International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-09 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities From China; Determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Microcurrent Facial Toning Devices and Systems Thereof, DN 3846; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant’s filing pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. 3. Sugar From Mexico; Determinations Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-08
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-08 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil and Norway: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR) from Mexico. This notice amends the cash deposit rate for Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero). The period of review (POR) is September 01, 2022, through August 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
OFAC Adds New Names to Specially Designated Nationals List Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published an official notice in the Federal Register. This notice announces that new persons have been added to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This action was issued on August 27, 2025. It is based on OFAC’s determination that the legal requirements for sanctions were met. These sanctions mean that all property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction belonging to the listed persons are now blocked. U.S. persons are generally not allowed to do business or any transactions with these blocked persons. All affected property remains blocked. The full SDN List and more details about OFAC sanctions programs are available on the OFAC website at OFAC website. If you need more information, you can contact the Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. The notice is signed by Bradley T. Smith, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. The full legal notice can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 169, Thursday, September 4, 2025, on pages 42790-42792. The action blocks the property and interests in property of the named persons under the relevant sanctions authority. All persons and organizations should review the updated SDN List to ensure compliance with sanctions laws. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-09-04
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-09-04 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons who have been removed from OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Chinese Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the People’s Republic of China will continue. This decision comes after the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) decided that ending the order would likely result in continued dumping and harm to U.S. industry. The antidumping order was first put in place on February 26, 2009. On March 3, 2025, the ITC and Commerce began the third five-year review of this order, as required by law. In July 2025, the Department of Commerce found that getting rid of the order would likely lead to more dumping of these products into the U.S. market by Chinese companies. The ITC agreed, saying that the ending of the order would likely cause further harm to American businesses. The order covers small diameter graphite electrodes of any length, with diameters of 400 millimeters (16 inches) or less. These electrodes are used in furnaces and include those attached or not attached to a joining system. The order also covers graphite pin joining systems for these electrodes, whether sold attached or separately. These products are mainly used in metal melting, steel refining, and special furnace industries like foundries and smelters. The products fall under several subheadings of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS), including 8545.11.0010, 3801.10, and 8545.11.0020. Some products under these codes were included due to earlier decisions to stop companies from using extra processing in other countries to get around the order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits at current rates for these Chinese imports. The effective date for this continuation is August 29, 2025. The Commerce Department plans to begin its next five-year review of the order no later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the last ITC determination. This notice also reminds involved parties about their duty to return or destroy any confidential business information in line with the law and regulations. For more information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at the Department of Commerce. This news is published according to sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the related federal regulations. Dated: August 29, 2025. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-04
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-04 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: Binational Panel Review: Notice of Request for Panel Review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Two Requests for Panel Review were filed in the matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Administrative Review, and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2023 with the U.S. Section of the USMCA Secretariat on August 28, 2025. The first Request for Panel Review was filed on behalf of Resolute FP Canada Inc., the Conseil de l'industrie forestière du Quebec, the Ontario Forest Industries Association, and each association's respective individual members (collectively Central Canada) as well as Plaster Rock Lumber Corporation and CHAP Alliance, Inc. The second was filed by The Government of Canada, the Governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Québec; Alberta Softwood Lumber Trade Council, British Columbia Lumber Trade Council; Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest Products Ltd., Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd., Canfor Fox Creek Ltd., Canfor Whitecourt Ltd., Interfor Corporation, Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd., EACOM Timber Corporation, Chaleur Forest Products Inc., Chaleur Forest Products LP, J.D. Irving, Limited, Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd. and Tolko Industries Ltd., Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd., and West Fraser Mills Ltd. The USMCA Secretariat has assigned case number USA-CDA-2025-10.12-02 to this request. 2. Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Teh Fong Min International Co., Ltd., also known as Teh Fong Ming International Co., Ltd. (TFM), the sole producer and/or exporter subject to this administrative review, made sales of stilbenic optical brightening agents (stilbenic OBAs) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2023 through April 30, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 3. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (TA 2000) sold steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023. 4. Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the People's Republic of China would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of this AD order. 5. Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that La Molisana, S.p.A. (La Molisana) and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A (Garofalo) made sales of certain pasta (pasta) from Italy at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review with respect to certain companies. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Hydrodermabrasion Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submission on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Input on Hydrodermabrasion Systems Investigation Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced a request for public comments related to an ongoing investigation about certain hydrodermabrasion systems and their parts. The investigation is officially known as Investigation No. 337-TA-1408. On August 26, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) working on the case issued an Initial Determination that a violation of Section 337 has occurred. The ALJ also made a Recommended Determination about possible remedies and bonding if a violation is found. The ITC is now asking the public and interested government agencies to share comments about the possible impact of the recommended remedial actions. This includes a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. These actions would affect the importation, sale for importation, or sales after importation of the hydrodermabrasion systems and their components by Cartessa. The Commission wishes to understand how these orders could affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competitive conditions within the U.S. economy The production of similar or directly competitive products in the U.S. Consumers in the United States The Commission is especially looking for comments that: Explain how the affected hydrodermabrasion systems and their parts are used in the United States. Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns about the recommended orders. Point out similar or directly competing products made in the U.S. by the complainant, its licensees, or third parties that could replace the imported items. Indicate whether there is enough capacity among the complainant, licensees, or third-party suppliers to replace the imported products quickly. Explain how the recommended orders might impact U.S. consumers. Public submissions must be five pages or less, including any attachments. The deadline for submitting these comments is the close of business on October 2, 2025. Those making submissions must file documents electronically by the deadline under 19 CFR 210.4(f). The investigation number “Inv. No. 337-TA-1408” should be clear on the cover or first page. Questions about filing can be directed to the Secretary of the Commission at (202) 205-2000. Documents with confidential information must be clearly marked as such. Non-parties submitting confidential information must also serve these documents to the investigation parties following the guidelines in the Administrative Protective Order and file a redacted public version of the document at the same time. Non-confidential submissions will be available for public viewing via the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on September 2, 2025. The action is authorized under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules (19 CFR part 210). For more information, contact Jonathan D. Link, Esq., at the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3103. General information is also available at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Liquid Crystal Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Liquid Crystal Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same” (Docket Number 3845). The USITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know about any public interest issues related to the complaint or the complainant’s filing. Who Filed the Complaint? The complaint was filed by BH Innovations LLC on August 29, 2025. It claims that certain companies have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The violations involve importing, selling for importation, or selling in the United States after importation certain liquid crystal devices and related products. Who Are the Respondents? The complaint lists several companies as respondents. They include: HKC Corporation Ltd. (China) Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (China) HKC Overseas Ltd. (Hong Kong) HiSense Co., Ltd. (China) HiSense International Co., Ltd. (China) HiSense Visual Technology Co. Ltd. (China) HiSense US Corporation (Suwanee, GA) VIZIO Holding Corp. (Irvine, CA) TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co. Ltd. (China) TCL King Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd. (China) TTE Technology Inc. (Irvine, CA) TCL Technology Group Corp. (China) TCL Moka International Ltd. (Hong Kong) TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd. (Hong Kong) TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. (China) TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. (Vietnam) LG Electronics, Inc. (South Korea) LG Electronics USA, Inc. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Canonsburg, PA) What Does the Complaint Request? BH Innovations LLC is asking the USITC to: Issue a limited exclusion order. Issue cease and desist orders. Impose a bond on the alleged infringing items during the 60-day Presidential review period, according to law. What Comments Does the USITC Want? The USITC wants comments from: Respondents Other interested parties Members of the public Government agencies Comments should discuss if the requested actions by BH Innovations LLC would: Affect public health or welfare in the U.S. Affect competition in the U.S. economy. Impact the production of similar products in the U.S. Influence U.S. consumers. The USITC is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the liquid crystal devices are used in the U.S. Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the U.S. about these products. Name similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the imported ones. Show if BH Innovations LLC or its licensees can replace the volume of products if the order is made. Explain how the orders would impact U.S. consumers. How to File Comments Written submissions must be filed electronically within eight calendar days after publication in the Federal Register. Replies to submissions must be filed within three days after the original due date. Submissions are limited to five pages. All filings must use the EDIS online system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Only electronic filings are accepted. Confidential Information Any person wanting to keep their filing confidential must request confidential treatment and state the reasons. Information may be shared with USITC staff and U.S. government workers for official purposes. Non-confidential information will be public. Legal Authority This notice is issued under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as the USITC’s regulations. The notice is signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and was issued on September 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-04
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-04 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Liquid Crystal Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, DN 3845; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2. Certain Hydrodermabrasion Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submission on the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on August 26, 2025, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-03
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-03 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Oleoresin Paprika From India: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Netherlands: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the Netherlands were sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
JC Briefing 2025-09-02
Judicial Conference of the United States Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Meeting of the Judicial Conference Sub: Judicial Conference of the United States Content: The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold an in- person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on November 6, 2025 in New Orleans, LA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the meeting. 2. Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; Meeting of the Judicial Conference Sub: Judicial Conference of the United States Content: The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules will hold an in- person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on November 5, 2025 in New Orleans, LA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the meeting. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China
U.S. Removes Major Chipmakers from Export List in China Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, released a final rule about exports to China. This rule changes the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The main change is the removal of three companies from the Validated End-User (VEU) list in China. The companies are Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd. The VEU program allowed approved companies in certain countries to receive U.S. goods, software, and technology with less paperwork. They did not need an export license for eligible items. These three companies will no longer have this special status after December 31, 2025. Suppliers will now need to submit license applications to export, reexport, or transfer certain U.S.-controlled items to them in China. The VEU program is explained in 15 CFR 748.15 of the EAR. It helps companies in eligible countries get specific U.S. items more easily. The U.S. government checks and approves VEUs, making sure they follow U.S. export rules. The End-User Review Committee (ERC) administers the VEU program. It includes people from the Departments of State, Defense, Energy, Commerce, and other agencies. The change is allowed by the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA), part of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019. ECRA allows the BIS to regulate exports from the U.S. and to make changes through final rules without needing public comments before approval. The rule is not a significant regulatory action. It does not have federalism implications and is exempt from several administrative rulemaking requirements. These include the need for proposed rulemaking, public participation, and a regulatory flexibility analysis. BIS estimates that removing these companies will create about 1,000 more license applications each year. This will add about 495 hours of paperwork, which fits within current estimates for federal collections of information. The final rule removes entries for Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd from Supplement No. 7 to Part 748 of the EAR. This rule was signed by Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade. The rule takes effect on December 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-09-02
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to revise the existing Validated End-User (VEU) Authorizations list for the People's Republic of China (PRC) by removing Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd; Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd; and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd. 2. Relaxing Export Controls for Syria Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) makes changes to the Syria export control measures under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14312, Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions, which directed the removal of sanctions on Syria. This final rule relaxes the EAR's existing restrictions on exports and reexports to Syria of items subject to the EAR by making the following changes: revising certain restrictive license application review policies that had applied to most items subject to the EAR to be more favorable; expanding existing license exceptions to apply to Syria; and adding new license exceptions for Syria, including for EAR99 items. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; License Exemptions and Exclusions Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction
U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Correction in Steel Fencing Dumping Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice in the Federal Register for its investigation on temporary steel fencing from the People’s Republic of China. The notice updates the preliminary determination of sales at less than fair value (LTFV), preliminary affirmative determination of critical circumstances, postponement of the final determination, extension of provisional measures, and corrects errors made in a previous publication from August 19, 2025. Background The Department of Commerce had earlier announced that some Chinese firms sold temporary steel fencing in the United States at prices below fair market value. This is considered dumping under U.S. trade laws. The August 19 notice had mistakenly stated that critical circumstances exist for some companies, which affects how tariffs are applied. The department also recognized errors in how some company names were listed. Correction of Critical Circumstances The new notice clarifies that critical circumstances did not exist for the following exporters and their related producers: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and several specific producers including Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd., Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd., among others. Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and producers like Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. with different producers. Metaltec Group Co., Limited with several listed producers. Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and several listed producers. Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. with four producers. Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Correction in Producer Names The Department corrected the spelling of producers’ names for certain companies in the rate table of the August 19, 2025 notice. This table lists the dumping margins and the adjusted cash deposit rates for each exporter-producer pair. Dumping Margins and Cash Deposit Rates For Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., the weighted-average dumping margin is 187.69%, with a subsidy-adjusted cash deposit rate of 177.15%. Most other exporter-producer combinations have a margin and cash deposit rate of 136.57%. An exception is Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd., which has a margin of 136.57% and a cash deposit rate of 126.03%. The China-wide entity margin is 187.69%, with the same rate for cash deposit. Legal Notification This notice is made as required by sections 733(f) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.205(c). The correction was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on August 27, 2025. For more details, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466, U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VIII, Washington, DC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-02
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register of August 19, 2025, in which Commerce announced the preliminary determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of temporary steel fencing from the People's Republic of China (China). This notice corrects the inadvertent statement that critical circumstances exist for the separate rate companies and corrects the names of producers of certain separate rate companies. 2. Certain Quartz Surface Products From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain quartz surface products (quartz surface products) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice. 3. Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register on August 22, 2025, in which Commerce announced the final results of the 2023 administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy. This notice corrects the name of a company subject to the non- selected company subsidy rate, Forge Monchieri S.p.A., which was listed incorrectly as Officine Meccaniche Roselli S.r.l. 4. Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). 5. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List 6. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
U.S. Trade Commission Starts Third Review of Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On September 2, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it is starting new reviews to decide if removing current trade duties on kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China would hurt American companies again. The USITC is reviewing two orders: antidumping and countervailing duties. These orders have been in place since September 14, 2009. They were reviewed and continued in 2015 and again in 2020. The Commission is now doing its third review under the Tariff Act of 1930. Key Dates and Participation Reviews started: September 2, 2025 Responses due: October 2, 2025 Comments on responses due: November 14, 2025 Anyone interested in this issue, including producers, importers, and consumer groups, can take part by submitting information. Parties must file an entry of appearance within 21 days of this notice to be on the service list. What Products Are Involved? The review is about two main products made for kitchen appliances, both produced in the U.S. and imported from China: Refrigeration shelving and baskets for refrigerators, freezers, and other cooling equipment. Oven racks, side racks, and subframes for cooking ovens and stoves. Request for Information The Commission wants information about: Names and addresses of involved companies and officials. Whether the company is a U.S. producer, importer, worker union, trade group, or foreign producer or exporter. The party’s willingness to provide information. The expected effect of removing duties on U.S. companies. Lists of all U.S. producers, importers, and foreign exporters of these products. Leading buyers of these products in the U.S. How much of these products companies produced, imported, or exported in 2024. Details on prices, production levels, and changes in supply or demand since 2019. How to Respond Those replying are encouraged to use the Commission’s NOI worksheet on its website. Responses must be submitted electronically using the Commission’s EDIS system. Paper filings are not being accepted now. All information provided must be complete and accurate. If a party cannot give the requested information, they must explain why. Incomplete responses may be used against the responding party. Definitions “Subject Merchandise” means the shelving and racks being reviewed. “Subject Country” refers to China. “Domestic Like Product” means similar products made in the U.S. “Domestic Industry” includes all U.S. makers of these products. Further Details The USITC will decide if it will do a full review or an expedited one based on the responses. Review rules are found in 19 CFR parts 201 and 207. For help, contact Juan Carlos Pena-Flores at 202-205-3169 or visit the Commission’s website. Authority This review is conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice is published as required by USITC Rule 207.61. Issued: August 27, 2025 By order of the Commission Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-02
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing and the antidumping duty orders on kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. 2. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico and Turkey; Institution of Five-Year Reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar ("rebar") from Turkey and revocation of the antidumping duty order on rebar from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
JC Briefing 2025-09-02
Judicial Conference of the United States Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Meeting of the Judicial Conference Sub: Judicial Conference of the United States Content: The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold an in- person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on November 6, 2025 in New Orleans, LA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the meeting. 2. Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; Meeting of the Judicial Conference Sub: Judicial Conference of the United States Content: The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules will hold an in- person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on November 5, 2025 in New Orleans, LA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the meeting. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China
U.S. Removes Three Semiconductor Companies in China from Special Export List Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made new changes to export rules for companies in China. These changes were published in the Federal Register. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has removed Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd from the Validated End-User (VEU) authorizations list. This new rule will take effect on December 31, 2025. What Is the VEU List? The VEU list lets approved companies in certain countries get some U.S. items without needing extra export licenses. These companies are checked and approved by a group of U.S. government agencies. A company on the VEU list can receive certain items, like hardware, software, and technology, more easily. Items tied to missile technology or crime control are not included. What Changed? The End-User Review Committee (ERC), which checks and approves VEUs, has decided to remove the three semiconductor companies from China from the VEU program. This means these companies will no longer have the special permission to receive certain U.S.-controlled exports without extra review. Legal Background These changes are made based on the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. This law allows the U.S. government to control exports for reasons related to national security and foreign policy. Section 1753 and Section 1754 of the law allow the government to control which items can be sent overseas and to which companies. The government can do this without public notice before the rule is final. Impact Starting December 31, 2025, Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd will need to apply for export licenses like other companies, without the easier process from the VEU program. BIS expects this rule to create about 1,000 more export license applications each year. This would add about 495 hours of extra work, but this is within normal expectations. Other Details The rule is not considered major under Executive Order 12866 and does not have federalism impacts. It is also not subject to the regulatory steps that usually let the public comment first. Next Steps The official removal appears in 15 CFR Part 748. The names of the three companies will be taken off the VEU list in the regulations. This change was announced by Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-09-02
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to revise the existing Validated End-User (VEU) Authorizations list for the People's Republic of China (PRC) by removing Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd; Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd; and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd. 2. Relaxing Export Controls for Syria Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) makes changes to the Syria export control measures under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14312, Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions, which directed the removal of sanctions on Syria. This final rule relaxes the EAR's existing restrictions on exports and reexports to Syria of items subject to the EAR by making the following changes: revising certain restrictive license application review policies that had applied to most items subject to the EAR to be more favorable; expanding existing license exceptions to apply to Syria; and adding new license exceptions for Syria, including for EAR99 items. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; License Exemptions and Exclusions Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction
U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Ruling on Chinese Steel Fencing Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction for its August 19, 2025, preliminary determination in an investigation about temporary steel fencing from China. This update was released on September 2, 2025. Background The Commerce Department had found that certain steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means the products are being sold for less than they cost in China. The investigation is a response to concerns from U.S. companies about unfair trade. Correction of Critical Circumstances In the August notice, Commerce said “critical circumstances” existed for some exporters. “Critical circumstances” means extra duties could be charged on products brought to the U.S. before the investigation started. The latest correction says this was a mistake for some companies. The corrected notice states that critical circumstances do NOT exist for these separate rate companies regarding temporary steel fencing: Exported by Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and produced or supplied by the following companies: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Cangzhou Hualing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Chanzhou Lianrui Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and supplied by: Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Metaltec Group Co., Limited and produced by: Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and produced by: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. and produced and supplied by: Tangshan ZhongRui Industrial Co., Ltd. Huanghua Tianhang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Tinlin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xindarui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and produced by: Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Names of Producers Corrected There were also errors in some producer names in the earlier table showing dumping and deposit rates for certain exporters. The Commerce Department corrected the producer names for rows 16, 19, 20, and 22 in its rate table. Dumping Margins and Deposit Rates The table lists each exporter and producer, with weighted-average dumping margins and adjusted cash deposit rates. Most companies received a dumping rate of 136.57 percent. Some, like Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., received a higher dumping rate of 187.69 percent. The China-wide rate is 187.69 percent. Legal Notice and Next Steps This notice is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The final determination in the investigation has been postponed. Provisional measures and possible duties remain in place for certain companies and products. The full correction can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 167, dated September 2, 2025. Contact Information For questions, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466 at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-02
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-02 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register of August 19, 2025, in which Commerce announced the preliminary determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of temporary steel fencing from the People's Republic of China (China). This notice corrects the inadvertent statement that critical circumstances exist for the separate rate companies and corrects the names of producers of certain separate rate companies. 2. Certain Quartz Surface Products From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain quartz surface products (quartz surface products) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice. 3. Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register on August 22, 2025, in which Commerce announced the final results of the 2023 administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy. This notice corrects the name of a company subject to the non- selected company subsidy rate, Forge Monchieri S.p.A., which was listed incorrectly as Officine Meccaniche Roselli S.r.l. 4. Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). 5. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 6. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-29
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-29 Estimated reading time: 6 minutes 1. Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that large diameter welded pipe (LDWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) was not sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 2. Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on silicon metal from the Russian Federation (Russia) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice. 3. Certain Monomers and Oligomers From Taiwan: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain monomers and oligomers (monomers and oligomers) from Taiwan during the period of investigation (POI), January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 4. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) during the period of investigation (POI), January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 5. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation (POI) January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024. 6. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the United Arab Emirates: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 7. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 8. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Taiwan are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 9. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From South Africa: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from South Africa are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 10. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Netherlands: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Netherlands are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 11. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Mexico: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Mexico during the period of investigation (POI), January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 12. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Mexico: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 13. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Canada. The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 14. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from
DOJ Briefing 2025-08-28
Justice Department, Executive Office for Immigration Review Briefing 2025-08-28 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Designation of Temporary Immigration Judges Sub: Justice Department, Executive Office for Immigration Review Content: This final rule aligns the regulatory requirements for candidates for Temporary Immigration Judge (“TIJ”) appointments to mirror the regulatory requirements for permanent Immigration Judge (“IJ”) appointments, thus allowing the Attorney General and Director of EOIR to select TIJs from a larger pool of well-qualified candidates. Additionally, the Department of Justice (“the Department” or “DOJ”) is making various technical and non-substantive changes to its regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
In the Matter of Maxim Marchenko, Inmate Number: 78093-510, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges
Export Privileges Denied for Maxim Marchenko After Conviction Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2024-07-17 On July 17, 2024, Maxim Marchenko was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. He was found guilty of smuggling goods from the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 554 and for conspiracy to commit money laundering. Marchenko unlawfully caused companies in the United States to export OLED micro-displays to Russia. The court sentenced him to 36 months in prison and three years of supervised release. According to Section 1760(e) of the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA), a person convicted of certain offenses, like smuggling, can have their export privileges denied for up to ten years. Any licenses from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) that the person had at the time of conviction may also be revoked. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) received notice of Marchenko’s conviction. BIS gave Marchenko a chance to submit a written statement. He did not provide any written response. After reviewing the case, BIS decided to deny Marchenko’s export privileges for ten years from his conviction date. This ban lasts until July 17, 2034. Details of the Export Ban: Maxim Marchenko cannot take part in any business involving any item (commodity, software, or technology) subject to the Export Administration Regulations, whether directly or indirectly. He cannot apply for, obtain, or use any export license, or be involved in negotiations, buying, selling, or any transaction related to exported items covered by the regulations. Marchenko cannot benefit from any transaction involving items exported from the U.S. Restrictions for Others: No person may export or help export any item subject to the regulations to Marchenko. Nobody can help Marchenko get ownership, possession, or control of regulated items. No one can acquire regulated items from Marchenko with knowledge that such items will be exported from the United States. No person can service any regulated item owned or controlled by Marchenko if it involves use of items exported from the United States. Extension of the Order: Any person, firm, corporation, or business linked to Marchenko by ownership, control, position, affiliation, or business connection may also be subject to the order to prevent evasion. Appeal Process: Marchenko may appeal the order to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days and follow the rules in Part 756 of the Regulations. Public Notice: A copy of the order will be delivered to Marchenko and published in the Federal Register. The order is effective immediately and will remain so until July 17, 2034. Issued by: Steven Fisher, Acting Director, Office of Export Enforcement. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
In the Matter of Vladimir Kuznetsov, Inmate Number: 91806-053, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges
Vladimir Kuznetsov Denied Export Privileges by U.S. Government Until 2034 Estimated reading time: 4-6 minutes On April 30, 2024, Vladimir Kuznetsov was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was found guilty of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act. This law can be found at 22 U.S.C. 2778. Kuznetsov was found to have exported and tried to export rifle parts and accessories from the United States to Russia. He did this without the needed U.S. government license. The items included one Accuracy International AICS AX MK II rifle chassis, an H-S Precision aluminum rifle stock, a Kinetic Research Group savage 180-Alpha rifle chassis, a Dakota bolt shroud, a Timney Sportsman trigger assembly, many firearm magazines, and other firearms accessories. These are all listed as defense articles on the United States Munitions List. Because of his conviction, Kuznetsov was sentenced to 46 months in prison. He will also have two years of supervised release after prison. Under the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) can deny a person’s export privileges for up to 10 years if they are convicted of crimes like violating Section 38 of the AECA. This is found at 50 U.S.C. 4819(e). The BIS also has the power to cancel any export licenses that the convicted person held. BIS learned of Kuznetsov’s conviction and gave him a chance to send a written statement. As allowed by the Export Administration Regulations, found at 15 CFR 766.25, Kuznetsov could have replied. But he did not send any response to BIS. After reviewing the case, the Acting Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, Steven Fisher, decided to deny Kuznetsov’s export privileges for 10 years from the date of his conviction. The Office of Exporter Services also decided to cancel any export licenses linked to Kuznetsov. The order means that Vladimir Kuznetsov cannot participate in any export activities under U.S. regulations until April 30, 2034. This ban applies to him directly or through anyone acting for him. He cannot apply for export licenses, buy, sell, transport, or use any U.S. export items. He also cannot benefit from any activity involving items regulated by U.S. export laws. No person may export, reexport, or transfer items controlled under these rules to or for Kuznetsov. No one can help Kuznetsov get control or ownership of those items. No one may take any action to get items from Kuznetsov that are subject to U.S. export laws, or help him get those items. Any person, firm, or company related to Kuznetsov by ownership, control, or business ties may also be subject to this order, if needed, to stop any plan to avoid the order. Kuznetsov can appeal this order. He must file his appeal with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security within 45 days. He must follow the rules in Part 756 of the Export Administration Regulations. A copy of the order will be given to Kuznetsov and published in the Federal Register. The order is effective immediately and will last until April 30, 2034. Steven Fisher, Acting Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, signed the order. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-08-28
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-08-28 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. In the Matter of: Fares Abdo Al Eyani, 3838 Turquoise Way, Unit #415, Oakland, CA 94609; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 2. In the Matter of: Prince Bediako, 3790 Longview Drive, Douglasville, GA 30135-1370; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 3. In the Matter of: Miguel Barrera, Inmate Number: 10606-506, FCI Fort Dix, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 2000, Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 4. In the Matter of Jasmine Desire Gallegos, Inmate Number: 61075-509, FPC Bryan, P.O. Box 2149, Bryan, TX 77805; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 5. In the Matter of: Chrissie Fier Williams, Inmate Number: 87415-510, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 6. In the Matter of: Pedro Cruz Almeida, Jr., Inmate Number: 43804-510, FCI Beaumont, P.O. Box 26020, Bryan, TX 77720; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 7. In the Matter of Vladimir Kuznetsov, Inmate Number: 91806-053, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 8. In the Matter of Maxim Marchenko, Inmate Number: 78093-510, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 9. In the Matter of Juan Manuel Cervantes-Aceves, 5226 E 23rd Street, Tucson, AZ 85042; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 10. In the Matter of Jose Guadalupe Mejia, Inmate Number: 37825-510, FCI Beaumont Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 26020, Beaumont, TX 77720; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 11. In the Matter of: Jessica Alvarado, Inmate Number: 42634-510 FPC Bryan, Federal Prison Camp, P.O. Box 2149, Bryan, TX 77805; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 12. In the Matter of Imelda Jimenez, 434 Plantano, Brownsville, TX 78521; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 13. In the Matter of Guadalupe Gil, 2721 E Caldwell Street, Phoenix, AZ 85042; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 14. In the Matter of Gabriel Daniel Pinnace, Inmate Number: 77450-510, FCI Oakdale II, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5010, Oakdale, LA 71463; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 15. In the Matter of Francisco Dario Mora, 2130 S 7th Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85713; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 16. In the Matter of Damian Alejandro Vidal, Inmate Number: 93487-510, FMC Fort Worth, Federal Medical Center, P.O. Box 15330, Fort Worth, TX 76119; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau 17. In the Matter of Cesar David Piz Corona, 830 N Lamb Blvd., Space 3, Las Vegas, NV 89110; Order Denying Export Privileges Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Chinese Slag Pots Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Washington, D.C., August 28, 2025 — The U.S. Department of Commerce has made its final decision in the antidumping duty investigation of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The Department determined that these products are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). Period of Investigation The period looked at was from April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. No Comments or Changes The Department published its preliminary decision on June 17, 2025. No parties sent comments, so the Department adopted its preliminary findings as final. There is no decision memorandum for this action. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers slag pots from China. The Department received no comments on what products should be included. The scope, as described in the appendix of the notice, was not changed. Facts Available and Adverse Inferences No companies were found eligible for separate rates. The Department treated all companies as part of the “China-wide entity.” No verification was done. Based on sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the Department used facts available with adverse inferences. The Department set the dumping rate at 294.43 percent for the China-wide entity. This is the highest rate claimed in the original petition. The China-wide entity includes these companies: Chaeng Great Wall Casting Co., Ltd. Chaugzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. China Minmetals Corporation Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. Dehua Protech Innovation Co., Ltd. Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. MCC Baosteel Technology Services Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Shaoguan Germany China Metal Group, Ltd. Shenyang Minmetal Import & Export Co., Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Co., Ltd. No Separate or Combination Rates The Department did not offer individual “separate rates” or “producer/exporter combination rates” because no company qualified for a separate rate. Final Dumping Margin The weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide entity is 294.43 percent. The cash deposit rate, adjusted for export subsidy offset, is 278.81 percent. No Disclosure Calculations Because the rate is based on adverse facts available and the petition, there are no calculations to disclose. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation The Department will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue suspending liquidation of all related entries entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after June 17, 2025. This includes all merchandise covered under the investigation. CBP will require cash deposits based on the rates above. The cash deposit rate may be changed in the future if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds both dumping and subsidies, at which point it will be adjusted for export subsidies. For now, CBP will not collect deposits adjusted for provisional measures in the companion countervailing duty (CVD) case, because they have expired. Next Steps by the U.S. International Trade Commission The Department will notify the ITC about its findings. The ITC must decide if U.S. industry is being injured or threatened with injury by these imports within 45 days. If the ITC rules there is no injury, the case ends and deposits are returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department will order AD duties on all entries made on or after the effective date for suspension of liquidation. Administrative Protective Orders If the ITC finds no injury, this notice will serve to remind all parties with access to business-sensitive information under Administrative Protective Orders (APOs) to return or destroy relevant documents. Scope: What Is Covered The products covered are slag pots with capacities from 65 cubic feet to 1200 cubic feet, regardless of shape, finish, or whether finished or unfinished. These are load-bearing goods typically made by casting or fabrication, such as welding. They may have legs, stands, or lifting hooks. The country where the slag pot was cast or forged determines its origin. The products are classified under HTSUS codes 7309.00.0090 and 8454.20.0080, though scope and definitions are controlled by the written description. Contact Information For more information, contact George McMahon at the International Trade Administration, (202) 482-1167. This final determination is official as of August 28, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Countervailable Subsidies on Slag Pots from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Investigation Period and Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision on imports of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The agency determined that Chinese producers and exporters of slag pots receive countervailable subsidies. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. On April 3, 2025, the Department published its preliminary findings. No comments were received, and the results remain unchanged in the final determination. Companies Involved and Subsidy Rate The following companies from China were assigned a countervailing duty rate: Chaeng Great Wall Steel Casting Co. Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Inc. Ltd. Cast-Con Engineering GmbH & Co. KG Changzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. GVA Krefeld GmbH Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. Luoyang Zhongtai Industries Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Tangshan Sinya International Trade Co., Ltd. All other companies Each company received an estimated countervailable subsidy rate of 226.16 percent ad valorem. This rate was based on facts available because the mandatory respondents did not provide requested information and were considered uncooperative. Product Scope The investigation covers slag pots with a nominal capacity of 65 to 1,200 cubic feet. These items are used in metal processing and can be made by casting or fabrication, with or without finishes like coating or heat treatment. They may come with parts such as legs and lifting hooks. Both finished and unfinished slag pots, even those further processed in other countries, are covered. Relevant U.S. import tariff codes for these products include: 7309.00.0090 8454.20.0080 Possible attachments could also enter under codes like 7316.00.0000, 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7325.99.5000, and 7326.19.0080. Suspension of Liquidation Following the preliminary decision, U.S. Customs was told to suspend liquidation of slag pot imports from China that arrived on or after April 3, 2025. Customs will not suspend entries made on or after August 1, 2025, but will keep suspending those entered on or before July 31, 2025. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if these imports hurt the U.S. industry. The ITC must issue its decision within 45 days. If the ITC finds injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued and cash deposits for duties will be required. If no injury is found, the case will end and all deposits will be refunded. Legal Reference This action was published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2025, under the authority of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For more information, the full legal text can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 165, pages 41986-41988. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Rescinds Administrative Review of Chinese Magnesia Carbon Bricks Estimated reading time: 1–4 minutes On August 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant to cover imports made between September 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024. The rescission took place because there were no reviewable entries of magnesia carbon bricks from the companies involved during the period of review. This means that no imports of these bricks entered the United States in a way that would be affected by the review during that time. The review process started after the Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee requested it on September 30, 2024. U.S. Customs and Border Protection data later showed that there were no relevant entries to review. No parties provided comments about this data, and no comments were received after the notice of intent to rescind the review was issued on July 8, 2025. This decision follows Commerce’s usual practice. When there are no entries to review because none were imported during the set period, Commerce rescinds the review according to its regulations. No antidumping cash deposit rates will change because of this rescission. The current cash deposit requirements for these imports will stay in effect until further notice. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess antidumping duties at the same rates that were in place at the time the entries were made. Instructions about assessment will be sent to Customs no earlier than 35 days after this notice is published. Parties involved in this review are reminded of their duties under the administrative protective order. They must return or destroy any proprietary information given under this order according to the rules. This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce says that polypropylene corrugated boxes from China are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This is called an “affirmative preliminary determination” in an antidumping investigation. Time Period Investigated The time period studied was July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. What is Being Investigated The investigation is about boxes made from corrugated sheets of polypropylene. These boxes are used to hold or carry goods. The boxes can be any size, shape, or style. They can have handles, lids, tops, or be made in one piece, two pieces, or more. The investigation also covers lids or tops by themselves. How the Boxes are Made The boxes are made from plastic sheets that have air channels inside. These make the boxes strong but still light. The plastic used is at least 50% polypropylene. Where the Boxes are Classified These boxes are classified in U.S. customs under number 3923.10.9000. The written description is most important for determining what is covered. Results of the Investigation No companies from China responded to the government’s requests for information. Because of this, Commerce used facts available “with adverse inferences” to set the dumping rate for all exporters from China. Dumping Margins The Commerce Department says the “China-wide entity” has a weighted-average dumping margin of 83.64 percent. The cash deposit rate, after adjusting for subsidies, is 73.10 percent. What Happens Next U.S. Customs must suspend liquidation of these products brought into the U.S. on or after August 28, 2025. Importers must pay cash deposits based on the dumping margin. If changes happen in a related countervailing duty case, the deposit rates could change. These rules stay in effect until more notice is given. Public Comment Period Interested parties have 30 days to send in written comments, called “case briefs.” They can send in rebuttal briefs 5 days after that. Everyone who sends briefs must include a table of contents and a list of legal sources. Summaries of each argument (about 450 words) should be put at the start of each brief. Anyone wanting a hearing must request one in writing within 30 days of the notice. Hearings will be only about issues in these briefs. What Happens Later Commerce will make its final decision within 75 days of this preliminary determination. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will be told about this preliminary decision. If Commerce says in its final decision that dumping has happened, the ITC will decide if this has hurt the U.S. industry. Scope of the Investigation The full description of the products and steps of the investigation are posted on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Enforcement and Compliance website. More Information The official notice and more details are published in the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 165, on August 28, 2025. For questions, contact Dan Alexander at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-28
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-28 Estimated reading time: 6 minutes 1. Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that polypropylene corrugated boxes (corrugated boxes) from the People's Republic of China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 2. Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain magnesia carbon bricks (bricks) from the People's Republic China (China), covering the period of review (POR) September 1, 2023, though August 31, 2024, because, as explained below, there are no reviewable suspended entries for the companies subject to this review. 3. Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of slag pots from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 4. Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that slag pots from the People's Republic of China (China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. 5. Quartz Surface Products From India: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on quartz surface products from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Tungsten Shot From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Sets Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Tungsten Shot from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 27, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued final antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain tungsten shot imported from the People’s Republic of China. This action follows affirmative final determinations by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Commerce determined on July 11, 2025, that Chinese producers and exporters of tungsten shot are selling their products in the United States at less than fair value and are receiving countervailable subsidies. The ITC confirmed, on August 20, 2025, that U.S. industry is being materially retarded by these imports. Product Scope The orders cover tungsten spheres or balls, also known as shot, that are 92.6 percent or greater tungsten by weight. The size ranges from 1.5 mm to 10.0 mm in diameter. The product may be called “Tungsten Super Shot” and may include coatings, such as copper, nickel, iron, or metallic alloys. These products are generally classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) subheading 9306.29.0000, and may also enter under 8101.99.8000. The written description in the order determines the scope. Antidumping Order Details Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to impose antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds its export price. Because the ITC’s injury determination is based on material retardation, AD duties will only be collected on entries made on or after the date the ITC’s final injury determination is published. CBP will also refund any cash deposits from entries before this date, specifically for entries made on or after February 19, 2025 (the date of the AD Preliminary Determination). Commerce will reinstitute the suspension of liquidation and require a cash deposit for all future imports of subject tungsten shot from China. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all Chinese producers and exporters is 201.32 percent. Countervailing Duty Order Details Under the CVD order, CBP will collect duties on imports of tungsten shot from China beginning with entries made on or after the publication date of the ITC’s final injury determination. CBP will refund any cash deposits for entries before this date, specifically those made on or after December 20, 2024 (the date of the CVD Preliminary Determination). Estimated subsidy rates by company: Luoyang Combat Tungsten & Molybdenum Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Luoyang Hypersolid Metal Tech Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Mudanjiang North Alloy Tools Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Shaanxi Xinheng Rare Metal Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Xi’an Refractory & Precise Metals Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd.: 55.64% Zhuzhou Oston Carbide Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou Tungsten Man Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% All Others: 55.64% Administrative Procedures Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for these orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance to be added to this list within 30 days of the order’s publication. Law firms are asked to designate a lead attorney. This list will be updated as needed. The petitioner and the Government of China must submit their initial entries of appearance to be included on the first annual list. They do not need to resubmit each year but must update their entries if there are changes. Conclusion These orders are effective as of August 27, 2025. Detailed information is available online at: https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. These actions were signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ceramic Tile From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Ceramic Tile from China Likely to Continue Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The antidumping duty order on ceramic tile from China was first published on June 1, 2020. In May 2025, the Commerce Department began its first sunset review of this order as required by law. The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile, a group of U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers, submitted a notice to participate in this review before the deadline. The group also provided a full response with information and arguments. No responses came from any Chinese companies. Review Process Because there were no responses from the other side, the Commerce Department ran an expedited review, which takes 120 days. The review considered whether removing the antidumping duty order would lead to more dumping of ceramic tiles from China. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on what is covered are in the full decision memo, which is available online. Findings The Commerce Department found that canceling the order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at prices below fair value. The Department determined that if the order is revoked, weighted average dumping margins could be as high as 356.02 percent. Other Information Parties who got special access to information in this review must follow rules for returning, destroying, or converting protected information. These results were issued in line with the law and regulations. For more information and for access to the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, visit https://access.trade.gov or contact Juliana Kogan at the U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: 202-482-0966. Dated: August 22, 2025 Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-27
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-27 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Ceramic Tile From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on ceramic tile from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice. 2. Certain Tungsten Shot From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain tungsten shot (tungsten shot) from the People’s Republic of China (China). 3. Thermal Paper From the Federal Republic of Germany: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that thermal paper from the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany) was not sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
United States Imposes Sanctions on Four Costa Rican Nationals and Two Entities Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took new sanctions actions. OFAC has added four individuals and two companies to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These actions are based on Executive Order 14059, “Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade.” All property and interests in property in the United States, belonging to these persons and companies, are now blocked. U.S. persons may not do business with them. Individuals Added to SDN List: Edwin Danney Lopez Vega – Also known as “Pecho de Rata” – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: January 2, 1977 – Place of Birth: Centro Central, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701210791 – Gender: Male Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez – Location: Cartago, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: April 21, 1976 – Place of Birth: Carmen Central, San Jose, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 109380563 – Gender: Male Alejandro Antonio James Wilson – Also known as “Turesky” – Location: San Jose, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: October 5, 1972 – Place of Birth: Centro Central, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701040769 – Gender: Male Alejandro Arias Monge – Also known as “Diablo” – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: September 19, 1984 – Place of Birth: Guapiles Pococi, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701600166 – Gender: Male These four individuals are designated for activities or transactions that have contributed, or pose a significant risk of contributing, to the international spread of illicit drugs or drug production tools. Entities Added to SDN List: Limon Black Star FC – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Established: 2022 – Organization Type: Activities of sports clubs – Linked to: Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez Bufete Celso Gamboa and Asociados – Location: San Jose, Costa Rica – Established: 1945 – Organization Type: Legal activities – Linked to: Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez Both companies are designated for being owned, controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez. Further Information The official list and further details about OFAC’s sanctions programs are available on the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. The information in this article is based entirely on the official notice published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 163, on August 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-08-26
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-08-26 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Syrian Sanctions Regulations Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is removing from the Code of Federal Regulations the Syrian Sanctions Regulations as a result of the termination of the national emergency on which the regulations were based and further changes to the policy of the United States towards Syria. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Steel Wire Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background On January 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce published the CVD order on steel wire rod from China. On May 1, 2025, Commerce began the second sunset review of this order. U.S. producers—Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company, Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC—showed intent to participate as domestic interested parties. These companies are producers of the same type of product in the U.S. On June 2, 2025, Commerce received a response from the domestic interested parties. The Government of China and companies from China did not respond. Expedited Review Because only domestic interested parties responded, and the Chinese side did not, Commerce held an expedited review as allowed by law. This was done under section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. Product Scope The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. A full description of the products and issues discussed appears in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum,” which is available electronically on the Department of Commerce’s official system ACCESS. Findings Commerce found that ending the CVD order would likely lead to more countervailable subsidies from China. Here are the countervailable subsidy rates that are most likely to apply if the order were removed: Benxi Steel (which includes several related companies): 193.31% ad valorem Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Tangshan Branch: 178.46% ad valorem All Others: 185.89% ad valorem Administrative Details Parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) are reminded to return or destroy confidential information according to the rules. Failure to do this can result in sanctions. Publication The Department of Commerce is publishing these final results as required by law, including sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Official Contact For more information, contact Emily Eshoo of the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce, by phone at 202-482-6296. Signed Dated: August 22, 2025. Abdelali Elouaradia Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance — Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 26, 2025), Pages 41547-41548, Notice C-570-013. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-26
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-26 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (steel wire rod) from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice. 2. Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) received scope ruling applications, requesting that scope inquiries be conducted to determine whether identified products are covered by the scope of antidumping duty (AD) and/or countervailing duty (CVD) orders and that Commerce issue scope rulings pursuant to those inquiries. In accordance with Commerce's regulations, we are notifying the public of the filing of the scope ruling applications listed below in the month of July 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From China and Vietnam; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigation
U.S. Moves Forward in Trade Case on Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is moving ahead with the final step of an investigation into polypropylene corrugated boxes (“PC boxes”) from China and Vietnam. This notice came after a finding from the U.S. Department of Commerce that these boxes from China are being subsidized. What Are Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes? These are boxes, bins, totes, or other containers made from special sheets of plastic called polypropylene. The inside of these sheets have channels or pockets of air. This makes the boxes lightweight but strong. They can come in one piece, two pieces, or several pieces, with or without handles, lids, or reinforcing wire. They may also be printed with ink or digital designs. Even lids or tops shipped alone are included. Why Is There an Investigation? The investigation looks at imports from China and Vietnam. The goal is to decide if the influx of these boxes hurts U.S. companies or slows down new businesses. Four U.S. companies asked for this review: CoolSeal USA Inc., Inteplast Group Corporation, SeaCa Plastic Packaging, and Technology Container Corp. Next Steps of the Investigation The final part of the investigation started on August 20, 2025. The U.S. Department of Commerce already made a first decision that boxes from China may be getting help from the Chinese government. Decisions about “antidumping”—selling the boxes for less than they cost to make—are still pending. The ITC will decide if the imports hurt or threaten to hurt U.S. industry. Key Dates and Deadlines October 22, 2025: A staff report will be made in the nonpublic record. A public version will follow. October 28, 2025: Final prehearing briefs must be turned in. October 29, 2025: People must request to appear at the hearing. November 4, 2025: A prehearing conference may be held, and written testimony and slides for the hearing are due by noon. November 5, 2025: The main hearing will start at 9:30 a.m. November 12, 2025: Deadline for post-hearing briefs and for others to send in written statements. November 25, 2025: All new information will be shared with the parties. December 1, 2025: Final comments must be submitted. How to Get Involved People who want to take part in the hearing must file an “entry of appearance” at least 21 days before the hearing. Industrial users, consumers, and others can send written statements. All filings must be made online through the Commission’s electronic filing system. Rules and Security Business secrets collected during the investigation can only be seen by allowed people under a special order. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Only electronic filings will be used. Contact and More Information For questions, contact Camille Bryan at (202) 205-2811. More information is available on the ITC’s website (https://www.usitc.gov) and on the electronic docket (https://edis.usitc.gov). Legal Authority This investigation is being conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Issued by: Lisa Barton,Secretary to the CommissionDate: 2025-08-22
USITC Briefing 2025-08-26
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-08-26 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From China and Vietnam; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/26/2025-16339/polypropylene-corrugated-boxes-from-china-and-vietnam-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of countervailing duty investigation No. 701-TA-757 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of polypropylene corrugated boxes (“PC boxes”) from China, provided for in subheadings 3923.10.90 and 3923.50.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to be subsidized by the Government of China. Commerce’s preliminary determinations with respect to PC boxes from China and Vietnam, alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value, are pending. 2. Certain Smart Wearable Devices, Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/26/2025-16316/certain-smart-wearable-devices-systems-and-components-thereof-notice-of-the-commissions-final Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has determined to issue: (1) a limited exclusion (“LEO”) prohibiting the unlicensed entry of infringing smart wearable devices, systems, and components thereof that are manufactured by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of, the respondents; and (2) cease and desist orders (“CDOs”) against five respondents. The investigation is terminated. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Wind Turbines and Their Parts and Components
U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Investigation Into Wind Turbine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun an investigation about wind turbines and their parts coming into the United States. The purpose is to find out how these imports may affect national security. The investigation started on August 13, 2025. It is being managed by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). How the Public Can Comment The Department of Commerce wants to hear from the public. People and companies can send in comments, facts, or studies related to the investigation. Comments are due by September 9, 2025. You must submit comments through the Federal rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov. Use the ID BIS-2025-0191 and refer to XRIN 0694-XC133 when you comment. If you want to keep information private, you must clearly mark which parts are confidential. You should also provide a public version without the secret details. This information will be made public unless you follow the correct steps for business confidentiality. What Topics Should Comments Cover? How much wind turbines and their parts the United States needs now and will need in the future. If companies in the United States can make enough of these items. How much the United States depends on other countries to supply these items. If many wind turbines or parts come from just a few countries or suppliers, which could be risky. Whether foreign governments help their companies with unfair subsidies or trade practices. If foreign companies make prices too low because of unfair actions or because their governments make too many wind turbines. If other countries might limit exports or use their control over wind turbines as a weapon. How possible it is to make more wind turbines in the United States and buy fewer from other countries. If current trade policies are helping or hurting U.S. companies. If new measures, like tariffs or limits on imports, are needed for national security. Risks that come from letting foreign companies or countries control parts of the supply chain. If foreign wind turbines or parts can be used in ways that could harm the United States. How to Protect Confidential Information If your comments have confidential business information: Mark those pages “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL.” Give a public version for sharing. Make sure the confidential file name starts with “BC,” and the public file starts with “P.” If you submit comments without using “BC” or “P,” the information may become public on regulations.gov. More Information If you have questions, you can contact Stephen Astle, Director at the Defense Industrial Base Division of BIS, at (202) 482-4506 or by email (provided in the original notice). Details about the investigation and regulations are at www.bis.doc.gov/232. For FOIA requests and to see related records, visit https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/. The notice was signed by Robby S. Saunders, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Security. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-08-25
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-08-25 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Wind Turbines and Their Parts and Components Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: On August 13, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of wind turbines and their parts and components. This investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (Section 232). Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to the investigation to the Department of Commerce’s (Department) Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. This notice identifies issues on which the Department is especially interested in obtaining the public’s views. 2. Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Wind Turbines and Their Parts and Components Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: On August 13, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of wind turbines and their parts and components. This investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (Section 232). Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to the investigation to the Department of Commerce's (Department) Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. This notice identifies issues on which the Department is especially interested in obtaining the public's views. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Second Sunset Review on Chinese Steel Wire Rod Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of the expedited second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The Department found that removing the antidumping duties on steel wire rod from China would likely lead to continued or repeated dumping. The likely dumping margins would be up to 110.25 percent. Background of the Order The original antidumping duty order on steel wire rod from China was published on January 8, 2015. The purpose of this order is to prevent unfair dumping of steel wire rod into the United States at prices lower than fair value, which can harm U.S. producers. On May 1, 2025, the Department of Commerce started the second sunset review of this order. This review is required under the Tariff Act of 1930. A sunset review occurs every five years to decide if ending the duties would lead to continued dumping. Participation in the Review On May 16, 2025, Domestic Interested Parties, which include Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC, filed their notice of intent to participate in the review. These parties said they are U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers of the steel wire rod covered by the order. The Department of Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this intent to participate on May 22, 2025. On June 2, 2025, these same parties submitted their full response, which was on time and in full detail. No parties from China responded to the Department’s request for comments. Because there was no response from China, the Department carried out an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The full details are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which the Department has made public. This document is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS system. Final Results The Department concluded that ending the antidumping duty order would probably result in the continued or repeated dumping of steel wire rod from China. The likely margins are up to 110.25 percent. This means that, according to the Department, if the duties are revoked, Chinese companies might continue or resume selling steel wire rod in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, at levels up to 110.25 percent below fair value. Administrative Protective Orders The notice also reminds parties who have access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility to return or destroy this information as required by law. Further Information All related documents, including the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, are available to the public on the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. This announcement is in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and corresponding regulations. Contact For more information, contact Morgan Jefferies at the Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, telephone 202-482-6302. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ceramic Tile From People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Chinese Ceramic Tile After Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has finished its first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on ceramic tile from the People’s Republic of China. The department found that ending the order would likely cause countervailable subsidies to continue or come back. What Is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a regular check done every five years. It looks at whether removing duties would lead to unfair trading practices starting again. This review was started on May 1, 2025, under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Process and Responses The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile sent in a notice of intent to take part in the review on May 16, 2025. The group claimed status as an interested party, as most of its members make, produce, or wholesale similar products in the U.S. The Coalition also submitted a full response to the review by the June 2, 2025, deadline. No responses came from the Government of China or any respondent interested parties. The Department of Commerce told the U.S. International Trade Commission about the lack of responses from China on June 20, 2025. As a result, the department did an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on the scope can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum provided by the Department of Commerce. What Did the Department Find? The Department of Commerce decided that ending the countervailing duty order would likely lead to the continuation or return of illegal subsidies for ceramic tile from China. The review includes analysis of likely subsidy rates if the order was removed. The main subsidy rate found likely to continue or come back is 358.81 percent ad valorem for the following producers and exporters: Temgoo International Trading Limited: 358.81% Foshan Sanfi Imp & Emp Co., Ltd: 358.81% All Others: 358.81% Information for Interested Parties The notice is also a reminder for parties with access to confidential information to follow the rules for returning or destroying materials. These rules are detailed in 19 CFR 351.305. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is publishing these results according to sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). The final results were signed on August 20, 2025, by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. To access the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, interested parties can visit https://access.trade.gov. Appendix – Topics in the Issues and Decision Memorandum: Summary Background Scope of the Order History of the Order Legal Framework Discussion of the Issues Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail Nature of the Subsidies Final Results of Sunset Review Recommendation Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-08-25
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-08-25 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee; Meeting Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) will hold a virtual meeting on Tuesday, September 9, 2025. The meeting is open to the public with registration instructions provided below. This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed topics for the meeting. 2. Ceramic Tile From People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on ceramic tile from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice. 3. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (steel wire rod) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates Sanctions List: August 22, 2025 Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced updates to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). On July 1, 2025, OFAC updated the SDN List entry for a company in China. The new entry is for “SHANGHAI WINSON IMP AND EXP CO LTD,” also known as “SHANGHAI YUNCHEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO LTD.” The company’s addresses are listed in Shanghai, China. Its Unified Social Credit Code is 91310115MA1K40X926. Its property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction remain blocked. On the same day, July 1, OFAC announced that the property and interests in property of “GOLD MILES LIMITED” are now unblocked and the company has been removed from the SDN List. GOLD MILES LIMITED had addresses in Hong Kong, China, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The company’s Hong Kong registration number is 1596444. This company was previously linked to John Desmond Hanafin. On July 3, 2025, three persons and one company from Colombia were also removed from the SDN List. They are: Gabriel Puerta Parra (“Doctor Puerta”), with various addresses in Bogota, Colombia. He was also associated with several companies in Colombia. His ID number is 8238830 and his Colombian passport number is P020046. INDUSTRIAL MINERA Y PECUARIA S.A., located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82B La Castellana, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 830000855-1. COMERCIALIZADORA ANDINA BRASILERA S.A. (“CABRASA”), located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 830003298-2. LA FRONTERA UNION GALVEZ Y CIA S EN C (formerly LA FRONTERA PUERTA GALVEZ LTDA.), located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 800050795-2. On August 18, 2025, OFAC updated SDN List entries for other individuals. They also announced that Claudia Mercedes Vargas Giraldo from Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, has been removed from the SDN List. Her date of birth is December 4, 1964, and her Colombian ID number is 42885957. She was previously linked to several companies, including CLAMASAN S.A.S., GUISANES S.A.S., C.M.V. CARNES S.A.S., and AGROPECUARIA MAIS SAS. These changes mean that the property and interests in property of those who have been removed from the SDN List are no longer blocked by OFAC. For more details, go to the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. For questions, contact the OFAC Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. Authority: 31 CFR chapter V. Bradley T. Smith, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-08-22
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-08-22 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more persons currently included in OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). OFAC is also publishing the names of one or more persons whose property and interests in property have been unblocked and who have been removed from the SDN List. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more persons currently included in OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). OFAC is also publishing the names of one or more persons whose property and interests in property have been unblocked and who have been removed from the SDN List. 3. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more persons currently included in OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). OFAC is also publishing the names of one or more persons whose property and interests in property have been unblocked and who have been removed from the SDN List. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Justice Department Announces Third Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the third meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission. This meeting will take place on September 29, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. It will be held at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, at 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting is open to the public. There will be a live broadcast available at justice.gov/live. To attend in person, members of the public must register online at the Religious Liberty Commission website: https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. In-person attendance is limited due to space. Everyone attending will be required to show identification and pass through security. Media representatives must register through the Office of Public Affairs by September 26, 2025, at 5 p.m. They will need to bring government-issued photo ID and valid media credentials. Security checks for the media will be required. The contact person for the Religious Liberty Commission is Mary Margaret Bush. She serves as the Designated Federal Officer. For more information or for accommodations to attend the meeting, Mrs. Bush can be reached at 202-297-3196 or by email. The Religious Liberty Commission was set up by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission is a federal advisory committee. It includes a chair, a vice chair, 11 members chosen by the President, and three ex-officio members. These members come from the private sector, employers, schools, religious groups, and States. The Commission advises the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office about religious liberty policies. The group is creating a whole report for the President. Topics in the report will be: foundations of religious liberty in America, how religious liberty affects society, current threats, ways to protect religious liberty for the future, and programs to raise awareness and celebrate America’s religious diversity. The September 29 meeting will focus on religious liberty in education. The agenda includes discussions of issues for teachers and coaches, school funding, educational choice, and the independence of faith-based schools. Panels at the meeting will hear from teachers, coaches, school leaders, families, and experts. The hearing aims to cover the history of religious liberty in schools, threats today, and ways to protect these rights going forward. The public can send written comments by email or mail. Comments must be received by September 22, 2025. Email messages can be sent to the Commission’s official address. Mailed comments should go to the U.S. Department of Justice, Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5263, Washington, DC 20530. This meeting is announced under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Dated: August 19, 2025. Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree
United States Files Consent Decree in Clean Water Act Case Against Tyson L. Friskney Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 19, 2025, a proposed Consent Decree was lodged in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This action was brought by the United States against Tyson L. Friskney. The case is titled United States v. Tyson L. Friskney, 3:23-cv-00439-JRK. The complaint was filed under Section 309(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b). The United States alleges that Tyson L. Friskney violated the Clean Water Act. The violation involved discharging pollutants into waters of the United States without obtaining a permit. To resolve these claims, the proposed Consent Decree requires Tyson L. Friskney to take certain actions. The defendant must complete injunctive relief. This relief is in the form of compensatory mitigation. Specifically, Tyson L. Friskney must purchase stream mitigation credits. The Department of Justice will accept written comments about the proposed Consent Decree. The comment period lasts for thirty days from August 22, 2025. Comments should be sent to Miranda Jensen at: P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Email: [protected address] Include reference to United States v. Tyson L. Friskney, 90-5-1-1-21944. The proposed Consent Decree can be examined at the Clerk’s Office. The address is: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio 1716 Spielbusch Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43604 It is also available online at: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees Charles Scott Spear, Acting Assistant Section Chief of the Environmental Defense Section in the Environment and Natural Resources Division, submitted this notice. The official Federal Register document number is 2025-16097. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
