U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Liquid Crystal Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Liquid Crystal Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same” (Docket Number 3845). The USITC is asking for comments from the public. They want to know about any public interest issues related to the complaint or the complainant’s filing. Who Filed the Complaint? The complaint was filed by BH Innovations LLC on August 29, 2025. It claims that certain companies have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The violations involve importing, selling for importation, or selling in the United States after importation certain liquid crystal devices and related products. Who Are the Respondents? The complaint lists several companies as respondents. They include: HKC Corporation Ltd. (China) Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (China) HKC Overseas Ltd. (Hong Kong) HiSense Co., Ltd. (China) HiSense International Co., Ltd. (China) HiSense Visual Technology Co. Ltd. (China) HiSense US Corporation (Suwanee, GA) VIZIO Holding Corp. (Irvine, CA) TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co. Ltd. (China) TCL King Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd. (China) TTE Technology Inc. (Irvine, CA) TCL Technology Group Corp. (China) TCL Moka International Ltd. (Hong Kong) TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd. (Hong Kong) TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. (China) TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. (Vietnam) LG Electronics, Inc. (South Korea) LG Electronics USA, Inc. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Canonsburg, PA) What Does the Complaint Request? BH Innovations LLC is asking the USITC to: Issue a limited exclusion order. Issue cease and desist orders. Impose a bond on the alleged infringing items during the 60-day Presidential review period, according to law. What Comments Does the USITC Want? The USITC wants comments from: Respondents Other interested parties Members of the public Government agencies Comments should discuss if the requested actions by BH Innovations LLC would: Affect public health or welfare in the U.S. Affect competition in the U.S. economy. Impact the production of similar products in the U.S. Influence U.S. consumers. The USITC is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the liquid crystal devices are used in the U.S. Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the U.S. about these products. Name similar products made in the U.S. that could replace the imported ones. Show if BH Innovations LLC or its licensees can replace the volume of products if the order is made. Explain how the orders would impact U.S. consumers. How to File Comments Written submissions must be filed electronically within eight calendar days after publication in the Federal Register. Replies to submissions must be filed within three days after the original due date. Submissions are limited to five pages. All filings must use the EDIS online system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Only electronic filings are accepted. Confidential Information Any person wanting to keep their filing confidential must request confidential treatment and state the reasons. Information may be shared with USITC staff and U.S. government workers for official purposes. Non-confidential information will be public. Legal Authority This notice is issued under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as the USITC’s regulations. The notice is signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and was issued on September 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China
U.S. Removes Major Chipmakers from Export List in China Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, released a final rule about exports to China. This rule changes the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The main change is the removal of three companies from the Validated End-User (VEU) list in China. The companies are Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd. The VEU program allowed approved companies in certain countries to receive U.S. goods, software, and technology with less paperwork. They did not need an export license for eligible items. These three companies will no longer have this special status after December 31, 2025. Suppliers will now need to submit license applications to export, reexport, or transfer certain U.S.-controlled items to them in China. The VEU program is explained in 15 CFR 748.15 of the EAR. It helps companies in eligible countries get specific U.S. items more easily. The U.S. government checks and approves VEUs, making sure they follow U.S. export rules. The End-User Review Committee (ERC) administers the VEU program. It includes people from the Departments of State, Defense, Energy, Commerce, and other agencies. The change is allowed by the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA), part of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019. ECRA allows the BIS to regulate exports from the U.S. and to make changes through final rules without needing public comments before approval. The rule is not a significant regulatory action. It does not have federalism implications and is exempt from several administrative rulemaking requirements. These include the need for proposed rulemaking, public participation, and a regulatory flexibility analysis. BIS estimates that removing these companies will create about 1,000 more license applications each year. This will add about 495 hours of paperwork, which fits within current estimates for federal collections of information. The final rule removes entries for Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd from Supplement No. 7 to Part 748 of the EAR. This rule was signed by Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade. The rule takes effect on December 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction
U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Correction in Steel Fencing Dumping Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a correction notice in the Federal Register for its investigation on temporary steel fencing from the People’s Republic of China. The notice updates the preliminary determination of sales at less than fair value (LTFV), preliminary affirmative determination of critical circumstances, postponement of the final determination, extension of provisional measures, and corrects errors made in a previous publication from August 19, 2025. Background The Department of Commerce had earlier announced that some Chinese firms sold temporary steel fencing in the United States at prices below fair market value. This is considered dumping under U.S. trade laws. The August 19 notice had mistakenly stated that critical circumstances exist for some companies, which affects how tariffs are applied. The department also recognized errors in how some company names were listed. Correction of Critical Circumstances The new notice clarifies that critical circumstances did not exist for the following exporters and their related producers: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and several specific producers including Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd., Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd., among others. Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and producers like Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. with different producers. Metaltec Group Co., Limited with several listed producers. Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and several listed producers. Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. with four producers. Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Correction in Producer Names The Department corrected the spelling of producers’ names for certain companies in the rate table of the August 19, 2025 notice. This table lists the dumping margins and the adjusted cash deposit rates for each exporter-producer pair. Dumping Margins and Cash Deposit Rates For Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., the weighted-average dumping margin is 187.69%, with a subsidy-adjusted cash deposit rate of 177.15%. Most other exporter-producer combinations have a margin and cash deposit rate of 136.57%. An exception is Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd., which has a margin of 136.57% and a cash deposit rate of 126.03%. The China-wide entity margin is 187.69%, with the same rate for cash deposit. Legal Notification This notice is made as required by sections 733(f) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.205(c). The correction was signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on August 27, 2025. For more details, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466, U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VIII, Washington, DC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
U.S. Trade Commission Starts Third Review of Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On September 2, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it is starting new reviews to decide if removing current trade duties on kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China would hurt American companies again. The USITC is reviewing two orders: antidumping and countervailing duties. These orders have been in place since September 14, 2009. They were reviewed and continued in 2015 and again in 2020. The Commission is now doing its third review under the Tariff Act of 1930. Key Dates and Participation Reviews started: September 2, 2025 Responses due: October 2, 2025 Comments on responses due: November 14, 2025 Anyone interested in this issue, including producers, importers, and consumer groups, can take part by submitting information. Parties must file an entry of appearance within 21 days of this notice to be on the service list. What Products Are Involved? The review is about two main products made for kitchen appliances, both produced in the U.S. and imported from China: Refrigeration shelving and baskets for refrigerators, freezers, and other cooling equipment. Oven racks, side racks, and subframes for cooking ovens and stoves. Request for Information The Commission wants information about: Names and addresses of involved companies and officials. Whether the company is a U.S. producer, importer, worker union, trade group, or foreign producer or exporter. The party’s willingness to provide information. The expected effect of removing duties on U.S. companies. Lists of all U.S. producers, importers, and foreign exporters of these products. Leading buyers of these products in the U.S. How much of these products companies produced, imported, or exported in 2024. Details on prices, production levels, and changes in supply or demand since 2019. How to Respond Those replying are encouraged to use the Commission’s NOI worksheet on its website. Responses must be submitted electronically using the Commission’s EDIS system. Paper filings are not being accepted now. All information provided must be complete and accurate. If a party cannot give the requested information, they must explain why. Incomplete responses may be used against the responding party. Definitions “Subject Merchandise” means the shelving and racks being reviewed. “Subject Country” refers to China. “Domestic Like Product” means similar products made in the U.S. “Domestic Industry” includes all U.S. makers of these products. Further Details The USITC will decide if it will do a full review or an expedited one based on the responses. Review rules are found in 19 CFR parts 201 and 207. For help, contact Juan Carlos Pena-Flores at 202-205-3169 or visit the Commission’s website. Authority This review is conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice is published as required by USITC Rule 207.61. Issued: August 27, 2025 By order of the Commission Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China
U.S. Removes Three Semiconductor Companies in China from Special Export List Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On September 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made new changes to export rules for companies in China. These changes were published in the Federal Register. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has removed Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd from the Validated End-User (VEU) authorizations list. This new rule will take effect on December 31, 2025. What Is the VEU List? The VEU list lets approved companies in certain countries get some U.S. items without needing extra export licenses. These companies are checked and approved by a group of U.S. government agencies. A company on the VEU list can receive certain items, like hardware, software, and technology, more easily. Items tied to missile technology or crime control are not included. What Changed? The End-User Review Committee (ERC), which checks and approves VEUs, has decided to remove the three semiconductor companies from China from the VEU program. This means these companies will no longer have the special permission to receive certain U.S.-controlled exports without extra review. Legal Background These changes are made based on the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. This law allows the U.S. government to control exports for reasons related to national security and foreign policy. Section 1753 and Section 1754 of the law allow the government to control which items can be sent overseas and to which companies. The government can do this without public notice before the rule is final. Impact Starting December 31, 2025, Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd will need to apply for export licenses like other companies, without the easier process from the VEU program. BIS expects this rule to create about 1,000 more export license applications each year. This would add about 495 hours of extra work, but this is within normal expectations. Other Details The rule is not considered major under Executive Order 12866 and does not have federalism impacts. It is also not subject to the regulatory steps that usually let the public comment first. Next Steps The official removal appears in 15 CFR Part 748. The names of the three companies will be taken off the VEU list in the regulations. This change was announced by Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade at the Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures; Correction
U.S. Commerce Department Corrects Ruling on Chinese Steel Fencing Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a correction for its August 19, 2025, preliminary determination in an investigation about temporary steel fencing from China. This update was released on September 2, 2025. Background The Commerce Department had found that certain steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means the products are being sold for less than they cost in China. The investigation is a response to concerns from U.S. companies about unfair trade. Correction of Critical Circumstances In the August notice, Commerce said “critical circumstances” existed for some exporters. “Critical circumstances” means extra duties could be charged on products brought to the U.S. before the investigation started. The latest correction says this was a mistake for some companies. The corrected notice states that critical circumstances do NOT exist for these separate rate companies regarding temporary steel fencing: Exported by Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. and produced or supplied by the following companies: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Cangzhou Hualing Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Tianjin Linkwel International Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Tianjin Lianhao Metal Products Co., Ltd. Chanzhou Lianrui Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shantou Jiayu Trading Co., Ltd. and supplied by: Huanghua Juntai Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Metaltec Group Co., Limited and produced by: Shijiazhuang Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Yelang Imp. & Exp. Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Pengxiang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Joint Force Int’l Co., Limited and produced by: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. Huanghua Wangang Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Taiyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Hebei Wuxin Garden Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Qingxin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xingyu Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Huanghua Huanyu Hardware Factory Exported by Hebei Jinshi Industrial Metal Co., Ltd. and produced and supplied by: Tangshan ZhongRui Industrial Co., Ltd. Huanghua Tianhang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Hebei Tinlin Metal Products Co., Ltd. Huanghua Xindarui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Haiao Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. and produced by: Raoyang Shengshi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Houtuo Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua Aiyuan Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Exported by Hebei Neweast Yilong Trading Co., Ltd. and produced by: Huanghua City Deyue Hardware Co., Ltd. Exported and produced by: Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Names of Producers Corrected There were also errors in some producer names in the earlier table showing dumping and deposit rates for certain exporters. The Commerce Department corrected the producer names for rows 16, 19, 20, and 22 in its rate table. Dumping Margins and Deposit Rates The table lists each exporter and producer, with weighted-average dumping margins and adjusted cash deposit rates. Most companies received a dumping rate of 136.57 percent. Some, like Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., received a higher dumping rate of 187.69 percent. The China-wide rate is 187.69 percent. Legal Notice and Next Steps This notice is issued under the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The final determination in the investigation has been postponed. Provisional measures and possible duties remain in place for certain companies and products. The full correction can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 167, dated September 2, 2025. Contact Information For questions, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973 or Noah Wetzel at (202) 482-7466 at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
In the Matter of Maxim Marchenko, Inmate Number: 78093-510, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges
Export Privileges Denied for Maxim Marchenko After Conviction Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2024-07-17 On July 17, 2024, Maxim Marchenko was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. He was found guilty of smuggling goods from the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 554 and for conspiracy to commit money laundering. Marchenko unlawfully caused companies in the United States to export OLED micro-displays to Russia. The court sentenced him to 36 months in prison and three years of supervised release. According to Section 1760(e) of the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA), a person convicted of certain offenses, like smuggling, can have their export privileges denied for up to ten years. Any licenses from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) that the person had at the time of conviction may also be revoked. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) received notice of Marchenko’s conviction. BIS gave Marchenko a chance to submit a written statement. He did not provide any written response. After reviewing the case, BIS decided to deny Marchenko’s export privileges for ten years from his conviction date. This ban lasts until July 17, 2034. Details of the Export Ban: Maxim Marchenko cannot take part in any business involving any item (commodity, software, or technology) subject to the Export Administration Regulations, whether directly or indirectly. He cannot apply for, obtain, or use any export license, or be involved in negotiations, buying, selling, or any transaction related to exported items covered by the regulations. Marchenko cannot benefit from any transaction involving items exported from the U.S. Restrictions for Others: No person may export or help export any item subject to the regulations to Marchenko. Nobody can help Marchenko get ownership, possession, or control of regulated items. No one can acquire regulated items from Marchenko with knowledge that such items will be exported from the United States. No person can service any regulated item owned or controlled by Marchenko if it involves use of items exported from the United States. Extension of the Order: Any person, firm, corporation, or business linked to Marchenko by ownership, control, position, affiliation, or business connection may also be subject to the order to prevent evasion. Appeal Process: Marchenko may appeal the order to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days and follow the rules in Part 756 of the Regulations. Public Notice: A copy of the order will be delivered to Marchenko and published in the Federal Register. The order is effective immediately and will remain so until July 17, 2034. Issued by: Steven Fisher, Acting Director, Office of Export Enforcement. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
In the Matter of Vladimir Kuznetsov, Inmate Number: 91806-053, FCI Allenwood Low, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, White Deer, PA 17887; Order Denying Export Privileges
Vladimir Kuznetsov Denied Export Privileges by U.S. Government Until 2034 Estimated reading time: 4-6 minutes On April 30, 2024, Vladimir Kuznetsov was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was found guilty of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act. This law can be found at 22 U.S.C. 2778. Kuznetsov was found to have exported and tried to export rifle parts and accessories from the United States to Russia. He did this without the needed U.S. government license. The items included one Accuracy International AICS AX MK II rifle chassis, an H-S Precision aluminum rifle stock, a Kinetic Research Group savage 180-Alpha rifle chassis, a Dakota bolt shroud, a Timney Sportsman trigger assembly, many firearm magazines, and other firearms accessories. These are all listed as defense articles on the United States Munitions List. Because of his conviction, Kuznetsov was sentenced to 46 months in prison. He will also have two years of supervised release after prison. Under the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) can deny a person’s export privileges for up to 10 years if they are convicted of crimes like violating Section 38 of the AECA. This is found at 50 U.S.C. 4819(e). The BIS also has the power to cancel any export licenses that the convicted person held. BIS learned of Kuznetsov’s conviction and gave him a chance to send a written statement. As allowed by the Export Administration Regulations, found at 15 CFR 766.25, Kuznetsov could have replied. But he did not send any response to BIS. After reviewing the case, the Acting Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, Steven Fisher, decided to deny Kuznetsov’s export privileges for 10 years from the date of his conviction. The Office of Exporter Services also decided to cancel any export licenses linked to Kuznetsov. The order means that Vladimir Kuznetsov cannot participate in any export activities under U.S. regulations until April 30, 2034. This ban applies to him directly or through anyone acting for him. He cannot apply for export licenses, buy, sell, transport, or use any U.S. export items. He also cannot benefit from any activity involving items regulated by U.S. export laws. No person may export, reexport, or transfer items controlled under these rules to or for Kuznetsov. No one can help Kuznetsov get control or ownership of those items. No one may take any action to get items from Kuznetsov that are subject to U.S. export laws, or help him get those items. Any person, firm, or company related to Kuznetsov by ownership, control, or business ties may also be subject to this order, if needed, to stop any plan to avoid the order. Kuznetsov can appeal this order. He must file his appeal with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security within 45 days. He must follow the rules in Part 756 of the Export Administration Regulations. A copy of the order will be given to Kuznetsov and published in the Federal Register. The order is effective immediately and will last until April 30, 2034. Steven Fisher, Acting Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, signed the order. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Chinese Slag Pots Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5 minutes Washington, D.C., August 28, 2025 — The U.S. Department of Commerce has made its final decision in the antidumping duty investigation of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The Department determined that these products are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). Period of Investigation The period looked at was from April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. No Comments or Changes The Department published its preliminary decision on June 17, 2025. No parties sent comments, so the Department adopted its preliminary findings as final. There is no decision memorandum for this action. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers slag pots from China. The Department received no comments on what products should be included. The scope, as described in the appendix of the notice, was not changed. Facts Available and Adverse Inferences No companies were found eligible for separate rates. The Department treated all companies as part of the “China-wide entity.” No verification was done. Based on sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the Department used facts available with adverse inferences. The Department set the dumping rate at 294.43 percent for the China-wide entity. This is the highest rate claimed in the original petition. The China-wide entity includes these companies: Chaeng Great Wall Casting Co., Ltd. Chaugzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. China Minmetals Corporation Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. Dehua Protech Innovation Co., Ltd. Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. MCC Baosteel Technology Services Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Shaoguan Germany China Metal Group, Ltd. Shenyang Minmetal Import & Export Co., Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Co., Ltd. No Separate or Combination Rates The Department did not offer individual “separate rates” or “producer/exporter combination rates” because no company qualified for a separate rate. Final Dumping Margin The weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide entity is 294.43 percent. The cash deposit rate, adjusted for export subsidy offset, is 278.81 percent. No Disclosure Calculations Because the rate is based on adverse facts available and the petition, there are no calculations to disclose. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation The Department will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue suspending liquidation of all related entries entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after June 17, 2025. This includes all merchandise covered under the investigation. CBP will require cash deposits based on the rates above. The cash deposit rate may be changed in the future if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds both dumping and subsidies, at which point it will be adjusted for export subsidies. For now, CBP will not collect deposits adjusted for provisional measures in the companion countervailing duty (CVD) case, because they have expired. Next Steps by the U.S. International Trade Commission The Department will notify the ITC about its findings. The ITC must decide if U.S. industry is being injured or threatened with injury by these imports within 45 days. If the ITC rules there is no injury, the case ends and deposits are returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department will order AD duties on all entries made on or after the effective date for suspension of liquidation. Administrative Protective Orders If the ITC finds no injury, this notice will serve to remind all parties with access to business-sensitive information under Administrative Protective Orders (APOs) to return or destroy relevant documents. Scope: What Is Covered The products covered are slag pots with capacities from 65 cubic feet to 1200 cubic feet, regardless of shape, finish, or whether finished or unfinished. These are load-bearing goods typically made by casting or fabrication, such as welding. They may have legs, stands, or lifting hooks. The country where the slag pot was cast or forged determines its origin. The products are classified under HTSUS codes 7309.00.0090 and 8454.20.0080, though scope and definitions are controlled by the written description. Contact Information For more information, contact George McMahon at the International Trade Administration, (202) 482-1167. This final determination is official as of August 28, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Countervailable Subsidies on Slag Pots from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Investigation Period and Background The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision on imports of slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The agency determined that Chinese producers and exporters of slag pots receive countervailable subsidies. The period of investigation was from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. On April 3, 2025, the Department published its preliminary findings. No comments were received, and the results remain unchanged in the final determination. Companies Involved and Subsidy Rate The following companies from China were assigned a countervailing duty rate: Chaeng Great Wall Steel Casting Co. Ltd. UMECC Beijing Equipment Inc. Ltd. Cast-Con Engineering GmbH & Co. KG Changzhou Jinyuan Machinery Equipment Ltd. Co. Dawang Metals Co. Ltd. GVA Krefeld GmbH Liaoning Mineral and Metallurgy Group Co. Ltd. Luoyang Zhongtai Industries Co., Ltd. Shantou Huaxing Metallurgical Equipment Co. Ltd. Tangshan Sinya International Trade Co., Ltd. All other companies Each company received an estimated countervailable subsidy rate of 226.16 percent ad valorem. This rate was based on facts available because the mandatory respondents did not provide requested information and were considered uncooperative. Product Scope The investigation covers slag pots with a nominal capacity of 65 to 1,200 cubic feet. These items are used in metal processing and can be made by casting or fabrication, with or without finishes like coating or heat treatment. They may come with parts such as legs and lifting hooks. Both finished and unfinished slag pots, even those further processed in other countries, are covered. Relevant U.S. import tariff codes for these products include: 7309.00.0090 8454.20.0080 Possible attachments could also enter under codes like 7316.00.0000, 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7325.99.5000, and 7326.19.0080. Suspension of Liquidation Following the preliminary decision, U.S. Customs was told to suspend liquidation of slag pot imports from China that arrived on or after April 3, 2025. Customs will not suspend entries made on or after August 1, 2025, but will keep suspending those entered on or before July 31, 2025. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if these imports hurt the U.S. industry. The ITC must issue its decision within 45 days. If the ITC finds injury, a countervailing duty order will be issued and cash deposits for duties will be required. If no injury is found, the case will end and all deposits will be refunded. Legal Reference This action was published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2025, under the authority of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For more information, the full legal text can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 165, pages 41986-41988. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Rescinds Administrative Review of Chinese Magnesia Carbon Bricks Estimated reading time: 1–4 minutes On August 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks from the People’s Republic of China. The review was meant to cover imports made between September 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024. The rescission took place because there were no reviewable entries of magnesia carbon bricks from the companies involved during the period of review. This means that no imports of these bricks entered the United States in a way that would be affected by the review during that time. The review process started after the Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Committee requested it on September 30, 2024. U.S. Customs and Border Protection data later showed that there were no relevant entries to review. No parties provided comments about this data, and no comments were received after the notice of intent to rescind the review was issued on July 8, 2025. This decision follows Commerce’s usual practice. When there are no entries to review because none were imported during the set period, Commerce rescinds the review according to its regulations. No antidumping cash deposit rates will change because of this rescission. The current cash deposit requirements for these imports will stay in effect until further notice. Commerce will instruct Customs to assess antidumping duties at the same rates that were in place at the time the entries were made. Instructions about assessment will be sent to Customs no earlier than 35 days after this notice is published. Parties involved in this review are reminded of their duties under the administrative protective order. They must return or destroy any proprietary information given under this order according to the rules. This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on August 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Sold at Less Than Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce says that polypropylene corrugated boxes from China are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This is called an “affirmative preliminary determination” in an antidumping investigation. Time Period Investigated The time period studied was July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. What is Being Investigated The investigation is about boxes made from corrugated sheets of polypropylene. These boxes are used to hold or carry goods. The boxes can be any size, shape, or style. They can have handles, lids, tops, or be made in one piece, two pieces, or more. The investigation also covers lids or tops by themselves. How the Boxes are Made The boxes are made from plastic sheets that have air channels inside. These make the boxes strong but still light. The plastic used is at least 50% polypropylene. Where the Boxes are Classified These boxes are classified in U.S. customs under number 3923.10.9000. The written description is most important for determining what is covered. Results of the Investigation No companies from China responded to the government’s requests for information. Because of this, Commerce used facts available “with adverse inferences” to set the dumping rate for all exporters from China. Dumping Margins The Commerce Department says the “China-wide entity” has a weighted-average dumping margin of 83.64 percent. The cash deposit rate, after adjusting for subsidies, is 73.10 percent. What Happens Next U.S. Customs must suspend liquidation of these products brought into the U.S. on or after August 28, 2025. Importers must pay cash deposits based on the dumping margin. If changes happen in a related countervailing duty case, the deposit rates could change. These rules stay in effect until more notice is given. Public Comment Period Interested parties have 30 days to send in written comments, called “case briefs.” They can send in rebuttal briefs 5 days after that. Everyone who sends briefs must include a table of contents and a list of legal sources. Summaries of each argument (about 450 words) should be put at the start of each brief. Anyone wanting a hearing must request one in writing within 30 days of the notice. Hearings will be only about issues in these briefs. What Happens Later Commerce will make its final decision within 75 days of this preliminary determination. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will be told about this preliminary decision. If Commerce says in its final decision that dumping has happened, the ITC will decide if this has hurt the U.S. industry. Scope of the Investigation The full description of the products and steps of the investigation are posted on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Enforcement and Compliance website. More Information The official notice and more details are published in the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 165, on August 28, 2025. For questions, contact Dan Alexander at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Tungsten Shot From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Sets Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Tungsten Shot from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 27, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued final antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain tungsten shot imported from the People’s Republic of China. This action follows affirmative final determinations by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Background Commerce determined on July 11, 2025, that Chinese producers and exporters of tungsten shot are selling their products in the United States at less than fair value and are receiving countervailable subsidies. The ITC confirmed, on August 20, 2025, that U.S. industry is being materially retarded by these imports. Product Scope The orders cover tungsten spheres or balls, also known as shot, that are 92.6 percent or greater tungsten by weight. The size ranges from 1.5 mm to 10.0 mm in diameter. The product may be called “Tungsten Super Shot” and may include coatings, such as copper, nickel, iron, or metallic alloys. These products are generally classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) subheading 9306.29.0000, and may also enter under 8101.99.8000. The written description in the order determines the scope. Antidumping Order Details Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to impose antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds its export price. Because the ITC’s injury determination is based on material retardation, AD duties will only be collected on entries made on or after the date the ITC’s final injury determination is published. CBP will also refund any cash deposits from entries before this date, specifically for entries made on or after February 19, 2025 (the date of the AD Preliminary Determination). Commerce will reinstitute the suspension of liquidation and require a cash deposit for all future imports of subject tungsten shot from China. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all Chinese producers and exporters is 201.32 percent. Countervailing Duty Order Details Under the CVD order, CBP will collect duties on imports of tungsten shot from China beginning with entries made on or after the publication date of the ITC’s final injury determination. CBP will refund any cash deposits for entries before this date, specifically those made on or after December 20, 2024 (the date of the CVD Preliminary Determination). Estimated subsidy rates by company: Luoyang Combat Tungsten & Molybdenum Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Luoyang Hypersolid Metal Tech Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Mudanjiang North Alloy Tools Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Shaanxi Xinheng Rare Metal Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Xi’an Refractory & Precise Metals Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou KJ Super Materials Co., Ltd.: 55.64% Zhuzhou Oston Carbide Co., Ltd.: 292.84% Zhuzhou Tungsten Man Materials Co., Ltd.: 292.84% All Others: 55.64% Administrative Procedures Commerce will maintain an annual inquiry service list for these orders. Interested parties must submit an entry of appearance to be added to this list within 30 days of the order’s publication. Law firms are asked to designate a lead attorney. This list will be updated as needed. The petitioner and the Government of China must submit their initial entries of appearance to be included on the first annual list. They do not need to resubmit each year but must update their entries if there are changes. Conclusion These orders are effective as of August 27, 2025. Detailed information is available online at: https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. These actions were signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ceramic Tile From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Ceramic Tile from China Likely to Continue Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background The antidumping duty order on ceramic tile from China was first published on June 1, 2020. In May 2025, the Commerce Department began its first sunset review of this order as required by law. The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile, a group of U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers, submitted a notice to participate in this review before the deadline. The group also provided a full response with information and arguments. No responses came from any Chinese companies. Review Process Because there were no responses from the other side, the Commerce Department ran an expedited review, which takes 120 days. The review considered whether removing the antidumping duty order would lead to more dumping of ceramic tiles from China. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on what is covered are in the full decision memo, which is available online. Findings The Commerce Department found that canceling the order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping. Dumping means selling products in the U.S. at prices below fair value. The Department determined that if the order is revoked, weighted average dumping margins could be as high as 356.02 percent. Other Information Parties who got special access to information in this review must follow rules for returning, destroying, or converting protected information. These results were issued in line with the law and regulations. For more information and for access to the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, visit https://access.trade.gov or contact Juliana Kogan at the U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: 202-482-0966. Dated: August 22, 2025 Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
United States Imposes Sanctions on Four Costa Rican Nationals and Two Entities Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took new sanctions actions. OFAC has added four individuals and two companies to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These actions are based on Executive Order 14059, “Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade.” All property and interests in property in the United States, belonging to these persons and companies, are now blocked. U.S. persons may not do business with them. Individuals Added to SDN List: Edwin Danney Lopez Vega – Also known as “Pecho de Rata” – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: January 2, 1977 – Place of Birth: Centro Central, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701210791 – Gender: Male Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez – Location: Cartago, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: April 21, 1976 – Place of Birth: Carmen Central, San Jose, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 109380563 – Gender: Male Alejandro Antonio James Wilson – Also known as “Turesky” – Location: San Jose, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: October 5, 1972 – Place of Birth: Centro Central, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701040769 – Gender: Male Alejandro Arias Monge – Also known as “Diablo” – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: September 19, 1984 – Place of Birth: Guapiles Pococi, Limon, Costa Rica – Nationality: Costa Rica – Cedula Number: 701600166 – Gender: Male These four individuals are designated for activities or transactions that have contributed, or pose a significant risk of contributing, to the international spread of illicit drugs or drug production tools. Entities Added to SDN List: Limon Black Star FC – Location: Limon, Costa Rica – Established: 2022 – Organization Type: Activities of sports clubs – Linked to: Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez Bufete Celso Gamboa and Asociados – Location: San Jose, Costa Rica – Established: 1945 – Organization Type: Legal activities – Linked to: Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez Both companies are designated for being owned, controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez. Further Information The official list and further details about OFAC’s sanctions programs are available on the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. The information in this article is based entirely on the official notice published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 163, on August 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Steel Wire Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background On January 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce published the CVD order on steel wire rod from China. On May 1, 2025, Commerce began the second sunset review of this order. U.S. producers—Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company, Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC—showed intent to participate as domestic interested parties. These companies are producers of the same type of product in the U.S. On June 2, 2025, Commerce received a response from the domestic interested parties. The Government of China and companies from China did not respond. Expedited Review Because only domestic interested parties responded, and the Chinese side did not, Commerce held an expedited review as allowed by law. This was done under section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. Product Scope The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. A full description of the products and issues discussed appears in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum,” which is available electronically on the Department of Commerce’s official system ACCESS. Findings Commerce found that ending the CVD order would likely lead to more countervailable subsidies from China. Here are the countervailable subsidy rates that are most likely to apply if the order were removed: Benxi Steel (which includes several related companies): 193.31% ad valorem Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Tangshan Branch: 178.46% ad valorem All Others: 185.89% ad valorem Administrative Details Parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) are reminded to return or destroy confidential information according to the rules. Failure to do this can result in sanctions. Publication The Department of Commerce is publishing these final results as required by law, including sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Official Contact For more information, contact Emily Eshoo of the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce, by phone at 202-482-6296. Signed Dated: August 22, 2025. Abdelali Elouaradia Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance — Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 26, 2025), Pages 41547-41548, Notice C-570-013. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From China and Vietnam; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigation
U.S. Moves Forward in Trade Case on Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is moving ahead with the final step of an investigation into polypropylene corrugated boxes (“PC boxes”) from China and Vietnam. This notice came after a finding from the U.S. Department of Commerce that these boxes from China are being subsidized. What Are Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes? These are boxes, bins, totes, or other containers made from special sheets of plastic called polypropylene. The inside of these sheets have channels or pockets of air. This makes the boxes lightweight but strong. They can come in one piece, two pieces, or several pieces, with or without handles, lids, or reinforcing wire. They may also be printed with ink or digital designs. Even lids or tops shipped alone are included. Why Is There an Investigation? The investigation looks at imports from China and Vietnam. The goal is to decide if the influx of these boxes hurts U.S. companies or slows down new businesses. Four U.S. companies asked for this review: CoolSeal USA Inc., Inteplast Group Corporation, SeaCa Plastic Packaging, and Technology Container Corp. Next Steps of the Investigation The final part of the investigation started on August 20, 2025. The U.S. Department of Commerce already made a first decision that boxes from China may be getting help from the Chinese government. Decisions about “antidumping”—selling the boxes for less than they cost to make—are still pending. The ITC will decide if the imports hurt or threaten to hurt U.S. industry. Key Dates and Deadlines October 22, 2025: A staff report will be made in the nonpublic record. A public version will follow. October 28, 2025: Final prehearing briefs must be turned in. October 29, 2025: People must request to appear at the hearing. November 4, 2025: A prehearing conference may be held, and written testimony and slides for the hearing are due by noon. November 5, 2025: The main hearing will start at 9:30 a.m. November 12, 2025: Deadline for post-hearing briefs and for others to send in written statements. November 25, 2025: All new information will be shared with the parties. December 1, 2025: Final comments must be submitted. How to Get Involved People who want to take part in the hearing must file an “entry of appearance” at least 21 days before the hearing. Industrial users, consumers, and others can send written statements. All filings must be made online through the Commission’s electronic filing system. Rules and Security Business secrets collected during the investigation can only be seen by allowed people under a special order. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Only electronic filings will be used. Contact and More Information For questions, contact Camille Bryan at (202) 205-2811. More information is available on the ITC’s website (https://www.usitc.gov) and on the electronic docket (https://edis.usitc.gov). Legal Authority This investigation is being conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Issued by: Lisa Barton,Secretary to the CommissionDate: 2025-08-22
Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Wind Turbines and Their Parts and Components
U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Investigation Into Wind Turbine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun an investigation about wind turbines and their parts coming into the United States. The purpose is to find out how these imports may affect national security. The investigation started on August 13, 2025. It is being managed by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). How the Public Can Comment The Department of Commerce wants to hear from the public. People and companies can send in comments, facts, or studies related to the investigation. Comments are due by September 9, 2025. You must submit comments through the Federal rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov. Use the ID BIS-2025-0191 and refer to XRIN 0694-XC133 when you comment. If you want to keep information private, you must clearly mark which parts are confidential. You should also provide a public version without the secret details. This information will be made public unless you follow the correct steps for business confidentiality. What Topics Should Comments Cover? How much wind turbines and their parts the United States needs now and will need in the future. If companies in the United States can make enough of these items. How much the United States depends on other countries to supply these items. If many wind turbines or parts come from just a few countries or suppliers, which could be risky. Whether foreign governments help their companies with unfair subsidies or trade practices. If foreign companies make prices too low because of unfair actions or because their governments make too many wind turbines. If other countries might limit exports or use their control over wind turbines as a weapon. How possible it is to make more wind turbines in the United States and buy fewer from other countries. If current trade policies are helping or hurting U.S. companies. If new measures, like tariffs or limits on imports, are needed for national security. Risks that come from letting foreign companies or countries control parts of the supply chain. If foreign wind turbines or parts can be used in ways that could harm the United States. How to Protect Confidential Information If your comments have confidential business information: Mark those pages “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL.” Give a public version for sharing. Make sure the confidential file name starts with “BC,” and the public file starts with “P.” If you submit comments without using “BC” or “P,” the information may become public on regulations.gov. More Information If you have questions, you can contact Stephen Astle, Director at the Defense Industrial Base Division of BIS, at (202) 482-4506 or by email (provided in the original notice). Details about the investigation and regulations are at www.bis.doc.gov/232. For FOIA requests and to see related records, visit https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/. The notice was signed by Robby S. Saunders, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Security. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Department of Commerce Announces Results of Second Sunset Review on Chinese Steel Wire Rod Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of the expedited second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The Department found that removing the antidumping duties on steel wire rod from China would likely lead to continued or repeated dumping. The likely dumping margins would be up to 110.25 percent. Background of the Order The original antidumping duty order on steel wire rod from China was published on January 8, 2015. The purpose of this order is to prevent unfair dumping of steel wire rod into the United States at prices lower than fair value, which can harm U.S. producers. On May 1, 2025, the Department of Commerce started the second sunset review of this order. This review is required under the Tariff Act of 1930. A sunset review occurs every five years to decide if ending the duties would lead to continued dumping. Participation in the Review On May 16, 2025, Domestic Interested Parties, which include Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Corporation, and Optimus Steel LLC, filed their notice of intent to participate in the review. These parties said they are U.S. manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers of the steel wire rod covered by the order. The Department of Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this intent to participate on May 22, 2025. On June 2, 2025, these same parties submitted their full response, which was on time and in full detail. No parties from China responded to the Department’s request for comments. Because there was no response from China, the Department carried out an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The full details are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which the Department has made public. This document is available online at the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS system. Final Results The Department concluded that ending the antidumping duty order would probably result in the continued or repeated dumping of steel wire rod from China. The likely margins are up to 110.25 percent. This means that, according to the Department, if the duties are revoked, Chinese companies might continue or resume selling steel wire rod in the U.S. at unfairly low prices, at levels up to 110.25 percent below fair value. Administrative Protective Orders The notice also reminds parties who have access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility to return or destroy this information as required by law. Further Information All related documents, including the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, are available to the public on the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. This announcement is in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and corresponding regulations. Contact For more information, contact Morgan Jefferies at the Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, telephone 202-482-6302. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ceramic Tile From People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on Chinese Ceramic Tile After Sunset Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has finished its first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on ceramic tile from the People’s Republic of China. The department found that ending the order would likely cause countervailable subsidies to continue or come back. What Is a Sunset Review? A sunset review is a regular check done every five years. It looks at whether removing duties would lead to unfair trading practices starting again. This review was started on May 1, 2025, under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Process and Responses The Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile sent in a notice of intent to take part in the review on May 16, 2025. The group claimed status as an interested party, as most of its members make, produce, or wholesale similar products in the U.S. The Coalition also submitted a full response to the review by the June 2, 2025, deadline. No responses came from the Government of China or any respondent interested parties. The Department of Commerce told the U.S. International Trade Commission about the lack of responses from China on June 20, 2025. As a result, the department did an expedited (120-day) review. Scope of the Order The order covers ceramic tile from China. More details on the scope can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum provided by the Department of Commerce. What Did the Department Find? The Department of Commerce decided that ending the countervailing duty order would likely lead to the continuation or return of illegal subsidies for ceramic tile from China. The review includes analysis of likely subsidy rates if the order was removed. The main subsidy rate found likely to continue or come back is 358.81 percent ad valorem for the following producers and exporters: Temgoo International Trading Limited: 358.81% Foshan Sanfi Imp & Emp Co., Ltd: 358.81% All Others: 358.81% Information for Interested Parties The notice is also a reminder for parties with access to confidential information to follow the rules for returning or destroying materials. These rules are detailed in 19 CFR 351.305. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is publishing these results according to sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). The final results were signed on August 20, 2025, by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. To access the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, interested parties can visit https://access.trade.gov. Appendix – Topics in the Issues and Decision Memorandum: Summary Background Scope of the Order History of the Order Legal Framework Discussion of the Issues Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail Nature of the Subsidies Final Results of Sunset Review Recommendation Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates Sanctions List: August 22, 2025 Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced updates to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). On July 1, 2025, OFAC updated the SDN List entry for a company in China. The new entry is for “SHANGHAI WINSON IMP AND EXP CO LTD,” also known as “SHANGHAI YUNCHEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO LTD.” The company’s addresses are listed in Shanghai, China. Its Unified Social Credit Code is 91310115MA1K40X926. Its property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction remain blocked. On the same day, July 1, OFAC announced that the property and interests in property of “GOLD MILES LIMITED” are now unblocked and the company has been removed from the SDN List. GOLD MILES LIMITED had addresses in Hong Kong, China, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The company’s Hong Kong registration number is 1596444. This company was previously linked to John Desmond Hanafin. On July 3, 2025, three persons and one company from Colombia were also removed from the SDN List. They are: Gabriel Puerta Parra (“Doctor Puerta”), with various addresses in Bogota, Colombia. He was also associated with several companies in Colombia. His ID number is 8238830 and his Colombian passport number is P020046. INDUSTRIAL MINERA Y PECUARIA S.A., located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82B La Castellana, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 830000855-1. COMERCIALIZADORA ANDINA BRASILERA S.A. (“CABRASA”), located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 830003298-2. LA FRONTERA UNION GALVEZ Y CIA S EN C (formerly LA FRONTERA PUERTA GALVEZ LTDA.), located at Carrera 30 No. 90-82, Bogota, Colombia. Their tax ID number is 800050795-2. On August 18, 2025, OFAC updated SDN List entries for other individuals. They also announced that Claudia Mercedes Vargas Giraldo from Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, has been removed from the SDN List. Her date of birth is December 4, 1964, and her Colombian ID number is 42885957. She was previously linked to several companies, including CLAMASAN S.A.S., GUISANES S.A.S., C.M.V. CARNES S.A.S., and AGROPECUARIA MAIS SAS. These changes mean that the property and interests in property of those who have been removed from the SDN List are no longer blocked by OFAC. For more details, go to the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. For questions, contact the OFAC Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. Authority: 31 CFR chapter V. Bradley T. Smith, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Justice Department Announces Third Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the third meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission. This meeting will take place on September 29, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. It will be held at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, at 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting is open to the public. There will be a live broadcast available at justice.gov/live. To attend in person, members of the public must register online at the Religious Liberty Commission website: https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. In-person attendance is limited due to space. Everyone attending will be required to show identification and pass through security. Media representatives must register through the Office of Public Affairs by September 26, 2025, at 5 p.m. They will need to bring government-issued photo ID and valid media credentials. Security checks for the media will be required. The contact person for the Religious Liberty Commission is Mary Margaret Bush. She serves as the Designated Federal Officer. For more information or for accommodations to attend the meeting, Mrs. Bush can be reached at 202-297-3196 or by email. The Religious Liberty Commission was set up by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission is a federal advisory committee. It includes a chair, a vice chair, 11 members chosen by the President, and three ex-officio members. These members come from the private sector, employers, schools, religious groups, and States. The Commission advises the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office about religious liberty policies. The group is creating a whole report for the President. Topics in the report will be: foundations of religious liberty in America, how religious liberty affects society, current threats, ways to protect religious liberty for the future, and programs to raise awareness and celebrate America’s religious diversity. The September 29 meeting will focus on religious liberty in education. The agenda includes discussions of issues for teachers and coaches, school funding, educational choice, and the independence of faith-based schools. Panels at the meeting will hear from teachers, coaches, school leaders, families, and experts. The hearing aims to cover the history of religious liberty in schools, threats today, and ways to protect these rights going forward. The public can send written comments by email or mail. Comments must be received by September 22, 2025. Email messages can be sent to the Commission’s official address. Mailed comments should go to the U.S. Department of Justice, Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5263, Washington, DC 20530. This meeting is announced under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Dated: August 19, 2025. Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree
United States Files Consent Decree in Clean Water Act Case Against Tyson L. Friskney Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On August 19, 2025, a proposed Consent Decree was lodged in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This action was brought by the United States against Tyson L. Friskney. The case is titled United States v. Tyson L. Friskney, 3:23-cv-00439-JRK. The complaint was filed under Section 309(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b). The United States alleges that Tyson L. Friskney violated the Clean Water Act. The violation involved discharging pollutants into waters of the United States without obtaining a permit. To resolve these claims, the proposed Consent Decree requires Tyson L. Friskney to take certain actions. The defendant must complete injunctive relief. This relief is in the form of compensatory mitigation. Specifically, Tyson L. Friskney must purchase stream mitigation credits. The Department of Justice will accept written comments about the proposed Consent Decree. The comment period lasts for thirty days from August 22, 2025. Comments should be sent to Miranda Jensen at: P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Email: [protected address] Include reference to United States v. Tyson L. Friskney, 90-5-1-1-21944. The proposed Consent Decree can be examined at the Clerk’s Office. The address is: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio 1716 Spielbusch Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43604 It is also available online at: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees Charles Scott Spear, Acting Assistant Section Chief of the Environmental Defense Section in the Environment and Natural Resources Division, submitted this notice. The official Federal Register document number is 2025-16097. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension Without Change, of a Previously Approved Collection; Federal Coal Lease Request
Department of Justice Seeks Comments on Federal Coal Lease Form Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Details of the Collection The proposed information collection is related to the use of two forms: ATR-139 and ATR-140. These forms are known as the Federal Coal Lease Form. Businesses or other for-profit groups are the main respondents. The forms help the Department of Justice evaluate the competitive impact of giving out, transferring, or exchanging federal coal leases. The forms gather information from coal companies about their current coal reserves. The Department reviews this data to check if any lease issuance, transfer, or exchange is consistent with the antitrust laws. Estimated Burden The Department estimates that 10 respondents will fill out each form. Each form is expected to take about two hours to complete. The total estimated burden for all respondents together is 20 hours per year. Comment Process The DOJ encourages people and businesses to send in comments. Comments will be accepted for 30 days, until September 22, 2025. Commenters are invited to address: If the collection of information is necessary. If the estimated response burden is correct. How the quality or clarity of the information can be improved. How to reduce time or effort needed to respond, including possible use of electronic submissions. Contact Information For more details, copies of the forms, or questions, contact Sarah Oldfield, Deputy Chief Legal Advisor, Antitrust Division, DOJ, at 950 Pennsylvania Street NW, Room 3304, Washington, DC 20530. The phone number is 202-305-8915. If more information is required, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, DOJ, at 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC 20530. Notice This collection is being continued without change. The public is encouraged to submit suggestions or comments to help improve the process. The notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at DOJ, on August 20, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Paper Plates From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquires on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Starts Investigation on Paper Plates Imported from Cambodia and Malaysia Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced new investigations about certain paper plates being imported into the United States. The investigations focus on paper plates made in Cambodia and Malaysia. These plates use paperboard that was made in China. Background of the Investigation This decision comes after a request from the Anticircumvention Working Group of the American Paper Plate Coalition. This group wants the U.S. government to check if companies are trying to avoid anti-dumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) taxes on Chinese paper plates by finishing the products in other countries. The official Orders that put duties on paper plates from China have been in effect since March 20, 2025. What Is Being Investigated? The main concern is that companies may be sending Chinese paperboard to Cambodia and Malaysia, making paper plates there, and then shipping them to the U.S. By doing this, they might be trying to avoid the extra duties on products from China. Commerce will check if the process of turning the paperboard into plates in Cambodia or Malaysia is minor or small. If yes, the plates might still be treated as if they come from China for tax purposes. Steps in the Investigation Commerce looked at the request and extra questions sent by the companies. After reviewing all the information, Commerce has decided that there is enough evidence to start a full investigation. The investigation will focus on how the paper plates are made in Cambodia and Malaysia. They will study if the work done there is small compared to the value of the paperboard from China. Commerce will also look at trade patterns and any connections between companies in China and those in Cambodia and Malaysia. How the Companies Will Be Chosen Commerce will use data from U.S. Customs to choose which companies to investigate further. This data will show which companies send paper plates from Cambodia and Malaysia to the U.S. Interested companies will have a chance to respond and provide information to Commerce. What Happens to the Imports Now? While the investigation is happening, U.S. Customs will keep stopping imports that are already being held under the Orders. If Commerce decides that circumvention is happening, Customs may continue to block certain imports and require extra taxes on them. Timeframe for the Decision Commerce plans to make a first decision within 150 days from August 22, 2025. The final decision should come within 300 days, unless there are delays or the investigation is stopped early. Who Can Be Involved? Any interested parties can submit information or comments. All steps and information are managed by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Contact Information If anyone needs more information, they can reach Justin Enck, Shawn Gregor (for Cambodia), or Walter Schaub (for Malaysia) at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Section. This information is published to help all interested parties follow the progress of the investigation and understand the rules for paper plate imports into the United States. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex High Point, Inc.
Cambrex High Point, Inc. Applies to Import Controlled Substance for Research Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Cambrex High Point, Inc. has filed an application to be registered as an importer of a controlled substance. The application was officially submitted on July 16, 2025. The company’s address is 4180 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High Point, North Carolina, 27265-8017. Cambrex High Point, Inc. wants to import poppy straw concentrate, which is listed as a Schedule II drug. The specific drug code for poppy straw concentrate is 9670. This substance will only be used for research and development purposes. The registration does not allow any other activity for this drug code. No approval is given to import Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms this registration. These cannot be imported for commercial sale. The United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is handling this application. Bulk manufacturers and other applicants can send electronic comments or objections on this registration. They may also ask for a hearing. The last day to submit comments or hearing requests is September 22, 2025. All comments must be sent in electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. A Comment Tracking Number will be given after submitting a comment. Requests for a hearing must also go to the Drug Enforcement Administration at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. These requests should go to the Hearing Clerk/OALJ, the DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, and the Administrator at the same address. Approval of permit applications will happen only if the business activity matches what is allowed under United States law 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The notice was issued by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator at the DEA. This information was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 160, on August 21, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex High Point, Inc.
Cambrex High Point, Inc. Seeks DEA Registration to Manufacture Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes Cambrex High Point, Inc. has applied to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of controlled substances. This notice comes from the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 160, dated August 21, 2025. The company is located at 4180 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High Point, North Carolina 27265-8017. They submitted their application on July 18, 2025. Cambrex High Point, Inc. is seeking permission to manufacture two basic classes of controlled substances: Oxymorphone (Drug code 9652, Schedule II) Noroxymorphone (Drug code 9668, Schedule II) The purpose of this registration is to allow Cambrex High Point, Inc. to produce these substances in bulk. The company plans to use them as internal intermediates and for distribution to its customers. No other activities are authorized under this registration for these drug codes. Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected substances, or other applicants, can submit electronic comments or objections about the proposed registration. The deadline to submit comments or request a hearing is October 20, 2025. Comments must be sent through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. The portal allows users to type comments or attach longer files. Each submission will get a Comment Tracking Number. Comments are not immediately visible online after submission. For more details, follow instructions available on the regulations.gov website. The notice was issued by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA. [FR Doc. 2025-16003 Filed 8-20-25; 8:45 am] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Catalent CTS, LLC
Catalent CTS, LLC Applies to Import Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes Catalent CTS, LLC has applied to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to become registered as an importer of certain controlled substances. The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 21, 2025. Catalent CTS, LLC is located at 10245 Hickman Mills Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64137-1418. The company sent its application to the DEA on July 17, 2025. The application covers the following controlled substances: Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (Drug code 2010), Schedule I Marihuana Extract (Drug code 7350), Schedule I Marihuana (Drug code 7360), Schedule I Tetrahydrocannabinols (Drug code 7370), Schedule I Catalent CTS, LLC plans to import these substances either in bulk or as dosage unit products. The imports are intended for clinical trials and distribution. For Tetrahydrocannabinols, Catalent CTS, LLC plans to import only a synthetic type. The company’s registration does not allow any other activities for these drug codes. According to the DEA notice, permit approval will only be considered when the activity fits the requirements under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The registration does not allow import of finished dosage forms for commercial sale, either FDA-approved or not. Anyone who manufactures these substances or has applied to manufacture them can send comments or objections to the DEA by September 22, 2025. Electronic comments must be sent through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Written hearing requests must be sent to the DEA at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for hearings should also go to the attention of the DEA Administrator at the same address. The notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator. The notice reference number is 2025-16004. For more information, visit the Federal Register or the official DEA website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex Charles City
Cambrex Charles City Applies to Import Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Cambrex Charles City, located at 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa, has applied to become an importer of controlled substances. The application was submitted on June 23, 2025. The company seeks permission to import several basic classes of controlled substances. These substances and their details are: Psilocybin (Drug code: 7437, Schedule I) 4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP) (Drug code: 8333, Schedule II) Phenylacetone (Drug code: 8501, Schedule II) Coca Leaves (Drug code: 9040, Schedule II) Opium Raw (Drug code: 9600, Schedule II) Poppy Straw Concentrate (Drug code: 9670, Schedule II) Cambrex Charles City plans to import psilocybin for formulation development and to support clinical trials for customers. The other substances will be imported to help make other controlled substances. These controlled substances will then be sent to customers. No other uses for these drug codes are allowed under this registration. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will only approve permits if the company’s business matches what is allowed under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The registration does not allow importing finished dosage forms, whether approved or not by the Food and Drug Administration, for commercial sale. Registered bulk manufacturers and applicants can submit comments or objections to the DEA about this proposed registration. Comments must be sent electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. The deadline for submitting comments or requesting a hearing is September 22, 2025. Requests for hearings must be sent to the Drug Enforcement Administration at the following addresses: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Requests should also be sent to the DEA Administrator at the same address. This notice was made by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, and appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Vici Health Sciences, LLC
Vici Health Sciences Applies to Import Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On August 21, 2025, the United States Department of Justice released a notice about a new application from Vici Health Sciences, LLC. The notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 160. Vici Health Sciences, LLC has asked to become an importer of certain controlled substances. The company is located at 6655 Amberton Drive, Suite O, Elkridge, Maryland 21075-6202. The requested substance is fentanyl-related compounds. This drug is listed under code 9850 and is a Schedule I controlled substance, as defined in 21 CFR 1308.11(h). The company plans to import this substance as part of a manufacturing process. The purpose is to support research and clinical trial efforts. No other uses of this drug are allowed under this registration. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has stated that only certain business activities are allowed. These must match the rules in 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). The permit does not allow the import of finished drug products for sale, whether approved or not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Registered bulk manufacturers and other applicants of the listed class can send electronic comments or objections about this application. The deadline for comments or to request a hearing is September 22, 2025. Comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Requests for a hearing must be sent to the Drug Enforcement Administration at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152. Requests should be sent to the Hearing Clerk/OALJ, DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, and the DEA Administrator at the same address. The notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Continuus Pharmaceuticals
Continuus Pharmaceuticals Applies to Make Fentanyl for Research Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Continuus Pharmaceuticals has applied to become a registered bulk manufacturer of a controlled drug. The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 21, 2025. The application is for the drug fentanyl. Fentanyl is listed as a Schedule II controlled substance. This means it is tightly regulated. The company is located at 256 West Cummings Park, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801. Continuus Pharmaceuticals plans to make fentanyl in bulk. The drug made is only for research and development. The company is not allowed to do anything else with this drug under this application. The Drug Enforcement Administration, known as the DEA, is handling this application. The public can send comments or objections about the application. People can also ask for a hearing. The deadline to comment or request a hearing is October 20, 2025. All comments must be sent online through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. When you send a comment, you will get a tracking number. Comments may not show up for public view right away. This notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA. The notice was filed with the Federal Register on August 20, 2025. No other activities with fentanyl are allowed under this registration. The only use is for research and development by Continuus Pharmaceuticals. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fiberglass Door Panels From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Sets Preliminary Subsidies on Fiberglass Door Panels from China Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision about fiberglass door panels from China. Officials found these items receive unfair help, called subsidies, from the Chinese government. What Is Being Investigated The investigation looks at fiberglass door panels, including their side panels, known as sidelites. These panels can be finished or unfinished, assembled or unassembled, and can come with other door parts. Only the fiberglass panels and sidelites are included in the investigation. Parts like door handles or locks are not covered. Investigation Timeline This investigation covers products from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The Commerce Department started the investigation on April 15, 2025. It postponed the timeline, and released the preliminary decision on August 18, 2025. Companies and Their Rates Commerce examined two companies: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd.: 71.37% subsidy rate Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd.: 59.17% subsidy rate Several other companies did not answer the Department’s questions. These companies receive a much higher rate: Kits Glass (China) Limited Hebei Charlotte Enterprise Co., Ltd. Lily Industries Co., Ltd. Shanghai Unikey International Trading Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Kuchuan Door Co., Ltd. Zhenshi Group Huamei New Materials Co Ltd. Each of these companies was given a 921.42% subsidy rate. All other companies that were not examined will use an “all others” rate of 62.55%. What Happens Next U.S. Customs will start holding back, or suspending, fiberglass door panel imports from China starting August 21, 2025. Companies must pay cash deposits at the rates above when importing these products. Commerce will double-check its information before making a final decision. The final results will come out by December 30, 2025, unless postponed. How to Respond People or companies interested in this topic can send in written comments. They must follow special rules for submitting comments, including how long the comments can be. If anyone wants a hearing, they must ask within 30 days of this notice. What Is Covered The investigation covers most fiberglass door panels and sidelites from China, even if they are: Assembled or not Painted or not Have glass panels or not Imported with other parts Some products are not included, like certain wood mouldings and float glass products. The items are normally imported under codes like 3925.20.0010, and sometimes under 4418.29.4000, 4418.29.8030, 4418.29.8060, or 7019.90.5150. Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission will decide if the imports hurt U.S. businesses. They will do this after Commerce makes its final decision. For more details, people can find information online at the U.S. Department of Commerce website. This post is based on the official U.S. Federal Register notice dated August 21, 2025 (Federal Register Volume 90, Number 160, Notices: Pages 40818-40821). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Title: Claims Under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act
Department of Justice Seeks Feedback on Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Claim Process Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced that it will be extending its information collection process for claims filed under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. This process is necessary for individuals or households who want compensation because of radiation exposure. The DOJ is asking for public comments about this information collection. The comments will be accepted for 60 days, ending on October 20, 2025. Anyone who wants more information or who would like to make suggestions about the process can contact Jason C. Bougere at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, DC. People providing feedback should focus on four main points: Whether collecting this information is necessary for the Bureau of Justice Statistics to do its job. How accurate the agency’s estimate is about the amount of time and burden this collection will take. How the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information collected can be better. How the burden for people filling out the form can be reduced, maybe using better online systems or technology. This collection is a revision of a previously approved process. It affects individuals or households who need to file claims for compensation. The process is voluntary, but it is required to get the benefit. The DOJ estimates that about 70,000 people will respond. Each person will need about 2.5 hours to complete the form. The forms only need to be filled out once. The total expected time needed by everyone together for the year is 175,000 hours. There are no expected other costs for those responding. For more details or if more information is needed, contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, in Washington, DC. The notice was signed by Darwin Arceo on August 11, 2025. The official notice number for this collection is OMB #1105-0052, and the DOJ Civil Division oversees the process. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
Commerce Department Finds Preliminary Subsidies on Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 20, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a preliminary decision. It found that producers and exporters of polypropylene corrugated boxes from China received countervailable subsidies. The investigation period is January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Investigation Details The case is handled by the International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance. The investigation follows section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The preliminary decision was delayed to August 15, 2025, after an earlier planning notice. What Is Being Investigated The product under review is polypropylene corrugated boxes from China. This covers boxes made from corrugated, fluted, or hollow core polypropylene sheets. Sheets include different types such as twin wall or multi wall. Boxes can be different shapes and sizes. They may include lids, handles, or reinforcing wire. Some may be one piece, two piece, or multi-piece. Printed or plain boxes are included. These products are listed under U.S. tariff code 3923.10.9000. This code is for customs purposes. Scope of Investigation No parties commented on changing the scope of goods covered. The list is the same as first stated in the notice starting the investigation. How the Investigation Was Done Commerce based its method on section 701 of the Act. It looked for financial contributions from authorities that make a benefit and are specific to certain producers, following sections 771(5) of the Act. Some companies did not respond to requests for information. Commerce then used facts available and made negative inferences against those companies, as allowed by section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. Alignment with Antidumping Investigation The final result for this case will be aligned with the final result of the companion less-than-fair-value (antidumping) investigation for these boxes. This alignment was requested by the petitioners. Both final decisions are expected on or before November 10, 2025, unless delayed. Preliminary Subsidy Rates Commerce found that the following Chinese companies received subsidies at a rate of 199.60 percent (ad valorem): Dongguan Jian Xin Plastic Products Jinan Mantis Co Ltd Ningbo Luchen Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Shandong PPKG I&E Co. Ltd. Suzhou Huiyuan Plastic Products Co. All other Chinese companies also received the same rate of 199.60 percent. These rates are based on facts available with adverse inferences. What Happens Next U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of entries of these products coming into the U.S. after this notice date. Importers must deposit cash equal to the subsidy rates listed. Commerce will make its calculations public within five days of this notice. It will consider and correct any timely allegations of major calculation mistakes. Verification and Public Comment Due to lack of cooperation, Commerce will not conduct verification for non-responsive companies or the Government of China. Interested parties can submit written comments within 30 days after this notice. They may also submit rebuttal briefs up to five days later. Briefs must include a table of contents, a table of authorities, and a public summary for each issue. Requests for a hearing must be made within 30 days. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of its findings. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will decide within 120 days of this announcement or 45 days after the final determination if the imports cause injury to U.S. industry. Official Details This determination is issued by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, and follows sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act. For more information, the full memorandum is available at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Further procedural and product scope details are found in Appendix I of the notice. The complete process, background, and findings are also listed in Appendix II. Official contact for more information: Rachel Accorsi or Shane Subler, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-3149 or (202) 482-6241. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 159, August 20, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Adoption and Procedures of the Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariff Inclusions Process
U.S. Expands Steel and Aluminum Tariffs to More Products Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), published a notice adding new products to its steel and aluminum tariffs. This action follows Presidentially issued Proclamations 10895 and 10896, dated February 10, 2025. New Products Covered BIS added 407 new product codes (called HTSUS codes) to the list of items considered steel and aluminum derivative products. These products will now have the steel and aluminum tariffs applied to them, based on the value of the steel or aluminum content inside each product. For 60 other product codes, BIS did not add them at this time because they are part of ongoing investigations. The full list of new HTSUS codes now covered by the tariffs is listed in the annexes of the notice. When This Starts The new duties take effect for products entered for consumption, or taken out of warehouse for consumption, at or after 12:01 a.m. (Eastern Time) on August 18, 2025. What the Notice Changes Adds hundreds of HTSUS codes to the list of steel and aluminum derivative products. Explains that these products are only subject to extra tariffs for the value of their steel or aluminum content. Other parts of the products will keep their usual tariffs. States that products which entered a U.S. foreign trade zone under “privileged foreign status” before August 18, 2025, are covered unless the steel was melted and poured in the U.S. Makes technical corrections to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) to clarify tariffs apply to steel or aluminum content only. Lists which tariff codes are changed and what text changes have been made for legal clarity. How This Was Decided President Biden’s Proclamations in February told the Secretary of Commerce to adjust the tariff schedule and create a process to include more steel and aluminum derivative products. BIS was told to publish any changes in the Federal Register. The first round of submissions for new product inclusions opened on May 1, 2025. BIS reviewed public submissions and decided which products to add. About Tariff Application Steel and aluminum tariffs under these rules will be measured based on the steel or aluminum value in each product, not the entire product value. Extra tariffs on non-steel or non-aluminum parts will still apply. For More Details The legal memoranda and the full list of affected product codes (HTSUS codes) are available at: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/BIS-2025-0023/document Summary Table of Main Actions 407 new product codes added for steel and aluminum tariffs Other tariffs apply to non-steel and non-aluminum parts 60 codes not included due to ongoing investigations Changes effective August 18, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time Technical clarifications to tariff schedule made Contact Robby S. Saunders, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Security, signed the notice on behalf of BIS. The changes are published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 158, pages 40326-40329. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Sets Preliminary Antidumping Duties on Temporary Steel Fencing from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary determination on temporary steel fencing imported from China. Commerce found that temporary steel fencing from China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. This means Chinese companies are selling these products in the U.S. for less than they charge in their own country. Investigation Period The time frame for this investigation is from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products involved include temporary steel fencing. This type of fencing includes temporary steel fence panels and temporary steel fence stands. These are the fences commonly used at construction sites or events. Both complete and unassembled parts are most often made of steel tubing and mesh, and they fit together to create a free-standing fence. Decorative steel fence panels are excluded from this ruling if they meet certain size and design requirements. Scope of Duties Commerce has decided to charge duties, called “cash deposits,” on these products because of their findings. The duties are different for each company, based on how much they were found to be underpricing their goods: Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd.: 187.69% (cash deposit rate 177.15%) Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. (for three unique producers): 136.57% (cash deposit rate 136.57%) Other Companies with Separate Rates: 136.57% (various producers and exporters; see official notice for details) Anping Chengxin Metal Mesh Co., Ltd.: 136.57% (cash deposit rate 126.03%) China-Wide Entity (all other companies not listed above): 187.69% (cash deposit rate 187.69%) These duties apply to the value of the imported products. Critical Circumstances Determination In this case, Commerce also made what is called a “critical circumstances” determination for some exporters. This means that for some companies, the new duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the notice date. This applies to the China-wide entity, and to Shenzhou Yongao Metal Products Co., Ltd./Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd., as well as many companies with separate rates. Separate Rates and Combination Rates Commerce grants certain companies “separate rates” if they can show independence from the Chinese government. Most companies received a rate matching the finding for Shijiazhuang Sd Company Ltd. If a company did not qualify for a separate rate, it gets the higher “China-wide” rate. Suspension of Liquidation Starting from the notice date, U.S. Customs will stop processing the import paperwork (“suspend liquidation”) for these items and will require cash deposits at the rates above. For companies with critical circumstances, this applies to earlier shipments as well. Next Steps Commerce will allow parties to comment and present new arguments. There may be verification of data and possibly a hearing if requested. The final decision could be postponed up to 135 days after this preliminary finding, extending the period during which the duties apply. Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination is also affirmative, the ITC will decide if U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. If so, the duties will become permanent. Details and Further Information Details about what products are included and which companies are affected appear in the official notice and appendices. Commerce’s decision includes a full list of affected exporters and producers, and describes exactly what kinds of panels and stands are covered. Merchandise covered by this order is mainly classified under U.S. tariff code 7308.90.9590 but may also enter under other codes. The U.S. Department of Commerce reminds all interested parties there are procedures for comments, hearings, and filings. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Finds Circumvention of Antidumping Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from China via Thailand Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued a preliminary affirmative determination that imports of seamless oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Thailand, made with steel billets from China, are circumventing existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on OCTG from China. Background Antidumping and countervailing duty orders have been in place against OCTG from China since 2010. These orders are meant to protect U.S. businesses from goods sold at less than fair value and from unfair subsidies. Commerce began a country-wide circumvention inquiry on December 18, 2024. The question: Are OCTG finished in Thailand from Chinese steel billets avoiding the original orders? Three companies in Thailand were selected for review: Boly Pipe Co., Ltd., Nanobest Limited, and Petroleum Equipment (Thailand) Co., Ltd. On April 23, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for its preliminary determination. This notice, along with the full explanation, can be found online through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Scope of Orders The original orders apply to hollow, round steel products, such as oil well casing and tubing. These items can be made of iron or steel, made by seamless or welded methods. They may have different finishes and may meet various specifications. Both finished and unfinished goods are covered. Merchandise Subject to Inquiry This inquiry focuses on seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using steel billets made in China and then exported to the U.S. Methodology Commerce conducted the inquiry using U.S. law (section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930) and relevant regulations. The full details are included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination Commerce found that seamless OCTG finished in Thailand using Chinese steel billets and then shipped to the U.S. are circumventing the original orders from China on a country-wide basis. As a result, this merchandise should be included in the scope of the existing orders. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation and require cash deposits on entries made on or after December 18, 2024. This is only for OCTG from Thailand made with Chinese steel billets. If the merchandise is made with billets from countries other than China, the cash deposit requirements do not apply. Specific case numbers have been created for these products: A-549-991 and C-549-992. Certification Requirements Importers and exporters can submit certifications showing that the merchandise does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. These certifications must be completed and submitted with supporting documents, such as steel mill certificates, at the time of entry. Steel mill certificates must show the country where the steel was melted and poured. If these certifications are not provided, Commerce may require cash deposits at rates established for the AD and CVD orders on China (99.14% for AD, 13.41% for CVD). For companies with specific rates, those rates apply. Both importers and exporters must keep these records for five years after the last covered entry or three years after any related court cases. Certification Process and Timing For entries made between December 18, 2024, and September 3, 2025, importers and exporters must complete and upload certifications no later than October 3, 2025. Blanket certifications can be used for multiple entries. If non-AD or non-CVD entries were made during this period and cannot be certified, importers must submit a Post Summary Correction and pay any required duties. Public Comments Parties may comment on this finding and on certification procedures. Case briefs are due within fourteen days of this notice, with rebuttals due seven days later. Executive summaries are required for each issue and are limited to 450 words per issue. Requests for a hearing must be filed within 30 days of this notice. Hearings, if requested, will be scheduled later. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission of this preliminary determination. The ITC may seek consultations if it believes there is an injury issue within 60 days of notification. Certification Templates Provided The notice includes detailed importer and exporter certification templates. These templates must be filled out with names, addresses, invoice numbers, and documentation showing that the OCTG does not use Chinese-origin steel billets. Conclusion The Department of Commerce is taking steps to ensure that seamless OCTG from Thailand using Chinese steel billets is covered by existing orders against China. Suspension of liquidation and cash deposits are required unless proper certifications are provided. For more details, refer to the Federal Register notice and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Rechargeable Batteries and Components and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to the Last Active Respondents Based on Settlement; Request for Briefing on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Closes Investigation on Rechargeable Batteries After Settlements, Requests Comments on Remedy and Public Interest Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Summary of the Action The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has stopped its investigation against Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC. This follows a settlement agreement between these companies and the complainants, LithiumHub, LLC, Lithiumhub Technologies, LLC, and Martin Koebler. Background of the Case The investigation started on October 21, 2024. It was based on a complaint by LithiumHub. LithiumHub claimed unfair imports of certain rechargeable batteries and their parts, saying these products infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 9,412,994 and 9,954,207. The following companies were named as respondents: Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC, Missouri Clean Republic SODO LLC, Washington MillerTech Energy Solutions LLC, Ohio Shenzhen Fbtech Electronics Ltd., China Shenzhen LiTime Technology Co., China Relion Battery (Shenzhen) Technology Co., China Renogy New Energy Co., Ltd., China RNG International Inc., California Navico Group Americas, LLC, Wisconsin Dragonfly Energy Corp. and Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp., Nevada Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD, China The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also a party to the case. Investigation Actions On February 3, 2025, the Commission found Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD in default. Other companies were terminated from the case earlier because they reached settlements. The last active respondents, Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC, filed a joint motion to settle on July 10, 2025. The administrative law judge (ALJ) approved ending the investigation against them on July 22, 2025. No party objected to this decision. Current Focus: Possible Remedy Against Defaulting Respondent Since all other companies are out of the case, only Shenzhen Yichen S-Power Tech Co. LTD is still facing action. The Commission may issue orders such as: A limited exclusion order (blocking some products from entering the U.S.) A cease and desist order (requiring Shenzhen Yichen to stop certain acts in the U.S.) Request for Public Comments The Commission is now asking for written comments on: What kind of remedy should be issued against the defaulting respondent. How the remedy would affect the public interest, including: Public health and welfare Competition in the U.S. economy U.S. production of similar articles U.S. consumers The amount of the bond that should be set if a remedy is imposed. If the Commission decides on a remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, acting for the President, has 60 days to approve, reject, or take no action. During that time, the products may enter under bond. Instructions for Submission – All initial written submissions and proposed remedial orders are due by close of business on August 28, 2025. – Reply submissions are due by close of business on September 4, 2025. – Submissions must be filed electronically and refer to Investigation No. 337-TA-1421. For confidential submissions, documents should be marked with a header for confidential information. A non-confidential version must also be filed within two business days. Guidance on filing is available at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. Further Information The full record and submissions are available via the USITC’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. Additional queries can be directed to Paul Lall, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, at (202) 205-2043. Authority This action is taken under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and rules in 19 CFR part 210. Issued by order of the Commission on August 14, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Foreign-Fabricated Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Institution
USITC Amends Investigation in Semiconductor Patent Case Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has made an important change in its ongoing investigation into certain foreign-made semiconductor devices and related products. On March 26, 2025, the USITC began an investigation after a complaint was filed by Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Ltd., both based in Dublin, Ireland. The complaint said that some companies were breaking the law by importing and selling products in the U.S. that used certain patented technology without permission. The patents involved are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,745,847; 9,093,473; 9,147,747; 9,184,292; and 9,953,880. The original investigation named several companies as respondents, including Lenovo Group Ltd. (LGL) of Hong Kong S.A.R., China. Other companies named were: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (Taiwan) Apple Inc. (California) Broadcom Inc. (California) Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies Communication Co. (China) Motorola Mobile Communication Technology Ltd. (China) OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co. (China) Qualcomm Inc. (California) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) also joined the investigation. On July 1, 2025, Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. filed a motion with LGL. They asked to replace LGL with six other Lenovo-related companies in the complaint and to end the investigation for LGL. The new Lenovo companies are: Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Lenovo PC International Ltd. Lenovo PC HK Ltd. Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Lenovo Beijing Co., Ltd. Lenovo (United States) Inc. The motion was not opposed by the OUII or any of the other respondents. On July 21, 2025, the administrative law judge agreed to this change. The judge said it was proper to replace LGL with the Lenovo companies and to end the investigation for LGL. The judge found there was good cause for this step. The order said that there were no secret deals between the complainants and LGL, and that making the change would not hurt anyone’s rights or the public interest. It would also save resources for everyone involved. No party asked for a review of the judge’s decision. On August 14, 2025, the USITC decided not to review the judge’s order. This means the complaint and the investigation now include the six Lenovo companies, and Lenovo Group Ltd. is no longer part of the investigation. This decision was made under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. The statement was made official by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on August 14, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Request for Comments and Notice of Public Hearing Concerning China’s Compliance With WTO Commitments
USTR Seeks Public Comments on China’s WTO Compliance Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is asking for public comments about how China is following the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). USTR will use the comments to prepare a report for Congress. This happens every year. People can also ask to speak at a public hearing. Key Dates The deadline for sending comments, requests to testify, and summaries of testimony is September 24, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. The public hearing will be on October 7, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. EDT. How to Send Comments USTR wants people to send comments online through www.regulations.gov. Use Docket Number USTR-2025-0015 to find the correct place to submit. If online submission is not possible, contact Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China Affairs, before the deadline at 202.395.9625 or by email. Information to Include Comments or testimony should talk about China’s promises as a WTO member. These areas include: A. Trading rights B. Import rules (such as tariffs, quotas, and licenses) C. Export rules D. Internal trade policies (including subsidies, standards, taxes, and government procurement) E. Intellectual property rights F. Services G. Rule of law (such as transparency and legal reform) H. Other WTO commitments USTR also wants to hear about any unresolved issues. About the Hearing To speak at the hearing, people must send a request and a summary of their talk by the deadline. Each speaker has up to five minutes. No business confidential information should be shared in oral testimony. Small businesses, or groups representing small businesses, should say so in their comments. Written Submission Rules Send comments by September 24, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. Write in English. Keep submissions to 30 single-spaced, letter-size pages in 12-point font. Include: (1) 2025 China WTO Compliance Report, (2) organization’s name, and (3) type of submission (“written comment,” “request to testify,” or “summary of written testimony”). Do not send attachments or cover letters as separate files. All content should be in one file. After submitting, a tracking number will be given. Keep this number. If Submitting Business Confidential Information Clearly mark each page containing business confidential information as “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL.” The file name for confidential submissions must start with “BCI.” Also send a public version labeled “P.” USTR will not share business confidential information with the public. Viewing Comments All non-confidential submissions can be viewed by the public online at www.regulations.gov, using Docket Number USTR-2025-0015. Contact Information Questions or requests for alternative submission methods should be sent to Alex Martin, Deputy Director for China Affairs, at 202.395.9625. General Information More on the USTR can be found at www.ustr.gov. Published by: Edward Marcus, Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative Federal Register, August 18, 2025 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Exercise Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and a Limited Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Exclusion Orders on Exercise Equipment Patents Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On August 14, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (the Commission) announced new actions regarding certain exercise equipment and their subassemblies. Patent Infringement Determined The investigation, started on September 27, 2024, followed a complaint by Balanced Body, Inc. of Sacramento, California. The complaint said that some companies brought products into the U.S. that infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,721,511 (“the ‘511 patent”), U.S. Patent No. D659,208 (“the D’208 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. D659,205 (“the D’205 patent”). The companies named in the case were: Guangzhou Oasis, LLC d/b/a trysauna.com (Trysauna) Ciga Pilates of Hong Kong Shandong Tmax Machinery Technology Co. Ltd. (Tmax) Shandong VOG Sports Products Co. Ltd. (VOG Sports) Dezhou Bodi Fitness Equipment Co., Ltd. (Dezhou) Suzhou Selfcipline Sports Goods Co., Ltd. (Selfcipline) Results of the Investigation Ciga Pilates was removed from the investigation after the complaint was withdrawn against it. The remaining companies—Trysauna, Tmax, VOG Sports, Dezhou, and Selfcipline—did not respond and were found in default. The investigation later only focused on claim 1 and claim 19 of the ‘511 patent, and the claims of the D’205 and D’208 patents. The Commission found that VOG Sports, Dezhou, and Selfcipline imported products infringing claim 1 of the ‘511 patent and the claim of the D’208 patent. It was also found that the needed domestic industry exists in the U.S. Commission Remedies The Commission decided that the correct remedies are: A General Exclusion Order (GEO) that bans all imports infringing claim 1 of the ‘511 patent or the claim of the D’208 patent. A Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) that bans imports of products infringing: claim 19 of the ‘511 patent as to VOG Sports, Dezhou, Selfcipline, and Tmax the claim of the D’205 patent as to Trysauna, VOG Sports, Dezhou, Selfcipline, and Tmax This ban applies to imports by or on behalf of these respondents. Public Interest and Bond The Commission reviewed public interest issues as required by law. No responses were filed by the public. The Commission found that issuing these orders does not go against the public interest. Also, a bond of 100% of the value of the imported products covered by the orders must be posted during the presidential review period. End of Investigation With these orders, the investigation is now closed. The Commission’s actions are based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Additional Information The vote took place on August 11, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Z-Wave Alliance, Inc.
Notice of Changes in Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. Membership Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division has published a notice about the Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. This was released in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. On June 18, 2025, Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. sent written notifications. These were sent to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The notifications were sent as required by the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notice is for changes in the members of the Z-Wave Alliance. These changes help limit antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under certain rules. The new companies joining as members are: Copeland Comfort Control LP, St. Louis, AL Saya Life Inc, Los Angeles, CA Hubbell Incorporated, Shelton, CT Shenzhen iSurpass Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA HELTUN Inc., Yerevan, REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA RYSE Inc., Toronto, CANADA FireAvert, LLC, Springville, UT The companies leaving as members are: Canny Electrics, Melbourne, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Nexa Trading AB, Askim, KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Shenzhen Longzhiyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA There have been no other changes to the membership or plans of the Z-Wave Alliance. Membership remains open. Z-Wave Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes again. The Z-Wave Alliance first registered with the Department of Justice on November 19, 2020. This was also shown in a Federal Register notice on December 1, 2020 (85 FR 77241). The last change was filed on March 14, 2025. That change was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16701). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-OPENGMSL ASSOCIATION
OpenGMSL Association Files Antitrust Notification Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 30, 2025, the OpenGMSL Association filed a notice with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The Act allows certain groups to work together on research and production. When they file these notices, their risk for some antitrust damages is limited. The OpenGMSL Association is a group of companies working together. The listed members are: Aptiv, Warren, OH Coilcraft, Cary, IL indie, Aliso Viejo, CA Denso Corporation, Aichi, JAPAN Ethernovia, Inc., San Jose, CA GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Malta, NY Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, GERMANY Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co.KG, Fridolfing, GERMANY TZ Electronic Systems GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, GERMANY Analog Devices Inc., Wilmington, MA Granite River Labs, Santa Clara, CA Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, CA Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation, Atsugi, JAPAN The OpenGMSL Association has several goals. First, it plans to make the GMSL (Gigabit Multimedia Serial Link) technology a worldwide standard. This technology helps send video and data using SerDes transmission. Second, it will keep GMSL and its versions—GMSL2 and GMSL3—compatible for easier use. Third, it wants to keep making GMSL better to support video and data link markets around the world. Fourth, it may use these technologies in other industries if allowed by its Board of Directors. Fifth, it will do other actions that help with these goals. Membership in the OpenGMSL Association is still open. The Association will report changes in members as needed. This notice was provided by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. The record was published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Changes Membership Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On July 3, 2025, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (CableLabs) filed a notification with the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. CableLabs announced that CableVideo Digital S.A., from Buenos Aires, Argentina, has been terminated as a member of its organization. CableLabs gave this notice to extend special legal protections under the Act. These protections can limit the amount of money antitrust plaintiffs may recover to just actual damages under certain situations. There were no other changes to CableLabs’ membership. There were also no new plans or activities announced for the group. Membership in CableLabs is still open. CableLabs will continue to tell the government about any changes to its membership. CableLabs filed its first notice on August 8, 1988. A notice was published in the Federal Register on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593). The last notification before this one was filed on March 20, 2025. That notice was published on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16705). This notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division. The federal register number for this notice is 2025-15372. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.
Department of Justice Updates on PXI Systems Alliance Membership Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On July 8, 2025, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed notifications with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The filing shows there have been changes in the group’s membership. Sigma Advanced Systems Private Limited, based in Telangana, Republic of India, has been added as a new member. Three companies have left the group. They are Stelight Instrument Co., Ltd., from Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; Power Value Technologies Co., Ltd., from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; and JX Instrumentation, also from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. There have been no other changes in either the membership or the planned work of the group research project. Membership in this research group remains open. PXI Systems Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes. The original notification for PXI Systems Alliance was filed on November 22, 2000. The Department of Justice published it in the Federal Register on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971). The most recent notification before this was filed on April 15, 2025. That was published in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24669). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations from the Antitrust Division, confirmed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Training & Readiness Accelerator II
Notice Issued for Training & Readiness Accelerator II by Department of Justice Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 13, 2025, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division posted a notice about the Training & Readiness Accelerator II (TReX II) group. This was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154. This notice was filed under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, which is also called the Act. TReX II filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission showing changes in its membership. These notifications are meant to limit antitrust plaintiffs’ recovery to actual damages only, under certain conditions. New Members Added The document lists new members added to the TReX II group. Some of them are: Infiltron Software Suite LLC, Warner Robins, GA Space Information Laboratories LLC, Santa Maria, CA Duality Robotics, Inc., San Mateo, CA Recon RF, Inc., San Diego, CA Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., Honolulu, HI Bluedrop USA, Inc., Orlando, FL Data Squared USA, Inc., Wilmington, DE Other new members include companies from several states such as California, Florida, Maryland, Alabama, Missouri, New York, Michigan, and more. Parties Withdrawn Several companies have withdrawn from TReX II. Some of these are: Integrated Consultants, Inc., San Diego, CA JackTech LLC, Washington, DC JIRACOR LLC, Orlando, FL Open Source Systems LLC, Suwanee, GA Terida LLC, Pinehurst, NC Symbiosis.io LLC, Smyrna, GA Other withdrawn members are from locations like Virginia, Georgia, Ohio, Massachusetts, California, Texas, and more. No Further Changes There are no other changes to either the membership or the planned activities of the research group. The group’s membership remains open. TReX II plans to continue filing notifications about any membership changes. Past Notifications TReX II filed its first notification about its group on February 17, 2023. The Department of Justice posted a related notice on June 13, 2023. The most recent notification before this one was filed on February 7, 2025, and appeared in the Federal Register on March 7, 2025. Summary This official notice documents the latest changes in the Training & Readiness Accelerator II group’s membership. It also confirms the procedures used for antitrust law protections under the Act. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, issued this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
IEEE Updates Standards Activities Under Federal Antitrust Law Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On June 24, 2025, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This filing was made under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The purpose of this notice is to extend the Act’s provisions. These provisions limit the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under some circumstances. According to the notification, 57 new standards have been started. In addition, 20 existing standards are being revised. More information about these new and revised standards can be found at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/28may2025/ and https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/19jun2025/. There are also new or renewed pre-standards activities related to IEEE Industry Connections Activities. Details are at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/bog/cag/approvals/june202/. IEEE first filed a notification under the Act on September 17, 2004. The Department of Justice published a notice about that on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). The last notification before this one was filed with the Department on April 10, 2025. A notice about that was published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2025 (90 FR 17079). Suzanne Morris is the Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025-15381 Filed 8-12-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas
Department of Justice Releases Notice on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas Membership Changes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice has issued a notice about the Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154, dated Wednesday, August 13, 2025. The notification comes under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. On June 18, 2025, the Southwest Research Institute–Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (called “RIC-Americas”) sent updates about its membership to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Two new organizations were added to the group. These are Edison Welding Institute in Columbus, Ohio, and Zachry Corporation in San Antonio, Texas. At the same time, Tormach, Inc., from Madison, Wisconsin, has withdrawn as a party to this research group. No other changes have been made in the group’s membership or activities. The group’s membership is still open. RIC-Americas will continue to file written updates about any new membership changes. RIC-Americas first filed for coverage under this Act on April 30, 2014. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register on June 9, 2014, about this filing. The last update was sent to the Department on August 29, 2023. A notice for that update appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 2023. This current notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division. For more details, see Federal Register document number 2025-15382. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Float Glass Products From China and Malaysia; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
U.S. to Investigate Imports of Float Glass from China and Malaysia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the schedule for the final phase of its investigation into float glass products imported from China and Malaysia. The investigation will determine if these imports are harming the U.S. industry or threatening to harm it in the future. What Products Are Being Investigated The investigation covers float glass products made by floating molten glass over a bath of tin, cooling it, and then cutting it to size. These products must be at least 2.0 mm thick and have a surface area of at least 0.37 square meters. They can be clear, colored, or coated, such as Low-E glass or mirror stock. Some glass used in shower doors, laminated glass, insulating glass units, and LED mirrors are also included. Glass is still covered even if further worked—such as cut, drilled, or curved—as long as it meets original standards and is first made in China or Malaysia. What Products Are Not Included Certain kinds of glass are not included. These exclusions are: Wired glass, greenhouse glass, and patterned solar glass Safety glass for vehicles Vacuum insulating glass units Framed mirrors without LEDs Unframed over-the-door mirrors ready for use Smaller washing machine lid glass Some solar glass with specific features Metal-camed glass if the parts are already excluded Any glass covered by other existing trade orders, such as aluminum extrusions from China Background and Rules The U.S. Department of Commerce had made preliminary findings that float glass from China and Malaysia was subsidized and sold below fair value. The petitions for the investigation were filed by Vitro Flat Glass, LLC and Vitro Meadville Flat Glass, LLC. To take part as a party in the investigation’s final phase, a notice of appearance must be filed no later than 21 days before the hearing. Services and document submissions are handled electronically. Certain information in the investigation may be confidential and handled under a protective order. Parties who had access before do not need to reapply. Key Dates to Know The prehearing staff report will be placed in the record on November 10, 2025; a public version will come later. The main hearing will be at 9:30 a.m. on November 25, 2025. Requests to appear must be made by November 19, 2025. Remote testimony is allowed under specific circumstances. Prehearing briefs are due by November 18, 2025. Posthearing briefs and written public statements are due by December 2, 2025. Final comments from parties are due December 18, 2025. All filings must be electronic. Paper copies are not accepted at this time. How to Participate Anyone can submit written statements, even if not a party to the investigation. Any submissions must follow the detailed Commission rules. Documents must be served to all parties, with proof of service filed. Submissions that do not meet requirements will not be accepted. Authority The investigation is being conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice. Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 154 (August 13, 2025), Notice 2025-15343. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Active Anode Material From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
USITC Schedules Final Phase of Investigations Into Active Anode Material Imports From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a notice about the final phase of investigations into imports of active anode material from China. These investigations cover both antidumping and countervailing duties. The aim is to decide if U.S. industries have been harmed or threatened by these imported materials. The case concerns active anode material, which is an anode-grade graphite material with at least 90% carbon by weight. It can be synthetic, natural, or blended graphite. It is included whether or not it has a coating. The material can come as powder, dry, liquid, or block. It is usually up to 80 microns in powder form. It must have an energy density of 330 milliamp hours per gram or more and graphitization of at least 80%. The product counts as active anode material even if mixed with silicon-based materials like silicon-oxide, silicon-carbon, or silicon, or with additives such as carbon black or nanotubes. It does not matter if it is imported alone, as part of a compound, in a battery, as a component of an anode slurry, or within a subassembly such as an electrode. But only the anode-grade graphite is covered in these cases. The Department of Commerce already made preliminary findings that some manufacturers, producers, or exporters in China are getting subsidies, and the material is being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The investigation began after petitions were filed on December 18, 2024, by the American Active Anode Material Producers. Its members are Anovion Technologies (Sanborn, NY), Syrah Technologies LLC (Vidalia, LA), NOVONIX Anode Materials LLC (Chattanooga, TN), Epsilon Advanced Materials (Leland, NC), and SKI US, Inc. (Marietta, GA). The schedule for the final phase is as follows: A staff report will go on the nonpublic record on November 14, 2025. A public version will come out after that. A hearing is set for December 4, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at the hearing are due by November 24, 2025. A prehearing conference is set for December 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Written testimony for the hearing is due by noon on December 3, 2025. Prehearing briefs are due by November 21, 2025. Posthearing briefs are due by December 11, 2025. Final comments may be submitted by December 31, 2025. Only electronic filings will be accepted. Submissions must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No in-person paper filings are allowed until further notice. Business proprietary information (BPI) will be shared only with authorized applicants under an administrative protective order (APO). Applications for access must be made at least 21 days before the hearing date. All filings must follow the Commission’s rules. Parties and their representatives must be listed in a public service list, which the Secretary to the Commission will maintain. Each document must be served to all other parties with a certificate of service. Further details on hearing rules, participation as a nonparty, and filing procedures are provided on the USITC’s website at https://www.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on August 11, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.