl)phenyl]methanone), lemborexant ((1R,2S)-2-[(2,4-dimethylpyrimidin-5-yl)oxymethyl]-2-(3-fluorophenyl)- N-(5-fluoropyridin-2-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxamide), and daridorexant ([(2S)-2-(5-chloro-4-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1- yl]-[5-methoxy-2-(triazol-2-yl)phenyl]methanone) from schedule IV to schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act. If finalized, this action would impose the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule V controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import, export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or possess) or propose to handle suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant. 2. Adjudication of Civil Penalties Against International Marriage Brokers Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16290/adjudication-of-civil-penalties-against-international-marriage-brokers Sub: Justice Department Content: This interim final rule ("IFR") amends Department of Justice ("Department") regulations to specify the procedures for adjudicating alleged violations of the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 ("IMBRA") by international marriage brokers ("IMBs") doing business in the United States that fail to provide required information to persons recruited for matchmaking services or that improperly disclose prohibited information. This IFR is necessary to deter fraudulent marriages and the exploitation of immigrants recruited by IMBs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-11
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-11 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16362/aluminum-extrusions-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and exporters of aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (China) received countervailable subsidies during the period or review (POR) January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. 2. Mattresses From Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16361/mattresses-from-malaysia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that mattresses from Malaysia were sold at prices below than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. 3. Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16360/ripe-olives-from-spain-final-results-and-partial-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. 4. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China, Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of Türkiye: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews and Intent To Revoke the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, in Part Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16358/common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-bahrain-brazil-croatia-egypt-germany Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating and issuing preliminary results of changed circumstances reviews (CCRs) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the People's Republic of China (China), Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye), to revoke the orders, in part, with respect to certain aluminum can stock. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 5. Rescission of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16346/rescission-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based upon the timely withdrawal of all review requests, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative reviews covering the periods of review (PORs) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders identified in the table below. 6. Difluoromethane (R-32) From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16297/difluoromethane-r-32-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-continuation-of-antidumping-duty-order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on difluoromethane (R-32) from the People's Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of this AD order. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-11
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-11 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16363/certain-wi-fi-routers-wi-fi-devices-mesh-wi-fi-network-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on August 6, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. 2. Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16332/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on July 23, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. On August 6, 2026, the ALJ issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. 3. Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same II; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16305/certain-glass-substrates-for-liquid-crystal-displays-products-containing-the-same-and-methods-for Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has found a violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has determined to issue: (1) a limited exclusion order ("LEO") prohibiting the unlicensed entry of infringing glass substrates for liquid crystal displays, products containing the same, and methods for manufacturing the same that are manufactured by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of, the respondents and (2) a cease and desist orders ("CDO") against respondent TTE Technology, Inc., d/b/a TCL North America of Irvine, California. The investigation is terminated. 4. Certain Child Car Seats; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation in Its Entirety Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16304/certain-child-car-seats-notice-of-commission-determination-not-to-review-an-initial-determination Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 21) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on settlement. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. 5. Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of the Commission’s Determination To Review in Part, and, on Review, To Affirm in Part and Take No Position in Part on a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16303/certain-pre-stretched-synthetic-braiding-hair-and-packaging-thereof-ii-notice-of-the-commissions Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to review in part, and on review, to affirm in part and take no position in part on a final initial determination ("Final ID") issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") finding no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated. 6. Large Vertical Shaft Engines From China; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16302/large-vertical-shaft-engines-from-china-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 7. Mattresses From Cambodia, China, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/11/2026-16301/mattresses-from-cambodia-china-malaysia-serbia-thailand-turkey-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-expedited Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on mattresses from China and antidumping duty orders on mattresses from Cambodia, Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-10
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-10 1) Executive Summary Today’s brief covers 3 events from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). The ITC instituted preliminary AD/CVD investigations on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India and scheduled the final phase of AD/CVD investigations on truck bed covers from China. The DOC initiated administrative reviews of multiple antidumping and countervailing duty orders with June anniversary dates, including several China-related products. The primary policy instruments across these items are AD/CVD investigations and administrative reviews. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) – Headline: Perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA) — AD/CVD (Institution of investigations; preliminary phase scheduling) Summary: The ITC instituted preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigations (Nos. 701-TA-805 and 731-TA-1804) on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India, alleged to be sold at less than fair value and subsidized. Unless Commerce extends the time for initiation, the ITC must reach its preliminary injury determination by September 21, 2026, and transmit its views to Commerce by September 28, 2026. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-805 and 731-TA-1804 (Preliminary) – Key dates: Petitions filed August 5, 2026; ITC staff conference August 26, 2026; requests to appear due by noon August 24, 2026; pre-conference submissions due August 25, 2026; written briefs due August 31, 2026; ITC preliminary determination due by September 21, 2026; views due to Commerce by September 28, 2026. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/perfluoroalkoxy-alkane-from-india-institution-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-investigations-and-scheduling-of-preliminary-phase-investigations/ – Headline: Truck bed covers — AD/CVD (Final phase scheduling) Summary: The ITC scheduled the final phase of AD/CVD investigations (Nos. 701-TA-789 and 731-TA-1777) on truck bed covers from China. Commerce preliminarily found subsidization by the Government of China; Commerce’s preliminary less-than-fair-value determinations are pending. Key Details: – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-789 and 731-TA-1777 (Final) – Key dates: Scheduling notice dated July 27, 2026; prehearing staff report October 1, 2026; hearing October 15, 2026 (requests to appear due October 8, 2026); prehearing briefs due October 8, 2026; posthearing briefs due October 22, 2026; final party comments on new information due November 6, 2026. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/truck-bed-covers-from-china-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing-duty-and-antidumping-duty-investigations/ DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration) – Headline: AD/CVD administrative reviews — multiple orders (Initiation notice) Summary: Commerce initiated administrative reviews of numerous antidumping and countervailing duty orders with June anniversary dates. The notice outlines respondent selection, separate rate application/certification procedures for non-market economy cases, certification eligibility, and timelines for submissions. The scope includes products from multiple countries, with several China-related proceedings (e.g., certain alkyl phosphate esters, chlorinated isocyanurates, citric acid/citrate salts, crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, mattresses, gas powered pressure washers, disposable aluminum containers, and stainless steel flanges). Key Details: – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key identifiers: Federal Register notice (FR Doc. 2026-16265); multiple case numbers listed in the notice – Key dates: Applicable August 10, 2026; Separate Rate Applications/Certifications due 14 calendar days after publication; Certification Eligibility Applications due 30 calendar days after publication; Commerce intends to issue final results of these reviews by June 30, 2027. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews-7/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC launched preliminary AD/CVD investigations on perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India, with a preliminary injury determination due by September 21, 2026. – The ITC set the final phase schedule for AD/CVD investigations on truck bed covers from China, including an October 15, 2026 hearing. – Commerce initiated administrative reviews of a broad set of AD/CVD orders with June anniversaries, including several China-origin products across chemicals, solar components, consumer goods, and metals. – For NME proceedings covered in Commerce’s notice, Separate Rate Applications/Certifications are due within 14 days of publication; final results of the reviews are targeted by June 30, 2027. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/perfluoroalkoxy-alkane-from-india-institution-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-investigations-and-scheduling-of-preliminary-phase-investigations/ (Perfluoroalkoxy alkane — ITC prelim) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/truck-bed-covers-from-china-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing-duty-and-antidumping-duty-investigations/ (Truck bed covers — ITC final phase) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews-7/ (DOC initiation — AD/CVD administrative reviews) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Commerce Department Initiates Reviews on Various Trade Issues Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It has begun a series of administrative reviews on antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These reviews focus on products with June anniversary dates, according to the Federal Register notice published on August 10, 2026. What Are These Reviews? Administrative reviews help check if foreign companies are selling goods at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This is called dumping. If they do, extra taxes called antidumping duties can be applied. The reviews also check if foreign companies receive unfair help from their governments. This is called a countervailable subsidy. In such cases, countervailing duties can be applied. Which Products Are Under Review? Some of the products under review include raw honey from Argentina and Brazil, brass rods from Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea, and crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Other products include certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing from Germany, India, and Switzerland; quartz surface products from India; glycine from Japan and India; and laminated woven sacks from Vietnam. What Is the Procedure? The reviews allow any parties, like companies and producers, to request that their cases be looked at by the Department of Commerce. There are deadlines for submitting information, comments, and responses. For instance, separate rate applications for non-market economy countries must be filed. The companies in the reviews need to prove their independence from their governments to avoid being assigned a single antidumping deposit rate. Applications are due 14 calendar days after this Federal Register notice. Respondents and Deadlines Commerce will select companies for individual examination based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data or through questionnaires requesting sales information. Respondent selection decisions will be made within 35 days of the notice publication. Comments on Customs data or questionnaire data should be submitted within seven days after these are recorded. Companies should also complete the Quantity and Value (Q&V) questionnaire separately for accuracy in respondent selection. Notices of No Sales and Deadlines If there is no sale or entry during the examination period, a notice of no sales must be filed within 30 days of the initiation notice. Additionally, if a market situation affects normal pricing, companies have 20 days after initial questionnaire submissions to notify Commerce. Conclusion The Commerce Department aims to conclude these reviews by June 30, 2027. These actions ensure fair trade practices and protect U.S. markets from unfair foreign practices. This process is a crucial part of maintaining healthy international trade relations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Truck Bed Covers From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
USITC Announces Final Phase Schedule for Truck Bed Cover Investigations Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the schedule for the final phase of investigations into truck bed covers imported from China. These investigations concern potential antidumping and countervailing duties. The investigations aim to find out if a U.S. industry has been harmed or is threatened by these imports. The truck bed covers are thought to be sold in the U.S. at prices below fair market value. The Department of Commerce believes these covers are subsidized by the Chinese government. The truck bed covers in question are protective covers made from materials like aluminum, steel, fiberglass, carbon fiber, plastic, or water-resistant fabric. They fit over the open area of a pickup truck bed. There are different types of these covers, including folding, roll-up, one-piece, and retractable. The scope of the investigation includes parts that come with the truck bed covers. These parts can include hardware for mounting the covers or other related items. However, truck caps, which are higher enclosures for truck beds, are not included in this investigation. The investigations were initiated because of petitions filed by RealTruck, Inc., which is based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The final phase of the investigations follows affirmative preliminary determinations by Commerce. Interested parties, including those representing consumer organizations, need to file an entry of appearance at least 21 days before the scheduled hearing. The USITC plans to hold a hearing on October 15, 2026, and expects written testimonies from interested parties by October 8, 2026. The prehearing staff report will be ready by October 1, 2026. Posthearing briefs should be filed by October 22, 2026. The Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) is being used for filings, and only electronic filings are accepted. The rules and procedures for the hearing and written submissions are detailed on the Commission’s website. The investigations are being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice was issued by order of the Commission on August 5, 2026, and it was published on August 10, 2026. The public can view the document on the Government Publishing Office’s website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Perfluoroalkoxy Alkane From India; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations
U.S. International Trade Commission Launches Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of new investigations. These investigations focus on imports of a chemical called perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India. There are concerns that these imports are harming industries in the United States. The investigations are called antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The USITC needs to decide if imports from India are being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. They also need to find out if the Indian government is giving special help to its producers of this chemical. The investigations are important because they could help protect U.S. companies and workers. If the USITC finds problems, they might recommend actions to balance the unfair trade. The investigations started because a company called The Chemours Company FC, LLC filed petitions on August 5, 2026. The USITC has 45 days to make a preliminary determination. This means a decision needs to be made by September 21, 2026. People interested in these investigations can find more information on the USITC’s website. There are also opportunities for people to participate or share their thoughts. However, to do this, you must meet certain deadlines and rules. The USITC will hold a staff conference about these investigations on August 26, 2026. People who want to be part of this event need to send an email request before noon on August 24, 2026. Written comments and arguments about the investigations can be submitted to the Commission by 5:15 p.m. on August 31, 2026. These comments should add helpful information to the investigations. The USITC is working under the rules of the Tariff Act of 1930. All information shared with the Commission must be true and complete, as false information can cause problems. Information provided to the Commission can be used for security and internal checks. By order of the Commission, these actions are necessary to ensure fair trade practices. The Secretary to the Commission, Lisa Barton, confirmed the issuance of this notice on August 5, 2026. The Commission’s electronic systems are important for handling documents. This means all filings should be done online, as paper-based filings are not allowed for now. These investigations are an important step in making sure trade practices are fair and help protect U.S. industries. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-10
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-08-10 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/10/2026-16265/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders with June anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. 2. Welded Stainless Line and Pressure Pipe From India and the Republic of Türkiye: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/10/2026-16194/welded-stainless-line-and-pressure-pipe-from-india-and-the-republic-of-trkiye-initiation-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Welded Stainless Line and Pressure Pipe From India, the Republic of Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/10/2026-16193/welded-stainless-line-and-pressure-pipe-from-india-the-republic-of-trkiye-and-the-united-arab Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-10
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-08-10 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Perfluoroalkoxy Alkane From India; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/10/2026-16203/perfluoroalkoxy-alkane-from-india-institution-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-investigations Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-805 and 731-TA-1804 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of perfluoroalkoxy alkane from India, provided for in subheading 3904.69.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and alleged to be subsidized by the Government of India. Unless the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 days, or in this case by September 21, 2026. The Commission's views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by September 28, 2026. 2. Truck Bed Covers From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/10/2026-16195/truck-bed-covers-from-china-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing-duty-and-antidumping Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-789 and 731-TA-1777 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of truck bed covers from China, provided for in subheading 8708.29.51 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be subsidized by the government of China. Commerce's preliminary determinations with respect to truck bed covers from China, alleged to be sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value, are pending. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-08-07
US–China Trade Daily Hightlights | 2026-08-07 1) Executive Summary – Today’s briefing covers 6 Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) notices. The actions span antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) administrative reviews and five-year (sunset) reviews. Instruments include preliminary and final AD results, as well as revocations of AD/CVD orders. China-related actions include a PRC polyethylene retail carrier bags review outcome and revocation of AD orders on carbazole violet pigment 23. 2) Updates by Authority DOC (Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration) Headline (one line, bold):Preserved mushrooms (Poland) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce preliminarily determines that Okechamp S.A. made sales at less than normal value during the May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025 period of review. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin is 0.54 percent. Commerce intends to verify and invites comments. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-455-806– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; POR May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025; hearing requests due within 30 days of publication; case briefs due seven days after issuance of the verification report; rebuttal briefs five days thereafter– Preliminary margin: Okechamp S.A. — 0.54% Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-preserved-mushrooms-from-poland-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline (one line, bold):Polyethylene retail carrier bags (Malaysia) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce issues final results finding PRCBs from Malaysia were not sold at less than normal value during August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024. The final weighted-average dumping margin for Euro SME Sdn Bhd and Euro Nature Green Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Euro SME) is 0.00 percent; entries will be liquidated without AD duties, and cash deposit requirements are updated accordingly. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-557-813– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; POR August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024– Final margin: Euro SME — 0.00% Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/polyethylene-retail-carrier-bags-from-malaysia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Headline (one line, bold):Polyethylene retail carrier bags (China) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce’s final results find that Crown Polyethylene Products (International) Ltd. is not eligible for a separate rate and remains part of the China-wide entity for the August 1, 2024–July 31, 2025 review. Suspended entries associated with Crown will be assessed at the China-wide rate (77.57 percent); cash deposit instructions reflect continued application of the China-wide rate for non-separate-rate exporters. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: A-570-886– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; POR August 1, 2024–July 31, 2025– Notes: No change from preliminary results; China-wide entity not under review Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/polyethylene-retail-carrier-bags-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline (one line, bold):Circular welded carbon steel pipe and tube (Türkiye) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce preliminarily finds sales at less than normal value for Borusan during May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin is 4.91 percent; comments are invited and hearing requests are due within 30 days of publication. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– Key identifiers: A-489-501– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; POR May 1, 2024–April 30, 2025; case briefs due 21 days after publication; rebuttal briefs due five days thereafter; hearing requests due within 30 days of publication– Preliminary margin: Borusan İstikbal Ticaret T.A.Ş.; Borusan Birleşik Boru Fabrikaları Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. — 4.91% Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/circular-welded-carbon-steel-standard-pipe-and-tube-products-from-the-republic-of-turkiye-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Headline (one line, bold):Carbazole violet pigment 23 (India) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce issues the final results of the fourth sunset review and revokes the CVD order on CVP‑23 from India due to no domestic party response to initiation. Suspension of liquidation will be terminated for entries on or after June 15, 2026; prior entries remain subject to applicable requirements. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: C-533-839– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; effective revocation date June 15, 2026; initiation May 1, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbazole-violet-pigment-23-from-india-final-results-of-fourth-sunset-review-and-revocation-of-countervailing-duty-order/ Headline (one line, bold):Carbazole violet pigment 23 (India and China) — AD_CVD (TRADE_REMEDY) Summary:Commerce issues the final results of the fourth sunset reviews and revokes the AD orders on CVP‑23 from India and the People’s Republic of China due to no domestic interested party response. Suspension of liquidation will be terminated for entries on or after June 15, 2026; prior entries remain subject to applicable AD requirements. Key Details:– Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key identifiers: A-533-838; A-570-892– Key dates: Applicable August 7, 2026; effective revocation date June 15, 2026; initiation May 1, 2026 Source:– Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbazole-violet-pigment-23-from-india-and-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-sunset-reviews-and-revocation-of-the-antidumping-duty-orders/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – Commerce issued both preliminary and final AD results across multiple proceedings; margins ranged from 0.00% (Malaysia PRCBs) to 4.91% (Türkiye CWP), with a 0.54% preliminary margin for Poland preserved mushrooms. – In the PRC PRCBs review, Crown remains part of the China-wide entity, with assessment and cash deposit at the existing China-wide rate. – Commerce revoked the AD orders on CVP-23 from India and China, and revoked the CVD order on CVP-23 from India, due to no domestic party participation; revocations are effective June 15, 2026. – Notices specify assessment and cash deposit instructions, including liquidation without AD duties where margins are zero or de minimis. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-preserved-mushrooms-from-poland-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (Mushrooms—Poland, prelim AD review) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/polyethylene-retail-carrier-bags-from-malaysia-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ (PRCBs—Malaysia, final AD review) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/polyethylene-retail-carrier-bags-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (PRCBs—China, final AD review) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/circular-welded-carbon-steel-standard-pipe-and-tube-products-from-the-republic-of-turkiye-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ (CWP—Türkiye, prelim AD review) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbazole-violet-pigment-23-from-india-final-results-of-fourth-sunset-review-and-revocation-of-countervailing-duty-order/ (CVP‑23—India, CVD revocation) – https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbazole-violet-pigment-23-from-india-and-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-sunset-reviews-and-revocation-of-the-antidumping-duty-orders/ (CVP‑23—India & China, AD revocations) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Orders
Decision on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Duties Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Department of Commerce recently announced a decision regarding carbazole violet pigment 23. This pigment comes from India and China. On May 1, 2026, the Department began a review of antidumping duties on this pigment. The review aimed to decide if the duties should continue. No domestic company responded to this review. This resulted in the revocation of these duties. Antidumping duties are taxes on foreign products. They aim to protect domestic businesses from cheap foreign imports. These duties were first put in place in 2004. The main purpose was to prevent unfair pricing from foreign companies. The pigment involved in this case is known by its specific chemical names and formulas. It is also identified under a special code called the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. This helps customs officials classify products. With the revocation, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will stop suspending the liquidation of this pigment. This affects goods entered or withdrawn from warehouses after June 15, 2026. However, products entered before this date will still face the old rules. Reviews can still happen for merchandise entered before the revocation date. The notice was published on August 7, 2026, by Christopher Abbott. Abbott serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. This decision follows the laws and regulations mentioned in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of Fourth Sunset Review and Revocation of Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Ends Special Trade Rules for a Chemical from India Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to change the trade rules for a chemical called carbazole violet pigment 23 that comes from India. On May 1, 2026, the Department started what they call a “sunset review.” This is where they check whether they should keep extra taxes on a product when it is imported into the United States. Carbazole violet pigment 23 is used to make paints and inks. The chemical has a special code, C34H22Cl2N4O2, and is known by its Color Index No. 51319. Normally, if American companies think they need the extra tax to compete with foreign products, they tell the Department they want to be involved. But this time, no American company said they wanted to be involved. Because of this, the Department decided to stop the extra tax starting on August 7, 2026. This decision means that carbazole violet pigment 23 from India can enter the U.S. without the extra tax. But any of the chemical imported before June 15, 2026, will still have to pay it. This change could make it cheaper for companies in the U.S. to buy this pigment from India. But it also means American companies that make similar products might have to adjust because they won’t have the tax to help them compete. The Department made this decision because it follows trade laws that say if nobody shows interest in having the tax, it should be removed. This decision will be managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who will make sure the rules are followed. The Department of Commerce shared this decision in an official notice signed by Christopher Abbott. This change reflects how trade rules can change based on the needs and interests of businesses in the U.S. and those who make the decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Government Announces Preliminary Results in Antidumping Case Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has taken steps in an important trade case. The department looked at whether a Turkish company sold steel pipes in the U.S. for less than the normal value during a certain period. Background of the Case The case is about circular welded carbon steel pipes from Turkey. This review is for the time between May 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025. Borusan Birleşik Boru, a company from Turkey, is the only company being looked at in this review. In 1986, the U.S. started putting antidumping duties on these products because they believed they were being sold in the U.S. for less than they should be. In 2025, Borusan asked for a review of these duties. Preliminary Findings The Commerce Department found that Borusan did sell the steel pipes at less than the normal value. This could mean that their prices in the U.S. were unfair and harmed American companies. The department used specific rules and laws to figure this out. They examined how the pipes were sold and compared the prices. They followed the law set in the Tariff Act of 1930 to make their decision. Weighted Average Dumping Margin For the period being reviewed, the department found that Borusan’s dumping margin was 4.91 percent. This number shows how much lower their prices were compared to what would be normal. Next Steps and Comments Commerce has shared these preliminary results so that interested parties can comment on them. People can send their thoughts on the findings for the next few weeks. Both case briefs and rebuttal briefs can be submitted to provide different perspectives. Future Actions The final decision on this review will come within 120 days from now. Depending on the results, Borusan might have to pay more duties. Responsibilities for Importers Importers need to pay attention to this review. They have to file a special certificate if they want to avoid extra duties. The U.S. government might assume they are not following the rules if they do not file this certificate properly. This preliminary decision is an important step in making sure trade is fair. The U.S. government is working to ensure American companies can compete on a level playing field with foreign products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
United States Department of Commerce Releases Final Review Results on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has released the final results of their review on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China. This review was for the period from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Crown Polyethylene Products is part of the China-wide entity. This means they are not eligible for a special rate. The rate for the China-wide entity remains at 77.57 percent. This rate has not changed because no one asked for a review of it. The department did not change anything from their first review results. Because of this, they did not include any new calculations. When goods come into the US, there is a cash deposit needed. This deposit will stay until new rules are made. Chinese exporters without a special rate pay 77.57 percent. If a Chinese exporter gave goods to another country’s exporter, that rate applies. Importers of these bags need to file a certificate before their goods are processed. This tells whether they have already paid any of these charges. Otherwise, they might have to pay them twice. Lastly, businesses must return private info used in this review. This is important to keep private business info safe. Not doing so can lead to problems with the law. These results are officially published by the Deputy Assistant Secretary. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Final Review on Malaysian Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its final review of the sale of polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Malaysia in the United States. This review shows that these bags were sold at normal value during the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. This decision was published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2026. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a division of the Department of Commerce. The final review included comments from different parties and considered all issues related to the sale of these bags. For instance, changes were made to how the companies Euro SME Sdn Bhd and Euro Nature Green Sdn. Bhd, known collectively as Euro SME, were examined. A weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent was assigned to Euro SME. This result means that the bags they exported to the United States did not have unfairly low prices. For future entries of these bags, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will use these final results to determine duties. Since Euro SME’s margins showed no dumping, CBP will liquidate entries without extra duties. Cash deposit rates will apply differently based on the exporter and producer relationship, continuing at 84.94 percent for others not directly reviewed. These rates will remain until further notice. Parties who import these bags have responsibilities, including filing a certificate regarding antidumping duties. They must also handle proprietary information carefully under administrative protective order rules. This update highlights the ongoing efforts to maintain fair trade practices between Malaysia and the United States regarding plastic bags. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
