US Investigates Imports of Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China and India Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the final phase scheduling of its investigation into imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India. This case looks at whether the U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports, which are thought to be sold at less-than-fair-value and subsidized. What Products Are Being Investigated? The products involved are helically-wound, overhead door counterbalance torsion steel springs. These springs usually have attached cones, plugs, or other fittings for mounting or making torque. The springs are used to lift and lower overhead doors, such as garage doors and warehouse doors. The springs covered must have: Coil inside diameter between 15.8 mm and 304.8 mm Wire diameter from 2.5 mm to 20.4 mm Length of at least 127 mm All wire types, shapes, and coatings are included. Springs with different winding orientations or end types are also included, as well as springs fitted with hardware like fasteners and cones. What Is Not Included? The following items are not under investigation: Leaf springs Disc springs Extension springs Compression springs Spiral springs Kits and Third-Country Processing If torsion springs and their fittings are shipped as part of overhead door kits, mounting kits, spring-operated or winder assemblies, they are included in the scope. If they undergo minor changes in another country before coming to the U.S., they are still covered. Background of the Investigation The investigation follows a petition filed on October 29, 2024, by three companies: IDC Group, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota) Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc. (Adel, Iowa) Service Spring Corp. (Maumee, Ohio) The Department of Commerce found that these products from China and India may be subsidized and sold below fair value in the U.S. This led to the USITC starting its investigation as required by the Tariff Act of 1930. Important Dates and Procedures The prehearing staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 7, 2025. The public hearing is set for August 21, 2025, starting at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at the hearing must be filed by August 15, 2025. Written testimony and presentation slides are due by noon on August 20, 2025. Prehearing briefs must be filed by August 14, 2025; posthearing briefs and public written statements by August 28, 2025. The Commission will share new information on September 9, 2025, allowing parties to comment by September 11, 2025. All official filings must be made electronically via the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings will be accepted for now. Participation and Hearing Details Any party, including companies and consumer organizations, wishing to take part in the investigation must file an appearance. To get access to business proprietary information, parties must apply at least 21 days before the hearing. There are also specific rules for submitting hearing requests for remote testimony. Nonparties can ask to make short statements during the public hearing. Written submissions must follow detailed rules, especially if they contain confidential information. Contact Information For more details, contact Peter Stebbins at (202) 205-2039, Office of Investigations, USITC. Additional information and all documents are available online at https://www.usitc.gov and https://edis.usitc.gov. Issued by the USITC This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on June 6, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Department of Justice Proposes Consent Decree for Idaho Mine Cleanup Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 3, 2025, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. This filing is part of a lawsuit called United States, et al. v. Nu-West Mining Inc. and Nu-West Industries, Inc., Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-00287-AKB. The case involves claims made by the United States under Sections 106 and 113(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund. The Superfund law deals with cleaning up hazardous waste sites. Claims are also made by the State of Idaho and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. The case focuses on the East Mill Dump Sub-Operable Unit (EMDSOU) at the North Maybe Mine Site in Idaho. The Consent Decree would resolve the government’s claims against the companies. The Decree would also resolve claims by Idaho and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes under CERCLA Section 107 and 113(g)(2) for recovery of costs spent to address hazardous waste. According to the Consent Decree, the companies will perform cleanup activities at the EMDSOU. These actions are to follow the September 1, 2022, Interim Record of Decision. The companies must also pay for oversight costs to the State of Idaho, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. In return, the United States will not sue the companies under Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA for the work agreed upon in the Consent Decree. The State and the Tribes will also not sue or take action under Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, the Idaho Environmental Protection & Health Act, the Hazardous Waste Management Act of 1983, and the Idaho Water Quality Act. The companies give the United States similar promises about not suing. The public can comment on the Consent Decree. Comments must be sent no later than thirty days after June 10, 2025. Comments should be sent to the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division. Comments can be submitted by email or by mail. By email: “#{email}” By mail: Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611 Written comments may be included in the public court docket. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree is available for review and download at: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees If assistance is needed to access the Consent Decree, requests can be made via the same email or mailing addresses provided. Signed, Kathryn C. Macdonald Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From China
US Maintains Duties on Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 4, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) issued a determination about malleable iron pipe fittings from China. The USITC decided that ending the antidumping duty order on these products from China would likely cause harm again to U.S. industries. This decision was made under the Tariff Act of 1930. The purpose of the review was to see if taking away the duties would hurt the U.S. industry within a short amount of time. After looking at the official records, the Commission decided that removing the duties would probably lead to new problems for American businesses making these products. The review officially started on November 1, 2024. The Commission decided on February 4, 2025, to have an expedited review, meaning the process would move faster than usual. The notice of expedited review was published on March 7, 2025. All details about the decision are included in USITC Publication 5633, published in June 2025. The publication is titled “Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1021 (Fourth Review).” Lisa Barton, the Secretary to the Commission, issued the order. The details are available in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 110, published on June 10, 2025. The antidumping duty order will therefore remain in place to protect the U.S. industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board
NIST Announces Open Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board Meeting Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has scheduled an open meeting of the Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board (ISPAB). This meeting will be held virtually. The dates are Wednesday, July 16, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time and Thursday, July 17, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The ISPAB is organized by NIST, part of the Department of Commerce. The Board gives advice about information security and privacy. The Board follows the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. It reports to the Director of NIST and gives yearly reports to the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of the National Security Agency, and Congress. The Board works under 15 U.S.C. 278g-4. It helps find new issues in information security and privacy. The main purpose of the meeting is to discuss and make recommendations on information security and privacy topics. The full agenda will be posted on the NIST website: https://csrc.nist.gov/Events/2025/ispab-july-2025-meeting. The expected meeting topics include: Board Introductions and Member Activities Annual Ethics Briefing for Board Members by a Department of Commerce Ethics Attorney Update from NIST’s Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) Director on ITL Activities Briefing on NIST’s Work in Digital Ledger Technologies Update on NIST Post Quantum Cryptographic Guidance Briefing on Department of Defense’s Software Fast Track (SWFT) Initiative Updates from NIST’s Computer Security Division Updates from NIST’s Applied Security Division Public Comments Board Discussions and Recommendations Members of the public and organizations can request to speak at the meeting. Around thirty minutes will be set aside for public comments. Speaking slots are given on a first-come, first-serve basis. Each speaker will likely have about five minutes. The time may change based on the number of requests. Questions from the public will not be taken during this time. People who want to share more, people who were not able to speak, or those who could not attend, may send written statements by email. All attendees must register to join the webinar. To register, participants must give their first and last name, email address, and company name. Registration must be completed through the link at https://csrc.nist.gov/Events/2025/ispab-july-2025-meeting by 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday, July 14, 2025. For more information, contact Jeff Brewer, ISPAB Designated Federal Official, NIST, at (301) 975-2489 or by email. Alicia ChambersNIST Executive Secretariat Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
Notice: Public Meeting of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Board of Overseers Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced an open meeting of the Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The meeting will take place on Wednesday, June 25, 2025. It will start at 11 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. Eastern Time. The meeting will be held virtually through a webinar. The Board of Overseers will review and discuss improvements to the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Board will also give recommendations to the Director of NIST if needed. The agenda for the meeting will include several topics. These are: Baldrige Program Update Baldrige Foundation Update Judges Panel Update Ethics Review Alliance for Performance Excellence Update Communities of Excellence Update New Business/Public Comment The Board is made up of about six members. These members are leaders in the field of organizational performance excellence. They are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce. Their role is to make an annual report on the Award’s activities and give suggestions for improving the Award process. The Board members understand issues in quality, performance improvement, and competition. They represent different industries, including U.S. service, manufacturing, nonprofit, education, and healthcare industries. The meeting is open to the public. People who want to give comments or suggestions can request a place on the agenda. About thirty minutes will be set aside for public comments. Speaking time will be around three minutes per person. People will be chosen on a first-come, first-served basis. The exact time for public comments will be in the final agenda, posted online at: https://www.nist.gov/baldrige/community/overseers.cfm. To request a speaking spot, send an email to Robyn Decker at [email address protected] by 4 p.m. Eastern Time on June 20, 2025. People may also send written comments if they cannot speak during the meeting or were not able to attend. Written statements can be sent by email to [email address protected] at any time. Anyone who wants to attend must pre-register. Send your name, email, and phone number to Mrs. Robyn Decker by email at [email address protected], or by mail to NIST c/o Robyn Decker, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 1020, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. You may also call 301-975-2361. All requests to attend must be received by 4 p.m. Eastern Time on June 17, 2025. If you need special accommodations to attend the meeting, contact [email address protected] by June 17, 2025, so arrangements can be made. For more details, contact Robert Fangmeyer, Director, Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1020, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-1020. Phone: 301-975-2361. The official notice was issued by Alicia Chambers, NIST Executive Secretariat. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Adds Tao Motor as Respondent in Self-Balancing Vehicle Patent Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 4, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) officially decided not to review an initial determination made by the presiding administrative law judge. This decision grants a motion to amend a complaint by adding Zhejiang TaoTao Vehicles Co., Ltd. (Tao Motor) as a new respondent in an ongoing investigation. The investigation, known as No. 337-TA-1440, began on February 26, 2025. The complaint was filed by Razor USA LLC of Cerritos, California, and Shane Chen of Camas, Washington. These parties claim there are violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. They allege certain motorized self-balancing vehicles imported into the United States infringe on their patents. The patents in question are U.S. Patent No. RE46,964; U.S. Patent No. RE49,608; and U.S. Patent No. D739,906. The complaint states that an industry related to these patents exists or is being established in the United States, as required by law. The Commission’s initial notice named five respondents: Golabs Inc. d/b/a Gotrax of Carrollton, Texas, Dongguan Saibotan Nengyuan Keji Co., Ltd. d/b/a “Gyroor US,” Guangdong, China, Gyroor Technology (CHINA) Co., Ltd. d/b/a Gyroor, Guangdong, China, Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Gyroor, Guangdong, China, Unicorn Network, LLC. d/b/a Sisigad of Dover, Delaware. Respondent Sisigad was previously found in default on April 16, 2025. This was not reviewed by the Commission. On April 30, 2025, the complainants asked to amend the complaint. They wanted to add Tao Motor of Lishui City, China, as a new respondent. They stated there was good cause, and that doing so would not harm any party or affect public interest. On May 13, 2025, the administrative law judge found good cause to add Tao Motor as a respondent. The judge confirmed adding Tao Motor would not cause harm to other parties or the public interest. No petitions to review this decision were filed. The Commission voted on June 3, 2025, to leave the decision unchanged. Tao Motor is now officially added as a respondent in the ongoing patent case. The authority for this action comes from Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. It also follows the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. This decision was announced by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The official document is Federal Register No. 2025-10393. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Corrosion Inhibitors From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2023-2024
U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Corrosion Inhibitors from China for 2023-2024 Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the final results of its administrative review regarding antidumping duties on certain corrosion inhibitors from China for the period of March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Background The review was first published on January 2, 2025. It covers two main producers and exporters: Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd. (ATC), including Jiangsu Trust Chem Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Trust Chem Co., Ltd., treated as a single entity, and Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. (Botao). The review also included Gold Chemical Limited, a separate rate applicant. The review period was delayed by 90 days, making July 8, 2025, the deadline for the final results. Companies and Results Commerce determined that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins apply for entries during the review period: Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (percent) Anhui Trust Chem Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Trust Chem Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Trust Chem Co., Ltd. (treated jointly as ATC) 128.88 Nantong Botao Chemical Co., Ltd. 128.54 Gold Chemical Limited (separate rate applicant) 128.76 China-Wide Entity The China-wide entity was not under review since no parties requested a review and Commerce did not self-initiate. The rate for the China-wide entity remains 241.02 percent. Changes and Analysis Commerce considered comments from interested parties and made changes to the final results, explained in the detailed Issues and Decision Memorandum, available via the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. Assessment Rates U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess antidumping duties on all relevant entries. Instructions for assessments will be issued no earlier than 35 days after this notice is published. If a timely summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, instructions may be delayed for up to 90 days. Where companies did not report the entered value, CBP will use a per-unit duty assessment rate. If an importer’s rate is less than 0.5 percent, their entries will not be subject to duties. Sales not reported by ATC or Botao will be assessed at the China-wide rate. Non-selected separate rate applicants will be assessed the average of the rates for ATC and Botao. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit rates take effect for shipments entered, or withdrawn for consumption, after the publication date: Reviewed companies receive the rates shown above. Companies with previously established separate rates keep their last rate. All Chinese exporters without a separate rate receive the China-wide rate of 241.02 percent. Non-Chinese exporters without their own rate receive the rate of the Chinese supplier. These requirements remain until further notice. Reminders for Importers Importers must file certificates regarding reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties. Failure to comply may result in double duties or duties increased by the amount of countervailing duties. Administrative Protective Order Parties under an administrative protective order must return or destroy proprietary information according to U.S. regulations. Failure to comply is a violation. Official Notification This notice is issued under U.S. law sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1), and specific regulations. For more details, the public may access the full Issues and Decision Memorandum, which includes discussion on surrogate financial ratios, surrogate values for sodium nitrite and labor rates, and customs liquidation instructions. Dated: May 29, 2025 Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Vanillin From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Vanillin From China Is Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final decision about vanillin from China. The Department found that vanillin from China is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. Investigation Period The period of investigation was from October 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Key Details This decision follows a preliminary decision published on January 16, 2025. The final decision includes findings after verifying the sales and production records from Jiangxi Brother Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Standard verification methods were used. These included checking business and accounting records and other original documents provided by Jiangxi Brother. Scope of the Case Vanillin covered by this case includes: Natural vanillin Synthetic vanillin Bio-sourced synthetic vanillin (biovanillin) Ethylvanillin It includes all forms, regardless of purity, particle size, or physical form. The covered vanillin falls under U.S. tariff codes 2912.41.0000 and 2912.42.0000. The relevant Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers are 121-33-5 and 121-32-4. Final Rates Set The Department assigned the following final dumping rates for vanillin from China, for the period investigated: Exporter Producer Dumping Margin (%) Cash Deposit Rate (%) Jiangxi Brother Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Jiangxi Brother Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Chongqing Thrive Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. Chongqing Thrive Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 HongKong Wictive Merchants Co., Ltd. Kunshan Asia Aroma Corp., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Kunshan Asia Aroma Corp., Ltd. Kunshan Asia Aroma Corp., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Mianyang Sunshine Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Mianyang Sunshine Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Shanghai Fuxin Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Shenzhen Siyomicro Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Siyomicro Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Wuxi Lotus Essence Co., Ltd. Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 Xiamen Bestally Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Xiamen Oamic Biotech Co., Ltd. 190.20 190.15 China-Wide Entity — 379.87* 379.82* * The China-Wide Entity rate is based on facts available and uses adverse inferences. Separate Rates and Combination Rates The Department evaluated requests for separate rates and combination rates. No changes were made since the preliminary determination regarding separate rate status. Combination rates were calculated for companies eligible for separate rates, following Department Policy Bulletin 05.1. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to suspend the liquidation for all covered entries of vanillin from China that were entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after January 16, 2025. These instructions will stay in effect until further notice. Cash deposits are required at the rates listed above for each producer/exporter combination. For other Chinese producers/exporters not listed, the rate for the China-Wide Entity will apply. For third-country exporters not listed, the rate for the supplier, or, if needed, the China-Wide rate applies. Adjustment for Export Subsidies The Department will adjust the final duty rates by export subsidy rates as needed. If both dumping and subsidy findings are confirmed, the deposit rate will be lowered by the export subsidy amount. Next Steps The Department has sent its decision to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC must decide if the domestic U.S. industry has been injured by vanillin imports from China. The ITC has 45 days to make this decision. If the ITC finds no injury or threat, the investigation ends and cash deposits will be returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department will issue an antidumping order and duties will be collected. This notice was published on June 6, 2025. Legal Reference The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Citations and Reference Information The full legal title is “Vanillin From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value.” Federal Register Volume 90, Number 108 (Friday, June 6, 2025), pages 24093-24095. For more details, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum linked at here. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Vanillin From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Countervailable Subsidies for Vanillin from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final affirmative determination in its investigation of vanillin from the People’s Republic of China. This means that the Department found producers and exporters in China received unfair financial help, called countervailable subsidies. Investigation Details The investigation focused on one company, Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (Guihua). The period of investigation was from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The Department used their normal procedures to check information given by Guihua and used official documents during the process. Scope of the Investigation The products in this investigation include all types of vanillin from China. This covers natural vanillin, synthetic vanillin, bio-sourced vanillin (biovanillin), and ethylvanillin. These are chemical compounds used as flavorings. Vanillin under this investigation has Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers 121-33-5 or 121-32-4. It must fall under U.S. tariff codes 2912.41.0000 and 2912.42.0000, regardless of its purity, particle size, or physical form. No changes were made to the scope after the preliminary findings. Subsidy Programs and Methodology Commerce examined many programs to see if they gave a financial advantage to Chinese companies. If a program had a financial contribution by the government, gave a benefit, and was specific, it was seen as a subsidy. Changes were made since the preliminary determination, especially in how Commerce calculated the costs for caustic soda, sulfuric acid, and hydrogen peroxide. The details about these changes and the full list of issues discussed are included in the official Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Subsidy Rates The Department found that Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. benefited from subsidies at a rate of 42.10 percent ad valorem. All other producers and exporters of vanillin in China received the same rate of 42.10 percent. Suspension of Liquidation Customs and Border Protection was directed to collect cash deposits and suspend liquidation (final processing) of imported vanillin from China entered into the United States from November 18, 2024, to March 17, 2025. Entries on or after March 18, 2025, were not suspended, but suspension would start again if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final positive injury decision. If the ITC finds injury to the U.S. vanillin industry, Commerce will order permanent suspension and collect countervailing duties based on the rates listed. If the ITC says there is no injury, all collected deposits will be refunded or cancelled. Next Steps The ITC has up to 45 days to decide if the U.S. vanillin industry is injured by these imports. If injury is found, final duties will be collected. If not, the investigation ends and deposits are refunded. For more information and full legal details, the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available online via the Department of Commerce’s website. Summary The U.S. government has officially found that Chinese vanillin producers, especially Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., benefited from unfair subsidies in 2023. A final duty rate of 42.10 percent has been set for all Chinese exporters of vanillin if the ITC confirms injury to U.S. industry. The process now awaits the ITC’s injury decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Extension/Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form (Form EOIR-58)
Department of Justice Requests Comments on Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) of the Department of Justice (DOJ) has released a notice about the Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form, known as Form EOIR-58. EOIR plans to submit this information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This submission is part of the review process required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Department is encouraging public comments on this collection until August 4, 2025. People can comment on the following points: Is the form needed for the work of the agency? Is the estimate of the time to complete the form accurate? Is the information collected clear and useful? Can the burden on people filling out the form be reduced by using technology? What Does the Form Do? Section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prohibits job discrimination based on citizenship or national origin. It also prohibits employers from taking action against someone for using their rights, or from asking workers for more or different documents than needed in a way that leads to discrimination. People who think their rights were violated can file a charge with the DOJ Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER). IER has 120 days to decide whether to file a complaint with the EOIR Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO). If IER does not file, the person can file their own complaint with OCAHO using Form EOIR-58. Changes to the Form The DOJ is making updates to the form and instructions. Changes are non-substantive and aim to improve clarity, formatting, and grammar. The IER mailing address has been updated. The Privacy Act notice now mentions OCAHO’s System of Record Notice (SORN). The estimated time to complete the form has been revised. The instructions now explain differences between filing by mail and electronically, in preparation for expanded electronic filing options. Who Uses the Form? The people who use this form are individuals who want to report unfair immigration-related job practices under INA section 274B. Filling out the form is voluntary. People may also submit a complaint in writing if it meets the requirements in 28 CFR 68.7. Burden Estimates Estimated number of respondents yearly: 38 Estimated time to complete the form: 1 hour each Total annual burden: 38 hours Cost Estimates No filing fees for Form EOIR-58 Printing cost: About $15.00 per response (5 copies, average 150 pages at 10 cents per page) Postage cost (Priority Mail): About $10.10 per response Attorney cost if legal help is used: Average attorney wage is $72.67 per hour (according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) Maximum total estimated cost to the public: $3,715.26 (($15.00 + $10.10 + $72.67) x 38 responses) People who submit the form by email will not have printing or mailing costs. Most people send the form to OCAHO by U.S. mail. EOIR is working to fully implement electronic filing. Once available, this will eliminate printing and mailing costs for these forms. Contact for More Information For more details or a copy of the proposed form and instructions, contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, EOIR, at 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church, VA 22041, or by calling (703) 305-0265. For additional information, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Publication Information This notice was dated June 2, 2025, and appeared in the Federal Register on June 5, 2025, Volume 90, Issue 107, Pages 23960-23961. BILLING CODE 4410-30-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Product Exclusion Extensions: China’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
USTR Extends Product Exclusions for Certain Chinese Imports Until August 31, 2025 Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 5, 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published a notice in the Federal Register. The USTR announced an extension of certain product exclusions under the Section 301 investigation. This investigation is about China’s acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation. Background Information In earlier notices, USTR removed some products from extra duties that had been placed on imports from China. These products were excluded as part of the Section 301 investigation. The USTR had asked for public comments about whether to extend these exclusions. On December 29, 2023, USTR requested comment on 352 reinstated product exclusions and 77 COVID-related exclusions. On May 30, 2024, USTR decided to extend 164 of these exclusions. Also, on September 18, 2024, they announced 14 exclusions for certain solar manufacturing equipment. New Extension Decision After reviewing the public comments, advisory committee advice, and input from the interagency Section 301 Committee, the USTR has chosen to extend the 164 previously extended exclusions and the 14 solar equipment exclusions. The new extension lasts for three months. These exclusions now remain in effect through August 31, 2025. Details for Importers The extension affects products described in the exclusions. The description and scope of each exclusion will follow the rules in the ten-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) and the specified product descriptions. For items eligible under these rules, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will give instructions about entering goods under the exclusions. Annex A: Heading 9903.88.69 All exclusions under heading 9903.88.69 and its related notes to the HTSUS are extended. The new exclusion period covers goods entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouses for consumption between 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on June 1, 2025, and 11:59 p.m. eastern daylight time on August 31, 2025. The article description for heading 9903.88.69 will now say “August 31, 2025” instead of “May 31, 2025”. Annex B: Heading 9903.88.70 All exclusions under heading 9903.88.70 and the related note to the HTSUS are also extended. This extension applies to goods entered, or withdrawn for consumption, between 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on June 1, 2025, and 11:59 p.m. eastern daylight time on August 31, 2025. The heading’s date is updated from “June 1, 2025,” to “September 1, 2025”. Future Actions USTR may consider more extensions or changes in the future. For more information, contact Senior Associate General Counsel Philip Butler at 202.395.5725. Source: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 107 (Thursday, June 5, 2025) [FR Doc. 2025-10203] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Exercise Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting-in-Part Complainant’s Motion for Summary Determination of Violation; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Moves Forward on Exercise Equipment Patent Investigation Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it will not review a recent initial determination. This decision comes from Investigation No. 337-TA-1419. The case is about claims by Balanced Body, Inc. of Sacramento, California. Balanced Body says some companies imported exercise equipment and subassemblies that infringe on their patents. Who is Involved? Guangzhou Oasis, LLC, also known as trysauna.com, from Boulder, Colorado Shandong Tmax Machinery Technology Co., Ltd., China Shandong VOG Sports Products Co., Ltd., China Dezhou Bodi Fitness Equipment Co., Ltd., China Suzhou Selfcipline Sports Goods Co., Ltd., China A company called Ciga Pilates from Hong Kong was also named at first. The complaint against Ciga Pilates was later withdrawn. What Patents Are Claimed? Balanced Body claims some of these companies violated the Tariff Act of 1930. The patents involved are: Claims 1-15, 19-21, and 23-26 from U.S. Patent No. 8,721,511 The claim of U.S. Patent No. D659,205 The claim of U.S. Patent No. D659,208 Later, the investigation for some patent claims was ended. Only claim 1 and claim 19 of the ‘511 patent and the claims of the D’205 and D’208 patents remain. Investigation Status On April 9, 2025, five companies were found in default (not defending themselves). On April 16, 2025, some patent claims were removed from the investigation. Balanced Body asked for two types of orders: A General Exclusion Order (GEO), which would stop all imports of infringing products, from anyone. A Limited Exclusion Order (LEO), which would stop just those companies from importing. They also asked for a 100% bond on the value of any products imported during a Presidential review period. ALJ and Commission Decisions An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued a ruling on April 30, 2025. The ALJ granted some of Balanced Body’s motion. The ALJ found that VOG Sports, Dezhou, and Selfcipline violated claim 1 of the ‘511 patent and the D’208 patent. The ALJ said the domestic industry requirement was met. The ALJ also said there was strong evidence to support these findings. The ALJ said Balanced Body should get a General Exclusion Order (GEO) for claim 1 of the ‘511 patent and the D’208 patent, and a 100% bond. But, this relief was seen as premature because some issues were still open. On May 9, 2025, Balanced Body withdrew its request for a GEO on some other patent claims. This made the investigation ready to move forward to the “remedy phase.” On May 12, 2025, the ALJ supported issuing a GEO for claim 1 of the ‘511 patent and the D’208 patent, along with a 100% bond. No company requested a review of the ALJ’s initial determination. The Commission voted on May 30, 2025, not to review the decision. Next Steps: Seeking Input The Commission may use its authority to issue orders that: Exclude the products from the U.S. Order companies to stop unfair acts in importing and selling the products. The USITC is asking parties and the public to send written comments. They want to know: What remedies should be ordered How any remedy could affect the public health and welfare How it could affect U.S. producers, consumers, and competition What the bond amount should be Balanced Body must provide: The remedy they want Draft remedial orders When the patents expire Importer details Product category information The deadline for submissions is June 13, 2025. Replies are due June 20, 2025. Extra details on submitting documents are included in the notice. Bond and Presidential Review If a remedy is put in place, a 60-day Presidential review follows. During this time, the products can still enter the U.S., but only under a set bond. Confidential Information Parties can ask for confidential treatment of their submissions. Redacted versions must be filed for public access. Authority The Commission’s authority is based on Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and USITC rules. Contact and More Information Namo Kim, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, USITC, can be reached at (202) 205-3459 for questions. More information and documents are available at https://edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on May 30, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Glow Fish Tape Systems, Safety Helmet Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Updates Investigation into Glow Fish Tape and Safety Helmet Systems Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has made a new announcement about an ongoing investigation. This investigation is called Investigation No. 337-TA-1442. It concerns certain glow fish tape systems, safety helmet systems, and their parts. The Commission said it will not review an important decision made by the Chief Administrative Law Judge (CALJ). This decision allowed Klein Tools, Inc., from Lincolnshire, Illinois, to make changes to its complaint. Now, Klein Tools can add new accusations about U.S. Patent No. 12,268,265 (the ‘265 patent). These new claims say that there is infringement of claims 1-4 of the ‘265 patent. This investigation first began on March 19, 2025. Klein Tools filed the complaint, saying that Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, based in Brookfield, Wisconsin, was bringing products into the United States, or selling products in the United States, that violated several patents. The original complaint listed U.S. Patent Nos. 11,452,327; 11,713,209; and 12,187,573. Now, the complaint also includes the ‘265 patent, claims 1-4. The Commission’s notice said that there is a domestic industry connected to the products in question. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not taking part in this case. The CALJ gave permission to amend the complaint on May 1, 2025. The decision is called Order No. 6. Nobody asked for a review of this decision. The Commission officially stated that it will not review the CALJ’s decision. The investigation is now updated to include the new allegations concerning the ‘265 patent against Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation. The Commission made this determination on May 30, 2025. The legal authority for this decision comes from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. This announcement was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on May 30, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on Brown Aluminum Oxide From China Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce published its final results for the fourth “sunset review” of antidumping duties on refined brown aluminum oxide from China. Commerce decided that canceling (revoking) the duties would likely lead to more dumping of this material at very high rates. The review looked at refined brown aluminum oxide, which is also called brown fused alumina or artificial corundum. This product comes from China. The antidumping duty order has been in place since November 19, 2003. The review is required every five years under U.S. law (section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930). Domestic companies in the U.S. took part in this review. They included Great Lakes Minerals, LLC, Imerys Niagara Falls, Inc., U.S. Electrofused Minerals, Inc., and Washington Mills. These companies said they wanted to keep the duties in place. The Department of Commerce did not get any participation from companies in China. After looking at all information, Commerce found that if the order were removed, dumping by Chinese companies would likely start again or get worse. The likely dumping rate would be as high as 135.18 percent. Commerce’s final decision is detailed in a public “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” This document is available at the Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) online at https://access.trade.gov. This notice also tells all involved parties to follow the rules for handling confidential information. If they had access to protected information during the review, they must return or destroy it according to the instructions. Commerce’s decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. The results of this review were made official on June 4, 2025, and keep the existing antidumping duties in place. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Selective Thyroid Hormone Receptor-Beta Agonists, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. Trade Commission Issues Orders in Thyroid Drug Case Estimated reading time: 5 minutes On June 4, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced the results of Investigation No. 337-TA-1352. The investigation was over certain selective thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists and related products. The ITC found that four companies in China broke Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. These companies are Ascletis Pharma Inc., Ascletis Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Ascletis Bioscience Co., Ltd., and Gannex Pharma Co., Ltd. These four companies are called “Corporate Respondents” in the case. The ITC said these companies got and used trade secrets that belonged to Viking Therapeutics, Inc., which is based in San Diego, California. Viking was the “Complainant.” Viking said these companies used trade secrets to make and sell certain thyroid-related drugs in the United States. The ITC ordered a seven-year limited exclusion order (LEO) against the Corporate Respondents. That means the drugs and products involved cannot be brought into the United States by these companies for seven years, unless they have a license. The ITC also issued cease and desist orders (CDO) to each of the four companies. This means they must stop all actions that break the law regarding these products. The case started on February 9, 2023. The ITC looked into whether the companies’ actions hurt or stopped a U.S. company from growing. There was a hearing from November 13 to 16, 2023. The main judge, called the Chief Administrative Law Judge (Chief ALJ), found that the companies broke the law and said sanctions were needed. Sanctions mean punishment or penalties. The ITC also looked at the role of Dr. Jinzi Jason Wu, who works for the Corporate Respondents. The ITC decided not to find Dr. Wu personally at fault. Sanctions against Dr. Wu were dropped. Sanctions against the companies and their former lawyers, Rimon PC, were upheld. The ITC also set a bond during a review period. This bond is one hundred percent of the value of any covered items imported during the Presidential review. This means if the companies try to bring in these products during the review, they must pay a bond worth the product’s total value. No other public comments were received about this case. The ITC said the public interest does not stop them from giving these orders. The investigation is now finished. The orders and decisions were sent to the President and the United States Trade Representative on the same day they were made. The ITC voted on this decision on May 29, 2025. The legal authority for these actions comes from Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s own rules. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, recorded this action. Reference: Federal Register Volume 90, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 4, 2025), Pages 23709-23711. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Treasury Department Announces OFAC Sanctions Action Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 3, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released a notice about actions taken by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 105. OFAC has added one or more people to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, also called the SDN List. According to this notice, OFAC decided that legal rules for adding these people were met. When someone is placed on the SDN List, all their property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction are blocked. U.S. persons are generally not allowed to do business or other transactions with these people. The action became effective on May 29, 2025. This means that the sanctions started on that date. Extra information about the SDN List and OFAC’s sanctions programs is available on the OFAC website at https://ofac.treasury.gov. If anyone has questions about this notice, they can contact the Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. There is also an online contact form at https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac. This notice was signed by Lisa M. Palluconi, Acting Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. The official Federal Register Document Number is 2025-10055. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Designation of Propionyl Chloride as a List I Chemical
DEA Proposes New Rule: Propionyl Chloride To Become a Controlled Chemical Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is planning to make a new rule about propionyl chloride. This chemical is often used to make fentanyl and related dangerous drugs. The proposed rule would list propionyl chloride as a List I chemical. This means it will be controlled under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Why Is Propionyl Chloride Being Controlled? Propionyl chloride is used by illegal labs to make fentanyl, fentanyl analogues, and fentanyl-like substances. These drugs have caused many overdose deaths in the United States. Fentanyl is a powerful synthetic opioid. A small amount can be deadly. The DEA says propionyl chloride is important in making these drugs because it replaces another controlled chemical, propionic anhydride, during the process. What Will Happen If the Rule Is Finalized? Everyone who makes, sells, imports, or exports propionyl chloride will have to follow CSA rules. There will not be a threshold amount. This means any amount of propionyl chloride, even a tiny amount, will be regulated. Chemical mixtures that contain any propionyl chloride will also be regulated, no matter the concentration. No automatic exemptions will be given, but companies can apply for an exemption. Comment Period Open Until July 3, 2025 The DEA is asking for comments from the public about this rule. Comments need to be sent in by July 3, 2025. People can comment online at www.regulations.gov or by mail. All comments become part of the public record, so personal information could be seen by others. How Does Propionyl Chloride Make Fentanyl? Fentanyl and related drugs are not found in nature. They are made from chemicals. Propionyl chloride is used in several steps of different methods for making fentanyl. These methods include the “Janssen,” “Siegfried,” and “Gupta” processes. In these, propionyl chloride reacts with other chemicals to make important fentanyl building blocks. Illegal labs use propionyl chloride because it is easy to get and is not currently regulated. Making it a List I chemical will make it harder for illegal labs to get the chemical. Information Gathered by the DEA The DEA got six public comments about this action. Three comments supported the rule. Three others mentioned possible problems. Some said that propionyl chloride can also be used in research labs or in making pharmaceutical or agricultural products. Some worried that controlling this chemical would make it harder and more expensive for researchers to get. Others said most people who use it already have the paperwork to buy it. What Will Be Required If the Rule Takes Effect? Registration: Anyone making, selling, importing, or exporting propionyl chloride (or mixtures with it) must register with the DEA. Records and Reports: Records of transactions must be kept for two years. Any odd transactions, losses, or thefts must be reported. Shipping: Importing or exporting must follow DEA rules. Security: Companies must provide strong controls to prevent theft or misuse. Inspections: The DEA can inspect businesses handling this chemical. Legal Risk: Doing anything with propionyl chloride that is not allowed by law is a crime. There will be a temporary 30-day exemption for people already handling propionyl chloride. During this time, they must apply for registration or exemption. Economic and Legal Effects The DEA does not expect this rule to have big costs for companies. The main cost will be registration fees ($3,699 for manufacturers and $1,850 for distributors, importers, and exporters). Companies already making opioid medicines with fentanyl should already have DEA registration. The DEA thinks very few businesses will be impacted. The rule follows all proper government and legal procedures. It does not interfere with state laws or other government powers. Next Steps The DEA is taking comments until July 3, 2025. After that, they will decide if the rule should go into effect. Contact Information For more details, contact Terrence L. Boos at the DEA (571) 362-3249. How To Comment Online: www.regulations.gov (Docket No. DEA-1189) Mail: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152 All comments must be sent or postmarked by July 3, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of 4-Fluoroamphetamine in Schedule I
DEA Proposes Rule to Place 4-Fluoroamphetamine in Schedule I Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 3, 2025, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced a proposed rule to place the substance 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). What Is 4-Fluoroamphetamine (4-FA)? 4-FA is a central nervous system stimulant. It is similar to amphetamine and methamphetamine, which are already controlled substances. 4-FA has no approved medical use in the United States. Why Is the DEA Proposing This Rule? This proposal is partly to help the United States meet its requirements under the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. The United Nations international body placed 4-FA in Schedule II of its convention in 2018. The DEA is acting to control 4-FA following these international decisions and U.S. law. What Evidence Did the DEA Review? The DEA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reviewed scientific studies, medical information, case reports, and law enforcement data. Their findings show that 4-FA: Acts like powerful stimulant drugs. Is being abused in the United States and elsewhere. Is found in illegal drug markets. Can cause serious health problems, including death. Has no accepted medical use. Details From the Scientific Review 4-FA produces effects similar to those of schedule I and II drugs such as amphetamine, methamphetamine, cocaine, and MDMA. It increases levels of certain chemicals in the brain and produces feelings of euphoria and high energy. People have taken it without medical advice, and it has been abused in many states. Law enforcement tested drug samples and found 269 reports of 4-FA in drug exhibits from January 2011 to December 2023. Most users are young adults. The drug can be taken by swallowing or snorting. 4-FA has caused emergency department visits, overdoses, and at least five deaths. Common effects include fast heartbeat, high blood pressure, headache, agitation, and fever. No studies show that it has accepted medical use or that it is safe for use with medical supervision. Proposed Rule Details If the rule is finalized, 4-FA will become a Schedule I controlled substance. This means: Only DEA-registered persons can manufacture, distribute, import, export, research, or possess 4-FA. Those who wish to handle 4-FA will need DEA registration. Those who do not register must surrender or transfer their 4-FA stock. 4-FA will need to be stored securely. Quotas will limit manufacturing. Inventories must be taken and records kept. Reports must be submitted to the DEA. Order forms must be used for transactions. Import and export rules will apply. Activities with 4-FA not allowed under the law may lead to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. Comment Period and Hearing Requests Comments about the proposed rule must be submitted to the DEA by July 3, 2025. People may also request a hearing by that date, showing their interest and objections. Regulatory Effects This proposal will not have a big economic impact on small businesses. There is no evidence of legitimate use for 4-FA, except in some scientific research. The DEA says this rule does not add new paperwork requirements for businesses or government agencies, but existing recordkeeping rules must be followed. How to Comment Comments can be sent electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Paper comments can be mailed to the DEA in Springfield, Virginia. All comments are part of the public record unless marked as confidential. Conclusion The DEA is proposing full control of 4-FA due to high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. If the rule becomes final, 4-FA and related substances will be placed in Schedule I and subject to strict regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of 2-Methyl AP-237 in Schedule I; Correction
DEA Corrects Rule to Add 2-Methyl AP-237 to Schedule I Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On June 3, 2025, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a correcting amendment in the Federal Register. This update concerns the controlled substance 2-methyl AP-237. What is 2-methyl AP-237? 2-methyl AP-237 is a synthetic drug. Its full name is 1-(2-methyl-4-(3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl)piperazin-1-yl)butan-1-one. It belongs to a group of drugs called synthetic opioids. These drugs can be changed in small ways in a lab to make similar versions. Why was there a correction? The DEA first published a final order on March 15, 2024. This order put 2-methyl AP-237 and its related chemical forms into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. Schedule I drugs are thought to have a high chance for abuse and no approved medical use. The order said this new rule would start 30 days later, on April 15, 2024. Before this date came, the DEA published another rule about three different drugs. These drugs—etodesnitazene, N-pyrrolidino etonitazene, and protonitazene—were also put into Schedule I. Because these two rules overlapped, there was a mistake in the text about how 2-methyl AP-237 should be listed. What does the correction do? The correction fixes the list in the government rules. It adds 2-methyl AP-237 to 21 CFR 1308.11(b), which is the official list for Schedule I drugs. It also adds its special drug code number, 9664. All other parts of the rule stay the same. The correction says 2-methyl AP-237 has been in Schedule I since April 15, 2024. The change in the text does not change when the rule started. How does this affect the law? Since April 15, 2024, it has been illegal to make, sell, or have 2-methyl AP-237 without special permission. This applies to the drug and any chemical forms that are possible. Who signed this correction? The correction was signed on May 27, 2025, by DEA Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. Heather Achbach, DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer, submitted the document for publication. Where can you get more information? Questions can go to Dr. Terrence L. Boos at the DEA Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section. The phone number is (571) 362-3249. Summary 2-methyl AP-237 is now clearly listed as a Schedule I controlled substance. The rule has been effective since April 15, 2024. The correction fixes a technical mistake and makes the listing official and clear. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection eComments Requested; Extension/Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (Form EOIR-60); and Notice of Entry of Limited Appearance for Document Assistance Before the Immigration Court (Form EOIR-61)
Department of Justice Issues Notice on Immigration Court Forms Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ) has published a notice about its collection of information for two important forms. These forms are used in immigration cases. The forms are called EOIR-60 and EOIR-61. The forms let an attorney or representative help a person, called a “pro se respondent,” with a legal document for the Board of Immigration Appeals or the Immigration Court. This is called a “limited appearance.” It means the lawyer only helps with one document. EOIR-60 is for the Board of Immigration Appeals. EOIR-61 is for the Immigration Court. Starting in July 2024, people can file these forms online using the EOIR Courts and Appeals System Respondent Access Portal (RAP). The forms have been updated. They no longer need to be mailed only. The EOIR Policy Manual now gives filing instructions. The new forms also let people show if they sent the paperwork to the other side electronically through ECAS. A change was made to the privacy notice on the forms. The correct system of records is JUSTICE/EOIR-003. More case information is now available online in English or Spanish at the EOIR Automated Case Information System. The EOIR-60 form now has a note to say that “limited appearance” is not allowed in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proceedings that the Board controls. The DOJ asks for comments about the forms. People have 60 days, until August 4, 2025, to respond. They can give thoughts on whether the forms are needed, if the estimates of time are correct, and how to make the process easier. Here are details about the information collection: Type of Collection: The DOJ is updating and extending forms already in use. Forms: EOIR-60 (Board of Immigration Appeals) and EOIR-61 (Immigration Court). Who Fills Them Out: Individuals, attorneys, and representatives helping pro se respondents. Filling out the form is required to help with a document. Estimate of Use: About 40 people will fill out EOIR-60 each year. About 22,018 will fill out EOIR-61 each year. Time to Complete: Each form takes about 6 minutes. Total Annual Burden: 2,206 hours for everyone together. Cost: There is no fee to send in the forms. Forms can be sent online, saving postage costs. The estimated cost for a legal expert to fill out the form is $7.27 per time. The yearly cost for everyone combined is about $160,310.02. The DOJ’s contact for more information is Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel at EOIR. People can also contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, for other questions. The notice was published on June 3, 2025. It is a public invitation for feedback on these forms and their collection. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection; Application for Registration-DEA Form 225, Application for Registration Renewal-DEA Form 225a, Affidavit for Chain Renewal-DEA Form 225b
Department of Justice Requests Public Comment on DEA Registration Forms Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 3, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a request for public comments regarding an extension of an information collection. This collection is for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registration forms. The specific forms are DEA Form 225, DEA Form 225a for renewals, and DEA Form 225b for chain renewals. The DOJ is required to obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before continuing to collect this information. They must do this under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The DOJ invites public comments for 30 days, ending July 3, 2025. The public may comment on the accuracy of time estimates for the forms, suggest better ways to collect information, and more. Anyone interested can provide comments online by visiting www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. People may search for this collection using the title or OMB Control Number 1117-0012. The forms are used as part of the Controlled Substances Act. All businesses and individuals that manufacture, distribute, import, export, research, or analyze controlled substances must register with the DEA. These records keep controlled substances secure and ensure only approved people handle them. Here are the key details: Type of Collection: Extension, without changes, of a current approval. Title: Application for Registration, Registration Renewal, Affidavit for Chain Renewal. Forms: DEA 225, 225a, 225b. Affected Groups: Businesses, not-for-profit institutions, and government agencies. Number of Respondents: 16,560 per year. Estimated Time Per Response: 0.20066 hours. Frequency: Once per year. Total Annual Time Burden: 3,323 hours. Total Annual Non-Labor Cost: $0. Obligation: Required for businesses or individuals wanting to handle controlled substances. Anyone with questions or requests for copies of the forms or instructions can contact Heather E. Achbach, Regulatory Drafting and Policy Support Section, DEA. The contact address is 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152, telephone (571) 776-3882, or by email. For more information, the public can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, at the DOJ’s Justice Management Division in Washington, DC. This information collection will stay in effect for up to three years if approved. Renewals will occur as needed for continued authorization. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
L-lysine From China; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations; Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations
U.S. Opens Investigations on L-lysine Imports from China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started preliminary phase investigations on L-lysine imports from China. These investigations are for antidumping and countervailing duties. The case numbers are 701-TA-767 and 731-TA-1750 (Preliminary). They are being done under the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigations will find out if U.S. industry is being hurt or threatened by L-lysine imports from China. The L-lysine is under the U.S. tariff code 2922.41.0090. The investigations began because of petitions filed on May 28, 2025. The petitions were made by the Lysine Fair Trade Coalition and its members. Members include Archer Daniels Midland Company (Decatur, Illinois), CJ Bio America, Inc. (Fort Dodge, Iowa), and Evonik Corporation (Blair, Nebraska). The petitions say that L-lysine from China is being sold below fair value and is supported by government subsidies. The Department of Commerce may extend the investigation time. But the USITC must reach a preliminary decision by July 14, 2025. The Commission’s views must be sent to the Department of Commerce by July 21, 2025. Anyone wanting to join as a party in the investigation, other than the petitioners, must file an entry of appearance within seven days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. Industrial users and representative consumer organizations can also join as parties. The Secretary of the Commission will make public and confidential service lists. These include the names and addresses of all parties and their representatives. Confidential information, called business proprietary information (BPI), will only be given to authorized applicants under a protective order. These applications must be made within seven days after this notice is published. A staff conference about the case will happen on June 18, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at the conference must be emailed by noon, June 16, 2025. Email addresses for every participant must be included. Some guidance for witnesses joining by videoconference will be available on the Commission’s Public Calendar. The Secretary will accept only electronic filings for now. All filings must go through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). Paper filings are not being accepted. Written briefs and arguments can be sent to the Commission by 5:15 p.m. on June 24, 2025. Written testimony and extra material for the June 18 conference must be filed by 4 p.m. on June 17, 2025. All documents must follow the Commission’s rules, including requirements for confidential business information. Every document filed must be sent to all other parties, as shown by the public or BPI service list. A certificate of service must be included. The Secretary will not accept filings without this. Anyone who gives information to the Commission during these investigations must certify that it is complete and accurate. The information may be used by the Commission, its staff, or other government employees for their duties. All contract personnel must sign a nondisclosure agreement. These investigations are being held under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, and this notice follows section 207.12 of the Commission’s rules. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on May 29, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Importer of Controlled Substances Application: ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc.
ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc. Applies to Import Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes ANI Pharmaceuticals Inc. has asked the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to approve its registration as an importer of two controlled substances: Levorphanol and Tapentadol. Levorphanol has a drug code of 9220 and is listed as a Schedule II substance. ANI Pharmaceuticals plans to import Levorphanol for distribution to customers. Tapentadol has a drug code of 9780 and is also a Schedule II substance. ANI Pharmaceuticals will only import small amounts of Tapentadol. The Tapentadol is for internal research and making reference standards. No other uses of these drugs are allowed under this registration. Only bulk manufacturers already registered for these drugs, or new applicants, may send comments or objections about ANI’s application. Comments and objections must be sent electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. The deadline is July 2, 2025. Anyone asking for a hearing about this application must send their written request by July 2, 2025. Requests for hearings must be sent to several DEA addresses in Springfield, Virginia. These addresses include the Hearing Clerk/OALJ, the DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, and the Administrator. The DEA says it will approve permit applications only if ANI Pharmaceuticals’ business activity matches what is allowed under U.S. law 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). ANI’s authorization will not cover importing FDA-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for sale. The notice was signed by Matthew Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator, and published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Veranova, L.P.
Veranova, L.P. Applies to Manufacture Controlled Substances in Bulk Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Veranova, L.P. has sent an application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to become a bulk manufacturer of several controlled substances. The request was made on April 17, 2025. The proposed location for manufacturing is 25 Patton Road, Pharmaceutical Service, Devens, Massachusetts 01434-3803. The company seeks to produce the following basic classes of controlled substances: Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) (Drug Code 7315), Schedule I 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (Drug Code 7405), Schedule I Dimethyltryptamine (Drug Code 7435), Schedule I Amphetamine (Drug Code 1100), Schedule II Methylphenidate (Drug Code 1724), Schedule II Nabilone (Drug Code 7379), Schedule II Hydrocodone (Drug Code 9193), Schedule II Levorphanol (Drug Code 9220), Schedule II Thebaine (Drug Code 9333), Schedule II Alfentanil (Drug Code 9737), Schedule II Remifentanil (Drug Code 9739), Schedule II Sufentanil (Drug Code 9740), Schedule II The DEA states that Veranova plans to use the substances to support manufacturing and analytical testing at its other DEA-registered manufacturing facility. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized under this registration. Anyone who is a registered bulk manufacturer of these drugs, or is applying to become one, can submit comments or object to the proposed registration. Comments and objections must be sent electronically by August 1, 2025. To submit a comment, visit https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions. Once a comment is submitted, you will get a Comment Tracking Number as proof. Comments may not appear immediately online. A written request for a hearing about this application must also be filed by the deadline. This notice was signed by Matthew Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator at the DEA. The official notice is document number 2025-09929 and was published in the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 104, on June 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Makes Preliminary Decision on Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China Estimated reading time: 7 minutes U.S. Makes Preliminary Decision on Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It says sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The decision was announced on June 2, 2025. The investigation covers sales from April 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024. Background of the Case The Department started the investigation in January 2025. It noted a possible error in the scope and fixed it with a correction. The Commerce team studied all facts and evidence. The investigation followed the procedures in the Tariff Act of 1930. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains. These grains are made mostly of aluminum oxide (at least 94%). They can include titanium dioxide, magnesium oxide, and other compounds. Grain sizes range from 0.85 mm to 0.0395 mm. The grains can be different shapes, such as sharp, round, triangular, or blocky. They have special crystal structures. These give the grains high hardness (16-22 gigapascals by the Vickers Diamond Indent Method) and a high melting point (2050°C). The grains can look blue, white, or off-white. These abrasive grains are included in the investigation even if they are put into other products. This includes grinding wheels and abrasive papers. Only the grains are included, not the whole product. The grains are usually traded under specific tariff codes, but the written description is the deciding factor. Comments on the Scope The Department allowed comments on the product coverage. A company, Weiler Corporation, gave comments, but the Department did not change the scope at this point. Investigation Results The Department used certain rules because no respondent qualified for a separate rate. The China-wide entity received a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 88.32 percent. The cash deposit rate, after adjusting for subsidy offsets, is set at 72.22 percent. Suspension of Liquidation The Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend entries of the goods. This starts from the date notice is published in the Federal Register. Importers must pay a cash deposit, based on the margin above. If measures in a related countervailing duty investigation end, the deposits may change. These instructions will stay until further notice. No Calculations to Disclose No calculations will be shown to the public because the Department used facts available and adverse inferences. There are no specific calculations to share. No Verification The Department will not run further checks. This is because the main respondents did not give the needed data and were found uncooperative. Next Steps and Public Comment Anyone interested can submit briefs or written comments. These must be sent within 30 days after this notice. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. All briefs must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. People may also request a hearing. Requests need to be filed within 30 days, and must contain contact details and a list of topics. Final Determination and Commission Notification The Department will make a final decision within 75 days after this preliminary notice. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will use this decision to check if there is harm to the U.S. industry. If the final result is affirmative, the ITC will decide if the imports injure or threaten U.S. producers. Official Contact For questions, contact Thomas Cloyd at the U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-1246. Reference This notice is signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. The official text is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 104, on June 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews
U.S. Starts Five-Year Trade Reviews for Certain Chinese Products Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Details of the Review This review covers certain goods from China. Both antidumping and countervailing duty orders are included. The U.S. International Trade Commission is doing its own review at the same time. The reviews started on June 2, 2025. Products Under Review Calcium Hypochlorite (A-570-008 and C-570-009) – second review Collated Steel Staples (A-570-112 and C-570-113) – first review Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (A-570-919) – third review Lightweight Thermal Paper (A-570-920 and C-570-921) – third review Contact people for these reviews at the Commerce Department are Thomas Martin, (202) 482-3936, and Mary Kolberg, (202) 482-1785. How the Review Works The Commerce Department will follow its published rules on how to do Sunset Reviews. These rules are found in Federal Register notices from March 20, 1998; October 28, 2005; and February 14, 2012. Information for the Public People can find details about the review process on the Commerce Department website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All documents must follow specific formatting, translation, and electronic filing rules. These are in 19 CFR 351.303. Parties must certify that the information they give is correct and complete. The format for these certifications is in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce will reject information if these rules are not followed. Participation Steps Anyone wanting to take part must file a letter of appearance as per 19 CFR 351.103(d). To get on the public list early, interested parties should submit their entry of appearance within 10 days of this notice. The Commerce Department still has some special rules about serving documents that have private business information because of COVID-19. These were announced on July 10, 2020. What Interested Parties Must Do Domestic interested parties must file a notice of intent to participate within 15 days of the June 2, 2025 notice. What needs to be in the notice is in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). If no domestic party files in time, the order will be revoked automatically, as per 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). If there is a valid notice, all parties must file a full substantive response within 30 days after June 2, 2025. The requirements for these responses are in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). There are different information requirements for domestic parties and respondents. Commerce’s rules are separate from the ITC’s rules. Terms are defined in 19 CFR part 351. Commerce amended service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f). Electronic documents must be fully received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on due dates. Executive Summaries Required Parties filing comments are asked to provide an executive summary for each issue at the beginning of their comments. Public executive summaries should be no longer than 450 words per issue, not counting citations. These summaries will be used in the final decision document that will be published. Proper citations must be included in footnotes in the summaries. Key Dates Notice Published: June 2, 2025 Notice of Intent to Participate deadline: 15 days from June 2, 2025 Substantive Response deadline: 30 days from June 2, 2025 This public notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on May 16, 2025. The notice was officially published as document FR Doc. 2025-09939. Contact Information Commerce Department: AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. ITC Contact: Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, (202) 205-3193. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Overhead Door Torsion Springs Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes U.S. Finds Chinese Overhead Door Torsion Springs Sold Below Fair Value On June 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its preliminary findings in an important trade investigation. The Department found that overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from the People’s Republic of China are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). Investigation Details The investigation looks at torsion springs made in China. These springs are used to open and close overhead doors, including garage, warehouse, and trailer doors. The time frame of the investigation is from April 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024. The U.S. Department of Commerce began this investigation in November 2024. On March 11, 2025, the Department delayed the preliminary findings until May 27, 2025. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers helically-wound, counterbalance torsion steel springs with cones or similar fittings attached or sold with them. These springs must have a coil inside diameter of 15.8 mm or more, but not more than 304.8 mm, a wire diameter between 2.5 mm and 20.4 mm, and a length of at least 127 mm. The springs may be made from any type of steel wire, of any shape, any winding direction, any end type, any coating, and may or may not have hardware attached. The investigation includes springs sold as part of kits. Some products are not included, such as leaf, disc, extension, compression, and spiral springs. Method and Margins According to the law, Commerce looks at both company-specific and country-wide sales practices. The Department used facts available with adverse inferences for the China-wide entity, including the main companies checked: Foshan Nanhai Xulong Spring Factory and Tianjin Wangxia Spring Co Ltd. This means these companies did not give required data and were not cooperative. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for most Chinese producers and exporters is 734.33 percent. For all other Chinese companies (the “China-wide entity”), the rate is 778.31 percent. Affected Companies and Rates Examples of producer/exporter pairs with the 734.33 percent rate include: Suzhou Shunchi Hardware Co., Ltd / Chi Hardware Corporation Limited Hangzhou Fuxing Spring Co., Ltd / Hangzhou Fuxing Spring Co., Ltd Tianjin Gangzhen Auto Parts Co., Ltd / Hebei Meirui Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd MFG Direct (Ningbo) Limited / MFG Direct (Ningbo) Limited Full details are available in the Federal Register notice. Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposits U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of these imports and will require a cash deposit equal to the dumping margin shown above. If the related countervailing duty (CVD) investigation’s measures expire first, CBP will use the dumping margin without subsidy offset adjustments. Next Steps and Comments Interested parties may comment on the findings within 30 days of the notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Parties can request a hearing. The Department of Commerce will make a final determination within 75 days of this preliminary announcement. If the final decision is positive, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if imports harm or threaten U.S. industry. Full Details The decision, including a description of products and full methods, can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 104, June 2, 2025. For more information, visit https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Collated Steel Staples From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Five-Year Review of Collated Steel Staples from China Estimated reading time: 4-5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started reviews to decide if ending the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain collated steel staples from China would likely cause harm to American industry again. Key Dates The review officially began on June 2, 2025. Anyone wanting to respond must do so by July 2, 2025. Comments about the responses can be sent until August 13, 2025. Background On July 20, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce put in place duties on collated steel staples from China. The USITC now needs to review if these duties should stay. The decision will look at if removing the duties would likely cause injury to U.S. makers of these staples. Definitions in This Review Subject Merchandise: The kind of staples covered in the review. Subject Country: China. Domestic Like Product: Collated steel staples made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: All U.S. makers of these staples. Order Date: July 20, 2020. Importer: Any person or company that brings these staples from China to the U.S. How to Participate People or groups, like companies that use these staples, can join as parties in this review. They need to file an entry of appearance within 21 days after this notice is published. A public list of all parties will be made. Former Commission Employees Past USITC workers can appear in this review, even if they worked on past reviews or investigations about the same products. More information is available from the Office of the General Counsel. Business Proprietary Information Certain business information can be shared under a special protective order. Only approved people will get access. Applications for this must be made within 21 days. Submitting Information Each response must be certified as accurate and complete. Information given can be used by USITC employees and, when needed, for cybersecurity by U.S. government workers. Name, address, website, and contact details. How the company is an interested party. If the company is willing to participate. What effect removing the duties might have. A list of current U.S. producers of the staples. A list of current U.S. importers and Chinese producers/exporters of these staples. Names and contacts for key U.S. buyers. Information sources on prices. Detailed operation data for 2024 if a U.S. producer. Similar data if a U.S. importer or group. Export and production data from Chinese producers or groups. Notes on any big changes in supply or demand since July 2020. (Optional) Comments on product and industry definitions. Forms and further instructions are available on the USITC website. Filing Procedures All information must be sent electronically using USITC’s EDIS system. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. The OMB number for this request is 3117 0016/USITC No. 25-5-638. If a company cannot provide information in the exact form asked, they should tell the Commission as soon as possible and give reasons. If a company does not respond properly, the Commission might use the information in a way that is unfavorable to that company. Contact Information For more details, contact Alec Resch at the Office of Investigations (202-708-1448). Authority This review is conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Issued by: Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission Issued May 27, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
U.S. Government Starts Review of Manganese Dioxide Orders from China Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of a new review on June 2, 2025. The review will decide if removing the current rules on electrolytic manganese dioxide from China could hurt U.S. companies again. Electrolytic manganese dioxide is a chemical used in products like batteries. Since 2008, the U.S. has had an antidumping duty order on this product from China. The Department of Commerce put this order in place on October 7, 2008. The U.S. already did two reviews—in 2015 and 2020—and decided both times to keep the order. Now, this is the third five-year review. The review follows rules in the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC wants to know if ending the order would likely lead to harm for companies in the United States. They are asking interested parties to send information by July 2, 2025. People can also send comments about if responses are strong enough by August 13, 2025. Who Should Respond The USITC says interested parties can include U.S. producers, unions, importers, foreign producers, exporters, and trade groups. Those wanting to join the proceeding as a party must file an entry of appearance within 21 days after the notice was published in the Federal Register. Companies and individuals can look at case records online through the USITC’s electronic document system. They can also find more information on the agency website. Information Needed The USITC is asking for detailed information. This includes: Names and addresses of businesses. Whether the company or person is an interested party under the law. Whether the company will give information for the review. Predictions about what will happen to U.S. companies if the order ends. Lists of U.S. producers, U.S. importers, and foreign companies making or shipping electrolytic manganese dioxide. Names of top buyers in the U.S. Where to get U.S. or world price data for the product. Details of production and sales for the last year. Lists of changes in markets or conditions since 2018 and what might change soon. The USITC provides a worksheet on its website to help parties organize responses. They must file electronically; paper submissions are currently not accepted. Guidelines for Submissions All information must be certified as true and complete. Private business information will only be shared with those who sign special confidentiality agreements. If a party cannot provide some information, it must explain why and try to offer other data. If parties do not respond fully, the Commission may decide the case using facts against the non-responding party. Review Timeline and Authority Key deadlines are: July 2, 2025 – deadline for initial responses. August 13, 2025 – deadline for comments on responses. The USITC acts under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and its own rules. The agency will decide if a full or quick review is needed, based on the responses. Their final decision could affect duties on Chinese electrolytic manganese dioxide for years to come. For more questions, the Commission contact is Laurel Schwartz at the USITC, and further materials are available on their website. The review started on June 2, 2025, and was announced by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Lightweight Thermal Paper From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
USITC Starts Five-Year Review of Duties on Lightweight Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the start of its third five-year review of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on lightweight thermal paper from China. The review will decide if removing these trade duties would likely continue or cause new harm to American industry. The review began on June 2, 2025. Parties interested in this case must send their responses to the Commission by July 2, 2025. People can leave comments about the responses by August 13, 2025. All filings must be electronic, using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The USITC is following section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for this review. Earlier, the Department of Commerce issued these duty orders on November 24, 2008. The duties were continued in January 2015 and July 2020 after earlier five-year reviews. This new review checks if revoking these orders would hurt U.S. producers of lightweight thermal paper in the near future. “Subject Merchandise” in this review means lightweight thermal paper from China. The “Domestic Like Product” is thermal paper made in the U.S., while the “Domestic Industry” covers all U.S. companies making this kind of paper. “Importers” bring this paper into the U.S. from China. Anyone wishing to participate must file an entry of appearance within 21 days after the notice date. The rules also explain how business confidential information will be handled, who may access it, and how the information must be certified. Responses to the USITC must include detailed information. Each company or group responding should provide: Name, address, and contact information. Whether they are an “interested party” like a U.S. producer, importer, exporter, or association. Willingness to give information. What effects would follow if the duties were revoked. Lists of U.S. producers, importers, and Chinese producers and exporters. Major purchasers in the U.S. Price sources for these products. U.S. producers need to give information about their 2024 production, sales, and financial results. U.S. importers and Chinese exporters must also give trade and sales data for 2024. The USITC wants to know about any big changes in how and where this paper is made and sold after 2018, and if any big changes are likely soon. Anyone who cannot provide the requested information must notify the Commission right away and explain why. Additional rules are given about who may participate, disclosures, certification, how to file electronically, and accuracy of information, as well as time limits. This proceeding is under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and Sec. 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on May 27, 2025. The full record and further information are available at the USITC’s official website. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Calcium Hypochlorite From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews
US International Trade Commission Starts Five-Year Review of Calcium Hypochlorite Orders on China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started new five-year reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on calcium hypochlorite from China. These reviews are required by law and will decide if canceling the orders would cause injury to US industry. The orders were first put in place on January 30, 2015. They were continued once before in 2020. Now, as of June 2, 2025, the second review is happening. All interested parties must send information to the USITC by July 2, 2025, to be considered. Comments on how good the responses are can be sent by August 13, 2025. Anyone wanting more information can contact Jesse Sanchez at the USITC’s Office of Investigations. General information about the USITC is available at https://www.usitc.gov and case records can be seen at https://edis.usitc.gov. Details About the Review The reviews are about calcium hypochlorite from China. The USITC wants to know if ending the orders would hurt the US industry soon. The rules for this review are in 19 CFR parts 201 and 207. The “Subject Merchandise” is calcium hypochlorite from China. The “Domestic Like Product” is US-made calcium hypochlorite. The “Domestic Industry” is all US producers of that product. Companies who only convert, not make, calcium hypochlorite are not counted as US producers for this review. How to Participate People or groups, such as industrial users or consumer groups, who want to be part of the review must file an entry of appearance within 21 days after June 2, 2025. The USITC keeps a public list of all parties. Old Commission members can take part in these reviews even if they worked on past cases about the same matter, according to federal rules. Some information must be protected as business proprietary. Those wanting access must apply for an administrative protective order within 21 days after June 2, 2025. Any party giving the USITC information must certify it is correct to the best of their knowledge. Information may be shared within the government for official use and for cybersecurity. Sending Written Submissions Responses on the review must be sent by 5:15 p.m. on July 2, 2025. Comments on the adequacy of responses must be sent by 5:15 p.m. on August 13, 2025. All files must meet USITC rules, and confidential data requirements if needed. Details are available at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. All filings must be made online at https://edis.usitc.gov. No in-person or paper filings are accepted at this time. Each response should include: Name, address, web address, and contact details for the firm or entity. Whether the firm is an interested party under the law, and how it qualifies. Willingness to provide more information to the Commission. The likely effects of ending the orders on the US industry and their own business. A list of currently operating US producers of calcium hypochlorite. A list of all US importers and Chinese producers or exporters of the product since 2018. A list of 3-5 major buyers in the US for this product. Sources of price information for the product. For US producers: 2024 data on production, capacity, shipments, sales, costs, profits, and more. For US importers: 2024 data on import volumes and sales, both with and without duties. For Chinese producers/exporters: Data on production, capacity, and exports to the US for 2024. Information on changes in supply or demand since 2018, or any likely soon. If a party cannot provide the requested information, they must notify the USITC as soon as possible and explain why. If not, the Commission may make decisions based on the available facts. Extra Notes Agreement or disagreement with the Commission’s definitions of Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry can also be submitted, with reasons and alternatives if desired. Authority for this review comes from Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Issued By Lisa Barton Secretary to the Commission Order dated May 27, 2025 Federal Register Doc No. 2025-09830 Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
U.S. Sets Final Phase Schedule for Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains Trade Investigations Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Summary of the Investigations The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced the final phase schedule for antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China. The investigations are to decide if the U.S. industry is hurt, threatened, or slowed because of imports of these grains from China. The Department of Commerce has made a preliminary finding that Chinese producers and exporters get subsidies for these grains. These grains fall under subheading 2818.10.20 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Scope of the Investigations The subject of the investigations is “sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains.” They must have at least 94% aluminum oxide (Al2O3). These grains can have other compounds, like titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, calcium oxide, sodium superoxide, ferric oxide, magnesium oxide, lanthanum oxide, and more. Grain sizes range from 0.85 mm to 0.0395 mm, equal to ANSI grit sizes from 20 to 280. The grains come in shapes like angular, sharp, blocky, splintery, round stripped, triangular, or extruded rods or stars. These grains have special crystal structures, with high hardness (16-22 gigapascals by the Vickers Diamond Indent Method), a high melting point (2050°C), and crystalline sizes from 0.05 to 30 micrometers. Their colors can be blue, white, white-translucent, or off-white opaque. The scope includes the grains themselves, whether or not they are in other articles, such as abrasive papers, grinding wheels, cylinders, or discs. Only the sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains part is covered when in a product. Background and Legal Process The investigations were requested by Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. from Malvern, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2024. The investigations are under sections 705(b) and 731(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, using procedures from the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Participation and Public Information Anyone wishing to join as a party in these investigations must file an entry of appearance no later than 21 days before the hearing date. If someone already filed during the preliminary phase, they do not have to file again. The Commission is only accepting electronic filings. All documents must be filed through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted. Business Proprietary Information (BPI) will be shared under an administrative protective order for authorized parties who apply no later than 21 days prior to the hearing. Key Dates in the Schedule Prehearing staff report (nonpublic): July 24, 2025. Public version to come out after. Prehearing briefs deadline: July 31, 2025. Hearing: August 7, 2025, starting at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at the hearing: Due by August 1, 2025. Prehearing conference (if needed): August 4, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Hearing presentation slides and written testimony: Due by noon, August 6, 2025. Posthearing briefs: Due by August 14, 2025. Written statements from others (not party to investigations): Due by August 14, 2025. Release of information not yet commented on: August 27, 2025. Final comments by parties: Due by August 29, 2025. No new factual information allowed. Further Rules and Information All filings must follow the Commission’s rules (see www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Any written materials containing BPI must conform with specific sections of the rules. Each document filed must be served on all parties and include a certificate of service. The hearing can include remote appearances if needed, with justification. The investigations are conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. For questions, contact Keysha Martinez in the Office of Investigations at 202-205-2136. Authority and Publication This investigation is ordered by the Commission. The Secretary to the Commission is Lisa Barton. The notice is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 104, on June 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation
U.S. Postpones Preliminary Decision in China Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Investigation Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States Department of Commerce has postponed its preliminary decision in a trade investigation about polypropylene corrugated boxes (PCBs) from the People’s Republic of China. The investigation began on April 7, 2025. The Department of Commerce wants to find out if imports of these boxes from China receive unfair government support, also known as countervailable subsidies. The original deadline for the preliminary decision was June 11, 2025. On May 21, 2025, the petitioners asked the Department of Commerce to delay the decision. The petitioners are four companies: CoolSeal USA Inc., Inteplast Group Corporation, SeaCa Plastic Packaging, and Technology Container Corp. They said more time was needed to review early responses and to ask for extra information. According to the law, the Department of Commerce can extend the deadline for up to 130 days from the start of the investigation. The law also says that the request must be made 25 days or more before the deadline, and the Department must give the delay unless there is a big reason not to. The Department of Commerce agreed with the petitioners’ reasons and decided to postpone. The new deadline for the preliminary determination is August 15, 2025. The final decision in the investigation will be due 75 days after the new preliminary decision date. The notice about this postponement was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on May 23, 2025. These steps are required under U.S. trade law and regulations. The Department will keep reviewing information from all parties. The investigation will continue. More updates will follow as new information and decisions become available. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Request for Comments Regarding Foreign Nations Freeloading on American-Financed Innovation
USTR Requests Comments on Foreign Nations’ Impact on U.S. Drug Prices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes USTR Requests Comments on Foreign Nations’ Impact on U.S. Drug Prices On May 30, 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) sent out a request for comments about foreign countries’ drug pricing rules and their effects on American patients. This action follows President Biden’s Executive Order 14297, “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients.” The order says that Americans should not have to pay more for prescription drugs because other countries pay less. It asks that Americans get the best price for prescription drugs, like the lowest price charged to other nations. USTR is asking for information about any foreign act, policy, or practice that makes American patients pay too much for drug research and development. In particular, USTR is interested in any action that forces drug prices down in other countries, making the United States carry more of the costs. How to Comment Comments are due by June 27, 2025. To submit a comment, use the USTR portal at https://comments.ustr.gov/s/. The comments should use docket number USTR-2025-0011. If you cannot use the website, you can contact Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Monitoring and Enforcement, Catherine Gibson, at 202.395.5725 or by email. What to Include in Your Comment USTR wants comments that name the foreign country or area, describe the act, policy, or practice, and tell why it may be unfair or discriminatory. Comments should also explain how this affects American patients and raises their share of drug research and development costs. Anyone can send comments, including individuals, companies, and groups. The request repeats that parties are always welcome to send information about trade concerns. Instructions for Submitting Comments To submit online, go to the portal and choose the right docket. You do not need to create an account. Enter your contact details. Organizations must include their legal name and contact information. There are options to mark parts of the comment as Business Confidential Information (BCI) or as Public. Mark any BCI as “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL” and highlight the confidential information. You must also send a public version without the confidential details. If you need other ways to protect confidential business information, you can contact Catherine Gibson at 202.395.5725 to discuss options. Submitted documents will be posted for public inspection, except for properly marked confidential information. Contact for Questions To discuss submission problems or for other questions, you may contact Catherine Gibson, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Monitoring and Enforcement, at 202.395.5725. The request for comments was signed by Jennifer Thornton, General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative. Official notice number: 2025-09757. For more details, visit the Federal Register at https://www.gpo.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Vertical Metal File Cabinets From China; Determinations
USITC Decides to Continue Duties on Vertical Metal File Cabinets from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On May 23, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a decision about vertical metal file cabinets from China. The Commission reviewed the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on these cabinets. The review is part of Investigation Nos. 701-TA-623 and 731-TA-1449. The USITC checks every five years to see if removing the duties would harm American industries. The Commission found that if the orders were removed, American companies that make vertical metal file cabinets would likely be hurt again. The USITC looked at all the facts and made this decision under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. These reviews began on November 1, 2025. The Commission decided on February 4, 2025, to do expedited reviews. They finished and filed their final decision on May 23, 2025. The results and the Commission’s full opinions are in USITC Publication 5629, titled “Vertical Metal File Cabinets from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-623 and 731-TA-1449 (Review).” Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued the order. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From China and Vietnam; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations
U.S. Moves Forward with Trade Investigations on Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On May 30, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced important steps in its investigations on imports of thermoformed molded fiber products (TMFPs) from China and Vietnam. The USITC is working to decide if the U.S. industry is being harmed by these imported products. The investigations will look at whether TMFPs from China and Vietnam are being sold in the United States at below fair value and if they are being subsidized by their governments. The TMFPs include items like plates, bowls, trays, lids, food packaging, and other product packaging. These products are made from cellulose fibers and formed using heated molds. TMFPs can be any shape, size, color, or design. They can be made from any type of fiber, including recycled or natural fiber sources such as wood or agricultural by-products. They may also have extra treatments or features, like being heat resistant, water-resistant, or having special closures or designs. Some products are not included in this investigation. For example, products covered by other trade orders on paper plates from China, Thailand, and Vietnam are excluded. TMFPs used only as packaging for other products, such as molded fiber around a phone, are also excluded from this case. These investigations began after petitions were filed on October 8, 2024, by the American Molded Fiber Coalition, which includes two companies and a trade union. The final phase of the investigations is scheduled under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC and the Department of Commerce will review if TMFPs from the two countries are causing material injury to the U.S. market. The USITC has provided a detailed timeline: The prehearing staff report will be issued on September 11, 2025, with a public version to follow. The hearing will begin at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, September 25, 2025. Requests to appear at the hearing must be filed by September 19, 2025. Written testimony and presentation slides are due by noon on September 24, 2025. Prehearing briefs must be filed by September 18, 2025. Posthearing briefs are due by October 2, 2025. The USITC will release more information to the parties on October 22, 2025, and final comments must be submitted by October 24, 2025. Anyone wanting to take part in these investigations, including companies who use TMFPs or groups who represent buyers, must file an entry of appearance with the USITC. Electronic filing is required, and no paper filings will be accepted for now. Business proprietary information (BPI) will be given to approved applicants under an administrative protective order. The USITC has rules for making these filings and handling confidential information. All parties involved must serve documents on one another and submit a certificate of service. Submissions that do not follow these rules will not be accepted. The USITC is conducting these investigations under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. For more information and to view the public record, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Issued by order of the Commission on May 27, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People’s Republic of China: Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination With Final Less-Than-Fair-Value Determination
U.S. Aligns Final Duty Decision on Chinese Ceramic Abrasive Grains Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 29, 2025, the United States Department of Commerce published a notice about its trade investigations into sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China. On January 6, 2025, Commerce started two investigations on these products from China. One is a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation to see if Chinese manufacturers received unfair government help. The other is a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation to see if these products are sold in the United States at prices lower than in China. Both investigations cover the same type of ceramic abrasive grains. On May 19, 2025, the company Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc., who is the petitioner, asked the Department of Commerce to align the final CVD determination with the final LTFV determination. This request was made according to Section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. In response, Commerce decided to align the final decisions for both investigations. This means the final decision for the CVD investigation will come out on the same date as the LTFV investigation’s decision. Currently, the final determinations are scheduled to be issued no later than August 11, 2025. This date can be changed if the investigations are postponed. This announcement follows the legal process stated in section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4)(i). The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fiberglass Door Panels From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation
U.S. Postpones Preliminary Decision in Fiberglass Door Panels Investigation Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a postponement in its countervailing duty investigation into fiberglass door panels imported from the People’s Republic of China. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2025. The Department of Commerce started this investigation on April 9, 2025. The countervailing duty process usually requires a preliminary decision within 65 days of starting the investigation. This means the original due date for the preliminary determination was June 13, 2025. According to section 703(c)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, Commerce can postpone the preliminary date up to 130 days after starting the investigation. The rules allow this if the group that started the investigation, called the petitioner, asks for more time and gives reasons for the request. The petitioner in this case is the American Fiberglass Door Coalition. On May 19, 2025, the petitioner officially asked Commerce to delay the preliminary determination. The reason given was to ensure Commerce has enough time to carefully review all the answers from involved parties, ask for more information, and clear up any questions before reaching a decision. Commerce checked the petitioner’s request and found no reason to deny it. Therefore, the agency has postponed the preliminary determination. The new due date is no later than August 18, 2025. This postponement follows from federal regulations that move deadlines to the next business day if they land on a weekend or holiday. The final determination in this investigation will still be due 75 days after the preliminary determination. This notice was issued and published according to U.S. law and Commerce Department regulations. The notice is signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He is performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For more information, contact Sam Brummitt at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention
U.S. Finds Malaysia Circumventing MSG Antidumping Order on China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 29, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final decision that imports of monosodium glutamate (MSG) completed in Malaysia using glutamic acid from China are circumventing the U.S. antidumping duty (AD) order on MSG from China. This decision is based on a detailed investigation. The Department published a preliminary determination in February 2025. The Department then notified the U.S. International Trade Commission. The ITC did not request consultations. Case briefs were submitted by CPF Legacy, LLC, JEFI Enterprise (USA) Inc., and Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. on April 28, 2025. Rebuttal letters were filed by these parties on May 5, 2025. The deadline for the final determination was extended to May 22, 2025. The Department found that MSG finished in Malaysia using Chinese-origin glutamic acid, and then exported to the U.S., is covered by the scope of the 2015 antidumping duty order on MSG from China. This includes MSG “blended or in solution with other products” at 15 percent or more MSG by dry weight, in various forms and packaging. A full description of the product scope is in Appendix I of the notice. The Department used facts available, with adverse inferences, especially for Ajinoriki MSG Sdn Bhd, because Ajinoriki did not participate in required on-site verification. As a result, Ajinoriki is no longer eligible to certify that its shipments to the U.S. do not contain Chinese-origin glutamic acid. The Department also applied findings to all other non-responsive Malaysian companies listed in the notice. The Department is making this determination on a country-wide basis. The earlier certification process, which allowed verification of product origin, is now removed. Customs and Border Protection will suspend liquidation and require a cash deposit of estimated duties on all covered MSG from Malaysia that uses Chinese glutamic acid. This applies to entries imported since November 4, 2021, the date new circumvention regulations became effective, and also on or after May 15, 2024, the date this inquiry started. The antidumping cash deposit rate for affected MSG entries from Malaysia will be 56.54 percent, which is the China-wide rate. The Department created a new case number for these entries: Malaysia A-557-992-000. These requirements will stay in effect until further notice. Companies may request administrative reviews in each anniversary month of the AD order, with the next window in November 2025. This final country-wide finding is published under the authority granted by U.S. federal law and regulations. For further details or questions, contact Thomas Cloyd, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Enforcement and Compliance. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is available online at https://access.trade.gov. The written description in the official notice is controlling for the merchandise covered by this order. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hard Empty Capsules From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Hard Empty Capsules from China Are Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has made a preliminary decision that hard empty capsules from the People’s Republic of China (China) are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. This notice was published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2025. The period of investigation covered April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on this preliminary finding. Background Commerce started this investigation on November 20, 2024. The preliminary determination, initially scheduled earlier, was postponed to May 22, 2025. The full details about the events and methodology can be found in the related Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is available online for registered users. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers hard empty capsules from China. These are capsules made of two prefabricated, hollow cylindrical sections (cap and body). They are unfilled and composed of at least 80 percent water-soluble, non-toxic polymer that is fit for human or animal use, such as gelatin, HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), or pullulan. The capsules may include colorants, opacifiers, plasticizers, and other additives. They are included regardless of size, material, markings, or how they are imported (together or separately). The subject capsules are typically classifiable under subheadings 9602.00.1040 and 9602.00.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Other possible subheadings include 1905.90.9090 (general), 3503.00.5510 (gelatin capsules), 3923.90.0080 (HPMC capsules), and 2106.90.9998 (pullulan capsules). However, the written scope description is controlling. Product Coverage and Scope Comments Commerce provided time for parties to comment on product coverage. It received and reviewed comments but did not change the scope as a result. Further guidance and the summary of comments are found in the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum. Methodology The investigation follows section 731 of the Tariff Act. Since China is treated as a non-market economy, Commerce calculated export prices and normal values using rules specific to such countries. In the case of Shandong Healsee Capsule Ltd. (Shandong Healsee), Commerce applied facts available with adverse inferences to estimate dumping margins. Separate Rate Companies and China-wide Entity Commerce granted separate rates to certain companies not individually examined. For companies not selected for individual examination, the rate is based on a weighted average of the rates for the main examined exporters, Shandong Healsee and Shanxi JC Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanxi JC). The same rate was given to the China-wide entity. Preliminary Dumping Margins The following are the estimated weighted-average dumping margins: Shandong Healsee Capsule Ltd.: 172.24% Shanxi JC Biological Technology Co., Ltd.: 5.40% Guizhou Guang De Li Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.; Hebei Kangxin Plant Capsule Co., Ltd.; Hubei Kornnac Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Lefan Capsule Co., Ltd.; Jiujiang Angtai Capsule Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Yiqing Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Shaanxi Genex Bio-Tech Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Guang De Li Capsule Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Guangsheng Medicinal Capsule Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Kangke Capsule Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Renhe Capsule Co., Ltd.; Xinchang County Hexin Capsule Co., Ltd.; Xinchang County No.6 Capsule Factory; Shaoxing Kangke Capsule Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Huaguang Capsule Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Guangsheng Capsule Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Pujiang Enerkang Capsule Co., Ltd.; Yantai Oriental Pharmacap Co., Ltd.; Ningbo Capsulcn Capsule Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Zhongya Capsules Industry Co., Ltd.; Shandong Healsee Capsule Ltd.; Zhejiang Guangjuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Huaguang Capsule Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Huili Capsules Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Lujian Capsule Co., Ltd: 88.82% China-wide Entity: 88.82% Liquidation and Cash Deposit U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will suspend liquidation of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouses for consumption on or after May 29, 2025. Cash deposits will be required in amounts equal to the above margins. Verification Commerce will verify the data used in its final decision, as provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act. Public Comments Parties can submit briefs or comments after the last verification report is issued. Rebuttal briefs must be filed no later than five days after the initial brief. Each brief and rebuttal should begin with an executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words per issue. Parties who want a hearing must make a written request within 30 days of the publication of this notice. Postponement of Final Determination Following requests from Shandong Healsee, Shanxi JC, and the petitioner (Lonza Greenwood LLC), the final determination has been postponed. The final determination will be made no more than 135 days after May 29, 2025. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this preliminary finding. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will decide whether imports are causing harm or threaten harm to the U.S. industry. Official Issuance This notice was issued by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on May 22, 2025. All further details, including scope definitions and a list of topics discussed in the preliminary memorandum, can be found in the official Federal Register notice and its appendices. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From China, Indonesia, and Vietnam; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations
U.S. International Trade Commission Opens Investigations Into Plywood Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 29, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of investigations on hardwood and decorative plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. The case is about whether these imports are harming the U.S. industry. The investigations are under numbers 701-TA-764-766 and 731-TA-1747-1749 (Preliminary). The USITC will check if American makers of hardwood and decorative plywood are being hurt or could be hurt by imports sold at less than fair value or if these are being subsidized by the governments of China, Indonesia, or Vietnam. The products being investigated are listed under many Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes, like 4412.31.06, 4412.31.25, 4412.31.26, up to 4412.99.57. These investigations started because a group called the Coalition for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood sent a petition on May 22, 2025. Members of the coalition are Columbia Forest Products (North Carolina), Commonwealth Plywood Co., Ltd. (New York), Manthei Wood Products (Michigan), States Industries LLC (Oregon), and Timber Products Company (Oregon). The USITC must decide by July 7, 2025, if there is a reasonable sign that the U.S. industry is being harmed. After that, their views will go to the U.S. Department of Commerce by July 14, 2025. Anyone who wants more information can contact Calvin Chang at the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission. The public can also check the investigation records online at https://edis.usitc.gov. Parties who want to join the investigation must file an entry of appearance within seven days after this notice was published. Industrial users and consumer groups may also ask to be part of the investigation. There are rules for protecting companies’ business information. Parties must apply within seven days if they wish to access business proprietary details under a protective order. A staff conference about the investigations will happen at 9:30 a.m. on June 12, 2025. Anyone wishing to join must email the Commission by noon, June 10, 2025. Details about the conference and participation will be available on the USITC Public Calendar. Only electronic filings are allowed at this time. No paper documents will be accepted. All filings must be made via the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Written arguments or information can be given to the USITC by 5:15 p.m. on June 17, 2025. Written testimony or any supporting materials for the conference are due by 4:00 p.m. on June 11, 2025. All documents must follow the Commission’s official rules for format and filing. Documents must be shared with all parties and include a certificate of service. People sending information to the Commission must certify that their information is complete and true to the best of their knowledge. The information could be used by the Commission or shared with other government workers, but all contractors must sign nondisclosure agreements. These actions follow the rules of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, and this notice was published following USITC regulations. The notice is signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, and was officially filed on May 28, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Announces New OFAC Sanctions Actions Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published new sanctions in the Federal Register. These sanctions list new people and organizations that the U.S. government will watch and block. What Are OFAC Sanctions? OFAC is a part of the Treasury that makes lists of people and groups whose money and property in the United States are blocked. U.S. people are not allowed to work with them. OFAC uses these lists to stop crimes like selling illegal drugs and terrorism. New People Added to the List OFAC added two people to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List): Miguel Angel De Anda Ledezma Nickname: Miguelon Lives in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico Born September 16, 1984, in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico Mexican nationality Male ID Number: AALM840916HTSNDG02 (Mexico) Linked to: Cartel Del Noreste He is blocked for working for, or being part of, the Cartel Del Noreste, a group punished under U.S. rules for illegal drugs and for terrorism. Ricardo Gonzalez Sauceda Nicknames: El Ricky, Mando R, Mando Ricky Lives in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico Born January 21, 1998, in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico Mexican nationality Male ID Number: GOSR980121HTSNCC04 (Mexico) Linked to: Cartel Del Noreste He is blocked for working for, or being part of, the Cartel Del Noreste, a group punished for illegal drugs and terrorism. Both men now have their money and property in the U.S. blocked. U.S. people cannot do business with them. Update to Cartel SANCTIONS OFAC also updated its information for the group called Los Zetas. This group also goes by other names: Cartel Del Noreste, CDN, and Northeast Cartel. The group is in Mexico. Organization Type: Transnational Terrorist Group Also called: CD N, Northeast Cartel, and Los Zetas Secondary sanctions apply under special U.S. rules for terrorism and for fighting illegal drugs The group is recognized as a terrorist and criminal organization. Money and property in the U.S. that belong to these groups or people are now blocked. Why Is This Important? OFAC uses Executive Order 14059 from December 15, 2021, to punish people in the global illegal drug trade. It also uses Executive Order 13224 to block property of people or groups tied to terrorism. The main aim is to stop crime and terror by blocking money from bad groups and people. Where to Find More Information Extra details and updates on sanctions are on OFAC’s official website: https://ofac.treasury.gov. Contact Information For more information, contact the OFAC Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420, or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. You can also use https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension Without Change of a Currently Approved Collection; Comments Requested: Sequestered Juror Information Form
U.S. Marshals Service Proposes Extension of Sequestered Juror Information Form Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) at the Department of Justice announced a proposed extension for the “Sequestered Juror Information Form” in the Federal Register (Vol. 90, No. 101, p. 22515). This notice relates to collecting information from people or households as part of the USMS’s duty to keep federal courthouses, courtrooms, and judges safe. The “Sequestered Juror Information Form” (Form USM-523A) helps Marshals Service workers plan for and react to safety needs for jurors during court cases. There will be no changes to the form compared to the currently approved version. The USMS is simply asking for an extension of the form’s use. Comments about this extension are welcome for 60 days, ending on July 28, 2025. The public or other agencies can send feedback on things such as: Whether this information collection is needed for the job of the Bureau of Justice Statistics. If the estimate for time spent and the way it is counted is correct. How the quality or understanding of the questions can be improved. How to reduce the amount of time people need to spend answering. The USMS expects about 14 people to fill out this form each year. It should take each person about 4 minutes to finish. This adds up to around 1 hour total for all 14 people each year. There is no cost burden listed for the people filling out the form. If anyone wants to send comments, give suggestions, or get more information about the form or the process, they can contact Assistant Chief Karl Slazer at the USMS Headquarters in Arlington, Virginia at 703-740-2316 or by email. For further questions, Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, can be reached at the Justice Management Division in Washington, DC. The notice was dated May 21, 2025, and signed by Darwin Arceo as the Department Clearance Officer for the Paperwork Reduction Act at the U.S. Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension Without Change of a Currently Approved Collection; Comments Requested: Leased/Charter/Contract Personnel Expedited Clearance Request
U.S. Marshals Service Requests Comments on Expedited Clearance Form Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) is asking for public comments on an information collection form. The request is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 101, dated Wednesday, May 28, 2025. The form is called “Leased/Charter/Contract Personnel Expedited Clearance Request.” It is also known as Form USM-271. The form is used to get and use contract flight personnel, such as pilots, cabin crew, and mechanics. These people are needed for short-notice flight missions for JPATS (Justice Prisoner & Alien Transportation System). The form collects information needed to complete quick background checks on flight staff. This helps keep U.S. Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons prisoners safe during transport. Details of the Information Collection Type: Extension without change of a currently approved collection. Form Number: USM-271. Who Fills Out the Form: Individuals or households, such as contracted flight personnel. Number of Respondents: 180 estimated each year. Time to Complete: About 5 minutes per person. Total Time for All Respondents: 15 hours per year. USMS calculates the total time by multiplying 180 respondents by 5 minutes each, then dividing by 60 minutes for hours. How to Send Comments The USMS wants comments about four main points: If the information collected is needed for the Bureau of Justice Statistics and if it is useful. Whether the agency’s estimate of the burden is correct. If the collection can be made higher quality, more useful, or clearer. How to lessen the burden, such as using electronic or other modern technology. Comments will be accepted for 60 days, ending July 28, 2025. Contact for More Information If you want to send comments or need a copy of the form or instructions, contact: Assistant Chief Karl Slazer Management Support Division US Marshals Service Headquarters 1215 S Clark St., Ste. 10017 Arlington, VA 22202-4387 Phone: 703-740-2316 Email: [provided in the source document] If you need more information, you can also contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Official Notice This notice is signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice, dated May 21, 2025 (FR Doc. 2025-09520). Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission
Department of Justice Announces First Meeting of Religious Liberty Commission Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the first meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission. The meeting will take place on June 16, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The event will be held at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, located at 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting will be recorded and broadcast at justice.gov/live. The Religious Liberty Commission was created by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission serves as a federal advisory committee. It has a chairperson, a vice chair, and eleven other members. These members are chosen by the President. They include people from the private sector, employers, schools, religious groups, and state governments. The Commission will give advice to the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office about religious liberty policies in the United States. It will also create a report for the President. This report will cover the history of religious liberty in America, how religious liberty has helped society, today’s threats to religious liberty, ideas on how to protect religious liberty, and programs to increase awareness and celebrate religious pluralism in America. At the first meeting, the Commission will discuss the history of religious liberty in America. The group will talk about the Founders’ plans to protect religious liberty in the First Amendment. They will also discuss how the Supreme Court has decided cases about religious liberty, mainly from the mid-twentieth century onward. The meaning of the separation of church and state will also be a topic. Anyone who wants to attend in person needs to register. In-person attendance is open to the first 300 people who sign up. People can register by sending their full name, organization (if there is one), and email address to the provided email address. All guests must show ID and pass a security screening. People who want to give public comments can send them in writing. Comments must be sent by 5:00 p.m. on June 15, 2025. They can be sent by email or mailed to the Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706, Washington, DC 20530. For more information or to ask for help attending the meeting, contact M. Ashleigh Bondoc, Acting Designated Federal Official for the Religious Liberty Commission, by email or phone at 771-220-9743. This meeting notice is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). Dated May 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Continues Antidumping Duty Order on Mattresses From China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has announced the continuation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on mattresses from the People’s Republic of China (China). This announcement follows determinations by both Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Reason for Continuation Commerce and the ITC decided that ending the AD order would probably result in more dumped mattresses coming from China. Dumping means selling products at prices lower than in the home market or below the cost of production. The agencies found that if the order ended, U.S. mattress makers could be harmed again. Background The AD order on mattresses from China started on December 16, 2019. A required sunset review process began in November 2024. In the review, Commerce found that ending the order would bring back dumping. The ITC decided that this would likely cause harm, called “material injury,” to the U.S. mattress industry. Which Mattresses Are Covered The order covers all types of youth and adult mattresses. These must have a “core” for support. The core can be made of springs, foam, or other fillings. Adult mattresses must be more than 35 inches wide, 72 inches long, and 3 inches deep. Types include twin, full, queen, king, and California king. Youth mattresses must be more than 27 inches wide, 51 inches long, and over 1 inch deep. Crib mattresses can be up to 6 inches deep. Types include crib, toddler, and youth mattresses. The order applies to innerspring, non-innerspring, and hybrid mattresses. Hybrid mattresses have two or more support types, such as memory foam and springs. Non-innerspring mattresses are made with foam or other fillings. Mattresses imported by themselves, as part of furniture, or with a mattress foundation are covered. Only the mattress part is covered if it is imported with other furniture or as a set. Exclusions Certain items are not covered: Futon mattresses (tufted and without innersprings or foam) Airbeds and waterbeds (air or liquid-filled beds) Certain furniture that turns into beds if the mattress part is built into the furniture and inseparable Products already under the order for uncovered innerspring units from China (since 2009) Product Codes The products are listed under specific Harmonized Tariff Schedule for the United States (HTSUS) codes. These include 9404.21.0010, 9404.21.0013, 9404.29.1005, 9404.29.1013, 9404.29.9085, 9404.29.9087, and others. The written description is the final guide on what is covered. What Happens Next The continuation of the order is effective from May 20, 2025. U.S. Customs will keep collecting antidumping cash deposits at current rates for all covered mattresses from China. Commerce will next review this order in five years. Reminder on Confidentiality Commerce reminds all parties with access to confidential information to handle it properly under protection rules. This notice is published under the relevant laws and regulations. The determination and continuation are signed by Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, on May 21, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Active Anode Material From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
Commerce Department Finds Subsidies for Chinese Active Anode Material Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision. It found that producers and exporters in China are getting countervailable subsidies for active anode material. The finding comes after an investigation covering January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. What Is Active Anode Material? Active anode material is used in batteries. It is graphite with at least 90 percent carbon. It may have synthetic or natural graphite, or a mix of both. It might also be mixed with silicon materials or additives like carbon black. It can be in powder, liquid, or block forms. It is covered even if imported as part of a mixture or a battery. Companies Covered in the Investigation The Department looked at several companies. These include Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd. and its partner, Panasonic Corporation of China. Together, they work with suppliers such as BTR New Material Group and its affiliates. Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat and Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd. were also examined. Initial Findings and Subsidy Rates The Department set subsidy rates for these companies. The results are: Panasonic Global Procurement China Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of China: 6.55 percent. Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat: 721.03 percent (this rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences). Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology Corp., Ltd.: 721.03 percent (this rate is also based on facts available with adverse inferences). All other producers and exporters: 6.55 percent. The highest rates were assigned when companies did not provide enough information to the Department. Next Steps in the Investigation U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now suspend liquidation of the imports listed above. This means imports of active anode material from China will need a cash deposit equal to the above rates. The Department will check the information in the final review, called verification. The final decision will be made on the same date as the companion antidumping investigation. That is now set for no later than September 29, 2025, unless postponed. How to Comment or Take Part Companies and parties interested in this investigation can comment. They can send case briefs or comments on the determination. They can also request a hearing by giving their name, address, and which issues they want to discuss. These requests must be made within 30 days of the notice. International Review The U.S. International Trade Commission will be informed of this decision. If the final finding is also affirmative, the Commission will decide if these imports hurt U.S. industry. Where to Find More Information The full details and reasoning are provided in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Public documents are available online at https://access.trade.gov. Product Scope and Customs Active anode material is usually listed under these U.S. customs codes: 2504.10.5000 and 3801.10.5000. Other possible codes include 2504.10.1000 and 3801.90.0000. The written scope in the investigation is the final word. Summary The Department of Commerce believes Chinese producers of active anode material are receiving financial backing from the Chinese government. This investigation is ongoing. Interested parties should review the findings and take action if needed. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Extends Duties on Stainless Pressure Pipe Imports from China Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it will continue its antidumping and countervailing duty orders for circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from China. This decision follows findings by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The Department of Commerce and ITC agreed that removing these duties would likely cause more dumping—when products are sold at less than fair value—and let unfair government subsidies continue. They also found that ending the duties could hurt U.S. companies that make these pipes. The duties first started in March 2009. Since then, the U.S. government has checked every five years to see if the duties are still needed. This latest check is the third five-year “sunset review” for these orders. What Is Covered The orders apply to circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe that is up to 14 inches wide. The pipe covered includes products made to meet ASTM A-312 or ASTM A-778 standards or similar standards from other countries. The orders do not cover mechanical tubing, certain boiler or heat exchanger tubes, and special tubing made to other ASTM standards. Most of these pipes are listed in certain Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) codes. The exact product description controls which items the orders cover. Next Steps U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting the antidumping and countervailing duty deposits on all covered pipe from China at current rates. The official continuation began on May 21, 2025, the same day the ITC shared its final decision. The Department of Commerce will begin another five-year review of these orders on or before the fifth anniversary of this latest decision. Rules for Businesses The notice also reminds parties involved to return or destroy private information they received during this review process, according to federal rules. This decision and the duties are being continued under U.S. law, following sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Abdelali Elouaradia, signed the order on May 21, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Removes Two Individuals from OFAC Sanctions List Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced the removal of two persons from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. The action was issued on May 21, 2025. This means the property and interests in property of these individuals are no longer blocked under Executive Orders (E.O.) 13850 or 13857. Individuals Removed: Leonardo Gonzalez Dellan – Also known as Leonardo Gonzalez – Located in London, United Kingdom – Date of Birth: September 11, 1966 – Citizen of Venezuela – Male – Venezuelan ID Number: 8639102 – Venezuelan Passports: – 073785390 (expired July 1, 2018) – 046041771 (expired May 24, 2016) – 002272834 (expired August 14, 2012) Alejandro Antonio Fleming Cabrera – Located in Caracas, Capital District, Venezuela – Date of Birth: October 3, 1973 – Male – Venezuelan ID Number: 11953485 – Vice Minister for Europe of Venezuela’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Former posts include: – Vice Minister for North America, Ministry of Foreign Affairs – President, National Center for Foreign Commerce (CENCOEX) – President, Suministros Venezolanos Industriales, C.A. (SUVINCA) – Ambassador of Venezuela to Luxembourg – Chief Ambassador of the Venezuelan Mission to the European Union Further Information: The official notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 100, dated Tuesday, May 27, 2025, on page 22438. OFAC notifications and the full SDN List are available online at: https://ofac.treasury.gov. For more details, contact the Office of Foreign Assets Control at: Associate Director for Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Assistant Director for Licensing: 202-622-2480 Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance: 202-622-2490 Acting Director: Lisa M. Palluconi Office of Foreign Assets Control Department of the Treasury Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection and Comments Requested; Extension Without Change, of a previously Approved Collection #1121-0277: OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package
Department of Justice Seeks Comments on OJJDP Feedback Form Extension Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 27, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), released a notice in the Federal Register. The notice concerns a request for public comments about the extension of an information collection called the “OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package.” This collection is identified with OMB Number 1121-0277. The OJJDP is asking the public to send comments about whether the information collected is needed for its activities, the accuracy of the estimated time for people to respond, ways to make the data better, and methods to decrease the time it takes to complete the forms. Comments will be accepted for 60 days, until July 28, 2025. If you need more information or want to review the forms, you can contact Jill Molter, the Digital Communications and Training and Technical Assistance Coordinator at OJJDP’s NTTAC. She can be reached by phone at 202-514-8871 or by mail at 999 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Comments can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget at [email address protected]. The main purpose of the Feedback Form Package is to collect feedback from people who receive technical help, attend conferences, provide training, or take part in focus groups. This helps OJJDP and NTTAC check on the quality of their services, make needed changes, and improve training and help for people working in juvenile justice. The form will be sent to many groups, including individuals, households, all levels of government, non-profits, and private businesses. The process will help OJJDP learn about people’s satisfaction and understand their needs better. It is estimated that 4,756 people will fill out these forms. The time it takes to fill out a form could be as quick as 0.03 hours or as long as 1.5 hours. The total time for all responses in one year is expected to be about 430.5 hours. If additional information is needed, Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the Justice Management Division, can be contacted at Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC 20530. The notice was officially signed by Darwin Arceo on May 21, 2025. The Department of Justice encourages everyone involved or interested to share their comments before the deadline. Legal Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
