U.S. Trade Commission Launches Patent Investigation into Computing Devices Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 11, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to begin an investigation under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This comes after a complaint was filed on January 12, 2026, by Vicor Corporation of Andover, Massachusetts. The complaint was later updated on January 21, January 23, and January 26, 2026. A revised version was submitted on January 27, 2026. The complaint says that certain companies are importing, selling, or offering for sale in the U.S. power converters, circuit board assemblies, and computing systems that contain these parts. Vicor believes these products break the law by infringing on its U.S. Patent No. 12,395,087. According to Vicor, these violations involve numerous claims under the ‘087 patent. Vicor also states that a U.S. industry exists and is being harmed. The ITC agreed to start this investigation to see if a violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B) has happened. This section focuses on products that are imported, sold for import, or sold in the U.S. after import that infringe on intellectual property rights. The products under investigation are: Power converters used in data center servers, artificial intelligence (AI) systems, and cloud computing setups. These power converters provide power to: AI accelerators, Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), and Central Processing Units (CPUs). Also included are circuit board assemblies and computing systems that include these converters. Vicor requests that the ITC issue: A limited exclusion order, Cease and desist orders against the accused companies. The accused parties are: Delta Electronics, Inc. (Taiwan) Delta Electronics (Americas) Ltd. (Fremont, CA) DET Logistics (USA) Corporation (Fremont, CA) Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (Dongguan, China) Dongguan Luxshare Technology Co., Ltd. (also known as Luxshare-Tech) (Dongguan, China) Shanghai Peiyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. (also known as MetaPWR Electronics Co., Ltd.) (Shanghai, China) Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (Kirkland, WA) Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) MPS International (Shanghai) Ltd. (Shanghai, China) Wistron Corporation (Taipei, Taiwan) Wiwynn Corporation (New Taipei City, Taiwan) Quanta Computer Inc. (Taoyuan, Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology Inc. (Taoyuan, Taiwan) Quanta Cloud Technology USA LLC (San Jose, CA) Quanta Computer USA Inc. (Fremont, CA) The Commission assigned the Chief Administrative Law Judge to appoint an Administrative Law Judge for this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be part of the case. The accused companies must respond within 20 days of being served with the complaint and the notice of investigation. This is in line with Rule 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. If a company does not respond in time, it may lose its right to contest the claims. A result could be the issuing of an exclusion order or cease and desist orders without further warning. For public access, the complaint (excluding confidential information) is available on the Commission’s electronic docket system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Contact Info: Susan Orndoff, U.S. International Trade Commission, Docket Services Division, at (202) 205-1802. For help with EDIS: edis3help@usitc.gov ITC TDD (for hearing impaired): (202) 205-1810 ITC general: https://www.usitc.gov Official Document Number: FR Doc. 2026-03032 Filed: 2026-02-13 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-17
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and India: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03061/citric-acid-and-certain-citrate-salts-from-canada-and-india-initiation-of-less-than-fair-value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03060/citric-acid-and-certain-citrate-salts-from-canada-and-india-initiation-of-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Active Anode Material From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-02999/active-anode-material-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-affirmative-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of active anode material from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 4. Active Anode Material From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-02998/active-anode-material-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that active anode material from the People's Republic of China (China) is being, or likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. 5. Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Kingdom of Bahrain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-02984/common-alloy-aluminum-sheet-from-the-kingdom-of-bahrain-final-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill B.S.C. (GARMCO) subject to this administrative review made sales of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Kingdom of Bahrain (Bahrain) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-02-17
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-02-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Hard Empty Capsules From Brazil, China, India, and Vietnam; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03071/hard-empty-capsules-from-brazil-china-india-and-vietnam-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Fatty Acids from Indonesia and Malaysia; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03033/fatty-acids-from-indonesia-and-malaysia-revised-schedule-for-the-subject-investigations Sub: International Trade Commission 3. Certain Power Converters, Circuit Board Assemblies, and Computing Systems Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03032/certain-power-converters-circuit-board-assemblies-and-computing-systems-containing-the-same-notice Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 12, 2026, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Vicor Corporation of Andover, Massachusetts. Supplements to the Complaint were filed on January 21, 23, and 26, 2026. On January 27, 2026, the public Complaint was refiled with a revised set of public exhibits. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain power converters, circuit board assemblies, and computing systems containing the same by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,395,087 (“the ‘087 patent”). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 4. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (Solar Panels) From China and Taiwan; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/17/2026-03031/crystalline-silicon-photovoltaic-products-solar-panels-from-china-and-taiwan-scheduling-of-expedited Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic products (solar panels) from China and the antidumping duty order on solar panels from Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-02-13
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-02-13 1) Executive Summary Today’s update covers five official events published in the Federal Register involving the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), including the International Trade Administration (ITA). The authorities acted under Section 337 and antidumping/countervailing duty (AD/CVD) statutes. Key developments include the ITC’s termination of a consolidated Section 337 investigation on certain TOPCon solar products involving Chinese respondents and DOC’s continuation of AD/CVD orders, rescissions of reviews, and preliminary results in multiple country cases. The main policy tools covered are patent-related import investigations, administrative reviews, and five-year (sunset) reviews of duty orders. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) TOPCon Solar Cells — ITC Section 337 Investigation (Termination)The U.S. International Trade Commission announced it would not review an initial determination (Order No. 40) granting the parties’ joint motion to terminate the consolidated Investigations Nos. 337‑TA‑1422 and 337‑TA‑1425, which concerned certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, and components thereof. The termination ends the investigation entirely. The case involved complainants Trina Solar (China and U.S. affiliates) and named respondents including Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., and CSI Solar Co., Ltd. – Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission– Policy Type: ITC_337– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Investigations: 337‑TA‑1422, 337‑TA‑1425 (Consolidated)– Key Date: Commission vote on February 10, 2026; notice issued February 11, 2026– Link: Federal Register summary – TOPCon Solar Cells Investigation DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE – International Trade Administration (ITA) Multiple Products — Rescission of AD/CVD Administrative ReviewsThe Department of Commerce rescinded several antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews for multiple products after all review requests were timely withdrawn. Reviews affected include “Certain Collated Steel Staples” and “Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and up to 225cc” from the People’s Republic of China. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties based on the cash deposit rates at entry. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Key Date: Effective February 13, 2026– Link: Rescission of AD/CVD Administrative Reviews Calcium Hypochlorite — Continuation of AD/CVD Orders (China)Following affirmative determinations by Commerce and the ITC, Commerce published a notice continuing both the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on calcium hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China. The agencies found that revocation of the orders would likely lead to the recurrence of dumping, subsidization, and material injury to a U.S. industry. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: EXPLICIT– Orders: A‑570‑008 (AD), C‑570‑009 (CVD)– Effective Date: February 10, 2026– Link: Calcium Hypochlorite from China – Continuation of AD/CVD Orders Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (India) — Preliminary AD Review Results and Partial RescissionCommerce preliminarily determined that Western Chemical Industries P Limited made no sales below normal value during the December 2023–November 2024 period of review and partially rescinded the review for Meghmani Pigments. Interested parties may comment before final results are issued. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: NONE– Period of Review: Dec 1, 2023 – Nov 30, 2024– Link: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 – Preliminary Results Acetone (Republic of Korea) — Preliminary AD Review Results and Partial RescissionCommerce preliminarily found that Kumho P&B Chemicals, Inc. sold acetone at less than normal value during the March 2024–February 2025 review period, while rescinding the review for LG Chem, Ltd. due to lack of entries. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: NONE– Period of Review: Mar 1, 2024 – Feb 28, 2025– Link: Acetone from Korea – Preliminary Results Ripe Olives (Spain) — Preliminary AD Review Results and Partial RescissionCommerce preliminarily determined that Spanish producers, including Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S. Coop. And., made sales below normal value during the review covering August 2023–July 2024. The review was rescinded for one company after a timely withdrawal. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration– Policy Type: AD_CVD– Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY– China Indicator: NONE– Period of Review: Aug 1, 2023 – Jul 31, 2024– Link: Ripe Olives from Spain – Preliminary AD Review Results 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) – The ITC formally terminated a consolidated Section 337 investigation on TOPCon solar cells and related components, closing the case involving Chinese and global solar manufacturers. – Commerce continued AD and CVD orders on calcium hypochlorite from China after positive findings in second sunset reviews. – Commerce rescinded a range of AD/CVD administrative reviews—including certain Chinese products—following withdrawal of review requests within the regulatory deadlines. – Other preliminary administrative review results involved products from India, Korea, and Spain, reflecting Commerce’s ongoing regular annual review cycle. – All actions published on February 13, 2026, maintain procedural consistency under the Tariff Act without introducing new duty rates for China-related cases other than continuation of existing orders. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – TOPCon Solar Cells – ITC termination notice – Rescission of AD/CVD Administrative Reviews – Calcium Hypochlorite from China – Continuation of Orders – Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 – Preliminary Results – Acetone from Korea – Preliminary Results – Ripe Olives from Spain – Preliminary Results 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Issues Preliminary Results in Antidumping Review of Spanish Olives Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary results from the 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ripe olives from Spain. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. The Department found that sales of ripe olives by the mandatory respondent, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And., were made at less than normal value. The agency calculated a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 3.54 percent for Agro Sevilla. The same rate of 3.54 percent was also assigned to one non-selected company, Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. The review was initially requested for four companies. However, two were removed during the process. Commerce rescinded the review for Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L., because the request for review was withdrawn within the 90-day time limit. The agency also intends to rescind the review for Alimentary Group DCOOP, S.Coop.And., as the company did not have any entries of subject merchandise during the review period. The review follows the antidumping duty order first published on August 1, 2018. Commerce performed this review under the authority of Section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Export price and constructed export price were calculated following Section 772 of the Act, and normal value was determined under Section 773. Initial results were delayed due to multiple deadline tolling events, including a 90-day tolling on December 9, 2024; a 47-day tolling on November 14, 2025, due to a government shutdown; and an additional 21-day tolling on November 24, 2025, because of submission backlogs. The deadline for the preliminary results was extended to February 5, 2026. Commerce plans to verify certain information reported by Agro Sevilla. The verification was requested by the Musco Family Olive Company, a member of the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives. Commerce will accept comments from interested parties at a later date. Rebuttal briefs will be due five days after case briefs. All briefs must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Executive summaries for each issue must be included and limited to 450 words. Requests for public hearings must be submitted within 30 days of this notice. Hearings will be limited to issues raised in briefs. Upon final determination, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. If rates are de minimis, CBP will not assess duties. Otherwise, importer-specific rates will be calculated based on entered values. Commerce will issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of final results unless a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. For companies removed from the review—Aceitunas Guadalquivir and Alimentary Group—CBP will assess duties based on the rate in effect at the time of entry. Cash deposit rates from the final results will apply to future entries. If a company is not covered in this or prior reviews, the “all-others” rate of 19.98 percent will apply. All filings must be submitted via Commerce’s AntiDumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The final results of the review are due within 120 days of this notice, unless extended. Commerce reminds importers to file certificates on duty reimbursement per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Failure to comply may trigger double duty assessments. Contacts and full documentation are available through the Federal Register and ACCESS at https://access.trade.gov. This notice was issued under sections 751(a)(1), 777(i), and 351.221(b)(4) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing non-exclusive duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Acetone From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Recission, In Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Acetone Antidumping Review from Korea Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published its preliminary findings from the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on acetone from the Republic of Korea. The review covered the period from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. Kumho P&B Chemicals, Inc. (KPB) was found to have sold acetone in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. Its preliminary weighted-average dumping margin was set at 1.43 percent. The Department has also decided to rescind the review in part. Specifically, it will not continue the review for LG Chem, Ltd. (LG Chem). This conclusion was made because there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise from LG Chem during the review period. The Department of Commerce stated that in the absence of any entries during the period of review for LG Chem, assessment of antidumping duties is not applicable. Therefore, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on LG Chem’s prior entries at the cash deposit rates in effect at the time of entry. The administrative review followed a standard process outlined under the Tariff Act of 1930, sections 751(a)(2), 772, and 773. The Department calculated export prices and normal values based on sales and cost data submitted by KPB. Because of a government shutdown in 2025, deadlines were delayed. Deadlines were first tolled by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and then by another 21 days on November 24, 2025. As a result, the deadline for preliminary results was shifted to February 9, 2026. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), Commerce will disclose the calculations used in these preliminary results within five days of publication. Interested parties who wish to comment can submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 21 days after this notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs can be filed within five days following the close of case briefs. Case and rebuttal briefs must include: A statement of the issue A summary of the argument A table of authorities Parties must also provide a concise executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words per summary. Oral hearings can be requested within 30 days of publication. Any hearing will cover only the issues raised in written briefs. Commerce will use the final results to instruct CBP on the liquidation of entries. For KPB, importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates will be calculated. If the importer-specific dumping margins are de minimis (less than 0.50 percent), the entries will be assessed at zero. If an importer-specific rate cannot be determined, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties using the “all-others” rate of 33.10 percent. These assessment instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after the final results are published in the Federal Register. Following the final results, cash deposit rates will be updated as follows: The rate for each reviewed company will be established by the final results Companies not reviewed will continue with the most recent rate assigned If only the producer or the exporter has been reviewed before, that rate will apply All others will retain the 33.10 percent rate Commerce expects to issue its final results within 120 days unless extended. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to report any reimbursement of duties, as required under 19 CFR 351.402(f). This notice was signed on February 9, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. The appended Preliminary Decision Memorandum includes: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation The full document, including detailed methodology and instructions, is publicly available through the Federal Register and Commerce’s ACCESS portal. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Antidumping Review Results for Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India. The review covers the period from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The review found that Western Chemical Industries P Limited did not sell CVP-23 in the U.S. at prices below normal value. Therefore, a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent was preliminarily assigned to Western Chemical Industries P Limited. The review was conducted under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce used section 772 of the Act to calculate export prices and section 773 to calculate normal values. Commerce will disclose its calculations to the interested parties within five days of publication. The public may view these through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Commerce also announced the partial rescission of the review for Meghmani Pigments. The company withdrew its request for review on January 22, 2025. Since no other parties requested a review for Meghmani Pigments, the Department has rescinded the review for this company under regulation 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Case briefs or written comments on the preliminary results may be submitted within 21 days of the Federal Register publication date. Rebuttal briefs must be submitted within five days after the deadline for case briefs. All briefs must be filed through the ACCESS system. Interested parties submitting briefs should include a statement of the issue, a brief argument summary, a list of authorities, and a public summary of each issue limited to 450 words. Footnotes are required for citations in the public summary. Requests for a public hearing must be filed within 30 days of publication. Requests must include the participant’s name, address, phone number, the number of participants, nationality status, and a list of topics to discuss. Only topics raised in case briefs can be discussed. Once the review is complete, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties. If the final rate is zero or de minimis (less than 0.5%), entries will be liquidated without antidumping duties. Otherwise, importer-specific rates will be used. Entries of CVP-23 during the period that were produced by the respondent, but not known to be sold to the U.S., will be assessed at the “all-others” rate of 27.48 percent. This default rate came from the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Commerce plans to issue final results of this administrative review within 120 days of publication, unless this period is extended. Once final results are issued, cash deposit rates for future entries of CVP-23 from India will change. If the final rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required for Western Chemical Industries P Limited. Other deposit rates will depend on whether a rate for the company or its manufacturer has been previously established. This serves as a reminder to importers to submit a certificate of non-reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties before liquidation. Failure to do so may lead to double duties or higher assessments. The preliminary results were signed by Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Abbott on February 9, 2026. Appendix – Topics Included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Partial Rescission of Review V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Currency Conversion VII. Recommendation Reference: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 30 (February 13, 2026), Document Number: 2026-02878, Pages 6819–6821. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Calcium Hypochlorite From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Will Keep Duties on Calcium Hypochlorite from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced it will continue the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on calcium hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China. This decision follows determinations by the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both agencies found that ending the AD and CVD orders would likely cause dumping of the product and allow unfair subsidies to continue. That could hurt the U.S. industry making the same chemical. The Commerce Department and ITC looked at the orders as part of the required second five-year or “sunset” review process. Commerce began this review on June 2, 2025. The ITC agreed with the Department of Commerce’s findings. On February 10, 2026, the ITC ruled that ending the orders would probably lead to harm for U.S. companies. Calcium hypochlorite is a chemical used to disinfect water and other surfaces. It can be made in different forms like powder, tablets, crystals, or liquid. It must contain at least 10% available chlorine by weight to be covered by the orders. This chemical can have different formulas. This includes common bleaching powders and hemibasic forms. The main formula is Ca(OCl)₂. Other forms are Ca(OCl)₂·CaCl₂·Ca(OH)₂·2H₂O, 2Ca(OCl)₂·Ca(OH)₂, and Ca(OCl)₂·0.5Ca(OH)₂. The Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number for calcium hypochlorite is 7778-54-3. Its EPA Pesticide Code Number is 014701. It is classified as dangerous under multiple International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) codes, including UN 1748, 2880, 2208, and also UN 3485, 3486, and 3487. The chemical is listed under HTSUS subheading 2828.10.0000 for customs purposes. When it’s mixed into tablets or other forms, it may also be entered under 3808.94.5000 and 3808.99.9500. These codes apply to disinfectants. But the written description, not the code, defines what is covered. Because of the Commerce and ITC decisions, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep collecting AD and CVD deposits on imports of this product from China. This action helps American companies compete fairly. The next five-year review of the orders may begin by early 2031. The law requires this review to start no later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the last decision. This notice is also a reminder to all parties who had access to business confidential information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). They must either return or destroy the information or ask the court to convert it to a judicial protective order. Failing to do so is a violation. This decision and notice follow the Trade Act of 1930 and related regulations. The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Commerce Department, on February 10, 2026. It was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2026, under document number 2026-02951. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Rescission of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
U.S. Department of Commerce Rescinds Several Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-02-13 On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) officially rescinded administrative reviews of antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. This action follows timely withdrawal of all review requests during the proper deadlines. The International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance unit issued the notice. It confirms that no other requests for the listed reviews were submitted within the relevant 90-day timeframe. According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a review can be canceled in full or part if all parties who requested it withdraw within 90 days from the notice of initiation. The following reviews have been rescinded: ANTIDUMPING PROCEEDINGS: Burma: Mattresses (A-546-001) – Period of Review (POR): December 2, 2023 – June 30, 2025 Canada: Utility Scale Wind Towers (A-122-867) – POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 India: Brass Rod (A-533-915); POR: December 1, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Raw Honey (A-533-903); POR: June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025 Japan: Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products (A-588-873) – POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Mexico: Brass Rod (A-201-858) – POR: December 1, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepacked for Sale (A-552-835); POR: November 29, 2023 – May 31, 2025 Certain Steel Nails (A-552-818); POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Oil Country Tubular Goods (A-552-817); POR: September 1, 2024 – August 31, 2025 Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube (A-552-831); POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 Taiwan: Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepacked for Sale (A-583-871) – POR: June 1, 2024 – May 31, 2025 The People’s Republic of China: Certain Collated Steel Staples (A-570-112); POR: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof (A-570-124); POR: May 1, 2024 – April 30, 2025 Ukraine: Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A-823-819) – POR: August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025 COUNTERVAILING DUTY PROCEEDINGS: Canada: Utility Scale Wind Towers (C-122-868) – POR: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 India: Certain Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders (C-533-913); POR: September 29, 2023 – December 31, 2024 Certain Paper Shopping Bags (C-533-918); POR: November 6, 2023 – December 31, 2024 The People’s Republic of China: Certain Collated Steel Staples (C-570-113); POR: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 For the listed reviews, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties at the deposit rate collected at the time the goods entered the U.S. market or were withdrawn from warehouse. For reviews involving Canada or Mexico, CBP will receive assessment instructions no earlier than 41 days after this notice. For other countries, CBP will be instructed no earlier than 35 days after publication. Commerce reminds importers of their duty under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate confirming whether antidumping and/or countervailing duties were reimbursed. Failing to do so may lead to a presumption of reimbursement and result in double duties. Parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must follow procedures in 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3) regarding the return, destruction, or conversion of proprietary information. This notice was signed on February 10, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. The official reference number for this notice is FR Doc. 2026-02959. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting the Parties’ Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation; Terminating Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Ends Solar Panel Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 13, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it will not review an initial determination to end a trade investigation. This decision terminates Investigation Nos. 337-TA-1422 and 337-TA-1425. The investigations focused on certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, and related products. These products were alleged to infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,722,104 and U.S. Patent No. 10,230,009. The complaints were filed by Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc. of Fremont, California; Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC of Wilmer, Texas; and Trina Solar Co., Ltd. of Xinbei District, China. The complaints claimed patent infringement and said that a domestic industry existed. USITC officially opened Investigation No. 337-TA-1422 on November 5, 2024, and Investigation No. 337-TA-1425 on December 9, 2024. The investigations named several companies as respondents. These included: Runergy USA Inc., Pleasanton, CA Runergy Alabama Inc., Huntsville, AL Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Yangcheng City, China Adani Solar USA Inc., Irving, TX Adani Green Energy Ltd., Ahmedabad, India CSI Solar Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China Canadian Solar Inc., West Guelph, Canada Canadian Solar (USA) Inc., Walnut Creek, CA Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Bo Win, Thailand Canadian Solar US Module Manufacturing Corporation, Mesquite, TX Recurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC, Austin, TX The Commission’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations took part in the investigations. On January 21, 2025, the Commission combined the two investigations. On January 31, 2025, the Commission approved removing Adani Green Energy Ltd. from the case and added Mundra Solar PV Ltd. as a respondent. On February 12, 2025, the target date for completing the investigation was changed to May 20, 2026. On February 13, 2025, the Commission approved ending the case against Recurrent Energy Development Holdings LLC. On June 17, 2025, the Commission updated the name of Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC to T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC. On August 26, 2025, the investigation was partially ended for claims 11 of the ‘104 patent and claim 14 of the ‘009 patent. On December 8, 2025, the deadline for completing the investigation was extended to August 18, 2026. On December 9, 2025, more claims were withdrawn: claims 2–5 and 9–10 of the ‘104 patent, and claims 2, 3, 5, 7, 11–13, and 16 of the ‘009 patent. On January 15, 2026, the Administrative Law Judge approved the parties’ joint motion to end the investigation entirely. The judge found the motion followed Rule 210.21(a)(1) and said that ending the investigation was in the public interest. No party reviewed the judge’s decision. As a result, the USITC chose not to review the decision. The investigation is now officially closed. This action is taken under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and Part 210 of the Commission’s rules (19 CFR part 210). The Commission made its decision on February 10, 2026. The document was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on February 11, 2026. It is filed under Federal Register Document number 2026-02949. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Justice Department Briefing 2026-02-13
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2026-02-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: S&B Pharma LLC DBA Norac Pharma Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02914/importer-of-controlled-substances-application-sandb-pharma-llc-dba-norac-pharma Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: S&B Pharma LLC DBA Norac Pharma has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 2. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02911/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-siemens-healthcare-diagnostics-inc Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 3. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Scottsdale Research Institute Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02909/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-scottsdale-research-institute Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Scottsdale Research Institute has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 4. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Scottsdale Research Institute Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02908/bulk-manufacturer-of-controlled-substances-application-scottsdale-research-institute Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Scottsdale Research Institute has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 5. John Bender, M.D.; Decision and Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02902/john-bender-md-decision-and-order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration 6. Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02882/privacy-act-of-1974-implementation Sub: Justice Department Content: The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), a component within the United States Department of Justice (DOJ or Department), is finalizing without changes its Privacy Act exemption regulations for the system of records titled, Adjudication and Appeal Records of the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge and Board of Immigration Appeals, JUSTICE/EOIR-001, which were published as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on August 29, 2025. Specifically, the Department's regulations will exempt the records maintained in JUSTICE/ EOIR-001 from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act. The exemptions are necessary to protect properly classified information and law enforcement sensitive materials maintained in the system. The Department received one anonymous comment in support of this rulemaking in response to the NPRM. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-13
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Rescission of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02959/rescission-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based upon the timely withdrawal of all review requests, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative reviews covering the periods of review (PORs) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders identified in the table below. 2. Calcium Hypochlorite From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02951/calcium-hypochlorite-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-continuation-of-antidumping-and Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on calcium hypochlorite from the People's Republic of China would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. 3. Fresh Winter Strawberries From Mexico: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02931/fresh-winter-strawberries-from-mexico-initiation-of-less-than-fair-value-investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 4. Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02878/carbazole-violet-pigment-23-from-india-preliminary-results-and-partial-rescission-of-antidumping Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Western Chemical Industries P Limited did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value. The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. In addition, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect to Meghmani Pigments. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 5. Acetone From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Recission, In Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02877/acetone-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-recission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that Kumho P&B Chemicals, Inc. (KPB) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. In addition, Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to LG Chem, Ltd. (LG Chem). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 6. Chromium Trioxide From India: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02876/chromium-trioxide-from-india-postponement-of-preliminary-determination-in-the-countervailing-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 7. Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02875/ripe-olives-from-spain-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-and-partial Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. In addition, we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to one company. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-02-13
International Trade Commission Briefing 2026-02-13 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Van-Type Trailers and Subassemblies From Canada, China, and Mexico; Determinations Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02990/van-type-trailers-and-subassemblies-from-canada-china-and-mexico-determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting the Parties’ Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation; Terminating Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/13/2026-02949/certain-topcon-solar-cells-modules-panels-components-thereof-and-products-containing-same-notice-of Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 40) granting the parties' joint motion to terminate the investigation. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-02-12
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-02-12 1) Executive Summary Today’s briefing covers nine official U.S. government notices, primarily from the Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) and the Department of the Treasury (Office of Foreign Assets Control, OFAC). The trade actions focus on antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings, including preliminary and final results, sunset reviews, and rescissions across multiple jurisdictions (India, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil). Separately, OFAC issued multiple listings updating identifying information across its sanctions programs. The principal policy tools addressed are antidumping reviews, new shipper reviews, sunset reviews, and sanctions list updates. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration (ITA) Certain Frozen Fish Fillets (Vietnam) — AD Review (Court Decision and Amended Final Results) The Court of International Trade sustained Commerce’s remand redetermination regarding the new shipper review of frozen fish fillets from Vietnam, finding that Co May Import-Export Company’s sale was not bona fide. Commerce rescinded the review and reinstated Co May under the Vietnam-wide entity rate of $2.39/kg. – Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: NONE – Key dates: CIT judgment January 8, 2026; effective January 18, 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-notice-of-court-decision-not-in-harmony-with-the-final-results-of-new-shipper-review-and-notice-of-amended-final-results/ Certain Uncoated Paper (Brazil) — AD Review (Rescission; 2024–2025) Commerce rescinded the administrative review of the antidumping order on uncoated paper from Brazil for March 1, 2024–February 28, 2025. The rescission applied to Suzano S.A. due to withdrawal of requests and to Sylvamo due to absence of reviewable entries. – Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT (China included in original order scope) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-uncoated-paper-from-brazil-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025/ Finished Carbon Steel Flanges (India) — AD Review (Preliminary Results; 2023–2024) Commerce preliminarily determined that Norma Group and R.N. Gupta & Co. made U.S. sales of finished carbon steel flanges at less than normal value during August 1, 2023–July 31, 2024. The preliminary margins are 2.65% for R.N. Gupta, 1.88% for Norma Group, and 2.35% for other firms. Interested parties may comment prior to final results. – Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key dates: Preliminary results published February 12, 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/finished-carbon-steel-flanges-from-india-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film (India and Taiwan) — AD Orders (Final Sunset Review Results) Commerce completed the fourth five-year sunset reviews of the AD orders on PET film from India and Taiwan. The agency found that revoking the orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping with margins up to 24.10% for India and 8.99% for Taiwan. – Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key dates: Final results effective February 12, 2026 – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/polyethylene-terephthalate-film-sheet-and-strip-from-taiwan-and-india-final-results-of-the-expedited-fourth-sunset-reviews-of-the-antidumping-duty-orders/ Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod (Mexico) — AD Review (Preliminary Results; 2023–2024) Commerce preliminarily found wire rod sales from Mexico to have been made at less than normal value during October 1, 2023–September 30, 2024. Deacero was assigned a 15.97% margin. The review was partially rescinded for seven companies with no reviewable entries. – Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/carbon-and-certain-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-mexico-preliminary-results-and-partial-rescission-of-the-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Sodium Nitrite (India) — AD Review (Final Results; 2022–2024) Commerce determined that Deepak Nitrite Limited did not make below-normal-value sales of sodium nitrite to the United States during August 17, 2022–January 31, 2024. The final weighted-average dumping margin is 0.00 percent; entries will be liquidated without antidumping duties. – Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/sodium-nitrite-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2022-2024/ Department of the Treasury – Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) OFAC Sanctions Actions — Identifying Information Updates OFAC issued multiple notices updating entries across its sanctions lists to enhance data standardization and correct administrative errors. Each notice references historical update dates. – OFAC Update (April 22, 2025) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-11/ – OFAC Update (October 2, 2024) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-13/ – OFAC Update (November 27, 2024) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-12/ – OFAC Update (June 18, 2025) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-10/ – OFAC Update (August 6, 2025) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-9/ – OFAC Update (September 23, 2025) – Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-8/ Each notice affirms that OFAC’s sanctions lists remain accessible at https://ofac.treasury.gov. 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Commerce issued six antidumping duty administrative actions—three preliminary results, one final result, one sunset review conclusion, and one rescission. The Vietnam frozen fish fillets case included a court decision leading to rescission of a new shipper review. India featured prominently across several notices (sodium nitrite, PET film, flanges), with one producer receiving a zero margin. OFAC recorded six updates adjusting identifying details on sanctioned entities for consistency and correction purposes. None of the actions introduced new sanctions or new AD/CVD orders on China, though uncoated paper from Brazil remains part of a multination order that includes China. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – Certain Frozen Fish Fillets – Vietnam (CIT Decision) – Certain Uncoated Paper – Brazil (Rescission) – Finished Carbon Steel Flanges – India (Preliminary Review Results) – PET Film from Taiwan and India (Final Sunset Review) – Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod – Mexico (Preliminary Review Results) – Sodium Nitrite – India (Final Review Results) – OFAC Notice – April 22 2025 – OFAC Notice – October 2 2024 – OFAC Notice – November 27 2024 – OFAC Notice – June 18 2025 – OFAC Notice – August 6 2025 – OFAC Notice – September 23 2025 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
OFAC Issues Updates to Sanctions List Entries Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Date: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 29, Page 6732 The U.S. Department of the Treasury, through its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), has made official updates to names listed on one or more of its sanctions lists. These updates were made on October 2, 2024. The updates help correct minor errors and improve how the information is written. This helps make the data consistent and easier to understand. The changes are part of OFAC’s ongoing efforts to keep its sanctions data accurate. The corrected names and the related legal authorities can be found online. To view the updated names and details, OFAC provides the direct link here: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20241002 People can also go to OFAC’s website at https://ofac.treasury.gov to get more information about OFAC’s sanctions programs and lists. If anyone needs more help or has questions, they can contact OFAC: Office of Sanctions Support and Operations: 202-622-6943 Office of Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Online form: https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac This notice is given under the authority of 31 CFR Chapter V. The notice was signed by Bradley T. Smith, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Document Number: 2026-02835 Filed: February 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. Billing Code: 4810-AL-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates Sanctions List Records Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes Date: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register Volume 91, Number 29 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a notice on February 12, 2026. The notice includes updates to names already listed on one or more of OFAC’s sanctions lists. The changes were made on November 27, 2024. The updated names help improve data accuracy and consistency. Some names had small errors. OFAC corrected those. The updated names and full list are published at this link: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20241127 These changes were issued under Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter V. The notice was signed by Bradley T. Smith. He is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. More information about OFAC sanctions is available at: https://ofac.treasury.gov Anyone with questions can contact OFAC by phone: Office of Sanctions Support and Operations: 202-622-6943 Office of Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Or online at: https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac The official document number for this notice is 2026-02836. It was filed on February 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. BILLING CODE: 4810-AL-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
Treasury Department Updates Sanctions List Information Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury has released a new notice through the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). The notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 29, on Thursday, February 12, 2026. OFAC is part of the Department of the Treasury. This office manages and enforces economic and trade sanctions. The notice reports changes to information on OFAC’s sanctions lists. These changes were made to fix errors and improve how data is shown. The updates were made on April 22, 2025. These updates affect entries already on one or more of OFAC’s sanctions lists. OFAC updated names of individuals or groups. The goal is to make information clear, accurate, and consistent. No new names were added. The changes focus only on correcting and improving existing records. The updated names and related sanctions authorities can be found online. OFAC provided a direct link: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250422. Anyone who wants more information or has questions can contact OFAC. There are contacts for the Associate Director for the Office of Sanctions Support and Operations at 202-622-6943. There is also a contact number for the Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420. More details about OFAC and its sanctions programs are also online at https://ofac.treasury.gov. The notice was signed by Bradley T. Smith. He is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. The official document was filed on February 11, 2026. It was published the next day. The full document number is 2026-02837. The billing code for this action is 4810-AL-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates Sanctions List Information Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes Date: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 29, Page 6732 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has released an official update. This notice appeared in the Federal Register on February 12, 2026. OFAC made changes to names listed in its sanctions records. These changes were made on June 18, 2025. The updates help improve how data is reported. They also fix small errors in past records. The changes affect names currently on OFAC’s sanctions lists. These lists are used to show who is under U.S. sanctions. Updating the information keeps the records correct and in line with data standards. The public can view the updated names and related sanctions laws at: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250618 OFAC’s lists and other sanctions program details are online at: https://ofac.treasury.gov If you have questions, you can contact OFAC: Office of Sanctions Support and Operations: 202-622-6943 Office of Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Online contact form: https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac This notice was signed by Bradley T. Smith. He is the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. The notice was filed on February 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. Document Number: 2026-02838 Billing Code: 4810-AL-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates Sanctions List Entries Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes Date: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 29, Page 6731 The U.S. Department of the Treasury has released a notice through its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). The notice was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, February 12, 2026. The reference number for the official document is 2026-02839. Action Taken OFAC announced updates to information about certain individuals or entities on its sanctions lists. The updates are meant to improve data consistency. Some entries had small mistakes, and these have been corrected. These changes do not add new names to the sanctions lists. They only fix or standardize the way existing names are shown. Update Date OFAC made the updates on August 6, 2025. Details of the Changes The new information is available on OFAC’s website listed at: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250806 Purpose OFAC publishes these updates to ensure accuracy in how names and details appear on the lists. They are part of OFAC’s ongoing work to manage sanctions programs and support enforcement. Contact For more information, you can contact the U.S. Treasury: Office of Sanctions Support and Operations: 202-622-6943 Office of Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Online: https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac Electronic Access OFAC’s full sanctions lists and updates are available at: https://ofac.treasury.gov Authority This notice was issued under the legal authority of 31 CFR Chapter V. Signed Bradley T. Smith Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control Filing Information Filed on February 11, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. Billing Code: 4810-AL-P End of Notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Updates OFAC Sanctions List Estimated reading time: 1–5 minutes Date: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register Volume 91, Number 29 The Department of the Treasury has issued a notice about changes to the official sanctions list managed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). These changes were made to correct mistakes and to make the information clearer. OFAC updated identifying information related to one or more names already on its lists. These updates help improve accuracy and standardization in government records. The updates took place on September 23, 2025. These changes are part of OFAC’s ongoing effort to keep records correct and easy to use. The complete list of updated names and the legal reasons for their listing are available online. To see the full update, visit: https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250923 OFAC’s sanctions lists and more information about its work can also be found at: https://ofac.treasury.gov If you need help or have questions about these updates, you can contact OFAC at: Office of Sanctions Support and Operations: 202-622-6943 Office of Global Targeting: 202-622-2420 Online contact form: https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac This notice was signed by Bradley T. Smith, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Record Number: FR Doc 2026-02840 Filed: February 11, 2026 Code: 4810-AL-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
U.S. Ends Review of Antidumping Duties on Paper from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has ended a review of antidumping duties on uncoated paper from Brazil. This was for the time period from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. Commerce has decided to stop its review of Suzano S.A. and Sylvamo do Brasil Ltda. with Sylvamo Exports Ltda. Suzano asked for a review. The petitioner, Domtar Corporation, also asked for a review of Suzano. Both parties withdrew those requests on July 28, 2025. Since no one else asked for a review, Commerce is now rescinding it under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Sylvamo did not have any imports of the paper during this time. On June 12, 2025, Sylvamo told Commerce that no shipments matched their entries. Commerce agreed. Because of this, Sylvamo’s review was also ended under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Commerce announced its intent to stop the review of Sylvamo on January 9, 2026. No party objected. Sylvamo supported the decision. Government shutdowns delayed the timing. First, on November 14, 2025, deadlines were pushed back by 47 days. Then, on November 24, 2025, delays added 21 more days. New deadlines moved the preliminary results date to February 9, 2026. There will be no change in cash deposit rates. The current rates continue. Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties at rates matched to the time goods entered the U.S. Instructions will come no earlier than 35 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. This is also a reminder for parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to return or destroy confidential materials as per 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). The notice follows sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). This notice was signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, on February 9, 2026. Federal Register publication date: February 12, 2026. Document number: 2026-02781. End of notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of New Shipper Review; and Notice of Amended Final Results
Court Rules Against Co May in Fish Fillet Trade Case; Commerce Rescinds Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a final judgment in the case Catfish Farmers of America, et al. v. United States, Court No. 24-00126. The court upheld the U.S. Department of Commerce’s new decision concerning the new shipper review of certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The period of review covered by this decision is August 1, 2022, through January 31, 2023. The product in question was exported to the United States by Co May Import-Export Company Limited (Co May). In the original final results, issued on June 25, 2024, Commerce had found that Co May’s single sale during the review period was a bona fide, or legitimate, sale. Commerce set a weighted-average dumping margin of $0.00 per kilogram for Co May. Initially, Commerce believed that Co May’s U.S. customer resold the fish fillets at a profit. It did not count the antidumping (AD) cash deposit as a cost in its profit calculation. Commerce also found no evidence on the record that the customer’s relationship with downstream buyers changed the profit analysis. However, the Catfish Farmers of America and other petitioners appealed that decision. On June 5, 2025, the CIT ordered Commerce to provide further explanation. The court asked Commerce to revisit its treatment of the AD cash deposit in the profit analysis. It also asked for more clarity regarding the relationship between Co May’s U.S. customer and the second-level buyers. In the remand redetermination issued on November 17, 2025, Commerce reconsidered its findings. It re-evaluated how it treated cash deposits and the reseller’s financial relationships. After further review, Commerce determined that Co May’s sale was not bona fide. Commerce stated that it would rescind the new shipper review if that finding was affirmed. On January 8, 2026, the CIT officially sustained Commerce’s remand redetermination. According to the court’s ruling, and as required by the Timken decision and 19 U.S.C. sections 516A(c) and (e), Commerce must now take action consistent with the final judgment that is not in harmony with its earlier ruling. As a result, Commerce has amended its final results. Commerce now finds that Co May’s sale was not a bona fide sale. Therefore, Commerce has rescinded the 2022–2023 new shipper review. Because of this decision, Co May is no longer eligible for separate rate treatment. Co May will now be treated as part of the Vietnam-wide entity. The Vietnam-wide cash deposit rate of $2.39 per kilogram now applies to Co May. Commerce will send updated cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Commerce is currently barred by court order from liquidating Co May’s entries made between August 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. These entries remain suspended under that injunction during the appeals process. If there are no further appeals, or if the court’s ruling is upheld, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties on affected entries at the Vietnam-wide rate of $2.39 per kilogram. This notice was issued in compliance with the requirements of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related court rulings. Dated: 2026-02-06. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Sodium Nitrite From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2024
Commerce Releases Final Results for Review of Sodium Nitrite from India, Finds No Dumping Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on sodium nitrite from India. This review covers the period from August 17, 2022, through January 31, 2024. The review was conducted by the International Trade Administration under docket number A-533-906. The subject merchandise is sodium nitrite produced by Deepak Nitrite Limited (Deepak), a company based in India. Key Findings Commerce determined that Deepak did not sell sodium nitrite at less than normal value during the period of review. The final weighted-average dumping margin was 0.00 percent. As a result, Deepak will not face antidumping duties on entries of sodium nitrite into the United States for this period. Background Commerce released preliminary results on June 4, 2025. A post-preliminary analysis was issued on July 18, 2025. On September 24, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for its final results to December 1, 2025. Due to a federal government shutdown, there were two tolling periods applied to administrative deadlines: a 47-day toll announced on November 14, 2025, and a 21-day toll announced on November 24, 2025. These tolling periods extended the final results deadline to February 9, 2026. Final Calculation Changes Commerce revised Deepak’s margin calculation since the preliminary phase, based on comments submitted by interested parties. Commerce has published a complete Issues and Decision Memorandum that outlines all changes and responses to comments. The memorandum is available on the ACCESS electronic system at https://access.trade.gov. Assessment of Duties Because the final margin is zero percent, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate relevant entries without collecting antidumping duties. For any entries where Deepak did not know the final destination was the United States, CBP will assess duties at the “all-others” rate of 42.76 percent unless a specific rate applies to an intermediate party. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of the final results. If a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade within 90 days, CBP will be instructed to delay liquidation accordingly. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective as of the publication date in the Federal Register: Deepak’s cash deposit rate is set at 0.00 percent. Exporters not covered by this review but covered in prior segments will remain subject to previously published rates. If the producer is covered but the exporter is not, the deposit rate will be based on the producer’s most recent rate. All others continue to have a deposit rate of 42.76 percent. These cash deposit requirements remain in effect until further notice. Importer Requirements Importers must submit certificates of reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Failure to file such certificates may result in Commerce presuming reimbursement and applying double duties. APO Compliance Parties under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) must return or destroy all proprietary information in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). This requirement continues to apply and violations are subject to sanctions. Contact Information For more details, contact Joy Zhang at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance. Phone: (202) 482-1168. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. For full documentation, including the final results and Issues and Decision Memorandum, visit https://access.trade.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Mexican Steel Wire Rod Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review for carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico. The review covers the period from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. Preliminary Results The Department preliminarily found that steel wire rod from Mexico was sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. Specifically, Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 15.97 percent for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V. These two companies were treated as a single entity for the purpose of this review. Review Background The original antidumping duty order was issued on October 29, 2002. The current review was officially initiated on November 14, 2024. Nine companies were included in the scope of the review: ArcelorMittal Mexico S.A. de C.V. (AMM) Comercializadora Eloro S.A. Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V. Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V. Ingeteknos Estructurales S.A. Optimatiks S.A. de C.V. TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (successor to Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V.) Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. Delays in the Review The timeline for issuing these preliminary results was extended multiple times. On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled review deadlines by 90 days. On September 30, 2025, the timeline was extended by an additional 30 days. Two more delays followed in November 2025 due to a federal government shutdown. A 47-day tolling was imposed on November 14, followed by an additional 21 days on November 24. Finally, on December 29, 2025, another 30-day extension was granted. The deadline was moved to February 6, 2026. Partial Rescission Commerce is rescinding the review for seven of the nine companies. This decision is based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, which showed that AMM, Comercializadora Eloro, Villacero, Ingeteknos, Optimatiks, TA 2000 (Talleres y Aceros), and Ternium had no entries of subject merchandise during the review period. Only Deacero and Deacero Summit remain in the review. Methodology Commerce used standard procedures under the Tariff Act of 1930. Constructed export prices and normal values were calculated under sections 772(b) and 773 of the Act. The full explanation is available in a separate Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Comments and Case Briefs Commerce invites interested parties to submit comments. Case briefs are due within 21 days of this notice. Rebuttal briefs are due within five days after that. Each brief must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Parties must also provide a public executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words. If a hearing is requested, all parties must submit a formal request within 30 days of this notice, through the ACCESS electronic system. Assessment Rates Importers will be assessed antidumping duties following the final results. Each importer’s duty will be calculated using total U.S. entry values. If a company’s dumping margin is de minimis (too small to measure), entries will be instructed for liquidation without duties. The final results will also determine future deposit amounts. For the seven companies dropped from the review, duties will be assessed according to deposit rates in place at the time of entry. Final Results Final results are due within 120 days of this notice, unless extended. Commerce will use comments received to prepare the final decision. Reminders Commerce reminds importers of their duty to file certificates of reimbursement, as per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). Lack of certification may lead to double duties. Cash Deposits Once final results are published, new cash deposit rates will go into effect for future entries. For companies not reviewed or covered in prior segments, the “all others” rate of 20.11 percent will apply. For More Information The Preliminary Decision Memorandum, methodology, and full documentation are available at: https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Signed, Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations U.S. Department of Commerce Dated: 2026-02-06 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan and India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Keeps Antidumping Duties on PET Film from Taiwan and India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of the fourth sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from Taiwan and India. The Department of Commerce found that removing these antidumping duties would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. Dumping is when products are sold in the United States at prices below their fair value. The current antidumping margins for PET film are up to 8.99 percent for Taiwan and up to 24.10 percent for India. The Department published the original antidumping orders on July 1, 2002. The fourth sunset reviews began on August 1, 2025, in line with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. On August 18, 2025, domestic PET film producers Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc. and Microworks America, Inc. submitted timely notices of their intent to participate in the sunset reviews. By August 29, 2025, these domestic interested parties filed complete substantive responses. No responses were submitted by exporting companies or foreign governments. On September 23, 2025, the Department informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that no responses had been received from respondents. The Commerce Department then conducted an expedited 120-day review, as allowed under U.S. law. Due to a Federal Government shutdown, deadlines were tolled. All procedural deadlines were delayed by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and another 21 days on November 24, 2025. The final deadline became February 5, 2026. The full scope of these orders covers PET film imported from Taiwan and India. Details are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is filed electronically in Commerce’s ACCESS system. The list of topics in the memorandum includes: Summary Background Scope of the Orders History of the Orders Legal Framework Likelihood of Dumping Size of Dumping Margins Final Results of the Sunset Reviews Recommendation This notice also reminds parties handling confidential information under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) to return or destroy materials according to federal rules. These results were published under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. Full details can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 29, pages 6620–6621. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Preliminary Dumping Margins Found in Review of Carbon Steel Flanges from India Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Published: 2026-02-12 Source: Federal Register, Vol. 91, No. 29 Document Number: 2026-02859 The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary results for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from India. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Commerce found that certain Indian producers and exporters sold carbon steel flanges below normal value during this period. These findings may result in continued or adjusted duties on imports from these firms. Background The original antidumping duty order was issued on August 24, 2017. On August 1, 2024, Commerce announced the opportunity to request this review. The review was started on September 20, 2024. Norma Group and R.N. Gupta & Co., Ltd. (RNG) were selected as the mandatory respondents. The Norma Group includes Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal. Commerce continues to treat them as a single entity based on previously verified evidence. Delays in the review process occurred due to various events: 90-day tolling of deadlines on December 9, 2024 112-day extension on July 17, 2025 47-day tolling due to the Federal Government shutdown 21-day additional tolling for backlog caused by electronic filing delays As a result, the new deadline for the preliminary results was set for January 28, 2026. Scope of the Order The order covers finished carbon steel flanges. A full description is available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, posted online via ACCESS. Methodology Commerce followed sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(2), 772, and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Export prices and normal values (NV) were used to calculate dumping margins. Rate for Non-Selected Companies Commerce applied guidance from section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act to assign a rate to non-examined companies. The rate is 2.35 percent. This reflects the weighted average of the margins for Norma Group and RNG, based on publicly available sales data. Preliminary Results Commerce preliminarily assigned the following weighted-average dumping margins: R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd.: 2.65% Norma Group: 1.88% Non-selected companies: 2.35% (List of non-selected companies is included in Appendix II.) Disclosure Commerce will release its calculations within five days following publication of this notice. These will be available via the ACCESS system. Public Comment Case briefs are due within 21 days of publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after that. Parties must file electronically via ACCESS. Briefs must include a table of contents and authorities, along with executive summaries. Summaries should not exceed 450 words per issue. Requests for a hearing are due within 30 days of publication. Hearing requests must include participant details and a list of issues to be discussed. The hearing’s date and time will be determined later. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the review, Commerce will direct CBP to assess duties based on the final results. If the final rate is zero or de minimis, no duties will be assessed. For unreviewed entries, the reseller policy will apply. Commerce will assign a rate equal to the weighted average rate from the final results for non-selected companies. Instructions to CBP will be issued no earlier than 35 days after publication of final results. Cash Deposit Requirements Once final results are published, new cash deposit rates will apply as follows: For reviewed companies: their final company-specific margin For companies covered in prior segments: the most recent rate For exporters not reviewed but whose producers were: the producer’s rate For others: the all-others rate of 8.91% established in the original investigation These rates will stay in effect until further notice. Importer Notification Importers must comply with 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file certificates regarding duty reimbursements. Failure to do so may result in doubled or increased duties. Appendix I – Topics in Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Methodology Munish Forge Private Corporate Name Change Currency Conversion Recommendation Appendix II – Non-Selected Companies Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. BFN Forgings Private Limited Cetus Engineering Private Limited Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd. Munish Forge Private Limited (Commerce received a name-change notification from this company and is evaluating it.) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2026-02-12
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2026-02-12 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02840/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02839/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. 3. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02838/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. 4. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02837/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. 5. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02836/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. 6. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02835/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing updates to the identifying information of one or more entries currently included on one or more of OFAC's sanctions lists. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-12
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-12 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02859/finished-carbon-steel-flanges-from-india-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 2. Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan and India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02851/polyethylene-terephthalate-film-sheet-and-strip-from-taiwan-and-india-final-results-of-the-expedited Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from Taiwan and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice. 3. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02850/carbon-and-certain-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-mexico-preliminary-results-and-partial-rescission-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that sales of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico were made at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review with respect to seven companies. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 4. Sodium Nitrite From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02828/sodium-nitrite-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2022-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deepak Nitrite Limited (Deepak) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) from August 17, 2022, through January 31, 2024. 5. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of New Shipper Review; and Notice of Amended Final Results Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02783/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-notice-of-court-decision-not-in Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On January 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Catfish Farmers of Am., et al. v. United States, Court No. 24-00126, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s remand results pertaining to the new shipper review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) covering the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through January 31, 2023. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results in the new shipper review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to Co May Import-Export Company Limited (Co May). 6. Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/12/2026-02781/certain-uncoated-paper-from-brazil-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Brazil covering the period of review (POR) March 1, 2024, though February 28, 2025. We are rescinding this administrative review with respect to Suzano S.A. (Suzano) because all review requests for the company have been withdrawn. Additionally, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to Sylvamo do Brasil Ltda. and Sylvamo Exports Ltda. (collectively, Sylvamo), as it had no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-02-11
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-02-11 1) Executive Summary Four trade remedy updates were published today by the U.S. Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance). The events cover antidumping duty (AD) administrative reviews and rescissions concerning multiple trading partners. Two reviews involve products from the People’s Republic of China—monosodium glutamate and passenger vehicle and light truck tires. The remaining notices concern Vietnam (frozen fish fillets) and Ukraine (steel wire rod). Policy instruments highlighted include administrative reviews, partial rescissions, separate rate determinations, and findings regarding the China-wide entity. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration (Enforcement and Compliance) Monosodium Glutamate from China — AD Administrative Review (Preliminary Results) The Department of Commerce preliminarily finds that Ajinoriki MSG (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd is not eligible for a separate rate in the review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate from the People’s Republic of China for the period November 1, 2023, through October 31, 2024. As no party requested review of the China-wide entity, the 40.41 percent China-wide rate remains unchanged. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Event Type: Preliminary Results China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-992; applicable rate 40.41% (China-wide) Key date: Applicable February 11, 2026 Source: Link Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China — AD Administrative Review (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily determines that certain exporters of passenger and light truck tires from China sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Sixteen companies are rescinded from the review due to withdrawn requests or lack of entries. Weighted-average dumping margins were preliminarily set at 61.43% for Qingdao Transamerica Tire Industrial Co., Ltd.; 62.56% for Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.; and 61.47% for Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. The existing China-wide rate of 76.46% remains unchanged. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Event Type: Preliminary Results / Partial Rescission China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-016; China-wide entity rate 76.46% Key date: Applicable February 11, 2026 Source: Link Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine — AD Administrative Review (Rescission) Commerce rescinds the 2024–2025 administrative review of the antidumping order on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Ukraine because no reviewable entries were found during the period March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. Existing cash deposit rates remain in effect. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Event Type: Final Rescission China Indicator: None Key identifiers: Case A-823-816 Key date: Applicable February 11, 2026 Source: Link Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam — AD Administrative Review (Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission) Commerce preliminarily finds that Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company made sales of frozen fish fillets at less than normal value during the period August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Four Vietnamese exporters qualified for separate rates, with preliminary dumping margins ranging from $0.07/kg to $0.29/kg. The review is rescinded for 16 firms and preliminarily rescinded for 24 firms and the Vietnam-wide entity. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Event Type: Preliminary Results / Partial and Preliminary Rescission China Indicator: None Key identifiers: Case A-552-801 Key date: Applicable February 11, 2026 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce issued four new antidumping administrative review decisions and rescissions on February 11, 2026. Two cases involve Chinese-origin products—monosodium glutamate and vehicle tires—with varying outcomes on separate rate eligibility. For monosodium glutamate, Commerce found the sole company under review part of the China-wide entity, maintaining a 40.41 percent rate. In the tire review, Commerce preliminarily found dumping margins above 60 percent and rescinded reviews for several firms. Reviews for Ukraine and Vietnam were largely rescinded or partially rescinded due to lack of entries or standing, maintaining ongoing deposit rates. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Monosodium Glutamate from China – Preliminary AD Review Results Passenger Tires from China – Preliminary AD Review Results and Partial Rescission Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine – AD Review Rescission Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam – Preliminary AD Review and Partial Rescission 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Preliminary Recission of Administrative Review; and Recission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2023-2024
Commerce Releases Preliminary Results of 2023–2024 Antidumping Review on Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published the preliminary results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Commerce has preliminarily found that Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. (Bien Dong) and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (NTSF) sold frozen fish fillets in the United States at less than normal value. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins are $0.29 per kilogram for Bien Dong and $0.07 per kilogram for NTSF. Two additional companies—Cantho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company and Nam Viet Corporation—have preliminarily been granted separate rate status. A weighted-average dumping margin of $0.23 per kilogram has been assigned to these and other separate-rate companies not individually reviewed. Commerce is rescinding the review in part with respect to 16 companies. These companies had valid separate rates, but no entries of subject merchandise during the period of review. The list includes: C.P. Vietnam Corporation Cafatex Corporation Co May Import Export Co. Ltd. Dai Thanh Seafoods Co. Ltd. Dong A Seafood One Member Co. Ltd. East Sea Seafoods LLC FATIFISH Co., Ltd. GODACO Seafood J.S.C. Green Farms Seafood JSC Hai Huong Seafood J.S.C. HungCa 6 Corporation Hung Vuong Corporation and affiliated entities IDI International Development and Investment Corporation Loc Kim Chi Seafood J.S.C. QVD Food Co., Ltd. and affiliates Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation Commerce is also preliminarily rescinding the review for 24 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity due to lack of standing by the sole remaining requestor, Luscious Seafood LLC. Luscious Seafood was found not to be a U.S. wholesaler of domestic like product during the review period. The 24 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity—assigned a fixed antidumping duty rate of $2.39 per kilogram—will not have their existing rate altered if this preliminary decision becomes final. Commerce has determined that the following companies are part of the Vietnam-wide entity as they did not qualify for a separate rate: An Chau Co., Ltd Basa Joint Stock Company Bien Dong Hau Giang Seafood J.S.C. Golden Quality Seafood Corporation Vietnam Seaproducts J.S.C. Vinh Long Import-Export Company And 97 other companies listed in Appendix IV Due to various administrative delays, including a 90-day deadline tolling on December 9, 2024, a 47-day tolling due to the federal government shutdown on November 14, 2025, and a further 21-day tolling on November 24, 2025, Commerce set the preliminary results deadline to February 5, 2026. Commerce used constructed export price methodology to calculate rates, as Vietnam is treated as a non-market economy under U.S. law. All methods and calculations are detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum available at access.trade.gov. Public briefing and comment schedules will be announced later. Interested parties may submit written comments and request a public hearing. Executive summaries of arguments are required with submissions, limited to 450 words per issue. Commerce will calculate assessment rates upon issuing final results. Bien Dong and NTSF may receive importer-specific rates. For companies in the Vietnam-wide entity, CBP will assess duties at the standard $2.39/kg rate if results are unchanged. Final results are due within 120 days of the preliminary notice, barring extensions. Cash deposit instructions for future entries will be based on final rates, ranging from zero for de minimis margins to $2.39/kg for Vietnam-wide entity firms. This review is conducted under case number A-552-801. For further details, contact Blair Hood at (202) 482-8329 or Gemma Larsen at (202) 482-8125. Agency Contact: U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration Enforcement and Compliance, Office I 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 These results were published in the Federal Register on 2026-02-11. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Publishes Preliminary Results in MSG Antidumping Duty Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 11, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its preliminary findings in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People’s Republic of China. The review covers the period from November 1, 2023, through October 31, 2024. Ajinoriki MSG (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd was the only company subject to the review. The Department found that Ajinoriki did not file a required Separate Rate Application (SRA) or Separate Rate Certification (SRC). Therefore, Ajinoriki is not eligible for a separate rate. It is considered part of the China-wide entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, it is not under review in this segment. The China-wide entity’s antidumping duty rate remains at 40.41 percent. Background The antidumping duty order was originally published on January 6, 2015. On November 1, 2024, Commerce notified parties of the opportunity to request a review. Ajinoriki filed a timely request. Commerce initiated the review on December 18, 2024. In the initiation notice, Commerce reminded all firms involved in a non-market economy proceeding, such as China, about the requirement to submit an SRA or SRC to qualify for a separate rate. Ajinoriki did not submit either. Under Commerce rules, exporters in non-market economies are presumed to be under government control. To obtain a separate rate, they must prove independence from such control. All firms listed in the Federal Register are advised of this process. China continues to be treated as a non-market economy. Commerce applied its standard methodologies for such cases. Separate Rate Analysis Commerce considers whether companies are state-controlled. Firms must prove they are not controlled de jure (by law) or de facto (in practice). Ajinoriki had not been assigned a separate rate in a previous review. Therefore, it needed to submit an SRA for this review. The deadline was January 17, 2025. Ajinoriki did not meet this deadline. Because Ajinoriki failed to file a timely SRA, Commerce finds it to be part of the China-wide entity. This action is consistent with Commerce practice. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld Commerce’s ability to treat companies as part of the China-wide entity if they fail to submit an SRA or SRC. No other companies were subject to this review. Thus, Commerce did not need to select additional respondents or place U.S. Customs data on the record. China-Wide Entity Commerce did not receive a request to review the China-wide entity. As a result, it remains not under review. The 40.41 percent antidumping duty rate remains unchanged. Preliminary Results Commerce preliminarily finds that Ajinoriki is part of the China-wide entity and is ineligible for a separate rate. There are no new calculations for this review, as no company was found eligible for individual examination. Public Comment Case briefs may be submitted within 21 days of publication of the preliminary results. Rebuttal briefs must be submitted within five days after case briefs. Each brief must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Commerce requests public executive summaries of each issue, not exceeding 450 words. Hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days of publication. Requests must include participant details and a list of issues to be discussed. Assessment Rates If Commerce’s preliminary findings are confirmed in the final results, Ajinoriki will be assessed duties at the China-wide rate of 40.41 percent. Commerce will issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results. If an appeal is filed, liquidation of entries will be suspended. Cash Deposit Requirements Cash deposit requirements for MSG from China will remain as follows: For exporters with assigned separate rates, the existing rate continues. For exporters without separate rates, including Ajinoriki, the rate is 40.41 percent. These requirements remain in effect until further notice. Final Results Commerce intends to issue the final results within 120 days of publication of the preliminary results. This notice serves as a reminder to importers of the requirement to file a reimbursement certificate for antidumping duties. Authority This action is issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). Signed, Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Date: 2026-02-06 Appendix – Scope of the Order The order covers monosodium glutamate (MSG) from China. This includes MSG in any physical form, and in products where MSG makes up 15 percent or more of the dry weight. MSG may be mixed with salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, or other seasonings. MSG is included whether in monohydrate form (CAS 6106-04-3; UNII W81N5U6R6U) or anhydrous form (CAS 142-47-2; UNII C3C196L9FG). MSG is classified under HTS code 2922.42.10.00 but may also enter under other codes such as 2922.42.50.00 and several subcategories of 2103.90. HTS codes and CAS numbers are for convenience. The written description of the scope is controlling. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Issues Preliminary Results on Chinese Passenger Tire Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-02-11 The U.S. Department of Commerce has published the preliminary results of the 2023-2024 antidumping duty administrative review on certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the People’s Republic of China. Background The Department of Commerce (Commerce) started the review based on requests filed between August 5 and September 3, 2024. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. It involves 20 exporters from China. Delays Several delays affected the schedule. Commerce tolled deadlines on December 9, 2024, by 90 days. Then, again on November 14, 2025, due to a government shutdown, deadlines were tolled another 47 days. A further 21-day toll occurred on November 24, 2025. On December 17, 2025, Commerce gave a 30-day extension for the preliminary results. The new deadline became February 5, 2026. Scope of the Review The order covers passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. Partial Rescission Commerce rescinded the review for 16 companies. These companies had either no requests remaining or no reported entries during the review period. The list of these companies is in Appendix II of the notice. Further, for three companies—Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd. (Yongsheng), Qingdao Fullrun Tech Tyre Corp., Ltd. (Fullrun Tech), and Shandong Duratti Rubber Corporation Co., Ltd. (Duratti)—Commerce reviewed Customs documents to determine if they had any entries. It found that Yongsheng had no knowledge of U.S. shipments and rescinded the review. It also rescinded the review for Duratti due to no suspended entries. However, Fullrun Tech was found to be part of the China-wide entity. Methodology China is classified as a non-market economy. Commerce used constructed export prices and normal values based on surrogate values in line with law and regulation. Adverse facts available were used for two companies: Qingdao Transamerica Tire Industrial Co., Ltd. (Transamerica) and Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. (Haohua). This was due to failures in providing necessary information. Separate Rates Commerce found that three companies qualified for separate rates: Qingdao Transamerica Tire Industrial Co., Ltd. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. Fullrun Tech did not qualify and is part of the China-wide entity. The China-wide rate remains 76.46 percent. Preliminary Dumping Margins The following are the preliminary estimated weighted-average dumping margins: Transamerica: 61.43% Haohua: 62.56% Triangle Tyre: 61.47% Public Comment Commerce invites case briefs within 21 days of publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after that. All submissions must include a table of contents and table of authorities. Parties must also provide a short public summary of each issue, not more than 450 words. Hearings Interested parties may request a hearing within 30 days of publication. Requests should be filed via the ACCESS system. Assessment Rates Commerce will direct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties after the final results. Transamerica and Haohua reported the entered value of their sales, which will form the basis for importer-specific rates. Where exporters were found to be part of the China-wide entity, liquidation will occur at the 76.46 percent rate. For Triangle Tyre, the assessment rate will be the average of Transamerica and Haohua. Companies for which the review was rescinded, including Duratti and Yongsheng, will be assessed at the cash deposit rates at the time of entry. Cash Deposits After the final results, new cash deposit rates will take effect: For companies with a separate rate, that final rate will apply. Other companies will continue with the most recent cash deposit rate. The China-wide rate of 76.46 percent stays the same. Final Results Expected Commerce intends to issue the final results within 120 days from the publication date of the preliminary results. Further Information The full decision memorandum and materials are available on the Enforcement and Compliance ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. —for the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Ukraine: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025
Commerce Rescinds Antidumping Review of Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-02-11 The U.S. Department of Commerce has officially rescinded the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Ukraine. This review covered entries made from March 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025. On March 14, 2018, Commerce published an AD order on steel wire rod from Ukraine. On March 4, 2025, Commerce issued a notice in the Federal Register that allowed interested parties to request an administrative review for the specified period. Commercial Metals Company and Nucor Corporation submitted a timely request for review on March 31, 2025. Based on this request, Commerce initiated the review on April 28, 2025, under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On June 5, 2025, Commerce placed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry data on the record. That data showed no reviewable entries during the period of review. Commerce invited comments from interested parties. No comments were submitted. On July 8, 2025, Commerce issued a notice of intent to rescind the review. Again, no comments were filed. Due to a federal government shutdown in late 2025, all administrative deadlines were extended. On November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled deadlines by 47 days. An additional 21-day tolling was implemented on November 24, 2025, to address a backlog in filings submitted through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). These combined extensions moved the deadline for preliminary results to February 9, 2026. Commerce follows 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), which allows it to rescind a review when no reviewable entries are found. Since there were no imports of subject merchandise with suspended entries during the review period, Commerce has rescinded the review in full. Cash deposit rates remain unchanged. Current cash deposit requirements continue to apply. Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties at rates equal to the estimated antidumping duty deposits made at the time of entry. Assessment instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days from the date this notice is published. This notice also reminds parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their obligation to return or destroy business proprietary information in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely compliance is required. This action is taken under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Signed: Scot Fullerton Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations Document Number: 2026-02780 Filed: February 10, 2026 Billing Code: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-11
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2026-02-11 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Ukraine: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/11/2026-02780/carbon-and-alloy-steel-wire-rod-from-ukraine-rescission-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and alloy steel wire rod (steel wire rod) from Ukraine, covering the period of review (POR) March 1, 2024, though February 28, 2025. 2. Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/11/2026-02779/certain-passenger-vehicle-and-light-truck-tires-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that certain exporters of passenger vehicle and light truck tires (passenger tires) from the People's Republic of China (China) made sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. We are also rescinding this administrative review for 16 companies because either all requests for review were withdrawn or these companies had no reviewable entries during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 3. Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/11/2026-02778/monosodium-glutamate-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that Ajinoriki MSG (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Ajinoriki), the sole company subject to the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period of review (POR) November 1, 2023, through October 31, 2024, is not eligible to receive a separate rate and is, therefore, considered part of the China-wide entity. Furthermore, Commerce finds that, because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity for the POR, the China-wide entity is not under review, and the China-wide entity's rate (i.e., 40.41 percent) is not subject to change. 4. Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the Adequacy of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Petitions: Certain Fatty Acids From Indonesia and Malaysia Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/11/2026-02777/notice-of-extension-of-the-deadline-for-determining-the-adequacy-of-the-antidumping-duty-and Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 5. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Preliminary Recission of Administrative Review; and Recission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2023-2024 Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/11/2026-02772/certain-frozen-fish-fillets-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-preliminary-results-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd. (Bien Dong) and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (NTSF), made sales of certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Additionally, Commerce determines that four companies are eligible for a separate rate. Finally, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to 16 companies and preliminarily rescinding this review with respect to 24 companies and the Vietnam-wide entity. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-02-10
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-02-10 1) Executive Summary Today’s report summarizes 13 U.S. trade actions involving China and related jurisdictions. The principal authorities include the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Key policy instruments were antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) determinations, Section 337 investigations, and circumvention inquiries. Actions covered a broad range of products such as erythritol, solar products, PET film, and vehicle parts, showing continuing engagement in both enforcement and review proceedings across multiple trade programs. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Vehicle Parts — Section 337 Complaint (Public Interest Solicitation)The ITC received a complaint from General Motors LLC and GM Global Technology Operations LLC titled Certain Vehicle Parts, Components Thereof, and Vehicles Containing Same, DN 3884. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 in the importation and sale of certain vehicle parts from multiple respondents, including Jiangsu Srumto Auto Parts Co., Ltd. (China). The Commission is soliciting public comments on potential public-interest issues relating to any requested exclusion or cease and desist orders. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Docket No.: 3884 – Key Date: February 5, 2026 – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Vehicle Telematics Systems — Section 337 Review (Final Determination)In Investigation No. 337-TA-1393, Certain Vehicle Telematics, Fleet Management, and Video-Based Safety Systems, the ITC affirmed a final determination of no violation of section 337. The case, involving Samsara Inc. and Motive Technologies Inc., found no infringement and failure to meet the domestic industry requirement. The investigation is now terminated. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Source: MYLink DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION) Erythritol from China — Final Antidumping Determination (LTFV Sales)Commerce determined that erythritol from the People’s Republic of China is being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The final weighted-average dumping margins were 85.04% for separate rate companies and 184.26% for the China-wide entity. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Erythritol from China — Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty DeterminationCommerce also issued a final affirmative CVD determination on erythritol from China. Countervailable subsidies were found for producers including Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd. (4.54%) and Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (8.63%), with an all-others rate of 8.12 percent. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Solar Products from China and Taiwan — Second Sunset Reviews (AD Orders)Commerce concluded that revocation of AD orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from China and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Expected margins are up to 165.04% for China and 27.55% for Taiwan. – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Solar Products from China — Second Sunset Review (CVD Order)Commerce found that revoking the CVD order on solar products from China would likely lead to continued subsidization at rates up to 41.57% (Trina Solar and affiliates), 29.72% (Wuxi Suntech), and an all-others rate of 35.65%. – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Disposable Aluminum Containers from China — Circumvention Inquiry (UAE Completion)Commerce initiated a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether aluminum containers completed in the United Arab Emirates using Chinese aluminum foil circumvent AD and CVD orders on China-origin containers. – Policy Type: AD_CVD – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink PET Film from China and UAE — Third Sunset Reviews (AD Orders)Commerce found that repeal of the AD orders on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film from China and the UAE would likely result in resumption of dumping, with margins up to 76.72% for China and 4.05% for the UAE. – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink Large Power Transformers from Korea — Preliminary AD Review (2023–2024)Commerce preliminarily found no dumping of large power transformers from Korea during the period of review, with zero margins for HD Hyundai Electric Co., Ltd. and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd. – China Indicator: NONE – Source: MYLink Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea — Preliminary AD ReviewThe sole respondent, Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Inc., was found to have a 3.02% preliminary dumping margin for the 2023–2024 review period. – Source: MYLink Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from China — Preliminary AD ReviewCommerce preliminarily found sales of HFC blends from China at prices below normal value, assigning 182.61% to Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. and related firms; one company was found to have no shipments. – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Source: MYLink PET Film from India — Fourth Sunset Review (CVD Order)Commerce determined that revocation of the CVD order on PET film from India would lead to continuation of subsidies with rates ranging from 18.57% to 29.45%. – Source: MYLink PET Film from India — Amended Final CVD Review (Settlement)Commerce amended the 2021 final review for Jindal Poly Films Limited, following a court-approved settlement, setting final assessment rates between 10.51% and 11.67%. – Source: MYLink Silicon Metal from Malaysia — Preliminary AD ReviewCommerce preliminarily found no sales below normal value for PMB Silicon Sdn. Bhd., maintaining a 0.00% margin for the 2023–2024 review period. – Source: MYLink 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Commerce issued final AD and CVD determinations on erythritol from China, finding both dumping and subsidization. The ITC launched a new Section 337 vehicle parts investigation including a Chinese respondent (Jiangsu Srumto Auto Parts). Multiple sunset reviews confirmed continuation risks for trade measures on solar panels and PET film involving China. Commerce initiated a circumvention inquiry on aluminum containers completed in the UAE using Chinese foil. Several reviews for Korea, Malaysia, and India found either zero or low margins, while most China-linked cases affirmed high margins. 4) Full Source Links (Index) – Vehicle Parts – ITC 337 Complaint – Vehicle Telematics – ITC Final Determination – Erythritol – AD Final (China) – Erythritol – CVD Final (China) – Solar Products – AD Sunset Review (China/Taiwan) – Solar Products
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Countervailing Duties on PET Film from India Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published final results of its fourth sunset review of the countervailing duty order on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. The Department of Commerce found that ending the current order would likely allow unfair subsidies from India to continue or happen again. These subsidies help Indian companies sell PET film in the U.S. at unfair, lower prices. The original countervailing duty order was put in place on July 1, 2002. This review was part of the normal five-year cycle to check if the duties are still needed. The review started on August 1, 2025. Two U.S. companies, Microworks America, Inc. and Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc.—Polyester Film Division, filed notices to take part in the review. They are both U.S. producers of PET film products. By August 29, 2025, both companies sent in full responses. These are required to keep the review going. The Government of India and Indian companies did not respond. Without responses from India, the Department of Commerce moved to an expedited 120-day review. This kind of review is allowed under U.S. law when only one side joins in. There were delays in the process due to a federal government shutdown in 2025. As a result, deadlines were extended by a total of 68 days (47 days on November 14, 2025, and another 21 days on November 24, 2025). The final deadline was February 5, 2026. The Department has decided to keep the duties in place. It found that removing them would lead to continued subsidization. The subsidy rates that would likely return are as follows: Ester Industries Ltd. – 23.21% Garware Polyester Ltd. – 29.45% Polyplex Corporation Ltd. – 18.57% All Others – 25.25% These rates show how much financial help Indian companies could get from their government if the duties were removed. The Department’s full findings are in a document called the “Issues and Decision Memorandum.” This public document is available online through Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS portal. This notice also reminds those involved that all sensitive information covered by an administrative protective order must be returned or destroyed, as required by federal rules. These results were signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, acting in place of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. The notice was officially filed on February 9, 2026, and posted in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
Commerce Finds China Solar Subsidies Likely to Continue if Order Ends Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results for the second sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from the People’s Republic of China. The findings were published on February 10, 2026, in the Federal Register (Volume 91, Number 27). Commerce determined that ending the CVD order would likely lead to continued or repeated subsidies from China. These subsidies would give Chinese solar producers an unfair advantage if the order were revoked. Background The original order was published on February 18, 2015. This second sunset review began on August 1, 2025, under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On August 15, 2025, the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing (AASM) submitted its notice of intent to participate. AASM is a domestic group made up of companies like First Solar, Inc. and Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc. This group stated that it qualifies as an interested party because its members manufacture or sell the same type of product within the U.S. On September 2, 2025, AASM submitted a full response supporting continuation of the CVD order. No response was received from China or any interested party on the respondent side. As a result, Commerce treated the review as expedited and completed it within 120 days. There were two tolling delays during this process. On November 14, 2025, all deadlines were extended by 47 days due to a government shutdown. Then, on November 24, 2025, deadlines were extended by another 21 days due to a backlog of electronically filed documents. Scope The order covers certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from China. A full scope description is available in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis Commerce found that if the order is revoked, Chinese producers are likely to continue receiving countervailable subsidies. The agency also calculated the subsidy rates that would prevail. Final Subsidy Rates Commerce determined the following net countervailable subsidy rates: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates: 41.57 percent Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.: 29.72 percent All Other Producers/Exporters: 35.65 percent These rates reflect findings cited in several earlier decisions and memoranda, including corrections to previous typographical errors. The correct rate for Trina Solar was reaffirmed to be 41.57 percent. Administrative Notices Parties under administrative protective orders (APOs) are reminded of their duties. They must return or destroy sensitive documents as required by 19 CFR 351.305. Failure to comply may result in penalties. Publication These final results have been issued under sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act and under 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Signed on February 4, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix: Topics in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order History of the Order Legal Framework Discussion of the Issues Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail Nature of the Subsidies Final Results of Sunset Review Recommendation Federal Register Document No. 2026-02558. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Maintains Antidumping Duties on PET Film from UAE and China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-02-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce has completed its expedited third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the People’s Republic of China (China). Commerce determined that removing the existing AD orders would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping of these products in the U.S. market at unfair prices. The dumping margins likely to continue are: Up to 4.05 percent for the UAE 76.72 percent for China Commerce first issued the AD orders on November 10, 2008. These orders apply to PET film imported from the UAE and China. PET film is widely used in packaging, imaging, and other industrial applications. On August 1, 2025, Commerce began the third sunset reviews under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On August 15 and 18, 2025, domestic producers Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc.—Polyester Film Division (Mitsubishi), and Microworks America, Inc. (Microworks), submitted timely notices of intent to participate. Both companies identified themselves as domestic producers of like products under section 771(9)(C) of the Act. On August 22, 2025, Commerce informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that domestic producers intended to participate in the review. By August 29, 2025, both domestic participants filed complete substantive responses under 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). No responses were filed by foreign parties. On September 23, 2025, Commerce notified the ITC that no responses were received from respondents. Commerce then proceeded with expedited 120-day reviews under the law. Administrative timelines were revised due to the federal government shutdown in late 2025. On November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled deadlines by 47 days. An additional 21-day tolling was announced on November 24, 2025, due to a backlog in electronic filings. The final results were scheduled for February 5, 2026. Commerce analyzed the likelihood of renewed dumping and magnitude of the dumping margins in its Issues and Decision Memorandum. The memorandum is available to the public on Commerce’s ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. All parties covered by an Administrative Protective Order (APO) are reminded of their responsibility to destroy or return proprietary information according to 19 CFR 351.305. The results were signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Commerce is issuing these final results under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 351.221(c)(5)(ii). The decision keeps the current antidumping duties in place to protect U.S. producers from unfair import pricing practices. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Silicon Metal From Malaysia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Finds No Dumping by Malaysian Silicon Producer for 2023–2024 Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the preliminary results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Malaysia. The agency reviewed the activities of one company: PMB Silicon Sdn. Bhd. This review covered the period of August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. Commerce found that PMB Silicon did not sell silicon metal in the United States at prices below normal value during this period. The preliminary dumping margin assigned to PMB Silicon is 0.00 percent. The U.S. government began the review on September 20, 2024. The review followed the procedure laid out under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Updates to deadlines occurred throughout 2024 and 2025 because of tolling and government shutdown-related delays. The preliminary results are detailed in a document called the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. This memorandum is available to the public through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at http://access.trade.gov. Commerce used the methods in sections 772(a) and 773 of the Act to determine export price and normal value. A breakdown of the methods used can be found in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Companies or individuals who want to comment on these findings may submit case briefs. These briefs are due no later than 21 days after this notice’s publication. Rebuttal briefs, which reply to issues raised in case briefs, are due five days later. Both must follow specific rules, including providing a table of contents and a table of authorities. Commerce also asks that all briefs include a public summary of each issue, limited to 450 words. These summaries help prepare the final results and are part of the official record. Anyone who wants to request a hearing must submit their request within 30 days after the publication date. The request must include the name, contact information, number of participants, and a list of issues to be discussed. After the final results are issued, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on appropriate entries. If the final calculated dumping margin is not zero or de minimis, CBP will collect duties as instructed by Commerce. If the final margin is zero or de minimis — as it is preliminarily — CBP will not collect duties for those entries. If PMB Silicon exported goods but did not know they were destined for the United States, then duties will be assessed using the original “all-others” rate of 12.27 percent. Commerce will issue assessment instructions to CBP no sooner than 35 days after the publication of the final results. If a legal summons is filed in court, assessment will be delayed until that process is complete. New cash deposit rates for future shipments will take effect upon publication of the final results. If PMB Silicon receives a zero or de minimis rate, its cash deposit rate will be set to zero. For other companies, the previous rates from earlier reviews or the original investigation will remain. Commerce expects to publish the final results within 120 days, unless extended. Importers are reminded to file reimbursement certificates. If an importer fails to file, Commerce may assume that antidumping duties were reimbursed and may double them as a consequence. The agency issued this notice under authority in sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations (acting), on February 4, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Steel Propane Cylinders From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Finds Thai Manufacturer Sold Steel Propane Cylinders Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination in the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel propane cylinders from Thailand. The notice was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026 (Federal Register Volume 91, Number 27, Pages 5901–5903). Commerce determined that Sahamitr Pressure Container Public Company Limited (also known as Sahamitr Pressure Container Plc. or SMPC) sold steel propane cylinders in the United States at prices less than normal value during the period of review (POR) from August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin assigned to SMPC is 1.32 percent. Background The antidumping duty order on steel propane cylinders from Thailand was originally published on August 15, 2019. In August 2024, both SMPC and Worthington Industries, the petitioner, requested a review of SMPC. Commerce initiated the review on September 20, 2024. Due to multiple administrative delays, including a 90-day extension, a federal government shutdown, and Electronic Service System backlogs, the deadline for the preliminary finding was extended to February 5, 2026. Scope of the Order The order applies to steel propane cylinders exported from Thailand. Full product details are available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, accessible via the ACCESS online system. Methodology Under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, Commerce calculated export price (EP) and normal value (NV) using data and methodology consistent with sections 772 and 773 of the Act, respectively. Disclosure Commerce will release details of its calculations within five days of any public notification or publication in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs within 21 days of publication. Rebuttal briefs are due five days later. Each brief must include a table of contents and a list of legal references. All documents must be filed electronically via the ACCESS system and received in full by 5:00 p.m. ET on the respective due dates. Commerce asks parties to include a public executive summary of no more than 450 words per issue raised. Hearings Requests for a hearing are allowed within 30 days of publication. The request must include the name and contact information of the participant(s), number of participants, foreign national status of any participant, and list of issues. Hearings will be limited to topics addressed in filed briefs. Final Results Commerce will issue final results within 120 days of this preliminary notice, unless the deadline is extended. Assessment Rates Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties based on the final results. If SMPC’s margin is not zero or de minimis (less than 0.50 percent), importer-specific assessment rates will be calculated based on entered value or sold quantity. If the rates are zero or de minimis, CBP will be instructed to liquidate entries without duties. In cases where SMPC did not know merchandise was destined for the U.S., Commerce will apply the “all-others” rate of 10.77 percent. Cash Deposit Requirements New cash deposit rates will take effect on the date of publication of the final results: SMPC will receive the final rate as determined (unless it is de minimis). Other companies that were reviewed previously will maintain their rates. If the exporter is unlisted but the producer is listed, the producer’s rate will apply. All others will continue to be subject to the 10.77 percent rate from the original investigation. Importer Notice Importers must submit certifications of duty reimbursement per 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) before the liquidation of relevant entries. Failure to do so may lead to double duties being assessed. Interested parties can access the full decision and related documents electronically through the ACCESS portal at https://access.trade.gov. This review was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on February 4, 2026. Appendix – Topics Covered in Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation Federal Register Document Number: 2026-02561 BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Erythritol From People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finalizes Antidumping Duties on Erythritol from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued its final decision on the investigation into erythritol imports from the People’s Republic of China. The agency found that Chinese erythritol is being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). This ruling applies to imports entering the U.S. between April 1, 2024, and September 30, 2024. Commerce published its preliminary determination on July 16, 2025. Following a government shutdown that caused delays, the final decision was issued on February 4, 2026. This action was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026. Scope of the Investigation The investigation covers erythritol, a sugar alcohol used as a sweetener. It includes all physical forms and grades of erythritol, regardless of how it is made or what feedstock is used. The investigation does not cover finished sugar substitute products packaged for retail sale, such as tabletop sweeteners that combine erythritol with other substances like monk fruit or stevia. Modifications to Scope Commerce made one change to the product scope from the preliminary phase. After reviewing submitted comments, the agency adjusted the language of the scope. The revised description is available in Appendix I of the published notice. China-Wide Entity Determination Commerce continued to apply adverse facts available (AFA) to the China-wide entity. This happened because the agency found the China-wide entity uncooperative and determined that the mandatory respondents were not eligible for a separate rate. Based on AFA, the China-wide entity was assigned a dumping margin of 184.26%. Separate Rate Companies Commerce assigned a dumping margin of 85.04% to the following exporters and producers, each of which qualified for a separate rate: Beijing Refine Biology Co., Ltd./Chuzhou Refine Biology Co., Ltd. Hunan Nutramax Inc. Shandong Newnature Biotechnology Co., Ltd./Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd. The agency adjusted the cash deposit rate for each firm based on export subsidies credited in a separate countervailing duty (CVD) investigation: Beijing Refine Biology Co., Ltd.: 84.95% Hunan Nutramax Inc.: 84.95% Shandong Newnature Biotechnology Co., Ltd.: 84.95% Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd.: 84.86% The China-wide entity is assigned a full antidumping duty rate of 184.26%, with no export subsidy offset applied. Suspension of Liquidation Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to: Suspend liquidation for entries made on or after July 16, 2025. Discontinue suspension for entries made after January 11, 2026, when provisional measures expired. Resume suspension if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) makes a final affirmative injury determination. If the ITC finds that imports have caused material injury to the U.S. domestic industry, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order and require the deposit of duties at the rates listed above. No Verification Conducted Commerce did not conduct verification in the investigation. This decision was due to the use of total AFA for the China-wide entity and its findings that the mandatory respondents did not qualify for individual rates. Petition-Based Rate Calculation Because Commerce did not find any individually examined companies with valid data apart from AFA, it used petition and surrogate value data to calculate the rate for companies receiving separate rates. Next Steps Commerce has notified the ITC of its final determination. The ITC has 45 days to decide whether the U.S. domestic industry has been harmed by the imports. If it finds no injury, all duties will be canceled and deposits refunded. If it finds injury, Commerce will issue an antidumping order. This determination may be viewed in detail in the Federal Register Volume 91, Issue 27, published on February 10, 2026, including attached appendices and decision memoranda. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Erythritol From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Issues Final Countervailing Duty on Erythritol Imports from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes Date: 2026-02-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a final affirmative determination in its countervailing duty investigation of erythritol from the People’s Republic of China. The final decision was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026 (Federal Register Volume 91, Number 27, Pages 5920–5922). The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Commerce determined that producers and exporters of erythritol from China received countervailable subsidies during the period of investigation. This investigation was conducted by the International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance division. The contact officer for the case is Christopher Doyle of AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, reachable at (202) 482–2805. BACKGROUND Commerce published its preliminary determination on May 16, 2025 (90 FR 21000), and later issued a post-preliminary analysis memorandum on June 24, 2025. A 68-day tolling adjustment was made due to a federal government shutdown and subsequent backlog. The final determination deadline was extended to February 4, 2026. SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION The product covered is erythritol from China, regardless of form. Erythritol is a white, crystalline sugar alcohol with the molecular formula C4H10O4 and CAS number 149-32-6. It includes crystalline, powdered, directly compressible, and organic forms. The product is generally classified under HTSUS 2905.49.4000 and may also fall under 2106.90.9998. Excluded from the scope are certain tabletop sugar substitute products that contain erythritol along with a high-intensity sweetener, and are packaged and labeled for retail sale or individual consumption. SCOPE COMMENTS Parties submitted comments regarding the product scope based on the preliminary decision. Commerce analyzed the comments and made one change to the product description, as reflected in Appendix I of the notice. VERIFICATION Commerce conducted on-site verification to confirm the accuracy of data provided by Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd. and Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Standard procedures were used to examine accounting records and source documents, with verification reports issued in July 2025. METHODOLOGY Commerce evaluated Chinese government programs under sections 701, 771(5)(B), 771(5)(D), 771(5)(E), and 771(5A) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Some findings relied on facts otherwise available with adverse inferences under sections 776(a) and 776(b). SUBSIDY PROGRAM ANALYSIS Changes were made to subsidy calculations for both Baolingbao Biology and Shandong Sanyuan. Adjustments included program additions from the post-preliminary analysis. A full discussion is available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, linked via the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. ALL-OTHERS RATE Commerce established an estimated all-others subsidy rate using a weighted average of the rates from the two individually examined companies, based on publicly ranged sales data. This procedure follows section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act and applicable case precedent. FINAL SUBSIDY RATES Final countervailable subsidy margins are as follows: Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd.: 4.54% Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.: 8.63% All Other Producers/Exporters: 8.12% These ad valorem rates apply to entries of erythritol from China during the stated period. SUSPENSION OF LIQUIDATION Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue suspension of liquidation for entries on or before September 12, 2025. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final affirmative injury determination, Commerce will issue a countervailing duty order requiring cash deposits. If the ITC issues a negative injury determination, the proceeding will terminate, and any collected duties will be refunded. ITC PROCESS The ITC will determine within 45 days whether the U.S. domestic industry is materially injured or threatened by imports of erythritol from China. If affirmative, a countervailing duty order will follow. Commerce will then direct CBP to assess countervailing duties for all relevant entries. APO REMINDER All Administrative Protective Order (APO) information must be properly returned or destroyed in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply may result in sanctions. AUTHORIZATION This determination was approved by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Christopher Abbott, on February 4, 2026. The full Issues and Decision Memorandum, Scope Comments, and revised scope description appear in the appendices of the official Federal Register notice (FR Doc No. 2026-02563). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Forged Steel Fittings From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has issued preliminary results in its ongoing administrative review of the antidumping duty order on forged steel fittings from Taiwan. These findings were published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2026. The review period covers shipments entered into the U.S. between September 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024. Commerce has preliminarily determined that the company Both-Well Steel Fittings Co., Ltd. sold forged steel fittings in the U.S. at prices below normal value. The weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Both-Well is 3.03 percent. The preliminary decision was released in a memorandum dated February 4, 2026. A list of discussed topics is included as an appendix attached to the notice. A complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is publicly available on the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. The scope of the review includes carbon and alloy forged steel fittings from Taiwan. These products include both unfinished (blanks or rough forgings) and finished fittings. Commerce used sections 772 and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to calculate export price and normal value. Commerce will disclose its calculations to interested parties within five days of publication of the notice or its public announcement, as per 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 21 days. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. All briefs require a table of contents and a table of authorities and must be filed electronically using ACCESS. Each issue in the briefs must contain a public executive summary. This summary must be no more than 450 words, excluding citations. Commerce will use these summaries to prepare the final decision memo. Requests for a hearing must be submitted electronically within 30 days of this notice. Requests must include the party’s name, telephone number, number of participants, and a list of issues to be discussed. Hearings will only cover issues raised in the briefs. Commerce expects to release the final results within 120 days of this notice’s publication, unless extended. Following publication of the final results, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on relevant entries. If a company’s dumping margin or importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, CBP will be told to liquidate those entries without duties. If the final results confirm the dumping margin, Both-Well’s importers will receive duty assessment instructions 35 days after final publication, unless a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash deposit requirements will be updated after the final results. Both-Well’s deposit rate will match the final weighted-average dumping margin, unless it is zero or de minimis. If the exporter was reviewed previously, its previous rate remains. If the exporter was not reviewed but the producer was, the rate will reflect the producer’s most recent rate. All other producers and exporters will default to the all-others rate of 116.17 percent. Importers must file duty reimbursement certificates prior to liquidation, or face possible doubling of duties. This requirement is under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2). This notice is issued under sections 751(a)(1), 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). For further details, contact Dennis McClure at (202) 482-5973, U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VIII. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Notice of Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Settlement; 2021
Commerce Amends Final Results in PET Film Duty Review Following Settlement with Jindal Poly Films Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued amended final results in the administrative review of countervailing duties on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India. This action follows a settlement with Jindal Poly Films Limited. The original final results were published on January 29, 2024. In those results, Commerce assigned Jindal a subsidy rate of 116.96% for the 2021 review period. The period of review (POR) covered January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. After publication of the final results, Jindal filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The company challenged Commerce’s findings. Jindal disputed three main issues: the denial of its extension request, Commerce’s use of adverse facts available (AFA), and the choice of rate used under AFA. On August 1, 2025, the CIT ordered Commerce to reconsider its final results. On January 28, 2026, a settlement agreement was reached between the United States and Jindal. The CIT approved a stipulated judgement on January 29, 2026. Under the settlement, revised assessment rates were agreed. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess countervailing duties as follows: 10.51% for entries made between January 1, 2021, and May 16, 2021. 11.67% for entries made between May 17, 2021, and December 31, 2021. These rates apply to all PET film entries produced and exported by Jindal during the POR. The cash deposit rate for Jindal will not change. It is based on a newer review that set a current rate. Commerce issued the amended final results under section 516(a)(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930. This action is recorded in the Federal Register under document number 2026-02633. For additional information, contact Theodore Pearson at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, telephone (202) 482-2631. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Solar Products from China and Taiwan Likely to Continue if Duties End Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the final results of its expedited second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products from China and Taiwan. Commerce determined that ending the AD orders would likely lead to continued or repeated dumping of solar products from both countries. These findings cover crystalline silicon photovoltaic products—commonly known as solar products. The original antidumping duty orders for these products were issued on February 18, 2015. On August 1, 2025, Commerce announced it was starting the second round of five-year sunset reviews under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Commerce received notices of intent to participate in the review on August 15, 2025, from the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing. The American Alliance includes five U.S. producers: First Solar, Inc., Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc., Heliene USA Inc., Suniva, Inc., and Mission Solar Energy LLC. According to their notice, the American Alliance qualifies as a domestic interested party under section 771(9)(E) of the Act. On August 22, 2025, Commerce informed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it had received valid notices of intent to participate. On September 2, 2025, the American Alliance submitted substantive responses to Commerce. No foreign producers or exporters responded with substantive submissions. Therefore, Commerce proceeded with a 120-day expedited sunset review. Because of a federal government shutdown and related delays, Commerce extended all deadlines in the review. A total of 68 days of tolling was applied—47 days announced on November 14, 2025, and an additional 21 days announced on November 24, 2025. The final result was issued on February 5, 2026. Commerce concluded that ending the AD orders would likely lead to continued or renewed dumping. The dumping margins likely to return if the orders are lifted are calculated as follows: Up to 165.04 percent for China Up to 27.55 percent for Taiwan A full explanation of these results and the analysis behind them is included in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is publicly available through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. The memorandum includes: A summary of the review Background of the orders Description of the products covered History of the review Legal analysis Findings on likelihood of dumping Likely dumping margins Final results Commerce’s recommendation This is the final step in this sunset review under sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as under regulations 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). For more details, parties can contact David de Falco at the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, at (202) 482-2178. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Malaysia: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order
Commerce Initiates Circumvention Inquiry on Mattresses from Malaysia Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-02-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce announced the start of a country-wide circumvention inquiry involving mattress components from Malaysia. This inquiry is in response to a request filed on November 18, 2025. The request came from Brooklyn Bedding LLC, Carpenter Company, Future Foam, Inc., FXI, Inc., Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc., Leggett & Platt, Incorporated, Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC, Tempur Sealy International, Inc., the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and the United Steelworkers, AFL-CIO. The case involves the antidumping duty (AD) order on mattresses from Malaysia. Requesters claim that mattress parts made in Malaysia are being sent to the United States and turned into finished mattresses. They state this is a way to avoid the existing AD order. The AD order in question was first published on May 14, 2021, in the Federal Register. Commerce reviewed that the request met the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c). Under 19 CFR 351.226(d), Commerce accepted the request and began the inquiry. The law in focus is section 781(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. It says a product completed in the U.S. using imported parts can fall under an AD/CVD duty if certain conditions are met. Commerce is looking at these points: Whether the final product is the same kind of item as the AD order covers. Whether the parts are made in the country named in the order — Malaysia in this case. Whether the finishing done in the U.S. is minor or simple. Whether the Malaysian parts make up much of the product’s total value. Commerce will use five main factors to decide if U.S. finishing is minor: Investment level in the U.S. U.S.-based research and development Type of U.S. production process Size of U.S. production operations Value added by U.S. processing Commerce will consider all five factors together before making a decision. Section 781(a)(3) adds more items for Commerce to consider: Trade patterns and part sourcing methods, If Malaysian part makers are linked to U.S. finishers, If part imports from Malaysia rose after the original AD case started. Requesters provided detailed data. Commerce found it was enough to open a formal inquiry. The inquiry will cover all Malaysian exporters and producers. A questionnaire will be sent out. Companies must report if their items are finished into mattresses in the U.S., and if the parts came from Malaysia. Commerce will use quantity and value (Q&V) responses to choose which companies to study more. Those chosen must fully reply to Commerce’s questions. If they do not, Commerce might use “facts available,” and that may include adverse inferences. Commerce will keep suspension of liquidation in effect for items already subject to the AD order. The existing cash deposit rate will stay in place for these goods while the inquiry is underway. If Commerce makes preliminary or final findings of circumvention, it will use the suspension rules in 19 CFR 351.226(l)(2)-(4). A full product description, along with the decision to begin the inquiry, is on record in the Circumvention Initiation Checklist. A preliminary decision is expected within 150 days of this notice. This inquiry is handled by Dennis McClure of the AD/CVD Operations Office VIII. For more information, contact him at (202) 482-2000. This notice was signed on February 5, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Federal Register Citation: [FR Doc No: 2026-02635] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Mexico: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Begins Investigation into Mattresses from Mexico Assembled in the U.S. Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes Date: 2026-02-10 The U.S. Department of Commerce has started a circumvention inquiry into mattresses from Mexico. The inquiry will determine if components made in Mexico and assembled into mattresses in the U.S. are avoiding existing antidumping duties. This inquiry follows requests by several U.S. mattress makers, including Brooklyn Bedding LLC, Corsicana Mattress Company, and Serta Simmons Bedding LLC. Labor unions such as the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the United Steelworkers also joined the request. The inquiry relates to the antidumping duty order placed on mattresses from Mexico on September 10, 2024 (89 FR 73357). The requesters say that Mexican parts are being used to make mattresses in the U.S., thereby bypassing the duties. The request to start this process was filed on November 18, 2025, under section 781(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commerce Department issued a supplemental questionnaire on December 18, 2025. The requesters responded on December 24, 2025. Mexican producers Ureblock S.A. de CV and Elements Sleep LLC opposed the claims on December 29, 2025. The requesters filed rebuttal comments on January 5, 2026. On January 21, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for initiation to February 5, 2026. On that date, the agency concluded that the request met the legal criteria under 19 CFR 351.226(c) for starting an inquiry. According to the Commerce Department, the inquiry will focus on whether the U.S.-assembled mattresses, using Mexican components, are the same type of product covered by the original order. The agency will examine whether the assembly process in the U.S. is minor and whether the value of the imported parts is a large portion of the finished product’s value. Under section 781(a)(2) of the Act, Commerce will also study these five factors: The level of U.S. investment in assembly The level of U.S. research and development The nature of production in the U.S. The extent of production in the U.S. Whether U.S. processing makes up a small part of the final product’s value Commerce will also consider trading patterns, affiliations between component makers and U.S. assemblers, and whether Mexican component imports rose after the order. This inquiry is being treated as country-wide. That means it covers all exports from Mexico. To collect the facts, Commerce will send questionnaires to producers and exporters in Mexico. Commerce will use these responses to select which companies to investigate more. Failing to respond could lead to the use of neutral or adverse facts under section 776 of the Act. Currently, suspension of liquidation remains in place. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue collecting cash deposits on affected products, as already directed under the existing order. Commerce expects to issue a preliminary decision within 150 days from this notice’s publication. This inquiry complies with section 781(a) of the Tariff Act and 19 CFR 351.226(d). For questions, contact Thomas Martin at the U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-3936. Federal Register Notice: 91 FR 5904-5905 Document Number: 2026-02636 Published: February 10, 2026 Agency: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mattresses From Poland: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Begins Trade Investigation on Mattress Parts from Poland Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On February 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce started a formal trade inquiry. This inquiry investigates if mattress parts made in Poland are avoiding U.S. trade duties when turned into finished mattresses in the U.S. This action was taken after a request by several U.S. mattress companies. These include Brooklyn Bedding LLC, Carpenter Company, Future Foam, Inc., FXI, Inc., Kolcraft Enterprises Inc., Leggett & Platt, Incorporated, Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC, and Tempur Sealy International, Inc. Two labor unions also joined the request. These are the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the United Steelworkers Union. The Department of Commerce is checking if mattress parts are being shipped from Poland and turned into full mattresses in the U.S. This process may be used to avoid an Antidumping Duty (AD) order that applies to mattresses from Poland. The Antidumping Duty Order in question was issued on July 11, 2024. It covered mattresses from Poland and other countries. Commerce is now looking at whether parts imported from Poland lead to mattresses that should fall under this same order. The investigation falls under U.S. law section 781(a). This law allows the Department of Commerce to act when goods covered by a trade order are assembled in the U.S. from parts made in a foreign country. To start the inquiry, the Commerce Department reviewed the request. It found that the request contained enough facts to open a case. A key question is whether the finishing work done in the U.S. is minor or low value. The law outlines specific things the Department must look at: If the items sold in the U.S. are the same type as those from Poland. If the items sold in the U.S. are made from Polish parts. If the work done in the U.S. is small compared to the full job. If the value of the Polish parts is a large part of the whole mattress. Commerce also must study: Investment levels in U.S. mattress work. Research or development done in the U.S. The production steps done in the U.S. The size of the mattress work areas in the U.S. How much value the U.S. work adds to the total price. Other facts also must be reviewed: If there was a big change in Poland-to-U.S. trading patterns. If companies in Poland are working with U.S. companies. If Polish part imports rose after the U.S. launched the original duty case. Commerce plans to send detailed questions to firms in Poland. It will ask where mattress parts come from and what happens to them after arriving in the U.S. Next, the agency will pick which companies to focus on based on how much they trade. They will use company addresses to send out surveys. A schedule for the review will follow. If a company does not answer fully, the Department may use other facts to decide the case. This could include using facts that go against what the company wants. During the investigation, already-suspended items will stay on hold. These are items already caught under the earlier duty order. U.S. Customs will keep charging the same fees while the review is underway. If Commerce later finds that the duty is being avoided, they may expand the order to cover these types of shipments. Commerce expects to make its first decision on this case around July 2026. Anyone involved in trade with Poland on mattresses should watch this case closely. Further updates will be posted in the Federal Register and on the Department of Commerce website. For more details, contact: Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, Office II Enforcement and Compliance U.S. Department of Commerce Phone: (202) 482-3936 This investigation is being carried out as required by section 781(a) of U.S. trade law and federal regulations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Utility Scale Windtowers From Indonesia: Preliminary Results and Rescission, In Part, of the Antidumping Duty Admninistrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Finds No Dumping from Indonesian Wind Tower Maker in 2023–2024 Review Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review for utility scale wind towers from Indonesia. The findings cover the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. The agency concludes that PT. Kenertec Power System, the only company under review, did not sell wind towers in the U.S. at prices below normal value during the review period. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for Kenertec is 0.00 percent. Commerce also announced it is rescinding the review for six companies. These firms had no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the period of review. The six companies are: GE Indonesia GE Renewable Energy General Electric Indonesia Korindo Wind Nordex SE PT. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy The review remains active only for PT. Kenertec Power System. The antidumping duty order was first established on August 26, 2020. Commerce initiated this specific review on September 20, 2024, based on requests received in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Due to procedural delays, the preliminary results deadline was extended multiple times. Initial delays stemmed from the tolling of deadlines in December 2024 and July 2025, the lapse in federal appropriations and resulting government shutdown in November 2025, and a backlog of electronic filings. The final extended deadline for these preliminary results was February 5, 2026. The merchandise covered by the review includes utility scale wind towers from Indonesia. The scope now also includes updates to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule Of the United States (HTSUS), with Commerce adding HTSUS subheadings 7308.20.0030 and 7308.20.0035. The methodology used follows sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, with constructed export prices and normal values calculated under sections 772 and 773 of the Act. Commerce has stated its intention to verify the data submitted by Kenertec. A verification was requested by the Wind Tower Trade Coalition on December 30, 2024. Verification will occur before the final results are issued. Interested parties will be notified of the deadline to submit case briefs after verification is complete. Parties will have seven days after the verification report to submit case briefs, and five days after that to submit rebuttal briefs. A hearing may be requested within 30 days of the notice’s publication. The hearing date and time will be confirmed by Commerce and subject to parties’ requests and participation. For entries with a dumping margin of zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate those entries without any dumping duties. If Kenertec’s margin remains zero in the final results, its entries will be duty-free. If the margin is not zero or de minimis, importer-specific assessment rates will be calculated using Commerce’s standard method. In cases where entered values were not reported, per-unit rates may be used. For Kenertec’s U.S. sales where the exporter was unaware the goods were destined for the U.S., an “all-others” rate of 8.53 percent will apply. This follows the rate set in the original investigation. For the six companies removed from the review, Commerce will direct CBP to assess antidumping duties based on the existing cash deposit rates at the time of entry. Upon final results, new cash deposit rates will apply for Kenertec and other reviewed companies. The rate will be zero if the final margin is less than 0.5 percent. For exporters not covered in this review but included in prior proceedings, the most recent company-specific rate will apply. If neither the exporter nor the producer was examined in this or prior reviews, the deposit rate will default to 8.50 percent, the “all-others” rate from the original investigation. Importers are reminded to file reimbursement certificates for any antidumping duties paid. Failure to do so may lead to doubled duties. Commerce will finalize and publish its results no later than 120 days after this notice, unless extended. Final assessment instructions will be issued to CBP 35 days after publication, unless a court challenge delays the liquidation. This notice was signed on February 5, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For more details, see the public Preliminary Decision Memorandum available through Commerce’s ACCESS system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Releases Preliminary Countervailing Duty Review Results on Spanish Ripe Olives Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On February 10, 2026, the Department of Commerce released its preliminary results in the countervailing duty (“CVD”) administrative review on ripe olives from Spain. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The Commerce Department has found that two Spanish olive producers received subsidies during this time period. These subsidies make the imports unfair under U.S. trade law. The review was conducted under the 2018 CVD order on ripe olives from Spain (83 FR 37469). The administrative review was first announced in a Federal Register notice dated September 20, 2024 (89 FR 77079). Two producers were selected for individual examination: Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop And. Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L. For Agro Sevilla, Commerce preliminarily found a net subsidy rate of 5.00%. Angel Camacho Alimentación, S.L., along with its affiliated companies — Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L. — received a higher preliminary subsidy rate of 20.10%. The Department also rescinded the review for two companies. First, the review was rescinded for Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L. Commerce accepted the company’s timely withdrawal request, filed on October 1, 2024. Second, the review was rescinded for Alimentary Group DCoop, S.Coop. And., after finding no reviewable or suspended entries for the relevant period. A memorandum of intent to rescind was issued on March 18, 2025, and no parties objected. The review was delayed by several tolling extensions due to administrative matters, including a December 2024 tolling memo, a July 2025 deadline extension, and two further delays in November 2025 caused by a government shutdown. As stated by Commerce, the preliminary findings are based on a complete review of the companies’ behavior, submitted records, and responses. In some cases, the agency relied on facts available under sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Interested parties have the right to submit case briefs. These must be filed within seven days after the last verification report. Rebuttal briefs are due five days later. All filings must include an executive summary for each issue raised, using no more than 450 words per issue and must be filed through the ACCESS system at https://access.trade.gov. Parties may request a public hearing to discuss the case. Such requests must be filed within 30 days of publication and must include participant names and topics to be discussed. Commerce will release its final results within 120 days of publication of this notice, unless extended. Upon completion, assessment instructions will be issued to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Cash deposit rates will be updated based on the final results. Commerce will post a full decision memorandum on the ACCESS website and notify Customs to apply the calculated rates for future imports. This review was conducted per the process in sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and according to Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR 351. For further information, contact Ted Pearson at (202) 482-2631 or Stefan Smith at (202) 482-4342 from the AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
