U.S. Finalizes High Antidumping Duties on Some Chinese Electric Vehicles Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Commerce Finds Dumping The Department of Commerce found that these LSPTVs from China are being sold in the United States for less than their fair value. This means that U.S. companies are hurt because Chinese companies are selling LSPTVs at unfairly low prices. The investigation looked at sales from October 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. What Is Covered The products affected are low speed personal transportation vehicles and their parts, even if they are unfinished or unassembled. LSPTVs are small vehicles, with four wheels, a steering wheel, and seats next to each other. They can run on electric or gas power, and cannot go faster than 25 miles per hour. Go-karts, off-road vehicles, mobility scooters, and some other vehicle types are not included. Who Is Affected Many Chinese companies were investigated. Two major companies, Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangdong Lvtong) and Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), were looked at closely. Other companies also asked for lower rates because they said they were different from the main group of Chinese companies. Some of these companies received different rates based on their information. Final Dumping Margins The Department set very high antidumping rates. Here are the dumping margins: Guangdong Lvtong: 119.39% Xiamen Dalle: 312.31% Other Companies with Separate Rates: 291.04% All Other Chinese Companies (China-wide rate): 478.09% This China-wide rate is based on the highest number provided in the investigation because some companies did not work with the Department. Cash Deposit Requirements Now, U.S. Customs will keep holding back money (cash deposits) when these vehicles are brought from China. This deposit matches the rates listed. Liquidation of these imports (final acceptance) will be stopped for entries made after January 30, 2025. Critical Circumstances The Department found that, in some cases, companies were bringing in a lot of LSPTVs just before these new rates would start. For Guangdong Lvtong, many separate rate companies, and the China-wide group, stricter rules now apply for goods entered as far back as November 1, 2024. Certification Rules for Importers Special certification rules now apply for LSPTV parts, like seat assemblies and motors, that could be used to build these vehicles in the U.S. Importers must show detailed proof that these parts do not arrive with unfinished vehicles or rolling chassis. If not enough proof is given, the highest duty rate (China-wide rate) will be required. What Happens Next The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will check if U.S. companies are materially hurt by the Chinese LSPTV imports. If the ITC finds no harm, all the cash deposits will be refunded, and the case will stop. If harm is found, the Department of Commerce will order final duties on the products. List of Companies with Separate Rates Thirty-eight Chinese exporter and producer pairs qualified for individual rates, including companies like Dongguan Excar Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd., Haike EV Co., Ltd., and Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Further Information The full government announcement, including detailed product definitions, specific legal references, and certification requirements, can be reviewed at the Federal Register Volume 90, Number 118, pages 26530-26535, dated June 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances
U.S. Finds Subsidies for Low-Speed Vehicles from China, Sets Duties Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes On June 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce released its final determination in the investigation of certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. The Department found that subsidies are being given to producers and exporters of these vehicles in China. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. Background The Department of Commerce started this process by publishing its preliminary findings in December 2024 and collecting opinions from interested parties. The investigation looked closely at the facts and information provided by companies involved, especially Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Lvtong), Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle), as well as two non-responsive companies, Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD., and Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd. Scope of Investigation The investigation covers certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from China. These are mainly open-air vehicles powered by electric motors or gas engines and have traditional seating, four wheels, and a gross weight of no more than 5,500 pounds. Vehicles with a fixed roof and integrated doors or windows are not covered. The investigation also includes unfinished vehicles and subassemblies, also called “rolling chassis,” with or without parts like seats, roofs, or tires. Certain components, like seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, and motors, are not included if they come by themselves and have the right certification. However, if they arrive together with LSPTVs or their subassemblies, or without proper certification, they are included. Methodology and Changes After reviewing all submissions and conducting verification of the information, Commerce made some changes to subsidy calculations from the preliminary stage. The Department used facts available and sometimes adverse findings when companies did not provide all required data. Final Subsidy Rates The Department determined the following subsidy (duty) rates for the period investigated: Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd.: 31.45% Hebei Machinery Import and Export Co., LTD.: 679.44% * Shandong Odes Industry Co. Ltd.: 679.44% * Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd.: 44.38% All Other Producers/Exporters: 41.14% *Rates with a star (*) are based on adverse facts available. Critical Circumstances The Department found that “critical circumstances” applied, meaning that for some companies, duties will apply to imports made up to 90 days before the preliminary determination (December 6, 2024). This now includes Lvtong, Xiamen Dalle, all others, and the non-responsive companies. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs will collect deposits and suspend liquidation (final settlement) on subject imports that entered the U.S. on or after December 6, 2024. Suspension for entries made after April 5, 2025 (the end of provisional measures), was discontinued, but entries before April 4, 2025, remain suspended. Because of the critical circumstances decision, Customs will suspend liquidation and collect deposits for imports from Xiamen Dalle and all others that entered up to 90 days before December 6, 2024. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds that the domestic U.S. industry is injured by these imports, a countervailing duty (CVD) order will be issued, and Customs will continue to collect duties. If the ITC finds no injury, all duties will be refunded. Certification Requirements Commerce now requires importers of certain LSPTV components (Chinese-origin seat assemblies, steering columns, suspension systems, plastic cowlings, or motors) to certify that these parts are not being combined with subject LSPTVs or subassemblies. Specific certification procedures and records are required, as detailed in the official notice. Importers must keep this documentation for at least five years after the last entry covered or three years after any court cases are finished. If an importer fails to follow these rules, all their affected entries may be considered subject to duties. Next Steps The Commerce Department will notify the ITC of its decision. The ITC will decide within 45 days if imports of LSPTVs from China are causing harm to the U.S. industry. If the answer is yes, Commerce will issue a formal CVD order. If not, the case will end, and money collected will be returned. Appendices The notice includes the full legal definition (“scope”) of the products covered, the importer certification form, and a full list of topics addressed in Commerce’s Issues and Decision Memorandum. For further details, all documents are on file with the U.S. Department of Commerce and available online. Contact Information For questions, contact Dan Alexander in the Enforcement and Compliance office at the U.S. Department of Commerce: (202) 482-4313. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-06-23
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-06-23 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain low-speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 2. Certain Low Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain low speed personal transportation vehicles (LSPTVs) from the People's Republic of China (China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) during the period of investigation (POI) October 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Modules and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Updates Name in OLED Display Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a decision in Investigation No. 337-TA-1378. This case is about certain organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display modules and their parts. The investigation started on December 6, 2023, after a complaint filed by Samsung Display Company, Ltd. of South Korea. The complaint said that some companies from China and the United States may have imported or sold these items by using trade secrets in the wrong way. This could hurt U.S. businesses or stop new ones from starting. The companies named in the investigation were: BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. of Mianyang, China Ordos Yuansheng Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. of Inner Mongolia, China Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. of Chengdu, China Chongqing BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. of Chongqing, China Wuhan BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. of Wuhan, China BMOT, also known as Kunming BOE Display Technology, of Yunnan, China BOE Technology America Inc. of Santa Clara, California On May 21, 2025, Samsung and all the companies involved said together that BMOT changed its name. Now, BMOT is called Yunnan Invensight Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (Yunnan). On May 27, 2025, the administrative law judge (ALJ) in charge gave an order, called Initial Determination (Order No. 63). This order updated the official records to change BMOT’s name to Yunnan in the complaint and in the investigation notice. The ALJ said there was a good reason for this update, since Yunnan is now the right name to use. No one asked the ITC to review this change. The ITC has now decided not to review the judge’s order. This means the name change is official in the case. The ITC used its authority from section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure to make this decision. The vote happened on June 17, 2025. The notice was signed by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, and published in the Federal Register on June 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Topcon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect Corporate Name Change
U.S. International Trade Commission Updates Solar Cell Investigation Due to Company Name Change Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a notice about two ongoing investigations, Investigation No. 337-TA-1422 and Investigation No. 337-TA-1425. These investigations involve certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, panels, their parts, and products that use them. The ITC has decided not to review an initial decision made by the Administrative Law Judge. The decision allowed the complainants to amend their complaint and the notice of investigation. This amendment was made to show a corporate name change. The company “Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC” is now “T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC.” The name change took effect on April 21, 2025. Background of the Investigation The ITC started Investigation No. 337-TA-1422 on November 5, 2024, and Investigation No. 337-TA-1425 on December 9, 2024. The complaints were filed by Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc., Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC (now T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC), and Trina Solar Co., Ltd. These companies are called “Complainants.” The complaints say there were violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The violations relate to bringing certain TOPCon solar products into the United States, selling them for import, or selling them after they arrive. The claims involve U.S. Patent No. 9,722,104 (claims 1-11) and U.S. Patent No. 10,230,009 (claims 1-17). The complaints also say there is a domestic industry involved. Parties Named in the Investigation The investigation names several respondents, including: Runergy USA Inc. (Pleasanton, CA) Runergy Alabama Inc. (Huntsville, AL) Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology, Co., Ltd. (Yangcheng City, China) Adani Solar USA Inc. (Irving, TX) Adani Green Energy Ltd. (Ahmedabad, India) CSI Solar Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China) Canadian Solar Inc. (Guelph, Canada) Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. (Walnut Creek, CA) Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Bo Win, Thailand) Canadian Solar US Module Manufacturing Corporation (Mesquite, TX) Recurrent Energy Development Holdings, LLC (Austin, TX) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also part of the case. Progress of the Investigation On January 21, 2025, the ITC combined the two investigations into one. There have been some changes in the list of respondents: On January 31, 2025, the investigation decided not to continue with Adani Green Energy Ltd., and added Mundra Solar PV Ltd. as a new respondent. On February 12, 2025, the target date for the investigation was updated to May 20, 2026. On February 13, 2025, the ITC decided not to continue with Recurrent Energy Development Holdings LLC. Company Name Change On May 12, 2025, the complainants asked for permission to change the complaint and notice of investigation. This was to reflect the company’s new name, from Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC to T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC. The judge agreed to the change on May 23, 2025, stating there was good reason to update the name. No one objected to this update. The ITC has now officially amended the documents to use the correct new company name. Authority and Dates The ITC made this decision under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as updated, and according to the ITC’s rules. The decision was made on June 17, 2025. For more information, contact Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission. The case number for this Federal Register notice is 2025-11434. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations
USITC Announces Revised Schedule for Torsion Spring Investigations Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has issued a notice regarding the schedule for its investigations into overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India. On June 2, 2025, the Commission set a schedule for the final phase of these investigations. On June 17, 2025, the Commission changed the schedule to solve some timing conflicts. The new schedule is as follows: The prehearing staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 5, 2025. Prehearing briefs and requests to appear at the hearing must be filed with the Secretary to the Commission by 5:15 p.m. on August 11, 2025. The prehearing conference will take place at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building on August 13, 2025, if needed. Parties must file and serve written testimony and presentation slides for the hearing by noon on August 14, 2025. The hearing will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on August 15, 2025. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is 5:15 p.m. on August 22, 2025. Any person who has not entered as a party may submit a written statement of information about the topic. These statements can include support or opposition to the petition. The due date for these statements is August 22, 2025. These investigations are being held under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and based on the Commission’s rules, including 19 CFR parts 201 and 207. For more information, contact Peter Stebbins at the USITC, phone 202-205-2039. Persons with hearing or mobility impairments can reach the USITC using the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810, or the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. More details and public records are available on the USITC website at https://www.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on June 18, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-06-23
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-06-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Certain Topcon Solar Cells, Modules, Panels, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation To Reflect Corporate Name Change Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") granting Complainants' motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate name change by Trina Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC to T1 G1 Dallas Solar Module (Trina) LLC. 3. Certain Nasal Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion For Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), granting Complainant's motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. 4. Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 16, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Estelgia, LLC of Dover, Delaware. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on June 3, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,936,714 ("the '714 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 11,246,016 ("the '016 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 10,735,973 ("the '973 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 10,531,518 ("the '518 patent"); U.S. Patent No, 9,775,164 ("the '164 patent"); and U.S. Patent No. 9,277,591("the'591 patent"). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. 5. Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Modules and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 63) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to change the name of one of the respondents. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Rust Foundation
Rust Foundation Updates Membership in National Research Venture Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On May 27, 2025, the Rust Foundation made official notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. These notifications were made under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The law is found in 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The notifications shared new changes in group membership. Five new parties have joined the Rust Foundation’s research project. They are: Fledgio Limited, London, UNITED KINGDOM OpenAtom Foundation, Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA School of Computer Science at University of Bristol, Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM Stichting Trifecta Tech Foundation, Nijmegen, KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS Tock Foundation, Seattle, WA Three organizations have withdrawn as parties in the project. They are: Dropbox Inc., San Francisco, CA Embecosm, Southampton, UNITED KINGDOM Knoldus Inc., Missisauga, CANADA No other changes have taken place in either the membership or planned work of the research group. The membership in the group research project continues to stay open. The Rust Foundation will send more written notifications when new members join or leave. The Rust Foundation first filed a notification for this venture on April 14, 2022. The Department of Justice published notice of that filing in the Federal Register on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384). The most recent notification before this was filed on March 19, 2025. Notice of that was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16702). This information was filed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division, at the Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ASTM INTERNATIONAL
Notice of ASTM International Filing Published in the Federal Register Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On June 20, 2025, the Department of Justice announced an official notice from ASTM International. This notice appears in Volume 90, Number 117 of the Federal Register, on page 26328. The notice states that ASTM International has filed written notifications as of May 22, 2025. The filing is under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, found at 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., also known as “the Act.” ASTM International sent these notifications to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The purpose of the notification is to extend the protections in the Act. These protections limit what antitrust plaintiffs can recover to only actual damages under specific situations. The content of the filing from ASTM International contains an updated list of ongoing standards development activities. These activities are called “Work Items,” and they started between February 17, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Each Work Item has a brief description and is listed on the ASTM website at http://www.astm.org. ASTM International first filed a notification for these purposes on September 15, 2004. The Department of Justice then published a notice about it in the Federal Register on November 10, 2004, found at 69 FR 65226. The most recent prior notification from ASTM was filed on February 28, 2025. That notice appeared in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025, at 90 FR 16701. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, certified this notice. The document’s reference number is 2025-11311. It was filed on June 18, 2025, at 8:45 am. The Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s billing code for this notice is 4410-11-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-06-20
Justice Department, Antitrust Division Briefing 2025-06-20 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ASTM INTERNATIONAL Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 2. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Rust Foundation Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 3. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Mobile Satellite Services Association Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division 4. Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Integrated Photonics Institute for Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics Sub: Justice Department, Antitrust Division Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; BIS Program Evaluation
Department of Commerce Seeks Comments on Export Control Seminar Survey Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the Department of Commerce, has announced a request for public comments. The request is about its “BIS Program Evaluation” information collection. This is part of the government’s effort to reduce paperwork and improve reporting. The survey helps BIS assess and improve its export control seminars. These seminars teach about export controls under BIS rules. Seminars are held both in-person and online. BIS hosts over 20 seminars each year, inside and outside the United States. The survey is voluntary. People who attend seminars fill out the survey. BIS uses the feedback to make its programs better and more useful for people who export goods. Here are some key facts: The survey can be filled out either online or on paper. The government estimates 3,030 people respond each year. Each response takes about ten minutes to complete. The total time for all responses is about 505 hours per year. There is no cost for people who fill out the survey. The survey is done with the authority of the Government Performance and Results Act. The Department of Commerce wants comments from the public and other agencies. They want advice on: Whether the survey is needed. If the survey is useful. If the time estimates are correct. How to improve the survey. How to make it easier to fill out, including the use of technology. You can send your comments by email to Nancy Kook, the IC Liaison at BIS. Make sure to use OMB Control Number 0694-0125 in your email. Do not send private or sensitive business information with your comments. All comments will become public records. The Department might publish your comment and personal information. If you want your information kept private, you can ask, but the Department cannot promise to do so. Send your comments by August 19, 2025. For questions, contact Nancy Kook at 202-482-2440 or by email. This notice was filed by Sheleen Dumas, the Departmental PRA Compliance Officer at the Commerce Department. [Federal Register Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025)] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-06-20
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-06-20 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; BIS Program Evaluation Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; BIS Program Evaluation Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review, Rescission, in Part, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Preliminary Results on Tapered Roller Bearings from China Estimated reading time: 3–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its preliminary findings for the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings (TRBs) and parts from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers the period of June 1, 2023 through May 31, 2024. Key Actions Commerce is rescinding the administrative review in part. This means that some companies will no longer be under review. The companies removed from the review are: Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. (CPZ) C&U Metallurgy Bearing Co., Ltd. Sichuan C&U Bearing Co., Ltd. C&U Automotive Bearing Co., Ltd. Hangzhou C&U Bearing Co., Ltd. Commerce is also announcing preliminary findings for two other companies: Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai) C&U Group Shanghai Bearing Co., Ltd. (C&U Shanghai Bearing) Tainai Had No Shipments Commerce found that Tainai did not ship any TRBs to the United States during the review period. This was based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Commerce checked the CBP data and information from Tainai and did not find any shipments from Tainai. C&U Shanghai Is Considered Part of the China-Wide Entity C&U Shanghai Bearing did not apply for a separate rate in this review. Companies without a separate rate are considered to be part of the “China-wide entity.” The rate for the China-wide entity is 92.84 percent. Commerce will apply this rate to C&U Shanghai Bearing. Review Details The review originally included several companies after requests from JTEKT Bearings North America LLC (a domestic company) and CPZ. After business and procedural steps: CPZ withdrew from the review. Four other companies had no entries of subject merchandise. Commerce decided to rescind the review for these companies. Scope of Products The order covers all shipments of finished and unfinished tapered roller bearings and parts from China. It also covers different units and housings that include tapered roller bearings. The products fall under many Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes, such as 8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, and others. Public Participation Parties can submit case briefs or comments about these preliminary results within 21 days of the notice publication. Rebuttal briefs are allowed five days after initial briefs. Hearings can be requested within 30 days, and all submissions must be filed electronically. Assessment and Cash Deposits For companies no longer under review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at the rates on record when the goods were imported. For companies still under review, any duties owed would be based on final results. Tainai’s entries, if any, will be assessed at the China-wide rate of 92.84 percent. The same rate applies to C&U Shanghai Bearing for any subject merchandise during the review period. These cash deposit requirements are effective from the date the final results are published and remain in force until further notice. Next Steps Commerce plans to release final results within 120 days of the preliminary results, unless otherwise extended. These results will help decide the assessment of duties for the review period and future deposit rates. Reminders This notice also reminds parties involved of their responsibilities in handling confidential information according to rules set for Administrative Protective Orders. Contact For more information, contact Jerry Xiao at the U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: (202) 482-2273. Official Publication These actions are taken under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related regulations. The official notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part, and Alignment of Final Determination With the Final Antidumping Determination
U.S. Finds Chinese Temporary Steel Fencing Gets Unfair Subsidies Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary decision in a trade case about temporary steel fencing from China. The Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of this fencing are getting support from their government. This help is called a “countervailable subsidy.” What Is Being Investigated The investigation looks at “temporary steel fencing.” This fencing includes steel fence panels and stands. The panels have steel tubing and inside material like chain link or steel wire mesh. Most panels are 10 to 12 feet long and 6 to 8 feet high. Both the panels and stands are covered, whether they are imported together or by themselves. Period of the Investigation The period reviewed is from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Key Companies and Rates Two companies were closely investigated: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd.: 33.27% subsidy rate Shijiazhuang SD Company Ltd.: 139.20% subsidy rate Five companies did not answer questions from U.S. officials. These are: Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Shenzhou Yuelei Metal Products Co., Ltd. Sichuan Gold-Link Industry Sourcing Solution Co., Ltd. Tianjin Mengsheng Metal Products These non-responsive companies got a rate of 301.83%. This rate is based on “adverse facts available” because they did not cooperate. “All-other” producers and exporters who were not individually investigated received an 86.24% subsidy rate. Critical Circumstances The Department of Commerce found “critical circumstances” for some imports. This means they believe companies rushed products into the U.S. to avoid possible duties. The companies affected by this are Hebei Minmetals, the five non-responsive companies, and all-other companies. One company, Shijiazhuang SD, was not found to have critical circumstances. Suspension of Liquidation For the affected companies with critical circumstances, U.S. Customs will hold back (“suspend liquidation” of) entries made on or after 90 days before this notice was published. For Shijiazhuang SD, the suspension begins on the date of notice. Importers must pay a cash deposit for the above rates. Scope of Products Covered The fencing includes panels and stands, coated or not, in any size over six square feet and weighing more than four pounds. The scope also covers items finished or packed in another country, as long as they match these rules. Only the fencing from China is covered, not any extra parts or accessories that may come with it. Next Steps The Department of Commerce will now check (“verify”) the information used for this preliminary finding. Interested parties can submit arguments (“case briefs”) after the last verification report is released. Hearings may also be requested. The International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the imports hurt U.S. companies. If the final decision stays the same, these duties will continue. This finding is open to public review. All related details and documents are available to the public online. Key Dates Notice published: June 20, 2025 Final determination expected: October 27, 2025 (unless delayed) Contact Information Questions may be directed to Natasia Byrd or Janaé Martin at the Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, Office VI, Washington, DC. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025), Document Number: 2025-11383 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-06-20
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-06-20 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Temporary Steel Fencing From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part, and Alignment of Final Determination With the Final Antidumping Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of temporary steel fencing from the People’s Republic of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. 2. Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review, Rescission, in Part, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding, in part, the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs) from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024. Further, Commerce preliminarily finds that Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai) had no shipments during the POR and C&U Group Shanghai Bearing Co., Ltd. (C&U Shanghai) did not qualify for a separate rate and therefore, is considered part of the China-wide entity. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances AJNA Biosciences
AJNA Biosciences Applies to Make Psilocybin and Psilocyn in Colorado Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes What AJNA Wants to Do AJNA Biosciences wants to make mushrooms that contain Psilocybin and Psilocyn. These are both schedule I controlled substances. The company’s work is for internal research, clinical trials, and analysis. AJNA also wants to sell these substances to its customers who do schedule I clinical research. Where and When AJNA Biosciences is located at 8022 Southpark Circle, Suite 500, Littleton, Colorado 80120-5659. The company sent its application on May 7, 2025. Rules and Details The DEA says this notice is made under 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Anyone who is a registered bulk manufacturer or an applicant for the same substances can comment or object. They have until August 18, 2025, to do this. They may also ask for a hearing by the same date. How to Comment Comments need to be sent electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. People can write short comments or attach longer files. After sending a comment, a Comment Tracking Number is given. Comments may not show up right away on the site. Who Signed the Notice Matthew Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator at the DEA, signed the notice. No activities except for those listed are allowed for this registration. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-06-18
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2025-06-18 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Veranova, L.P. Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Veranova, L.P. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 2. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: American Radiolabeled Chem Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: American Radiolabeled Chem has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 3. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances AJNA Biosciences Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: AJNA Biosciences has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 4. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: AndersonBrecon, Inc. DBA PCI Pharma Services Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: AndersonBrecon, Inc. DBA PCI Pharma Services has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. 5. Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Veranova, L.P. Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Veranova, L.P., has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Brake Drums Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final decision about certain brake drums from China. The Department says these brake drums are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. What Is the Product? The investigation looked at brake drums made from gray cast iron. They must have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches. The brake drums must weigh more than 50 pounds. Brake drums are included if they are finished or unfinished, imported alone or with non-subject items like a hub. Assemblies are covered, but only the brake drum itself is part of this case. Some brake drums are excluded, like composite drums with more than 38 percent steel by weight, and some covered by other antidumping orders. Investigation Timeline The Department started the investigation on January 29, 2025. The period looked at sales between October 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. Changes were made since the preliminary decision after reviewing comments and documents from companies. Companies Involved The investigation looked at several Chinese companies, including Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. The Department checked sales and production information from these companies. Dumping Margins and Results The Department determined the following estimated dumping margins: Producer Exporter Weighted-Average Dumping Margin (%) Cash Deposit Rate (%) Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. Shandong ConMet Mechanical Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co. Liaoning Hechuang CV Parts MFG Co. 77.14 77.14 Hebei OE Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Ningbo Qingchen Intl. Trade Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Longyao County Yiheng Auto Parts Co. Qingdao Jasmine Intl. Trade Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Lingang Nonferrous Metals Co. Qingdao Tordon Brake Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Qiqihar Beimo Auto Parts Mfg Co., Ltd. Qiqihar Beimo Auto Parts Mfg Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Lingang Nonferrous Metals Co. Shandong Haoxin Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Hongma Engineering Machinery Shandong Hongma Engr. Machinery Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Longyao Gucheng Automobile Parts Factory Shandong North Autotech Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 Shandong Longji Machinery Co., Ltd. Shanghai Winsun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 77.14 77.14 China-Wide Entity 160.79* 150.25 *The higher margin for the China-Wide Entity is based on facts available with adverse inferences. Rates and Instructions U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep suspending the liquidation of entries for these products after January 29, 2025. Importers must place cash deposits at the rates shown. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) finds U.S. industry injured by these products, antidumping duties will be ordered. Possible Changes If the ITC decides there is no injury, the process will stop, and any deposits will be returned. If injury is found, the cash deposit rates may be updated for subsidies. Where to Find More Information The full Issues and Decision Memorandum, including changes and comments from interested parties, is available online at here. Conclusion The Department of Commerce has finished its investigation. Many Chinese companies exporting certain brake drums to the U.S. will face high dumping margins. The final decision now goes to the ITC to determine if these sales harmed U.S. industry. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duy Determination
U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Countervailable Subsidies for Certain Brake Drums from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes U.S. Department of Commerce Finds Countervailable Subsidies for Certain Brake Drums from China The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued its final determination that producers and exporters of certain brake drums from the People’s Republic of China receive countervailable subsidies. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Investigation Background On December 3, 2024, the Department of Commerce published its preliminary findings in the Federal Register. CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd., a key respondent, withdrew from the case on February 21, 2025. A post-preliminary analysis was released on April 1, 2025. All events and comments submitted by interested parties were taken into account in the final determination. Scope of the Investigation The products under investigation are gray cast iron brake drums from China. These brake drums have an actual or nominal inside diameter of 14.75 inches or more, but not over 16.6 inches, and weigh more than 50 pounds. Both finished and unfinished brake drums are included. The detailed description of the products is set out in Appendix I of the final notice. Certain drum and chassis products from China covered by earlier antidumping and countervailing duty orders are excluded from the scope. Brake drums with more than 38 percent steel by weight are also excluded. Changes to Product Scope During the investigation, comments were received regarding the scope of products. The Department issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum and later added more Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings in response to comments. These changes are reflected in Appendix I. Verification of Information In January 2025, the Department verified information provided by Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd. and Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. (collectively, ConMet). Standard procedures were used to check accounting records and source documents. Analysis and Methodology The Department reviewed various subsidy programs. The final decision outlines which programs were found to be countervailable. The official record provides a detailed list of the issues raised by interested parties. The full methodology is available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Department determined if subsidies existed by confirming financial contributions from authorities, proof of benefit to recipients, and specificity. The Department relied partly on facts available and used adverse inferences, especially concerning CAIEC’s withdrawal and data gaps. Details are in the preliminary memorandum and the final Issues and Decision Memorandum. Calculation Changes The subsidy rate for ConMet was changed based on comments and verification. For CAIEC, the calculation relied on adverse inferences. The adverse facts available (AFA) rate was updated to include rates for three additional programs and corrections. All-Others Rate The ‘all-others’ rate is based on ConMet’s revised rate, because its rate is not zero, de minimis, or entirely based on facts otherwise available. Final Subsidy Rates The Department assigned these rates: Company Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd. / Trailer Master CVS Inc. 446.83* Shandong ConMet Mechanical, Ltd./Weifang ConMet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd. 11.94 Guangzhou Joyhand Import & Export Co. 446.83* Hebei Iruijin Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Henan Broad Top Metal Work, Llc 446.83* Henan Valiant Braking System Co. 446.83* HTS (Tianjin) Supply Chain Co., Ltd. 446.83* Panasia CVS (HK), Ltd. 446.83* Raw King Brake Parts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Tianjin Textile Group Import and Export Inc. 446.83* Xiamen Tinmy Industrial Co., Ltd. 446.83* Xingtai Xunchiyoute Auto Parts Co. 446.83* Yancheng Terbon Auto Parts Co. 446.83* Yantai Hongtian Autoparts Co., Ltd. 446.83* Zhejiang Firsd Group Co., Ltd. 446.83* All Others 11.94 *Rates marked with an asterisk are based on facts available with adverse inferences. Suspension of Liquidation On December 3, 2024, the Department told U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits and suspend liquidation of relevant entries. Suspension was lifted for entries after April 2, 2025, but remains for earlier entries. If the International Trade Commission (ITC) gives a final injury determination, the Department will order more actions, including duty deposits on future entries. ITC Process The Department will notify the ITC about its findings. The ITC must decide within 45 days whether U.S. industry is harmed or threatened by these imports. If not, the process ends and deposits are refunded. Access to Documents Interested parties may access all public documents online through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. Administrative Protective Orders The notice reminds parties of their responsibilities to return or destroy proprietary information as required by law. Official Signing The determination was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 13, 2025. For More Information Contact Nathan James at (202) 482-5305 or Olivia Woolverton at (202) 482-7452. See the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 116, pages 26002-26004, for the complete notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Aluminum Wire and Cable From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Continues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Chinese Aluminum Wire and Cable Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum wire and cable from the People’s Republic of China. This action follows findings that canceling these orders would likely lead to more dumping, subsidies, and injury to U.S. companies. Background The original AD and CVD orders began on December 23, 2019. In November 2024, the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce started their first “sunset reviews” to check if the orders should stay in place. These reviews are required by law every five years. Experts at the Department of Commerce found that removing the orders would likely allow dumping and government support for Chinese companies to start again. They shared their findings with the ITC. On June 13, 2025, the ITC determined that removing the orders would harm the U.S. industry that makes aluminum wire and cable. Scope of the Orders The orders cover assemblies of one or more electrical conductors made from specific aluminum alloys. At least one conductor must be insulated and have a voltage rating above 80 volts but not more than 1,000 volts. At least one conductor must be stranded and sized between 16.5 thousand circular mil (kcmil) and 1,000 kcmil. The assembly can have extra parts like a grounding conductor, different metal coverings, connectors, shields, jackets, or fillers. Most products match certain National Electrical Code and Underwriters Laboratories standards, but this is not required. Aluminum wire and cable products shorter than six feet, even if they arrive as part of equipment, are not included. The products usually fall under trade codes 8544.49.9000 or 8544.42.9090 in U.S. records. However, the exact written scope decides what is covered. Continued Orders Customs officers will keep collecting AD and CVD cash deposits on these products from China at the rates set when the goods enter the country. This continuation started on June 13, 2025. The Department of Commerce will launch the next five-year review of these orders no more than 30 days before June 13, 2030. Protecting Proprietary Information The Department reminds all parties to return or destroy any business secrets shared under an Administrative Protective Order (APO). Not following these rules can lead to penalties. Review Information This continuation, and the reviews leading up to it, were carried out under U.S. law and rules. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-06-18
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-06-18 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Organic Soybean Meal From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to certain producers/exporters of organic soybean meal from India. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 2. Aluminum Wire and Cable From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum wire and cable (AWC) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. 3. Certain Brake Drums From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain brake drums from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye). The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 4. Certain Brake Drums From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain brake drums (brake drums) from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 5. Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain brake drums (brake drums) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 6. Certain Brake Drums From People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain brake drums (brake drums) from the People's Republic of China (China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is October 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 7. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Bien Dong Seafood Joint Stock Company (Bien Dong), an exporter of certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam), did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Commerce also determines that six additional companies, Can Tho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company (CASEAMEX), Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited (Dai Thanh), Dong A Seafood One Member Company Limited (Dong A), HungCa 6 Corporation (HungCa 6), Nam Viet Corporation (NAVICO), and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (NTSF), are eligible for separate-rate status. Commerce is also rescinding the review with respect to the Vietnam-wide entity. 8. Certain High Chrome Cast Iron Grinding Media From India: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Countervailing Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain high chrome cast iron grinding media (grinding media) from India. In addition, Commerce is amending its final determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of certain high chrome cast iron grinding media from India to correct a ministerial error. The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Dryer Wall Exhaust Vent Assemblies and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Issue Remedial Orders Against the Defaulting Respondent; Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Issues Orders Against Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. in Patent Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. of Xiamen City, China. This company was the only respondent in the investigation. The case concerned the import of dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies and their components. The investigation began on February 6, 2025, after a complaint from InOvate Acquisition Company of Jupiter, Florida. This complaint stated that Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The violation was due to the import, sale for import, or sale within the U.S. after importation of dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies and components. These actions were said to infringe on certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,953,230. The complaint also claimed that there was a related industry in the United States. Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. did not respond to the ITC’s complaint or its notice. On March 14, 2025, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordered Xiamen Dirongte to explain its lack of response. The company did not reply. On April 15, 2025, the ALJ found Xiamen Dirongte in default. The Commission chose not to review this decision. It then asked for briefs on the remedy, bonding, and public interest. On May 19, 2025, InOvate replied, asking for both a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against Xiamen Dirongte. No other responses were given. After reviewing the case record, the Commission decided on the following remedies: A limited exclusion order. This order blocks the unlicensed entry into the United States of certain dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies and components that infringe the ‘230 patent and come from Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. A cease and desist order against Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. The Commission also set a bond for the Presidential review period. The bond is 100% of the value of the infringing imported products. The Commission found no public interest reasons to stop these orders from being issued. The ITC made its official vote on June 16, 2025. The orders and bond are effective following that date. The investigation is now terminated. The decision was announced by Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney of the ITC. For more information, documents can be found on the ITC’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-06-18
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-06-18 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Certain Dryer Wall Exhaust Vent Assemblies and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Issue Remedial Orders Against the Defaulting Respondent; Termination of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order against defaulting respondent Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. of Xiamen City, China (“Xiamen”), the sole respondent in this investigation. The Commission has also determined to impose a bond equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the entered value of the infringing products imported during the period of Presidential review. The investigation is hereby terminated. 2. Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Request for Comments Regarding the Institution of a Section 751(b) Review Concerning the Commission’s Affirmative Determination and Continued Antidumping Duty Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission invites comments from the public on whether changed circumstances exist sufficient to warrant the institution of a review pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)) (the Act) regarding the Commission’s affirmative determination and continued antidumping duty investigation in investigation No. 731- TA-747 (Fifth Review). The purpose of the proposed review would be to determine whether revocation of the existing suspension agreement on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(2)(A)). 3. Certain Boiler Protection for Absorption Refrigeration Systems and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 14, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of ARPC LLC and Paul Unmack of Butte, Montana. A supplement was filed on May 23, 2025. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain boiler protection for absorption refrigeration systems and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,056,360. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Program Evaluation Data Collections
NIST Requests Public Comment on Program Evaluation Data Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a part of the Department of Commerce, has published a notice about collecting information to evaluate its programs. This process follows the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. NIST wants to hear from the public and other federal agencies about its plan to collect data. The goal is to study how well its programs work from the viewpoint of its customers. NIST plans to use surveys, focus groups, reply cards, and online surveys. All opinions will be collected voluntarily. No information will be required or regulated. People can share their opinions in several ways. Information can be collected by email, mail, phone, electronic methods, or face-to-face interviews. NIST expects about 40,000 people to respond each year. These might include members of the public, businesses, non-profit groups, and all levels of government. The time needed per response will vary. Some may be as short as two minutes for a reply card. Focus group visits could take up to two hours. The average time per response is expected to be 30 minutes. There will be no cost to the public for responding. The total estimated annual time for all responses is about 20,000 hours. NIST asks for comments to help it: Decide if the information collection is necessary and will be useful. Make sure its estimate of time and cost is correct. Find ways to make the collected information better. Lower the reporting burden, including using online or automatic tools. All comments are part of the public record. Any personal information you include in your comment, like name, address, or phone number, might become public. To send comments, mail or email Maureen O’Reilly at NIST by August 18, 2025. Reference OMB Control Number 0693-0033. For more information, contact Maureen O’Reilly at NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 1710, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Phone: 301-975-3189. This notice was signed by Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. Federal Register Document Number: 2025-11162. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
NIST Briefing 2025-06-17
Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Briefing 2025-06-17 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Program Evaluation Data Collections Sub: Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Content: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. 2. Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Sub: Commerce Department, National Institute of Standards and Technology Content: The Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (Judges Panel) reports the results of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (Award) activities to the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) each year, along with its recommendations for the improvement of the Award process. The purpose of this meeting is to review the results of examiners’ ratings of applications. Panel members will vote on which applicants merit site visits by examiners to verify the accuracy of quality improvements claimed by applicants. The meeting is closed to the public to protect the proprietary data to be examined and discussed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From China and Vietnam; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations
USITC Revises Schedule for Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products Investigations Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced new dates for its final investigation of thermoformed molded fiber products from China and Vietnam. The revision follows a request from the American Molded Fiber Coalition to change the hearing date. The updated schedule is as follows: Prehearing briefs must be filed by 5:15 p.m. on September 19, 2025. Requests to appear at the hearing are due by 5:15 p.m. on September 25, 2025. The prehearing conference will take place at the USITC Building on September 29, 2025, if necessary. The hearing is set for September 30, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. at the USITC Building. Posthearing briefs are due by 5:15 p.m. on October 7, 2025. The investigations are related to cases 701-TA-739-740 and 731-TA-1716-1717. These cases concern possible issues with the import of thermoformed molded fiber products from China and Vietnam. The USITC is conducting these investigations under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The schedule update was issued on June 11, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. For more information or access to the public record, visit the Commission’s website at www.usitc.gov or its electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. Contact Caitlyn Costello at 202-205-2058 for further details. Those with hearing or mobility impairments can get assistance by calling the Commission’s TDD terminal at 202-205-1810 or the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. This notice is published pursuant to Section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-06-17
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-06-17 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof II Institution of Investigation; Notice of Institution of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 13, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Epson Portland Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of Los Alamitos, California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan. Supplements to the complaint were filed on May 19 and 30, 2025, and June 3, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof II by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,764,172 (“the ‘172 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,370,934 (“the ‘934 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,535,038 (“the ‘038 Patent”); U.S. Patent No. 12,240,248 (“the ‘248 Patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 12,240,249 (“the ‘249 Patent”). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. 2. Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof I; Notice of Institution of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 13, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Epson Portland Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of Los Alamitos, California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan. Supplements to the complaint were filed on May 19 and 30, 2025, and June 3, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,540,347 (“the ‘347 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,061,508 (“the ‘508 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,535,037 (“the ‘037 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 11,820,150 (“the ‘150 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 12,246,539 (“the ‘539 patent”). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders. 3. High Chrome Cast Iron Grinding Media From India Sub: International Trade Commission 4. Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From China and Vietnam; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Adds Names to Sanctions List Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On June 16, 2025, the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a notice in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 114. The notice listed new actions taken under OFAC’s sanctions program. OFAC has added persons to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These persons were added because OFAC decided that certain legal criteria were met. All property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction that belong to these persons are now blocked. People in the United States are generally not allowed to do business or transactions with them. The action was issued by OFAC on June 10, 2025. The SDN List and more information about the sanctions programs can be found at the OFAC website: https://ofac.treasury.gov. The notice was signed by Lisa M. Palluconi, Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. If you have questions, you can contact the Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. You can also use https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac to get in touch with OFAC. The official record is available in the Federal Register through the Government Publishing Office at www.gpo.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Sanctions Members and Companies Linked to Sinaloa Cartel Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published new actions on June 9, 2025. OFAC added several people and companies to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). This action blocks all property and interests owned by these people and groups in the United States. U.S. citizens cannot do business with them. The designations follow two Executive Orders: Executive Order 14059 targets foreign persons involved in the global illegal drug trade. Executive Order 13224 targets people and groups who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism. People Added to the SDN List Victor Manuel Barraza Pablos – Also known as “El 40” – Born July 17, 1990, in Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Linked to the Sinaloa Cartel Archivaldo Ivan Guzman Salazar – Also known as Ivan Archivaldo Guzman Salazar, “Chapito,” or “Tocallo” – Born August 15, 1983, in Durango, Mexico – Linked to the Sinaloa Cartel Jesus Alfredo Guzman Salazar – Also known as “Alfredito” or “Menor” – Born May 17, 1986, in Jalisco, Mexico – Linked to the Sinaloa Cartel Jose Raul Nunez Rios – Also known as “El Lic” – Born October 11, 1981, in Sinaloa, Mexico – Linked to the Sinaloa Cartel Sheila Paola Urias Vazquez – Also known as Sheila Paola Urias de Nunez – Born March 14, 1994, in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Companies and Groups Added to the SDN List Beach y Marina, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Involved in construction – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Carpe Diem Spa – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Offers beauty treatments – Website: www.sheilauriaspa.com – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Club Playa Real, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Provides tour operator activities – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Comercializadora Copado, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Sells household goods – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Eco Campestres Ultra, S.A.P.I. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Operates as a holding company – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios IMB 24 Siete, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Handles construction of buildings – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Los Chapitos – Criminal organization in Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Linked to the Sinaloa Cartel MKT 24 Siete, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Works in advertising – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Mue Renta y Venta de Vestidos – Located at Avenida Francisco Solis No. 2601, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Offers beauty treatment services – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Proyecta Interna, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Handles construction activities – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios Sea Wa Beach Club, S.A. de C.V. – Located in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico – Provides tour operator activities – Linked to Jose Raul Nunez Rios What These Sanctions Mean All property of these people and businesses within U.S. jurisdiction is blocked. U.S. persons must not do business with them. These actions follow U.S. laws meant to stop illegal drugs and combat terrorism. More information about OFAC sanctions is available at https://ofac.treasury.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-06-16
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-06-16 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. 2. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Implementation of Duties on Steel Pursuant to Proclamation 10896 Adjusting Imports of Steel Into the United States
New U.S. Tariffs on Steel Products Begin June 23, 2025 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The Department of Commerce announced new rules for importing steel and some steel products into the United States. These new rules start on June 23, 2025. The action follows Proclamation 10896 from the President on February 10, 2025. What Are the New Rules? Starting June 23, 2025, certain products made with steel will have new tariffs. A tariff is a tax on imports. These tariffs apply when these items are brought into the U.S. for people to use or sold from a warehouse. Which Products Have Tariffs Now? Here are the products that will now have steel tariffs: Combined refrigerator-freezers (HTSUS 8418.10.00) Small and large dryers (HTSUS 8451.21.00 and 8451.29.00) Washing machines (HTSUS 8450.11.00 and 8450.20.00) Dishwashers (HTSUS 8422.11.00) Chest and upright freezers (HTSUS 8418.30.00 and 8418.40.00) Cooking stoves, ranges, and ovens (HTSUS 8516.60.40) Food waste disposals (HTSUS 8509.80.20) Welded wire racks (HTSUS 9403.99.9020) The tariff will be added based on the value of the steel inside these products. Are There Any Exceptions? If the steel came from the United States and was melted and poured here, then made into these products in another country, the tariff does not apply. This also applies to items brought into U.S. foreign trade zones before June 23, 2025. Products listed under 9403.99.9020 may also have tariffs for aluminum content if affected by earlier rules. What Stays the Same? All other rules for steel and steel products in Annex 1 remain the same. Why These Changes? These changes make the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States match recent Presidential orders. The rules are published by the Bureau of Industry and Security. For more information, see the official notice from the Department of Commerce in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 114, dated June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-06-16
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-06-16 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Implementation of Duties on Steel Pursuant to Proclamation 10896 Adjusting Imports of Steel Into the United States Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: In the Proclamation of February 10, 2025, Adjusting Imports of Steel into the United States (Steel Presidential Proclamation), the President imposed specified rates of duty on imports of steel. That Proclamation authorized and directed the Secretary of Commerce to publish modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) so that it conforms to the amendments and effective dates in the Proclamation. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a notice, Implementation of Duties on Steel Pursuant to Proclamation 10896 Adjusting Imports of Steel into the United States, on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce on March 5, 2025, that fulfilled this directive. The revised HTSUS was set out in Annex 1 to the March 5 notice. In this notice, BIS revises Annex 1 to add additional steel derivative products. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Rescission of Review, In Part; 2022-2023
U.S. Sets Antidumping Duties on Steel Nails from China: Final 2022-2023 Review Results Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its administrative review of antidumping duties on certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China. This review covers shipments made from August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Company Found Dumping Steel Nails The department determined that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. (also known as Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd.) sold steel nails in the United States at prices less than the normal value during the time studied. Final Antidumping Duty Rate Announced For the review period, Commerce found that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. will face a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.73 percent. Companies Removed from Review Commerce has rescinded the review for eight companies because there was no evidence of suspended entries during the review period. The companies are: Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. China-Wide Entity and S-Mart S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd. remains part of the China-wide entity because it did not submit a separate rate application. The China-wide antidumping duty rate is set at 118.04 percent. How Duties Will Be Assessed Commerce will order U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on all applicable entries. For Shanghai Yueda, duties will be set at the rate of 11.73 percent for each importer, unless the amount is less than 0.5 percent. If the rate is lower than 0.5 percent, entries will not be charged duties. For sales not reported by Shanghai Yueda, Commerce will use the China-wide rate. Entries made by companies in the China-wide entity, including S-Mart, will be assessed at the rate of 118.04 percent. For the eight companies with rescinded reviews, duties will be based on the deposit rate at the time of entry. Commerce plans to send assessment instructions to Customs 35 days after the final results notice is published, unless a summons is filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade. Cash Deposit Instructions These cash deposit requirements will be implemented at the time of publication: For Shanghai Yueda, the rate is 11.73 percent. For other exporters with a separate rate from prior reviews, their existing rate continues. For all exporters from China without a separate rate, the rate is 118.04 percent. For non-Chinese exporters without a separate rate, the Chinese supplier’s rate applies. These rates will stay in effect until Commerce announces otherwise. Importer and Legal Reminders Importers must file a certificate about reimbursement of duties. Not doing so may result in Commerce charging double duties. Parties under an Administrative Protective Order must return or destroy confidential information as required by law. Not following these rules can lead to sanctions. Additional Information The scope, background, and detailed points from this review are included in the official Issues and Decision Memorandum, available to the public at the Commerce Department’s online ACCESS system. This final decision was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 10, 2025. The official notice was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
U.S. Continues Antidumping Duties on Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On June 10, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it will continue the antidumping duty order on malleable cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s Republic of China. This decision follows findings by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both agencies determined that canceling this order would likely result in more dumping of these pipe fittings from China. They also found that such dumping would likely harm the U.S. industry. The original antidumping duty order was published on December 12, 2003. A new review of the order began in November 2024. The ITC started its review on November 1, 2024. The Department of Commerce began its review on November 4, 2024. This was the fourth five-year (sunset) review for this order. The Department of Commerce found that removing the order would likely bring back dumping of these products at similar rates seen before. They sent their findings to the ITC. The ITC agreed that getting rid of the order would likely lead to more injury to U.S. businesses within a short period. The products under this order are certain malleable iron pipe fittings that are cast and not grooved. These items are from China. They are currently listed under U.S. tariff numbers 7307.19.90.30, 7307.19.90.60, and 7307.19.90.80. Metal compression couplings are not covered by this order, even if they have similar tariff codes. Because of these decisions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting antidumping cash deposits for these imports. The continuation of the order started on June 10, 2025. The Department of Commerce plans to start the next five-year review of this order before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s latest decision. This notice also reminds parties with access to confidential records about the need to return or destroy any protected information, or change it to a judicial order, as the law requires. For more details, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at the U.S. Department of Commerce, at (202) 482-0473. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 10, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Commerce Department Finds Dumping of Wood Mouldings and Millwork from China Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the preliminary results for its review of wood mouldings and millwork products imported from China. The review covers the period from February 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Key Findings The Commerce Department found that certain Chinese exporters sold wood mouldings and millwork products in the U.S. at prices lower than normal value. This means those companies were selling items for less than the usual price, or below “fair value.” Companies Reviewed The Department reviewed 38 companies or groups. Later, the review was stopped for 20 of these companies because there were either no requests to continue, or no entries of merchandise needing review. Four companies were removed from the review after all requests concerning them were withdrawn. Separate Rate Status The Commerce Department said that some companies proved they are separate from the Chinese government and can get their own rates. These included Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd.; Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd.; Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd.; and 12 other companies. Antidumping Margins Preliminary results show the following estimated dumping margins for the period: Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd. / Zhejiang Senya Board Industry Co., Ltd.: 140.79% Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. / Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd.: 101.70% 12 other companies that qualified for separate rates: 109.42% For companies that did not qualify for their own rate, the China-wide dumping margin remains at 220.87 percent. Customs and Assessment Cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties will be applied to shipments entered on or after the date of the final decision. Importers must be ready to file certificates proving they did not get reimbursed for dumping or countervailing duties. Failure to do so could mean paying extra duties. Next Steps and Deadlines The Commerce Department is sharing these results for public comment. Parties who wish to comment have up to 21 days after publication to submit their case briefs. Rebuttal briefs are due five days after case briefs. Any hearing request must be filed within 30 days of this notice. The Department expects to announce the final results of this review within 120 days of this preliminary notice. Appendices The notice also lists, in detail, all companies included in each group: those receiving separate rates, those rescinded from review due to withdrawn requests, and those rescinded from review because there were no entries during the review period. Responsibility of Importers This announcement reminds importers to follow all rules about paperwork and proof of duty payments. Not following the rules could lead to extra penalties. This news is based on official information from the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 114, published June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
U.S. Opens Antidumping Investigations on Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced the start of less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigations into imports of hardwood and decorative plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. This means Commerce is looking into whether these products are being sold in the United States at unfairly low prices. Background On May 22, 2025, a group of U.S. plywood producers (the Coalition for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood) filed petitions asking for these investigations. The same day, they also filed petitions for countervailing duties on imports from all three countries. Commerce reviewed the petitions and asked for more information. The group provided all requested details between May 28 and June 10, 2025. Scope of Investigations The investigations cover hardwood and decorative plywood from these three countries. This includes flat, multilayered plywood panels with face or back veneers made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. The product can have other surface coatings, coverings, or minor processing. The full description and all relevant product codes (HTSUS) are included in the official notice. Some items are excluded, like structural plywood stamped for specific standards, cork-faced plywood, multilayered wood flooring, certain bamboo products, fully assembled furniture, and others. Investigation Periods For Indonesia, the study covers sales from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. For China and Vietnam, which are considered non-market economies, the period is October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. Industry Support To start an investigation, Commerce checks if there is enough support from U.S. producers. The Coalition represents more than 50% of U.S. hardwood and decorative plywood makers who support the petition. They also meet the requirement of representing at least 25% of total U.S. production. Allegations of Injury The petitions claim that U.S. industry is being hurt by these imports due to increasing import volumes, prices under U.S. market rates, shifting market share, and financial harm. The petitions say each country’s imports are high enough to meet investigation rules. Alleged Dumping Margins The estimated dumping margins (how much lower the prices are compared to fair value) are listed as follows: China: 540.07% Indonesia: 84.94% Vietnam: 138.04% to 152.41% Investigation Procedures Commerce will choose companies from each country to study closely. For Indonesia, companies will receive questionnaires, and the largest firms will be examined based on sales data. For China and Vietnam, Commerce will use special methods because these are non-market economies. Companies must apply for “separate rates” if they want to be treated apart from government-run businesses. Parties have deadlines to comment on scope (July 1, 2025) and to respond to product characteristic questions or other requests. Timeline and Next Steps The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide within 45 days if there is a reasonable sign that U.S. industry is being injured. If the ITC finds no injury by imports from any of the countries, the investigation regarding that country will stop. Commerce will make a preliminary decision within 140 days unless postponed. Legal and Filing Details All parties must use the Enforcement and Compliance Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) for submissions unless exceptions apply. There are clear instructions and timelines for submitting information, requesting deadline extensions, and applying for participation rights. Commerce has set rules for how information should be filed and certified. These requirements ensure submissions are complete and accurate. Product Codes Products are most commonly imported under many specific HTSUS codes, which are detailed in the official notice. The written product description controls the investigation, not the HTSUS codes. Contact Information Questions can be directed to: Theodora Mattei (China) at (202) 482-4834. Joy Zhang (Indonesia) at (202) 482-1168. Kabir Archuletta (Vietnam) at (202) 482-2593. The notice was signed by Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on June 11, 2025. The full text with all technical details and codes is available through the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations
U.S. Launches Countervailing Duty Investigations on Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On June 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce started countervailing duty (CVD) investigations on hardwood and decorative plywood imported from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. This action was announced in the Federal Register on June 16, 2025. Background The Coalition for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood filed CVD petitions on May 22, 2025. The coalition includes U.S. producers like Columbia Forest Products, Commonwealth Plywood Inc., Manthei Wood Products, States Industries LLC, and Timber Products Company. They claim that manufacturers in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam benefit from government subsidies, making it hard for American producers to compete. The CVD petitions came with antidumping duty (AD) petitions for the same products from these countries. Process and Investigation Period The Department reviewed the information in the petitions and exchanged several supplemental questions and answers with the Coalition until June 10, 2025. The investigation period is from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Product Scope The investigations cover hardwood and decorative plywood. These are flat, layered wood panels made with two or more wood veneers, possibly over a core. At least one outer veneer must be made of hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. The panels can have different surface coatings or coverings but are still included under this review. More details and exclusions are listed in the Federal Register notice. Submitting Scope Comments Interested parties can comment on which products should be included. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 1, 2025. Rebuttal comments are due by July 11, 2025, also at 5:00 p.m. All submissions must use the Department’s electronic filing system, ACCESS. Consultations The Department notified the governments of China, Indonesia, and Vietnam about the petitions and invited consultations. Meetings were held with Indonesia and Vietnam on June 5, 2025. China did not request a meeting but sent written comments. Industry Support For a petition to proceed, U.S. producers supporting the petition must make up at least 25 percent of total production and more than 50 percent of those expressing either support or opposition. The Department found that the coalition met these requirements. Injury Test The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if the imported plywood causes or threatens harm to the U.S. industry. Allegations The coalition says that imports from these countries are getting subsidies and that the U.S. industry is suffering. Reasons include a large rise in imports, lower prices, lost sales, and falling profits in the U.S. industry. Initiation of the Investigations The Department found enough support to start investigations on nearly all the subsidy programs listed in the petitions: 33 for China, 12 for Indonesia, and 26 for Vietnam. Public checklists with more details are available online. Respondent Selection The Department plans to issue questionnaires to many identified producers and exporters in each country. If companies do not get a questionnaire directly, they can still submit information. Responses are due by June 25, 2025. Next Steps The Department will send a copy of the public version of the petitions to the governments involved and, as much as possible, to all named exporters. The ITC will make a preliminary decision in 45 days on whether U.S. industry has been harmed. If they decide there is no harm for any country, the case for that country will end. Other Instructions All parties must follow specific rules when submitting evidence and requests for more time. Special certification forms and procedures must be used for anything submitted. Rules on who must be notified and how paperwork is served have been updated. What Is Covered Under the Scope The plywood covered under investigation includes a wide range of wood panels. Some products are excluded, such as plywood certified to certain U.S. structural standards, products with cork veneers, specific wood flooring, some fully assembled or ready-to-assemble furniture, finished countertops, certain laminated door parts, and some two-ply products. The plywood usually enters under many different customs numbers, which are listed in detail in the notice. These customs numbers help identify which products are included, but the written descriptions are what matter most for the investigations. Published By Steven Presing, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, signed the notice for publication. For full legal text and more details, please refer to the official Federal Register Volume 90, Number 114, dated June 16, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-06-16
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-06-16 Estimated reading time: 6 minutes 1. Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 3. Ceramic Tile From India: Countervailing Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing the countervailing duty order on ceramic tile from India. 4. Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. 5. Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), February 1, 2023, through January 31, 2024. Further, Commerce is also rescinding this review with respect to 20 of the 38 companies/ company groupings under review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. 6. University of Washington et. al; Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 7. Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration As a result of determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on malleable cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of this AD order. 8. Certain Steel Nails From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Rescission of Review, In Part; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Yueda), an exporter of certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of China (China), sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. 9. Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the Federal Register of June 5, 2025, in which Commerce announced the final results of the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on stainless steel flanges from India. This notice corrects the spelling of a company name that is part of the collapsed entity comprising one of the mandatory respondents, BFN/Viraj. 10. Utility Scale Wind Towers From Malaysia: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd (CS Wind), a producer/exporter of utility scale wind towers (wind towers) from Malaysia, received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. 11. Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Announces New OFAC Sanctions Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has taken a new sanctions action. This was announced in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 113, on Friday, June 13, 2025. Who Is Affected OFAC has added new persons and vessels to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). The names of these persons and vessels were published because OFAC decided that certain legal criteria are met. What Does This Mean All property and interests in property of these persons that are under U.S. control are now blocked. U.S. persons cannot do business or make transactions with them. The vessels on the SDN List are also blocked because a blocked person owns or controls them. Key Dates This sanctions action was issued on May 8, 2025. Contact Information Questions can be directed to OFAC’s Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420, Assistant Director for Licensing at 202-622-2480, or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490. More details are also at https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac. Online Resources The SDN List and more information about OFAC sanctions can be found at https://ofac.treasury.gov. Vessels Identified IMPALAS (S9Z4)Crude Oil TankerFlag: Sao Tome & PrincipeYear Built: 1999IMO: 9171448MMSI: 668116257Linked To: EMBRACE QUE LIMITED THANE (T7BR8)Crude Oil TankerFlag: San MarinoYear Built: 2002IMO: 9237228MMSI: 268246702Linked To: NISSHO LINES INCORPORATED STAR TWINKLE 6 (3E5173)Crude Oil TankerFlag: PanamaYear Built: 2004IMO: 9256987MMSI: 352003519Linked To: STAR TWINKLE SHIPPING LIMITED LAMD (also known as TAI HE) (3E6106)Crude Oil TankerFlag: PanamaYear Built: 2007IMO: 9320843MMSI: 352003859Linked To: HONG KONG PRIME TRADING CO., LIMITED SKADI (HPPN)Crude Oil TankerFlag: PanamaYear Built: 2001IMO: 9230971MMSI: 352421000Linked To: SKADI LIMITED BIG MAG (HORS)Crude Oil TankerFlag: PanamaYear Built: 2002IMO: 9263215MMSI: 356336000Linked To: PROPITIOUS FOREVER TRADING CO LTD All these vessels are now property blocked by OFAC as part of this action. Authority This notice is signed by Lisa M. Palluconi, Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. Legal Reference Federal Register Document Number: 2025-10808. Filed 6-12-25, 8:45 am. Billing Code 4810-AL-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
OFAC Briefing 2025-06-13
Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Briefing 2025-06-13 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Sub: Treasury Department, Foreign Assets Control Office Content: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons and vessels that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. The vessels placed on the SDN List have been identified as property in which a blocked person has an interest. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Fire Protection Association
Department of Justice Posts Notice on NFPA Standards Activity Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice has published an official notice in the Federal Register on June 13, 2025. This notice is about the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and its work on developing safety standards. On May 1, 2025, the NFPA filed written notifications under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The NFPA sent this notice to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This is part of their regular process when updating their standards development activities. The NFPA’s filing is meant to extend the protection of the Act. This Act limits the recovery of antitrust damages to actual damages in certain situations. The NFPA has sent an updated list about its standards development. This includes information on their technical committees and assessment work. The NFPA releases information about its regulations, current standards, standards development, and assessment activities to the public. This information is available on the NFPA website at nfpa.org. The NFPA first notified the Department of Justice under this Act on September 20, 2004. The first notice was published in the Federal Register on October 21, 2004. The most recent notification before this one was filed on January 24, 2025. That notice was published on February 28, 2025. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, signed this latest notice. The notice was printed under [FR Doc. 2025-10768]. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage Evaluation-II
New Venture on Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On April 3, 2025, a notice was filed with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. It is about Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage Evaluation–II (EVESE II). This notice is under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The purpose is to let the public know which companies are working together, and what the group intends to do. The notice lists the parties in the EVESE II venture. These are: BAE Systems Controls Inc., from Endicott, New York Castrol Limited, from Reading, United Kingdom Ford Motor Company, from Dearborn, Michigan Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC, from Marysville, Ohio Komatsu America Corp, from Chicago, Illinois The companies plan to better understand battery energy storage systems. This work is for vehicles and other uses. They will study batteries in both normal use (called cycling) and in unusual or extreme use (called abuse). The research will focus on three main areas. These are: the battery cell, the battery module, and applications of the battery. The notice says this information is being made public to limit damages if there are any antitrust lawsuits. The Deputy Director for Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, Suzanne Morris, signed the notice. This entry is documented in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 113, Page 25081. The filing date was June 12, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Southwest Research Institute-Cooperative Research Group on Numerical Propulsion System Simulation
Department of Justice Announces Updates to NPSS Cooperative Research Group Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On May 7, 2025, the Southwest Research Institute’s Cooperative Research Group on Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) submitted a notice to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notice reported changes in the group’s membership. Mitsubishi Power Aero, LLC, based in Glastonbury, Connecticut, has been added as a new member of the NPSS group. The notice also said that the period for the group’s work has been extended. The new end date for the research group’s project is now April 30, 2026. No other changes were made to the group’s membership or activities. The NPSS group is still accepting new members and plans to report any future changes as required. NPSS first filed for protection under the Act on December 11, 2013. A notice about this was published in the Federal Register on February 20, 2014. The latest notice before this one was filed with the Department of Justice on October 29, 2024. That notice was published on January 24, 2025, in the Federal Register. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. This information can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 113, on Friday, June 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Global Synchronizer Foundation
New Members Join Global Synchronizer Foundation Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 13, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register about changes in the Global Synchronizer Foundation (GSF). This notice is made under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. GSF sent written notifications to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. These notifications let the government know that four new members have joined the group. The new members are Proof Group from Menlo Park, California; T-RIZE Group from Montreal, Canada; Chainlink Labs from New York, New York; and BNP Paribas from Paris, French Republic. This update was filed by GSF on May 19, 2025. It is meant to help protect group members by limiting damages in some antitrust cases. The Act only allows antitrust plaintiffs to get actual damages in specific situations. No other changes were made to the group’s membership or planned activities. Membership in GSF is still open. GSF will keep submitting notifications when there are more membership changes. GSF first filed a notification with the Department of Justice on September 18, 2024. The Department published a notice about this on October 11, 2024. The last update before this one was filed on February 25, 2025, and a notice was published on March 7, 2025. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division, signed this latest notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, Inc.
Department of Justice Announces Membership Changes in Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, Inc. Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On May 23, 2025, the Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, Inc. filed official notifications about changes in its group membership. This was done under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The notification was sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The purpose was to extend protections under the Act. These protections limit antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages in certain cases. Four new parties have joined the consortium. They are Matchstick LLC from Boonton, New Jersey; Gilead Sciences, Inc. from Forest City, California; SHL Medical AG from Zug, Switzerland; and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from Tarrytown, New York. No other changes were made to the membership or to the planned activities of the group research project. Membership in the research project remains open. The Consortium plans to file more notifications if there are membership changes in the future. The original notification for the Consortium was filed on October 26, 2020. The Department of Justice published a notice about this in the Federal Register on December 3, 2020 (85 FR 78148). The most recent membership update before this one was filed on October 4, 2024. A notice of that filing was published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2024 (89 FR 104209). This announcement was signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 113, Friday, June 13, 2025, Page 25081] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Rapid Response Partnership Vehicle
DOJ Publishes Update on Rapid Response Partnership Vehicle Membership Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division published a notice about changes in the Rapid Response Partnership Vehicle (RRPV) group. The notice appeared in the Federal Register on June 13, 2025. The RRPV is a group covered by the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This law limits antitrust damages for certain group activities. The RRPV must tell the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission about changes in its members. On April 8, 2025, RRPV sent a written update to the proper authorities. This update shared new members joining the group and noted some leaving members. The notice lists all these changes. New Members Added Many organizations have joined the RRPV. Some new members include: Fisher BioServices, Inc., Rockville, MD Landmark Vaccines, Ltd., Loughborough, United Kingdom Rx Bandz, Locust Valley, NY Zeteo Tech, Inc., Sykesville, MD BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand EmitBio, Inc., Morrisville, NC Matisse Pharmaceuticals, B.V., Geleen, Netherlands National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education, Inc., Minneapolis, MN ProtonDx, Ltd., London, United Kingdom BioVaxys Technology Corp., Etobicoke, Canada Enplas, Santa Clara, CA RHEAVITA BV, Ghent, Belgium And many more listed in the official document. The notice lists each new member, including companies from different countries and states in the United States. Members That Withdrew Some groups have left the RRPV. These include: TFF Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Fort Worth, TX Spring Discovery, Inc., San Carlos, CA Cue Health, Inc., San Diego, CA Deimos Biosciences, San Francisco, CA Other Details There were no other changes in membership or group activities. Membership in the RRPV is still open. RRPV plans to keep reporting any new changes in its membership. RRPV first filed for coverage under the antitrust law on January 5, 2024. The Department of Justice reported this in the Federal Register on April 16, 2024. The last membership update before this new one was filed on January 16, 2025 and published on February 28, 2025. The notice was signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Medical CBRN Defense Consortium
Department of Justice Publishes Notice on Medical CBRN Defense Consortium Membership Changes Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On June 13, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register about the Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (MCDC). The notice states that on April 1, 2025, the MCDC sent written notifications to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notifications are meant to extend the law’s rules that limit antitrust plaintiffs to only actual damages in some cases. The notice lists three new members added to the MCDC: Defense Operations & Executions Solutions, Inc., W Melbourne, FL Systems & Technology Research, Woburn, MA The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA No other changes have been made to the membership or planned activities of the MCDC. Membership in the group is still open. MCDC will continue to file more notifications when new members join. MCDC first filed a notification under this law on November 13, 2015. The Department of Justice published the first related notice on January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513). The last membership notification was filed on January 6, 2025. Another notice about this was published on February 28, 2025 (90 FR 10945). This most recent notice was signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium
New Companies Join Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On April 7, 2025, the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) filed a notification with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, section 6(a). Many new companies and organizations have been added as members of MTEC. The list includes AbViro LLC (Bethesda, MD), Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc. (Rockville, MD), Advanced Light Devices LLC (Las Vegas, NV), AI Optics, Inc. (New York, NY), Alamgir Research, Inc. dba ARIScience (Wayland, MA), Alcamena Stem Cell Therapeutics LLC (Halethorpe, MD), American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), and BelleTorus Corp. (Cambridge, MA). The new members also include BIOPAC Systems, Inc. (Goleta, CA), Bitterroot Innovation LLC (Stevensville, MT), Business Enabled Acquisition and Technology, Inc. (San Antonio, TX), CereVu Medical, Inc. (San Francisco, CA), CleanBeam Technologies LLC (Greensboro, NC), Clearview Limited LLC dba Grant Engine (Durham, NC), Clyra Medical Technologies, Inc. (Tampa, FL), Cornell University (Ithaca, NY), CranioSense, Inc. (Bedford, MA), and DanForth Advisors (Waltham, MA). Other new members are Dephy, Inc. (Boxborough, MA), Evrys Bio LLC (Doylestown, PA), Global Resonance Technologies LLC (Shelbourne, VT), GreenLifeTech Corp. (Banner Elk, NC), Griffith University (Southport, Australia), Guide Biomedical Solutions LLC (Media, PA), Healables Digital Health, Inc. (Miami, FL), Health Helper Holdings, Inc. (Hollywood, FL), Heartland GS LLC (Delaware, OH), and Hemerus Medical LLC (St Paul, MN). The growing MTEC group also now includes Humanetics Corp. (Excelsior, MN), ICPupil, Ltd. (Tel Aviv, Israel), Innovative Design Labs, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN), IntegerBio, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD), KBR (Houston, TX), Layer 3 Services Pty, Ltd. (Fyshwick, Australia), LumenAstra, Inc. (Boulder, CO), Matisse Pharmaceuticals, B.V. (Geleen, Netherlands), Medasense Biometrics, Ltd. (Ramat Gan, Israel), and MendaCel, Inc. (Laguna Beach, CA). Additional companies are MHCombiotic, Inc. (Calgary, Canada), Miracus LLC (Troy, MI), Molecular Technologies Laboratories dba InfinixBio (Galena, OH), Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Inc. (Edison, NJ), Nanohmics, Inc. (Austin, TX), Neural Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (Newton, MA), Neurovascular Research and Design Corp. (Tucson, AZ), NextCure, Inc. (Beltsville, MD), Nostopharma LLC (Bethesda, MD), Obvius Robotics, Inc. (Sunrise, FL), Orgenesis, Inc. (Germantown, MD), pdx-tec LLC dba ppx-tec LLC (Jackson, MS), and Persistent Technology, Inc. (Alexandria, VA). More new members include President and Fellows of Harvard College (Cambridge, MA), PROYECCIÓN 22 SA DE CV (Uruapan, Mexico), Pulsethera, Inc. (Chestnut Hill, MA), Quest Consultants LLC dba Aerstone (Kensington, Morocco), Radiatric, Inc. (Washougal, WA), Results Group LLC (Glastonbury, CT), Roam Robotics, Inc. (San Francisco, CA), Safeguard Surgical (Tampa, FL), SafePush LLC (New Orleans, LA), Sciperio, Inc. (Orlando, FL), Senseye, Inc. (Austin, TX), SereNeuro Therapeutics, Inc. (Baltimore, MD), Signature Performance, Inc. (Omaha, NE), SilverStream Medical (Caesarea, Israel), Solascure, Ltd. (Cambridge, United Kingdom), Stoic Bio, Inc. (San Diego, CA), and Summit Technology Laboratory (Irvine, CA). Tillerline Associates LLC (Solon, OH), Tunnell Consulting, Inc. (Bethesda, MD), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Little Rock, AR), Valinor Enterprises (Alexandria, VA), Vira Regen, Inc. (Salt Lake City, UT), and VitaKey, Inc. (Birmingham, AL) are also new parties to this group. No other changes have been made to the membership or the planned activity of the MTEC research project. Membership in this group research project remains open. MTEC will file more notifications when there are changes in membership. MTEC first filed with the Department of Justice on May 9, 2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2014 (79 FR 32999). The last notification was filed on January 6, 2025, and was published on February 4, 2025 (90 FR 8943). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division, signed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative Research Group Corrosion Under Insulation-Phase 2 (CUI-Phase 2)
Department of Justice Issues Notice on Corrosion Under Insulation Research Group Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 6, 2025, the Cooperative Research Group Corrosion Under Insulation–Phase 2 (CUI–Phase 2) filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notifications shared the names of all parties involved in the venture. These parties are: Conoco Phillips Company, Houston, TX Nanotech Inc., Houston, TX Armancell Engineered Systems Ltd., London, UNITED KINGDOM The Sherwin Williams Company, Cleveland, OH PPG Industries, Incorporated, Pittsburgh, PA International Paint LLC, Houston, TX Superior Products International II, Inc., Shawnee, KS Promat Incorporated, Maryville, TN Jotun A/S, Sandefjord, KINGDOM OF NORWAY Hempel A/S, Lyngby, KINGDOM OF DENMARK BP America Production Company, Houston, TX Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA Aspen Aerogels, Inc., Marlborough, MA Exxonmobil Technology and Engineering, Spring, TX Equinor Energy AS, Stavanger, KINGDOM OF NORWAY The notice explained that these notifications were filed to use the Act’s provisions. These provisions can limit the damages recoverable by antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages in certain situations. The CUI–Phase 2 group will focus on testing protective coatings and insulation products. This includes insulative coatings using the TM21442 test method and similar methods. The tests will happen in both laboratory and field settings. Phase 2 of the project will also use laboratory setups to test new sensing technologies for Corrosion Under Insulation. Early tests will check a range of CUI sensors and compare how they perform. The test methods described above will be used. The CUI Phase 2 group has four main technical tasks: Performance testing of CUI Protective Coating/Insulation Systems Performance evaluation of CUI Insulative Coatings Performance evaluation of CUI Insulative Coatings Preliminary evaluation of CUI Sensors Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. The full notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 113 (Friday, June 13, 2025), on page 25080. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Customer Experience Hub
Notice of Changes in the Customer Experience Hub Membership Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On April 1, 2025, the Customer Experience Hub (CX Hub) sent new written notifications under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This Act is also called 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. These notifications were sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The purpose was to inform them of changes to CX Hub’s membership. The goal is to extend the Act’s protections that limit antitrust plaintiffs’ recovery to actual damages in certain cases. Four new organizations have joined the CX Hub: Ammonoosuc Community Health Services, Inc., Littleton, NH Merative US LP, Ann Arbor, MI Polished Technologies LLC, Chevy Chase, MD Washington State University Health Sciences, Spokane, WA Three organizations have withdrawn from the CX Hub: Ruth Health, Bronx, NY Spring Discovery, Inc., San Carlos, CA The Innovation Foundation at Oklahoma State University, Inc., Stillwater, OK No other changes were made to the group’s membership or planned activity. Membership in the CX Hub remains open. CX Hub will continue to file notifications about any membership changes. CX Hub filed its original notification under section 6(a) of the Act on January 11, 2024. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register on April 16, 2024 (89 FR 26929). The last notification was filed with the Department on January 3, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register on February 4, 2025 (90 FR 8942). This notice is issued by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2025-10816 Filed 6-12-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.