U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Clear Aligners Estimated reading time: 3-5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission has started an investigation into certain clear aligners and parts used to make them. A complaint was filed on September 23, 2025, by Align Technology, Inc. from Tempe, Arizona. They said that clear plastic aligners and their parts, including the tri-layer material for the aligners, are being imported and sold in the U.S. without their permission. The complaint was updated on November 20, 2025. Align Technology claims that some companies are using their inventions covered by these U.S. patents: Patent No. 11,766,313 Patent No. 11,766,314 Patent No. 8,899,977 Patent No. 12,059,321 Patent No. 10,980,616 Patent No. 11,490,996 The focus will be on these claims: Claims 1 and 16 of the ‘313 patent Claims 1, 11, and 21 of the ‘314 patent Claims 1 and 9 of the ‘977 patent Claim 1 of the ‘321 patent Claims 1, 12, and 20 of the ‘616 patent Claims 1, 17, and 21 of the ‘996 patent The accused companies in the investigation are: Angelalign Technology Inc., Shanghai, China Wuxi EA Medical Instruments Technologies Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China Wuxi EA Bio-Tech Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China Shanghai EA Medical Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China USA Angelalign Technology Corp., Newark, Delaware The Commission will look to see if there is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section is about importing goods that infringe U.S. patents. If the companies are found to have broken the rules, the Commission may stop imports or sales, and issue cease and desist orders. The investigation started on December 19, 2025. The main products being looked at are clear plastic aligners for treating misaligned teeth and bites, along with key parts used to make them. Respondents must answer the complaint within 20 days of being served. If they do not respond in time, they may lose their right to defend themselves. The Commission and an Administrative Law Judge can then decide the case based on the claims. This may lead to orders stopping the import or sale of the accused products. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be a party to this investigation. Anyone can view the public version of the complaint online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Processed Slabs Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On December 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a new complaint. The case is titled “Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same, DN 3870.” The USITC announced this in an official notice on December 29, 2025. Nature of the Complaint The complaint was filed by Cambria Company LLC. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The accusations relate to importing, selling for importation, and selling after importation certain processed slabs and related methods. Companies Named in the Complaint The following companies are named as respondents: Surface Warehouse, L.P. (d/b/a US Surfaces and Vadara Quartz Surfaces), Austin, TX M S International Inc. (d/b/a MSI), Orange, CA Arizona Tile, LLC, Tempe, AZ OHM International Inc., Monroe Twp, NJ Architectural Surfaces Group LLC, Spicewood, TX Caesarstone Ltd., Israel Caesarstone USA, Inc., Charlotte, NC LX Hausys, Ltd., South Korea LX Hausys America, Inc., Alpharetta, GA Mohawk Industries, Inc., Calhoun, GA Dal-Tile, LLC, Dallas, TX Requested Actions Cambria Company LLC requests the Commission to: Issue a limited exclusion order. Issue cease and desist orders. Impose a bond on the allegedly infringing articles, pending the 60-day Presidential review period, as allowed by 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Invitation for Public Comments The USITC invites comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. Comments should address whether the requested relief would affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competitive conditions in the U.S. economy Production of competing products in the U.S. U.S. consumers The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the products subject to possible orders are used in the U.S. Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns about the requested orders. Identify who makes similar or competing products in the U.S. State if U.S. producers can replace the volume in question within a reasonable time. Explain how U.S. consumers would be affected by the requested orders. Filing Deadlines and Rules Written submissions must be filed no later than eight days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Parties may respond to comments no later than three days after initial comments are due. Each submission is limited to five pages, including attachments. All documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper or in-person filings will be accepted at this time. The complainant and other parties should refer to Docket No. 3870 on submissions. Confidential Information Anyone submitting confidential documents must request confidential treatment and include reasons as required by 19 CFR 201.6. Information may be disclosed to USITC staff and contractors, as outlined in the rules. Additional Information General information is available at https://www.usitc.gov, and the public record of this case is online at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help with EDIS, email [email protected]. For confidential filings, contact [email protected]. Authority This action is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and Commission rules 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). Issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 19, 2025. The full public version of this notice and further documents are available through the USITC. [FR Doc. 2025-23806 Filed 12-23-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Sets Schedule for Expedited Review of Ferrovanadium Duties Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews for antidumping duty orders on ferrovanadium from China and South Africa. This notice follows the requirements of the Tariff Act of 1930. The purpose of these reviews is to decide if removing the current antidumping duties would likely cause continued or new harm to U.S. industries within a short, predictable time. The ITC decided on November 24, 2025, that the domestic interested party group response was adequate. The response from foreign interested parties was found to be inadequate. No other reasons to hold full reviews were identified. Therefore, the ITC will move forward with expedited reviews under section 751(c)(3) of the Act. A staff report with information about the reviews is in the nonpublic record. It will be provided to certain parties on January 30, 2026. A public version will be shared later, as the Commission’s rules state. Written comments can be filed by interested parties and others. These comments are due by February 4, 2026. They cannot include new facts. If the U.S. Department of Commerce takes longer to finish its review, then the deadline for comments will be three business days after Commerce announces its results. All documents from parties in the reviews must be shared with every other party, and a certificate of service must be included. Documents will not be accepted by the Secretary without this certificate. The ITC has decided that these reviews are unusually complex. For this reason, the Commission is using its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. This action is done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 22, 2025. The full notice can be found in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 245, page 60741. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Terminates Investigation Into Composite Intermediate Bulk Containers for Most Respondents, Seeks Comments On Relief Against Remaining Defaulted Firm Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has closed its investigation against three companies involved in importing certain composite intermediate bulk containers. The companies—Shanghai Sakura Plastic Products Co., Ltd. (also called Shanghai Yinghua Plastic Products Co., Ltd.), Shandong Jinshan Jieyuan Container Co., Ltd., and Zibo Jielin Plastic Pipe Manufacture Co. Ltd.—were removed from the investigation after agreeing to settlement terms and consent orders. Each company is based in China. The decision follows three unopposed motions for termination, which were granted by the Chief Administrative Law Judge on December 8, 2025. No party objected to these orders. As a result, the USITC issued consent orders to these companies, and has ended the investigation for them. The investigation originally started on January 27, 2025, after a complaint was filed by Schütz Container Systems, Inc. of New Jersey and Protechna S.A. of Switzerland. The complaint alleged patent violations related to bulk containers. Several U.S. patents were named in the complaint. Hebei Shijiheng Plastics, Co., Ltd., also from China, was another respondent in the investigation. This company did not respond to the complaint and was found in default on July 7, 2025. The USITC is now focusing only on Hebei Shijiheng. The Commission is inviting written comments from the public, complainants, and government agencies. The Commission requests detailed comments on what remedies should be applied against the defaulted company, Hebei Shijiheng. This may include an order to stop the company’s goods from entering the United States, or a requirement to stop certain unfair business activities. The USITC also wants information on how any order might affect public health, U.S. consumers, competition in the U.S., and similar products made in America. The public and interested parties are encouraged to share their opinions on these subjects. If a remedy is issued, the US Trade Representative has 60 days to approve, disapprove, or take no action. During this time, the accused products may still enter the country, but a bond may be required. Comments about the bond amount are also requested. Written submissions must be sent electronically by January 9, 2026. Reply submissions are due by January 16, 2026. Submissions should clearly list the investigation number 337-TA-1434. Guidelines and rules for submitting confidential documents are also provided by the Commission. This decision was made by Commission vote on December 22, 2025. The USITC’s authority for this decision is based on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s rules. For more details or to view non-confidential documents, visit the Commission’s electronic docket system at https://edis.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Starts Five-Year Review of Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a five-year review. This review is for wood mouldings and millwork products that come from China. The review started on January 2, 2026. The USITC will check if ending certain trade orders will hurt companies in the United States. These orders are called countervailing and antidumping duty orders. They were first put in place on February 16, 2021. The review looks at whether removing these orders would cause damage to U.S. businesses making similar products. The review covers both injury that could stay the same and injury that could happen again. The USITC has rules for how it does these reviews. The rules can be found in 19 CFR part 201 and part 207. The commission will decide if the review needs to be full or can be done quickly. Key Definitions in the Review: “Subject Merchandise” is the kind of wood products covered by these reviews. The “Subject Country” is China. The “Domestic Like Product” means the same kind of product made in the U.S. The “Domestic Industry” includes U.S. companies that make these products. The “Order Date” is February 16, 2021. An “Importer” is someone who brings the subject goods to the U.S. How to Participate: People or companies wanting to take part must file an “entry of appearance.” This must be done within 21 days from when the notice was published. Former USITC employees can participate in this review, even if they worked on the earlier, related cases. There are special rules for handling business information. Some business data can be protected under an administrative order if it is filed on time. Anyone giving information must certify that it is true and complete. The information may be used by the USITC and other U.S. government staff for work and for security checks. Deadlines for Responses: All responses must be sent by 5:15 p.m. on February 2, 2026. Comments on the responses are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 16, 2026. All documents must be sent in electronically. No paper copies are allowed right now. Filings should be made through the USITC’s EDIS system (https://edis.usitc.gov). Information Requested by the USITC: The commission wants detailed information from companies, groups, and associations. They are encouraged to use a special Excel form found at https://usitc.gov/reports/response_noi_worksheet. Information to provide includes: Name, address, and contact details of the firm or group. If the group is an interested party and why. Willingness to take part fully in the review. The likely effects of ending these trade orders on U.S. companies and on the person or group filing. A list of U.S. makers of these products and details on related parties. A list of current importers and exporters from China. Names of top buyers in the U.S. for these products. Where to find price information for these items. U.S. producer data, including amounts made, capacity, shipments, and sales values for 2025. U.S. importer data for 2025. Foreign producer/exporter data for 2025. Any major changes in supply or demand in the U.S. or China since the orders started, and expected changes. (Optional) If the filer agrees with the definitions used in the review. If any group cannot provide the requested data, they must explain why and suggest other ways to give similar information. Failing to provide information could mean the USITC makes decisions against that party based on what it knows. This review uses the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice was signed by Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney, and published on January 2, 2026. For more information, the public can contact Alexis Yim at the USITC or visit https://www.usitc.gov. The document number for this review is 2025-24194. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts New Review on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is Happening? The Commission is checking if canceling the current countervailing and antidumping duty orders would likely cause problems for U.S. businesses that make these tires. The duties were first ordered in 2015 and then continued in 2021 after previous reviews. Who Can Respond? Anyone who is involved in making, importing, or selling these tires can send a response. This includes U.S. tire producers, importers, unions, worker groups, trade groups, and producers or exporters in China. Representative consumer and industrial user groups may also take part. To join, groups or people must file a notice with the USITC within 21 days from when the notice was published. What Information Should Be Sent? Interested parties need to provide detailed information for the year 2025. The questions cover: The name and address of the company or group Details about being involved in the tire trade or market Willingness to provide more information Views on how removing the duties would affect U.S. industry Lists of tire producers, importers, exporters, and major buyers Information on tire prices and sources Sales, production, and profit numbers Details about big changes in supply, demand, or technology since 2019 U.S. producers need to share data on their tire output, market share, and financial results. Importers and exporters should report how many tires they handled and their value. How to Send Responses All documents must be filed electronically through the USITC’s online system at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies are allowed. The deadline for sending responses is 5:15 p.m. on February 2, 2026. Comments on the quality of responses are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 16, 2026. Important Rules All submitted information must be accurate and full. Special rules protect business confidential information. Parties cannot leave out required information without explaining why and suggesting how they can give similar data. Failing to do this may count against them. Need More Help? More details, filing instructions, and the response worksheet can be found on the Commission’s website: https://usitc.gov/reports/response_noi_worksheet For questions, contact Laurel Schwartz at 202-205-2398 or visit https://www.usitc.gov. Authority This review follows U.S. law under the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was approved and published by order of the USITC on December 23, 2025, by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff. OMB Information The request for information is approved under OMB number 3117 0016/USITC No. 25-5-664, with an expiration date of June 30, 2026. End of Notice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Revises Schedule for Monosodium Glutamate Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a revised schedule for its investigation related to monosodium glutamate (MSG) from China and Indonesia. The investigation numbers are 731-TA-1229-1230 and are part of the second review process. The changes were made because a lapse in appropriations caused the Commission to stop its operations for a time. Responses to the notice of institution are now due by December 17, 2025. Comments on the adequacy of those responses, and on whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or a full review, are due by January 27, 2026. If anyone, such as industrial users or representative consumer organizations, wishes to participate as a party, the deadline to file an entry of appearance, which was originally set for 21 days after publication on October 1, 2025, has been extended by 47 days. For more information, the public can contact Rachel Devenney at the USITC. The public record for the proceeding can be viewed online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The investigation is under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and follows the Commission’s rules for such proceedings. This notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 1, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Revises Schedule in Review of Steel Wire Rod Imports from China Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a notice about changes to its schedule in the review of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. This is part of Investigation Nos. 701-TA-512 and 731-TA-1248 (Second Review). The USITC announced that the schedule change is needed because of a lapse in government funding. This lapse caused the Commission’s operations to stop for a period of time. According to the notice, the staff report will now be placed in the nonpublic record on November 19, 2025. The deadline for public comments has been moved to November 26, 2025. People who need more information can contact Juan-Carlos Pena-Flores at the USITC Office of Investigations. The phone number is 202-205-3169. Those with hearing impairments may use TDD at 202-205-1810. People with mobility impairments, needing access help, can contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information about the Commission can be found online at www.usitc.gov. The public record for this proceeding is available at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice states that this proceeding is under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice is published according to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. The notice was issued on December 1, 2025 by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Revises Schedule for Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks Review Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a revised schedule for its review of kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China. The change is for Investigation Nos. 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Third Review). This new schedule is because of a lapse in government funding, which caused a pause in the Commission’s work. Now, all responses to the notice of institution are due by November 18, 2025. Comments about the responses and if the Commission should do an expedited or full review are due December 30, 2025. Anyone needing more details can contact Juan-Carlos Pena-Flores at 202-205-3169. For people with hearing problems, the Commission’s TDD terminal is 202-205-1810. Those needing special assistance with access can call the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information about the Commission is available at www.usitc.gov. Case documents can be seen on the electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. The case is being handled under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. This notice was ordered by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on December 1, 2025. This action is recorded under section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Changes Schedule for Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced changes to the schedule for the fourth review of the anti-dumping investigation of Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China. This notice is about Investigation No. 731-TA-1046. The change is due to a lapse in government funding, which stopped some Commission work for a time. Now, responses to the notice of institution must be sent by December 17, 2025. Comments about the responses and about whether the review should be full or expedited are due by January 27, 2026. Industrial users of the product, and organizations that speak for consumers, can join in the review by filing an entry of appearance. The deadline for this was 21 days after the first notice, but because of the delay, the new deadline is 47 days later. This review follows the procedures in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The rules are found in part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201) and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). This action follows the authority given in title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and is published according to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, people can contact Alec Resch at the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, phone 202-708-1448. Hearing-impaired persons can use 202-205-1810. For assistance to enter the Commission, call the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. The public can see records for this case online at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued on November 26, 2025, by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Five-Year Review on Forged Steel Fittings from India and South Korea Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Five-Year Review on Forged Steel Fittings from India and South Korea On December 1, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a review of orders about forged steel fittings from India and South Korea. This review follows the Tariff Act of 1930 rules. The goal is to decide if canceling these orders would hurt U.S. businesses. What Is Being Reviewed The review covers: Countervailing duty order on forged steel fittings from India. Antidumping duty orders on forged steel fittings from both India and South Korea. The USITC wants to know if removing these orders will hurt U.S. companies by bringing back unfair trade. Key Dates The review began on November 3, 2025. Interested parties must send in responses by December 31, 2025. Comments about the responses’ quality are due by February 10, 2026. How to Respond Any person or company interested in this case must respond with specific information. They can send information if they are businesses that make, sell, or use forged steel fittings, or if they are trade groups or worker groups. Definitions “Subject Merchandise” means the forged steel fittings under review. “Subject Countries” are India and South Korea. “Domestic Like Product” is the similar product made in the U.S. “Domestic Industry” means all U.S. makers of the product, except one company. The “Order Date” is December 11, 2020, when the duty orders started. Who Can Take Part People, companies, and groups can join by filing an entry of appearance. They must do this within 21 days of this notice. The names and contacts of all parties will be kept on a public list. Former commission employees can also appear in this review, even if they worked on earlier, related cases. They do not need special commission approval to do this. Business Proprietary Information Some information can be shared under a special order to protect business secrets. Only approved applicants can see this information. They must apply within 21 days of this notice. Submitting Information Each person or group must ensure all information is accurate and complete. There are strict rules for submitting and serving documents on all parties. People must file documents electronically at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper files are accepted. If anyone cannot provide the full information, they must explain why as early as possible. What Information Is Needed Those responding must give: Firm or group name, address, website, and certifying official’s contact. How they qualify as an interested party. Whether they will fully take part in providing information. The likely impact if the orders are canceled, including on the volume and price of imports, and effects on U.S. makers. Lists of all U.S. makers and importers, and overseas makers/exporters since December 11, 2020. Names and contacts for 3 to 5 of the biggest U.S. buyers. Sources for price information for these products. Production, shipment, sales, and financial data for 2024. Lists and data for importers, foreign producers, and exporters. Parties are also asked to detail any big changes in market conditions since the orders started and any expected changes soon. They may say if they agree or disagree with how USITC defines the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry. Legal Authority This review follows Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. Contact Alexis Yim Office of Investigations U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436 Phone: 202-708-1446 For more details and to send in comments, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Five-Year Review of Citric Acid Imports From China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On December 1, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the start of its third five-year review to determine if ending special trade protections on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China would harm U.S. companies. What Is Happening? The USITC is reviewing two types of trade protection orders: antidumping and countervailing duty orders on citric acid and related products from China. These orders were first put in place in 2009. Their goal is to stop unfairly traded imports that could injure American businesses. Now, the Commission wants to find out if removing these orders would likely lead to continued or repeated harm to the U.S. citric acid industry. What Products Are Covered? The products under review include citric acid (in unfinished or finished form), sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. These products are used in many foods, drinks, and cleaning products. Who Is Involved? The review focuses on imports from China only. The U.S. “domestic industry” covers all U.S. producers of these citric acid products. Other parties, such as importers, foreign exporters, unions, and trade groups, can also take part. How Can Companies Participate? Interested parties must respond to the Commission by December 31, 2025, to have their input considered. They need to: Give their company’s or group’s contact information. Say if they are a producer, importer, or a trade association of these products. Say if they are willing to share related business information. Discuss the possible effects if the trade protections end. They are also asked for lists of: Current U.S. producers. Importers of the subject goods. Chinese exporters who have shipped these goods since 2019. Major U.S. buyers and price sources. U.S. producers and importers are asked for details about their operations in 2024, such as production, sales, costs, and profits. Chinese producers and exporters must share similar information about their business and exports to the U.S. Deadlines and Procedures All responses are due by 5:15 p.m. on December 31, 2025. Comments on other responses are due by February 12, 2026. Every submission must be filed electronically via the USITC’s online system at https://edis.usitc.gov. The Commission will review the responses to decide if a full investigation or an expedited review is needed. Special Instructions Replies must be certified as accurate and complete. U.S. law allows some private business information to be used under protection. Companies unable to provide all requested information should explain why and offer alternatives. If not, the Commission may make decisions without their input. Public Record and Further Information All review documents and updates are publicly available at https://www.usitc.gov and via the EDIS system. For questions, contact Alec Resch at 202-708-1448 or visit the USITC website. Legal Authority This review follows Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and USITC rules. The official notice was signed by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff and published in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Starts Five-Year Reviews on Fluid End Blocks from China, Germany, India, and Italy Estimated reading time: 4–8 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started five-year reviews for fluid end blocks from China, Germany, India, and Italy. The decision was announced on December 1, 2025. The reviews will help decide if removing the current countervailing and antidumping duty orders will likely lead to harm for the U.S. industry. These orders were first put in place on January 29, 2021. What Are Fluid End Blocks? Fluid end blocks are parts used in high-pressure pumps. The reviews involve imports from four countries: China, Germany, India, and Italy. What Is Being Reviewed? Countervailing duty orders on fluid end blocks from China and India. Countervailing and antidumping duty orders on fluid end blocks from Germany and Italy. What Is the USITC Doing? The USITC will collect information to decide if removing the orders would hurt U.S. producers. If needed, the USITC may hold full reviews or decide on the facts they receive. Important Definitions Subject Merchandise: The fluid end blocks covered in these reviews. Subject Countries: China, Germany, India, and Italy. Domestic Like Product: U.S.-made fluid end blocks. Domestic Industry: All U.S. producers of fluid end blocks. Order Date: January 29, 2021, when the duty orders took effect. Importer: Anyone who brings the subject merchandise into the United States. How to Participate Anyone who wants to join this process as a party must file an entry of appearance no later than 21 days after the notice was published. The USITC will keep a public list of all parties. Former USITC staff who worked on past investigations can now take part in five-year reviews of the same products without special approval. Public Information and Filing Some business information will be protected and only shared with approved parties. All filings must be electronic through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings are accepted at this time. Deadlines Responses to the notice must be sent by 5:15 p.m. on December 31, 2025. Comments on the responses’ adequacy can be filed by 5:15 p.m. on February 12, 2026. Information Requested The USITC is asking for information from firms or organizations related to fluid end blocks. Information requested includes: Name and details of businesses. Statement if they are an interested party. Willingness to participate. Effects if the orders are removed. Lists of U.S. producers, importers, and exporters. Lists of buyers in the U.S. market. Production and sales data for 2024. Major changes in the market since January 2021. Unable to Provide Information? If a party cannot provide the requested data, they must inform the USITC and explain why. Failure to provide data may result in the USITC making decisions based on other available information. Authority and Contact The review is being conducted under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney, announced the notice. For more information, people can contact Kenneth Gatten at the USITC. End of Notice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Announces Review for Oil Country Tubular Goods from China Estimated reading time: 6-9 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started its third five-year review of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from China. The review aims to decide if removing these orders would likely harm U.S. industry. Background The Department of Commerce made a countervailing duty order on OCTG from China on January 20, 2010. An antidumping duty order was issued on May 21, 2010. These orders were reviewed and continued in 2015 and 2020. Now, the USITC is reviewing them again as required by law. What Are Oil Country Tubular Goods? OCTG are steel tubes used in the oil and gas industry for drilling and transporting oil and gas. How the Review Works The Commission’s review follows section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The review checks if canceling the orders would lead to harm for U.S. companies within a reasonable time. The Commission will decide based on facts, including information provided during this review. Definitions Used in the Review Subject Merchandise: The goods under review, defined by the Department of Commerce. Subject Country: China. Domestic Like Product: U.S.-made goods most similar to the Subject Merchandise. Domestic Industry: All U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Importer: Anyone bringing the Subject Merchandise into the U.S. How to Take Part Anyone, including industrial users and consumer groups, may take part by filing an “entry of appearance” within 21 days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. A public service list will be made with names and addresses of all parties involved. Rules for Former Employees Former Commission employees may participate in this review, even if they worked on earlier reviews or investigations, without special approval. Handling of Business Proprietary Information (BPI) Business proprietary information will be shared with authorized applicants under an Administrative Protective Order. A separate service list will be kept for parties allowed to get BPI. All information given must be accurate and complete. Information may be used by the Commission or other U.S. government employees for various reasons, including cybersecurity. Submitting Information Responses must be filed by 5:15 p.m. on December 31, 2025. Comments about how strong the responses are can be filed by 5:15 p.m. on February 6, 2026. All filings must follow the Commission’s rules. Only electronic filings will be accepted. Filings are done through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Information Requested by the Commission Firms responding must provide: Name, address, and contact information. A statement indicating if the firm is an interested party and how. Willingness to participate in the review. Likely effects of lifting the duties on the Domestic Industry and their business. List of all known U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. List of U.S. importers and foreign producers/exporters of the Subject Merchandise. List of 3-5 leading U.S. buyers of the products. Known sources of U.S. or other market prices for the products. (For U.S. producers) Details on operations in 2024 (production, capacity, sales, profits, costs, and more). (For importers) Details on imports and sales for 2024. (For Chinese producers/exporters) Details on production, capacity, and U.S. exports for 2024. Any major changes in supply and demand since 2019 or expected soon. (Optional) Agreement or disagreement with how Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry are defined. Other Details If a party cannot provide all the information, it must explain why. Failure to give information may result in adverse findings by the Commission. No further response is needed if the Office of Management and Budget control number is not shown. Contact Information For more information, contact Rachel Devenney at 202-205-3172, or access the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney, on November 25, 2025. Source: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 228 (Monday, December 1, 2025), pages 55167-55169. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Begins Review of Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Imports Estimated reading time: 7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has officially started its second five-year review of duties on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. This review will determine if removing certain trade orders would harm the U.S. industry. Background on Duties and Reviews On December 3, 2014, the U.S. Department of Commerce placed special trade orders on NOES imports. These were: Countervailing duty orders on NOES from China and Taiwan Antidumping duty orders on NOES from China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan After an earlier five-year review in 2020, these duties stayed in place. The new review, started on November 3, 2025, checks if ending these orders would hurt the U.S. NOES industry. What is Being Reviewed In this process, the USITC is looking at: The effects of ending both antidumping and countervailing duties. If removing the orders would let more imports come in, lower prices, or negatively impact the domestic NOES industry. The only known U.S. producer of NOES is AK Steel. The review is guided by rules in the Tariff Act of 1930 and USITC regulations. Who Can Participate Any interested party (like domestic producers, unions, importers, exporters, or industry groups) may get involved. To do this, they must file an entry of appearance within 21 days after the notice appears in the Federal Register. Anyone wishing to handle confidential business information in this case must apply under an Administrative Protective Order, again no later than 21 days after publication. Information Needed from Participants Those responding should provide: Their company or group name and contact information Statements on why they are interested parties Whether they will take part in the proceeding Opinions on what would happen if the trade orders ended, focusing on import levels, pricing, and industry impacts Lists of U.S. producers, importers, overseas exporters, and main U.S. buyers Business data for 2024, such as production, sales, and profits There are also requests for updates on changes in supply or demand since 2019, and expected future changes. Document Filing Requirements All filings must be electronic, using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Submissions must be made by 5:15 p.m. on December 31, 2025. Comments on the quality of responses can be filed until 5:15 p.m. on February 6, 2026. Contact and Further Information For questions, contact Camille Bryan at the Office of Investigations (202-205-2811). More details are available on the USITC website, including filing rules and important worksheets. Authority This review is held under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and is published by order of the Commission. The notice was issued on November 25, 2025, by Supervisory Attorney Susan Orndoff. Official Reference Federal Register Volume 90, Number 228 (Monday, December 1, 2025), pages 55159-55161. For full details and instructions, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US Finds Injury From Imports of Slag Pots From China Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has completed its investigations into imports of slag pots from China. The Commission found that U.S. industry is materially injured because these Chinese imports are sold at less than fair value and are subsidized by the government of China. Slag pots are identified under subheadings 7309.00.00 and 8454.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The USITC started this investigation on December 31, 2024. The investigation began after a petition was filed by WHEMCO-Steel Castings, Inc. from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Earlier, the U.S. Department of Commerce determined that slag pots from China were being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) and were also being subsidized. A public hearing for these investigations was held by the Commission on August 27, 2025. Everyone who asked to take part in the hearing was able to do so. There was a temporary pause in import injury investigations due to a lapse in appropriations and the stopping of Commission operations. All investigations were tolled, or put on hold, according to U.S. laws. The Commission made its determinations under the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically under sections 705(b) and 735(b). The final findings in the investigations were completed and filed by the Commission on November 25, 2025. Commissioner David S. Johanson agreed with the majority that there is harm, but said the industry is threatened with material injury, rather than already injured. The views of the Commission can be found in USITC Publication 5679, released in November 2025. The official record of this action is recorded in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 228, issued Monday, December 1, 2025. The notice of the Commission’s final actions was issued by Susan Orndoff, Supervisory Attorney, on November 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

US International Trade Commission Revises Schedule for Lightweight Thermal Paper Proceeding Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a revised schedule for its investigation of lightweight thermal paper from China. The investigation numbers are 701-TA-451 and 731-TA-1126 (Third Review). The change is because there was a lapse in government funding. This stopped the Commission’s work for a time. Because of this, the schedule needed to be updated. The Commission says the staff report will now be put into the nonpublic record on December 3, 2025. Anyone who wants to send comments about the report must do so by December 9, 2025. This investigation is being done under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The rules the Commission is following are in 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F. People can contact Alexis Yim at the USITC Office of Investigations for more information. The phone number is 202-708-1446. Those who are hearing impaired may call the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. People with mobility impairments may need special help to access the Commission, and they should call the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. The public can see all records related to this investigation on the USITC’s online docket system at https://edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued on November 25, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. The notice is published following section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Changes Schedule in Hard Empty Capsules Investigation Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has released a revised schedule for the investigation into hard empty capsules from Brazil, China, India, and Vietnam. This investigation is officially titled “Investigation Nos. 701-TA-742-745 and 731-TA-1720-1723 (Final).” The new schedule changes follow a lapse in government funding that led to a pause in Commission operations. The new schedule includes important dates for people and companies involved. The deadline for filing prehearing briefs is now November 24, 2025. Anyone who wants to speak at the hearing must file a request with the Secretary to the Commission on November 25, 2025. A prehearing conference will be held on November 28, 2025, if the Commission decides it is needed. Parties must file and serve their written testimony and presentation slides for the hearing by noon on December 1, 2025. The hearing will take place at the USITC Building at 9:30 a.m. on December 2, 2025. Posthearing briefs and written statements from those who have not joined as a party are due December 9, 2025. The Commission will make its final release of information on December 19, 2025. Final party comments are due on December 23, 2025. This investigation is being run as directed by title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice is published to follow section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, people can contact Julie Duffy at the USITC or visit the Commission’s website. This revised schedule was ordered and released by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on November 20, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Changes Schedule for Float Glass Products Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced a revised schedule for its investigation into float glass products from China and Malaysia. This change is due to a recent lapse in government funding, which caused the Commission to temporarily stop operations. The investigation numbers are 701-TA-748-749 and 731-TA-1726-1727 (Final). Here are the new important dates: The prehearing staff report will be made available on December 23, 2025. Prehearing briefs must be filed by December 31, 2025. Requests to appear at the hearing are due to the Secretary by January 2, 2026. A prehearing conference may be held on January 6, 2026, if needed. Any parties presenting at the hearing must file written testimony and slides by noon on January 7, 2026. The hearing will take place at the USITC Building at 9:30 a.m. on January 8, 2026. Post-hearing briefs and written statements from people who have not registered as a party are due on January 15, 2026. The Commission will make a final release of information on January 28, 2026. The deadline for final comments from parties is February 2, 2026. This investigation is being conducted under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The official notice was published according to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, the public can contact Kristina Lara at 202-205-3386. Hearing-impaired persons can use the TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. Those needing help with building access should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. Additional details and public records for this investigation can be found on the USITC website at www.usitc.gov and on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on November 20, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Vaporizer Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced that it received a formal complaint named “Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof II, DN 3849.” The complaint was filed by three organizations: NJOY, LLC; Altria Group Distribution Company; and Altria Client Services LLC. The document says the complaint was filed on September 22, 2025. The complaint claims that JUUL Labs, Inc. of Washington, DC has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This means the company is accused of importing, selling for importation, or selling in the U.S. after importation certain vaporizer devices, cartridges, and parts that may be infringing. The complaint asks the USITC to take several actions: Issue a limited exclusion order Issue cease and desist orders Impose a bond on the accused products during a 60-day Presidential review period, according to U.S. law Because of a lapse in appropriations, there was a delay in accepting written comments. Now, interested parties and the public can send comments about the public interest issues raised by the complaint. The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the potentially banned products are used in the U.S. Point out any public health, safety, or welfare concerns Identify similar or competitive products made in the U.S. that could replace the accused products State whether the complainant or others have the ability to replace the volume of products if banned Explain how the requested orders would affect U.S. consumers Written comments about the public interest must be sent to the Commission no later than eight calendar days after this notice is published in the Federal Register. There will also be a chance for the public to comment after the first big decision in the investigation. Any other written comments must also be filed by the same eight-day deadline. The complainant may reply to responses within three calendar days after the deadline for initial submissions. All documents must be filed electronically on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS), at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper copies will be accepted at this time. Each submission is limited to five pages, including attachments. Those requesting confidential treatment for submissions must give full reasons to the Secretary at the Commission. All nonconfidential submissions will be available for public viewing at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. This action was authorized under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the Commission’s rules. Issued by the authority of the Commission. Signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on 2025-11-17. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint on Clear Aligners and Components Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On November 19, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Clear Aligners and Components Thereof,” Docket Number 3850. The complaint was filed by Align Technology, Inc. on September 23, 2025. It claims that some companies have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Align Technology, Inc. says that certain clear aligners and their parts are being brought into the United States, sold for import, and sold within the U.S. after being imported, in a way that breaks the law. The companies named as respondents in the complaint are: Angelalign Technology Inc. of China Wuxi EA Medical Instruments Technologies Co., Ltd. of China Wuxi EA Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. of China Shanghai EA Medical Instruments Co., Ltd. of China USA Angelalign Technology Corp. of Newark, Delaware Align Technology, Inc. is asking the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order. They also ask for cease and desist orders, and they want a bond put in place on the products while the matter is under the 60-day Presidential review. The original notice was published on September 25, 2025. Because of a lapse in appropriations, the Commission could not accept public submissions at that time. Now, the Commission has changed the notice and is asking for public comments about the complaint and any issues that may affect the public interest. The Commission is accepting comments from the public, interested parties, and government agencies. Comments should focus on whether the requested actions by the complainant would affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competition in the U.S. economy Production of similar items in the U.S. U.S. consumers The Commission is especially interested in comments that: Explain how the products could be used in the U.S. Identify any health, safety, or welfare concerns in the U.S. if the orders are given. Identify products made by the complainant or others in the U.S. that could replace these products. Indicate if the complainant, its licensees, or third parties can make enough products to replace those that might be excluded, in a reasonable time. Explain how the requested orders would affect U.S. consumers. Comments about the public interest must be sent in by close of business, eight calendar days after this notice appears in the Federal Register. Other written submissions about this matter must also be filed by that deadline. If there are replies to comments, they must be filed within three calendar days after the initial comments were due. No other submissions will be accepted unless the Commission asks for them. Each submission or reply can be up to five pages long, including any attachments. Anyone sending their comments must file the original document electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Only electronic filings are being accepted at this time. No paper documents will be accepted until further notice. If someone wants to submit confidential information, a request for confidential treatment must be included. Requests should explain why the information should stay confidential and be sent to the Secretary to the Commission. The Commission will handle all such requests as outlined in 19 CFR 201.6. All non-confidential submissions will be public and can be viewed on the EDIS website. This action comes under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and rules 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The notice was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on November 17, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Receives Complaint on Certain Semiconductor Devices and Computing Products Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a new complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Semiconductor Devices, Computing Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof”, with Docket Number 3855. The notice was made public on November 19, 2025. The complaint was filed by Adeia, Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc., and Adeia Holdings Inc. It was filed on November 17, 2025. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The parties named as respondents are: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA) Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Morrisville, NC) Lenovo Group Limited (Hong Kong) Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (China) Super Micro Computer, Inc. (San Jose, CA) The complaint concerns the importation and sale of certain semiconductor devices and computing products that may infringe on the complainants’ rights. Adeia has requested that the Commission issue: A limited exclusion order Cease and desist orders A bond on the allegedly infringing products during the 60-day Presidential review period under 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) The USITC is now asking for comments from: The proposed respondents Other interested parties The public Government agencies Comments should focus on public interest issues linked to the complaint. The Commission wants details regarding: How the articles may be used in the United States. Any public health, safety, or welfare concerns connected to the potential orders. U.S.-made articles that could replace the accused products if excluded. Whether the complainant, its licensees, or third parties can replace these products in a reasonable time. The possible impact on U.S. consumers. Comments must be filed electronically no later than eight calendar days after this notice’s publication. Written submissions must address the specific issues raised. Replies to any submissions may be filed up to three calendar days after the deadline for the initial submissions. Submissions must only be filed electronically via the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Paper filings are not being accepted at this time. Those submitting documents seeking confidential treatment must request it from the Secretary to the Commission and include reasons for such treatment. Documents for which confidentiality is granted will be handled accordingly. All non-confidential submissions will be viewable by the public through the Commission’s Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. This investigation proceeds under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and rules 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). For more information, contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, at (202) 205-2000. Additional details are also available at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. ITC Receives Complaint on Vaporizers and Cartridges Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has received a complaint. The complaint is titled “Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof, DN 3853.” The complaint was filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC on September 30, 2025. The complaint names two companies as respondents: Glas, Inc. and Glas, LLC, both based in Los Angeles, California. The complaint states there are violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The complaint covers the import, sale for import, and sale after import of vaporizer devices, cartridges, and parts used with them. JUUL Labs and VMR Products have asked the Commission to take several actions. They request a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. They also ask the Commission to place a bond on the products of the respondents during the 60-day Presidential review period, in line with 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The USITC is asking for comments from the public. The comments should focus on whether the relief requested by the complainants could affect: Public health and welfare in the United States Competitive conditions in the United States economy The production of similar or competing products in the country United States consumers The Commission especially wants answers to the following questions: How are the products in question used in the United States? Are there any public health, safety, or welfare concerns related to the requested remedial orders? Are there similar or competitive products made in the United States that could replace the imported items if they are excluded? Can JUUL Labs, its licensees, or third parties provide enough replacement products within a reasonable time, if imports are excluded? How would the requested orders affect U.S. consumers? Comments on public interest must be sent no later than eight calendar days after the notice appears in the Federal Register. Complainants can reply to other parties’ comments within three days after submissions are due. All submissions must be filed electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, as no paper filings will be accepted for now. Each submission must be no more than five pages. The submissions must note “Docket No. 3853” on the first page. Anyone wanting to submit confidential information must request such treatment and explain why confidentiality is needed. Confidential information will be shared only with approved USITC personnel and for official purposes. This notice is issued by order of the Commission, following Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and Commission rules (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). Further information is available at the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation can be found at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued on September 30, 2025, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. For questions or help on electronic filing, parties may contact the Secretary at the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Receives Complaint About DRAM Devices Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On November 17, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a complaint about certain DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) devices, products containing DRAM, and DRAM components. The complaint is known as Docket No. 3854. The complaint was filed by Netlist, Inc. on September 30, 2025. Netlist, Inc. claims there have been violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). This law deals with unfair trade practices related to imported products. The complaint names the following companies as respondents: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Plano, TX Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of Plano, TX Google LLC of Mountain View, CA Super Micro Computer, Inc. of San Jose, CA Netlist, Inc. is asking the Commission to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. It also requests that a bond be imposed on the respondents’ products during the 60-day Presidential review period under 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). The USITC is asking for comments from the public, other interested parties, and government agencies about public interest issues related to the complaint. Some questions the Commission raised include: How are the DRAM devices and related products used in the United States? Are there any health, safety, or welfare concerns if the requested orders are issued? Are there similar products made in the United States that could replace the imported products? Can Netlist, its licensees, or others make enough of these products to meet the demand if imports are stopped? How would these orders impact U.S. consumers? People who want to send written comments must do so within eight days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Netlist, Inc. can reply to these comments within three days after the first comments are due. Comments must not be more than five pages, including attachments. All filings must be electronic using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted at this time. Anyone who wants to keep their submission confidential must request this in writing and follow the rules in 19 CFR 201.6. Confidential information may still be shared with certain government employees and contractors for official use. This action follows the authority given by section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and related rules. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, issued this notice on November 13, 2025. The public version of the complaint is available online at https://edis.usitc.gov. To contact the Commission with questions, call (202) 205-2000. For electronic filing help, email the Secretary as provided in the official notice. All nonconfidential information will be available to the public on the EDIS website. This notice provides all details for parties interested in participating in the investigation or submitting comments about the public interest. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced that it will conduct an expedited five-year review of the antidumping duty order on electrolytic manganese dioxide imported from China. The review is being done under the Tariff Act of 1930. This is to decide if removing the antidumping duty would lead to more injury to U.S. businesses in the near future. Important Dates The schedule began on September 5, 2025. A report about the investigation will be shared with approved parties on October 30, 2025. The public version of the report will be released later. Parties who are part of this review and have responded correctly can send their written comments to the Commission. These comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on November 5, 2025. The comments must not have any new facts. Anyone who is not a party in this case can also send a short written statement by November 5, 2025. These statements also cannot contain new facts. Who Is Involved The Commission said the domestic interested parties’ responses were enough. It noted that the responses from the opposing parties were not enough. Because of this, the Commission is moving forward with an expedited review instead of a full review. The companies, EMD Acquisition LLC d/b/a Borman Specialty Materials and Vibrantz Technologies Inc., were found to have provided sufficient responses. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. Filing Procedures If anyone files documents for the review, a certificate of service must be included. This means that each filing must also be sent to all other parties in the review. If the Department of Commerce takes more time to finish its part of the review, the deadline for comments will shift. In this case, comments would be due three business days after Commerce’s results. More rules about this are in the Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, which can be found on the USITC website. Extended Timeline The Commission has decided that this is an extraordinarily complicated review. Because of this, the review period may be extended for up to 90 more days, as allowed by law. Contact and Additional Information For more information, contact Laurel Schwartz at 202-205-2398. The public record is available at https://edis.usitc.gov. This review is being held under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was published as required by Section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. This order was issued by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on September 30, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Reviews Antidumping Orders on MSG from China and Indonesia Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a new review. This is the second five-year review of antidumping duty orders on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from China and Indonesia. The main question is if removing the orders would harm U.S. companies again. Key Dates for the Review The review began on October 1, 2025. Anyone interested must send their responses by October 31, 2025. Comments about whether responses are good enough must be filed by December 11, 2025. What Is Being Reviewed MSG is the product under review. MSG is mainly produced in the U.S. by Ajinomoto North America, Inc. Imports from China and Indonesia are being checked. The USITC wants to know if ending duties would bring back problems for U.S. producers. Who Can Take Part Any person or group who uses, sells, or produces MSG can join. This includes industrial users, sellers, and consumer groups. To join, they must file an entry within 21 days after October 1, 2025. What Is Needed From Participants Participants must give specific details. This includes: Their name, address, and contact details. If they are an “interested party” under U.S. trade law. If they will help in the review. How removing the duties might affect them or the entire U.S. industry. A list of all U.S. MSG makers and related parties. A list of all U.S. importers and export firms since 2019. Names and contacts of big U.S. buyers. Places to find info on MSG prices. Data about their operations with MSG during 2024, including production, capacity, sales, and profits. Special Rules for Submissions Every document must be filed electronically at EDIS. No paper filings are allowed now. Any data sent must be certified as correct. If a party cannot give all information, they must explain why, or the Commission might assume the worst (“adverse inference”). Some sensitive business information can be given under a protective order. Definitions Subject Merchandise: MSG covered in the review. Subject Countries: China and Indonesia. Domestic Like Product: All MSG made in the U.S. Domestic Industry: U.S. companies making MSG, mainly Ajinomoto North America, Inc. Importer: Companies that bring MSG from China or Indonesia into the U.S. Confidential Information Sensitive details can be protected if the company asks within 21 days of the notice. Only authorized people will see it. Burden Estimate The average reporting time is 15 hours per response. The deadline for this is June 30, 2026. Cost and Business Changes Parties are asked if there have been big supply or demand changes for MSG since 2019, and what future changes might happen. Authority This review is under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The official notice was published by Secretary Lisa Barton on September 24, 2025. For more information, contact Rachel Devenney at the USITC, or visit usitc.gov. End of Notice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Reviews Duties on Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has started a five-year review of the antidumping duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China. This review will decide if ending the antidumping duties would likely hurt U.S. industry again. The USITC first put duties on imports of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol from China in August 2004. Since then, the order has been kept in place after three other five-year reviews, with the most recent update made in November 2020. The fourth review started on October 1, 2025. The USITC wants interested parties to send detailed information for its decision. Responses are due by October 31, 2025. Comments on these responses are due by December 11, 2025. Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol is the product being reviewed. The country involved is China. The USITC will look at if the U.S. industry making tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol will be hurt if the duties are removed. Anyone who wants to be a party in this review must file an entry of appearance within 21 days after this notice. The USITC keeps a list of all parties. People who worked for the Commission in the past can take part in this review, even if they worked on earlier reviews or the original investigation. Business proprietary information can be shared under an administrative protective order if requests are made in time. All information submitted must be certified as complete and accurate. The USITC has asked all interested parties to give specific data, including: Name and contact information of the company or person responding. If the company is a U.S. producer, importer, exporter, or related party. Willingness to provide information for this review. How removing the duties would affect the U.S. industry and the company. Lists of U.S. producers, importers, and Chinese producers of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol. Names of main U.S. buyers and known price sources. Detailed production, sales, and financial data for the year 2024. Lists of important supply and demand changes since 2019. Information must be sent electronically through the USITC’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). No paper filings are accepted. All detailed requirements for filing can be found in the USITC’s filing handbook online. Firms that cannot provide all the requested information should explain why and suggest alternative details. This review is being done under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. For more information, contact Alec Resch in the USITC Office of Investigations at 202-708-1448 or visit https://www.usitc.gov. The notice was signed by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, on September 24, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Launches Final Phase of Investigation on Chinese Chemical Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has started the final phase of its antidumping investigation on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. This chemical is used in many products and industries. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2025. About the Investigation The case is called Investigation No. 731-TA-1733 (Final). The investigation checks if imports of MDI from China are hurting U.S. companies. The ITC is acting under the Tariff Act of 1930. MDI from China is said to be sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value prices. The Department of Commerce has already made a “preliminary determination” about these imports. The ITC must now decide if U.S. companies are injured or threatened by these imports. What is MDI? MDI stands for methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. It is an aromatic chemical used in many goods. Its other names include Polymeric MDI, Monomeric MDI, and Modified MDI. MDI is made of two or more isocyanate groups attached to benzene rings, joined by methylene bridges. It has many Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers. The most common numbers are 9016-87-9 and 101-68-8. MDI can be a liquid or a solid. It is included under various Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) numbers like 2929.10.80 and 3909.31.00. If a mixture contains less than 40% MDI by weight, it is not covered by this case. Some partially reacted forms of MDI are not included if their NCO content is under 10% by weight. MDI Products and Processing MDI may have additives such as catalysts, plasticizers, or fire retardants. MDI processed in another country but matching the description is still covered. This includes blending or adding additives. Blends with MDI from countries not under investigation are covered, but only the Chinese MDI in the mix is subject. Background of the Case This full investigation started after BASF Corporation and The Dow Chemical Company filed a complaint as the MDI Fair Trade Coalition on February 12, 2025. Both companies are large chemical producers in the United States. How to Participate The ITC has set out rules for those wanting to take part. Anyone who wants to have a say in the investigation must file an “entry of appearance” 21 days before the hearing. The staff report will be ready on January 12, 2026. The public hearing is on January 27, 2026, starting at 9:30 a.m. in Washington, DC. Requests to join the hearing must be filed by January 21, 2026. There are rules for appearing by videoconference, especially if someone is sick. Written submissions, including statements for or against the petition, must be sent by February 3, 2026. The final date for responding to released information is February 24, 2026. No paper filings will be accepted; everything must be sent electronically. Access to Information Business confidential information will be protected and handled under special orders. Parties must apply to see this information 21 days before the hearing. Who Is In Charge? The notice is issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer at the ITC. Legal Basis The investigation follows Section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). All procedures are described in parts 201 and 207 of the ITC’s rules. Contact Information Questions can be directed to Lawrence Jones at the ITC Office of Investigations, (202) 205-3358. Learn More Full details and updates for the case can be found on the ITC’s website: https://www.usitc.gov. For the public record, see https://edis.usitc.gov. Key Dates to Remember: Prehearing staff report: January 12, 2026 Deadline to appear at hearing: January 21, 2026 Public hearing: January 27, 2026 Final written statements: February 3, 2026 Final comments on released information: February 24, 2026 This investigation may affect the imports of MDI from China and could impact U.S. chemical companies and industries that use MDI. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

USITC Finds Injury to U.S. Industry From Chinese Imports of Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 19, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a final determination about imports from China. The USITC found that an industry in the United States is materially injured by imports of sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China. These grains are listed under subheading 2818.10.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Department of Commerce found that these imports from China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value and are subsidized by the Chinese government. The investigation was started on November 25, 2024. Petitions were filed by Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc., of Malvern, Pennsylvania. The USITC decided to move forward with the final phase after Commerce made a preliminary ruling that the imports were subsidized as stated in section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)). A public notice was posted by the USITC about the final phase and a public hearing was scheduled. This information was made available in the Federal Register on June 2, 2025 (90 FR 23359). The hearing, which was planned for August 7, 2025, was later canceled, as announced in the Federal Register on August 8, 2025 (90 FR 38501). The USITC’s findings were finalized and filed on September 19, 2025. The views of the Commission are published in USITC Publication 5669, dated September 2025. The document is titled “Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-750 and 731-TA-1728 (Final).” Commissioner Johanson had a different view. He determined that the U.S. industry faces a threat of material injury from these imports, rather than current material injury. These actions were completed according to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 1673d(b)). The official order was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer of the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Steel Wire Rod Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced it will conduct expedited five-year reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The notice was issued on September 24, 2025, in the Federal Register (Volume 90, Number 183). The purpose of these reviews is to determine if removing the current duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. The decision to proceed with expedited reviews comes after the USITC found that the group response from domestic interested parties was adequate. The response from the respondent interested party group was found to be inadequate. As a result, the Commission did not identify any reason to conduct full reviews. However, Commissioner Johanson voted to conduct full reviews. The reviews are being conducted according to the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751(c)(3), and under relevant sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR parts 201 and 207). A staff report with details about the reviews has been placed in the nonpublic record. It will be made available on October 3, 2025, to those listed on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will be issued later. Parties that have supplied individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, or parties other than interested parties, may submit written comments by October 9, 2025. These comments may not include new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends the time limit for completing its final results, any comments regarding those results are due within three business days after Commerce issues its results. Only comments from Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Steel, and Optimus Steel LLC will be accepted. These were found to be individually adequate responses. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. All documents submitted as part of the reviews must be served to all other parties and must include a certificate of service. Documents without the certificate will not be accepted. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, the review period may be extended by up to 90 days, following 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). These reviews are conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and published according to Section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. The notice was signed by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, and issued on September 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review for Lightweight Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes On September 23, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it is beginning expedited reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders for lightweight thermal paper from China. The reviews are being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will decide if ending the current duties on lightweight thermal paper from China would likely cause harm to the U.S. paper industry in the future. The key date for this action is September 5, 2025. On this date, the USITC decided that the response from groups supporting U.S. industry was strong. The response from groups opposing the review was not strong. Because of this, the Commission chose an expedited review, following section 751(c)(3) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). There are rules for how the review process happens. These rules can be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure—19 CFR part 201 and part 207. A staff report with information about this review is on the nonpublic record. The report will be shared with those on the Administrative Protective Order service list on October 17, 2025. A public version will come out later, as stated in the Commission’s rules. Written comments about these reviews can be submitted by interested parties who gave an individually adequate response to the notice of institution. Other people, who are not parties to the review, can also send a short written statement. Comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on October 23, 2025. Comments must not have new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review, the deadline for comments will change to three business days after Commerce publishes its final results. Any comments with business proprietary information must meet the rules in 19 CFR 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. Every document entered must be served to all others involved. Each document must have a certificate of service or it will not be accepted. The Commission has found Domtar Corporation’s response to be individually adequate. Other interested parties may not submit comments, according to 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2). The Commission has determined that these reviews are very complicated. Because of this, it is using its authority to add up to 90 days to the review period, following 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). This review is being done under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was published under section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, contact Alexis Yim at the Office of Investigations (202-708-1446). Hearing-impaired persons can call 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. More information can also be found at the USITC website: usitc.gov or on the electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, on September 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Keeps Tariffs on Hot-Rolled Steel From Six Countries Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes On September 23, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its final decision in a major trade case. The USITC finished its fourth review of duties on hot-rolled steel products. The countries involved are China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. The USITC decided not to revoke the current duties. This decision applies to two types of duties: countervailing duties and antidumping duties. The USITC found that removing these duties would probably cause harm again to the U.S. hot-rolled steel industry. This harm is called “material injury” in the law. Countries and Products Covered Countervailing duties stay on products from India, Indonesia, and Thailand. Antidumping duties remain on products from China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. These duties will continue at current levels. They are meant to stop unfair foreign trade practices that hurt U.S. companies. About the Review The USITC began these reviews on July 1, 2024. The process followed all rules under the Tariff Act of 1930. A public hearing was held on July 24, 2025. Everyone who wanted to take part was given a chance. The official report is USITC Publication 5667. It is titled “Hot-Rolled Steel Products from China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-405-406 and 408 and 731-TA-899-901 and 906-908 (Fourth Review).” Legal Reference The work was done as required by section 751(c) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The determination was filed with the Secretary on September 19, 2025. Who Issued the Decision Sharon Bellamy, the Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, issued the notice by order of the USITC. This decision means tariffs will stay in place to protect the U.S. steel industry from unfair trade for the next five years. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Patent Case Involving GoPro and Insta360 Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes Background of the Case GoPro, a camera company based in California, filed a complaint on May 6, 2024. They claimed Insta360 imported cameras and accessories into the U.S. that violated six of GoPro’s patents. These patents included five “utility” patents for different camera technologies and one design patent known as D789,435. The ITC began an official investigation soon after the complaint. Insta360 is based in Shenzhen, China, with a U.S. branch in Irvine, California. Changes in Claims During the Case GoPro withdrew some of its claims during the investigation. By the end of the case, GoPro was only asserting certain claims for each of the six patents. ALJ’s Initial Findings The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) held a hearing in January 2025. On July 11, 2025, the ALJ made a decision: Insta360 violated Section 337 with respect to GoPro’s design patent D789,435. Insta360 did not violate Section 337 with respect to the five utility patents. The ALJ also made several findings about patent infringement, invalidity, and whether GoPro’s products satisfied certain legal requirements. These included: Some GoPro patent claims were found invalid or not infringed. Some claims were satisfied for domestic industry needs. The design patent D’435 was found infringed and valid. Proposed Remedies from the ALJ If the ITC finds a violation, the ALJ recommended: A limited exclusion order to block certain Insta360 products from entering the U.S. A cease and desist order to stop Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC from certain sales, since it had significant inventory. A bond set at zero percent of entered value, because GoPro’s products cost less than Insta360’s. Petitions for Review On July 25, 2025, both GoPro and Insta360 challenged parts of the decision and asked for review. They disagreed over both the final findings and specific issues related to the design and utility patents. They filed responses to each other’s petitions on August 4, 2025. Comments from Public and Government Officials The ITC asked for public comments about the case on July 15, 2025. Several U.S. Representatives and the involved companies submitted opinions. Issues Under ITC Review The ITC will review parts of the decision involving: Certain limits in the ‘840 patent. Some language in the ‘052 patent. The ALJ’s finding that certain Insta360 products infringe the design patent D’435. The ITC does not plan to review the rest of the ALJ’s findings. Questions and Next Steps The ITC is asking the parties to explain whether Insta360 products infringe GoPro’s D’435 design patent. They especially want to know about Insta360’s rear screen, which can be in many positions. The ITC also requests written answers on potential remedies, the public interest, and whether warranty and repair parts should be exempt from any orders. The public interest includes concerns for health, the U.S. economy, competition, U.S. production, and consumers. If the ITC orders a remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative will have 60 days to review. During that review, products can enter the U.S. under bond. Deadline for Written Submissions All main written submissions must be filed by September 25, 2025. Reply submissions are due by October 2, 2025. There are page limits for all submissions, and parties must follow all ITC rules. Contact Information People can find documents online at https://edis.usitc.gov or get general details at https://www.usitc.gov. For filing questions, call (202) 205-2000. By order of the Commission.Issued: September 11, 2025.Supervisory Attorney: Susan Orndoff. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Vaporizer Devices and Components Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On August 8, 2025, JUUL Labs, Inc. from Washington, DC, filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission. The complaint is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The case is about certain vaporizer devices, cartridges used with these devices, and their parts. The complaint says these products are being imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. after being imported. JUUL Labs claims these products infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,156,533. The complaint also says that there is an industry in the United States involved in this matter, as the law requires. JUUL Labs has asked the Commission to investigate and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. On September 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission agreed to begin an investigation. The investigation will check if section 337(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act has been violated. It will focus on the importation, sale for importation, or sale in the U.S. after importation of the following products: Vaporizer devices (also known as electronic nicotine delivery systems or ENDS) Cartridges used with these devices Components of these devices and cartridges, including cartridge housings, e-liquid nicotine salt formulations, heater components (also called atomizers), chargers, batteries, and subassemblies of these items The investigation will also check if an industry in the U.S. exists in this area, as required by section 337(a)(2). The named parties in this investigation are: Complainant: JUUL Labs, Inc., 1000 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20004 Respondents: NJOY, LLC, 9449 N 90th Street, Suite 201, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 NJOY Holdings, Inc., 9449 N 90th Street, Suite 201, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Altria Group, Inc., 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 Altria Group Distribution Company, 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 Altria Client Services LLC, 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 The Chief Administrative Law Judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission will choose the presiding Administrative Law Judge for the investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not join as a party in this case. Respondents must send their replies to the complaint and the investigation notice, following section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The deadline is no later than 20 days after the Commission sends the complaint and notice of investigation. Extensions for the deadline will only be allowed if there is good reason. If a respondent does not reply on time, they may lose their right to contest the complaint. The Commission and the judge may take the facts as given in the complaint and notice. This can result in an exclusion order, a cease and desist order, or both, against the respondent. For more information or to see the complaint (without confidential information), visit the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, on September 9, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.