U.S. Finds Eight Chinese Exporters Part of China-Wide Entity in Wooden Bedroom Furniture Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its review of antidumping duties for wooden bedroom furniture from China. The review looked at exports made between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Commerce decided that eight exporters from China did not show that they qualify for a separate rate from the China-wide entity. These exporters are: Dorbest Ltd. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd. Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd. Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc. Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd. Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd. These companies either did not file the required forms, did not respond to requests for information, or failed to show that they meet the rules for a separate rate. Because of this, they are treated as part of the China-wide entity. Commerce did not calculate any individual dumping margins for this review. There are no new calculations to share. For all entries of wooden bedroom furniture from these companies, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect antidumping duties at the China-wide entity rate. The current China-wide rate is 216.01 percent. The cash deposit requirements for shipments will be as follows: If an exporter already has a separate rate from a past review, that rate is still used. For exporters from China that do not have a separate rate, including those listed above, the cash deposit rate is 216.01 percent. For non-China exporters with no separate rate, the rate will match the Chinese supplier they used. Importers must file a certificate showing they did not get reimbursed for antidumping duties before their entries are finalized. If they do not do this, they may have to pay double duties. This notice also reminds anyone under an Administrative Protective Order to follow rules for handling confidential information. These results were published under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and United States regulations. For more information, interested parties can find the full decision and related documents on the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Special Taxes on Wooden Cabinets and Vanities From China Estimated reading time: 4 minutes Why Are There Special Taxes? The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is keeping its special taxes, called antidumping and countervailing duties, on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This decision was made because removing the taxes could lead to more unfair trading and hurt U.S. companies. Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) looked at the trade rules about wooden cabinets and vanities from China. They found that if the special taxes were removed, more unfair trading, called dumping and subsidies, would happen. This would likely hurt companies in the United States. What Products Are Covered? The taxes apply to wooden cabinets and vanities and their parts from China. These products are usually used in kitchens and bathrooms. They can be floor mounted, wall mounted, or attached in other ways. The material can be real wood or wood made from particles, fibers, or bamboo. Wooden cabinets and vanities, with or without wooden or other coverings. Wooden component parts, such as frames, cabinet boxes, doors, drawers, shelves, and panels. “Ready to assemble” cabinets, also known as “flat packs.” Cabinets and vanities imported with sinks, faucets, plumbing, or countertops. Only the wooden part is taxed. Wooden cabinets and vanities processed in another country (such as cutting, painting, or assembly) are still included. What Is Not Included? Some products are not taxed. These include: Accessories added after making the cabinet, like drawer organizers or lazy Susans. Solid wooden decorations, like corbels and rosettes. Hardware made of metal, like hinges, handles, or screws. Medicine cabinets that are wall mounted, have mirrors, are assembled before shipping, are sold ready for retail, and are no deeper than seven inches. Wooden bedroom furniture. Hardwood plywood that is taxed under other rules. Trade Code Numbers These products are listed under special trade codes. The main codes are 9403.40.9060 and 9403.60.8081. Some parts may use codes 9403.90.7080 and 9403.91.0080. What Happens Next? Customs officers will keep collecting the special taxes on these products when they enter the United States. This rule began on September 9, 2025. The next check on these taxes will happen five years from the last ITC decision. Important Reminders Parties with special business information must keep following the rules on how to return or destroy the information. Breaking those rules could lead to punishment. This notice follows all U.S. trade law rules. It was officially signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on September 12, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Chinese MDI Sold Below Fair Value in Preliminary Decision Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary finding on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. Commerce determined that MDI from the People’s Republic of China is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value (LTFV). What is MDI? MDI is a chemical used in making foams and plastics. It has two or more isocyanate groups connected to benzene rings with methylene bridges. MDI can be liquid or solid. Some of the common names for MDI include Polymeric MDI, Monomeric MDI, and Modified MDI. The investigation covers all types and grades of MDI from China, regardless of their physical form, additives, or packaging. Investigation Scope The investigation covers MDI and products containing more than 40% MDI by weight. Some products with less MDI or that are highly modified are not included. If MDI is processed in a third country or mixed with MDI from other sources, only the Chinese component is covered. Preliminary Dumping Margins Commerce found these estimated dumping margins for Chinese exporters and producers: Covestro Polymers (China) Co., Ltd.: 376.12% Shandong Mingko Co., Ltd.: 376.12% China-wide entity: 511.75% (based on facts available with adverse inferences) These margins show that MDI from China is being sold in the U.S. at much lower prices than normal value. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend liquidation of MDI from China that is entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice. Importers will need to provide a cash deposit equal to the dumping margin above for their specific supplier. How Did Commerce Make Its Decision? Commerce used information from the original petition and relied on facts available for the China-wide entity. For companies not individually examined, Commerce used the average margin alleged in the petition (376.12%). No Changes to Scope No parties commented on the scope of the products covered. Therefore, the scope remains unchanged from the initial notice. Public Comments and Hearing Requests Interested parties can submit written comments (case briefs) within 30 days of the notice’s publication. Parties may also request a hearing on the issues raised. If requested, the hearing date will be announced by Commerce. Postponement of Final Decision Wanhua Singapore and Wanhua Ningbo requested to postpone the final determination. Commerce agreed, extending the final decision deadline to 135 days after this notice. Provisional measures (such as cash deposits) may now last up to six months. Next Steps Commerce will send its findings to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination confirms the preliminary findings, the ITC will then decide if imports of MDI from China harm U.S. industry. Details and Contacts The full decision can be found online at https://access.trade.gov. For further information, contact Kayden Jenson or Christopher Maciuba at the International Trade Administration in Washington, DC. This finding was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2025 (Volume 90, Number 177, Pages 44629-44632). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Court Orders Amended Results in Chinese Wood Flooring Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Court Orders Amended Results in Chinese Wood Flooring Duty Review On August 29, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) gave its final judgment in the case of Evolutions Flooring, Inc. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 21-00591. The CIT agreed with the U.S. Department of Commerce’s revised findings about the countervailing duty on multilayered wood flooring from China for goods imported between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Changes to Subsidy Rates Riverside Plywood Corporation and its cross-owned affiliates: 9.02% Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd.: 5.29% Non-selected companies under review: 7.91% Background of the Decision In its earlier decision on October 27, 2021, Commerce used certain facts to say that the Government of China’s Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP) applied to companies under review. This contributed to their subsidy rates. Later, the Department fixed errors in its calculations. Evolutions Flooring, Inc. and others appealed the results. On March 27, 2025, the CIT sent the decision back for corrections. The Commerce Department then found that Jiangsu Senmao did not use the EBCP during the review period. It also corrected calculation mistakes for Baroque Timber. Cash Deposit Rules The Commerce Department will update instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). However, companies listed in Appendix I already have newer cash deposit rates, so their current rates will not change. For Dailan Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., which does not have a newer rate, new instructions will be sent to CBP. Liquidation of Entries Certain entries remain on hold by order of the CIT while any appeals are pending. These are imports by Riverside Plywood Corporation, Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and companies listed in Appendix II from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. If the CIT ruling is not appealed, or if higher courts agree with CIT, Commerce will order CBP to collect duties at the new rates for these companies. Lists of Companies *Appendix I lists companies with superseding cash deposit requirements. Appendix II lists non-selected companies now subject to the new amended final results.* The news is official as of September 8, 2025, and is signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

United States Sets Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Hexamethylenetetramine From China Estimated reading time: 8 minutes What Happened Commerce and the ITC made final decisions that Chinese hexamine sold in the U.S. was both dumped at less than fair value and subsidized by the Chinese government. This was found to hurt U.S. manufacturers. Important Dates These orders apply starting September 11, 2025. Antidumping duties apply to service entries from May 6, 2025. Countervailing duties apply to entries from March 7, 2025. Duty Rates Antidumping Duties: The cash deposit rate for all Chinese exporters is set at 394.65%, based on a dumping margin of 405.19%. This applies to the “China-wide Entity.” Countervailing Duties: The cash deposit rate is 420.73% for all named Chinese companies and for all others. The companies include Changzhou Highassay Chemical Co., China Bluestar International Chemical Co., Ltd, Fengchen Group Co., Ltd, Hutubi Ruiyuantong Chemicals Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Guotai Guomian Trading, Jiaozuo Runhua Chemical Industry Co., and Qingdao Sun Chemical Corp. Ltd. How It Works U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect duties on imports of hexamine from China, based on these rates. For antidumping duties, CBP will collect the difference between the normal value and the exported price. Rates apply to entries after May 6, 2025, except some entries after provisional measures expired before the final ITC injury determination. For countervailing duties, CBP will collect duties equal to the subsidy rate. This applies to entries from March 7, 2025, except for entries during certain periods when provisional measures expired. Product Scope The orders cover granular hexamine from China, which has a particle size of 5 millimeters or less. It does not matter if the hexamine is stabilized or unstabilized. The orders apply whether it is blended, mixed, or ground with other products, as long as it contains at least 50% hexamine by weight. Hexamine may also be called: Hexamethylene tetramine HMT HMTA 1,3,5,7-tetraazaadamantanemethenamine 1,3,5,7-tetraazatricyclo{3.3.1.13,7}decane It is classified under HTSUS code 2933.69.5000. The written description decides if a product is covered, not just the HTS code. Suspension of Liquidation CBP will continue to suspend the processing (liquidation) of all affected entries until further instructions. The AD and CVD orders are effective as of the Federal Register publication date. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will maintain an annual service list for each order or investigation. Law firms, petitioners, foreign governments, and interested parties must enter appearances on Commerce’s online system, ACCESS. This ensures they are notified of any new scope applications or rulings related to these orders. What It Means Any U.S. importer of hexamine from China must now pay very high cash deposits. These new trade orders are designed to protect U.S. industry from unfairly traded imports. Contact Information For questions about antidumping, contact Thomas Cloyd at (202) 482-1246. For countervailing duties, contact Eliza DeLong at (202) 482-3878, both at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Reference This order was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on September 8, 2025. For more details and a list of all ongoing AD and CVD orders, visit https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Review on Citric Acid from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On September 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The review covers sales made between May 1, 2023, and April 30, 2024. The companies under review are RZBC Group Co., Ltd., RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (together, RZBC). The Department determined that RZBC did not sell citric acid in the United States at less than its normal value during this period. Key Details of the Review The Department of Commerce began this review after a request was submitted following the publication of the original antidumping order on May 29, 2009. The current review only covers RZBC, which was selected as the mandatory respondent. On December 9, 2024, Commerce extended some deadlines in this review by 90 days. The preliminary results deadline was then extended to September 5, 2025. All detailed events and analysis are available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, available to the public through the ACCESS system. Product Scope The product covered by this review is citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. The full product description can be found in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. China-Wide Entity The China-wide entity, which has an assessment rate of 156.87 percent, is not under review because no party requested its review. Its rate is not subject to change. Methodology Commerce used the methods set by the Tariff Act of 1930. Export price was calculated using section 772(a), and normal value was calculated using section 773. More detail is in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results For the review period, the following preliminary dumping margin was found: Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (percent) RZBC Group Co., Ltd., RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. 0.00 Next Steps and Public Comment Commerce will release its calculations within five days of this notice. Interested parties have 21 days from publication to submit case briefs. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Briefs must include a table of contents and table of authorities. Executive summaries should be provided for each issue and be no more than 450 words per issue. Anyone who wants a hearing must submit a request through the ACCESS system within 30 days of publication. The hearing can only cover issues raised in the written briefs. Final Results The final results of the review are expected within 120 days from publication unless extended. These will include analysis of all comments. Assessment Rates After the final results, the Department will set antidumping duties as follows: If a company’s margin is zero or less than 0.5 percent (de minimis), Customs will liquidate entries with no additional duties. If an importer-specific rate is not de minimis, duties will be collected. Instructions to Customs (CBP) will be issued not less than 35 days after publication of the final results. Cash Deposit Requirements After the final results, the following will apply: For RZBC, the new cash deposit rate will be based on the final results (zero if the margin is zero or de minimis). For other exporters with past separate rates, their previous rate will continue. For Chinese exporters without a separate rate, the China-wide entity rate applies. For non-Chinese exporters without their own rate, the rate of their Chinese supplier applies. These requirements stay in effect until further notice. Reminder to Importers Importers must file a certificate about reimbursement of antidumping or countervailing duties before liquidation. Failing to do so may result in double duties being assessed. Publication This notice is issued and published in accordance with U.S. law. The review was signed on September 5, 2025, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix The Preliminary Decision Memorandum discusses: Summary Background Scope of the Order Methodology Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) Currency Conversion Recommendation For full documents and more information, refer to the Federal Register notice and the ACCESS portal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Chinese Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has announced that the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the People’s Republic of China will continue. This decision comes after the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) decided that ending the order would likely result in continued dumping and harm to U.S. industry. The antidumping order was first put in place on February 26, 2009. On March 3, 2025, the ITC and Commerce began the third five-year review of this order, as required by law. In July 2025, the Department of Commerce found that getting rid of the order would likely lead to more dumping of these products into the U.S. market by Chinese companies. The ITC agreed, saying that the ending of the order would likely cause further harm to American businesses. The order covers small diameter graphite electrodes of any length, with diameters of 400 millimeters (16 inches) or less. These electrodes are used in furnaces and include those attached or not attached to a joining system. The order also covers graphite pin joining systems for these electrodes, whether sold attached or separately. These products are mainly used in metal melting, steel refining, and special furnace industries like foundries and smelters. The products fall under several subheadings of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS), including 8545.11.0010, 3801.10, and 8545.11.0020. Some products under these codes were included due to earlier decisions to stop companies from using extra processing in other countries to get around the order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits at current rates for these Chinese imports. The effective date for this continuation is August 29, 2025. The Commerce Department plans to begin its next five-year review of the order no later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the last ITC determination. This notice also reminds involved parties about their duty to return or destroy any confidential business information in line with the law and regulations. For more information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at the Department of Commerce. This news is published according to sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the related federal regulations. Dated: August 29, 2025. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Correction in Steel Fencing Dumping Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice in the Federal Register for its investigation on temporary steel fencing from the People’s Republic of China. The notice updates the preliminary determination of sales at less than fair value (LTFV), preliminary affirmative determination of critical circumstances, postponement of the final determination, extension of provisional measures, and corrects errors made in a previous publication from August 19, 2025. Background The Department of Commerce had earlier announced that some Chinese firms sold temporary steel fencing in the United States at prices below fair market value. This is considered dumping under U.S. trade laws. The August 19 notice had mistakenly stated that critical circumstances exist for some companies, which affects how tariffs are applied. The department also recognized errors in how some company names were listed. Correction of Critical Circumstances The new notice clarifies that critical circumstances did not exist for the following exporters and their related producers: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and several specific producers including Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd., Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd., among others. Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and producers like Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. with different producers. Metaltec Group Co., Limited with several listed producers. Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and several listed producers. Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. with four producers. Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Correction in Producer Names The Department corrected the spelling of producers’ names for certain companies in the rate table of the August 19, 2025 notice. This table lists the dumping margins and the adjusted cash deposit rates for each exporter-producer pair. Dumping Margins and Cash Deposit Rates For Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., the weighted-average dumping margin is 187.69%, with a subsidy-adjusted cash deposit rate of 177.15%. Most other exporter-producer combinations have a margin and cash deposit rate of 136.57%. An exception is Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd., which has a margin of 136.57% and a cash deposit rate of 126.03%. The China-wide entity margin is 187.69%, with the same rate for cash deposit. Legal Notification This notice is made as required by sections 733(f) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.205(c). The correction was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on August 27, 2025. For more details, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466, U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VIII, Washington, DC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Ruling on Chinese Steel Fencing Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction for its August 19, 2025, preliminary determination in an investigation about temporary steel fencing from China. This update was released on September 2, 2025. Background The Commerce Department had found that certain steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means the products are being sold for less than they cost in China. The investigation is a response to concerns from U.S. companies about unfair trade. Correction of Critical Circumstances In the August notice, Commerce said “critical circumstances” existed for some exporters. “Critical circumstances” means extra duties could be charged on products brought to the U.S. before the investigation started. The latest correction says this was a mistake for some companies. The corrected notice states that critical circumstances do NOT exist for these separate rate companies regarding temporary steel fencing: Exported by Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and produced or supplied by the following companies: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Cangzhou Hualing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Chanzhou Lianrui Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and supplied by: Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Metaltec Group Co., Limited and produced by: Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and produced by: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. and produced and supplied by: Tangshan ZhongRui Industrial Co., Ltd. Huanghua Tianhang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Tinlin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xindarui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and produced by: Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Names of Producers Corrected There were also errors in some producer names in the earlier table showing dumping and deposit rates for certain exporters. The Commerce Department corrected the producer names for rows 16, 19, 20, and 22 in its rate table. Dumping Margins and Deposit Rates The table lists each exporter and producer, with weighted-average dumping margins and adjusted cash deposit rates. Most companies received a dumping rate of 136.57 percent. Some, like Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., received a higher dumping rate of 187.69 percent. The China-wide rate is 187.69 percent. Legal Notice and Next Steps This notice is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The final determination in the investigation has been postponed. Provisional measures and possible duties remain in place for certain companies and products. The full correction can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 167, dated September 2, 2025. Contact Information For questions, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466 at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Chinese Slag Pots Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Washington, D.C., August 28, 2025 — The U.S. Department of Commerce has made its final decision in the antidumping duty investigation of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The Department determined that these products are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). Period of Investigation The period looked at was from April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. No Comments or Changes The Department published its preliminary decision on June 17, 2025. No parties sent comments, so the Department adopted its preliminary findings as final. There is no decision memorandum for this action. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers slag pots from China. The Department received no comments on what products should be included. The scope, as described in the appendix of the notice, was not changed. Facts Available and Adverse Inferences No companies were found eligible for separate rates. The Department treated all companies as part of the “China-wide entity.” No verification was done. Based on sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the Department used facts available with adverse inferences. The Department set the dumping rate at 294.43 percent for the China-wide entity. This is the highest rate claimed in the original petition. The China-wide entity includes these companies: Chaeng Great Wall Casting Co., Ltd. Chaugzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. China Minmetals Corporation Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. Dehua Protech Innovation Co., Ltd. Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. MCC Baosteel Technology Services Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Shaoguan Germany China Metal Group, Ltd. Shenyang Minmetal Import & Export Co., Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Co., Ltd. No Separate or Combination Rates The Department did not offer individual “separate rates” or “producer/exporter combination rates” because no company qualified for a separate rate. Final Dumping Margin The weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide entity is 294.43 percent. The cash deposit rate, adjusted for export subsidy offset, is 278.81 percent. No Disclosure Calculations Because the rate is based on adverse facts available and the petition, there are no calculations to disclose. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation The Department will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue suspending liquidation of all related entries entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after June 17, 2025. This includes all merchandise covered under the investigation. CBP will require cash deposits based on the rates above. The cash deposit rate may be changed in the future if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds both dumping and subsidies, at which point it will be adjusted for export subsidies. For now, CBP will not collect deposits adjusted for provisional measures in the companion countervailing duty (CVD) case, because they have expired. Next Steps by the U.S. International Trade Commission The Department will notify the ITC about its findings. The ITC must decide if U.S. industry is being injured or threatened with injury by these imports within 45 days. If the ITC rules there is no injury, the case ends and deposits are returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department will order AD duties on all entries made on or after the effective date for suspension of liquidation. Administrative Protective Orders If the ITC finds no injury, this notice will serve to remind all parties with access to business-sensitive information under Administrative Protective Orders (APOs) to return or destroy relevant documents. Scope: What Is Covered The products covered are slag pots with capacities from 65 cubic feet to 1200 cubic feet, regardless of shape, finish, or whether finished or unfinished. These are load-bearing goods typically made by casting or fabrication, such as welding. They may have legs, stands, or lifting hooks. The country where the slag pot was cast or forged determines its origin. The products are classified under HTSUS codes 7309.00.0090 and 8454.20.0080, though scope and definitions are controlled by the written description. Contact Information For more information, contact George McMahon at the International Trade Administration, (202) 482-1167. This final determination is official as of August 28, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Countervailable Subsidies on Slag Pots from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Investigation Period and Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision on imports of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The agency determined that Chinese producers and exporters of slag pots receive countervailable subsidies. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. On April 3, 2025, the Department published its preliminary findings. No comments were received, and the results remain unchanged in the final determination. Companies Involved and Subsidy Rate The following companies from China were assigned a countervailing duty rate: Chaeng Great Wall Steel Casting Co. Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Inc. Ltd. Cast-Con Engineering GmbH & Co. KG Changzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. GVA Krefeld GmbH Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. Luoyang Zhongtai Industries Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Tangshan Sinya International Trade Co., Ltd. All other companies Each company received an estimated countervailable subsidy rate of 226.16 percent ad valorem. This rate was based on facts available because the mandatory respondents did not provide requested information and were considered uncooperative. Product Scope The investigation covers slag pots with a nominal capacity of 65 to 1,200 cubic feet. These items are used in metal processing and can be made by casting or fabrication, with or without finishes like coating or heat treatment. They may come with parts such as legs and lifting hooks. Both finished and unfinished slag pots, even those further processed in other countries, are covered. Relevant U.S. import tariff codes for these products include: 7309.00.0090 8454.20.0080 Possible attachments could also enter under codes like 7316.00.0000, 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7325.99.5000, and 7326.19.0080. Suspension of Liquidation Following the preliminary decision, U.S. Customs was told to suspend liquidation of slag pot imports from China that arrived on or after April 3, 2025. Customs will not suspend entries made on or after August 1, 2025, but will keep suspending those entered on or before July 31, 2025. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if these imports hurt the U.S. industry. The ITC must issue its decision within 45 days. If the ITC finds injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued and cash deposits for duties will be required. If no injury is found, the case will end and all deposits will be refunded. Legal Reference This action was published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2025, under the authority of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For more information, the full legal text can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 165, pages 41986-41988. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Rescinds Administrative Review of Chinese Magnesia Carbon Bricks Estimated reading time: 1–4 minutes On August 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant to cover imports made between September 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024. The rescission took place because there were no reviewable entries of magnesia carbon bricks from the companies involved during the period of review. This means that no imports of these bricks entered the United States in a way that would be affected by the review during that time. The review process started after the Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee requested it on September 30, 2024. U.S. Customs and Border Protection data later showed that there were no relevant entries to review. No parties provided comments about this data, and no comments were received after the notice of intent to rescind the review was issued on July 8, 2025. This decision follows Commerce’s usual practice. When there are no entries to review because none were imported during the set period, Commerce rescinds the review according to its regulations. No antidumping cash deposit rates will change because of this rescission. The current cash deposit requirements for these imports will stay in effect until further notice. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess antidumping duties at the same rates that were in place at the time the entries were made. Instructions about assessment will be sent to Customs no earlier than 35 days after this notice is published. Parties involved in this review are reminded of their duties under the administrative protective order. They must return or destroy any proprietary information given under this order according to the rules. This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Chinese Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce says that polypropylene corrugated boxes from China are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This is called an “affirmative preliminary determination” in an antidumping investigation. Time Period Investigated The time period studied was July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. What is Being Investigated The investigation is about boxes made from corrugated sheets of polypropylene. These boxes are used to hold or carry goods. The boxes can be any size, shape, or style. They can have handles, lids, tops, or be made in one piece, two pieces, or more. The investigation also covers lids or tops by themselves. How the Boxes are Made The boxes are made from plastic sheets that have air channels inside. These make the boxes strong but still light. The plastic used is at least 50% polypropylene. Where the Boxes are Classified These boxes are classified in U.S. customs under number 3923.10.9000. The written description is most important for determining what is covered. Results of the Investigation No companies from China responded to the government’s requests for information. Because of this, Commerce used facts available “with adverse inferences” to set the dumping rate for all exporters from China. Dumping Margins The Commerce Department says the “China-wide entity” has a weighted-average dumping margin of 83.64 percent. The cash deposit rate, after adjusting for subsidies, is 73.10 percent. What Happens Next U.S. Customs must suspend liquidation of these products brought into the U.S. on or after August 28, 2025. Importers must pay cash deposits based on the dumping margin. If changes happen in a related countervailing duty case, the deposit rates could change. These rules stay in effect until more notice is given. Public Comment Period Interested parties have 30 days to send in written comments, called “case briefs.” They can send in rebuttal briefs 5 days after that. Everyone who sends briefs must include a table of contents and a list of legal sources. Summaries of each argument (about 450 words) should be put at the start of each brief. Anyone wanting a hearing must request one in writing within 30 days of the notice. Hearings will be only about issues in these briefs. What Happens Later Commerce will make its final decision within 75 days of this preliminary determination. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will be told about this preliminary decision. If Commerce says in its final decision that dumping has happened, the ITC will decide if this has hurt the U.S. industry. Scope of the Investigation The full description of the products and steps of the investigation are posted on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Enforcement and Compliance website. More Information The official notice and more details are published in the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 165, on August 28, 2025. For questions, contact Dan Alexander at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Tungsten Shot from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 27, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued final antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain tungsten shot imported from the People’s Republic of China. This action follows affirmative final determinations by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Commerce determined on July 11, 2025, that Chinese producers and exporters of tungsten shot are selling their products in the United States at less than fair value and are receiving countervailable subsidies. The ITC confirmed, on August 20, 2025, that U.S. industry is being materially retarded by these imports. Product Scope The orders cover tungsten spheres or balls, also known as shot, that are 92.6 percent or greater tungsten by weight. The size ranges from 1.5 mm to 10.0 mm in diameter. The product may be called “Tungsten Super Shot” and may include coatings, such as copper, nickel, iron, or metallic alloys. These products are generally classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) subheading 9306.29.0000, and may also enter under 8101.99.8000. The written description in the order determines the scope. Antidumping Order Details Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to impose antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds its export price. Because the ITC’s injury determination is based on material retardation, AD duties will only be collected on entries made on or after the date the ITC’s final injury determination is published. CBP will also refund any cash deposits from entries before this date, specifically for entries made on or after February 19, 2025 (the date of the AD Preliminary Determination). Commerce will reinstitute the suspension of liquidation and require a cash deposit for all future imports of subject tungsten shot from China. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all Chinese producers and exporters is 201.32 percent. Countervailing Duty Order Details Under the CVD order, CBP will collect duties on imports of tungsten shot from China beginning with entries made on or after the publication date of the ITC’s final injury determination. CBP will refund any cash deposits for entries before this date, specifically those made on or after December 20, 2024 (the date of the CVD Preliminary Determination). Estimated subsidy rates by company: Luoyang Combat Tungsten & Molybdenum Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Luoyang Hypersolid Metal Tech Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Mudanjiang North Alloy Tools Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Shaanxi Xinheng Rare Metal Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Xi’an Refractory & Precise Metals Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd.: 55.64% Zhuzhou Oston Carbide Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou Tungsten Man Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% All Others: 55.64% Administrative Procedures Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for these orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance to be added to this list within 30 days of the order’s publication. Law firms are asked to designate a lead attorney. This list will be updated as needed. The petitioner and the Government of China must submit their initial entries of appearance to be included on the first annual list. They do not need to resubmit each year but must update their entries if there are changes. Conclusion These orders are effective as of August 27, 2025. Detailed information is available online at: https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. These actions were signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Ceramic Tile from China Likely to Continue Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The antidumping duty order on ceramic tile from China was first published on June 1, 2020. In May 2025, the Commerce Department began its first sunset review of this order as required by law. The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile, a group of U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers, submitted a notice to participate in this review before the deadline. The group also provided a full response with information and arguments. No responses came from any Chinese companies. Review Process Because there were no responses from the other side, the Commerce Department ran an expedited review, which takes 120 days. The review considered whether removing the antidumping duty order would lead to more dumping of ceramic tiles from China. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on what is covered are in the full decision memo, which is available online. Findings The Commerce Department found that canceling the order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at prices below fair value. The Department determined that if the order is revoked, weighted average dumping margins could be as high as 356.02 percent. Other Information Parties who got special access to information in this review must follow rules for returning, destroying, or converting protected information. These results were issued in line with the law and regulations. For more information and for access to the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, visit https://access.trade.gov or contact Juliana Kogan at the U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: 202-482-0966. Dated: August 22, 2025 Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Steel Wire Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background On January 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce published the CVD order on steel wire rod from China. On May 1, 2025, Commerce began the second sunset review of this order. U.S. producers—Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company, Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC—showed intent to participate as domestic interested parties. These companies are producers of the same type of product in the U.S. On June 2, 2025, Commerce received a response from the domestic interested parties. The Government of China and companies from China did not respond. Expedited Review Because only domestic interested parties responded, and the Chinese side did not, Commerce held an expedited review as allowed by law. This was done under section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. Product Scope The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. A full description of the products and issues discussed appears in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum,” which is available electronically on the Department of Commerce’s official system ACCESS. Findings Commerce found that ending the CVD order would likely lead to more countervailable subsidies from China. Here are the countervailable subsidy rates that are most likely to apply if the order were removed: Benxi Steel (which includes several related companies): 193.31% ad valorem Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Tangshan Branch: 178.46% ad valorem All Others: 185.89% ad valorem Administrative Details Parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) are reminded to return or destroy confidential information according to the rules. Failure to do this can result in sanctions. Publication The Department of Commerce is publishing these final results as required by law, including sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Official Contact For more information, contact Emily Eshoo of the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce, by phone at 202-482-6296. Signed Dated: August 22, 2025. Abdelali Elouaradia Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance — Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 26, 2025), Pages 41547-41548, Notice C-570-013. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Second Sunset Review on Chinese Steel Wire Rod Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of the expedited second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The Department found that removing the antidumping duties on steel wire rod from China would likely lead to continued or repeated dumping. The likely dumping margins would be up to 110.25 percent. Background of the Order The original antidumping duty order on steel wire rod from China was published on January 8, 2015. The purpose of this order is to prevent unfair dumping of steel wire rod into the United States at prices lower than fair value, which can harm U.S. producers. On May 1, 2025, the Department of Commerce started the second sunset review of this order. This review is required under the Tariff Act of 1930. A sunset review occurs every five years to decide if ending the duties would lead to continued dumping. Participation in the Review On May 16, 2025, Domestic Interested Parties, which include Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC, filed their notice of intent to participate in the review. These parties said they are U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers of the steel wire rod covered by the order. The Department of Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this intent to participate on May 22, 2025. On June 2, 2025, these same parties submitted their full response, which was on time and in full detail. No parties from China responded to the Department’s request for comments. Because there was no response from China, the Department carried out an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The full details are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which the Department has made public. This document is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS system. Final Results The Department concluded that ending the antidumping duty order would probably result in the continued or repeated dumping of steel wire rod from China. The likely margins are up to 110.25 percent. This means that, according to the Department, if the duties are revoked, Chinese companies might continue or resume selling steel wire rod in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, at levels up to 110.25 percent below fair value. Administrative Protective Orders The notice also reminds parties who have access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility to return or destroy this information as required by law. Further Information All related documents, including the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, are available to the public on the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. This announcement is in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and corresponding regulations. Contact For more information, contact Morgan Jefferies at the Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, telephone 202-482-6302. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Chinese Ceramic Tile After Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has finished its first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on ceramic tile from the People’s Republic of China. The department found that ending the order would likely cause countervailable subsidies to continue or come back. What Is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a regular check done every five years. It looks at whether removing duties would lead to unfair trading practices starting again. This review was started on May 1, 2025, under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Process and Responses The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile sent in a notice of intent to take part in the review on May 16, 2025. The group claimed status as an interested party, as most of its members make, produce, or wholesale similar products in the U.S. The Coalition also submitted a full response to the review by the June 2, 2025, deadline. No responses came from the Government of China or any respondent interested parties. The Department of Commerce told the U.S. International Trade Commission about the lack of responses from China on June 20, 2025. As a result, the department did an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on the scope can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum provided by the Department of Commerce. What Did the Department Find? The Department of Commerce decided that ending the countervailing duty order would likely lead to the continuation or return of illegal subsidies for ceramic tile from China. The review includes analysis of likely subsidy rates if the order was removed. The main subsidy rate found likely to continue or come back is 358.81 percent ad valorem for the following producers and exporters: Temgoo International Trading Limited: 358.81% Foshan Sanfi Imp & Emp Co., Ltd: 358.81% All Others: 358.81% Information for Interested Parties The notice is also a reminder for parties with access to confidential information to follow the rules for returning or destroying materials. These rules are detailed in 19 CFR 351.305. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is publishing these results according to sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). The final results were signed on August 20, 2025, by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. To access the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, interested parties can visit https://access.trade.gov. Appendix – Topics in the Issues and Decision Memorandum: Summary Background Scope of the Order History of the Order Legal Framework Discussion of the Issues Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail Nature of the Subsidies Final Results of Sunset Review Recommendation Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Starts Investigation on Paper Plates Imported from Cambodia and Malaysia Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced new investigations about certain paper plates being imported into the United States. The investigations focus on paper plates made in Cambodia and Malaysia. These plates use paperboard that was made in China. Background of the Investigation This decision comes after a request from the Anticircumvention Working Group of the American Paper Plate Coalition. This group wants the U.S. government to check if companies are trying to avoid anti-dumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) taxes on Chinese paper plates by finishing the products in other countries. The official Orders that put duties on paper plates from China have been in effect since March 20, 2025. What Is Being Investigated? The main concern is that companies may be sending Chinese paperboard to Cambodia and Malaysia, making paper plates there, and then shipping them to the U.S. By doing this, they might be trying to avoid the extra duties on products from China. Commerce will check if the process of turning the paperboard into plates in Cambodia or Malaysia is minor or small. If yes, the plates might still be treated as if they come from China for tax purposes. Steps in the Investigation Commerce looked at the request and extra questions sent by the companies. After reviewing all the information, Commerce has decided that there is enough evidence to start a full investigation. The investigation will focus on how the paper plates are made in Cambodia and Malaysia. They will study if the work done there is small compared to the value of the paperboard from China. Commerce will also look at trade patterns and any connections between companies in China and those in Cambodia and Malaysia. How the Companies Will Be Chosen Commerce will use data from U.S. Customs to choose which companies to investigate further. This data will show which companies send paper plates from Cambodia and Malaysia to the U.S. Interested companies will have a chance to respond and provide information to Commerce. What Happens to the Imports Now? While the investigation is happening, U.S. Customs will keep stopping imports that are already being held under the Orders. If Commerce decides that circumvention is happening, Customs may continue to block certain imports and require extra taxes on them. Timeframe for the Decision Commerce plans to make a first decision within 150 days from August 22, 2025. The final decision should come within 300 days, unless there are delays or the investigation is stopped early. Who Can Be Involved? Any interested parties can submit information or comments. All steps and information are managed by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Contact Information If anyone needs more information, they can reach Justin Enck, Shawn Gregor (for Cambodia), or Walter Schaub (for Malaysia) at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Section. This information is published to help all interested parties follow the progress of the investigation and understand the rules for paper plate imports into the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidies on Fiberglass Door Panels from China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about fiberglass door panels from China. Officials found these items receive unfair help, called subsidies, from the Chinese government. What Is Being Investigated The investigation looks at fiberglass door panels, including their side panels, known as sidelites. These panels can be finished or unfinished, assembled or unassembled, and can come with other door parts. Only the fiberglass panels and sidelites are included in the investigation. Parts like door handles or locks are not covered. Investigation Timeline This investigation covers products from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department started the investigation on April 15, 2025. It postponed the timeline, and released the preliminary decision on August 18, 2025. Companies and Their Rates Commerce examined two companies: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd.: 71.37% subsidy rate Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd.: 59.17% subsidy rate Several other companies did not answer the Department’s questions. These companies receive a much higher rate: Kits Glass (China) Limited Hebei Charlotte Enterprise Co., Ltd. Lily Industries Co., Ltd. Shanghai Unikey International Trading Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Kuchuan Door Co., Ltd. Zhenshi Group Huamei New Materials Co Ltd. Each of these companies was given a 921.42% subsidy rate. All other companies that were not examined will use an “all others” rate of 62.55%. What Happens Next U.S. Customs will start holding back, or suspending, fiberglass door panel imports from China starting August 21, 2025. Companies must pay cash deposits at the rates above when importing these products. Commerce will double-check its information before making a final decision. The final results will come out by December 30, 2025, unless postponed. How to Respond People or companies interested in this topic can send in written comments. They must follow special rules for submitting comments, including how long the comments can be. If anyone wants a hearing, they must ask within 30 days of this notice. What Is Covered The investigation covers most fiberglass door panels and sidelites from China, even if they are: Assembled or not Painted or not Have glass panels or not Imported with other parts Some products are not included, like certain wood mouldings and float glass products. The items are normally imported under codes like 3925.20.0010, and sometimes under 4418.29.4000, 4418.29.8030, 4418.29.8060, or 7019.90.5150. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission will decide if the imports hurt U.S. businesses. They will do this after Commerce makes its final decision. For more details, people can find information online at the U.S. Department of Commerce website. This post is based on the official U.S. Federal Register notice dated August 21, 2025 (Federal Register Volume 90, Number 160, Notices: Pages 40818-40821). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Commerce Department Finds Preliminary Subsidies on Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 20, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a preliminary decision. It found that producers and exporters of polypropylene corrugated boxes from China received countervailable subsidies. The investigation period is January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Investigation Details The case is handled by the International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance. The investigation follows section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The preliminary decision was delayed to August 15, 2025, after an earlier planning notice. What Is Being Investigated The product under review is polypropylene corrugated boxes from China. This covers boxes made from corrugated, fluted, or hollow core polypropylene sheets. Sheets include different types such as twin wall or multi wall. Boxes can be different shapes and sizes. They may include lids, handles, or reinforcing wire. Some may be one piece, two piece, or multi-piece. Printed or plain boxes are included. These products are listed under U.S. tariff code 3923.10.9000. This code is for customs purposes. Scope of Investigation No parties commented on changing the scope of goods covered. The list is the same as first stated in the notice starting the investigation. How the Investigation Was Done Commerce based its method on section 701 of the Act. It looked for financial contributions from authorities that make a benefit and are specific to certain producers, following sections 771(5) of the Act. Some companies did not respond to requests for information. Commerce then used facts available and made negative inferences against those companies, as allowed by section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. Alignment with Antidumping Investigation The final result for this case will be aligned with the final result of the companion less-than-fair-value (antidumping) investigation for these boxes. This alignment was requested by the petitioners. Both final decisions are expected on or before November 10, 2025, unless delayed. Preliminary Subsidy Rates Commerce found that the following Chinese companies received subsidies at a rate of 199.60 percent (ad valorem): Dongguan Jian Xin Plastic Products Jinan Mantis Co Ltd Ningbo Luchen Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Shandong PPKG I&E Co. Ltd. Suzhou Huiyuan Plastic Products Co. All other Chinese companies also received the same rate of 199.60 percent. These rates are based on facts available with adverse inferences. What Happens Next U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of entries of these products coming into the U.S. after this notice date. Importers must deposit cash equal to the subsidy rates listed. Commerce will make its calculations public within five days of this notice. It will consider and correct any timely allegations of major calculation mistakes. Verification and Public Comment Due to lack of cooperation, Commerce will not conduct verification for non-responsive companies or the Government of China. Interested parties can submit written comments within 30 days after this notice. They may also submit rebuttal briefs up to five days later. Briefs must include a table of contents, a table of authorities, and a public summary for each issue. Requests for a hearing must be made within 30 days. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of its findings. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will decide within 120 days of this announcement or 45 days after the final determination if the imports cause injury to U.S. industry. Official Details This determination is issued by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, and follows sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act. For more information, the full memorandum is available at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Further procedural and product scope details are found in Appendix I of the notice. The complete process, background, and findings are also listed in Appendix II. Official contact for more information: Rachel Accorsi or Shane Subler, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-3149 or (202) 482-6241. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 159, August 20, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Preliminary Antidumping Duties on Temporary Steel Fencing from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary determination on temporary steel fencing imported from China. Commerce found that temporary steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means Chinese companies are selling these products in the U.S. for less than they charge in their own country. Investigation Period The time frame for this investigation is from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products involved include temporary steel fencing. This type of fencing includes temporary steel fence panels and temporary steel fence stands. These are the fences commonly used at construction sites or events. Both complete and unassembled parts are most often made of steel tubing and mesh, and they fit together to create a free-standing fence. Decorative steel fence panels are excluded from this ruling if they meet certain size and design requirements. Scope of Duties Commerce has decided to charge duties, called “cash deposits,” on these products because of their findings. The duties are different for each company, based on how much they were found to be underpricing their goods: Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd.: 187.69% (cash deposit rate 177.15%) Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. (for three unique producers): 136.57% (cash deposit rate 136.57%) Other Companies with Separate Rates: 136.57% (various producers and exporters; see official notice for details) Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd.: 136.57% (cash deposit rate 126.03%) China-Wide Entity (all other companies not listed above): 187.69% (cash deposit rate 187.69%) These duties apply to the value of the imported products. Critical Circumstances Determination In this case, Commerce also made what is called a “critical circumstances” determination for some exporters. This means that for some companies, the new duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the notice date. This applies to the China-wide entity, and to Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., as well as many companies with separate rates. Separate Rates and Combination Rates Commerce grants certain companies “separate rates” if they can show independence from the Chinese government. Most companies received a rate matching the finding for Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. If a company did not qualify for a separate rate, it gets the higher “China-wide” rate. Suspension of Liquidation Starting from the notice date, U.S. Customs will stop processing the import paperwork (“suspend liquidation”) for these items and will require cash deposits at the rates above. For companies with critical circumstances, this applies to earlier shipments as well. Next Steps Commerce will allow parties to comment and present new arguments. There may be verification of data and possibly a hearing if requested. The final decision could be postponed up to 135 days after this preliminary finding, extending the period during which the duties apply. Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination is also affirmative, the ITC will decide if U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. If so, the duties will become permanent. Details and Further Information Details about what products are included and which companies are affected appear in the official notice and appendices. Commerce’s decision includes a full list of affected exporters and producers, and describes exactly what kinds of panels and stands are covered. Merchandise covered by this order is mainly classified under U.S. tariff code 7308.90.9590 but may also enter under other codes. The U.S. Department of Commerce reminds all interested parties there are procedures for comments, hearings, and filings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Finds Circumvention of Antidumping Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from China via Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued a preliminary affirmative determination that imports of seamless oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Thailand, made with steel billets from China, are circumventing existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on OCTG from China. Background Antidumping and countervailing duty orders have been in place against OCTG from China since 2010. These orders are meant to protect U.S. businesses from goods sold at less than fair value and from unfair subsidies. Commerce began a country-wide circumvention inquiry on December 18, 2024. The question: Are OCTG finished in Thailand from Chinese steel billets avoiding the original orders? Three companies in Thailand were selected for review: Boly Pipe Co., Ltd., Nanobest Limited, and Petroleum Equipment (Thailand) Co., Ltd. On April 23, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for its preliminary determination. This notice, along with the full explanation, can be found online through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Scope of Orders The original orders apply to hollow, round steel products, such as oil well casing and tubing. These items can be made of iron or steel, made by seamless or welded methods. They may have different finishes and may meet various specifications. Both finished and unfinished goods are covered. Merchandise Subject to Inquiry This inquiry focuses on seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using steel billets made in China and then exported to the U.S. Methodology Commerce conducted the inquiry using U.S. law (section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930) and relevant regulations. The full details are included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination Commerce found that seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using Chinese steel billets and then shipped to the U.S. are circumventing the original orders from China on a country-wide basis. As a result, this merchandise should be included in the scope of the existing orders. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation and require cash deposits on entries made on or after December 18, 2024. This is only for OCTG from Thailand made with Chinese steel billets. If the merchandise is made with billets from countries other than China, the cash deposit requirements do not apply. Specific case numbers have been created for these products: A-549-991 and C-549-992. Certification Requirements Importers and exporters can submit certifications showing that the merchandise does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. These certifications must be completed and submitted with supporting documents, such as steel mill certificates, at the time of entry. Steel mill certificates must show the country where the steel was melted and poured. If these certifications are not provided, Commerce may require cash deposits at rates established for the AD and CVD orders on China (99.14% for AD, 13.41% for CVD). For companies with specific rates, those rates apply. Both importers and exporters must keep these records for five years after the last covered entry or three years after any related court cases. Certification Process and Timing For entries made between December 18, 2024, and September 3, 2025, importers and exporters must complete and upload certifications no later than October 3, 2025. Blanket certifications can be used for multiple entries. If non-AD or non-CVD entries were made during this period and cannot be certified, importers must submit a Post Summary Correction and pay any required duties. Public Comments Parties may comment on this finding and on certification procedures. Case briefs are due within fourteen days of this notice, with rebuttals due seven days later. Executive summaries are required for each issue and are limited to 450 words per issue. Requests for a hearing must be filed within 30 days of this notice. Hearings, if requested, will be scheduled later. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission of this preliminary determination. The ITC may seek consultations if it believes there is an injury issue within 60 days of notification. Certification Templates Provided The notice includes detailed importer and exporter certification templates. These templates must be filled out with names, addresses, invoice numbers, and documentation showing that the OCTG does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is taking steps to ensure that seamless OCTG from Thailand using Chinese steel billets is covered by existing orders against China. Suspension of liquidation and cash deposits are required unless proper certifications are provided. For more details, refer to the Federal Register notice and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Duties on Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued new antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These orders were announced after final investigations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC found that U.S. industry is suffering because of imports of LSPTVs from China that are sold at less than fair value and are subsidized. Ministerial Error Corrections Commerce also corrected some mistakes in their original decisions called “ministerial errors.” These included small calculation or clerical mistakes. Because of these corrections, the estimated dumping margin for one company, Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd., changed from 312.31% to 312.54%. The rate for separate companies changed from 291.04% to 292.03%. Key Dates The AD order covers LSPTVs from China entered into the U.S. on or after January 30, 2025 (the date the preliminary determination was published). The CVD order applies to goods entered on or after September 7, 2024 (90 days before the preliminary determination). For certain companies, “critical circumstances” were found, so duties may apply to imports made up to 90 days before preliminary measures started. Scope of the Orders The orders cover low-speed personal transportation vehicles and their subassemblies from China. These vehicles: Usually have four wheels. Have side-by-side or in-line seating. Use a steering wheel and foot pedals. Weigh not more than 5,500 pounds. Have a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour or less. Gas and electric models are included. Excluded are vehicles like all-terrain vehicles, go-karts, and mobility aids. Products specifically excluded: All-terrain vehicles Utility vehicles with speeds over 25 mph Recreational vehicles with speeds over 30 mph Go-karts, electric scooters, and mobility aids Product codes under the orders include: HTSUS subheading 8703.10.5030 Also may enter under subheadings 8703.10.5060, 8703.90.0100, 8706.00.1540, and 8707.10.0040 Duties and Cash Deposit Rates The companies and the rates set are: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: AD margin 119.39%, cash deposit 119.33% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: AD margin and cash deposit 312.54% Non-examined separate rate companies: AD margin 292.03%, cash deposit 292.00% China-Wide Entity: AD margin and cash deposit 478.09% For CVD rates: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD: 691.58% Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 691.58% All Others: 41.14% Suspension of Liquidation Customs will suspend liquidation for covered vehicles and collect cash deposits at the rates noted. This will remain until further notice. During times when provisional measures expired but before the final ITC decision, entries are not subject to duties. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will keep annual inquiry service lists. Interested parties can be added by filing in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Law firms should submit a lead attorney. Petitioners and the Chinese government will be included automatically going forward. List of Companies A detailed list of eligible exporters and producers, including over 35 separate rate companies, is provided under Appendix II of the notice. More Information The official notice is listed in Federal Register Volume 90, Number 153, pages 38759-38764. The orders take effect on August 12, 2025. For questions, contact the International Trade Administration at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Initiates Circumvention Inquiries on Steel Wire Garment Hangers Involving Cambodia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Background on the Case The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the start of new circumvention inquiries. These focus on steel wire garment hangers. The concern is that hangers made in Cambodia, using Chinese or Vietnamese materials, may be avoiding trade duties. M&B Metal Products Co., Inc., a U.S. company, asked Commerce to investigate. They said that steel wire or steel wire with paper parts from China or Vietnam are being sent to Cambodia. In Cambodia, the wire is used to make hangers. The hangers are then shipped to the United States. This may be a way to avoid paying antidumping and countervailing duties placed on hangers from China and Vietnam. Orders in Place There are already orders to stop dumping and unfair support of steel wire garment hangers from: People’s Republic of China (China) Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) These orders help protect American companies from unfairly cheap imports. What Is Being Investigated The investigation covers hangers made in Cambodia from: Steel wire Steel wire and paper accessories The materials are made in China or Vietnam and then shipped to the U.S. from Cambodia. Reason for the Inquiry Under U.S. law, Commerce looks at these cases if: The final product shipped to the U.S. is similar to what is already covered by orders. Parts or pieces come from a country subject to an order, but assembly is done in a different country. The assembly or finishing in the new country is minor. The value of the parts from the original country is a big part of the final product’s value. Taking action is needed to stop people from getting around (circumventing) the trade orders. Factors Studied Commerce will study details about assembly in Cambodia, including: Investment in factories in Cambodia Level of research and development there Nature of the production process Size and extent of production facilities How much value is added by Cambodia compared to the whole product They will also look at: Trade patterns (where parts and finished goods are coming from or going) Company relationships across countries Increases in imports to Cambodia since U.S. orders began What Happens Next Commerce will: Use U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data to find which exporters to ask for information. Send questions to the largest producers and exporters in Cambodia. Review trade and company data to decide if duties should be applied. If companies do not answer questions fully, Commerce may use facts that go against those companies. What Could Change If Commerce finds that hangers from Cambodia are really just made from Chinese or Vietnamese parts and are meant to avoid duties, it can: Order customs to collect cash deposits for these products Continue or start “suspension of liquidation” (holding off on final duty assessments) on suspected products Apply duties on entries made after the date of this notice (August 12, 2025) Timeline Commerce plans to: Make preliminary decisions within 150 days of August 12, 2025 Make final decisions within 300 days Contact Information For questions, contact Samuel Frost at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 202-482-8180. This notice was dated August 6, 2025 and signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Issues Antidumping Duty Orders on Brake Drums from China and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued official antidumping duty orders on certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye. The orders were published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2025. These orders come after findings by the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission that brake drums from China and Türkiye have been sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, causing harm to U.S. industry. Key Details of the Orders The antidumping duty orders cover brake drums made of gray cast iron, with an inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more but not over 16.6 inches, and weighing more than 50 pounds. This includes both finished and unfinished brake drums. The scope of the orders applies to brake drums imported separately or with other parts, such as a hub. If a brake drum is imported with non-subject merchandise, only the brake drum is covered by these orders. Drums processed in other countries, or that are assembled with non-subject parts, are still subject to these orders unless they are specifically excluded. Items excluded from the orders include merchandise already covered by previous antidumping orders on chassis and subassemblies from China, and composite brake drums containing more than 38 percent steel by weight. Covered merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 8708.30.5020, and may also fall under several other related HTSUS subheadings. Antidumping Duty Rates For brake drums from China, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: For the named producers and exporters, such as Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd., Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co., and others: 77.14 percent. For the China-wide entity: 160.79 percent, with a cash deposit rate of 150.25 percent. For brake drums from Türkiye, the weighted-average dumping margins are: EKU Fren ve Dok. San. A.S.: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). Akkus Dokum San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Buyuk Eker Bijon Sanayi Ve Ticaret, and Genk Otomotiv San. Dis Tic. Ltd. Sti.: 149.29 percent (cash deposit rate: 146.93 percent). All Others: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). These cash deposit rates are adjusted for export subsidies where appropriate. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Effective August 12, 2025, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend the liquidation of all entries of subject brake drums from China and Türkiye. Importers must deposit cash in an amount equal to the rates shown above at the time of entry. Antidumping duties will apply to all unliquidated entries made on or after January 29, 2025, the date when preliminary determinations were published. For entries made after July 27, 2025, and before the official order date, liquidation will proceed without regard to antidumping duties. Service List and Administrative Procedures Commerce will set up an annual inquiry service list for these antidumping duty orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance in Commerce’s ACCESS system within 30 days of the order’s publication to be included. The petitioner and the governments of China and Türkiye will automatically stay on the service list each year but are responsible for updating their contact information as needed. Scope of the Orders (Detailed) The orders cover gray cast iron brake drums with 14.75 to 16.6 inches inside diameter, weighing more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are covered, whether or not they are imported with other parts, assembled, or processed in a third country. The scope does not include: Brake drums that are part of certain chassis and subassemblies already under other antidumping or countervailing orders. Composite brake drums with over 38 percent steel by weight. HTSUS numbers include 8708.30.5020 (main), 8708.30.5090 (assemblies), and others as specified. Contact For details, contact Samuel Frost at (202) 482-8180 (China inquiries) and Colin Thrasher at (202) 482-3004 (Türkiye inquiries), U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. This is an official notice under section 736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The orders remain in effect until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.