Commerce Begins Investigation on Vietnamese Steel Circumvention Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes Background Information This inquiry starts after a request from Steel Dynamics Inc. and Nucor Corporation. They claim that these steel products should fall under existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) against corrosion-resistant steel from Vietnam. What Are the Orders About? The orders involve flat-rolled steel products. These products might be plated or coated with metals that resist rust, like zinc or aluminum. Such products could also have added layers of paint or plastic coatings. What Is Being Inquired? The inquiry looks at whether steel completed in Indonesia, using materials from Vietnam, is avoiding the duties. The steel products are meant for the U.S. market. If found to be avoiding duties, they will face AD and CVD orders. Steps by Commerce Commerce has guidelines under U.S. trade law to decide if there is circumvention. They look at whether the steel imported into the U.S. is similar to products made in Vietnam, whether the process in Indonesia is minor, and if substantial value comes from Vietnam. They also check if taking steps is necessary to prevent duty evasion. Factors for Consideration Investment level in Indonesia. Research and development efforts there. Production nature and facilities’ extent. Value proportion of the process. The individual factors do not single-handedly decide the issue. Commerce will examine all of them combined to get a complete picture. Looking at Trade Patterns Commerce also examines trade patterns. This includes checking any shifts in how materials are sourced or if trade has increased since the order started. They will study relationships between manufacturers or exports as well. Next Steps and Timeline Commerce will select respondents based on U.S. Customs data. Respondents will likely include Indonesian firms producing the questioned steel. Companies have a duty to provide complete information, or they may face penalties. Suspension Details For products already under suspension due to the orders, Customs will maintain the status quo. If the inquiry finds circumvention, suspended shipments will stay affected. If new items not under suspension are found to skirt the rules, suspension will start from March 25, 2026. Timeline for Decision Commerce plans to issue a preliminary decision in 150 days and a final decision within 300 days. All interested parties will stay informed as the inquiry progresses. Commerce’s decisions aim to ensure fair trade practice and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Circumvention of Trade Orders on Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On March 25, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made an important announcement. They found that some imports from Mexico are avoiding certain trade rules. These rules are called the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. The decision affects specific steel products. Which Products Are Affected? The products involved are low-carbon steel (LCS) wires. These wires are made in Mexico. After they arrive in the U.S., they are turned into welded wire mesh. This mesh is used in construction. It helps make concrete stronger. The Commerce Department decided that some companies are not following the trade rules. How Did This Decision Come About? The Department of Commerce began looking into this issue in September 2025. They had a preliminary decision. Then, they gave more time before making the final decision due to a government shutdown. This final decision was announced on March 20, 2026. Which Companies Are Involved? One company, Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., was found to be avoiding the trade orders. Another company, Impulsora del Alambre S.A. de C.V., was not found to be breaking the rules. What Happens Next? From March 25, 2026, the U.S. will take action to stop these companies from avoiding the rules. All wire shipments from Mexico used to make wire mesh will be watched more closely. The companies must now pay special duties. They also must keep track of what they are importing and prove that they are following the rules. What Are the New Rules? Importers of LCS wire must now follow new rules. They need to show that their products are not avoiding any duties. This is done through certifications. If an importer cannot prove this, they will have to pay the duties. Conclusion This decision affects companies that make and use wire mesh. They need to make sure they follow these new rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce is working hard to make sure everyone plays by the rules. This is how the U.S. is trying to protect its industries and stop unfair trade practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Commerce Opens Inclusions Window for Automobile Parts Tariff Process Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced a new update regarding the tariff process on automobile parts. This update comes from the International Trade Administration (ITA). The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is working with the ITA to handle this process. A special time, called the “inclusions window,” is opening for submissions. During this time, people can ask to add more automobile parts to the list under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The President has given permission for certain duties, or taxes, on vehicle parts. The inclusions window will open on April 1, 2026, and will close at 11:59 p.m. ET on April 14, 2026. This window is the time frame during which people can submit requests to include more parts on the tariff list. All submissions must be sent to a specific email. The email address is protected and needs to be accessed responsibly to avoid errors. The process was established by a proclamation from the President on March 26, 2025. This is known as Proclamation 10908, titled “Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States.” It sets out specific duties on automobiles and certain parts. In September 2025, an interim final rule (IFR) was published. This rule created a specific process to include additional parts. The rule established four two-week windows each year: in January, April, July, and October. These windows are for submitting automobile parts for possible inclusion in the tariff duties. This April’s inclusions window will be open for two weeks. Once the window closes, inclusion requests that are accepted will be available for public comment. This will happen on Docket ID ITA-2025-0040 at Regulations.gov. Before submitting a request, make sure the parts are not already part of the duties list. If you have submitted a request before and have not received a decision, do not submit the same request again. Only submit if you have new important information. Andrew Farquharson, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing, provided this update. The document information was filed on March 23, 2026, and carries the billing code 3510-DR-P. For further details or questions, you may contact the email provided in the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Completes Review on Citric Acid Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of the antidumping duty on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The review period was from May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration under the U.S. Department of Commerce. The agency looked at the sales of RZBC Group Co., Ltd., including RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., in the United States. It was determined that these companies did not sell citric acid at prices below what is considered normal. The review confirms that the decision remains unchanged from the preliminary results shared in September 2025. There were no comments or disputes concerning the preliminary findings, leading to this final decision without alteration. The product discussed in this review is citric acid from China. The review ensures that the product sold in the United States was not sold at unfairly low prices, harming U.S. markets. The review also covered the “China-wide entity,” a status that involves other Chinese exporters. There was no requirement to review this entity in this instance since no requests were made. The earlier set rate of 156.87 percent remains for the China-wide entity. The final results show that RZBC did not sell citric acid at unfairly low prices in the U.S. during the review period, maintaining a zero percent dumping margin. There were no changes to the original calculations or findings from the preliminary review, so no further details will be disclosed. For this review, there are also implications for duties. Since there was no unfair pricing detected, duties on these products will not be applied for the entries made during the review period. Additionally, new cash deposit requirements will be effective with the publication of the results. This means any new shipments of citric acid from China will follow the updated rules. The Commerce Department’s assessments guide how duties are applied to imports that might harm U.S. businesses. This ensures fair trade practices. The review process and its results are crucial for maintaining fair prices and protecting U.S. industries from unfair trade practices. The entire review and its implications are published for transparency and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Gave Extra Help to Some Manufacturers Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has looked at how two Chinese chemical companies, Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd., received extra help from their government. This help, called countervailable subsidies, was given between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Because of this help, the U.S. decided that these companies might have an unfair advantage when selling their products in the United States. The final decision was made on March 16, 2026. The Department of Commerce published the details on March 20, 2026. The companies were checked to see how much help they got from the Chinese government. Zhejiang Yonghe got a subsidy rate of 10.11%, and Zhejiang Sanmei got a 3.02% subsidy rate. This means that they received financial support that could give them an advantage over other companies not receiving such help. The Department of Commerce collected data through a thorough review process. They used the Tariff Act of 1930, a long-standing U.S. law, to guide their analysis. They looked at if the support from the Chinese government was specific and beneficial for these companies. Several extensions were granted during the review to ensure a thorough examination, especially considering delays due to government shutdowns. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will now be collecting these extra duties on products shipped from these companies after this decision. This will continue until further notice. The Department wants to make sure American companies can compete fairly with those abroad. For anyone who wants more information, it is available through the ACCESS system, a place where people can see public government documents. Officials ensure that rules about keeping information private are strictly followed, though. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s actions show its commitment to fair trade, making sure all companies play by the same rules, and protecting American businesses from unfair foreign competition. This detailed look into the countervailable subsidies is a clear example of ongoing efforts to ensure fair competition globally. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Reviews Korean Steel Pipes and Tubes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Review Background The antidumping duty order on these products was first published by Commerce on September 13, 2016. In October 2024, following requests for review, the department started assessing four producers and exporters from Korea. Due to various delays, including extensions and federal shutdowns, Commerce set March 9, 2026, as the deadline for final results. Scope of Merchandise The subject merchandise concerns particular heavy walled welded steel pipes from Korea. The review evaluates if these products were sold in the U.S. at lower than fair value. Findings and Methodology Commerce is conducting the review per U.S. trade laws, focusing on constructed export prices. It confirmed that products from Korea were sold at fair value during this period. Using previously determined rates as references, it was decided that if zero or low margins were found, a different method could be applied for non-reviewed companies based on recent calculations. For Kukje Steel Co., Ltd., a specific rate of 35.11% was recommended while Dong-a-Steel Co., Ltd. and HiSteel Co., Ltd. were preliminarily found to have a zero percent margin. Partial Rescission of Review The review of NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. is rescinded due to no suspended entries of its merchandise during the review period. This decision was made without opposition from parties. Next Steps Interested parties may submit comments on these preliminary findings. There will be a chance to request a hearing within 30 days. A decision on the final results will follow within 120 days of publication. For companies with no individual assessment, the cash deposit rate depends on the most recent official rates. The final instructions to U.S. Customs will follow 35 days after the final result publication. This preliminary review suggests Korean steel pipe exports are compliant with U.S. fair trade laws, pending final evaluation. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

The U.S. Department of Commerce Initiates Review of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a review to look into changes involving large diameter welded pipe from Canada. This review aims to see if a company named Interpro Pipe & Steel Inc. (Interpro) is now acting as the same company as Evraz Inc. NA Canada (Evraz). The reason for this review is because of an antidumping duty order on these pipes from Canada. On March 19, 2026, the Commerce Department announced that, earlier this year, on January 26, 2026, Interpro made a request. They asked the Commerce Department to check if they are the successor to Evraz. This is important because it affects the taxes that Interpro will need to pay when they sell pipes in the United States. The review will look at changes like the company’s name, ownership, and operations. The antidumping duty is a special kind of tax. It is applied when a company sells products in another country at unfairly low prices. On May 2, 2019, the Commerce Department had placed a duty on large diameter welded pipes from Canada. Interpro claims they should have the same rate as Evraz because they are the same business, just with a different name and owner. The Commerce Department will take into account things like changes in management, the factories where the pipes are made, and who sells to and buys from the company. They will check if Interpro is truly different from Evraz. If Interpro is found to be not that different from Evraz, they might have the same duties to pay. This review might take some time. By law, the review should not take more than 270 days unless it is extended. The department plans to publish preliminary findings in the Federal Register soon. This will let people know what they think so far. Everyone interested will then get a chance to say what they think about these results. In conclusion, this review is a detailed check by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It is to make sure that taxes are fair when products are brought into the U.S. from Canada. The Commerce Department wants to see if Interpro and Evraz are operating the same, just under a new name and new ownership. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Wind Towers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Happened? The United States Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping duties (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) on utility-scale wind towers. These orders affect imports from Canada, Vietnam, Indonesia, and South Korea. The Department of Commerce, along with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), determined that removing these duties could harm industries in the United States. If the duties were removed, it might lead to dumping and unfair subsidies continuing. This could cause material injury to U.S. companies. Why Is This Important? Dumping happens when a foreign producer sells goods in the United States for less than the cost of production or below prices in their home market. Countervailing duties are used to counteract subsidies provided by foreign governments which can make foreign products unfairly cheap. What Products Are Involved? The orders cover certain wind towers made of steel. These towers support wind turbines, which generate electricity. The towers included in these duties are taller than 50 meters and support turbines that produce more than 100 kilowatts of power. Excluded Products Some products are not covered by these duties: Nacelles and rotor blades, even if attached to the towers. Internal or external components not attached to the wind towers. What’s Next? U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD deposits on these wind towers. The continuation of these orders started on March 13, 2026. The Department of Commerce plans to review these duties again before their next fifth anniversary date. For More Information If you have questions or need further details, contact David de Falco at the U.S. Department of Commerce. He can be reached at (202) 482-2178. This decision ensures that U.S. industries remain competitive and are not harmed by unfair trade practices from foreign markets. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Confirms Subsidies for Indian Tire Producers Estimated reading time: 8 minutes Date: 2026-03-19 Location: Washington, DC The United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a significant announcement. It found that certain producers and exporters of tires from India have been given subsidized support. This happened during the review period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Commerce carried out this review under legal rules. These are part of the Tariff Act of 1930. The review takes a close look at companies that make pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR tires) in India. The review results show specific subsidy rates. ATC Tires Private Limited has a rate of 5.96%. Another company, Balkrishna Industries Ltd, has a lower rate of 0.57%. Other companies under review have a subsidy rate of 3.97%. Why are these rates important? When tires from India enter the United States, there are cash deposit rules. These rules make sure U.S. Customs collects estimated countervailing duties on these imports. The duties match the subsidy rate of the company. The results of this review will now be used. They affect how much companies must deposit for these estimated duties. This will continue until further notice from the Commerce Department. This is not the end for all companies. Some companies were not chosen for individual review. For them, their rates remain as they were before this new review. Each decision is part of a bigger plan to keep things fair in trade between countries. The U.S. government is always working to keep trade fair. It does this by reviewing and checking on imports like these tires from India. The Department of Commerce helps to make sure that the rules are followed. This way, they can protect U.S. businesses from unfair competition. They want everyone to compete on a level playing field. These results are official and based on a complete review. They are important to ensure fair trade and to monitor any financial benefits that companies receive from the government. Keeping a balance in international trade relations is crucial. The announcement shows how serious the U.S. is about fair trade. By making sure rules are followed, it protects its businesses and workers. In addition to these findings, companies must follow specific rules about sensitive information. They must handle information carefully. This is important for keeping business secrets safe. All parties involved are reminded of their responsibilities. They must protect any private information they have during this process. In conclusion, the review by the Department of Commerce highlights the importance of fair trade practices. It plays a key role in maintaining trust in international trading systems. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Portugal’s Navigator Company Sold Paper at Lower Prices Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has made an important decision. They found that The Navigator Company, from Portugal, sold uncoated paper in the U.S. at prices below the normal value. This is called “dumping.” Dumping can hurt businesses in the U.S., so it is closely watched. Review Details The review covered the period from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. During this time, Navigator was the sole company under review. The U.S. Department of Commerce studied Navigator’s sales and found the prices in the U.S. during this time were too low compared to normal values. Changes in Dates The review process had some delays. There was a government shutdown, and deadlines were adjusted. The final results were shared on March 19, 2026. The Department of Commerce moved very carefully to ensure the results were accurate. Final Results The review shows a weighted-average dumping margin for Navigator at 10.91 percent. This means that the prices they sold for in the U.S. were 10.91 percent below normal value. Next Steps for Importers The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now assess the antidumping duties. Companies importing this paper must be ready to pay these duties on past shipments. These duties will now become a regular part of importing from Navigator until further notice. Rules for Cash Deposits For Navigator, the rate is set at the 10.91 percent as discovered. Other companies not covered by this review but previously reviewed will continue with their last known rates. If an exporter is not part of this review, but a producer is, the producer’s rate will be applied. For all other producers and exporters, a different rate of 7.80 percent is set by prior inquiry. A Reminder to Importers Importers must remember to file a certificate confirming they have not been refunded duties. Not doing this may lead to extra charges as a consequence of suspected reimbursement. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is committed to protecting U.S. markets by carefully reviewing and addressing dumping practices. The rules and assessments will be enforced to ensure fair trade and competition. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Investigates Circumvention of Steel Wheel Duties Estimated reading time: 2 minutes Introduction The U.S. Department of Commerce has started an investigation into whether certain steel wheels from Vietnam are avoiding U.S. trade duties meant for Chinese products. This move comes after a request from two U.S. companies, Accuride Corporation and Maxion Wheels USA LLC. Background In January 2026, Accuride and Maxion asked Commerce to look into steel wheels finished in Vietnam. They claim these wheels use steel from China and then get sent to the U.S. to sidestep duties put on Chinese products since May 2019. Details of the Inquiry Commerce will check if wheels finished in Vietnam, using Chinese materials, are dodging U.S. antidumping and countervailing duties. These duties are extra charges on imports to protect U.S. businesses from unfair pricing or government support in other countries. Commerce uses several rules to decide if products are avoiding duties. For instance, they consider how much of the product is made in China versus Vietnam and whether the changes made in Vietnam are significant. Process and Next Steps Commerce will collect information from Vietnamese producers and exporters. They will use data from U.S. Customs to choose which companies to question further. The companies involved must answer Commerce’s questions fully, or they might face penalties. Impact on Duties If Commerce finds that these wheels are avoiding duties, they will ask U.S. Customs to continue holding any questionable imports and may backdate the duties to November 2021. Timeline Commerce aims to make a preliminary decision within 150 days and a final decision within 300 days from the start of the inquiry. Conclusion This investigation is an important step to ensure U.S. trade laws are being followed and that Chinese products are not avoiding duties by being finished in Vietnam. The outcome will show whether these wheels should face the same duties as those from China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Reviews Antidumping Duties on Steel Threaded Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Steel Wheels from China: U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Circumvention Inquiry Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Why the Inquiry Started The U.S. Department of Commerce, through its International Trade Administration, has started an investigation. This is to see if steel wheels sent to the U.S. from Thailand are avoiding taxes meant for similar products from China. Two companies in the U.S., Accuride Corporation and Maxion Wheels USA LLC, asked for this investigation. They believe that wheels finished in Thailand, using materials from China, are being sold in the U.S. to get around extra taxes that should be applied to Chinese products. Important Dates The inquiry is officially starting on March 19, 2026. Companies involved have been engaged since early 2026, with key activities in January and February. Details on the Steel Wheels The wheels in question are used on roads and fit tubeless tires. They have rim diameters of 22.5 inches and 24.5 inches. These wheels can be classified under several codes when imported into the U.S. Merchandise Focus The inquiry will specifically look at steel wheels finished in Thailand using hot-rolled steel from China. These are then sent to the U.S. Criteria for the Inquiry The U.S. law allows such inquiries if products are finished in a third country. They must show traits of products that should be taxed. The focus is on whether finishing the products in Thailand is a minor part of the overall process. Respondents and Process The Department of Commerce will pick participants based on data from U.S. Customs. They will gather information from Thailand about steel wheel shipments and where their materials come from. Effect on Imports The inquiry might change how the U.S. handles taxes on these products. If the products are found to be avoiding taxes, new rules could be applied retroactively. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will analyze data and decide whether there’s circumvention. The next significant milestone will be a preliminary decision in about 150 days from the start date. Contact Information For more details, interested parties can contact Thomas Cloyd at the Department of Commerce. This inquiry is crucial to prevent unfair trade practices and ensure fair competition in the market. The outcome will have implications for manufacturers and trade between the U.S., Thailand, and China. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Antidumping Duties on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced preliminary results on the administrative review of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) exported by companies from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This announcement was made on March 16, 2026. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that certain producers and exporters from Vietnam sold their products in the United States at less than the normal value. The main case involves SeAH Steel VINA Corporation, which received a preliminary dumping margin of 12.84 percent. This means the company sold its goods at a price lower than fair value, causing harm to American companies. The review also involved two other companies, Halima Pipe Company (Halima) and Pusan Pipe America, Inc. (PPA). However, the review was rescinded for these two companies. This decision was because there were no suspended entries of their products during the period under review. This means they did not have any questionable sales during the designated time. According to the Department’s policy, a review of the Vietnam-wide entity would only occur if specifically requested or if deemed necessary by the Department. There were no requests for such a review, so the Vietnam-wide entity’s duty rate remains unchanged at 111.47 percent. For all interested parties, the Department has opened a window to submit comments on these preliminary results. Parties are invited to submit their feedback within 21 days from the notice’s publication. This allows stakeholders to raise any points or concerns about the preliminary findings. After the review is complete, antidumping duties will be assessed on all appropriate entries. Duties will be calculated based on the amount of dumping compared to total sales. The intent is to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition that results from foreign producers selling below market value. Importers must comply with these requirements and file certificates regarding reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failing to do so could lead to penalties or additional duties. In conclusion, the U.S. Department of Commerce remains committed to ensuring fair trade practices and protecting the interests of American industries through vigilant monitoring and enforcement of antidumping measures. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Lawn Groomers from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has decided to keep the antidumping duties on tow-behind lawn groomers and some parts from China. These duties are there to stop unfair pricing that could hurt U.S. businesses. The duties on lawn groomers first started on August 3, 2009. The U.S. wants to protect industries in the country from low-priced products sold by other countries. On March 10, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) agreed with the Department of Commerce. They said that ending these duties could lead to more unfair pricing and hurt U.S. businesses. What’s Covered The duties apply to non-motorized tow-behind lawn groomers made from any material. Lawn groomers can include lawn sweepers, aerators, dethatchers, and spreaders. These are used to maintain lawns. Lawn groomers usually attach to a vehicle, allowing them to be pulled along the ground. Some have a hitch and a push handle. They may also have some parts that help them work better. The Order includes lawn sweepers, aerators that make holes in the ground, dethatchers that remove dead grass, and spreaders that spread seeds or fertilizer. Size Limits The duties cover lawn dethatchers that weigh 100 pounds or less. Other lawn groomers covered weigh 200 pounds or less. Lawn groomer parts like brush housings and weight trays are also included. Excluded Items Some items are not covered by the duties. These include farm tools like plows, carts, wagons, lawn groomers with motors, and hand-held models. Also excluded are lawn groomers that are more than the specified weight limit and lawn rollers meant solely for flattening grass. The tariff numbers that help identify these items globally are 8432.41.0000, 8432.42.0000, 8432.80.0000, and several others listed. These numbers are for reference purposes only. Next Steps The duties will continue starting March 10, 2026. U.S. Customs will keep collecting cash deposits on these imports to ensure fair market competition. The Department of Commerce plans to review these duties again before March 10, 2031. This will be five years after this latest decision. Parties involved must continue to handle confidential information properly. Failure to do so can lead to penalties. This decision helps protect U.S. industries from unfair pricing practices, ensuring fair competition and supporting local businesses. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Results Announced for Antidumping Review on Korean Oil Country Tubular Goods Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the review of antidumping duties on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea. These products are essential pipes used in the drilling of oil and gas. The review covers the period from September 1, 2023, to August 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce found that certain OCTG from Korea were not sold in the United States at prices below normal value. This means that the products were not sold at unfairly low prices to undercut local businesses. Two companies from Korea were examined closely in this review. These companies are NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. and SeAH Steel Corporation. The Department discovered that both of these companies had a weighted-average dumping margin of zero percent. A margin of zero percent indicates that there was no dumping, or selling below cost, for these companies. For other Korean companies that were not individually reviewed, the Department set different rates. Most of these companies received a rate of 1.18 percent. However, HiSteel Co., Ltd. received a lower rate of 0.77 percent. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd. has a much higher rate of 11.70 percent. The results are open for comments from interested parties. This means that people or businesses who have something to say about these results can share their thoughts before the final decisions are made. The final results of this review are expected to be published soon. This process is important because it ensures that all businesses have a fair chance to compete in the market. The new rules about duties will also come into effect once the final results are out. This review helps maintain fair trade practices. It also protects American producers from unfair competition. This ensures that goods are sold at fair prices, supporting companies on both sides of the trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds China Exporter Violating Trade Rules Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its review on the sale of a chemical from China. This review covered the period from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. A company called Zhejiang Sanmei Ind. Co., Ltd., or Sanmei, was found to be selling a chemical, named pentafluoroethane or R-125, to the U.S. at unfairly low prices. This means they were selling it below what the normal price should be. An investigation started in July 2025 with preliminary results shared in the Federal Register. Important data collection was disrupted due to a U.S. government shutdown during the investigation. This required extensions on deadlines for completing the review. Sanmei has to follow the rules set by the U.S. for antidumping duties. This means Sanmei’s customers must now pay a special fee when they import R-125 from China. The new rate of this fee is 48.67%. Another company, Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd., known as Yonghe, was considered as part of a larger group of companies based in China. This is because Yonghe couldn’t get a separate rate. The group’s rate is high—267.51%—and this rate will remain because there was no special investigation into the bigger group. The Department of Commerce keeps careful records of these investigations. They use a system called ACCESS to store information about these cases. Anyone interested in detailed information can visit their website. These findings have important effects. Now, the companies that buy R-125 from China will need to pay extra fees to bring the chemical into the U.S. This is to make sure that everyone plays fair in business and that U.S. industries are treated fairly by their overseas competitors. The U.S. plans to keep an eye on these companies in the future. This helps to ensure fair trade continues between the U.S. and other countries. It is important for businesses to remember their responsibilities to avoid getting into trouble with the law. The new rules for buying R-125 from these companies in China will start right away. Importers of this chemical must pay close attention to these changes to avoid any issues with customs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces New Trade Orders on Corrugated Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Washington, D.C. – On March 16, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce issued important announcements about trade with China. The Department has decided to place new duties on certain products from China. These products are polypropylene corrugated boxes. These boxes are special because they are strong and lightweight. They are made using a special plastic called polypropylene. The government took this step after investigations showed something concerning. Some companies in China have been selling these boxes in the U.S. at unfair prices. These prices are lower than what they sell for in China. This is called “dumping” and it can hurt U.S. companies. The U.S. International Trade Commission found that this practice is hurting American businesses. As a result, the Commerce Department is issuing two types of orders. There are antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Antidumping duty means the U.S. will charge extra money on these imported boxes. This makes the price fairer for U.S. businesses. Countervailing duty means there will be an extra charge on goods that are unfairly subsidized by China’s government. Subsidies are like financial help which lowers production costs in China. The orders say that U.S. Customs and Border Protection will collect these extra charges. They will collect on all such boxes entering the U.S. from China starting from March 16, 2026. For antidumping duties, they will be checking sales from August 28, 2025. They noted that imports of these boxes from China hurt U.S. industries. These new rules also state the estimated dumping margins. This is how much lower the Chinese prices are compared to fair market prices. For these boxes, the margin is 83.64 percent, which will lead to a cash deposit rate of 82.21 percent. For countervailing duties, the separate subsidy rate is set at 62.27 percent. This applies to various Chinese companies listed by the department. The decision to put these orders in place follows laws that protect U.S. industries. These laws are from the Tariff Act of 1930. The Department of Commerce wants to make sure U.S. industries are fair and competitive. The government also wants anyone interested in these developments to keep up with updates. Businesses and individuals need to check a special list. This list is called the Annual Inquiry Service List. It’s updated every year to include people who are affected or interested. This decision is part of the U.S. government’s larger efforts to ensure a fair and competitive market. It seeks to protect American jobs and industries from unfair foreign pricing practices. For more detailed information, businesses can contact Dan Alexander or Rachel Accorsi at the Department of Commerce. They are in charge of AD and CVD Operations. Their contact numbers are listed in the official announcement. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Federal Register Announcement: Temporary Steel Fencing from China Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision regarding temporary steel fencing imported from China. This decision comes after an extensive investigation by the International Trade Administration. The main finding is that temporary steel fencing from China has been sold in the United States at less than its fair value. This is referred to as “less than fair value” (LTFV) sales. The investigation looked at sales from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The Department of Commerce also determined that some Chinese companies sold these fences under unusual conditions called “critical circumstances.” This means that they suddenly surged imports into the U.S. under conditions that affected American businesses more than usual. The investigation involves several Chinese companies. Two were looked at closely: Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. However, it was found that they didn’t qualify for separate rate status after all because of issues with verifying their information. As a result, these companies are now part of a larger group collectively referred to as the “China-wide entity.” This group is being hit with an adverse decision because of unfair practices. They now face a dumping margin of 184.27 percent, which is very high. This margin is a penalty that makes the cost of these imports much higher, discouraging the unfair pricing practices. In total, 13 other Chinese companies were investigated as well, and they showed that they deserve a different, separate rate. These companies will face a lower penalty rate of 129.70 percent. The Department of Commerce will work with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue to suspend the liquidation of steel fencing imports from China. This means that these goods will not be allowed into the U.S. market at the current rates until all issues are resolved. The International Trade Commission (ITC) now has to determine if these imports harmed the U.S. industry. If the ITC agrees with the Department’s findings, then an official order will be made to impose these penalties permanently. The penalties mean that Chinese companies exporting such steel products will now need to pay a lot extra to bring their fencing products to the U.S. This action should help protect U.S. businesses from being undercut by cheaper imports. Meanwhile, all involved parties are reminded of their duties to handle confidential information carefully, making sure it is returned or destroyed when no longer needed to comply with regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Subsidies on Chinese Steel Fencing Estimated reading time: 4 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that producers and exporters of temporary steel fencing from China are receiving unfair subsidies. This decision comes after a detailed investigation into the matter. The period under review was from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce published a preliminary finding in June 2025. After that, interested parties were invited to comment. In February 2026, a post-preliminary analysis was issued by the Department. Due to delays caused by a government shutdown, the final determination was made on March 10, 2026. The investigation focused on whether Chinese producers received financial benefits from their government. It was discovered that some companies had not followed proper procedures, leading to incorrect data. As a result, some subsidy rates were based on available facts. One company, Shijiazhuang SD, faced challenges because of errors in its reported information. The Department used adverse inferences to decide the subsidy rate for this company. The department also verified information from other companies like Hebei Minmetals. For most companies involved, the subsidy rate was determined to be over 49 percent. However, for non-responsive companies, a higher rate of nearly 179 percent was applied. These findings were crucial to ensure fair trade practices between China and the United States. Before this final decision, the Department had asked U.S. Customs to hold imports of this steel fencing. Now, with the final determination, cash deposits will be required for these imports. The decision also involves a review by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the ITC finds that these imports harm U.S. industry, duties will be permanently imposed. If not, the proceedings will be terminated, and previous deposits will be refunded. The Department aims to ensure fair competition while protecting U.S. industries from unfair practices in international trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Italian Pasta Sold at Less Than Normal Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce recently released the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review involving pasta imported from Italy. The review covered sales made in the United States from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. This review was part of efforts to ensure that certain pasta products from Italy are not sold in the U.S. at prices lower than the normal value in their home market. The findings indicate that pasta from Italy was sold in the U.S. at prices less than the normal value during this period. The review involved several Italian companies, including La Molisana S.p.A. and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. The U.S. Department of Commerce calculated the estimated weighted-average dumping margins for these companies. La Molisana S.p.A. was assigned a dumping margin of 2.65 percent, while Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. was assigned a dumping margin of 7.00 percent. Other non-selected companies received a weighted-average dumping margin of 5.21 percent. The department’s review process experienced delays due to a lapse in federal appropriations and a government shutdown. As a result, deadlines were extended to accommodate these disruptions. The final results were published in the Federal Register on March 16, 2026. Following the review, certain changes were made to the margin calculations for La Molisana S.p.A. and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A., as well as the rates applied to companies not selected for individual review. Based on the final results, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess antidumping duties on the relevant entries. For companies not individually examined, the antidumping duty assessment will be based on the determined weighted-average dumping margins. Cash deposit requirements will also be updated for all shipments of Italian pasta entering the U.S. after the publication of the review’s final results. The cash deposit rates will be based on the newly established company-specific rates. This review serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility to file a certificate regarding reimbursement of duties. It also underscores the importance of compliance with antidumping and countervailing duty rules. The U.S. Department of Commerce will continue monitoring and conducting such reviews to ensure fair trade practices and adherence to antidumping regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Reviews Steel Rebar Subsidies from Türkiye Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its review of subsidies given to producers of steel concrete reinforcing bar, or rebar, from the Republic of Türkiye. This review is known as a “sunset review.” The report indicates that if the current duties on these imports were removed, it is likely that Türkiye would continue subsidizing its rebar at certain rates. Subsidies are financial benefits given by a government to help companies compete internationally. The duties were first put in place on November 6, 2014, because of these subsidies. The latest review is part of a regular check to see if the duties should stay. The review started on September 2, 2025, and was sped up because not enough opposing arguments were received from Türkiye. According to the Commerce Department, if the duties were removed, certain companies would still receive benefits. One such company, Icdas Celik Enerji Tersanev e Ulasim Sanayi A.S., would remain at a subsidy rate of 7.71 percent. However, another company, Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi, has been excluded from these duties. All other companies will have a rate of 6.58 percent. The report confirms that keeping these duties is important to prevent unfair advantages due to continued subsidies. Commerce says these findings have been outlined in a detailed notice available through their official resources. This notice reminds everyone involved, particularly those with access to protected information, of their duty to handle it responsibly. The Department of Commerce is responsible for making sure trade laws are followed. They do this to protect U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition and to ensure international trade rules are just and balanced. This review is an effort to maintain fair trade practices and is part of Commerce’s ongoing checks to ensure foreign producers do not gain an unfair advantage over U.S. companies through government subsidies. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Issues Final Results in 2023–2024 Antidumping Review of Aluminum Sheet from Bahrain Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On February 17, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the final results of its administrative review concerning antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet imported from the Kingdom of Bahrain. The review covered the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Commerce found that Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO) sold aluminum sheet in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. As a result, Commerce assigned GARMCO a final weighted-average dumping margin of 15.74 percent. Commerce made certain changes to its preliminary findings after analyzing comments from stakeholders. These changes were explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The memorandum is available to the public through Commerce’s online portal (https://access.trade.gov). Background The preliminary results of this review were released on August 6, 2025, and published in the Federal Register (90 FR 37840). This review was conducted in line with Section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Due to a lapse in government funding and a Federal Government shutdown, Commerce tolled deadlines in administrative proceedings twice—first by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and then by an additional 21 days on November 24, 2025. Scope of the Order The order covers aluminum sheet products from Bahrain. A detailed description is included in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results Commerce’s final results establish a 15.74 percent dumping margin for GARMCO for exports made between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Assessment of Duties Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on entries of aluminum sheet from Bahrain made during the review period. For any entries produced by GARMCO but not known by it to be destined for the United States, CBP will apply the “all-others” rate of 4.83 percent if no specific rate applies to the intermediate parties involved. These instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the notice is published. If litigation is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will delay liquidation of subject entries until the period for filing for a statutory injunction expires—90 days after publication. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective the date of publication of the final results: The cash deposit rate for GARMCO will be 15.74 percent. For companies not reviewed but previously assigned a company-specific rate, that rate remains in effect. If only the producer (but not the exporter) is previously rated, that producer’s most recent rate will apply. For all other producers and exporters, the cash deposit rate remains 4.83 percent. These deposit rates will remain in place until further notice. Importer Responsibilities Importers are reminded to file certificates regarding the reimbursement of duties under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) before liquidation. Failure to file may lead Commerce to assume reimbursement has occurred and impose double duties. Administrative Protective Orders Parties must comply with rules under administrative protective orders (APO), including timely destruction or return of proprietary information. Failure to comply is a violation and can result in sanctions. Authority This notice is issued under Sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: February 10, 2026. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix: Summary of Comments in the Final Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Changes Since the Preliminary Results Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Third-Country Comparison Market Comment 2: Major Input Adjustments Comment 3: Date of Sale Comment 4: By-Product Offsets Comment 5: Billing Adjustment Comment 6: Interest Expense Calculation Recommendation Federal Register Citation: 91 FR 7250–7252 (February 17, 2026) Federal Register Document Number: 2026-02984 BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Finds Chinese Active Anode Material Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced its final determination in the antidumping duty investigation of active anode material from the People’s Republic of China. The agency concluded that the product is being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) spanned from April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. Commerce first released its preliminary findings on July 22, 2025. At that time, it also postponed the final determination to December 4, 2025. Due to the federal government shutdown and backlog in case filings, all administrative deadlines were later extended by a total of 68 days. As a result, Commerce published its final determination on February 10, 2026. Final dumping margins were assigned to various exporter-producer combinations. Each of them received a margin of 93.50 percent. The China-wide entity was assigned a final dumping margin of 102.72 percent, based on adverse facts available. Commerce also confirmed that certain Chinese exporters were ineligible for separate rates. This was due to changes in product scope and a lack of shipments during the POI. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers active anode material. This product is an anode-grade graphite consisting of at least 90 percent carbon. It includes forms made from synthetic graphite, natural graphite, or blends. It may or may not have coatings. The material can appear in powder, dry, liquid, or block form. It has a maximum size of 80 microns in powder form. The product meets an energy density of at least 330 milliamp hours per gram and a graphitization degree of at least 80 percent. The scope includes products mixed with silicon-based materials or additives. These materials remain covered even when imported as part of an anode slurry, electrode, or subassembly. However, active anode materials already incorporated into imported lithium-ion batteries, battery modules, packs, and electric or hybrid vehicles are excluded. Commerce revised the scope since the preliminary stage. Certain products once included are no longer subject to this determination. Producers and Exporters Receiving Final Dumping Margin of 93.50 Percent: Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE / BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR New Material Group Sales Co., Ltd. Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / BTR (Jiangsu) New Energy Material Panasonic Global Procurement (China) Co., Ltd. / Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. Hunan Zhongke Shinzoom Co., Ltd. / Guizhou Zhongke Shinzoom Co., Ltd. Jiangxi Zichen Technology Co., Ltd. / Jiangxi Zichen Technology Co., Ltd. Resonac Corporation / Henan Yicheng New Energy Co., Ltd. Resonac Corporation / PetroChina Daqing Petrochemical Company Resonac Corporation / Qingdao Qingbei Carbon Products Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Inner Mongolia Shanshan Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Sichuan Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Fujian Shanshan Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanshan New Material Co., Ltd. / Ningbo Shanshan New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Final Rate for the China-Wide Entity: 102.72 Percent Adverse facts available were applied to the China-wide entity as certain companies failed to cooperate or provide data. No new facts required a change from the preliminary determination in that regard. Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to require cash deposits. These will match the dumping margins as adjusted for subsidy offsets where applicable. Cash deposit responsibilities depend on producer/exporter combinations. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce previously instructed CBP to suspend liquidation of entries entered on or after July 22, 2025. This was the Preliminary Determination date. CBP was instructed to stop this suspension for entries on or after January 18, 2026. For entries made during the suspension period, CBP must follow the rates listed in the final determination, unless the product falls outside the final scope. Next Steps If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final affirmative injury determination, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. Final suspension of liquidation will be reinstated. If the ITC rules that there is no injury, no order will be issued. CBP will refund cash deposits and end the suspension. Interested parties must dispose of any proprietary data from the investigation according to the Administrative Protection Order (APO) provisions. For a full list of scope details and all topics covered in the decision memorandum, see Appendices I and II of the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Trade Department Sets Final Duties on Battery Anode Imports from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce announced its final decision in a trade case involving active anode material from the People’s Republic of China. This decision was published in the Federal Register on February 17, 2026. The Commerce Department concluded that Chinese producers and exporters of active anode material received unfair subsidies from their government. This ruling is part of a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation. The investigation looked at product entries between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. The Department began the investigation officially on January 25, 2025. A preliminary ruling was issued on May 28, 2025. An amended preliminary ruling followed on July 2, 2025, correcting some errors in the original subsidy rate estimates. The final ruling includes a list of Chinese companies and the countervailing duty rates assigned to each: Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd., and Panasonic Corporation of China: 66.86% BTR New Material Group Co., Ltd., and its affiliates: 66.82% Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat: 66.82% (rate based on adverse facts available) Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd.: 66.82% (rate based on adverse facts available) All Other Chinese producers and exporters: 66.86% The Department used verification procedures to examine records and documents provided during on-site reviews. The process followed required steps under U.S. trade law. Commerce made changes to the subsidy rate calculations from the preliminary review. Details of these changes are in the final Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is available online via the ACCESS system. The Commerce Department used facts available with adverse inferences for some companies, including Shanghai Shaosheng and Huzhou Kaijin. These companies did not respond properly to requests for information. All other producers will receive the same rate as Panasonic. This is because Panasonic was the only cooperating respondent without a zero or de minimis rate and not based only on adverse facts. The Department has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue collecting cash deposits. Suspension of liquidation applies to entries made on or before September 25, 2025. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) also finds material injury to the U.S. industry, CBP will assess duties on all impacted imports after that date. The ITC must now decide if the subsidies caused harm to U.S. producers. If the ITC agrees, the Department of Commerce will issue a final countervailing duty order. If the ITC decides there is no injury, the investigation ends, and duties collected so far will be refunded. The scope of the investigation includes graphite-based anode materials with certain purity and size characteristics. These materials are used in lithium-ion batteries. Certain finished products like electric vehicles, phones, or entire battery systems are excluded. The final determination closes a major step in a trade enforcement process aimed at active anode material from China. All documents related to this case are available to registered users through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Issues Preliminary Results in Antidumping Review of Spanish Olives Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary results from the 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ripe olives from Spain. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. The Department found that sales of ripe olives by the mandatory respondent, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And., were made at less than normal value. The agency calculated a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 3.54 percent for Agro Sevilla. The same rate of 3.54 percent was also assigned to one non-selected company, Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. The review was initially requested for four companies. However, two were removed during the process. Commerce rescinded the review for Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L., because the request for review was withdrawn within the 90-day time limit. The agency also intends to rescind the review for Alimentary Group DCOOP, S.Coop.And., as the company did not have any entries of subject merchandise during the review period. The review follows the antidumping duty order first published on August 1, 2018. Commerce performed this review under the authority of Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Export price and constructed export price were calculated following Section 772 of the Act, and normal value was determined under Section 773. Initial results were delayed due to multiple deadline tolling events, including a 90-day tolling on December 9, 2024; a 47-day tolling on November 14, 2025, due to a government shutdown; and an additional 21-day tolling on November 24, 2025, because of submission backlogs. The deadline for the preliminary results was extended to February 5, 2026. Commerce plans to verify certain information reported by Agro Sevilla. The verification was requested by the Musco Family Olive Company, a member of the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives. Commerce will accept comments from interested parties at a later date. Rebuttal briefs will be due five days after case briefs. All briefs must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Executive summaries for each issue must be included and limited to 450 words. Requests for public hearings must be submitted within 30 days of this notice. Hearings will be limited to issues raised in briefs. Upon final determination, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. If rates are de minimis, CBP will not assess duties. Otherwise, importer-specific rates will be calculated based on entered values. Commerce will issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of final results unless a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. For companies removed from the review—Aceitunas Guadalquivir and Alimentary Group—CBP will assess duties based on the rate in effect at the time of entry. Cash deposit rates from the final results will apply to future entries. If a company is not covered in this or prior reviews, the “all-others” rate of 19.98 percent will apply. All filings must be submitted via Commerce’s AntiDumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The final results of the review are due within 120 days of this notice, unless extended. Commerce reminds importers to file certificates on duty reimbursement per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Failure to comply may trigger double duty assessments. Contacts and full documentation are available through the Federal Register and ACCESS at https://access.trade.gov. This notice was issued under sections 751(a)(1), 777(i), and 351.221(b)(4) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing non-exclusive duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Acetone Antidumping Review from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published its preliminary findings from the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on acetone from the Republic of Korea. The review covered the period from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. Kumho P&B Chemicals, Inc. (KPB) was found to have sold acetone in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. Its preliminary weighted-average dumping margin was set at 1.43 percent. The Department has also decided to rescind the review in part. Specifically, it will not continue the review for LG Chem, Ltd. (LG Chem). This conclusion was made because there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise from LG Chem during the review period. The Department of Commerce stated that in the absence of any entries during the period of review for LG Chem, assessment of antidumping duties is not applicable. Therefore, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on LG Chem’s prior entries at the cash deposit rates in effect at the time of entry. The administrative review followed a standard process outlined under the Tariff Act of 1930, sections 751(a)(2), 772, and 773. The Department calculated export prices and normal values based on sales and cost data submitted by KPB. Because of a government shutdown in 2025, deadlines were delayed. Deadlines were first tolled by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and then by another 21 days on November 24, 2025. As a result, the deadline for preliminary results was shifted to February 9, 2026. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), Commerce will disclose the calculations used in these preliminary results within five days of publication. Interested parties who wish to comment can submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 21 days after this notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs can be filed within five days following the close of case briefs. Case and rebuttal briefs must include: A statement of the issue A summary of the argument A table of authorities Parties must also provide a concise executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words per summary. Oral hearings can be requested within 30 days of publication. Any hearing will cover only the issues raised in written briefs. Commerce will use the final results to instruct CBP on the liquidation of entries. For KPB, importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates will be calculated. If the importer-specific dumping margins are de minimis (less than 0.50 percent), the entries will be assessed at zero. If an importer-specific rate cannot be determined, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties using the “all-others” rate of 33.10 percent. These assessment instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the final results are published in the Federal Register. Following the final results, cash deposit rates will be updated as follows: The rate for each reviewed company will be established by the final results Companies not reviewed will continue with the most recent rate assigned If only the producer or the exporter has been reviewed before, that rate will apply All others will retain the 33.10 percent rate Commerce expects to issue its final results within 120 days unless extended. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to report any reimbursement of duties, as required under 19 CFR 351.402(f). This notice was signed on February 9, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. The appended Preliminary Decision Memorandum includes: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation The full document, including detailed methodology and instructions, is publicly available through the Federal Register and Commerce’s ACCESS portal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Antidumping Review Results for Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India. The review covers the period from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The review found that Western Chemical Industries P Limited did not sell CVP-23 in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Therefore, a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent was preliminarily assigned to Western Chemical Industries P Limited. The review was conducted under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce used section 772 of the Act to calculate export prices and section 773 to calculate normal values. Commerce will disclose its calculations to the interested parties within five days of publication. The public may view these through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Commerce also announced the partial rescission of the review for Meghmani Pigments. The company withdrew its request for review on January 22, 2025. Since no other parties requested a review for Meghmani Pigments, the Department has rescinded the review for this company under regulation 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Case briefs or written comments on the preliminary results may be submitted within 21 days of the Federal Register publication date. Rebuttal briefs must be submitted within five days after the deadline for case briefs. All briefs must be filed through the ACCESS system. Interested parties submitting briefs should include a statement of the issue, a brief argument summary, a list of authorities, and a public summary of each issue limited to 450 words. Footnotes are required for citations in the public summary. Requests for a public hearing must be filed within 30 days of publication. Requests must include the participant’s name, address, phone number, the number of participants, nationality status, and a list of topics to discuss. Only topics raised in case briefs can be discussed. Once the review is complete, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. If the final rate is zero or de minimis (less than 0.5%), entries will be liquidated without antidumping duties. Otherwise, importer-specific rates will be used. Entries of CVP-23 during the period that were produced by the respondent, but not known to be sold to the U.S., will be assessed at the “all-others” rate of 27.48 percent. This default rate came from the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Commerce plans to issue final results of this administrative review within 120 days of publication, unless this period is extended. Once final results are issued, cash deposit rates for future entries of CVP-23 from India will change. If the final rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required for Western Chemical Industries P Limited. Other deposit rates will depend on whether a rate for the company or its manufacturer has been previously established. This serves as a reminder to importers to submit a certificate of non-reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties before liquidation. Failure to do so may lead to double duties or higher assessments. The preliminary results were signed by Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Abbott on February 9, 2026. Appendix – Topics Included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Partial Rescission of Review V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Currency Conversion VII. Recommendation Reference: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 30 (February 13, 2026), Document Number: 2026-02878, Pages 6819–6821. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Will Keep Duties on Calcium Hypochlorite from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on calcium hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China. This decision follows determinations by the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both agencies found that ending the AD and CVD orders would likely cause dumping of the product and allow unfair subsidies to continue. That could hurt the U.S. industry making the same chemical. The Commerce Department and ITC looked at the orders as part of the required second five-year or “sunset” review process. Commerce began this review on June 2, 2025. The ITC agreed with the Department of Commerce’s findings. On February 10, 2026, the ITC ruled that ending the orders would probably lead to harm for U.S. companies. Calcium hypochlorite is a chemical used to disinfect water and other surfaces. It can be made in different forms like powder, tablets, crystals, or liquid. It must contain at least 10% available chlorine by weight to be covered by the orders. This chemical can have different formulas. This includes common bleaching powders and hemibasic forms. The main formula is Ca(OCl)₂. Other forms are Ca(OCl)₂·CaCl₂·Ca(OH)₂·2H₂O, 2Ca(OCl)₂·Ca(OH)₂, and Ca(OCl)₂·0.5Ca(OH)₂. The Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number for calcium hypochlorite is 7778-54-3. Its EPA Pesticide Code Number is 014701. It is classified as dangerous under multiple International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) codes, including UN 1748, 2880, 2208, and also UN 3485, 3486, and 3487. The chemical is listed under HTSUS subheading 2828.10.0000 for customs purposes. When it’s mixed into tablets or other forms, it may also be entered under 3808.94.5000 and 3808.99.9500. These codes apply to disinfectants. But the written description, not the code, defines what is covered. Because of the Commerce and ITC decisions, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep collecting AD and CVD deposits on imports of this product from China. This action helps American companies compete fairly. The next five-year review of the orders may begin by early 2031. The law requires this review to start no later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the last decision. This notice is also a reminder to all parties who had access to business confidential information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). They must either return or destroy the information or ask the court to convert it to a judicial protective order. Failing to do so is a violation. This decision and notice follow the Trade Act of 1930 and related regulations. The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Commerce Department, on February 10, 2026. It was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2026, under document number 2026-02951. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Several Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-02-13 On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) officially rescinded administrative reviews of antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. This action follows timely withdrawal of all review requests during the proper deadlines. The International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance unit issued the notice. It confirms that no other requests for the listed reviews were submitted within the relevant 90-day timeframe. According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a review can be canceled in full or part if all parties who requested it withdraw within 90 days from the notice of initiation. The following reviews have been rescinded: ANTIDUMPING PROCEEDINGS: Burma: Mattresses (A-546-001) – Period of Review (POR): December 2, 2023 – June 30, 2025 Canada: Utility Scale Wind Towers (A-122-867) – POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 India: Brass Rod (A-533-915); POR: December 1, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Raw Honey (A-533-903); POR: June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025 Japan: Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products (A-588-873) – POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Mexico: Brass Rod (A-201-858) – POR: December 1, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepacked for Sale (A-552-835); POR: November 29, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Certain Steel Nails (A-552-818); POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Oil Country Tubular Goods (A-552-817); POR: September 1, 2024 – August 31, 2025 Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube (A-552-831); POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 Taiwan: Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepacked for Sale (A-583-871) – POR: June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025 The People’s Republic of China: Certain Collated Steel Staples (A-570-112); POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof (A-570-124); POR: May 1, 2024 – April 30, 2025 Ukraine: Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A-823-819) – POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 COUNTERVAILING DUTY PROCEEDINGS: Canada: Utility Scale Wind Towers (C-122-868) – POR: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 India: Certain Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders (C-533-913); POR: September 29, 2023 – December 31, 2024 Certain Paper Shopping Bags (C-533-918); POR: November 6, 2023 – December 31, 2024 The People’s Republic of China: Certain Collated Steel Staples (C-570-113); POR: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 For the listed reviews, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties at the deposit rate collected at the time the goods entered the U.S. market or were withdrawn from warehouse. For reviews involving Canada or Mexico, CBP will receive assessment instructions no earlier than 41 days after this notice. For other countries, CBP will be instructed no earlier than 35 days after publication. Commerce reminds importers of their duty under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate confirming whether antidumping and/or countervailing duties were reimbursed. Failing to do so may lead to a presumption of reimbursement and result in double duties. Parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must follow procedures in 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3) regarding the return, destruction, or conversion of proprietary information. This notice was signed on February 10, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The official reference number for this notice is FR Doc. 2026-02959. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Ends Review of Antidumping Duties on Paper from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has ended a review of antidumping duties on uncoated paper from Brazil. This was for the time period from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. Commerce has decided to stop its review of Suzano S.A. and Sylvamo do Brasil Ltda. with Sylvamo Exports Ltda. Suzano asked for a review. The petitioner, Domtar Corporation, also asked for a review of Suzano. Both parties withdrew those requests on July 28, 2025. Since no one else asked for a review, Commerce is now rescinding it under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Sylvamo did not have any imports of the paper during this time. On June 12, 2025, Sylvamo told Commerce that no shipments matched their entries. Commerce agreed. Because of this, Sylvamo’s review was also ended under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Commerce announced its intent to stop the review of Sylvamo on January 9, 2026. No party objected. Sylvamo supported the decision. Government shutdowns delayed the timing. First, on November 14, 2025, deadlines were pushed back by 47 days. Then, on November 24, 2025, delays added 21 more days. New deadlines moved the preliminary results date to February 9, 2026. There will be no change in cash deposit rates. The current rates continue. Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties at rates matched to the time goods entered the U.S. Instructions will come no earlier than 35 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. This is also a reminder for parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to return or destroy confidential materials as per 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). The notice follows sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, on February 9, 2026. Federal Register publication date: February 12, 2026. Document number: 2026-02781. End of notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Rules Against Co May in Fish Fillet Trade Case; Commerce Rescinds Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a final judgment in the case Catfish Farmers of America, et al. v. United States, Court No. 24-00126. The court upheld the U.S. Department of Commerce’s new decision concerning the new shipper review of certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The period of review covered by this decision is August 1, 2022, through January 31, 2023. The product in question was exported to the United States by Co May Import-Export Company Limited (Co May). In the original final results, issued on June 25, 2024, Commerce had found that Co May’s single sale during the review period was a bona fide, or legitimate, sale. Commerce set a weighted-average dumping margin of $0.00 per kilogram for Co May. Initially, Commerce believed that Co May’s U.S. customer resold the fish fillets at a profit. It did not count the antidumping (AD) cash deposit as a cost in its profit calculation. Commerce also found no evidence on the record that the customer’s relationship with downstream buyers changed the profit analysis. However, the Catfish Farmers of America and other petitioners appealed that decision. On June 5, 2025, the CIT ordered Commerce to provide further explanation. The court asked Commerce to revisit its treatment of the AD cash deposit in the profit analysis. It also asked for more clarity regarding the relationship between Co May’s U.S. customer and the second-level buyers. In the remand redetermination issued on November 17, 2025, Commerce reconsidered its findings. It re-evaluated how it treated cash deposits and the reseller’s financial relationships. After further review, Commerce determined that Co May’s sale was not bona fide. Commerce stated that it would rescind the new shipper review if that finding was affirmed. On January 8, 2026, the CIT officially sustained Commerce’s remand redetermination. According to the court’s ruling, and as required by the Timken decision and 19 U.S.C. sections 516A(c) and (e), Commerce must now take action consistent with the final judgment that is not in harmony with its earlier ruling. As a result, Commerce has amended its final results. Commerce now finds that Co May’s sale was not a bona fide sale. Therefore, Commerce has rescinded the 2022–2023 new shipper review. Because of this decision, Co May is no longer eligible for separate rate treatment. Co May will now be treated as part of the Vietnam-wide entity. The Vietnam-wide cash deposit rate of $2.39 per kilogram now applies to Co May. Commerce will send updated cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Commerce is currently barred by court order from liquidating Co May’s entries made between August 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. These entries remain suspended under that injunction during the appeals process. If there are no further appeals, or if the court’s ruling is upheld, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties on affected entries at the Vietnam-wide rate of $2.39 per kilogram. This notice was issued in compliance with the requirements of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related court rulings. Dated: 2026-02-06. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Releases Final Results for Review of Sodium Nitrite from India, Finds No Dumping Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on sodium nitrite from India. This review covers the period from August 17, 2022, through January 31, 2024. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration under docket number A-533-906. The subject merchandise is sodium nitrite produced by Deepak Nitrite Limited (Deepak), a company based in India. Key Findings Commerce determined that Deepak did not sell sodium nitrite at less than normal value during the period of review. The final weighted-average dumping margin was 0.00 percent. As a result, Deepak will not face antidumping duties on entries of sodium nitrite into the United States for this period. Background Commerce released preliminary results on June 4, 2025. A post-preliminary analysis was issued on July 18, 2025. On September 24, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for its final results to December 1, 2025. Due to a federal government shutdown, there were two tolling periods applied to administrative deadlines: a 47-day toll announced on November 14, 2025, and a 21-day toll announced on November 24, 2025. These tolling periods extended the final results deadline to February 9, 2026. Final Calculation Changes Commerce revised Deepak’s margin calculation since the preliminary phase, based on comments submitted by interested parties. Commerce has published a complete Issues and Decision Memorandum that outlines all changes and responses to comments. The memorandum is available on the ACCESS electronic system at https://access.trade.gov. Assessment of Duties Because the final margin is zero percent, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate relevant entries without collecting antidumping duties. For any entries where Deepak did not know the final destination was the United States, CBP will assess duties at the “all-others” rate of 42.76 percent unless a specific rate applies to an intermediate party. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of the final results. If a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade within 90 days, CBP will be instructed to delay liquidation accordingly. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective as of the publication date in the Federal Register: Deepak’s cash deposit rate is set at 0.00 percent. Exporters not covered by this review but covered in prior segments will remain subject to previously published rates. If the producer is covered but the exporter is not, the deposit rate will be based on the producer’s most recent rate. All others continue to have a deposit rate of 42.76 percent. These cash deposit requirements remain in effect until further notice. Importer Requirements Importers must submit certificates of reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Failure to file such certificates may result in Commerce presuming reimbursement and applying double duties. APO Compliance Parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must return or destroy all proprietary information in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). This requirement continues to apply and violations are subject to sanctions. Contact Information For more details, contact Joy Zhang at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance. Phone: (202) 482-1168. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For full documentation, including the final results and Issues and Decision Memorandum, visit https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Mexican Steel Wire Rod Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review for carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico. The review covers the period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. Preliminary Results The Department preliminarily found that steel wire rod from Mexico was sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. Specifically, Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 15.97 percent for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V. These two companies were treated as a single entity for the purpose of this review. Review Background The original antidumping duty order was issued on October 29, 2002. The current review was officially initiated on November 14, 2024. Nine companies were included in the scope of the review: ArcelorMittal Mexico S.A. de C.V. (AMM) Comercializadora Eloro S.A. Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V. Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V. Ingeteknos Estructurales S.A. Optimatiks S.A. de C.V. TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (successor to Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V.) Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. Delays in the Review The timeline for issuing these preliminary results was extended multiple times. On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled review deadlines by 90 days. On September 30, 2025, the timeline was extended by an additional 30 days. Two more delays followed in November 2025 due to a federal government shutdown. A 47-day tolling was imposed on November 14, followed by an additional 21 days on November 24. Finally, on December 29, 2025, another 30-day extension was granted. The deadline was moved to February 6, 2026. Partial Rescission Commerce is rescinding the review for seven of the nine companies. This decision is based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, which showed that AMM, Comercializadora Eloro, Villacero, Ingeteknos, Optimatiks, TA 2000 (Talleres y Aceros), and Ternium had no entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Only Deacero and Deacero Summit remain in the review. Methodology Commerce used standard procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. Constructed export prices and normal values were calculated under sections 772(b) and 773 of the Act. The full explanation is available in a separate Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Comments and Case Briefs Commerce invites interested parties to submit comments. Case briefs are due within 21 days of this notice. Rebuttal briefs are due within five days after that. Each brief must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Parties must also provide a public executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words. If a hearing is requested, all parties must submit a formal request within 30 days of this notice, through the ACCESS electronic system. Assessment Rates Importers will be assessed antidumping duties following the final results. Each importer’s duty will be calculated using total U.S. entry values. If a company’s dumping margin is de minimis (too small to measure), entries will be instructed for liquidation without duties. The final results will also determine future deposit amounts. For the seven companies dropped from the review, duties will be assessed according to deposit rates in place at the time of entry. Final Results Final results are due within 120 days of this notice, unless extended. Commerce will use comments received to prepare the final decision. Reminders Commerce reminds importers of their duty to file certificates of reimbursement, as per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Lack of certification may lead to double duties. Cash Deposits Once final results are published, new cash deposit rates will go into effect for future entries. For companies not reviewed or covered in prior segments, the “all others” rate of 20.11 percent will apply. For More Information The Preliminary Decision Memorandum, methodology, and full documentation are available at: https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Signed, Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations U.S. Department of Commerce Dated: 2026-02-06 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on PET Film from Taiwan and India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the fourth sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from Taiwan and India. The Department of Commerce found that removing these antidumping duties would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping is when products are sold in the United States at prices below their fair value. The current antidumping margins for PET film are up to 8.99 percent for Taiwan and up to 24.10 percent for India. The Department published the original antidumping orders on July 1, 2002. The fourth sunset reviews began on August 1, 2025, in line with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. On August 18, 2025, domestic PET film producers Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc. and Microworks America, Inc. submitted timely notices of their intent to participate in the sunset reviews. By August 29, 2025, these domestic interested parties filed complete substantive responses. No responses were submitted by exporting companies or foreign governments. On September 23, 2025, the Department informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that no responses had been received from respondents. The Commerce Department then conducted an expedited 120-day review, as allowed under U.S. law. Due to a Federal Government shutdown, deadlines were tolled. All procedural deadlines were delayed by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and another 21 days on November 24, 2025. The final deadline became February 5, 2026. The full scope of these orders covers PET film imported from Taiwan and India. Details are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is filed electronically in Commerce’s ACCESS system. The list of topics in the memorandum includes: Summary Background Scope of the Orders History of the Orders Legal Framework Likelihood of Dumping Size of Dumping Margins Final Results of the Sunset Reviews Recommendation This notice also reminds parties handling confidential information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to return or destroy materials according to federal rules. These results were published under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. Full details can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 29, pages 6620–6621. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Preliminary Dumping Margins Found in Review of Carbon Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Published: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register, Vol. 91, No. 29 Document Number: 2026-02859 The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from India. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Commerce found that certain Indian producers and exporters sold carbon steel flanges below normal value during this period. These findings may result in continued or adjusted duties on imports from these firms. Background The original antidumping duty order was issued on August 24, 2017. On August 1, 2024, Commerce announced the opportunity to request this review. The review was started on September 20, 2024. Norma Group and R.N. Gupta & Co., Ltd. (RNG) were selected as the mandatory respondents. The Norma Group includes Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal. Commerce continues to treat them as a single entity based on previously verified evidence. Delays in the review process occurred due to various events: 90-day tolling of deadlines on December 9, 2024 112-day extension on July 17, 2025 47-day tolling due to the Federal Government shutdown 21-day additional tolling for backlog caused by electronic filing delays As a result, the new deadline for the preliminary results was set for January 28, 2026. Scope of the Order The order covers finished carbon steel flanges. A full description is available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, posted online via ACCESS. Methodology Commerce followed sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(2), 772, and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Export prices and normal values (NV) were used to calculate dumping margins. Rate for Non-Selected Companies Commerce applied guidance from section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act to assign a rate to non-examined companies. The rate is 2.35 percent. This reflects the weighted average of the margins for Norma Group and RNG, based on publicly available sales data. Preliminary Results Commerce preliminarily assigned the following weighted-average dumping margins: R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd.: 2.65% Norma Group: 1.88% Non-selected companies: 2.35% (List of non-selected companies is included in Appendix II.) Disclosure Commerce will release its calculations within five days following publication of this notice. These will be available via the ACCESS system. Public Comment Case briefs are due within 21 days of publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after that. Parties must file electronically via ACCESS. Briefs must include a table of contents and authorities, along with executive summaries. Summaries should not exceed 450 words per issue. Requests for a hearing are due within 30 days of publication. Hearing requests must include participant details and a list of issues to be discussed. The hearing’s date and time will be determined later. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the review, Commerce will direct CBP to assess duties based on the final results. If the final rate is zero or de minimis, no duties will be assessed. For unreviewed entries, the reseller policy will apply. Commerce will assign a rate equal to the weighted average rate from the final results for non-selected companies. Instructions to CBP will be issued no earlier than 35 days after publication of final results. Cash Deposit Requirements Once final results are published, new cash deposit rates will apply as follows: For reviewed companies: their final company-specific margin For companies covered in prior segments: the most recent rate For exporters not reviewed but whose producers were: the producer’s rate For others: the all-others rate of 8.91% established in the original investigation These rates will stay in effect until further notice. Importer Notification Importers must comply with 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Failure to do so may result in doubled or increased duties. Appendix I – Topics in Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Methodology Munish Forge Private Corporate Name Change Currency Conversion Recommendation Appendix II – Non-Selected Companies Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. BFN Forgings Private Limited Cetus Engineering Private Limited Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd. Munish Forge Private Limited (Commerce received a name-change notification from this company and is evaluating it.) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.