U.S. Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review for Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the scheduling of an expedited five-year review. The review concerns the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China. This notice was published on August 13, 2025, in the Federal Register. The purpose of the review is to decide if lifting the duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China would likely cause continued or new injury to the U.S. industry within a foreseeable time. The review falls under the Tariff Act of 1930. On July 7, 2025, the Commission found the domestic interested party group response to its earlier notice of institution was adequate. The respondent interested party group response was found inadequate. No other circumstances required a full review. As a result, the Commission chose to conduct an expedited review as allowed by section 751(c)(3) of the Act. The staff report with information about the review has been added to the nonpublic record. This report will be available to people on the Administrative Protective Order service list on September 4, 2025. A public version will be released later, according to the Commission’s rules. Those who are parties to the review and who gave adequate responses can submit written comments to the Secretary. The comments must state what determination the Commission should make in the review. Comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on September 9, 2025. These comments cannot include new factual information. Anyone who is not a party to the review or an interested party may submit a brief written statement. These must also be sent by September 9, 2025, and must not contain new facts. If the Department of Commerce extends its review time, comments are due three business days after Commerce announces its results. If comments include business proprietary information, they must follow the requirements in sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s “Handbook on Filing Procedures” gives detailed instructions. The Commission has found responses from Bio-Lab, Inc., Innovative Water Care, LLC, and Occidental Chemical Corporation to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. Every document filed must be served on all other parties, and a certificate of service must be filed. Documents without a certificate of service will not be accepted. This review is considered extraordinarily complicated. The Commission is using its authority to lengthen the review period by up to 90 days, according to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). The review is being done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was published on August 13, 2025. For more information, contact Alexis Yim at the Office of Investigations, USITC, or visit the Commission’s website. Issued by order of the Commission August 11, 2025 Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Announces New OFAC Sanctions Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sanctions on August 7, 2025. This action was reported in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 153, on Tuesday, August 12, 2025. OFAC added names to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These changes are based on laws and rules that OFAC uses to decide who should be added. When a person or company is put on the SDN List, all of their property and interests in property under U.S. control are blocked. This means no one in the United States can have business dealings or make transactions with them. OFAC makes information about these actions and its sanctions programs available on its website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. The notice includes both companies and individuals added to the SDN List. The exact list can be seen in the official Federal Register notice. People can contact OFAC for more information by calling these numbers: Associate Director for Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Assistant Director for Licensing: 202-622-2480 Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance: 202-622-2490 Bradley T. Smith is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. This notice was officially filed on August 11, 2025. The billing code is 4810-AL-C. The full details and the names of the people and companies involved are found on the official OFAC website and in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Issues New OFAC Sanctions on Vessels and Companies Estimated reading time: 8–12 minutes On July 30, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) made new changes to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These changes block the property and interests in property of certain people, companies, and ships that are under U.S. jurisdiction. U.S. persons are now not allowed to deal with these people and companies. The listed ships are also considered blocked because they are owned or controlled by blocked persons. List of Affected Companies The Federal Register did not show specific company names in text, but the companies are connected to the blocked ships and are named beside each vessel. List of Blocked Vessels The following ships have been added to the SDN List. They are named, given their type, country flag, year made, and connection to the guiding Executive Order (E.O.) 13902. Linked to MARVISE SMC DMCC: ALE (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9303754) BERTIE (Container Ship, Liberia, 2003, IMO 9241487) LIDIA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2007, IMO 9330501) STAR (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9436484) ZAGOR (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9313242) VANI (Crude Oil Tanker, San Marino, 2004, IMO 9264881) HAKUNA MATATA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2008, IMO 9354167) MOANA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2004, IMO 9292151) PINOCCHIO (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9400112) PUMBA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9302566) RANTANPLAN (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9307023) SIMBA (Container Ship, Liberia, 2015, IMO 9719862) BIGLI (Container Ship, Liberia, 2005, IMO 9307047) TEX (Container Ship, Liberia, 2003, IMO 9246322) TIMON (Container Ship, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9415844) YOGI (Container Ship, Liberia, 2006, IMO 9307009) Linked to THE ZULU SHIPS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION–SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP L.L.C: ETHERA (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9387279) MISHELL (Chemical/Products Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9332315) MYRA (Oil Products Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9336490) AETHER (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2007, IMO 9328170) APATE (Oil Products Tanker, Panama, 2009, IMO 9433016) BRIONT (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2003, IMO 9252955) MANASLU (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9388027) NEMRUT (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9439541) TAGOR (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2005, IMO 9282481) TASSOS (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2009, IMO 9408695) TOA PAYOH (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2005, IMO 9298492) Linked to ALGAE SHIP CHARTER–FZCO: CHARMINAR (Chemical/Oil Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9318022) EVENTIN (Crude Oil Tanker, Unknown, 2006, IMO 9308065) ANTARES I (Oil Products Tanker, Liberia, 2008, IMO 9382073) Linked to REEL SHIPPING L.L.C: ACE (Container Ship, St. Vincent and Grenadines, 2001, IMO 9228538) AEOLUS (Container Ship, Liberia, 1996, IMO 9088524) CERUS (Container Ship, St. Kitts and Nevis, 2003, IMO 9259408) DHANU (Container Ship, St. Kitts and Nevis, 2001, IMO 9122473) GAUJA (Container Ship, Panama, 2006, IMO 9348493) ROB (Container Ship, Liberia, 2001, IMO 9236652) TB ANPING (Container Ship, Liberia, 2002, IMO 9237084) Linked to SILVER TETRA MARINE CO.: GUANYIN (Crude Oil Tanker, Liberia, 2005, IMO 9299707) Linked to RAVI LINES INC: IANTHE (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Panama, 2012, IMO 9554822) Linked to KANTI LINES INC.: KANTI (LPG Tanker, San Marino, 2004, IMO 9282106) Linked to NEO SHIPPING INC.: ABHRA (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2004, IMO 9282041) Linked to SHAMKHANI, Mohammad Hossein: OMNI (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2008, IMO 9400980) URANUS (Crude Oil Tanker, Tanzania, 2002, IMO 9248485) Linked to MEUSE SHIPPING INC.: IRIS (Crude Oil Tanker, Palau, 2002, IMO 9247778) Linked to KYLO SHIPPING INC.: KYLO (Crude Oil Tanker, Comoros, 2001, IMO 9189146) Linked to MAHADEV MARITIME INC: MAHADEV (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Palau, 2011, IMO 9571052) Linked to BACKSTREET PALM CORP: YODAN (Crude Oil Tanker, Vanuatu, 2005, IMO 9304356) Linked to WESER SHIPPING INC.: TRIS GAS (LPG Tanker, Cameroon, 1992, IMO 9041655) Linked to XANTE LINE INC.: XANTE (Asphalt/Bitumen Tanker, Panama, 2010, IMO 9554834) Linked to YUG SHIPPING INC.: YUG (Crude Oil Tanker, Comoros, 2005, IMO 9288875) Linked to ZALE SHIPPING INC.: ZALE (Crude Oil Tanker, Panama, 2006, IMO 9321718) Linked to NOVA LINES INC.: ELKE (LPG Tanker, Palau, 1993, IMO 9012886) Legal Basis These sanctions are put in place under Executive Order 13902. This order gives the U.S. power to block property and stop people and companies from making transactions with banned people/entities. Blocked Property All U.S.-linked property of the people, companies, and ships named above is blocked. Anyone in the U.S. is not allowed to make deals or transactions with them. More Information For more on OFAC and these lists, visit the official OFAC website at: https://ofac.treasury.gov Prepared by:Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Register Citation: 90 FR 38890-38906, August 12, 2025.Document Number: 2025-15240. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Amended Final Determination of Countervailing Duty Investigation and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Sets Duties on Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued new antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These orders were announced after final investigations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC found that U.S. industry is suffering because of imports of LSPTVs from China that are sold at less than fair value and are subsidized. Ministerial Error Corrections Commerce also corrected some mistakes in their original decisions called “ministerial errors.” These included small calculation or clerical mistakes. Because of these corrections, the estimated dumping margin for one company, Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd., changed from 312.31% to 312.54%. The rate for separate companies changed from 291.04% to 292.03%. Key Dates The AD order covers LSPTVs from China entered into the U.S. on or after January 30, 2025 (the date the preliminary determination was published). The CVD order applies to goods entered on or after September 7, 2024 (90 days before the preliminary determination). For certain companies, “critical circumstances” were found, so duties may apply to imports made up to 90 days before preliminary measures started. Scope of the Orders The orders cover low-speed personal transportation vehicles and their subassemblies from China. These vehicles: Usually have four wheels. Have side-by-side or in-line seating. Use a steering wheel and foot pedals. Weigh not more than 5,500 pounds. Have a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour or less. Gas and electric models are included. Excluded are vehicles like all-terrain vehicles, go-karts, and mobility aids. Products specifically excluded: All-terrain vehicles Utility vehicles with speeds over 25 mph Recreational vehicles with speeds over 30 mph Go-karts, electric scooters, and mobility aids Product codes under the orders include: HTSUS subheading 8703.10.5030 Also may enter under subheadings 8703.10.5060, 8703.90.0100, 8706.00.1540, and 8707.10.0040 Duties and Cash Deposit Rates The companies and the rates set are: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: AD margin 119.39%, cash deposit 119.33% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: AD margin and cash deposit 312.54% Non-examined separate rate companies: AD margin 292.03%, cash deposit 292.00% China-Wide Entity: AD margin and cash deposit 478.09% For CVD rates: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD: 691.58% Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 691.58% All Others: 41.14% Suspension of Liquidation Customs will suspend liquidation for covered vehicles and collect cash deposits at the rates noted. This will remain until further notice. During times when provisional measures expired but before the final ITC decision, entries are not subject to duties. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will keep annual inquiry service lists. Interested parties can be added by filing in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Law firms should submit a lead attorney. Petitioners and the Chinese government will be included automatically going forward. List of Companies A detailed list of eligible exporters and producers, including over 35 separate rate companies, is provided under Appendix II of the notice. More Information The official notice is listed in Federal Register Volume 90, Number 153, pages 38759-38764. The orders take effect on August 12, 2025. For questions, contact the International Trade Administration at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiries of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Initiates Circumvention Inquiries on Steel Wire Garment Hangers Involving Cambodia Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Background on the Case The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the start of new circumvention inquiries. These focus on steel wire garment hangers. The concern is that hangers made in Cambodia, using Chinese or Vietnamese materials, may be avoiding trade duties. M&B Metal Products Co., Inc., a U.S. company, asked Commerce to investigate. They said that steel wire or steel wire with paper parts from China or Vietnam are being sent to Cambodia. In Cambodia, the wire is used to make hangers. The hangers are then shipped to the United States. This may be a way to avoid paying antidumping and countervailing duties placed on hangers from China and Vietnam. Orders in Place There are already orders to stop dumping and unfair support of steel wire garment hangers from: People’s Republic of China (China) Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) These orders help protect American companies from unfairly cheap imports. What Is Being Investigated The investigation covers hangers made in Cambodia from: Steel wire Steel wire and paper accessories The materials are made in China or Vietnam and then shipped to the U.S. from Cambodia. Reason for the Inquiry Under U.S. law, Commerce looks at these cases if: The final product shipped to the U.S. is similar to what is already covered by orders. Parts or pieces come from a country subject to an order, but assembly is done in a different country. The assembly or finishing in the new country is minor. The value of the parts from the original country is a big part of the final product’s value. Taking action is needed to stop people from getting around (circumventing) the trade orders. Factors Studied Commerce will study details about assembly in Cambodia, including: Investment in factories in Cambodia Level of research and development there Nature of the production process Size and extent of production facilities How much value is added by Cambodia compared to the whole product They will also look at: Trade patterns (where parts and finished goods are coming from or going) Company relationships across countries Increases in imports to Cambodia since U.S. orders began What Happens Next Commerce will: Use U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data to find which exporters to ask for information. Send questions to the largest producers and exporters in Cambodia. Review trade and company data to decide if duties should be applied. If companies do not answer questions fully, Commerce may use facts that go against those companies. What Could Change If Commerce finds that hangers from Cambodia are really just made from Chinese or Vietnamese parts and are meant to avoid duties, it can: Order customs to collect cash deposits for these products Continue or start “suspension of liquidation” (holding off on final duty assessments) on suspected products Apply duties on entries made after the date of this notice (August 12, 2025) Timeline Commerce plans to: Make preliminary decisions within 150 days of August 12, 2025 Make final decisions within 300 days Contact Information For questions, contact Samuel Frost at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 202-482-8180. This notice was dated August 6, 2025 and signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Antidumping Duty Orders on Brake Drums from China and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued official antidumping duty orders on certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye. The orders were published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2025. These orders come after findings by the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission that brake drums from China and Türkiye have been sold in the U.S. at less than fair value, causing harm to U.S. industry. Key Details of the Orders The antidumping duty orders cover brake drums made of gray cast iron, with an inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more but not over 16.6 inches, and weighing more than 50 pounds. This includes both finished and unfinished brake drums. The scope of the orders applies to brake drums imported separately or with other parts, such as a hub. If a brake drum is imported with non-subject merchandise, only the brake drum is covered by these orders. Drums processed in other countries, or that are assembled with non-subject parts, are still subject to these orders unless they are specifically excluded. Items excluded from the orders include merchandise already covered by previous antidumping orders on chassis and subassemblies from China, and composite brake drums containing more than 38 percent steel by weight. Covered merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 8708.30.5020, and may also fall under several other related HTSUS subheadings. Antidumping Duty Rates For brake drums from China, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: For the named producers and exporters, such as Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd., Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co., and others: 77.14 percent. For the China-wide entity: 160.79 percent, with a cash deposit rate of 150.25 percent. For brake drums from Türkiye, the weighted-average dumping margins are: EKU Fren ve Dok. San. A.S.: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). Akkus Dokum San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Buyuk Eker Bijon Sanayi Ve Ticaret, and Genk Otomotiv San. Dis Tic. Ltd. Sti.: 149.29 percent (cash deposit rate: 146.93 percent). All Others: 15.22 percent (cash deposit rate: 12.86 percent). These cash deposit rates are adjusted for export subsidies where appropriate. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits Effective August 12, 2025, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend the liquidation of all entries of subject brake drums from China and Türkiye. Importers must deposit cash in an amount equal to the rates shown above at the time of entry. Antidumping duties will apply to all unliquidated entries made on or after January 29, 2025, the date when preliminary determinations were published. For entries made after July 27, 2025, and before the official order date, liquidation will proceed without regard to antidumping duties. Service List and Administrative Procedures Commerce will set up an annual inquiry service list for these antidumping duty orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance in Commerce’s ACCESS system within 30 days of the order’s publication to be included. The petitioner and the governments of China and Türkiye will automatically stay on the service list each year but are responsible for updating their contact information as needed. Scope of the Orders (Detailed) The orders cover gray cast iron brake drums with 14.75 to 16.6 inches inside diameter, weighing more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are covered, whether or not they are imported with other parts, assembled, or processed in a third country. The scope does not include: Brake drums that are part of certain chassis and subassemblies already under other antidumping or countervailing orders. Composite brake drums with over 38 percent steel by weight. HTSUS numbers include 8708.30.5020 (main), 8708.30.5090 (assemblies), and others as specified. Contact For details, contact Samuel Frost at (202) 482-8180 (China inquiries) and Colin Thrasher at (202) 482-3004 (Türkiye inquiries), U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. This is an official notice under section 736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The orders remain in effect until further notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye: Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Brake Drums from China and Türkiye Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced final countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Türkiye. The duties are based on investigations that began in 2024. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that U.S. companies were injured by brake drum imports from China and Türkiye because those imports were subsidized. The Department of Commerce will now order U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect countervailing duties on brake drums from those countries. The duties apply to all unliquidated entries of brake drums from China and Türkiye entered on or after December 3, 2024, except for those made after April 2, 2025, and before the publication of the ITC’s injury determination. Company Rates For China, two groups have the lowest duty rate of 11.94%: Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd./Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. All Others not named separately Several other Chinese exporters, including CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd./Trailer Master CVS Inc., and others, have a higher rate of 446.83%. This high rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences. For Türkiye, EKU Fren ve Dok. San. A.S. and all others not named separately have a rate of 2.80%. Akkus Dokum San.Ve Tic.Ltd.Sti., Buyuk Eker Bijon Sanayi Ve Ticaret, and Genk Otomotiv San.Dis Tic.Ltd.Sti. have a higher rate of 131.60%, also based on facts available with adverse inferences. Scope of the Orders The CVD orders cover gray cast iron brake drums with an actual or nominal inside diameter from 14.75 inches to 16.6 inches and weighing more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are included, whether imported by themselves or with other non-subject parts. The orders also cover brake drums processed in other countries or in the U.S., so long as they keep their classification as brake drums. Brake drums attached to or assembled with other goods are still in scope. However, composite brake drums that have more than 38% steel by weight are excluded. Goods covered by separate antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain chassis and subassemblies from China are not included. Harmonized Tariff Classification These brake drums are mainly classified under HTSUS subheading 8708.30.5020. They may also fall under other related subheadings when they are part of an assembly. Suspension of Liquidation CBP will suspend liquidation and collect cash deposits for these entries from the date of this order. Entries made between April 2, 2025, and the date of publication of the ITC’s injury determination are not subject to the countervailing duty because the provisional measures period expired. Annual Inquiry Service List The Department of Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list related to these orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance on the annual list within 30 days of the order’s publication. Updates and changes should be made as needed. Petitioners and foreign governments will be placed on the annual list after their initial entry and will stay there in following years unless changed by them. Contact Information For more information, contact: Charles Doss (Türkiye): (202) 482-4474 Nathan James (China): (202)-482-5305 A list of current countervailing duty orders is available at https://www.trade.gov/data-visualization/adcvd-proceedings. The CVD orders were signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on August 6, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Recission, in Part, of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Review Results for Wooden Cabinets From China Estimated reading time: 4–10 minutes Date: 2025-08-12 On August 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review of wooden cabinets and vanities from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Key Findings The review found that two companies, The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree) and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM), sold wooden cabinets and vanities in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.: 112.23% dumping margin The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.: 7.67% dumping margin Fourteen other companies qualified for a separate rate. These companies were assigned a dumping margin of 14.48%. Five companies were found to be part of the China-wide entity, which keeps its rate at 251.64%. No changes were made to the China-wide rate, as no requests were made to review the entity. The review is being partially rescinded for 49 companies. This is because either the requests for review were withdrawn or there were no shipments of cabinets from these companies during the period. Administrative Review Process The antidumping duty order on wooden cabinets from China began on April 21, 2020. On April 1, 2024, the Commerce Department invited interested parties to request a review. The review began with 70 companies. Some parties withdrew their requests to review certain companies. Eleven companies filed no-shipment certifications, and 18 filed for a separate rate. As a result, the review now covers 21 companies, including Ancientree and KM. After tolling and postponing deadlines, the preliminary results were set for August 5, 2025. Separate Rates and Review Results All companies from China are presumed to be under government control unless they prove otherwise. Fourteen companies and the two main respondents did so and qualified for individual rates. Companies receiving individual rates: Anhui Swanch Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Changyi Zhengheng Woodwork Co., Ltd. Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. Goldenhome Living Co., Ltd. Honsoar New Building Material Co., Ltd. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Senke Manufacturing Company Shanghai Zifeng International Trading Co., Ltd. Taishan Oversea Trading Company Ltd. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Xuzhou Yihe Wood Co., Ltd. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. Five companies did not file necessary information and are considered part of the China-wide entity. These companies are: Fujian Leifeng Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Oppein Home Group Inc. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., Ltd. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd. Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd. Rescinded Companies The review is being rescinded, in part, for 49 companies either because no requests for their review remain or there were no entries during the period. The full list is given in Appendix IV of the official notice. Next Steps Commerce will release final results within 120 days of these preliminary findings. Parties can submit comments and request hearings. Importers must ensure all paperwork is filed, or they may face extra duties. Cash Deposit Instructions When the final results are published, new cash deposit rates will apply: Companies with a separate rate will receive their assigned margin. Companies without a separate rate default to the China-wide rate (251.64%). Companies not under review keep their previous rates. Contact for Further Information For questions, contact Jacob Keller or Blair Hood at AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, (202) 482-4849 or (202) 482-8329. Official Notification Details Full details, company lists, and methodology are in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 153, August 12, 2025, pages 38727-38730. The notice includes directions for interested parties, assessment instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and deadlines for public comments. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Chemtos, LLC
Chemtos, LLC Applies to Make Bulk Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has posted a notice about Chemtos, LLC. The company has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer. This means they want to make large amounts of certain controlled substances. Application Information Chemtos, LLC sent their application on July 4, 2025. Their address is 16713 Picadilly Court, Round Rock, Texas, 78664-8544. Comments and Objections Anyone who is already a registered bulk manufacturer can comment on or object to this application. The deadline for comments or requests for a hearing is October 7, 2025. Comments must be sent online through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. People can type their comments or upload longer files. Submitters will get a Comment Tracking Number after sending in their comments. Controlled Substances Listed Chemtos, LLC has applied to make a large number of controlled substances. These include drugs in both Schedule I and Schedule II. Schedule I drugs have a high chance for abuse and have no accepted medical use in the United States. Schedule II drugs also have a high chance for abuse but are used for some medical treatments. Schedule I Controlled Substances Amineptine Cathinone Methcathinone Mephedrone N-Ethylamphetamine Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Methaqualone Etizolam Fentanyl-related compounds as defined in 21 CFR 1308.11(h) Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) Marihuana (synthetic) Tetrahydrocannabinols (synthetic) Psilocybin Heroin Methyldesorphine Methyldihydromorphine Bufotenine A wide range of synthetic cannabinoids (like JWH-018, UR-144, AB-FUBINACA) Many fentanyl analogs and other synthetic opioids Schedule II Controlled Substances Amphetamine Methamphetamine Lisdexamfetamine Phenmetrazine Methylphenidate Amobarbital Pentobarbital Secobarbital Nabilone Phencyclidine (PCP) Cocaine Codeine Hydrocodone Oxycodone Methadone Morphine Fentanyl Sufentanil Carfentanil Tapentadol The full list includes many more substances and covers several pages. How These Substances Will be Used Chemtos, LLC plans to manufacture and distribute these controlled substances as reference standards. Reference standards are used by labs and agencies for various tests. For the drug codes 7360 (Marihuana) and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company will only make them as synthetic substances. No other activities with these drugs are allowed under this registration. Contact Details and Notices The notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for the DEA. The official document (FR Doc. 2025-15115) was filed on August 7, 2025. The notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 151, dated August 8, 2025, on pages 38502 to 38507. Businesses or people who want to make comments or objections have until October 7, 2025. All comments must be sent using the online portal given by the DEA. This is a public notice. It is provided so people and companies know about Chemtos, LLC’s application and can respond if needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Finds Dumping of Chinese Mobile Access Equipment for 2023-2024 Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its review on certain mobile access equipment and subassemblies from China. This comes from a notice published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2025, Volume 90, Issue 151. What Products Are Covered? The review covers mobile access equipment (MAE) and their parts (subassemblies) made in China. The scope of these products is described in detail in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Which Companies Are Reviewed? At first, five companies were included. After Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou) withdrew their request for review, four companies remain: Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli) Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd. Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Dingli was picked as a mandatory respondent. What Did Commerce Find? Commerce found that some companies sold MAE in the U.S. at prices below the normal value (dumping) between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. The preliminary dumping margin rates found are as follows: Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (%) Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. 9.75 Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. 9.75 Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd. 9.75 Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. 9.75 China-Wide Entity Rate The China-wide entity is not under this review because no party asked for it. The China-wide rate remains at 165.14 percent. Process and Methodology Commerce reviewed the sales data from each company following U.S. law. The full method is detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, available to the public at https://access.trade.gov and https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Public Comments Interested parties can submit written comments within 21 days from the notice date. Rebuttal briefs may be filed five days later. Parties should include an executive summary and a table of contents for each issue. Hearings may be requested within 30 days after the notice publication. Assessment and Cash Deposits After final results, Commerce and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on the entries. If the dumping margin is zero or very low (less than 0.50 percent), Commerce will ask CBP to not collect duties. New cash deposit rates will apply after the final results are published. Companies in this review that get a separate rate will have a cash deposit rate equal to their dumping margin. For other exporters not reviewed, the rate will stay the same as before. Next Steps Commerce aims to finalize these results within 120 days, as required by law. Instructions for duty assessment will be given after the final results. Importers: Reminder Importers must file a certificate about duty reimbursement. Not filing could lead to extra duties. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For detailed topics and the full decision memorandum, see the official Federal Register publication pages 38458-38460, document number 2025-15117. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Announces New Countervailing Duty Rates on Aluminum Foil from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Review Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the preliminary results of its 2023 review of countervailing duties on certain aluminum foil from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. The Department began this review on June 12, 2024, after receiving requests from different parties. Two companies were first chosen for full review: Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Later, both companies were dropped from individual review requests. The Department then reviewed Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd., which became the main company examined. Some companies asked to be left out of the review, and their requests were granted. Also, based on customs data, the Department found 26 companies with no shipments during the review period. One company, Prosvic Sales, Inc., was removed from the review for this reason. Scope of the Order The duty order applies to aluminum foil imports from China. Full details are found in the Order and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Review The Department ended the review early for 17 companies after they submitted proper withdrawal requests. All withdrawals were filed on time. These companies are listed in Appendix II. One company, Prosvic Sales, Inc., was removed after review showed it made no shipments. How Rates Are Set for Companies Normally, the Department gives each reviewed company its own duty rate. If there are too many companies, it can review only the biggest ones and average their rates for the others. For this review, only Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. had a calculated rate that was not zero, very small, or based on limited information. The Department assigned this same rate to all the companies that were not reviewed in detail. Methodology The review checks if the government of China gave unfair advantages, known as subsidies, to aluminum foil exporters. The Department found that certain companies received benefits that were specific and provided by authorities. Preliminary Results Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. and its affiliated companies received a preliminary subsidy rate of 25.25 percent. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. received a preliminary rate of 540.55 percent because its rate was based entirely on facts available due to lack of participation. Other companies under review, who were not individually examined, received a preliminary subsidy rate of 27.45 percent. List of Companies and Rates Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. and affiliates: 25.25% Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd.: 540.55% Non-selected companies: 27.45% (see Appendix III for company names) Public Comments and Hearings Anyone interested can submit written comments about the review. Case briefs are due 21 days after this notice, and rebuttals are due five days after that. Summaries of each key point should be given, limited to 450 words per topic. If someone wants a hearing, they must ask for it electronically within 30 days of this notice. The number of participants and a list of topics to discuss must also be included in the request. Assessment Rates After the final results are published, U.S. Customs will collect duties based on the rates set in the review. For companies whose review ended early, duties will be collected at the previous rate that was in effect at the time of entry. If there is a court challenge, Customs will wait before collecting duties. Cash Deposit Instructions New cash deposit rates will be set for reviewed companies after the final results. These rates apply to future imports. For companies not reviewed, previous deposit rates stay in effect. Final Results Deadline The Department plans to publish the final results within 120 days of this notice unless the deadline is changed. Notification This notice follows U.S. laws and rules for duty administrative reviews. Appendices Appendix II: Companies Removed from Review Seventeen companies, including Alcha International Holdings Limited and Zhejiang Zhongjin Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., were removed after timely requests. Prosvic Sales, Inc. had no shipments and was also removed. Appendix III: Non-Selected Companies Under Review Fourteen companies, such as Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd., were not individually examined and received the new 27.45 percent duty rate. For more details, see the full Preliminary Decision Memorandum on the Commerce Department website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Antidumping Duties for R-134a from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On August 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Key Findings Commerce determined that Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. and its affiliates sold R-134a at less than normal value during the review period. The weighted-average dumping margin found was 141.22 percent. Scope of the Order The order covers 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, also known as R-134a, or its chemical equivalent, no matter the form, type, or purity. Partial Rescission of Review Commerce is rescinding the review for 28 companies. The petitioners withdrew their request for these companies within 90 days of the initiation notice, and no other party requested a review for them. The companies are listed in Appendix II of the notice. Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co. Ltd. and its affiliates remain under review. China-Wide Entity The China-wide entity’s rate remains unchanged at 167.02 percent. No party requested a review of the China-wide entity, so it is not under review. Zhejiang Sanmei was preliminarily found eligible for a separate rate and is not part of the China-wide entity. Methodology Commerce conducted this review following section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. Export prices for Zhejiang Sanmei were calculated according to section 772(a), and the normal value was calculated under section 773(c), as China is considered a non-market economy. Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs or written comments within 21 days after the publication of the notice. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Each brief should include a table of contents, a table of authorities, and a public executive summary for every issue raised. Parties who want a hearing must request one within 30 days of the publication of the notice. Final Results Timeline The Department will issue final results within 120 days of the publication of the preliminary results, unless extended. Assessment Rates After the final results are issued, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. Assessment instructions will be sent to CBP 35 days after the final results are published, except if a lawsuit delays the process. Individual assessment rates for importers will be calculated based on their entries. If an ad valorem margin or importer- specific rate is zero or de minimis, no duties will be assessed. Sales not reported in the U.S. sales database will be assessed at the China-wide margin rate. For companies rescinded from review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties at the deposit rate in effect at the time of entry. Cash Deposit Requirements After publication of the final results: Zhejiang Sanmei’s cash deposit rate will be the one from the final results, unless it is de minimis. Exporters with an existing separate rate not listed will keep their current rate. Companies with no separate rate will have the China-wide rate of 167.02 percent. Non-Chinese exporters’ rates will match their Chinese suppliers. These deposit requirements stay in effect until further notice. Reminder to Importers Importers must file a certificate about the reimbursement of antidumping duties. Failure to do so can result in double assessments. Companies with Review Rescinded Appendix II lists 25 companies for which the review is being rescinded, including Bestcool Inc., Ltd., Jinhua Binglong Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. Further Information Full details and the list of topics discussed are available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. For questions, contact John Conniff at (202) 482-1009. [Federal Register: 90 FR 38455-38458, August 8, 2025] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023
“`html U.S. Finds Chinese Producers Dumped Aluminum Foil, Issues Preliminary Results Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of aluminum foil from China. The review covers sales from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Preliminary Findings Commerce found that some producers and exporters from China sold aluminum foil below the normal value in the United States. Selling below normal value is called “dumping.” The government will collect extra duties on those products. Companies Reviewed Commerce looked at 24 companies. Some companies were treated as one group because they are connected by ownership or business ties. For example, Commerce grouped nine companies including Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited; and others as a single entity. Another group of six connected companies included Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd.; and their partners. Separate Rates Not all companies are treated the same. Some companies proved they are separate from the Chinese government and received their own dumping rates. These companies are: Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd. (as part of a group with Dingsheng) Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (as part of its group) Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd. Eastern Valley Co., Ltd. Korea Aluminium Co., Ltd. Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. Dumping Margins Commerce’s preliminary results assigned these dumping margins: Dingsheng Group: 24.51% Zhongji Group: 30.17% Other companies with separate rates: 26.94% Dumping margin means the percentage added to the product’s price to make it equal to fair value. China-Wide Entity Some companies did not answer all questions or did not apply for a separate rate. These companies are part of the “China-wide entity.” They will get the China-wide dumping rate, which is 105.80%. Companies in this group include: Dongwon Systems Corp. Gränges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Sama Aluminium Co Ltd. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Co., Ltd. No Shipments Some companies said they did not ship aluminum foil to the U.S. during the review period. But since their business partners shipped foil, Commerce did not accept their claim of no shipments. Assessment and Cash Deposits When these results are final, U.S. Customs will collect duties based on these percentages for all shipments entered from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. The deposit rates will continue for future shipments until updated. Next Steps Interested parties can comment or ask for a hearing within set deadlines. Commerce will publish final results within 120 days after August 8, 2025, unless the deadline is extended. Notice to Importers Importers must file a certificate about duty reimbursement. If they do not, extra duties may be applied. Official Documents Details and documents can be found at https://access.trade.gov. Appendix: Companies with Separate Rate Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd. Eastern Valley Co., Ltd. Korea Aluminium Co., Ltd. Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. Companies Considered Part of China-Wide Entity Dongwon Systems Corp. Gränges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Sama Aluminium Co Ltd. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Co., Ltd. Details are based on the official Federal Register notice released by the Department of Commerce on August 8, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy. “`
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Department of Justice Announces Religious Liberty Commission’s Second Public Meeting Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) will hold the second meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission on September 8, 2025. This meeting will take place from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting is open to the public. Those who wish to attend in person must register ahead of time on the Religious Liberty Commission’s website at https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. Only the first 300 people who register will be allowed to attend in person. Attendees must show identification and go through a security screening before entering. The meeting will also be recorded and available to watch live at justice.gov/live. Media guests are required to register with the Office of Public Affairs before September 5, 2025, at 5 p.m. Media must also present a government-issued photo ID and valid media credentials, and go through security. For more information about the meeting or to request a reasonable accommodation to attend, contact Mary Margaret Bush, the Designated Federal Officer for the Religious Liberty Commission, at 202-297-3196 or by email. The Religious Liberty Commission was created by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission has a chair, a vice chair, 11 members appointed by the President from private and public sectors, plus three ex-officio members. The Commission’s goal is to advise the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office on important religious liberty policies in the United States. The Commission will provide a full report to the President. The report will cover the foundations of religious liberty in America, the effects of religious liberty on American society, current threats to domestic religious liberty, ways to protect religious liberty in the future, and ideas for programs to promote and celebrate America’s religious diversity. The main topic for this meeting will be religious liberty in public education. The Commission will hear from parents and students. Panels will include elementary, secondary, undergraduate, and graduate students. Experts in religious liberty and public education will also give testimonies. The goal is to understand the history of religious liberty in public schools, identify current threats, and find opportunities to protect religious liberty in schools for the future. The public can send in written comments about religious liberty in public education. Comments must be sent by September 1, 2025. They can be emailed to the Commission or mailed to: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, ATTN: Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706, Washington, DC 20530. This meeting notice is published as required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). Dated: July 28, 2025. Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Title-DEA Voluntary Wellness Program Healthcare Provider Clearance
DOJ Announces New Information Collection for DEA Wellness Program Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Purpose of the Collection The new collection, called the “DEA Voluntary Wellness Program Healthcare Provider Clearance,” is required for DEA employees who want to join physical fitness activities under the Wellness Program. To make sure it is safe for employees to join these activities, they must submit a health assessment form. This form must be filled out by a licensed medical professional before taking part. This process helps keep employees safe and supports the agency’s health and wellness efforts. How the Information Will Be Used The main goal is to check if DEA employees are medically able to safely take part in physical activities. The results will help prevent injuries or worsening of any health conditions. This requirement comes from the DEA Personnel Manual 2792. Employees must get medical clearance before starting any voluntary wellness activities with the agency. Details of the Collection The collection uses form DEA-315c. Only a licensed medical professional can fill out the form. The form is required before an employee can take part in wellness activities. Estimated Burden The DEA estimates about 100 people will respond each year. Each response will take about 45 minutes to complete. The total annual burden is expected to be 75 hours. There is no annual cost burden to the DEA. How to Comment Comments are welcome for 60 days, until October 3, 2025. If you have comments or need a copy of the information collection, you can contact Benjamin Inks, Office of Compliance, Policy Administration Section, 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, phone: 571-672-4524, or email at the address listed in the notice. For Further Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Dated: July 31, 2025. Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer for PRA U.S. Department of Justice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection and Comments Requested; Extension of currently approved collection Title-OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form package
Department of Justice Requests Comments on OJJDP NTTAC Feedback Form Package Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is asking for public comments on a feedback form package. This package is managed by the National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC). The request was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. The OJJDP wants feedback about collecting information from people who use their training and technical help. This information helps the agency know how well they are doing and find ways to help people better. What Is Being Collected The feedback forms are given to: People who get technical help from OJJDP Conference attendees Training and technical help providers Online meeting and in-person meeting participants Focus group participants The forms ask about satisfaction with the help, the quality, efficiency, and resources provided. They also ask about any other needs for training or help. Who Responds People who may need to fill out the forms include: Individuals or households Federal, state, local, or tribal government Nonprofit institutions Businesses How the Information Is Used The data from the forms is used to: Improve support for OJJDP NTTAC users Help the juvenile justice field Improve services and outcomes for youth Estimated Impact The Department of Justice thinks about 4,756 people will respond to these forms. The time it takes to fill out a form is estimated to be between 0.03 hours (about 2 minutes) and 1.5 hours. The total estimated time for all responses in one year is 430.5 hours. How to Comment The comment period is open until September 4, 2025. People may: Ask for a copy of the information collection instrument Make suggestions or comments about the time it takes to respond Contact Jill Molter at OJJDP NTTAC for more information by phone at 202-514-8871 or by email Written comments can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget in Washington, DC. For More Information Anyone needing more information can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, at the Department of Justice’s Washington, DC office. The notice was dated July 31, 2025. This announcement meets the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Certifying Qualifying State Relief from Disabilities Program
Department of Justice Seeks Comments on ATF Program for Relief from Firearm Disabilities Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is asking for public comments. The request is about an information collection program. This program is called “Certifying Qualifying State Relief from Disabilities Program.” The ATF wants to keep collecting information for this program. They are sending a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve it again. This is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. What is the Program? The program comes from the NICS Improvement Act. This Act helps make sure states report mental health records. These records can prevent someone from buying a firearm if they are not allowed to. States can get grants to help them make these reports better. But to get the grants, a state must have a program. This program lets people who were not allowed to have a firearm because of a mental health decision ask for that right back. A state official must certify to ATF that such a program exists. Details about the Collection Type of Collection: This is an extension of a collection that was already approved before. Form Number: ATF Form 3210.12. Who Responds: State, local, and tribal governments. Responding is needed if they want to get or keep grant funding. How Often: Each respondent will complete the collection once every year. Time Needed: It takes about 15 minutes (0.25 hours) for each person to complete. Number of Respondents: ATF expects about 10 responses every year. Total Time Spent: All together, this will add up to about 2.5 hours per year. Total Cost: The estimated cost for all respondents together is $120 a year. Table—Estimated Annual Burden and Cost Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Monetized Value of Time Complete 10 1 10 0.25 2.5 $47.92 $120 How to Comment Comments will be accepted for 60 days. The deadline is October 6, 2025. People can send suggestions or talk about the time needed to respond. Comments can also suggest better ways to collect the information. Contact Information For more information or to get a copy of the collection form, contact Pamela Eisert, FIPB, at ATF. The address is 99 New York Ave NE, Washington, DC 20226. You can also email or call 202-648-7190. If you need more information, you can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, at the U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Official Notice This notice was signed on July 31, 2025, by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a previously approved collection Title-National Tracing Center (NTC) Trace Request/Solicitud de Rastreo del Centro Nacional de Rastreo (NTC)
ATF Updates on Gun Trace Requests: Important Changes Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Collection Renewal and Changes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is making changes to how law enforcement agencies ask for gun traces. These requests use the National Tracing Center (NTC) Trace Request form, also called ATF Form 3312.1 or 3312.1S. The form helps police and other law enforcement agencies get information about guns used in crimes. ATF is asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to renew and approve their information collection. People may send comments for the next 60 days, until October 6, 2025. ATF wants to hear what the public thinks about the collection and if it is useful, the time it takes, and if the form is easy to use. What ATF is Changing The number of law enforcement agencies using the form each year will increase from 1,153 to 17,000. The number of trace requests will rise from 24,490 to 510,000. The total time agencies spend on this will increase from 2,449 hours to 51,000 hours. Total yearly estimated cost to agencies will be $2,443,920. Who Uses the Form? State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies use the form. It is not required by ATF but is needed if an agency wants a gun to be traced. How the Process Works Each law enforcement agency will send about 30 trace requests every year. Filling out each request takes about 6 minutes. ATF does not make a gun registry during this process. Only the agency that requested the information gets the results. Details for Public Comment People who want to comment or want a copy of the form can contact Carrie Robertson at the National Tracing Center Division by mail, email, or phone. The public should tell ATF if the collection is necessary, if the time needed is correct, if the process can be improved, or if there are better ways to collect the information. Contact for More Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the U.S. Department of Justice. Summary Table Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Cost LEA trace requests 17,000 30 510,000 6 minutes 51,000 $47.92 $2,443,920 This notice was dated July 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection Title-Application and Permit To Import Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles
ATF Seeks Comments on Import Form Update for Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) is asking for public comments on a new version of its form called “Application and Permit to Import Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles.” The form is known as ATF Form 5330.3B, or “Form 6, Part II.” Purpose of the Notice The ATF needs to collect information from individuals who want to bring firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the United States. This process is done through the Form 6, Part II document. The form helps ATF check if what someone wants to bring in can be imported. This update is a regular review under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The comment period will last for 60 days, ending October 6, 2025. Changes to the Form The form title will be changed for better readability. New attachment sheets are added. This helps people who need extra space, especially if importing many items at once. The new sheets are for listing defense articles and ammunition. Instructions on the form are updated. These now include current laws, use easier words, and explain things more clearly. Details like office contact information are updated so people know how to reach out if they need help. Grammar and terminology updates are made throughout. There are no changes to the overall procedure or requirements, but the number of people using the form has dropped. Who Uses This Form? Individuals, like returning military members, use Form 6, Part II to ask permission before bringing firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the U.S. Filling out the form is required to get approval to import these items. Annual Use and Burden Estimated number of users per year: 312 people. How often: Each user fills it out once a year. Time to fill out: About 30 minutes per person. Total annual time: 156 hours for all users. Estimated total cost of respondent time: $3,588 per year. Comments Needed The ATF wants feedback from the public and any groups who work with the form. They are looking for comments on: Whether the form is needed and useful. If their numbers and estimates are correct. Any ideas to make the form more helpful or clear. Ways to make the form easier, like by using computers or electronics. How to Respond People who want to comment or get more information can contact Austin Funk at the Firearms and Explosives Import Branch. He can be reached by mail at Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405; by email; or by phone at 304-616-4654. For other information, Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice can also be reached at 145 N Street, NE, Washington, DC. The official notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, on July 31, 2025. The full information is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Extension and Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Application for Cancellation of Removal (Form EOIR-42A) for Certain Permanent Residents; and Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status (Form EOIR-42B) for Certain Nonpermanent Residents
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a request for public comments on two important immigration forms. The forms are used for people in removal proceedings who want to stay in the United States. The two forms are: Form EOIR-42A (Application for Cancellation of Removal for Certain Permanent Residents) Form EOIR-42B (Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents) These forms help the government decide if a person should be allowed to stay in the country even if they are removable. Why Comments Are Needed EOIR wants the public, especially those affected, to comment on whether the forms collect the right information and are easy to use. Comments can also suggest ways to make the process clearer or faster. The goal is to make sure these forms help the agency do its work well. How to Comment Anyone who wants to comment has 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can ask for more information or share thoughts about the time and effort required to fill out the forms. Questions or requests for more details can be sent to: Justine Fuga Associate General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 Phone: (703) 305-0265 Key Details About the Forms According to U.S. law, people who are being removed from the United States may ask the Attorney General to cancel their removal. To receive this help, the person must show they meet requirements in the law. The forms let EOIR collect all necessary information. Changes Being Made The EOIR will update the forms in several ways: Update information about filing fees Add a Privacy Act Notice Show the expiration date for approval on each form Make small formatting changes so the forms are easier to read Who Will Use These Forms? The forms are for individuals in court proceedings who are at risk of being removed from the United States. Completing the forms helps decide if they can stay. How Many People Will Use the Forms and How Long It Takes Each year: About 1,519 people will fill out Form EOIR-42A About 15,757 people will fill out Form EOIR-42B It takes about 5 hours and 50 minutes for a person to complete each form. Total Hours People Will Spend For Form EOIR-42A: About 8,856 hours For Form EOIR-42B: About 91,865 hours Estimated Costs The government also shared the expected cost for filling out these forms. This includes: The average cost for hiring a lawyer or practitioner The cost to file each form For Form EOIR-42A: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $700 per response Total annual responses: 1,519 Total public cost: $1,683,912 each year For Form EOIR-42B: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $1,600 per response Total annual responses: 15,757 Total public cost: $31,640,056 each year The forms can be submitted electronically, so printing or mailing costs can be zero. How These Costs Are Calculated Costs include lawyers’ fees as estimated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the required government form fees. Further Information Anyone needing more information can contact: Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer Justice Management Division United States Department of Justice Two Constitution Square 145 N Street NE, 4W-218 Washington, DC This update was signed by Darwin Arceo of the U.S. Department of Justice on August 1, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection: Application To Transfer and Register NFA Firearm (Tax-Exempt), ATF Form 5320.5 (“Form 5”)
DOJ Announces Changes to NFA Firearm Transfer Form 5 Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), has shared a notice about updates to ATF Form 5320.5, also known as “Form 5”. This form is used by people and organizations who want to transfer or register National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms without paying the usual transfer tax, if they qualify for a tax exemption. Sixty-Day Comment Period for the Public The DOJ is asking people for comments on these updates. The comment period is open for 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can share their opinions about the time it takes to complete the form, the form’s usefulness, and suggestions for improvements. What is Form 5 Used For? Form 5 is for people who want to transfer and register an NFA firearm and believe they do not need to pay the tax. The form is used to: Ask for permission and show why the tax does not apply Support transfers that happen because of law changes, such as when a firearm is inherited through an estate Make it easier to temporarily transfer a firearm for repairs and get it back Who’s Affected? Those affected include: Federal government State or local government People or groups transferring unserviceable firearms People must fill out the form to follow the law and get the benefits offered. Increases and Decreases in Reporting Burden The number of people who fill out this form has increased from 10,591 to 17,322 in 2025. But, the average time needed to do the form has dropped from 30 minutes to 12 minutes. Technology now allows: Electronic forms and signatures Fewer people needing to send in fingerprints or photographs The use of cell phone photos and photocopied IDs Sending documents electronically People also don’t need to make an extra copy for local police anymore. Key Changes to Form 5 Some important changes to the form include: A clearer title Taking out the photo box to let people attach a passport photo or a copy of a photo ID Combining race and ethnicity questions More ways to sign electronically or digitally The fillable PDF form now fills in copy 2 as you fill in copy 1, except for check boxes and signature Added links to eForms and pay.gov Information about the refund process Ending the requirement to notify the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) and to send a copy New instructions for married couples applying together Corrections to small errors in the form Adding email contacts for specific questions Annual Reporting Details An estimated 17,322 people will fill out Form 5 each year Each form takes about 12 minutes, for a total of about 3,464 hours of work by all respondents The total estimated cost to respondents is $79,672 Contact for More Information For more information, contact Meghan Tisserand at the National Firearms Act Division, using the following: Mail: 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405 Email: [contact emails in original document] Phone: 304-616-3219 Official Record This notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, the Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, and filed on August 4, 2025. For more details, see the official notice in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted
Department of Justice Publishes Notice on Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 6, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register about collecting data on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is responsible for this data collection. The FBI will send a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review and approve this activity. The public is invited to share their comments. You have 60 days to send in your comments—until October 6, 2025. Comments should talk about how useful the information is, if the response time estimates are correct, how to make the data better, and ways to reduce the effort needed to answer. The goal of this collection is to help the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. The UCR Program is a national center for collecting and sharing information about crime. Each year, it publishes statistics on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The legal authority for this collection is Title 28, United States Code, Section 534. Key Details of the Collection: Type: This is an extension of a previously approved collection. Form Title: Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. Form Number: 1-705. Responsible Agency: CJIS Division, FBI, Department of Justice. Who Responds: Federal, state, county, city, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. Responding is voluntary. Number of Respondents: In 2024, there were 19,328 possible agencies. Of these, 1,084 agencies submitted LEOKA Form 1-705. Estimated Responses: The highest number of responses in 2024 was 13,008. Time for Each Response: Completing the form takes about 7 minutes per response. Total Annual Burden: The total estimated burden for all responses is about 1,517.6 hours each year. The number of agencies using the summary form (Form 1-705) is expected to decrease over time, as more agencies move to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Agencies using NIBRS report the same information in a different way. If you need more information or have questions, you can contact Linda Shriver, Acting Unit Chief at the FBI CJIS Division, by calling 304-625-4830 or emailing the address in the notice. For more details or to submit comments, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice, at the address listed in the notice. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149, on August 6, 2025, pages 37888-37889. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Title-Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (Form EOIR-60); and Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Immigration Court (Form EOIR-61)
U.S. Department of Justice Seeks Comments on Updated Immigration Forms for Limited Legal Help Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the U.S. Department of Justice has announced updates to two important forms. These forms let lawyers or representatives tell immigration courts or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that they are helping someone just with paperwork, not full legal representation. The forms are called EOIR-60 and EOIR-61. The new changes update how forms can be submitted. Now, attorneys and representatives can file EOIR-60 and EOIR-61 online using the EOIR Courts and Appeals System (ECAS) Respondent Access Portal. The rules for filing by mail are changed, and people are told to look at the EOIR Policy Manual for guidance. There is a new section in the forms that lets users say if they gave documents electronically using ECAS. The updates also fix some legal citations in the Privacy Act notice. The forms now say that case information can be found online, in English or Spanish, through the EOIR Automated Case Information System. A new sentence was added to EOIR-60. It tells people that this limited help is not allowed in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cases that are handled by the Board of Immigration Appeals. These forms are needed for lawyers or representatives who want to help someone with a document or filing, but not appear for the whole case. According to the notice, filling out these forms is required if a person wants to enter a limited appearance in these immigration matters. The Department of Justice says that around 40 people are expected to submit Form EOIR-60 to the BIA each year. Around 22,018 are expected to submit Form EOIR-61 to the immigration courts every year. Each form takes about 6 minutes to fill out. Together, this is about 2,206 total hours of work each year. There are no fees to file, and the forms can be completed electronically. The estimated cost, based on attorney wages, for all these forms each year is about $160,310.02. Comments about these changes are being accepted until September 8, 2025. People who want to give feedback should go to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and find this collection under “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments.” The OMB Control Number is 1125-0021. For more information, contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, EOIR, or Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer. The Department is seeking public comments on whether these forms are needed, their usefulness, the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates, if the information is clear, and ways to make the process easier through technology. This notice was published on August 7, 2025, in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Title-Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form (Form EOIR-58)
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a request for public comments on the “Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form,” known as Form EOIR-58. The notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 150. Purpose of the Form Form EOIR-58 is used by people who want to file a complaint about unfair immigration-related employment practices. These practices include discrimination based on citizenship status or national origin, retaliation or intimidation by employers, and “document abuse” during the hiring process. Document abuse means asking for more or different papers than needed to prove permission to work in the United States, if the reason is to discriminate. How the Complaint Process Works If someone thinks they have faced discrimination under Section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), they can file a charge with the DOJ Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER). The IER has 120 days to decide if it will file a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) for the person. If not, the individual may file their own complaint with OCAHO using Form EOIR-58. This form gathers all the information needed so OCAHO can assign the complaint to an Administrative Law Judge. Non-substantive changes have been made to the form and instructions to help with clarity and formatting. The IER’s mailing address and the Privacy Act notice were also updated. The time estimate for filling out the form has been revised. Obligation to Respond Filling out Form EOIR-58 is not required, but it is needed if a person wants to file a complaint under INA Section 274B. Alternatively, a written statement can be sent if it meets the rule requirements in 28 CFR 68.7. Key Details About the Form and Costs Number of Respondents Each Year: Around 38 individuals are expected to fill out the form each year. Time to Complete: Each person takes about 1 hour to fill in the form. How Often: Once a year. Total Annual Time: 38 hours in total. Cost: The estimated cost for filing by mail is about $25.10 per response ($15.00 for printing and $10.10 for mailing), with no fees for submitting by email. If someone uses an attorney, the cost may increase by $72.67 per hour for legal help. The maximum estimated cost to the public for all responses is $3,715.26. There are no labor costs for people who fill the form themselves. Most people currently mail the form to OCAHO, but it can also be submitted by email. The DOJ is working to add full electronic filing, which would remove the needs for printing and postage costs. Submitting Comments Comments are open until September 8, 2025. People can visit www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain to submit their thoughts. They can find the form by selecting “Currently under 30-day Review–Open for Public Comments,” or searching for the title or OMB Control Number 1125-0016. The DOJ asks for public input on: If the collection of information is needed and useful. If the estimated time and burden are correct. How the form and instructions can be clearer. How to reduce the time or cost for people filling out the form, including better use of technology. Additional Information If you need more information, you can contact Justine Fuga at the Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church, VA 22041, or call (703) 305-0265. For other questions, contact Darwin Arceo, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. Key Dates Notice published: August 7, 2025. Comments due: September 8, 2025. This notice provides an opportunity for the public and agencies to give feedback before the form is approved for use through August 2028, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Request for Certification of Alabama Capital Counsel Mechanism
Department of Justice Receives Request for Certification of Alabama Capital Counsel Mechanism Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On August 7, 2025, the Department of Justice released a public notice about Alabama’s request for certification of its capital counsel mechanism. The request was made to the United States Attorney General. Alabama seeks to have its system for appointing counsel in capital cases officially certified. This would cover appointments, compensation, and covering legal expenses for lawyers who represent people sentenced to death and who cannot afford their own attorneys. Federal law, specifically Chapter 154 of Title 28, United States Code, sets special rules for federal court reviews of cases for prisoners on death row who do not have money for legal help. These special rules are available only if the U.S. Attorney General certifies that a state has a qualified system for appointing and paying competent lawyers to handle these state post-conviction cases. The public notice confirms that Alabama has formally submitted its request. The Department of Justice invites the public to send in comments about this request. How to Comment People can send in written or electronic comments. Comments must be received on or before October 6, 2025. Mailed comments will be accepted if they are postmarked by that date. Electronic comments will be accepted until midnight Eastern Time on October 6, 2025. Where to Submit Comments All comments should reference “Docket No. OLP181.” The Department of Justice asks that comments be submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov using the comment form there. People should not send paper copies if they already submitted their comments online. Anyone who wants to send written comments can mail them to Levi Lall, Counsel, Office of Legal Policy, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530. More Information Questions about Alabama’s request can be directed to Levi Lall at 202-598-0771. Public materials about Alabama’s request, as well as details about the review process, are available to view at https://www.justice.gov/olp/pending-requests-final-decisions. The notice is dated August 4, 2025, and was signed by Nicholas J. Schilling Jr., Supervisory Official of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Request for Certification of Tennessee Capital Counsel Mechanism
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comment on Tennessee Death Penalty Lawyers Request Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 7, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice about Tennessee’s request for federal certification of its capital counsel mechanism. The State of Tennessee has asked the U.S. Attorney General for certification of its system to provide lawyers for people sentenced to death. The state wants approval that it meets federal rules for appointing, paying, and supporting lawyers for those who cannot afford legal help in death penalty cases. The rules for this come from Chapter 154 of Title 28 in the United States Code. These rules give states special procedures for federal court review of death penalty cases, but only if the state has set up a fair way for poor prisoners to get qualified lawyers and pay their legal costs. Now, the public can send comments about Tennessee’s request. People can write or make electronic comments until October 6, 2025. Mailed comments must be postmarked by that date. Online comments are open until Midnight Eastern Time on October 6, 2025. Comments must say “Docket No. OLP180” to help the Department handle them correctly. Electronic comments should be sent via www.regulations.gov. Paper comments should not copy the electronic version. For questions, contact Levi Lall, Counsel at the Office of Legal Policy, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530. Phone: 202-598-0771. The public can read Tennessee’s request and the facts supporting it at https://www.justice.gov/olp/pending-requests-final-decisions. This notice was signed by Nicholas J. Schilling Jr., Supervisory Official in the Office of Legal Policy, on August 4, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Inclusions to the Section 232 National Security Adjustments to Imports
Commerce Department Requests Public Comment on Section 232 National Security Adjustments to Imports Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes What Is the Notice About? The Department of Commerce wants to gather feedback before sending information collections to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). These collections are linked to Section 232 National Security Adjustments to Imports. The public and other federal agencies have 60 days to comment on this proposal. The end date for submitting comments is September 30, 2025. Why Is This Happening? Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 lets the Secretary of Commerce check if imports of an article could harm U.S. national security. The Secretary can start these investigations for several reasons, such as a request from an interested party, another agency, or the Secretary themselves. After an investigation starts, the Secretary has 270 days to report to the President with their findings. Then, the President has 90 days to decide if action is needed to “adjust the imports” to protect national security. Presidential Proclamations and Tariffs In February 2025, Presidential Proclamations 10895 and 10896 were issued. Both proclamations require the Secretary of Commerce to set up a process within 90 days for including more aluminum and steel products in the scope of the Section 232 tariffs. These tariffs were first set up by earlier proclamations from March 2018. Under the new proclamations, the Secretary can add more products to the tariffs on their own. They can also do this if they get a request from a U.S. producer or industry association. To request inclusion, submissions must show that imports of a certain product have gone up in a way that could threaten national security or hurt the goals of the 2018 investigations or related proclamations. How Will Information Be Collected? The information will be collected electronically. Details of the Collection OMB Control Number: 0694-0146 Form Numbers: None Review Type: Regular, with a revision of a current collection Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit groups Estimated Number of Respondents: 250 Estimated Time per Response: 16 hours Estimated Total Annual Burden: 4,000 hours Estimated Total Cost to Public: $176,000 Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary Legal Authority: Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962; Presidential Proclamations 10895 and 10896 (February 10, 2025) Request for Input The Department is asking for public comments to: Check if the information collection is needed for its work Test the accuracy of their estimates on time and cost Find ways to improve the quality and clarity of the information Suggest ways to lower the reporting burden, such as using automated technology Any comments submitted will be part of the public record. These comments may be shared with the OMB. Personal information may not stay private, so commenters should be careful about what they submit. How to Comment Interested people should send comments by email to Nancy Kook, IC Liaison, Bureau of Industry and Security. The subject line should reference OMB Control Number 0694-0146. Do not send confidential or sensitive information. Contact for More Information For more information or questions, people can contact Nancy Kook at 202-482-2440 or by email. Official Filing The notice was filed by Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. Publication Details Federal Register Volume 90, Number 146, Friday, August 1, 2025, Page 36131. Federal Register Document Number: 2025-14641. BILLING CODE 3510-33-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Vanillin From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Vanillin from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on vanillin from the People’s Republic of China. This action comes after the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made final determinations about the trade practices surrounding vanillin imports from China. The Department of Commerce found that vanillin from China was being sold in the United States at less than fair value and that Chinese producers and exporters of vanillin were receiving government subsidies. On July 18, 2025, the ITC confirmed that these imports were causing material injury to U.S. industries. Scope of the Orders The orders affect vanillin (molecular formulas C8H8O3 or C9H10O3), including natural vanillin, synthetic vanillin, biovanillin (bio-sourced synthetic vanillin), and ethylvanillin. These chemicals are also known as 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde and 3-Ethoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde. The related Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers are 121-33-5 and 121-32-4. This order covers vanillin in all forms, regardless of purity, size, or physical state. The products fall under U.S. tariff codes 2912.41.0000 and 2912.42.0000. Antidumping Duty Order The Department of Commerce is directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of vanillin from China that entered, or were withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption, on or after January 16, 2025. These duties are assessed based on the difference between the normal value and the export (or constructed export) price. The suspension of liquidation and requirement for cash deposits resume as of the date of publication of the ITC’s final determination in the Federal Register, which is July 28, 2025. Dumping Margins Imposed For most named companies, the weighted-average dumping margin is 190.20 percent, with a cash deposit rate of 190.15 percent. For the “China-wide entity,” the margin is 379.87 percent with a cash deposit rate of 379.82 percent. The orders cover various listed exporters and producers, as well as companies not specifically mentioned. Provisional Measures (AD) The provisional measures, which began on January 16, 2025, ended on July 14, 2025. For vanillin from China entered between July 15, 2025, and the date before July 28, 2025, there will be no antidumping duties collected. Countervailing Duty Order Countervailing duties apply to vanillin imported from China that entered on or after November 18, 2024. The CBP will collect cash deposits on vanillin entries, equal to the countervailable subsidy rates listed. Subsidy Rates Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. and all other importers will have a cash deposit rate of 42.10 percent ad valorem. Provisional Measures (CVD) For entries after March 18, 2025, and before July 28, 2025, there will be no countervailing duties collected. The collection of duties resumes on July 28, 2025. Annual Inquiry Service Lists Commerce will create an annual inquiry service list for these orders under each case number in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Interested parties should submit entries to be added to these lists within 30 days of the order’s publication. Both the original petitioner and the Government of China will be placed on the list automatically in future years but must submit an initial request after this notice. Notifications This notice is the official AD and CVD order for vanillin from China. For the full list of orders currently in effect, interested parties can visit the Commerce website at https://www.trade.gov/data-visualization/adcvd-proceedings. The written definition of the products covered is final, not the HTSUS or CAS numbers. Contact Information Further information is available from the Department of Commerce: Bryan Hansen (AD): (202) 482-3683 Dylan Hill (CVD): (202) 482-1197 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 142, July 28, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India and the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determinations of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations
U.S. Government Finds Critical Circumstances in Torsion Spring Imports From India and China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes WASHINGTON, July 29, 2025 — The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about some springs used in overhead doors. These are called overhead door counterbalance torsion springs. The springs come from India and China. What Did the Department of Commerce Find? The Department of Commerce looked into whether these springs are being sold in the U.S. for less than what they cost to make. This is called “less-than-fair-value” (or LTFV). The Department also checked to see if too many springs were coming in too quickly, harming U.S. companies. This is called a “critical circumstances” investigation. Spring Imports From India The Department found that critical circumstances exist for all exporters and producers in India. The investigation said that the springs from India were being dumped in the U.S. at rates between 46.75% and 126.14%. The amount shipped into the U.S. also increased by over 100% after the investigation started. The companies in India named in the investigation are: Alcomex Springs Pvt. Ltd. Asha Spring and Engineering Company Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd. Modern Engineering & Spring Company Reliable Springs Ltd. Because these companies did not give enough information, the Department used facts available with adverse inferences. The Department determined these companies did not cooperate fully. Spring Imports From China For China, the Department found critical circumstances for the China-wide entity. The dumping margins from China were very high, between 669.36% and 778.31%. The amount of springs shipped rose by more than 25% in the months after the investigation started. The China-wide entity includes: Foshan Xulong Spring Factory Tianjin Wangxia Spring Co. Ltd. And all other companies that did not cooperate For Chinese companies who got a separate rate in the investigation, the Department did not find a massive surge in imports. How Did the Department Make Its Decision? The Department uses information from the companies, trade data, and earlier findings by the International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC has already said there is a “reasonable indication” that U.S. companies are being hurt by these imports. Under the law, the Department looks for: High levels of dumping A large jump in imports in a short time Earlier findings of harm to U.S. companies The Department uses special trade data and sets a 15% increase as the minimum to call imports “massive.” Suspension of Liquidation Because critical circumstances were found, the U.S. will hold off on releasing (liquidating) all shipments of the springs from India and China entered into the U.S. up to 90 days before the first suspension date. This is to collect duties if the final decision finds dumping occurred. What Happens Next? The Department of Commerce will make its final decision about critical circumstances soon. For China, the final decision is scheduled for August 11, 2025. For India, it is scheduled for October 15, 2025. If you have comments, you can send them to the Department of Commerce. Comments on this topic must be sent in quickly—within three days after this notice. Rebuttals can be sent two days after the case briefs. Summary The U.S. government has found that overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India and China are very likely being dumped in the U.S. This may be hurting U.S. businesses. Because of this, there are now extra steps being taken on spring imports until the investigation is finished. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Chinese Chlorinated Isocyanurates Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has finished its second sunset review of the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China. The review finds that removing the order would likely allow government subsidies to restart or continue. Sunset reviews are scheduled checks every five years to decide if duties should stay in place. The Department first placed these duties on chlorinated isocyanurates from China in 2014. The product is often used in pool disinfectants and cleaning agents. This second review started on April 1, 2025. U.S. manufacturers of these chemicals sent their notices to participate in the review process. They gave a full response before the deadline. The government of China or interested exporters did not respond to this review. As required, the Department of Commerce informed the U.S. International Trade Commission that it had not received any responses from Chinese parties. Because there was no response, the review was expedited. The Department finds that canceling the order would lead to the return or continuation of subsidies. The following subsidy rates are likely to continue if the duties are removed: Hebei Jiheng Chemicals Co., Ltd.: 32.58 percent Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.: 14.11 percent All Other Producers/Exporters: 17.08 percent All documents and the full decision are open to the public online through the Enforcement and Compliance’s electronic system (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. The Commerce Department reminds all parties who viewed confidential data during this review of their duty to return or destroy this information according to federal rules. The Department shared these results in line with legal procedures on August 4, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Termination of Five-Year Review
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Five-Year Review of Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the termination of its five-year review of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. This review began on August 1, 2024. Its purpose was to decide if ending the agreement that suspended the antidumping duty investigation would hurt the U.S. tomato industry. On July 14, 2025, the Department of Commerce officially withdrew from and ended the 2019 Agreement that had suspended the antidumping investigation into Mexican tomatoes. Commerce also issued the antidumping duty order. This action was reported in the Federal Register on July 17, 2025 (Volume 90, FR 33363). Because the 2019 Agreement is no longer in effect, there is nothing left for the USITC to review. The Commission has now formally ended its five-year review of this matter. For more information, you may contact Lawrence Jones at the USITC, Office of Investigations, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, or by phone at 202-205-3358. Information for hearing-impaired people is available through the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. People with mobility issues needing help to access the Commission can call the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General details about the Commission can be found at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation is at https://edis.usitc.gov. This decision was issued by order of the Commission. It was made public on July 25, 2025, by Susan Orndoff, Secretary to the Commission. This notice was published under legal authority from title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. Starts Expedited Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities From China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has begun expedited five-year reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This announcement was made on July 31, 2025. The review will decide if ending the orders on these imports would likely cause material injury to U.S. producers again within a reasonable time. The decision for an expedited process happened after USITC found that only the domestic interested parties gave enough response to the notice of institution, while responses from the foreign side were not enough. No other factors were found to require a full review. These expedited reviews are being done under section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). More details about the rules can be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 201 and part 207). On July 30, 2025, a staff report with details for these reviews was placed in the nonpublic record for those on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will be released later, following the rules. Interested parties who provided individually adequate responses—including MasterBrand Cabinets, LLC, and the American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance—may file written comments. All comments must be received by August 7, 2025. Comments cannot include new factual information. Non-parties may also submit short statements by August 7, 2025. If the Department of Commerce extends time for its review, the deadline for comments will be three business days after Commerce’s final decision. Comments with business proprietary information must follow the requirements in the rules (Sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7, among others). All documents must include a certificate of service showing they were shared with all other parties in the review. The Commission found this review to be extraordinarily complicated and has used its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days under 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). These reviews are being done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, and this notice was published to meet requirement in Section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, visit the USITC’s website at https://www.usitc.gov. Issued by order of the Commission on July 29, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet From South Korea; Institution of a Five-Year Review
U.S. Starts Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet Imports from South Korea Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of a five-year review on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sheets imported from South Korea. This review will decide if removing the antidumping duty order on these PET sheets will likely cause harm to U.S. makers of this product. The public is asked to give information to the USITC about this decision. Key Dates and Rules The review began on August 1, 2025. People interested in this case must send their responses by September 2, 2025. Comments on these responses can be given by October 10, 2025. People who want to join the case must file an entry within 21 days of this notice. The USITC will keep a list of all people taking part. About the Antidumping Duty Order On September 10, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a rule to charge extra duties on PET sheets from South Korea. The USITC is now deciding if lifting this rule would hurt U.S. businesses. The USITC uses its own set of rules for reviews. If there are not enough detailed responses from interested people, the USITC may make its decision using all the data it has. Important Definitions Subject Merchandise: PET sheets that are part of this review. Subject Country: South Korea. Domestic Like Product: PET sheets made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: All U.S. companies making PET sheets, except one. Order Date: September 10, 2020, when duties began. Who Can Take Part People or groups who use or sell the PET sheets can take part. Worker groups, companies, and consumer organizations can also join by registering with the USITC. Former USITC workers can take part even if they worked on earlier cases. How to Submit Info Anyone giving information must make sure it is true and complete. Documents must be sent online using the USITC’s system, not on paper. Detailed steps are on the USITC’s website. If you cannot give all asked information, you must explain why. What Info Is Needed The USITC has asked for detailed facts, including: Name, address, and contact details. How you are involved or interested in the case. Willingness to take part. How lifting the duties will affect U.S. makers and your own business. Lists of U.S. makers, importers, and exporters of PET sheets. Lists of big buyers in the U.S. Information on prices. Production and sales data from U.S. companies in 2024. Import data for U.S. importers. Export and production data for South Korean makers. Any big changes in how these products are made or used since September 2020. (Optional) Agree or not with how the USITC defines the products and industry. Special Notes People giving information for groups should share data from all their members. All details must follow USITC rules, especially if the data is secret for business reasons. Contact Details For questions, contact Rachel Devenney of the Office of Investigations at 202-205-3172. More information is at www.usitc.gov. Authority This review is done under the Tariff Act of 1930. The official notice was issued on July 25, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. (Source: Federal Register, August 1, 2025, Vol. 90, No. 146, Pages 36181-36184) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From China and Taiwan; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
USITC Begins Second Review of Duties on Solar Products from China and Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a five-year review of rules about crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, also known as certain types of solar panels, from China and Taiwan. The review began on August 1, 2025. The review will decide if removing current duties—a type of tax—on these products would hurt the solar panel industry in the United States. The review looks at both antidumping and countervailing duties against China, and antidumping duties against Taiwan. Background In 2015, the Department of Commerce placed special duties on solar products from China because of unfair pricing and government support. Taiwan was also named in the orders for selling products at less than fair value. The orders were continued after a review in 2020. Now, as required by law, the USITC will again consider if those duties are still needed. If the Commission finds that removing the duties will hurt U.S. businesses, the duties can stay in place. Key Details The USITC calls the solar panels “Subject Merchandise.” The review covers China and Taiwan (“Subject Countries”). US makers of similar solar products are considered the “Domestic Industry.” The main issue is if ending the duties hurts these U.S. producers. People or groups—including importers, producers, unions, and business associations—who want to take part as parties in the review must file paperwork within 21 days after the notice. How to Respond Anyone sending information to the USITC must give: The name, address, and contact details of their business or group. A statement about who they are—such as a producer, importer, or association. Whether they will give information during the process. Details on how taking away the duties would affect them and the U.S. solar industry. Lists of companies making or importing covered solar panels, leading buyers, and sources for price info. Producers and importers also have to give data about their sales, production, and profit for 2024. This includes numbers of panels sold, value of sales, manufacturing costs, and operating income. Deadlines All responses must be given by September 2, 2025, at 5:15 p.m. Comments about the adequacy of the responses can be submitted by October 10, 2025, at 5:15 p.m. Submitting Information The USITC only accepts electronic filings, using its Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies will be accepted for now. If someone cannot give the requested information, they must explain why and offer other ways to provide similar information. Not responding fully may lead the USITC to use negative assumptions about the missing information. Other Rules Some confidential business data will be shared only with authorized people under a protective order. Anyone submitting data must certify that it is true and complete. Past USITC employees can participate in these five-year reviews even if they worked on earlier stages of the case. Further Information To learn more or get help, contact Julie Duffy at the USITC, telephone 202-708-2579. For document filing help, visit https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. Authority for this review comes from the Tariff Act of 1930, as stated in the USITC’s rules. Issued July 25, 2025 By order of the Commission Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Erythritol From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations
U.S. Trade Commission Sets Schedule for Final Phase of Erythritol Imports Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is the Investigation About? The USITC is looking into whether U.S. industry is being hurt by erythritol imports from China. Erythritol is a sugar alcohol often used as a sweetener. The U.S. Department of Commerce found that erythritol from China may be sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices and might be getting subsidies from the Chinese government. Why Is This Happening? These investigations started with petitions filed on December 13, 2024, by Cargill, Incorporated. Cargill believes that the imports from China are being sold at prices below fair value and that Chinese exporters are receiving government help. The main question is whether U.S. companies that produce erythritol are being harmed or facing a threat from these imports. What Products Are Included? Erythritol, with the chemical formula C4H10O4 and CAS number 149-32-6, is covered under this investigation. It is included even if it is in different forms—like crystals or powder—or is labeled organic. Erythritol is used as a sweetener in foods, drinks, and other items. How Does the Investigation Work? The investigation follows the rules set by the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will decide if the imports are causing actual harm or a threat of harm to the U.S. industry. If harm is found, it may lead to new duties on erythritol imports from China. Important Dates and Information July 16, 2025: Start date for this phase of the investigation. November 17, 2025: The staff report will be released to authorized parties in a non-public version. The public version will come later. November 24, 2025: Deadline for prehearing briefs. November 25, 2025: Deadline to request to appear at the hearing. December 1, 2025: Prehearing conference at 9:30 a.m.; written testimony and presentation slides are due by noon. December 2, 2025: The official hearing begins at 9:30 a.m. December 9, 2025: Deadline for posthearing briefs and for anyone else to submit comments. December 22, 2025: All new information will be made available to the parties. December 24, 2025: Final comments on new information are due. How Can People Take Part? Anyone who wants to take part in the final phase must file an appearance with the Secretary to the Commission. They have to do this no later than 21 days before the hearing. Only electronic filings are accepted using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Interested parties can also get access to certain confidential information if they apply on time. The rules for handling and sharing this information are strict, and all participants must follow them. Public Participation Organizations, companies, and even people who use erythritol may take part. Comments or statements can be sent to the Commission on or before December 9, 2025. Final comments on information shared by the Commission are due December 24, 2025. Rules and Contact Information The investigation will follow USITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. For details, participants can check the USITC website or call Celia Feldpausch at (202) 205-2387. All procedures and deadlines must be followed closely. The notice was ordered by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and published on August 1, 2025. For more information and updates, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Brake Drums From China and Turkey; Determinations
United States Finds Injury from Brake Drum Imports from China and Turkey Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On August 4, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its final determination on brake drum imports from China and Turkey. The USITC found that the U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. The brake drums are included under subheading 8708.30.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The decision states that brake drums from China and Turkey are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. The U.S. Department of Commerce also found that these imports are being subsidized by the governments of China and Turkey. Webb Wheel Products, Inc., located in Cullman, Alabama, filed the original petition on June 20, 2024. This started the investigation by the USITC and Commerce. The Commission scheduled the final part of its investigation after Commerce made initial findings that imports from China and Turkey were subsidized and sold at less than fair value. A public hearing was held by the USITC on June 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. The notice about the hearing was published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2025. The USITC made its final determinations under sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The details of the findings are in USITC Publication 5651 (August 2025), called “Brake Drums from China and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-729-730 and 731-TA-1698-1699 (Final)”. The notice was prepared by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. For more details, the official Federal Register notice is No. 2025-14994, filed on August 6, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Low Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From China; Determinations
US Finds Injury From Chinese Low Speed Transportation Vehicle Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 7, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its findings on low speed personal transportation vehicles from China. The USITC decided that the United States industry is being hurt by imports of these vehicles from China. These vehicles are listed under codes 8703.10.50, 8703.90.01, 8706.00.15, and 8707.10.00 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The U.S. Department of Commerce found that these vehicles from China are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. Commerce also found that the Chinese government is giving support to these exports. The USITC also found that certain imports, included in Commerce’s “critical circumstances” determination, are likely to harm the effects of new import rules on these vehicles. One commissioner, David S. Johanson, disagreed with this part. The USITC started its investigation in June 2024. The investigation began after the American Personal Transportation Vehicle Manufacturers Coalition filed petitions. This group includes Club Car, LLC, from Evans, Georgia, and Textron Specialized Vehicles, Inc., from Augusta, Georgia. The final steps of the investigation were scheduled after Commerce gave its first findings about unfair pricing and government support. The USITC held a public hearing on June 12, 2025, allowing everyone who asked to take part. The findings were made following sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC finished and filed these results on August 4, 2025. Full details can be found in USITC Publication 5652, titled “Low Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-731 and 731-TA-1700 (Final).” This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Clonazolam, Diclazepam, Etizolam, Flualprazolam, and Flubromazolam in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act
DEA Proposes Permanent Schedule I Placement for Five Designer Benzodiazepines Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has announced a proposed rule to place five substances—clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, and flubromazolam—in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The proposal includes each substance and its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers. These substances were temporarily placed in Schedule I on July 26, 2023, due to concerns about an imminent hazard to public safety. The temporary order was later extended to July 26, 2026. If this proposed rule is finalized, it will make these controls permanent. Why Are These Substances Being Scheduled? According to the DEA, these five substances have a high potential for abuse. They are chemically and pharmacologically similar to classical benzodiazepines, like diazepam and alprazolam. These classical drugs are widely abused and can cause dependence. The DEA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reviewed scientific and medical evidence about these substances. The review found that: They are not approved for any medical use in the United States. There are no accepted safety standards for their use under medical supervision. They have been linked to abuse, dependence, and serious health risks. Evidence and Data No legitimate sources, such as approved medicines, exist for these five substances in the United States. They are not used or manufactured legally and are mostly obtained from illegal sources or foreign countries. The DEA and HHS collected the following data: Over 50,000 encounters of these substances by law enforcement, from every state and Washington, DC. Evidence from U.S. poison centers and toxicology programs showing hundreds of cases involving these drugs, including deadly overdoses. Studies and user reports showing these drugs can cause strong sedative effects, impaired driving, and physical dependence. Some are more potent than known prescription benzodiazepines. Risks to Public Health The five substances act as strong depressants on the central nervous system. They can cause drowsiness, confusion, poor coordination, and breathing trouble. People have died from overdoses involving these drugs, especially when mixed with other substances like opioids. Reports show that people of all adult ages, and both sexes, have been harmed. Often, these drugs are used alone or with other dangerous drugs like fentanyl or stimulants. Legal and International Obligations The United States is required by the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) to control these substances because other countries voted to add them to international lists. What Will Happen Under Permanent Scheduling? If permanently placed in Schedule I: It will be illegal to manufacture, distribute, import, export, or possess these substances except for DEA-approved research. They will be subject to strict storage and recordkeeping rules. Only DEA-registered persons will be allowed to handle these substances. Penalties for unauthorized activity would include criminal, civil, and administrative actions. Public Input and Comments The public can comment on this proposed rule until August 25, 2025. Comments can be made electronically at regulations.gov or mailed to the DEA office. People who want a hearing must ask before the same deadline. Small Business Impact DEA states that very few suppliers or researchers use these substances for legal research. The rule is not expected to impact a significant number of small businesses. How the Rule Changes Regulations If the rule becomes final, it will remove the substances from the temporary list and add them to the permanent list of Schedule I controlled substances under 21 CFR 1308.11(e). Contact Information For more information, contact Dr. Terrence L. Boos at the DEA, phone: (571) 362-3249. Conclusion The DEA’s proposal aims to keep U.S. laws in line with international treaties and protect public health. Clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, and flubromazolam will remain closely controlled due to the dangers they pose. The public is invited to review and comment before the rule is finalized. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Extension of Temporary Placement of Clonazolam, Diclazepam, Etizolam, Flualprazolam, and Flubromazolam in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act
DEA Extends Temporary Ban on Five Designer Benzodiazepines Until 2026 Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Are the Banned Substances? The substances included in this order are: Clonazolam Diclazepam Etizolam Flualprazolam Flubromazolam These include their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers. Background On July 26, 2023, the DEA first placed these five substances under Schedule I due to an “imminent hazard to the public safety.” That two-year ban was set to end on July 26, 2025. The DEA says it needs more time to finish permanent scheduling rules. Legal Process The Controlled Substances Act allows the DEA to make temporary bans for up to two years. The ban can be extended for one more year if work to make the ban permanent is not finished. The Acting Administrator of the DEA started the process for a permanent ban. The DEA is publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking about this in the Federal Register. Regulatory Details The extension of the ban is not a regular rule but an order. This order is not subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking. The extension uses authority under 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which allows an expedited action to avoid risks to public safety. The DEA says that more delays would be against the public interest. Not extending the ban now could create risks if the substances became legal again before permanent rules are ready. Impacts on the Public Under Schedule I, these drugs are illegal to make, distribute, import, export, research, or possess unless specially permitted. Anyone handling these substances is subject to the same controls and penalties as with other Schedule I drugs. Why the Ban? The DEA explains that these five designer benzodiazepines pose a risk to public health. They used their emergency powers to make and extend this temporary ban. Administrative Information The order was signed on July 22, 2025, by Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. The official document was filed for publication and sent to both Houses of Congress and to the Comptroller General, although this is not legally required since it is an order, not a rule. Effective Date The order is effective July 26, 2025, and will stay in effect until July 26, 2026, unless permanent rules are made before then. Contact Questions can be directed to Terrence L. Boos, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Diversion Control Division, DEA, at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152, phone (571) 362-3249. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New collection; Title-User Access Request Form for EPIC System Portal (ESP)
Department of Justice Requests Comments on New User Access Form for EPIC System Portal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), part of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has announced a new information collection request. The form is called the User Access Request Form for the EPIC System Portal (ESP). This form will be used by law enforcement personnel at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels. They need this form to request access to the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC) System Portal. The portal lets approved users see information about drug and human trafficking, firearms smuggling, money laundering, and other crimes. The DEA is submitting this request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, following the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Public comments about the request are open for 60 days, ending September 23, 2025. The Department asks the public and other agencies to give feedback. They want comments on: Whether this information collection is needed. If the estimates about the burden on the public are correct. How the information collected can be improved for quality and usefulness. How to reduce the effort required to fill out the form, including by using better technology or allowing electronic submissions. The main purpose of the form is to collect enough information to approve new users for the EPIC System Portal. It is important for security and to meet federal law enforcement rules. Key Details of the Information Collection: Type: New collection. Title: User Access Request Form for the EPIC System Portal. Form Number: To be assigned after OMB approval. The Drug Enforcement Administration is responsible for this form. Who is Affected: Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement personnel wanting to access the portal. Filling out the form is required to get access. Estimated Respondents: 1,000 people per year. Time Per Response: About 7 minutes per form. Total Burden: 1,000 responses are expected each year, leading to a total estimated burden of 116.67 hours per year. Annual Cost Burden: The estimated yearly cost of this information collection is $4,666.80. The Department noted that the total burden hours and cost are based on the number of people expected to fill out the form and the time needed. Those seeking more information or a copy of the form may contact Benjamin Inks at the Office of Compliance, Policy Administration Section, Arlington, VA (telephone: 571-672-4524). For general questions, Darwin Arceo is listed as the Department Clearance Officer at the Justice Management Division, Washington, DC. Notice issued: July 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Bytecode Alliance Foundation
Bytecode Alliance Foundation Updates Membership in Official Notice Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On May 29, 2025, the Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed an official notification under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This law is found at 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The notification was sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. It shared changes in the group’s membership. Renderlet, Inc., located in Brooklyn, New York, has joined the Bytecode Alliance Foundation as a party to this venture. SingleStore, based in San Francisco, California, has withdrawn as a party from this venture. No other changes have been made in the membership or the planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project is still open. The Bytecode Alliance Foundation plans to send more written notifications for all membership changes in the future. The Bytecode Alliance Foundation first filed its original notification on April 20, 2022, under section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register under section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022. The citation is 87 FR 29379. The last notification before this was filed on March 19, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025. The citation is 90 FR 16704. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. The official Federal Register document number is 2025-14051. This notice was filed on July 24, 2025, and appeared in Volume 90, Number 141 on page 35313. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-1EdTech Consortium, Inc.
New Members and Withdrawals in 1EdTech Consortium Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division released a notice about the 1EdTech Consortium, Inc. This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 141, on Friday, July 25, 2025. The notice states that 1EdTech Consortium, Inc. filed a report on May 29, 2025. This report was sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The report was made according to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The report says that new members have joined the 1EdTech Consortium. The new members are: Aurora Public Schools (CO), Aurora, CO University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC Tuscaloosa City Schools, Tuscaloosa, AL Terrace Metrics, Inc., Cincinnati, OH Texas Education Agency, Austin, TX ViewSonic Education Agency, Brea, CA Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX International Baccalaureate Organization, Cardiff, UNITED KINGDOM Navigatr, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM Alexander Becker (individual member), Berlin, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY The following groups or companies have withdrawn from 1EdTech Consortium: KERIS, Dong-gu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA Udemy, San Francisco, CA Cisco, San Jose, CA Swedish National Agency for Education (Statens skolverk), Solna, KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Partners4Results, Waukesha, WI Switch Energy Alliance, Austin, TX Siemens, Munich, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY There are no further changes in membership or planned activities. The membership for this group remains open. 1EdTech Consortium plans to file more updates about membership changes. The 1EdTech Consortium first reported its activities under the law on April 7, 2000. The Department of Justice first published a related notice on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283). The most recent earlier notification was made on March 17, 2025. That notice was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16702). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director for Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. The official Federal Register document identifier is FR Doc. 2025-14054. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Decentralized Storage Alliance Association
Notice of Membership Change in Decentralized Storage Alliance Association Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On July 25, 2025, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division published a notice in the Federal Register about changes in the Decentralized Storage Alliance Association (DSAA). The notice states that on May 27, 2025, DSAA filed written notifications with both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This action was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The filing’s purpose is to extend legal protections. It limits the damages that antitrust plaintiffs can recover to actual damages under specific conditions. MetaProof Inc., based in New York, NY, has been added as a party to the DSAA venture. No other changes have been made to the membership or the group’s planned activities. Membership in the research project is still open. DSAA plans to keep the Department updated about future changes in membership. DSAA originally filed notification under the Act on August 1, 2023. The Department published information about this in the Federal Register on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69670). The previous update was filed on December 9, 2024. That notice was published on February 3, 2025 (90 FR 8816). This notice was issued by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director, Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-America’s Datahub Consortium
America’s DataHub Consortium Updates Membership Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On June 16, 2025, America’s DataHub Consortium (ADC) sent official notifications about changes in its membership. These notifications were given to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This action follows the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The new members joining ADC are: 22nd Century Technologies, Inc., McLean, VA Daniel H. Wagner Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA Discovery Machine, Inc., Williamsport, PA Industry Defense Systems LLC, Lansdale, PA ISSAC LLC, Colorado Springs, CO JLGOV LLC, Virginia Beach, VA L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Clifton, NJ Magnum Multimedia, Inc., Herndon, VA Turnkey Federal LLC, Tampa, FL Two members have left the consortium: JIL NZ LLC, Chevy Chase, MD ZCTS LLC, Arlington, VA No other changes were made to the group’s membership or its planned activities. Membership in this group remains open. ADC will continue to provide notifications about future changes in its membership. ADC first filed notification under the Act on November 11, 2021. The Department of Justice published a notice about that filing on December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72628). The most recent notification before this one was filed with the Department on March 6, 2025. A notice for the March 2025 filing was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16702). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations for the Antitrust Division, reported this information in the Federal Register on July 25, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Taha Dias, M.D.; Decision and Order
DEA Revokes Registration of Dr. Taha Dias, M.D. in Florida Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background and Order Issued On November 4, 2024, the DEA sent an Order to Show Cause (OSC) to Dr. Taha Dias. The DEA warned that he might lose his DEA registration. The DEA said Dr. Dias gave out prescriptions for controlled substances in ways that were not allowed by law. These actions were seen as inconsistent with public interest. The DEA cited violations of both federal and Florida state law. Service of Order A DEA Diversion Investigator (DI) served the OSC to Dr. Dias. The DI sent it by email and by mail to his registered addresses. On November 22, 2024, Dr. Dias spoke with the DI. He was told about the OSC and what it meant. Details of Violations Between July 2022 and December 2023, Dr. Dias gave prescriptions for controlled substances that were outside the usual course of professional practice. He did not follow federal law 21 CFR 1306.04(a) or Florida Statutes Sec. 456.44(3). Dr. Dias did not reply to the DEA’s charges. The DEA says this means Dr. Dias admits to the facts described in the OSC. Dr. Dias admitted he wrote nine prescriptions for promethazine with codeine to nine different people, knowing the drugs would be obtained by someone else and not those named. On July 5, 2022, he texted a local pharmacist about sending these prescriptions, which were not for a real medical reason. Dr. Dias also admitted he wrote nine prescriptions for controlled substances to a person named M.S. between December 9, 2022, and December 4, 2023. M.S. was in a correctional facility when these prescriptions were written. Dr. Dias did not do a medical exam or create a real doctor-patient relationship for these prescriptions either. In total, Dr. Dias gave out at least 18 prescriptions that had no real medical purpose and were not allowed by his profession’s rules. Legal Findings and Process The DEA stated that under federal and Florida law, doctors must only prescribe controlled substances for real medical reasons and after proper exams. They must keep detailed patient records. The DEA found Dr. Dias did not follow these rules. In cases like this, the DEA checks five factors to decide if someone should keep their registration. The DEA mainly considered Dr. Dias’s compliance with laws and his experience with controlled substances. No evidence was found of state medical license problems or crime convictions for Dr. Dias. But the DEA said the main problem was how Dr. Dias prescribed the drugs. Sanction and Final Decision The DEA said Dr. Dias did not reply to the charges or try to explain his actions. He did not show he accepted responsibility or would follow the law in the future. Because of these reasons, the DEA revoked Dr. Dias’s DEA Certificate of Registration No. BD9971208. The DEA also denied any of his pending applications to renew or change his registration or to apply for a new registration in Florida. This order takes effect on August 25, 2025. Signed Order The order was signed on July 21, 2025, by Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. Reference: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 141, Friday, July 25, 2025, Pages 35313-35315. [FR Doc No: 2025-14077] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; Requirement That Movie Theaters Provide Notice as to the Availability of Closed Movie Captioning and Audio Description for Digital Movies
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comment on Movie Theater Accessibility Notice Requirements Estimated reading time: 4–9 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division, is asking for public comments on the rules that require movie theaters to tell people if closed movie captioning and audio description are available for digital movies. This request is part of a review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Why This is Happening Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), movie theaters must not discriminate against people with disabilities. Federal law at 42 U.S.C. 12182 says that public places like movie theaters must provide aids and services for people with disabilities. Movie theaters that show digital movies and offer captioning or audio description must make sure all their notices—including signs at the box office, on websites, mobile apps, in newspapers, or over the phone—tell people which movies have these services. This is required by the rule at 28 CFR 36.303(g)(8). Who Must Follow These Rules These rules apply to any business or not-for-profit group that owns, operates, or leases a movie theater (but not drive-in theaters) that shows digital movies to the public for a fee. All theater firms that show digital movies with these features must let the public know in their movie listings if closed captioning or audio description is available. It is mandatory for these firms to follow this rule. Details About the Requirement The DOJ says that almost all U.S. movie theaters now show digital movies that can have closed captions and audio descriptions. Whenever these theaters tell the public about movie showings—such as by updating weekly movie listings—they must include information about the availability of these accessibility features. Estimated Effort to Meet the Requirement There are about 1,813 firms in the U.S. owning one or more movie theaters, according to 2022 U.S. Census Bureau data. Each firm is expected to spend about 10 minutes per week updating movie listings for closed captions and audio description information. Over a year, this is about 8.7 hours per firm for complying with the requirement. Summary Table of Burden Activity Number of Respondents Times per Year Total Responses Time per Response (minutes) Total Annual Hours Weekly update of movie listings 1,813 52 94,276 10 15,713 Total Annual Estimated Hours All firms together are expected to spend about 15,713 hours yearly to meet this requirement. Estimated Cost There is no new cost for theaters to meet this rule. Updating movie listings is already a normal part of movie theater business. The extra work to add symbols or notes about accessibility features is considered small. How to Give Comments Anyone can send comments until September 23, 2025. Comments should focus on: If the information is needed, If the burden estimates are correct, Ways to improve the quality and clarity, Ideas to make responding easier. Comments can be sent by mail to the Department of Justice in Washington, DC, by email, or to the Office of Management and Budget. Make sure to include the title: “Requirement that Movie Theaters Provide Notice as to the Availability of Closed Movie Captioning and Audio Description for Digital Movies.” Who to Contact for More Information For more information about this plan or to get materials in another format, contact Roberta Kirkendall, Special Litigation Counsel, Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, by mail or call the ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 (voice) or (800) 514-0383 (TTY). Conclusion This required information helps people with hearing or vision disabilities learn which digital movies have closed captions or audio description. The DOJ is seeking public comments before the rules become final. Published: July 25, 2025 Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 141 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Department of Commerce Begins Reviews on Antidumping and Countervailing Duties for Multiple Countries Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On July 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced the start of new administrative reviews for antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. These reviews address orders with June anniversary dates. Commerce follows the rules in 19 CFR 351.213(b) to begin these reviews. Details of the Reviews Commerce reviews if products from other countries are sold in the U.S. at unfair prices, or if foreign governments give unfair help to exporters. These reviews help decide if special taxes should stay on imported goods. Respondent Selection Process Commerce may choose specific companies (respondents) to check more closely. It uses data from U.S. Customs or direct questions about sales. The selection process usually happens within 35 days after this notice is published. If a company already was found to be part of a group with others for past reviews, Commerce will treat them together again. Companies need to clearly state if they were grouped with others before. No Sales and Withdrawal Rules If a company did not sell the product during the review period, it can notify Commerce within 30 days. Companies that asked for a review can withdraw that request within 90 days, unless Commerce extends the deadline. Particular Market Situation Allegations Companies or interested parties can claim there was a special market situation (PMS) that affected costs. These claims and all support must be sent within 20 days after section D questionnaire responses. Separate Rates in Non-Market Economy (NME) Countries Companies in NME countries must prove they act independently from their government to get a separate AD rate. Certification or a new application is due within 14 calendar days after this notice is published. The forms are on Commerce’s website. Certification Eligibility Some companies export both covered and non-covered goods. They must submit a Certification Eligibility Application within 30 calendar days if they want to participate in the certification program. The application is on the Commerce website. Products and Countries Reviewed Some of the main products and countries covered in these reviews are: Raw honey from Argentina, Brazil, India, and Vietnam Brass rod from Brazil, India, Mexico, Republic of Korea, and South Africa Glycine from India and Japan Quartz surface products from India and Turkiye Cold-drawn mechanical tubing from Germany, India, Italy, and Switzerland Chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain and China Prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Malaysia, Spain, Turkiye, and Ukraine Non-refillable steel cylinders from India Boltless steel shelving units from Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam Commerce lists specific companies in each country for review. The review period dates can vary by product and country. Duty Absorption Commerce may check if exporters have absorbed dumping duties. Domestic parties must request this check within 30 days. Gap Period Liquidation For a first review, there will be no AD or CVD charges on goods brought into the country during any “gap” period between temporary and final measures, if applicable. Administrative Procedures Interested parties must apply for access to business information as per Commerce’s rules. Factual information must follow the correct category and submission standards in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) and 19 CFR 351.301. All information must be certified for accuracy. Extension of Time Limits Applications for more time must be made before deadlines. For joint submissions, extension requests are untimely if filed after 10 a.m. on the due date. Official Contact For questions, contact Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration (phone: 202-482-4735). Regulatory References These processes are under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, U.S. Department of Commerce, on July 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Commerce Department Announces June 2025 Scope Ruling Applications in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On July 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, published a list of scope ruling applications received in June 2025 for antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings. These applications ask the Department to decide if certain products fall under the scope of AD or CVD orders. List of Scope Ruling Applications The following applications were submitted: 1. Aluminum Lithographic Printing Plates from Japan (A-588-881) Product: Flexographic printing plates. Description: Contains 40-80% styrene polymer coating, 20-40% butadiene coating, 5-20% polymer resins and colorants, and 5-10% polyester substrate. These plates do not contain aluminum. They are flexible, made for flexographic printing presses, and are not used with lithographic presses. Produced and exported from: Japan. Applicant: Miraclon Corporation Ltd. Date filed: June 4, 2025. ACCESS scope segment: “Non-Aluminum-Based Printing Plates”. 2. Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and Parts Thereof from China (A-570-129/C-570-130) Product: Walk-behind lawn mowers. Description: Rotary lawn mowers, both self-propelled and push type. Powered by internal combustion engines under 3.7 kw, maximum displacement of 197cc. Assembled in Thailand with U.S.-origin engines and Chinese chassis. The cutting deck shell and blade parts are attached in Thailand. Produced in and exported from: China. Applicant: Daye North America, Inc. (DNA). Date filed: June 6, 2025. ACCESS scope segment: “DNA US Engines”. 3. Stainless-Steel Flanges from India (A-533-877/C-533-878) Product: Ring-shaped components of measurement instruments. Description: Made of various metals, these rings reinforce measurement instrument parts and connect the instrument to a flange. The products may have any of the following features: non-standard bore, hub, precision or stepped grooves, threads, chamfering, bolt holes, tapped holes, or non-standard neck length. Produced and exported from: India. Applicant: Pradeep Metals Limited, Inc. Date filed: June 25, 2025. ACCESS scope segment: “Ring-shaped Components”. Process and Deadlines This list shows applications filed but does not mean scope inquiries have started. The Department will accept applications or start inquiries within 30 days of filing. If the 30th day is not a business day, action will occur on the next business day. If there are both AD and CVD orders for the same product from the same country, the inquiry will be on the AD proceeding record. The Department may apply a scope ruling country-wide or to specific companies. Other interested parties must file an entry of appearance to participate. For more details on procedures, refer to the Scope Ruling Application Guide at https://access.trade.gov/help/Scope_Ruling_Guidance.pdf. Notices of scope ruling applications may be posted before or after a scope inquiry begins. To check the latest information, visit the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Parties can request to be on the service list for a specific order each year during the order’s anniversary month. Comments and Contact Information Comments on the completeness of this list can be sent to Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, International Trade Administration, at [email protected]. This notice is issued under 19 CFR 351.225(d)(3). Dated: July 22, 2025. Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on National Crime Victimization Survey Changes Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On July 24, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), published a notice in the Federal Register about the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The BJS is asking the public for comments on a planned update for the NCVS. The updates must be approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The public can send comments for 60 days, ending on September 22, 2025. The NCVS collects national information about how often people in the United States experience crime. The survey counts crimes both reported and not reported to the police. The NCVS also collects data on how police handle reports and how safe people feel in their communities. Every so often, the survey process is updated. The 2026 update uses new methods to better represent the U.S. population using 2020 census data. Details of the Collection: Type: This is a revision of a currently approved collection. Title: National Crime Victimization Survey. Form Numbers: NCVS-1 and NCVS-2. Agency: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs. Who Responds: U.S. residents age 12 or older living in selected households. Responding is voluntary. Estimates for the Survey: Total Respondents per Year: 157,439 people. Time to Complete Survey (Average Interview): 34.4 minutes. Time for Non-Interviewed Respondents: 9.3 minutes. Follow-up Interview Time: 7 minutes. Follow-up for Non-interview: 1 minute. Annual Burden (Total Hours): 123,202 hours. Annual Cost Burden: $0. Burden Hours by Activity: Activity Respondents Frequency Annual Responses Time per Response (minutes) Annual Burden (hours) Interviewed 91,312 2 182,624 34.4 104,698 Non-interviewed 56,772 2 113,544 9.3 17,599 Re-interview (Interviews) 7,484 1 7,484 7.0 873 Re-interview (Non-interviews) 1,871 1 1,871 1.0 31 Unduplicated Totals 157,439 — 305,523 — 123,202 How to Comment or Get More Information: Those with suggestions or questions can contact Rachel Morgan, Chief of the Victimization Statistics Unit at the BJS. Her office is located at 999 N Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20531. Email and phone contacts are also provided: [email protected], 202-307-0765. For further information, Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the DOJ, is also listed as a contact. Key Points for Comments: The DOJ asks the public to focus on these points in their comments: Is the survey needed for the BJS to do its job well? Are the time estimates and methods correct? Can the collected information be improved? Can the burden on respondents be reduced by using technology? The deadline for public comments is September 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Semi-Annual and Annual Performance Reporting Data Catalog for Formula and Discretionary Grant Programs
Department of Justice Proposes New Data Collection for Violence Against Women Act Grants Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), part of the Department of Justice, has announced a new proposal for collecting information from grantees of programs under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). These changes are explained in a notice published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2025. What is the New Plan? The OVW wants to combine 19 current performance reporting forms into one new, streamlined system. This system will collect data from groups that receive money under VAWA. It will cover both “formula” programs, such as STOP and SASP, and “discretionary” programs. This means all grantees and subgrantees will use the same online reporting platform. Who Will Use This System? The new system will be used by: Formula grant program administrators Formula grant subgrantees Discretionary grant program grantees These groups include local, state, and tribal governments, courts, non-profits, schools, colleges, coalitions, and other groups. How Does It Work? The new system uses a web-based form. The form is tailored for each grant program. Grantees will only complete sections about activities funded by their grant. Why Change the Old System? Currently, 19 different forms are in use, collecting similar or repetitive data in different ways. The new plan will: Make reporting easier and faster Use clearer questions Cut out repeated questions Allow electronic submission This is expected to improve the quality, usability, and consistency of the data. It will also make future updates easier if VAWA or government needs change. How Much Work Will This Involve? The estimate for reporting is: About 6,112 groups will need to report Each form takes about 60 minutes to complete The workload for each group is: Formula administrators: 112 responses per year (once a year per respondent) Formula subgrantees: 3,000 responses per year (once per respondent) Discretionary grantees: 6,000 responses per year (twice per respondent) The total amount of reporting time is estimated at 9,112 hours per year. How Much Does It Cost? The OVW estimates the total annual cost to review the reports and keep the system running is $800,000. What Happens Next? This is a proposed plan. The OVW wants public feedback. Comments will be accepted until September 22, 2025. If you have questions or want to comment, contact Tiffany Watson at the Office on Violence Against Women at 202-307-6026, or email OVW for a copy of the collection instrument or more information. Conclusion The Department of Justice is working to make it easier and faster for groups to report on activities funded by Violence Against Women Act grants. The new system is designed to cut paperwork and improve the way data is collected and used. Groups affected by these changes can learn more and share their feedback before September 22. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.