U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Tariff Adjustment Procedures for Steel and Aluminum Producers Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new procedures for certain steel and aluminum producers. These procedures relate to Proclamation 10984. This Proclamation addresses tariffs on medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and parts. It also covers buses entering the United States. Proclamation 10984 was issued on October 17, 2025. It aims to secure national security by adjusting tariffs. It also refers back to Proclamations 9704 and 9705 from March 8, 2018. These addressed aluminum and steel imports into the United States.
Lithium Hexafluorophosphate From China
U.S. International Trade Commission Discontinues Lithium Hexafluorophosphate Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On April 14, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission announced important news. They received a letter from a company called Mexichem Fluor Inc. doing business as Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials. This company is based in Boston, Massachusetts. They decided to take back their requests for investigations. These investigations were about a chemical called lithium hexafluorophosphate. It comes from China. The investigations were called antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Department of Commerce did not start these investigations. They follow rules from a law. This law is called the Tariff Act of 1930. The rules are in sections 702(c) and 732(c). Because Mexichem Fluor took back their requests, the Commission has stopped their investigations. These investigations had numbers. They were numbers 701-TA-790 and 731-TA-1778. They were at the preliminary stage. The official end date for these investigations is April 14, 2026. The public can find more information on this matter. They can contact Peter Stebbins at the U.S. International Trade Commission. His phone number is 202-205-2039. People with hearing issues can get information too. They can call the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. If someone has difficulty moving, they can contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000 for help. More details about the Commission can be found online. Their website is https://www.usitc.gov. The public can also look at the electronic records for these cases at https://edis.usitc.gov. The Commission issued this notice on April 20, 2026. The Supervisory Attorney, Susan Orndoff, signed it. This notice was made official on April 22, 2026. It is part of the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 78. The billing code for this is 7020-02-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Energy Drinks Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received an important complaint related to energy drinks. This complaint is titled “Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof” with docket number 3902. The complaint comes from Monster Energy Company. Monster Energy says there are violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This involves importing certain energy drinks into the United States. The company believes that some products and their packaging are illegal when brought into the U.S., sold for importation, or sold after importation. The complaint names several companies that are allegedly involved in this issue. These companies are from different places, including Florida, New York, Illinois, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Texas, Michigan, Panama, and New Jersey. Monster Energy Company is asking the USITC to take certain actions. They want a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also want a bond on the allegedly infringing products during a 60-day Presidential review period. The USITC is asking for comments from the public and interested parties. The comments should focus on public interest issues that the complaint raises. People can share their views on whether the relief requested by Monster Energy would affect health and welfare in the U.S., or impact competition or consumers. The Commission is interested in knowing how the energy drinks are used in the country. They want to know if there are any health, safety, or welfare concerns. The USITC is also looking for feedback on whether there are other products made in the U.S. that can replace the imported energy drinks. They also want to know if there is enough supply in the U.S. to replace these products. The Commission is also interested in how the orders requested by Monster Energy would impact U.S. consumers. We encourage people to write their feedback and submit it through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System. The deadline for submitting these comments is eight days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. The Commission might ask for more comments after any further decisions are made in this investigation. If anyone wants to submit documents confidentially, they must request confidential treatment. All non-confidential submissions will be available for public viewing. Submissions must be electronic, as no paper documents will be accepted right now. This investigation is important because it relates to the U.S. economy and consumers. It also involves big names in the energy drink market. We will keep following this story and will provide updates as they become available. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Antitrust Division Briefing 2026-04-23
Justice Department, Antitrust Division Briefing 2026-04-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07900/notice-pursuant-to-the-defense-production-act-of-1950 Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division Content: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ("DPA"), that the Acting Assistant Attorney General finds, with respect to the Implementing Voluntary Agreements Under the Defense Production Act ("Voluntary Agreement") proposed by the Department of Energy ("DOE"), that the purposes of section 708(c)(1) of the DPA may not reasonably be achieved through plans of action having less anticompetitive effects or without any plans of action. Given this finding, the proposed Plans of Action may become effective following the publication of this notice. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Reinstatement of a Previously Approved Collection; Title: National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS) Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07895/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-reinstatement-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: The Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Reinstatement of a Previously Approved Collection; Title: Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07893/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-reinstatement-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: The Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 4. Notice Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07892/notice-pursuant-to-the-defense-production-act-of-1950 Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division Content: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ("DPA"), that the Acting Assistant Attorney General finds, with respect to the Implementing Voluntary Agreements Under the Defense Production Act ("Voluntary Agreement") proposed by the Department of Energy ("DOE"), that the purposes of section 708(c)(1) of the DPA may not reasonably be achieved through a voluntary agreement having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement. Given this finding, the proposed revised Voluntary Agreement may become effective following the publication of this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-23
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Procedures for Submissions by Certain Steel and Aluminum Producers Committing to New U.S. Steel or Aluminum Production To Obtain Tariff Adjustments Under Proclamation 10984 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07987/procedures-for-submissions-by-certain-steel-and-aluminum-producers-committing-to-new-us-steel-or Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In Presidential Proclamation 10984 of October 17, 2025 (Adjusting Imports of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Parts, and Buses Into the United States), the President imposed additional tariffs on imports of specified medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs), medium- and heavy-duty vehicles parts (MHDVPs), and buses to eliminate the threat to national security posed by such imports. That Proclamation also authorized the Secretary of Commerce to reduce tariffs owed under Proclamation 9704 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Aluminum Into the United States) as amended, and Proclamation 9705 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Steel Into the United States) as amended, for certain steel and aluminum producers operating production facilities in Canada or Mexico, based on newly committed U.S. production capacity. This notice establishes procedures for submission and review of documentation substantiating new U.S. production capacity commitments and eligibility for adjusted tariffs by the Department of Commerce. 2. Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07979/certain-activated-carbon-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain exporters under review sold certain activated carbon (activated carbon) from the People's Republic of China (China) in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 3. Certain Preserved Mushrooms From the Netherlands: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07867/certain-preserved-mushrooms-from-the-netherlands-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Okechamp B.V. (Okechamp) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 3, 2022, through April 30, 2024. 4. Wooden Cabinet and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Recission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07866/wooden-cabinet-and-vanities-and-components-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree) and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM) made sales of wooden cabinets and vanities and components thereof (cabinets) at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-23
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07962/notice-of-receipt-of-complaint-solicitation-of-comments-relating-to-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Energy Drinks and Labeling and Packaging Thereof, DN 3902; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2. Lithium Hexafluorophosphate From China Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/23/2026-07875/lithium-hexafluorophosphate-from-china Sub: International Trade Commission Content: On April 14, 2026, the Department of Commerce and the Commission received a letter from petitioner in the subject investigations, Mexichem Fluor Inc. dba Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials, Boston, Massachusetts, withdrawing its petitions. Commerce has not initiated investigations as provided for in sections 702(c) and 732(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671a(c) and 1673a(c)). Accordingly, the Commission gives notice that its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations concerning lithium hexafluorophosphate from China (Investigation Nos. 701-TA-790 and 731- TA-1778 (Preliminary)) are discontinued. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-22
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-22 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers one event involving the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The case relates to Section 337 proceedings addressing alleged patent infringement concerning light-based physiological measurement devices. The key policy instrument used is the ITC’s limited exclusion order (LEO). The Commission determined not to review an administrative law judge’s finding that redesigned products do not infringe, concluding the combined modification and enforcement proceeding. 2) Updates by Authority International Trade Commission (ITC — U.S. International Trade Commission) Light-Based Physiological Measurement Devices — Section 337 Enforcement/Modification Determination (TRADE_REMEDY) The U.S. International Trade Commission announced it would not review the administrative law judge’s combined recommended determination on modification and enforcement in Investigation No. 337-TA-1276. The Commission found that the accused redesigned devices did not infringe Masimo Corporation’s asserted patents and therefore should not be excluded under the limited exclusion order originally issued in the case involving Apple Inc. This determination effectively terminates the proceeding. Key Details: – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key Identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1276 (Enforcement/Modification) – Key Dates: Commission vote on April 17, 2026; notice published April 22, 2026 – China Indicator: NONE – Parties Involved: Masimo Corporation, Cercacor Laboratories, Inc., and Apple Inc. – Outcome: Commission decided not to review the ALJ’s finding; redesigned products were determined not to infringe and should not be excluded under the existing LEO. Source: – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-light-based-physiological-measurement-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-not-to-review-a-combined-recommended-determination-on-modification-and-enforcement-in/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC concluded its review under Section 337 concerning light-based physiological measurement devices. – The Commission upheld the ALJ’s finding that Apple’s redesigned products do not infringe Masimo’s patents. – The limited exclusion order remains in place but does not cover the redesigned products found non-infringing. – The decision finalizes the modification and enforcement proceeding initiated in late 2025. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – ITC — Light-Based Physiological Measurement Devices Determination 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Light-Based Physiological Measurement Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review a Combined Recommended Determination on Modification and Enforcement Initial Determination; Termination of Proceeding
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Investigation into Apple’s Redesigned Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the conclusion of its investigation into Apple Inc.’s redesigned light-based physiological measurement devices. The investigation, known as No. 337-TA-1276, focused on whether Apple’s new devices infringed upon patents held by Masimo Corporation and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc. The investigation began in August 2021. Masimo and Cercacor alleged that Apple’s devices violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by infringing on their patents. The ITC found that some of Apple’s products did infringe certain patent claims. In October 2023, the ITC issued a final decision. They found that some of Apple’s products violated specific claims of Masimo’s patents. The ITC issued a limited exclusion order (LEO) and a cease and desist order against Apple. In September 2025, Masimo requested the ITC to modify the orders. They wanted clarification on whether Apple’s new product designs still violated their patents. In November 2025, the ITC started a new proceeding to examine Apple’s redesigned devices. The goal was to see if these products infringed any patents. On March 18, 2026, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decided that Apple’s redesigned products did not violate any of the asserted patent claims. Masimo and Apple each requested a review of this decision. On April 17, 2026, the ITC decided not to review the ALJ’s decision. This means the investigation is now closed. The ITC will not exclude Apple’s redesigned products from the market. This decision was made under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-22
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-22 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Electric Aircraft, Power Systems for Electric Aircraft, and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation; Correction Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/22/2026-07784/certain-electric-aircraft-power-systems-for-electric-aircraft-and-components-thereof-notice-of Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Correction is made to the scope of investigation on the delegation of public interest. 2. Certain Light-Based Physiological Measurement Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review a Combined Recommended Determination on Modification and Enforcement Initial Determination; Termination of Proceeding Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/22/2026-07779/certain-light-based-physiological-measurement-devices-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review a combined recommended determination on modification and enforcement initial determination ("EID") of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), finding that the accused redesigned products do not infringe the asserted patents, and therefore, they should not be excluded pursuant to the terms of the limited exclusion order. 3. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Algeria; Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/22/2026-07778/steel-concrete-reinforcing-bar-from-algeria-determination Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-21
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-21 1) Executive Summary Three China-related notices were published today by the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). The updates include two expedited five-year (sunset) reviews under the antidumping and countervailing duty laws covering Chinese imports of passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires and wood mouldings and millwork products. In addition, the Commission issued a procedural notice seeking public comments on proposed modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) to align with new amendments adopted by the World Customs Organization. The instruments involved are primarily antidumping/countervailing duty reviews and a procedural tariff schedule amendment process under Section 1205 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (USITC) Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China — AD/CVD Expedited Review (TRADE_REMEDY) The USITC announced the scheduling of expedited five-year (sunset) reviews to determine whether revocation of the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires from China would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission determined that domestic responses were adequate while respondent participation was inadequate, justifying expedited procedures under Section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930. – Authority: United States International Trade Commission – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-522 and 731-TA-1258 (Second Review) – Key Dates: Staff report to be made available June 2, 2026; comments due June 9, 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/passenger-vehicle-and-light-truck-pvlt-tires-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China — AD/CVD Expedited Review (TRADE_REMEDY) The Commission scheduled expedited reviews to evaluate whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China would likely cause the continuation or recurrence of material injury. The domestic industry response was deemed adequate while respondent participation was inadequate, leading to expedited review procedures under Section 751(c). – Authority: United States International Trade Commission – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-636 and 731-TA-1470 (Review) – Key Dates: Staff report due May 22, 2026; written comments due May 29, 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/wood-mouldings-and-millwork-products-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews/ Harmonized Tariff Schedule Amendments — Procedural Notice (POLICY_NOTICE) The USITC issued a notice inviting public comments on proposed recommendations to the President to modify the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. The changes would align U.S. tariff nomenclature with new amendments adopted by the World Customs Organization (WCO) that take effect January 1, 2028. Investigation No. 1205-14 also considers subdividing HTS subheading 3004.90.92 covering medicaments into nine new subheadings to accommodate future statistical needs. Comments on the proposed recommendations are due by May 18, 2026, and the Commission plans to submit its final report to the President in December 2026. – Authority: United States International Trade Commission – Policy Type: PROCEDURAL_NOTICE – Event Type: POLICY_NOTICE – China Indicator: NONE – Investigation No.: 1205-14 – Key Dates: Comments due May 18, 2026; report to President expected December 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/recommended-modifications-in-the-harmonized-tariff-schedule/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The USITC is conducting expedited five-year reviews of existing AD/CVD orders on Chinese PVLT tires and on wood mouldings and millwork products. Both reviews found inadequate participation from Chinese or respondent parties, prompting the use of expedited procedures. The Commission is also seeking public input on planned modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to align with WCO amendments effective in 2028. The HTS review includes a proposal to subdivide a medicaments tariff line to expand statistical tracking capacity. Key comment deadlines for stakeholders fall between May and June 2026. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires – Expedited AD/CVD Review Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products – Expedited AD/CVD Review Harmonized Tariff Schedule – Procedural Notice 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From China, Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Wood Products from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is conducting reviews of wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China. These reviews are identified as Investigation Nos. 701-TA-636 and 731-TA-1470. The purpose of the reviews is to decide if cancelling certain duty orders on these products might lead to harm to U.S. industry. The duty orders in question are antidumping and countervailing duties. The reviews will be expedited, meaning they will proceed quickly. This decision was made because the response from domestic groups was strong, while the response from groups in China was weak. Comments about the review should be submitted by May 29, 2026. Participants will not be allowed to include new factual information in these comments. If any comments contain sensitive business information, they must adhere to specific rules set by the Commission. The USITC also announced that these reviews are very complex. Because of this, the Commission has decided to extend the review period by an extra 90 days. The USITC scheduled these reviews and published notice of them on April 7, 2026. The Commission issued the notice in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 76, which came out on April 21, 2026. The document number is 2026-07684. If you want more information, you can visit the USITC’s website at www.usitc.gov or check out their electronic docket system at edis.usitc.gov. Contact Alexis Yim at the USITC for any questions or more details. Her phone number is 202-708-1446. For those with hearing impairments, the TDD terminal number is 202-205-1810. You can also contact the Office of the Secretary if you need special help accessing the Commission. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on April 16, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck (PVLT) Tires From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
USITC Announces Expedited Reviews on Economic Measures Related to PVLT Tires from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced plans to begin expedited reviews on specific economic measures. These reviews will focus on antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders. The primary concern is passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires imported from China. The expedited reviews are under the Tariff Act of 1930. They aim to decide if removing these orders will cause harm to the U.S. industry. This review checks if ongoing or future damage is likely. The expedited process will help determine this quickly. The review decision date was April 7, 2026. The USITC staff has prepared a report with important information for the reviews. Parties involved in the review will receive it by June 2, 2026. A version without sensitive information will be available later. Comments from interested parties or related groups are due by June 9, 2026. These comments cannot include new facts. The review is complex, so the USITC may extend it by 90 days if needed. This step ensures a careful and thorough evaluation. The reviews are part of routine procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. For more details, the USITC website provides additional resources and information on this matter. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Recommended Modifications in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
Proposed Changes to U.S. Tariff Schedule: Public Comments Welcome Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is thinking about making changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. These changes aim to align with updates recommended by the World Customs Organization (WCO). The modifications are set to take effect on January 1, 2028. On April 17, 2026, the Commission shared its proposed recommendations on its website. Federal agencies and the public have until May 18, 2026, to send in their written opinions on these recommendations. These updates are important because they help keep the U.S. HTS in line with global customs guidelines. The Commission will send a report with its recommendations to the President in December 2026. This report will include a summary of all the feedback it receives. A big part of the proposed changes involves HTS subheading 3004.90.92. This part covers specific medicaments—a type of medicine. Right now, there are over 70 different codes under this heading. The ITC wants to split it into nine new subheadings. This will create more space for new codes in the future. Government officials, businesses, and other interested parties can view and comment on the proposed changes. They can find more information on the ITC’s website under “Investigation No. 1205-14.” For those with special needs, access assistance is available at the Commission’s office. All comments must be sent electronically and received by 5:15 p.m. on May 18, 2026. If the comments include confidential business information, they need to meet specific guidelines for submission. The Commission’s final report will provide a summary of the feedback and detail the likely economic impact of the changes. This ensures that any modification is well-informed and considers various perspectives. The overall goal of these proposed updates is to improve the efficiency and accuracy of U.S. customs processes. Your participation is crucial. Share your thoughts by the deadline to have your voice heard. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-04-21
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-04-21 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: AJNA Biosciences Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07698/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-ajna-biosciences Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: AJNA Biosciences has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 2. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: VA Cooperative Studies Program Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07697/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-va-cooperative-studies-program Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: VA Cooperative Studies Program has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 3. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Leading Pharma LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07696/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-leading-pharma-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Leading Pharma LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-21
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-21 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Recommended Modifications in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07753/recommended-modifications-in-the-harmonized-tariff-schedule Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission is seeking comments from interested Federal agencies and the public regarding proposed Commission recommendations to the President with respect to modifications to the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). The modifications would conform the HTS to recommended amendments adopted by the World Customs Organization (WCO) and that are scheduled to enter into force on January 1, 2028. 2. Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck (PVLT) Tires From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07693/passenger-vehicle-and-light-truck-pvlt-tires-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on passenger vehicle and light truck (PVLT) tires from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3. Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From China, Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/21/2026-07684/wood-mouldings-and-millwork-products-from-china-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order on wood mouldings and millwork products from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fan Zhang Appointed Director of Jingsh National Corporate Law Committee
Fan Zhang Appointed Director of Jingsh National Corporate Law Committee Home › News & Insights › Corporate Law › Appointment: Director, Corporate Law Committee Professional Appointment Fan Zhang Appointed Director of Jingsh National Corporate Law Committee Dual China-U.S. qualified lawyer brings multidisciplinary expertise — FCIArb, DIAC Arbitrator, ACCA — to lead corporate governance and compliance across Jingsh’s 95-office global network Legal · News · April 21, 2026 · 6 min read Letter of Appointment — Jingsh Law Firm (National) Corporate Law Professional Committee, April 18, 2026 When a lawyer holds qualifications on both sides of the Pacific, practices before international arbitration tribunals, and speaks the language of both boardrooms and courtrooms, it signals something beyond conventional legal expertise. Beijing Jingsh Law Firm has recognized this rare convergence by appointing Fan Zhang as Director of its National Corporate Law Professional Committee — a role that places her at the center of corporate legal strategy across the firm’s 57 domestic offices and 38 international branches. The appointment, effective April 18, 2026, reflects the firm’s assessment of Zhang’s capabilities in an arena where corporate governance, cross-border transactions, and regulatory compliance intersect. For clients navigating the China-U.S. business corridor, this means access to leadership-level corporate legal guidance informed by direct experience in both jurisdictions. The Distinction of Dual Qualification Zhang’s legal authority spans two of the world’s largest economies. She is licensed to practice in China and holds active admission to the State Bar of California, along with federal court standing across multiple U.S. circuits and district courts. This dual qualification is a structural advantage for enterprises engaged in cross-border formation, equity transactions, and regulatory compliance. Specifically, her U.S. admissions include practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Ninth Circuit, the U.S. District Courts for the Central and Northern Districts of California, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. For clients, this means counsel who can advise on both Chinese corporate law and U.S. federal litigation strategy without the delays and coordination costs of multi-firm engagement. A Profile Built on Four Disciplines What distinguishes Zhang’s practice is not a single qualification but the deliberate integration of four professional domains. Her background combines legal practice with finance, international commerce, and accounting — a structure that reflects how modern corporate problems actually present themselves. Key Credentials at a Glance 1 Fellow, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb) — International dispute resolution 2 Arbitrator, Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) 3 Chartered Certified Accountant (ACCA) — Financial analysis and compliance 4 Certified International Trade Finance Professional (CITF) 5 FIDIC Certified Consulting Expert — International construction and engineering contracts 6 RCEP Trainer — Regional trade agreement expertise (CCPIT/CCOIC certified) With bachelor’s degrees in both Finance and Law, and approximately a decade of hands-on experience in corporate operations and investment transactions, Zhang has built a service model that treats legal, financial, and commercial questions as interconnected rather than separate workstreams. This is particularly relevant in complex corporate disputes involving control battles, equity restructuring, and cross-border financing where the legal, financial, and tax implications must be evaluated simultaneously. Multiple Roles, One Platform Zhang’s appointment as Director of the Corporate Law Committee is the latest in a series of leadership positions she holds within Jingsh. These roles collectively reflect the firm’s organizational confidence in her ability to drive practice development across multiple disciplines: Director, Jingsh (National) Commercial Arbitration Committee Director, Jingsh (National) Contract Law Committee Director of Cross-Border Legal Affairs, Jingsh Chengdu Office Practice Lead (Preparatory), Jingsh UAE Office Beyond the firm, she has been designated a Leading Talent in Cross-Border Legal Services by the City of Chengdu and appointed as an Expert of the Economic System Reform Think Tank under the Chengdu Development and Reform Commission. These external recognitions connect her practice to municipal economic policy and regulatory development, giving her advisory work an additional layer of institutional insight. What the Committee Directorship Means for Clients The Jingsh National Corporate Law Professional Committee oversees practice standards, professional development, and knowledge management across the firm’s corporate law practice. As Director, Zhang will shape how the firm’s 95 offices approach corporate legal services — from initial entity formation through governance, transactions, and restructuring or exit. Her practice covers the full lifecycle of enterprise legal needs: Corporate formation and governance structure design Equity architecture and incentive programs Shareholder rights and control dispute resolution Equity transfers, M&A, and post-merger integration Corporate compliance and regulatory frameworks Cross-border investment and financing advisory International commercial arbitration Bankruptcy, liquidation, and restructuring In cross-border matters involving China and the U.S., she draws on direct experience with both countries’ corporate and securities frameworks, combined with international trade rules and arbitration practice. This enables her to address the practical friction points that arise when Chinese enterprises expand overseas or when foreign investors enter the Chinese market — issues that often involve governance alignment, financial structuring, and dispute resolution planning in addition to legal compliance. I will fully leverage my dual China-U.S. lawyer’s qualifications and multidisciplinary background to actively participate in theoretical research, practice seminars, and professional development initiatives. My goal is to promote the integration of cutting-edge corporate law theory with judicial practice, help enterprises enhance their compliance governance, and contribute to the high-quality development of the commercial legal services industry. — Fan Zhang, Director, Jingsh National Corporate Law Committee Looking Forward Zhang’s appointment arrives at a moment when corporate legal practice is being reshaped by regulatory divergence between China and the U.S., evolving cross-border investment rules, and increasing scrutiny of corporate governance standards. The combination of her jurisdictional breadth, multidisciplinary training, and operational experience positions the committee to respond to these challenges with guidance that is both technically precise and commercially informed. For enterprises seeking corporate legal counsel, this signals that Jingsh is investing in leadership that can operate across the boundaries that traditionally separate legal, financial, and commercial advisory functions. Whether the issue is a domestic governance question or a cross-border transaction requiring alignment of Chinese and U.S. legal requirements, the underlying value proposition
US Highlights 2026-04-20
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-20 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers two trade remedy developments involving the U.S. Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration). Both events concern preliminary determinations of circumvention of antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on disposable aluminum containers from China. The determinations address production in Thailand and Vietnam that utilizes Chinese-origin aluminum foil. The policy instruments involved include AD/CVD circumvention inquiries, suspension of liquidation, and certification requirements for importers and exporters. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Disposable Aluminum Containers from Thailand — AD/CVD Circumvention (Preliminary Determination) The U.S. Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that imports of disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids completed in Thailand using aluminum foil produced in China circumvent existing AD and CVD orders on aluminum containers from China. Commerce found that such products are sufficiently linked to Chinese production to fall within the scope of the original China orders. Interested parties may submit comments and request a hearing. Key Details: – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Investigation Numbers: A-570-170, C-570-171 (Third-country case numbers A-549-170, C-549-171) – Determination Date: April 15, 2026; Applicable April 20, 2026 – Action: Suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements for entries on or after October 28, 2024; certification mechanism established for non-Chinese aluminum foil inputs – Comment Deadline: 14 days from Federal Register publication; rebuttals due 7 days thereafter – Hearing Request Deadline: 30 days from publication – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/disposable-aluminum-containers-pans-trays-and-lids-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-circumvention-of-the-antidumping-duty-and-countervailing-duty-orders/ Disposable Aluminum Containers from Vietnam — AD/CVD Circumvention (Preliminary Determination) Commerce preliminarily determined that aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids completed in Vietnam using aluminum foil of Chinese origin circumvent the AD and CVD orders on aluminum containers from China. The country-wide finding includes suspension of liquidation requirements and imposes certification obligations for importers and exporters claiming non-Chinese inputs. Interested parties are invited to provide written comments and request hearings under standard administrative procedures. Key Details: – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Investigation Numbers: A-570-170, C-570-171 (Third-country case numbers A-552-170, C-552-171) – Determination Date: April 15, 2026; Applicable April 20, 2026 – Action: Suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements for entries on or after October 28, 2024; certified non-Chinese aluminum sources may be exempted – Comment Deadline: 14 days from publication; rebuttals due 7 days thereafter – Hearing Request Deadline: 30 days from publication – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/disposable-aluminum-containers-pans-trays-and-lids-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-circumvention-of-the-antidumping-duty-and-countervailing-duty-orders-2/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The Department of Commerce issued parallel preliminary determinations addressing circumvention of AD/CVD orders on disposable aluminum containers from China. – Both determinations apply to production in third countries—Thailand and Vietnam—using Chinese-origin aluminum foil. – Commerce directed suspension of liquidation and collection of cash deposits for affected entries beginning October 28, 2024. – Certification procedures are introduced for importers and exporters to document non-Chinese aluminum inputs. – Public comment and hearing opportunities are available before Commerce issues final determinations. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – Federal Register Notice – Thailand Aluminum Containers Circumvention Determination – Federal Register Notice – Vietnam Aluminum Containers Circumvention Determination 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Disposable Aluminum Containers, Pans, Trays, and Lids From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention in Aluminum Container Imports Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision regarding aluminum containers from Vietnam. These containers are made using aluminum foil from China. The Department believes these imports are avoiding duties on aluminum containers from China. This decision may affect many imports. Companies and parties interested are encouraged to comment on this preliminary determination. Background and Investigation Timeline The investigation started in July 2025. The Department wanted to know if aluminum containers made in Vietnam with Chinese foil were bypassing trade rules. This came after antidumping and countervailing duty orders were put on similar Chinese products in May 2025. Due to government shutdowns, the investigation faced delays. On January 16, 2026, the deadline for a preliminary decision was moved to April 15, 2026. Scope of the Orders The orders focus on disposable containers, pans, trays, and lids. These products are usually made from flat-rolled aluminum. When these products are made in Vietnam using Chinese foil, they might be avoiding U.S. duties. Preliminary Determination The Department thinks these imports from Vietnam are circumventing duties meant for China. This means duties might apply to these imports in the future. Impact on Importers and Exporters Importers must provide certifications stating their products are not made with Chinese foil. If they can’t prove it, they must follow the rules for imports from China, including paying duties. Certifications must be submitted at the time of entry. Public Comment and Next Steps Interested parties can submit their views and comments on this determination. They must do so within 14 days after the notice is published. There are processes and deadlines for submitting additional information and requesting hearings. Certifications Companies importing products can certify their goods are not affected by these determinations. Both importers and exporters need to keep documentation to prove compliance with these certifications. Conclusion The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking steps to address potential circumvention of duties on aluminum containers. All parties involved in these kinds of imports and exports need to pay close attention to compliance requirements and deadlines. Further actions and adjustments will depend on the final decisions made by the Department after public and industry feedback. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Disposable Aluminum Containers, Pans, Trays, and Lids From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Duties on Aluminum Containers from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes Published: 2026-04-20 The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important announcement. It found that some products made with aluminum from China are avoiding extra duties. This process is called “circumvention.” The products in question are disposable aluminum containers. These include pans, trays, and lids. They are being made in Thailand using aluminum that comes from China. After that, they are sent to the United States. The aim of this determination is to close any loopholes in the regulations. Commerce wants to ensure that duties on certain products are properly applied. These products are bound by antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These are meant to protect U.S. businesses from unfair foreign trade practices. Commerce made a preliminary finding on April 15, 2026. It invited comments from all interested parties. The circumvention inquiry began because of the AD and CVD orders published in May 2025. Commerce began looking into the matter on July 11, 2025. They were checking if products made in Thailand with Chinese materials were avoiding duties. Two companies in Thailand were chosen for this investigation. They are Peak Legends (Thailand) Co., Ltd. and Wohler Household Products (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Due to government shutdowns, the investigation deadlines were extended. This pushed the preliminary determination date to April 15, 2026. The result of this investigation will affect duties. Importers to the United States must now be more careful. They will need to provide certifications to avoid duties. For products from Thailand entering the U.S. since October 28, 2024, importers must complete certifications. These documents show products were not made with Chinese materials. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will use these certifications to decide if duties apply. If the conditions are not met, duties at high rates may apply. Importers and exporters must keep records of certifications. These include documents like commercial invoices and aluminum mill certificates. They must keep these records for at least five years. Commerce has invited public comments on these certification rules. They also set deadlines for the submission of briefs and hearing requests. This decision by the Department of Commerce underscores the importance of strict trade regulations. The move protects U.S. industries from unfair competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department, Antitrust Division Briefing 2026-04-20
Justice Department Briefing 2026-04-20 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Extension of Compliance Dates for Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/20/2026-07663/extension-of-compliance-dates-for-nondiscrimination-on-the-basis-of-disability-accessibility-of-web Sub: Justice Department Content: By this Interim Final Rule ("IFR"), the Department of Justice ("Department") is revising the regulations implementing title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") to extend the compliance dates for the requirements for web content and mobile application ("app") accessibility that were adopted on April 24, 2024. The compliance date for State and local government entities with a total population of 50,000 or more is extended from April 24, 2026, to April 26, 2027. The compliance date for public entities with a total population of less than 50,000, or any special district government, is extended from April 26, 2027, to April 26, 2028. 2. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Blockchain Security Standards Council, Inc. Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/20/2026-07658/notice-pursuant-to-the-national-cooperative-research-and-production-act-of-1993-blockchain-security Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-20
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-20 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Disposable Aluminum Containers, Pans, Trays, and Lids From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/20/2026-07660/disposable-aluminum-containers-pans-trays-and-lids-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids (aluminum containers), completed in Thailand using aluminum foil produced in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum containers from China. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 2. Disposable Aluminum Containers, Pans, Trays, and Lids From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/20/2026-07659/disposable-aluminum-containers-pans-trays-and-lids-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of disposable aluminum containers, pans, trays, and lids (aluminum containers), completed in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) using aluminum foil produced in the People's Republic of China (China), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum containers from China. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-17
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-17 1) Executive Summary Five trade-related events are covered in today’s briefing. The authorities involved include the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA). The actions involve Section 337 investigations (ITC) and antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings (ITA). Policy instruments referenced include exclusion orders, cease and desist orders, administrative reviews, and rescission notices. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC – U.S. International Trade Commission) Certain Crafting Machines and Components — Section 337 Review and Public Submissions (TRADE_REMEDY)The ITC announced that it will review in part the Administrative Law Judge’s final initial determination finding a violation of Section 337 relating to certain crafting machines and components. The review focuses on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The Commission seeks written comments on remedy, public interest, and bonding. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1426 Key dates: Submissions due April 28, 2026; replies due May 5, 2026; Commission vote April 14, 2026. Respondents: Multiple entities in China, including Vevor and HTVRONT; complainant is Cricut, Inc. Source: Link Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles — Public Interest Submissions Requested (TRADE_REMEDY)The ITC is seeking public interest comments following an Initial Determination on violation of Section 337 regarding motorized self-balancing vehicles. The ALJ issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding. The requested submissions focus on potential impacts of a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order on public health, welfare, competition, and consumers in the United States. Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1440 Key dates: Submissions due by May 14, 2026; Initial Determination issued April 10, 2026. Respondents: Gotrax and Zhejiang TaoTao Vehicles Co., Ltd. Source: Link DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (International Trade Administration – ITA) Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber (Republic of Korea) — Antidumping Duty Final Results (TRADE_REMEDY)Commerce issued its final results in the administrative review covering August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Inc. (TAK) was found to have made sales of low melt polyester staple fiber at less than normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 3.02 percent. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Key identifiers: A‑580‑895 Key date: Final results signed April 13, 2026. Source: Link Phosphate Fertilizers (Russian Federation) — Countervailing Duty Final Results (TRADE_REMEDY)Commerce announced final results of the 2023 countervailing duty administrative review for phosphate fertilizers from Russia. Joint Stock Company Apatit received countervailable subsidies at a rate of 12.71 percent. The determination includes revised subsidy calculations following comments from interested parties. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Key identifiers: C‑821‑825 Key date: Final results signed April 13, 2026. Source: Link Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products (United Kingdom) — Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review (TRADE_REMEDY)Commerce rescinded the 2024–2025 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cold‑rolled steel flat products from the United Kingdom. The rescission followed confirmation that there were no reviewable suspended entries of subject merchandise during the period of review. Cash deposit requirements remain unchanged. Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: NONE Key identifiers: A‑412‑824 Key date: Notice issued April 14, 2026. Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC is reviewing a Section 337 case on crafting machines involving multiple Chinese respondents; written public submissions are due in April and May 2026. The ITC also seeks public comments on possible exclusion and cease and desist orders for motorized self‑balancing vehicles related to Chinese supplier Zhejiang TaoTao. Commerce’s final AD review for Korea’s low melt polyester staple fiber confirmed sales below normal value with a 3.02 percent dumping margin. Commerce’s final CVD review found Russian producer JSC Apatit received countervailable subsidies at 12.71 percent. Commerce rescinded an AD review of cold‑rolled steel from the UK due to absence of reviewable entries. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Crafting Machines – ITC Section 337 Review Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles – ITC Public Interest Notice Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber – Korea AD Final Phosphate Fertilizers – Russia CVD Final Cold-Rolled Steel – UK AD Review Rescission 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the United Kingdom: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Antidumping Duty Review on Cold-Rolled Steel from the UK Rescinded Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding cold-rolled steel from the United Kingdom. They have decided to rescind, or cancel, the administrative review on antidumping duties for the period from September 1, 2024, to August 31, 2025. Antidumping duties are extra charges on products from other countries that are sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S. This can hurt U.S. companies. The review was supposed to check if the right amount of extra duties was being charged on cold-rolled steel from the UK during the review period. The review was canceled because there were no entries of cold-rolled steel from the UK into the U.S. during that time. Without any entries to review for that period, the U.S. Commerce Department decided there was no need to proceed with the review. This decision means that the current cash deposit rates for cold-rolled steel from the UK will stay the same. Cash deposit rates are the extra money importers pay when bringing goods into the U.S. The Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to handle any duties owed. The duties will be equal to the cash deposits made when the goods first arrived in the U.S. For those involved in the case and have access to private information protected under Administrative Protective Order (APO), they must follow certain rules about handling this information. They must either return or destroy this information properly. The decision was officially documented on April 14, 2026, and signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. This information was published in the Federal Register, a daily journal of the United States government, on April 17, 2026. This publication is important for keeping everyone informed and ensuring transparency in government actions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Subsidies in Russian Phosphate Fertilizers Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of an administrative review concerning phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation. These fertilizers are produced by Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit). The Department found that JSC Apatit received subsidies from the Russian government during 2023. The review covered the period from January 1 to December 31, 2023. This review is part of the Department’s efforts to ensure fair trade practices. The results became applicable on April 17, 2026. The Department determined that JSC Apatit received a subsidy rate of 12.71 percent. This means that JSC Apatit benefitted from financial contributions by the Russian government that are specific to them. As a result, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will assess duties on JSC Apatit’s phosphate fertilizers. The Department extended the deadline for its final results several times due to various delays, including a government shutdown. The final results were completed by April 13, 2026. The Department used specific methods to review the subsidies. It looked into different government programs that might have helped JSC Apatit. The review also considered comments from interested parties. Each subsidy program was examined to ensure that it provided specific financial help to JSC Apatit. The Department used various data prompts to calculate the subsidy amounts. The Department will issue instructions to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect duties on these subsidies. The duties will apply to products entering the U.S. on or after the date of publication of the review. The results of this review highlight the Department’s ongoing work to maintain fair trade by ensuring that foreign companies do not benefit unfairly from government subsidies. These findings are important for U.S. businesses competing in the fertilizer market. The final report includes detailed discussions of issues raised during the review process. This includes the use of facts available and adverse facts available regarding data on file. For more detailed information, parties with interests can refer to the full Issues and Decision Memorandum. This document is accessible online for any registered users. The Department also issued a reminder to parties subject to the Administrative Protective Order about the proper handling of sensitive information. These actions reflect the U.S. Department of Commerce’s commitment to enforcing trade laws and ensuring fair competition in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Korean Fiber Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes April 17, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has concluded an investigation into imports of low melt polyester staple fiber from the Republic of Korea. This inquiry was focused on the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The findings indicate that Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Inc. (TAK) sold this type of fiber at prices lower than its regular value in the U.S. market. This activity is known as dumping. The department determined that the margin by which the fiber was sold below normal value was 3.02 percent. A margin tells us the extent to which the price was cut. This decision follows a preliminary finding issued in February 2026. During the review process, TAK submitted comments on the initial results. However, the Commerce Department did not make any changes to the final calculations from the preliminary findings. The original investigation into this type of fiber began with an antidumping order in August 2018. This order targets synthetic staple fibers that melt at low temperatures, specifically designed for certain manufacturing uses. The review was delayed due to government shutdowns and document backlogs last year. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess and apply the appropriate duties to shipments covered by this review. The duties are designed to bring the import prices closer to the usual market values and protect American producers from unfair foreign pricing. The department has also outlined the new cash deposit requirements. These deposits are a form of security for future imports and must be made for all new shipments entering the U.S. They vary depending on whether the producer or exporter was covered in this or previous reviews. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to certify that no antidumping duties have been reimbursed, which could lead to penalty duties if not complied with. This action is part of continued efforts by the U.S. government to enforce fair trade and ensure a level playing field for domestic industries. This notice was signed and dated April 13, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Seeks Public Comments On Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments regarding an ongoing investigation. This inquiry involves certain motorized self-balancing vehicles. On April 10, 2026, a judge appointed by the ITC issued an Initial Determination. This determination concerns a possible violation of Section 337. Additionally, the judge recommended certain actions related to remedy and bonding if a violation is confirmed. The ITC is now asking for public input on issues that could affect the public. Comments are welcome from both the public and government agencies. The Commission is considering whether to exclude specific motorized self-balancing vehicles. These vehicles are imported and sold by companies named Golabs Inc., known as Gotrax, and Zhejiang TaoTao Vehicles Co., Ltd. The investigation involves possible infringement on two patents, namely U.S. Patent Nos. RE46,964 and RE49,608. The ITC is also considering issuing a cease and desist order against Gotrax. Comments should be filed by May 14, 2026. The ITC wants to understand how the possible exclusion of these vehicles might affect public health, the U.S. economy, production of similar products, and U.S. consumers. Further, the ITC is interested in knowing how these vehicles are used in the U.S. It also wants to identify any health or safety concerns related to this case. The Commission seeks information on whether other U.S. companies can make similar products. They are also interested in knowing if these companies can meet the demand if the current products are excluded. To file a comment, individuals must follow specific instructions set by the ITC. It is important to refer to the investigation number 337-TA-1440 in submissions. Comments containing confidential information must be marked and handled as confidential. The ITC’s electronic docket system, EDIS, is used for submissions and accessing case documents. This investigation is carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930, which aims to protect U.S. trade and consumers. The ITC emphasizes the need for input from different stakeholders to make informed decisions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Case on Crafting Machines Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is reviewing a case involving crafting machines. This investigation is called Investigation No. 337-TA-1426. It started because a company named Cricut, Inc. complained about certain machines being imported into the United States. They say these machines infringe on their patents. The case includes several patents. These are important legal protections for inventions. Cricut claims that other companies are using their patented ideas without permission. This is against Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation began on December 11, 2024. The complaint involves crafting machines and their parts. Cricut says these machines infringe on six of their patents. The patents are numbered U.S. Patent No. 11,208,758, U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646, U.S. Design Patent No. D893,563, U.S. Design Patent No. D910,724, U.S. Design Patent No. D926,237, and U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. The investigation names several companies from China as respondents. These companies include Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co. Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sishun E-Commerce Co., Ltd., LiPing Zhan, Hunan Sijiu Technology, Co. Ltd., Guangdong Rongtu Technology Co., Ltd., and SainStore Technology Co., Ltd. Some companies have already been found in default. A company is in “default” when it does not respond or participate in the investigation. These companies are part of two groups called the Vevor Respondents and Konduone. Default findings mean that these companies did not defend themselves in the case. The investigation also includes a review of a new type of crafting machine made by HTVRONT. This review is to decide if the new machine infringes on Cricut’s patents. On January 21, 2026, a decision was made. The decision found that Konduone violated Section 337 as to some patents. It also found that the Vevor Respondents violated Section 337 for a specific design patent. However, it found no violation for other patents because Cricut did not provide evidence for those. If the final decision finds violations, it could result in an exclusion order. An exclusion order would stop these machines from being imported into the U.S. Another possible outcome is a cease and desist order. This would stop the companies from selling these machines in the U.S. The ITC is now asking for written comments from the public and interested parties. They want to know how any orders might affect the public and the economy. They also want to know if any bond should be required during a review period. The ITC has set deadlines for these comments. They should be submitted by April 28, 2026. There can be replies to these submissions by May 5, 2026. The outcome of this investigation is important. It will decide if the machines will continue to be sold or imported into the United States. It is also an important case for those who hold patents, as it deals with protecting inventions. By order of the Commission, this investigation and its details are part of the official record. This ensures a fair and thorough process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-04-17
Justice Department Briefing 2026-04-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval has Expired: Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA) Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07567/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-reinstatement-with Sub: Justice Department Content: The Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice (DOJ) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 2. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Usona Institute, Inc. Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07562/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-usona-institute-inc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Usona Institute, Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 3. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Royal Emerald Pharmaceuticals Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07561/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-royal-emerald-pharmaceuticals Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Royal Emerald Pharmaceuticals has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 4. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Quagen Pharmaceuticals LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07559/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-quagen-pharmaceuticals-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Quagen Pharmaceuticals LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 5. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: LTS Therapy Systems, LLC Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07558/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-lts-therapy-systems-llc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: LTS Therapy Systems, LLC has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 6. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Drug Use Statement Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07520/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a Sub: Justice Department Content: The Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-17
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07505/low-melt-polyester-staple-fiber-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Inc. (TAK) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. 2. Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07503/phosphate-fertilizers-from-the-russian-federation-final-results-of-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit), a producer/exporter of phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation (Russia), received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 3. Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the United Kingdom: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07502/certain-cold-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-united-kingdom-rescission-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the United Kingdom, covering the period of review (POR) September 1, 2024, through August 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-17
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07511/certain-crafting-machines-and-components-thereof-notice-of-a-commission-determination-to-review-in Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the presiding administrative law judge's ("ALJ") final initial determination ("ID") finding a violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding under the schedule set forth below. 2. Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/17/2026-07506/certain-motorized-self-balancing-vehicles-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on April 10, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-16
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-16 1) Executive Summary This edition covers eight U.S. trade remedy updates published in the Federal Register on April 16, 2026. The main authorities involved include the U.S. Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The measures primarily involve antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings, including administrative reviews, sunset reviews, and new AD/CVD orders. Several actions explicitly reference the People’s Republic of China, focusing on aluminum foil, mobile access equipment, and non-oriented electrical steel. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC – U.S. International Trade Commission) Commodity Matchbooks from India — AD/CVD (Expedited Sunset Reviews) The ITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on commodity matchbooks from India to determine whether revocation would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. The reviews are being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission – Policy Type: AD/CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-459 and 731-TA-1155 (Third Review) – Key Dates: Staff report due May 12, 2026; Public comments due May 19, 2026; other submissions by May 26, 2026. – Link: commodity-matchbooks-from-india-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance) Certain Aluminum Foil from China — AD (Administrative Review Final Results, 2023–2024) Commerce determined that multiple Chinese aluminum foil producers and exporters sold at less than normal value during the review period of April 1, 2023–March 31, 2024. The China-wide entity margin remains 105.80 percent. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: A-570-053 – Key Companies: Dingsheng group (25.76%), Zhongji group (29.10%), five companies with separate rate (27.19%). – China Indicator: Explicit – Link: certain-aluminum-foil-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024 Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Korea — AD (Administrative Review Final Results, 2023–2024) Commerce found that the POSCO single entity did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the review period May 1, 2023–April 30, 2024. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: A-580-887 – Key Entity: POSCO single entity (POSCO and affiliated companies) with a final margin of 0.00%. – Link: carbon-and-alloy-steel-cut-to-length-plate-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024 Silicon Metal from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic — CVD (Final Order) Commerce issued a final CVD order on silicon metal from Laos based on affirmative determinations by both Commerce and the ITC. The subsidy rate is 69.10 percent for all producers. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: C-553-002 – Effective Date: April 16, 2026 – Link: silicon-metal-from-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic-countervailing-duty-order Silicon Metal from Angola and Laos — AD (Final Orders) Commerce issued new antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Angola and Laos following affirmative dumping and injury determinations. Dumping margins are 68.45 percent for Angola and 94.44 percent for Laos. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation IDs: A-762-001 (Angola), A-553-001 (Laos) – Effective Date: April 16, 2026 – Link: silicon-metal-from-angola-and-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic-antidumping-duty-orders Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from Sweden, Germany, China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan — AD (Expedited Second Sunset Reviews) Commerce concluded that revocation of the AD orders would likely result in continued or recurrent dumping, with margins up to 407.52 percent for China and varying by country. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation IDs: A-401-809 et al. – China Indicator: Explicit – Link: non-oriented-electrical-steel-from-sweden-germany-the-peoples-republic-of-china-the-republic-of-korea-taiwan-and-japan-final-results-of-the-expedited-second-sunset-reviews-of-the-antidumping-dut Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China and Taiwan — CVD (Expedited Second Sunset Reviews) Commerce determined that revocation of the CVD orders on NOES from China and Taiwan would lead to recurrence of subsidization. Subsidy rates likely to prevail are 158.88 percent for China and up to 17.12 percent for Taiwan. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: Explicit – Link: non-oriented-electrical-steel-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-taiwan-final-results-of-the-expedited-second-sunset-reviews-of-the-countervailing-duty-orders Certain Mobile Access Equipment from China — AD (Administrative Review Final Results, 2023–2024) Commerce determined that Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. made sales at less than normal value during the review period. The weighted-average dumping margin for Dingli and separate rate respondents is 18.27 percent. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: A-570-139 – China Indicator: Explicit – Link: certain-mobile-access-equipment-and-subassemblies-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024 Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Taiwan — AD (Administrative Review Final Results, 2023–2024) Commerce found C.S. Aluminium Corporation made sales of aluminum sheet below normal value during the period April 1, 2023–March 31, 2024. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 0.71 percent. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: A-583-867 – Link: common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-taiwan-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024 Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Oman — AD (Administrative Review Final Results, 2023–2024) Commerce determined that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC sold subject aluminum sheet in the United States at prices below normal value. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 14.71 percent. – Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Investigation ID: A-523-814 – Link: common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-the-sultanate-of-oman-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – Commerce issued final antidumping and countervailing duty orders for silicon metal from Laos and Angola. – The Department of Commerce continued AD and CVD orders on non-oriented electrical steel from China after expedited second sunset reviews confirmed likely recurrence of dumping and subsidization. – Multiple administrative reviews finalized findings of dumping margins ranging from 0% to 29.1%, including aluminum foil and mobile access equipment from China. – The ITC scheduled expedited five-year reviews for Indian matchbooks, keeping the duties under review active pending outcome. – Commerce affirmed several determinations covering Asian and Middle Eastern exporters, demonstrating ongoing enforcement of AD/CVD trade measures. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – Commodity Matchbooks from India – ITC Expedited
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Department of Commerce Finds Oman Aluminum Company Sold Sheets at Low Prices Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The Department of Commerce has completed a review of the sale of aluminum sheets from the Sultanate of Oman. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration, a branch of the Department of Commerce. It was found that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC) sold these products in the United States at prices below the normal value. This review covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Summary of Findings The final results are published by the Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration. After a careful review, OARC was determined to have a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.71 percent. This means they were selling the aluminum sheets for much less than they should have been. The review began after preliminary results were published in August 2025. Following this, OARC and other interested parties submitted their comments. Background In November 2025, there was a federal government shutdown that impacted this review. The deadline for the results was delayed several times due to the backlog of documents and additional complications. Additional details about these events can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, a public document available online. Scope of the Review The review pertains to common alloy aluminum sheets from Oman. This product was first subjected to an anti-dumping duty order in April 2021. During the review, it was found that OARC sold the sheets at underpriced rates in the U.S. Changes and Assessment From the preliminary results, certain changes were made to how the dumping margins were calculated. The Department of Commerce has disclosed these calculations. The assessment rates are determined based on detailed rules. If importers have a margin of 0 or less than 0.5 percent, they may not have to pay these additional duties. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will give instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection on how to proceed with the assessment of duties. However, if there is an appeal in the U.S. Court of International Trade, action may be delayed further. Cash Deposit Requirements These findings also set the cash deposit rates for future shipments. The new deposit rate for OARC will be the same as the determined dumping margin. For others, the rate from previous reviews will be applied. It emphasizes that these requirements will remain until further changes are made. Important Notices Importers are reminded of their responsibility to file the certificate regarding reimbursement before liquidating entries. The Department of Commerce warns that non-compliance may result in doubled duties. Conclusion This notice marks an important find in the ongoing efforts to ensure fair trade practices. The Department of Commerce remains vigilant in upholding trade laws and ensuring fair market value for imported goods. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Dumping of Aluminum Sheet from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes Date: 2026-04-16 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the results of a review about aluminum sheets coming from Taiwan. They found that a company sold aluminum sheets at prices lower than usual during 2023 and 2024. Important Dates The findings are effective from April 16, 2026. Background In August 2025, the Department asked for opinions on the matter. There were delays due to a government shutdown and technical issues. Because of these reasons, the final results were delayed until April 16, 2026. Scope of the Review The review looked at common alloy aluminum sheets from Taiwan to see if they were priced too low. Findings The review showed that C.S. Aluminium Corporation, a producer from Taiwan, had a dumping margin of 0.71 percent. Next Steps The Commerce Department will work with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to apply duties on the aluminum sheets. These duties are based on how much the products were underpriced. Cash Deposit Requirements For future imports, a cash deposit based on these findings will be needed. If there is no specific rate for a company, a default rate of 17.50 percent will apply. Notification to Importers Importers need to follow rules about reimbursing antidumping duties to avoid penalties. End Note These results are official as of April 16, 2026, by the Department of Commerce, ensuring fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Final Results on Antidumping Duties for Chinese Mobile Access Equipment Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued its final results in the review of antidumping duties on certain mobile access equipment and parts from China. This review focused on sales made from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024, and involved Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli). Commerce found that Dingli sold these products in the U.S. at prices below their normal value during this time period. This finding means that Dingli will continue to face duties when exporting these specific products to the United States. The final results of the review, published on April 16, 2026, indicate a dumping margin of 18.27 percent for Dingli. Other companies such as Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd., and Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. were also reviewed and given the same margin rate. These results come after the preliminary findings reported on August 8, 2025, which underwent several deadline extensions due to a government shutdown and backlog issues. The Commerce Department conducted this review following the processes outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930 and used data drawn from various submissions during the review period to make its calculations. CBP will assess duties based on these final results. Importers will have to pay cash deposits at the rates determined in this review when these goods enter the U.S. This measure aims to ensure fair trade and level the playing field for U.S. industries. The products affected by this measure are manufactured in China. The Department has made detailed changes since the preliminary review, and these are recorded in official documents available through designated online government platforms. These findings are part of ongoing efforts to enforce trade laws and protect domestic companies from unfair competition due to dumping. The declarations made are a reminder to importers of the importance of compliance with trade regulations to avoid financial penalties. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Concludes Review on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China and Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the countervailing duty orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from China and Taiwan. These orders were first published on December 3, 2014, as a means to address the unfair subsidization of these products by the governments of China and Taiwan. According to the Department, removing these countervailing duties could lead to continued or renewed subsidies. This could potentially harm the U.S. industry that produces similar products. Therefore, the Department has decided to maintain the duties. The countervailing duties for Chinese producers, such as Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., are set at 158.88%. The same rate applies to all other producers from China under the “all others” category. For Taiwanese producers, the company Leicong Industrial Company, Ltd. faces a countervailing duty rate of 17.12%. Other producers from Taiwan are subjected to a reduced rate of 8.61%. The review process began on December 1, 2025, when the Department announced its intention to examine the necessity of the orders. The process included adequate responses from domestic parties, such as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and the United States Steel Corporation. However, no substantive responses were received from the governments of China and Taiwan or any respondent parties. Due to government shutdowns and subsequent procedural delays, the deadline for these final results was extended to April 14, 2026. This notice also reminds parties involved of their obligation to manage administrative protective orders. Such measures ensure the protection of confidential information during trade investigations. For more details or to access the full report, interested parties can visit the Government Publishing Office’s website or use the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From Sweden, Germany, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Japan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Commerce Department Keeps Antidumping Duties on Electrical Steel Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement. They have decided to continue duties on a special kind of steel called Non-Oriented Electrical Steel (NOES). This steel comes from countries like Sweden, Germany, China, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. The Commerce Department wants to stop unfair pricing, also known as “dumping.” Why Are There Duties? In 2014, the U.S. put these duties in place. This was to stop other countries from selling their steel at very cheap prices in the U.S. These low prices harm U.S. businesses. Now, after reviewing the situation, the Commerce Department believes lifting these duties would result in more dumping. What Did the Review Find? The review, also known as a “sunset review,” started in December 2025. It looked at whether stopping the duties would lead to more unfair pricing. The review found that the unfair pricing, or dumping, would likely continue without these duties. For example, the review found dumping margins range from 6.88% in Korea to as high as 407.52% in China. Who Is Involved? Two major companies, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and United States Steel Corporation, showed interest in this review. Both are big U.S. steel producers. They want to keep the duties in place to protect their businesses. How Does This Affect International Trade? The Commerce Department’s decision means these duties will stay. This helps keep the playing field fair between U.S. and foreign steel producers. It also means that the U.S. wants to keep supporting its own steel industry. What’s Next? The decision was signed on April 14, 2026. Now, parties that use this steel must continue following the duties. The Commerce Department says these actions are in line with laws that ensure fair international trade. This careful decision aims to protect U.S. industries and workers from practices that could harm them. By keeping these duties, the Commerce Department shows its commitment to fair trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Silicon Metal From Angola and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Antidumping Duty Orders
New Antidumping Duty Orders Issued on Silicon Metal Imports from Angola and Laos Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced new antidumping duty orders on silicon metal imports from Angola and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos). These measures are set to apply starting April 16, 2026. The antidumping duty orders follow investigations by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both bodies concluded that silicon metal from these countries is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. This practice is harmful to U.S. industries. The investigations found that imports from Angola and Laos have injured U.S. industries. This finding is based on sections 735(b)(1)(A)(i) and 735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Department of Commerce published its final determination on February 23, 2026. The ITC concluded its final determination on April 6, 2026. The silicon metal covered by these orders contains at least 85% but less than 99.99% silicon. It also has less than 4% iron by weight. Semiconductor grade silicon with 99.99% or more silicon is excluded from these orders. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess duties on these imports from Angola and Laos. These duties are based on the difference between the normal value of the silicon metal and its export price. Suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements will resume with the ITC’s final injury determination. Importers will need to submit cash deposits when bringing in silicon metal from these countries. Angola’s PC Silicon Co. Limited and Wanhongda International Limited are affected. They have a dumping margin of 68.45%. In Laos, Lao Silicon Co., Ltd has a dumping margin of 94.44%. The duty order includes an annual inquiry service list, which interested parties can join. This list will help them with future inquiries or applications related to these orders. These actions are part of efforts to protect U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. They ensure that all imported goods compete fairly in the U.S. market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Silicon Metal From the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Issues Duty Order on Silicon Metal from Laos Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States government has issued a countervailing duty order on silicon metal. This order comes from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos). The U.S. Department of Commerce made an affirmative final determination. It found that subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from Laos. On April 6, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) confirmed this decision. It said the U.S. industry is being hurt by these imports. The order is effective from April 16, 2026. The duty order covers all forms of silicon metal. This includes silicon metal powder. The metal in question must contain at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight. However, silicon used in semiconductors is excluded. This specific type of silicon has at least 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight. The U.S. will now assess countervailing duties. This applies to entries from Laos entered or taken from warehouses for consumption. This covers imports on or after September 26, 2025. Lao Silicon Co., Ltd. has a subsidy rate of 69.10 percent. The same rate applies to all other producers or exporters from Laos. The Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of these imports. This action aims to protect the U.S. industry from unfair competition. It also applies cash deposit requirements on incoming silicon metal shipments described in the order. Finally, the order will be in effect until the review for the following year. The new list for service and inquiry will be updated annually. The Department of Commerce issues this order following the proper procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. The government continues to enforce measures to support fair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Announces Final Results for Antidumping Review of Steel Plates from Korea Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration has released the final results of its review on antidumping duties concerning certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plates from the Republic of Korea. This decision was announced on April 16, 2026, and applies to the period of May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The department found that the group of companies, referred to as the POSCO single entity—which includes POSCO, POSCO International Corporation, POSCO Mobility Solution, Taechang Steel Co., Ltd., and Winsteel Co., Ltd.—did not sell the steel plates at prices lower than the normal value during the reviewed period. This conclusion means that these companies will not face additional antidumping duties on their products shipped to the United States for the specified review period. The review began with preliminary results published on September 11, 2025. During the review, only the POSCO single entity, the mandatory respondent, submitted comments. Despite some delays in the administrative process due to a federal government shutdown, the final determination was completed without altering the initial findings. The Commerce Department’s decisions, including the confirmation of zero percent dumping margins for the POSCO single entity, mean that no additional fees will be levied on their steel plate exports. Commerce has outlined how U.S. Customs and Border Protection will proceed with assessments for the subject merchandise. This includes instructions for all the entries during the review period, including those involving intermediaries unaware that the steel was destined for the U.S. Final cash deposit requirements have also been set. These rules are essential for all future shipments of the steel plates from Korea entering the U.S. All cash deposits for subject merchandise will continue under guidelines that offer clarity on rates for companies outside the current review but covered in earlier segments of the proceedings. The department has issued a reminder to importers about their responsibilities to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties. This action is to ensure that Commerce doesn’t presume the occurrence of reimbursements, which could lead to doubled duties. Overall, the Commerce Department’s findings reflect thorough administrative processes. The results demonstrate compliance with international trade laws, ensuring fair trade practices between the U.S. and Korea in the steel industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Aluminum Foil from China Sold at Cheaper Prices Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently published its final findings for an investigation on some aluminum foil products imported from China. The investigation looked at the sale of these products from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The results showed that certain Chinese producers and sellers sold the aluminum foil at prices lower than what is considered normal. This is known as selling at “less than normal value.” The Department of Commerce, which works on issues like international trade, carried out this review. They released the preliminary findings last year in August and gave people time to comment. However, the process faced delays due to government shutdowns and document backlogs. These final results were released on April 16, 2026. In the investigation, some changes were made to the calculations for certain companies from China. The companies involved are Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Zhejiang Dingsheng, and Zhongji, among others. The review made sure to check if these companies could prove they should be treated separately from the rest of their country. This is important because it affects the rates of duties they must pay. Five companies succeeded in showing they should get separate rates. However, other companies will be treated as part of the bigger China-wide entity and face a higher duty rate of 105.80 percent. The next steps are for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect duties, based on these findings. The Department of Commerce will tell them how much to charge within 35 days, unless some legal actions change this plan. For companies that worked to get separate treatment, the new duty rates will apply for any aluminum foil they bring into the U.S. Extra rules will apply for companies without their own rates, and they will continue to use either the China-wide rate or other existing rates, depending on their situation. Anyone bringing these products into the U.S. must remember their responsibilities, like filing the right forms about duties. If they don’t, they might have to pay twice the regular amount. This decision comes after careful checking and reviewing the facts. The goal is to ensure fair trade practices between countries. The new rules start immediately and will continue until further updates from the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commodity Matchbooks From India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
USITC Announces Expedited Reviews of Indian Matchbooks Impact Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced an important update. They are starting quick reviews about matchbooks from India. These reviews will check if stopping certain trade rules could hurt U.S. businesses. The reviews start on March 16, 2026. They will look at antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These orders help prevent foreign companies from selling products at very low prices, which could harm U.S. companies. The USITC said that they got enough responses from U.S. companies but not enough from Indian companies. Because of this, the reviews will be faster and simpler. Commissioner Johanson had a different idea. He thought that the review should be more detailed. The reviews will follow specific rules. These rules from the Tariff Act of 1930 make sure everything is done correctly. There will be a report with more information. This will be for people on a special service list, and others can see a public version later. People can write comments about these reviews. These comments help decide what should happen next. Comments must be sent by May 19, 2026. No new facts can be included. If the Department of Commerce needs more time, they will delay the final comments. For companies and other parties involved, they must follow strict rules when sending documents. They need to make sure everyone involved gets a copy. The USITC thinks these reviews are very complicated. They decided to take more time to get everything right. They might take up to 90 extra days. This process is under the Tariff Act of 1930. All of these details are based on official orders from the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-16
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-04-16 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07468/certain-aluminum-foil-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers and/or exporters made sales of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 2. Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07467/carbon-and-alloy-steel-cut-to-length-plate-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that POSCO, POSCO International Corporation, POSCO Mobility Solution, Taechang Steel Co., Ltd. and Winsteel Co., Ltd. (collectively, the POSCO single entity), the sole exporter subject to this administrative review, did not make sales of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to- length plate (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. 3. Silicon Metal From the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Countervailing Duty Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07466/silicon-metal-from-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic-countervailing-duty-order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing a countervailing duty (CVD) order on silicon metal from the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos). 4. Silicon Metal From Angola and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Antidumping Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07465/silicon-metal-from-angola-and-the-lao-peoples-democratic-republic-antidumping-duty-orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) orders on silicon metal from Angola and the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos). 5. Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From Sweden, Germany, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Japan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07464/non-oriented-electrical-steel-from-sweden-germany-the-peoples-republic-of-china-the-republic-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from Sweden, Germany, the People's Republic of China (China), the Republic of Korea (Korea), Taiwan, and Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice. 6. Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07463/non-oriented-electrical-steel-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-taiwan-final-results-of-the Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from the People's Republic of China (China) and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice. 7. Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07462/certain-mobile-access-equipment-and-subassemblies-thereof-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli), exporter of certain mobile access equipment and subassemblies thereof (MAE) from the People's Republic of China (China), made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 8. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07461/common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-taiwan-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that a producer and exporter made sales of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from Taiwan at below normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 9. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07460/common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-the-sultanate-of-oman-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC), the sole producer or exporter subject to this administrative review, made sales of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-16
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-04-16 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Commodity Matchbooks From India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07449/commodity-matchbooks-from-india-scheduling-of-expedited-five-year-reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on commodity matchbooks from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 2. Truck Bed Covers From China Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/16/2026-07339/truck-bed-covers-from-china Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-04-15
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-04-15 1) Executive Summary Today’s summary covers four China-related events published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA). All events pertain to antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings. The updates include final results of sunset reviews for citric acid, oil country tubular goods (OCTG), and forged steel fluid end blocks, as well as preliminary administrative review results on aluminum extrusions from China. The policy instruments used were AD and CVD orders under section 751(c) or 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts — Antidumping Duty (Final Results of Third Sunset Review) The Department of Commerce determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from the People’s Republic of China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Event Type: Final Results of Sunset Review China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Weighted-average dumping margins up to 156.87%. Review conducted pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Applicable date: April 15, 2026. Source: Link Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts — Countervailing Duty (Final Results of Third Sunset Review) Commerce concluded that revocation of the countervailing duty order on citric acid from China would likely result in continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: CVD Event Type: Final Results of Sunset Review China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Net countervailable subsidy rates up to 166.34%. Producers include TTCA Co., Ltd. (60.07%) and Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd. (166.34%). Applicable date: April 15, 2026. Source: Link Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) — Antidumping Duty (Final Results of Third Sunset Review) Commerce found that revocation of the antidumping duty order on OCTG from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD Event Type: Final Results of Sunset Review China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Weighted-average dumping margins likely to prevail up to 99.14%. Domestic interested parties included United States Steel Tubular Products, Inc. and U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association. Applicable date: April 15, 2026. Source: Link Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) — Countervailing Duty (Final Results of Third Sunset Review) Commerce determined that revocation of the CVD order on OCTG from China would lead to continuation or recurrence of subsidization. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: CVD Event Type: Final Results of Sunset Review China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Net subsidy rates between 20.90% and 26.19%. Among named producers: Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co. (22.87%), Tianjin Pipe (Group) Co. (20.90%), Zhejiang Jianli Enterprise Co. Ltd. (26.19%). Applicable date: April 15, 2026. Source: Link Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks — Countervailing Duty (Final Results of First Sunset Reviews) Commerce finds that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on forged steel fluid end blocks from China (along with Germany, India, and Italy) would lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: CVD Event Type: Final Results of Sunset Reviews China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Noted subsidy rates for Chinese producers up to 337.07%. Review conducted under sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Tariff Act. Applicable date: April 15, 2026. Source: Link Aluminum Extrusions — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 2024 Administrative Review) Commerce preliminarily determined that certain producers and exporters of aluminum extrusions from China received countervailable subsidies during the 2024 period of review. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: CVD Event Type: Preliminary Administrative Review Results China Indicator: Explicit Key Details: Period of review: January 1–December 31, 2024. Preliminary subsidy rate: 164.29% (based on adverse facts available). Review partially rescinded for 79 companies following withdrawals. Public comment period open 21 days after publication. Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Commerce reaffirmed both antidumping and countervailing duty orders on multiple Chinese products (citric acid, OCTG, and aluminum extrusions). The Department conducted reviews under section 751(c) to determine the likelihood of recurrence of dumping and subsidization if the orders were revoked. Aluminum extrusions from China remain subject to high preliminary subsidy rates, and the review includes both rescissions and adverse fact-based determinations. Domestic U.S. industries and trade associations participated in each review process, underscoring consistent engagement in enforcement actions regarding Chinese exports. Most determinations were expedited reviews due to absence of substantive response from foreign producers or government authorities. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Citric acid – AD sunset review Citric acid – CVD sunset review OCTG – AD sunset review OCTG – CVD sunset review Forged steel fluid end blocks – CVD sunset reviews Aluminum extrusions – CVD administrative review 2024 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Mattresses From Malaysia: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Department of Commerce Announces Antidumping Review on Mattresses from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that several companies sold mattresses from Malaysia at prices below normal value from May 1, 2024, through April 30, 2025. As a result, the Department is partially rescinding its review of certain companies which had no entries of the merchandise during the period under review. The announcement came in a notice published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2026. The Department is inviting interested parties to comment on the preliminary findings. Background of the Review The Department of Commerce initiated the antidumping duty order on mattresses from Malaysia on May 14, 2021. On May 5, 2025, it announced a chance to request an administrative review. In June 2025, the petitioners requested a review for 19 companies. Respondent Selection and Examination The Department selected several companies, including CS Vision Supply SDN BHD and Premier High Ventures, for mandatory examination. However, these companies, along with others like Pinnacle Salute SDN BHD and Weld Tack Industries, did not respond timely to the Department’s requests for information. Partial Rescission of Review For eight companies with no entries of merchandise during the period, the Department will rescind the administrative review. These companies are APM Auto Parts Marketing, Comfort Coil Technology SDN BHD, Delandis Furniture (M) SDN BHD, Ever Want (M) SDN BHD, Far East Foam, Industries SDN BHD, GGC Global, Irama Furniture SDN BHD, and Vision Foam Ind. SDN BHD. Application of Adverse Facts Available The Department will use adverse facts available to assign estimated dumping margins to companies that were uncooperative, such as CS Vision and others. These companies will face a rate of 42.92 percent, which is consistent with rates applied in previous segments of this proceeding. Comments and Further Actions Interested parties can submit comments within 21 days of the notice’s publication. The Department of Commerce plans to publish the final results within 120 days, determining the final duties on the mattresses. Future Instructions Upon final results, the Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection on assessment rates for the concerned companies. The cash deposit rate will remain effective until further notice. The Department emphasizes the importance for importers to comply with the requirement to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties before the liquidation of entries during the review period. This announcement by the Department of Commerce marks a critical step in enforcing trade regulations and ensuring fair competition in the international mattress market. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2024
Federal Register Notice: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Review on Aluminum Extrusions from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department Announces Preliminary Results The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has announced the preliminary results of the Countervailing Duty (CVD) Administrative Review on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China. This notice was published under Federal Register Volume 91, Number 72, on April 15, 2026. Scope of the Review The review looked into whether some Chinese manufacturers and exporters of aluminum extrusions received illegal government subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Partial Rescission Commerce has rescinded this review in part. Specifically, the administrative review was withdrawn for 79 companies. This was at the request of the petitioner, the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee. Additionally, there was no review performed on 12 companies as there were no customs entries during the review period. Methodology The review was conducted under section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Six companies were found to not respond to the requests and were given a countervailable subsidy rate based on data, implying adverse inferences. Preliminary Results The preliminary finding imposed a subsidy rate of 164.29 percent ad valorem for the following six companies: Anji Chang Hong Chain Manufacturing, Assa Abloy (Zhongshan) Security Technology, Dezhou Huoamei Windows and Doors, Ewellix Motion Technologies, Ningbo Lianda Winch, and Shanghai Zesheng Automotive Technology. Public Comment and Hearing Stakeholders are invited to submit comments. Case briefs should be filed within 21 days of this notice, and rebuttal briefs within five days after case briefs. An executive summary for each issue should be included in briefs. Hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days. Next Steps The Commerce Department plans to issue the final results within 120 days of these preliminary results. The department will also notify the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for assessment rates and cash deposit instructions. Conclusion This announcement marks an important stage in the enforcement of trade laws concerning aluminum extrusions from China. It demonstrates ongoing efforts by the U.S. Department of Commerce to ensure fair trade practices. The results remain subject to change pending final assessment. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Commerce Department’s Review of Antidumping Duties on Chinese Citric Acid Stays In Place Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made an important decision regarding citric acid from China. The department found that ending the antidumping duty order on citric acid and citrate salts from China could lead to dumping again. Dumping is when products are sold in another country at unfairly low prices. This decision is part of an important process called the “Expedited Third Sunset Review.” Background Information Back in 2009, the U.S. started putting extra charges on citric acid and some citrate salts from China. They did this to stop dumping. Every five years, they review to see if these charges are still needed. This is now the third time they are doing this review. On December 1, 2025, they started the review process. Some American companies like Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Cargill, Inc. told Commerce they want the charges to stay. These companies make the same products and were worried that ending the duties could hurt them. Review Process The review followed set rules. The American companies told the department why they believed the duties should stay. They sent a detailed response on December 22, 2025. Nobody from China’s side gave a formal response to the review. Because of this, the Commerce Department had no need to do a longer review and instead did a quicker 120-day review. This was due to a lack of responses from China. Due to some delays, including a government shutdown, they finished their final review on April 14, 2026. What This Means The department decided that if the duties were removed, dumping could start again. They believe the Chinese companies would likely go back to selling citric acid at unfairly low prices in the U.S. They also decided that the dumping margin could be as high as 156.87 percent. This decision means that the current additional charges on citric acid from China will stay in place. This helps protect American companies who make similar products. Closing Notes The U.S. Department of Commerce is committed to making sure trade rules are fair. This decision is important for keeping a fair market for citric acid producers in the U.S. The decision shows dedication to preventing unfair trade practices from happening again. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Scot Fullerton signed the final decision on April 10, 2026. The ultimate goal is to ensure American companies can compete on a level playing field. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Department of Commerce Maintains Antidumping Duties on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes April 15, 2026 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced its final decision regarding certain frozen fish fillets imported from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. They have decided not to remove the antidumping duties currently in place. What This Decision Means Antidumping duties are in place to prevent products from other countries being sold at unfairly low prices, which can hurt U.S. businesses. The Department of Commerce has determined that removing these duties could lead to more dumping of fish fillets by Vietnam. This means they believe Vietnam might continue to sell fish fillets at very low prices in the United States, making it hard for U.S. companies to compete. Background of the Decision The Department first set these duties in August 2003. Every five years, they review if these duties are still needed. This is known as a “sunset review.” The recent review began on December 1, 2025. The Catfish Farmers of America, as well as some individual U.S. catfish processors and producers, showed interest in keeping these duties. They believe these duties help protect their businesses from unfair pricing by Vietnamese exporters. The Review Process The Department of Commerce received feedback from U.S. catfish farmers, processors, and producers, showing their support to keep the duties. They said they are important to ensure fair competition. However, the Vietnamese companies did not respond with any comments. As a result, the review was done quickly, and the decision was made within 120 days. Future Steps The decision means that the U.S. will continue to have duties of up to 63.88% on certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. This helps protect U.S. companies from the negative effects of dumping. Any parties involved must follow the rules about confidentiality and the use of information. The details are governed by the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty laws. Conclusion The Department of Commerce’s decision shows their commitment to ensuring fair trade practices. The duties aim to support U.S. businesses and maintain competitive market conditions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Continuation of Subsidies on Oil Country Tubular Goods from China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Date: 2026-04-15 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its expedited third sunset review of the countervailing duty order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the People’s Republic of China. This review, which is part of a regular five-year cycle, evaluates whether removing the duty order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of subsidies. According to the Department of Commerce, if the countervailing duty order were revoked, it is likely that countervailable subsidies would continue or reoccur. This means that Chinese companies might still be receiving unfair financial support from their government, which could harm U.S. businesses. The product in question, OCTG, is essential for the oil and gas industry. It includes pipes used to drill and transport oil and gas from wells. The sunset review began on December 1, 2025. United States Steel Tubular Products and the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association, representing domestic interests, showed intent to participate in the review. They provided responses supporting the continuation of the duty order. During the review, the Department of Commerce received no adequate responses from China or any Chinese companies. As a result, they decided to conduct an expedited 120-day review. The Department of Commerce’s findings specify net countervailable subsidy rates that range from 20.90% to 26.19% for various Chinese producers and exporters. These include companies like Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co., Tianjin Pipe (Group) Co., and Zhejiang Jianli Enterprise Co. Ltd. Finally, the Department of Commerce will continue to enforce the countervailing duty order to help maintain fair competition within the U.S. market. They stress the importance of companies understanding their responsibilities concerning any shared private information during this process. This decision aims to protect American jobs and ensure that U.S. companies can compete fairly with international businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Continued Duties on Citric Acid from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its third sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on citric acid and certain citrate salts from the People’s Republic of China. The findings indicate that revoking the CVD order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. This decision was announced on April 15, 2026, and is effective immediately. Background Information The countervailing duty order on citric acid from China was first published by the Commerce Department on May 29, 2009. Under U.S. trade laws, these orders are subject to sunset reviews every five years to assess their continued necessity. The third sunset review began on December 1, 2025. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC, as domestic interested parties, participated in the review. These companies claimed interested party status because they manufacture, produce, or wholesale the domestic like product in the United States. Process and Findings The review was expedited, taking 120 days to complete. Commerce did not receive a substantive response from the Government of China or any respondent interested party. As a result, the U.S. International Trade Commission was notified, and the expedited review proceeded. The department found that revoking the order would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of subsidies with the following net countervailable subsidy rates: TTCA Co., Ltd. (also known as Shandong TTCA Biochemistry Co., Ltd.): 60.07% Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd., and Yixing Union Cogeneration Co., Ltd.: 52.22% Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd.: 166.34% All other producers/exporters: 55.53% Scope and Impact The order covers citric acid and citrate salts from China. This decision plays a crucial role in maintaining fair competition in the U.S. market by addressing unfair subsidies received by Chinese exporters. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will continue with the countervailing duties on the specified Chinese products. This notice also serves as a reminder for parties under an Administrative Protective Order to handle proprietary information accordingly. This decision aligns with the department’s commitment to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition. The Department of Commerce is responsible for enforcing compliance with trade agreements and conducting duties like these sunset reviews. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
