Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-30 Estimated reading time: 6 minutes 1. Silicon Metal From the Kingdom of Thailand: Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination With Final Less-Than-Fair-Value Determinations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews and Intent To Revoke the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, in Part Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on a request from Nextracker LLC (Nextracker), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating and issuing preliminary results of changed circumstances reviews (CCRs) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells), whether or not assembled into modules, from the People's Republic of China (China) to revoke the orders, in part, with respect to certain products. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. 3. Unwrought Palladium From the Russian Federation: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 4. Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On September 15, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co. et al. v. United States, Court No. 22-00190, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) third remand results pertaining to the administrative review of antidumping duty (AD) order on multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period 12/1/2019 through 11/30/2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Senmao). 5. Raw Honey From Brazil: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping (AD) order on raw honey from Brazil for the period of review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024. Commerce preliminarily finds that Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindústria Ltda. (Melbras) and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda. (Minamel) made sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. Additionally, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect to certain companies for which there were no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR, and for which requests for review were timely withdrawn. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 6. Certain Freight Rail Couplers and Parts Thereof From India: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 7. Silicon Metal From the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that silicon metal from the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos) is being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 8. Silicon Metal From Angola: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that silicon metal (silicon) from Angola is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2024, through March 30, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 9. Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of thermoformed molded fiber products (molded fiber products) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) during the period of investigation (POI), January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 10. Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of thermoformed molded fiber products (molded fiber products) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. 11. Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that thermoformed molded fiber products (molded fiber products) from the People's Republic of China (China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) during the period of investigation (POI) April 1, 2025, through September 30, 2025. 12. Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that thermoformed molded fiber products (molded fiber products) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer,
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Issues New Duties on Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes What Is Covered The orders cover sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains made with at least 94% aluminum oxide. These grains may also have other materials like titanium dioxide or silicon dioxide. They come in sizes from 0.85 mm to 0.0395 mm. Shapes can include angular, blocky, round, and more. The grains are extremely hard and can be various colors like blue or white. These grains are included in the duties whether imported in bulk or already made into products like abrasive papers or grinding wheels. However, only the ceramic grains inside the finished products are covered, not the entire product. Duties for Dumping The U.S. determined that ceramic abrasive grains from China were sold below fair value. Importers must pay antidumping duties at a weighted-average dumping margin of 88.32 percent. This rate applies to all producers from China and is based on facts available with adverse inferences. Duties for Subsidies The investigation found that Chinese companies producing these grains received unfair government support. Countervailing duties were set at a subsidy rate of 165.05 percent. This rate applies to several named companies and all others not listed. How Duties Are Applied U.S. Customs and Border Protection must collect cash deposits for these duties on imports from China. For antidumping duties, this started for products entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after June 2, 2025. For countervailing duties, this started for products entered on or after May 22, 2025. There was a temporary pause for the subsidy duties after September 18, 2025, until publication of the final injury determination. Duties collection resumed with the new order. Legal Process and Ongoing Requirements The orders were put in place after both Commerce and the International Trade Commission found that dumped and subsidized grains from China hurt the U.S. industry. These rules are upheld under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The orders also include instructions about how interested parties and lawyers can be added to annual inquiry service lists to receive updates and take part in future matters related to the orders. Special instructions apply for both U.S. petitioners and the Government of China. A full list of affected Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) codes is provided in the orders, with the written description taking priority over any classification. Where to Find More Information The notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. The full list of existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders is available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. These new duties are effective as of September 29, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-29
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-29 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Paper File Folders From Sri Lanka: Antidumping Duty Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18886/paper-file-folders-from-sri-lanka-antidumping-duty-order Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing an antidumping duty (AD) order on paper file folders (file folders) from Sri Lanka. 2. Certain Chassis and Subassemblies Thereof From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18885/certain-chassis-and-subassemblies-thereof-from-the-socialist-republic-of-vietnam-preliminary Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain chassis and subassemblies thereof (chassis) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 3. Certain Chassis and Subassemblies Thereof From Thailand: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18884/certain-chassis-and-subassemblies-thereof-from-thailand-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain chassis and subassemblies thereof (chassis) from Thailand are being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 4. Certain Chassis and Subassemblies Thereof From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18883/certain-chassis-and-subassemblies-thereof-from-mexico-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-sales Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain chassis and subassemblies thereof (chassis) from Mexico are being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 5. Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18882/sol-gel-alumina-based-ceramic-abrasive-grains-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-antidumping-duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), Commerce is issuing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains (ceramic abrasive grains) from the People's Republic of China (China). 6. High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/29/2025-18881/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-postponement-of-preliminary-determination-in-the Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection
Federal Bureau of Investigation Seeks Comments on ViCAP National Crime Database Information Collection Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG), is submitting an information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This request is in line with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are being accepted for 30 days, until October 27, 2025. If you have comments about the time it will take to respond, how the collection is done, or suggestions to improve it, you can contact Nathan Graham, Program Manager at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. The phone number is (703) 632-4309. The proposed collection was previously published for a 60-day comment period on September 17, 2025. The FBI welcomes written comments and suggestions on: If the collection of information is necessary. The accuracy of the estimated burden to the public. How to improve the quality and clarity of the information. Ways to reduce the burden, including electronic methods. Written comments and recommendations should be submitted within 30 days of the notice. They must be submitted at www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Use “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments” or search “OMB Control Number 1110-0011” to find the request. The DOJ seeks approval for this information collection for three years. OMB cannot authorize for more than three years without another review. Details about the Collection ViCAP is a unit of the FBI that analyzes serial violent and sexual crimes. The ViCAP National Crime Database is the largest collection of major violent crime case data in the United States. It gathers data about the following: Homicides (and attempts) believed to be part of a series, random, or sexually oriented. Sexual assaults suspected to be part of a series or committed by a stranger. Missing persons cases that suggest foul play and the person is still missing. Unidentified human remains where the death is known or suspected to be homicide. Overview of the Information Collection This is a revision of a previously approved collection. The collection is named “ViCAP National Crime Database.” There is no specific agency form number. The respondents are state, local, and tribal governments. Participation is voluntary. There are an estimated 5,700 respondents. The estimated time per respondent is 20 minutes. Users decide how often to respond, but for calculation, it is counted as once per year. The total estimated annual time burden is 1,900 hours. There are no other annual costs. For more information, contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, at 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC 20530. This information was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-09-26
Justice Department Briefing 2025-09-26 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Personal Protective Equipment, Medical Consumables, and Medical Equipment, Including Devices
U.S. Commerce Department Announces Investigation on Medical Imports Estimated reading time: 4–7 minutes On September 2, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce started an investigation. The investigation will look at how importing personal protective equipment (PPE), medical consumables, and medical equipment, including devices, affects U.S. national security. This investigation is under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) will run this investigation. They invite the public and interested parties to send in written comments, data, or other information. The deadline to submit comments is October 17, 2025. What Is Being Investigated? The investigation covers: PPE used in health care settings, like surgical masks, N95 respirators, gloves, and gowns. Medical consumables, which are single-use or short-term-use items, such as syringes, needles, IV pumps, IV bags, catheters, bandages, gauze, sutures, and laboratory reagents. It does not include pharmaceuticals like drugs, which are part of another investigation. Medical equipment, which means durable equipment and tools, like wheelchairs, hospital beds, and crutches. Medical devices, such as pacemakers, insulin pumps, coronary stents, hearing aids, prosthetics, blood glucose monitors, MRI machines, ventilators, and x-ray machines. How to Submit Comments Comments can be sent through the Federal rulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov. The regulations.gov ID is BIS-2025-0258. Use XRIN 0694-XC134 in all comments. If you send business confidential information, mark those pages “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL.” Also give a non-confidential version marked “PUBLIC.” File names should start with “BC” for confidential and “P” for public. Comments sent without these markers will be made public. Main Issues BIS Wants Comments On The Department is looking for information especially on: The current and future demand for PPE, medical consumables, and equipment in the U.S. How much domestic production can meet this demand. The role of foreign supply chains, especially major exporters, in supplying these goods. If many U.S. imports come from only a few foreign countries and if this is a risk. The impact of foreign government subsidies and unfair trade practices on U.S. manufacturers. The economic impact of low prices caused by unfair foreign trade or overproduction. If foreign countries could restrict exports or control supplies, and if this could be used against the U.S. Whether it is possible to increase domestic manufacturing to use fewer imports. The impact of current trade policies and if tariffs or quotas are needed for national security. Whether foreign countries could control or exploit supply chains. If foreign-made PPE, consumables, or equipment could be used to harm the U.S. Any other relevant factors. Confidentiality and Contact Business confidential comments will be protected as required by the law. Comments from U.S. Government agencies will not be made public. The BIS website has information and resources at https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/. For help, call (202) 482-0795. For any more information, contact Stephen Astle, Director, Defense Industrial Base Division, Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, BIS, at (202) 482-4506, or visit www.bis.doc.gov/232. Signed, Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade Federal Register Vol. 90, No. 185 (September 26, 2025) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Robotics and Industrial Machinery
U.S. Commerce Department Seeks Public Comments on Risks From Imported Robotics and Industrial Machines Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 2, 2025, the United States Department of Commerce started a national security investigation. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is leading this work. The focus is on imports of robotics and industrial machinery. The Department wants to know how these imports may affect United States national security. The investigation is under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The public can send comments and data. The deadline to submit is October 17, 2025. Robotics and industrial machinery in this investigation include robots and mechanical systems run by computers. It also covers CNC machines, turning and milling machines, grinding equipment, and stamping and pressing machines. Other types include automatic tool changers, jigs, fixtures, and machine tools for cutting, welding, or handling work pieces. It also covers metalworking equipment like autoclaves, industrial ovens, and laser or water-cutting tools. This investigation does not look at unmanned aircraft systems. Those are studied in a different review. The Department wants comments on many issues, including: How much demand there is in the United States for robotics and industrial machinery now, in the future, and in the best case. How much of this demand can be met by makers in the United States. The role of foreign supply chains, especially from top exporting countries. How much U.S. imports come from only a few suppliers or countries. Also, any risks because of this. The impact of money or support from foreign governments that could hurt U.S. makers. If foreign countries keep prices low on purpose or make too much, hurting U.S. jobs or businesses. The chance that foreign countries could limit exports or use control over supplies for harm. If it is possible to increase U.S. capacity to depend less on other countries. How current trade rules affect U.S. makers, and if more steps are needed, like tariffs or limits on imports. Effects on U.S. jobs from using, or not using, robotics and industrial machines. If foreign countries or people could control or misuse the supply chain. The risk that foreign-built machines or parts could be misused. The future importance of robotics and industrial machines for U.S. national security items or work. Any other points the public thinks matter. The BIS will accept business confidential information, if marked as required. Public comments will be posted unless marked as confidential. The Department will not make U.S. government communications public. Instructions for submitting comments and for business confidential information are listed in the official notice. Anyone with questions can contact Stephen Astle, Director at the Defense Industrial Base Division, Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, at (202) 482-4506. More information is available at www.bis.doc.gov/232. Records connected to this investigation can also be found at https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/. The Department of Commerce asks all interested parties to share their views and information by October 17, 2025. The official responsible for this notice is Julia A. Khersonsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-09-26
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-09-26 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Robotics and Industrial Machinery Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: On September 2, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of robotics and industrial machinery. This investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (Section 232). Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to the investigation to the Department of Commerce’s (Department) Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. This notice identifies issues on which the Department is especially interested in obtaining the public’s views. 2. Notice of Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Personal Protective Equipment, Medical Consumables, and Medical Equipment, Including Devices Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: On September 2, 2025, the Secretary of Commerce initiated an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of personal protective equipment (PPE), medical consumables, and medical equipment including devices. This investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (Section 232). Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, data, analyses, or other information pertinent to the investigation to the Department of Commerce’s (Department) Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security. This notice identifies issues on which the Department is especially interested in obtaining the public’s views. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Domestic and International Client Export Services and Customized Forms Revision
Department of Commerce Requests Comments on Export Services Forms Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Department of Commerce Requests Comments on Export Services Forms The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a request for public comments on its revised information collection for export services forms. This review is being conducted by the International Trade Administration (ITA). The request was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2025. The ITA helps U.S. businesses by providing services that make it easier to export goods and work in markets outside the country. Details of the Information Collection The form is known as “Domestic and International Clients Export Services & Customized Forms.” It is being revised and needs new approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB control number for this collection is 0625-0143. There are no specific form numbers. The total number of expected respondents is 100,020. Each response is expected to take about 10 minutes. The yearly burden is estimated to be 34,133 hours. Purpose and Use of Collected Information Congress requires ITA to help more U.S. companies export and to encourage foreign companies to invest in the United States. The ITA offers help to U.S. companies, such as finding business partners in other countries, setting up meetings, and preparing reports on possible foreign partners. Some ITA services are customized for unique business needs. These forms help ITA know how to assist each business. Information can be shared and collected online or by paper. U.S. companies can show interest through forms on the ITA website, web-based surveys, or paper forms. Who Can Respond The affected groups are: Businesses or for-profit organizations Not-for-profit institutions State, local, or tribal governments Submitting these forms is voluntary and only needed when a business wants ITA’s help. Legal Authority The legal authority for this information collection comes from Public Law 15 U.S.C. et seq and 15 U.S.C. 171 et seq. How to Comment The public can view the request and submit comments at www.reginfo.gov. Go to “Currently under 30-day Review–Open for Public Comments” or search for the form using its title or OMB control number (0625-0143). Comments and recommendations must be submitted within 30 days from the date of the notice. Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department, is listed as the contact for this request. Reference Federal Register Volume 90, Number 185, September 26, 2025. Document Number: 2025-18765. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-26
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-26 Estimated reading time: 6 minutes 1. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Domestic and International Client Export Services and Customized Forms Revision Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Silicon Metal From Australia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from Australia. The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 3. Silicon Metal from Thailand: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from Thailand. The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 4. Silicon Metal From the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 5. Silicon Metal From Norway: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of silicon metal from Norway. The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-25
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration, Trade Representative, Office of United States Briefing 2025-09-25 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Implementing Certain Tariff-Related Elements of the U.S.-EU Framework on an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration, Trade Representative, Office of United States Content: On August 21, 2025, the United States and the European Union announced agreement on a Framework on an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade (Framework Agreement). On September 5, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14346, Modifying the Scope of Reciprocal Tariffs and Establishing Procedures for Implementing Trade and Security Agreements, finding that it is necessary and appropriate to implement the tariff modifications described in that Framework Agreement. Executive Order 14346 also directed and authorized the Secretary of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative to take the necessary and appropriate steps to implement any current or forthcoming trade and security framework agreements between a foreign trading partner and the United States. This notice amends the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to implement the elements of the Framework Agreement that adjust tariffs on certain articles that are products of the European Union, including automobiles and automobile parts subject to tariffs under Proclamation 10908, Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States, as amended, and unavailable natural resources (including cork), all aircraft and aircraft parts, and generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients and chemical precursors. 2. Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders with August anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. 3. Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V. (ASB) did not make sales of stainless steel plate in coils from Belgium at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (MDI) From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of an Antidumping Duty Investigation
U.S. Launches Final Phase of Investigation on Chinese Chemical Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has started the final phase of its antidumping investigation on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. This chemical is used in many products and industries. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2025. About the Investigation The case is called Investigation No. 731-TA-1733 (Final). The investigation checks if imports of MDI from China are hurting U.S. companies. The ITC is acting under the Tariff Act of 1930. MDI from China is said to be sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value prices. The Department of Commerce has already made a “preliminary determination” about these imports. The ITC must now decide if U.S. companies are injured or threatened by these imports. What is MDI? MDI stands for methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. It is an aromatic chemical used in many goods. Its other names include Polymeric MDI, Monomeric MDI, and Modified MDI. MDI is made of two or more isocyanate groups attached to benzene rings, joined by methylene bridges. It has many Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers. The most common numbers are 9016-87-9 and 101-68-8. MDI can be a liquid or a solid. It is included under various Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) numbers like 2929.10.80 and 3909.31.00. If a mixture contains less than 40% MDI by weight, it is not covered by this case. Some partially reacted forms of MDI are not included if their NCO content is under 10% by weight. MDI Products and Processing MDI may have additives such as catalysts, plasticizers, or fire retardants. MDI processed in another country but matching the description is still covered. This includes blending or adding additives. Blends with MDI from countries not under investigation are covered, but only the Chinese MDI in the mix is subject. Background of the Case This full investigation started after BASF Corporation and The Dow Chemical Company filed a complaint as the MDI Fair Trade Coalition on February 12, 2025. Both companies are large chemical producers in the United States. How to Participate The ITC has set out rules for those wanting to take part. Anyone who wants to have a say in the investigation must file an “entry of appearance” 21 days before the hearing. The staff report will be ready on January 12, 2026. The public hearing is on January 27, 2026, starting at 9:30 a.m. in Washington, DC. Requests to join the hearing must be filed by January 21, 2026. There are rules for appearing by videoconference, especially if someone is sick. Written submissions, including statements for or against the petition, must be sent by February 3, 2026. The final date for responding to released information is February 24, 2026. No paper filings will be accepted; everything must be sent electronically. Access to Information Business confidential information will be protected and handled under special orders. Parties must apply to see this information 21 days before the hearing. Who Is In Charge? The notice is issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer at the ITC. Legal Basis The investigation follows Section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). All procedures are described in parts 201 and 207 of the ITC’s rules. Contact Information Questions can be directed to Lawrence Jones at the ITC Office of Investigations, (202) 205-3358. Learn More Full details and updates for the case can be found on the ITC’s website: https://www.usitc.gov. For the public record, see https://edis.usitc.gov. Key Dates to Remember: Prehearing staff report: January 12, 2026 Deadline to appear at hearing: January 21, 2026 Public hearing: January 27, 2026 Final written statements: February 3, 2026 Final comments on released information: February 24, 2026 This investigation may affect the imports of MDI from China and could impact U.S. chemical companies and industries that use MDI. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-25
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-25 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Clear Aligners and Components Thereof, DN 3850; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2. Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (MDI) From China; Scheduling of the Final Phase of an Antidumping Duty Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping investigation No. 731-TA-1733 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate ("MDI") from China, provided for in subheadings 2929.10.80 and 3909.31.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to be sold at less-than-fair-value. 3. Certain Urine Splash Guards and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on September 17, 2025, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Preliminary Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. 4. Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof II, DN 3849; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 5. Certain Electronic Eyewear Products, Components Thereof, and Related Charging Apparatuses; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation With Respect to Five Respondents Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 32) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") terminating the investigation with respect to the remaining respondents Bytedance, Ltd.; Bytedance Inc.; Qingdao Chuangjian Weilai Technology Co., Ltd.; Funnico Inc.; and PICO Immersive Pte. Ltd. based on settlement. The investigation is terminated. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings
U.S. Department of Commerce Lists Scope Ruling Applications for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published a list of applications for scope rulings in antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings. These applications were filed in August 2025. Scope rulings help decide if certain products are covered by existing AD or CVD orders. Details of Scope Ruling Applications Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From China Order Codes: A-570-016, C-570-017 Product: New pneumatic light truck tires made of rubber with a “LT” marking. Sizes are not listed in the 2023–2025 Tire and Rim Association Year Books. These tires have an outer diameter of 31 to 39 inches, section widths of 11.5 to 15.5 inches, radial construction, and inner diameters of 17 to 26 inches. They have ply ratings from 10 to 12, load indices from 100 to 128, and speed ratings of Q, P, or S. Producer/Exporter: China Applicant: Transamerica Tire Co., Ltd. (Transamerica) Date Filed: August 25, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “Transamerica” Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From China Order Codes: A-570-073, C-570-074 Product: Aluminum composite panels (also called aluminum composite materials). These panels include a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) core, bonded between two aluminum sheets of the 3003-H24 series. Adhesive film coats both sides of the LDPE. The top and bottom aluminum sheets are painted different colors, and the top sheet has a protective film. The total thickness is 3mm. The top aluminum sheet is 0.5mm or 0.3mm thick, and the bottom sheet is 0.3mm thick. Producer/Exporter: China Applicant: Hong Kong Harbour Company Limited (HKH) Date Filed: August 28, 2025 ACCESS Segment: “HKH Aluminum Composite Panels” Process Information Commerce will accept a scope ruling application if it is not rejected or a scope inquiry is not started within 30 days after filing. If the 30th day is a non-business day, the next business day will be used. If the application is accepted, a scope inquiry will begin on day 31. If Commerce chooses to address the issue under a different process, it will let the applicant know. Scope inquiries will be conducted on the record of the AD proceeding if there are companion AD and CVD orders for the same product from the same country. Commerce can decide if the ruling will apply country-wide or only to specific companies. Public Access and Participation The full list of scope ruling applications is available at https://access.trade.gov. For more information on how to file or participate, visit https://access.trade.gov/help/Scope_Ruling_Guidance.pdf. Anyone wishing to take part in a scope inquiry must file an entry of appearance according to 19 CFR 351.103(d)(1) and 19 CFR 351.225(n)(4). Interested parties may ask to be on the annual inquiry service list during the anniversary month of the relevant order’s publication. This is in line with Commerce’s procedures under 19 CFR 351.225(n). Submitting Comments Comments about the completeness of this notice should be sent to Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, at the U.S. Department of Commerce. This notice, dated 2025-09-18, is published according to 19 CFR 351.225(d)(3). The public can check the current status of each scope ruling application on the ACCESS system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-24
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-24 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Notice of Scope Ruling Applications Filed in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) received scope ruling applications, requesting that scope inquiries be conducted to determine whether identified products are covered by the scope of antidumping duty (AD) and/or countervailing duty (CVD) orders and that Commerce issue scope rulings pursuant to those inquiries. In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, we are notifying the public of the filing of the scope ruling applications listed below in the month of August 2025. 2. Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On September 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the Federal Register of the preliminary results of the circumvention inquiry of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on standard steel welded wire mesh from Mexico. This notice corrects the date on or after which entries should be subject to suspended liquidation for one company from April 22, 2024, which was incorrectly printed, to the correct date of April 2, 2024. This notice also corrects the importer of low-carbon steel wire to be Deacero USA, Inc, rather than Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China; Determinations
USITC Finds Injury to U.S. Industry From Chinese Imports of Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 19, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) made a final determination about imports from China. The USITC found that an industry in the United States is materially injured by imports of sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China. These grains are listed under subheading 2818.10.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Department of Commerce found that these imports from China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value and are subsidized by the Chinese government. The investigation was started on November 25, 2024. Petitions were filed by Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc., of Malvern, Pennsylvania. The USITC decided to move forward with the final phase after Commerce made a preliminary ruling that the imports were subsidized as stated in section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)). A public notice was posted by the USITC about the final phase and a public hearing was scheduled. This information was made available in the Federal Register on June 2, 2025 (90 FR 23359). The hearing, which was planned for August 7, 2025, was later canceled, as announced in the Federal Register on August 8, 2025 (90 FR 38501). The USITC’s findings were finalized and filed on September 19, 2025. The views of the Commission are published in USITC Publication 5669, dated September 2025. The document is titled “Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-750 and 731-TA-1728 (Final).” Commissioner Johanson had a different view. He determined that the U.S. industry faces a threat of material injury from these imports, rather than current material injury. These actions were completed according to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 1673d(b)). The official order was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer of the USITC. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review of Steel Wire Rod Orders Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced it will conduct expedited five-year reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. The notice was issued on September 24, 2025, in the Federal Register (Volume 90, Number 183). The purpose of these reviews is to determine if removing the current duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to the U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. The decision to proceed with expedited reviews comes after the USITC found that the group response from domestic interested parties was adequate. The response from the respondent interested party group was found to be inadequate. As a result, the Commission did not identify any reason to conduct full reviews. However, Commissioner Johanson voted to conduct full reviews. The reviews are being conducted according to the Tariff Act of 1930, section 751(c)(3), and under relevant sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR parts 201 and 207). A staff report with details about the reviews has been placed in the nonpublic record. It will be made available on October 3, 2025, to those listed on the Administrative Protective Order service list. A public version will be issued later. Parties that have supplied individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, or parties other than interested parties, may submit written comments by October 9, 2025. These comments may not include new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends the time limit for completing its final results, any comments regarding those results are due within three business days after Commerce issues its results. Only comments from Charter Steel, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Liberty Steel USA, Nucor Steel, and Optimus Steel LLC will be accepted. These were found to be individually adequate responses. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted. All documents submitted as part of the reviews must be served to all other parties and must include a certificate of service. Documents without the certificate will not be accepted. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated. Therefore, the review period may be extended by up to 90 days, following 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). These reviews are conducted under the authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and published according to Section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. The notice was signed by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, and issued on September 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-24
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-24 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Paper File Folders From Sri Lanka; Determination Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3. Certain Shapewear Garments; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Consent Order; Termination of Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 21) issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting a joint motion to terminate the above- captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement, consent order stipulation, and consent order. A consent order is issued to the remaining respondent Honeylove Sculptwear, Inc. of Los Angeles, CA ("Honeylove"). The investigation is terminated. 4. Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Modules and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to review in part a final initial determination ("FID") issued by the presiding Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"), finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties on the issues under review and from the parties, interested government agencies, and other interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding, under the schedule set forth below. 5. Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From China; Determinations Sub: International Trade Commission Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-09-23
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2025-09-23 Estimated reading time: 2 minutes 1. Rachel Kientcha-Tita, M.D.; Decision and Order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/23/2025-18362/rachel-kientcha-tita-md-decision-and-order 2. Immacula Michel, M.D.; Decision and Order Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Link: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/23/2025-18361/immacula-michel-md-decision-and-order Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results; Correction
Correction Issued on Multilayered Wood Flooring Countervailing Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce made a correction related to a recent court decision on multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China. On September 15, 2025, Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register. This notice was about the U.S. Court of International Trade’s (CIT) final judgment in Evolutions Flooring, Inc. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 21-00591. The judgment covered the review of countervailing duties for wood flooring from China for the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. The original notice said the court’s judgment was not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review. It also said Commerce would amend the final results for certain companies. However, Commerce found an error in the spelling of a company’s name. The company’s correct name is Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. This company is a producer/exporter without a superseding cash deposit rate. Commerce is also changing its cash deposit instruction for this company. The notice directs that, in the Federal Register of September 15, 2025 (FR Doc 2025-17777), on page 44371, the name should be corrected to “Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.” This correction applies to both the first column, where the company is named, and the second column, where it is listed in Appendix II. This correction is being shared as required by sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. For more information, contact Jonathan Schueler or Laurel Smalley at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Washington, DC 20230. Phone numbers are (202) 482-9175 or (202) 482-3456. This notice is signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, acting for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. The official correction notice was filed on September 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
U.S. Amends Countervailing Duty Results for Multilayered Wood Flooring from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background Commerce’s 2017 CVD review included important Chinese companies. The companies affected include Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Senmao), Riverside Plywood Corporation and its cross-owned affiliates like Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. (Baroque Timber), and non-selected companies under review. The case does not change the result for Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Guyu). Commerce first published its 2017 review on November 27, 2020. It chose Baroque Timber and Jiangsu Guyu as mandatory respondents. Commerce did not select Jiangsu Senmao for individual review. Court Remands and Commerce Actions Jiangsu Senmao and other companies appealed Commerce’s results. On August 11, 2022, the CIT told Commerce to reconsider how it picked which companies to review and to recalculate the rate for companies not chosen for individual examination. After more court orders and remands, Commerce changed its methodology. The CIT then told Commerce to review Jiangsu Senmao as a main respondent and adjust its subsidy rate calculations for companies not chosen as main respondents. On August 8, 2025, Commerce issued new results. Commerce now based the rate for non-selected companies on both Baroque Timber and Jiangsu Senmao’s rates. The CIT accepted Commerce’s new final results on September 11, 2025. Subsidy Rates Assigned The amended rates for the 2017 period of review are: Producer/Exporter Subsidy Rate (percent ad valorem) Riverside Plywood Corporation and affiliates 13.18 Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 2.45 Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd. 122.94 Non-selected companies under review 10.02 Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will send new import duty collection (cash deposit) instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for some companies. If a company already has a newer deposit rate from a later review, Commerce will not issue new instructions. For Houzhou Chenchang Wood Co., Ltd., Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd., Commerce will issue new cash deposit instructions because they do not have newer rates. Liquidation of Entries At present, entries by Riverside Plywood Corporation, its affiliates, Jiangsu Senmao, and companies listed in Appendix II remain under court injunction and cannot be finalized. This applies to goods entered between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. These entries will remain on hold until the appeals process is complete. If the CIT’s decision is not appealed, or after final court decisions, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess duties as per the amended rates, unless the rate is zero or de minimis. Companies Affected The companies impacted by these amended results are detailed in Appendices I and II of the official notice. Notice This action is required under U.S. law based on sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: September 17, 2025 Christopher Abbott,Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations For questions, contact:Jonathan Schueler (202-482-9175) or Laurel Smalley (202-482-3456),AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-23
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-23 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Hexamethylenetetramine From the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 2. Hexamethylenetetramine From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from India. The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 3. Hexamethylenetetramine from India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from India is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 4. Hexamethylenetetramine From Germany: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from Germany is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 5. Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On September 11, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 20-03885, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)’s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Senmao), Riverside Plywood Corporation (Riverside Plywood) and its cross-owned affiliate Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. (Baroque Timber), and the non-selected companies under review. Commerce is not amending the final results with respect to the countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Guyu). 6. Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results; Correction Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register of September 15, 2025, in which Commerce notified the public that the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)’s final judgment in Evolutions Flooring, Inc. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 21-00591 sustained Commerce’s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China covering the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, and is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review. This notice notified the public that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to certain companies; however, we incorrectly spelled the name of Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., the producer/exporter without a superseding cash deposit rate and for which Commerce is revising its cash deposit instruction, within the Federal Register Notice. 7. Crystalline Silicone Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or Not Assembled Into Modules From India, Indonesia, and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing Duty Investigations Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Lightweight Thermal Paper From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
U.S. International Trade Commission Schedules Expedited Review for Lightweight Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes On September 23, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced it is beginning expedited reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders for lightweight thermal paper from China. The reviews are being conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will decide if ending the current duties on lightweight thermal paper from China would likely cause harm to the U.S. paper industry in the future. The key date for this action is September 5, 2025. On this date, the USITC decided that the response from groups supporting U.S. industry was strong. The response from groups opposing the review was not strong. Because of this, the Commission chose an expedited review, following section 751(c)(3) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). There are rules for how the review process happens. These rules can be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure—19 CFR part 201 and part 207. A staff report with information about this review is on the nonpublic record. The report will be shared with those on the Administrative Protective Order service list on October 17, 2025. A public version will come out later, as stated in the Commission’s rules. Written comments about these reviews can be submitted by interested parties who gave an individually adequate response to the notice of institution. Other people, who are not parties to the review, can also send a short written statement. Comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on October 23, 2025. Comments must not have new factual information. If the Department of Commerce extends its review, the deadline for comments will change to three business days after Commerce publishes its final results. Any comments with business proprietary information must meet the rules in 19 CFR 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7. Every document entered must be served to all others involved. Each document must have a certificate of service or it will not be accepted. The Commission has found Domtar Corporation’s response to be individually adequate. Other interested parties may not submit comments, according to 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2). The Commission has determined that these reviews are very complicated. Because of this, it is using its authority to add up to 90 days to the review period, following 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). This review is being done under the authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was published under section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. For more information, contact Alexis Yim at the Office of Investigations (202-708-1446). Hearing-impaired persons can call 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. More information can also be found at the USITC website: usitc.gov or on the electronic docket at edis.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, on September 19, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hot-Rolled Steel Products From China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine; Determinations
U.S. Keeps Tariffs on Hot-Rolled Steel From Six Countries Estimated reading time: 2–5 minutes On September 23, 2025, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its final decision in a major trade case. The USITC finished its fourth review of duties on hot-rolled steel products. The countries involved are China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. The USITC decided not to revoke the current duties. This decision applies to two types of duties: countervailing duties and antidumping duties. The USITC found that removing these duties would probably cause harm again to the U.S. hot-rolled steel industry. This harm is called “material injury” in the law. Countries and Products Covered Countervailing duties stay on products from India, Indonesia, and Thailand. Antidumping duties remain on products from China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. These duties will continue at current levels. They are meant to stop unfair foreign trade practices that hurt U.S. companies. About the Review The USITC began these reviews on July 1, 2024. The process followed all rules under the Tariff Act of 1930. A public hearing was held on July 24, 2025. Everyone who wanted to take part was given a chance. The official report is USITC Publication 5667. It is titled “Hot-Rolled Steel Products from China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-405-406 and 408 and 731-TA-899-901 and 906-908 (Fourth Review).” Legal Reference The work was done as required by section 751(c) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The determination was filed with the Secretary on September 19, 2025. Who Issued the Decision Sharon Bellamy, the Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, issued the notice by order of the USITC. This decision means tariffs will stay in place to protect the U.S. steel industry from unfair trade for the next five years. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-23
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-23 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Hot-Rolled Steel Products From China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine; Determinations Sub: International Trade Commission 2. Lightweight Thermal Paper From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order and countervailing duty order on lightweight thermal paper from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3. Certain High-Strength Aluminum or Aluminum Alloy-Coated Steel, and Automotive Products and Automobiles Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review a Final Initial Determination and, on Review, To Affirm the Final Initial Determination’s Finding of No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined to review a final initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) and, on review, the Commission has determined to affirm the ID’s finding of no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-22
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-22 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Forged Steel Fittings From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Samyoung Fitting Co., Ltd. (Samyoung), a producer/exporter subject to this administrative review, made sales of forged steel fittings at less than normal value. The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023. 2. Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and exporters subject to this administrative review did not make sales of certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) February 1, 2023, through January 31, 2024. 3. Certain Monomers and Oligomers From Taiwan: Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigation Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of certain monomers and oligomers (monomers and oligomers) from Taiwan. The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination of critical circumstances. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-19
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-19 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Fresh Mushrooms From Canada; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-778 and 731-TA-1764 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of fresh mushrooms from Canada, provided for in subheading 0709.51.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and alleged to be subsidized by the government of Canada. Unless the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 days, or in this case by October 31, 2025. The Commission’s views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by November 7, 2025. 2. Silicon Metal From Russia; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Russia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3. Quartz Surface Products From India and Turkey; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Sub: International Trade Commission Content: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on quartz surface products from India and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Title-Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; Friction Ridge Cards: Arrest and Institution FD-249; Applicant FD-258; Identity History Summary Request FD-1164; FBI Standard Palm Print FD-884; Supplemental Finger and Palm Print FD-884a; Voluntary Appeal File Fingerprint FD-1212; Firearm-Related Challenge Fingerprint FD-1211 Restoration of Federal Firearm Rights Fingerprint FD-1222
FBI Releases Notice on Revised Friction Ridge Card Data Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has announced a proposed change to its approved collection of friction ridge card data. This change was shared in the Federal Register on September 17, 2025. The public can comment on it for 60 days until November 17, 2025. The FBI collects and keeps fingerprint and palm print records using special forms. These records help law enforcement and government agencies identify people and keep records about criminal events. Details of the Collection The collection includes several forms: FD-249: Arrest and Institution FD-258: Applicant FD-1164: Identity History Summary Request FD-884: FBI Standard Palm Print FD-884a: Supplemental Finger and Palm Print FD-1212: Voluntary Appeal File Fingerprint FD-1211: Firearm-Related Challenge Fingerprint FD-1222: Restoration of Federal Firearm Rights These forms are for law enforcement groups and civil groups that need security checks or background checks. The record data is kept in the FBI’s Next Generation Identification System (NGI). Purpose of the Collection The FBI collects this information under Title 28, United States Code, Section 534. This law lets the FBI gather, keep, and share identification records, including for criminal and other investigations. The forms make sure the FBI can help other agencies across the country. Statistics and Burden The expected number of respondents each year is 459,238. Each response is estimated to take 10 minutes. The total yearly burden is about 12.4 million hours. The total annual cost for this collection is $0. Feedback and Questions People can send comments about: If collecting this information is needed. If the estimated time and process are correct. Ways to make the collection better or clearer. How to make it easier for people to submit information, including electronic ways. For more information or to give feedback, contact Brian A. Cain at the FBI’s Criminal History Information and Policy Unit in Clarksburg, West Virginia. You can call 304-625-5590 or email the office. For other details, contact Darwin Arceo at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. This notice was shared by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for the Paperwork Reduction Act, U.S. Department of Justice, on September 15, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments; Requested; New Collection; Title-Optional Flexible Financial Assistance Survey
U.S. Justice Department Seeks Comments on New Financial Assistance Survey for Victims Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Is the Survey About? The survey is called the Optional Flexible Financial Assistance Survey. It is part of the Financial Assistance Grants for Victims of Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking Program (FAV Program). This program began in 2024. It helps victims by giving them quick and flexible financial help. The financial help is for things victims need to stay safe and stable. Sometimes, traditional services do not cover these things. This new survey will help the program learn if the help works well. How Will the Survey Be Used? The survey is short and optional. It will be given to people who get flexible financial help from FAV Program grantees. The survey will be sent online. Grantees will collect the answers and report them to OVW twice a year. The results will show Congress and others how the program is working. What Does the Survey Ask? The survey will ask survivors questions like: How and when they got financial help, How the help affected their safety and their families. The survey will not ask for a lot of information, just what is needed to see if the program is working. Who Will Take the Survey? About 2,600 people will take the survey each year. OVW expects 13 grantees to give financial help. Each grantee will ask about 200 people to take the survey per year. How Long Will the Survey Take? Each survey will take about 10 minutes. Altogether, this means about 433 hours are needed for everyone to finish the survey each year. How Can You Comment? The DOJ wants comments from the public. Comments should be about: If the survey is needed, If the estimate of how long it takes is correct, Ways to improve the survey, How to reduce the work for people taking the survey. Comments will be accepted until November 17, 2025. Contact Details If you want a copy of the survey or have questions, contact Tiffany Watson at the Office on Violence Against Women by phone at 202-514-5430 or by email. For more information, you can also contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, at the U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Management Division. Key Facts Table Activity Estimated Respondents Responses per Person Total Responses Time per Response (min) Total Hours Flexible Financial Assistance Survey 2,600 1 2,600 10 433 The Department of Justice is taking this step to help victims get better support and protection. The public’s ideas and comments will help make the program better. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Title-Voluntary Appeal File (VAF) Application Form
Justice Department Seeks Comments on Voluntary Appeal File Application Update Estimated reading time: 5 minutes The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is asking for public comments on changes to the Voluntary Appeal File (VAF) Application Form. This is a notice from the Criminal Justice Information Services Division. People have 60 days to send comments, ending November 17, 2025. The FBI wants to hear more about: Whether the new information the form collects is useful. If the time it takes to fill out the form makes sense. Ways to make the form clearer. How to make the form easier to use, including online options. About the Voluntary Appeal File (VAF): If a person is delayed or told “no” when trying to buy a firearm, but they appeal and win, the FBI cannot keep a record of that decision or supporting documents. If the person tries to buy a firearm again, there can be more delays or denials. The person may need to submit documents again for each appeal. The VAF was created to help with this problem. People can ask the FBI to keep their information in the VAF. This can stop delays or wrong denials in the future. If accepted, the person gets a Unique Personal Identification Number (UPIN). They give their UPIN when buying a firearm, using the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). The VAF UPIN may help in other situations too, like for National Firearms Act gun checks or upcoming “firearm handler background checks.” People who have never been in a NICS check can also apply to the VAF to avoid problems later. Details of the Information Collection: Type of Collection: Revision of an approved collection. Form Title: Voluntary Appeal File (VAF) Application Form. Form Number: 1110-0043. Who Responds: Individuals. Response is voluntary. Time to Complete: About 30 minutes per person, not including travel for fingerprints or postage. Number of Respondents: About 11,073 people may apply each year. Total Time Spent Each Year: 5,536.5 hours total, based on all applicants. Some applications are resolved quickly. If fingerprints show the person is not restricted, it may take one day. If the person matches a possible restriction, the FBI might take up to 60 days, as they may need help from other agencies. Because of this, it is hard to estimate how long it will take to process all applications every year. For more information or to comment, contact Jill Montgomery at the FBI NICS Section, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 26306, or call 304-709-1476. Official contact at the Department of Justice: Darwin Arceo, Justice Management Division, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. This notice was dated September 15, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; ViCAP National Crime Database
Department of Justice Seeks Comments on ViCAP National Crime Database Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice, through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is asking for public comments on a revised information collection for the ViCAP National Crime Database. This request follows the rules set by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG) of the FBI will submit this information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. The public comment period is open for 60 days until November 17, 2025. Anyone with questions, suggestions, or requests for copies of the proposed collection instrument and instructions can contact Nathan Graham, Program Manager at the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group. He can be reached at the FBI Academy, Quantico, VA 22135, by phone at (703) 632-4309. The Department encourages people to provide feedback on these points: Is the information collection needed for the FBI’s work, and does it have practical use? Is the FBI’s estimate of the public’s time and the number of responses correct? Can the quality, usefulness, or clarity of the information be improved? How can the burden on people who respond be reduced, for example, by using electronic or other technology? Details about the ViCAP National Crime Database: ViCAP is a unit within the FBI that studies serial violent and sexual crimes. The ViCAP National Crime Database is the largest U.S. collection of major violent crime case information. It collects and analyzes information about: Homicides (and attempted homicides) that are part of a series, appear random, or are sexually oriented Sexual assaults that are part of a series, or are committed by a stranger Missing persons, if foul play is likely and the victim is still missing Unidentified human remains when the cause of death may be homicide Overview of the Collection: Type of Information Collection: It is a revision of a collection already approved. Title of the Form/Collection: ViCAP National Crime Database. Agency Form Number: None. Affected Public: State, local, and tribal governments. Response is voluntary. Number of Respondents and Time: There are about 5,700 respondents each year. Each response takes about 20 minutes. Annual Burden: Total annual burden is about 1,900 hours (5,700 responses x 20 minutes each). Annual Cost Burden: There is no cost. Summary Table Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response (min) Total Annual Burden (hours) ViCAP National Crime Database 5,700 1 5,700 20 1,900 If more information is needed, readers can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the United States Department of Justice, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. This notice was signed by Darwin Arceo on September 15, 2025, as the Department Clearance Officer for the Paperwork Reduction Act at the U.S. Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Charter Renewal; Name of the Committee: NIC Advisory Board
NIC Advisory Board Charter Renewed Through 2027 Estimated reading time: 1–2 minutes The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) has renewed the charter for the NIC Advisory Board. The renewal is for two years, and it lasts through September 12, 2027. The NIC Advisory Board is a federal advisory committee. It was created by law under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, found at 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014 and 41 CFR 102-3.50(a). This law guides how advisory committees work in the government. The Advisory Board gives advice to the NIC on long-range plans and program development. It also recommends guidance to help NIC’s efforts. The Board also gives advice to the Attorney General about picking the Director of the NIC. The NIC helps corrections agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. It provides training, technical help, information, and development of policies and programs. It gives award funds to help start or run important correctional programs. The NIC tries to lead and guide how corrections work is done in the United States. Anyone can get a full copy of the NIC Advisory Board Charter. It can be downloaded as a PDF from the NIC website at https://nicic.gov. People can also ask for a paper copy by sending a mail request to the National Institute of Corrections, 320 1st Street NW, Washington, DC 20534. People who want to know more can contact Leslie LeMaster, who is the Designated Federal Officer. The phone number is (202) 305-5773, and the email is available on the NIC website. This notice is official and meets the rules of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended. The renewal was announced by Leslie LeMaster, Designated Federal Officer, National Institute of Corrections. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-09-17
Justice Department, National Institute of Corrections Briefing 2025-09-17 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Charter Renewal; Name of the Committee: NIC Advisory Board Sub: Justice Department, National Institute of Corrections Content: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the purpose of this notice is to announce that the National Institute of Corrections has renewed the charter for the NIC Advisory Board for a two-year period through September 12, 2027. The NIC Advisory Board is a federal advisory committee enacted pursuant to the authority provided at 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014, the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and 41 CFR 102-3.50(a). 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; ViCAP National Crime Database Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Title-Voluntary Appeal File (VAF) Application Form Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 4. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments; Requested; New Collection; Title-Optional Flexible Financial Assistance Survey Sub: Justice Department Content: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 5. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Title-Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; Friction Ridge Cards: Arrest and Institution FD-249; Applicant FD-258; Identity History Summary Request FD-1164; FBI Standard Palm Print FD-884; Supplemental Finger and Palm Print FD-884a; Voluntary Appeal File Fingerprint FD-1212; Firearm-Related Challenge Fingerprint FD-1211 Restoration of Federal Firearm Rights Fingerprint FD-1222 Sub: Justice Department Content: The DOJ, FBI, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 6. Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Sub: Justice Department Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of the Opening of the Inclusions Window for the Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariff Inclusions Process
Notice: September 2025 Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariff Inclusions Window Opens Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has opened a new window for requests to include additional steel and aluminum products within Section 232 tariffs. This process is related to the President’s orders under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. These orders are part of Proclamations 10895 and 10896, issued on February 10, 2025. The Proclamations made new tariff rates for steel and aluminum imports, including certain extra products made from steel and aluminum. The BIS has set up a process to let people request more products to be added under these duties. Window Dates and Submission Information The window is open from September 15, 2025, until 11:59 PM ET on September 29, 2025. Only submissions for inclusion requests will be accepted during this time. All submissions must be sent by email to the Defense Industrial Base Programs inbox at the BIS. Process Details After the window closes, accepted requests will be posted online for a two-week public comment period. This will be on Docket ID BIS-2025-0023 at Regulations.gov. The process follows the interim final rule published on May 2, 2025 (90 FR 18780). There are set submission periods each year in May, September, and January. Contact Information For questions or more information about the inclusions process, contact Stephen Astle at 202-482-4506. For steel, email [email addresses as listed in notice]. For aluminum, email [email addresses as listed in notice]. More information and details about the submission process can be found in the interim final rule. Robby S. Saunders Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Security Federal Register Notice 2025-18008, September 17, 2025 Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Adoption and Procedures of the Section 232 Automobile Parts Tariff Inclusions Process
U.S. Sets New Process for Adding Auto Parts to Tariffs Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced a new process for including additional automobile parts in tariffs. This decision comes after President Biden issued Proclamation 10908 on March 26, 2025. This proclamation directs that more auto parts may be added to the scope of tariffs to protect national security. Key Points of the New Rule The rule became effective on September 17, 2025. The aim is to include more automobile parts under existing tariffs if imports of these parts threaten U.S. national security. The process is detailed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Who Can Request Additions Any U.S. producer of automobiles or automobile parts may make a request. Industry associations representing these producers can also request inclusions. How and When to Apply Inclusion requests are accepted during two-week windows, four times a year. The windows open at the start of January, April, July, and October. The first submission window opens on October 1, 2025. Requests should be sent in PDF format to a dedicated email inbox. Each request must be no longer than 30 pages, including all attachments. Information Needed in Requests Requests must include: Clear identification of the requester. A detailed description of the specific auto part. The eight or ten-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) code. An explanation about why the article is an automobile part. Information about the domestic industry affected by the part. Import and domestic production statistics. A description of how increased imports threaten national security or the goals set by the Proclamation. If any information is missing or incorrect, requesters may get a 48-hour period to fix and resubmit the request. Public Comment Process Valid requests are posted for public review. There will be a 14-day public comment window after each submission period. Public comments must be submitted through regulations.gov using specific IDs for each quarterly window. Decision Timeline The Secretary of Commerce will make a decision on each request within 60 days. For each request, a memorandum stating approval or denial will be posted on regulations.gov. The rationale for the decision will be included. Any new parts added to the tariffs are effective the day after a Federal Register notice is published. Regulatory Details The rule is published as an interim final rule. The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection under emergency processing. The process is exempt from some federal rulemaking procedures due to its national security purpose. The rule does not affect state or local government authority. How to Comment on the Rule Itself Comments about the rule should be made separately from the inclusion requests. Rule comments must be submitted at regulations.gov under ID ITA-2025-0041 and by November 3, 2025. More Information For questions, contact Emily Davis, Director for Public Affairs at the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The official rule appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, No. 178, pages 44767-44772 (September 17, 2025), under Docket No. 250728-0130, RIN 0625-AB30. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
BIS Briefing 2025-09-17
Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Briefing 2025-09-17 Estimated reading time: 3 minutes 1. Adoption and Procedures of the Section 232 Automobile Parts Tariff Inclusions Process Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: On March 26, 2025, the President issued Proclamation 10908, "Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts into The United States" (Automobile Proclamation). The Automobile Proclamation required the Secretary of Commerce to establish a process for including additional automobile parts articles for passenger vehicles and light trucks within the scope of the tariffs imposed by the President in the Automobile Proclamation. This interim final rule (IFR) establishes the requisite process. 2. Notice of the Opening of the Inclusions Window for the Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariff Inclusions Process Sub: Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau Content: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has established a process for including additional derivative steel and aluminum articles within the scope of the duties authorized by the President under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This notice opens the September 2025 inclusions window for submissions. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Finds Eight Chinese Exporters Part of China-Wide Entity in Wooden Bedroom Furniture Case Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the final results of its review of antidumping duties for wooden bedroom furniture from China. The review looked at exports made between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Commerce decided that eight exporters from China did not show that they qualify for a separate rate from the China-wide entity. These exporters are: Dorbest Ltd. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd. Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd. Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc. Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd. Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd. These companies either did not file the required forms, did not respond to requests for information, or failed to show that they meet the rules for a separate rate. Because of this, they are treated as part of the China-wide entity. Commerce did not calculate any individual dumping margins for this review. There are no new calculations to share. For all entries of wooden bedroom furniture from these companies, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect antidumping duties at the China-wide entity rate. The current China-wide rate is 216.01 percent. The cash deposit requirements for shipments will be as follows: If an exporter already has a separate rate from a past review, that rate is still used. For exporters from China that do not have a separate rate, including those listed above, the cash deposit rate is 216.01 percent. For non-China exporters with no separate rate, the rate will match the Chinese supplier they used. Importers must file a certificate showing they did not get reimbursed for antidumping duties before their entries are finalized. If they do not do this, they may have to pay double duties. This notice also reminds anyone under an Administrative Protective Order to follow rules for handling confidential information. These results were published under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and United States regulations. For more information, interested parties can find the full decision and related documents on the Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS website. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty
U.S. Keeps Special Taxes on Wooden Cabinets and Vanities From China Estimated reading time: 4 minutes Why Are There Special Taxes? The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is keeping its special taxes, called antidumping and countervailing duties, on wooden cabinets and vanities from China. This decision was made because removing the taxes could lead to more unfair trading and hurt U.S. companies. Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) looked at the trade rules about wooden cabinets and vanities from China. They found that if the special taxes were removed, more unfair trading, called dumping and subsidies, would happen. This would likely hurt companies in the United States. What Products Are Covered? The taxes apply to wooden cabinets and vanities and their parts from China. These products are usually used in kitchens and bathrooms. They can be floor mounted, wall mounted, or attached in other ways. The material can be real wood or wood made from particles, fibers, or bamboo. Wooden cabinets and vanities, with or without wooden or other coverings. Wooden component parts, such as frames, cabinet boxes, doors, drawers, shelves, and panels. “Ready to assemble” cabinets, also known as “flat packs.” Cabinets and vanities imported with sinks, faucets, plumbing, or countertops. Only the wooden part is taxed. Wooden cabinets and vanities processed in another country (such as cutting, painting, or assembly) are still included. What Is Not Included? Some products are not taxed. These include: Accessories added after making the cabinet, like drawer organizers or lazy Susans. Solid wooden decorations, like corbels and rosettes. Hardware made of metal, like hinges, handles, or screws. Medicine cabinets that are wall mounted, have mirrors, are assembled before shipping, are sold ready for retail, and are no deeper than seven inches. Wooden bedroom furniture. Hardwood plywood that is taxed under other rules. Trade Code Numbers These products are listed under special trade codes. The main codes are 9403.40.9060 and 9403.60.8081. Some parts may use codes 9403.90.7080 and 9403.91.0080. What Happens Next? Customs officers will keep collecting the special taxes on these products when they enter the United States. This rule began on September 9, 2025. The next check on these taxes will happen five years from the last ITC decision. Important Reminders Parties with special business information must keep following the rules on how to return or destroy the information. Breaking those rules could lead to punishment. This notice follows all U.S. trade law rules. It was officially signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on September 12, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-17
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-17 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on wooden cabinets and vanities and components thereof (wooden cabinets and vanities) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. 2. Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that eight exporters of wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (China) under review have not established their eligibility for a separate rate and are part of the China-wide entity. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
DOJ Briefing 2025-09-16
Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Briefing 2025-09-16 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Catalent Greenville, Inc. Sub: Justice Department, Drug Enforcement Administration Content: Catalent Greenville, Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information. 2. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection; eComments Requested; Extension of a Previously Approved Collection Title-Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Sub: Justice Department Content: The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, FBI, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 3. Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Previously Approved Collection; Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) Enrollment/National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) E-Check Enrollment Form, Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) Officer/Employee Acknowledgment of Responsibilities Under the NICS Form, Responsibilities of a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) Under the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Form Sub: Justice Department Content: The CJIS Division, FBI, Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Finds Chinese MDI Sold Below Fair Value in Preliminary Decision Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary finding on methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. Commerce determined that MDI from the People’s Republic of China is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value (LTFV). What is MDI? MDI is a chemical used in making foams and plastics. It has two or more isocyanate groups connected to benzene rings with methylene bridges. MDI can be liquid or solid. Some of the common names for MDI include Polymeric MDI, Monomeric MDI, and Modified MDI. The investigation covers all types and grades of MDI from China, regardless of their physical form, additives, or packaging. Investigation Scope The investigation covers MDI and products containing more than 40% MDI by weight. Some products with less MDI or that are highly modified are not included. If MDI is processed in a third country or mixed with MDI from other sources, only the Chinese component is covered. Preliminary Dumping Margins Commerce found these estimated dumping margins for Chinese exporters and producers: Covestro Polymers (China) Co., Ltd.: 376.12% Shandong Mingko Co., Ltd.: 376.12% China-wide entity: 511.75% (based on facts available with adverse inferences) These margins show that MDI from China is being sold in the U.S. at much lower prices than normal value. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection will suspend liquidation of MDI from China that is entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice. Importers will need to provide a cash deposit equal to the dumping margin above for their specific supplier. How Did Commerce Make Its Decision? Commerce used information from the original petition and relied on facts available for the China-wide entity. For companies not individually examined, Commerce used the average margin alleged in the petition (376.12%). No Changes to Scope No parties commented on the scope of the products covered. Therefore, the scope remains unchanged from the initial notice. Public Comments and Hearing Requests Interested parties can submit written comments (case briefs) within 30 days of the notice’s publication. Parties may also request a hearing on the issues raised. If requested, the hearing date will be announced by Commerce. Postponement of Final Decision Wanhua Singapore and Wanhua Ningbo requested to postpone the final determination. Commerce agreed, extending the final decision deadline to 135 days after this notice. Provisional measures (such as cash deposits) may now last up to six months. Next Steps Commerce will send its findings to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination confirms the preliminary findings, the ITC will then decide if imports of MDI from China harm U.S. industry. Details and Contacts The full decision can be found online at https://access.trade.gov. For further information, contact Kayden Jenson or Christopher Maciuba at the International Trade Administration in Washington, DC. This finding was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2025 (Volume 90, Number 177, Pages 44629-44632). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-16
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-16 Estimated reading time: 5 minutes 1. Implementing Certain Tariff-Related Elements of the United States-Japan Agreement Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On July 23, 2025, the President announced a framework agreement between the United States and Japan (the Agreement), which lays the foundation for a new era of U.S.-Japan trade relations grounded in principles of reciprocity and our shared national interests. On September 4, 2025, the President issued Executive Order 14345, Implementing the United States-Japan Agreement, finding that specified tariff actions are consistent with the national interests of the United States and are necessary and appropriate to address the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14257, as amended, and to reduce or eliminate the threats to national security found in certain proclamations issued under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Executive Order 14345 also directed and authorized the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to publish in the Federal Register changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) with respect to general tariffs on Japanese goods (in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of Homeland Security acting through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Chair of the United States International Trade Commission (ITC)); products of Japan that fall under the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft, except for unmanned aircraft (in consultation with the Chair of the ITC and the Commissioner of CBP); and products of Japan subject to duties under Proclamation 10908 of March 26, 2025 (Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States) (in consultation with the Chair of the ITC and the Commissioner of CBP). This notice amends the HTSUS to implement these provisions of the Agreement. 2. Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From Italy: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers/exporters of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL Plate) from Italy made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. 3. Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of certain low carbon steel (LCS) wire that are produced in Mexico and assembled or completed into standard steel welded wire mesh (welded wire mesh) in the United States are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on welded wire mesh from Mexico. As a result, all imports of certain LCS wire from Mexico imported by Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Deacero) will be subject to suspension of liquidation on or after April 2, 2024, and all other imports of certain LCS wire from Mexico will be subject to suspension of liquidation on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Commerce is also imposing a certification requirement. We invite interested parties to comment on this preliminary determination. 4. Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from the People’s Republic of China (China) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. 5. Utah State University et. al; Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 6. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory et al.; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Cameras, Camera Systems, and Accessories Used Therewith; Notice of Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination of Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Certain Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Patent Case Involving GoPro and Insta360 Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes Background of the Case GoPro, a camera company based in California, filed a complaint on May 6, 2024. They claimed Insta360 imported cameras and accessories into the U.S. that violated six of GoPro’s patents. These patents included five “utility” patents for different camera technologies and one design patent known as D789,435. The ITC began an official investigation soon after the complaint. Insta360 is based in Shenzhen, China, with a U.S. branch in Irvine, California. Changes in Claims During the Case GoPro withdrew some of its claims during the investigation. By the end of the case, GoPro was only asserting certain claims for each of the six patents. ALJ’s Initial Findings The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) held a hearing in January 2025. On July 11, 2025, the ALJ made a decision: Insta360 violated Section 337 with respect to GoPro’s design patent D789,435. Insta360 did not violate Section 337 with respect to the five utility patents. The ALJ also made several findings about patent infringement, invalidity, and whether GoPro’s products satisfied certain legal requirements. These included: Some GoPro patent claims were found invalid or not infringed. Some claims were satisfied for domestic industry needs. The design patent D’435 was found infringed and valid. Proposed Remedies from the ALJ If the ITC finds a violation, the ALJ recommended: A limited exclusion order to block certain Insta360 products from entering the U.S. A cease and desist order to stop Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC from certain sales, since it had significant inventory. A bond set at zero percent of entered value, because GoPro’s products cost less than Insta360’s. Petitions for Review On July 25, 2025, both GoPro and Insta360 challenged parts of the decision and asked for review. They disagreed over both the final findings and specific issues related to the design and utility patents. They filed responses to each other’s petitions on August 4, 2025. Comments from Public and Government Officials The ITC asked for public comments about the case on July 15, 2025. Several U.S. Representatives and the involved companies submitted opinions. Issues Under ITC Review The ITC will review parts of the decision involving: Certain limits in the ‘840 patent. Some language in the ‘052 patent. The ALJ’s finding that certain Insta360 products infringe the design patent D’435. The ITC does not plan to review the rest of the ALJ’s findings. Questions and Next Steps The ITC is asking the parties to explain whether Insta360 products infringe GoPro’s D’435 design patent. They especially want to know about Insta360’s rear screen, which can be in many positions. The ITC also requests written answers on potential remedies, the public interest, and whether warranty and repair parts should be exempt from any orders. The public interest includes concerns for health, the U.S. economy, competition, U.S. production, and consumers. If the ITC orders a remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative will have 60 days to review. During that review, products can enter the U.S. under bond. Deadline for Written Submissions All main written submissions must be filed by September 25, 2025. Reply submissions are due by October 2, 2025. There are page limits for all submissions, and parties must follow all ITC rules. Contact Information People can find documents online at https://edis.usitc.gov or get general details at https://www.usitc.gov. For filing questions, call (202) 205-2000. By order of the Commission.Issued: September 11, 2025.Supervisory Attorney: Susan Orndoff. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
USITC Briefing 2025-09-16
International Trade Commission Briefing 2025-09-16 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Certain Cameras, Camera Systems, and Accessories Used Therewith; Notice of Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination of Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Certain Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part a final initial determination ("Final ID") issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission requests briefing from the parties on certain issues under review and from the parties, interested government agencies, and interested persons on remedy, the public interest, and bonding based on the schedule set forth below. 2. Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest Sub: International Trade Commission Content: Notice is hereby given that on September 10, 2025, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination granting a motion for summary determination on violation of section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Court Orders Amended Results in Chinese Wood Flooring Duty Review Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Court Orders Amended Results in Chinese Wood Flooring Duty Review On August 29, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) gave its final judgment in the case of Evolutions Flooring, Inc. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 21-00591. The CIT agreed with the U.S. Department of Commerce’s revised findings about the countervailing duty on multilayered wood flooring from China for goods imported between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Changes to Subsidy Rates Riverside Plywood Corporation and its cross-owned affiliates: 9.02% Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd.: 5.29% Non-selected companies under review: 7.91% Background of the Decision In its earlier decision on October 27, 2021, Commerce used certain facts to say that the Government of China’s Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP) applied to companies under review. This contributed to their subsidy rates. Later, the Department fixed errors in its calculations. Evolutions Flooring, Inc. and others appealed the results. On March 27, 2025, the CIT sent the decision back for corrections. The Commerce Department then found that Jiangsu Senmao did not use the EBCP during the review period. It also corrected calculation mistakes for Baroque Timber. Cash Deposit Rules The Commerce Department will update instructions for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). However, companies listed in Appendix I already have newer cash deposit rates, so their current rates will not change. For Dailan Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., which does not have a newer rate, new instructions will be sent to CBP. Liquidation of Entries Certain entries remain on hold by order of the CIT while any appeals are pending. These are imports by Riverside Plywood Corporation, Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd., and companies listed in Appendix II from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. If the CIT ruling is not appealed, or if higher courts agree with CIT, Commerce will order CBP to collect duties at the new rates for these companies. Lists of Companies *Appendix I lists companies with superseding cash deposit requirements. Appendix II lists non-selected companies now subject to the new amended final results.* The news is official as of September 8, 2025, and is signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-15
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-15 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From Italy: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On September 3, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Officine Tecnosider SRL v. United States, Court no. 23-00001, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)’s second remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL Plate) from Italy covering the period May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Officine Tecnosider s.r.l. (OTS). 2. Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: On August 29, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Evolutions Flooring, Inc. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 21-00591, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)’s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Senmao), Riverside Plywood Corporation (Riverside Plywood) and its cross-owned affiliate Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. (Baroque Timber), and the non-selected companies under review. 3. Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) was not sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
CIT Court Appointed Counsel
At the Tianfu Central Legal Zone Forum, Fan Zhang, Director at JINGSH Chengdu, accepts the award designating JINGSH Riyadh Office as an official Overseas Legal Service Station, strengthening global legal support for Chinese enterprises.
ITA Briefing 2025-09-12
Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Briefing 2025-09-12 Estimated reading time: 4 minutes 1. Silicon Metal From Australia and Norway: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration 2. Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that large diameter welded pipe (LDWP) from Canada was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) of May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Further, we preliminary find that Evraz Inc. NA (Evraz) had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Finally, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to certain companies that had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. 3. Certain Aluminum Foil From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company (OARC) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023. 4. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Türkiye (Türkiye) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. 5. Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023. 6. Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023 Sub: Commerce Department, International Trade Administration Content: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio and CBA Itapissuma Ltda. (collectively, CBA) made sales of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from Brazil at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof (II); Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Investigation on Vaporizer Devices and Components Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On August 8, 2025, JUUL Labs, Inc. from Washington, DC, filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission. The complaint is under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The case is about certain vaporizer devices, cartridges used with these devices, and their parts. The complaint says these products are being imported, sold for importation, or sold in the U.S. after being imported. JUUL Labs claims these products infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,156,533. The complaint also says that there is an industry in the United States involved in this matter, as the law requires. JUUL Labs has asked the Commission to investigate and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. On September 9, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission agreed to begin an investigation. The investigation will check if section 337(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act has been violated. It will focus on the importation, sale for importation, or sale in the U.S. after importation of the following products: Vaporizer devices (also known as electronic nicotine delivery systems or ENDS) Cartridges used with these devices Components of these devices and cartridges, including cartridge housings, e-liquid nicotine salt formulations, heater components (also called atomizers), chargers, batteries, and subassemblies of these items The investigation will also check if an industry in the U.S. exists in this area, as required by section 337(a)(2). The named parties in this investigation are: Complainant: JUUL Labs, Inc., 1000 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20004 Respondents: NJOY, LLC, 9449 N 90th Street, Suite 201, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 NJOY Holdings, Inc., 9449 N 90th Street, Suite 201, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Altria Group, Inc., 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 Altria Group Distribution Company, 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 Altria Client Services LLC, 6601 W Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230 The Chief Administrative Law Judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission will choose the presiding Administrative Law Judge for the investigation. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not join as a party in this case. Respondents must send their replies to the complaint and the investigation notice, following section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The deadline is no later than 20 days after the Commission sends the complaint and notice of investigation. Extensions for the deadline will only be allowed if there is good reason. If a respondent does not reply on time, they may lose their right to contest the complaint. The Commission and the judge may take the facts as given in the complaint and notice. This can result in an exclusion order, a cease and desist order, or both, against the respondent. For more information or to see the complaint (without confidential information), visit the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. The notice was issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, on September 9, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Vehicle Telematics, Fleet Management, and Video-Based Safety Systems, Devices, and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Requests Public Comments on Vehicle Telematics Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–4 minutes On September 12, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a request for public comments as part of Investigation No. 337-TA-1393. This investigation involves certain vehicle telematics, fleet management, and video-based safety systems and devices. A Final Initial Determination on Violation was issued by the presiding administrative law judge on September 8, 2025. The determination included recommendations on possible remedies and bonding if a violation is found. The ITC is now asking for comments on public interest issues related to these recommendations. The recommended remedies are a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. These would apply to certain vehicle telematics, fleet management, and video-based safety systems, devices, and components imported, sold for importation, or sold after importation by Motive Technologies Inc. The ITC is seeking public comments covering the following topics: How the products that might be excluded are used in the United States. Any concerns about public health, safety, or welfare in the United States related to the recommended orders. Other similar products made in the United States that could replace the products that might be excluded. Whether the complainant or others can supply enough replacement products within a reasonable time. The potential impact on U.S. consumers if the recommended orders are issued. Submissions can be up to five pages long, including attachments. The deadline for submissions is the close of business on October 9, 2025. All documents must be filed electronically. They should clearly refer to “Inv. No. 337-TA-1393” on the cover or first page. For details on how to file, the ITC’s Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures is available online. Those with questions about filing can contact the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Persons submitting confidential documents must mark them properly and may also need to file non-confidential versions for public inspection. Confidential material will be handled as outlined in ITC rules. All non-confidential documents will be available to the public. For further information, contact Paul Lall at the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2043. Publicly available documents can also be viewed via the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. This process follows Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and part 210 of the Commission’s rules. The ITC will consider the public interest before making final decisions about the exclusion or limitation of these products. Issued by Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, on September 9, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
